Next Article in Journal
Uremia Impacts VE-Cadherin and ZO-1 Expression in Human Endothelial Cell-to-Cell Junctions
Next Article in Special Issue
FGF23, Biomarker or Target?
Previous Article in Journal
Extensive Contamination of Water with Saxitoxin Near the Dam of the Irkutsk Hydropower Station Reservoir (East Siberia, Russia)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Dietary Arginine, Ornithine, and Zeolite Supplementation on Uremic Toxins in Cats
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 10
Issue 10
10.3390/toxins10100403
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association of Uremic Toxins and Inflammatory Markers with Physical Performance in Dialysis Patients

by
Maja Pajek
1,
Alexander Jerman
2,
Joško Osredkar
3,
Jadranka Buturović Ponikvar
2 and
Jernej Pajek
2,*
1
Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana, Gortanova 22, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
2
Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia
3
Clinical Institute for Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2018, 10(10), 403; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins10100403
Submission received: 26 August 2018 / Revised: 16 September 2018 / Accepted: 29 September 2018 / Published: 1 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Disposition of Uremic Toxins: The Challenges in Uremia)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Association of higher serum levels of uremic toxins and inflammatory markers with poorer physical performance is understudied. We measured the six-minute walk test (6MWT), 10 repetition sit-to-stand test (STS-10), handgrip strength (HGS), and Human Activity Profile (HAP) questionnaire score in 90 prevalent hemodialysis patents, with low comorbidity to reduce the potential confounding of concomitant disease. Midweek pre-dialysis serum levels of asymmetric dimethyl-arginine (ADMA), β2-microglobulin (B2M), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), indoxyl sulfate (IS), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), myostatin, and urea were analyzed as predictor parameters of physical performance measures in adjusted models. Serum levels of most measured toxins were not significantly related to performance, except for ADMA, which was significantly related to poorer performance in the STS-10 test (B = 0.11 ± 0.03 s, p < 0.01). Higher hs-CRP was associated with poorer results in the 6MWT (B = −2.6 ± 0.97 m, p < 0.01) and a lower HAP score (B = −0.36 ± 0.14, p = 0.01). There were no other significant associations found. We conclude that inflammation may be a more important pathway to physical impediment than uremic toxemia. This suggests that there is a large physical rehabilitation potential in non-inflamed uremic patients.
Keywords:
hemodialysis; 6-minute walk test; sit-to-stand test; handgrip strength; Human Activity Profile; sarcopenia; muscle; asymmetric dimethyl-arginine; C-reactive protein; motor ability
Key Contribution: We found no consistent association of various uremic toxin levels with physical performance, except for limited association of asymmetric dimethyl–arginine with lower extremity function. Inflammation expressed through levels of high-sensitive C-reactive protein had a better predictive value for physical performance loss.

1. Introduction

Poor physical performance and frailty predict a high risk of mortality, cardiovascular events, and hospitalizations in dialysis patients [1,2]. Motor performance in dialysis patients is reduced and greatly affected by some clinical modifiable and non-modifiable anthropometric factors [3,4]. Decreased physical performance is a consequence of multiple factors, such as comorbidity, protein energy wasting, abnormal body composition, inadequate nutrition, and a sedentary lifestyle [5]. Uremia-induced alterations of increased energy expenditure, inflammation, acidemia, and hyper-metabolism may play a part as well [6]. So far, the relative proportions to which various components of uremic milieu add to poor physical performance, morbidity, and mortality are unknown.
Uremia is defined by a state of elevated serum concentrations of various uremic toxins [7]. Uremic toxins are categorized as free water-soluble, low-weight, middle-weight, or protein-bound molecules. Overall, there is a poor relationship between serum toxin concentrations and either the estimated glomerular filtration rate in chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2–5 patients [8] or the urea purification adequacy parameter Kt/V in dialysis-dependent patients; predialysis serum levels of uremic toxins are predominantly associated with protein intake and residual renal function [9].
In this work, we set out to analyze the association of serum uremic toxin levels with reduced physical performance of dialysis patients. We hypothesized that patients with higher concentrations of uremic toxins might suffer a greater loss of motor abilities. As patients with CKD have many comorbid diseases that may interfere with motor abilities, our study aimed to identify associations of five representative uremic toxins with physical performance measures in a sample of low-comorbid dialysis patients. We also analyzed two serum markers of inflammation—interleukin 6 (IL-6) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)—to account for the effect of inflammation, which is an important part of uremic milieu muscle catabolism [10]. Additionally, two metabolic mediators associated with muscle mass, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), and myostatin were analyzed as well.

2. Results

Ninety prevalent hemodialysis patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. They were all treated with high-flux dialyzers without reuse, and 52% of them were treated with on-line hemodiafiltration. The baseline demographic characteristics are shown in the Table 1.

2.1. Six-Minute Walk Test

The analysis of predictive parameters of the six-minute walk test (6MWT) test included age, sex, patient body height, fat tissue index, and serum levels of the selected uremic toxins. Certain anthropometric factors adjusted here—age, height, and fat tissue index (FTI)—were previously shown to be predictive for the results of the 6MWT [4]. The estimates for individual uremic toxins and other markers in the linear adjusted model and their variation estimates are shown in Table 2. The only parameter significantly negatively associated with performance was hs-CRP.

2.2. Ten-Repetition Sit-to-Stand Test

We have previously shown that age, body height, and lean tissue index (LTI) predict 10-repetition sit-to-stand (STS-10) test performance [11]. Therefore, we adjusted for these factors in the models incorporating individual uremic toxins and other markers as predictors of STS-10 results. Asymmetric dimethyl-arginine (ADMA) was the only toxin significantly associated with longer time to perform this exercise (see Table 3).

2.3. Hand Grip Strength

It was previously shown that sex, age, body height, and wrist width are non-modifiable predictors of hand grip strength (HGS), whereas LTI and FTI are potentially modifiable predictors [3]. Table 4 shows the results of models, including the aforementioned predictors, and each of selected uremic toxins and other markers. No significant associations with uremic toxins and metabolic or inflammation markers were found in the adjusted analyses.

2.4. Human Activity Profile Questionnaire Results for Habitual Daily Activity

Habitual daily physical activity, estimated with the HAP adjusted activity score (AAS) is known to be associated with age and LTI [3], so the association of each of the uremic toxins and other selected markers was adjusted for these two covariates. The results for parameter estimates are shown in the Table 5. Again, only hs-CRP was significantly associated with a lower score.
Finally, in Table 6 we summarize the predictive values of all significant predictors in above-mentioned analyses. Partial eta squared coefficients show that the proportion of explained variability in the examined physical performance measures is in the rage of 7.2% to 14.3%. The most consistent association with physical performance was found for inflammatory marker hs-CRP, which significantly predicted performance in the 6MWT and HAP questionnaire. Uremic toxins and metabolic mediators were not predictive of physical performance, except for ADMA in STS-10 performance.

3. Discussion

In this work, we examined the hypothesis that higher serum levels of uremic toxins predict worse physical performance in end-stage renal disease patients. We were able to recruit low-comorbid group of 90 prevalent hemodialysis patients, and assess four different measures of physical performance. We selected representative uremic toxins from three classes according to molecular weights and protein binding properties [7,12]. Previously reported potential effects of uremic toxins on the osteo-muscular and nervous systems—the two systems that take part in the control of movement and motor tasks—were taken into consideration in the process of selecting candidate toxins, as revealed in the methods section. Overall, the results of our study did not confirm our hypothesis. We were not able to find a consistent association between uremic toxins and physical performance, with the exception of ADMA, which was associated with a longer time to complete the STS-10 test. In contrast to the overall impact of various uremic toxins, our data suggest that inflammation is a more important factor of physical performance loss. Specifically, higher values of hs-CRP predicted poorer performance in the 6MWT and habitual daily activity, as measured by the HAP questionnaire.
ADMA is a recognized toxin with a role in cardiovascular and renal disease, but exact mechanisms for its toxicity are unknown. It is an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis [13], and increased levels are associated with decreased endothelial function; in non-diabetics, levels are also correlated with insulin resistance [14]. There is some laboratory evidence that elevated levels of ADMA may contribute to skeletal muscle proteolysis [15], which may also be a mechanism for reduced physical capacity in the STS-10 performance found in our study. Association of ADMA with the loss of physical fitness was confirmed for patients with heart failure [16] and in non-uremic elderly persons [17]. Currently no specific, clinically applicable means to lower the ADMA level is available for renal failure patients.
Chronic low-level inflammation is associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes [18,19] and cardiovascular morbidity [20,21]. If this inflammation presents concomitantly with poor physical activity, it bears a high risk of mortality [22]. Inflammation was linked to muscle atrophy in the patient cohort with end-stage renal disease [23]. Impaired intracellular insulin signaling, involving insulin and IGF-1, might be the causal link between inflammation and muscle protein degradation. Increase in IL-6 is linked to decreased levels of insulin receptor substrate 1 (IRS-1), and this leads to increased proteolysis [24]. Inflammation activates myostatin, which negatively regulates muscle growth via activation of protein degradation with the ubiquitin–proteasome system [25,26]. Additionally, inflammation also causes endothelial dysfunction (ED), which is aggravated by the action of ADMA through inhibition of NO synthesis (see Materials and methods). ED mediates atherosclerosis [27], which may have long-term deleterious effects. In incident and prevalent hemodialysis patients, inflammation is linked to adiposity and increased mortality risk [28]. Importantly, recent work from Delgado and coworkers suggest that larger amount of visceral fat is associated with increased inflammation, while peripheral fat is associated with improved markers of nutrition [29]. Our results have shown that for the six-minute walk distance, there was an independent negative association of hs-CRP with walked distance in the models, with or without adjustment for the fat tissue index, which may point to an effect of inflammation beyond the contribution from visceral fat.
Our study has some limitations. Since this was an observational study, we are unable to prove any causal relationship. We performed a number of statistical models, and therefore introduced the possibility for a raised alpha error. Also, if the number of participants was larger, we could perhaps confirm as significant more subtle associations; however, the number of participants was comparable to previous studies of motor performance in the dialysis population [30]. There is a known intra-patient variability of some uremic toxins, especially for ADMA and IS time-averaged concentration would be a better representation of exposure than a single midweek pre-dialysis value [31]. The strengths of our study include the recruitment of patients with low comorbidity, thus limiting the confounding effect of comorbidities on physical performance. In addition, based on our previous work, we were able to control for important non-modifiable anthropometric covariates that were found to affect performance. We also included markers of inflammation and crucial muscle metabolic mediators (IGF-1, myostatin) in our analysis, thus extending the analysis on these two pathways of a possible performance loss.
In conclusion, our analysis of selected uremic toxins in low-comorbidity hemodialysis patients revealed no consistent associations with physical performance in four major motor ability tests. We could only find a significant association of higher ADMA levels with poorer lower extremity function during the STS-10 test. More consistent was a predictive role of inflammation, expressed as elevated hs-CRP levels, for a loss of 6MWT distance and habitual activity in everyday life. This finding suggests that regular physical training and activity may have a large rehabilitation potential, possibly to the level of healthy controls in non-inflamed, low-comorbid, end-stage renal disease patients.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Design and Participants

This was a cross-sectional study recruiting a sample of prevalent hemodialysis patients from 10 outpatient dialysis units in Slovenia. Measurements were done in the period from July to December 2014. Main outcome measures were the results of key functional performance tests covering the motor abilities of the upper extremities (HGS), the lower extremities (STS-10), submaximal aerobic performance (6MWT), and the result of the Human Activity Profile questionnaire (HAP) to assess the level of physical abilities and activities in the home environment. Subjects were invited to participate if older than 18 years, able to walk with or without additional support, and if they voluntarily signed the informed consent for participation. Exclusion criteria contained acute disease in the last four weeks before the start of the study, active malignant disease or chronic infection, consequences of cerebrovascular accident, heart failure of New York Heart Association (NYHA) stage 3–4, symptomatic angina pectoris (Canadian Cardiovascular Society) stage 2–4, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease stage 3–4, decompensated liver cirrhosis, symptomatic peripheral arterial obstructive disease, painful degenerative or inflammatory arthropathy with current use of analgesic therapy, and symptomatic psychiatric disease. The study was approved by the Slovenian Medical Ethics Committee (document No. 125/05/14). Investigations were carried out following the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, revised in 2008. All participants gave informed consent to inclusion in the study.

4.2. Research Protocol

The exact description of the research protocol and measurements was given previously [4,11,32]. In short, physical performance tests were performed in the afternoon hours on non-dialysis days (mean time lag from the last dialysis session was 25 ± 6 h). Application of HAP Questionnaire was followed by anthropometric measurements (instruments by SiberHegner, Zurich, Switzerland), vital signs recordings, and bioimpedance body composition analysis (Body Composition Monitor, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). Here, estimated lean and fat mass in kg were normalized to squared body height (in m2) to give the LTI and FTI. Then, physical performance tests were done. Additional medical information on comorbidities and most recent routine blood test laboratory values were obtained from dialysis centers and attending physicians. Concentrations of uremic toxins were measured from the serum midweek pre-dialysis samples taken at participating dialysis centers, and transported immediately to the central laboratory within the two-hour period in the week immediately subsequent to physical performance measurements.
The 6MWT was performed on a 30 m track according to the guidelines [33], with the traveled distance measured to the nearest meter. A Jamar hand dynamometer (Sammons Preston, Warrenville, IL, United States) was used to assess HGS, engaging both hands three times, with the best value of all attempts was taken as a result (in kg units). The STS-10 time (in seconds) was measured as the time needed to perform rises from the chair of a standard height to the full leg extension and back to sitting position 10 times in a single attempt. HAP questionnaire is used to assess the level of physical activity, with the result reported as the adjusted activity score (AAS), on a scale of 1–94 points (larger values designate higher level of ability in everyday life) [32,34,35]. Previously, the HAP questionnaire was recognized as the single best substitute for quantitative measurement of habitual physical activity in hemodialysis patients [34].

4.3. Rationale for the Choice of Uremic Toxins and Measurement Methods

We measured serum levels of urea, asymmetric-dimethylarginine (ADMA), β2-microglobulin (B2M), indoxyl sulfate (IS), myostatin, interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). We used reagent kits based on ELISA or chemiluminescent technology, and routine laboratory methods for the measurement serum levels of hs-CRP. All procedures followed the instructions from manufacturers. With values above the linearity range, we diluted samples following instructions in the manufacturer kit. For the values below the detection limit, we expressed the results as a lower limit of detection divided by the square root of two. We present details for these methods in Table 7.
Urea is a prototype of small (60 Da) water-soluble uremic toxins, giving the name to the uremic syndrome. Because of a complex metabolism, it is not a reliable marker of kidney function loss. However, an indirect toxicity has been established, and some evidence supports direct toxicity of urea [36].
ADMA is a small water-soluble molecule (202 Da), similar to urea. It belongs to a group of guanidines, known neurotoxins that have a significantly larger distribution volume than urea. This may result in decreased removal with conventional dialysis techniques. In-vitro studies show that guanidines have a pro-inflammatory effect at uremic concentrations. ADMA is an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, with a direct effect on cellular dysfunction [37]. It was correlated with increased intima-media thickness in dialysis patients [38], vascular damage, proteinuria, amyloidosis [39], cardiovascular outcome, and all-cause mortality [40]. Importantly, published data suggests that the complex metabolism of ADMA can be modified with interventions targeting the enzyme dimethylarginine–dimethylaminohydrolase, achieving a lower concentration and change in vascular status [38].
B2M is a middle-weight protein (11.8 kDa), included here as it is often used as a marker of other retention solutes of the same size class. It is implicated in the genesis of uremic amyloid disease [41] in chronic hemodialysis patients, as well as their increased total [42] and infectious mortality [43]. Longer dialysis treatment with a high-flux membrane decreases predialysis β2-microglobulin levels, which is further improved by adding hemofiltration [38]. Part of β2-microglobulin’s clearance might be associated with adsorption to the dialyzer membrane [44,45].
IS is a protein-bound molecule (213 Da), and as such, it is representative of a group of relatively small protein-bound uremic toxins that are not easily removed with low- or high-flux dialysis membranes. It is suspected that IS conveys its in-vitro and in-vivo effect via a pro-oxidant mechanism, one of them being induction of ROS in endothelial cells [46]. It has been found to be associated with endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, vascular calcification, smooth muscle proliferation, and progression of CKD due to pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic mechanisms [47]. Furthermore, it has also been associated with higher mortality in CKD patients [48].
Myostatin is a member of the transforming growth factors beta superfamily, and is negatively associated with muscle growth and development. Its molecular mass is 25 kDa, and high-flux dialyzer membranes may partially remove it. Serum levels are increased in uremic patients and in patients with heart failure [49,50]. Myostatin is probably directly involved in cardiac cachexia in heart failure patients, and its direct inhibition positively affects skeletal muscle mass [50]. Importantly, patients with advanced heart failure were excluded from our study (see above) to allow for evaluation of isolated myostatin association with muscle performance in uremia.
IL-6 is a middle molecular weight protein of 24.5 kDa [47]. It is produced by many immune, fat, and peripheral muscle cells. It has both pro- and anti-inflammatory action, but the former is more prominent. It has been shown to be a reliable prognostic factor for mortality in CKD patients [49], as it induces catabolism, lipolysis, and insulin resistance. Although it is partly adsorbed to a high-flux dialyzer membrane [45], this clearance is probably too small to affect long-term mortality or morbidity [44]. Several studies have shown small water-soluble guanidines to be responsible for the increased generation of IL-6 [51] and tumor necrosis factor alpha [52]. IL-6 was included in this study to represent the group of uremic toxins with inflammatory action. As inflammation may be one of the key pathways for induction of muscle catabolism and perhaps poor performance, hs-CRP was measured as well. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a marker of inflammation, produced in the liver cells under the influence of IL-6 and possibly other factors. CRP is very stable, the measurements are well standardized, and it is used widely for the assessment of inflammation. It is a well-known cardiovascular disease risk factor [53]. It was added to our analysis to mitigate the examination of inflammation as a possible pathway for reduced physical performance.
IGF-1 is a middle-weight protein (7.7 kDa). Its impairment by inflammatory factors is involved in muscle proteolysis [49], but the serum concentrations are elevated in CKD patients [7]. It has been also been associated with malnutrition [54]. It was included here as a possible mediator of both inflammatory and metabolic derangements of uremic milieu.

4.4. Statistical Analyses

Baseline patient characteristics were calculated as means and their standard deviations for continuous variables, and frequencies for categorical variables. We performed a series of general linear models, with individual physical performance measures as dependent and uremic toxin levels as predictor variables. In each model, besides standard parameters, partial eta squared was calculated, which gives the proportion of variance in the dependent variable explained by each independent predictor variable. For each uremic toxin, a separate model—including selected demographic and non-modifiable anthropometric variables (such as height)—was calculated. We only adjusted for those case-mix and non-modifiable anthropometric variables that we previously showed to be significantly associated with physical performance test results analyzed here (1st model) [3,4,11]. The body composition indices LTI and FTI were considered to be modifiable parameters that may lie in the causal pathway from uremic toxin level to the physical performance measurement. Therefore, in an exploratory analysis, we constructed a separate model (2nd model) incorporating one or both of these indices in cases where previous research showed that one or both of them may associate significantly with a specific physical performance measure.
We performed adjusted analyses by entering all independent variables of interest simultaneously. No stepwise methods were executed. Probability levels of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Analyses were conducted using the IBM SPSS statistics (v. 22, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) and SAS Studio (Rel. 3.6, Basic edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and J.P.; Methodology, M.P., J.O., J.P.; Validation, M.P. and J.O.; Formal Analysis, A.J. and J.P.; Investigation, M.P., A.J. and J.P.; Resources, J.B.P.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.P., A.J., J.P.; Writing—Review & Editing, A.J., J.P..; Supervision, J.B.P., J.P.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovenian Research Agency grant number P3-0323, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, grant number 20150204, and the Faculty of Sport, University of Ljubljana with material and logistic support.

Acknowledgments

Authors acknowledge the support from Ivan Čuk, Janez Vodičar, and Vedran Hadžić. Authors thank Teja Fabjan and Kristina Kumer for their contribution to measurement of uremic toxin levels.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Torino, C.; Manfredini, F.; Bolignano, D.; Aucella, F.; Baggetta, R.; Barillà, A.; Battaglia, Y.; Bertoli, S.; Bonanno, G.; Castellino, P.; et al. Physical performance and clinical outcomes in dialysis patients: A secondary analysis of the EXCITE trial. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2014, 39, 205–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Johansen, K.L.; Chertow, G.M.; Jin, C.; Kutner, N.G. Significance of frailty among dialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2007, 18, 2960–2967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Bučar Pajek, M.; Pajek, J. Characterization of deficits across the spectrum of motor abilities in dialysis patients and the impact of sarcopenic overweight and obesity. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 37, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bučar Pajek, M.; Čuk, I.; Leskošek, B.; Mlinšek, G.; Buturović Ponikvar, J.; Pajek, J. Six-minute walk test in renal failure patients: Representative results, performance analysis and perceived dyspnea predictors. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Caria, S.; Cupisti, A.; Sau, G.; Bolasco, P. The incremental treatment of ESRD: A low-protein diet combined with weekly hemodialysis may be beneficial for selected patients. BMC Nephrol. 2014, 15, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Carrero, J.J.; Stenvinkel, P.; Cuppari, L.; Ikizler, T.A.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kaysen, G.; Mitch, W.E.; Price, S.R.; Wanner, C.; Wang, A.Y.M.; et al. Etiology of the protein-energy wasting syndrome in chronic kidney disease: A consensus statement from the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism (ISRNM). J. Ren. Nutr. 2013, 23, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Duranton, F.; Cohen, G.; De Smet, R.; Rodriguez, M.; Jankowski, J.; Vanholder, R.; Argiles, A. Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012, 23, 1258–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Eloot, S.; Schepers, E.; Barreto, D.V.; Barreto, F.C.; Liabeuf, S.; Van Biesen, W.; Verbeke, F.; Glorieux, G.; Choukroun, G.; Massy, Z.; et al. Estimated glomerular filtration rate is a poor predictor of concentration for a broad range of uremic toxins. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 6, 1266–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Eloot, S.; Van Biesen, W.; Glorieux, G.; Neirynck, N.; Dhondt, A.; Vanholder, R. Does the adequacy parameter Kt/Vurea reflect uremic toxin concentrations in hemodialysis patients? PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Pecoits-Filho, R.; Lindholm, B.; Stenvinkel, P. The malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis (MIA) syndrome—the heart of the matter. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 2002, 17 (Suppl. 11), 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bučar Pajek, M.; Svilan, K.; Vivoda, T.; Škoberne, A.; Pajek, J. Isolated effects of renal failure, anthropometric indices, and serum total iron-binding capacity as determinants of muscle performance in hemodialysis patients. J. Ren. Nutr. 2016, 26, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vanholder, R.; Pletinck, A.; Schepers, E.; Glorieux, G. Biochemical and clinical impact of organic uremic retention solutes: A comprehensive update. Toxins 2018, 10, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alpoim, P.N.; Sousa, L.P.N.; Mota, A.P.L.; Rios, D.R.A.; Dusse, L.M.S. Asymmetric Dimethylarginine (ADMA) in cardiovascular and renal disease. Clin. Chim. Acta 2015, 440, 36–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sydow, K.; Mondon, C.E.; Cooke, J.P. Insulin resistance: Potential role of the endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor ADMA. Vasc. Med. 2005, 10, S35–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zhou, Q.G.; Zhou, M.; Hou, F.F.; Peng, X. Asymmetrical dimethylarginine triggers lipolysis and inflammatory response via induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress in cultured adipocytes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 296, E869–E878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tsuda, M.; Kinugawa, S.; Fukushima, A.; Takada, S.; Yokota, T.; Matsushima, S.; Furihata, T.; Matsumoto, J.; Tsutsui, H. Metabolomic analysis reveals new insights towards understanding skeletal muscle mass and exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. J. Card. Fail. 2015, 21, S195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Obayashi, K.; Saeki, K.; Maegawa, T.; Sakai, T.; Kitagawa, M.; Otaki, N.; Kataoka, H.; Kurumatani, N. Association of serum asymmetric dimethylarginine with muscle strength and gait speed: A cross-sectional study of the HEIJO-KYO cohort. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016, 31, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Elkind, M.S.V.; Luna, J.M.; Moon, Y.P.; Liu, K.M.; Spitalnik, S.L.; Paik, M.C.; Sacco, R.L. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein predicts mortality but not stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study. Neurology 2009, 73, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Bonaccio, M.; Di Castelnuovo, A.; Pounis, G.; De Curtis, A.; Costanzo, S.; Persichillo, M.; Cerletti, C.; Donati, M.B.; de Gaetano, G.; Iacoviello, L.; Moli-sani Study Investigators. A score of low-grade inflammation and risk of mortality: Prospective findings from the Moli-sani study. Haematologica 2016, 101, 1434–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rutter, M.K.; Meigs, J.B.; Sullivan, L.M.; D’Agostino, R.B.; Wilson, P.W.F. C-reactive protein, the metabolic syndrome, and prediction of cardiovascular events in the Framingham Offspring Study. Circulation 2004, 110, 380–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Buckley, D.I.; Fu, R.; Freeman, M.; Rogers, K.; Helfand, M. C-reactive protein as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analyses for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lee, J.-Y.; Ryu, S.; Cheong, E.; Sung, K.-C. Association of physical activity and inflammation with all-cause, cardiovascular-related, and cancer-related mortality. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016, 91, 1706–1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Carrero, J.J.; Chmielewski, M.; Axelsson, J.; Snaedal, S.; Heimbürger, O.; Bárány, P.; Suliman, M.E.; Lindholm, B.; Stenvinkel, P.; Qureshi, A.R.; et al. Muscle atrophy, inflammation and clinical outcome in incident and prevalent dialysis patients. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 27, 557–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wang, X.H.; Mitch, W.E. Muscle wasting from kidney failure—A model for catabolic conditions. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2013, 45, 2230–2238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, X.H.; Mitch, W.E. Mechanisms of muscle wasting in chronic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2014, 10, 504–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Thomas, S.S.; Mitch, W.E. Mechanisms stimulating muscle wasting in chronic kidney disease: The roles of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and myostatin. Clin. Exp. Nephrol. 2013, 17, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Libby, P. Inflammation and cardiovascular disease mechanisms. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 83, 456S–460S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cordeiro, A.C.; Qureshi, A.R.; Stenvinkel, P.; Heimburger, O.; Axelsson, J.; Barany, P.; Lindholm, B.; Carrero, J.J. Abdominal fat deposition is associated with increased inflammation, protein-energy wasting and worse outcome in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Delgado, C.; Chertow, G.M.; Kaysen, G.A.; Dalrymple, L.S.; Kornak, J.; Grimes, B.; Johansen, K.L. Associations of Body mass index and body fat with markers of inflammation and nutrition among patients receiving hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2017, 70, 817–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Martinson, M.; Ikizler, T.A.; Morrell, G.; Wei, G.; Almeida, N.; Marcus, R.L.; Filipowicz, R.; Greene, T.H.; Beddhu, S. Associations of body size and body composition with functional ability and quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 9, 1082–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Eloot, S.; Van Biesen, W.; Roels, S.; Delrue, W.; Schepers, E.; Dhondt, A.; Vanholder, R.; Glorieux, G. Spontaneous variability of pre-dialysis concentrations of uremic toxins over time in stable hemodialysis patients. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0186010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bučar Pajek, M.; Leskošek, B.; Vivoda, T.; Svilan, K.; Čuk, I.; Pajek, J. Integrative examination of motor abilities in dialysis patients and selection of tests for a standardized physical function assessment. Ther. Apher. Dial. 2016, 20, 286–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002, 166, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Johansen, K.L.; Painter, P.; Kent-Braun, J.A.; Ng, A.V.; Carey, S.; Da Silva, M.; Chertow, G.M. Validation of questionnaires to estimate physical activity and functioning in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2001, 59, 1121–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Fix, A.J.; Daughton, D.M. Human Activity Profile: Professional Manual; Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.: Lutz, FL, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  36. Duranton, F.; Depner, T.A.; Argilés, À. The saga of two centuries of urea: Nontoxic toxin or vice versa? Semin. Nephrol. 2014, 34, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kielstein, J.T.; Impraim, B.; Simmel, S.; Bode-Böger, S.M.; Tsikas, D.; Frölich, J.C.; Hoeper, M.M.; Haller, H.; Fliser, D. Cardiovascular effects of systemic nitric oxide synthase inhibition with asymmetrical dimethylarginine in humans. Circulation 2004, 109, 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Neirynck, N.; Vanholder, R.; Schepers, E.; Eloot, S.; Pletinck, A.; Glorieux, G. An update on uremic toxins. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2013, 45, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yilmaz, M.; Sonmez, A.; Sağlam, M.; Qureshi, A.R.; Carrero, J.; Caglar, K.; Eyileten, T.; Cakir, E.; Oguz, Y.; Vural, A.; et al. ADMA levels correlate with proteinuria, secondary amyloidosis, and endothelial dysfunction. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 19, 388–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zoccali, C.; Bode-Böger, S.; Mallamaci, F.; Benedetto, F.; Tripepi, G.; Malatino, L.; Cataliotti, A.; Bellanuova, I.; Fermo, I.; Frölich, J.; Böger, R. Plasma concentration of asymmetrical dimethylarginine and mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease: A prospective study. Lancet 2001, 358, 2113–2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vanholder, R.; De Smet, R.; Glorieux, G.; Argilés, A.; Baurmeister, U.; Brunet, P.; Clark, W.; Cohen, G.; De Deyn, P.P.; Deppisch, R.; et al. Review on uremic toxins: Classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int. 2003, 63, 1934–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cheung, A.K.; Rocco, M.V.; Yan, G.; Leypoldt, J.K.; Levin, N.W.; Greene, T.; Agodoa, L.; Bailey, J.; Beck, G.J.; Clark, W.; et al. Serum beta-2 microglobulin levels predict mortality in dialysis patients: Results of the HEMO study. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006, 17, 546–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Cheung, A.K.; Greene, T.; Leypoldt, J.K.; Yan, G.; Allon, M.; Delmez, J.; Levey, A.S.; Levin, N.W.; Rocco, M.V.; Schulman, G.; et al. Association between serum beta2-microglobulin level and infectious mortality in hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 3, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bouré, T.; Vanholder, R. Which dialyser membrane to choose? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2004, 19, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Bouman, C.S.; van Olden, R.W.; Stoutenbeek, C.P. Cytokine filtration and adsorption during pre- and postdilution hemofiltration in four different membranes. Blood Purif. 1998, 16, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dou, L.; Jourde-Chiche, N.; Faure, V.; Cerini, C.; Berland, Y.; Dignat-George, F.; Brunet, P. The uremic solute indoxyl sulfate induces oxidative stress in endothelial cells. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007, 5, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Jourde-Chiche, N.; Dou, L.; Cerini, C.; Dignat-George, F.; Vanholder, R.; Brunet, P. Protein-bound toxins—Update 2009. Semin. Dial. 2009, 22, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Barreto, F.C.; Barreto, D.V.; Liabeuf, S.; Meert, N.; Glorieux, G.; Temmar, M.; Choukroun, G.; Vanholder, R.; Massy, Z.A.; European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox). Serum indoxyl sulfate is associated with vascular disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009, 4, 1551–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Carrero, J.J.; Park, S.H.; Axelsson, J.; Lindholm, B.; Stenvinkel, P. Cytokines, atherogenesis, and hypercatabolism in chronic kidney disease: A dreadful triad. Semin. Dial. 2009, 22, 381–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Breitbart, A.; Auger-Messier, M.; Molkentin, J.D.; Heineke, J. Myostatin from the heart: Local and systemic actions in cardiac failure and muscle wasting. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2011, 300, H1973–H1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Schepers, E.; Barreto, D.V.; Liabeuf, S.; Glorieux, G.; Eloot, S.; Barreto, F.C.; Massy, Z.; Vanholder, R. Symmetric dimethylarginine as a proinflammatory agent in chronic kidney disease. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 6, 2374–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Glorieux, G.L.; Dhondt, A.W.; Jacobs, P.; Van Langeraert, J.; Lameire, N.H.; De Deyn, P.P.; Vanholder, R.C. In vitro study of the potential role of guanidines in leukocyte functions related to atherogenesis and infection. Kidney Int. 2004, 65, 2184–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Pepys, M.B.; Hirschfield, G.M. C-reactive protein: A critical update. J. Clin. Investig. 2003, 111, 1805–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jacob, V.; Marchant, P.R.; Wild, G.; Brown, C.B.; Moorhead, P.J.; El Nahas, A.M. Nutritional profile of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephron 1995, 71, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Patient demographic, body composition, and clinical characteristics (n = 90).
Table 1. Patient demographic, body composition, and clinical characteristics (n = 90).
ParameterMeanStd. dev. or IQR
Female29/90 (32%)/
Age (years)55.216.0
Patient height (cm)168.39.1
Patient weight (kg)74.415.5
Body mass index (kg/m2)26.14.1
Fat tissue index (km/m2)12.04.7
Lean tissue index (kg/m2)13.62.7
Serum creatinine (µmol/L)877232
Serum albumin (g/L)41.23.6
Davies comorbidity grade 0/1/2 (n (%))47 (52.2)/ 37 (41.1)/ 6 (6.7)/
Dialysis vintage (years)4.61.7–11.5
Weekly dialysis time (h)1412–15
Hemoglobin (g/L)11912
Serum phosphate (mmol/L)1.60.4
Serum intact PTH (pmol/L)289128–574
n: number of patients. Std. dev.: standard deviation. IQR: inter-quartile range. /: not applicable.
Table
Table 2. The serum toxin estimates for prediction of a six-minute walk test (6MWT) result (distance in meters). The R2 coefficient and p-value for the selected significant model is shown just below.
Table 2. The serum toxin estimates for prediction of a six-minute walk test (6MWT) result (distance in meters). The R2 coefficient and p-value for the selected significant model is shown just below.
Parameter1st Model2nd Model
B (m)Std. err.Sig.Partial Eta SquaredB (m)Std. err.Sig.Partial Eta Squared
ADMA−0.210.500.67<0.01−0.250.470.60<0.01
B2M−2.902.200.190.02−2.802.070.180.02
hs-CRP †−3.0961.04<0.010.10−2.630.97<0.010.08
IGF-1−0.000.000.540.010.000.000.92<0.01
IL-6−0.010.000.140.03−0.010.000.190.02
IS−0.454.820.93<0.01−0.364.480.94<0.01
Myostatin−0.650.520.210.02−0.540.490.270.01
Urea0.8121.310.540.010.391.240.75<0.01
Fat tissue index////−6.551.74<0.010.14
1st model was adjusted for age, sex, body height; 2nd model was adjusted also for fat tissue index. ADMA: asymmetric dimethyl-arginine. B2M: β2-microglobulin. hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor 1. IL-6: interleukin 6. IS: indoxyl sulfate. B: B coefficient in analysis of variance general linear model. Std. err.: standard error. Sig.: statistical significance. †: 1st model: R2 = 0.554, p < 0.0001, 2nd model: R2 = 0.618, p < 0.0001.
Table
Table 3. The serum toxin estimates for the 10-repetition sit-to-stand (STS-10) test (time in seconds). The R2 coefficient and p-value for the selected significant model is shown just below.
Table 3. The serum toxin estimates for the 10-repetition sit-to-stand (STS-10) test (time in seconds). The R2 coefficient and p-value for the selected significant model is shown just below.
Parameter1st Model2nd Model
B (s)Std. err.Sig.Partial Eta SquaredB (s)Std. err.Sig.Partial Eta Squared
ADMA †0.110.03<0.010.110.110.03<0.010.14
B2M−0.130.160.410.01−0.080.150.59<0.01
hs-CRP0.110.080.150.030.110.070.130.03
IGF-10.000.000.430.010.000.000.78<0.01
IL-60.000.000.68<0.010.000.000.360.01
IS−0.190.340.570.01−0.190.320.560.01
Myostatin−0.010.040.81<0.01−0.010.040.75<0.01
Urea−0.070.090.470.01−0.000.090.97<0.01
Lean tissue index////−0.840.25<0.010.14
1st model was adjusted for age and body height, 2nd model was also adjusted for lean tissue index (LTI). B: B coefficient in analysis of variance general linear model. Std. err.: standard error. Sig.: statistical significance. †: 1st model: R2 = 0.5, p < 0.0001; 2nd model: R2 = 0.57, p < 0.0001.
Table
Table 4. The serum toxin estimates for hand grip strength (HGS, force of grip in kilograms). The R2 coefficient and p-value for the selected significant model is shown just below.
Table 4. The serum toxin estimates for hand grip strength (HGS, force of grip in kilograms). The R2 coefficient and p-value for the selected significant model is shown just below.
Parameter1st Model †2nd Model †
B (kg)Std. err.Sig.Partial Eta SquaredB (kg)Std. err.Sig.Partial Eta Squared
ADMA0.040.040.290.020.030.040.470.01
B2M0.130.170.460.010.060.170.74<0.01
hs-CRP−0.050.090.550.01−0.060.080.480.01
IGF-10.000.000.82<0.010.000.000.82<0.01
IL-6−0.000.000.79<0.010.000.000.280.02
IS0.410.370.270.020.470.360.190.02
Myostatin0.050.040.240.020.030.040.470.01
Urea0.200.100.050.050.170.100.100.03
Lean tissue index *////0.610.310.050.04
Fat tissue index **////0.150.150.330.01
1st model was adjusted for age, sex, wrist width, and body height, 2nd model was adjusted also for fat tissue index (FTI) and LTI. B: B coefficient in analysis of variance general linear model. Std. err.: standard error. Sig.: statistical significance. †: 1st model: R2 = 0.67, p < 0.0001, 2nd model: R2 = 0.71, p < 0.0001. *: only entered in the second model. **: only entered in the second model.
Table
Table 5. The serum toxin estimates for Human Activity Profile (HAP) adjusted activity score (AAS).
Table 5. The serum toxin estimates for Human Activity Profile (HAP) adjusted activity score (AAS).
Predictor Parameter1st Model2nd Model
B (AAS)Std. err.Sig.Partial Eta SquaredB (AAS)Std. err.Sig.Partial Eta Squared
ADMA−0.070.0730.340.01−0.070.070.290.02
B2M−0.030.340.92<0.01−0.130.300.67<0.01
hs-CRP †−0.350.160.030.07−0.360.140.010.07
IGF-1−0.000.000.120.03−0.000.000.280.02
IL-60.000.000.58<0.010.000.000.94<0.01
IS−0.120.730.87<0.01−0.070.650.91<0.01
Myostatin−0.030.080.72<0.01−0.060.070.410.01
Urea0.130.200.520.01−0.050.180.78<0.01
Lean tissue index////2.120.44<0.010.21
1st model was adjusted for age, 2nd model was adjusted for LTI. B: B coefficient in analysis of variance general linear model. Std. err.: standard error. Sig.: statistical significance. †: 1st model: R2 = 0.33, p < 0.0001. 2nd model: R2 = 0.48, p < 0.0001.
Table
Table 6. Summary of significant associations of inflammatory markers and uremic toxins with physical performance measures found in this study.
Table 6. Summary of significant associations of inflammatory markers and uremic toxins with physical performance measures found in this study.
TestParameterBStd. err.Sig.Partial Eta Squared
6MWThs-CRP−2.63 m0.970.00370.08
STS-10ADMA0.11 s0.030.00090.14
HAPhs-CRP−0.360.140.01340.07
B: B coefficient in analysis of variance general linear model. Std. err.: standard error. Sig.: statistical significance.
Table
Table 7. Reagent kits used with quality control data.
Table 7. Reagent kits used with quality control data.
ParameterProducerRangeSensitivityIntra-AssayInter-Assay
ADMAAntibodies-online (Atlanta, GA, USA)7.8–500 µg/L1.95 µg/L<8%<10%
B2MAntibodies-online (Atlanta, GA, USA)0.025–10 mg/L0.025 mg/L3.2%8.7%
hs-CRPRoche (Basel, Switzerland)0.15–20 mg/L0.15 mg/L0.4%1.6%
IGF-1Abcam (Cambridge, UK)0.1–30 µg/L0.2 µg/L<10%<12%
IL-6Abcam (Cambridge, UK)1.56–50 pg/mL0.8 pg/mL4.4%8.7%
ISAntibodies-online (Atlanta, GA, USA)1.0–25 µg/L0.1 µg/L<10%12%
MyostatinImmunodiagnostik AG (Bensheim, Germany)0.6–500 µg/L0.37 µg/L10.4%12.2%
UreaSiemens Healthineers (Erlangen, Germany)1.8–53.6 mmol/L0.36 mmol/L1.0%1.5%
ADMA: Asymmetric-dimethylarginine; B2M: β2-Microglobulin; IL-6: interleukin 6; IS: indoxyl sulfate; IGF-1: insulin-like growth factor 1; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pajek, M.; Jerman, A.; Osredkar, J.; Ponikvar, J.B.; Pajek, J. Association of Uremic Toxins and Inflammatory Markers with Physical Performance in Dialysis Patients. Toxins 2018, 10, 403. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins10100403

AMA Style

Pajek M, Jerman A, Osredkar J, Ponikvar JB, Pajek J. Association of Uremic Toxins and Inflammatory Markers with Physical Performance in Dialysis Patients. Toxins. 2018; 10(10):403. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins10100403

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pajek, Maja, Alexander Jerman, Joško Osredkar, Jadranka Buturović Ponikvar, and Jernej Pajek. 2018. "Association of Uremic Toxins and Inflammatory Markers with Physical Performance in Dialysis Patients" Toxins 10, no. 10: 403. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins10100403

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop