Next Article in Journal
A Generic Encapsulation to Unravel Social Spreading of a Pandemic: An Underlying Architecture
Next Article in Special Issue
Anomalies Detection Using Isolation in Concept-Drifting Data Streams
Previous Article in Journal
Energy-Efficient Task Partitioning for Real-Time Scheduling on Multi-Core Platforms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Robotic Hand for Object Grasping and Shape Recognition
Open AccessArticle

An Empirical Review of Automated Machine Learning

Department of Engineering, Roma Tre University, 00146 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 2 November 2020 / Revised: 6 January 2021 / Accepted: 8 January 2021 / Published: 13 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from ICCSA 2020)
In recent years, Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) has become increasingly important in Computer Science due to the valuable potential it offers. This is testified by the high number of works published in the academic field and the significant efforts made in the industrial sector. However, some problems still need to be resolved. In this paper, we review some Machine Learning (ML) models and methods proposed in the literature to analyze their strengths and weaknesses. Then, we propose their use—alone or in combination with other approaches—to provide possible valid AutoML solutions. We analyze those solutions from a theoretical point of view and evaluate them empirically on three Atari games from the Arcade Learning Environment. Our goal is to identify what, we believe, could be some promising ways to create truly effective AutoML frameworks, therefore able to replace the human expert as much as possible, thereby making easier the process of applying ML approaches to typical problems of specific domains. We hope that the findings of our study will provide useful insights for future research work in AutoML. View Full-Text
Keywords: automated machine learning; meta learning; neural architecture search; reinforcement learning automated machine learning; meta learning; neural architecture search; reinforcement learning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Vaccaro, L.; Sansonetti, G.; Micarelli, A. An Empirical Review of Automated Machine Learning. Computers 2021, 10, 11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/computers10010011

AMA Style

Vaccaro L, Sansonetti G, Micarelli A. An Empirical Review of Automated Machine Learning. Computers. 2021; 10(1):11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/computers10010011

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vaccaro, Lorenzo; Sansonetti, Giuseppe; Micarelli, Alessandro. 2021. "An Empirical Review of Automated Machine Learning" Computers 10, no. 1: 11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/computers10010011

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop