Next Article in Journal
Coronary Artery Disease and Cancer: Treatment and Prognosis Regarding Gender Differences
Next Article in Special Issue
CONUT Score: A New Tool for Predicting Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Thyroid Cancer Treated with TKI
Previous Article in Journal
Modern Management of Esophageal Cancer: Radio-Oncology in Neoadjuvancy, Adjuvancy and Palliation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of Diagnostic Criteria from ACR and EU-TIRADS Systems to Improve the Performance of Cytology in Thyroid Nodule Triage
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 14
Issue 2
10.3390/cancers14020432
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optimal Surgical Extent in Patients with Unilateral Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

by
Joohyun Woo
and
Hyungju Kwon
*
Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Medical Center, Seoul 07985, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2022, 14(2), 432; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14020432
Submission received: 13 December 2021 / Revised: 10 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2022 / Published: 15 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Thyroid Carcinoma)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Around 30% of patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) have multifocality. As tumor multifocality could increase the risk of recurrence in patients with PTC, more aggressive treatments, including total thyroidectomy and higher-dose radioiodine, are commonly used to treat patients with multifocal PTC. However, it is unclear whether aggressive treatment can decrease the risk of recurrence. Our study of 718 patients demonstrated that thyroid lobectomy showed comparable recurrence-free survival to that of total thyroidectomy. Moreover, our findings indicated that thyroid lobectomy could be safely performed on multifocal PTC patients with high-risk factors, such as large tumor size or lymph node metastasis. In conclusion, thyroid lobectomy was not associated with the risk of recurrence in patients with multifocal PTCs. Multifocality in PTC may not always require aggressive surgery.

Abstract

Multifocality increases the risk of recurrence in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC); however, it is unclear whether multifocality justifies more extensive or aggressive surgical treatment. Here, we evaluated the effect of the operative extent on the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with multifocal PTC. Between 2010 and 2019, 718 patients with unilateral multifocal PTC were enrolled; 115 patients (16.0%) underwent ipsilateral thyroid lobectomy, and 606 patients (84.0%) underwent total thyroidectomy. With a mean follow up of 5.2 years, RFS was comparable between the total thyroidectomy and lobectomy groups (p = 0.647) after adjusting for potential confounders. Multivariable Cox regression analysis also demonstrated that the operative extent was not an independent predictor of recurrence (HR 1.686, 95% CI: 0.321–8.852). Subgroup analyses further indicated that both total thyroidectomy and thyroid lobectomy resulted in comparable RFS for multifocal PTC patients with other high-risk factors, including tumor size > 1 cm (p = 0.711), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.536), and intermediate ATA risk of recurrence (p = 0.682). In conclusion, thyroid lobectomy was not associated with the risk of recurrence in patients with multifocal PTCs. Multifocality in PTC may not always require aggressive surgery.

1. Introduction

Thyroid cancer is the ninth most prevalent cancer worldwide, and its incidence has dramatically increased over the last four decades [1]. There were 586,202 new cases of thyroid cancer in 2020, and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) represented over 80% of all thyroid cancers [1]. Surgery for thyroid cancer is the most important element of a multifaceted treatment approach [2]. Earlier guidelines recommended total thyroidectomy as the initial surgical treatment option, whereas the latest 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines have endorsed that thyroid lobectomy is safe and sufficient in selected patients with a low to intermediate risk of recurrence [2,3,4]. The optimal surgical extent can be determined by several clinicopathological factors, including personal history of radiation treatment to the head and neck, familial history of thyroid cancer, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension (ETE), regional or distant metastases, and multifocality [2].
Multifocality is defined as the simultaneous presence of two or more tumor foci within the thyroid gland [5]. Tumor multifocality is a common finding in PTC, with a prevalence of 18–87% of cases in the literature [6]. Multifocality is considered as a prognostic marker for the progression of PTC [7]. Multifocality has been associated with the high-risk features of PTC, including aggressive histology, ETE, lymph node (LN) involvement, and distant metastasis [7,8]. A recent meta-analysis also indicated that multifocality was an independent predictor of recurrence [9]. Some researchers further suggested that multifocal PTC could increase the risk of cancer-specific and overall mortality [10]. Therefore, more aggressive treatments, including total thyroidectomy and higher-dose radioiodine, are commonly used to treat patients with multifocal PTC [9,11,12,13].
There is a controversy about the optimal operative extent for patients with multifocal PTC. Several studies demonstrated that total thyroidectomy decreased the risk of recurrence compared with thyroid lobectomy [14,15,16]. On the contrary, other studies have suggested that lobectomy could be a feasible and valid option for patients with unilateral multifocal PTC [17,18,19,20]. These conflicting results are because, at least in part, all previous studies except one investigated the impact of operative extent without adjustment of other risk factors. Only Jeon et al. evaluated the significance of the surgical extent using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model; however, this study only included patients with tumor size ≤ 1 cm, absence of gross ETE, and node-negative PTC (pT1aN0M0) [19].
Therefore, in the present study, we investigated the effect of the operative extent on the recurrence of multifocal PTC patients with various risk factors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients aged 20 years or older with a diagnosis of unilateral multifocal PTC from 2010 to 2019 at the Ewha University Medical Center Mokdong Hospital. Institutional Review Board approval (Approval No. 2021-07-015) was obtained, and the need for written informed consent was waived.

2.2. Participant Selection

Patients were included in the present study if they were 20 years or older, had a pathologic diagnosis of unilateral multifocal PTC, and underwent curative-intent surgical treatment, including thyroid lobectomy or total thyroidectomy. The medical record of each patient was reviewed for clinicopathological data. Patients were excluded if they had high-risk histologic subtypes (including diffuse sclerosing, tall cell, and hobnail variants), gross ETE, or distant metastasis. Patients with incomplete data were also excluded. Data on patient demographics and tumor characteristics, including tumor size, microscopic ETE, LN metastasis, resection margin involvement, and coexisting Hashimoto thyroiditis, as well as recurrence status, were collected. The American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition was used for pathologic tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) staging.

2.3. Study End Points

The primary outcome measure was recurrence-free survival (RFS), which was defined as the time from initial surgery to the first event of recurrence. Recurrence was defined as newly found malignant lesions on the operative bed or metastatic LNs after 1 year from initial surgery, which were proven to be malignant by cytologic or histologic examination.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

SPSS Statistics version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R 3.5.3 (R Development Core Team, Vienna, Austria) were used for statistical analyses. Continuous data were compared by Student’s t-tests. The comparison of dichotomous data was performed by Pearson chi-squared tests. To minimize potential confounding effects and selection bias, we performed 3:1 propensity score matching [21]. We selected 4 factors that could affect the recurrence as follows: tumor size, microscopic ETE, LN metastasis, and coexisting Hashimoto thyroiditis. RFS was assessed by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank test. As the RFS curves for lobectomy met those for total thyroidectomy, we checked the proportionality of the hazards to use a Cox proportional hazards regression model. The log(-log(survival)) plot and the scaled Schoenfeld residuals test for assessment of proportionality of hazards were used to verify the proportional hazards assumption [22]. The log(-log(survival)) plot for operative extent gave rise to reasonably parallel lines and suggested proportionality (Figure S1). The scaled Schoenfeld residuals test also produced no evidence of a poor fit (p = 0.42). Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models, therefore, were used to identify risk factors that could affect recurrence. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Clinicopathological Characteristics of Included Patients

The baseline characteristics of 718 patients are summarized in Table 1. The mean age was 46.8 ± 11.3 years at the time of surgery, and 603 of the patients (83.6%) were women. The mean follow-up period was 5.2 ± 2.6 years. Of the 718 enrolled patients, 115 patients (16.0%) underwent ipsilateral thyroid lobectomy, and 606 patients (84.0%) underwent total thyroidectomy. Patients in the total thyroidectomy group had a larger tumor size (0.8 ± 0.5 cm vs. 0.7 ± 0.4 cm; p = 0.047), a higher rate of ETE (55.6% vs. 40.0%; p = 0.002), and an increased risk of LN metastasis (33.0% vs. 22.6%; p = 0.028) compared with those in the lobectomy group. Coexisting Hashimoto thyroiditis was also more common in the total thyroidectomy group than in the lobectomy group (33.7% vs. 21.7%; p = 0.012). Other clinicopathological factors, including age, sex, and margin involvement, showed no significant differences between the groups.
Recurrences were observed in 8 patients (1.3%) in the total thyroidectomy group and 2 patients (1.7%) in the lobectomy group (p = 0.729). In the total thyroidectomy group, 7 patients developed ipsilateral neck LN recurrences, and thyroid bed recurrence was observed in the remaining patient. All recurrences in the lobectomy group were found in the ipsilateral lateral neck LN. The log-rank test indicated that the RFS of the total thyroidectomy group (p = 0.515) was comparable to that of the lobectomy group (Figure 1a).

3.2. Recurrence-Free Survival in the 3:1 Matched Patient Group

As tumor size, microscopic ETE, or LN metastasis could affect recurrence, we performed 3:1 propensity score matching and yielded 115 matched pairs. Table 2 shows the clinicopathological comparison between the 3:1 matched total thyroidectomy and ipsilateral thyroid lobectomy groups. The matched cohorts did not differ in terms of clinicopathological features, including tumor size, microscopic ETE, and LN metastasis.
After adjusting for potential confounders, the overall recurrence rate was still comparable between the groups (1.4% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.826). RFS of the total thyroidectomy group (p = 0.647) also showed no significant difference from that of the lobectomy group (Figure 1b).

3.3. Predictive Factors of Poor RFS in Patients with Multifocal PTCs

The univariable Cox proportional hazards model indicated that only LN metastasis (hazards ratio [HR]: 5.370, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.388–20.785) was significantly associated with recurrence, and the operative extent (HR of thyroid lobectomy: 1.666, 95% CI: 0.353–7.870) was not predictive of the risk of recurrence (Table 3). LN metastasis (HR: 4.863, 95% CI: 1.179–20.056) retained statistical significance in multivariable analysis.

3.4. Lack of an Independent Role of Operative Extent in Patients with Other Risk Factors

Subgroup analyses were performed to assess the impact of the operative extent in multifocal PTC patients with several risk factors. We examined 3 factors that might influence the recurrence of PTC: primary tumor size (≤1 cm or >1 cm), LN metastasis (node-negative or node-positive), and ATA risk of recurrence (low or intermediate).
Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC; defined as PTC ≤ 1 cm) was found in 476 patients, and 143 patients had PTC larger than 1 cm (non-PTMC). The recurrence rates of the total thyroidectomy and lobectomy groups were 6 of 476 (1.1%) and 2 of 99 (2.0%; p = 0.469), respectively, for PTMC patients and 2 of 127 (3.2%) and 0 of 16 (0.0%; p = 0.467), respectively, for non-PTMC patients. Kaplan–Meier analysis also indicated that total thyroidectomy showed comparable RFS to that of thyroid lobectomy in both the PTMC (p = 0.443) and non-PTMC (p = 0.711) groups (Figure 2A,B).
There were 490 patients with node-negative PTC, and LN metastasis was diagnosed in 225 patients. In the node-negative group, recurrences were observed in 2 of 404 patients (0.5%) after total thyroidectomy and 1 of 89 patients (1.1%) after thyroid lobectomy (p = 0.490). In the node-positive group, 6 of 199 patients (3.0%) with total thyroidectomy and 1 of 26 patients (3.8%) with thyroid lobectomy developed recurrences (p = 0.818). RFS was not considerably different between total thyroidectomy and thyroid lobectomy in both the node-negative (p = 0.447) and node-positive (p = 0.536) groups (Figure 3A,B).
When we stratified patients according to the ATA risk of recurrence categories, 324 and 394 patients were classified as low risk and intermediate risk, respectively. In ATA low-risk patients, recurrence rates were comparable between the total thyroidectomy and lobectomy groups (0.4% vs. 1.5%; p = 0.297). Patients with ATA intermediate risk also showed no difference in the recurrence rates be-tween groups (2.0% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.996). Total thyroidectomy and lobectomy demonstrated similar RFS in the ATA low-risk (p = 0.411) and ATA intermediate-risk (p = 0.682) groups (Figure 4A,B).

4. Discussion

The present study demonstrated that the operative extent of patients with unilateral multifocal PTC was not associated with risk of recurrence. Various guidelines and recent publications have promoted a “less is more” approach for the treatment of low-risk PTC, which represents the vast majority of thyroid cancers; this involves less extensive operation, less radioiodine, and less or no thyroid hormone suppression [23]. A global trend toward less radical surgical procedures, including thyroid lobectomy, has also gained traction in recent years [24]. Thyroid lobectomy has several advantages, including lowering the risk of complications and possibly avoiding a lifelong need for thyroid hormone supplements; however, concerns about oncological safety remain for patients with specific risk factors, including multifocality [25].
Determining the optimal surgical extent for patients with multifocal PTC has been a long-standing problem [26,27,28]. A consensus report of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons recommended total or near-total thyroidectomy for multifocal PTC patients to reduce local recurrence [12]. A meta-analysis further indicated that patients with multifocal PTC should undergo central LN dissection [29]. On the contrary, recent studies demonstrated comparable RFS between total thyroidectomy and lobectomy for patients with node-negative multifocal PTC [18,19]. This inconsistency may be partly attributed to multifocality-associated risk factors, including large tumor size and LN metastasis, which can affect the operative extent decision [7]. These factors should also be considered to determine the optimal surgical extent for multifocal PTC.
Total thyroidectomy is usually performed instead of lobectomy for patients with more aggressive clinicopathological characteristics [30]. In the present study, compared with the thyroid lobectomy group, the total thyroidectomy group was also found to have a larger tumor size, a higher rate of microscopic ETE, and an increased risk of LN metastasis. As these high-risk features could affect the development of recurrence, propensity score matching was performed to minimize potential biases [21]. After adjusting for possible confounding factors, including tumor size, microscopic ETE, LN metastasis, and coexisting Hashimoto thyroiditis, our matched cohorts showed no difference in RFS between the total thyroidectomy and lobectomy groups. Our results further confirmed the overall oncologic safety of thyroid lobectomy for patients with multifocal PTC.
Subgroup analyses were performed to determine whether thyroid lobectomy is feasible for multifocal PTC patients with various risk factors. Total thyroidectomy showed comparable RFS to that of thyroid lobectomy for patients with non-PTMC (p = 0.711), node-positive PTC (p = 0.536), and ATA intermediate risk of recurrence (p = 0.682). Our findings suggest that multifocal PTC patients with tumor size > 1 cm, LN involvement, or intermediate ATA risk of recurrence do not always require a more extensive operation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis also indicated that the operative extent was not associated with the risk of recurrence, regardless of other risk factors. Therefore, we believe that thyroid lobectomy is suitable for all multifocal PTC patients without high-risk factors that require total thyroidectomy.
Our study has some limitations. First, this study was a retrospective cohort study, which is prone to selection bias. Patient selection for total thyroidectomy might be influenced by various factors, and the assignment of thyroid lobectomy and total thyroidectomy was not randomized. Although we performed propensity score matching, the results might be influenced by selection bias. Second, we did not evaluate long-term outcomes such as cancer-specific survival. During the mean follow-up period of 5.2 years, there was no cancer-specific mortality in the present study. Third, the number of patients with other risk factors of recurrence was relatively small. When we calculated the sample size for survival analysis using the data from Table 3, more than 255 recurrences were required to determine the statistical significance with HR of 1.686, 90% of power, and 2.5% of significance. Further validation studies with a larger cohort and long-term follow-up are warranted.

5. Conclusions

Thyroid lobectomy was not associated with the risk of recurrence in patients with multifocal PTCs. Multifocality in PTC may not always require aggressive surgery.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/cancers14020432/s1: Figure S1. Comparison of survival analysis by the operative extent: log(-log(survival)) plot.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.W. and H.K.; methodology, J.W.; validation, H.K.; formal analysis, J.W. and H.K.; resources, H.K.; data curation, H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.W.; writing—review and editing, J.W. and H.K.; project administration, H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Ewha University Medical Center Mokdong Hospital (approval number: 2021-07-015 and date of approval: 30 July 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived by the institutional review board, because (1) this research involved no more than minimal risk to subjects and (2) this research could be carried out practicably without the waiver.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to institutional policy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haugen, B.R.; Alexander, E.K.; Bible, K.C.; Doherty, G.M.; Mandel, S.J.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Pacini, F.; Randolph, G.W.; Sawka, A.M.; Schlumberger, M.; Schuff, K.G.; Sherman, S.I.; Sosa, J.A.; Steward, D.L.; Tuttle, R.M.; Wartofsky, L. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016, 26, 1–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cooper, D.S.; Doherty, G.M.; Haugen, B.R.; Kloos, R.T.; Lee, S.L.; Mandel, S.J.; Mazzaferri, E.L.; McIver, B.; Sherman, S.I.; Tuttle, R.M.; American Thyroid Association Guidelines, T. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2006, 16, 109–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cooper, D.S.; Doherty, G.M.; Haugen, B.R.; Kloos, R.T.; Lee, S.L.; Mandel, S.J.; Mazzaferri, E.L.; McIver, B.; Pacini, F.; Schlumberger, M.; et al. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009, 19, 1167–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kuhn, E.; Teller, L.; Piana, S.; Rosai, J.; Merino, M.J. Different clonal origin of bilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma, with a review of the literature. Endocr Pathol. 2012, 23, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Qu, N.; Zhang, L.; Ji, Q.H.; Zhu, Y.X.; Wang, Z.Y.; Shen, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, D.S. Number of tumor foci predicts prognosis in papillary thyroid cancer. BMC Cancer. 2014, 14, 914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Joseph, K.R.; Edirimanne, S.; Eslick, G.D. Multifocality as a prognostic factor in thyroid cancer: A meta-analysis. Int J. Surg. 2018, 50, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vuong, H.G.; Duong, U.N.P.; Pham, T.Q.; Tran, H.M.; Oishi, N.; Mochizuki, K.; Nakazawa, T.; Hassell, L.; Katoh, R.; Kondo, T. Clinicopathological Risk Factors for Distant Metastasis in Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis. World J. Surg. 2018, 42, 1005–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, H.; Kwon, H.; Moon, B.I. Association of Multifocality With Prognosis of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2021, 147, 847–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Markovic, I.; Goran, M.; Besic, N.; Buta, M.; Djurisic, I.; Stojiljkovic, D.; Zegarac, M.; Pupic, G.; Inic, Z.; Dzodic, R. Multifocality as independent prognostic factor in papillary thyroid cancer - A multivariate analysis. J. BUON. 2018, 23, 1049–1054. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim, K.J.; Kim, S.M.; Lee, Y.S.; Chung, W.Y.; Chang, H.S.; Park, C.S. Prognostic significance of tumor multifocality in papillary thyroid carcinoma and its relationship with primary tumor size: A retrospective study of 2,309 consecutive patients. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 22, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Iacobone, M.; Jansson, S.; Barczynski, M.; Goretzki, P. Multifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma--a consensus report of the European Society of Endocrine Surgeons (ESES). Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2014, 399, 141–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kim, H.J.; Sohn, S.Y.; Jang, H.W.; Kim, S.W.; Chung, J.H. Multifocality, but not bilaterality, is a predictor of disease recurrence/persistence of papillary thyroid carcinoma. World J. Surg. 2013, 37, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xue, S.; Wang, P.; Liu, J.; Chen, G. Total thyroidectomy may be more reasonable as initial surgery in unilateral multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A single-center experience. World J. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 15, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Li, X.; Zhao, C.; Hu, D.; Yu, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhao, W.; Gao, M. Hemithyroidectomy increases the risk of disease recurrence in patients with ipsilateral multifocal papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2013, 5, 1412–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ross, D.S.; Litofsky, D.; Ain, K.B.; Bigos, T.; Brierley, J.D.; Cooper, D.S.; Haugen, B.R.; Jonklaas, J.; Ladenson, P.W.; Magner, J.; Robbins, J.; Skarulis, M.C.; Steward, D.L.; Maxon, H.R.; Sherman, S.I. Recurrence after treatment of micropapillary thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009, 19, 1043–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Albinsaad, L.S.; Kim, W.W.; Lee, Y.M.; Sung, T.Y.; Chung, K.W.; Hong, S.J. The appropriateness of thyroid lobectomy as an initial surgery for preoperatively detected unilateral multifocal papillary carcinoma. Asian J. Surg. 2021, 44, 1050–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Harries, V.; Wang, L.Y.; McGill, M.; Xu, B.; Tuttle, R.M.; Wong, R.J.; Shaha, A.R.; Shah, J.P.; Ghossein, R.; Patel, S.G.; Ganly, I. Should multifocality be an indication for completion thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma? Surgery 2020, 167, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jeon, Y.W.; Gwak, H.G.; Lim, S.T.; Schneider, J.; Suh, Y.J. Long-Term Prognosis of Unilateral and Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma After Unilateral Lobectomy Versus Total Thyroidectomy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2019, 26, 2952–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Huang, H.; Liu, S.; Xu, Z.; Ni, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, X. Long-term outcome of thyroid lobectomy for unilateral multifocal papillary carcinoma. Medicine 2017, 96, e7461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Woo, J.; Kim, H.; Kwon, H. Impact of Multifocality on the Recurrence of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bradburn, M.J.; Clark, T.G.; Altman, D.G. Survival analysis Part III: Multivariate data analysis -- choosing a model and assessing its adequacy and fit. Br. J. Cancer 2003, 89, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Hartl, D.M.; Guerlain, J.; Breuskin, I.; Hadoux, J.; Baudin, E.; Al Ghuzlan, A.; Terroir-Cassou-Mounat, M.; Lamartina, L.; Leboulleux, S. Thyroid Lobectomy for Low to Intermediate Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Marciniak, C.; Lenne, X.; Clement, G.; Bruandet, A.; Lifante, J.C.; Sebag, F.; Mirallie, E.; Mathonnet, M.; Brunaud, L.; Donatini, G.; et al. Partial Versus Total Thyroidectomy: What Influences Most Surgeons’ Decision? Analysis of a Nationwide Cohort of 375,810 Patients Over 10 Years. Ann. Surg. 2021, 274, 829–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Raffaelli, M.; Tempera, S.E.; Sessa, L.; Lombardi, C.P.; De Crea, C.; Bellantone, R. Total thyroidectomy versus thyroid lobectomy in the treatment of papillary carcinoma. Gland. Surg. 2020, 9, S18–s27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Feng, J.W.; Pan, H.; Wang, L.; Ye, J.; Jiang, Y.; Qu, Z. Determine the Optimal Extent of Thyroidectomy and Lymphadenectomy for Patients With Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2019, 10, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Z.; Xiang, J.; Gui, Z.; Qin, Y.; Sun, W.; Huang, J.; He, L.; Dong, W.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, T.; Shao, L.; Lv, C.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, H. Unilateral Tnm T1 And T2 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma With Lateral Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis: Total Thyroidectomy or Lobectomy? Endocr. Pract. 2020, 26, 1085–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, L.H.; Yin, K.X.; Wen, Q.L.; Chen, C.; Ge, M.H.; Tan, Z. Predictive Risk-scoring Model For Central Lymph Node Metastasis and Predictors of Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, T.; He, L.; Wang, Z.; Dong, W.; Sun, W.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, H. The Differences Between Multifocal and Unifocal Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in Unilateral Lobe: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 657237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Filetti, S.; Durante, C.; Hartl, D.; Leboulleux, S.; Locati, L.D.; Newbold, K.; Papotti, M.G.; Berruti, A.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1856–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Cancers 14 00432 g001 550
Figure 1. Recurrence-free survival according to the operative extent in patients with multifocal PTCs, (A) before and (B) after propensity score matching.
Figure 1. Recurrence-free survival according to the operative extent in patients with multifocal PTCs, (A) before and (B) after propensity score matching.
Cancers 14 00432 g001
Cancers 14 00432 g002 550
Figure 2. Recurrence-free survival in patients with (A) PTMC and (B) non-PTMC.
Figure 2. Recurrence-free survival in patients with (A) PTMC and (B) non-PTMC.
Cancers 14 00432 g002
Cancers 14 00432 g003 550
Figure 3. Recurrence-free survival in patients with (A) node-negative and (B) node-positive PTC.
Figure 3. Recurrence-free survival in patients with (A) node-negative and (B) node-positive PTC.
Cancers 14 00432 g003
Cancers 14 00432 g004 550
Figure 4. Recurrence-free survival in patients with (A) ATA low risk and (B) intermediate risk.
Figure 4. Recurrence-free survival in patients with (A) ATA low risk and (B) intermediate risk.
Cancers 14 00432 g004
Table
Table 1. Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between lobectomy and total thyroidectomy groups.
Table 1. Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between lobectomy and total thyroidectomy groups.
CharacteristicsTotal Thyroidectomy (n = 603)Thyroid Lobectomy
(n = 115)		p-Value
Age (years)47.1 ± 11.146.3 ± 11.10.489
Female sex509 (84.4%)91 (79.1%)0.161
Pathologic characteristics
Tumor size
Mean (cm)0.8 ± 0.50.7 ± 0.40.047
Microcarcinoma (%)476 (78.9%)99 (86.1%)0.079
Microscopic ETE335 (55.6%)46 (40.0%)0.002
LN metastasis199 (33.0%)26 (22.6%)0.028
Margin involvement32 (5.3%)5 (4.3%)0.670
Coexisting Hashimoto thyroiditis203 (33.7%)25 (21.7%)0.012
Postoperative management NA
131I remnant ablation353 (58.5%)
131I dose (mCi)131.3 ± 33.3
Follow-up period (years)5.4 ± 2.44.4 ± 3.30.005
Recurrence8 (1.3%)2 (1.7%)0.729
ETE, extrathyroidal extension; LN, lymph node; NA, not applicable.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between lobectomy and total thyroidectomy groups after matching.
Table 2. Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics between lobectomy and total thyroidectomy groups after matching.
CharacteristicsTotal Thyroidectomy (n = 345)Thyroid Lobectomy (n = 115)p-Value
Age (years)46.2 ± 11.046.3 ± 11.10.938
Female sex276 (80.0%)91 (79.1%)0.841
Pathologic characteristics
Tumor size
Mean (cm)0.7 ± 0.50.7 ± 0.40.523
Microcarcinoma (%)283 (82.0%)99 (86.1%)0.315
Microscopic ETE136 (39.4%)46 (40.0%)0.912
LN metastasis87 (25.2%)26 (22.6%)0.574
Margin involvement12 (3.5%)5 (4.3%)0.669
Coexisting Hashimoto thyroiditis89 (25.8%)25 (21.7%)0.383
Postoperative management NA
131I remnant ablation171 (49.6%)
131I dose (mCi)128.1 ± 38.6
Follow-up period (years)5.3 ± 2.54.4 ± 3.30.014
Recurrence5 (1.4%)2 (1.7%)0.826
ETE, extrathyroidal extension; LN, lymph node; NA, not applicable.
Table
Table 3. Univariable and multivariable analysis for predictive factors of recurrence in patients with multifocal PTCs.
Table 3. Univariable and multivariable analysis for predictive factors of recurrence in patients with multifocal PTCs.
CovariatesUnivariable AnalysisMultivariable Analysis
HR (95% CI)p-ValueHR (95% CI)p-Value
Age (years)0.958 (0.902–1.017)0.1570.958 (0.899–1.021)0.189
Male sex2.289 (0.592–8.854)0.2301.637 (0.403–6.641)0.490
Tumor size (cm)1.027 (0.349–3.022)0.9620.805 (0.192–3.377)0.767
Microscopic ETE1.270 (0.358–4.503)0.7111.137 (0.290–4.457)0.853
LN metastasis5.370 (1.388–20.785)0.0154.863 (1.179–20.056)0.029
Margin involvement0.046 (0.000–6959.675)0.6120.000 (0.000-infinite)0.982
Hashimoto thyroiditis0.253 (0.032–2.002)0.1930.288 (0.035–2.402)0.250
Operative extent1.666 (0.353–7.870)0.5191.686 (0.321–8.852)0.537
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ETE, extrathyroidal extension; LN, lymph node.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Woo, J.; Kwon, H. Optimal Surgical Extent in Patients with Unilateral Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers 2022, 14, 432. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14020432

AMA Style

Woo J, Kwon H. Optimal Surgical Extent in Patients with Unilateral Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers. 2022; 14(2):432. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14020432

Chicago/Turabian Style

Woo, Joohyun, and Hyungju Kwon. 2022. "Optimal Surgical Extent in Patients with Unilateral Multifocal Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma" Cancers 14, no. 2: 432. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14020432

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop