Next Article in Journal
Model Composites Based on Poly(lactic acid) and Bioactive Glass Fillers for Bone Regeneration
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Multimodal Molecular Imaging of Cancer Mediated by Hybrid Magnetic Nanoparticles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Acetate Film Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibril

1
Department of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
2
Institute of Forest Science, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
3
National Institute of Forest Science, Seoul 02455, Korea
4
Kangwon Institute of Inclusive Technology, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 4 August 2021 / Revised: 27 August 2021 / Accepted: 1 September 2021 / Published: 3 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Sustainable Polymer Technologies)

Abstract

:
In this study, cellulose acetate (CA)/cellulose nanofibril (CNF) film was prepared via solvent casting. CNF was used as reinforcement to increase tensile properties of CA film. CNF ratio was varied into 3, 5, and 10 phr (parts per hundred rubbers). Triacetin (TA) and triethyl citrate (TC) were used as two different eco-friendly plasticizers. Two different types of solvent, which are acetone and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), were also used. CA/CNF film was prepared by mixing CA and CNF in acetone or NMP with 10% concentration and stirred for 24 h. Then, the solution was cast in a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) dish followed by solvent evaporation for 12 h at room temperature for acetone and 24 h at 80 °C in an oven dryer for NMP. The effect of solvent type, plasticizers type, and CNF amount on film properties was studied. Good dispersion in NMP was evident from the morphological study of fractured surface and visible light transmittance. The results showed that CNF has a better dispersion in NMP which leads to a significant increase in tensile strength and elastic modulus up to 38% and 65%, respectively, compared with those of neat CA. CNF addition up to 5 phr loading increased the mechanical properties of the film composites.

1. Introduction

Cellulose is a bio-based plastic polymer that can be derived from biomass. Thus, it is highly available. Cellulose-derived products such as cellulose acetate (CA), cellulose acetate propionate (CAP), and cellulose acetate butyrate (CAB) have been used in many industries such as automotive, biomedical, coatings, and packaging [1]. Among all the cellulose-derived products, cellulose acetate (CA) is the one that has been widely produced for thermoplastics. Cellulose acetate was successfully applied for the preparation of membranes in different membrane technologies [2], for wastewater treatment containing heavy metals or metallic ions [3,4], film packaging [5], in the textile industry [6], medical engineering [7], and in gas separation [8]. CA is prepared through acetylation of cellulose with an excessive amount of acetic anhydride by a sulfuric acid catalyst. The biodegradability of CA is based on its acetylation degree; CA with a low acetylation degree or substitution degree (DS: ≤2.5) can be degraded. CA is highly available, biodegradable, biocompatible, and relatively low-cost [9].
Considering these advantages, CA can be considered as a promising biodegradable plastic material that can serve an alternative for fossil-based plastic. However, CA has high stiffness and CA with DS around 2.5 has a narrow window between the melting point and the degradation temperature [10]. These properties are limiting the use of CA for wider applications. The use of a plasticizer can reduce the glass transition temperature of CA and also decrease the intermolecular force among the polymer chains, resulting in a softened and more flexible polymeric matrix [11].
Phthalate esters are the most common industrially used plasticizers for CA. However, they have been subjected to environmental scrutiny as a health threat, and thus there is now serious concern about their long-term use [12]. To improve the processing of CA, some studies have explored several eco-friendly plasticizers such as Triacetin (TA), triethyl citrate (TC), glycerol, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [13,14]. These plasticizers are biodegradable, non-toxic, and have been approved as a plasticizer for many polymers. TA and TC are two of the most common eco-friendly plasticizers that have been used for CA. TA and CA share the same side functional groups: acetyl groups. TC is proved to be able to improve the stiffness and brittle of CA films [15,16]. Plasticizer addition into the CA matrix will decrease the tensile strength [16,17]. Therefore, it could impede the function of CA bio-plastics in specific industries. For this reason, the use of reinforcement or filler is needed to improve the tensile strength of CA [17]. Several studies have been conducted to improve the mechanical properties of CA using organo-clay, zeolite, microfiber, lignin, and nanocellulose as reinforcement [18,19].
Cellulose nanofibril (CNF) is one type of nanocellulose that contains long, flexible, and entangled fiber [20]. It has several advantages such as high tensile properties and high specific surface area, and being renewable and biodegradable [21]. CNF is considered as a potential reinforcing filler for manufacturing composites as it is renewable, lightweight, and cost effective [22,23]. Moreover, it also has high young’s modulus and tensile properties [24]. Despite these advantages, uniform dispersion of CNF in CA matrix is challenging. Dispersing CNF in the same organic solvent with CA is one method that can be taken to obtained good dispersion of CNF in CA matrix. Several studies have mentioned good dispersion of nanocellulose in some organic solvents such as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), dimethylformamide (DMF), and N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) [25,26]. Berg et al., in 2007, found that NMP performs a faster dispersion process compared with DMF or DMSO [25].
In this study, CA was plasticized using two different kinds of eco-friendly plasticizers, TA and TC. Plasticized CA was then reinforced with CNF to improve the mechanical properties of the composite. CA film was prepared with a solvent casting method using two different solvents (acetone and NMP). The effect of plasticizer type, solvent type, and CNF amount on film properties were investigated. The novelty of the present work lies in the manufacture and comparison of the properties of new CA/CNF films using two different solvents so as to indicate the better solvent for film making.

2. Materials and Methods

Commercial CNF (3.9 wt% in water) was supplied by Cellulose Lab, Co., Ltd. (Fredericton, NB, Canada). Cellulose acetate (39.8 wt% acetyl content, DS 2.5, and average molecular weight Mn ~30,000), acetone (99.8% purity), triacetin (99.5% purity), and N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) were purchased from Daejung Chemical & Metals Co., Ltd. (Siheung, Korea). Triethyl citrate (99.0% purity) was purchased from TCI chemicals (Seoul, Korea).
CNF was solvent-exchanged from water to acetone or NMP using centrifugation at 18,000 rpm for 15 min followed by re-dispersion in the new solvent. Centrifugation was repeated at least 6 times to ensure all the water was exchanged.
Films were prepared by solvent casting technique on a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) dish (graphical illustration is shown in Scheme 1).
CA and plasticizer were dissolved in acetone or NMP solvent with 10 wt% concentration and then mixed for 2 h until homogenized. CNF in the same solvent was added with concentrations of 3, 5, and 10 parts per hundred rubbers (phr). The mixture was homogenized by magnetic stirring for 22 h continued with 3 min sonication. Then, plasticized CA/CNF solution was poured into the PTFE dish and solvent was evaporated by keeping at room temperature for 12 h for acetone and at 80 °C for 24 h for NMP. Neat CA and plasticized CA without CNF were also prepared using the same method with magnetic stirring for 24 h. Table 1 describes sample compositions for both acetone and NMP solvents.
Mechanical properties of the neat CA film, CA/TA, CA/TC, CA/TA/CNF, and CA/TC/CNF films were measured using a universal testing machine (UTM test one Model TO-102D, Siheung, South Korea) with a cross-head speed of 10 mm/min. A specimen span length was set at 30 mm. Samples were cut into dog-bone shapes as described by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM D638) [27]. At least 5 specimens of each sample were tested, and the average values were taken. All of the tests were performed at 25 °C and 40% relative humidity.
The water absorption test was conducted based on the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D570 as the Standard Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics [28]. Film specimens were dried in an oven for 24 h at 50 °C and then cooled in a desiccator, and immediately weighted to the nearest 0.001 g. The conditioned specimens were then placed in a container of distilled water at a temperature of 23 °C, resting on the edge, and were entirely immersed for 24 h. All the specimens were removed from the water at a time, and then surface water was wiped off with a dry tissue paper and they were immediately weighted to the nearest 0.001 g. The percentage of water absorption was determined by the following Equation (1):
Water   absorption ( % ) = ( wet   sample   weight dry   sample   weight ) dry   sample   weight × 100 %
Thermal stability of neat CA, CA/TC, and CA/TC/CNF5 films was investigated using a TG analyzer (Q2000, TA Instruments Inc., New Castle, DE, USA) in the Central laboratory of Kangwon National University. The samples (5–10 mg) were heated on a platinum pan under a nitrogen atmosphere. The scanning temperature range was set from 25 to 700 °C, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min. The derivative TG (DTG) analysis was obtained by measuring the mass loss percentage with respect to temperature.
The viscosity of the CA/TC, CA/TC/CNF3, CA/TC/CNF5, and CA/TC/CNF10 samples was measured using a digital viscometer (DV-II+, Brookfield Engineering Laboratories, Middleborough, MA, USA). The temperature was maintained at 25 °C. The viscosity was measured with SC4-18 spindle at a range of shear rates from 0.4 to 132 s−1.
Fractured surfaces of CA/TC, CA/TC/CNF5, and CA/TC/CNF10 prepared in NMP samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) in the Central Laboratory of the Kangwon National University. Samples were cryo-fractured using liquid nitrogen and directly used. Before the observation, the surfaces were sputter-coated with a platinum layer using a high-vacuum sputter coater (EM ACE600, Leica Microsystems, Ltd., Wtzlar, Germany) to avoid charging under the electron beam. The morphologies were observed at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV with a working distance of 8.5 mm.
CNF sample for SEM analysis was prepared with the following method. CNF suspensions were diluted to 0.1 wt% and then dispersed using an ultrasonicator (VCX130PB, Sonics & Materials Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) for 1 min. The suspensions were then filtrated on a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane filter with a pore size of 0.2 µm (ADVANTE®, Toyo Roshi Kaisha Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) using vacuum filtration. The filtrated CNF was then solvent exchanged from water to tert-butanol by immersing in tert-butanol for 30 min. The solvent exchange procedure was repeated 6 times to fully exchange water with tert-butanol. After solvent exchange, CNF was freeze-dried (FDB-5503, Operon Co., Ltd., Gimpo, Korea) at −55 °C for 2 h. The freeze-dried CNFs were placed on aluminum stubs and then coated with iridium using a high-vacuum sputter coater (EMACE600, Leica Microsystems, Ltd., Wetzlar, Germany). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the films were recorded on an X-Ray diffractometer (X’pert PRO MPD, PAN analytical: Netherland; operating voltage, 40 kV; current, 30 mA) in the scan range of 10° to 35°. The surface functional groups were probed by Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy (Frontier, PerkinElmer; UK) in the range of 400–4000 cm−1 at a resolution of 1 cm−1. Light transmittance of the films was measured on a UV-Vis spectrometer (OPTIZEN POP-V, Daejon, Korea) with a wavelength range of 400–800 nm. An empty cuvette was taken as a reference and the cut films were placed inside the cuvette and scanned.

3. Results

3.1. Mechanical Properties

Mechanical properties of CA/TC and CA/TA prepared using acetone as solvent at various ratios (60/40, 70/30, 80/20) were first investigated to choose the best plasticizer content. Figure 1 shows the mechanical properties of CA/TC and CA/TA. As shown in the figure, the addition of both TA and TC plasticizers decreased the tensile strength and elastic modulus of the CA film but increased its elasticity. This result is similar to previous reports. [15,16,18]. In the research conducted by Phuong et al. in 2014, 20% TA addition into CA obtained a tensile strength of 58.3 MPa, Elastic modulus of 3100 MPa, and elongation at break of 8.3%; when TA concentration increased to 30%, tensile strength decreased to 30.2 MPa, elastic Modulus decreased to 2100 GPa, and elongation at break increased to 11.6% [16]. Meanwhile, in the research conducted by Park et al., 2014, 20% TC addition into CA obtained a tensile strength of 70 MPa, Elastic modulus of 4100 MPa, and elongation at break of 8.5%; when TC concentration increased to 30%, tensile strength decreased to 61 MPa, Elastic modulus decreased to 2100 MPa, and elongation at break increased to 11.6% [11]. This can be explained because plasticizers (TA and TC) acted as a dilutor and lower the interaction of the molecules [29]. Based on this mechanical properties result, plasticizer content was fixed at 30% where elongation at break and tensile strength are in balance conditions. Both TC and TA were used in 30% content as a plasticizer for CA film reinforced with CNF. The effect of solvent type was also varied; acetone and NMP were used as two different solvents. Mechanical properties of CA/TC/CNF and CA/TA/CNF with varied CNF content in acetone and NMP solvent are shown in Figure 2. CNF addition up to 5 phr increased tensile strength and elastic modulus. Meanwhile, elongation break decreased with an increasing amount of CNF. The increase in elastic modulus is due to the presence of rigid nanoparticles from CNF. This shows that there is a stress transfer between CNF and CA matrix [30]. All samples with different plasticizer and solvent types showed the same patterns in mechanical properties. Similar results were also reported in a previous report by Leite et al., 2016, where 10% and 15% addition of CNC into CA increased elastic modulus up to 5% and 15% [30]. Research conducted by Azeredo et al. 2010 reported that 10% CNF addition into chitosan increases tensile strength up to 16% [31].
Compared with plasticized CA without CNF, CA/TC/CNF in NMP solvent has shown the highest improvement in both tensile strengths from 34.2 MPa to 47.6 MPa (38%) and elastic modulus from 1649.1 MPa to 2722.9 MPa (65%). This is probably because of good dispersion of CNF in NMP, which is also evident from the better transparency of CA films (Figure 3).

3.2. UV-Visible Spectroscopy

Good transparency is one of the advantages of CA. Because of its high transparency, CA is used for several applications such as high-quality frames for sunglasses, personal protective equipment, and sports goggles [32]. Therefore, when reinforcement is added into CA, it is expected that the transparency of CA could still be maintained. According to this result, NMP has become a possible alternative solvent to CA reinforced with CNF film for plastic application. Both TA and TC are clear colorless, thus the addition of plasticizers is not affecting the transparency of CA. UV-Visible spectroscopy was used to further compare film transparency. Figure 4 shows transmittance values of 68.7%, 64.9%, 67.7%, 63.4%, and 55.3% for neat CA, CA/TC/CNF3 (Acetone), CA/TC/CNF3 (NMP), CA/TC/CNF10 (NMP), And CA/TC/CNF10 (Acetone), respectively. Compared with acetone, CA film prepared with NMP has better transparency due to better dispersion of CNF in NMP than in acetone. This result is also supported by the tensile properties result where CA film prepared with NMP had higher tensile properties compared with CA film prepared with acetone.

3.3. Thermal Stability

Figure 5 shows the thermal degradation behavior of Neat CA, CA/TC, and CA/TC/CNF5 in both acetone and NMP solvent. Thermal degradation behavior was investigated by Thermogravimetric analysis. Neat CA film showed two stages of degradation behavior. The first stage at 100 °C can be attributed to the evaporation of water. The second stage starting from 320 °C to 400 °C can be attributed to the thermal degradation of acetate functional groups and glucose rings in the polymer chain [12,33]. With the presence of TC plasticizer in CA film (CA/TC), thermal degradation behavior was changed from two stages to three stages. The first degradation stage corresponds to the evaporation of water, whereas the second stage at around 230 °C is attributed to TC degradation [9]. The third stage at around 350 °C to 400 °C is attributed to the degradation of CA. This indicates that there is a physical interaction between CA and TC [11]. CA/TC/CNF5 has shown similar behavior in thermal degradation with three stages of degradation. However, the first degradation temperature is lower than CA/TC film. This might be because the interaction between TC and CA was reduced with the presence of CNF. In terms of solvent variation, NMP showed a slightly higher thermal stability than acetone. This is probably because NMP has a higher boiling point compared with acetone.

3.4. Water Absorption

Water absorption is one of the important parameters for biodegradable plastic. Biodegradable plastic should have fewer water absorption properties for its functions. Water absorption was obtained from 24 h immersion in distilled water according to ASTM D570. The water absorption result is shown in Figure 6. All samples showed an increase in the percentage of water absorption with the addition of CNF. The increase in water absorption is related to the increased hydrophilic properties of the film upon adding CNF which is highly hydrophilic [34]. The water absorption percentage was relatively small (≤4.8%), and these results aligned with research conducted by Amri et al. 2021, where 0.5% CNF addition into waterborne polyurethane polymer had water absorption less than 3.5% [35]. This indicates the hydrophobic properties of the polymer still dominate the composite.

3.5. Viscosity

Viscosity vs. shear rate curves are shown in Figure 7. CA fluid solution has shown typical curves of plastic fluid. The rheological behavior of other samples have shown a combination of non-Newtonian and Newtonian behavior. The viscosity of the solution was decreased at a lower shear rate; however, it was starting to be constant at the higher shear rate. A similar trend was also shown in research conducted by Park et al., 2021, where CNF was added into alginate (AL) [36]. This happened because with increasing shear rate, the polymer molecules start to untangle from each other and start to align them in the direction of flow, resulting in a decrease in viscosity.
The effect of CNF amount on the viscosity of CA/TC/CNF in NMP solution is summarized in Table 2. The viscosity was increased with an increasing amount of CNF filler. The increase of viscosity upon the addition of CNF filler could indicate good dispersion of CNF in the CA matrix which leads to a good interaction between CNF and CA macromolecules [37].

3.6. Morphological Observation

Morphological observation from the fractured surface of CA film reinforced with CNF is shown in Figure 8. As shown in the images, the presence of CNF resulted in a drastic change in the structure of the CA composite. The CA composite with addition of 5% and 10% CNF had a rough structure in the fractured surfaces area. Meanwhile, the fractured surface of neat CA was smooth. The effect of solvent on the morphological characteristic was also studied, and CA/TC/CNF5 with NMP solvent showed less rough structure compared with acetone, even with a higher CNF content of 10%. SEM images of the surface area of neat CA, CA composite, and CNF are shown in Figure 9. As shown in the figure, Neat CA showed a very smooth surface area. Meanwhile, apart from CA, composite films exhibited a little aggregation of CNF, shown as white spots in the surface area, indicating the presence of CNF in CA film.

3.7. XRD and FTIR

XRD patterns of neat CA, CA/TC, CA/TC/CNF5, and CA/TC/CNF10 in NMP solvent are shown in Figure 10a. Neat CA exhibited weak cellulose peaks at 2θ = 18–22°. This is because CA has a substitution degree at ~2.5 where most of the hydroxyl group on cellulose are replaced with acetyl groups. As a result, intermolecular hydrogen bonding is absent or minimal, destroying the ordered crystalline structure [38]. Addition of TC caused no significant difference. However, the addition of CNF into CA matrix slightly increased the intensity of the peak in the 2θ = 18–22° range. No significant cellulosic peak was observed at 2θ = 18–22°, even at high CNF content (CA/TC/CNF10), indicating the CNF is uniformly distributed throughout the CA matrix. Figure 10b shows the FTIR spectra of neat CA, CA/TC, CA/TC/CNF5, and CA/TC/CNF10 in NMP solvent. For neat CA, the peak at 3470 cm−1 can be attributed to the O-H bond stretching, and the peak at 2924 cm−1 is for C-H stretching. The characteristic peak at 1730 cm−1 is assigned for carbonyl stretch of the acetate function and the peak at 1367 cm−1 can be assigned to C-H bending. Peaks at 1215 cm−1 and 1028 cm−1 can be ascribed to C-O stretch in C-O-H and in the C-O-C group respectively [1]. No significant changes in the peaks were observed after the addition of TC and CNF. Only a slight change in the intensity and shape of C-O peak at 1215 cm−1 was observed. This might be due to their uniform distribution and low loading content.

4. Conclusions

CA film was successfully prepared with CNF as reinforcement. Two different kinds of plasticizers, TA and TC, and two different kinds of solvents, acetone and NMP, were used. For both TA and TC, 30% content was chosen as the optimal condition for CA. When plasticizer content was more than 30%, tensile and elastic modulus properties of the CA film became unacceptably low. The presence of plasticizer in CA films changed the thermal degradation behavior of CA from two stages into three stages, also reducing film stiffness. The addition of up to 5 phr CNF into the CA matrix increased the tensile properties of the composite. However, the tensile strength was decreased with 10 phr CNF addition. The highest improvement in tensile strength and elastic modulus was gained by using NMP as a solvent because of better dispersion of CNF in NMP than in acetone. NMP was found to be a good solvent for the CA/CNF composite with higher tensile properties. Tensile strength and elastic modulus increased up to 38% and 65%, respectively. The use of CNF as reinforcement and TC and TA as eco-friendly plasticizer can expand the application of CA into wider applications, such as food packaging.

Author Contributions

Data curation, A.W.C., G.-J.K.; methodology, A.W.C., C.-W.P.; resources, J.-S.P., E.-A.L., J.-K.K.; project administration, S.-Y.H.; supervision, S.-H.L.; writing—original draft, A.W.C.; writing—review and editing, R.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (No.2018R1A6A1A03025582, No. 2021R1A2C2004941).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, B.; Chen, J.; Peng, H.; Gai, J.; Kang, J.; Cao, Y. Investigation on Changes in the Miscibility, Morphology, Rheology and Mechanical Behavior of Melt Processed Cellulose Acetate through Adding Polyethylene Glycol as a Plasticizer. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys. 2016, 55, 894–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ezugbe, E.O.; Rathilal, S. Membrane technologies in wastewater treatment: A review. Membranes 2020, 10, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Thakur, V.K.; Voicu, S.I. Recent advances in cellulose and chitosan based membranes for water purification: A concise review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 146, 148–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Căprărescu, S.; Zgârian, R.G.; Tihan, G.T.; Purcar, V.; Totu, E.E.; Modrogan, C.; Chiriac, A.L.; Nicolae, C.A. Biopolymeric membrane enriched with chitosan and silver for metallic ions removal. Polymers 2020, 12, 1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Saha, N.R.; Sarkar, G.; Roy, I.; Bhattacharyya, A.; Rana, D.; Dhanarajan, G.; Banerjee, R.; Sen, R.; Mishra, R.; Chattopadhyay, D. Nanocomposite films based on cellulose acetate/polyethylene glycol/modified montmorillonite as nontoxic active packaging material. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 92569–92578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Felgueiras, C.; Azoia, N.G.; Gonçalves, C.; Gama, M.; Dourado, F. Trends on the Cellulose-Based Textiles: Raw Materials and Technologies. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2021, 9, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bifari, E.N.; Bahadar Khan, S.; Alamry, K.A.; Asiri, A.M.; Akhtar, K. Cellulose Acetate Based Nanocomposites for Biomedical Applications: A Review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 3007–3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Najafi, M.; Sadeghi, M.; Bolverdi, A.; Pourafshari Chenar, M.; Pakizeh, M. Gas permeation properties of cellulose acetate/silica nanocomposite membrane. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 2043–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wsoo, M.A.; Shahir, S.; Mohd Bohari, S.P.; Nayan, N.H.M.; Razak, S.I.A. A review on the properties of electrospun cellulose acetate and its application in drug delivery systems: A new perspective. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 491, 107978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Charvet, A.; Vergelati, C.; Long, D.R. Mechanical and ultimate properties of injection molded cellulose acetate/plasticizer materials. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 204, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Phuong, V.T.; Lazzeri, A. “green” biocomposites based on cellulose diacetate and regenerated cellulose microfibers: Effect of plasticizer content on morphology and mechanical properties. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2012, 43, 2256–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dreux, X.; Majesté, J.C.; Carrot, C.; Argoud, A.; Vergelati, C. Viscoelastic behaviour of cellulose acetate/triacetin blends by rheology in the melt state. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 222, 114973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. El-Rehim, H.A.; Kamal, H.; Hegazy, E.S.A.; Soliman, E.S.; Sayed, A. Use of gamma rays to improve the mechanical and barrier properties of biodegradable cellulose acetate nanocomposite films. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2018, 153, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Teixeira, S.C.; Silva, R.R.A.; de Oliveira, T.V.; Stringheta, P.C.; Pinto, M.R.M.R.; Soares, N.d.F.F. Glycerol and triethyl citrate plasticizer effects on molecular, thermal, mechanical, and barrier properties of cellulose acetate films. Food Biosci. 2021, 42, 101202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bao, C. Cellulose Acetate/Plasticizer Systems: Structure, Morphology and Dynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, Universite Claude Bernard-Lyon I, Villeurbanne, France, 2015; pp. 1–197. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, S.H.; Shiraishi, N. Plasticization of cellulose diacetate by reaction with maleic anhydride, glycerol, and citrate esters during melt processing. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2001, 81, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Phuong, V.T.; Verstichel, S.; Cinelli, P.; Anguillesi, I.; Coltelli, M.B.; Lazzeri, A. Cellulose acetate blends -effect of plasticizers on properties and biodegradability. J. Renew. Mater. 2014, 2, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Park, H.M.; Misra, M.; Drzal, L.T.; Mohanty, A.K. “Green” nanocomposites from cellulose acetate bioplastic and clay: Effect of eco-friendly triethyl citrate plasticizer. Biomacromolecules 2004, 5, 2281–2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Iryani, D.A.; Wulandari, N.F.; Cindradewi, A.W.; Ginting, S.B.; Ernawati, E.; Hasanudin, U. Lampung natural zeolite filled cellulose acetate membrane for pervaporation of ethanol-water mixtures. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 141, p. 012013. [Google Scholar]
  20. Xia, Z.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, J. Processing and valorization of cellulose, lignin and lignocellulose using ionic liquids. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 79–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, S.-H.; Kim, H.-J.; Kim, J.-C. Nanocellulose Applications for Drug Delivery: A Review. J. For. Environ. Sci. 2019, 35, 141–149. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zou, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, J.; Guo, X.; Chen, P.; Duan, G.; Liu, X.; Li, Y. A Mussel-Inspired Polydopamine-Filled Cellulose Aerogel for Solar-Enabled Water Remediation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 7617–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Joseph, B.; Sagarika, V.K.; Sabu, C.; Kalarikkal, N.; Thomas, S. Cellulose nanocomposites: Fabrication and biomedical applications. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 2020, 5, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Oksman, K.; Aitomäki, Y.; Mathew, A.P.; Siqueira, G.; Zhou, Q.; Butylina, S.; Tanpichai, S.; Zhou, X.; Hooshmand, S. Review of the recent developments in cellulose nanocomposite processing. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2016, 83, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. van der Berg, O.; Capadona, J.R.; Weder, C. Preparation of homogeneous dispersions of tunicate cellulose whiskers in organic solvents. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8, 1353–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Viet, D.; Beck-Candanedo, S.; Gray, D.G. Dispersion of cellulose nanocrystals in polar organic solvents. Cellulose 2007, 14, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Astm ASTM D638: Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2004; pp. 1–15.
  28. ASTM International ASTM D570—Standard Test for Water Absorption of Plastics; American Society for Testing and Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2010; Volume 98, pp. 1–4.
  29. Kormin, S.; Kormin, F.; Beg, M.D.H. Effect of plasticizer on physical and mechanical properties of ldpe/sago starch blend. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 1150, p. 012032. [Google Scholar]
  30. Leite, L.S.F.; Battirola, L.C.; da Silva, L.C.E.; Gonçalves, M.d.C. Morphological investigation of cellulose acetate/cellulose nanocrystal composites obtained by melt extrusion. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 44201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Azeredo, H.M.C.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Avena-Bustillos, R.J.; Filho, G.C.; Munford, M.L.; Wood, D.; McHugh, T.H. Nanocellulose reinforced chitosan composite films as affected by nanofiller loading and plasticizer content. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, N1–N7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Introduction to Bioplastics Engineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016.
  33. Gwon, J.G.; Lee, D.B.; Cho, H.J.; Lee, S.Y. Preparation and characteristics of cellulose acetate based nanocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs). J. Korean Wood Sci. Technol. 2018, 46, 565–576. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kahavita, K.D.H.N.; Samarasekara, A.M.P.B.; Amarasinghe, D.A.S.; Karunanayake, L. Influence of Surface Modification of Cellulose Nanofibers (CNF) as the Reinforcement of Polypropylene Based Composite. In Proceedings of the MERCon 2019—Proceedings, 5th International Multidisciplinary Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka, 3–5 July 2019; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 99–104. [Google Scholar]
  35. Amri, M.R.; Guan, C.T.; Osman Al-Edrus, S.S.; Yasin, F.M.; Mohamad, S.F. Effect of cellulose nanofibrils on the properties of jatropha oil-basedwaterborne polyurethane nanocomposite film. Polymers 2021, 13, 1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Park, J.S.; Park, C.W.; Han, S.Y.; Lee, E.A.; Cindradewi, A.W.; Kim, J.K.; Kwon, G.J.; Seo, Y.H.; Yoo, W.J.; Gwon, J.Y.; et al. Preparation and properties of wet-spun microcomposite filaments from various cnfs and alginate. Polymers 2021, 13, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Marquez-Bravo, S.; Doench, I.; Molina, P.; Bentley, F.E.; Tamo, A.K.; Passieux, R.; Lossada, F.; David, L.; Osorio-Madrazo, A. Functional bionanocomposite fibers of chitosan filled with cellulose nanofibers obtained by gel spinning. Polymers 2021, 13, 1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lu, J.; Drzal, L.T. Microfibrillated cellulose/cellulose acetate composites: Effect of surface treatment. J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys. 2010, 48, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of CA film preparation with and without CNF.
Scheme 1. Schematic diagram of CA film preparation with and without CNF.
Polymers 13 02990 sch001
Figure 1. Tensile strength (a), elastic modulus (b), and elongation at break (c) of CA with TA and TC as a plasticizer in different ratios.
Figure 1. Tensile strength (a), elastic modulus (b), and elongation at break (c) of CA with TA and TC as a plasticizer in different ratios.
Polymers 13 02990 g001
Figure 2. Tensile strength (a), elastic modulus (b), and elongation at break (c) of CA/TC/CNF and CA/TA/CNF in acetone and NMP solvent (Plasticizer content 30%).
Figure 2. Tensile strength (a), elastic modulus (b), and elongation at break (c) of CA/TC/CNF and CA/TA/CNF in acetone and NMP solvent (Plasticizer content 30%).
Polymers 13 02990 g002
Figure 3. Digital photographs of plasticized CA/CNF films prepared in acetone (a) and NMP (b).
Figure 3. Digital photographs of plasticized CA/CNF films prepared in acetone (a) and NMP (b).
Polymers 13 02990 g003
Figure 4. Visible light transmittance of CA films containing different ratios of CNF prepared using acetone and NMP solvent.
Figure 4. Visible light transmittance of CA films containing different ratios of CNF prepared using acetone and NMP solvent.
Polymers 13 02990 g004
Figure 5. TGA (a) and DTG (b) graph of neat CA, CA/TC, and CA/TC/CNF5 in both acetone and NMP solvent.
Figure 5. TGA (a) and DTG (b) graph of neat CA, CA/TC, and CA/TC/CNF5 in both acetone and NMP solvent.
Polymers 13 02990 g005
Figure 6. Water absorption of CA/TC/CNF and CA/TA/CNF with different CNF content prepared in both acetone and NMP solvent.
Figure 6. Water absorption of CA/TC/CNF and CA/TA/CNF with different CNF content prepared in both acetone and NMP solvent.
Polymers 13 02990 g006
Figure 7. Viscosity of CA/TC and CA/TC/CNF with different CNF content in NMP solvent (Plasticizer content 30%).
Figure 7. Viscosity of CA/TC and CA/TC/CNF with different CNF content in NMP solvent (Plasticizer content 30%).
Polymers 13 02990 g007
Figure 8. SEM images of the fractured surface of Neat CA (a), CA/TC/CNF5 (Acetone) (b), CA/TC/CNF5 (NMP) (c), and CA/TC/CNF10 (NMP) (d).
Figure 8. SEM images of the fractured surface of Neat CA (a), CA/TC/CNF5 (Acetone) (b), CA/TC/CNF5 (NMP) (c), and CA/TC/CNF10 (NMP) (d).
Polymers 13 02990 g008
Figure 9. SEM images of Neat CA (a), CNF (b), CA/TC/CNF5 (Acetone) (c), CA/TC/CNF5 (NMP) (d), and CA/TC/CNF10 (NMP) (e).
Figure 9. SEM images of Neat CA (a), CNF (b), CA/TC/CNF5 (Acetone) (c), CA/TC/CNF5 (NMP) (d), and CA/TC/CNF10 (NMP) (e).
Polymers 13 02990 g009
Figure 10. XRD patterns (a) and FTIR spectra (b) of Neat CA, CA/TC, CA/TC/CNF5 (NMP) and CA/TC/CNF10 (NMP).
Figure 10. XRD patterns (a) and FTIR spectra (b) of Neat CA, CA/TC, CA/TC/CNF5 (NMP) and CA/TC/CNF10 (NMP).
Polymers 13 02990 g010
Table 1. Sample compositions (applied to both acetone and NMP solvents).
Table 1. Sample compositions (applied to both acetone and NMP solvents).
Sample NameCompositions (wt%) WeightCNF (phr)
CATATC
CA100---
CA/TA8020--
7030--
6040--
CA/TC80-20-
70-30-
60-40-
CA/TA/CNF37030-3
CA/TA/CNF57030-5
CA/TA/CNF107030-10
CA/TC/CNF370-303
CA/TC/CNF570-305
CA/TC/CNF1070-3010
Table 2. Viscosity of CA/TC and CA/TC/CNF solutions in NMP with different CNF content and shear rate at a concentration of 10 wt%.
Table 2. Viscosity of CA/TC and CA/TC/CNF solutions in NMP with different CNF content and shear rate at a concentration of 10 wt%.
Sample NameCNF Content (phr)Viscosity (mPa.s)
SR 0.79 s−1SR 1.32 s−1SR 1.98 s−1
CA/TC0N/A516511
CA/TC/CNF331245996935
CA/TC/CNF55177113141226
CA/TC/CNF101031852463N/A
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cindradewi, A.W.; Bandi, R.; Park, C.-W.; Park, J.-S.; Lee, E.-A.; Kim, J.-K.; Kwon, G.-J.; Han, S.-Y.; Lee, S.-H. Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Acetate Film Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibril. Polymers 2021, 13, 2990. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13172990

AMA Style

Cindradewi AW, Bandi R, Park C-W, Park J-S, Lee E-A, Kim J-K, Kwon G-J, Han S-Y, Lee S-H. Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Acetate Film Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibril. Polymers. 2021; 13(17):2990. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13172990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cindradewi, Azelia Wulan, Rajkumar Bandi, Chan-Woo Park, Ji-Soo Park, Eun-Ah Lee, Jeong-Ki Kim, Gu-Joong Kwon, Song-Yi Han, and Seung-Hwan Lee. 2021. "Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose Acetate Film Reinforced with Cellulose Nanofibril" Polymers 13, no. 17: 2990. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13172990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop