Next Article in Journal
Lack of Toxic Interaction between Fusariotoxins in Broiler Chickens Fed throughout Their Life at the Highest Level Tolerated in the European Union
Next Article in Special Issue
Endothelial Toxicity of High Glucose and its by-Products in Diabetic Kidney Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Association of Long-Term Treatment by Botulinum Neurotoxins and Occupational Therapy with Subjective Physical Status in Patients with Post-Stroke Hemiplegia
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endothelial Microparticles in Uremia: Biomarkers and Potential Therapeutic Targets
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/toxins11080454
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Indoxyl Sulfate Stimulates Angiogenesis by Regulating Reactive Oxygen Species Production via CYP1B1

by
Jiayi Pei
1,2,3,
Rio Juni
4,
Magdalena Harakalova
2,5,
Dirk J. Duncker
6,
Folkert W. Asselbergs
2,7,8,
Pieter Koolwijk
4,
Victor van Hinsbergh
4,
Marianne C. Verhaar
1,3,
Michal Mokry
3,9,10 and
Caroline Cheng
1,3,*
1
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, DIGD, UMC Utrecht, University of Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
2
Department of Cardiology, Division Heart & Lungs, UMC Utrecht, University of Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
3
Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, UMC Utrecht, University of Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
4
Department of Physiology, Amsterdam UMC, VUmc location, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
5
Department of Pathology, UMC Utrecht, University of Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
6
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
7
Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London NW1 2DA, UK
8
Health Data Research UK and Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London NW1 2DA, UK
9
Department of Clinical Chemistry and Heamatology, University of Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
10
Division of Paediatrics, UMC Utrecht, University of Utrecht, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2019, 11(8), 454; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins11080454
Submission received: 14 June 2019 / Revised: 22 July 2019 / Accepted: 29 July 2019 / Published: 2 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Endothelial Effects of Uremic Toxins)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Indoxyl sulfate (IS) is an accumulative protein-bound uremic toxin found in patients with kidney disease. It is reported that IS impairs the vascular endothelium, but a comprehensive overview of all mechanisms active in IS-injury currently remains lacking. Here we performed RNA sequencing in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) after IS or control medium treatment and identified 1293 genes that were affected in a IS-induced response. Gene enrichment analysis highlighted pathways involved in altered vascular formation and cell metabolism. We confirmed these transcriptome profiles at the functional level by demonstrating decreased viability and increased cell senescence in response to IS treatment. In line with the additional pathways highlighted by the transcriptome analysis, we further could demonstrate that IS exposure of HUVECs promoted tubule formation as shown by the increase in total tubule length in a 3D HUVECs/pericytes co-culture assay. Notably, the pro-angiogenic response of IS and increased ROS production were abolished when CYP1B1, one of the main target genes that was highly upregulated by IS, was silenced. This observation indicates IS-induced ROS in endothelial cells is CYP1B1-dependent. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that IS promotes angiogenesis and CYP1B1 is an important factor in IS-activated angiogenic response.
Keywords:
indoxyl sulfate; chronic kidney disease; reactive oxygen species; CYP1B1; angiogenesis
Key Contribution: In this study we present the transcriptome profile of endothelial adaptation to indoxyl sulfate (IS). CYP1B1 was identified as a key regulator in IS enhanced reactive oxygen species production and pro-angiogenic response.

1. Introduction

Indoxyl sulfate (IS) is a uremic retention solute that accumulates in the systemic circulation due to renal impairment [1]. Unlike other uremic retention solutes that are water-soluble or non-protein-bound, IS binds to albumin (66.5 kDA) and cannot be cleared effectively via dialysis, which is the main method to remove uremic toxins in end-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients [1]. Compared to healthy individuals, serum IS levels are nearly 50 times higher in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) and reach the highest level in patients with end-stage CKD [2]. Circulating IS has been shown to play an important role in the progression of CKD and the development of cardiac disease, such as left ventricular hypertrophy [3]. Although treatment with the carbonaceous adsorbent AST-120 to lower serum IS level showed improvement on renal and cardiac function in both animal models and a phase II study, it failed to demonstrate promising results in the subsequent phase III trail [4,5]. More studies based on a genome wide analysis approach could shed new light on the working mechanism of IS associated cardiorenal disease and provide new targets for the development of new therapeutic approaches.
Studies have implied that IS first impairs endothelial function, which subsequently contributes to the worsening of kidney function and the development of cardiovascular disease [6]. Flow-mediated endothelial dilation (FMD), which is a clinical parameter for endothelial function, is significantly lower in CKD patients when compared to healthy individuals and hypertensive patients [7]. Notably, by lowering IS level, FMD increases in CKD patients and correlates inversely with IS levels. In vitro studies have revealed that IS inhibits nitric oxide (NO) production, which is a critical regulator of vascular tone, while it promotes reactive oxygen species (ROS) release, resulting in oxidative stress [7,8,9]. Furthermore, IS inhibits the proliferation ability of endothelial cells (ECs) by activating aryl hydrocarbon receptor-mediated cell senescence [10]. Besides the direct deleterious effect of IS on ECs, IS also interferes with the immune system and actives inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, E-selectin and TNF-α, which contribute to EC apoptosis and result in endothelial dysfunction [11,12]. Thus IS appears to have a broad and complex effect on endothelial function. A genome-wide transcriptome study would aid in mapping the key driving signalling factor(s) underlying this important IS-induced disease mechanism.
In the present study, we conducted a genome-wide transcriptome analysis using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to reveal the transcriptome profile of IS-treated human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Based on the set of IS influenced genes, we performed gene enrichment analyses and obtained indications on altered pathways involved in cell migration, angiogenesis, apoptosis and cell metabolism. We studied these enriched biological processes at the functional level using an established 3D collagen-based in vitro model for angiogenesis [13,14]. An activated angiogenic response was observed under IS stimulation. Furthermore, cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1) was identified as one of the strongest up-regulated genes in IS-treated HUVECs. Silencing of CYP1B1 decreased IS-induced ROS and attenuated angiogenic response under IS stimulation, implying a role for CYP1B1-dependent ROS production in the IS-induced angiogenic response.

2. Results

2.1. RNA-seq Reveals Differentially Expressed Genes in IS Treated HUVECs

We studied transcriptome changes in HUVECs after 24 h stimulation of 250 µM IS as compared to the potassium salt (KCl) control using RNA-seq. Heatmap depicts clustering of samples based on all differentially expressed genes between the two groups (Figure 1A). Volcano plot shows both fold change and p value of all genes in log 2 scale, and differentially expressed genes were highlighted in red (Figure 1B). In total, we identified 1293 genes that were differentially expressed between KCl control and IS groups (p value < 0.05, Table 1, Supplementary Table S1). Of these, 643 genes were up-regulated by IS as compared to the control group, and gene enrichment analysis showed that they were mostly involved in cell migration, angiogenesis and programmed cell death processes (Figure 1C); 650 genes were down-regulated by IS, and these were mainly enriched for biological processes related to cell metabolism, such as cell cycle process, chromosome segregation, and cell division (Figure 1D).

2.2. IS Inhibits Cell Viability at High Concentration

As the transcriptome profile indicated that apoptosis was enhanced by IS in HUVECs, we performed a MTT assay to examine the viability of IS-treated HUVECs. IS at 250 µM decreased cell viability as compared to the control, although the decrease was not significant (p value = 0.07, Figure 2A). A significant decrease of cell viability was achieved in 500 µM and 750 µM IS treated HUVECs (p value < 0.05, Figure 2A).

2.3. IS Induces Cell Senescence

The transcriptome data also indicated that cell cycle progression was impeded by IS exposure. For validation, we examined IS-induced senescence features. HUVECs were incubated with 250 µM IS or control buffer for 24 h incubation before the X-gal assay for senescent cell detection. We observed more X-gal positive cells (blue) in IS group when compared to the control (Figure 2B). In line with this finding, the expression level of cell senescence marker CDKN1A was significantly higher in IS group when compared to the KCl control, whereas the expression level of cell proliferation marker KI67 was significantly lower in IS group, as shown by RT-qPCR validation (Figure 2C).

2.4. IS Does Not Influence Cell Migration Ability

Transcriptome data implied that IS enriched transcripts of genes were involved in cell migration. We used both invasive wound healing assay and non-invasive plug assay to study the influence of IS on the cell migration capacity. After 24 h incubation with either IS or KCl control buffer, the migration distances of HUVECs were comparable between two groups at three difference concentrations using the wound healing assay (Figure 2D,E). Likewise, no difference was detected between the two groups on the number of migrated HUVECs into the cell-free area using the plug assay (Figure 2F,G).

2.5. IS Promotes Angiogenic Response

The main biological process enriched in upregulated genes of the IS response was blood vessel morphogenesis. To validate this, we used a 3D collagen-based co-culture model to study the influence of IS on endothelial reorganization and tubule formation. In this assay, HUVECs-GFP cells and pericytes-DsRED were cultured together in type I collagen and incubated with IS or control buffer for 3 days. In control conditions, these vascular cells will undergo EC sprouting, tubule formation and pericytes-induced stabilization of neovascular structures in 3–5 days. Compared to the standard culture medium, the KCl-adjusted control medium did not affect formation of vascular structures. No difference on the number of branches, the number of tubules and total tubule length was detected between IS and KCl control treated co-cultures at day 1 post-stimulation. At day 3 both the number of branches and tubules in IS groups were higher than the controls (p value = 0.063 and p value = 0.062 respectively). The total tubule length in IS group was significantly higher compared to control (p value < 0.05, Figure 3A,B). Combined, these in vitro data, except for the migration assays, confirm the findings from transcriptome analysis, and demonstrate the complex effects of IS on ECs homeostasis and regenerative capacity.

2.6. Depletion of CYP1B1 Inhibits Tubular Formation

CYP1B1 showed the highest fold change among IS up-regulated genes based on the RNA-seq data. To investigate the role of CYP1B1 in IS-treated HUVECs, we first validated its expression level using RT-qPCR and obtained a consistent result (Figure 4A). Compared to the siSham transfected HUVECs, a significant lower mRNA expression level of CYP1B1 was observed in CYP1B1 silenced HUVECs 3 days post transfection (Figure 4B). Next, we investigated the possible involvement of CYP1B1 in relation to IS-induced angiogenesis in the previously described co-culture assay. After exposure to 250 µM IS, the number of branches, the number of tubules and total tubule length were significantly lower in CYP1B1 silenced HUVECs when compared to siSham transfected cells at day 3, and remained highly suppressed at day 4 after IS stimulation (Figure 4C,D).

2.7. CYP1B1 Plays an Important Role in IS-Increased ROS Production

ROS plays an important role in the induction of endothelial dysfunction and has been shown to trigger the angiogenic response [15]. Next, we studied the possible involvement of CYP1B1 in IS-induced ROS production. In line with previous reports, IS-treated HUVECs showed significantly higher ROS level when compared to the control at three different concentrations (p value < 0.05, Figure 5A,B), indicative of enhanced cellular oxidative stress. However, HUVECs transfected with siRNA targeting CYP1B1 transcripts demonstrated a decrease in ROS production compared to control sisham transfected groups at three difference concentrations (Figure 5C,D). Additionally, we further investigate this effect in cardiac microvascular endothelial cells (CMECs) to access whether it holds true in the arterial vascular bed, in particular cardiac microcirculation. Notably, we also observed a significantly increase of ROS production in IS-treated CMECs, which was attenuated after silencing CYP1B1 (Figure 5E). Combined, these data indicate a regulatory role of CYP1B1 in endothelial ROS production.

3. Discussion

In the present study, we demonstrated using whole genome transcriptome analysis that the IS affected genes in ECs were mostly enriched in biological functions related to vascular formation, cell apoptosis, and cell cycle. Consistent with previous studies, we validated in in vitro assays that IS indeed induced an EC phenotype with reduced cell viability and increased activated cellular senescence [9,10]. Paradoxically, we also observed enhanced angiogenic capacity of vascular cells in our 3D co-culture system in response to IS stimulation, which was in line with our transcriptome findings. We identified CYP1B1 as a new downstream target of IS and demonstrated the pro-angiogenic effect of IS was likely to be regulated via CYP1B1 modulation of endothelial ROS levels.
Dou and colleagues showed that IS decreased cell proliferation ability of HUVECs, but it did not affect cell viability at tested concentrations (from 100 μM to 1 nM) using the trypan blue exclusion test, which stains only dead cells [16]. We did not observe an effect on cell viability after 250 μM IS stimulation, however we showed that 500 μM and 750 μM impaired cell viability using the MTT assay, which more reflects metabolic activity. Dou et al. also showed that in the presence of 4% human albumin, IS decreased the wound repaired at the concentration of 125 μg/mL and 250 μg/mL. This reduction remained but was milder in IS-treated cells without the addition of albumin. On the contrary, we did not find any effect of IS on cell migration and would healing ability, which might be explained by differences in assay setups: no albumin was used in our stimulation buffer and the effect we obtained might resemble more the non-bound IS. However, the exact effect of albumin binding of IS on endothelial cell response remains to be further evaluated.
Patients with AKI suffer from oxidative stress, during which oxygen radicals could lead to cell injury and trigger apoptosis and senescence [17,18]. The application of antioxidants in lowering ROS level and to modulate AKI has been extensively studied and reviewed in previous studies [19]. In CKD patients, ROS level remains at a high level, especially in patients with end stage kidney disease, and has been proposed as an important mediator in CKD-associated cardiovascular diseases [20,21]. Consistent with previous studies showing the ability of IS to induce ROS [6,9], we also showed IS-induced ROS production. IS is a protein-bound toxin and around 90% of IS bind to plasma proteins [22,23]. Most previous in vitro studies used a range from 62.5 μM to 1000 μM “free” IS [24,25,26] or 2 mM to 20 mM protein-bound IS [27,28]. Additionally, 250 μM IS is comparable to the mean serum level in CKD patients [29,30], and the maximum IS concentration in the circulation of patients is approximately 236 mg/L (939.1 μM) as reported by the European Uremic Toxin Work Group [31]. Therefore, we examined IS at a broad range of concentrations from 250 μM to maximum 750 μM. Furthermore, we observed this effect in both HUVECs and CMECs, suggesting a potential role of IS-induced ROS in cardiorenal syndrome.
Excessive ROS has been shown to promote angiogenesis by inducing proangiogenic factors in ECs, such as VEGF, MMPs, ANGPT1, and VEGFRs [32]. ROS also oxidize phospholipids and the resulting oxidant products could contribute to angiogenesis via TLR signalling [15]. The transcriptome data indicated that IS exposure significantly increased expression levels of VEGFC, MMP1, MMP24-AS1 and MMP25-AS1 in ECs. Furthermore, in our co-culture assay, we found a significant increase in total tubule length 3 days after exposing to IS, indicating IS activated a (micro)vascular angiogenic response.
A major source of ROS is cytochrome P450 activity [33]. Cytochrome P450 is a large complex of enzymes, which are actively involved in more than 70% of all drug metabolism by initiating monooxygenase or hydroxylation reaction via other substrates (i.e., oxygen and NADPH) [34]. During the reaction, P450 produces active oxygen species and subsequently contribute to excessive ROS formation [33].
CYP1B1, the biggest known human P450 protein in terms of size of mRNA and amino acids, is highly expressed in tumour cells and studies have highlighted its important role in tumour development [35]. Compared to the general population, the prevalence of cancer is higher in patients with moderate CKD and patients received dialysis or kidney transplantation [36]. Notably, McFadyen and colleagues showed a higher CYP1B1 expression in renal cell carcinoma when compared to the normal kidney [37]. Gondouin et al. further showed that IS increased CYP1B1 expression in HUVECs using a microarray setup [38]. Consistent with previous studies, we also demonstrated an increased in CYP1B1 expression levels in response to IS. In fact, our RNAseq based analysis showed that CYP1B1 had the highest fold change increase among all IS-activated genes. So far, only a limited number of studies have shown the involvement of CYP1B1 in angiogenesis. Dallaglio and colleagues showed that both the RNA and protein expression levels of CYP1B1 were significantly down-regulated in HUVECs after exposing to metformin, which inhibited vascular formation in vitro [39]. Tang and colleagues showed that the number of retinal blood vessels was decreased in mice that lacked CYP1B1 [40]. They also confirmed that the lack of CYP1B1 impaired endothelial cell sprouting in vitro, which could be reversed by restoring CYP1B1 expression. Both studies used only one vascular cell type (ECs) in a 2D Matrigel-based model. A later study from Palenski and colleagues examined the involvement of CYP1B1 in both retinal ECs and pericytes that were isolated from mice [41]. They also observed impaired vascular formation using the Matrigel model, in which ECs that lacked CYP1B1 were cultured with normal pericytes. Expanding on these previous findings, using our established 3D type I collagen human-derived EC and pericyte co-culture model that allows complex vascular structure formation [13,14], we provide evidence that the enhanced angiogenic response under IS stimulation is partially mediated via CYP1B1 upregulation by IS in endothelial cells.
Interestingly, multiple studies show defective angiogenesis in CKD patients. Futrakul and colleagues showed that CKD patients had nearly 17-fold increase of circulating endothelial cells that reflected vascular injury when compared to healthy individuals. This was also linked to a decrease in VEGF/endostatin ratio that indicated a decline in angiogenic capacity [42]. A recent study included a larger population of both CKD patients and healthy individuals, and showed a decrease in angiopoietin-1/VEGF-A ratio in CKD patients when compared to the control, indicating impaired angiogenesis and enhanced endothelial leakage [43]. In AKI, hypoxia impaired angiogenesis has also been identified, which has been proposed to contribute to the transition from AKI to CKD [44]. However, only a limited number of studies are focused on the influence of IS on angiogenesis. Hung and colleagues showed that accumulated IS in nephrectomised mice inhibited the maturation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and subsequently suppressed neovascularization [45]. By treating these mice with AST-120 that removes IS precursor indole in the intestine, they showed a decreased plasma level of IS and an improvement in the EPC-based neovascularization. Another study showed IS inhibited the chemotactic motility and the colony-forming ability of human EPCs [46]. In our study, IS activated genes were highly enriched for angiogenesis. We also showed increased branches and tubule formation at 3 days after IS stimulation in vitro, and the total tubule length was significantly higher in IS group. Combined, our data suggest enhanced vascular formation activity in response to IS. It is important to point out that different cell types were used in previous studies and in our study, namely EPCs and HUVECs respectively [47]. Besides, instead of vasculogenesis during which vascular formation occurs from in situ differentiating EPCs [48], we used a well-established model to study angiogenesis of differentiated ECs. Additionally, tubular structures seem to decline from day 3 post IS stimulation to day 4 in CYP1B1 silenced cells, whereas it remained stable or slightly increased between day 3 and day 4 in absence of IS stimulation (Supplementary Figure S1). Further studies are required to examine the long-term effect of IS on angiogenesis. Combined, they could explain the different findings between previous studies and the present study.
IS has been shown to function as a ligand for aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), and the AhR signaling is activated upon binding [49]. Notably, the expression level of AhR is relatively high in kidney [50], and the highest level of accumulated IS has also found in kidney as compared to lung, heart and liver [51]. A positive correlation between the increased activation of AhR signaling and CKD has also been shown [52], suggesting the deleterious effect of AhR signaling in kidney disease. The downstream targets of AhR signaling vary among cell types [53,54,55,56]. To investigate the regulation between IS and AhR signaling in ECs, we collected 266 established AhR targets (systematic name: M9986 and M17378) from Molecular Signature Database v6.2 and performed gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) to examine the representation level of AhR targeted genes in differentially expressed genes from our study. We observed an over-representation of AhR downstream targets in the IS-activated genes under the default settings (FDR < 25%, Supplementary Report 1 and Supplementary Figure S2), implying the activation of AhR pathway by IS in HUVECs. Taken together, these data highlight an important main regulatory pathway through which IS could negatively impact the regenerative capacity of the renal vasculature in renal disease. More studies are required to investigate the effect of IS-mediated AhR signaling on angiogenic response in ECs.
In terms of disease, we previously reported increased capillary networks in heart and kidney of obese ZSF1 rat with cardiorenal metabolic syndrome when compared to the controls, indicating an activated angiogenic response [57]. Despite the enriched ECs foci and pericytes foci, the lack of regular vascular endothelial luminal surface and the decrease of peritubular and glomerular endothelium suggested non-functional vasculature. Furthermore, they recruited macrophages, which subsequently contributed to the fibrotic formation. It is important to note that other risk factors, such as hypertension and onset of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, were also observed in this obese ZSF1 rat model and could interfere with the impaired vascular formation. In the light of these findings, the observed IS-activated angiogenic responses need further investigation, especially in relation to their functional activities, the paracrine signaling with the immune system and the possible influence from other metabolic risk factors.
In summary, we presented a comprehensive list of IS affected genes in ECs. Gene enrichment analyses indicated altered angiogenesis and cell metabolism. IS induced enhanced ROS production in ECs, which was CYP1B1-dependent. Furthermore, IS activated an angiogenic response in HUVECs-pericytes co-culture. CYP1B1 deficiency in ECs resulted in a suppressed angiogenic response, indicating a critical role of CYP1B1 in IS-activated angiogenesis. We hypothesize that IS induces ROS level in ECs, which initiates the activation of the observed angiogenic responses. However, the influence of a chronic status of high ROS level on the balance between pro- and anti-angiogenic factors in vivo is more complex and remains to be elucidated. With the transcriptome data generated in our study, we offer a detailed overview of putative functional chances in EC-behaviour in response to IS, and we identified CYP1B1 as a key regulator in the process, shedding light into the underlying mechanism of IS-regulated vascular formation and maturation.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured in EGM2 medium (Lonza, Breda, The Netherlands) with 100 UmL−1 penicillin-streptomycin (PS). Pooled donor HUVEC were purchased from Lonza and used in all functional assays in this study. For the sequencing purpose, HUVECs were isolated from three newborns anonymously and obtained from the University of Utrecht Department of Gynecology (The Netherlands), with the informed consent under the EPD term. Human brain vascular pericytes (ScienCell, Uden, The Netherlands) were cultured in DMEM (Gibco, Landsmeer, The Netherlands) supplied with 10% FCS and 100 UmL−1 PS. All cells were cultured in the gelatin-coated dishes (Greiner Bio-One, Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Cells between passage 3 and 8 were used in this study.

4.2. RNA-seq and Data Analysis

HUVECs were incubated with 250 µM IS for 24 h. Potassium chloride (KCl) was used as a control, because IS is a potassium salt. Total RNA isolation was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Polyadenylated mRNA was further selected using Poly(A) Beads (NEXTflexTM) and libraries were generated using the NEXTflexTM Rapid RNA-seq Kit (Bioo Scientific, Uden, The Netherlands). Libraries were sequenced by the Nextseq500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Sequencing data were analysed as described previously [58]. Briefly, reads were aligned to the human reference genome GRCh37 and mapped to the transcriptome. Reads per kilobase million for each refseq gene were calculated [59] and a list of differentially expressed genes between IS and control groups was obtained at p value < 0.05 [60].

4.3. Gene Enrichment Analysis

Differentially expressed genes were enriched for their biological functions using ToppGene Suite tool ToppFun (default setting: FDR correction, p value cut off at 0.05 and gene limit set between and including 1 and 2000 per pathway) [61].

4.4. Cell Metabolism Assay

Cells were seeded to a gelatin-coated 96-well plate and incubated overnight for adhesion. Cells were washed once with PBS and incubated with either IS or control buffer for 24 h. Afterwards, stimulation buffers were removed and cells were washed once with PBS, followed by 4 h incubation with 100 µL 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) buffer (0.5 mg/mL, Sigma, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). MTT buffer was removed and 200 µl dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) per well was added to dissolve formed formazan crystals. The plate was shaken gently using a microplate shaker (IKA, Staufen, Germany) for 30 min in the dark. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm by the microplate reader (Bio-Rad, Veenendaal, The Netherlands). To correct for batch effects, an additional condition of cells cultured in the standard growth medium was included in each independent experiment.

4.5. Senescence-Associated Beta Galactosidase Activity

Cellular senescence was examined using the Senescence Detection Kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Briefly, treated HUVECs were washed once with PBS and fixed using Fixative Solution for 15 min in the incubator. Afterwards, HUVECs were washed twice with PBS and incubated with staining buffer containing 25 mg/mL X-gal overnight. TNFα (40 ng/mL) treated HUVECs were used as positive control. Images of random views were taken at 10× magnification using an inverted fluorescence microscope.

4.6. Wound Healing Assay

Cells were seeded to a gelatin-coated 24-well plate (Greiner Bio-One) and were grown till 95% confluency in the growth medium. A scratch was made to create a cell-free area. Cells were washed once with PBS and incubated with IS or control buffer. Images were taken at 0 h and 24 h post stimulation. Area covered by migrated cells from the leading edge of the scratch was measured. To avoid batch effect, an additional condition of cells cultured in the standard growth medium was included in each independent experiment.

4.7. Cell Migration Plug Assay

Cell stoppers (OrisTM) were pre-inserted to a gelatin-coated 96-well plate (Greiner Bio-One) to create a cell-free area. Cells were seeded to the plate and incubated overnight for adhesion. The following day cell stoppers were removed and cells were stimulated by IS or control buffer for 24 h. Afterwards, cells were stained by calcein-AM (BD-Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) and images were taken by.

4.8. 3D Collagen Co-Culture Assay

Lentivirus green fluorescent protein transduced HUVECs (HUVECs-GFP) and lentivirus discosoma sp. Red fluorescent protein transduced pericytes (pericytes-DsRED) were mixed at 5:1 ratio in co-culture medium, which is basal EBM medium supplied with 2% FCS, rhFGF-B, ascorbic acid and 100 UmL-1 PS. Cell mixture supplied with growth factors, including IL-3, SCF-1 and CXCL12 (BD Bioscience), at the volume of 300 µL was added to 200 µL bovine collagen type I (Gibco). NaOH was used to adjust pH to 7.5. Cell-collagen mixture was added to 96-well plate (50 µL per well). After 1 h incubation, 100 µL EGM2 was added per well and the plate was incubated overnight. The following day IS or control buffer was added to the cells. Images were taken from day 1 till day 3 after stimulation using inverted fluorescence microscope and analysed by AngioSys 2.0. To correct for batch effects, an additional condition of cells cultured in the standard co-culture medium was included in each independent experiment.

4.9. Detection of Intracellular ROS Levels in HUVECs

Cells were seeded to a gelatin-coated 96-well plate and incubated overnight for adhesion. Next day, IS or control buffer was added to the cells. After 24 h, stimulation buffer was removed and cells were exposed to 10 µM CM-H2DCFDA (Life Technologies, Landsmeer, The Netherlands) for 30 min in the dark. Excessive CM-H2DCFDA was washed twice with PBS, followed by the addition of 100 µL PBS supplied with 0.2% Bovine Serum Albumin. Images were taken using a SP8X confocal microscope (Leica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) at 20× magnification, and the fluorescence intensity was measured at the wavelength of 485 nm (excitation) and 538 nm (emission) using a fluorescence plate reader (FluoroskanTM).

4.10. Detection of Intracellular ROS Levels in Cardiac Microvascular Endothelial Cells (CMECs)

Besides HUVECs, we also examined the impact of IS on ROS production in cardiac microvascular endothelial cells (CMECs). The culture of CMECs (Lonza, CC-7030) and cytoplasmic reactive oxygen species measurement were performed as previously described [62]. Briefly, 6 h after exposure to 250 μm IS, CEMCs were washed once and incubated with 5 µM CM-H2DCFDA (C6827, ThermoFisher, Landsmeer, The Netherlands) for 30 min in phosphate buffer saline (220/12257974/1110, Braun, Landsmeer, The Netherlands). Excess CM-H2DCFDA was washed off. Images were taken using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M Marianas inverted fluorescence microscope (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Denver, CO, USA) with a 63× oil-immersion objective at 37 °C and 5% CO2 environment. All fluorescent images were corrected for background and negative controls. Quantification of all fluorescent images was performed using digital cell masking software (Slidebook 6, Intelligent Imaging Innovations).

4.11. Reverse Transcription-Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) Analysis

RNA was isolated from HUVECs treated by 250 µM IS for 24 h or control buffer. The quality and quantity of RNA was measured by a spectrophotometer (DeNoVIX, Waddinxveen, Landsmeer, The Netherlands). Complementary DNA was transcribed using iScript Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed to measure mRNA level of targeted genes using SYBR-GREEN-Cycler IQ5 detection system (Bio-Rad). β-actin was used as the housekeeping gene. Primer sequences were as follows: CYP1B1 (forward: 3′-TGATGGACGCCTTTATCCTC-5′; reverse: 5′-ACGACCTGATCCAATTCTGC-3′), CDKN1A (forward: 3′-GACACCACTGGAGGGT GACT-5′; reverse: 5′-ACAGGTCCACATGGTCTTCC-3′), KI67 (forward: 3′-AAGCCCTCCAGCTC CTAGTC-5′; reverse: 5′-TCCGAAGCACCACTTCTTCT-3′), and beta-actin (forward: 3′-TCCCTG GAGAAGAGCTACGA-5′; reverse: 5′-AGCACTGTGTTGGCGTACAG-3′).

4.12. Short Interference RNA

HUVECs were grown to 60% confluence and transfected with 200 nM CYP1B1-siRNA or non-targeting Sham-siRNA (DharmaconTM, Athens, Greece) using lipofectamine according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The silencing effect of CYP1B1 expression in HUVECs was validated using RT-qPCR at 24 h and 72 h post transfection. Successfully transfected cells were further used for comparing the intracellular ROS production and angiogenic response between IS and control groups as explained above.

4.13. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 7.02 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Unpaired t-test was used to evaluate the difference between treatment and control groups. One-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the difference when three groups were included. All means are reported with SEM. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

4.14. Data Availability

RNA-seq data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE132410. Differentially expressed genes in HUVECs with or without IS stimulation is presented in the Supplementary Table S1.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2072-6651/11/8/454/s1, Table S1: Differentially expressed genes in indoxyl sulfate stimulated HUVECs as compared to control, Figure S1: IS-affected angiogenic responses compared to the control group at day 3 and day 4 in a 3D co-culture model, Figure S2: Gene set enrichment plot shows the over-representation of the AhR signaling in the indoxyl sulfate activated genes, Report S1: Gene set enrichment report of the over-representation of the AhR signaling in the indoxyl sulfate activated genes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.C.; Data curation, J.P. and M.M.; Formal analysis, J.P. and M.M.; Methodology, J.P., M.M., and C.C.; Validation, R.J., P.K., and V.v.H.; Supervision, M.H., F.W.A., M.C.V., and C.C.; Manuscript writing and editing, J.P., R.J., M.H., D.J.D., P.K., V.v.H., M.C.V., and C.C.

Funding

This work was supported by the Netherlands Foundation for Cardiovascular Excellence (to C.C.), NWO VIDI grant [No. 91714302] (to C.C.), the Erasmus MC fellowship grant (to C.C.), the RM fellowship grant of the UMC Utrecht (to C.C.), the Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative: An initiative with support of the Dutch Heart Foundation [CVON2014-11 RECONNECT] (to C.C., M.C.V., M.M., D.J.D.), and Dutch Heart Foundation (Queen of Heart: to C.C., M.C.V.). F.W.A. is supported by UCL Hospitals NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ellis, R.J.; Small, D.M.; Vesey, D.A.; Johnson, D.W.; Francis, R.; Vitetta, L.; Gobe, G.C.; Morais, C. Indoxyl sulphate and kidney disease: Causes, consequences and interventions. Nephrology 2016, 21, 170–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wu, V.C.; Young, G.H.; Huang, P.H.; Lo, S.C.; Wang, K.C.; Sun, C.Y.; Liang, C.J.; Huang, T.M.; Chen, J.H.; Chang, F.C.; et al. In acute kidney injury, indoxyl sulfate impairs human endothelial progenitor cells: Modulation by statin. Angiogenesis 2013, 16, 609–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tan, X.; Cao, X.; Zou, J.; Shen, B.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Lv, W.; Teng, J.; Ding, X. Indoxyl sulfate, a valuable biomarker in chronic kidney disease and dialysis. Hemodial Int. 2017, 21, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Yamaguchi, J.; Tanaka, T.; Inagi, R. Effect of AST-120 in Chronic Kidney Disease Treatment: Still a Controversy? Nephron 2017, 135, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schulman, G.; Berl, T.; Beck, G.J.; Remuzzi, G.; Ritz, E.; Arita, K.; Kato, A.; Shimizu, M. Randomized Placebo-Controlled EPPIC Trials of AST-120 in CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015, 26, 1732–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dou, L.; Jourde-Chiche, N.; Faure, V.; Cerini, C.; Berland, Y.; Dignat-George, F.; Brunet, P. The uremic solute indoxyl sulfate induces oxidative stress in endothelial cells. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2007, 5, 1302–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, M.; Kim, Y.J.; Kang, D.H. Indoxyl sulfate-induced endothelial dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease via an induction of oxidative stress. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2011, 6, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Stinghen, A.E.; Chillon, J.M.; Massy, Z.A.; Boullier, A. Differential effects of indoxyl sulfate and inorganic phosphate in a murine cerebral endothelial cell line (bEnd.3). Toxins 2014, 6, 1742–1760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, W.C.; Li, L.C.; Chen, J.B.; Chang, H.W. Indoxyl sulfate-induced oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and impaired biogenesis are partly protected by vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 620826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Koizumi, M.; Tatebe, J.; Watanabe, I.; Yamazaki, J.; Ikeda, T.; Morita, T. Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Mediates Indoxyl Sulfate-Induced Cellular Senescence in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2014, 21, 23663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shen, W.C.; Liang, C.J.; Huang, T.M.; Liu, C.W.; Wang, S.H.; Young, G.H.; Tsai, J.S.; Tseng, Y.C.; Peng, Y.S.; Wu, V.C.; et al. Indoxyl sulfate enhances IL-1beta-induced E-selectin expression in endothelial cells in acute kidney injury by the ROS/MAPKs/NFkappaB/AP-1 pathway. Arch. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 2779–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kim, H.Y.; Yoo, T.H.; Hwang, Y.; Lee, G.H.; Kim, B.; Jang, J.; Yu, H.T.; Kim, M.C.; Cho, J.Y.; Lee, C.J.; et al. Indoxyl sulfate (IS)-mediated immune dysfunction provokes endothelial damage in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chrifi, I.; Hermkens, D.; Brandt, M.M.; Van Dijk, C.G.; Bürgisser, P.E.; Haasdijk, R.; Pei, J.; van de Kamp, E.H.; Zhu, C.; Blonden, L.; et al. Cgnl1, an endothelial junction complex protein, regulates GTPase mediated angiogenesis. Cardiovasc. Res. 2017, 113, 1776–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Chrifi, I.; Louzao-Martinez, L.; Brandt, M.M.; Van Dijk, C.G.; Bürgisser, P.E.; Zhu, C.; Kros, J.M.; Verhaar, M.C.; Duncker, D.J.; Cheng, C. CMTM4 regulates angiogenesis by promoting cell surface recycling of VE-cadherin to endothelial adherens junctions. Angiogenesis 2018, 22, 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kim, Y.W.; Byzova, T.V. Oxidative stress in angiogenesis and vascular disease. Blood 2014, 123, 625–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Dou, L.; Bertrand, E.; Cerini, C.; Faure, V.; Sampol, J.; Vanholder, R.; Berland, Y.; Brunet, P. The uremic solutes p-cresol and indoxyl sulfate inhibit endothelial proliferation and wound repair. Kidney Int. 2004, 65, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nath, K.A.; Norby, S.M. Reactive oxygen species and acute renal failure. Physiol. Med. 2000, 109, 665–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aksua, U.; Demircic, C.; Incea, C. The Pathogenesis of Acute Kidney Injury and the Toxic Triangle of Oxygen, Reactive Oxygen Species and Nitric Oxide. In Pathophysiology Sepsis Induced Acute Kidney Injury; Karger Publishers: Basel, Switzerland, 2011; Volume 174. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dennis, J.M.; Witting, P.K. Protective Role for Antioxidants in Acute Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2017, 9, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Duni, A.; Liakopoulos, V.; Rapsomanikis, K.P.; Dounousi, E. Chronic Kidney Disease and Disproportionally Increased Cardiovascular Damage: Does Oxidative Stress Explain the Burden? Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2017, 2017, 9036450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cachofeiro, V.; Goicochea, M.; de Vinuesa, S.G.; Oubina, P.; Lahera, V.; Luno, J. Oxidative stress and inflammation, a link between chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2008, 74, S4–S9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Leong, S.C.; Sirich, T.L. Indoxyl Sulfate-Review of Toxicity and Therapeutic Strategies. Toxins 2016, 8, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Maheshwari, V.; Thijssen, S.; Tao, X.; Fuertinger, D.H.; Kappel, F.; Kotanko, P. In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, W.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H. The Effects of Indoxyl Sulfate on Human Umbilical Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2016, 38, 401–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kharait, S.; Haddad, D.J.; Springer, M.L. Nitric oxide counters the inhibitory effects of uremic toxin indoxyl sulfate on endothelial cells by governing ERK MAP kinase and myosin light chain activation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 409, 758–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Carmona, A.; Guerrero, F.; Buendia, P.; Obrero, T.; Aljama, P.; Carracedo, J. Microvesicles Derived from Indoxyl Sulfate Treated Endothelial Cells Induce Endothelial Progenitor Cells Dysfunction. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Edamatsu, T.; Fujieda, A.; Itoh, Y. Phenyl sulfate, indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate decrease glutathione level to render cells vulnerable to oxidative stress in renal tubular cells. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Edamatsu, T.; Fujieda, A.; Ezawa, A.; Itoh, Y. Classification of Five Uremic Solutes According to Their Effects on Renal Tubular Cells. Int. J. Nephrol. 2014, 2014, 512178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saito, S.; Shimizu, H.; Yisireyili, M.; Nishijima, F.; Enomoto, A.; Niwa, T. Indoxyl sulfate-induced activation of (pro)renin receptor is involved in expression of TGF-beta1 and alpha-smooth muscle actin in proximal tubular cells. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 1899–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Adesso, S.; Popolo, A.; Bianco, G.; Sorrentino, R.; Pinto, A.; Autore, G.; Marzocco, S. The uremic toxin indoxyl sulphate enhances macrophage response to LPS. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vanholder, R.; De Smet, R.; Glorieux, G.; Argilés, A.; Baurmeister, U.; Brunet, P.; Clark, W.; Cohen, G.; De Deyn, P.P.; Deppisch, R.; et al. Review on uremic toxins: Classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int. 2003, 63, 1934–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Ushio-Fukai, M.; Nakamura, Y. Reactive oxygen species and angiogenesis: NADPH oxidase as target for cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2008, 266, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Lewis, D.F.V. Oxidative stress: The role of cytochromes P450 in oxygen activation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2002, 77, 1095–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Munro, A.W.; McLean, K.J.; Grant, J.L.; Makris, T.M. Structure and function of the cytochrome P450 peroxygenase enzymes. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2018, 46, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Murray, G.I.; Melvin, W.T.; Greenlee, W.F.; Burke, M.D. Regulation, Function, and Tissue-specific Expression of Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. 2001, 41, 297–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stengel, B. Chronic kidney disease and cancer: A troubling connection. J. Nephrol. 2010, 23, 253. [Google Scholar]
  37. McFadyen, M.C.; Melvin, W.T.; Murray, G.I. Cytochrome P450 CYP1B1 activity in renal cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer. 2004, 91, 966–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gondouin, B.; Cerini, C.; Dou, L.; Sallée, M.; Duval-Sabatier, A.; Pletinck, A.; Calaf, R.; Lacroix, R.; Jourde-Chiche, N.; Poitevin, S.; et al. Indolic uremic solutes increase tissue factor production in endothelial cells by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway. Kidney Int. 2013, 84, 733–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Dallaglio, K.; Bruno, A.; Cantelmo, A.R.; Esposito, A.I.; Ruggiero, L.; Orecchioni, S.; Calleri, A.; Bertolini, F.; Pfeffer, U.; Noonan, D.M.; et al. Paradoxic effects of metformin on endothelial cells and angiogenesis. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35, 1055–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, Y.; Scheef, E.A.; Wang, S.; Sorenson, C.M.; Marcus, C.B.; Jefcoate, C.R.; Sheibani, N. CYP1B1 expression promotes the proangiogenic phenotype of endothelium through decreased intracellular oxidative stress and thrombospondin-2 expression. Blood 2009, 113, 744–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Palenski, T.L.; Gurel, Z.; Sorenson, C.M.; Hankenson, K.D.; Sheibani, N. Cyp1B1 expression promotes angiogenesis by suppressing NF-kappaB activity. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2013, 305, C1170–C1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Futrakul, N.; Butthep, P.; Laohareungpanya, N.; Chaisuriya, P.; Ratanabanangkoon, K. A defective angiogenesis in chronic kidney disease. Ren. Fail. 2008, 30, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Anderson, C.E.; Hamm, L.L.; Batuman, G.; Kumbala, D.R.; Chen, C.S.; Kallu, S.G.; Siriki, R.; Gadde, S.; Kleinpeter, M.A.; Krane, N.K.; et al. The association of angiogenic factors and chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2018, 19, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tanaka, S.; Tanaka, T.; Nangaku, M. Hypoxia and Dysregulated Angiogenesis in Kidney Disease. Kidney Dis. 2015, 1, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hung, S.C.; Kuo, K.L.; Huang, H.L.; Lin, C.C.; Tsai, T.H.; Wang, C.H.; Chen, J.W.; Lin, S.J.; Huang, P.H.; Tarng, D.C. Indoxyl sulfate suppresses endothelial progenitor cell-mediated neovascularization. Kidney Int. 2016, 89, 574–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lin, C.J.; Wu, C.J.; Wu, P.C.; Pan, C.F.; Wang, T.J.; Sun, F.J.; Liu, H.L.; Chen, H.H.; Yeh, H.I. Indoxyl Sulfate Impairs Endothelial Progenitor Cells and Might Contribute to Vascular Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2016, 41, 1025–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ingram, D.A.; Mead, L.E.; Moore, D.B.; Woodard, W.; Fenoglio, A.; Yoder, M.C. Vessel wall–derived endothelial cells rapidly proliferate because they contain a complete hierarchy of endothelial progenitor cells. Hemost. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2005, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Patan, S. Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Cancer Treat Res. 2004, 117, 3–32. [Google Scholar]
  49. Schroeder, J.C.; DiNatale, B.C.; Murray, I.A.; Flaveny, C.A.; Liu, Q.; Laurenzana, E.M.; Lin, J.M.; Strom, S.C.; Omiecinski, C.J.; Amin, S.; et al. The uremic toxin 3-indoxyl sulfate is a potent endogenous agonist for the human aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 393–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moriguchi, T.; Motohashi, H.; Hosoya, T.; Nakajima, O.; Takahashi, S.; Ohsako, S.; Aoki, Y.; Nishimura, N.; Tohyama, C.; Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.; et al. Distinct response to dioxin in an arylhydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-humanized mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5652–5657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Deguchi, T.; Nakamura, M.; Tsutsumi, Y.; Suenaga, A.; Otagiri, M. Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of uraemic indoxyl sulphate in rats. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 2003, 24, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sindhu, R.K.; Vaziri, N.D. Upregulation of cytochrome P450 1A2 in chronic renal failure: Does oxidized tryptophan play a role? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2003, 527, 401–407. [Google Scholar]
  53. Patel, R.D.; Murray, I.A.; Flaveny, C.A.; Kusnadi, A.; Perdew, G.H. Ah receptor represses acute-phase response gene expression without binding to its cognate response element. Lab. Investig. 2009, 89, 695–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Ikuta, T.; Kawajiri, K. Zinc finger transcription factor Slug is a novel target gene of aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Exp. Cell Res. 2006, 312, 3585–3594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hollingshead, B.D.; Beischlag, T.V.; Dinatale, B.C.; Ramadoss, P.; Perdew, G.H. Inflammatory signaling and aryl hydrocarbon receptor mediate synergistic induction of interleukin 6 in MCF-7 cells. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 3609–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Patel, R.D.; Kim, D.J.; Peters, J.M.; Perdew, G.H. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor directly regulates expression of the potent mitogen epiregulin. Toxicol. Sci. 2006, 89, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Van Dijk, C.G.; Oosterhuis, N.R.; Xu, Y.J.; Brandt, M.; Paulus, W.J.; Van Heerebeek, L.; Duncker, D.J.; Verhaar, M.C.; Fontoura, D.; Lourenço, A.P.; et al. Distinct Endothelial Cell Responses in the Heart and Kidney Microvasculature Characterize the Progression of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction in the Obese ZSF1 Rat With Cardiorenal Metabolic Syndrome. Circ. Heart Fail. 2016, 9, e002760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brandt, M.M.; Meddens, C.A.; Louzao-Martinez, L.; Van Den Dungen, N.A.; Lansu, N.R.; Nieuwenhuis, E.E.; Duncker, D.J.; Verhaar, M.C.; Joles, J.A.; Mokry, M.; et al. Chromatin Conformation Links Distal Target Genes to CKD Loci. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018, 29, 462–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Robinson, M.D.; McCarthy, D.J.; Smyth, G.K. edgeR: A bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 139–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Chen, J.; Bardes, E.E.; Aronow, B.J.; Jegga, A.G. ToppGene Suite for gene list enrichment analysis and candidate gene prioritization. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W305–W311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Juni, R.P.; Kuster, D.W.D.; Goebel, M.; Helmes, M.; van der Velden, J.; Musters, R.; Koolwijk, P.; Paulus, W.; van Hinsbergh, V. Loss of Cardiac Microvascular Endothelial Cell-Cardiomyocyte Interaction by Inflammatory Activation is Restored by Empagliflozin. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2019, in press. [Google Scholar]
Toxins 11 00454 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of the transcriptome profile of HUVECs treated with IS to KCl treated control groups. (A) Heatmap depicting clustering of samples based on all differentially expressed genes between two groups. (B) Volcano plot presenting fold change (x-axis) and p value (y-axis) of all genes in log 2 scale. Differentially expressed genes are shown in red. (C) Top five enriched biological processes (green) and pathways (orange) based on IS upregulated genes. (D) Top five enriched biological processes (green) and pathways (orange) based on IS downregulated genes.
Figure 1. Comparison of the transcriptome profile of HUVECs treated with IS to KCl treated control groups. (A) Heatmap depicting clustering of samples based on all differentially expressed genes between two groups. (B) Volcano plot presenting fold change (x-axis) and p value (y-axis) of all genes in log 2 scale. Differentially expressed genes are shown in red. (C) Top five enriched biological processes (green) and pathways (orange) based on IS upregulated genes. (D) Top five enriched biological processes (green) and pathways (orange) based on IS downregulated genes.
Toxins 11 00454 g001
Toxins 11 00454 g002 550
Figure 2. Functional examination of the identified IS related processes: Assessment of cell viability, senescence and migration in response to IS. (A) Cell viability was studied using a MTT assay. IS diminished viability of HUVECs when compared to the control at three difference concentrations (n = 4). (B) A representative image of X-gal activity in HUVECs treated with 250 μM IS or KCl control buffer, at 10× magnification. More X-gal positive cells (blue) were observed in IS group when compared to the control. (C) RT-qPCR results showed a higher expression level of cell senescence marker CDKN1A and a lower expression level of cell proliferation marker KI67 in HUVECs after exposing to 250 μM IS when compared to the KCl control (n ≥ 5). (D) An invasive wound healing assay was performed to study the influence of IS on cell migration ability. No difference on the migration distances of HUVECs was shown between two groups at three difference concentrations (n = 3). (E) Examples of migrated HUVECs after exposure to 250 μM IS or KCl control after 24 h in the wound healing assay, at 4× magnification. (F) A non-invasive plug assay was also performed to study the influence of IS on cell migration ability. No difference on the migrated HUVECs into the cell-free area was shown between two groups at three difference concentrations (n = 6). (G) Examples of migrated HUVECs after exposure to 250 μM IS or KCl control after 24 h in the plug assay. 2× magnification was used. All values are presented as mean ± SEM and they are shown in arbitrary units (AU), # p value < 0.1, * p value < 0.05. White lines indicate migration area in wound healing and plug assay.
Figure 2. Functional examination of the identified IS related processes: Assessment of cell viability, senescence and migration in response to IS. (A) Cell viability was studied using a MTT assay. IS diminished viability of HUVECs when compared to the control at three difference concentrations (n = 4). (B) A representative image of X-gal activity in HUVECs treated with 250 μM IS or KCl control buffer, at 10× magnification. More X-gal positive cells (blue) were observed in IS group when compared to the control. (C) RT-qPCR results showed a higher expression level of cell senescence marker CDKN1A and a lower expression level of cell proliferation marker KI67 in HUVECs after exposing to 250 μM IS when compared to the KCl control (n ≥ 5). (D) An invasive wound healing assay was performed to study the influence of IS on cell migration ability. No difference on the migration distances of HUVECs was shown between two groups at three difference concentrations (n = 3). (E) Examples of migrated HUVECs after exposure to 250 μM IS or KCl control after 24 h in the wound healing assay, at 4× magnification. (F) A non-invasive plug assay was also performed to study the influence of IS on cell migration ability. No difference on the migrated HUVECs into the cell-free area was shown between two groups at three difference concentrations (n = 6). (G) Examples of migrated HUVECs after exposure to 250 μM IS or KCl control after 24 h in the plug assay. 2× magnification was used. All values are presented as mean ± SEM and they are shown in arbitrary units (AU), # p value < 0.1, * p value < 0.05. White lines indicate migration area in wound healing and plug assay.
Toxins 11 00454 g002
Toxins 11 00454 g003 550
Figure 3. Examination of IS affected angiogenic responses. (A) A 3D co-culture model, in which HUVECs-GFP cells and pericytes-DsRED were cultured together in type I collagen, was used to study the influence of IS on angiogenesis at 250 μM. No difference on the number of branches, the number of tubules, and the total tubule length was detected between the two groups at 24 h after incubation. After 3 days, IS showed a tendency to promote angiogenesis by increasing all three parameters when compared to the KCl control (n ≥ 25). (B) Confocal images showing representative examples of vascular formation at day 3 post 250 μM IS or KCl control stimulation. Images shown in the upper row were taken at 20× magnification and zoomed-in views are shown in the lower row. In red are shown DsRED marked pericytes. In green are shown GFP marked HUVECs. All values are mean ± SEM, # p value < 0.1, * p value < 0.05.
Figure 3. Examination of IS affected angiogenic responses. (A) A 3D co-culture model, in which HUVECs-GFP cells and pericytes-DsRED were cultured together in type I collagen, was used to study the influence of IS on angiogenesis at 250 μM. No difference on the number of branches, the number of tubules, and the total tubule length was detected between the two groups at 24 h after incubation. After 3 days, IS showed a tendency to promote angiogenesis by increasing all three parameters when compared to the KCl control (n ≥ 25). (B) Confocal images showing representative examples of vascular formation at day 3 post 250 μM IS or KCl control stimulation. Images shown in the upper row were taken at 20× magnification and zoomed-in views are shown in the lower row. In red are shown DsRED marked pericytes. In green are shown GFP marked HUVECs. All values are mean ± SEM, # p value < 0.1, * p value < 0.05.
Toxins 11 00454 g003
Toxins 11 00454 g004 550
Figure 4. Investigation of increased CYP1B1 expression in IS influenced angiogenic responses. (A) Bar graphs show results of RT-qPCR evaluation of CYP1B1 expression level in HUVECs treated with 250 μM IS compared to the KCl controls (n = 6). (B) Bar graphs show results of RT-qPCR evaluation of CYP1B1 expression level in CYP1B1 silenced HUVECs when compared to siSham transfected cells at day 3 post transfection (n = 4). (C) Bar graphs show the number of branches, the number of tubules, and the total tubule length in CYP1B1 targeting siRNA transfected HUVECs (siCYP1B1) compared to sham transfected HUVECs (siSham) 3 days and 4 days after 250 μM IS stimulation (n ≥ 3). (D) Examples of vascular formation at day 3 post 250 μM IS in siSham and siCYP1B1 treated HUVECs. In red are shown DsRED marked pericytes. In green are shown GFP marked HUVECs. 20× magnification was used. All values are presented as mean ± SEM and they are shown in arbitrary units (AU), * p value < 0.05, ** p value < 0.01, *** p value < 0.001.
Figure 4. Investigation of increased CYP1B1 expression in IS influenced angiogenic responses. (A) Bar graphs show results of RT-qPCR evaluation of CYP1B1 expression level in HUVECs treated with 250 μM IS compared to the KCl controls (n = 6). (B) Bar graphs show results of RT-qPCR evaluation of CYP1B1 expression level in CYP1B1 silenced HUVECs when compared to siSham transfected cells at day 3 post transfection (n = 4). (C) Bar graphs show the number of branches, the number of tubules, and the total tubule length in CYP1B1 targeting siRNA transfected HUVECs (siCYP1B1) compared to sham transfected HUVECs (siSham) 3 days and 4 days after 250 μM IS stimulation (n ≥ 3). (D) Examples of vascular formation at day 3 post 250 μM IS in siSham and siCYP1B1 treated HUVECs. In red are shown DsRED marked pericytes. In green are shown GFP marked HUVECs. 20× magnification was used. All values are presented as mean ± SEM and they are shown in arbitrary units (AU), * p value < 0.05, ** p value < 0.01, *** p value < 0.001.
Toxins 11 00454 g004
Toxins 11 00454 g005 550
Figure 5. Detection of intracellular ROS production and the involvement of CYP1B1 in IS influenced ROS level. (A) IS or control treated HUVECs were loaded with CM-H2DCFDA, a fluorescent indicator for ROS. Bargraphs show detected fluorescent signal representing ROS production in IS group when compared to the KCl control at three difference concentrations (n = 4). (B) Confocal figures showing representative examples of ROS signals in HUVECs treated with 250 μM IS compared to the KCl controls. (C) ROS signal measured in HUVECs treated with siRNA targeting CYP1B1 (siCYP1B1) versus non-targeting siRNA shams (siSham) with different doses of IS or equivalent doses of KCl control stimulation. (n ≥ 9 for each group). (D) Confocal figures showing typical examples of ROS signals in siSham or siCYP1B1 treated HUVECs at 24 h after exposure to 250 μM IS or KCl control. 20× magnification was used. (E) ROS signal measured in CMECs treated with siCYP1B1 versus siSham (n = 3) with or without 250 μM IS stimulation. All values are mean ± SEM and they are shown in arbitrary units (AU), * p value < 0.05, ** p value < 0.01.
Figure 5. Detection of intracellular ROS production and the involvement of CYP1B1 in IS influenced ROS level. (A) IS or control treated HUVECs were loaded with CM-H2DCFDA, a fluorescent indicator for ROS. Bargraphs show detected fluorescent signal representing ROS production in IS group when compared to the KCl control at three difference concentrations (n = 4). (B) Confocal figures showing representative examples of ROS signals in HUVECs treated with 250 μM IS compared to the KCl controls. (C) ROS signal measured in HUVECs treated with siRNA targeting CYP1B1 (siCYP1B1) versus non-targeting siRNA shams (siSham) with different doses of IS or equivalent doses of KCl control stimulation. (n ≥ 9 for each group). (D) Confocal figures showing typical examples of ROS signals in siSham or siCYP1B1 treated HUVECs at 24 h after exposure to 250 μM IS or KCl control. 20× magnification was used. (E) ROS signal measured in CMECs treated with siCYP1B1 versus siSham (n = 3) with or without 250 μM IS stimulation. All values are mean ± SEM and they are shown in arbitrary units (AU), * p value < 0.05, ** p value < 0.01.
Toxins 11 00454 g005
Table
Table 1. Top 10 genes that were significantly up- or down-regulated in IS-treated HUVECs when compared to the KCl treated control.
Table 1. Top 10 genes that were significantly up- or down-regulated in IS-treated HUVECs when compared to the KCl treated control.
CategoryEnsembl IDGene SymbolGene NameAngiogenic Function †Fold Change
(log2)		p-Value
Up-regulationENSG00000138061CYP1B1Cytochrome P450 Family 1 Subfamily B Member 1Promote angiogenesis1.4341.390 × 10−38
ENSG00000114812VIPR1Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide Receptor 1Not known1.3211.072 × 10−36
ENSG00000137809ITGA11Integrin Subunit Alpha 11Not known1.2724.190 × 10−32
ENSG00000178695KCTD12Potassium Channel Tetramerization Domain Containing 12Not known0.8833.247 × 10−17
ENSG00000063438AHRRAryl-Hydrocarbon Receptor RepressorNot known0.8724.144 × 10−15
ENSG00000007908SELESelectin ENot known0.7461.240 × 10−13
ENSG00000137331IER3Immediate Early Response 3Not known0.7365.396 × 10−19
ENSG00000163659TIPARPTCDD Inducible Poly(ADP-Ribose) PolymeraseNot known0.7348.865 × 10−20
ENSG00000144476ACKR3Atypical Chemokine Receptor 3Promote angiogenesis0.6951.596 × 10−13
ENSG00000144802NFKBIZNFKB Inhibitor ZetaNot known0.6633.022 × 10−10
Down-regulationENSG00000117724CENPFCentromere Protein FNot known−0.5861.114 × 10−14
ENSG00000143476DTLDenticleless E3 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase HomologNot known−0.5548.619 × 10−8
ENSG00000163808KIF15Kinesin Family Member 15Not known−0.5101.195 × 10−6
ENSG00000138778CENPECentromere Protein ENot known−0.4901.912 × 10−8
ENSG00000137812CASC5Kinetochore Scaffold 1Not known−0.4838.198 × 10−8
ENSG00000184661CDCA2Cell Division Cycle Associated 2Not known−0.4822.314 × 10−6
ENSG00000066279ASPMAbnormal Spindle Microtubule AssemblyNot known−0.4737.741 × 10−10
ENSG00000156802ATAD2ATPase Family AAA Domain Containing 2Inhibit angiogenesis−0.4709.314 × 10−9
ENSG00000196549MMEMembrane MetalloendopeptidaseNot known−0.4659.572 × 10−8
ENSG00000132646PCNAProliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenNot known−0.4613.809 × 10−9
†: Established biological function of each gene in relation to angiogenesis was collected from NCBI Gene (https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/gene).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pei, J.; Juni, R.; Harakalova, M.; Duncker, D.J.; Asselbergs, F.W.; Koolwijk, P.; van Hinsbergh, V.; Verhaar, M.C.; Mokry, M.; Cheng, C. Indoxyl Sulfate Stimulates Angiogenesis by Regulating Reactive Oxygen Species Production via CYP1B1. Toxins 2019, 11, 454. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins11080454

AMA Style

Pei J, Juni R, Harakalova M, Duncker DJ, Asselbergs FW, Koolwijk P, van Hinsbergh V, Verhaar MC, Mokry M, Cheng C. Indoxyl Sulfate Stimulates Angiogenesis by Regulating Reactive Oxygen Species Production via CYP1B1. Toxins. 2019; 11(8):454. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins11080454

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pei, Jiayi, Rio Juni, Magdalena Harakalova, Dirk J. Duncker, Folkert W. Asselbergs, Pieter Koolwijk, Victor van Hinsbergh, Marianne C. Verhaar, Michal Mokry, and Caroline Cheng. 2019. "Indoxyl Sulfate Stimulates Angiogenesis by Regulating Reactive Oxygen Species Production via CYP1B1" Toxins 11, no. 8: 454. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins11080454

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop