Next Article in Journal
Ethanol- and Methanol-Coordinated and Solvent-Free Dodecahydro closo-Dodecaborates of 3d Transition Metals and of Magnesium
Next Article in Special Issue
Press to Success: Gd5FW3O16—The First Gadolinium(III) Fluoride Oxidotungstate(VI)
Previous Article in Journal
Systematic Design of Crystal Structure for Hofmann-Like Spin Crossover Fe(L)2[Ag(CN)2]2 Complexes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Controlled Two-Step Formation of Faceted Perovskite Rare-Earth Scandate Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Growth from the Melt and Properties Investigation of ScF3 Single Crystals

1
Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography of Federal Scientific Research Center «Crystallography and Photonics», Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy Prospekt 59, Moscow 119333, Russia
2
Lomonosov Moscow State University, GSP-1, Leninskie Gory, Moscow 119991, Russia
3
Petrovsky Bryansk State University, Bezhitskaya str. 14, Bryansk 241036, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 June 2019 / Revised: 12 July 2019 / Accepted: 19 July 2019 / Published: 20 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rare-Earth Metal Compounds)

Abstract

:
ScF3 optical quality bulk crystals of the ReO3 structure type (space group P m 3 ¯ m , a = 4.01401(3) Å) have been grown from the melt by Bridgman technique, in fluorinating atmosphere for the first time. Aiming to substantially reduce vaporization losses during the growth process graphite crucibles were designed. The crystal quality, optical, mechanical, thermal and electrophysical properties were studied. Novel ScF3 crystals refer to the low-refractive-index (nD = 1.400(1)) optical materials with high transparency in the visible and IR spectral region up to 8.7 µm. The Vickers hardness of ScF3 (HV ~ 2.6 GPa) is substantially higher than that of CaF2 and LaF3 crystals. ScF3 crystals possess unique high thermal conductivity (k = 9.6 Wm−1К−1 at 300 K) and low ionic conductivity (σ = 4 × 10−8 Scm−1 at 673 К) cause to the structural defects in the fluorine sublattice.

1. Introduction

Crystalline materials based on the rare-earth fluorides RF3 (where R = La – Lu, Y, Sc) play a significant role in the photonics and optoelectronic instrument engineering for many years [1]. ScF3 is one of the most unusual and insufficiently explored fluoride. It is a thermomiotic, i.e., it features a negative thermal expansion (NTE) coefficient over a wide temperature range from 10 to 1100K [2]. The stability of the RF3 structural type under standard conditions changes in the rare-earth row as R3+ ionic radius decreases [1]:
LaF3-type (tysonite) → β-YF3 (Fe3C-cementite) → ReO3.
In this case coordination number (CN) of the rare-earth cations changes, respectively, from CN = 11 (LaF3-type) to CN = 8–9 (β-YF3-type), and then up to CN = 6 (ReO3-type). According to the crystal-chemical characteristics, ScF3 differs drastically from other RF3, and is close to InF3, but its compounds have high chemical stability. In the RF3 row, it is the only one that has structural ReO3 type and it belongs to the perovskite-like compounds family with the common formula АВХ3, in which the position of one of the cations (at the unit cell center) is vacant. Sc atoms are located in the centers of the octahedra composed of F atoms (Figure 1). In the ScF3 structure, Sc3+ cations are located at the vertices of the primitive cubic cell. ScF6 octahedra join with their vertices to form a three-dimensional framework. Volume voids in the structure give place to its looseness.
ScF3 exhibit a large band gap (Eg~10.5 eV [3]) and a high chemical resistance. Among all inorganic fluorides MFm (m = 1–4) ScF3 has the highest melting temperature Tm = 1822 ± 3 К [4]. Under normal pressure, ScF3 has no solid state polymorphic transitions up to melting, but under hydrostatic pressure it transforms from ReO3-type to β-YF3- and LaF3-types structure forms [5,6,7,8].
Structural type ReO3 is very sensitive to the impurities. Cubooctahedron voids between ScF6 octahedra can be filled with rather large impurity ions. Hence, physical properties determined experimentally are often distorted. Insignificant oxygen contamination in ScF3 crystals leads to the structure rhombohedral distortion (sp.gr. R32) [8,9,10], and phase transition at T = 1623 ± 20 К [7,8] and 1748 ± 20 К [10]. However, the authors [4,11] have not found any phase transformations in ScF3.
ScF3 exhibit a great isomorphous capacity with respect to the transition and rare-earth metals ions. Isomorphous doping enables varying of materials properties over a wide range. Solid solutions Sc1–xMxF3, where M = Y [12,13], Al [14], Ga and Fe [15], Ti [16] were obtained with solid-phase synthesis and then investigated. Cubic phase of Sc1–xAlxF3 exists up to х = 0.5 at T = 1340 К, and with Al content increasing the thermal expansion coefficient of the material changes from negative to positive [14]. Phases in Sc1–xMxF3 with M = Ga, Fe exhibit a practically zero thermal expansion material over a wide temperature range 300−900 K [15]. The NTE of ScF3 induce by the fluorine transverse oscillations normal to the Sc-F-Sc bonds and result in decreasing distance between Sc3+ ions [17,18]. Wide-range solid solutions Sc1–xRxF3 with R = Yb [19,20] and Lu [21] were discovered by differential thermal analysis technique. Thus, ScF3-based materials are interesting for the fundamental physical investigations of the NTE and phase-transition mechanisms.
ScF3-based crystalline materials are promising for the practical applications as low-refraction thin-film coatings, matrices for doping by transition and rare-earth metals ions with small ion radius, as well as a component of materials with high fluorine-ion conductivity [22]. Study of the growth techniques and the properties of ScF3 crystals can provide the possibilities to obtain thermomiotics with programmable thermal behavior, e.g., optical elements, which preserve their fixed overall dimensions over a wide temperature range.
Flux-melt method for growing ScF3 with several mm dimensions, pure and doped with transition metal ions, has been described in [5,8,23,24,25]. LiF or NaF were used as a solvent, and the melts with content of 20–40 (mol.) % ScF3 in platinum ampoules were cooled at a rate of up to 3 K/h. Synthesis ScF3 nano- and microcrystals (up to 200–500 nm) from various precursors by hydrothermal synthesis was described in [26,27,28]. Gas–solution interface technique (GSIT) was used to obtain ScF3 in the form of nano-dimensional needles and tubes [29,30]. The above techniques enable to grow, as a rule, small single crystals.
For the first time, ScF3 bulk crystals were obtained from a melt over 50 years ago by X.S. Bagdasarov with co-workers in Shubnikov Crystallography Institute of RAS using a direct crystallization technique [31,32]. The growth was carried out in the graphite crucibles in vacuum at the pulling rate up to 1 mm/h. The crucible was heated by means of an interaction with a non-focused electron beam, which is quite a tedious procedure. No details of the growth experiments were provided. Since then, no attempts were made to obtain ScF3 crystals from the own melt. Growth of ScF3 bulk crystals directly from its own melt is complicated by the high melting temperature, and NTE and high vapor pressure. Therefore, the low-temperature synthesis techniques for ScF3-based crystals growth were utilized until now. Our group attempted to obtained ScF3 crystal from own melt using a crucible patented by us for growing volatile substances [33]. Evaporation losses in such constriction crucible were high (more than 30 wt.%) and crystals demonstrated low optical quality. Nevertheless, we managed to fabricate a ScF3 crystal elements of 0.5 cm3 in size and even to measure its ionic conductivity [33].
The purpose of this paper is the development of a method for ScF3 bulk crystals growth from the own melt, crystal characterization, and investigation of its some physical properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Growth Problems and Crucible Design

High melting temperature Tm of ScF3 and its reactivity strongly restrict the choice of the growth container materials, NTE and the high vapors pressure present almost impossible requirements to the crucible design.
Data on the ScF3 saturated vapors pressure are fitted [34,35], and the vapors pressure (P, atm) for a wide temperature range (T = 1172–1528 K) can be calculated using the following equation:
lgP = (10.092 ± 0.253) − (2.0141 ± 0.0339)∙104/T.
These P values obtained are higher than those observed during growth of СaF2 or LaF3 crystals by a factor of 102. Extrapolation of the P(T) relationship to the value P = 1 atm yields the boiling temperature value Tb ~ 2095 K. However, the standard accepted boiling temperature for ScF3 is considered to be Tb = 1880 К, i.e., only ~60 K higher than its melting temperature [36,37]. This is in contradiction with the observed practical results of the growth experiments, when the ScF3 melt was strongly overheated. Hence, the boiling temperature issue is subject to a separate investigation.
Graphite is the most commonly used crucible material for a fluoride crystals growth from melt. However, ScF3 melting at T ~ 1822–1875 К in the open crucible results in material evaporation losses exceeding 50 wt.% already after 1.5–2 h of the melt exposure. Generally, obtaining a pressure-tight connection in graphite details is quite a problem. There are several models of graphite crucibles [38,39,40] suitable for growth of crystal with high saturated vapor pressure. Sealing of the growth cell volume is achieved by using a thread connection between several graphite elements. When operating such crucibles, the melt flows into the thread connection, the result being that the crucible gets broken during its disassembly. The design suggested in [38] is essentially axially arranged and inserted into each other graphite cartridges sealed on their side surface with the condensate of the initial material during growth experiment. This model was taken as a crucible prototype used to obtaining ScF3 crystals in our previous work [33]. But evaporation losses were still very high for it. For the purpose of this work, a special design graphite crucible, which enabled maintaining some excessive vapor pressure inside it, was developed [41]. Earlier, a graphite container based on this principle was successfully used by the authors to grow crystals of highly volatile fluoride compounds [42,43]. A crucible image is shown in Figure 2a.
The design is essentially an upturned graphite crucible with a conical bottom which is pressed up against the base by tightening up the thread connection. The charge material placed inside provides additional sealing of the crucible bottom after melting. Utilization of such a crucible results in substantially lower material losses compared to the designed models from [38,39]. It was expected that gap availability between crucible parts will also compensate for the crystal thermal expansion during their cooling.

2.2. Impurity Composition

Impurity composition of crystals was determined by a spark source mass spectrometry technique based on JMS-01-BM2 mass-spectrometer (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The analysis results random inaccuracy was characterized by the standard deviation value 0.15–0.30. The content of inert gases and transuranic elements is below their detection limit (0.1 ppm). ScF3 crystal analysis for the oxygen content was carried out with vacuum induction fusion in graphite capsules. The sensitivity of this analysis was 200 ppm.

2.3. Thermal Stability

Thermal stability of the ScF3 crystals was investigated by heating the samples in air (under low-humidity conditions), in Pt-crucibles in a muffle furnace, in the temperature range of 500–900 K for 20–24 h. The temperature was maintained constant with an error of ±2 K.

2.4. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

XRD patterns of the crystal samples, both before and after thermal treatment, were carried out on an X-ray powder diffractometer MiniFlex 600 (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) with CuKα radiation. The diffraction peaks were recorded within the angle range 2θ from 10° to 140°. Phases were identified using the ICDD PDF-2 (2014) and Crystallography Open Databases. The unit-cell parameters were calculated by the Le Bail full-profile fitting (the Jana2006 software). A high resolution X-ray diffractometer (Rigaku SmartLab diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with 9kW rotating anode and double-crystal Ge (220) monochromator, MoKα1 radiation) was employed to collect the X-ray rocking curve.
The samples for investigation were essentially polished plates, 0.5–5 mm thick, cut out perpendicular to the crystal growth axis.

2.5. Crystal Chemical Etching

Chemical etching was carried out by concentrated hydrofluoric acid as etching solution; the crystal samples were etched for 100 h at about 300 K. The surface morphology of ScF3 crystals was investigated using optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy techniques (Quanta 200 3D, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

2.6. Refractive Index

Refractive index n and its dispersion n(λ) for ScF3 in the visible spectrum were measured using refractometric technique with the accuracy ±10–3. Light sources were Hg– (λ = 0.436 and 0.546 µm) and Na– (λ = 0.589 µm) lamps.

2.7. Transmission Spectra

Transmission spectra of the crystals were recorded under room temperature (RT) using Varian Cary 5000 spectrophotometer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) in the spectral region λ = 0.19–2.50 µm, and AF-1 analytical Fourier-transform spectrometer (Moscow, Russia) in the region λ = 2–16 µm.

2.8. Hardness of Crystal

Crystal hardness was investigated under room temperature (RT) by the microhardness indentation technique using Wilson 2100 Tukon Vickers/Knoop hardness tester (Aachen, Germany) operating in automatic mode.
The Vickers hardness (HV) values at different loads were calculated using the following equation:
HV = 1.854P/d2 [kgf/mm2],
where P is the applied load and d is the diagonal length of the indentation imprint (1 kgf = 9.807 N). Measurement error was not in excess of 3%.

2.9. The Thermal Conductivity

The thermal conductivity k(T) of the crystal was measured by an absolute steady-state axial heat flow technique in the temperature range of 50–300 K. The measurement procedure was described in detail elsewhere [44]. The sample was a non-oriented parallelepiped 6 × 6 × 20 mm3 in size. The error in determining the absolute k value did not exceed ±5%.

2.10. The Electrical Conductivity

The electrical conductivity σ of the crystals was determined by impedance spectroscopy. The measurements were carried out in the frequency range of 10−2–107 Hz in the temperature range of 350–830 К using a Novoterm-HT 1200 system with Alpha-A+ZG4 (Novocontrol Technologies GmbH & Co KG, Montabaur, Germany) impedance tester. Silver paste (Leitsilber) as current-conducting electrodes was used. The relative measurement error was less than 1%.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Growth

Growth of ScF3 crystals was carried out by the Bridgman technique in a double-zone growth chamber with resistive heating in the high pure He atmosphere, in the graphite heat unit.
ScF3 charge material was obtained in a laboratory from Sc2O3 oxide (99.95%, Novosibirsk rare metals plant) by transferring it into chloride solution. Then it was deposited with concentrated HF acid followed by drying, vacuum calcination and melting in the atmosphere of polytetrafluoroethylene pyrolysis products. The growth chamber was evacuated to provide residual pressure ~10−3 Pa using a turbomolecular pump system. Mixture of NH4HF2 (97.5% Sigma-Aldrich) and СF4 (99.999%) were used as fluorinating agents during growth. Temperature gradient in the growth zone was ~80 K/cm, crucible pulling rate - 5 mm/h, cooling rate of grown crystals ~100 К/h.
ScF3 single crystals of optical quality have been grown in the self-sealing graphite crucibles described above. The crystals were colorless, transparent; losses of the substance during crystallization process were 4 wt.% only, no cracks and light-scattering centers were observed. Crystal ScF3 boules 25 mm in diameter and 50 mm long were obtained. One of the as-grown ScF3 crystals is shown in Figure 2b. With the spontaneous crystal seeding, the ScF3 growth axis was close to [111] crystallographic direction.
Impurities content is provided in Table 1 showing that the major contribution to the chemical composition is made by cations of alkali-earth and rare-earth metals resulting from the original Sc2O3, trace impurity of chlorine resulting from the ScF3 reagent synthesis, and oxygen.

3.2. Crystal Structure and Quality

The assignment of crystals to the structure type ReO3 ( P m 3 ¯ m space group) has been confirmed by XRD. XDR diffraction patterns of the as-grown and heat-treated ScF3 crystals are shown in Figure 3a. The cubic lattice parameter of the as-grown ScF3 crystal is a = 4.01401(3) Å at 295 K, which confirms well with the published data (coincides with the standard patterns PDF #79-8099, COD ID 4127282). Crystal density ρ = 2.601(3) g/cm3 (measured by hydrostatic weighing in distilled water) is insignificant lower than the theoretical density value.
Thermal treatment of crystals in the air showed that ScF3 exhibit stability and do not loose transparency when heated up to T = 773 K. With increasing the temperature, the crystals surface was covered by additional phase Sc2O3 ( I a 3 ¯ space group, standard patterns PDF #84-1880, COD ID 4326666) with the lattice parameter a = 9.8420(3) Å (see Figure 3a), the phase being due to pyrohydrolysis of ScF3. According to [1,37], the reaction of ScF3 pyrohydrolysis follows the equation:
2ScF3 + 3H2O = Sc2O3 + 6HF,
without formation of intermediate oxofluoride phases specific for other RF3.
The X-ray double-crystal rocking curve of the 222 reflection is shown in Figure 3b. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) intensity is 23" (0.0064°). The profile of the rocking curve is fairly smooth, symmetric, without splitting due to twinning. From this point of view, the measured curve indicates a relatively high quality of the ScF3 crystal. The peak broadening (the typical FWHM for perfect semiconductor single crystals is about 5-10") is most likely due to the presence of crystal lattice deformations (strains) in the samples.
Selective chemical etching is an effective and simple method for investigation of the crystal surface morphology and structure imperfections. High chemical stability of ScF3 hinders the search for an effective selective etchant. In our work HF was choose as an etchant during the long period of interaction. Wide mosaic structure and grain boundaries aggregations appears in the noncentral crystal parts (Figure 4a) due to NTE and arising strong strain in places where the crystal is in contact with the crucible walls. The triangle shape of dislocation etching pits is show in Figure 4b. Etching pits size varied in the range of 0.1 –0.5 μm2, and their density was ~1*107 сm−2 in the central part but it increased up to ~6*107 сm−2 in the peripheral crystal area. Therefore, for improving the ScF3 crystals quality (removing lattice strains and decreasing density of dislocations) it is necessary to post-growth ScF3 crystal annealing.

3.3. Optical Properties

The RT transmission spectrum of the ScF3 crystal over the wide range is shown in Figure 5a. The observed absorption bands and low transparency in UV spectral regions are attributed with presents of uncontrollable impurities, primarily, oxygen-containing. Transmission cutoff in IR-region is located at 8.7 µm. Additional deep purification of initial charge can significantly improve the transmission of ScF3 crystals in the short-wavelength part of the transparency window. The last one is being very sensitive to the crystal impurity contaminations. A wide band gap of ScF3 crystals makes it a promising candidate as a new transparent matrix in vacuum UV spectral range comparable to such material as LaF3 et al. [45].
For the crystalline ScF3, the refractive index was measured nD = 1.400(1) and its dispersion dependence was obtained in the visible region (see Figure 5b). Dependence n(λ) for some low-refractive fluoride crystals [46,47,48] are also provided in Figure 5b for the comparison purposes.
Mathematical processing of dispersion dependence n(λ) of ScF3 crystals was carried out using one-term Sellmeier equation:
n 2 ( λ )   =   1 + A λ 2 λ 2 λ 0 2 ,
where A = 0.9435(1) is the multiple related to the oscillators number and strength, λ 0 = 0.794(1) μm is the characteristic wavelength.
ScF3 crystals refer to the low-refractive and low-dispersion materials. These materials can be considered as a promising isotropic material for antireflection coatings, on a par with the isostructural fluoroperovskite KMgF3 crystal. Such materials with lower refractive index as KF and LiF are hygroscopic, and MgF2 and LiCaAlF6 – birefringent. It is worth noting that the data on the refractive indices for ScF3 thin-film [49] are substantially higher than those for bulk crystals and coincides with vitreous silica.

3.4. Thermal Conductivity Measurements

Measurement results for thermal conductivity k(T) of ScF3 crystal are shown in the graphical form in Figure 6a. Experimental curves of CaF2 (space group F m 3 ¯ m , Z = 4) [50] and LaF3 (space group P 3 ¯ c 1 , Z = 6) [51] with different from ScF3 crystals structure are also shown for the comparison. As can be seen in Figure 6a, absolute values for ScF3 thermal conductivity within the observed temperature range are intermediate between the relative values for CaF2 and LaF3. However, temperature dependence k(T) for ScF3 is noted for its weakness. Within the temperature range, the value of k changes only by a factor of 2, i.e., from 20.5 Wm−1К−1 at Т = 50 К to 9.6 Wm−1К−1 at Т = 300 К. The nature of the temperature dependence is slightly different from that determined by logarithmic function of the following type:
k(T)= −6.171 × ln T+44.4 [Wm−1К−1]
The extrapolation of our experimental data into the high temperature range (T = 400–1500 К) provides a rather accurate coincidence with the calculated ab initio values k(T) obtained by authors [52].
The availability of experimental data on the ScF3 heat capacity [13] makes it possible to calculate temperature dependence of the mean free path l(T) of the phonons in this crystal. For the calculation, use has been made of the known Debye expression:
k   =   C ν   l / 3 ,
where C is the heat capacity of a crystal volume unit, ν is the mean phonons velocity. Thermal phonons mean velocity ν was estimated as follows. Using elastic constants c 11 = 233, c 12 = 17 and c 44 = 18 GPа [53,54] and referring to the known relationships for the cubic crystal system, calculations were made for the longitudinal wave velocity ν l = 7.48 km/s and velocities of two transverse waves – ν S 1 = 2.67 km/s and ν S 2 = 6.48 km/s. The averaging was made as per the known formula:
3 ν 3   =   1 ν 1 3   +   1 ν S 1 3   +   1 ν S 2 3 .
As a result, ν = 3.71 km/s for ScF3 crystals. The results of calculation of the phonons mean free path as a function of temperature l(T) are shown in Figure 6b. The similar data for CaF2 [50] and LaF3 [51] crystals are also provided here for the comparison.
One can note the weak relative dependence l(T) obtained for ScF3, even for lowest temperatures. Such temperature dependence is specific for materials with disturbances in the periodicity of their crystal field [55]. Such disturbances perhaps are related to the ScF3 structure intrinsic imperfection.
Indeed, the investigation of ScF3 crystals using the electron paramagnetic resonance technique [24] showed that there are lines in the spectrum that can be referred to as the local defects in the crystal structure. Sc3+ vacancies in the octahedral cation positions (Frenkel defect i.e., the vacancies being, perhaps, related to the fact that Sc3+ cations occupy other initially vacant positions with a large CN) were considered as the defects. The evident signs of local distortion in the cubic symmetry crystal field are also indicated. (see also [25]). The electrical conductivity of undoped ScF3 crystals with application of the anti-Frenkel anion defects model (F- ions transition into cubooctahedron void and vacancies formation in the main anion sublattice) and their associates was considered in Reference [56].
It does not seem possible to divide contributions of the above defects into the thermal resistance of the ScF3 crystal. Taking account of the substantial role of Sc3+ cations in maintaining crystal structure stability one may assume a more substantial effect in thermal phonons dispersion on the cation defects (without referring to the number of these defects). Relationship between fluorine ion conductivity and the anion sublattice disorder in fluoride crystals, and observed correlation with thermal conductivity was reported in Reference [57].
Let us note the following distinction of the obtained results. Extrapolation of l(T) into the melting temperature value Tm (Figure 6b) provides the value lmina for both CaF2 crystal and other crystal with fluorite structure [58], whereas for LaF3 lmin is close to the mean interstitial distance l0. In case of ScF3 crystals the value lmin is three-fold the parameter a of the unit cell. Perhaps, specifics in the behavior of l(T) and k(T) are related with the special type of individual modes anharmonicity of ScF3 crystal thermal vibrations. Necessity of description of ScF3 phonon spectrum with the application of a quantum quartic oscillator model was noted in Reference [17].

3.5. Mechanical Properties

Dependence of ScF3 microhardness on indentation load is shown in Figure 7. Vickers microhardness, under the load P = 0.3 H, is HV = 2.58(4) GPa which is higher than that of both alkali-earth (CaF2, SrF2 [59]) and rare-earth (LaF3 [60]) fluoride crystals. When the load was P > 0.4 N the area around indentation exhibited cracks in the material. ScF3 crystal refers to the group of solid materials with a high tendency to brittle failure.

3.6. Ionic Conductivity

Temperature dependences of the ionic conductivity of the ScF3 and some rare earth fluoride crystals are shown in Figure 8. The anionic transport parameters for ScF3 are well described by the Arrhenius-Frenkel equation:
σT = Aexp(−ΔHσ/kT),
where A = 9.7 × 103 SKcm−1 is the pre-exponential factor for electrical conductivity, ΔHσ = 1.13 ± 0.05 eV is the ion transport activation enthalpy, k is the Boltzmann’s constant, T is the temperature.
Electrical conductivity of ScF3 crystals changes by the order of 8 within the presented temperature range 350–833 К. Ionic conductivity is σ = 2 × 10−9 Sm/cm at T = 573 К. These results coincide with data previously published in Reference [33] within experimental error. Such low conductivity of the ScF3 single crystal confirms data for the polycrystalline ScF3 solid [56]. The mobility of highly charged Sc3+ cations is unlikely; the ion transport in ScF3 crystals is related to anti-Frenkel defects in the anion (fluorine) crystal sublattice that is created due to the F- ions transition into interstitial positions and simultaneous formation of anion vacancies [33]. The same crystal-chemical specifics belong to CaF2 crystals featuring low intrinsic conductivity [61,62]. As can clearly be seen in Figure 8, ScF3 crystal is substantially inferior to another RF3, such as HoF3 [63], recently studied similar TbF3 [64] (with β-YF3-type) and tysonite LaF3 crystals [61,65,66] in terms of the ionic conductivity.
Low conductivity of ScF3 crystal (compared to other RF3 crystals) is caused by the Sc3+ ions low coordinating ability (CN = 6), which is not typical for rare-earth cations in fluorides, their low electron polarizability (αcat = 1.1 Å3 [56]), and by strong Sc−F couplings in crystal structure (ScF3 has the highest melting temperature among all fluorides).

4. Summary

A novel bulk ScF3 crystal growth procedure with a self-sealing graphite crucible was designed. Optical quality ScF3 crystals were grown successfully from the own melt by the Bridgman technique. It was noted that the density of the etching pits is very high (more than 107 сm−2), which will require further development of the post-growth annealing procedure to reduce it.
Grown cubic ScF3 crystals are superior to such materials as LaF3 and СaF2 due to their unique mechanical and optical properties. Crystals are transparent in broad spectral range up to 8.7 µm and save optical transparency under heating on air up to T = 773 K; observed weak absorption bands are related to the oxygen contamination and a more chemically pure initial charge should be used to solve this problem. ScF3 crystals shows the isotropy of optical properties and low refractive index nD = 1.400(1), which is close to the data for other cubic LiF and KMgF3 crystals.
The ScF3 thermal conductivity examination demonstrate k = 9.6 Wm−1К−1 at room temperature, which coincides with CaF2 crystals. The Vickers hardness of the ScF3 crystals strongly depends on the applied load and average is HV ~ 2.6 GPa, which is substantially more than similar data for LaF3 and СaF2 crystal. Among others studied RF3, these crystals show a very low ionic conductivity (σ = 4 × 10−8 Scm−1 at 673 К) cause to structural defects in the fluorine sublattice.
We believe that our data on crystalline ScF3 are important for the rare earth materials science and demonstrate the competitive possibilities for its application in photonics and optical instrumentation.

Author Contributions

D.K., I.B., N.A., P.P. performed the experiments, prepared figures and manuscript; D.K., I.B. performed single crystal experiments; N.A. and P.P. analyzed crystal quality; V.G. and N.S. performed conductivity investigation; T.G. performed optical investigation; P.P. performed thermal conductivity investigation; D.K., I.B., P.P. analyzed the data, interpreted experiments; D.K. and I.B. provided the idea, designed the experiments; D.K. coordinated the group.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (projects nos. 17-00-00118, 19-02-00877) in the part concerning growth of crystals and by the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of the Russian Federation within the State assignments of the Federal Scientific Research Centre “Crystallography and Photonics” of the Russian Academy of Sciences and Petrovsky Bryansk State University (nos. 3.8326.2017/8.9) in the part concerning investigation and analysis of crystal characteristics.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sobolev, B.P. The Rare Earth Trifluorides. Pt 1. The High Temperature Chemistry of the Rare Earth Trifluorides; Institut d’Estudis Catalans: Barcelona, Spain, 2000; 520p. [Google Scholar]
  2. Greve, B.K.; Martin, K.L.; Lee, P.L.; Chupas, P.J.; Chapman, K.W.; Wilkinson, A.P. Pronounced Negative Thermal Expansion from a Simple Structure: Cubic ScF3. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15496–15498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Purans, J.; Piskunov, S.; Bocharov, D.; Kalinko, A.; Kuzmin, А.; Ali, S.E.; Rocca, F. Local structure of perovskites ReO3 and ScF3 with negative thermal expansion: Interpretation beyond the quasiharmonic approximation. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2016, 712, 012013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Petzel, T.; Schneider, F.; Hormann, B. On the phase diagram of the binary system Sc2O3-ScF3 in the temperature range 1400–1840 K. Thermochim. Acta 1996, 276, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aleksandrov, K.S.; Voronov, V.N.; Zamkova, N.G.; Zinenko, V.I.; Krylov, A.S.; Vtyurin, A.N.; Goryainov, S.V. Lattice dynamics and hydrostatic-pressure-induced phase transitions in ScF3. JETP 2002, 94, 977–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bendeliani, N.A. New modification of ScF3 at high pressure. Doklady AN SSSR 1974, 219, 851–852. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  7. Aleksandrova, M.M.; Bendeliani, N.A.; Blank, V.D.; Dyuzheva, T.I. Phase transformations in pressurized ScF3 at 300 K. Neorg. Mater. 1990, 26, 1938–1942. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  8. Aleksandrov, K.S.; Voronov, N.V.; Vtyurin, A.N.; Krylov, A.S.; Molokeev, M.S.; Oreshonkov, A.S.; Goryainov, S.V.; Likhacheva, A.Y.; Ancharov, A.I. Structure and lattice dynamics of the high-pressure phase in the ScF3 crystal. Phys. Solid State 2011, 53, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nowacki, W. Die Kristallstruktur von ScF3. Z. Krist. 1939, 101, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ippolitov, E.G.; Maklachkov, A.G. Structure and some properties of scandium fluoride. Zh. Neorg. Khim. 1970, 15, 1466–1469. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  11. Løusch, R.; Hebecker, C.; Ranft, Z. Röntgenographische Untersuchungen an neuen ternären Fluoriden vom Typ TlIIIMF6 (M = Ga, In, Sc) sowie an Einkristallen von ScF3. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1982, 491, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morelock, C.R.; Greve, B.K.; Gallington, L.C.; Chapman, K.W.; Wilkinson, A.P. Negative thermal expansion and compressibility of Sc1−xYxF3(x ≤ 0.25). J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 213501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Romao, C.P.; Morelock, C.R.; Johnson, M.B.; Zwanziger, J.W.; Wilkinson, A.P.; White, M.A. The heat capacities of thermomiotic ScF3 and ScF3–YF3 solid solutions. J. Mater. Sci. 2015, 50, 3409–3415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Morelock, C.R.; Gallington, L.C.; Wilkinson, A.P. Solid solubility, phase transitions, thermal expansion, and compressibility in Sc1−xAlxF3. J. Sol. State Chem. 2015, 222, 96–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, L.; Chen, J.; Fan, L.; Ren, Y.; Rong, Y.; Pan, Z.; Deng, J.; Yu, R.; Xing, X. Zero Thermal Expansion and Ferromagnetism in Cubic Sc1–xMxF3 (M = Ga, Fe) over a Wide Temperature Range. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13566–13569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Morelock, C.R.; Gallington, L.C.; Wilkinson, A.P. Evolution of Negative Thermal Expansion and Phase Transitions in Sc1−xTixF3. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 1936–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, C.W.; Tang, X.; Muñoz, J.A.; Keith, J.B.; Tracy, S.J.; Abernathy, D.L.; Fultz, B. Structural Relationship between Negative Thermal Expansion and Quartic Anharmonicity of Cubic ScF3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 195504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Handunkanda, S.U.; Curry, E.B.; Voronov, V.; Said, A.H.; Guzman-Verri, G.G.; Brierley, R.T.; Littlewood, P.B.; Hancock, J.N. Large isotropic negative thermal expansion above a structural quantum phase transition. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 92, 134101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fedorov, P.P.; Kalinin, V.I.; Sobolev, B.P. Phase diagram of the ScF3–YbF3 system. Zh. Neorg. Khim. 1982, 27, 1882–1883. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  20. Fedorov, P.P. Phase Equilibria in MF2–YbF3–ScF3 (M = Cd or Mg) Systems and Isomorphic Substitutions Stabilizing α-YF3 Type Structures. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 59, 595–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fedorov, P.P.; Lovetskaya, G.A.; Sobolev, B.P. Phase diagram of the ScF3–LuF3 system. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 40, 1504–1505. [Google Scholar]
  22. Trnovcova, V.; Fedorov, P.P.; Buchinskaya, I.I.; Šmatko, V.; Hanic, D. Fast ionic conductivity of PbF2:MF2 (M=Mg, Ba, Cd) and PbF2:ScF3 single crystals and composites. Solid State Ion. 1999, 119, 181–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huber, G.; Payne, S.A.; Chase, L.L.; Krupke, W.F. Optical spectroscopy of Cr3+ in ScF3 and Sc2O3. J. Lumin. 1988, 39, 259–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Voronov, V.N.; Petrakovskaya, E.A.; Alexandrovich, A.A. ESR study of ScF3 crystals and the crystals of ScF3 based solid solutions. Funct. Mater. 2010, 17, 324–328. [Google Scholar]
  25. Voronov, V.N.; Petrakovskaya, E.A. EPR investigation of local paramagnetic centers in perovskite-like crystals. Phys. Solid State 2013, 55, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Han, L.; Wang, Y.; Guo, L.; Zhao, L.; Tao, Y. Multifunctional ScF3:Ln3+ (Ln = Tb, Eu, Yb, Er, Tm and Ho) nano/microcrystals: Hydrothermal/solvothermal synthesis, electronic structure, magnetism and tunable luminescence properties. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5907–5917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hu, L.; Chen, J.; Pan, Z.; Deng, J.; Yu, R.; Xing, X. Large-Scale Synthesis of Isotropic Single-Crystalline ScF3 Cubes by Hydrothermal Method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 97, 1386–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, R.; Zeng, Y.; Liang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Qi, Y.; Liu, Y.; Lyu, Y. Regulated morphology of ScF3: Eu3+, Bi3+ microcrystals: Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis, structure and luminescence properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 269, 447–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gulina, L.B.; Tolstoy, V.P.; Kasatkin, I.A.; Murin, I.V. Facile synthesis of scandium fluoride oriented single-crystalline rods and urchin-like structures by a gas-solution interface technique. CrystEngComm. 2017, 19, 5412–5416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gulina, L.B.; Tolstoy, V.P.; Petrov, Y.V.; Danilov, D.V. Interface-Assisted Synthesis of Single-Crystalline ScF3 Microtubes. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 9779–9781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koryagin, V.F.; Grechushnikov, B.N. EPR spectrum of Cr3+ ions in a pseudo-cubic crystal field. Sov. Phys.-Solid State 1964, 6, 337–339. [Google Scholar]
  32. Starostina, L.S.; Grechushnikov, B.N.; Koryagin, V.F. Gd+3, Mn+2 paramagnetic ions in ScF3 crystal. Sov. Phys.-Solid State 1973, 14, 2936–2938. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sorokin, N.I.; Karimov, D.N.; Grebenev, V.V.; Sobolev, B.P. Ionic conductivity of ScF3 crystals (ReO3 type). Crystallogr. Rep. 2016, 61, 270–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lyashenko, S.E.; Suponitskiy, Y.L. Comparative analysis for saturated vapor pressure of rare earth fluorides and bromides. Fundam. Res. 2013, 1068–1072. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rinehart, G.H.; Behrens, R.G. Vapor Pressure and Vaporization Thermodynamic of Scandium Trifluoride. J. Less-Common Metals 1980, 75, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gschneidner, K. Chapter 8. Inorganic compounds. In Scandium Its Occurrence, Chemistry Physics, Metallurgy, Biology and Technology, 1st ed.; Horovitz, C.T., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1975; pp. 152–251. [Google Scholar]
  37. Komissarova, L.N. Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry of Scandium; Editorial URSS: Moscow, Russia, 2001; 512p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  38. Jones, D.A. The crystallization of materials having high vapour pressures at their melting points by the Bridgman-Stockbarger technique. J. Cryst. Growth 1976, 34, 149–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Debska, U.; Giriat, W.; Harrison, H.R.; Yoder-Short, D.R. RF-heated Bridgman growth of (ZnSe)1-x(MnSe)x in self-sealing graphite crucibles. J. Cryst. Growth 1984, 70, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Fitzpatrick, B.J.; McGee, T.F.; Harnack, P.M. Self-sealing and self-releasing technique (SSSR) for the crystal growth of II–VI compounds. J. Cryst. Growth 1986, 78, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Karimov, D.N.; Kireev, V.V.; Dymshitc, Y.M.; Buchinskaya, I.I.; Sobolev, B.P.; Bogdashich, O.V. Crucible for Growth of Highly Volatile Material Crystals. RU Patent 153101U1, 27 November 2014. [Google Scholar]
  42. Buchinskaya, I.I.; Karimov, D.N.; Zakalyukin, R.M.; Gali, S. Vapor-phase growth of CdF2 whiskers in the CdF2-GaF3 system. Crystallogr. Rep. 2007, 52, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Buchinskaya, I.I.; Arkharova, N.A.; Ivanova, A.G.; Karimov, D.N. Growth of solid solution crystals with tysonite-type structure in PbF2RF3 (R = Pr, Nd) systems. Crystallogr. Rep. 2019, 64. to be published. [Google Scholar]
  44. Popov, P.A.; Sidorov, A.A.; Kul’chenkov, Е.А.; Аnishchenko, А.М.; Аvetisov, I.S.; Sorokin, N.I.; Fedorov, P.P. Thermal conductivity and expansion of PbF2 single crystal. Ionics 2017, 23, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Karimov, D.N.; Krivandina, E.A.; Zhmurova, Z.I.; Sobolev, B.P.; Bezhanov, V.A.; Chernov, S.P.; Shapochkin, G.M. Investigation of multicomponent fluoride optical materials in the UV spectral region: I. Single crystals of Ca1−xRxF2+x (R = Sc, Y, La, Yb, Lu) solid solutions. Crystallogr. Rep. 2006, 51, 1009–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shannon, R.D.; Shannon, R.C.; Medenbach, O.; Fischer, R.X. Refractive Index and Dispersion of Fluorides and Oxides. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 2002, 31, 931–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Víllora, E.G.; Shimamura, K.; Muramatsu, K.; Takekawa, S.; Kitamura, K.; Ichinose, N. Refractive index of SrAlF5 and derived grating period for UV/VUV quasi-phase-matching SHG. J. Cryst. Growth 2005, 280, 145–150. [Google Scholar]
  48. Shimamura, K.; Sato, H.; Bensalah, A.; Machida, H.; Sarukura, N.; Fukuda, T. Growth of LiCaAlF6 single crystals with an extended diameter and their optical characterizations. J. Alloys Compd. 2002, 343, 204–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chindaudom, P.; Vedam, K. Characterization of inhomogeneous transparent thin films on transparent substrates by spectroscopic ellipsometry: refractive indices n(λ) of some fluoride coating materials. Appl. Opt. 1994, 33, 2664–2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Popov, P.A.; Moiseev, N.V.; Karimov, D.N.; Sorokin, N.I.; Sulyanova, E.A.; Sobolev, B.P.; Konyushkin, V.A.; Fedorov, P.P. Thermophysical characteristics of Ca1−xSrxF2 solid solution crystals (0≤x≤1). Crystallogr. Rep. 2015, 60, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Popov, P.A.; Moiseev, N.V.; Filimonova, A.V.; Fedorov, P.P.; Konyushkin, V.A.; Osiko, V.V.; Papashvili, A.G.; Smirnov, A.N.; Mironov, I.A. Thermal conductivity of LaF3-based single crystals and ceramics. Inorg. Mater. 2012, 48, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. van Roekeghem, A.; Carrete, J.; Mingo, N. Anomalous thermal conductivity and suppression of negative thermal expansion in ScF3. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 020303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Aristova, N.M.; Belov, G.V. Refining the thermodynamic functions of scandium trifluoride ScF3 in the condensed state. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. A 2016, 90, 700–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. de Jong, M.; Chen, W.; Angsten, T.; Jain, A.; Notestine, R.; Gamst, A.; Sluiter, M.; Ande, C.K.; van der Zwaag, S.; Plata, J.J.; et al. Charting the complete elastic properties of inorganic crystalline compounds. Sci. Data 2015, 2, 150009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Oskotsky, V.; Smirnov, I. Defects in Crystals and Thermal Conductivity; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1972; 159p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  56. Fedorov, P.P.; Trnovcova, V.; Kocherba, G.I.; Sobolev, B.P. Ionic conductivity and dielectric relaxation of scandium fluoride. Crystallogr. Rep. 1995, 40, 663–666. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sorokin, N.I.; Karimov, D.N.; Buchinskaya, I.I.; Sobolev, B.P.; Popov, P.A. Electrical and thermal conductivities of congruently melting single crystals of isovalent M1−хM′хF2 solid solutions (M, M′ = Ca, Sr, Cd, Pb) in relation to their defect fluorite structure. Crystallogr. Rep. 2015, 60, 532–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Popov, P.A.; Matovnikov, A.V.; Moiseev, N.V.; Buchinskaya, I.I.; Karimov, D.N.; Sorokin, N.I.; Sulyanova, E.A.; Sobolev, B.P.; Krutov, M.A. Thermophysical characteristics of Pb0.679Cd0.321F2 solid solution crystals. Crystallogr. Rep. 2015, 60, 111–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Karimov, D.N.; Komar’kova, O.N.; Sorokin, N.I.; Sobolev, B.P.; Bezhanov, V.A.; Chernov, S.P.; Popov, P.A. Growth of congruently melting Ca0.59Sr0.41F2 crystals and study of their properties. Crystallogr. Rep. 2010, 55, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Krivandina, E.A.; Zhmurova, Z.I.; Berezhkova, G.V.; Sobolev, B.P.; Glushkova, T.M.; Kiselev, D.F.; Firsova, M.M.; Shtyrkova, A.P. Crystal growth, density, and mechanical properties of La1-xSrxF3-x solid solutions (0 < x < 0.15) with the tysonite structure. Crystallogr. Rep. 1995, 40, 686–690. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sobolev, B.P.; Sorokin, N.I.; Bolotina, N.B. Nonstoichiometric single crystals M1-xRxF2+x and R1-yMyF3-y (M – Ca, Sr, Ba; R – rare earth elements) as fluorine-conducting solid electrolytes. In Progress in Fluorine Science. Photonic & Electronic Properties of Fluoride Materials; Tressaud, A., Poeppelmeier, K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016; Chapter 21; Volume 1, pp. 465–491. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ure, R.W., Jr. Ionic Conductivity of Calcium Fluoride Crystals. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 1363–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sobolev, B.P.; Sorokin, N.I. Nonstoichiometry in inorganic fluorides: 2. Ionic conductivity of nonstoichiometric M1-xRxF2+x and R1-yMyF3-y (M – Ca, Sr, Ba; R are rare earth elements). Crystallogr. Rep. 2014, 59, 807–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sorokin, N.I.; Karimov, D.N.; Sobolev, B.P. Anisotropy of ionic conductivity of TbF3 crystals. Crystallogr. Rep. 2019, 64, 621–625. [Google Scholar]
  65. Schoonman, J.; Oversluizen, G.; Wapenaar, K.E.D. Solid electrolyte properties of LaF3. Solid State Ion. 1980, 1, 211–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Chable, J.; Dieudonne, B.; Body, M.; Legein, C.; Crosnier-Lopez, M.P.; Galven, C.; Mauvy, F.; Durand, E.; Fourcade, S.; Sheptyakov, D.; et al. Fluoride solid electrolytes: Investigation of the tysonite-type solid state solutions La1-xBaxF3-x (x < 0.15). Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 19625–19635. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Crystal structure of cubic ScF3 (space group P m 3 ¯ m ) consisting of corner-shared regular ScF6 octahedra.
Figure 1. Crystal structure of cubic ScF3 (space group P m 3 ¯ m ) consisting of corner-shared regular ScF6 octahedra.
Crystals 09 00371 g001
Figure 2. (a) Schematic drawing of a self-sealing graphite crucible: 1—growth container; 2—base; 3—internal insert with the seed channel; 4—crystal; 5—melt; (b) As-grown ScF3 crystal.
Figure 2. (a) Schematic drawing of a self-sealing graphite crucible: 1—growth container; 2—base; 3—internal insert with the seed channel; 4—crystal; 5—melt; (b) As-grown ScF3 crystal.
Crystals 09 00371 g002
Figure 3. (a) XDR patterns of the as-grown and heat-treated at T = 823 K ScF3 crystals. The Bragg reflections positions for the P m 3 ¯ m and I a 3 ¯ space groups are indicated; (b) X-ray rocking curve of ScF3 crystal 222 reflection.
Figure 3. (a) XDR patterns of the as-grown and heat-treated at T = 823 K ScF3 crystals. The Bragg reflections positions for the P m 3 ¯ m and I a 3 ¯ space groups are indicated; (b) X-ray rocking curve of ScF3 crystal 222 reflection.
Crystals 09 00371 g003
Figure 4. (a) The blocky structure of peripheral crystal areas; (b) Dislocation etching pits pattern on (111) crystallographic ScF3 crystal face.
Figure 4. (a) The blocky structure of peripheral crystal areas; (b) Dislocation etching pits pattern on (111) crystallographic ScF3 crystal face.
Crystals 09 00371 g004
Figure 5. (a) Transmission spectrum of 3 mm thick crystal and fabricated ScF3 optical element; (b) Refractive index dispersions of some fluoride crystals.
Figure 5. (a) Transmission spectrum of 3 mm thick crystal and fabricated ScF3 optical element; (b) Refractive index dispersions of some fluoride crystals.
Crystals 09 00371 g005
Figure 6. (a) Temperature dependences of the thermal conductivity k(T) (a) and the phonon mean free path l(T) (b) of CaF2, ScF3 and LaF3 crystals.
Figure 6. (a) Temperature dependences of the thermal conductivity k(T) (a) and the phonon mean free path l(T) (b) of CaF2, ScF3 and LaF3 crystals.
Crystals 09 00371 g006
Figure 7. Vickers microhardness of ScF3 crystals as a function of the load applied on the (111) plane.
Figure 7. Vickers microhardness of ScF3 crystals as a function of the load applied on the (111) plane.
Crystals 09 00371 g007
Figure 8. Comparative data on the ionic conductivity temperature dependencies σ(T) of the ScF3 single crystal [this work and [33]] (1), polycrystalline ScF3 [56] (2), HoF3 [63] (3) and LaF3 [65] (4) single crystals.
Figure 8. Comparative data on the ionic conductivity temperature dependencies σ(T) of the ScF3 single crystal [this work and [33]] (1), polycrystalline ScF3 [56] (2), HoF3 [63] (3) and LaF3 [65] (4) single crystals.
Crystals 09 00371 g008
Table 1. Results of chemical analysis of ScF3 crystals.
Table 1. Results of chemical analysis of ScF3 crystals.
ElementContent, ppmElementContent, ppmElementContent, ppm
Li0.08Ga<0.02Pr20
Be<0.01Ge<0.02Nd40
B0.04As<0.02Sm8
O300Se<0.02Eu1
FBasisBr0.6Gd8
Na0.2Rb<0.02Tb1
Mg6Sr4Dy15
Al0.2Y260Ho4
Si1Zr<0.05Er15
P<0.02Mo<0.05Tm3
S2Ru<0.05Yb40
Cl5Rh<0.05Lu6
K0.5Pd<0.05Hf<0.1
Ca580Ag<0.05W<0.1
ScBasisCd<0.05Re<0.1
Ti<0.01In<0.05Os<0.2
V<0.01Sn<0.05Ir<0.1
Cr<0.01Sb<0.05Pt<0.2
Mn<0.01Te<0.05Au<0.2
Fe2I0.4Hg<0.2
Co<0.02Cs<0.1Tl<0.1
Ni<0.02Ba9Pb<0.2
Cu<0.02La40Bi<0.2
Zn<0.02Ce4U<0.2

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Karimov, D.; Buchinskaya, I.; Arkharova, N.; Prosekov, P.; Grebenev, V.; Sorokin, N.; Glushkova, T.; Popov, P. Growth from the Melt and Properties Investigation of ScF3 Single Crystals. Crystals 2019, 9, 371. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst9070371

AMA Style

Karimov D, Buchinskaya I, Arkharova N, Prosekov P, Grebenev V, Sorokin N, Glushkova T, Popov P. Growth from the Melt and Properties Investigation of ScF3 Single Crystals. Crystals. 2019; 9(7):371. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst9070371

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karimov, Denis, Irina Buchinskaya, Natalia Arkharova, Pavel Prosekov, Vadim Grebenev, Nikolay Sorokin, Tatiana Glushkova, and Pavel Popov. 2019. "Growth from the Melt and Properties Investigation of ScF3 Single Crystals" Crystals 9, no. 7: 371. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cryst9070371

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop