Next Article in Journal
A Simple and Specific Noncompetitive ELISA Method for HT-2 Toxin Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Treatments for Latrodectism—A Systematic Review on Their Clinical Effectiveness
Previous Article in Journal
Diabetogenic Effects of Ochratoxin A in Female Rats
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antivenom for Neuromuscular Paralysis Resulting From Snake Envenoming

1
Monash Venom Group, Department of Pharmacology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
2
Faculty of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura 50008, Sri Lanka
3
Clinical Toxicology Research Group, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 22 March 2017 / Revised: 11 April 2017 / Accepted: 13 April 2017 / Published: 19 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Use of Antibodies/Antivenom Against Envenoming)

Abstract

:
Antivenom therapy is currently the standard practice for treating neuromuscular dysfunction in snake envenoming. We reviewed the clinical and experimental evidence-base for the efficacy and effectiveness of antivenom in snakebite neurotoxicity. The main site of snake neurotoxins is the neuromuscular junction, and the majority are either: (1) pre-synaptic neurotoxins irreversibly damaging the presynaptic terminal; or (2) post-synaptic neurotoxins that bind to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Pre-clinical tests of antivenom efficacy for neurotoxicity include rodent lethality tests, which are problematic, and in vitro pharmacological tests such as nerve-muscle preparation studies, that appear to provide more clinically meaningful information. We searched MEDLINE (from 1946) and EMBASE (from 1947) until March 2017 for clinical studies. The search yielded no randomised placebo-controlled trials of antivenom for neuromuscular dysfunction. There were several randomised and non-randomised comparative trials that compared two or more doses of the same or different antivenom, and numerous cohort studies and case reports. The majority of studies available had deficiencies including poor case definition, poor study design, small sample size or no objective measures of paralysis. A number of studies demonstrated the efficacy of antivenom in human envenoming by clearing circulating venom. Studies of snakes with primarily pre-synaptic neurotoxins, such as kraits (Bungarus spp.) and taipans (Oxyuranus spp.) suggest that antivenom does not reverse established neurotoxicity, but early administration may be associated with decreased severity or prevent neurotoxicity. Small studies of snakes with mainly post-synaptic neurotoxins, including some cobra species (Naja spp.), provide preliminary evidence that neurotoxicity may be reversed with antivenom, but placebo controlled studies with objective outcome measures are required to confirm this.

1. Introduction

Snakebite is a major public health concern in the tropics. Although an accurate figure of the burden of global snakebite is unavailable, an estimate of 5.5 million annual snakebites across the globe is considered realistic [1,2]. South and Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America are the most affected regions, with more than two-thirds of the global snakebite burden reported to arise from Asia [1]. Neuromuscular paralysis due to snake envenoming is common, including envenoming by elapid snakes such as kraits (genus: Bungarus), cobras (genus: Naja and Ophiophagus), coral snakes (genus: Calliophis and Micrurus), taipans (genus: Oxyuranus), tiger snakes (genus: Notechis) and death adders (genus: Acanthophis). Snake venom induced paralysis becomes life threatening with progressive paralysis of the bulbar and respiratory muscles which requires prompt airway assistance and mechanical ventilation [3].

2. Neuromuscular Paralysis in Snake Envenoming

Snake venom neurotoxins primarily target the neuromuscular junction of skeletal muscles of which the motor nerve terminal (pre-synaptic) and the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor at the motor-end plate (post-synaptic) are the major targeted sites. This is well supported by clinical observations that neurotoxic snake envenoming almost exclusively results in flaccid paralysis [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] which is due to the blockade of neurotransmission at the neuromuscular junction by venom neurotoxins [13,14,15,16]. Neuromuscular paralysis in snake envenoming varies from mild to life threatening, depending on the degree of envenoming (i.e., quantity of injected venom reaching the circulation), the composition of the venom and potentially early therapeutic interventions. Neuromuscular paralysis is classically a descending paralysis which initially involves the eye-lid muscles, clinically manifesting as bilateral ptosis, usually within a few hours of the bite. This is followed by external ophthalmoplegia and diplopia, facial muscle weakness [4,5,7,17] with slurred speech and difficulty in mouth opening [7,18]. The paralysis then descends to the neck muscles and bulbar muscles. Involvement of bulbar muscles causes difficulty in swallowing and compromises airway protection. This is potentially life-threatening because of the risk of aspiration [19]. Neuromuscular paralysis then involves the respiratory muscles resulting in hypoventilation from decreasing tidal volumes which requires mechanical ventilation [4,9,20,21,22]. In severe neurotoxic envenoming, particularly by kraits, neuromuscular paralysis will eventually involve all limb muscles [4,23]. Recovery of neuromuscular function usually follows the reverse order of muscle involvement, with ptosis and ophthalmoplegia being the last neurological signs to disappear [4]. This unique descending sequence of muscle involvement and recovery is unlikely to be due to properties of the snake neurotoxins, but rather a combination of the size and the unique physiology of the muscles and motor nerve connections, including the redundancy of neuromuscular junctions [24,25].
Central neurological effects are rarely reported in snake envenoming, and are almost always due to indirect neurological effects of haemorrohagic or thrombotic toxicity in the central nervous system from snake venom procoagulant toxins [26,27,28,29,30]. Apparent deep coma reported after krait envenoming [23,31] suggests possible direct toxin-mediated central neurological effects. However, this may be explained as an extreme state of neuromuscular paralysis mimicking coma rather than actual coma [4,31,32,33,34].

3. Neuromuscular Junction: The Primary Target Site

The neuromuscular junction is a specialised synapse between the motor nerve and skeletal muscle fibre and serves as the final relay station in the motor pathways. The neurotransmitter, acetylcholine (ACh), is stored in vesicles within the motor nerve terminal. Depolarisation of the motor nerve terminal opens the voltage gated Ca2+ channels resulting an influx of Ca2+ into the motor nerve terminal, which triggers the fusion of vesicles to the neurolemma and release of ACh into the synaptic cleft via exocytosis. The nAChR is a pentameric transmembrane protein with a central pore which functions as a non-selective ion channel. Binding of two ACh molecules with the two agonist binding sites of the nAChR leads to a conformational change resulting in the opening ofthe central pore of the nAChR, allowing an influx of Na+ and depolarisation of the post-synaptic membrane. Subsequent opening of the voltage-gated Ca+ channels causes depolarization of the sarcolemma resulting in initiation of the muscle fibre contraction process [35,36]. Snake venom neurotoxins can disrupt the neurotransmission process at several points. Most snake neurotoxins act either on the motor nerve terminal (i.e., pre-synaptically) to prevent the release of ACh or at the nAChR on the motor-end plate (i.e., post-synaptically) by antagonising the receptor.
Most neurotoxic snake venoms contain both pre- and post-synaptic neurotoxins, and it is common for venoms to contain several different post-synaptic toxins. However, some snakes have venoms that contain only pre-synaptic (e.g., Sri Lankan Russell’s viper, Daboia russelii) [37] or post-synaptic (e.g., King cobra, Ophiophagus hannah) toxins [38], rather than a combination of the two classes. With our rapidly expanding knowledge of snake venom proteomes and venom gland transcriptomes, many potential neurotoxins have been identified in snake venoms [38,39,40,41,42]. However, only a small proportion of these toxins have been isolated and functionally characterised.

Neurotoxins in Snake Venoms

Pre-synaptically acting neurotoxins have been isolated from many elapids such as Kraits, Tiger snakes, Taipans and also from some viperids, and appear to be important with regard to clinically evident neurotoxicity. Snake venom presynaptic toxins belong to group I phospholipases A2 (elapid venoms) and group II phospholipases A2 (Viperid venoms) (PLA2), a group of Ca2+-dependent enzymes. The exact mechanisms by which pre-synaptic toxins enter into the motor nerve terminal and initiate their actions are unclear. Hydrolysis of phospholipids in the neurilemma of the motor nerve is believed to be the primary mode of action of the pre-synaptic PLA2 neurotoxins [16,43]. Based on experimental work using β-bungarotoxin, the major pre-synaptic neurotoxin in Chinese banded krait (B. multicinctus) venom, the key toxin-mediated event occurring in the motor nerve terminals is the necrotic degeneration of the terminal boutons [13,43,44]. In isolated nerve-muscle preparations, neuromuscular transmission failure caused by pre-synaptic toxins is usually tri-phasic. This includes an initial phase of weak inhibition of ACh release, a second prolonged phase of facilitated ACh release, and a third phase of progressive decline of neurotransmission due to necrotic degeneration of the presynaptic terminal [45]. The process of necrotic degeneration includes the depletion of synaptic vesicles through the impairment of vesicle recycling, degeneration of the mitochondria and fragmentation of the neurilemma of the nerve terminal [13,43,44,46]. Ultimately, the damaged nerve terminals withdraw from the synaptic trough resulting in empty synaptic troughs [13]. The above pathophysiological changes appear to occur for, at least, elapid PLA2 pre-synaptic neurotoxins [47]. The process of necrotic degeneration occurs within the first 12 h of toxin exposure. Recovery of function by re-innervation takes 3 to 5 days after exposure to the toxin, and by 7 days, re-innervation is complete [13]. Many snake venoms that are known to cause severe paralysis in humans, such as Indian krait (B. caeruleus) [4], Malayan krait (B. candidus) [6], Chinese banded krait (B. multicinctus) [48], coastal taipan (O. scutellatus) [49] and tiger snake (N. scutatus) [11] venoms, contain potent pre-synaptic neurotoxins (Supplementary Table S1). A detailed account of these toxins is available in the review by Harris and Scott-Davey [16].
Most snake venom toxins that act post-synaptically belong to the three finger toxin family. Three finger toxins with curare-mimetic activity are broadly categorized into two groups: i.e., short-chain α-neurotoxins that have 60–62 amino acids with four disulfide bonds and long-chain α-neurotoxins that have 66–74 amino acids with five disulfide bonds. Irrespective of their structural differences, both long- and short-chain α-neurotoxins bind to similar sites on the nAChR with high affinity [50]. Short-chain α-neurotoxins bind to the nAChR 6 to 7 times faster, and dissociate 5 to 9 times, faster than long-chain α-neurotoxins [51]. α-Neurotoxins display a variety of types of interaction with the nAChR including reversible, pseudo-irreversible and irreversible binding in neuromuscular preparations. Long-chain α-neurotoxins are known to be relatively irreversible compared to short-chain α-neurotoxins. Both agonist binding sites of the nAChR need to be occupied by ACh (or agonist) to cause conformational change and the opening of the ion channel. Therefore, even if one binding site is occupied by an α-neurotoxin there will be dysfunction of the channel. Classic examples of long-chain α-neurotoxins are α-bungarotoxin from B. multiscinctus, and α-cobratoxin from N. kaouthia. A well-known short-chain α-neurotoxin is Toxin-α from N. nigricollis venom.
Recently published cobra venom proteomes (or “venomes”) suggest a high relative abundance of α-neurotoxins in Thai cobra (N. kaouthia) [52], King cobra (Ophiophagus hannah) [38] and Indian cobra (N. naja) [53] venoms, but negligible amounts of phospholipaseA2 toxins that are potentially pre-synaptic toxins. Although rare, life threatening neuromuscular paralysis has been reported in envenoming by all of the above cobra species, i.e., supporting the role of α-neurotoxins in neuromuscular paralysis in humans for at least some snakes. Detailed accounts of the structural and functional aspects of -neurotoxins are available in reviews by Barber et al. [15] and Nirthanan et al. [36]. There are other types of snake neurotoxins that are potentially important in the development of paralysis, but act at different sites compared to conventional pre-synaptic and post-synaptic toxins. Fasciculins inhibit AChE in the neuromuscular junction, allowing ACh to accumulate. These toxins have been isolated from the venoms of mamba species (Dendroaspis sp.). Once formed, the high affinity complex of fasciculin-AChE is very slow to dissociate [54]. Dendrotoxins, isolated from several African black mamba species, block the voltage-gated K+ channels in the nerve terminals resulting in continuous neurotransmitter release at vertebrate neuromuscular junctions. These toxins, when injected into the central nervous system, also facilitate neurotransmitter release [55].

4. Antivenoms

Antivenoms are the only antidotal treatment available for snake envenoming and have been in clinical use for over a century. Antivenoms are a mixture of polyclonal antibodies which can be whole or fractionated, F(ab)2 or F(ab) IgG, raised against one (i.e., monovalent) or several (i.e., polyvalent) snake venom(s) in animals such as horses, sheep, goats and donkeys [56]. Their polyclonal nature means that antivenoms consist of different antibodies against different toxin antigens in the venom. The antibody molecules bind with the toxins and (1) prevent the toxin-substrate interaction by blocking the active site, (2) form large venom-antivenom complexes preventing the distribution of the toxins from the central compartment, or (3) facilitate the elimination of toxins from the body [57,58]. Potential physico-chemical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic benefits of using monoclonal [59] and recombinant antibody [60] fragments raised against individual venom components has been experimentally explored. However, translation of such experimental antivenoms for clinical use has not yet occurred.

4.1. Antivenom Efficacy

The efficacy of antivenom against a particular venom is due to the ability of antivenom molecules to bind with toxins in the venom [61]. i.e., with respect to neurotoxicity, this is the ability of the antivenom molecules to bind with the neurotoxins in the venom. This is dependent on: (1) the avidity of the antivenom, which is a combined effect of the affinity constants of the different antibodies towards different toxins; (2) the relative abundance of antibodies in the antivenom against the individual neurotoxins; and (3) the relative abundance of the individual neurotoxins in the snake venom of interest. The ability of the antivenom molecules to bind with a specific venom can be quantified using an in vitro venom-antivenom binding assay, which provides useful insights into the overall ability of the antivenom to bind with the venom [62,63]. Immuno-depletion and, more recently, affinity chromatography based antivenomic approaches are useful tools in testing the ability of antivenoms to bind with specific neurotoxins or toxin groups in the venoms [64]. However, all of these approaches only demonstrate toxin binding and not neutralisation of neurotoxicity. In vitro pharmacological testing of antivenoms with chick biventer cervicis nerve-muscle preparations, frog rectus abdominis and rat phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm preparations is useful in specifically testing antivenom efficacy towards the neurotoxic properties of the venoms [45]. Of these, the chick biventer nerve-muscle preparation is capable of differentiating post-synaptic neurotoxicity from pre-synaptic neurotoxicity [37,63,65,66]. In these experimental procedures, antivenom is first equilibrated in the organ bath that contains the tissue, and then the venom or toxin is added to the organ bath allowing the antivenom to have sufficient time to bind with the neurotoxins [45]. It therefore measures antivenom efficacy only because antivenom is present prior to venom being added. The ability of antivenoms to bind to, and prevent the neurotoxicity of both long- and short-chain post-synaptic neurotoxins as well as pre-synaptic neurotoxins has been extensively investigated in the chick biventer nerve-muscle preparation [67,68,69,70]. Some studies have also demonstrated the ability of antivenom to partially reverse neurotoxicity in the chick biventer nerve-muscle preparation [65]. This is supported by a study demonstrating the ability of antivenoms to reverse the binding of post-synaptic toxins with the nAChR [71,72]. However, neuromuscular blockade mediated by pre-synaptic toxins is not reversed by antivenom, even if the antivenom is able to bind with the toxin because of the irreversibility of pre-synaptic neurotoxicity [70]. The most widely used method for assessing antivenom efficacy is rodent lethality testing. This test calculates the dose of antivenom required to reduce the mortality of rodents by 50% defined as the median effective dose 50% (ED50), when the animals are given five times the median lethal dose 50% (i.e., LD50) of the venom. From this test the ED50 of antivenom is calculated, which may be useful for inter-batch comparison of antivenoms or comparison of two antivenoms [73]. However, the outcome measure of this test is the death of the animal, which could be due to any, or a combination, of the toxin classes in the venom, not necessarily an effect of neurotoxicity, or even any toxic effect relevant to humans. Discrepancy between the rodent lethality based efficacy studies with in vitro venom-antivenom binding and nerve-muscle preparation based studies has recently been demonstrated [65]. In addition, the human muscle type nAChR is relatively resistant to snake venom short-chain post-synaptic neurotoxins compared to the rodent nAChR, suggesting possible inaccuracies with the use of rodents or their tissues as models for antivenom efficacy testing for neurotoxic venoms [74]. Therefore, the rodent lethality tests as a measure of antivenom efficacy for neuromuscular paralysis in humans is highly problematic. The ability of the heterologous antivenoms to cross-neutralise the neuromuscular effects of several other snake venoms and neurotoxins has been reported in in vitro pharmacological studies [66,75,76]. The remarkable ability of Asian antivenoms to cross-neutralise Australasian neurotoxic venoms and the similar ability of Australian antivenoms to cross-neutralise Asian neurotoxic venoms was shown recently [66]. This suggests the likely presence of common antigenic regions within the post-synaptic and pre-synaptic toxins indicating the potential to develop regional or even universal neurotoxic antivenoms [66].

4.2. Antivenom Effectiveness

The effectiveness of an antivenom can be defined as its ability to prevent the occurrence, or reverse the effects, of venom in the clinical setting [61]. With respect to neurotoxicity, the effectiveness of the antivenom is the ability of antivenom to prevent the occurrence of neurotoxicity or to reverse established neurotoxicity in snakebite patients. It is important to consider that in addition to the efficacy of the antivenom, many other factors will contribute to the effectiveness of an antivenom. These include: (1) factors that govern the severity and the rate of development of envenoming, such as the depth of the venom injection and amount of venom injected; (2) factors related to antivenom such as the delay from the bite to antivenom administration, antivenom dose, infusion rate, the ability of the antivenom to distribute to peripheral tissues; (3) the nature and extent of neurotoxin-mediated damage such as irreversible motor nerve injury due to pre-synaptic toxins; and (4), the geographical variations of the venom composition. The variability in these factors among patients makes it difficult to achieve an objective and pure measure of effectiveness of an antivenom in the clinical setting. Therefore, the interpretation of the evidence provided in clinical studies on the antivenom for neurotoxic envenoming should be interpreted with caution.

5. Clinical Studies of Antivenom for Neurotoxic Snake Envenoming

Well-designed, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials are the highest quality evidence required to demonstrate antivenom effectiveness for neurotoxicity in humans. Non-placebo controlled trials, non-randomized comparative trials and well-designed cohort studies also provide useful evidence in the absence of the former. The effectiveness of an antivenom depends on diverse factors, including the inter- and intra-species variability of venom composition of the snake. Therefore, proper case definition is also of high importance in securing the data quality of the clinical studies [77].

5.1. Randomised Controlled Trials

Our literature search yielded no randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials of antivenom for neuromuscular paralysis in snake envenoming. The search identified four randomized trials and one blinded cross-over trial, in which all arms in the trials received the same or different antivenom, without any placebo controls (Table 1).
Of the above five studies, three tested the effectiveness of an antivenom. One study compared a new monovalent antivenom with an existing polyvalent antivenom in Sri Lankan Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) envenoming [78] and the second compared two doses of the new CroFab antivenom in North American Crotalid envenoming in the United States [79]. In both studies, neuromuscular paralysis was not the primary outcome, but was part of the outcome assessment. Both studies showed no difference in the outcome between the trial arms. The snake species studied in both trials primarily caused venom-induced consumptive coagulopathy or local/regional effects, and neurotoxicity is non-life threatening for both snakes [5,80].
A third randomised blinded trial [81] conducted in South India tested two doses of Indian polyvalent antivenom against systemic envenoming. Although this study recruited patients with neuromuscular paralysis, the outcome measures for neurotoxic envenoming were not defined and the study included a heterogenous mix of snake types with the majority being unknown/unconfirmed. The study only had four versus three patients who developed neurotoxicity in the high and low dose groups, respectively. The study concluded that a low antivenom dose is more effective than the high dose, based on the obvious finding that the low dose group received less antivenom and that the low dose group had a shorter length of stay by one day.
The fourth randomised controlled trial [82] was a small pilot study of 15 patients with no predefined primary outcome, and no blinding of the treating doctors who were allowed to give repeat antivenom doses. In addition, the study included different types of snakes which were not balanced between groups.
A blinded randomised controlled trial [83] tested the effectiveness of edrophonium versus antivenom, only randomising patients to three different antivenom doses with all patients receiving edrophonium. The study was very small with only eight patients, had imbalanced randomisation and the time to antivenom varied between 3 h and 96 h, with a median of 24 h. This variability makes the results difficult to interpret, particularly the difference in time to antivenom because neurotoxicity usually develops over 24 h and then begins to recover. The fact that all patient responded to edrophonium suggests that this observed effect may not be directly related to the neurotoxicity.
All of the above studies lacked controlled arms and included small numbers of patients. In addition, individual studies had critical flaws such as lack of defined primary outcomes, authentication of the snake involved, and lack of blinding of the therapeutic interventions to the observer and the patient.

5.2. Non-Randomised Comparative Trials

Our search yielded three comparative trials (Table 2). One study compared the duration of neuromuscular paralysis in 27 patients with Bungarus multicinctus envenoming in Vietnam, treated with a new antivenom, with a historical control group of 54 patients who were not treated with antivenom [84]. The antivenom group had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay and other neurological signs, indicating the possible beneficial effects of antivenom in accelerating the recovery of neurotoxicity. However, there was no difference in the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation between the two groups (>80%). This may have been due to the fact that antivenom was delayed by 19 ± 9 h. The un-blinded before and after nature of the study also meant that other changes to treatment may have occurred between the groups. Duration of ventilation and length of stay are not good objective measures and there was no pre-defined primary outcome for the study.
A study of Thai cobra (Naja kaouthia and/or N. sumatrana) envenoming compared a group of patients who did not receive antivenom (historical) with three groups of patients who received a bolus of Thai cobra antivenom [85]. The antivenom-treated patient group had three sub-groups, each sub-group receiving a different antivenom dose (i.e., 50, 100 and 200 mL). The study showed a marked reduction in the duration of respiratory paralysis in the 100 and 200 mL groups compared to the no antivenom group. However, the study did not specify how respiratory paralysis was defined and the frequency of patients requiring ventilation was similar. The study also included a heterogenous group of patients with differing snake species and times of presentation to hospital. The study suggests that the post-synaptic neurotoxicity of Thai cobra envenoming is reversible, but a larger blinded, randomised and balanced study is required to confirm this.
The third study retrospectively compared the recovery of the snakebite patients with neurotoxicity who were treated with high dose versus low dose antivenom [86]. The study concluded that the lower dose was as effective as the higher dose. However, this could have been a result of the loading dose of antivenom being similar in both groups, while only the maintenance dose differed. All of these studies had major deficiencies in case definition as well as the objectiveness of the outcome measures.

5.3. Cohort Studies

The search also yielded numerous cohort studies that discussed the effects of antivenom on neuromuscular paralysis, including studies on envenoming by elapids such as Indian krait (Bungarus caeruleus) [4,18,87,88], multi-banded krait (B. multicinctus) [48,89], Malayan krait (B. candidus) [48,90], common cobra (Naja naja) [8,21], monocellate cobra (N. kaouthia) [91,92,93,94], Philippine cobra (N. philippinensis) [7], eastern coral snake (Micrurus fulvius fulvius) [95], coastal taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus) [96], Papuan taipan (O. canni) [10,97,98], tiger snake (Notechis scutatus) [11,99], rough-scaled snake (Tropidechis carinatus) [100], Papuan death adder (Acanthophis laevis) [101], Australian death adders (Acanthophis sp.) [12], Papuan black snake (Pseudechis papuanus) [102], and viperids such as Sri Lankan Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) [5,103,104,105], Balken adder (Viper berus bosniensis) [17], southern tropical rattlesnake (Crotalus durissus terrificus) [106,107] and Mojave rattlesnake (C. scutulatus scutulatus) [108] and North American crotalids [109]. In addition, there was a large number of case reports on snake bite induced paralysis and the effect of antivenom.
Almost all the above cohort studies commented on the efficacy or effectiveness of the antivenom therapy for neuromuscular dysfunction. However, apart from seven studies [4,5,11,12,97,100,103], the remaining studies had no data on serial venom antigen concentrations to enable comment on the ability of antivenom to clear free venom (efficacy). This deficiency, together with a lack of serial, well-defined objective neurological or neurophysiological parameters, makes it difficult to interpret the findings of the vast majority of the studies on the effectiveness of the antivenom in preventing or reversing paralysis, given that there was no untreated group for comparison.
Several of the above observational studies showed that antivenom failed to reverse already established neurotoxicity, particularly in envenomings by taipans and kraits, whose venoms predominately possess pre-synaptic neurotoxins. A large cohort study of 166 Papuan taipan (O. canni) envenomings showed that antivenom did not reverse established neurotoxicity. In addition, neurotoxicity did not improve in any patients within 6 h, and 19% of patients developed their first signs of neurotoxicity and 37% deteriorated after antivenom [99]. A recent observational study of 33 common krait (B. caeruleus) envenomings in Sri Lanka found that Indian polyvalent antivenom, given as early as a median of 3.5 h after the bite, rapidly cleared circulating venom antigens from the blood. However, it did not reverse neurotoxicity and there was subsequent worsening of neuromuscular paralysis in the patients observed clinically and measured neurophysiologically [4]. These studies provide objective evidence for the poor effectiveness of antivenom in reversing the paralysis in krait and taipain envenoming, despite it being efficacious in binding free venom in krait envenoming.
A large cohort of 245 authenticated Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) bite patients from Sri Lanka found that neuromuscular paralysis continued to worsen, as evident clinically and neurophysiologically, despite Indian polyvalent antivenom clearing circulating venom antigens [5]. These observations were largely consistent with the case reports that described the failure of antivenom therapy to prevent development or worsening of paralysis in common krait [110] and Cape cobra (Naja nivea) [111] envenoming.
A cohort study of 33 patients (18 envenomings) bitten by Papuan death adder (Acanthophis sp.) showed non-progression of the neuromuscular paralysis after antivenom therapy in 12 patients treated with death adder antivenom. In addition, a significant, rapid neurological improvement was observed in three patients [101]. In contrast, in a study of 29 definite death adder envenomings in Australia, 12 were treated with death adder antivenom and none showed a rapid improvement in paralysis despite the antivenom efficaciously clearing the venom antigens from the blood [12]. In contrast, there is evidence that early antivenom treatment decreases the frequency and severity of neurotoxic signs, and therefore prevents neurotoxicity developing in some snakes. In the study of 166 Papuan taipan envenoming, early administration of antivenom prevented intubation, with only 13.3% requiring intubation in patients given antivenom <4 h post-bite, compared to 63% in patients receiving antivenom >4 h post-bite [98]. Another study of 156 taipan envenomings also found that antivenom given within 4 h resulted in less patients requiring intubation [97]. A more recent cohort study in Australia of 40 coastal taipan (Oxyuranus spp.) envenomings demonstrated the efficacious binding of Australian polyvalent antivenom with the circulating venom. The same study found that early administration of antivenom was associated with a decreased frequency of neurotoxicity and requirement for intubation, indicating clinical effectiveness of the antivenom for preventing neuromuscular paralysis in taipan envenoming [96].
There were several case reports that reported spontaneous improvement with supportive treatment and no antivenom, in neuromuscular paralysis caused by Naja haje [112], Naja kaouthia [113], Bungarus candidus [114,115,116] and Micrurus laticollaris [117]. There were also numerous case reports that either suggested the beneficial effects of antivenom in accelerating the recovery of neuromuscular paralysis. None of these studies clearly demonstrated how antivenom therapy altered the clinical course of the paralysis, distinguishing it from the natural progression of the paralysis. Further, none of the reports provided circulating venom antigen data in-order to show the efficacious binding of the antivenom with the venom antigens.

6. Conclusions and Future Directions

Although antivenom use for neuromuscular paralysis in snake envenoming is established worldwide, there have been no randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials conducted on the effectiveness of antivenom therapy in preventing or reversing neuromuscular paralysis. Apart from a few studies, all the available randomized trials, comparative studies and cohort studies had deficiencies either in the case definition, study design, small sample size or in the objectivity of the measures of paralysis. A number of studies demonstrated the efficacy of antivenom in human envenoming by clearing circulating venom. Studies of snakes with primarily pre-synaptic neurotoxins (e.g., kraits, taipans) suggest that antivenom does not reverse established neurotoxicity, but early administration appears to prevent neurotoxicity or is associated with a decrease in severity for some snakes, mainly taipans. Small studies of snakes with mainly post-synaptic neurotoxins provide preliminary evidence that neurotoxicity may be reversed with antivenom, but placebo controlled studies with objective outcome measures are required to confirm this. The validity of the rodent lethality tests as pre-clinical tests of antivenom efficacy for neurotoxic envenoming in humans has been challenged and, in vitro pharmacological tests such as nerve-muscle preparation studies appear to provide more clinically meaningful information.
Future research needs to focus on well-designed studies investigating whether the early administration of antivenom will prevent neurotoxicity, both pre-synaptic and post-synaptic. This includes better case definition by using venom specific enzyme immunoassays to confirm envenoming [118], and improved objective measures of neurotoxicity, both clinical and neurophysiological [4]. In addition, there needs to be carefully designed studies investigating the ability of antivenom to reverse neurotoxicity in snakes with almost exclusively post-synaptic neurotoxins, such as cobras and the king cobra.

7. Methods

A search was carried out in MEDLINE from 1946 and EMBASE from 1947 to 31 March 2017 and included studies of snake envenoming which reported neuromuscular paralysis and provided information on antivenom. The following keywords were used: ‘‘snakebite’’, ‘‘snake envenoming/envenomation’’, “ophitoxaemia”, ‘‘neurotoxicity’’, ‘‘paralysis’’, ‘‘ptosis’’, ‘‘antivenom/antivenene’’ and ‘‘immunotherapy’’. Reference lists of retrieved articles were searched for additional relevant publications. Only articles in English were reviewed. After removing duplicates, we identified a total of 1136 studies of which 133 were included for review. (Figure 1) Articles that described in vivo and in vitro studies, reviews and epidemiological studies, clinical studies that did not report neurotoxic envenoming were excluded. There were four randomised comparative trials, one cross-over trial and 3 non-randomised comparative trials, 63 cohort studies and 62 case reports which described the effectiveness of antivenom.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/9/4/143/s1, Table S1: Some pre-synaptic toxins isolated and pharmacologically characterised from snake venoms that cause paralysis in humans.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by a National Health and Medical Research Council—Australia (NHMRC) Senior Research Fellowship (ID: 1061041) and a NHMRC Centres for Research Excellence Grant ID: 1110343. AS acknowledges the support of a Monash University International Postgraduate Research Scholarship and a Monash University Graduate Scholarship.

Author Contributions

G.K.I. and W.C.H. conceived the paper; A.S. performed the literature search; A.S. and G.K.I analysed data; A.S., W.C.H. and G.K.I. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kasturiratne, A.; Wickremasinghe, A.R.; De Silva, N.; Gunawardena, N.K.; Pathmeswaran, A.; Premaratna, R.; Savioli, L.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J. The global burden of snakebite: A literature analysis and modelling based on regional estimates of envenoming and deaths. PLoS Med. 2008, 5, e218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Chippaux, J. Snake-bites: Appraisal of the global situation. Bull. World Health Organ. 1998, 76, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Ranawaka, U.K.; Lalloo, D.G.; de Silva, H.J. Neurotoxicity in snakebite-the limits of our knowledge. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Silva, A.; Maduwage, K.; Sedgwick, M.; Pilapitiya, S.; Weerawansa, P.; Dahanayaka, N.J.; Buckley, N.A.; Johnston, C.; Siribaddana, S.; Isbister, G.K. Neuromuscular effects of common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) envenoming in Sri Lanka. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 10, e0004368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Silva, A.; Maduwage, K.; Sedgwick, M.; Pilapitiya, S.; Weerawansa, P.; Dahanayake, N.; Buckley, N.A.; Siribaddana, S.; Isbister, G.K. Neurotoxicity in Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) envenoming in Sri Lanka: A clinical and neurophysiological study. Clin. Toxicol. 2016, 54, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Warrell, D.A.; Looareesuwan, S.; White, N.J.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Warrell, M.J.; Kosakarn, W.; Reid, H.A. Severe neurotoxic envenoming by the Malayan krait Bungarus candidus (Linnaeus): Response to antivenom and anticholinesterase. Br. Med. J. 1983, 286, 678–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Watt, G.; Padre, L.; Tuazon, M.L.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Laughlin, L. Bites by the Philippine cobra (Naja naja philippinensis): Prominent neurotoxicity with minimal local signs. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1988, 39, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Kularatne, S.A.M.; Budagoda, B.D.S.S.; Gawarammana, I.B.; Kularatne, W.K.S. Epidemiology, clinical profile and management issues of cobra (Naja naja) bites in Sri Lanka: First authenticated case series. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 103, 924–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Manock, S.R.; Suarez, G.; Graham, D.; Avila-Aguero, M.L.; Warrell, D.A. Neurotoxic envenoming by South American coral snake (Micrurus lemniscatus helleri): Case report from eastern Ecuador and review. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008, 102, 1127–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Connolly, S.; Trevett, A.J.; Nwokolo, N.C.; Lalloo, D.G.; Naraqi, S.; Mantle, D.; Schofield, I.S.; Fawcett, P.R.W.; Harris, J.B.; Warrell, D.A. Neuromuscular effects of Papuan Taipan snake venom. Ann. Neurol. 1995, 38, 916–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Isbister, G.K.; O’Leary, M.A.; Elliott, M.; Brown, S.G.A. Tiger snake (Notechis spp.) envenoming: Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-13). Med. J. Aust. 2012, 197, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Johnston, C.I.; O’Leary, M.A.; Brown, S.G.A.; Currie, B.J.; Halkidis, L.; Whitaker, R.; Close, B.; Isbister, G.K. Death adder envenoming causes neurotoxicity not reversed by antivenom—Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-16). PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Prasarnpun, S.; Walsh, J.; Awad, S.S.; Harris, J.B. Envenoming bites by kraits: The biological basis of treatment-resistant neuromuscular paralysis. Brain 2005, 128, 2987–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Harris, J. Neuromuscular Junction (NMJ): A Target for Natural and Environmental Toxins in Humans. In Encyclopedia of Neuroscience; Elsevier Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2009; pp. 539–549. [Google Scholar]
  15. Barber, C.M.; Isbister, G.K.; Hodgson, W.C. Alpha neurotoxins. Toxicon 2013, 66, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Harris, J.B.; Scott-Davey, T. Secreted phospholipases A2 of snake venoms: Effects on the peripheral neuromuscular system with comments on the role of phospholipases A2 in disorders of the CNS and their uses in industry. Toxins (Basel) 2013, 1, 2533–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Malina, T.; Krecsák, L.; Jelić, D.; Maretić, T.; Tóth, T.; Siško, M.; Pandak, N. First clinical experiences about the neurotoxic envenomings inflicted by lowland populations of the Balkan adder, Vipera berus bosniensis. Neurotoxicology 2011, 32, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kularatne, S.A.M. Common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) bite in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka: A prospective clinical study, 1996–98. Postgrad. Med. J. 2002, 78, 276–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. De Silva, A.; Mendis, S.; Warrell, D.A. Neurotoxic envenoming by the Sri Lankan krait (Bungarus ceylonicus) complicated by traditional treatment and a reaction to antivenom. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1993, 87, 682–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pillai, L.V.; Ambike, D.; Husainy, S.; Khaire, A.; Captain, A.; Kuch, U. Severe Neurotoxic Envenoming and Cardiac Complications after the Bite of a “Sind Krait” (Bungarus cf. sindanus) in Maharashtra, India. Trop. Med. Health 2012, 40, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Theakston, R.; Phillips, R.; Warrell, D.; Galagedara, Y.; Abeysekara, D.; Dissanayake, P.; de Silva, A.; Aloysius, D. Envenoming by the common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) and Sri Lankan cobra (Naja naja naja): Efficacy and complications of therapy with Haffkine antivenom. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1990, 84, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Faiz, A.; Ghose, A.; Ahsan, F.; Rahman, R.; Amin, R.; Hassan, M.U.; Chowdhury, A.W.; Kuch, U.; Rocha, T.; Harris, J.B.; et al. The greater black krait (Bungarus niger), a newly recognized cause of neuro-myotoxic snake bite envenoming in Bangladesh. Brain 2010, 133, 3181–3193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Laothong, C.; Sitprija, V. Decreased parasympathetic activities in Malayan krait (Bungarus candidus) envenoming. Toxicon 2001, 39, 1353–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kaminski, H.J.; Maas, E.; Spiegel, P.; Ruff, R.L. Why are eye muscles frequently involved in myasthenia gravis? Neurology 1990, 7, 1663–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Soltys, J.; Gong, B.; Kaminski, H.; Zhou, Y.; Kusner, L. Extraocular Muscle Susceptibility to Myasthenia Gravis Unique Immunological Environment? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1132, 220–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gawarammana, I.; Mendis, S.; Jeganathan, K. Acute ischemic strokes due to bites by Daboia russelii in Sri Lanka—First authenticated case series. Toxicon 2009, 54, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mugundhan, K.; Thruvarutchelvan, K.; Sivakumar, S. Posterior circulation stroke in a young male following snake bite. J. Assoc. Physicians India 2008, 56, 713–714. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Thomas, L.; Chausson, N.; Uzan, J.; Kaidomar, S.; Vignes, R.; Plumelle, Y.; Bucher, B.; Smadja, D. Thrombotic stroke following snake bites by the “Fer-de-Lance” Bothrops lanceolatus in Martinique despite antivenom treatment: A report of three recent cases. Toxicon 2006, 48, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Jeevagan, V.; Chang, T.; Gnanathasan, C.A. Acute ischemic stroke following Hump-nosed viper envenoming; first authenticated case. Thromb. J. 2012, 10, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Narang, S.K.; Paleti, S.; Azeez Asad, M.A.; Samina, T.; Asad, M.A.A. Acute ischemic infarct in the middle cerebral artery territory following a Russell’s viper bite. Neurol. India 2009, 57, 479–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gawarammana, I.B.; Mudiyanselage Kularatne, S.A.; Kularatne, K.; Waduge, R.; Weerasinghe, V.S.; Bowatta, S.; Senanayake, N. Deep coma and hypokalaemia of unknown aetiology following Bungarus caeruleus bites: Exploration of pathophysiological mechanisms with two case studies. J. Venom Res. 2010, 1, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Prakash, S.; Mathew, C.; Bhagat, S. Locked-in syndrome in snakebite. J. Assoc. Physicians India 2008, 56, 121–122. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Sodhi, R.; Khanduri, S.; Nandha, H.; Bhasin, D.; Mandal, A.K. Brain death-think twice before labeling a patient. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2012, 30, 1321.e1–1321.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dayal, M.; Prakash, S.; Verma, P.K.; Pawar, M. Neurotoxin envenomation mimicking brain death in a child: A case report and review of literature. Indian J. Anaesth. 2014, 58, 458–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Albuquerque, E.X.; Pereira, E.F.R.; Alkondon, M.; Rogers, S.W. Mammalian nicotinic acetylcholine receptors: From structure to function. Physiol. Rev. 2009, 89, 73–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nirthanan, S.; Gwee, M.C.E. Three-finger-neurotoxins and the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, forty years on. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2004, 94, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Silva, A.; Kuruppu, S.; Othman, I.; Goode, R.J.A.; Hodgson, W.C.; Isbister, G.K. Neurotoxicity in Sri Lankan Russell’s Viper (Daboia russelii) envenoming is primarily due to U1-viperitoxin-Dr1a, a pre-synaptic neurotoxin. Neurotox. Res. 2017, 31, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Petras, D.; Heiss, P.; Süssmuth, R.D.; Calvete, J.J. Venom proteomics of Indonesian King Cobra, Ophiophagus hannah: Integrating top-down and bottom-up approaches. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 2539–2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tan, C.H.; Tan, K.Y.; Fung, S.Y.; Tan, N.H. Venom-gland transcriptome and venom proteome of the Malaysian king cobra (Ophiophagus hannah). BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Huang, H.-W.; Liu, B.; Chien, K.-Y.; Chiang, L.-C.; Huang, S.-Y.; Sung, W.-C.; Wu, W.-G. Cobra venom proteome and glycome determined from individual snakes of Naja atra reveal medically important dynamic range and systematic geographic variation. J. Proteom. 2015, 128, 92–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Petras, D.; Sanz, L.; Segura, Á.; Herrera, M.; Villalta, M.; Solano, D.; Vargas, M.; León, G.; Warrell, D.A.; Theakston, R.D.G.; et al. Snake venomics of African spitting cobras: Toxin composition and assessment of congeneric cross-reactivity of the Pan-African EchiTAb-Plus-ICP antivenom by antivenomics and neutralization approaches. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 1266–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tan, C.H.; Fung, S.Y.; Yap, M.K.K.; Leong, P.K.; Liew, J.L.; Tan, N.H. Unveiling the elusive and exotic: Venomics of the Malayan blue coral snake (Calliophis bivirgata flaviceps). J. Proteom. 2015, 132, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Prasarnpun, S.; Walsh, J.; Harris, J.B. Beta-bungarotoxin-induced depletion of synaptic vesicles at the mammalian neuromuscular junction. Neuropharmacology 2004, 47, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Dixon, R.W.; Harris, J.B. Nerve Terminal Damage by β-Bungarotoxin. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 154, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hodgson, W.C.; Wickramaratna, J.C. In Vitro neuromuscular activity of snake venoms. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2002, 29, 807–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rigoni, M.; Paoli, M.; Milanesi, E.; Caccin, P.; Rasola, A.; Bernardi, P.; Montecucco, C. Snake phospholipase A2 neurotoxins enter neurons, bind specifically to mitochondria, and open their transition pores. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 34013–34020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Rigoni, M.; Schiavo, G.; Weston, A.E.; Caccin, P.; Allegrini, F.; Pennuto, M.; Valtorta, F.; Montecucco, C.; Rossetto, O. Snake presynaptic neurotoxins with phospholipase A2 activity induce punctate swellings of neurites and exocytosis of synaptic vesicles. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117, 3561–3570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Pe, T.; Myint, T.; Htut, A.; Htut, T.; Myint, A.A.; Aung, N.N.; Unit, I.C.; Hospital, Y.G.; Division, B.; Township, M. Envenoming by Chinese krait (Bungarus multicinctus) and banded krait (B. fasciatus) in Myanmar. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1997, 91, 686–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Isbister, G.K.; Brown, S.G.A. Bites in Australian snake handlers—Australian snakebite project (ASP-15). QJM 2012, 105, 1089–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Servent, D.; Antil-Delbeke, S.; Gaillard, C.; Corringer, P.; Changeux, J.; Ménez, A. Molecular characterization of the specificity of interactions of various neurotoxins on two distinct nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2000, 393, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chicheportiche, R.; Vincent, J.P.; Kopeyan, C.; Schweitz, H.; Lazdunski, M. Structure-function relationship in the binding of snake neurotoxins to the torpedo membrane receptor. Biochemistry 1975, 14, 2081–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Tan, K.Y.; Tan, C.H.; Fung, S.Y.; Tan, N.H. Venomics, lethality and neutralization of Naja kaouthia (monocled cobra) venoms from three different geographical regions of Southeast Asia. J. Proteom. 2015, 120, 105–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sintiprungrat, K.; Watcharatanyatip, K.; Senevirathne, W.D.S.T.; Chaisuriya, P.; Chokchaichamnankit, D.; Srisomsap, C.; Ratanabanangkoon, K. A comparative study of venomics of Naja naja from India and Sri Lanka, clinical manifestations and antivenomics of an Indian polyspecific antivenom. J. Proteom. 2016, 132, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Marchot, P.; Prowse, C.N.; Kanter, J.; Camp, S.; Ackermann, E.J.; Radic, Z.; Bougis, P.E.; Taylor, P. Expression and Activity of Mutants of Fasciculin, a Peptidic Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor from Mamba Venom. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 3502–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Anderson, A.J.; Harvey, A.L. Effects of the potassium channel blocking dendrotoxins on acetylcholine release and motor nerve terminal activity. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1988, 1985, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chippaux, J.-P.; Goyffon, M. Venoms, antivenoms and immunotherapy. Toxicon 1998, 36, 823–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Maduwage, K.; Isbister, G.K. Current treatment for venom-induced consumption coagulopathy resulting from snakebite. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gutiérrez, J.M.; León, G.; Lomonte, B. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of immunoglobulin therapy for envenomation. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2003, 42, 721–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Cardoso, D.F.; Nato, F.; England, P.; Ferreira, M.L.; Vaughan, T.J.; Mota, I.; Mazie, J.C.; Choumet, V.; Lafaye, P. Neutralizing human anti crotoxin scFv isolated from a nonimmunized phage library. Scand. J. Immunol. 2000, 51, 337–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Richard, G.; Meyers, A.J.; McLean, M.D.; Arbabi-Ghahroudi, M.; MacKenzie, R.; Hall, J.C. In Vivo neutralization of α-cobratoxin with high-affinity llama single-domain antibodies (VHHs) and a VHH-Fc antibody. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e69495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Isbister, G.K. Antivenom efficacy or effectiveness: The Australian experience. Toxicology 2010, 268, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Isbister, G.K.; O’Leary, M.A.; Schneider, J.J.; Brown, S.G.A.; Currie, B.J. Efficacy of antivenom against the procoagulant effect of Australian brown snake (Pseudonaja sp.) venom: In vivo and in vitro studies. Toxicon 2007, 49, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Maduwage, K.; Silva, A.; O’Leary, M.A.; Hodgson, W.C.; Isbister, G.K. Efficacy of Indian polyvalent snake antivenoms against Sri Lankan snake venoms: Lethality studies or clinically focussed in vitro studies. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 26778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pla, D.; Gutiérrez, J.M.; Calvete, J.J. Second generation snake antivenomics: Comparing immunoaffinity and immunodepletion protocols. Toxicon 2012, 60, 688–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Rusmili, M.; Yee, T.; Mustafa, M.; Othman, I.; Hodgson, W. In Vitro Neurotoxicity of Two Malaysian Krait Species (Bungarus candidus and Bungarus fasciatus) Venoms: Neutralization by Monovalent and Polyvalent Antivenoms from Thailand. Toxins (Basel) 2014, 6, 1036–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Silva, A.; Hodgson, W.; Isbister, G. Cross-neutralisation of in vitro neurotoxicity of Asian and Australian snake neurotoxins and venoms by different antivenoms. Toxins (Basel) 2016, 8, 302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Tan, L.C.; Kuruppu, S.; Smith, A.I.; Reeve, S.; Hodgson, W.C. Isolation and pharmacological characterisation of hostoxin-1, a postsynaptic neurotoxin from the venom of the Stephen’s banded snake (Hoplocephalus stephensi). Neuropharmacology 2006, 51, 782–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Kuruppu, S.; Reeve, S.; Banerjee, Y.; Kini, R.M.; Smith, A.I.; Hodgson, W.C. Isolation and pharmacological characterization of cannitoxin, a presynaptic neurotoxin from the venom of the Papuan Taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus canni). J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2005, 315, 1196–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Kuruppu, S.; Reeve, S.; Smith, A.I.; Hodgson, W.C. Isolation and pharmacological characterisation of papuantoxin-1, a postsynaptic neurotoxin from the venom of the Papuan black snake (Pseudechis papuanus). Biochem. Pharmacol. 2005, 70, 794–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Blacklow, B.; Escoubas, P.; Nicholson, G.M. Characterisation of the heterotrimeric presynaptic phospholipase A2 neurotoxin complex from the venom of the common death adder (Acanthophis antarcticus). Biochem. Pharmacol. 2010, 80, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Alape-Giron, A.; Stiles, B.G.; Gutierrez, J.M. Antibody-mediated neutralization and binding-reversal studies on alpha-neurotoxins from Micrurus nigrocinctus nigrocinctus (coral snake) venom. Toxicon 1996, 34, 369–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Boulain, J.C.; Ménez, A. Neurotoxin-specific immunoglobulins accelerate dissociation of the neurotoxin-acetylcholine receptor complex. Science 1982, 217, 732–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. World Health Organisation (WHO). Guidelines for the Production Control and Regulation of Snake Antivenom Immunoglobulins; World Health Organisation (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2010; pp. 1–134. [Google Scholar]
  74. Ishikawa, Y.; Kano, M.; Tamiya, N.; Shimada, Y. Acetylcholine receptors of human skeletal muscle: A species difference detected by snake neurotoxins. Brain Res. 1985, 346, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Leong, P.K.; Tan, N.H.; Fung, S.Y.; Sim, S.M. Cross neutralisation of Southeast Asian cobra and krait venoms by Indian polyvalent antivenoms. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2012, 106, 731–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kornhauser, R.; Isbister, G.K.; O’Leary, M.A.; Mirtschin, P.; Dunstan, N.; Hodgson, W.C. Cross-Neutralisation of the neurotoxic effects of Egyptian cobra venom with commercial tiger snake antivenom. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 112, 138–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Isbister, G.K. Snake antivenom research: The importance of case definition. Emerg. Med. J. 2005, 22, 399–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ariaratnam, A.; Sjostrom, L.; Raziek, Z.; Kularatne, S.; Kodikara Arachchi, R.W.K.; Sheriff, M.; Theakston, R.; Warrell, D. An open, randomized comparative trial of two antivenoms for the treatment of envenoming by Sri Lankan Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii russelii). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2001, 95, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Dart, R.C.; Seifert, S.A.; Boyer, L.V.; Clark, R.F.; Hall, E.; McKinney, P.; McNally, J.; Kitchens, C.S.; Curry, S.C.; Bogdan, G.M.; et al. A randomized multicenter trial of crotalinae polyvalent immune Fab (Ovine) antivenom for the treatment for crotaline snakebite in the United States. Arch. Intern. Med. 2001, 161, 2031–2036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Holstege, C.P.; Miller, M.; Wermuth, M.; Furbee, B.; Curry, S.C. Crotalid snake envenomation. Crit. Care Clin. 1997, 13, 889–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tariang, D.; Phillip, P.; Alexander, G.; Jeyaseelan, L.; Peter, J.; Cherian, A. Randomized controlled trial on the effective dose of anti-snake venom in cases of snake bite with systemic envenomation. J. Assoc. Physicians India 1999, 47, 369–371. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  82. Sellahewa, K.; Kumararatne, M.; Dassanayake, P.; Wijesundara, A. Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of snake bite envenoming. Ceylon Med. J. 1994, 39, 173–175. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Watt, G.; Meade, B.D.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Padre, L.P.; Tuazonl, M.L.; Calubaquib, C.; Santiago, E.; Ranoa, C.P.; Naval, U.S.; No, U.; et al. Comparison of Tensilon and antivenom for the treatment of cobra bite paralysis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1989, 83, 570–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ha, T.H.; Höjer, J.; Trinh, X.K.; Nguyen, T. Du A controlled clinical trial of a novel antivenom in patients envenomed by Bungarus multicinctus. J. Med. Toxicol. 2010, 6, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Pochanugool, C.; Limthongkul, S.; Wilde, H. Management of Thai cobra bites with a single bolus of antivenin. Wilderness Environ. Med. 1997, 8, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Agarwal, R.; Aggarwal, A.N.; Gupta, D.; Behera, D.; Jindal, S.K. Low dose of snake antivenom is as effective as high dose in patients with severe neurotoxic snake envenoming. Emerg. Med. J. 2005, 22, 397–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Ariaratnam, C.A.; Sheriff, M.H.R.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Warrell, D.A. Distinctive epidemiologic and clinical features of common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) bites in Sri Lanka. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2008, 79, 458–462. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Singh, G.; Pannu, H.S.S.; Chawla, P.S.S.; Malhotra, S. Neuromuscular transmission failure due to common krait (Bungarus caeruleus) envenomation. Muscle Nerve 1999, 22, 1637–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hung, T.H.; Du Thi, N.; Hojer, J. Clinical features of 60 consecutive ICU-treated patients envenomed by Bungarus multicinctus. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2009, 40, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  90. Trinh, K.X.; Khac, Q.L.; Trinh, L.X.; Warrell, D.A.; Xuan, K.; Le, Q.; Xuan, L. Hyponatraemia, rhabdomyolysis, alterations in blood pressure and persistent mydriasis in patients envenomed by Malayan kraits (Bungarus candidus) in southern Viet Nam. Toxicon 2010, 56, 1070–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Wongtongkam, N.; Wilde, H.; Sitthi-Amorn, C.; Ratanabanangkoon, K. A study of Thai cobra (Naja kaouthia) bites in Thailand. Mil. Med. 2005, 170, 336–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Viravan, C.; Veeravat, U.; Warrell, M.J.; Theakstow, R.D.G.; Warrell, D. ELISA confirmation of acute and past envenoming by the Monocellate Thai Cobra (Naja kaouthia). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1986, 35, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  93. Trishnananda, M.; Oonsombat, P.; Dumavibhat, B.; Yongchaiyudha, S.; Boonyapisit, V. Clinical manifestations of cobra bite in the Thai farmer. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1979, 28, 165–166. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  94. Faiz, M.A.; Ahsan, M.F.; Ghose, A.; Rahman, M.R.; Amin, R.; Hossain, M.; Tareq, M.N.; Jalil, M.A.; Kuch, U.; Theakston, R.D.; et al. Bites by the monocled cobra, Naja kaouthia, in Chittagong division, Bangladesh: Epidemiology, clinical features of envenoming and management of 70 identified cases. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017. pii: 16-0842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Kitchens, C.S.; Van Mierop, L.H. Envenomation by the Eastern coral snake (Micrurus fulvius fulvius). A study of 39 victims. JAMA 1987, 258, 1615–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Johnston, C.I.; Ryan, N.M.; O’Leary, M.A.; Brown, S.G.A.; Isbister, G.K. Australian taipan (Oxyuranus spp.) envenoming: Clinical effects and potential benefits of early antivenom therapy—Australian Snakebite Project (ASP-25). Clin. Toxicol. 2017, 55, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Trevett, A.J.; Lalloo, D.G.; Nwokolo, N.C.; Naraqi, S.; Kevau, I.H.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Warrell, D.A. The efficacy of antivenom in the treatment of bites by the Papuan taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus canni). Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1995, 89, 322–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lalloo, D.G.; Treveti, A.J.; Korinhona, A.; Laurenson, I.A.N.F.; Paul, M.; Black, J.; Naraqi, S.; Mavo, B.; Sawer, A.; Hutfon, R.O.N.A.; et al. Snake bites by the Papuan Taipan (Oxyuranus scutellatus canni): Paralysis, Haemostatic and Electrocardiographic abnormalities, and effects of antivenom. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1995, 52, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  99. Scop, J.; Little, M.; Jelinek, G.A.; Daly, F.F.S. Sixteen years of severe tiger snake (Notechis) envenoming in Perth, Western Australia. Anaesth. Intensive Care 2009, 37, 613–618. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  100. Gan, M.; O’Leary, M.A.; Brown, S.G.A.; Jacoby, T.; Spain, D.; Tankel, A.; Gavaghan, C.; Garrett, P.; Isbister, G.K. Envenoming by the rough-scaled snake (Tropidechis carinatus): A series of confirmed cases. Med. J. Aust. 2009, 191, 183–186. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  101. Lalloo, D.G.; Trevett, A.J.; Black, J.; Mapao, J.; Saweri, A.; Naraqi, S.; Owens, D.; Kamiguti, A.S.; Hutton, R.A.; Theakston, R.D.; et al. Neurotoxicity, anticoagulant activity and evidence of rhabdomyolysis in patients bitten by death adders (Acanthophis sp.) in southern Papua New Guinea. QJM 1996, 89, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Lalloo, D.; Trevett1, A.; Black, J.; Mapao, J.; Naraqi, S.; Owens, D.; Hutton, R.; Theakston, D.; Warrell, D. Neurotoxicity and haemostatic disturbances in patients envenomed by the Papuan Black Snake (Pseudechis papuanus). Toxicon 1994, 32, 927–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Phillips, R.E.; Theakston, R.D.G.; Warrell, D.A.; Galigedara, Y.; Aloysius, D.J. Paralysis, rhabdomyolysis and haemolysis caused by bites of Russell’s viper (Vipera russelli pulchella) in Sri Lanka: Failure of Indian (Haffkine) antivenom. Q. J. Med. 1988, 68, 691–716. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  104. Kularatne, S.A.M. Epidemiology and clinical picture of the Russell’s viper (Daboia russelli russelli) bite in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka: A prospective study of 336 patients. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2000, 34, 855–862. [Google Scholar]
  105. Kularatne, K.; Budagoda, S.; Maduwage, K.; Naser, K.; Kumarasiri, R.; Kularatne, S. Parallels between Russell’s viper (Daboia russelii) and hump-nosed viper (Hypnale species) bites in the central hills of Sri Lanka amidst the heavy burden of unidentified snake bites. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2011, 4, 564–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Azevedo-Marques, M.M.; Hering, S.E.; Cupo, P. Evidence that Crotalus durissus terrificus (South American rattlesnake) envenomation in humans causes myolysis rather than hemolysis. Toxicon 1987, 25, 1163–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Cupo, P.; de Azevedo-Marques, M.M.; Hering, S.E. Absence of myocardial involvement in children victims of Crotalus durissus terrificus envenoming. Toxicon 2003, 42, 741–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Hardy, D.L. Envenomation by the Mojave rattlesnake (Crotalus scutulatus scutulatus) in southern Arizona, U.S.A. Toxicon 1983, 21, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Dart, R.C.; Seifert, S.A.; Carroll, L.; Clark, R.F.; Hall, E.; Boyer-Hassen, L.V.; Curry, S.C.; Kitchens, C.S.; Garcia, R.A. Affinity-purified, mixed monospecific crotalid antivenom ovine Fab for the treatment of crotalid venom poisoning. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1997, 30, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Agarwal, R.; Singh, A.P.; Aggarwal, A.N.; Agarwal, R.; Singh, A.P.; Aggarwal, A.N. Pulmonary oedema complicating snake bite due to Bungarus caeruleus. Singap. Med. J. 2007, 48, 227–230. [Google Scholar]
  111. Blaylock, R.S.; Lichtman, A.R.; Potgieter, P.D. Clinical manifestations of Cape cobra (Naja nivea) bites. A report of 2 cases. S. Afr. Med. J. 1985, 68, 342–344. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  112. Warrell, D.A.; Barnes, H.J.; Piburn, M.F. Neurotoxic effects of bites by the Egyptian cobra (Naja haje) in Nigeria. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1976, 70, 78–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ronan-Bentle, S.E.; Bryant, S.M.; Williams, J.B. Naja kaouthia envenomation in the Midwest. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 2004, 46, 181–182. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  114. Pochanugool, C.; Wilde, H.; Jitapunkul, S. Spontaneous recovery from severe neurotoxic envenoming by a Malayan krait Bungarus candidus (Linnaeus) in Thailand. Wilderness Environ. Med. 1997, 8, 223–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Leeprasert, W.; Kaojarem, S. Specific Antivenom for Bungarus candidus. J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2007, 90, 1467–1476. [Google Scholar]
  116. Kanchanapongkul, J. Neurotoxic Envenoming Following Bites by the Malayan Krait (Bungarus candidus). J. Med. Assoc. Thail. 2002, 85, 945–947. [Google Scholar]
  117. Pettigrew, L.C.; Glass, J.P. Neurologic complications of a coral snake bite. Neurology 1985, 35, 589–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Kulawickrama, S.; O’Leary, M.A.; Hodgson, W.C.; Brown, S.G.; Jacoby, T.; Davern, K.; Isbister, G.K. Development of a sensitive enzyme immunoassay for measuring taipan venom in serum. Toxicon 2010, 55, 1510–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Selection of the studies for the review.
Figure 1. Selection of the studies for the review.
Toxins 09 00143 g001
Table 1. Randomized trials without placebo-control and cross-over trials that describe the antivenom effectiveness for neuromuscular paralysis in snake envenoming.
Table 1. Randomized trials without placebo-control and cross-over trials that describe the antivenom effectiveness for neuromuscular paralysis in snake envenoming.
StudyNumber in Each ArmSnake SpeciesAuthentication of SnakeTrial ArmsBlindedRandomisationAllocation ConcealmentAV ** Dose DefinedPrimary Outcome DefinedNeurotoxicity Measures for OutcomeConclusion
Ariaratnam et al. 200123/20Daboia russeliiIdentification of snake specimen and ELISA * (n = 43); clinical features (n = 3)2 different AV (2 arms)NoYesGoodYesMultiple outcomesDuration of neurological signs (ptosis, diplopia)No difference between groups
Dart et al. 200116/15North American CrotalidsNot stated2 doses of AV (2 arms)NoYesGoodYesYes (Improvement of a defined severity score)Weakness Fasciculations Dizziness Paraesthesia (included to the severity score)Both doses equally effective
Sellahewa et al.8/7Naja naja (n = 3) Daboia russelli (n = 11) Hypnale hypnale (n = 1)Identification of specimen (n = 10), clinical features (n = 5)AV vs. AV + Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)NoYesGoodYesNoDuration of neurotoxic features (ptosis and ophthalmoplegia)No clear difference except more re-dosing in AV group.
Tariang et al. 199931/29‘Cobra’, ‘viper’Not statedTwo doses of AVYesYesNot describedYesNoNot definedLower dose is effective than higher dose
Watt et al. 19892/2/4/8 (Cross-over)Philippine cobra (Naja philippinensis)ELISA (n = 5); Identification from pictures (n = 2); clinical features (n = 1)Three different doses of AV and all patients received edrophoniumNoNoNoYesMultiple outcomesImprovement of neurological signsTensilon is effective compared to AV
* ELISA: Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; ** AV: antivenom.
Table 2. Comparative clinical studies that describe the antivenom effectiveness for neuromuscular paralysis in snake envenoming.
Table 2. Comparative clinical studies that describe the antivenom effectiveness for neuromuscular paralysis in snake envenoming.
StudyNumber in Each GroupSnake SpeciesAuthentication of SnakeStudy GroupsAntivenom Dose DefinedNeurotoxicity MeasuresConclusionRemarks
Agarwal et al. 200528/27Not definedNot defined.High vs. low dose AVYesDuration of the mechanical ventilation, duration of ICU stayNo difference in outcome between the two groupsSame AV loading dose was given to both groups. The difference was only the maintenance dose.
Hung et al. 201027/54Bungarus multicinctusNot definedAV vs. no AVYesNumber of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the ICU, duration of a defined degree of muscle paralysisAV group had shorter duration of ventilation, ICU stay and other neurological signs. No difference between the number of patients requiring ventilation.The no AV group is a historical group; AV dose varied within the AV group; Bite-to-AV delay is 19 ± 9 h (range: 5–38 h).
Pochanugool et al. 199727/41Naja kaouthia Naja sumatranaPatient’s description of snake or physician’s identification of the snakeNo AV vs. AV (three unbalanced dose groups within AV group)YesDuration of respiratory failureTwo dose groups of antivenom (100 and 200 mL) had significantly lower duration of respiratory failure compared to no AVThe no AV group is a historical group; No definition of ‘respiratory paralysis’.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silva, A.; Hodgson, W.C.; Isbister, G.K. Antivenom for Neuromuscular Paralysis Resulting From Snake Envenoming. Toxins 2017, 9, 143. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins9040143

AMA Style

Silva A, Hodgson WC, Isbister GK. Antivenom for Neuromuscular Paralysis Resulting From Snake Envenoming. Toxins. 2017; 9(4):143. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins9040143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silva, Anjana, Wayne C. Hodgson, and Geoffrey K. Isbister. 2017. "Antivenom for Neuromuscular Paralysis Resulting From Snake Envenoming" Toxins 9, no. 4: 143. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxins9040143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop