Next Article in Journal
Ionic EAP Actuators with Electrodes Based on Carbon Nanomaterials
Next Article in Special Issue
Modification of Xanthan Gum for a High-Temperature and High-Salinity Reservoir
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrastructural and Physicochemical Characterization of a Non-Crosslinked Type 1 Bovine Derived Collagen Membrane
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Dimensional Accuracy of the Cavity Produced by ABS P400 Polymer-Based Novel EDM Electrode
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advancements in Microbial Polysaccharides: Synthesis and Applications

by
Yehia A.-G. Mahmoud
1,
Mehrez E. El-Naggar
2,*,
Ahmed Abdel-Megeed
3 and
Mohamed El-Newehy
4,5,*
1
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
2
Textile Research Division, National Research Center (Affiliation ID: 60014618), Cairo 12622, Egypt
3
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture Saba Basha, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21531, Egypt
4
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 October 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 26 November 2021

Abstract

:
Polysaccharide materials are widely applied in different applications including food, food packaging, drug delivery, tissue engineering, wound dressing, wastewater treatment, and bioremediation sectors. They were used in these domains due to their efficient, cost-effective, non-toxicity, biocompatibility, and biodegradability. As is known, polysaccharides can be synthesized by different simple, facile, and effective methods. Of these polysaccharides are cellulose, Arabic gum, sodium alginate, chitosan, chitin, curdlan, dextran, pectin, xanthan, pullulan, and so on. In this current article review, we focused on discussing the synthesis and potential applications of microbial polysaccharides. The biosynthesis of polysaccharides from microbial sources has been considered. Moreover, the utilization of molecular biology tools to modify the structure of polysaccharides has been covered. Such polysaccharides provide potential characteristics to transfer toxic compounds and decrease their resilience to the soil. Genetically modified microorganisms not only improve yield of polysaccharides, but also allow economically efficient production. With the rapid advancement of science and medicine, biosynthesis of polysaccharides research has become increasingly important. Synthetic biology approaches can play a critical role in developing polysaccharides in simple and facile ways. In addition, potential applications of microbial polysaccharides in different fields with a particular focus on food applications have been assessed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Polysaccharides are the main constituent of carbohydrates in nature are consist of monosaccharides as building blocks [1,2]. There are two forms of polysaccharides; homopolysaccharides, which are comprised of only one type of monosaccharide molecule and heteropolysaccharides, which contain more than one type of monosaccharides [3]. D-glucose is the most predominant component of polysaccharides [4]. Additionally, there are other types of monosaccharides derivatives occurring in polysaccharides, such as simple sugar acids (glucuronic and iduronic acid), amino sugars (D-galactosamine and D-glucosamine), and amino sugars’ derivatives (N-acetylneuraminic acid and N-acetylmuramic acid) [5]. Homopolysaccharides are termed according to the unit of sugar they contain; hence, glucans refer to glucose homopolysaccharides, while mannans refers to mannose homopolysaccharides.
Several untraditional polysaccharides can be identified from photosynthetic plants, algae, parasites, and microorganisms. Various polysaccharides have antitumor, antimicrobial, immune-regulating, and hypoglycemic properties [6]. Natural polysaccharides can boost the immune system and assist with a variety of diseases. Moreover, polysaccharides are widely applied in the food and dairy industries [5,7].
The utilization of polysaccharides as a carrier for anticancer drugs has attracted much attention over the past decade [8,9]. Polysaccharides from macro-fungi might be utilized as a multi-purpose prescription in the future decade [10]. Furthermore, with the rapid advancement of science and medicine, plant polysaccharide research has become increasingly important [8,11]. Despite the fact that there are many unexplained mysteries in this regard, plant polysaccharides have therapeutic effects and a wide range of applications, making them an essential route for developing novel drugs. Medications and antimicrobials derived from various plant polysaccharides have been utilized to improve sedative vitality or lessen symptoms [12,13]. The immunological regulation mechanism of bioactive plant polysaccharides is becoming clearer as research progresses, and more bioactive plant polysaccharides would be developed and employed in different applications [6].
There are also few famous instances (dextran and levans) in which the development and polymerization occur outside cells due to naturally occurring enzymes that transform the substrate into the polymer in the extracellular environment [14,15]. The heterogeneity of polysaccharides is attributable to the wide variety of compositions of monosaccharides and linkages. Consequently, no ubiquitous digestive enzyme exists for generating oligosaccharides. With their strong affinity for particular glycosidic bonds, natural glycosidase enzymes are noteworthy. Thus, a particular enzyme could only break a limited number of polysaccharide linkages [16,17]. Polysaccharides are not only an energy source and supportive tissue structure, but they are more significantly active in biochemical processes, including viral and bacterial infection, cell proliferation, biosynthesis, intestinal flora, and metastasis of tumor cells [18]. Polysaccharides are distinguished based on their monosaccharide constituents, their chain length, and the number of branches [19]. In several sectors, the polysaccharide family generated from microbes has an essential role in the food processing industry [20]. Several factors such as temperature, pH, growing media components, and the availability of oxygen can influence microbial polysaccharides and play a significant role in the physiological processes of microorganisms [21,22,23].
Kim et al., assessed the effects of agitation strength and aeration rate on developing antioxidant exopolysaccharides from the submerged Ganoderma resencium mycelial community [24]. They inferred that the factors of agriculture seemed to have a remarkable impact on the structure of exopolysaccharide (EPS) carbohydrates, resulting in various antioxidative behaviors [25]. It implied that processed food packages offered in the market nowadays had heightened food consistency standards from ready-to-eat meals. In addition, other substantial polymers contribute to the polysaccharides present in living organisms called biopolymers [26]. Biopolymers have been more common than conventional polymers in recent decades, even though they are natural and environmentally sustainable [27]. Natural biopolymers, mainly polysaccharides that are generated from trees, plants, tree gums, seeds, tubers, seaweed, are the most utilized carbohydrate polymers in many different applications [28].
Herein, this review article focuses on the details of the bacterial biosynthetic pathways for polysaccharides. In addition, we highlighted the targeted polysaccharides structures modifications using molecular biology tools. The review article was extended to demonstrate microbial polysaccharides and their cellular functions. Some of the polysaccharide’s applications in food processing industries are also demonstrated, such as cellulose, xanthan, dextran, pullulan, glucans, chitin, and chitosan. Finally, the various applications of microbial polysaccharides in medical, health, wastewater, and bioremediations have also been reviewed.

2. Biosynthetic Pathways

Biopolymers are polymers that are produced during all organisms’ growth cycles under natural conditions. Consequently, they are also known as natural polymers such as carbohydrates [29,30]. Biopolymers are produced through complex metabolic processes within the microorganism’s cells [31]. Examples of biopolymers accumulated in the cytoplasm of cells are polyphosphate, polyhydroxyalkanoates, starch, cyanophycin, and glycogen [32]. Biopolymers are also isolated and identified from algae that thrive in natural conditions and some other rare natural sources [32]. It could also be produced in vitro in a cell-free system with isolated enzymes [32]. In addition, biopolymers are generated by the fermentation process. Intracellularly or extracellularly, the biotechnological production of biopolymers can proceed [33,34].
Figure 1 represents the synthesis pathway of microbial EPS. The bacterial biosynthetic pathways include (a) substrate digestion [35], (b) main metabolite pathway [36] and (c) polysaccharides synthesis [37,38]. Depending on the form of the substrate, either passive or active transport system, it may be absorbed by the cell, and catabolized through intracellular phosphorylation, or perhaps a direct oxidative periplasm could pass and oxidize it [39]. The periplasmic oxidative route only exists in some of these bacteria, although the intracellular phosphorylative pathway is widespread for bacteria. Both of these systems can be developed and work effectively in many EPS-producing species if substrate availability is offered [40].
Glycolysis is used to catabolize the substance in the cytoplasm. The production of polysaccharides entail the biosynthesis of effective precursors, which are energy-rich monosaccharides that can be generated from phosphorylated sugars, predominantly nucleoside diphosphate sugars (NDP-sugars) [42]. EPS secretion is a complicated bacterial mechanism wherein the hydrophilic polymers of high molecular weight packed in the cytoplasm get to cross the cell membrane without breaching the critical features of the barrier [43].
In most gram-negative bacteria, where a wide range of molecular structures is presented in EPSs, one of two mechanisms has been identified to follow their biosynthesis and release [41]. The main components of this integration system are the Wzx flippase, Wzy polymerase, and Wzz chain-length regulator proteins of the integral inner membrane that have defied detailed structural and functional characterization [44]. The polymer repeat complex is formed and polymerized on the periplasm, mostly on the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane and the transporter-dependent phase of ABC wherein the cytoplasmic surface of the inner membrane is polymerized [45].
Such polysaccharides provide potential characteristics to transfer toxic compounds and decrease their resilience to the soil [46,47]. New approaches, such as using modified genetically engineered microorganisms, were used to generate polysaccharides to increase the yield and allow economically efficient production [48,49].
The metabolic network prediction may also enable the understanding of relevant factors for rapid multiplication. Mannitol was established from the genome sequence mostly as stimulator for Chromohalobacter salexigens’ medically essential levan (a fructose homopolymer) biosynthesis [48]; a positive result was later obtained in another halophilic bacterium, Halomonas smyrnensisis [50]. Approaches of metabolic engineering could support the continuing fermentation process engineering efforts to optimize the development of EPS [51]. In this regard, as examined by Wang et al. [52] study on capsular K5 polysaccharides of Escherichia coli (K5 EPS) biosynthesis is a great illustration.
The fermentation method for heparosan has been optimized for improved production and yield. Transformation of uridine diphosphate glucose (UDP glucose) into UDP glucuronic acid via UDP glucose dehydrogenase and UDP-N-Acetyl-glucosamine pathway was established as controlling steps to maintain a balanced heparosan biosynthesis and cell wall synthesis supply of nucleotide sugars [53]. The requirement of a controlled over-expression of KfiA and KfiC GTs was discovered by genetic engineering targeting these metabolic reactions. The K5 lyase gene accomplished the breaking of such association has also been genetically engineered to increase the amount of K5 released in the supernatant, as part of the K5 polysaccharide, which directly binds to the cell membrane [52]. To regulate the length of chain, the K5 lyase gene could also be genetically engineered [52].

3. Targeted Polysaccharides Structures Modifications with Molecular Biology Tools

Carbohydrates as biomolecules can be used to address the resistance to medications that degrade in the battle of bacterial infections [54]. Recently, the interaction between carbohydrates and lectin has been widely studied [55]. However, their capacitance in many other processes, such as metabolism, is still not well established and requires more interdisciplinary joint investigations. Carbohydrates are inadequate for biological investigations due to their structural complexity and production difficulties [56]. Xu and Liu [57] proposed a top-down approach to peptidoglycan oligomers, which has offered a fresh perspective throughout this area. However, more common techniques, particularly possible automatic synthesis, are still needed. Furthermore, it is a critical emergency, and further development of glycobiology will encompass the biological route of the majority of sugar molecules at a molecular level [58].
Rehm [59] addressed strategies to manufacture modified biopolymers with modified characteristics of the metal, which increase the performance of the application. For the in vivo production of polymers, developed strains with enhanced yields and/or that really can generate modified or tailor-made polymers have been established. This analysis refers to metabolic engineering, applying the knowledge of pathways of polymer biosynthesis, metabolic flux, and main enzymes to alter the pathway of biosynthesis [60,61] correctly. There are two fundamental techniques, which can be in vitro implemented [60,61].
Firstly, the in vitro synthesis can lead to new biopolymers by using polymerizing or engineered enzymes subjected to specified substrates [59]. Secondly, exposure to enzymatic or chemical modifications may improve the isolated biopolymers [62,63], as shown in Figure 2.
This would be clearer if, along with biosynthetic genetic clusters, further EPS’ structure is identified with structure/bioactivity relationships. Reconstruction of the EPS biosynthesis pathway becomes conceivable with genomic sequences and functional notes and hence can be designed to acquire tailored polymers [64]. Unless the mechanisms of carbohydrate biosynthesis are established, the over-expression or the inhibition of targeted genes can lead to better development of EPS. The molecular weight, functional substituents, and acidic structure may also allow better vision into protein function and even the biosynthesis of tailored molecules with desirable features [65]. Protein engineering has adjusted the behavior of Glycosyltransferases—Gum genes (GT GumK) needed for xanthan synthesis) implicated in xanthan biosynthesis, resulting in a shift in the development of xanthan yield, emphasizing the opportunity to obtain tailor-made xanthan molecules thru GT engineering [66].
In Sphingomonas sp., examining the genes involved in diutan’s molecular weight control (repeated configuration of rhamnose, glucose, glucuronic acid, glucose units) were not effective [67]. This could imply that chain length regulation is very complicated regardless of the proposed biosynthesis mechanism [68].
GDP-mannose dehydrogenase has been widely established in Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a major regulatory protein in alginate biosynthesis via over-expression experiments [69]. On the other hand, genomic data will also enable the identification of new glycopolymer modifying enzymatic tools. Therefore, in the case of in vitro synthesis or in vivo biosynthesis engineering, enzymes would be interesting biotechnological tools. Marine biodiversity has also shown tremendous potential as biocatalysts [70]. Delbarre-Ladrat et al., have examined the exopolysaccharides generated by marine bacteria, including their implementations through glycosaminoglycan-like molecules [53,71,72].
Depolymerizing enzymes are being utilized in the process of in vitro depolymerization and as instruments for studying the chemical composition [73,74]. During in vitro synthesis, carbohydrate sulfotransferases and other replacement grafting enzymes, including acetate kinase, could be used to attach or remove substituents that are of critical interest to the molecule’s final bioactivity [75].
The classification of GTs is hard to categorize, particularly if they belong to a polyspecific family 4 or 2. Recognizing that both the chemical structure of the polysaccharide and the genetic cluster for biosynthesis will provide details for genetic knockout to explain the GT enzymatic role in the biosynthetic pathway [76,77]. It will also provide valuable guidance for enzymatic specificity determination and enzyme characterization. Whenever it was established that the polysaccharide biosynthesis cluster comprises cloning the entire biosynthesis cluster into a suitable heterologous host, recombinant development can be envisaged [78]. This is a modern approach established in accordance with the growth of synthetic biology [79,80,81]. Necessary to refer, only fewer complex polymers, including hyaluronic acid [82,83], chondroitin [84], and heparosananic acid [85], have indeed been identified in recombinant development.
Scientists have established groundbreaking methods throughout modern biotechnology to investigate and control living systems. Genetic engineering enables the time, location, degree, and form of gene expression to be controlled [86]. For protein polymers, the simplest case was applied. Accessing a specific protein polymer’s genetic blueprint (gene) enables one to alter both the polymer generating mechanism and the polymer’s structure. As a matter of fact, recombinant DNA techniques are considered to enable the development of identical (in length, composition, and spatial orientation) polymer chains [87].

3.1. Role of Genetics in Polymers Production Systems

Genetically engineered products are regulated based on their expected use, regardless of their manufacturing method or process [88]. For instance, genetically engineered foods are treated similarly to common ones under prevailing Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations. FDA does not require approval or labelling of new products, given that such products are identical in composition, function, and structure to the traditional food products. The genetics of the biosynthesis of the EPS relies on the microorganism involved and the generated polysaccharide [89]. That being said, certain general processes may be defined, focusing on the sort of polysaccharide [59]. Over the former decade, the molecular mechanisms and regulatory processes influencing the synthesis of biopolymers have been well established.
This available knowledge about the effective tools for engineering bacteria that can produce effective biopolymers and even synthetic polymers with specific material properties for particular high-value requirements, all at a feasible cost. Valuation relies on both the characteristics of the material and the relatively inexpensive of its processing [59].

3.2. Role of Genetics in Polysaccharides Over-Expression

For the application of genetic engineering, several mentioned techniques could be used to produce new and tailor-made molecules [90].

3.2.1. Recombinant of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) and Alginate Production

The engineering and production of HA has been carried out using the metabolic engineering of bacterial strains and pathogenic natural producer as described by Cimini et al. [83]. Novozymes for HA biosynthesis have used the gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis), in several industrial processes. Additionally, to HA synthase, it retains all catalyst activities essential for the synthesis of hour angle [91].
Recombinant development of alginate GDP-mannose dehydrogenase, but at the other hand, catalyzes the irreversible process that changes GDP-mannose into GDP-mannonate through tightly controlling alginate synthesis [92,93].

3.2.2. Biopolymer Production: Intracellular vs. Extracellular

The existence of a space in the cytoplasm restricts the generated quantity of polymer by the cell [94], although most microorganisms are used for fermentative manufacturing processes. They also claimed that the density of the cell and the biopolymer fraction in the biomass are limited/determined by the yield per volume. Poly(-Dglutamate), as well as several polysaccharides including xanthan, dextran, alginates, curdlan, chitosan, pullulan, and microbial cellulose, are examples of a biopolymer that appears outside of the cells as a response for the cell excretion or extracellular production [95]. Both of these methods have already come true, and several different scale instances have been seen both in the laboratory and on a broad scale. For example, polylactic acid has been developed on a large scale through combination of biotechnological and chemical approaches [96]. Additionally, both methods have previously proven effectiveness, and several scaled examples have been developed on both a laboratory and big scale. For instance, polylactic acid has been produced on a large scale via a combination of chemical and biotechnological approaches [96]. Table 1 summarizes most of the microbial polysaccharides and their applications for genetic engineering purposes.

4. Cell Functions of Microbial Polysaccharides

There are multiple functions for microbial polysaccharides, notably exopolysaccharides (EPS). There is an increasing research interest in EPS from both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The EPS generated by microorganisms is of significant concern because of its chemical, structural versatility as well as its physical, rheological and other promising applications in the food, bioremediation, wastewater treatment, bioleaching, biomedical and pharmaceutical fields [99,100]. Most of the synthesized polymers have a good degree of stability and degradation resistance; these would be deposited in the atmosphere, as described by some researchers, at such a rate of almost 8% by weight and 20% by landfill volume. Polymers are a category of “giant” molecules made up of different key components that are joined together, forming long chains [101].
Monomers, as simple building blocks, are the repeated units and often pointed to as “more complicated building blocks”. That being said, synthetic polymers have been cited as a significant concern, including plastics’ waste and water-soluble in wastewater. An active aspect of our everyday life is polymers-based plastics. Biopolymers, including cellulose and starch, are by far the most promising materials for biomedical applications. Fortunately, more complex hydrocarbon polymers are produced by bacteria and fungi, polysaccharides such as curdlan [102,103,104,105], xanthan gum, chitin, pullulan [106,107], chitosan, and hyaluronic acid, are becoming increasingly essential.

5. Applications of Different Polysaccharides

Several polysaccharides have been widely applied in various applications. The utilization of polysaccharide biopolymer materials for drug delivery may decrease the reaction of tissues and enable the non-conventional administration of drugs. Until now, the use of biopolymers in these compositions has also been limited to a restricted range of applications. The formulation of drug implementing systems for the delivery of polymer drugs is expected to influence the pharmaceutical industry shortly [108,109].
The treatment of cancers and diseases is a key area of application for these innovative sustained-release systems. Biopolymer delivery capabilities require drugs to be prescribed periodically when treating hormone disorders and geriatric diseases [110,111].
Dextran is thought to become the first polysaccharide generated by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) for commercial use. Many dextrans are soluble in water, while others aren’t. Dextran can be utilized to increase viscosity, water absorption, and sugar crystallization prevention.
In the production of ice cream, it acts as a gelling agent. Furthermore, owing to its great features, including such biocompatibility, biodegradability, adsorption, and the ability to create films for chelating metal ions, chitosan is gaining increasing economic attention as a useful resource material [94].

5.1. Food Applications of Different Polysaccharides

Table 2 lists the different utilized polysaccharides in foods applications such as cellulose, xanthan, dextran, pullulan, glucans, chitin and chitosan.

5.1.1. Cellulose

The most abundant biomass component and the primary feedstock for the paper and pulp industries is cellulose [103,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144]. It can be extracted from plant tissues such as trees, cotton, etc. In addition, it can be generated by bacterial fermentation, resulting in a purer source of cellulose with distinct properties. The most typical bacterial cellulose (BC) products are attracted owing to its large surface area and capacity to withstand liquids [137,145]. As a result, very low amounts of BC can create excellent binding, thickening, and coating agents. It is expected to have many implementations in food due to its thickening properties, as seen in Table 1. For example, cellulose can be utilized as a thickening agent in soaps and a texture modifier in dough [112]. Moreover, cellulose was used as a shortening replacer in dough products, probably due to its thermo-gelling ability [146].

5.1.2. Xanthan

A bacterium-produced xanthan is one of the first economically viable bacterial polysaccharides utilized for production [147]. Throughout the xanthan polymer building blocks or “repeat units”, the bacterium Xanthomonas forms five distinct sugar groups [148,149]. Thanks to its excellent gelling agents, Xanthan is being used in several food applications such as cheese spreads, ice creams, puddings, and other deserts [150,151]. According to Zia et al. [152], one of the key priorities of milk farmers is to produce dairy products of high quality. Xanthan could help to improve the texture and thus improve the quality of milk products.

5.1.3. Dextran

As a natural polysaccharide, Dextran is mainly composed of monomers (simple sugars) and is maintained by yeast and bacteria. Dextran refers to a group of microbial polysaccharides that are formed or polymerized outside of the cell using an enzyme known as dextran sucrases [153,154,155]. Dextran is being applied in several food applications, including the improvement of characteristics of dough products [137,153]. Also, it is applied for enhancing the viscoelastic properties of frozen foods [130,131,132,156]. In addition, dextran polymers have several medicinal uses, such as wound dressings, surgical sutures, blood volume expanders boost blood supply in capillaries in the treatment of artery occlusion, and combat iron-deficient anemia. Dextran haemoglobin molecules are employed as blood supplements as well as plasma expanders for oxygen delivery qualities [157].

5.1.4. Pullulan

As is known, pullulan is a water-soluble polysaccharide formed by many yeast species, most prominently, Aureobasidium pullulans, outside the cell. Pullulan is a linear polysaccharide composed of monomers joined together through three glucose sugars [106,107]. In biologically active conditions, pullulan compounds are biodegradable polymers. It is heat tolerant and possesses a wide variety of elasticities and solubilities. They can be found in several forms because of their versatility. This could be used as a bulking agent and texture enhancer in foods. It has no flavor, odor, or toxicity. It has a little caloric content, so it does not break down the components of naturally produced digestive enzymes [158].
Consequently, instead of starch or other fillers, it is being used as a food additive in low-calorie foods and beverages. Strong fertilizers use pullulan as a binding agent. Potash clays, uranium clays, and ferric hydroxide may be precipitated through slurries used throughout mineral or beneficiation with the biopolymer as a natural coagulant agent. Pullulan is also used in medicine as a plasma expander with no serious side effects as it is fully defecated after metabolic turnover. Pullulan compounds are being used as both drug carriers and surgical adhesives. Pullulan seems to have long-term commercial potential, because it is in the early stages of development [158].

5.2. Other Applications of Polysaccharides

5.2.1. Health Aspects

Some LAB strains are becoming increasingly utilized as probiotics. Apart from acid and bile resistance, a probiotic LAB strain must be able to develop antimicrobial compounds towards pathogenic and cariogenic bacteria, as well as bind to and colonize human intestinal mucosa [159]. The development of antimicrobial compounds can help probiotics colonize the gut mucosa by giving them a competitive advantage over typical gastrointestinal microflora. Capsular polysaccharide has been shown to facilitate bacterial adhesion to biological surfaces, making it possible for bacteria to colonize different ecological niches [160].
The value and prospective applications of Lactobacillus plantarum, Azotobacter vinelandii, and associated with polysaccharides in fresh and sea water fish farms have been investigated [161]. The utilization of polysaccharides for probiotic bacteria microencapsulation increased the survival rate of encapsulated probiotics [162,163]. Most polysaccharide features, such as enteric dissolution, ion-induced gelation, and electrostatic activity, are ideal for forming microcapsules. Polysaccharides could also protect the encapsulated probiotic bacteria from the harsh environment [164,165,166]. A semipermeable membrane forms as the negatively charged property of alginate interacts with the positively charged property of chitosan, providing the corresponding capsules as strong texture and lower permeability to water-soluble molecules [167]. Importantly, by transferring the chitosan-coated beads into such an alginate/chitosan solution, the single-layer chitosan-coated alginate beads may be coated often, hence increasing the viability of the probiotic bacteria. (Figure 3).
Furthermore, according to Chen et al. [168], The microencapsulation of probiotic bacteria could enhance the quality, storage, and viability of delivered bacteria throughout the gastrointestinal tract. Polysaccharides are one of the most frequently used probiotic microencapsulation products. However, as the demand for probiotic microcapsules grows and new applications emerge, the use of polysaccharides and other widely used ingredients is facing many challenges. As a result, new forms of polysaccharides with primary properties appropriate for probiotic microencapsulation are required.

5.2.2. Medical Application

The saccharide part of many vaccines is conjugated to a carrier protein, resulting in highly efficient and safe vaccines. Polysaccharides from marine Vibrio and Pseudomonas have been shown to have antiviral, antitumor, and immune-stimulant properties. Alteromonas infernus, a low molecular weight heparin-like EPS with anticoagulant effects, was discovered from deep-sea hydrothermal vents [169]. Clavan, and L-fucose, containing polysaccharides, can be utilized to prevent lung tumor cell colonization, control the formation of white blood cells, treat rheumatoid arthritis, synthesize antigens for antibody synthesis, and as a skin moisturizing agent in cosmeceuticals [170]. Because of their inherent abundance in plants, bioderived polymers including such polysaccharides have really been widely exploited in wound dressing production [171,172,173] (Figure 4).
Glucans are a homopolymer of glucose, a basic sugar joined together through β-(1,3) glycosidic bonds, with a connected side-chain of glucose residues linked together by β-(1,6) linkages. These glucans tend to have the ability to cure several diseases. β-glucans make up approximately half of the mass of the fungal cell wall [174]. Glucan component of the yeast cell wall is generally referred to as glucan. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a typical source of this glucan, but it can also be presented in other areas. In yeast, glucans seem to be the most common polymers, accounting for 12 to 14% dry cell weight [175]. Glucan can be effectively refined from yeast cells by extracting all other cellular materials with a warm alkali solution, allowing the insoluble glucan material to recover. Several studies have been undertaken to examine the use of glucan as an anti-infectious agent due to its immunomodulatory properties. Plants are also using glucan as an antiviral agent. Glucans have been shown to suppress tumor development in mice and rats in many experiments using multiple tumor models. They also have the curious property of being radioprotective, which raises the odds of laboratory specimens surviving radioactive doses that would otherwise kill them [174].
Chitin and chitosan have a chemical structure that is comparable. Chitin is a linear polymer of acetylglucosamine groups, whereas chitosan is made by removing enough acetyl groups (CH3-CO) from the molecule to have it dissolve in diluted acids [176]. Despite having positive ionic charges, unlike plant fiber, chitosan could chemically bind to negatively charged lipids, metal ions, fats, proteins, cholesterol, and macromolecules. Chitosan is produced industrially by chemically deacetylating chitin. This approach does not produce high-quality chitosan. Deacetylation removes acetyl groups from chitin’s molecular chain, leaving chitosan with a chemically reactive amino group [94]. Chitin is a type of skeletal polysaccharide found in the shells of crabs, lobsters, shrimps, and insects. Chitin can be derived from many sources, such as shellfish and crustacean waste materials. Chitin is water-insoluble in its natural state, but chitosan, a partially deacetylated form of chitin. Because of their water-retention and moisturizing qualities, they are commonly used in the cosmetics industry. Chitin and chitosan are being used as carriers in the production of water-soluble drugs [177,178].

5.2.3. Emulsifiers

Surfactants and emulsifiers extracted from bacteria are gaining much attention due to their biodegradability and ability to be manufactured from renewable resources [179]. As for emulsion, it has been found that EPS formed by a marine bacterium with various hydrocarbons can produce stable emulsions [180].
Exopolysaccharide (EPS 71a) formed by a marine Enterobacter cloaceae emulsified benzene, hexane, kerosene, xylene, and oils of coconut, paraffin, cottonseed, jojoba, groundnut, castor, and sunflower, according to Ask et al. [181].
At an optimum concentration of 1 mg/mL with peanut oil and hexane, it might generate emulsions. Increasing the concentration of EPS 71a did not result in a substantial improvement in the properties of emulsions.
As previously known, emulsions are being used to give specialized physicochemical qualities and functional features in pharmaceutical, food, and personal care sectors. In many cases, it is preferable to build emulsions with natural components in order to generate “label-friendly” items. Corn fiber gum, Gum arabic, and beet pectin have been used. These three polysaccharide-based emulsifiers were capable of producing emulsions, with average diameter decreasing as even the concentration of emulsifier with increasing the homogenization pressure. Moreover, monodisperse soybean oil-in-water emulsions were generated using the microchannel emulsification technique, using polysaccharides as the only emulsifier. The influence of several polysaccharide such as gum Arabic, carboxymethyl cellulose, sodium alginate, and pectin, with different concentrations on droplet size, droplet size distribution, and emulsion stability were explored [182]. Emulsions stabilized using sodium alginate and Arabic gum were shown to be stable for more than 5 h. On the other hand, the emulsifying potential of a polysaccharide that isolated from Cordia abyssinica was examined at different concentrations. The homogenizer was used to make emulsions of vegetable oil containing up to 1% polysaccharide in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4).
Whey protein isolate nanofibrils can be employed as a new stabilizer in the pickering emulsion system to increase lipophilic bioactive compounds’ water solubility, stability, and bioavailability. To make a stable pickering emulsion, researchers employed conjugated linoleic acid and whey protein isolate nanofibrils [183]. Such results demonstrated that a pickering emulsion supported via whey protein isolate nanofibrils is preferable for carrying conjugated linoleic linoleic acid because it boosts conjugated linoleic acid solubility and has much more active uses in biology and food as well [183,184].
In addition, nanofibrils manufactured from whey protein isolate nanofibrils were used to maintain a Pickering emulsion with a high internal phase. Hydrothermal at 110 °C for 4 h produced whey protein isolates with well-ordered sheet structures and a high aspect ratio, which would be more effective than the existing approach of 85 °C for 5–25 h. The findings showed that hydrothermal preparation of whey protein isolate nanofibrils is an unique and efficient approach, and as such the nanofibrils may be employed to sustain high internal phase Pickering emulsions with variable rheology [183].
In the presence of sodium chloride (range of 5–50 mg/mL), emulsions of groundnut oil and hexane were stable for 10 days at 35–37 °C and pH 2–10. Compared to conventional gums like Arabic gum, tragacanth, karaya, and xanthan, EPS 71a can form stable emulsions with xylene. It was found that EPS was more effective than commercially available emulsifiers [185].

5.2.4. Polysaccharide-Based Edible Films

The food industry has a big difficulty in the form of food waste. In this context, edible films and coatings have gotten a lot of interest because of their capacity to prevent food spoiling during handling, transportation, and storage. This has greatly aided in the extension of the shelf-life of food goods. Polysaccharides, among other polymers, have been studied in the recent decade for the development of edible films and coatings. In microbial food safety applications, such polymeric frameworks have shown tremendous potential. The addition of essential oils to polysaccharide matrices increased the functional qualities of edible films and coatings [186].
The qualities of binary mix films based on gelatin and polysaccharides with emulsifying activity: water soluble soy polysaccharides, methylcellulose, gum Arabic, and octenyl succinic anhydride modified starch were examined. The stretchiest film was made by combining gelatin and octenyl succinic anhydride modified starch in a 25/75 ratio. During storage, however, this film showed clear signs of recrystallization [187].
From the other hand, when using salted duck egg yolk, which is a traditional pickled egg product, weight loss and texture degradation occur during storage. To better maintain the texture of salted duck egg yolk, an edible covering relying on whey protein isolate nanofibers containing plasticizer agent (glycerol) and carvacrol as an antibacterial agent was created. When compared to other samples, the whey protein isolate nanofibers-carvacrol/glycerol edible coating showed stronger antibacterial activity, while the whey protein isolate nanofibers-carvacrol/glycerol film had smooth and continuous surfaces and improved transmission [188].
Weight loss and variations in the textural qualities of salted duck egg yolk with whey protein isolate nanofibers with carvacrol/glycerol coating were also assessed. Salted duck egg yolks with whey protein isolate nanofibers—carvacrol/glycerol coating showed less weight loss, according to the findings. The whey protein isolate nanofibers-carvacrol/glycerol coating on salted duck egg yolk greatly enhanced the textural qualities compared to the untreated samples. The egg yolks covered with the whey protein isolate nanofibers-carvacrol/glycerol coating showed the least amount of hardening (18.22%).
As a result, whey protein isolate nanofibers-based coatings might have a bright future in the food business. The effect of soy protein isolate preheating temperature on the physicochemical properties of soy protein isolate-oil emulsion films was also investigated. In the soy protein isolate-oil emulsion films, there was no noticeable change in protein molecular weight as the preheating temperature was increased, although the glass transition temperature improved [189].

5.2.5. Wastewater and Bioremediation

A emerging topic of biotechnology is the use of EPS-producing microbes in the treatment of mining-related environmentally favorable industrial wastewater [190]. Biofilm-mediated bioremediation is a more efficient alternative to planktonic bacteria-mediated bioremediation because cells developing inside a biofilm can adapt to the surrounding environmental conditions [191,192]. Biofilms support the cells to enhance the mineralization processes by preserving optimum physiological and chemical conditions, localized solute concentrations, and redox potential [193]. Biofilm reactors are often used to treat hydrocarbons, heavy metals, and large amounts of dilute aqueous solutions, such as commercial and municipal wastes. [193]. EPS plays an essential function in removing hazardous metals from the environment due to their participation in flocculation and high affinity for the metal ions from solutions [194].
Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are a common form of bacteria contained in metal-contaminated wastewater. This bacterial group is successful in the anaerobic oxidation of many organic compounds and the removal of wastewater heavy metals [195,196]. Bacteria such as enterobacter and pseudomonas can breakdown or absorb hazardous heavy metals during bioremediation methods [197,198].

6. Conclusions

Modification for the encode enzymes that catalyze the reactions in the processes or through modifying signaling pathways that influence gene expression and thus enzyme function, provides the most promising prospects towards increasing pure and high-quality EPS production. In the near future, more interdisciplinary studies are recommended to widespread screening, study structural characterization, develop bioactivity tests, understand biosynthesis and metabolic engineering problems. Thus, synthetic biology approaches can play a critical role in developing polysaccharides in simple and facile ways.

Author Contributions

Writing—Reviewing and Editing, Y.A.-G.M., M.E.E.-N., A.A.-M. and M.E.-N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mudgil, D.; Barak, S. Composition, properties and health benefits of indigestible carbohydrate polymers as dietary fiber: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 61, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khaskheli, S.G.; Zheng, W.; Sheikh, S.A.; Khaskheli, A.A.; Liu, Y.; Soomro, A.H.; Feng, X.; Sauer, M.B.; Wang, Y.F.; Huang, W. Characterization of Auricularia auricula polysaccharides and its antioxidant properties in fresh and pickled product. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 81, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, Q.; Wang, F.; Xu, Z.; Ding, Z. Bioactive mushroom polysaccharides: A review on monosaccharide composition, biosynthesis and regulation. Molecules 2017, 22, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ahmad, M.M. Characterization and antioxidant activities of polysaccharides extracted from flageolet bean pods waste. Curr. Res. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 4, 100154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mohammed, A.S.A.; Naveed, M.; Jost, N. Polysaccharides; Classification, Chemical Properties, and Future Perspective Applications in Fields of Pharmacology and Biological Medicine (A Review of Current Applications and Upcoming Potentialities). J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 2359–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sindhu, R.K.; Goyal, A.; Das, J.; Choden, S.; Kumar, P. Immunomodulatory potential of polysaccharides derived from plants and microbes: A narrative review. Carbohydr. Polym. Technol. Appl. 2021, 2, 100044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shakya, A.K. Unit-7 Polysaccharides; Indira Gandhi National Open University: New Delhi, India, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. Zheng, Y.; Xie, Q.; Wang, H.; Hu, Y.; Ren, B.; Li, X. Recent advances in plant polysaccharide-mediated nano drug delivery systems. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 2668–2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Barbosa, J.R.; de Carvalho Junior, R.N. Polysaccharides obtained from natural edible sources and their role in modulating the immune system: Biologically active potential that can be exploited against COVID-19. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaudhuri, S.; Datta, H.K. Macrofungal Polysaccharides as Immunoceuticals in Cancer Therapy. In Advances in Macrofungi; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 287–310. ISBN 1003191274. [Google Scholar]
  11. Qu, J.; Huang, P.; Zhang, L.; Qiu, Y.; Qi, H.; Leng, A.; Shang, D. Hepatoprotective effect of plant polysaccharides from natural resources: A review of the mechanisms and structure-activity relationship. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 161, 24–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tahmouzi, S.; Ghodsi, M. Optimum extraction of polysaccharides from motherwort leaf and its antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 112, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tahmouzi, S. Optimization of polysaccharides from Zagros oak leaf using RSM: Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2014, 106, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Santra, H.K.; Banerjee, D. Microbial Exopolysaccharides: Structure and Therapeutic Properties. In Microbial Polymers; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 375–420. [Google Scholar]
  15. Alsaadi, L.G.; Baker, B.A.A.; Kadhem, B.M.; Mahdi, L.H.; Mater, H.N. Exopolysaccharide as Antiviral, Antimicrobial And As Immunostimulants: A Review. Plant Arch. 2020, 20, 5859–5875. [Google Scholar]
  16. Günl, M.; Pauly, M. AXY3 encodes a α-xylosidase that impacts the structure and accessibility of the hemicellulose xyloglucan in Arabidopsis plant cell walls. Planta 2011, 233, 707–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Günl, M.; Neumetzler, L.; Kraemer, F.; de Souza, A.; Schultink, A.; Pena, M.; York, W.S.; Pauly, M. AXY8 encodes an α-fucosidase, underscoring the importance of apoplastic metabolism on the fine structure of Arabidopsis cell wall polysaccharides. Plant Cell 2011, 23, 4025–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gothwal, R.; Shashidhar, T. Antibiotic pollution in the environment: A review. Clean–Soil Air Water 2015, 43, 479–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Horton, D.; Wolfrom, M.L. Chapter VII: Section b: Polysaccharides:(Excluding Glycuronans, Bacterial Polysaccharides and Mucopolysaccharides). In Comprehensive Biochemistry; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1963; Volume 5, pp. 189–232. ISBN 0069-8032. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lapasin, R. Rheology of Industrial Polysaccharides: Theory and Applications; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; ISBN 1461521858. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nicolaus, B.; Kambourova, M.; Oner, E.T. Exopolysaccharides from extremophiles: From fundamentals to biotechnology. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 1145–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jindal, N.; Khattar, J.S. Microbial polysaccharides in food industry. In Biopolymers for Food Design; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 95–123. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ahmad, N.H.; Mustafa, S.; Che Man, Y.B. Microbial polysaccharides and their modification approaches: A review. Int. J. Food Prop. 2015, 18, 332–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kim, H.-M.; Kim, S.-W.; Hwang, H.-J.; Park, M.-K.; Mahmoud, Y.A.-G.; Choi, J.-W.; Yun, J.-W. Influence of agitation intensity and aeration rate on production of antioxidative exopolysaccharides from submerged mycelial culture of Ganoderma resinaceum. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 16, 1240–1247. [Google Scholar]
  25. Andrew, M.; Jayaraman, G. Structural features of microbial exopolysaccharides in relation to their antioxidant activity. Carbohydr. Res. 2020, 487, 107881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Prameela, K.; Mohan, C.M.; Ramakrishna, C. Biopolymers for food design: Consumer-friendly natural ingredients. In Biopolymers for Food Design; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mangaraj, S.; Yadav, A.; Bal, L.M.; Dash, S.K.; Mahanti, N.K. Application of Biodegradable Polymers in Food Packaging Industry: A Comprehensive Review. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2019, 3, 77–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rehm, B.H.A.; Valla, S. Bacterial alginates: Biosynthesis and applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 48, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bakshi, P.S.; Selvakumar, D.; Kadirvelu, K.; Kumar, N.S. Chitosan as an environment friendly biomaterial—A review on recent modifications and applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 150, 1072–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Bose, S.; Koski, C.; Vu, A.A. Additive manufacturing of natural biopolymers and composites for bone tissue engineering. Mater. Horizons 2020, 7, 2011–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moradali, M.F.; Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial biopolymers: From pathogenesis to advanced materials. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 195–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Steinbüchel, A. Perspectives for biotechnological production and utilization of biopolymers: Metabolic engineering of polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis pathways as a successful example. Macromol. Biosci. 2001, 1, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pandey, S.; Shreshtha, I.; Sachan, S.G. Pullulan: Biosynthesis, Production and Applications. In Microbial Exopolysaccharides as Novel and Significant Biomaterials; Springer: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 121–141. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, J.; Salem, D.R.; Sani, R.K. Microbial polymers produced from methane: Overview of recent progress and new perspectives. In Microbial and Natural Macromolecules; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 117–142. [Google Scholar]
  35. Salazar, N.; Gueimonde, M.; De Los Reyes-Gavilán, C.G.; Ruas-Madiedo, P. Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria as fermentable substrates by the intestinal microbiota. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2016, 56, 1440–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tang, Y.; Dai, X.; Dong, B.; Guo, Y.; Dai, L. Humification in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) dominates methane release and EPS reconstruction during the sludge stabilization of high-solid anaerobic digestion. Water Res. 2020, 175, 115686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sun, X.; Zhang, J. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: Chemical structures, gene clusters and genetic engineering. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 173, 481–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, X.; Bai, J.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, H.; Lu, G.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, L.; Liu, B.; Wang, L.; Huang, D. High efficiency biosynthesis of O-polysaccharide-based vaccines against extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 255, 117475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hooper, A.B.; DiSpirito, A.A. In bacteria which grow on simple reductants, generation of a proton gradient involves extracytoplasmic oxidation of substrate. Microbiol. Rev. 1985, 49, 140–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. More, T.T.; Yadav, J.S.S.; Yan, S.; Tyagi, R.D.; Surampalli, R.Y. Extracellular polymeric substances of bacteria and their potential environmental applications. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 144, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mohd Nadzir, M.; Nurhayati, R.W.; Idris, F.N.; Nguyen, M.H. Biomedical applications of bacterial exopolysaccharides: A review. Polymers 2021, 13, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mandakovic, D.; Cintolesi, Á.; Maldonado, J.; Mendoza, S.N.; Aïte, M.; Gaete, A.; Saitua, F.; Allende, M.; Cambiazo, V.; Siegel, A. Genome-scale metabolic models of Microbacterium species isolated from a high altitude desert environment. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 5560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Vaishnav, A.M.; Upadhyay, K.H.; Tipre, D.R.; Dave, S.R. Bio-prospecting of Fruits Waste for Exopolysaccharide Production by Bacteria. In Biotechnology for Sustainable Environment; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 353–371. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wiseman, B.; Nitharwal, R.G.; Widmalm, G.; Högbom, M. Structure of a full-length bacterial polysaccharide co-polymerase. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Soumya, M.P.; Nampoothiri, K.M. An overview of functional genomics and relevance of glycosyltransferases in exopolysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 184, 1014–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tiwari, U.P.; Fleming, S.A.; Rasheed, M.S.A.; Jha, R.; Dilger, R.N. The role of oligosaccharides and polysaccharides of xylan and mannan in gut health of monogastric animals. J. Nutr. Sci. 2020, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zheng, L.-X.; Chen, X.-Q.; Cheong, K.-L. Current trends in marine algae polysaccharides: The digestive tract, microbial catabolism, and prebiotic potential. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 151, 344–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ates, Ö.; Oner, E.T.; Arga, K.Y. Genome-scale reconstruction of metabolic network for a halophilic extremophile, Chromohalobacter salexigens DSM 3043. BMC Syst. Biol. 2011, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Finore, I.; Di Donato, P.; Mastascusa, V.; Nicolaus, B.; Poli, A. Fermentation technologies for the optimization of marine microbial exopolysaccharide production. Mar. Drugs 2014, 12, 3005–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Ates, O.; Arga, K.Y.; Oner, E.T. The stimulatory effect of mannitol on levan biosynthesis: Lessons from metabolic systems analysis of Halomonas smyrnensis AAD6T. Biotechnol. Prog. 2013, 29, 1386–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Merritt, J.H.; Ollis, A.A.; Fisher, A.C.; DeLisa, M.P. Glycans-by-design: Engineering bacteria for the biosynthesis of complex glycans and glycoconjugates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2013, 110, 1550–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, Z.; Dordick, J.S.; Linhardt, R.J. Escherichia coli K5 heparosan fermentation and improvement by genetic engineering. Bioeng. Bugs 2011, 2, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Delbarre-Ladrat, C.; Sinquin, C.; Lebellenger, L.; Zykwinska, A.; Colliec-Jouault, S. Exopolysaccharides produced by marine bacteria and their applications as glycosaminoglycan-like molecules. Front. Chem. 2014, 2, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hartmann, M.; Lindhorst, T.K. The bacterial lectin FimH, a target for drug discovery–carbohydrate inhibitors of type 1 fimbriae-mediated bacterial adhesion. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2011, 3583–3609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Becer, C.R. The glycopolymer code: Synthesis of glycopolymers and multivalent carbohydrate–lectin interactions. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 742–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Galan, M.C.; Benito-Alifonso, D.; Watt, G.M. Carbohydrate chemistry in drug discovery. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 3598–3610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, Y.; Liu, X. The versatility of carbohydrates in antimicrobial applications. J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2020, 67, 2204–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Taylor, M.E.; Drickamer, K. Introduction to Glycobiology; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2011; ISBN 0199569118. [Google Scholar]
  59. Rehm, B.H.A. Bacterial polymers: Biosynthesis, modifications and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 578–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jönsson, M.; Allahgholi, L.; Sardari, R.R.R.; Hreggviðsson, G.O.; Nordberg Karlsson, E. Extraction and modification of macroalgal polysaccharides for current and next-generation applications. Molecules 2020, 25, 930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Kosaraju, S.L. Colon targeted delivery systems: Review of polysaccharides for encapsulation and delivery. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45, 251–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Muir, V.G.; Burdick, J.A. Chemically Modified Biopolymers for the Formation of Biomedical Hydrogels. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 10908–10949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Begum, S.; Yuhana, N.Y.; Saleh, N.M.; Kamarudin, N.N.; Sulong, A.B. Review of chitosan composite as a heavy metal adsorbent: Material preparation and properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 259, 117613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Schmid, J.; Sperl, N.; Sieber, V. A comparison of genes involved in sphingan biosynthesis brought up to date. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 7719–7733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lamport, D.T.A. Structure and function of plant glycoproteins. In Carbohydrates: Structure and Function; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1980; pp. 501–541. [Google Scholar]
  66. Barreras, M.; Salinas, S.R.; Abdian, P.L.; Kampel, M.A.; Ielpi, L. Structure and mechanism of GumK, a membrane-associated glucuronosyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 25027–25035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Kamat, S. Molecular Basis and Genetic Regulation of EPS. In Microbial Exopolysaccharides as Novel and Significant Biomaterials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 45–83. [Google Scholar]
  68. Whitfield, C. Glycan chain-length control. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 403–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tatnell, P.J.; Russell, N.J.; Gacesa, P. GDP-mannose dehydrogenase is the key regulatory enzyme in alginate biosynthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Evidence from metabolite studies. Microbiology 1994, 140, 1745–1754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Trincone, A. Potential biocatalysts originating from sea environments. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2010, 66, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jiang, B.; Wang, L.; Zhu, M.; Wu, S.; Wang, X.; Li, D.; Liu, C.; Feng, Z.; Tian, B. Separation, structural characteristics and biological activity of lactic acid bacteria exopolysaccharides separated by aqueous two-phase system. LWT 2021, 147, 111617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Xu, Y.; Cui, Y.; Yue, F.; Liu, L.; Shan, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Lü, X. Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria: Structures, physiochemical functions and applications in the food industry. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 94, 475–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gavande, P.V.; Basak, A.; Sen, S.; Lepcha, K.; Murmu, N.; Rai, V.; Mazumdar, D.; Saha, S.P.; Das, V.; Ghosh, S. Functional characterization of thermotolerant microbial consortium for lignocellulolytic enzymes with central role of Firmicutes in rice straw depolymerization. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chio, C.; Sain, M.; Qin, W. Lignin utilization: A review of lignin depolymerization from various aspects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 107, 232–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Murrey, H.E.; Hsieh-Wilson, L.C. The chemical neurobiology of carbohydrates. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1708–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Farrokhi, N.; Burton, R.A.; Brownfield, L.; Hrmova, M.; Wilson, S.M.; Bacic, A.; Fincher, G.B. Plant cell wall biosynthesis: Genetic, biochemical and functional genomics approaches to the identification of key genes. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2006, 4, 145–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Thibodeaux, C.J.; Melançon III, C.E.; Liu, H. Natural-product sugar biosynthesis and enzymatic glycodiversification. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9814–9859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Jamieson, C.S.; Misa, J.; Tang, Y.; Billingsley, J.M. Biosynthesis and synthetic biology of psychoactive natural products. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 6950–7008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Winter, J.M.; Tang, Y. Synthetic biological approaches to natural product biosynthesis. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 736–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Cameron, D.E.; Bashor, C.J.; Collins, J.J. A brief history of synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 381–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Church, G.M.; Elowitz, M.B.; Smolke, C.D.; Voigt, C.A.; Weiss, R. Realizing the potential of synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Chien, L.; Lee, C. Enhanced Hyaluronic Acid Production in Bacillussubtilis by Coexpressing Bacterial Hemoglobin. Biotechnol. Prog. 2007, 23, 1017–1022. [Google Scholar]
  83. Cimini, D.; De Rosa, M.; Schiraldi, C. Production of glucuronic acid-based polysaccharides by microbial fermentation for biomedical applications. Biotechnol. J. 2012, 7, 237–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Leroux, M.; Michaud, J.; Bayma, E.; Armand, S.; Drouillard, S.; Priem, B. Misincorporation of Galactose by Chondroitin Synthase of Escherichia coli K4: From Traces to Synthesis of Chondbiuronan, a Novel Chondroitin-Like Polysaccharide. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Roman, E.; Roberts, I.; Lidholt, K.; Kusche-Gullberg, M. Overexpression of UDP-glucose dehydrogenase in Escherichia coli results in decreased biosynthesis of K5 polysaccharide. Biochem. J. 2003, 374, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Kovarik, M.L.; Gach, P.C.; Ornoff, D.M.; Wang, Y.; Balowski, J.; Farrag, L.; Allbritton, N.L. Micro total analysis systems for cell biology and biochemical assays. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 516–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Khan, S.; Ullah, M.W.; Siddique, R.; Nabi, G.; Manan, S.; Yousaf, M.; Hou, H. Role of recombinant DNA technology to improve life. Int. J. Genom. 2016, 2016, 2405954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Park, T.G.; Jeong, J.H.; Kim, S.W. Current status of polymeric gene delivery systems. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2006, 58, 467–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Vu, B.; Chen, M.; Crawford, R.J.; Ivanova, E.P. Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides involved in biofilm formation. Molecules 2009, 14, 2535–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Horton, R.M.; Cai, Z.; Ho, S.N.; Pease, L.R. Gene splicing by overlap extension: Tailor-made genes using the polymerase chain reaction. Biotechniques 2013, 54, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Schanté, C.E.; Zuber, G.; Herlin, C.; Vandamme, T.F. Chemical modifications of hyaluronic acid for the synthesis of derivatives for a broad range of biomedical applications. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 85, 469–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lundqvist, L.C.E.; Jam, M.; Barbeyron, T.; Czjzek, M.; Sandström, C. Substrate specificity of the recombinant alginate lyase from the marine bacteria Pseudomonas alginovora. Carbohydr. Res. 2012, 352, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Yang, M.; Li, N.; Yang, S.; Yu, Y.; Han, Z.; Li, L.; Mou, H. Study on expression and action mode of recombinant alginate lyases based on conserved domains reconstruction. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Rao, M.G.; Bharathi, P.; Akila, R.M. A comprehensive review on biopolymers. Sci. Revs. Chem. Commun 2014, 4, 61–68. [Google Scholar]
  95. Das, B.; Paul, S.; Sharma, H.K. A Review on Bio-Polymers Derived from Animal Sources with Special Reference to their Potential Applications. J. Drug Deliv. Ther. 2021, 11, 209–223. [Google Scholar]
  96. McCart, J.A.; Ward, J.M.; Lee, J.; Hu, Y.; Alexander, H.R.; Libutti, S.K.; Moss, B.; Bartlett, D.L. Systemic cancer therapy with a tumor-selective vaccinia virus mutant lacking thymidine kinase and vaccinia growth factor genes. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 8751–8757. [Google Scholar]
  97. Brown, C.K.; Gu, Z.-Y.; Matsuka, Y.V.; Purushothaman, S.S.; Winter, L.A.; Cleary, P.P.; Olmsted, S.B.; Ohlendorf, D.H.; Earhart, C.A. Structure of the streptococcal cell wall C5a peptidase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 18391–18396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Mao, Z.; Shin, H.-D.; Chen, R. A recombinant E. coli bioprocess for hyaluronan synthesis. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 84, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Fialho, A.M.; Moreira, L.M.; Granja, A.T.; Popescu, A.O.; Hoffmann, K.; Sá-Correia, I. Occurrence, production, and applications of gellan: Current state and perspectives. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 79, 889–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kumar, A.S.; Mody, K. Microbial exopolysaccharides: Variety and potential applications. In Microbial Production of Biopolymers and Polymer Precursors: Applications and Perspectives; Caister Academic Press: Norfolk, UK, 2009; pp. 229–253. [Google Scholar]
  101. Yin, G.-Z.; Zhang, W.-B.; Cheng, S.Z.D. Giant molecules: Where chemistry, physics, and bio-science meet. Sci. China Chem. 2017, 60, 338–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. El-Naggar, M.E.; Abdelgawad, A.M.; Salas, C.; Rojas, O.J. Curdlan in fibers as carriers of tetracycline hydrochloride: Controlled release and antibacterial activity. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 154, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. El-Naggar, M.E.; Abdelgawad, A.M.; Tripathi, A.; Rojas, O.J. Curdlan cryogels reinforced with cellulose nanofibrils for controlled release. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 5754–5761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. El-Naggar, M.E. Synthesis, Drying Process and Medical Application of Polysaccharide-Based Aerogels. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 145, 1115–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Shaheen, T.I.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Hussein, J.S.; El-Bana, M.; Emara, E.; El-Khayat, Z.; Fouda, M.M.; Ebaid, H.; Hebeish, A. Antidiabetic assessment; in vivo study of gold and core-shell silver-gold nanoparticles on streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016, 83, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mohamed, A.L.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Shaheen, T.I.; Hassabo, A.G. Novel nano polymeric system containing biosynthesized core shell silver/silica nanoparticles for functionalization of cellulosic based material. Microsyst. Technol. 2016, 22, 979–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Hussein, J.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Latif, Y.A.; Medhat, D.; El Bana, M.; Refaat, E.; Morsy, S. Solvent-free and one-pot synthesis of silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles: Activity toward cell membrane component and insulin signaling pathway in experimental diabetes. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2018, 170, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Prausnitz, M.R.; Mitragotri, S.; Langer, R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2004, 3, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Patra, J.K.; Das, G.; Fraceto, L.F.; Campos, E.V.R.; del Pilar Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Acosta-Torres, L.S.; Diaz-Torres, L.A.; Grillo, R.; Swamy, M.K.; Sharma, S. Nano based drug delivery systems: Recent developments and future prospects. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 16, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Selvasudha, N.; Koumaravelou, K. The multifunctional synergistic effect of chitosan on simvastatin loaded nanoparticulate drug delivery system. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 163, 70–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Maheshwari, R.; Sharma, P.; Seth, A.; Taneja, N.; Tekade, M.; Tekade, R.K. Drug Disposition Considerations in Pharmaceutical Product. In Dosage Form Design Considerations; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 337–369. [Google Scholar]
  112. Lee, H.; Sundaram, J.; Mani, S. Production of Cellulose Nanofibrils and Their Application to Food: A Review; Prasad, R., Kumar, V., Kumar, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; ISBN 9789811046780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ramalingam, C.; Priya, J.; Mundra, S. Applications of microbial polysaccharides in food industry. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2014, 27, 322–324. [Google Scholar]
  114. Sworn, G. Xanthan gum. In Handbook of Hydrocolloids; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2021; pp. 833–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Preichardt, L.D.; Vendruscolo, C.T.; Gularte, M.A.; Moreira, A.D. The role of xanthan gum in the quality of gluten free cakes: Improved bakery products for coeliac patients. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 46, 2591–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Moritaka, H.; Naito, S.; Nishinari, K.; Ishihara, M.; Fukuba, H. Effects of gellan gum, citric acid and sweetener on the texture of lemon jelly. J. Texture Stud. 1999, 30, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Duran, E.; Costell, E.; Izquierdo, L.; Duran, L. Low sugar bakery jams with gellan gum—guar gum mixtures. Influence of composition on texture. Food Hydrocoll. 1994, 8, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Bajaj, I.B.; Survase, S.A.; Saudagar, P.S.; Singhal, R.S. Gellan gum: Fermentative production, downstream processing and applications. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 45, 341–354. [Google Scholar]
  119. Totosaus, A.; Perez-Chabela, M.L. Textural properties and microstructure of low-fat and sodium-reduced meat batters formulated with gellan gum and dicationic salts. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2009, 42, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Nieto, M.B. Structure and function of polysaccharide gum-based edible films and coatings. In Edible Films and Coatings for Food Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 57–112. [Google Scholar]
  121. Tsujisaka, Y.; Mitsuhashi, M. Pullulan. In Industrial Gums; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 447–460. [Google Scholar]
  122. Kothari, D.; Das, D.; Patel, S.; Goyal, A. Dextran and food application. In Polysaccharides; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  123. McCurdy, R.D.; Goff, H.D.; Stanley, D.W. Properties of dextran as a cryoprotectant in ice cream. Food Hydrocoll. 1994, 8, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shi, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Phillips, G.O.; Yang, G. Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. 2014, 35, 539–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Sukumaran, S. Studies on Sporulation in Some Commercially Important Marine Algae of Mandapam Coast; Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute: Kochi, India, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  126. Helgerud, T.; Gaserod, O.; Fjæreide, T.; Andersen, P.; Larsen, C. 4. Alginates. In Food Stabilisers, Thickeners and Gelling Agents; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2010; pp. 50–72. [Google Scholar]
  127. Thomas, F.; Lundqvist, L.C.E.; Jam, M.; Jeudy, A.; Barbeyron, T.; Sandström, C.; Michel, G.; Czjzek, M. Comparative characterization of two marine alginate lyases from Zobellia galactanivorans reveals distinct modes of action and exquisite adaptation to their natural substrate. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 23021–23037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Yuasa, M.; Tagawa, Y.; Tominaga, M. The texture and preference of “mentsuyu (Japanese noodle soup base) caviar” prepared from sodium alginate and calcium lactate. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2019, 18, 100178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Ahari, H.; Fahimdanesh, M.; Khosravi Zanjani, M.A.; Anvar, A.; Shokri, E. Survival of alginate-prebiotic microencapsulated Lactobacillus acidophilus in mayonnaise sauce. Iran. J. Vet. Med. 2012, 6, 259–264. [Google Scholar]
  130. Petracci, M.; Bianchi, M.; Mudalal, S.; Cavani, C. Functional ingredients for poultry meat products. Trends food Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Storebakken, T.; Austreng, E. Binders in fish feeds: II. Effect of different alginates on the digestibility of macronutrients in rainbow trout. Aquaculture 1987, 60, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Marguet, M.; Sandre, O.; Lecommandoux, S. Polymersomes in “gelly” polymersomes: Toward structural cell mimicry. Langmuir 2012, 28, 2035–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hino, T.; Ishimoto, H.; Shimabayashi, S. Thermal gelation of aqueous curdlan suspension: Preparation of curdlan jelly. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2003, 55, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Funami, T.; Yada, H.; Nakao, Y. Curdlan properties for application in fat mimetics for meat products. J. Food Sci. 1998, 63, 283–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Sadar, L.N. Rheological and Textural Characteristics of Copolymerized Hydrocolloidal Solutions Containing Curdlan Gum; University of Maryland: College Park, MD, USA, 2004; ISBN 0496261908. [Google Scholar]
  136. Nakao, Y.; Yamaguchi, T.; Taguchi, T. Preparations of freezable processed tofu and freeze-dried tofu by using curdlan. Nippon Shokuhin Kogyo Gakkaishi 1994, 41, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Radwan, E.K.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Abdel-Karim, A.; Wassel, A.R. Multifunctional 3D cationic starch/nanofibrillated cellulose/silver nanoparticles nanocomposite cryogel: Synthesis, adsorption, and antibacterial characteristics. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 189, 420–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. El-Newehy, M.H.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Alotaiby, S.; El-Hamshary, H.; Moydeen, M.; Al-Deyab, S. Green Electrospining of Hydroxypropyl Cellulose Nanofibres for Drug Delivery Applications. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2018, 18, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Yan, J.; Abdelgawad, A.M.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Rojas, O.J. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized In-situ by solution spraying onto cellulose. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 147, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. El-Naggar, M.E.; Radwan, E.K.; El-Wakeel, S.T.; Kafafy, H.; Gad-Allah, T.A.; El-Kalliny, A.S.; Shaheen, T.I. Synthesis, characterization and adsorption properties of microcrystalline cellulose based nanogel for dyes and heavy metals removal. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 248–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Hussein, J.; El-Banna, M.; Razik, T.A.; El-Naggar, M.E. Biocompatible zinc oxide nanocrystals stabilized via hydroxyethyl cellulose for mitigation of diabetic complications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 107, 748–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Abdelrahman, M.S.; Khattab, T.A.; Aldalbahi, A.; Hatshan, M.R.; El-Naggar, M.E. Facile development of microporous cellulose acetate xerogel immobilized with hydrazone probe for real time vapochromic detection of toxic ammonia. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Sharaf, S.; El-Naggar, M.E. Eco-friendly technology for preparation, characterization and promotion of honey bee propolis extract loaded cellulose acetate nanofibers in medical domains. Cellulose 2018, 25, 5195–5204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Abdelgawad, A.M.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Elsherbiny, D.A.; Ali, S.; Abdel-Aziz, M.S.; Abd-Elmoneam, Y.K. Antibacterial carrageenan/cellulose-nanocrystal system loaded with silver nanoparticles, prepared via solid-state technique. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 104276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. El-Naggar, M.E.; Hasanin, M.; Youssef, A.M.; Aldalbahi, A.; El-Newehy, M.H.; Abdelhameed, R.M. Hydroxyethyl cellulose/bacterial cellulose cryogel dopped silver@titanium oxide nanoparticles: Antimicrobial activity and controlled release of Tebuconazole fungicide. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 165, 1010–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Sanz, T.; Laguna, L.; Salvador, A. Biscuit dough structural changes during heating: Influence of shortening and cellulose ether emulsions. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 62, 962–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. El-Naggar, M.E.; Abd-Al-Aleem, A.H.; Abu-Saied, M.A.; Youssef, A.M. Synthesis of environmentally benign antimicrobial dressing nanofibers based on polycaprolactone blended with gold nanoparticles and spearmint oil nanoemulsion. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 15, 3447–3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sun, H.; Zhu, X.; Li, C.; Ma, Z.; Han, X.; Luo, Y.; Yang, L.; Yu, J.; Miao, Y. Xanthomonas effector XopR hijacks host actin cytoskeleton via complex coacervation. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 4064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mielnichuk, N.; Bianco, M.I.; Yaryura, P.M.; Bertani, R.P.; Toum, L.; Daglio, Y.; Colonnella, M.A.; Lizarraga, L.; Castagnaro, A.P.; Vojnov, A.A. Virulence factors analysis of native isolates of Xanthomonas albilineans and Xanthomonas sacchari from Tucumán, Argentina, reveals differences in pathogenic strategies. Plant Pathol. 2021, 70, 1072–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Barak, S.; Mudgil, D.; Taneja, S. Exudate gums: Chemistry, properties and food applications–a review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020, 100, 2828–2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Yang, X.; Li, A.; Li, X.; Sun, L.; Guo, Y. An overview of classifications, properties of food polysaccharides and their links to applications in improving food textures. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 102, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Zia, K.M.; Tabasum, S.; Khan, M.F.; Akram, N.; Akhter, N.; Noreen, A.; Zuber, M. Recent trends on gellan gum blends with natural and synthetic polymers: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1068–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Medhat, D.; Hussein, J.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Attia, M.F.; Anwar, M.; Latif, Y.A.; Booles, H.F.; Morsy, S.; Farrag, A.R.; Khalil, W.K.B.; et al. Effect of Au-dextran NPs as anti-tumor agent against EAC and solid tumor in mice by biochemical evaluations and histopathological investigations. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 91, 1006–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Elnaggar, M.; Emam, H.; Fathalla, M.; Abdel-Aziz, M.; Zahran, M. Chemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles in its solid state: Highly efficient antimicrobial cotton fabrics for wound healing properties. Egypt. J. Chem. 2021, 64, 2697–2709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Hussein, J.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Fouda, M.M.G.; Othman, S.I.; Allam, A.A.; Nadwa, E.H.; Rashwan, E.K.; Hendawy, O.M. Eco-friendly Microwave Synthesis of Gold Nanoparticles for Attenuation of Brain Dysfunction in Diabetic Rats. J. Clust. Sci. 2021, 132, 423–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Wang, Y.; Maina, N.H.; Coda, R.; Katina, K. Challenges and opportunities for wheat alternative grains in breadmaking: Ex-situ- versus in-situ-produced dextran. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 113, 232–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Liu, P.; Shi, B.; Yue, C.; Gao, G.; Li, P.; Yi, H.; Li, M.; Wang, B.; Ma, Y.; Cai, L. Dextran-based redox-responsive doxorubicin prodrug micelles for overcoming multidrug resistance. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 5793–5799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Singh, R.S.; Kaur, N.; Kennedy, J.F. Pullulan production from agro-industrial waste and its applications in food industry: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 217, 46–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Saxelin, M.; Pessi, T.; Salminen, S. Fecal recovery following oral administration of Lactobacillus strain GG (ATCC 53103) in gelatine capsules to healthy volunteers. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1995, 25, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Hammerschmidt, S.; Wolff, S.; Hocke, A.; Rosseau, S.; Müller, E.; Rohde, M. Illustration of pneumococcal polysaccharide capsule during adherence and invasion of epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 4653–4667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Ramadan, E.-S.A.; El-Sawi, E.-S.S.; Abdel-Glel, M.Y.; Mohamed, E.-D.N. Importance and possible applications of lactobacillus plantarum, azotobacter vinelandii and its exopolysaccharides to fresh and marine water fish farms. Egypt. J. Exp. Biol. 2011, 7, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  162. Singh, P.; Magalhães, S.; Alves, L.; Antunes, F.; Miguel, M.; Lindman, B.; Medronho, B. Cellulose-based edible films for probiotic entrapment. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 88, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Li, W.; Liu, L.; Tian, H.; Luo, X.; Liu, S. Encapsulation of Lactobacillus plantarum in cellulose based microgel with controlled release behavior and increased long-term storage stability. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 223, 115065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Liu, H.; Xie, M.; Nie, S. Recent trends and applications of polysaccharides for microencapsulation of probiotics. Food Front. 2020, 1, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Rokka, S.; Rantamäki, P. Protecting probiotic bacteria by microencapsulation: Challenges for industrial applications. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010, 231, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Ding, W.K.; Shah, N.P. An improved method of microencapsulation of probiotic bacteria for their stability in acidic and bile conditions during storage. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, M53–M61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Călinoiu, L.-F.; Ştefănescu, B.E.; Pop, I.D.; Muntean, L.; Vodnar, D.C. Chitosan coating applications in probiotic microencapsulation. Coatings 2019, 9, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Chen, D.; Jin, D.; Huang, S.; Wu, J.; Xu, M.; Liu, T.; Dong, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Zhong, W. Clostridium butyricum, a butyrate-producing probiotic, inhibits intestinal tumor development through modulating Wnt signaling and gut microbiota. Cancer Lett. 2020, 469, 456–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Muñoz-Garcia, J.; Mazza, M.; Alliot, C.; Sinquin, C.; Colliec-Jouault, S.; Heymann, D.; Huclier-Markai, S. Antiproliferative properties of scandium exopolysaccharide complexes on several cancer cell lines. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Manivasagan, P.; Kim, S.-K. Extracellular polysaccharides produced by marine bacteria. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2014, 72, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  171. McCarthy, R.R.; Ullah, M.W.; Booth, P.; Pei, E.; Yang, G. The use of bacterial polysaccharides in bioprinting. Biotechnol. Adv. 2019, 37, 107448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. McCarthy, R.R.; Ullah, M.W.; Pei, E.; Yang, G. Antimicrobial inks: The anti-infective applications of bioprinted bacterial polysaccharides. Trends Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 1155–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Muthukumaran, J.; Jha, N. Bacterial Polysaccharides utilization in Bioprinting. J. Crit. Rev. 2020, 7, 776–780. [Google Scholar]
  174. McIntosh, M.; Stone, B.A.; Stanisich, V.A. Curdlan and other bacterial (1 → 3)-β-D-glucans. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 68, 163–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Freimund, S.; Sauter, M.; Käppeli, O.; Dutler, H. A new non-degrading isolation process for 1, 3-β-d-glucan of high purity from baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Carbohydr. Polym. 2003, 54, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Pillai, C.K.S.; Paul, W.; Sharma, C.P. Chitin and chitosan polymers: Chemistry, solubility and fiber formation. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 641–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Onishi, H.; Nagai, T.; Machida, Y. Applications of chitin, chitosan, and their derivatives to drug carriers for microparticulated or conjugated drug delivery systems. In Applications of Chitin and Chitosan; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020; pp. 205–231. ISBN 100307281X. [Google Scholar]
  178. Yu, J.; Wu, N.; Zheng, X.; Zheng, M. Preparation of water-soluble chitosan/poly-gama-glutamic acid—tanshinone IIA encapsulation composite and its in vitro/in vivo drug release properties. Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express 2020, 6, 45020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Sałek, K.; Euston, S.R. Sustainable microbial biosurfactants and bioemulsifiers for commercial exploitation. Process Biochem. 2019, 85, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Das, S. Structural and mechanical characterization of biofilm-associated bacterial polymer in the emulsification of petroleum hydrocarbon. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 239. [Google Scholar]
  181. Ask, M.; Ask, D.; Christiansson, R. Detection of borehole breakouts at the Forsmark site, Sweden. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on In-Situ Rock Stress, Trondheim, Norway, 19–21 June 2006; Lu, M., Li, C.C., Kjorholt, H., Dahle, H., Eds.; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2006; pp. 79–86. [Google Scholar]
  182. Bai, L.; Huan, S.; Li, Z.; McClements, D.J. Comparison of emulsifying properties of food-grade polysaccharides in oil-in-water emulsions: Gum arabic, beet pectin, and corn fiber gum. Food Hydrocoll. 2017, 66, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  183. Yang, Y.; Jiao, Q.; Wang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, B.; Li, D.; Feng, Z.; Liu, C. Preparation and evaluation of a novel high internal phase Pickering emulsion based on whey protein isolate nanofibrils derived by hydrothermal method. Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 123, 107180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Jiao, Q.; Liu, Z.; Li, B.; Tian, B.; Zhang, N.; Liu, C.; Feng, Z.; Jiang, B. Development of Antioxidant and Stable Conjugated Linoleic Acid Pickering Emulsion with Protein Nanofibers by Microwave-Assisted Self-Assembly. Foods 2021, 10, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Singha, T.K. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: Production, isolation and applications. IOSR J. Pharm. 2012, 2, 271–281. [Google Scholar]
  186. Anis, A.; Pal, K.; Al-Zahrani, S.M. Essential oil-containing polysaccharide-based edible films and coatings for food security applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Łupina, K.; Kowalczyk, D.; Zięba, E.; Kazimierczak, W.; Mężyńska, M.; Basiura-Cembala, M.; Wiącek, A.E. Edible films made from blends of gelatin and polysaccharide-based emulsifiers—A comparative study. Food Hydrocoll. 2019, 96, 555–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Wang, Q.; Liu, W.; Tian, B.; Li, D.; Liu, C.; Jiang, B.; Feng, Z. Preparation and characterization of coating based on protein nanofibers and polyphenol and application for salted duck egg yolks. Foods 2020, 9, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  189. Hu, Y.; Shi, L.; Ren, Z.; Hao, G.; Chen, J.; Weng, W. Characterization of emulsion films prepared from soy protein isolate at different preheating temperatures. J. Food Eng. 2021, 309, 110697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Rawlings, D.E.; Johnson, D.B. The microbiology of biomining: Development and optimization of mineral-oxidizing microbial consortia. Microbiology 2007, 153, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Shukla, S.K.; Khan, A.; Rao, T.S. Biofilm extracellular polymeric substances-based bioremediation of radionuclides. In Microbial and Natural Macromolecules; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 751–773. [Google Scholar]
  192. Fang, K.; Park, O.-J.; Hong, S.H. Controlling biofilms using synthetic biology approaches. Biotechnol. Adv. 2020, 40, 107518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Singh, R.; Paul, D.; Jain, R.K. Biofilms: Implications in bioremediation. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 389–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Pal, A.; Paul, A.K. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: Central elements in heavy metal bioremediation. Indian J. Microbiol. 2008, 48, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Dabrowska, M.; Debiec-Andrzejewska, K.; Andrunik, M.; Bajda, T.; Drewniak, L. The biotransformation of arsenic by spent mushroom compost–An effective bioremediation agent. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 213, 112054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Kushkevych, I.; Dordević, D.; Vítězová, M.; Rittmann, S.K.-M. Environmental Impact of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria, Their Role in Intestinal Bowel Diseases, and Possible Control by Bacteriophages. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Sharma, P. Efficiency of bacteria and bacterial assisted phytoremediation of heavy metals: An update. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 328, 124835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Sharma, P.; Pandey, A.K.; Kim, S.-H.; Singh, S.P.; Chaturvedi, P.; Varjani, S. Critical review on microbial community during in-situ bioremediation of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 24, 101826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Synthesis pathway for producing EPS. TPR: tetratricopeptide repeat protein; OPX: outer membrane polysaccharide export; PCP: polysaccharide co-polymerase; GTs: glycosyltransferases, modified from [41].
Figure 1. Synthesis pathway for producing EPS. TPR: tetratricopeptide repeat protein; OPX: outer membrane polysaccharide export; PCP: polysaccharide co-polymerase; GTs: glycosyltransferases, modified from [41].
Polymers 13 04136 g001
Figure 2. Proposed basic strategies for the in vitro modification of polysaccharides.
Figure 2. Proposed basic strategies for the in vitro modification of polysaccharides.
Polymers 13 04136 g002
Figure 3. A diagram illustrates the alginate-chitosan beads with single- and double-layer coatings. Adapted from Ref. [167].
Figure 3. A diagram illustrates the alginate-chitosan beads with single- and double-layer coatings. Adapted from Ref. [167].
Polymers 13 04136 g003
Figure 4. Fabrication and biocompatibility assessment of polysaccharide materials.
Figure 4. Fabrication and biocompatibility assessment of polysaccharide materials.
Polymers 13 04136 g004
Table 1. Some of the genetic engineering applications in the production of microbial polysaccharides.
Table 1. Some of the genetic engineering applications in the production of microbial polysaccharides.
Genetic Engineering ApplicationsMicroorganisms InvolvedReferences
Recombinant Hyaluronan/hyaluronic acid (HA) productionBacillus subtilis
E coli JM109
[97]
[98]
Recombinant Alginate and alginate productionP. aeruginosa[69]
Intracellular versus extracellular production of biopolymers-[95,96]
Table 2. Polysaccharides in the food processing industry and their used concentration.
Table 2. Polysaccharides in the food processing industry and their used concentration.
PolysaccharideTypes of Utilized FoodsRequired Concentration (%)FunctionalityReferences
Cellulosedough-based products texture modifier[112]
creamed soups0.75Thickening agent[112]
Xanthan gumdressings for salads0.1–0.5Suspending agent, dispersant, and emulsion stabilizer[113,114,115]
Mixes that are dry0.05–0.2Disperses in hot or cold water with ease.
Sauces, toppings, relishes, and syrups0.05–0.2Heat retention and uniform viscosity are both qualities of a thickener.
Beverages0.05–0.2Stabilizing agent
Milk products0.2–0.5Stabilizing agent; controlling the viscosity control of mixture
Baked foods0.1–0.4Stabilizing agent
Frozen foods0.05–0.2Improves the stability of the freeze-thaw cycle
GellanJellies
Jams
Confectionery Processed foods
Processed meats
Icings
Pie fillings
0.15–0.2
0.12–0.3
0.8–1
0.2–0.3
0.1–1
0.05–0.12
0.25–0.35
Agent for gelling
Spreads with few calories
Fruit and vegetable gelling
Modification of texture
Agent for coating
Texturizer
[99,116,117,118,119]
PullulanEdible Films in confectionary
decoration
Snack Foods
5–10Low oxygen permeability edible films, bioadhesive stability at high pH, and low viscosity NaCl[120,121]
DextranBakery products2Distinctive dough-mixing characteristics[122,123]
Ice cream, Frozen and dried
foods
2–4Beneficial viscosity properties
Film of dextran used in frozen
foods
Xylinan/Acetobacterxylinum celluloseConfectionery product-Nata
de coco
Agent for gelling and controlling the viscosity[113,124]
AlginatesConfectionery, Dairy products
Beverages,
Jams,
Soups,
Sauces,
Meat,
Fish, and
gellies
0.3Gelling agent, thickener, and stabilizer[125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132]
CurdlanGellies1–5Agent for gelling[102,103,133,134,135,136,137]
Processed meats1–10Agent for gelling
Processed meats0.1–1Modification of texture
Sauces0.2–0.7Improving the mixture viscosity
Freeze-dried foods0.5–1Improving the mixture rehydration
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahmoud, Y.A.-G.; El-Naggar, M.E.; Abdel-Megeed, A.; El-Newehy, M. Recent Advancements in Microbial Polysaccharides: Synthesis and Applications. Polymers 2021, 13, 4136. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13234136

AMA Style

Mahmoud YA-G, El-Naggar ME, Abdel-Megeed A, El-Newehy M. Recent Advancements in Microbial Polysaccharides: Synthesis and Applications. Polymers. 2021; 13(23):4136. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13234136

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahmoud, Yehia A.-G., Mehrez E. El-Naggar, Ahmed Abdel-Megeed, and Mohamed El-Newehy. 2021. "Recent Advancements in Microbial Polysaccharides: Synthesis and Applications" Polymers 13, no. 23: 4136. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/polym13234136

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop