Next Article in Journal
Effects of a Prenatal Lifestyle Intervention in Routine Care on Maternal Health Behaviour in the First Year Postpartum—Secondary Findings of the Cluster-Randomised GeliS Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
The Breast Milk Immunoglobulinome
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Calorie Restriction on Health Span and Insulin Resistance: Classic Calorie Restriction Diet vs. Ketosis-Inducing Diet
Previous Article in Special Issue
Does Flavonoid Consumption Improve Exercise Performance? Is It Related to Changes in the Immune System and Inflammatory Biomarkers? A Systematic Review of Clinical Studies since 2005
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/nu13041309
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Immunomodulatory Properties of β-2,6 Fructans: A Comprehensive Review

by
Ian D. Young
1,2,*,
Dimitrios Latousakis
1 and
Nathalie Juge
1,*
1
Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UQ, UK
2
Universitätsklinik für Viszerale Chirurgie und Medizin, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Department for BioMedical Research (DBMR), University of Bern, Murtenstrasse 35, 3008 Bern, Switzerland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2021, 13(4), 1309; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13041309
Submission received: 15 February 2021 / Revised: 5 April 2021 / Accepted: 11 April 2021 / Published: 15 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary Modulation of the Immune Function: Direct and Microbiota Dependent Effects)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Polysaccharides such as β-2,1-linked fructans including inulin or fructose oligosaccharides are well-known prebiotics with recognised immunomodulatory properties. In recent years, other fructan types covering β-2,6-linked fructans, particularly microbial levans, have gained increasing interest in the field. β-2,6-linked fructans of different degrees of polymerisation can be synthesised by plants or microbes including those that reside in the gastrointestinal tract. Accumulating evidence suggests a role for these β-2,6 fructans in modulating immune function. Here, we provide an overview of the sources and structures of β-2,6 fructans from plants and microbes and describe their ability to modulate immune function in vitro and in vivo along with the suggested mechanisms underpinning their immunomodulatory properties. Further, we discuss the limitations and perspectives pertinent to current studies and the potential applications of β-2,6 fructans including in gut health.

1. Introduction

Carbohydrates such as oligosaccharides and polysaccharides (PS) are one of the most abundant compounds on earth comprising >50% of the world’s biomass [1]. These diverse structures are derived from plants, microorganisms and mammals and synthesised by a vast range of enzymes [1,2,3]. PS and oligosaccharides fulfil many critical functions in living organisms including sustenance, storage reserves and as structural support [1,3,4,5,6,7,8]. PS are homopolymers or heteropolymers that are typically made up of >20 sugar monomers [1]. The large diversity of PS reflects the range of natural monomeric sugars (e.g., d-glucose, d-mannose, d-fructose, d-xylose, d-galactose, d-fucose, d-glucuronic acid, l-rhamnose, among many others) and pyranose and furanose ring formations that can make up countless assortments of di-, tri- and oligosaccharides and PS of wide ranging molecular weights [1,3]. These structures can be linked by α-or β-glycosidic bonds and may adopt many variations of branching combinations from simple structures to highly complex macromolecules [1,3].
PS from plants, as well as from microbes, can be consumed as part of the human diet [9,10,11,12] For example, starch can be broken down by host-derived enzymes to glucose units for energy [13]. Alternatively, nondigestible PS (NDP) are primary components of dietary fibres [12,14] and are resistant to human gut enzymes in the upper part of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [15,16]. These NDP are fermented by resident commensal microbes in the large intestine [15,16]. Consumption of dietary fibres by humans has been linked to several health and physiological benefits [15,17]. For example, a reduced risk of death and mortality from diabetes, cancer, infections, and respiratory disease was shown by meta-analysis to be associated with increased whole grain or cereal fibre consumption [15,18], and diets rich in dietary fibres are linked to decreased blood insulin and glucose levels, reduced food transit time, increased satiety, weight loss promotion, cholesterol-lowering effects, improved mineral absorption and reduced blood pressure, among other effects [13,15]. Dietary β-glucans and fructans are well-known examples of dietary fibres that contribute to some of these health benefits [19,20].
Microbial PS synthesised from pathogenic or commensal microbes comprise a vast and complex array of structures [21,22,23] with many attached to other macromolecules to form glycoconjugates such as glycolipids and glycoproteins [1,3,6,7]. Microbial PS can be found in the cytoplasm as storage PS, or associated with the cell wall [24] including as capsular PS on the outer surface [21,23] and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) anchored to the cell membrane [24,25]. They are also found as exopolysaccharides (EPS) secreted into the extracellular environment or loosely associated with the bacterial cell surface [1,24]. PS from microbes, for example those inhabiting the human body such as the gut [26] play biological roles ranging from biofilm formation to immunomodulators. For example, EPS are a component of biofilms aiding in their function, stability and maintenance [27,28]. EPS can interact with each other and form the matrix that encompasses microbial cells [28]. Biofilms have mainly be studied in pathogens [29]. Among commensal or probiotic bacteria, L. johnsonii EPS has been shown to modulate biofilm formation in vitro [30], and B. subtilis EPS has been reported to improve the stability of floating biofilms [31]. Further, it has been suggested that biofilms formed by EPS-producing probiotic bacteria may aid host protection to injury or pathogenic insults [24]. Many microbial PS are also known to influence host immune function [1,21,24,32,33,34,35]. For example, EPS-producing strains of Bifidobacteria showed a reduced ability to induce host immune responses in vivo compared to EPS knock-out strains, supporting the role of EPS from commensal bacteria in maintaining host-microbial mutualism [32]. Microbial or plant PS have also been shown to modulate cytokine production by immune cells in vitro [24,36,37,38,39].
Fructans represent an important class of PS in plants and microbes, in terms of occurrence and biological function. Poly- or oligosaccharide β-2,1 inulin-type fructans typically contain only β-2,1-linked fructose residues ranging up to 60 monomeric units [40] and are well-known prebiotics with recognised immunomodulatory properties as extensively reviewed [41,42,43]. Another type of fructans, containing β-2,6-linked fructose residues, are produced by microbes where they are named levan, and in plants, herein termed plant β-2,6 fructans.
Here, we will provide an overview of plant and microbial β-2,6 fructans of different structures, focusing on their in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory properties (Table 1, Figure 1). We will also discuss the suggested mechanisms underpinning their immunomodulatory function while outlining the limitations and perspectives pertinent to the field, as well as the potential applications of β-2,6 fructans including in gut health.

2. Overview of β-2,6 Fructans: Occurrence, Synthesis and Function

2.1. Plant β-2,6 Fructans

Plants utilise fructosyltransferases to synthesise fructans by adding fructose residues on to sucrose leading to the production of different fructofuranose-linked structures [44,45,46,47,48]. Plant fructans (β-2,6 fructans or β-2,1 inulin-type fructans) are polymers of fructose found as storage PS in ~15% of higher plants such as forage grasses, cereals and vegetables [49]. Ιnulin, known as a common dietary fibre and prebiotic [17], has received much attention for its immunomodulatory properties including the ability to induce beneficial effects via the gut microbiota or through direct interactions with the immune system [41,43,46,50,51], however, these effects are less known in plant fructans containing β-2,6 linkages.
Plant β-2,6 fructans include plant levans, also named phleins, which are fructans that generally contain linear β-2,6-linked fructose chains and are found in a small number of plant species like grasses [52,53]. In addition, mixed linkage plant fructans can contain β-2,6-fructose-linked residues with β-2,1-branching which are typically termed graminians [52]. Plant graminians also can comprise more complex structures involving additional fructose-linked branching or as neoseries structures [52]. Further, some plant fructans contain a β-2,1-backbone with β-2,6 linkages, for example [54]. β-2,6 fructans can be produced by some plant species including Agropyron cristatum [55], Pachysandra terminalis [56] and Curcuma kwangsiensis [57], among others [44,48]. These plant β-2,6 fructans are nonstructural storage carbohydrates located in leaf and stem sheaths and are generally low in molecular weight (Mw) [48]. In addition, this review includes plant inulin-type fructans with β-2,6 branching points, for example ALP-1 produced by Arctium lappa (discussed in Section 3 and Section 4; see Table 1 for structure).

2.2. Microbial Levan

Microbial levan is typically a large β-2,6 fructofuranose polymer, a β-2,6 fructan [10], that is linear or can contain β-2,1 branching [48,58,59]. Many bacteria are capable of synthesising levan including gut commensal Lactobacillus reuteri [60], and Streptococcus mutans or S. salivarius found in the oral cavity [61,62], as well as Bacillus subtilis [9,63], B. amyloliquefaciens [64], L. citreum [65], Zymomonas mobilis [66], Pseudomonas syringae pv [67], Erwinia herbicola [68], Microbacterium laevaniformans and Serratia levanicum [48,69]. In microbes, levan is synthesised by levansucrase (E.C 2.4.1.10), a fructosyltransferase belonging to family 68 of glycoside hydrolases (GH68) according to the CAZy (carbohydrate-active enzymes) database (www.cazy.org, accessed on 13 April 2021) [48]. Generally, levansucrases are secreted into the extracellular environment but can also be attached to the bacterial cell surface [48,58]. Levansucrase binds to a substrate, such as sucrose, and adds fructose molecules to a growing fructose chain [48,58]. Typically, this process produces a glucose-capped β-2,6-linked fructofuranose polymer containing no or some β-2,1 branching [48].
Levan can be produced by bacterial fermentation or in vitro using recombinant levansucrase heterologously made in Escherichia coli [48,70,71,72]. In addition, yeast such as S. cerevisiae has been used for levan production, although, this is less common [48,73]. The degree of branching (up to 13% branching has been reported [48]) and molecular weight of microbial levan depend on the microbial source and the production method [48,59]. In addition, low-branched microbial levan has been shown to be produced by bacteria such as S. levanicum [69]. Moreover, some species of acetic acid bacteria produce linear levan [74]. In general, microbial levans form high molecular weight polymers [48] such as levan produced by Serratia sp. which can reach up to 4,400,000 Da [48,69]. However, some bacteria have been shown to produce both low and high molecular weight levans, for example from B. subtilis natto [48,75]. The conditions known to affect the molecular weight of microbial levan during its production include temperature and levansucrase concentration [48].
Microbial levan is an amphiphilic molecule known to adopt a spherical conformation in aqueous solution, and, therefore is commonly referred to as a nanoparticle [48,58,59,72]. Microbial levan has been proposed for its use in several industries including in aquaculture [48,76] and as packaging/films [48]. Further, levan has been incorporated in products from the food industry, for example in dairy products or bread [48,77,78]. It is also present in fermented food such as natto (fermented soybean) [9,10]. Microbial levan may also be relevant to the pharmaceutical industry, for example, as a nanoparticle for delivering drugs including antibiotics [48,79].
In terms of its biological role, microbial levan acts as a constituent of biofilm matrices in some bacteria [31,80] and has also been suggested to contribute towards plant pathogen fitness and virulence [48,81,82]. Further, in soil-resident bacteria, levan has been shown to aid in tolerance to salt and desiccation as well formation of cell aggregates on abiotic surfaces suggesting a role for levan in environment adaptions of bacteria under high osmotic stress and in biofilm formation [80]. In addition, levan has been suggested to act as a nutritional reservoir [31] perhaps as an energy source under conditions like starvation [48]. Further, levan has been suggested to promote colonisation of bacteria in the gut [60] and to act as a prebiotic in vitro [71,83,84,85,86,87] although in vivo evidence is scarce [88,89]. The human gut symbiont B. thetaiotaomicron can utilise levan [90], supporting a potential role of levan as a prebiotic in humans. In addition, isolates of levan-producing strains such as B. subtilis sp isolates or L. reuteri LTH5794 have been detected in the faeces of healthy humans [91,92,93,94], yet further work is warranted to verify that levan is produced in the gut by resident commensal bacteria in the GI tract. In addition, microbial levan has been suggested to elicit bioactivity or confer several health benefits including anticancer/antitumour [66], antipathogenic [78], antidiabetic [95], cholesterol-lowering [48,96], antioxidant [97,98], antiviral [99] or antiobesity properties [100].
The next sections provide an overview of the in vitro (Table 1) and in vivo (Table 2) evidence for the immunomodulatory properties of β-2,6 fructans from plants and microbes.

3. The Immunomodulatory Properties of Microbial Levan and Plant β-2,6 Fructans In Vitro

3.1. Effect of β-2,6 Fructans on Cytokine or Chemokine Production and Immunity

Microbial levan and plant β-2,6 fructans have been shown to modulate cytokine production by immune cells in vitro, as summarised in Table 1, which includes structural information. For example, the soil-bacterium B. licheniformis produces a high-molecular weight (Mw) levan EPS (2,000,000 Da) containing β-2,1 branching which induced the production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α by human whole blood cells [101]. Another high Mw (>2,600,000 Da) but linear levan isolated from Paenibacillus sp. nov BD3526 induced TNF-α production by isolated murine splenocytes but not IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL17A or IFN-γ suggesting a marginal inflammatory effect [102]. The low Mw microbial levans produced by B. subtilis natto CCT7712, a β-2,6 fructooligosaccharide mix, increased expression of TNF-α and proinflammatory chemokine IL-8 in human-derived ovarian carcinoma cells [104]. Although these high and low Mw microbial levans both induce TNF-α, the discrepancy with other cytokines may be partly explained by the structural differences of levan such as branching/linearity and Mw, and/or the different cell types used in the assays. The mechanisms underpinning the proinflammatory immunomodulatory properties of microbial levan remain poorly understood. However, a study by Xu and colleagues (2006) showed that the production of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IL-12 p40 by B. subtilis natto levan in monocyte/macrophage cell lines [10], was not due to bacterial LPS, a potent TLR4 ligand, as (i) levan was sourced from Gram-positive bacteria and (ii) IL-12 p40 production was not dampened using the LPS inhibitor, polymyxin B [10] (LPS contamination is further discussed in Section 5). B. subtilis natto levan induced TNF-α and IL-12 p40 production in murine primary peritoneal and spleen cells. TNF-α production in peritoneal cells was strongly dependent on TLR4, and reduced in TLR2 KO cells [10]. In addition, microbial levan treated with LPS-inhibitor polymyxin-B activated human TLR4-transfected HEK293 cell lines at low concentrations, supporting that cytokine production by levan was TLR-mediated. In addition, some of the microbial levans tested were shown to induce anti-inflammatory cytokines in vitro. For example, levan from L. mesenteroides S81 found in sourdough did not induce cytokines TNF-α, IL-12 or IL-10 in HT-29 cells (human epithelial cell line [114]) but did stimulate IL-4 production [98]. IL-4 is an anti-inflammatory cytokine that plays a key role in the type 2 inflammatory response and allergy [115]. Furthermore, treatment of LPS-challenged RAW 264.7 macrophages with ALP-1 (see Table 1 for structure) stimulated anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 and reduced proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β in a dose-dependent fashion [54].
Similar variations in cytokine production are observed for plant β-2,6 fructans (Table 1). Anemarrhena asphodeloides, a plant commonly found in eastern Asia and used as a traditional medicine in China, produces a low Mw neokestose β-2,6 fructan termed AAP70-1 which was shown to induce the production of IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α in RAW 264.7 macrophages [110]. Moreover, Polygonatum odoratum and P. cyrtonema, plant species of the Asparagaceae family produces neokestose fructans with β-2,1-linked linear chains (instead of β-2,6 backbone) and β-2,6 branching, POP-1 and PCP-1, respectively. POP-1 and PCP-1 induced IL-6 production by RAW264.7 macrophages with PCP-1 exhibiting a higher potency [111]. The authors suggested that the acetyl group on the glucose residue of PCP-1 fructan may be responsible for the difference in IL-6 production, as the immunomodulatory properties of other acetylated PS exhibited stronger immunomodulatory activity than nonacetylated PS [111,116]. This supports the notion that different levan structures may explain in part some of the discrepancies observed in cytokine production in vitro. However, branching structures are only seldom reported (Table 1) and more thorough and systematic carbohydrate analyses such as GC-MS linkage analysis would help advance our understanding of structure-activity of levans, as shown in other studies [57,60]. The mechanisms underpinning the immunomodulatory properties of plant β-2,6 fructans remain to be investigated. Agave fructans isolated from Agave salmiana comprising highly branched fructose polymers with both β-2,6 and β-2,1 linkages [112] appeared to directly induce the expression of T-cell-associated transcription factors FOXP3 and Tbet in peripheral blood mononuclear cells [113].
Using well-characterised high-purity microbial levans and plant β-2,6 fructans to assay immune modulation across multiple cell types as well as in vivo (Section 4) is required to address the discrepancies between the effect of levans on cytokine modulation.

3.2. Effect of Levan on Macrophage NO Production, Phagocytic Activity and Cell Proliferation

Associated with their ability to influence immune cell responses, microbial levan and plant β-2,6 fructans have been reported to modulate nitric oxide (NO) production, a well-known immunomodulatory product of activated macrophages [117], as well as affect macrophage phagocytosis (see Table 1 for structural details when available). For example, plant β-2,6 fructan ALP-1 showed an anti-inflammatory effect by decreasing LPS-induced NO production in RAW 264.7 macrophages [54] while AAP70-1 showed no induction of NO [110]. Plant AAP70-1, POP-1 and PCP-1 also showed an ability to enhance the phagocytic activity of RAW 264.7 macrophages, and PCP-1 stimulated macrophage cell proliferation at high concentrations (>200 μg/mL) [111]. In line with these findings, a low Mw branched β-2,6 fructan with a β-2,6-linked main chain from the plant species Curcuma kwangsiensis also increased the phagocytic activity of RAW264.7 macrophages (by 39%), while LPS resulted in an 82% increase and induced macrophage proliferation [57]. The levan soil bacterium Tanticharoenia sakaeratensis, which produces a high Mw levan EPS, was also shown to induce NO production in RAW264.7 macrophages in a dose-dependent manner and the use of the LPS-inhibitor polymyxin B confirmed that the effects were not attributable to LPS contamination [105]. Similarly, both Z. mobilis levan and di-D-fructose-2,6′:6,2′-dianhydride (DFA-IV)-a levan derivative disaccharide consisting of 2 fructose residues enzymatically produced using levan fructosyl transferase [106] were found to increase NO production as well as NO synthase (iNOS) expression [108]. Other microbial levans have been reported to induce immune cell proliferation. This is for example the case for levans from B. licheniformis 8-37-0-1 and Paenibacillus bovis sp. nov BD3526 which were shown to induce the proliferation of murine splenocytes [102,103]. However, it is not known whether spleen cell proliferation by microbial levan or plant β-2,6 fructans includes macrophage proliferation, and what is the biological impact of the proliferative potential of microbial levan or plant β-2,6 fructans on immune cells.
Overall, microbial levan as well as plant β-2,6 fructans were shown to increase phagocytic activity of macrophages, which may be applied to promote animal health or reduce infection (as described in Section 4). Further, the contrasting findings of microbial levans (and levan derivative DFA-IV) or plant β-2,6 fructans on NO production is unclear but may be related to their purity, Mw or compositional structure. Further studies are warranted to compare how different β-2,6 fructan structures from plant and microbial sources may affect macrophage function which could be used for beneficial applications.

3.3. Effect of Microbial Levan on Gut Barrier Function

Intestinal epithelial cells are being increasingly recognised for their role in immune function and are important for providing protection to the host against microbial invaders [118,119]. Levan nanoparticles produced in vitro using recombinant levansucrase Lsc3 from P. syringae pv. Tomato, were tested for their effect on epithelium integrity using human Caco-2 cells grown on transwells by transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) [72]. While sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) increased membrane permeability, cells treated with levan nanoparticles showed a dose-dependent moderate decrease in intestinal permeability compared to medium controls, supporting a possible role of levan in strengthening the gut barrier [72]. In another study, pretreatment of IPEC-J2 cells (porcine enterocyte model [120]) with β-2,6-linked fructose disaccharide DFA-IV led to decreased membrane permeability post LPS-challenge, determined by TEER and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) dextran measurements [121]. The authors also showed that DFA-IV was associated with intestinal wound healing properties in vitro and in vivo through measuring specific genes associated with differentiation, proliferation and cell migration [121]. Together, these studies indicate that levan shows potential to improve intestinal barrier function in vitro or associated wound healing in the intestine, although due to the limited amount of studies and different methodologies between studies, further work is required to confirm these in vitro findings as well as test the effect of levan on intestinal barrier function in vivo.
IgA, the most abundant immunoglobulin (Ig) in animals, is secreted primarily in mucosal tissues such as the intestine [122]. IgA plays a key role in gut barrier function, protecting the host by neutralising pathogenic threats such as viruses, halting bacterial contact to the intestinal epithelium, and facilitating the clearance of large biomolecules, among other functions [122]. L. mesenteroides NTM048 levansucrase-synthesised levan and L. mesenteroides NTM048 EPS but not B. subtilis levan were shown to induce IgA production in isolated murine peyer’s patches [109]. These differences may be due to the capacity of IgA to target different microbial antigens [123]. For example, IgA was proposed to target proteins associated with the B. thetaiotaomicron fructan-associated PS utilization locus [123]. Therefore, this mechanism may play an indirect role in gut colonisation and host-microbial mutualism [123]. However, further work is needed to assess the role of microbial levan (or its derivative DFA-IV) from different sources on IgA induction, and whether this can be used as a route to modulate beneficial members of the gut microbiota.

4. The Immunomodulatory Properties of Microbial and Plant β-2,6-Associated Fructans In Vivo

There are limited studies investigating the impact of β-2,6 fructans on human health [124,125], and to the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports investigating the immunomodulatory properties of plant β-2,6 fructans or microbial levans in humans. Below we discuss studies that reported the immunomodulatory properties of microbial levan and plant β-2,6 fructans in vivo which have mostly been demonstrated using murine or fish models (Table 2).

4.1. Effect of β-2,6 Fructans on Immune Responses in Mice

The first studies investigating microbial levan and immunity-associated modulations in mice date back as far as 1948, with levan from S. salivarius on MUMPs virus multiplication [126]. Levan from Aerobacter laevenicum was later shown to induce levan-specific antibody responses which may also be cross-reactive with the β-2,1 fructose polymer inulin [127,128]. More recent evidence for immune modulation by microbial levan or β-2,6 fructans in mice is limited to studies using microbial levans from L. reuteri and B. subtilis natto and plant fructan ALP-1.
In vivo, L. reuteri 100-23, which produces a relatively low Mw branched levan (see Table 1 for structure), was found to modulate T cell responses in the spleen of rats, as splenic FOXP3+ CD4+ regulatory T cells were higher in rats colonised with the wild-type strain as compared to a fructosyltransferase (ftf) KO L. reuteri strain incapable of producing EPS levan [60]. This study indicates that levan produced in situ may play a role in the evolutionary adaptation of L. reuteri to a sucrose-rich gut environment by modulation of the immune system [60]. Microbial levan has also been suggested to modulate Th2 helper cell responses in allergy models. Here, B. subtilis natto levan orally-administered to mice decreased levels of ovalbumin-(OVA)-induced serum IgE while there was no difference seen with IgG2a or IgG1 [10]. IgE as well as IL-4 are involved in Th2 responses while IgG2a for example is associated with Th1 responses [10]. Following immunisation with OVA, B. subtilis natto levan decreased IL-4 levels in splenic T cells isolated from mice, but there was no difference in IFN-γ levels, suggesting that levan suppressed the Th2 response [10]. Interestingly, an older study by Bartocci and colleagues (1982) reported that levan from Aerobacter levanicum elevated the delayed-type hypersensitivity response in mice, also known as a type IV hypersensitivity reaction: a type of cell-mediated allergic immune reaction [129,130]. These studies, although limited to discrete microbial levans, provide some mechanistic insights into the immunomodulatory properties of levan reported in vitro, particularly through the modulation of T cell responses and interaction with TLR4 (see Section 3.1).
Dietary ALP-1 led to increased IL-10 in the serum and colon of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced mice, while proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL1β and IL-6 were decreased, and IgA levels also increased in the colon [131]. In addition, ALP-1 intake appeared to alleviate the damaging effects to the colon induced by colitis [131]. ALP-1 was also investigated in a separate study by Zhang and colleagues (2019) using mice challenged with LPS [54]. Levels of serum proteins TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 were significantly decreased in the LPS-challenged mice receiving ALP-1 supplementation whereas IL-10 was further elevated [54]. These studies suggest that the anti-inflammatory properties of levan are associated with the host physiological status, which may explain some of the discrepancies with and limitations of the in vitro assays which, for the vast majority, were carried out in nonchallenged conditions e.g. without LPS pretreatment (see Section 3.1).
Lastly, a recent study by Ragab and colleagues (2020) investigated the effect of levan from B. subtilis isolates associated with honey (see Table 2 for structure) on peptic ulcers in rats [132]. This low Mw levan induced ulcer alleviation, as well as decreased NF-κB levels but had no antimicrobial effect in vitro on Helicobacter pylori, a pathogen associated with producing gastric ulcers [133], suggesting that the mechanism was due to levan’s prebiotic and/or anti-inflammatory properties [132]. These effects are in accordance with previous reports showing that DFA-IV could improve intestinal wound healing in vivo [121], again supporting the view that the anti-inflammatory effects of levans may only be tractable in a disease model.

4.2. Effect of β-2,6 Fructans on the Immune Response in Fish

There have been several studies reporting microbial levan as immunomodulators or prebiotic agents in aquaculture [76] by modulating cytokine production and/or conferring improved resistance to pathogenic or chemical insults [76,134,135,136]. For example, fish (Cyprinus carpio fry) fed levan derived from Bacillus megaterium that were exposed to low doses of the insecticide Fipronil to induce stress responses, showed elevated serum globulin, total protein and lysosome activity, and increased white blood cell (WBC) counts, which are likely associated with increased phagocytic activity [135]. Moreover, Gupta and colleagues (2018) found that high Mw (750,000 Da) branched levan derived from Acetobacter xylinum NCIM 2526 induced TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-12p40 expression in several organs and reduced the expression of IL-10 in the intestines of Labeo rohita fingerlings after challenge with Aeromonas hydrophila, a common pathogenic bacteria in fish [137]. Dietary levan supplementation after pathogenic challenge also increased lysozyme activity and the respiratory burst (release of reactive oxygen species) in serum and blood. Gupta and colleagues (2020) then showed that A. xylinum levan fed to A. hydrophila-challenged L. rohita fingerlings, led to increased Ig levels [138]. This levan also upregulated TLR22 expression (a PRR exclusive to fish) and IFN-γ in several organs of the fish including the intestine while the expression of TGF-β was mostly reduced [138].
Taken together, studies in fish exposed to insults showed multiple immunomodulatory properties across several studies. Microbial levan may elevate the immune response to aid in response to chemical or pathogenic challenge such as inducing or lowering proinflammatory cytokine induction, respectively, or increasing TLR expression or Ig responses, all contributing to mounting an appropriate immune response, that may be beneficial for aquaculture.

4.3. Indirect Effects of β-2,6 Fructan-Induced Immune Responses

An inherent factor influencing the immunomodulatory properties of fructans in vivo may be through the modulation of the gut microbiota, as demonstrated for β-2,1 fructans [43]. However, little is known on the indirect immunomodulatory effects of microbial levan or plant β-2,6 fructans via the microbiota in vivo and most studies are based on models of pathogenic or inflammatory challenge. ALP-1 supplementation was shown to modulate gut microbiota composition, including a slight increase in beneficial Lactobacillus genus in the colon of DSS-induced mice compared to control [131]. In LPS-challenged mice, ALP-1 appeared to increase Proteobactera and Firmicutes. At the genus level, ALP- 1 led to an increase of Lactobacillus and Odoribacter and decreased Bacteroides in the LPS-induced mice [54]. In line with these changes in microbial profiles, ALP-1 treatment in LPS-challenged mice also increased faecal short chain fatty acids (SCFA). Together, these studies suggest that the observed anti-inflammatory effects of ALP-1 in diseased models may be attributed to its prebiotic properties through a modulation of the gut microbiota.
In pigs, Li and Kim (2013) investigated changes in microbiota composition, and the prebiotic and immunomodulatory activity of a commercial fructan, a Z. mobilis levansucrase-derived high Mw levan [139] (See Table 2). Dietary Z. mobilis levansucrase-derived levan was shown to increase Lactobacillus levels in faeces, indicating a possible prebiotic activity. In addition, prolonged dietary supplementation of this levan to pigs prior to an LPS-challenge modulated immune system factors in blood including increased blood leukocytes, and inhibited serum IL-6 and TNF-α production [139] as also similarly reported using ALP-1 [131], as described above. It is noteworthy that in another study, EPS dextran and levan (from B. paralicheniformis; 55,170 Da) was suggested as a potential natural alternative to antibiotics in reducing the growth of intestinal enteric pathogens in broilers [140]. Together, these data suggest that the anti-inflammatory properties of plant and microbial levans in diseased models may be via the modulation of the gut microbiota.

5. Conclusions and Perspectives

This review gathered in vitro and in vivo evidence for the immunomodulatory properties of microbial and plant β-2,6 fructans. The large heterogeneity of experimental approaches and in vitro and in vivo models used in these studies, as well as the large range of β-2,6 fructans tested (in terms of structure and biological source) and their degree of purity, render it challenging to attribute distinct effects to specific structures.
However, despite the variability of the findings, β-2,6 fructans from plants and microbes consistently showed modulation of cell cytokine production in vitro using macrophages, human blood cells, mouse splenocytes, or human epithelial cells. Although the exact mechanisms underpinning the immunomodulatory activities of both microbial and plant β-2,6 fructans as well as other immunomodulatory PS remain elusive, several pathways have been implicated including the modulation of the gut microbiota or their metabolites, or direct interaction with immune cells. One potential underpinning mechanism for microbial levan specifically is through the interaction with TLR4, as proposed for levan from B. subtilis natto using TLR4-transfected cells [10], in line with other immunomodulatory PS which have been proposed to interact with PRRs such as TLRs and C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) [10,24,26,36,37,41,141] including β-(2,1) fructans [142,143]. Furthermore, CLRs [144], are expressed in the gut where they play an immunomodulatory role by binding to carbohydrates [145,146,147,148], and may therefore interact with dietary or endogenously produced microbial fructans when accessible to the underlying gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) or systemic circulation.
When assessing the modulation of immune cell function of microbial levan or plant β-2,6 fructans, or other PS in vitro, it is important to consider their composition and purity [149]. For example, by removing microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) [26,150,151,152] such as LPS which can induce immunostimulatory effects at very low levels in vitro [150,153]. Current methods include the use of LPS inhibitor polymyxin B [153], Triton-X-114 and alkali-based treatments [152,154,155] but there is a need for more sensitive and efficient methods to remove and more accurately quantify LPS [153,156]. In addition, the huge diversity and complex structural features of plant and microbial PS presents challenges and difficulties when determining their full structures [157,158]. For example, with regards to fructan characterisation, degradation of fructose can occur during hydrolysis-based protocols such as monosaccharide analysis which relies on the use of trifluroracetic acid [3,159] and fructose interconversion to glucose or mannose has been reported to occur under acidic conditions [160]. There is also a need to better characterise the degree of branching which may affect microbial levan or plant β-2,6 fructan bioactivity.
In vivo studies suggest that microbial or plant β-2,6 fructans show anti-inflammatory properties using models of infection or inflammation. However very little work has been done to assess the contribution of the gut microbiota in this process, which is in contrast to the more frequently-studied β-(2,1) fructans for example [43,161,162] and reviewed in [41]. Most in vivo studies investigating the health effects of β-2,6 fructans, particularly microbial levan, reported in this review have been performed in fish or murine experimental models, and studies in humans are lacking. One of the mechanisms supporting the immunomodulatory properties of microbial levan specifically in vivo involves the modulation of regulatory T cell responses in the spleen, but whether this also occurs in GALT remains to be determined. Further work is warranted to determine how β-2,6 fructans from plants or microbes from different sources and of diverse structures and molecular weights may affect cytokine production and gut barrier function in murine models such as DSS-induced colitis in mice where altered permeability may provide facilitated access to GALT as suggested using other PS [163,164].
In conclusion, despite the limitations highlighted above, plant and microbial β-2,6 fructans represent a promising group of immunomodulatory PS. Further mechanistic work is warranted to uncover their mode of action using differently-sourced fructans of different molecular weights and structures in well-controlled animal models including if they can directly or indirectly affect the immune system. Human trials combined with metagenomic, transcriptomic, and metabolomic studies will help advance our understanding of how these β-2,6 fructans influence gut health.
At present, it is too early to select a β-2,6 fructan structure based on plant or microbial sources that could be used in prophylactic or therapeutic treatments of specific conditions although evidence from in vitro and animal studies indicates that microbial levans show great promise as immunomodulatory and/or prebiotic agents, that could be used in the pharmaceutical or food industry, or in animal husbandry. It should be noted that a factor limiting the wide study and application of microbial levan specifically is its low purification yield, high costs or bottlenecks in processing associated with its production on a large scale [165,166]. Plant β-2,6 fructans remain under-studied compared to microbial levan. Further work is required to harness the full potential of microbial levan and/or plant β-2,6 fructans as immunomodulatory and/or prebiotic agents for health and industrial applications.

Author Contributions

Original draft preparation and work was conceived by I.D.Y. and N.J. Tables were devised and constructed by I.D.Y. Writing was performed by I.D.Y. and N.J. N.J. provided Supervision. D.L. constructed Figure 1. Manuscript reviewing was performed by I.D.Y., N.J. and D.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC); this research was funded by the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Grant Food Innovation and Health BB/R012512/1 and its constituent project BBS/E/F/000PR10346 (Theme 3, Digestion and Fermentation in the Lower GI Tract) and BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Grant Gut Microbes and Health BB/R012490/1 and its constituent projects BBS/E/F/000PR10353 (Theme 1, Determinants of microbe-host responses in the gut across life) and BBS/E/F/000PR10356 (Theme 3, Modulation of the gut microbes to promote health throughout life).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ATR-FTIRattenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy;
CD4cluster of differentiation 4;
CLRsC-type lectin receptors;
DFA-IVdisaccharide Di-D-fructose-2,6′:6,2′-dianhydride;
DPdegree of polymerisation;
DSSdextran sodium sulfate;
ELISAenzyme-linked immunosorbent assay;
EPSexopolysaccharide;
FITCfluorescein isothiocyanate;
FOSfructooligosaccharide;
FOXP3forkhead box P3;
FT-IRFourier transform infrared spectroscopy;
FTFfructosyltransferase;
GALTGut-associated lymphoid tissue;
GC-MSgas chromatography-mass spectrometry;
GPCgel permeation chromatography;
GIgastrointestinal;
HPSEC-MALLSHigh-Performance Size-Exclusion Chromatography coupled with on-line multi-angle Laser Light Scattering;
Igimmunoglobulin;
ILinterleukin;
iNOSnitric oxide synthase;
KOknockout;
LPSlipopolysaccharide;
MAMPsmicrobe-associated molecular patterns;
NDPnon-digestible polysaccharides;
NMRnuclear magnetic reasonance;
NOnitric oxide;
OVAovalbumin;
OVCAR-3human-derived ovarian carcinoma cells;
MTT3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide;
PBMCperipheral blood mononuclear cell(s);
PRRpathogen recognition receptor;
PSpolysaccharides(s)
RT-qPCRreverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction;
SDSsodium dodecyl sulfate;
TbetT-box transcription factor;
TEERtransepithelial electrical resistance;
TLRtoll-like receptor(s);
TNFtumour necrosis factor;
WBCwhite blood cell(s);
WTwild type.

References

  1. Porter, N.T.; Martens, E.C. The critical roles of polysaccharides in gut microbial ecology and physiology. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2017, 71, 349–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ghazarian, H.; Idoni, B.; Oppenheimer, S.B. A glycobiology review: Carbohydrates, lectins and implications in cancer therapeutics. Acta Histochem. 2011, 113, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Kamerling, J.P.; Boons, G.-J. Comprehensive Glycoscience: From Chemistry to Systems Biology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Cosgrove, D.J. Growth of the plant cell wall. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Makki, K.; Deehan, E.C.; Walter, J.; Backhed, F. The impact of dietary fiber on gut microbiota in host health and disease. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 23, 705–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Prestegard, J.H.; Liu, J.; Widmalm, G. Oligosaccharides and polysaccharides. In Essentials of Glycobiology; Varki, A., Cummings, R.D., Esko, J.D., Stanley, P., Hart, G.W., Aebi, M., Darvill, A.G., Kinoshita, T., Packer, N.H., Prestegard, J.H., et al., Eds.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: La Jolla, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. van Kooyk, Y.; Kalay, H.; Garcia-Vallejo, J.J. Analytical tools for the study of cellular glycosylation in the immune system. Front. Immunol. 2013, 4, 451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhou, J.Y.; Oswald, D.M.; Oliva, K.D.; Kreisman, L.S.C.; Cobb, B.A. The Glycoscience of immunity. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 523–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shih, I.-L.; Yu, Y.-T. Simultaneous and selective production of levan and poly(γ-glutamic acid) by Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Xu, Q.; Yajima, T.; Li, W.; Saito, K.; Ohshima, Y.; Yoshikai, Y. Levan (beta-2, 6-fructan), a major fraction of fermented soybean mucilage, displays immunostimulating properties via Toll-like receptor 4 signalling: Induction of interleukin-12 production and suppression of T-helper type 2 response and immunoglobulin E production. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2006, 36, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abbott, D.W.; Martens, E.C.; Gilbert, H.J.; Cuskin, F.; Lowe, E.C. Coevolution of yeast mannan digestion: Convergence of the civilized human diet, distal gut microbiome, and host immunity. Gut microbes 2015, 6, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Nie, Y.; Lin, Q.; Luo, F. Effects of non-starch polysaccharides on inflammatory bowel disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Lovegrove, A.; Edwards, C.H.; De Noni, I.; Patel, H.; El, S.N.; Grassby, T.; Zielke, C.; Ulmius, M.; Nilsson, L.; Butterworth, P.J.; et al. Role of polysaccharides in food, digestion, and health. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Stephen, A.M.; Champ, M.M.J.; Cloran, S.J.; Fleith, M.; van Lieshout, L.; Mejborn, H.; Burley, V.J. Dietary fibre in Europe: Current state of knowledge on definitions, sources, recommendations, intakes and relationships to health. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2017, 30, 149–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Fuller, S.; Beck, E.; Salman, H.; Tapsell, L. New horizons for the study of dietary fiber and health: A Review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2016, 71, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Thursby, E.; Juge, N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem. J. 2017, 474, 1823–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gill, S.K.; Rossi, M.; Bajka, B.; Whelan, K. Dietary fibre in gastrointestinal health and disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Huang, T.; Xu, M.; Lee, A.; Cho, S.; Qi, L. Consumption of whole grains and cereal fiber and total and cause-specific mortality: Prospective analysis of 367,442 individuals. BMC Med. 2015, 13, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Saeed, F.; Pasha, I.; Arshad, M.U.; Muhammad Anjum, F.; Hussain, S.; Rasheed, R.; Nasir, M.A.; Shafique, B. Physiological and nutraceutical perspectives of fructan. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 1895–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wood, P.J. Cereal β-glucans in diet and health. J. Cereal Sci. 2007, 46, 230–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cress, B.F.; Englaender, J.A.; He, W.; Kasper, D.; Linhardt, R.J.; Koffas, M.A. Masquerading microbial pathogens: Capsular polysaccharides mimic host-tissue molecules. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2014, 38, 660–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Ahmad, N.H.; Mustafa, S.; Che Man, Y.B. Microbial Polysaccharides and Their Modification Approaches: A Review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Neff, C.P.; Rhodes, M.E.; Arnolds, K.L.; Collins, C.B.; Donnelly, J.; Nusbacher, N.; Jedlicka, P.; Schneider, J.M.; McCarter, M.D.; Shaffer, M.; et al. Diverse intestinal bacteria contain putative zwitterionic capsular polysaccharides with anti-inflammatory properties. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 20, 535–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Castro-Bravo, N.; Wells, J.M.; Margolles, A.; Ruas-Madiedo, P. Interactions of surface exopolysaccharides from bifidobacterium and lactobacillus within the intestinal environment. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Maldonado, R.F.; Sá-Correia, I.; Valvano, M.A. Lipopolysaccharide modification in Gram-negative bacteria during chronic infection. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2016, 40, 480–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Patten, D.A.; Collett, A. Exploring the immunomodulatory potential of microbial-associated molecular patterns derived from the enteric bacterial microbiota. Microbiology 2013, 159, 1535–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Flemming, H.-C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gupta, P.; Pruthi, P.A.; Pruthi, V. Role of exopolysaccharides in biofilm formation. In Introduction to Biofilm Engineering; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; pp. 17–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, A.; Alam, A.; Rani, M.; Ehtesham, N.Z.; Hasnain, S.E. Biofilms: Survival and defense strategy for pathogens. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 307, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Dertli, E.; Mayer, M.J.; Narbad, A. Impact of the exopolysaccharide layer on biofilms, adhesion and resistance to stress in Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dogsa, I.; Brloznik, M.; Stopar, D.; Mandic-Mulec, I. Exopolymer diversity and the role of levan in bacillus subtilis biofilms. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fanning, S.; Hall, L.J.; Cronin, M.; Zomer, A.; MacSharry, J.; Goulding, D.; O’Connell Motherway, M.; Shanahan, F.; Nally, K.; Dougan, G.; et al. Bifidobacterial surface-exopolysaccharide facilitates commensal-host interaction through immune modulation and pathogen protection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 2108–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Laino, J.; Villena, J.; Kanmani, P.; Kitazawa, H. Immunoregulatory effects triggered by lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides: New insights into molecular interactions with host cells. Microorganisms 2016, 4, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Donaldson, G.P.; Lee, S.M.; Mazmanian, S.K. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 14, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Danne, C.; Ryzhakov, G.; Martinez-Lopez, M.; Ilott, N.E.; Franchini, F.; Cuskin, F.; Lowe, E.C.; Bullers, S.J.; Arthur, J.S.C.; Powrie, F. A Large Polysaccharide Produced by Helicobacter hepaticus Induces an Anti-inflammatory Gene Signature in Macrophages. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 733–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Ferreira, S.S.; Passos, C.P.; Madureira, P.; Vilanova, M.; Coimbra, M.A. Structure–function relationships of immunostimulatory polysaccharides: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 132, 378–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Meijerink, M.; Rösch, C.; Taverne, N.; Venema, K.; Gruppen, H.; Schols, H.A.; Wells, J.M. Structure dependent-immunomodulation by sugar beet arabinans via a SYK tyrosine kinase-dependent signaling pathway. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hidalgo-Cantabrana, C.; López, P.; Gueimonde, M.; de los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Suárez, A.; Margolles, A.; Ruas-Madiedo, P. Immune Modulation Capability of Exopolysaccharides Synthesised by Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2012, 4, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Yin, M.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H. Advances in Research on Immunoregulation of Macrophages by Plant Polysaccharides. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Mensink, M.A.; Frijlink, H.W.; van der Voort Maarschalk, K.; Hinrichs, W.L.J. Inulin, a flexible oligosaccharide I: Review of its physicochemical characteristics. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 130, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Vogt, L.; Meyer, D.; Pullens, G.; Faas, M.; Smelt, M.; Venema, K.; Ramasamy, U.; Schols, H.A.; De Vos, P. Immunological properties of inulin-type fructans. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2015, 55, 414–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shoaib, M.; Shehzad, A.; Omar, M.; Rakha, A.; Raza, H.; Sharif, H.R.; Shakeel, A.; Ansari, A.; Niazi, S. Inulin: Properties, health benefits and food applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fransen, F.; Sahasrabudhe, N.M.; Elderman, M.; Bosveld, M.; El Aidy, S.; Hugenholtz, F.; Borghuis, T.; Kousemaker, B.; Winkel, S.; van der Gaast-de Jongh, C.; et al. β2→1-fructans modulate the immune system in vivo in a microbiota-dependent and -independent Fashion. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Cimini, S.; Locato, V.; Vergauwen, R.; Paradiso, A.; Cecchini, C.; Vandenpoel, L.; Verspreet, J.; Courtin, C.M.; D’Egidio, M.G.; Van den Ende, W.; et al. Fructan biosynthesis and degradation as part of plant metabolism controlling sugar fluxes during durum wheat kernel maturation. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Versluys, M.; Tarkowski, Ł.P.; Van den Ende, W. Fructans as DAMPs or MAMPs: Evolutionary prospects, cross-tolerance, and multistress resistance potential. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 7, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Apolinário, A.C.; de Lima Damasceno, B.P.G.; de Macêdo Beltrão, N.E.; Pessoa, A.; Converti, A.; da Silva, J.A. Inulin-type fructans: A review on different aspects of biochemical and pharmaceutical technology. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 101, 368–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Livingston, D.P.; Hincha, D.K.; Heyer, A.G. Fructan and its relationship to abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 2007–2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Öner, E.T.; Hernández, L.; Combie, J. Review of levan polysaccharide: From a century of past experiences to future prospects. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 827–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Peukert, M.; Thiel, J.; Mock, H.-P.; Marko, D.; Weschke, W.; Matros, A. Spatiotemporal dynamics of oligofructan metabolism and suggested functions in developing cereal grains. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Peshev, D.; Van den Ende, W. Fructans: Prebiotics and immunomodulators. J. Funct. Foods 2014, 8, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Franco-Robles, E.; López, M.G. Implication of fructans in health: Immunomodulatory and antioxidant mechanisms. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 289267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ritsema, T.; Smeekens, S. Fructans: Beneficial for plants and humans. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Carranza, C.O.; Fernandez, A.Á.; Bustillo Armendáriz, G.R.; López-Munguía, A. Chapter 15—Processing of fructans and oligosaccharides from agave plants. In Processing and Impact on Active Components in Food; Preedy, V., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2015; pp. 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, N.; Wang, Y.; Kan, J.; Wu, X.; Zhang, X.; Tang, S.; Sun, R.; Liu, J.; Qian, C.; Jin, C. In vivo and in vitro anti-inflammatory effects of water-soluble polysaccharide from Arctium lappa. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kawakami, A.; Yoshida, M. Fructan:fructan 1-fructosyltransferase, a key enzyme for biosynthesis of graminan oligomers in hardened wheat. Planta 2005, 223, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Van den Ende, W.; Coopman, M.; Clerens, S.; Vergauwen, R.; Le Roy, K.; Lammens, W.; Van Laere, A. Unexpected Presence of graminan- and levan-Type fructans in the evergreen frost-hardy eudicot pachysandra terminalis (Buxaceae): Purification, cloning, and functional analysis of a 6-SST/6-SFT Enzyme. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Dong, C.-X.; Zhang, L.-J.; Xu, R.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, Y.-B.; Han, X.-Q.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, Y.-X. Structural characterization and immunostimulating activity of a levan-type fructan from Curcuma kwangsiensis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 77, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Srikanth, R.; Reddy, C.H.S.; Siddartha, G.; Ramaiah, M.J.; Uppuluri, K.B. Review on production, characterization and applications of microbial levan. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 120, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Runyon, J.R.; Nilsson, L.; Ulmius, M.; Castro, A.; Ionescu, R.; Andersson, C.; Schmidt, C. Characterizing changes in levan physicochemical properties in different pH environments using asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2014, 406, 1597–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sims, I.M.; Frese, S.A.; Walter, J.; Loach, D.; Wilson, M.; Appleyard, K.; Eason, J.; Livingston, M.; Baird, M.; Cook, G.; et al. Structure and functions of exopolysaccharide produced by gut commensal Lactobacillus reuteri 100-23. ISME J. 2011, 1115–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ogawa, A.; Furukawa, S.; Fujita, S.; Mitobe, J.; Kawarai, T.; Narisawa, N.; Sekizuka, T.; Kuroda, M.; Ochiai, K.; Ogihara, H. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation by Streptococcus salivarius FruA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 1572–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Burne, R.A.; Schilling, K.; Bowen, W.H.; Yasbin, R.E. Expression, purification, and characterization of an exo-beta-D-fructosidase of Streptococcus mutans. J. Bacteriol. 1987, 169, 4507–4517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Cuskin, F.; Flint, J.E.; Gloster, T.M.; Morland, C.; Baslé, A.; Henrissat, B.; Coutinho, P.M.; Strazzulli, A.; Solovyova, A.S.; Davies, G.J. How nature can exploit nonspecific catalytic and carbohydrate binding modules to create enzymatic specificity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 20889–20894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Feng, J.; Gu, Y.; Quan, Y.; Zhang, W.; Cao, M.; Gao, W.; Song, C.; Yang, C.; Wang, S. Recruiting a new strategy to improve levan production in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Han, J.; Xu, X.; Gao, C.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Z. Levan-producing Leuconostoc citreum strain BD1707 and its growth in tomato juice supplemented with sucrose. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Calazans, G.c.M.T.; Lima, R.C.; de França, F.P.; Lopes, C.E. Molecular weight and antitumour activity of Zymomonas mobilis levans. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2000, 27, 245–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Laue, H.; Schenk, A.; Li, H.; Lambertsen, L.; Neu, T.R.; Molin, S.; Ullrich, M.S. Contribution of alginate and levan production to biofilm formation by Pseudomonas syringae. Microbiology 2006, 152, 2909–2918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Keith, J.; Wiley, B.; Ball, D.; Arcidiacono, S.; Zorfass, D.; Mayer, J.; Kaplan, D. Continuous culture system for production of biopolymer levan using Erwinia herbicola. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1991, 38, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kojima, I.; Saito, T.; Iizuka, M.; Minamiura, N.; Ono, S. Characterization of levan produced by Serratia sp. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1993, 75, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Raga-Carbajal, E.; Carrillo-Nava, E.; Costas, M.; Porras-Dominguez, J.; López-Munguía, A.; Olvera, C. Size product modulation by enzyme concentration reveals two distinct levan elongation mechanisms in Bacillus subtilis levansucrase. Glycobiology 2016, 26, 377–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Visnapuu, T.; Mardo, K.; Alamäe, T. Levansucrases of a Pseudomonas syringae pathovar as catalysts for the synthesis of potentially prebiotic oligo- and polysaccharides. New Biotechnol. 2015, 32, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Bondarenko, O.M.; Ivask, A.; Kahru, A.; Vija, H.; Titma, T.; Visnapuu, M.; Joost, U.; Pudova, K.; Adamberg, S.; Visnapuu, T.; et al. Bacterial polysaccharide levan as stabilizing, non-toxic and functional coating material for microelement-nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 136, 710–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Franken, J.; Brandt, B.A.; Tai, S.L.; Bauer, F.F. Biosynthesis of levan, a bacterial extracellular polysaccharide, in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Jakob, F.; Pfaff, A.; Novoa-Carballal, R.; Rubsam, H.; Becker, T.; Vogel, R.F. Structural analysis of fructans produced by acetic acid bacteria reveals a relation to hydrocolloid function. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 1234–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Dos Santos, L.F.; Martins Paiva, W.; Borsato, D.; MDL, C.C.D.S.; Celligoi, P.C. Characterization and optimization of levan production by Bacillus subtilis natto. Rom Biotechnol Lett. 2013, 18, 8413–8422. [Google Scholar]
  76. Gupta, S.; Das, P.; Singh, S.; Akhtar, M.; Meena, D.; Mandal, S. Microbial levan, an ideal prebiotic and immunonutrient in aquaculture. World Aquacult. 2011, 42, 61. [Google Scholar]
  77. Jakob, F.; Steger, S.; Vogel, R.F. Influence of novel fructans produced by selected acetic acid bacteria on the volume and texture of wheat breads. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2012, 234, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Byun, B.Y.; Lee, S.-J.; Mah, J.-H. Antipathogenic activity and preservative effect of levan (β-2,6-fructan), a multifunctional polysaccharide. Int. J. Food Sci. Tech. 2014, 49, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Sezer, A.D.; Kazak Sarılmışer, H.; Rayaman, E.; Çevikbaş, A.; Öner, E.T.; Akbuğa, J. Development and characterization of vancomycin-loaded levan-based microparticular system for drug delivery. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2017, 22, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Velázquez-Hernández, M.L.; Baizabal-Aguirre, V.M.; Cruz-Vázquez, F.; Trejo-Contreras, M.J.; Fuentes-Ramírez, L.E.; Bravo-Patiño, A.; Cajero-Juárez, M.; Chávez-Moctezuma, M.P.; Valdez-Alarcón, J.J. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus levansucrase is involved in tolerance to NaCl, sucrose and desiccation, and in biofilm formation. Arch. Microbiol. 2011, 193, 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Koczan, J.M.; McGrath, M.J.; Zhao, Y.; Sundin, G.W. Contribution of Erwinia amylovora exopolysaccharides amylovoran and levan to biofilm formation: Implications in pathogenicity. Phytopathology. 2009, 99, 1237–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Mehmood, A.; Abdallah, K.; Khandekar, S.; Zhurina, D.; Srivastava, A.; Al-Karablieh, N.; Alfaro-Espinoza, G.; Pletzer, D.; Ullrich, M.S. Expression of extra-cellular levansucrase in Pseudomonas syringae is controlled by the in planta fitness-promoting metabolic repressor HexR. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Adamberg, K.; Tomson, K.; Talve, T.; Pudova, K.; Puurand, M.; Visnapuu, T.; Alamäe, T.; Adamberg, S. Levan enhances associated growth of Bacteroides, Escherichia, Streptococcus and Faecalibacterium in fecal microbiota. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0144042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Arrizon, J.; Hernández-Moedano, A.; Oner, E.T.; González-Avila, M. In vitro prebiotic activity of fructans with different fructosyl linkage for symbiotics elaboration. Int. J. Probiotics Prebiotics. 2014, 9, 69. [Google Scholar]
  85. Bello, F.D.; Walter, J.; Hertel, C.; Hammes, W.P. In vitro study of prebiotic properties of levan-type exopolysaccharides from Lactobacilli and non-digestible carbohydrates using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 24, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Liu, C.; Kolida, S.; Charalampopoulos, D.; Rastall, R.A. An evaluation of the prebiotic potential of microbial levans from Erwinia sp. 10119. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 64, 103668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Cai, G.; Wu, D.; Li, X.; Lu, J. Levan from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens JN4 acts as a prebiotic for enhancing the intestinal adhesion capacity of Lactobacillus reuteri JN101. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 146, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Lei, X.J.; Kim, Y.M.; Park, J.H.; Baek, D.H.; Nyachoti, C.M.; Kim, I.H. Effects of levan-type fructan on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, diarrhoea scores, faecal shedding of total lactic acid bacteria and coliform bacteria, and faecal gas emission in weaning pigs. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2018, 98, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Jang, K.-H.; Kang, S.-A.; Cho, Y.-H.; Kim, Y.-Y.; Lee, Y.-J.; Hong, K.-H.; Seong, K.-H.; Kim, S.-H.; Kim, C.-H.; Rhee, S.-K. Prebiotic properties of levan in rats. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 13, 348–353. [Google Scholar]
  90. Sonnenburg, E.D.; Zheng, H.; Joglekar, P.; Higginbottom, S.K.; Firbank, S.J.; Bolam, D.N.; Sonnenburg, J.L. Specificity of polysaccharide use in intestinal bacteroides species determines diet-induced microbiota alterations. Cell 2010, 141, 1241–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Adnan, H.A.; Jabbar, F.; Mahdi, S. Bioactivity of Bacillus species isolated from human feces. J. Madenat Alelem College 2012, 4, 50–61. [Google Scholar]
  92. AL-Rubaie, M.S.; Abbas, A.H.; Hamza, I.S. Biofilm and Levan production by Bacillus species isolated from human feces. IJST 2012, 143, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  93. Yang, Y.; Galle, S.; Le, M.H.A.; Zijlstra, R.T.; Gänzle, M.G. Feed fermentation with reuteran- and levan-producing lactobacillus reuteri reduces colonization of weanling pigs by enterotoxigenic escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 5743–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Wang, Y.; Gänzle, M.G.; Schwab, C. Exopolysaccharide synthesized by Lactobacillus reuteri decreases the ability of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to bind to porcine erythrocytes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 4863–4866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Dahech, I.; Belghith, K.S.; Hamden, K.; Feki, A.; Belghith, H.; Mejdoub, H. Oral administration of levan polysaccharide reduces the alloxan-induced oxidative stress in rats. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2011, 49, 942–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Yamamoto, Y.; Takahashi, Y.; Kawano, M.; Iizuka, M.; Matsumoto, T.; Saeki, S.; Yamaguchi, H. In vitro digestibility and fermentability of levan and its hypocholesterolemic effects in rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1999, 10, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Srikanth, R.; Siddartha, G.; Sundhar Reddy, C.H.S.S.; Harish, B.S.; Janaki Ramaiah, M.; Uppuluri, K.B. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory levan produced from Acetobacter xylinum NCIM2526 and its statistical optimization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 123, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Taylan, O.; Yilmaz, M.T.; Dertli, E. Partial characterization of a levan type exopolysaccharide (EPS) produced by Leuconostoc mesenteroides showing immunostimulatory and antioxidant activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Esawy, M.A.; Ahmed, E.F.; Helmy, W.A.; Mansour, N.M.; El-Senousy, W.M.; El-Safty, M.M. Antiviral levans from Bacillus spp. isolated from honey. Complex World Polysacch. 2012, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kang, S.-A.; Hong, K.-H.; Jang, K.-H.; Kim, S.-H.; Lee, K.-H.; Chang, B.-I.; Kim, C.-H.; Choue, R.-W. Anti-obesity and hypolipidemic effects of dietary levan in high fat diet-induced obese rats. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 14, 796–804. [Google Scholar]
  101. van Dyk, J.S.; Kee, N.L.A.; Frost, C.L.; Pletschke, B.I. Extracellular polysaccharide production in Bacillus licheniformis SVD1 and its immunomodulatory effect. BioResources 2012, 7, 4976–4993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Xu, X.; Gao, C.; Liu, Z.; Wu, J.; Han, J.; Yan, M.; Wu, Z. Characterization of the levan produced by Paenibacillus bovis sp. nov BD3526 and its immunological activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 144, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Liu, C.; Lu, J.; Lu, L.; Liu, Y.; Wang, F.; Xiao, M. Isolation, structural characterization and immunological activity of an exopolysaccharide produced by Bacillus licheniformis 8-37-0-1. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 5528–5533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Magri, A.; Oliveira, M.R.; Baldo, C.; Tischer, C.A.; Sartori, D.; Mantovani, M.S.; Celligoi, M.A.P.C. Production of fructooligosaccharides by Bacillus subtilis natto CCT7712 and their antiproliferative potential. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 128, 1414–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Aramsangtienchai, P.; Kongmon, T.; Pechroj, S.; Srisook, K. Enhanced production and immunomodulatory activity of levan from the acetic acid bacterium, Tanticharoenia sakaeratensis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hang, H. Recent advances on the difructose anhydride IV preparation from levan conversion. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 7477–7486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Jang, K.-H.; Song, K.-B.; Kim, C.H.; Chung, B.H.; Kang, S.A.; Chun, U.-H.; Choue, R.W.; Rhee, S.-K. Comparison of characteristics of levan produced by different preparations of levansucrase from Zymomonas mobilis. Biotechnol. Lett. 2001, 23, 339–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Park, S.-K.; Jang, K.-H.; Kim, M.-H.; Lim, J.-D.; Han, E.-T.; Jang, S.-A.; Kim, K.-H.; Pyo, S.-N.; Sohn, E.-H. The differential immunomodulating effects of levan and dfa-iv on macrophage function. PNF 2008, 13, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ishida, R.; Sakaguchi, K.; Matsuzaki, C.; Katoh, T.; Ishida, N.; Yamamoto, K.; Hisa, K. Levansucrase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides NTM048 produces a levan exopolysaccharide with immunomodulating activity. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zhang, S.; Zhang, Q.; An, L.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Tuerhong, M.; Ohizumi, Y.; Jin, J.; et al. A fructan from Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge showing neuroprotective and immunoregulatory effects. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 229, 115477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Zhao, P.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, C.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Gao, W. Purification, characterization and immunomodulatory activity of fructans from Polygonatum odoratum and P. cyrtonema. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 214, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Michel-Cuello, C.; Ortiz-Cerda, I.; Moreno-Vilet, L.; Grajales-Lagunes, A.; Moscosa-Santillán, M.; Bonnin, J.; González-Chávez, M.M.; Ruiz-Cabrera, M. Study of enzymatic hydrolysis of fructans from Agave salmiana characterization and kinetic assessment. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Moreno-Vilet, L.; Garcia-Hernandez, M.H.; Delgado-Portales, R.E.; Corral-Fernandez, N.E.; Cortez-Espinosa, N.; Ruiz-Cabrera, M.A.; Portales-Perez, D.P. In vitro assessment of agave fructans (Agave salmiana) as prebiotics and immune system activators. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014, 63, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Martínez-Maqueda, D.; Miralles, B.; Recio, I. HT29 cell line. In The Impact of Food Bioactives on Health: In Vitro and Ex Vivo Models; Verhoeckx, K., Cotter, P., López-Expósito, I., Kleiveland, C., Lea, T., Mackie, A., Requena, T., Swiatecka, D., Wichers, H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Junttila, I.S. Tuning the cytokine responses: An update on interleukin IL-4 and IL-13 receptor complexes. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jiang, L.-M.; Nie, S.-P.; Huang, D.-F.; Fu, Z.-H.; Xie, M.-Y. Acetylation modification improves immunoregulatory effect of polysaccharide from seeds of Plantago asiatica L. J. Chem. 2018, 2018, 3082026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. MacMicking, J.; Qiao-wen, X.; and Nathan, C. Nitric oxide and macrophage function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1997, 15, 323–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Allaire, J.M.; Crowley, S.M.; Law, H.T.; Chang, S.Y.; Ko, H.J.; Vallance, B.A. The intestinal epithelium: Central coordinator of mucosal immunity. Trends Immunol. 2018, 39, 677–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Andrews, C.; McLean, M.H.; Durum, S.K. Cytokine tuning of intestinal epithelial Function. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Vergauwen, H. The IPEC-J2 Cell Line. In The Impact of Food Bioactives on Health: In Vitro and Ex Vivo Models; Verhoeckx, K., Cotter, P., López-Expósito, I., Kleiveland, C., Lea, T., Mackie, A., Requena, T., Swiatecka, D., Wichers, H., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 125–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Lee, S.I.; Kim, I.H. Difructose dianhydride improves intestinal calcium absorption, wound healing, and barrier function. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Macpherson, A.J.; Yilmaz, B.; Limenitakis, J.P.; Ganal-Vonarburg, S.C. IgA function in relation to the intestinal microbiota. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 36, 359–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Joglekar, P.; Ding, H.; Canales-Herrerias, P.; Pasricha, P.J.; Sonnenburg, J.L.; Peterson, D.A. Intestinal IgA regulates expression of a fructan polysaccharide utilization locus in colonizing gut commensal Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron. mBio 2019, 10, e02324-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Kang, S.A.; Jang, K.H.; Lee, J.C.; Chang, B.I.; Lim, Y.; Song, B.C. The effects of fructose polymer levan on the body fat accumulation and serum lipid profiles of Korean women. Korean J. Community Nutr. 2003, 8, 986–992. [Google Scholar]
  125. Niv, E.; Shapira, Y.; Akiva, I.; Rokhkind, E.; Naor, E.; Arbiv, M.; Vaisman, N. Effect of levan supplement in orange juice on weight, gastrointestinal symptoms and metabolic profile of healthy subjects: Results of an 8-week clinical trial. Nutrients 2012, 4, 638–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Ginsberg, H.S.; Goebel, W.F.; Horsfall, F.L., Jr. The inhibitory effect of polysaccharide on mumps virus multiplication. J. Exp. Med. 1948, 87, 385–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Bona, C.; Lieberman, R.; Chien, C.C.; Mond, J.; House, S.; Green, I.; Paul, W.E. Immune Response to Levan. I. kinetics and ontogeny of anti-Levan and anti-Inulin antibody response and of expression of cross-reactive idiotype. J. Immunol. 1978, 120, 1436–1442. [Google Scholar]
  128. Bona, C.; Mond, J.J.; Stein, K.E.; House, S.; Lieberman, R.; Paul, W.E. Immune Response to Levan. III. The capacity to produce anti-Inulin Antibodies and cross-reactive idiotypes appears late in ontogeny. J. Immunol. 1979, 123, 1484–1490. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  129. Bartocci, A.; Read, E.L.; Welker, R.D.; Schlick, E.; Papademetriou, V.; Chirigos, M.A. Enhancing activity of various immunoaugmenting agents on the delayed-type hypersensitivity response in mice. Cancer Res. 1982, 42, 3514–3518. [Google Scholar]
  130. Assenmacher, M.; Avraham, H.K.; Avraham, S.; Bala, S.; Barnett, J.; Basketter, D.; Ben-David, Y.; Berek, C.; Blümel, J.; Bolliger, A.P. Encyclopedic Reference of Immunotoxicology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, Y.; Zhang, N.; Kan, J.; Zhang, X.; Wu, X.; Sun, R.; Tang, S.; Liu, J.; Qian, C.; Jin, C. Structural characterization of water-soluble polysaccharide from Arctium lappa and its effects on colitis mice. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 213, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ragab, T.I.M.; Shalaby, A.S.G.; Awdan, S.A.E.; El-Bassyouni, G.T.; Salama, B.M.; Helmy, W.A.; Esawy, M.A. Role of levan extracted from bacterial honey isolates in curing peptic ulcer: In vivo. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 142, 564–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Kawakubo, M.; Ito, Y.; Okimura, Y.; Kobayashi, M.; Sakura, K.; Kasama, S.; Fukuda, M.N.; Fukuda, M.; Katsuyama, T.; Nakayama, J. Natural antibiotic function of a human gastric mucin against Helicobacter pylori infection. Science 2004, 305, 1003–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Huang, M.-Y.; Chang, C.-I.; Chang, C.-C.; Tseng, L.-W.; Pan, C.-L. Effects of dietary levan on growth performance, nonspecific immunity, pathogen resistance and body composition of orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides H.). Aquac. Res. 2015, 46, 2752–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Gupta, S.K.; Pal, A.K.; Sahu, N.P.; Saharan, N.; Mandal, S.C.; Prakash, C.; Akhtar, M.S.; Prusty, A.K. Dietary microbial levan ameliorates stress and augments immunity in Cyprinus carpio fry (Linnaeus, 1758) exposed to sublethal toxicity of fipronil. Aquac. Res. 2014, 45, 893–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Lončarević, B.; Lješević, M.; Marković, M.; Anđelković, I.; Gojgić-Cvijović, G.; Jakovljević, D.; Beškoski, V. Microbial levan and pullulan as potential protective agents for reducing adverse effects of copper on Daphnia magna and Vibrio fischeri. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 181, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gupta, S.K.; Sarkar, B.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Kumar, N.; Naskar, S.; Uppuluri, K.B. Modulation of cytokine expression by dietary levan in the pathogen aggravated rohu, Labeo rohita fingerlings. Aquaculture 2018, 495, 496–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Gupta, S.K.; Sarkar, B.; Priyam, M.; Kumar, N.; Naskar, S.; Foysal, M.J.; Saurabh, S.; Sharma, T.R. Inflammatory and stress biomarker response of Aeromonas hydrophila infected rohu, Labeo rohita fingerlings to dietary microbial levan. Aquaculture 2020, 521, 735020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Li, J.; Kim, I.H. Effects of levan-type fructan supplementation on growth performance, digestibility, blood profile, fecal microbiota, and immune responses after lipopolysaccharide challenge in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 5336–5343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ashfaq, I.; Amjad, H.; Ahmad, W.; Nasir, A.; Ali, A.; Ali, W.R.; Khaliq, S.; Hayat, A.; Ali, H.; Sattar, F.; et al. Growth inhibition of common enteric pathogens in the intestine of broilers by microbially produced dextran and levan exopolysaccharides. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 2128–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Zhang, X.; Qi, C.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, W.; Zhang, Y. Toll-like receptor 4-related immunostimulatory polysaccharides: Primary structure, activity relationships, and possible interaction models. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 149, 186–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Vogt, L.; Ramasamy, U.; Meyer, D.; Pullens, G.; Venema, K.; Faas, M.M.; Schols, H.A.; de Vos, P. Immune Modulation by Different Types of β2→1-Fructans Is Toll-Like Receptor Dependent. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Vogt, L.M.; Meyer, D.; Pullens, G.; Faas, M.M.; Venema, K.; Ramasamy, U.; Schols, H.A.; de Vos, P. Toll-like receptor 2 activation by beta-2>1-fructans protects barrier function of T84 human intestinal epithelial cells in a chain length-dependent manner. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 1002–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Brown, G.D.; Willment, J.A.; Whitehead, L. C-type lectins in immunity and homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Taylor, P.R.; Reid, D.M.; Heinsbroek, S.E.; Brown, G.D.; Gordon, S.; Wong, S.Y. Dectin-2 is predominantly myeloid restricted and exhibits unique activation-dependent expression on maturing inflammatory monocytes elicited in vivo. Eur. J. Immunol. 2005, 35, 2163–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Cohen-Kedar, S.; Baram, L.; Elad, H.; Brazowski, E.; Guzner-Gur, H.; Dotan, I. Human intestinal epithelial cells respond to beta-glucans via Dectin-1 and Syk. Eur. J. Immunol. 2014, 44, 3729–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Hernandez-Santos, N.; Klein, B.S. Through the scope darkly: The gut mycobiome comes into focus. Cell Host Microbe 2017, 22, 728–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  148. Li, T.-H.; Liu, L.; Hou, Y.-Y.; Shen, S.-N.; Wang, T.-T. C-type lectin receptor-mediated immune recognition and response of the microbiota in the gut. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Han, Q.-B. Critical problems stalling progress in natural bioactive polysaccharide research and development. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 4581–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Schwarz, H.; Schmittner, M.; Duschl, A.; Horejs-Hoeck, J. Residual endotoxin contaminations in recombinant proteins are sufficient to activate human CD1c+ dendritic cells. PloS ONE 2014, 9, e113840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  151. Perdijk, O.; van Neerven, R.J.J.; Meijer, B.; Savelkoul, H.F.J.; Brugman, S. Induction of human tolerogenic dendritic cells by 3′-sialyllactose via TLR4 is explained by LPS contamination. Glycobiology 2018, 28, 126–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Teodorowicz, M.; Perdijk, O.; Verhoek, I.; Govers, C.; Savelkoul, H.F.; Tang, Y.; Wichers, H.; Broersen, K. Optimized Triton X-114 assisted lipopolysaccharide (LPS) removal method reveals the immunomodulatory effect of food proteins. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0173778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  153. Tynan, G.A.; McNaughton, A.; Jarnicki, A.; Tsuji, T.; Lavelle, E.C. Polymyxin B inadequately quenches the effects of contaminating lipopolysaccharide on murine dendritic cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e37261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Govers, C.; Tomassen, M.M.M.; Rieder, A.; Ballance, S.; Knutsen, S.H.; Mes, J.J. Lipopolysaccharide quantification and alkali-based inactivation in polysaccharide preparations to enable in vitro immune modulatory studies. Bioact. Carbohydr. Diet. Fibre 2016, 8, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  155. Lebre, F.; Lavelle, E.C.; Borges, O. Easy and effective method to generate endotoxin-free chitosan particles for immunotoxicology and immunopharmacology studies. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 71, 920–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Schwarz, H.; Gornicec, J.; Neuper, T.; Parigiani, M.A.; Wallner, M.; Duschl, A.; Horejs-Hoeck, J. Biological activity of masked endotoxin. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 44750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Sims, I.M.; Carnachan, S.M.; Bell, T.J.; Hinkley, S.F.R. Methylation analysis of polysaccharides: Technical advice. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 188, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Costa, G.; Plazanet, I. Plant Cell Wall, a Challenge for Its Characterisation. Adv. Biol. Chem. 2016, 06, 70–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Fengel, D.; Wegener, G. Hydrolysis of polysaccharides with trifluoroacetic acid and its application to rapid wood and pulp analysis. In Hydrolysis of Cellulose: Mechanisms of Enzymatic and Acid Catalysis; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1979; Volume 181, pp. 145–158. [Google Scholar]
  160. Harris, D.W.; Feather, M.S. Mechanism of the interconversion of d-glucose, d-mannose, and d-fructose in acid solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 178–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Chen, K.; Chen, H.; Faas, M.M.; de Haan, B.J.; Li, J.; Xiao, P.; Zhang, H.; Diana, J.; de Vos, P.; Sun, J. Specific inulin-type fructan fibers protect against autoimmune diabetes by modulating gut immunity, barrier function, and microbiota homeostasis. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ito, H.; Takemura, N.; Sonoyama, K.; Kawagishi, H.; Topping, D.L.; Conlon, M.A.; Morita, T. Degree of polymerization of inulin-type fructans differentially affects number of lactic acid bacteria, intestinal immune functions, and immunoglobulin A secretion in the rat cecum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 5771–5778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, K.; Cheng, F.; Pan, X.; Zhou, T.; Liu, X.; Zheng, Z.; Luo, L.; Zhang, Y. Investigation of the transport and absorption of Angelica sinensis polysaccharide through gastrointestinal tract both in vitro and in vivo. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 1360–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  164. Rice, P.J.; Adams, E.L.; Ozment-Skelton, T.; Gonzalez, A.J.; Goldman, M.P.; Lockhart, B.E.; Barker, L.A.; Breuel, K.F.; Deponti, W.K.; Kalbfleisch, J.H.; et al. Oral delivery and gastrointestinal absorption of soluble glucans stimulate increased resistance to infectious challenge. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 314, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Han, J.; Feng, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, Z.; Wu, Z. Levan from Leuconostoc citreum BD1707: Production optimization and changes in molecular weight distribution during cultivation. BMC Biotechnol. 2021, 21, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Erkorkmaz, B.A.; Kırtel, O.; Ateş Duru, Ö.; Toksoy Öner, E. Development of a cost-effective production process for Halomonas levan. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2018, 41, 1247–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Nutrients 13 01309 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic structural representation of plant or microbial β-2,6 fructans with reported immunomodulatory properties. Microbial levan or plant β-2,6 fructans are shaded orange or blue, respectively. Green pentagons represent fructose, blue circles, glucose and black circles, O-acetylated glucose. * Tentative structure. Also see Table 1 and Table 2 for descriptive structures.
Figure 1. Schematic structural representation of plant or microbial β-2,6 fructans with reported immunomodulatory properties. Microbial levan or plant β-2,6 fructans are shaded orange or blue, respectively. Green pentagons represent fructose, blue circles, glucose and black circles, O-acetylated glucose. * Tentative structure. Also see Table 1 and Table 2 for descriptive structures.
Nutrients 13 01309 g001
Table
Table 1. Examples of studies describing the immunomodulatory effects of β-2,6 fructans in vitro.
Table 1. Examples of studies describing the immunomodulatory effects of β-2,6 fructans in vitro.
Fructan OriginSourceReported StructureMw (Da)Immunomodulatory Effect(s)Reference
B. subtilis natto levan EPSMicrobialn.dn.d↑ TNF-α and IL-12p40 production in monocyte/macrophage cell lines and peritoneal and splenic mouse primary macrophages; TNF-α production in peritoneal cells was TLR4-dependent. The levan also activated TLR4 reporter cells.[10]
B. licheniformis levan EPSMicrobialβ-2,6-linked backbone with β-2,1 branching.2,000,000↑ TNF-α and IL-6 production in human whole blood.[101]
Paenibacillus sp. nov BD3526 levan EPSMicrobialLinear β-2,6 fructofuranose polysaccharide.>2,600,000↑ TNF-α production in mouse splenocytes; and ↑ mouse spleen cell proliferation.[102]
B. licheniformis 8-37-0-1 levan EPSMicrobialβ-2,6-linked levan containing β-2,1 branching.28,260↑ mouse spleen cell proliferation[103]
B. subtilis natto CCT7712 FOS MicrobialMixed DP up to 7: β-2,6-linked fructooligosaccharides (primarily 6-nystose).n.d↑ gene expression of IL-8 and TNF-α in human OVCAR-3 cells.[104]
Levan derived from L. mesenteroides S81 (found in sourdough) MicrobialLinear β-2,6 fructan; spherical form in aqueous solution.n.d↑ IL-4 in human epithelial model HT-29 cells.[98]
Tanticharoenia sakaeratensis (from soil) levan EPSMicrobialβ-2,6 fructofuranose polymer.~100,000 to 680,000↑ NO production in RAW264.7 macrophages[105]
DFA-IV and Z. mobilis levanSynthetic and MicrobialDFA-IV, disaccharide Di-D-fructose-2,6′:6,2′-dianhydride is a levan derivative disaccharide consisting of 2 fructose residues enzymatically produced using levan fructosyl transferase [106]. Z. mobilis levan was n.d but is compositionally described in [107].DFA-IV, 324 [106]; Z. mobilis 6,000,000Both Z. mobilis levan (control) and DFA-IV ↑ phagocytosis of RAW264.7 macrophages; and ↑ iNOS expression and NO production in RAW264.7 macrophages.[108]
Recombinant levansucrase levan derived from leuconostoc mesenteroides NTM048 found in green peaRecombinant levansucraseLevan (similar NMR chemical shifts to B. subtilis levan).n.d↑ IgA in isolated murine ↑ peyer’s patches; however no IgA induction by B. subtilis levan.[109]
Fructan from Anemarrhena asphodeloides (AAP70-1)Plantβ-2,6 fructofuranose linear chain with β-2,1 fructofuranose branching point and terminal α-glucopyranose (neokestose).2720↑ IL-6, IL-1β and TNF-α in RAW 264.7 macrophages; ↑ phagocytic function of macrophages.[110]
Fructans from Polygonatum odoratum (POP-1) and P. cyrtonema (PCP-1)Plantβ-2,1 fructofuranose linear chain with β-2,6 side branching and an internal α-glucopyranose (neokestose).5000↑ IL-6 and phagocytic activity of RAW264.7 macrophages.[111]
Fructan from Arctium lappa (ALP-1)Plantβ-2,1 backbone with β-2,6 branching and a terminal α-glucopyranose.5120Treatment of LPS-challenged RAW 264.7 macrophages with ALP-1:
↓ TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1β yet ↑ IL-10; and ↓ LPS-induced NO production in RAW 264.7 macrophages		[54]
Fructan from Curcuma kwangsiensisPlantβ-2,6-linked main chain (81.8% total sugar residues) consisting of single β-fructofuranose branch points (4.9% branching) with both terminal glucose (3.1%) and terminal fructose (5.3%).5300↑ phagocytic activity of RAW264.7 macrophages; and ↑ RAW264.7 macrophage proliferation.[57]
Fructans from agave salmiana N.d, however, agave fructans have been described as highly branched fructose polymers comprising both β-2,6 and β-2,1 linkages [112].n.d↑ T-cell-associated transcription factors FOXP3 and Tbet in human PBMCs-showed prebiotic effects[113]
Abbreviations: ↑, induced or increased; ↓, decreased; DFA-IV, disaccharide Di-D-fructose−2,6′:6,2′-dianhydride (a levan derivative disaccharide consisting of two fructose residues enzymatically produced using levan fructosyl transferase [106]); EPS, exopolysaccharide; FOXP3, forkhead box P3; HPSEC-MALLS, high-performance size-exclusion chromatography coupled with online multiangle laser light scattering; Ig, immunoglobulin; IL, interleukin; iNOS, nitric oxide synthase; n.d, not described; NO, nitric oxide; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; Tbet, T-box transcription factor., TLR, toll-like receptor; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
Table
Table 2. Examples of studies describing the immunomodulatory effects of β-2,6 fructans in vivo.
Table 2. Examples of studies describing the immunomodulatory effects of β-2,6 fructans in vivo.
Fructan OriginSourceReported StructureMw (Da)Immunomodulatory Effect(s)SpeciesReference
Lactobacillus. reuteri 100-23 levan EPSMicrobialβ-2,6 main chain with β-2,1 branching and terminal fructose5700 - 7700 ↑ splenic CD4+ FOXP3+ regulatory T cellsRats[60]
Bacillus subtilis natto (fermented soybean) levan EPSMicrobialn.d.n.d.Oral administration ↓ OVA-specific serum IgE levels in mice post-OVA immunisation; ↓ IL-4 levels in splenic T cells.Mice[10]
Bacillus megaterium 1 (soil) levan EPSMicrobialn.dn.d↑ white blood cell counts, and serum globulin, total protein and lysosome activity. Fish[135]
Acetobacter xylinum NCIM 2526 levan EPSMicrobialβ-2,6 fructofuranose backbone with β-2,1 branching (Authors refer to the following reference for structural analysis: [97]) 750000 After pathogenic challenge, dietary levan: ↑ TNF-α, IL1β, and IL-12p40 expression in several organs, and ↓ expression of intestinal IL-10.Fish[137]
Acetobacter xylinum NCIM 2526 levan EPSMicrobialβ-2,6 fructofuranose backbone with β-2,1 branching (as described in [97])n.dDietary supplementation to A. hydrophila-challenged Labeo rohita fingerlings:
↑ Ig levels and ↑ myeloperoxidase;
↑ survival rates; and ↑ TLR22 and ↑ IFN-γ and ↓ TGF-β expression in liver, gill, kidney and intestine.		Fish[138]
Arctium lappa inulin-type fructan, ALP-1PlantGlucopyranose-capped β-2,1 fructofuranose main chain with β-2,6 fructofuranose branch points.5120Dietary ALP-1: ↑ IL-10 in serum and colon isolates of DSS-induced mice; also ↓ in TNF-α, IL1β and IL-6; and ↑ IgA response in colon; and ameliorated DSS-induced colitis.Mice[131]
Arctium lappa inulin-type fructan, ALP-1PlantGlucopyranose-capped β-2,1 inulin-type fructan containing β-2,6 branch points (see [131])5120↓ serum TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6; and↑IL-10 in LSP-challenged mice; andmodulation of faecal microbiota andSCFA content was observed. Mice[54]
Zymomonas mobilis levan EPSMicrobialDescribed as a microbial levan 700,000Dietary administration to pigs challenged with LPS or saline (control) via intraperitoneal injection:
↑ blood leukocytes and ↓ IL-6 and TNF-α production in the serum; and Dietary administration also increased Lactobacillus levels in faeces.		Pigs[139]
Bacillus sp. (bacterial honey isolates) levan EPS Levan comprising β-2,6 fructose-linkages 21,000Dietary administration promoted gastric ulcer alleviation and ↓ NF-κb production in the gastric mucosa.Rats[132]
Abbreviations: ↑, induced or increased; ↓, decreased; DFA-IV, disaccharide Di-D-fructose−2,6′:6,2′-dianhydride (a levan derivative disaccharide consisting of 2 fructose residues enzymatically produced using levan fructosyl transferase [106]); EPS, exopolysaccharide; FOXP3, forkhead box P3; Ig, immunoglobulin; IL, interleukin; n.d, not described; NO, nitric oxide; OVA, ovalbumin; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; TLR, toll-like receptor; TNF, tumour necrosis factor.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Young, I.D.; Latousakis, D.; Juge, N. The Immunomodulatory Properties of β-2,6 Fructans: A Comprehensive Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1309. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13041309

AMA Style

Young ID, Latousakis D, Juge N. The Immunomodulatory Properties of β-2,6 Fructans: A Comprehensive Review. Nutrients. 2021; 13(4):1309. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13041309

Chicago/Turabian Style

Young, Ian D., Dimitrios Latousakis, and Nathalie Juge. 2021. "The Immunomodulatory Properties of β-2,6 Fructans: A Comprehensive Review" Nutrients 13, no. 4: 1309. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nu13041309

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop