Next Article in Journal
Proteomic Analysis of Lung Cancer Types—A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicle-Based Method for Detecting MYCN Amplification Status of Pediatric Neuroblastoma
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Updates on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic NET

1
Clinic for Internal Medicine I, Martin-Luther University Halle/Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Strasse 40, D 06120 Halle, Germany
2
Medical Department, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, D 20246 Hamburg, Germany
3
Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldinger Strasse, D 35043 Marburg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 19 May 2022 / Revised: 21 May 2022 / Accepted: 24 May 2022 / Published: 26 May 2022
Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) comprise a plethora of distinct molecular-pathological, clinical, diagnostical and therapeutical approaches to enable individualized treatment. Although the incidence is low when compared to other gastrointestinal malignancies (<10/100,000), the prognosis for local and metastatic stages is considerably better and the prevalence has, therefore, risen significantly in the last 20 years [1]. With the standardization of the classification system of GEP-NEN by the latest WHO classification of 2019, it has been achieved to better define the risk groups of patients [2]. Along with the staging based on the TNM classification according to ENETS/UICC, there are strong parameters that are obtainable to determine overall prognosis [3]. In recent years, progress has also been achieved in understanding tumor biology of NEN, especially of well-differentiated pancreatic NET (PanNET). To date, for localized PanNET, a tumor size of 2 cm or below advocated between surgical resection or even surveillance [4]. However, recently published data uncovered new promising prognostic markers. Sporadic PanNET often harbor somatic DAXX/ATRX (death domain-associated protein/alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked chromatin remodeler) and MEN-1 mutations [5]. Additionally, loss of DAXX/ATRX protein expression is significantly associated with activation of alternative lengthening telomeres (ALT), which can be reflected by using telomere-specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) [6]. In PanNET the coincidence of DAXX/ATRX loss and ALT up-regulation negatively impacts the recurrence rate after curative resection and correlates with distant metastasis [6,7]. For non-metastatic small PanNET ≤2 cm relapse occurred frequently in DAXX/ATRX loss and/or ALT positivity and the recurrence-free survival (RFS) was shorter [8]. Although this holds true only for a subset of patients, evaluation of DAXX/ATRX and ALT should be implemented in clinical routine for non-metastatic PanNET. Moreover, DAXX/ATRX and ALT are highly specific conserved markers for pancreatic origin and can be utilized to uncover the primary tumor in NET metastasis of unknown origin [8].
Further advances in the field of NET care include molecular imaging procedures. Besides the well-established somatostatin receptor (SSTR) imaging with 68Ga-DOTATOC/-TATE and –NOC, the radioisotope 64Cu (copper) can be linked to DOTATATE with equivalent high image quality and diagnostic accuracy. Alternative approaches include SSTR antagonist such as 68Ga-OPS202 also called 68Ga-NODAGA-JR11 [9]. Preliminary data indicate a high metastasis detection rate and superior sensitivity compared to agonists in NET patients. Here, further clinical studies are warranted to decide which approach will remain or serve as the new standard in future. In patients with insulinomas SSTR imaging often fails due to low SSTR expression. Therefore, the preoperative identification of the hormone-secreting lesion often is challenging. Investigations regarding the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) introduced exendin-4 a GLP-1 analogue which can be coupled to 68Ga-DOTA [10]. The 68Ga-DOTA-exendin-4 PET/CT is superior to conventional CT or MRI imaging and 68Ga-DOTATOC in patients with suspected undetectable insulinoma and is the method of choice if available.
From a therapeutic perspective, several novel targeted therapies are in clinical development for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors [11]. The main concept of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) is to interrupt signaling pathways involved in mediating cell proliferation and angiogenesis. However, since the tumor microenvironment, in particular tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) were characterized as co-player for tumor progression and modulator of resistance for anti-angiogenic therapies [12,13], novel TKI such as surufatinib and cabozantinib (CABINET study, NCT 03375320) are in the research focus [14]. By additional targeting of the colony-stimulating factor receptor 1 and TIE2 receptor both compounds simultaneously can disrupt angiogenesis and induces TAM depletion thus enhancing anti-tumor efficacy. In this context, further clinical studies will determine the impact of TKI in NEN.
The Special Issue “Updates on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms” reports in 2 reviews on current developments in the multimodal therapy of PanNET as well as on new therapeutic approaches including immunotherapy, CAR-T cell therapy and vaccines in NEN [15,16]. Other original papers address the value of salvage PRRT, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) as a biomarker in NEN, and the best surgical approach for Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients [17,18,19].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.K.; writing—review and editing, S.K., J.S. and A.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dasari, A.; Shen, C.; Halperin, D.M.; Zhao, B.; Zhou, S.; Xu, Y.; Shih, T.; Yao, J.C. Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 1335–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nagtegaal, I.D.; Odze, R.D.; Klimstra, D.; Paradis, V.; Rugge, M.; Schirmacher, P.; Washington, K.M.; Carneiro, F.; Cree, I.A.; The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. Histopathology 2020, 76, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Rindi, G.; Wiedenmann, B. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gut and pancreas: New insights. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2012, 8, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Falconi, M.; Eriksson, B.; Kaltsas, G.; Bartsch, D.K.; Capdevila, J.; Caplin, M.; Kos-Kudla, B.; Kwekkeboom, D.; Rindi, G.; Klöppel, G.; et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2016, 103, 153–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Scarpa, A.; Chang, D.K.; Nones, K.; Corbo, V.; Patch, A.-M.; Bailey, P.; Lawlor, R.T.; Johns, A.L.; Miller, D.K.; Mafficini, A.; et al. Whole-genome landscape of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Nature 2017, 543, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Marinoni, I.; Kurrer, A.S.; Vassella, E.; Dettmer, M.; Rudolph, T.; Banz, V.; Hunger, F.; Pasquinelli, S.; Speel, E.; Perren, A. Loss of DAXX and ATRX are associated with chromosome instability and reduced survival of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 453–460.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Singhi, A.D.; Liu, T.-C.; Roncaioli, J.L.; Cao, D.; Zeh, H.J.; Zureikat, A.H.; Tsung, A.; Marsh, J.W.; Lee, K.K.; Hogg, M.E.; et al. Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres and Loss of DAXX/ATRX Expression Predicts Metastatic Disease and Poor Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Hackeng, W.M.; Brosens, L.A.A.; Kim, J.Y.; O’Sullivan, R.; Sung, Y.-N.; Liu, T.-C.; Cao, D.; Heayn, M.; Brosnan-Cashman, J.; An, S.; et al. Non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: ATRX/DAXX and alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) are prognostically independent from ARX/PDX1 expression and tumour size. Gut 2022, 71, 961–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Refardt, J.; Hofland, J.; Wild, D.; Christ, E. New Directions in Imaging Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2021, 23, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Wild, D.; Mäcke, H.; Christ, E.; Gloor, B.; Reubi, J.C. Glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor scans to localize occult insulinomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 359, 766–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Grillo, F.; Florio, T.; Ferraù, F.; Kara, E.; Fanciulli, G.; Faggiano, A.; Colao, A. Emerging multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the treatment of neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2018, 25, R453–R466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Pyonteck, S.M.; Gadea, B.B.; Wang, H.-W.; Gocheva, V.; Hunter, K.E.; Tang, L.H.; Joyce, J.A. Deficiency of the macrophage growth factor CSF-1 disrupts pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor development. Oncogene 2012, 31, 1459–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Krug, S.; Abbassi, R.; Griesmann, H.; Sipos, B.; Wiese, D.; Rexin, P.; Blank, A.; Perren, A.; Haybaeck, J.; Hüttelmaier, S.; et al. Therapeutic Targeting of Tumor-Associated Macrophages in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 143, 1806–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Xu, J.; Shen, L.; Bai, C.; Wang, W.; Li, J.; Yu, X.; Li, Z.; Li, E.; Yuan, X.; Chi, Y.; et al. Surufatinib in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (SANET-p): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 1489–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kaliszewski, K.; Ludwig, M.; Greniuk, M.; Mikuła, A.; Zagórski, K.; Rudnicki, J. Advances in the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Cancers 2022, 14, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marchese, U.; Gaillard, M.; Pellat, A.; Tzedakis, S.; Ali, E.A.; Dohan, A.; Barat, M.; Soyer, P.; Fuks, D.; Coriat, R. Multimodal Management of Grade 1 and 2 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Cancers 2022, 14, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Galler, M.; Rogasch, J.M.M.; Huang, K.; Jann, H.; Plehm, K.; Wetz, C.; Amthauer, H. Prognostic Value of the Largest Lesion Size for Progression-Free Survival in Patients with NET Undergoing Salvage PRRT with [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC. Cancers 2022, 14, 1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mettler, E.; Fottner, C.; Bakhshandeh, N.; Trenkler, A.; Kuchen, R.; Weber, M.M. Quantitative Analysis of Plasma Cell-Free DNA and Its DNA Integrity and Hypomethylation Status as Biomarkers for Tumor Burden and Disease Progression in Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasias. Cancers 2022, 14, 1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Kong, W.; Albers, M.B.; Manoharan, J.; Goebel, J.N.; Kann, P.H.; Jesinghaus, M.; Bartsch, D.K. Pancreaticoduodenectomy Is the Best Surgical Procedure for Zollinger-Ellison Syndrome Associated with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1. Cancers 2022, 14, 1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Krug, S.; Schrader, J.; Rinke, A. Updates on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic NET. Cancers 2022, 14, 2628. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14112628

AMA Style

Krug S, Schrader J, Rinke A. Updates on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic NET. Cancers. 2022; 14(11):2628. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14112628

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krug, Sebastian, Jörg Schrader, and Anja Rinke. 2022. "Updates on Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic NET" Cancers 14, no. 11: 2628. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14112628

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop