Next Article in Journal
Silk Fibroin-Based Biomaterials for Biomedical Applications: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Polymerization of Polyfurfuryl Alcohol: Ring Opening and Diels-Alder Reactions
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Polycondensation Catalyst on Fiber Structure Development in High-Speed Melt Spinning of Poly (Ethylene Terephthalate)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Safely Dissolvable and Healable Active Packaging Films Based on Alginate and Pectin
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study on the Printability through Digital Light Processing Technique of Ionic Liquids for CO2 Capture

by
Matteo Gillono
1,2,
Annalisa Chiappone
1,
Lorenzo Mendola
1,
Manuel Gomez Gomez
1,
Luciano Scaltrito
1,
Candido Fabrizio Pirri
1,2 and
Ignazio Roppolo
1,*
1
Department of Applied Science and Technology, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy
2
Center for Sustainable Future Technologies @Polito, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Livorno 60, 10144 Torino, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 4 November 2019 / Revised: 20 November 2019 / Accepted: 20 November 2019 / Published: 23 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Polymer Science and Technology in Italy (2019,2020))

Abstract

:
Here we present new 3D printable materials based on the introduction of different commercially available ionic liquids (ILs) in the starting formulations. We evaluate the influence of these additives on the printability of such formulations through light-induced 3D printing (digital light processing—DLP), investigating as well the effect of ionic liquids with polymerizable groups. The physical chemical properties of such materials are compared, focusing on the permeability towards CO2 of the different ILs present in the formulations. At last, we show the possibility of 3D printing high complexity structures, which could be the base of new high complexity filters for a more efficient CO2 capture.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Public and political opinion is currently always more interested in global warming phenomenon. Data collected through the last 150 years demonstrate that the greenhouse effect is the main reason of the global temperature increase and carbon dioxide is one of the main gases involved in this effect. The emission of a huge quantity of this gas (nearly 40 Gtonn/year in 2018 only from fossil fuels) [1] is causing an abrupt increase of its concentration from 300 ppm in the 50s to more than 400 ppm currently [2,3]. So, the capture of the gases present in the atmosphere is an urgent demand in order to decrease the greenhouse gases emissions, in particular for carbon dioxide. In this context, different technologies are available for CO2 capture (CC), such as pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxyfuel capture [4,5,6,7,8]. These technologies can employ liquids, both in pre-combustion and post-combustion processes [9,10], but also solid materials in form of beads and powders packed in columns, used as gas contactors [11]. Such materials can undergo two main capture processes: physical adsorption and chemical absorption. In the physical adsorption process, the capture is mainly due to Van der Waals forces generated by the chemical potential and the affinity between the CO2 molecules and the surface of the sorbents. The weak bond created guarantees a minimum amount of energy to be used in the regeneration phase. The most used solid CO2 adsorbents are zeolites, activated carbons and metal organic framework (MOF) [12,13,14,15]. The chemical absorption process is more employed in post combustion processes, and involves the creation of strong irreversible chemical bonds that bring to the creation of new chemical species. The main problem related to this process is the high amount of energy required to break the chemical bonds to regenerate the CO2 absorbed molecules. Among the most used chemical absorbents, there are the amine and lithium based materials [16,17,18,19].
In the last years, ionic liquids (ILs) have gained a lot of attention in the application of CC technologies [5,20,21,22]. They are salts with low melting point, usually under 100 °C and below room temperature for RTILs (room temperature ionic liquids); they possess very low vapor pressure with a consequent almost zero volatility. Furthermore, their cations and anions can be tuned and engineered in such a way that their CO2 solubility can be increased. ILs have been largely used in adsorbing liquid blends, like aqueous alkanolamines. The main differences of these systems consist in a decreased degradation in oxidizing environments, minor corrosion rate and lower regeneration energy [23]; nevertheless, the ILs present problems caused by their high viscosity and lower CO2 solubility compared with standard capturing liquid systems [24,25]. Supported liquid membranes (SLM), solid membranes containing ILs, have been also proposed [26,27,28,29]. Among those, some are formed of ionic liquids that were functionalized with reactive groups and used to create polymeric chains, the so-called poly ionic liquids (PILs) [30,31,32,33]. In 2007 Noble et al. proposed for the first time the use of PILs based membranes for CO2 capture, obtaining better results than the ones of the relative neat ILs [34]. Merging the intriguing CO2 solubility ability of ILs with the handiness of solid materials results extremely attractive for the development of CO2 capturing devices [35]; furthermore, the possibility to shape the material with complex geometries could enable the production of smart filters. In this perspective 3D printing can be a forwarding solution [36].
3D printing is a fabrication method that enables the direct fabrication of three dimensional objects starting from a digital model [37]. Compared to traditional methods, 3D printing enables a higher level of complexity, gathered with saving of raw materials and lower energy consumption [38]. ILs were already used in 3D printing both for direct Ink Writing (DIW) [39,40,41], Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) technology [42] and in photopolymerization-based technologies (i.e., stereolithography—SL—and digital light processing—DLP) [43]. The union between ILs and 3D printing was explored in many applications, such as sensors [39,44], optical data storage systems [45], chemical [46] and biomedical devices [47].
Among the different 3D printing technologies, DLP results particularly interesting for the production of functional components, in which materials and design properties are gathered. DLP is a vat polymerization 3D printing method that employs photosensitive liquid resins able to be cure upon light irradiation. In a DLP equipment, a digital micromirror device (DMD) shines the light on a photocurable formulation following a two-dimensional pixel pattern, which represents a single layer of a digital model (CAD file), inducing the layer solidification. Repeating the same procedure along the z axis, the object is built [48]. If compared to the other 3D printing technologies, DLP presents one of the highest resolution together with high output [49]. The polymeric materials typically employed in DLP are acrylic- and methacrylic- resins, which are cured by means of free-radical photopolymerization [50]. Considering the wide range of suitable resins, objects produced by DLP can now cover a wide range of applications, from biomedical to mechanical, electronic, energy and many more [51].
In this paper, we present the development of polymeric formulations printable with the DLP technique containing commercial available ILs. Those ILs are particularly suitable for DLP technology due to their intrinsic characteristic: first, in DLP liquid photocurable formulations are processed, so perfectly compatible with RTILs; second, cross-linked polymers are produced by this technology, trapping ILs and possibly avoiding phase separation or leakage; third, DLP allows a higher shape freedom and superior precision, which can be straightforward in order to produce complex devices containing ILs [52]. Here, we selected six commercially available ILs (Bmim[BF4], Bmim[Tf2N], Bvim[Tf2N], Amim[Tf2N], Bmim[ac] and C4NMA,11[Tf2N], Table 1) and we fabricated 3D printed structures based on these compounds, both trapped and co-polymerized in the polymeric network. First, a polymerization study showing the photo-rheological and infrared spectroscopy kinetics is presented to assess the reactivity of the formulations containing different ILs. Second, the formulations are loaded in the DLP system and 3D printed structures. The thermo-mechanical properties of the printed structures were then investigated. Afterwards, CO2 permeability on photo-polymerized membranes is done to study their gas transport properties. At last, very complex geometries (gyroids) are 3D printed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Poly(ethyleneglycol)diacrylate (PEGDA, Mn. 575), (Bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl)-phenylphosphineoxide (BAPO) and Reactive Orange 16 were purchased from Merck (Milan, Italy) and used as received. Regarding the ionic liquids employed, 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium bis (trifluorometilsulfonyl)imide, 1-Allyl-3-Methylimidazolium bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide and 1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium acetate were purchased from Merck (Milan, Italy); N,N,N,N-ButyldimethylMethacryloyloxyethylammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide and 1,4-Butandiyl-3,3′-bis-1-vinylimidazoliumbis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide were purchased from Solvionic (Toulouse, France). The ionic liquids used are summarized in Table 1.

2.2. Formulation Preparation and Printing

A reference formulation (named PEGDA) was obtained by mixing Poly(ethyleneglycol)diacrylate with Reactive Orange 16 at 0.2 phr (per hundred resin), as a dye, and BAPO at 2 phr as a photoinitiator.
The formulations containing the different ILs were produced by adding 0.4 mmol/g of each IL to the reference formulation. These were named as P_Bmim[BF4], P_Bmim[Tf2N], P_Bmim[ac], P_C4NMA,11[Tf2N], P_Amim[Tf2N] and P_Bvim[Tf2N] accordingly to the IL used. The influence of the IL concentration was tested for Bmim[BF4] and for C4NMA,11[Tf2N], in this case multiples of 0.4 mmol/g were added to the reference formulation. The samples were named as P_(ILname)_X, where X is the multiple of 0.4 used.
The different formulations were then printed using a DLP printer HD 2.0 (Robot Factory S.r.l., Venice, Itay), equipped with a projector as light source (X–Y resolution 50 µm corresponding to 1920 pixels × 1080 pixels, intensity 10 mW/cm2). The layer thickness was set to 50 µm and the layer exposure time was set for each sample according to preliminary tests (values reported in Table 2). The obtained samples were first washed, gently rinsing in ethanol, and then underwent a post curing process (5 min), performed with a medium pressure mercury lamp also provided by Robotfactory equipped with a rotating platform (intensity 10 mW/cm2).

2.3. Characterization

FTIR-ATR spectra were collected using a Tensor 27 FTIR Spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with ATR tool, 32 scans were collected with a resolution of 4 cm−1 from 4000 to 400 cm−1. Real-time photo-rheology measurements were performed using an Anton Paar rheometer Physica MCR 302 (Graz, Austria) in parallel plate mode equipped with a bottom glass plate. For the measurement a light source Hamamatsu Photonic LC8 lamp (Hamamatsu City, Japan) with visible bulb and a cut-off filter below 400 nm equipped with 8 mm light guide) was placed below the glass plate. The upper aluminum plate was placed at 0.1 mm from the glass one and the sample was kept at a constant temperature (25 °C) and under constant shear frequency of 5 rad s−1 at 1% of amplitude accordingly to preliminary amplitude sweep tests; light was turned on after 1 min in order to stabilize the system. Dynamic mechanical thermal analyses (DMTAs) were performed with a Triton Technology TTDMA (Mansfield, MA, USA). All of the experiments were conducted with a temperature ramp of 3 °C/min, applying a force with a frequency of 1 Hz and a displacement of 20 μm with a temperature range between −80 and 30 °C. TGA analysis were carried out with a Themo Netzsch TG 209 F1 Libra (Selb, Germany) instrument with a temperature ramp of 10 °C/min in air. For the permeability measurements, a single chamber Extrasolution Multiperm permeometer was used (Extrasolution, Pieve Fosciana, Italy). For the CO2 uptake measurements, FT-IR was used to check the interaction between the samples and the gas. The apparatus for CO2 atmosphere is composed by a pressurizing test chamber connected with a CO2 cylinder and a vacuum pump used to clean the chamber and regenerate the samples. A thin layer of the printable formulations (25 μm) was deposited on the silicon wafer and photocured in nitrogen atmosphere. The samples were then degassed in vacuum (5 mbar) for 24 h to desorb the gases adsorbed. The CO2 uptake phase was carried out by inserting the samples in the CO2 unit for 4 h at a pressure of 4 bar. Afterwards, the samples were again subjected to a vacuum cycle (24 h at 5 mbar) and a further heating (80 °C). After every step, the samples were tested by FT-IR in order to check the CO2 peaks in the 2400–2200 cm−1 range.

3. Results and Discussion

In order to determine the printability of the different formulations, investigations on the polymerization of the prepared mixtures containing the different ionic liquids were performed. The photo-rheological measurements show how the liquid formulations behave during light irradiation; in particular, the variation of the elastic modulus G′ vs. the irradiation time was investigated. The tests, reported in Figure 1, showed that three of the chosen ILs (i.e., Bmim[BF4], Bmim[Tf2N] and Bvim[Tf2N]) do not influence the kinetic of polymerization of the monomer, indicating that neither the imidazole cation nor the corresponding anions inhibit the polymerization process. Instead, C4NMA,11[Tf2N] showed slightly slower kinetics, which led to a delayed plateau value of G′, probably due to the ammonium-based cation, which could induce radical quenching [53]. Moreover, the IL Amim[Tf2N], which bears an allyl group, slows the polymerization: this could be expected considering the poor reactivity of allyl monomers [54,55]. At last, it was not possible to measure the polymerization of P_Bmim[ac]: in this case no variation of the G’ modulus was observed, indicating that the acetate-based IL completely hinders the reaction. The data obtained gave an indication of the required layer exposure time during printing that was then experimentally adjusted (Table 2).
After this preliminary study, 3D printing tests were performed to create both planar films and three-dimensional filter-like structures with cubical structures (Figure 2). The cubical hollow structure was chosen both to prove the possibility to manufacture complex features with high resolution and to create a structure with a high surface area to improve the gas contact with the material during the CO2 uptake analysis.
The key parameters to control in the printing process are the layer thickness and the layer exposure time. In fact, to adjust both parameters is essential to obtain the best printing performance, resulting in increased-X, Y and Z resolution. The exposure times (Table 2) were empirically obtained during the production of membranes and 3D printed parts, considering a good trade-off between ease of handling and precision of printing (i.e., no over-polymerization); those values are in good agreement with the trends obtained from photorheology tests, showing that all the samples containing IL required layer exposure times similar to neat PEGDA monomer. The only exception was the sample P_Amim[Tf2N], which needed longer exposure times for the polymerization in the form of membrane, and it demonstrated unsuitability to obtain more complex shapes. Sample Bmim[ac] could not be polymerized thus it was not further considered for the next experiments.
FTIR-ATR analyses of the 3D printed ionic liquids blended with PEGDA were carried out in order to further investigate the interaction of the different ILs with PEGDA matrix, in particular to observe weather if the ILs containing double bonds (C4NMA,11[Tf2N], Bvim[Tf2N] and Amim[Tf2N]) co-polymerize. First, the FTIR-ATR spectra of all neat ionic liquids and PEGDA as reference were collected (Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials), then the polymerized samples of each formulation were analyzed before and after being washed in acetone for 24 h (Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials). The spectra confirmed that C4NMA,11[Tf2N] and Bvim[Tf2N] copolymerized with PEGDA acrylic bonds, proving that these ionic liquids remained linked to the polymer chains during the polymerization reaction, being a part of polymeric network. So, the structures with these ILs could be used even in liquid environment without leakage of the components. Instead, in the spectra of the samples containing the remaining ILs (Bmim[BF4], Bmim[Tf2N] and Amim[Tf2N]), we observed that the peaks related to the ionic liquids disappeared after solvent rinsing, demonstrating that they were only trapped in the polymer matrix and no reaction occurred during polymerization. This confirms also that the allyl group in Amim[Tf2N] was not reactive enough to react with photoactivated process. Moreover, the weight of the samples was measured before and after the solvent washing. Table 3 reports the values of the concentration of the ionic liquids in the samples and the loss in weight after solvent washing. The results confirmed the considerations reported for FT-IR measurements.
The evaluation of the effect of the presence of the ILs on the thermo-mechanical properties of the 3D printed structures was carried out by DSC and DMTA. The data are reported in Table 4 while the curves are reported in Figures S3 and S4 (in Supplementary Materials) in the supporting information file. Starting from neat PEGDA as reference materials, it was possible to distinguish two distinct behavior: while the ILs that do not react with PEGDA (Bmim[BF4], Bmim[Tf2N] and Amim[Tf2N]) induced a decrease of the Tg, for the sample in samples in which copolymerization occurred, an increase of Tg was evidenced. This could be explained considering that not polymerizable ILs remained as liquid in the formulation, swelling the matrix and acting as plasticizers. On the other hand, when the ILs entered in the polymeric network, the chain mobility decreased, leading to an increase of Tg. The results followed a similar trend both on DSC and DMA, confirming the assumptions. For DMTA, unfortunately, it was not possible to perform measurements on P_Amim[Tf2N] sample due to brittleness and poor mechanical properties of this membrane.
According to literature [56], DMTA measurements were used also to calculate the cross-linking density according to the Equation
E′ = υ·R·T
where E′ (MPa) is the conservative modulus in the rubbery plateau, υ (mol/cm3) is the cross-linking density, R (cm3 MPa/mol K) the gas constant and T the temperature in K at which the measure is performed (in our case, 293 K for all the samples). The values (reported in Table 3) confirmed that the ILs without reactive groups drastically reduced the cross-linking density, acting as swelling agent in the polymeric matrix. A different behavior was measured for the IL with a single cross-linkable moiety (C4NMA,11[Tf2N]): even in this case the cross-linking density decreased as expected, since a monofunctional monomer was introduced in the network. On the other hand, the Tg slightly increased, related to the fact that the IL was not anymore liquid but integrated in the network. This was measured even in the presence of Bvim[Tf2N]. Moreover, the sample P_Bvim[Tf2N] showed also an increase of cross-linking density, related to the fact that this IL is bifunctional, thus introducing additional cross-linking points.
The first approach on the study of the interaction between CO2 and the polymerized structures containing dispersed and linked ionic liquid species was to carry out gas barrier measurements on the membranes. These experiments are fundamental for the evaluation of the gas transport properties such as permeability, diffusivity and solubility. Furthermore, they are a first step towards the understanding of the usage of these materials as supported liquid membranes (SLM) for CO2 separation. The membranes were tested with the same IL concentrations (0.4 mmol/g) in order to evaluate the real effect of each IL. The values of diffusivity, solubility and permeability, calculated from the CO2 transmission rate curves of the membranes as described in a precedent work [57], are shown in Table 4. With the addition of ionic liquids in the formulations, the diffusivity increases in all cases, with the exception of C4NMA,11[Tf2N]. The best result is the one with Bmim[BF4] that presents a diffusivity value almost double with respect the neat PEGDA. For what regards solubility, the only sample with a significant variation from neat PEGDA is Amim[Tf2N] that unfortunately has got issues in the 3D printing process. The characteristic that allows to evaluate the effectiveness of a SLM system is the permeability and, among the analyzed samples, the most promising are the Bmim[BF4] and Bmim[Tf2N].
Afterwards, further permeability tests were conducted by increasing the amount of Bmim[BF4] and C4NMA,11[Tf2N] in the printable formulations. The change in the amount of the two ILs did not affect the printability of the resins and the same irradiation times were used for producing the membranes to be tested. Those two ILs were selected among the others because they seemed to give the best (Bmim[BF4]) and the worst C4NMA,11[Tf2N] performance when introduced in PEGDA. In Figure S5 (in Supplementary Materials) of the supporting information the values of diffusivity, solubility and permeability are displayed with the increase of the ILS concentration. Unfortunately, it is not present a clear trend between the amount of the ILs and the gas permeation properties. Surprisingly, increasing the amount of C4NMA,11[Tf2N] a great increase of both solubility and diffusivity was measured, indicating that an optimization work could be performed individuating the most effective amount of IL. This is part of ongoing studies.
The interaction between polymers containing ILs and carbon dioxide was monitored also by FTIR. As an example, in Figure 3, the absorption spectra of P_Bmim[BF4] in the range between 2300 and 2400 cm−1 after different steps was reported. While after the production step the two typical peaks of this gas, related to the IR active ν3 vibrating mode centered at 2330 and 2360 cm−1 [58,59], were not present in the sample, as expected, they appeared after the treatment in CO2 atmosphere. The following treatment in vacuum produced a reduction of the absorbance in the range, indicating desorbing of CO2. However, CO2 was still present in the film due to the interaction with the embedded IL. A following thermal step led to a further but incomplete desorption of CO2, indicating that IL-gas interaction is strong and could be used for gas trapping.
At last, taking advantage of the high printability of the developed formulations, we printed components of very complex geometry like gyroids. In Figure 4 we reported gyroids of different sizes printed with P_Bmim[BF4] formulation, but the same structures were obtained with the all the other tested ILs except P_Amim[Tf2N]. This highly complex geometry applied to 3D printing offers improved mechanical properties compared to other structures [60] and a high surface to volume ratio [61] that can be exploited to create active filter for CO2 capture with improved gas/surface interaction. In particular, these shapes present interconnected continuous channels that allow the passage of the gas without a pressure drop but, at the same time, higher interaction with the structure for enabling gas adsorption. Those complex shape components are at the moment under investigation as well and will be presented in future works. In fact, different parameters should be taken into account in order to have an optimized device including material properties, channel dimensions, tortuosity and available surface. In this context 3D printing could be fully exploited integrating CAD design with formulation development.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we tested different commercially available ionic liquids in order to develop 3D printable formulations processable with DLP technology, with potential application in CO2 capture technology. Six ionic liquids were tested (Bmim[BF4], Bmim[Tf2N], Bvim[Tf2N], Amim[Tf2N], Bmim[ac] and C4NMA,11[Tf2N]) mixed with a bi-functional acrylate monomer (PEGDA). The photo-rheological analyses carried out brought us to exclude Bmim[ac] since the acetate anion inhibits the photopolymerization. Regarding the other ILs, we evidenced that imidazole based cations as well as tetrafluoroborate and bis (trifluorometilsulfonyl)imide anions did not affect the photopolymerization, while the other cations (containing ammonium salt and allyl group) slowed down the process. Afterwards, a 3D printing test was conducted on the formulations to build simple (membranes) and complex (hollow cubic) structures and to find the optimal printing parameters. All the ILs samples allowed the fabrication of complex 3D structures, with the exception of the samples containing Amim[Tf2N]. Moreover we demonstrated that the ILs bearing a reactive group (C4NMA,11[Tf2N] and Bvim[Tf2N]) participated to the polymerization reaction entering in the polymeric network, while it was possible to remove the other ILs by solvent extraction. This resulted even in thermomechanical properties, with a plasticizing effect of the dispersed ILs. The samples were then tested for the CO2 capture capacity by means of FTIR. The spectra showed the characteristic peaks related to the vibrating modes of the CO2 molecule, demonstrating the physical adsorption of the gas in the samples. Moreover an absorption/desorption experiment was conducted to check the regeneration of the samples. Regarding the possible application of these materials as supported liquid membranes (SLM) for CO2 separation, gas transport analyses were carried out to determine the transport properties of the membranes, unfortunately resulting in not univocal trends. As a final experiment, we 3D printed part with high complexity as gyroids in order to demonstrate the possibility to produce complex geometries that could be employed as active filters for CO2 capture. The present work successfully demonstrated the possibility to employ 3D printing for CO2 capture technologies, opening the way to new investigations in which CAD design and materials properties could lead to more efficient devices.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2073-4360/11/12/1932/s1, Figure S1: FTIR-ATR spectra of neat ILs and neat PEGDA; Figure S2: FTIR-ATR spectra of polymerized formulations before (red) and after (blue) solvent washing; Figure S3: DSC analysis of the studied formulations; Figure S4: DMTA analysis on the polymerized samples; Figure S5: Diffusivity, solubility and permeability values of membranes containing increasing concentrations Bmim[BF4] (red) e C4NMA, 11[Tf2N] (green). The black line indicates the value calculated for neat PEGDA.

Author Contributions

M.G. and L.M. conducted the experiments, M.G.G. methodology, A.C. and I.R. writing the paper and data analysis, L.S. and C.F.P. discussion and supervision.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Federica Piccatto for the support in CAD design.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Figueres, C.; Le Quéré, C.; Mahindra, A.; Bäte, O.; Whiteman, G.; Peters, G.; Guan, D. Emissions are still rising: Ramp up the cuts. Nature 2018, 564, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jacobson, M.Z. Air Pollution and Global Warming: History, Science, and Solutions, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Hoffmann, M.J. Global climate change. In The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 3–18. [Google Scholar]
  4. Araújo, O.D.Q.F.; de Medeiros, J.L. Carbon capture and storage technologies: Present scenario and drivers of innovation. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2017, 17, 22–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Theo, W.L.; Lim, J.S.; Hashim, H.; Mustaffa, A.A.; Ho, W.S. Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage. Appl. Energy 2016, 183, 1633–1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jansen, D.; Gazzani, M.; Manzolini, G.; Dijk, E.V.; Carbo, M. Pre-combustion CO2 capture. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2015, 40, 167–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hadjipaschalis, I.; Kourtis, G.; Poullikkas, A. Assessment of oxyfuel power generation technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 2637–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, C.A.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Che, D. Pyrolysis and combustion characteristics of coals in oxyfuel combustion. Appl. Energy 2012, 97, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Machida, H.; Ando, R.; Esaki, T.; Yamaguchi, T.; Norinaga, K. Modelling of CO2 solubility in phase separation solvent composed of amine/ether/water system for CO2 capture. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 292, 111411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kussainova, D.; Shah, D. Monoethanolamine based DESs for CO2 absorption: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 231, 115931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Meisen, A.; Shuai, X. Research and development issues in CO2 capture. Energy Convers. Manag. 1997, 38, S37–S42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Andirova, D.; Cogswell, C.F.; Lei, Y.; Choi, S. Effect of the structural constituents of metal organic frameworks on carbon dioxide capture. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2016, 219, 276–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nandasiri, M.I.; Jambovane, S.R.; McGrail, B.P.; Schaef, H.T.; Nune, S.K. Adsorption, separation, and catalytic properties of densified metal-organic frameworks. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 311, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Venna, S.R.; Carreon, M.A. Metal organic framework membranes for carbon dioxide separation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 124, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Zhang, G. Metal−organic framework composite membranes: Synthesis and separation applications. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2015, 135, 232–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heo, Y.J.; Seong, D.B.; Park, S.J. Synthesis of polyethylenimine-impregnated titanate nanotubes for CO2 capture: Influence of porosity and nitrogen content on amine-modified adsorbents. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 34, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, P.; Zhang, G.; Xu, Y.; Lv, Y. Amine functionalized hierarchical bimodal mesoporous silicas as a promising nanocomposite for highly efficient CO2 capture. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 34, 543–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stefanelli, E.; Puccini, M.; Vitolo, S.; Seggiani, M. CO2 sorption kinetic study and modeling on doped-Li4SiO4 under different temperatures and CO2 partial pressures. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 379, 122307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yang, Y.; Liu, W.; Hu, Y.; Sun, J.; Tong, X.; Li, Q.; Zhou, Z. Novel low cost Li4SiO4-based sorbent with naturally occurring wollastonite as Si-source for cyclic CO2 capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 374, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Halder, K.; Khan, M.M.; Grünauer, J.; Shishatskiy, S.; Abetz, C.; Filiz, V.; Abetz, V. Blend membranes of ionic liquid and polymers of intrinsic microporosity with improved gas separation characteristics. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 539, 368–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Marsh, K.N.; Boxall, J.A.; Lichtenthaler, R. Room temperature ionic liquids and their mixtures—A review. Fluid Phase Equilibria 2004, 219, 93–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zeng, S.; Zhang, X.; Bai, L.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Bao, D.; Li, M.; Liu, X.; Zhang, S. Ionic-Liquid-Based CO2 Capture Systems: Structure, Interaction and Process. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 9625–9673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Aroonwilas, A.; Veawab, A. Characterization and comparison of the CO2 absorption performance into single and blended alkanolamines in a packed column. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 2228–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sistla, Y.S.; Khanna, A. CO2 absorption studies in amino acid-anion based ionic liquids. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 273, 268–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Makino, T.; Kanakubo, M. CO2 absorption property of ionic liquid and CO2 permselectivity for ionic liquid membrane. J. Jpn. Pet. Inst. 2016, 59, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lozano, L.J.; Godínez, C.; de los Ríos, A.P.; Hernández-Fernández, F.J.; Sánchez-Segado, S.; Alguacil, F.J. Recent advances in supported ionic liquid membrane technology. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 376, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Malik, M.A.; Hashim, M.A.; Nabi, F. Ionic liquids in supported liquid membrane technology. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 171, 242–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Parhi, P.K. Supported liquid membrane principle and its practices: A short review. J. Chem. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dai, Z.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L.; Zhang, X.; Deng, L. Combination of ionic liquids with membrane technology: A new approach for CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 497, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zulfiqar, S.; Sarwar, M.I.; Mecerreyes, D. Polymeric ionic liquids for CO2 capture and separation: Potential, progress and challenges. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 6435–6451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tang, J.; Sun, W.; Tang, H.; Radosz, M.; Shen, Y. Enhanced CO2 Absorption of Poly(ionic liquid)s. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 2037–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tang, J.; Shen, Y.; Radosz, M.; Sun, W. Isothermal Carbon Dioxide Sorption in Poly(ionic liquid)s. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48, 9113–9118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tomé, L.C.; Gouveia, A.S.L.; Freire, C.S.R.; Mecerreyes, D.; Marrucho, I.M. Polymeric ionic liquid-based membranes: Influence of polycation variation on gas transport and CO2 selectivity properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 486, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bara, J.E.; Lessmann, S.; Gabriel, C.J.; Hatakeyama, E.S.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L. Synthesis and Performance of Polymerizable Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids as Gas Separation Membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 5397–5404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhou, X.; Weber, J.; Yuan, J. Poly(ionic liquid)s: Platform for CO2 capture and catalysis. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2019, 16, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Steldinger, H.; Esposito, A.; Brunnengräber, K.; Gläsel, J.; Etzold, B.J.M. Activated Carbon in the Third Dimension—3D Printing of a Tuned Porous Carbon. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1901340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chiappone, A.; Fantino, E.; Roppolo, I.; Lorusso, M.; Manfredi, D.; Fino, P.; Pirri, C.F.; Calignano, F. 3D Printed PEG-Based Hybrid Nanocomposites Obtained by Sol–Gel Technique. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 5627–5633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Farahani, R.D.; Dubé, M.; Therriault, D. Three-Dimensional Printing of Multifunctional Nanocomposites: Manufacturing Techniques and Applications. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 5794–5821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Emon, M.O.F.; Alkadi, F.; Philip, D.G.; Kim, D.-H.; Lee, K.-C.; Choi, J.-W. Multi-material 3D printing of a soft pressure sensor. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 28, 629–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Crump, M.R.; Gong, A.T.; Chai, D.; Bidinger, S.L.; Pavinatto, F.J.; Reihsen, T.E.; Sweet, R.M.; Mackenzie, J.D. Monolithic 3D printing of embeddable and highly stretchable strain sensors using conductive ionogels. Nanotechnology 2019, 30, 364002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wong, J.; Gong, A.T.; Defnet, P.A.; Meabe, L.; Beauchamp, B.; Sweet, R.M.; Sardon, H.; Cobb, C.L.; Nelson, A. 3D Printing Ionogel Auxetic Frameworks for Stretchable Sensors. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1900452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, G.; Chen, N.; Wang, Q. Preparation of poly (vinyl alcohol)/ionic liquid composites with improved processability and electrical conductivity for fused deposition modeling. Mater. Des. 2018, 157, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schultz, A.R.; Lambert, P.M.; Chartrain, N.A.; Ruohoniemi, D.M.; Zhang, Z.; Jangu, C.; Zhang, M.; Williams, C.B.; Long, T.E. 3D Printing Phosphonium Ionic Liquid Networks with Mask Projection Microstereolithography. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 1205–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, J.; Faruk Emon, M.O.; Vatani, M.; Choi, J.W. Effect of degree of crosslinking and polymerization of 3D printable polymer/ionic liquid composites on performance of stretchable piezoresistive sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 2017, 26, 035043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wales, D.J.; Cao, Q.; Kastner, K.; Karjalainen, E.; Newton, G.N.; Sans, V. 3D-Printable Photochromic Molecular Materials for Reversible Information Storage. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Wu, J.; Yan, Y.; Zhang, L.; Qin, Z.; Tao, S. Enhanced Mass Transfer and Improved Catalyst Recovery in a Stirred Reactor by Polymeric Ionic Liquids Modified 3D Printed Devices. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2019, 4, 1800515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ding, H.; Chang, R.C. Printability study of bioprinted tubular structures using liquid hydrogel precursors in a support bath. Appl. Sci. (Switzerland) 2018, 8, 403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Melchels, F.P.W.; Feijen, J.; Grijpma, D.W. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 6121–6130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Frascella, F.; González, G.; Bosch, P.; Angelini, A.; Chiappone, A.; Sangermano, M.; Pirri, C.F.; Roppolo, I. Three-Dimensional Printed Photoluminescent Polymeric Waveguides. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 39319–39326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Roppolo, I.; Chiappone, A.; Angelini, A.; Stassi, S.; Frascella, F.; Pirri, C.; Ricciardi, C.; Descrovi, E. 3D printable light-responsive polymers. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ligon, S.C.; Liska, R.; Stampfl, J.; Gurr, M.; Mülhaupt, R. Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 10212–10290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Nulwala, H.; Mirjafari, A.; Zhou, X. Ionic liquids and poly(ionic liquid)s for 3D printing—A focused mini-review. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 108, 390–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Jakubiak, J.; Allonas, X.; Fouassier, J.; Sionkowska, A.; Andrzejewska, E.; Linden, L.; Rabek, J. Camphorquinone–amines photoinitating systems for the initiation of free radical polymerization. Polymer 2003, 44, 5219–5226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Litt, M.; Eirich, F.R. Polymerization of allyl acetate. J. Polym. Sci. 1960, 45, 379–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Matsumoto, A.; Kumagai, T.; Aota, H.; Kawasaki, H.; Arakawa, R. Reassessment of Free-Radical Polymerization Mechanism of Allyl Acetate Based on End-Group Determination of Resulting Oligomers by MALDI-TOF-MS Spectrometry. Polym. J. 2009, 41, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Chiappone, A.; Jeremias, S.; Bongiovanni, R.; Schönhoff, M. NMR study of photo-crosslinked solid polymer electrolytes: The influence of monofunctional oligoethers. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2013, 51, 1571–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gillono, M.; Roppolo, I.; Frascella, F.; Scaltrito, L.; Pirri, C.F.; Chiappone, A. CO2 permeability control in 3D printed light responsive structures. Appl. Mater. Today 2019, 100470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yamazaki, T.; Katoh, M.; Ozawa, S.; Ogino, Y. Adsorption of CO2 over univalent cation-exchanged ZSM-5 zeolites. Mol. Phys. 1993, 80, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Veyrié, D.; Lellouchi, D.; Roux, J.; Pressecq, F.; Tetelin, A.; Pellet, C. FTIR spectroscopy for the hermeticity assessment of micro-cavities. Microelectron. Reliab. 2005, 45, 1764–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Al-Ketan, O.; Rezgui, R.; Rowshan, R.; Du, H.; Fang, N.X.; Abu Al-Rub, R.K. Microarchitected stretching-dominated mechanical metamaterials with minimal surface topologies. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2018, 20, 1800029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yoo, D.-J. Advanced porous scaffold design using multi-void triply periodic minimal surface models with high surface area to volume ratios. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2014, 15, 1657–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photorheology tests of PEGDA/ionic liquid (IL) formulations containing different ILs and neat PEGDA as reference. Light irradiation starts after 12 s.
Figure 1. Photorheology tests of PEGDA/ionic liquid (IL) formulations containing different ILs and neat PEGDA as reference. Light irradiation starts after 12 s.
Polymers 11 01932 g001
Figure 2. 3D printed complex structure (hollow cube).
Figure 2. 3D printed complex structure (hollow cube).
Polymers 11 01932 g002
Figure 3. FT-IR of P_Bmim[BF4] in the CO2 absorption area after different absorption/desorption steps.
Figure 3. FT-IR of P_Bmim[BF4] in the CO2 absorption area after different absorption/desorption steps.
Polymers 11 01932 g003
Figure 4. Gyroid-like structures printed with P_Bmim[BF4].
Figure 4. Gyroid-like structures printed with P_Bmim[BF4].
Polymers 11 01932 g004
Table 1. Ionic liquids tested in this study.
Table 1. Ionic liquids tested in this study.
Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate Bmim[BF4]
Polymers 11 01932 i001
N,N,N,N-ButyldimethylMethacryloyloxyethyl ammonium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imideC4NMA,11[Tf2N]
Polymers 11 01932 i002
1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium bis (trifluorometilsulfonyl)imide Bmim[Tf2N]
Polymers 11 01932 i003
1-Allyl-3-Methylimidazolium bis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide Amim[Tf2N]
Polymers 11 01932 i004
1-Butyl-3-Methylimidazolium acetate Bmim[ac]
Polymers 11 01932 i005
1,4-Butandiyl-3,3′-bis-1-vinylimidazoliumbis (trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide Bvim[Tf2N]
Polymers 11 01932 i006
Table 2. Layer exposure times needed for the samples.
Table 2. Layer exposure times needed for the samples.
SampleLayer Exposure Time (s)
MembraneCubic Filter-Like
PEGDA12
P_Bmim[BF4]11.7
P_Bmim[Tf2N]12
P_C4NMA,11[Tf2N]11.8
P_Amim[Tf2N]2Not obtained
P_Bvim[Tf2N]11.7
Table 3. Ionic liquid content in the samples in relation to the weight variation after solvent treatment.
Table 3. Ionic liquid content in the samples in relation to the weight variation after solvent treatment.
SampleIonic Liquid Concentration (wt %)Weight Variation (wt %)Tg (DSC; °C)Tg (DMTA; °C)υ (mmol/cm3)
PEGDA00−19.9−1710.8
P_Bmim[BF4]98.5−22.6−21.31.3
P_Bmim[Tf2N]15.113.9−22.5−21.61.4
P_C4NMA,11[Tf2N]17.50−15.1−12.81.6
P_Amim[Tf2N]14.714.2−44.8Not calculated-
P_Bvim[Tf2N]14.70−11.2−1012.2
Table 4. Calculated diffusivity (D), solubility (S) and permeability (P) values for 3D printed membranes containing different ionic liquids.
Table 4. Calculated diffusivity (D), solubility (S) and permeability (P) values for 3D printed membranes containing different ionic liquids.
Sample D   ( c m 2 s ) S P   ( c m 2 s × b a r )
PEGDA6.734.713.17
P_Bmim[BF4]11.332.993.39
P_Bmim[Tf2N]8.655.264.55
P_C4NMA,11[Tf2N]4.464.221.88
P_Amim[Tf2N]9.5314.4713.79
P_Bvim[Tf2N]8.453.202.70

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gillono, M.; Chiappone, A.; Mendola, L.; Gomez Gomez, M.; Scaltrito, L.; Pirri, C.F.; Roppolo, I. Study on the Printability through Digital Light Processing Technique of Ionic Liquids for CO2 Capture. Polymers 2019, 11, 1932. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym11121932

AMA Style

Gillono M, Chiappone A, Mendola L, Gomez Gomez M, Scaltrito L, Pirri CF, Roppolo I. Study on the Printability through Digital Light Processing Technique of Ionic Liquids for CO2 Capture. Polymers. 2019; 11(12):1932. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym11121932

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gillono, Matteo, Annalisa Chiappone, Lorenzo Mendola, Manuel Gomez Gomez, Luciano Scaltrito, Candido Fabrizio Pirri, and Ignazio Roppolo. 2019. "Study on the Printability through Digital Light Processing Technique of Ionic Liquids for CO2 Capture" Polymers 11, no. 12: 1932. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym11121932

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop