Next Article in Journal
Development of Generic Immuno-Magnetic Bead-Based Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay for Ustiloxins in Rice Coupled with Enrichment
Next Article in Special Issue
PKCζ-Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Signaling Mediates Crotalphine-Induced Antinociception
Previous Article in Journal
Unknown Extracellular and Bioactive Metabolites of the Genus Alexandrium: A Review of Overlooked Toxins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fish Cytolysins in All Their Complexity
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 13
Issue 12
10.3390/toxins13120906
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bitis arietans Snake Venom and Kn-Ba, a Snake Venom Serine Protease, Induce the Production of Inflammatory Mediators in THP-1 Macrophages

by
Ângela Alice Amadeu Megale
1,*,
Fabio Carlos Magnoli
1,
Felipe Raimondi Guidolin
1,
Kemily Stephanie Godoi
1,
Fernanda Calheta Vieira Portaro
2,* and
Wilmar Dias-da-Silva
1,*
1
Immunochemistry Laboratory, Butantan Institute, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Structure and Function of Biomolecules, Butantan Institute, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxins 2021, 13(12), 906; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins13120906
Submission received: 29 October 2021 / Revised: 29 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 December 2021 / Published: 16 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Celebrating 120 Years of Butantan Institute Contributions for Toxinology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bitis arietans is a snake of medical importance found throughout sub-Saharan Africa and in savannas and pastures of Morocco and western Arabia. The effects of its venom are characterized by local and systemic alterations, such as inflammation and cardiovascular and hemostatic disturbances, which can lead to victims’ death or permanent disability. To better characterize the inflammatory process induced by this snake’s venom, the participation of eicosanoids and PAF (platelet- activating factor) in this response were demonstrated in a previous study. In addition, edema and early increased vascular permeability followed by an accumulation of polymorphonuclear (PMN) cells in the peritoneal cavity were accompanied by the production of the eicosanoids LTB4, LTC4, TXB2, and PGE2, and local and systemic production of IL-6 and MCP-1. In this context, the present study focused on the identification of inflammatory mediators produced by human macrophages derived from THP-1 cells in response to Bitis arietans venom (BaV), and Kn-Ba, a serine protease purified from this venom. Here, we show that Kn-Ba, and even the less intensive BaV, induced the production of the cytokine TNF and the chemokines RANTES and IL-8. Only Kn-Ba was able to induce the production of IL-6, MCP-1, and IP-10, whereas PGE2 was produced only in response to BaV. Finally, the release of IL-1β in culture supernatants suggests the activation of the inflammasomes by the venom of Bitis arietans and by Kn-Ba, which will be investigated in more detail in future studies.
Keywords:
Bitis arietans venom (BaV); Kn-Ba; inflammation; cytokines and chemokines; PGE2; THP-1 macrophages
Key Contribution: Inflammation is closely related to the development of local and systemic deleterious effects due to snake envenomation. Therefore, comprehension of the molecular mechanisms involved in this process is a valuable tool to establish efficient complementary therapies. In this context, this study showed, for the first time, that BaV and Kn-Ba induced the production of different inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines, chemokines, and lipid mediators by THP-1 macrophages. Among these mediators, the production and release of the cytokine IL-1β must be highlighted, as it indicates the possible involvement of inflammasomes in Bitis arietans envenomation.

1. Introduction

The global burden of snake envenoming is estimated at around 400,000 cases/year, with 20,000 deaths/year. Due to poor notifications, 1,800,000 envenomations/year and 94,000 deaths/year may occur [1]. It is estimated that, on the African continent, more than 60% of these accidents happen in sub-Saharan Africa, of which 95% occur in rural regions, leading to about 12,000 to 32,000 deaths and more than 9000 amputations related to post-envenoming complications [1,2].
Except in some islands, at high altitudes, and in regions with long-lasting snow seasons, venomous snake species are distributed worldwide, living naturally in intimate contact with human populations [3]. In the different global regions, the number of venomous snake species is large and varied. In the Middle East and North Africa, 17 snake species are found, and in sub-Saharan Africa, encompassing the Central, East, South, and West regions of the African continent, 26 species are found. Among these snakes, the Bitis genus includes six species, which, due to the number and severity of envenomation incidents, are important: B. arietans, B. somalica, B. parviocula, B. gabonica, B. rhinoceros, and B. nasicornis [4,5,6]. B. arietans is found in North Africa and in all sub-Saharan regions and is considered one of the most relevant snakes of medical importance in the African continent [4,7,8,9].
Local and systemic symptoms are observed in human victims of Bitis arietans bite. Intense pain, blistering, edema, ecchymosis, hemorrhage, draining lymph node hypertrophy, and necrosis are the common local symptoms. The systemic symptoms are fever, neutrophilic leukocytosis, thrombocytopenia, hemolysis, and bleeding. These systemic symptoms result in anemia, lower resistance to infections, diffuse hemorrhages, myocardial injury, coagulopathy, blood hypotension, and sometimes permanent injury of the affected body regions. All of these can cause death [9,10,11,12,13].
The Bitis arietans venom (BaV) is a complex mixture of proteins (±90–95%), peptides, carbohydrates, nucleic-acid-derived segments, metallic cations, biogenic amines, lipids, and free amino acids. Among the proteins, there are substantial quantities of enzymes, such as snake venom serine proteases (SVSPs), snake venom metalloproteases (SVMPs), and phospholipase-A2. Aside from some non-enzymatic proteins such as disintegrins, type-C lectins, cystatins, and type-Kunitz protease inhibitors are also found [14,15,16,17]. More recently, our group showed the presence of some new and already known proline-rich peptides in BaV, also known as bradykinin-potentiating peptides (BPPs) [18].
Among the most common components of BaV are proteases, specially SVSPs and SVMPs, which represent 58% of the venom composition [15,16,17]. These two protease classes, already studied in other snake venoms, such as Bothrops atrox [19,20,21] and Bothrops jararaca [22,23,24], have been identified as important toxins for the local and systemic effects observed in envenomation.
Due to the importance of these molecules, our group has been working on the purification and characterization of SVSPs and SVMPs present in the BaV. Thus, initially, a serine protease with fibrinogenolytic and kinin-releasing activities, named Kn-Ba, was purified and characterized in vitro. Kn-Ba is also recognized by antibodies (Abs) present in the horse-serum anti-Bitis spp. venoms [25].
Based on the importance of the inflammatory process in snake envenomation [11,23,26,27,28,29], the in vivo inflammation induced by BaV was studied in mice peritoneal cavities. BaV induced local tissue vessel dilatation followed by plasma infiltration; erythrocytes and neutrophils accumulation with simultaneous production of the eicosanoids LTB4, LTC4, TXB2, and PGE2; as well as the local and systemic production of IL-6 and MCP-1. In general, this study demonstrated that the BaV contains toxins that trigger the inflammatory process, which is partially dependent on lipid mediators [30].
In this context, aiming to better understand the inflammatory mechanisms involved in Bitis arietans envenomation, the present study focused on the identification of inflammatory mediators induced by BaV and Kn-Ba in human macrophages differentiated from THP-1 cells (THP-1 macrophages).

2. Results

2.1. THP-1 Macrophage Differentiation

Human non-adherent pre-monocytes of the THP-1 lineage were cultured in supplemented RPMI medium at a density of 2–8 × 105 cells/mL (Supplementary Figure S1A). In these conditions, the cells grew in clumps and showed a high rate of proliferation, doubling the number of cells within 2–3 days. When the cells reached high concentrations, not exceeding 1 × 106 cells/mL, live cells were differentiated in macrophages using PMA (Supplementary Figure S1B). In contrast to monocytes, differentiated macrophages become adherent and relatively larger than undifferentiated cells, stopping proliferation and spreading.
To confirm the differentiation, the expression of CD11b was evaluated by flow cytometry. CD11b, which together with CD18 forms the inactive C3b (iC3b) receptor, known as CR3 receptor, has been reported to be induced during differentiation of monocytes into macrophages. CR3 has important functions both as an adhesion molecule and a membrane receptor mediating recognition of different ligands [31,32,33]. As showed in Supplementary Figure S1C, only differentiated macrophages expressed CD11b, confirming the differentiation of these cells for further treatments.

2.2. Total Protein and Endotoxin Contents Determination in BaV and Kn-Ba

For THP-1 macrophage treatments, stimuli stock solutions were prepared at a concentration of 5 mg/mL (BaV) and 26 µg/mL (Kn-Ba) in sterile PBS, pH 7.2. The determined endotoxin concentrations were <0.1 UE/µg in both samples, which can be considered as an acceptable endotoxin level [34].

2.3. Effects of BaV and Kn-Ba on THP-1 Macrophage Viabilities

To evaluate the cytotoxic effects caused by treatments with BaV and Kn-Ba, the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in culture supernatants was evaluated. After the incubation with 0.5–15 µg of BaV and 0.5–1 µg of Kn-Ba for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, cell viability was greater than 90% (Supplementary Figure S2).

2.4. BaV Induces the Production of TNF and IL-1β in THP-1 Macrophages

The concentration of cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and TNF were evaluated on cell-free supernatants by CBA (Cytometric Bead Array) after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatments with BaV. As shown in Figure 1, BaV induced the production of TNF and IL-1β in a concentration-dependent manner. The production of TNF was detected only after 24 h in response to the two highest doses of BaV (10 µg and 15 µg/well). On the other hand, the maximum production of IL-1β, also in response to the two highest doses of BaV, was reached in 24 h, then decreased after 48 h and 72 h of treatment. BaV did not induce the production of IL-6, IL-10, or IL-12.

2.5. BaV Induces the Production of RANTES and IL-8 in THP-1 Macrophages

As the two highest doses of BaV (10 and 15 µg/well) were able to induce the cytokines production without affecting the cell viability, these doses were selected to evaluate the production of chemokines CXCL8/IL-8, CCL5/RANTES, CXCL9/MIG, CCL2/MCP-1, and CXCL10/IP-10 in cell-free supernatants by CBA after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatments with BaV. BaV induced the production of RANTES and IL-8. RANTES was produced in a dose-dependent manner after 24 h, decaying thereafter. IL-8, in contrast, started to be produced—also in a dose-dependent manner—mainly after 48 h and continuing after 72 h (Figure 2). BaV did not induce the production of CXCL9/MIG, CCL2/MCP-1, and CXCL10/IP-10.

2.6. Kn-Ba Induces the Production of TNF, IL-6, and IL-1β in THP-1 Macrophages

The concentrations of cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and TNF were evaluated on cell-free supernatants by CBA after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatments with Kn-Ba. Kn-Ba induced the production of TNF and IL-1β, and, unlike BaV, it was also able to induce IL-6 production. At the two doses used (0.5 and 1 µg), Kn-Ba induced the production of these chemokines in concentration-dependent manners. The TNF and IL-6 production were detected after 24 h, decreasing thereafter, whereas the production of IL-1 β was accentuated after 48 h and maintained after 72 h (Figure 3). Kn-Ba did not induce the production of IL-10 or IL-12.

2.7. Kn-Ba Induces the Production of IP-10, MCP-1, RANTES, and IL-8 in THP-1 Macrophages

The concentrations of chemokines CXCL8/IL-8, CCL5/RANTES, CXCL9/MIG, CCL2/MCP-1, and CXCL10/IP-10 were evaluated in cell-free supernatants by CBA after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatments with Kn-Ba (0.5 and 1 µg). Just like BaV, Kn-Ba induced the production of RANTES and IL-8, but was also able to induce the production of IP-10 and MCP-1, in time- and concentration-dependent manners (Figure 4).

2.8. Kn-Ba Induced High Levels of TNF and IL-6, Whereas BaV Is Involved in the IL-1β Production in THP-1 Macrophages

The cytokine concentrations produced in response to highest doses of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well) were compared. As shown in Figure 5, the increased productions of TNF and IL-6 in response to Kn-Ba were evident. However, the highest concentration of IL-1β was detected mainly in response to BaV, suggesting that this important inflammatory cytokine is produced in response to other components present in BaV.

2.9. Kn-Ba Induced the Production of Highest Levels of all Evaluated Chemokines in THP-1 Macrophages

The chemokine concentrations produced in response to the highest doses of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well) were compared. As depicted in Figure 6, the higher productions of the chemokines IP-10, MCP-1, RANTES, and IL-8 were detected in response to Kn-Ba.

2.10. BaV, But Not Kn-Ba, Induced the Production of PGE2

The concentrations of the eicosanoids PGE2 and LTB4 were evaluated in cell-free supernatants by competitive ELISA after 30 min of treatments with higher doses of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well). BaV, but not Kn-Ba, induced the production of PGE2 (Figure 7). No stimulus was able to induce the production of LTB4 (data not shown).

3. Discussion

Inflammation is the hallmark of envenomation by snakes in the Viperidae family. The activation of the inflammatory process and its cascade of events play an important role in the pathogenesis of envenomation, in the clinical picture, and in the outcome of the accident. In this sense, the envenomation by Bothrops asper [35,36], B. atrox [37,38], and B. jararaca [39,40], which, among other characteristic changes such as hemostatic and cardiovascular disorders, induce a prominent inflammatory response, which has been associated not only with local damage but also with systemic disturbances caused by Viperidae venoms [11,29]. Therefore, given the importance in understanding the inflammatory response induced by the BaV as a tool for the development of complementary therapies, or the improvement of B. arietans antivenoms, we show that this venom was capable of inducing, in vitro, the production of several inflammatory mediators, including cytokines, chemokines, and lipid mediators.
Our previous in vivo results demonstrated that BaV induces inflammation with the participation of diverse endogenous inflammatory mediators produced by residents or derivatives of recently migrated blood cells [30]. Among these cells, macrophages became candidates for target cells in the present study of cell inflammation induced by BaV and Kn-Ba, since macrophages play a key role in inflammation [41] and also participate in the inflammatory response related to other snake envenomations [22,23,42]. In this sense, studies have shown that in the absence of macrophages, the recruitment of immune cells to the site of inflammation, especially neutrophils, is impaired [22,23].
Macrophages express, on their cell surface, receptors named pattern-recognizing receptors (PRRs), which recognize the molecular domains such as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) expressed by pathogens, virus, fungus, bacteria; and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which are expressed by host-damaged molecules [43,44,45]. In addition, the PRRs can also recognize venom-associated molecular patterns, also known as VAMPs. The term VAMP was coined by Brazilian researchers, who showed that mice deficient in TLR (Toll-like receptor)-2 and TLR-4, two important PRRs, as well as the adapter molecule CD14, produce fewer inflammatory mediators in response to the Tityus serrulatus scorpion venom, including decreased levels of IL-6 and TNF-α [46].
In view of the important role of macrophages in the inflammatory process, we used THP-1 macrophages to evaluate the in vitro pro-inflammatory properties of BaV and Kn-Ba. To support the homogeneity of the experiments, the human monocytes of the THP-1 lineage were differentiated in vitro into macrophages with PMA, as described in the literature [33,47]. There are different protocols using PMA for the differentiation of THP-1 monocytes to macrophages, but in some cases the differentiation profile may be not comparable to primary monocyte-derived macrophages [48]. To overcome this inconvenience, macrophages treated with PMA were kept at rest for 4 days in culture media without PMA, which was shown to be a good alternative to induce a differentiation pattern similar to primary monocyte-derived macrophages [33]. This differentiation was evaluated by morphological analyzes such as adhesion to the support surface, spreading and emission of pseudopods, and loss of proliferation. In addition to the morphological alterations, the differentiated macrophages, but no undifferentiated THP-1 monocytes, expressed CD11b, an important surface marker of monocyte-to-macrophage maturation [31,32,33]. CD11b forms the molecular complex CD11b-CD18, known as CR3 receptor, which is expressed in macrophages and in other leucocytes and binds to several ligands, such as iC3b adhered to pathogens. These promote phagocytosis [49] and expanding the macrophages’ biological activities [33]. After differentiation, the THP-1 macrophages were used as target cells in the studies with BaV and its purified serine protease, Kn-Ba.
In sequence, the effects of BaV and Kn-Ba as inflammation-inducers were demonstrated by the production of the cytokines TNF, IL-6, IL-1β; and the chemokines IP-10, MCP-1, RANTES, and IL-8; besides the lipid mediator PGE2.
The role of purified SVSP on the inflammation induced by snake venoms has been extensively studied [50,51,52]. However, although SVSPs presents a high degree of similarity between their amino acids sequences, their functions may differ [53], so that not all are involved with the inflammatory response. In this sense, two SVSPs purified from Bothrops pirajai venom, named BpirSP27 and BpirSP41, seem to be not involved in the inflammatory events related to B. pirajai envenomation, such as edema, pain, and leukocyte recruitment [54]. In contrast, it was showed that SVSPs from the venoms of Bothrops alternatus and B. moojeni are able to promote edema and pain, two classic signs of inflammation [50]. SVSPs from Bothrops asper can also activate endogenous matrix metalloproteases [51], while SVSPs from Crotalus durissus terrificus venom induced edema and the increased expression of COX-2 and PGE2 production [52]. In agreement with these finds, here we show that Kn-Ba induces the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines by THP-1-derived human macrophages, indicating its participation in BaV-induced inflammation.
Our results show differences between the type and concentration of some inflammatory mediators produced in response to treatments with BaV or purified Kn-Ba. In this sense, it can be suggested that the mediators produced only after stimuli with BaV, but not with Kn-Ba, as in the case of PGE2, were generated by other components present in the venom. However, here we also show that some mediators, more precisely IL-6, IP-10, and MCP-1, were produced only after stimulation with Kn-Ba. This is a complex issue involving both the composition of the venom itself and the immune response triggered against the components of the whole venom. It is well known that BaV is a complex mixture of proteins (±90–95%), which includes, besides enzymes such as SVSP and SVMPs, non-enzymatic proteins as Kunitz-type proteases inhibitors [14,15,16,17]. Therefore, it can be suggested that the activity of some proteases could be hindered by endogenous inhibitors present in the venom itself. Thus, it is possible that purified Kn-Ba inducing the production of different inflammatory mediators, in a greater degree than BaV, may be due to the absence of these inhibitors. In addition, the different components of BaV can act in a different way in immune cells, making the inflammatory response diverse from the one developed only against purified Kn-Ba.
Among the inflammatory mediators produced in response to BaV and Kn-Ba, the cytokine IL-1β is noteworthy. According to literature data, after the activation of macrophages via TLRs, a cascade of intracellular signaling begins. This cascade may culminate in the activation of an important transcription factor named NF-κB, which is responsible for the expression of diverse inflammatory genes, including TNF-α, IL-6, iNOS, and also pro IL-1β [45,55,56]. Pro IL-1β is a zymogen whose activation and later secretion depends on the inflammasomes’ activation, a multiprotein complex formed due to cell activation by the recognition of patterns via cytosolic PRRs of the NLR family (NOD-like receptors) [57,58]. An important subfamily of NLRs, called NALP, is involved in the induction of the inflammatory response via cytokines of the IL-1 family, including IL-1β, IL-8, and IL-33. Recognition via NALP promotes the formation of inflammasomes, which are responsible for the activation of inflammatory caspases 1, 4, and 5 in humans, and caspases-1, 11, and 12 in mice, which can convert pro-IL-1β into mature IL-1β [59,60]. IL-1β is a highly inflammatory cytokine produced during various inflammatory conditions, which mediates innate and adaptative immune responses by promoting acute phase response and recruiting inflammatory cells [61,62]. The overproduction of IL-1β is harmful and can trigger autoimmune diseases [63,64].
Here, we show that both BaV and Kn-Ba induced the production and secretion of IL-1β in the supernatant of macrophage cultures, suggesting the participation of inflammasomes in the inflammatory process related to the Bitis arietans envenomation. In addition, as higher concentrations of this cytokine were detected after treatment with BaV, our results indicate there are other components present in BaV, besides Kn-Ba, which may be involved in the possible inflammasome activation.
IL-1β can act synergistically with other cytokines produced by human macrophages to amplify Bitis-arietans-related inflammations, such as with TNF-α, activating the endothelium and inducing vasodilation and increased vascular permeability, and, with IL-6, activating hepatocytes and inducing the production of acute phase proteins, which can activate the complement system and act as opsonins, facilitating phagocytosis by macrophages and neutrophils [45].
Summing up, our study showed that BaV and Kn-Ba are able to induce the activation and the production of inflammatory mediators in THP-1-derived human macrophages, and this is the first suggestion that the inflammasomes may play a role in Bitis arietans envenomation.

4. Conclusions

Our study showed, for the first time, the pro-inflammatory effects of BaV and Kn-Ba upon THP-1 derived human macrophages. Both stimuli are responsible for the production of the cytokines TNF and the chemokines RANTES and IL-8. However, the significant production of these mediators occurred in response to Kn-Ba. Only Kn-Ba was able to induce the production of IL-6, MCP-1, and IP-10, whereas PGE2 was produced only in response to BaV. Finally, although both stimuli induced the production of IL-1β, suggesting that the inflammasomes may play a role in BaV envenomation, the highest production of this cytokine in response to BaV suggests the participation of other venom components in this process (Figure 8). These results together with previous data published by our group describing the biological actions of Kn-Ba and BaV-induced inflammation in vivo help us to better understand the inflammatory mechanisms involved in this envenomation, and to list important toxins for the future development of antivenoms.

5. Materials and Methods

5.1. BaV

Lyophilized B. arietans venom (BaV) was purchased from Venom Supplies, Tanunda, Australia. The venoms were obtained from male and female snakes of different ages, captured in South Africa and maintained in captivity. Stock solutions were prepared in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 8.1 mM Na2HPO4; 1.5 mM KH2PO4; 137 mM NaCl; 2.7 mM KCl, pH 7.2) and stored at −80 °C.

5.2. Kn-Ba

Kn-Ba was purified from BaV as previously described [25]. Purified Kn-Ba was diluted in sterile PBS pH 7.2 and stored at −80 °C.

5.3. Total Protein Quantification

Total protein concentration of BaV and Kn-Ba were measured by the bicinchoninic acid method [65] using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Waltham, IL, USA), according to manufacture instructions. A standard curve was prepared using increased concentrations (0–2000 µg/mL) of pure bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) diluted in sterile PBS pH 7.4. Absorbances were obtained in the plate spectrophotometer (ELX 800, Biotek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) at ƛ540 nm.

5.4. Endotoxin Contents Determination

Samples of BaV (20 µg/mL) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/mL) were diluted in sterile PBS, pH 7.2, and the endotoxin presence was analyzed by the Microbiological Quality Control of Butantan Foundation using the PYROGENT TM Gel clot LAL Assays kit (Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA), according to manufacture instructions. Endotoxin concentration was estimated by comparing with an Escherichia coli LPS standard (0.125 UE/mL).

5.5. Human THP-1 Pre-Monocyte Culture

The non-adherent human pre-monocyte of the THP-1 cell lineage was acquired from the Rio de Janeiro Cell Bank (Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, cat.: BCRJ: 0234) and cultured according to the manufacture instructions. The suspension cells were cultured in 75 cm3 culture flasks (Corning Inc., New York, NY, USA) with RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Invitrogen Corp., Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with 23 mM NaHCO3, 13 mM C6H12O6, 10 mM Hepes, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 10% FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum, Cultilab, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), 100 U/mL of penicillin, and 100 µg/mL of streptomycin (Gibco, Invitrogen Corp., Waltham, MA, USA). The cell was maintained at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at a density of 2–8 × 105 cells/mL, not exceeding the concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. Total cell number and cell viability were periodically monitored in a Neubauer chamber by Trypan blue exclusion (Trypan blue 0.4% in PBS pH 7.2; 1:1; v/v).

5.6. Human THP-1 Pre-Monocyte Differentiation into THP-1 Macrophages

Human pre-monocytes were differentiated into macrophages using Phorbol 12-Myristate 13-Acetate (PMA, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), according to protocol described by Daigneault and colleagues (2010) [33]. Briefly, live cells were transferred to 24 culture wells plates containing 1 mL/well of supplemented RPMI medium containing PMA (100 ng/mL) at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well. The cell was incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 during 72 h. After the fourth day, PMA-containing medium was replaced by medium without PMA (2 mL/well), and the cells were kept at rest for 4 more days. At the end of the rest period, macrophage adhesion was visualized under a phase contrast microscope (Leica DM2500, Wetzlar, Germany) and photographed.

5.7. CD11b Expression in Differentiated THP-1 Macrophages

The CD11b expression by differentiated THP-1 macrophages was evaluated by flow cytometry, according to the literature [32], with some modifications, as described below. THP-1 monocytes were cultured in 75 cm3 culture flasks until reaching a density of 8 × 105 cells/mL, according to what is described in 5.5. At this time, the culture medium was replaced with medium containing 100 ng/mL of PMA, and differentiation was conducted as described in 5.6. The adherent macrophages were carefully detached with cell scraper and centrifuged (260× g) for 10 min at 10 °C. Contents of viable cells were determined by Trypan blue exclusion, and the cell pellet was resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS with 1% BSA and 0.01% sodium azide) at the density of 20 × 106 cells/mL. Cells were transferred to 96 round-well-bottom microplates (50 µL/well) and were incubated protected from light for 30 min at 4 °C with anti-CD11b PE-labelled antibody (IgG1κ PE, Clone VIM 12, BD, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) or with isotypic control (IgG1κ PE, BD) diluted at 1:5 (v/v) in FACS buffer. After incubation, the cell suspensions were centrifuged (305× g) for 5 min at 4 °C, washed three times with FACS buffer and resuspended in 300 µL/well of FACS buffer with 1% paraformaldehyde. The data acquisition was performed in flow cytometer (FACS Aria III, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA). In parallel, the CD11b expression was also evaluated in THP-1 monocytes as control.

5.8. Incubation of THP-1 Macrophages with BaV and Kn-Ba

THP-1 differentiated in 24-well plates, according to what is described in 5.4, were treated with BaV (0.5 µg, 1 µg, 10 µg, and 15 µg/well) or with Kn-Ba (0.5 µg and 1 µg/well) diluted in 500 µL/well of supplemented RPMI medium without FBS and incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 during 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h [66]. The supernatants were collected, centrifuged (405× g) for 5 min at 4 ºC for removal of cell debris, aliquoted, and stored at −80 °C.

5.9. Release of Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH)

The cytotoxic effects after BaV and Kn-Ba treatments were evaluated by the quantification of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) enzyme in cell-free supernatants using the kit CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) [67], according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell-free supernatants of THP-1 macrophages treated during 45 min with lysis buffer were used as a positive control of LDH release, and cells treated only with culture medium were used as LDH release background.

5.10. Quantification of Cytokines and Chemokines Produced by THP-1 Macrophages

The cytokines and chemokines produced by THP-1 macrophages in response to the treatments with BaV and Kn-Ba were evaluated in cell-free supernatants. For quantification of inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, and TNF-α, the CBA Human Inflammatory Cytokines kit was used (BD, Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and for quantification of the chemokines CXCL8/IL-8, CCL5/RANTES, CXCL9/MIG, CCL2/MCP-1, and CXCL10/IP-10, the CBA Human Chemokines kit was used (BD, Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The data acquisition was performed in a flow cytometer (FACS Aria III, Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed by the software FACS Diva, version 6.1.3.

5.11. Quantification of Lipid Inflammatory Mediators Produced by THP-1 Macrophages

The concentration of the lipid mediators LTB4 and PGE2 in cell-free supernatants was quantified by competitive ELISA using specific kits (EIA, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbances were determined in a spectrophotometer at λ 405/420 nm (VersaMax, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA). The eicosanoids concentrations were calculated by the interpolation on the kits’ standard curve.

5.12. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ± standard error (SEM) and analyzed by Graph Pad Prism, version 6.0 for Windows (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). One-way ANOVA test and multiple comparisons by Tukey HSD were used for comparisons of one variable in more than two groups. For comparisons of two or more variables, two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD were used. For all tests, the values p < 0.05 were considered significant. The assays were conducted in duplicate and repeated at least twice in independent days.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/toxins13120906/s1, Figure S1. Differentiation of THP-1 macrophages. (A) Human pre-monocytes of the THP-1 lineage were cultured in 75 cm3 bottles containing supplemented RPMI medium. The cells were kept in an incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2, at a concentration of 2–8 × 105 cells/mL. (B) Macrophages were differentiated from THP-1 pre-monocytes with 100 ng/mL PMA for 3 days, followed by a 4-day rest period in the absence of PMA. 200× magnification. (C) CD11b expression in differentiated THP-1 macrophages. Adherent THP-1 macrophages differentiated with PMA and pre-monocytes in suspension were analyzed for CD11b expression by flow cytometry. Result expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test. (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective controls (p < 0.0001). Figure S2. Cell cytotoxicity. Differentiated THP-1 macrophages was treated with 0.5–15 µg/well of BaV or with 0.5 and 1 µg/well Kn-Ba for 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, and cell viability was evaluated by the quantification of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) enzyme in cell-free supernatants. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test. (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. p < 0.01 (**), and p < 0.0001 (****).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Â.A.A.M. and W.D.-d.-S.; methodology, Â.A.A.M., F.C.V.P. and W.D.-d.-S.); validation, Â.A.A.M., F.C.V.P. and W.D.-d.-S.; formal analysis, Â.A.A.M. and W.D.-d.-S.; investigation, Â.A.A.M. and F.C.M.; resources, W.D.-d.-S. and F.C.V.P.; data curation, Â.A.A.M., F.C.M., F.C.V.P. and W.D.-d.-S.; writing—original draft preparation, Â.A.A.M., F.C.V.P. and W.D.-d.-S.; writing—review and editing, Â.A.A.M., F.R.G., K.S.G., F.C.V.P. and W.D.-d.-S.; supervision, W.D.-d.-S. and F.C.V.P.; project administration, W.D.-d.-S.; funding acquisition, W.D.-d.-S. and F.C.V.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher-Level Education Personnel—CAPES (Â.A.A.M.: fellowship Ph.D. PROEX; W.D.S.: 23038.000814/2011–83); São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP 2013/07467-1 and Fapesp 2019/20832-7) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (PROÁFRICA, CNPq: 490048/2005-6).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Denise Tambourgi for the Immunochemistry Laboratory structure and to Martin Wesley for English reviewing in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kasturiratne, A.; Wickremasinghe, A.R.; de Silva, N.; Gunawardena, N.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Premaratna, R.; Savioli, L.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008, 5, 1591–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Chippaux, J.P. Estimate of the burden of snakebites in sub-Saharan Africa: A meta-analytic approach. Toxicon 2011, 57, 586–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Swaroop, S.; Grab, B. Snakebite mortality in the world. Bull. World Health Organ. 1954, 10, 35–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. WHO. Guidelines for the Production, Control and Regulation of Snake Antivenom Immunoglobulins; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 1–146. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shupe, S. Venomous Snakes of the World: A Manual for Use by US Amphibious Forces; Skyhorse Publishing Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shupe, S. Generic and Species Descriptions; Skyhorse Publishing: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. WHO. Guidelines for the Prevention and Clinical Management of Snakebite in Africa; World Health Organization: Brazzaville, Congo, 2010; pp. 1–145. [Google Scholar]
  8. Currier, R.B.; Harrison, R.A.; Rowley, P.D.; Laing, G.D.; Wagstaff, S.C. Intra-specific variation in venom of the African Puff Adder (Bitis arietans): Differential expression and activity of snake venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs). Toxicon 2010, 55, 864–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Warrell, D.A.; Ormerod, L.D.; Davidson, N.M. Bites by puff-adder (Bitis arietans) in Nigeria, and value of antivenom. Br. Med. J. 1975, 4, 697–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bey, T.A.; Boyer, L.V.; Walter, F.G.; McNally, J.; Desai, H. Exotic snakebite: Envenomation by an African puff adder (Bitis arietans). J. Emerg. Med. 1997, 15, 827–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Langhorn, R.; Persson, F.; Åblad, B.; Goddard, A.; Schoeman, J.P.; Willesen, J.L.; Tarnow, I.; Kjelgaard-Hansen, M. Myocardial injury in dogs with snake envenomation and its relation to systemic inflammation. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care 2014, 24, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Lavonas, E.J.; Tomaszewski, C.A.; Ford, M.D.; Rouse, A.M.; Kerns, W.P., 2nd. Severe puff adder (Bitis arietans) envenomation with coagulopathy. J. Toxicology. Clin. Toxicol. 2002, 40, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Theakston, R.; Wyatt, G. Venom antibody levels in a patient bitten by a young puff adder (Bitis arietans) during a world record attempt. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 1985, 79, 305–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Markland, F.S. Snake venoms and the hemostatic system. Toxicon 1998, 36, 1749–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Juarez, P.; Wagstaff, S.C.; Oliver, J.; Sanz, L.; Harrison, R.A.; Calvete, J.J. Molecular cloning of disintegrin-like transcript BA-5A from a Bitis arietans venom gland cDNA library: A putative intermediate in the evolution of the long-chain disintegrin bitistatin. J. Mol. Evol. 2006, 63, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fasoli, E.; Sanz, L.; Wagstaff, S.; Harrison, R.A.; Righetti, P.G.; Calvete, J.J. Exploring the venom proteome of the African puff adder, Bitis arietans, using a combinatorial peptide ligand library approach at different pHs. J. Proteom. 2010, 73, 932–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Archer, J.; Whiteley, G.; Casewell, N.R.; Harrison, R.A.; Wagstaff, S.C. VTBuilder: A tool for the assembly of multi isoform transcriptomes. BMC Bioinform. 2014, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kodama, R.T.; Cajado-Carvalho, D.; Kuniyoshi, A.K.; Kitano, E.S.; Tashima, A.K.; Barna, B.F.; Takakura, A.C.; Serrano, S.M.; Dias-Da-Silva, W.; Tambourgi, D.V.; et al. New proline-rich oligopeptides from the venom of African adders: Insights into the hypotensive effect of the venoms. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2015, 1850, 1180–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Petretski, J.; Kanashiro, M.; Silva, C.; Alves, E.; Kipnis, T. Two related thrombin-like enzymes present in Bothrops atrox venom. Braz. J. Med Biol. Res. Rev. Bras. Pesqui. Med. E Biol. 2000, 33, 1293–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kanashiro, M.M.; Rita de Cássia, M.E.; Petretski, J.H.; Prates, M.V.; Alves, E.W.; Machado, O.L.; da Silva, W.D.; Kipnis, T.L. Biochemical and biological properties of phospholipases A2 from Bothrops atrox snake venom. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 64, 1179–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Stocker, K.; Barlow, G. The coagulant enzyme from Bothrops atrox venom (batroxobin). Methods Enzymol. 1976, 45, 214–223. [Google Scholar]
  22. Clissa, P.B.; Laing, G.D.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Mota, I.; Taylor, M.J.; Moura-da-Silva, A.M. The effect of jararhagin, a metalloproteinase from Bothrops jararaca venom, on pro-inflammatory cytokines released by murine peritoneal adherent cells. Toxicon 2001, 39, 1567–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Costa, E.; Clissa, P.; Teixeira, C.; Moura-da-Silva, A. Importance of metalloproteinases and macrophages in viper snake envenomation–induced local inflammation. Inflammation 2002, 26, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Serrano, S.M.; Sampaio, C.A.; Mentele, R.; Camargo, A.C.; Fink, E. A novel fibrinogen-clotting enzyme, TL-BJ, from the venom of the snake Bothrops jararaca: Purification and characterization. Thromb. Haemost. 2000, 83, 438–444. [Google Scholar]
  25. Megale, Â.A.A.; Magnoli, F.C.; Kuniyoshi, A.K.; Iwai, L.K.; Tambourgi, D.V.; Portaro, F.C.; da Silva, W.D. Kn-Ba: A novel serine protease isolated from Bitis arietans snake venom with fibrinogenolytic and kinin-releasing activities. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins 2018, 24, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Teixeira, C.F.; Cury, Y.; Moreira, V.; Picolo, G.; Chaves, F. Inflammation induced by Bothrops asper venom. Toxicon 2009, 54, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Teixeira, C.F.; Fernandes, C.M.; Zuliani, J.P.; Zamuner, S.F. Inflammatory effects of snake venom metalloproteinases. Mem. Do Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2005, 100, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Voronov, E.; Apte, R.; Sofer, S. The systemic inflammatory response syndrome related to the release of cytokines following severe envenomation. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins 1999, 5, 5–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Szold, O.; Ben-Abraham, R.; Frolkis, I.; Sorkine, M.; Sorkine, P. Tumor necrosis factor as a mediator of cardiac toxicity following snake envenomation. Crit. Care Med. 2003, 31, 1449–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Megale, Â.A.A.; Portaro, F.C.; Da Silva, W.D. Bitis arietans snake venom induces an inflammatory response which is partially dependent on lipid mediators. Toxins 2020, 12, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Schwende, H.; Fitzke, E.; Ambs, P.; Dieter, P. Differences in the state of differentiation of THP-1 cells induced by phorbol ester and 1, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1996, 59, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mittar, D.; Paramban, R.; McIntyre, C. Flow cytometry and high-content imaging to identify markers of monocyte-macrophage differentiation. J. BD Biosci. 2011, 1, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  33. Daigneault, M.; Preston, J.A.; Marriott, H.M.; Whyte, M.K.; Dockrell, D.H. The identification of markers of macrophage differentiation in PMA-stimulated THP-1 cells and monocyte-derived macrophages. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zoccal, K.F. A Peçonha do Escorpião Tityus serrulatus é Reconhecida por Receptores de Reconhecimento Padrão e Induz Ativação Celular e Inflamação. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gutiérrez, J.M.; Chaves, F.; Cerdas, L. Inflammatory infiltrate in skeletal muscle injected with Bothrops asper venom. Rev. Biol. Trop. 1986, 34, 209–214. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zamuner, S.R.; Zuliani, J.P.; Fernandes, C.M.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Teixeira, C.d.F.P. Inflammation induced by Bothrops asper venom: Release of proinflammatory cytokines and eicosanoids, and role of adhesion molecules in leukocyte infiltration. Toxicon 2005, 46, 806–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Barros, S.; Friedlanskaia, I.; Petricevich, V.; Kipnis, T. Local inflammation, lethality and cytokine release in mice injected with Bothrops atrox venom. Mediat. Inflamm. 1998, 7, 339–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Moreira, V.; Dos-Santos, M.C.; Nascimento, N.G.; da Silva, H.B.; Fernandes, C.M.; Lima, M.R.D.I.; Teixeira, C. Local inflammatory events induced by Bothrops atrox snake venom and the release of distinct classes of inflammatory mediators. Toxicon 2012, 60, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Farsky, S.H.; Walber, J.; Costa-Cruz, M.; Curry, Y.; Teixeira, C.F. Leukocyte response induced by Bothrops jararaca crude venom: In vivo and in vitro studies. Toxicon 1997, 35, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zamuner, S.R.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Muscará, M.N.; Teixeira, S.A.; Teixeira, C.F. Bothrops asper and Bothrops jararaca snake venoms trigger microbicidal functions of peritoneal leukocytes in vivo. Toxicon 2001, 39, 1505–1513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Murray, P.J.; Wynn, T.A.J. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11, 723–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Laing, G.D.; Clissa, P.B.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Moura-da-Silva, A.M.; Taylor, M.J. Inflammatory pathogenesis of snake venom metalloproteinase-induced skin necrosis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2003, 33, 3458–3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lentschat, A.; Karahashi, H.; Michelsen, K.S.; Thomas, L.S.; Zhang, W.; Vogel, S.N.; Arditi, M. Mastoparan, a G protein agonist peptide, differentially modulates TLR4- and TLR2-mediated signaling in human endothelial cells and murine macrophages. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 4252–4261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, X.; Zhan, Z.; Li, D.; Xu, L.; Ma, F.; Zhang, P.; Yao, H.; Cao, X. Intracellular MHC class II molecules promote TLR-triggered innate immune responses by maintaining activation of the kinase Btk. Nat. Immunol. 2011, 12, 416–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Medzhitov, R. Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 2007, 449, 819–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zoccal, K.F.; Bitencourt Cda, S.; Paula-Silva, F.W.; Sorgi, C.A.; de Castro Figueiredo Bordon, K.; Arantes, E.C.; Faccioli, L.H. TLR2, TLR4 and CD14 recognize venom-associated molecular patterns from Tityus serrulatus to induce macrophage-derived inflammatory mediators. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Takashiba, S.; Van Dyke, T.E.; Amar, S.; Murayama, Y.; Soskolne, A.W.; Shapira, L. Differentiation of monocytes to macrophages primes cells for lipopolysaccharide stimulation via accumulation of cytoplasmic nuclear factor κB. J. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 5573–5578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kohro, T.; Tanaka, T.; Murakami, T.; Wada, Y.; Aburatani, H.; Hamakubo, T.; Kodama, T. A comparison of differences in the gene expression profiles of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate differentiated THP-1 cells and human monocyte-derived macrophage. J. Atheroscler. Trhromb. 2004, 11, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Aderem, A.; Underhill, D.M. Mechanisms of phagocytosis in macrophages. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 1999, 17, 593–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mamede, C.C.N.; de Sousa, B.B.; da Cunha Pereira, D.F.; Matias, M.S.; de Queiroz, M.R.; de Morais, N.C.G.; Vieira, S.A.P.B.; Stanziola, L.; de Oliveira, F. Comparative analysis of local effects caused by Bothrops alternatus and Bothrops moojeni snake venoms: Enzymatic contributions and inflammatory modulations. Toxicon 2016, 117, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saravia-Otten, P.; Frisan, T.; Thelestam, M.; Gutierrez, J.M. Membrane independent activation of fibroblast proMMP-2 by snake venom: Novel roles for venom proteinases. Toxicon 2004, 44, 749–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Costa, C.; Belchor, M.; Rodrigues, C.; Toyama, D.; de Oliveira, M.; Novaes, D.; Toyama, M. Edema induced by a Crotalus durissus terrificus venom serine protease (Cdtsp 2) involves the PAR pathway and PKC and PLC activation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Matsui, T.; Fujimura, Y.; Titani, K. Snake venom proteases affecting hemostasis and thrombosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2000, 1477, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Menaldo, D.L.; Bernardes, C.P.; Pereira, J.C.; Silveira, D.S.; Mamede, C.C.; Stanziola, L.; de Oliveira, F.; Pereira-Crott, L.S.; Faccioli, L.H.; Sampaio, S.V. Effects of two serine proteases from Bothrops pirajai snake venom on the complement system and the inflammatory response. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2013, 15, 764–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Lawrence, T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Arias-Salvatierra, D.; Silbergeld, E.K.; Acosta-Saavedra, L.C.; Calderon-Aranda, E.S. Role of nitric oxide produced by iNOS through NF-κB pathway in migration of cerebellar granule neurons induced by lipopolysaccharide. Cell. Signal. 2011, 23, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Eder, C. Mechanisms of interleukin-1β release. J. Immunobiol. 2009, 214, 543–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Martín-Sánchez, F.; Diamond, C.; Zeitler, M.; Gomez, A.; Baroja-Mazo, A.; Bagnall, J.; Spiller, D.; White, M.; Daniels, M.; Mortellaro, A. Inflammasome-dependent IL-1 β release depends upon membrane permeabilisation. J. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 1219–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Martinon, F.; Tschopp, J. Inflammatory caspases: Linking an intracellular innate immune system to autoinflammatory diseases. Cell 2004, 117, 561–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Meylan, E.; Tschopp, J.; Karin, M. Intracellular pattern recognition receptors in the host response. Nature 2006, 442, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zheng, H.; Fletcher, D.; Kozak, W.; Jiang, M.; Hofmann, K.J.; Corn, C.A.; Soszynski, D.; Grabiec, C.; Trumbauer, M.E.; Shaw, A. Resistance to fever induction and impaired acute-phase response in interleukin-1β-deficient mice. Immunity 1995, 3, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Rider, P.; Carmi, Y.; Guttman, O.; Braiman, A.; Cohen, I.; Voronov, E.; White, M.R.; Dinarello, C.A.; Apte, R.N. IL-1α and IL-1β recruit different myeloid cells and promote different stages of sterile inflammation. J. Immunol. 2011, 187, 4835–4843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Dinarello, C.A. Interleukin-1 in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory diseases. Blood 2011, 117, 3720–3732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Broderick, L.; De Nardo, D.; Franklin, B.S.; Hoffman, H.M.; Latz, E. The inflammasomes and autoinflammatory syndromes. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2015, 10, 395–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Smith, P.K.; Krohn, R.I.; Hermanson, G.; Mallia, A.; Gartner, F.; Provenzano, M.; Fujimoto, E.; Goeke, N.; Olson, B.; Klenk, D. Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem. 1985, 150, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Delafontaine, M.; Villas-Boas, I.; Mathieu, L.; Josset, P.; Blomet, J.; Tambourgi, D. Enzymatic and pro-inflammatory activities of Bothrops lanceolatus venom: Relevance for envenomation. Toxins 2017, 9, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rucavado, A.; Flores-Sánchez, E.; Franceschi, A.; Magalhaes, A.; Gutiérrez, J.M. Characterization of the local tissue damage induced by LHF-II, a metalloproteinase with weak hemorrhagic activity isolated from Lachesis muta muta snake venom. Toxicon 1999, 37, 1297–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Toxins 13 00906 g001 550
Figure 1. Cytokine production in THP-1 macrophages induced by BaV. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with different concentrations of BaV (0.5 to 15 µg/well) to induce cytokine production. Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the cytokine production was evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) TNF and (b) IL-1β. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between concentrations of BaV on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.01 (**); p < 0.001 (***); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Figure 1. Cytokine production in THP-1 macrophages induced by BaV. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with different concentrations of BaV (0.5 to 15 µg/well) to induce cytokine production. Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the cytokine production was evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) TNF and (b) IL-1β. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between concentrations of BaV on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.01 (**); p < 0.001 (***); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Toxins 13 00906 g001
Toxins 13 00906 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemokine productions in THP-1 macrophages induced by BaV. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with two concentrations of BaV (10 and 15 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the production of chemokines were evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) RANTES and (b) IL-8. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between concentrations of BaV on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.05 (*); p < 0.01 (##); p < 0.001 (*** and ###); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Figure 2. Chemokine productions in THP-1 macrophages induced by BaV. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with two concentrations of BaV (10 and 15 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the production of chemokines were evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) RANTES and (b) IL-8. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between concentrations of BaV on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.05 (*); p < 0.01 (##); p < 0.001 (*** and ###); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Toxins 13 00906 g002
Toxins 13 00906 g003 550
Figure 3. Cytokine production in THP-1 macrophages induced by Kn-Ba. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with two concentrations of Kn-Ba (0.5 and 1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h the production of cytokines were evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) TNF, (b) IL-6 and (c) IL-1β. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between concentrations of Kn-Ba on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.01 (** and ##); p < 0.001 (###); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Figure 3. Cytokine production in THP-1 macrophages induced by Kn-Ba. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with two concentrations of Kn-Ba (0.5 and 1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h the production of cytokines were evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) TNF, (b) IL-6 and (c) IL-1β. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between concentrations of Kn-Ba on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.01 (** and ##); p < 0.001 (###); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Toxins 13 00906 g003
Toxins 13 00906 g004 550
Figure 4. Chemokine productions in THP-1 macrophages induced by Kn-Ba. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with two concentrations of Kn-Ba (0.5 and 1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the production of chemokines were evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) IP-10, (b) MCP-1, (c) RANTES and (d) IL-8. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between concentrations of Kn-Ba on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.01 (**); p < 0.001 (###); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Figure 4. Chemokine productions in THP-1 macrophages induced by Kn-Ba. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with two concentrations of Kn-Ba (0.5 and 1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the production of chemokines were evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) IP-10, (b) MCP-1, (c) RANTES and (d) IL-8. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between concentrations of Kn-Ba on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.01 (**); p < 0.001 (###); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Toxins 13 00906 g004
Toxins 13 00906 g005 550
Figure 5. Comparison between cytokine productions induced by higher doses of BaV and Kn-Ba. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with higher concentrations of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the production of cytokines was evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) TNF, (b) IL-6 and (c) IL-1β. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between stimuli on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.01 (**); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Figure 5. Comparison between cytokine productions induced by higher doses of BaV and Kn-Ba. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with higher concentrations of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the production of cytokines was evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) TNF, (b) IL-6 and (c) IL-1β. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between stimuli on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.01 (**); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Toxins 13 00906 g005
Toxins 13 00906 g006 550
Figure 6. Comparison between chemokine productions induced by higher doses of BaV and Kn-Ba. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with higher concentrations of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the production of chemokines was evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) IP-10, (b) MCP-1, (c) RANTES and (d) IL-8. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between stimuli on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.001 (***); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Figure 6. Comparison between chemokine productions induced by higher doses of BaV and Kn-Ba. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with higher concentrations of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h, the production of chemokines was evaluated in culture supernatant by CBA. (a) IP-10, (b) MCP-1, (c) RANTES and (d) IL-8. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (each period compared with respective control) or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test (comparison between different periods of treatment). (*) Significant difference in relation to the respective control. (#) Significant difference between stimuli on each period. Symbols indicate differences between periods of treatment: (α) difference of 48 h or 72 h compared to 24 h; (β) difference from 72 h to 48 h. p < 0.001 (***); and p < 0.0001 (**** and ####).
Toxins 13 00906 g006
Toxins 13 00906 g007 550
Figure 7. Production of PGE2. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with higher concentrations of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 30 min, the production of PGE2 was evaluated by ELISA. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test. (Asterisk) Significant difference from control and Kn-Ba. p < 0.01 (**).
Figure 7. Production of PGE2. THP-1 macrophages (2 × 105 cells/well) were treated with higher concentrations of BaV (15 µg/well) and Kn-Ba (1 µg/well). Cells incubated only with culture medium were used as control. After 30 min, the production of PGE2 was evaluated by ELISA. Results expressed as mean of duplicates ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-test. (Asterisk) Significant difference from control and Kn-Ba. p < 0.01 (**).
Toxins 13 00906 g007
Toxins 13 00906 g008 550
Figure 8. Comparative overview of the inflammatory profiles induced by BaV and Kn-Ba in THP-1 macrophages. THP-1 macrophages were treated with BaV (left; blue) and Kn-Ba (right; red) resulting in the synthesis and secretion of the indicated cytokines, chemokines, and PGE2. The mediators highlighted in larger size were produced by both stimuli, but at higher levels at the evidenced side. Both stimuli induced the production and release of IL-1β, indicating the inflammasomes pathway activation during BaV envenomation. However, the highest production of this cytokine in response to BaV indicated the participation of other venom components in this process. The schematic art pieces used in this figure were provided by Servier Medical art. Servier Medical Art by Servier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Figure 8. Comparative overview of the inflammatory profiles induced by BaV and Kn-Ba in THP-1 macrophages. THP-1 macrophages were treated with BaV (left; blue) and Kn-Ba (right; red) resulting in the synthesis and secretion of the indicated cytokines, chemokines, and PGE2. The mediators highlighted in larger size were produced by both stimuli, but at higher levels at the evidenced side. Both stimuli induced the production and release of IL-1β, indicating the inflammasomes pathway activation during BaV envenomation. However, the highest production of this cytokine in response to BaV indicated the participation of other venom components in this process. The schematic art pieces used in this figure were provided by Servier Medical art. Servier Medical Art by Servier is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Toxins 13 00906 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Megale, Â.A.A.; Magnoli, F.C.; Guidolin, F.R.; Godoi, K.S.; Portaro, F.C.V.; Dias-da-Silva, W. Bitis arietans Snake Venom and Kn-Ba, a Snake Venom Serine Protease, Induce the Production of Inflammatory Mediators in THP-1 Macrophages. Toxins 2021, 13, 906. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins13120906

AMA Style

Megale ÂAA, Magnoli FC, Guidolin FR, Godoi KS, Portaro FCV, Dias-da-Silva W. Bitis arietans Snake Venom and Kn-Ba, a Snake Venom Serine Protease, Induce the Production of Inflammatory Mediators in THP-1 Macrophages. Toxins. 2021; 13(12):906. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins13120906

Chicago/Turabian Style

Megale, Ângela Alice Amadeu, Fabio Carlos Magnoli, Felipe Raimondi Guidolin, Kemily Stephanie Godoi, Fernanda Calheta Vieira Portaro, and Wilmar Dias-da-Silva. 2021. "Bitis arietans Snake Venom and Kn-Ba, a Snake Venom Serine Protease, Induce the Production of Inflammatory Mediators in THP-1 Macrophages" Toxins 13, no. 12: 906. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins13120906

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop