Next Article in Journal
Modeling the Impacts of Climate Change on Yields of Various Korean Soybean Sprout Cultivars
Next Article in Special Issue
Mitigating Soil Salinity Stress with Gypsum and Bio-Organic Amendments: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Tef (Eragrostis tef) Responses to Phosphorus and Potassium Fertigation under Semi-Arid Mediterranean Climate
Previous Article in Special Issue
Management of Phosphorus in Salinity-Stressed Agriculture for Sustainable Crop Production by Salt-Tolerant Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria—A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Trichoderma citrinoviride Treatment under Salinity Combined to Rhizoctonia solani Infection in Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)

1
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
2
Bornova Plant Protection Research Institute, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
3
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, 35100 Izmir, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 25 June 2021 / Revised: 13 July 2021 / Accepted: 1 August 2021 / Published: 10 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Biological Amendments in Abiotic Stress Tolerance of Crops)

Abstract

:
Trihoderma citrinoviride protects plants from diseases by functioning as antagonists of many pathogenic fungi or by triggering the antioxidant defense system in plants. In the present study, to uncover the possible alleviative role of Trichoderma against salinity and Rhizoctonia solani infection, strawberry plants were pretreated Trichoderma citrinoviride and then subjected to salinity, R. solani and combined salinity and R. solani. The effect of T. citrinoviride on the alleviation of the effects of salt stress and Rhizoctonia solani infection was investigated by analysing leaf dry weight, PSII efficiency, and the activity of some antioxidant enzymes in the leaves of strawberry plants. T. citrinoviride improved competitive capability against salinity and R. solani infection. It showed 79% inhibition of the growth of pathogen R. solani. T. citrinoviride reduced 63% of the severity of disease in the leaves. Trichoderma pretreatment maximized plant dry weight. The T. citrinoviride-pretreated plants showed higher levels of PSII efficiency (Fv/Fm). Decreased lipid peroxidation and H2O2 accumulation compared to untreated seedlings under salt stress and R. solani infection was observed. Trichoderma-pretreated and –untreated plants respond differently to salt stress and R. solani infection by means of antioxidant defense. As compared to untreated seedlings, treated seedlings showed significantly lower activities of antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POX), cell wall peroxidase (CWPOX) under salt stress and R. solani infection, indicating that treated seedlings might sense lower stress as compared to untreated seedlings. The study reports the effective adaptive strategy and potential of T. citrinoviride in alleviating the negative impact of salt stress and R. solani infection in strawberry.

1. Introduction

Plants live in a complex and ever-changing environment, where they constantly interact with biotic factors (herbivores and microbial pathogens) and abiotic factors (salinity, drought, high and low temperature, etc.) [1]. These factors negatively affect plant growth and development, which cause oxidative stress, leading to crop loss. Soil-borne pathogens are the major sources of biotic stress, and they increase the severity of this negative impact along with other stressors. When plants are exposed to a pathogen attack, parallel to biochemical and molecular responses, they mechanically strengthen their tissues in order to restrict the pathogen propagation [2,3]. In addition, cell wall reinforcement is stimulated by lignin and callose deposition in plants as a plant defense response and resistance against fungal pathogens such as Rhizoctonia [4]. Moreover, peroxidase, chitinase, and lignin formation are some of the defense mechanisms in the protection of tomatoes and rice against Rhizoctonia [5]. Rhizoctonia spp. is one of the most destructive soil-borne pathogens and causes significant losses in agricultural crops such as strawberry [6], tomato [7], corn [8], and potato [9]. The pathogen is difficult to control due to soil origin and ecological behavior, high survival rate of sclerotin in soil under harsh environmental conditions, and extremely wide host range [10]. Therefore, currently, it is a worldwide demand to find sustainable solution to the black root rot diseases caused by Rhizoctonia caused decrease in crop yield [11].
Oxidative stress is caused not only by biotic stress but also by abiotic stress. Therefore, combination of both stresses may act synergistically and affect plant growth and crop yield to a higher extent. Their combined effects can reduce the average yield to even less than 50% in an agricultural production [12]. Moreover, Nath et al. [13] showed that the presence of abiotic stresses such as salinity, temperature, cold, pH, and drought significantly alter the susceptibility of the plant to biotic stress. Salinity is one of the most harmful abiotic stresses which causes excessive intake of sodium (Na+) and chloride (Cl) ions, leading to perturbation in plant metabolism. Additionally, oxidative stress occurs due to the generation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) [14]. The formation of ROS; superoxide anion (O2.$-$), singlet oxygen (1O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl (HO.) cause severe damage to the plant cells [15]. ROS molecules, which are highly toxic and reactive, cause cell death by causing damaging proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, and DNA [16]. Plants have evolved various mechanisms to protect themselves from these toxic molecules. One of these mechanisms is the antioxidant defense system; ROS-scavenging enzymatic antioxidants such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POX), cell wall peroxidase (CWPOX), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and glutathione reductase (GR) are scavenged by non-enzymatic low molecular metabolites such as ascorbate (ASH), reduced glutathione (GSH), α-tocopherol, carotenoids, and flavonoids [16]. A vast amount of studies indicated that these molecules are produced during metabolic processes in different compartments of the cell and when they are produced at excess levels during stress, the metabolic balance is disturbed. If they are not scavenged efficiently by antioxidant enzymes, impaired metabolic balance occurs within plant cells.
Recent studies increase our limited knowledge of the molecular principles and mechanisms underlying plant-microbe-environment interactions [17]. For instance, the positive effects of the soil-borne fungus Trichoderma [18], which colonize in the roots of many plants as opportunistic, harmless plant symbiotes and do not show pathogenic effects, have been identified recently. The use of Trichoderma, a bio-control agent, is increasing day by day and is the subject of many studies in order to prevent the intensive use of chemical drugs (pollutes the atmosphere, is harmful to the environment, has remaining residues, and is not economical [19] in the fight against plant diseases. Trichoderma spp. is among the most effective components of the rhizosphere in terms of both plant growth and health [20]. Trichoderma species are also very effective microorganisms in suppressing plant diseases with biological warfare mechanisms such as hyperparasitism, antibiosis, and competition. The most common types of Trichoderma include T. harzianum, T. coningii, T. atroviride, T. reesei, T. viride and T. ghanense [21]. Many of these species have been reported to be effective biocontrol agents against soil-borne pathogens, including Rhizoctonia, by exhibiting various forms of biological action to control plant pathogens [22].
So far, little is known about how biocontrol agents act to protect host cells and suppress excessive ROS production in plants under biotic stress [23]. Chowdappa et al. [24] and Kumar et al. [25] showed that oxidative stress was regulated in infected plants through the increase of antioxidant enzymes such as POX, CAT, and SOD in their studies with different Tricoderma species (T. harzianum and T. virens). Similar results have also been reported in T. harzianum by Youssef et al. [11] and in T. atroviride by Nawrocka et al. [26]. However, there is limited information about the effect of T. citrinoviride under stress conditions. The study by Yesilyurt et al. [27] is the only study examining the role of T. citrinoviride on antioxidant enzymes under salt stress in maize.
Strawberry is among the most popular fruits all over the world due to its delicious taste and high content of sugars, vitamins, minerals and carotenoids, as well as ascorbic acid (Asc), phenolic compounds and other antioxidants that are beneficial for health [28]. The susceptibility of commercial strawberry cultivar to salt stress has been demonstrated by many studies [29,30]. Strawberry, which has a large cultivation area, naturally has many diseases and pests. Rhizoctonia, which causes black root rot disease, also affects strawberry plants. Although there are reports regarding the sole effects of both stresses, they are to date rare and limited. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, there is limited information about how the interactions between plant and T. citrinoviride affect host response to a combination of abiotic and biotic stress or how aspects of the abiotic and biotic environment affect this plant-T. citrinoviride interactions. In order to address these, in the present study, the possible effect of Trichoderma citrinoviride on disease suppression, plant growth and antioxidant status of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) under combination of salinity and Rhizoctonia solani infection were investigated. With this aim, we determined plant growth, severity of disease, Fv/Fm ratio, H2O2 content, lipid peroxidation, NADPH oxidase enzyme activity and some of antioxidant enzyme activities (superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POX), cell wall depend peroxidase (CWPOX)).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Trichoderma Citrinoviride Isolation and Identification

T. citrinoviride used in this study was provided from The Culture Collection Unit of the Phytopathology subdivision at Ege University, Turkey. Trichoderma spp. was grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA). Plates were incubated at 23 °C for 1 week. Phenotypic characterizations of isolate were performed using various culture techniques such as green conidia formation, pigments, and colony appearance. Slide examination of fungal growth and conidiophores formation were performed under light microscope at the Fruit and Vine Fungal Disease Lab. in Bornova Plant Protection Research Institute. Phenotypic identification was determined according to Gams and Bissett [31]. After phenotypic identification, fungal culture was further verified by molecular methods using the primers described by White et al. [32]. ITS1 (5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′), ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) (White et al., 1990) and EF1 forw. (5′-ATGGGTAAGGAGGACAAGAC-3′), TEF1a rev. (3′-GCCATCCTTGGAGATACCAGC-5′). The amplification program carried out an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 95 °C, annealing for 1 min at 60 °C and extension for 1 min at 72 °C and a final elongation step of 10 min at 72 °C. PCR product was separated in 3% agarose gels in 1X TAE buffer at 75 V for 40 min, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.
Sequencing of PCR: To determine the complete sequences of ITS1 and ITS4, they were sequenced with ABI prism automated DNA sequences. These sequences were used to identify the fungi with help of the BLAST program (www.ncbi.nih.gov/BLAST, accessed on 25 June 2021), and multiple sequence alignments were determined with the Clustal W program. Amplification of DNA samples with primer pairs ITS and tef1 was compared with the Ky764860.1 and Hg93, showing 98.1% and 99.7% similarity, respectively.

2.2. Rhizoctonia Solani Isolation and Identification

The isolate of R. solani were isolated from the roots of diseased plants of strawberry. The infected strawberry roots were surface sterilized in 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 3 min, washed for 1 min two times with sterilized distilled water, and dried between two sterilized filter papers. The sterilized root fragments were transferred to PDA medium and were incubated at 25 °C for seven days. The mycelia growth was taken and transferred onto new PDA medium. Phenotypic characterizations of developed isolate were performed.

2.3. Bioassay Analysis

2.3.1. Bioassay of Trichoderma Isolate against R. solani

T. citrinoviride and R. solani species were enlarged on PDA medium for antagonistic activity. T. citrinoviride and R. solani strains were tested in vitro using 85 mm petri dishes containing 20 mL of PDA medium with pH 5.5 for antagonistic activity [33]. Mycelial discs (5 mm in diameter) of T. citrinoviride, was placed on one edge of a petri dish containing PDA, while same size of R. solani was also placed at the periphery but on the opposing end of the same Petri dish. R. solani was enlarged at the edge of the plate for the control group. Antagonistic activity was tested 6 days after incubation. Four petri dishes per treatment were used, and they incubated at 28 °C and the percent inhibition of radial growth (PIRG) was recorded. PIRG was defined using the equation indicated below for all cultures that were measured [34].
Percentage Inhibition of Radial Growth = [(R1 − R2)/R1] × 100 (R1 = Control colony of radius, R2 = Trichoderma-treated colony radius)

2.3.2. Bioassay of Trichoderma Isolate against Salinity

Forty mM NaCl were added into petri dishes that each contained sterilized PDA. Petri dishes were sealed with parafilm and incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 4–7 days until the growth in the control plates reached the edge of the plates. The plates were then assessed by measuring the distances fungal cultures.

2.4. Plant Material and Treatments

Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch. cv. ‘Rubigen’) plants were obtained from Ege University, Faculty of Agriculture, Bornova, İzmir, Turkey. Three week old seedlings were planted into pots (16 cm × 14 cm) filled with torf + perlite + vermiculite mixture (7:2:1) and grown under natural day/night light conditions of the greenhouse. Pots were arranged in a completely randomized block design with three replicates for each treatment and four pots per replicate. Seedlings were watered regularly with the half-strength Hoagland solution and stress treatments were started when plants were 3 weeks old. Plants were divided into eight different treatment groups as follows; (1) control, (2) 40 mM NaCl, (3) R. solani infected, (4) 40 mM NaCl + R. solani infected, (5) T. citrinoviride pretreated, (6) T. citrinoviride pretreated + 40 mM NaCl, (7) T. citrinoviride + R. solani, (8) T. citrinoviride + NaCl+ R. solani. Strawberry plants were dip into solution of 2 × 10−6 cfu/mL spots suspension of T. citrinoviride. After T. citrinoviride inoculation, these seedlings were grown for two weeks. After two weeks, while salt treatment started by adding 40 mM NaCl into Hoagland solution, R.solani pathogen was inoculated with PDA pieces. For R. solani inoculation, 80 plugs (5 mm diameter) from 8 day old PDA cultured of R. solani containing abundant mycelium and sclerotia were mixed well in 1 cm of the soil surface and watered. Plant growth and disease incidence were taken on the 14th day of stress treatments. Disease incidence was estimated by both visual assessments of the plants and re-isolation of R. solani from the diseased root of the plants. Fully expanded leaves were sampled after 14 days for biochemical analyses, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until further analyses. For each treatment, at least 12 replicate plants were inoculated in a completely randomized experimental design and all experiments were repeated.
Disesase Incidence (%) = [(Number of infected plants/Total number of plants) × 100]

2.5. Plant Growth

Leaf samples were taken from each and was used for dry weight determination, and their dry weights were measured after samples were dried 70 °C for 72 h.

2.6. Fv/Fm (Maximal Efficiency of PSII Photochemistry)

The measurements were conducted after day 14 of salt stress and R. solani infection exposure. Leaves were dark-adapted for 30 min before the measurements. The maximum quantum efficiency of PSII readings (Fv/Fm (maximal efficiency of PSII photochemistry)) measured in second developed apical leaf and they were recorded by Plant Efficiency Analyser, P-Sensor type (Hansatech Fluorometer, Hansatech Instrument Ltd., Norfolk, UK)

2.7. Lipid Peroxidation (TBARS) Content

The level of lipid peroxidation in samples was done according to the method of Madhava Rao and Sresty [35], which determined the content of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). TBARS content was calculated from the absorbance at 532 nm and measurements were corrected for non-specific turbidity by subtracting the absorbance at 600 nm. The concentration of TBARS was calculated using an extinction coefficient of 155 mM−1cm−1.

2.8. Determination of H2O2 Content

The ferrous-xylenol orange (eFOX) assay was used to measure H2O2 [36] using eFOX reagent. In this assay, 1% ethanol is added to the reagent, which increases its sensitivity to H2O2 by 50% (eFOX). Samples were homogenized in ice-cold acetone, containing 25 mM H2SO4. Then, homogenates were centrifuged for 5 min at 3000× g at 4 °C. For 50 μL of supernatant, 950 μL eFOX reagent (250 μM ferrous ammonium sulphate, 100 μM xylenol orange, 100 μM sorbitol, 1% ethanol, v/v) was used. Reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance differences of the mixture at 550 and 800 nm were measured. The H2O2 concentration was calculated by using a standard curve with known H2O2 concentrations.

2.9. Enzyme Extractions and Assays

All assays were performed at 4 °C. Then, 0.1 g of the samples was grounded to fine powder by liquid nitrogen and homogenized in 500 µL of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, containing 0.1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.1% (w/v) Triton-X100, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP; 1%, w/v). The homogenate was centrifuged at 14,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. Supernatants were used for the determination of protein content and enzyme activities. Total soluble protein contents of the enzyme extracts were determined according to Bradford [37], using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. All spectrophotometric analyses were conducted on a Shimadzu UV 1700 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

2.9.1. NADPH Oxidase (NOX) Activity

NOX (EC 1.6.3. 1) activity was determined according to Jiang and Zhang [38]. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.5, 0.5 mM XTT, 100 µM NADPH•Na4 and 20 µg of protein. XTT reduction was followed at 470 nm. The background production was determined by the presence of 50 U SOD. One unit of NOX was defined as 1 nmol ml−1 XTT oxidized min−1 (E = 2.16 × 104 M−1 cm−1)

2.9.2. Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Activity

SOD (EC 1.15.1.1) activity was measured according to Beuchamp and Fridovich [39], measuring its ability to inhibit photochemical reduction of NBT at 560 nm. The reaction mixture (3 mL) contained 0.033 mM NBT, 10 mM l-methionine, 0.66 mM EDTA Na2 and 0.0033 mM riboflavin in 0.05 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.8). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the quantity of SOD enzyme that inhibits 50% NBT photoreduction.

2.9.3. Peroxidase (POX) and Cell Wall Bound POX (CWPOX) Activity

POX (EC1.11.1.7) and Cell wall POX (CWPOX) activity was based on the method of Herzog and Fahimi [40]. For determination of both activities, the same homogenates were used with different pretreatments. After the enzyme extraction, centrifugation was performed at 14,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C and supernatants were taken for POX assay while, pellets were washed in 50 mM sodium phosphate pH 5.8 and centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min at +4 °C. After centrifugation, pellets were resuspended with 1 mL dH2O and 1 M NaCl was pipetted into the tubes and stirred for 2 h. After that, samples were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 10 min and supernatants were used for CWPOX assay. The reaction mixture contained 3,3′-diaminobenzidine-tetra hydrochloride dihydrate solution containing 0.1% (w/v) gelatine and 150 mM Na-phosphate-citrate buffer (pH 4.4) and 0.6% H2O2. Absorbance was followed for 3 min at 465 nm. One unit of POX activity was calculated as the mmol H2O2 decomposed mL−1min−1.

2.9.4. Statistical Analysis

The experiments were repeated twice, and three biological replicates were used from each experiment for all analyses (n = 6). Results are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. Groups were compared using Student’s t-tests. In the figures, different letters above the bars indicate significant differences between the control and treatment groups at the p ≤ 0.05 level according to the least significant difference (LSD) test. Multivariate analyses were done using the SPSS statistical analyses program (IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0, 2017, NY, U.S.). General Linear Model was performed using LSD test for comparing Trichoderma-pretreated, salt stress-treated and Rhizoctonia-infected and control groups.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Trichoderma Citrinoviride on the Growth of R. solani

T. citrinoviride isolate was screened against R. solani (Figure 1) and it showed antagonistic activity against R. solani in the dual culture. While T. citrinoviride exhibited rapid growth, it caused a high inhibition (79%) in R. solani growth (Figure 1A,B). On the other hand, T. citrinoviride were not affected under salt stress (Figure 1C).

3.2. Disease Incidence

Plants treated with Trichoderma citrinoviride showed reduction in the development of the disease symptoms (T + R and T + S + R groups) as compared to untreated plants grown on infested soil (R and S + R groups) (Figure 2).While disease incidence in solely R. solani-infected plants was 88%, disease incidence in the R. solani-infected plants under salt stress reached 93%. Disease incidence was only 33% and 41% in T + R and T + S + R groups, respectively, which indicated the protective effect of Trichoderma pretreatment.

3.3. Plant Growth Analysis

Leaf dry weight used as a parameter for not only complaining the ameliorative effect of Trichoderma treatment but also for analyzing the difference between infected and uninfected plants (Figure 3). Salinity decreased plant growth significantly. Nontreated Trichoderma and uninfected strawberry plants showed 13.3% reduction in leaf dry weight at 40 mM NaCl. Furthermore, R. solani-infected plants had a significant decline in the total leaf dry weight. Leaf dry weight decreased by 49% in solely R. solani-infected plants, as compared to that of the control, but the rate of decline did not change when R. solani infection was combined with salinity. On the other hand, Trichoderma pretreatment significantly ameliorated (10%) the inhibitory effect of 40 mM NaCl on the leaf dry weight as compared to the control (Figure 3). The ameliorative effect of Trichoderma on leaf growth of R solani infected plants was higher by 26% as compared to that of NaCl-treated plants In Trichoderma-treated plants, leaf growth inhibition was reduced by only 34% under combined effects of salt and pathogen stress as compared to control. Therefore, remarkably, Trichoderma neutralized the inhibitory effect of R. solani in 40 mM NaCl. Furthermore the infection severity in 40 mM NaCl-treated plants infected with R. solani was also reduced in the groups pretreated with Trichoderma.

3.4. Maximum Quantum Yield of PSII (Fv/Fm)

The Trichoderma treatment slightly enhanced Fv/Fm under normal conditions as compared to the control. On the other hand, Trichoderma pretreatment caused a significant increase in Fv/Fm in the leaves of plants which were subjected to salt stress and R.solani infection either separately or in combination as compared to Trichoderma-untreated plants under abiotic and biotic stress (Table 1). Fv/Fm values were decreased by 9.5% and 9% in R. solani infected groups and when R. solani infection is combined with salinity, respectively. Solely salt stress treatment did not change Fv/Fm values (Figure 4). Remarkably, Trichoderma treatment under abiotic and biotic stress restored the Fv/Fm values close to control levels when compared to all Trichoderma-untreated plants under stress.

3.5. H2O2 Content

Only salt stress enhanced the H2O2 content by 31%, while only R. solani infection increased it by 87% as compared to the control. Moreover, a combination of salt stress and R. solani infection increased the H2O2 by 74% in the leaves of strawberry plants as compared to the control (Figure 5). Trichoderma treatment decreased H2O2 content to control levels under salt stress. Furthermore, Trichoderma treatment decreased H2O2 content by 46.7% in R. solani-infected plants, as compared to in that of solely R. solani-infected plants (Table 1). Similarly, in 40 mM NaCl R. solani-infected plants, Trichoderma decreased the H2O2 content by 26.3%, as compared to R. solani infected plants under salt stress (Table 1).

3.6. Lipid Peroxidation

The TBARS content was increased by 18.3% in salt-stressed plants as compared to the control (Figure 6).However; it remained at control levels in Trichoderma treated plants. R. solani infection caused a significant increase (48.4%) in TBARS content as compared to control. Furthermore, the highest lipid peroxidation level was found in 40 mM NaCl-treated plants infected with R. solani. However, the rate of increment in TBARS content of this group was not different from that of R. solani-treated plants under normal conditions (Figure 6). On the other hand, Trichoderma pretreatment decreased the TBARS content by 9% and 10% in solely NaCl-treated and solely R. solani-infected plants respectively, as compared to untreated-Trichoderma plants under stress (Table 1). Furthermore, Trichoderma prevented excessive increase in TBARS content in 40 mM NaCl-treated plants infected with R. solani. In these plants, TBARS content was decreased by 26.7% in Trichoderma pretreated groups, as compared to those of 40 mM NaCl-treated plants infected with R. solani (Table 1).

3.7. NADPH Oxidase (NOX) Activity

NOX activity was enhanced in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to 40 mM NaCl and R. solani infection either separately or in combination (Figure 7). The NOX activity was increased by 1.8-fold in NaCl-stressed plants as compared to control groups. However, R. solani infection resulted in higher levels of NOX activity. NOX activity was increased by 2.6 fold in solely R. solani-infected plants while it was increased by 4.6-fold in R. solani-infected plants under salt stress as compared to that of control. Accordingly, the highest NOX activity was measured in 40 mM NaCl + R. solani-infected plants. On the other hand, Trichoderma pretreatment caused a significant decrease (2.8-fold) in the leaves of strawberry plants under salt stress as compared to solely NaCl-treated plants (Table 1). Thus, NOX activity remained at control levels in Trichoderma-treated plants under salt stress. Furthermore, Trichoderma pretreatment decreased NOX activity by 2-fold in R. solani-infected plants, as compared to that of solely R. solani-infected plants (Table 1). Similarly, in 40 mM NaCl R. solani-infected plants, Trichoderma pretreatment significantly decreased NOX activity by 3-fold, as compared to R. solani infection under salt stress (Table 1).

3.8. Antioxidant Enzyme Activities

3.8.1. SOD Activity

A remarkable increase was observed in SOD activity in the leaves of strawberry plants subjected to salt stress and R. solani infection either separately or in combination as compared to the control. Among the Trichoderma-untreated plants, the highest SOD activity was observed in solely R. solani-infected plants (Figure 8A). SOD activity was increased by 28.7% in the NaCl-treated plants in Trichoderma pretreated group as compared to solely NaCl-treated plants. However Trichoderma did not significantly change SOD activity in the leaves of Rhizoctonia-infected plants in Trichoderma pretreated group, as compared to solely Rhizoctonia-infected plants (Table 1). When R. solani infection is combined with salinity, SOD activity in the Trichoderma pretreated groups was increased by 28.5% as compared to in that of solely 40 mM NaCl + R. solani-treated plants.

3.8.2. POX Activity

POX activity increased in solely NaCl-treated plants and the rate of increment was 2-fold as compared to that of the control (Figure 8B). Furthermore, all R. solani-infected plants either solely or combined with salinity (R and S + R) have exhibited higher levels of POX activity, as compared to that of solely NaCl-treated plants. The highest rate of increment in POX activity was 5.7-fold in solely R. solani-infected plants as compared to the control. On the other hand, Trichoderma treatment decreased in POX activity by 58%, 84% and 74% in the plants which were subjected to salt stress and R. solani infection either separately or in combination (Table 1). Thus, Trichoderma treatment under stress restored the POX activity values close to control levels.

3.8.3. CWPOX Activity

CWPOX activity was enhanced by 2-fold in the plants under salt stress (Figure 8C). However, R. solani infection resulted in the higher levels of POX whether it was alone or in combination with 40 mM NaCl. On the other hand, Trichoderma pretreatment prevented excess increase in the CWPOX activity in the all stress-treated plants (Table 1). Even, after Trichoderma treatment, CWPOX activity content in all stress groups was decreased almost to control levels.

4. Discussion

Salinity and pathogen attacks are two important constraints of plant growth and development [41]. Inoculation with beneficial fungal endophytes such as Trichoderma species has been found effective under both stresses to increase productivity. Therefore, understanding the interactions between plants and these fungal endophytes having influence on plant growth and stress tolerance is required. In the current study, we established correlations between the Trichoderma citrinoviride and the plant antioxidant enzyme profile in the strawberry plants which were subjected salt stress and R. solani infection either separately, or in combination. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to analyze the effect of abiotic and biotic stresses on induced resistance mechanisms by Trichoderma pretreatment in strawberry.
Recently, Krause et al. [42] demonstrated that T. hamamatum was able to inhibit R. solani infecting radish in the greenhouse. T. harzianum, another strain of Trichoderma, have effective antimicrobial activity against R. solani causing black root rot in bean [43]. According to our results, T. citrinoviride pretreatment suppressed R. solani infection therefore, it might be considered as a potential biocontrol agent due to the antifungal activity. On the other hand, it is known that high salinity can increase the disease incidence of plants or susceptibility of the plants to pathogen [44,45]. In the present study, we investigated the effects of T. citrinoviride pretreatment and salt stress (40 mM NaCl) on the plant’s predisposition to disease. Exposure to another stress factor such as salinity under R. solani infection did not increase the severity of the disease. Salt stress did not affect the final disease incidence in strawberry infected with R. solani as reported in cyclamen infected with F. oxyporum f. sp. cyclaminis by Elmer [46]. However, disease incidence in Chili pepper cv. Tequilla Sunrise infected with Phytophthora capsici was increased with salinity [47].
In our study, strawberry plants which were subjected to 40 mM NaCl and R. solani infection either separately or in combination declined in leaf dry weight. Growth inhibition under different NaCl salinity was reported in different plants as well, including strawberry [48,49] cucumber [41], and cowpea [50]. Similar to salt stress, R. solani infection was also reported to cause growth inhibition in different plant species such as cucumber [51], bean [43], and tomato [11]. The main reason of this inhibition in the growth under the effect of salt stress and R. solani infection might be attributed to the increased osmotic stress, plant water retention disturbance, deficiency of nutrients, increased respiration rate, decreased photosynthetic activity and decrease in activation of the natural plant-defense mechanisms leading to reduced total biomass production, as was previously reported by Nostar et al. [41], Hashem, and Abd Allah. [52] and Saidi Moradi et al. [53]. Promotion of plant growth by different Trichoderma species such as T. harzianum, T. longibrachiatum, T. asperellum under salt stress and R. solani infection, separately, in cucumber [54], rice [55], wheat [56], bean [43], and cotton [25] has been reported. We also found that the negative effects caused by salt stress and R. solani infection were mitigated by Trichoderma treatment. In the present study, T. citrinoviride increased the leaf dry weight of strawberry plants. Our results corroborated with the findings of Yesilyurt et al. [27] who reported that T. citrinoviride alleviates the adverse effects of salt stress in maize growth. In previous study, ameliorative effect of T. citrinoviride on maize growth under salt stress was attributed to the efficient role of Trichoderma in photosynthesis mechanism and osmolyte accumulation which is known to promote plant growth [27]. Another possible reason for improved plant growth by Trichoderma might be due to decreased ROS induced-oxidative damage in stressed plants that was also evident by lower lipid peroxidation levels.
It is known that Fv/Fm is a favorable parameter which allows detection of any damage on PSII causing photo-inhibition [57]. In our study, contrary to plants infected with R. solani (R and R + S), salt stress-treated seedlings did not show a remarkable decrease of the Fv/Fm ratio. Low Fv/Fm values in R. solani infected plants under salt stress generally might be indicative of some detrimental effects to the PSII reaction center [27,58,59]. Trichoderma treatment increased Fv/Fm ratio in NaCl-treated and R. solani-infected plants, suggesting that Trichoderma might be effective in improving photosynthetic apparatus under both abiotic and biotic stress.
Among ROS molecules, H2O2 is produced both under abiotic/biotic stresses and normal conditions. It can either be a toxic molecule causing irreversible damage to the plant cell or can be a secondary messenger regulating the antioxidative defense [60]. In the present study, we found a significant increase in H2O2 levels in response to salt stress and R. solani infection However, Trichoderma treatment reversed the accumulation of H2O2 in the R solani-infected plants under salt stress evident by a decrease in lipid peroxidation, which is an important oxidative stress marker. Therefore, we can propose that, Trichoderma treatment resulted in the improvement of cellular damage through decreased H2O2 levels. Guler et al. [59] and Shukla et al. [61] also found that Trichoderma atroviride and Trichoderma harzianum reduced H2O2 production in maize and rice roots under stress conditions.
Lipid peroxidation is an indicator of free radical-induced oxidative damage on cell membranes and expressed as TBARS content. Significant differences in lipid peroxidation levels were recorded in the leaves of stress-treated groups. Salt stress triggered lipid peroxidation, which might reflect the effect of salt stress on altering membrane lipid composition as indicated by previous studies in strawberry [48,49]. In the present study, plants infected with R. solani had the higher TBARS content, as compared to NaCl-treated plants. The highest lipid peroxidation level was determined in the R. solani- infected plants under salt stress. These results showed that strawberry plants have better performance in diminishing the effects of salt stress-induced oxidative stress, as compared to the harmful effects of R. solani-induced oxidative stress.
Trichoderma treatment resulted in a significant decrease in lipid peroxidation level in the leaves of all plants under salt stress and R. solani infection. These results suggest that T. citrinoviride can protect strawberry plants against salt and R. solani-dependent oxidative damage. This protective effect was very prominent, especially in R. solani–infected groups (R, S + R, T + S + R). These results are in a strong agreement with the results of Zhang et al. [62] who found decreased levels of lipid peroxidation in cucumber plants under salt stress treated with T. harzianum. Cell membrane stability is known to be correlated with abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. With this respect, salt-tolerance and pathogen resistance in Trichoderma treated plants might be resulted from lower TBARS accumulation, which decreased the symptoms of cellular damage.
Previous studies have shown that ther educed TBARS levels in the different Trichoderma species-pretreated seedlings might also be resulted from the elevated activities of antioxidant enzymes and the other protective molecules, the synthesis of compounds involved in eliminating the ROS molecules associated with lipid peroxidation [57,63]. Therefore, in the present study, we also determined the effect of T. citrinoviride on the activities of antioxidant enzymes in the leaves of strawberry plants under abiotic stress, biotic stress, and the combination of both stresses.
An increase in the activities of NOX, SOD, POX, and CWPOX during abiotic and biotic stress might be resulted from the induction of biosynthesis of these enzymes via the production of O2 and H2O2 [16]. Hence, these inductions can decrease the steady-state level of ROS levels in cells alleviating oxidative damage. This is reflected in a lower degree of lipid peroxidation in salt-treated plants. In contrast, the R. solani-infected groups all exhibited a greater extent of lipid peroxidation due to lack of efficient H2O2 detoxification mechanisms.
The NOX is among the main ROS sources in plant cells following the recognition of pathogens [64]. It catalyzes the formation of O2, which is then converted to H2O2 [65]. Studies on different plants species have demonstrated that plasma membrane-associated NOXs are the main enzymatic sources of apoplast H2O2 accumulation [66,67]. Several lines of evidence suggest that the plasma membrane-associated NADPH oxidase might be essential for H2O2 accumulation. The combination of NaCl stress and R. solani infection increased NOX activity and induced H2O2 accumulation. The highest rate of increment in NOX was observed in R. solani-infected plants under salt stress, which have the highest H2O2 accumulation. We can speculate that at least some of the H2O2 production induced by salt stress and R. solani infection might be originated from enhanced NOX activity. Previous studies have indicated that NOX-dependent H2O2 accumulation plays a crucial role in both defense responses against pathogens such as restriction of the area of infection in wheat [67] and mediating NaCl-induced SOS pathway in Arabidopsis [68].
SOD, POX, and CWPOX are key components of the antioxidant defense of the plants [16]. SOD, catalyzed dismutation of O2- to H2O2, is the most effective enzymatic antioxidant involved in stress tolerance. In order to reduce O2- and H2O2 damage, POX catalyzes the dismutation of H2O2 to water [16]. In this study, an increase was found in SOD activity in all strawberry plants under abiotic and biotic stress. Similarly, Keutgen and Pawelzik [69] found increased SOD activity in strawberry plants subjected to 40 and 80 mM NaCl. Similarly, SOD activity was increased also in tomato which was infected by R. solani [11]. We found decreased SOD activity in Trichoderma treated strawberry plants subjected to combined NaCl and R. solani stresses. These results are in strong conformation with the results of Yesilyurt et al. [27] who reported decreased SOD in T. citrinoviride-treated maize under salt stress. Contrary to these, in a previous study, it was found that biocontrol agents such as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens were able to induce SOD activity at a sufficient level to induce host protection [11,70].
Apart from their role in catalyzing the breakdown of H2O2, POXs have been reported to be involved in lignification and subarization processes [71]. Furthermore, POX activity has been reported to increase in different plants under salt stress and pathogen. Likewise, in this study, an increase was found in the POX activity of all Trihoderma-untreated plants under abiotic and biotic stress. The highest POX activity was observed in the plants infected with R. solani (R and S + R groups). In agreement with our results, Paranidharan et al. [72] found increased POX activities in rice in response to infection by Rhizoctonia solani. According to these results, we can speculate that increased lignin synthesis during both salt stress and pathogen infection in order to establish an apoplastic barrier and to make the cell wall less permeable to water loss might also be the case in our study [73]. On the other hand, POX activity of the all Trichoderma-treated plants under stress was lower than that of the control levels. Decreased activity of POX might reveal that T. citrinoviride might prevent or reduce lignification processes resulting from salt stress and R. solani infection. Therefore, it can reduce water loss as reported by Yesilyurt et al. [27] who reported higher RWC content in leaves of T. citrinoviride-treated maize plants under salt stress. There is an inverse relationship between growth rate and CWPOX. Several authors have shown that a reduction of growth is associated by increased CWPOX activity, which resulted in increased cell wall lignification [74,75]. Up to date, there is no information on how CWPOX activity is related to the growth responses in strawberry plants under combined salinity and pathogen infection. Accordingly, the effect of Trichoderma pretreatment on its activity is unknown. In the present study, both salt stress and R. solani infection increased CWPOX activity. This increment in CWPOX in the leaves of R. solani-infected plants strawberry could reflect the modification of mechanical properties of the cell wall, as it was also previously reported in Brassica juncea under Cd stress by Verma et al. [76]. We suggest that reduction growth in R. solani-infected plants might be attributed to increased activity of CWPOX, which led to generation of hydroxyl radicals in cell walls mediating extension growth [77]. Trichoderma treatment significantly decreased the CWPOX activity in the salt-treated, R. solani-infected and salt + R.solani-infected plants compared to Trichoderma-untreated plants. These indicated the alleviative effect of Trichoderma treatment findings on plant growth under salt stress and R. solani infection.

5. Conclusions

We conclude that Trichoderma treatment enabled a reduced infection rate of black root rot, stimulated growth and resistance to salt stress and R. solani infection in strawberry. Furthermore, Trichoderma reduced H2O2 content, which might be responsible for the protection of membrane lipids from peroxidation. Although a significant interaction between salt stress, R. solani infection and antioxidant enzyme activity was found, Trichoderma treatment tends to reduce these effects and it is plausible to propose that different mechanisms might also be acting on its mode of action. T. citrinoviride treatment may be an alternative/additional way to improve yield and production under abiotic and biotic stresses.

Author Contributions

A.H.S.C., A.G., E.E. and B.C. designed the experiment, performed the experimental assays and analyzed the data. A.H.S.C., A.G., E.E. and B.C. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. A.G., A.H.S.C., B.C. and N.C. carefully proofread the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Foyer, C.H.; Rasool, B.; Davey, J.W.; Hancock, R.D. Cross-tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in plants: A focus on resistance to aphid infestation. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 2025–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chowdhury, J.; Henderson, M.; Schweizer, P.; Burton, R.A.; Fincher, G.B.; Little, A. Differential accumulation of callose, arabinoxylan and cellulose in nonpenetrated versus penetrated papillae on leaves of barley infected with Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei. New Phytol. 2014, 204, 650–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rao, G.S.; Rao Reddy, N.N.; Surekha, C. Induction of plant systemic resistance in legumes Cajanus cajan, Vigna radiata, Vigna mungo against plant pathogens Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria alternata—A Trichoderma viride mediated reprogramming of plant defense mechanism. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 4270–4280. [Google Scholar]
  4. Nikraftar, F.; Taheri, P.; Rastegar, M.F.; Tarighi, S. Tomato partial resistance to Rhizoctonia solani involves antioxidative defense mechanisms. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 81, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Taheri, P.; Tarighi, S. The role of pathogenesis-related proteins in the tomato-Rhizoctonia solani interaction. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Asad-Uz-Zaman, M.; Bhuyian, M.R.; Khan, M.A.I.; Bhuiyan, M.K.A.; Latif, M.A. Integrated options for the management of black root rot of strawberry caused by Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. C. R. Biol. 2015, 338, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cao, L.; Qiu, Z.; You, J.; Tan, H.; Zhou, S. Isolation and characterization of endophytic Streptomyces strains from surface-sterilized tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) roots. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 39, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ogoshi, A. Ecology and pathogenicity of anastomosis and intraspecific groups of Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1987, 25, 125–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Keijer, J.; Korsman, M.G.; Dullemans, A.M.; Houterman, P.M.; De Bree, J.; Van Silfhout, C.H. In vitro analysis of host plant specificity in Rhizoctonia solani. Plant Pathol. 1997, 46, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Groth, D.E.; Bond, J.A. Initiation of rice sheath blight epidemics and effect of application timing of azoxystrobin on disease incidence, severity, yield, and milling quality. Plant Dis. 2006, 90, 1073–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Youssef, S.A.; Tartoura, K.A.; Abdelraouf, G.A. Evaluation of Trichoderma harzianum and Serratia proteamaculans effect on disease suppression, stimulation of ROS-scavenging enzymes and improving tomato growth infected by Rhizoctonia solani. Biol. Control 2016, 100, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dangi, A.K.; Sharma, B.; Khangwal, I.; Shukla, P. Combinatorial interactions of biotic and abiotic stresses in plants and their molecular mechanisms: Systems biology approach. Mol. Biotechnol. 2018, 60, 636–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nath, M.; Bhatt, D.; Prasad, R.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism and signaling in plant-mycorrhizal association under biotic and abiotic stress conditions. In Mycorrhiza-Eco-Physiology, Secondary Metabolites, Nanomaterials; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 223–232. [Google Scholar]
  14. Isayenkov, S.V. Physiological and molecular aspects of salt stress in plants. Cytol. Genet. 2012, 46, 302–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Mehla, N.; Sindhi, V.; Josula, D.; Bisht, P.; Wani, S.H. An introduction to antioxidants and their roles in plant stress tolerance. In Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidant Systems in Plants: Role and Regulation under Abiotic Stress; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2017; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  16. Foyer, C.H.; Noctor, G. Redox homeostasis and antioxidant signaling: A metabolic interface between stress perception and physiological responses. Plant Cell 2005, 17, 1866–1875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Saijo, Y.; Loo, E.P.I. Plant immunity in signal integration between biotic and abiotic stress responses. New Phytol. 2020, 225, 87–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hermosa, R.; Rubio, M.B.; Cardoza, R.E.; Nicolás, C.; Monte, E.; Gutiérrez, S. The contribution of Trichoderma to balancing the costs of plant growth and defense. Int. Microbiol. 2013, 16, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Delen, N.; Özbek, T.; Yıldırım, İ. Effectivenes of tolchlofos-methyl to Rhizoctania solani isolates. J. Turk. Phytopathol. 1991, 20, 113. [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2010; p. 850. [Google Scholar]
  21. Adnan, M.; Islam, W.; Shabbir, A.; Khan, K.A.; Ghramh, H.A.; Huang, Z.; Lu, G.D. Plant defense against fungal pathogens by antagonistic fungi with Trichoderma in focus. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 129, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kobori, N.N.; Mascarin, G.M.; Jackson, M.A.; Schisler, D.A. Liquid culture production of microsclerotia and submerged conidia by Trichoderma harzianum active against damping-off disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Fungal Biol. 2015, 119, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Tian, S.; Li, B.; Qin, G.; Xu, X. Plant host response to biocontrol agents. Acta Hortic. 2011, 905, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Chowdappa, P.; Kumar, S.M.; Lakshmi, M.J.; Upreti, K.K. Growth stimulation and induction of systemic resistance in tomato against early and late blight by Bacillus subtilis OTPB1 or Trichoderma harzianum OTPB3. Biol. Control 2013, 65, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, V.; Parkhi, V.; Kenerley, C.M.; Rathore, K.S. Defense-related gene expression and enzyme activities in transgenic cotton plants expressing an endochitinase gene from Trichoderma virens in response to interaction with Rhizoctonia solani. Planta 2009, 230, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Nawrocka, J.; Małolepsza, U.; Szymczak, K.; Szczech, M. Involvement of metabolic components, volatile compounds, PR proteins, and mechanical strengthening in multilayer protection of cucumber plants against Rhizoctonia solani activated by Trichoderma atroviride TRS25. Protoplasma 2018, 255, 359–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Yeşilyurt, A.M.; Pehlivan, N.; Durmuş, N.; Karaoğlu, S.A. Trichoderma citrinoviride: A potent biopriming agent for the alleviation of salt stress in maize. Hacet. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 46, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Galli, V.; da Silva Messias, R.; Perin, E.C.; Borowski, J.M.; Bamberg, A.L.; Rombaldi, C.V. Mild salt stress improves strawberry fruit quality. LWT 2016, 73, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Awang, Y.B.; Atherton, J.G. Growth and fruiting responses of strawberry plants grown on rockwool to shading and salinity. Sci. Hortic. 1995, 62, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pirlak, L.; Eşitken, A. Salinity effects on growth, proline and ion accumulation in strawberry plants. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B-Soil Plant Sci. 2004, 54, 189–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gams, W.; Bissett, J. Morphology and identification of Trichoderma. In Trichoderma and Gliocladium; Kubicek, C.P., Harman, G.E., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 1998; Volume 1, pp. 1–34. [Google Scholar]
  32. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal DNA for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innes, M.A., Gelfand, D.H., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  33. Rahman, M.A.; Begum, M.F.; Alam, M.F. Screening of Trichoderma isolates as a biological control agent against Ceratocystis paradoxa causing pineapple disease of sugarcane. Mycobiology 2009, 37, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Karaoglu-Alpay, S.; Bozdeveci, A.; Pehlivan, N. Characterization of Local Trichoderma spp. as potential bio-control agents, screening of in vitro antagonistic activities and fungicide tolerance. Hacet. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 46, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Madhava Rao, K.V.; Sresty, T.V.S. Antioxidative parameters in the seedlings of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan L., Millspaugh) in response to Zn and Ni stresses. Plant Sci. 2000, 157, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cheeseman, J.M. Hydrogen peroxide concentrations in leaves under natural condi-tions. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 2435–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantization of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of the protein–dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jiang, M.; Zhang, J. Involvement of plasma membrane NADPH oxidase in abscisic acid-and water stress-induced antioxidant defense in leaves of maize seedlings. Planta 2002, 215, 1022–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Beuchamp, C.; Fridovich, I. Isoenzymes of superoxide dismutase from wheat germ. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1973, 317, 50–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Herzog, V.; Fahimi, H. Determination of the activity of peroxidase. Anal. Biochem. 1973, 55, 554–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nostar, O.; Ozdemir, F.; Bor, M.; Turkan, I.; Tosun, N. Combined effects of salt stress and cucurbit downy mildew (Pseudoperospora cubensis Berk. and Curt. Rostov.) infection on growth, physiological traits and antioxidant activity in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013, 83, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Krause, M.S.; Madden, L.V.; Hoitink, H.A.J. Effect of potting mix microbial carrying capacity on biological control of Rhizoctonia damping-off of radish and Rhizoctonia crown and root rot of poinsettia. Phytopathology 2001, 91, 1116–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Mayo, S.; Gutiérre, S.; Malmierca, M.G.; Lorenzana, A.; Campelo, M.P.; Hermosa, R.; Casquero, P.A. Influence of Rhizoctonia solani and Trichoderma spp. in growth of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the induction of plant defense-related genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Elmer, W.H. Influence of chloride and nitrogen formon Rhizoctonia root and crown rot of table beets. Plant Dis. 1997, 81, 635–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Elmer, W.H.; LaMondia, J.A. Studies on the suppression of Fusarium crown and root rot with NaCl. Acta Hortic. 1999, 479, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Elmer, W.H. Influence of Inoculum Density of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cyclaminis and sodium chloride on cyclamen and the development of Fusarium Wilt. Plant Dis. 2002, 86, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Sanago, S. Response of chili pepper to Phytophthora capsici in relation to soil salinity. Plant Dis. 2004, 88, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ghaderi, N.; Hatami, M.R.; Mozafari, A.; Siosehmardeh, A. Change in antioxidant enzymes activity and some morphophysiological characteristics of strawberry under long-term salt stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2018, 24, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Samadi, S.; Habibi, G.; Vaziri, A. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on antioxidative responses, phenolic metabolism and photochemical activity of strawberry under salt stress. Iran. J. Plant Physiol. 2019, 9, 2685–2694. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wison, C.; Liu, X.; Lesch, S.M.; Suarez, D.L. Growth response of major USA cowpea cultivars II. Effect of salinity on leaf gas exchange. Plant Sci. 2006, 170, 1095–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jaiswal, A.K.; Elad, Y.; Graber, E.R.; Frenkel, O. Rhizoctonia solani suppression and plant growth promotion in cucumber as affected by biochar pyrolysis temperature, feedstock and concentration. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 69, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hashem, A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Al Huqail, A.A.; Egamberdieva, D. Alleviation of abiotic salt stress in Ochradenus baccatus (Del.) by Trichoderma hamatum (Bonord.) Bainier. J. Plant Interact. 2014, 9, 857–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saidimoradia, D.; Ghaderia, N.; Javadia, T. Salinity stress mitigation by humic acid application in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Sci. Hortic. 2019, 256, 108594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yedidia, I.; Srivastva, A.K.; Kapulnik, Y.; Chet, I. Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on microelement concentrations increased growth of cucumber plants. Plant Soil. 2001, 235, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Rawat, L.; Singh, Y.; Shukla, N.; Kumar, J. Seed biopriming with salinity tolerantisolates of Trichoderma harzianum alleviates salt stress in rice: Growth, physiological and biochemical characteristics. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 94, 353–365. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhang, S.; Xu, B.; Gan, Y. Application of Plant-Growth-Promoting Fungi Trichoderma longibrachiatum T6 enhances tolerance of wheat to salt stress through improvement of antioxidative defense system and gene expression. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ahmad, P.; Hashem, A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; John, R.; Egamberdieva, D.; Gucel, S. Role of Trichoderma harzianum in mitigating NaCl stress in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) through antioxidative defense system. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 868–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Nar, H.; Saglam, A.; Terzi, R.; Varkonyı, Z.; Kadıoğlu, A. Leaf rolling and photosystem II efficiency in Ctenanthe setosa exposed to drought stress. Photosynthetica 2009, 47, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Guler, N.S.; Pehlivan, N.; Karaoğlu, S.A.; Guzel, S.; Bozdeveci, A. Trichoderma atroviride ID20G inoculation ameliorates drought stress-induced damages by improving antioxidant defence n maize seedlings. Acta Physiol. Plant 2016, 38, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gechev, T.S.; Van Breusegem, F.; Stone, J.M.; Denev, I.; Laloi, C. Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death. Bioassays 2006, 28, 1091–1101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shukla, N.; Awasthi, R.P.; Rawat, L. Biochemical andphysiological responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) as influenced by Trichoderma harzianum under drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 54, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zhang, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, C.; Chen, F.; Ge, H.; Tian, F.; Yang, T.; Ma, K.; Zhang, Y. Trichoderma harzianum mitigates salt stress in cucumber via multiple responses. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Parida, A.K.; Das, A.B. Salt tolerance and salinity effect on plants: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2005, 60, 324–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Torres, M.A.; Dangl, J.L. Functions of the respiratory burst oxidase in biotic interactions, abiotic stress and development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2005, 8, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Foreman, J.; Demidchik, V.; Bothwell, J.H.F.; Mylona, P.; Miedema, H.; Torres, M.A.; Linstead, P.; Costa, S.; Brownlee, C.; Jones, J.D.G.; et al. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth, Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. Nature 2003, 422, 442–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, J.; Shabala, S.; Zhang, J.; Ma, G.; Chen, D.; Shabala, L.; Zeng, F.; Chen, Z.H.; Zhou, M.; Venkataraman, G. Melatonin improves rice salinity stress tolerance by NADPH oxidase-dependent control of the plasma membrane K+ transporters and K+ homeostasis. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2591–2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Pazarlar, S.; Cetinkaya, N.; Bor, M.; Ozdemir, F. Ozone triggers different defence mechanisms against powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis DC. Speer f. sp. tritici) in susceptible and resistant wheat genotypes. Funct. Plant Biol. 2017, 44, 1016–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Chung, J.S.; Zhu, J.K.; Bressan, R.A.; Hasegawa, P.M.; Shi, H. Reactive oxygen species mediate Na+-induced SOS1 mRNA stability in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008, 53, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Keutgen, A.J.; Pawelzik, E. Impacts of NaCl stress on plant growth and mineral nutrient assimilation in two cultivars of strawberry. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2009, 65, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, Y.; Gu, Y.; Li, J.; Xu, M.; Wei, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wei, Q.; Wang, Y. Biocontrol agent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LJ02 induces systemic resistance against cucurbits powdery mildew. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  71. Jbir, N.; Chaibi, W.; Ammar, S.; Jemmali, A.; Ayadi, A. Root growth and lignification of two wheat species differing in their sensitivity to NaCl, in response to salt stress. CR Acad. Sci. Paris 2001, 324, 863–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Paranidharan, V.; Palaniswami, A.; Vidhyasekaran, P.; Velazhahan, R. Induction of enzymatic scavengers of active oxygen species in rice in response to infection by Rhizoctonia solani. Acta Physiol. Plant 2003, 25, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Li, L.; Pan, S.; Melzer, R.; Fricke, W. Apoplastic barriers, aquaporin gene expression and root and cell hydraulic conductivity in phosphate-limited sheepgrass plants. Physiol. Plant 2020, 168, 118–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lin, C.C.; Kao, C.H. NaCl induced changes in ionically bound peroxidase activity in roots of rice seedlings. Plant Soil 1999, 216, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chen, L.M.; Lin, C.C.; Kao, C.H. Copper toxicity in rice seedlings: Changes in antioxidative enzyme activities, H2O2 level, and cell wall peroxidase activity in roots. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 2000, 41, 99–103. [Google Scholar]
  76. Verma, K.; Shekhawat, G.S.; Sharma, A.; Mehta, S.K.; Sharma, V. Cadmium induced oxidative stress and changes in soluble and ionically bound cell wall peroxidase activities in roots of seedling and 3–4 leaf stage plants of Brassica juncea (L.) czern. Plant Cell Rep. 2008, 27, 1261–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Liszkay, A.; Kenk, B.; Schopher, P. Evidence for the involvement of cell wall peroxidase in the generation of hydroxyl radicals mediating extension growth. Planta 2003, 217, 658–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) Control plate with R. solani (B) Effect of T. citrinoviride suppressing R. solani growth (C) Growth of T. citrinoviride under 40 mM NaCl stress.
Figure 1. (A) Control plate with R. solani (B) Effect of T. citrinoviride suppressing R. solani growth (C) Growth of T. citrinoviride under 40 mM NaCl stress.
Agronomy 11 01589 g001
Figure 2. The effect of T. citrinoviride on severity of disease in strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). R, R. solani infected; S + R, NaCl + R. solani; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride +NaCl + R. solani.
Figure 2. The effect of T. citrinoviride on severity of disease in strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). R, R. solani infected; S + R, NaCl + R. solani; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride +NaCl + R. solani.
Agronomy 11 01589 g002
Figure 3. The effect of T. citrinoviride on leaf dry weight of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments ((p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Figure 3. The effect of T. citrinoviride on leaf dry weight of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicate significant differences between the treatments ((p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Agronomy 11 01589 g003
Figure 4. The effect of T. citrinoviride on Fv/Fm (PSII efficiency) in the leaves of strawberry which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Figure 4. The effect of T. citrinoviride on Fv/Fm (PSII efficiency) in the leaves of strawberry which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Agronomy 11 01589 g004
Figure 5. The effect of T. citrinoviride on H2O2 content in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Figure 5. The effect of T. citrinoviride on H2O2 content in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Agronomy 11 01589 g005
Figure 6. The effect of T. citrinoviride on TBARS content in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Figure 6. The effect of T. citrinoviride on TBARS content in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Agronomy 11 01589 g006
Figure 7. The effect of T. citrinoviride on NOX activity in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Figure 7. The effect of T. citrinoviride on NOX activity in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Agronomy 11 01589 g007
Figure 8. The effect of T. citrinoviride on SOD (A), POX (B) and CWPOX (C) activities in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Figure 8. The effect of T. citrinoviride on SOD (A), POX (B) and CWPOX (C) activities in the leaves of strawberry plants which were subjected to abiotic stress (40 mM NaCl) and biotic stress (R. solani) either separately or in combination. Different letters indicates significant differences between treatments (p < 0.05). C, control; S, NaCl-treated; R, R. solani-infected; S + R, Salt stress + R. solani; T, T. citrinoviride-treated; T + S, T. citrinoviride + NaCl; T + R, T. citrinoviride + R. solani; T + S + R, T. citrinoviride+ NaCl + R. solani.
Agronomy 11 01589 g008
Table 1. Results of multiple comparisons by ANOVA for Trichoderma (T), Salt (S), Rhizoctonia (R), control (C) and their interactions for dry weight, Fv/Fm, H2O2, TBARS, NOX, SOD, POX, CWPOX values. Multivariate analysis through general linear model (GLM) was performed using the LDS test considering F values at 95% confidence level (***: p < 0.001, **: p < 0.01, *: p < 0.05, ns: non-significant).
Table 1. Results of multiple comparisons by ANOVA for Trichoderma (T), Salt (S), Rhizoctonia (R), control (C) and their interactions for dry weight, Fv/Fm, H2O2, TBARS, NOX, SOD, POX, CWPOX values. Multivariate analysis through general linear model (GLM) was performed using the LDS test considering F values at 95% confidence level (***: p < 0.001, **: p < 0.01, *: p < 0.05, ns: non-significant).
Dependent VariablesIndependent Variables
TT + ST + RT + S + R
CT + S + RSRS + R
Dry weight7.807 ***0.677 *5.303 *10.361 **10.361 **
Fv/Fm1.193 *1.958 *5.423 *17.999 **17.999 **
H2O20.912 *96.136 **8.432 **1.518 *1.518 *
TBARS0.129 ns5.666 *2.153 *1.008 *1.008 *
NOX0.319 ns1.469 *1.224 *1.304 *1.304 *
SOD0.033 ns1.130 *0.927 *0.075 ns0.075 ns
POX25.056 **0.547 *0.587 *2.134 **2.134 **
CWPOX2.618 *21.837 **1.227 *3.515 *3.515 *
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sekmen Cetinel, A.H.; Gokce, A.; Erdik, E.; Cetinel, B.; Cetinkaya, N. The Effect of Trichoderma citrinoviride Treatment under Salinity Combined to Rhizoctonia solani Infection in Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Agronomy 2021, 11, 1589. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy11081589

AMA Style

Sekmen Cetinel AH, Gokce A, Erdik E, Cetinel B, Cetinkaya N. The Effect of Trichoderma citrinoviride Treatment under Salinity Combined to Rhizoctonia solani Infection in Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Agronomy. 2021; 11(8):1589. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy11081589

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sekmen Cetinel, Askim Hediye, Azime Gokce, Erhan Erdik, Barbaros Cetinel, and Nedim Cetinkaya. 2021. "The Effect of Trichoderma citrinoviride Treatment under Salinity Combined to Rhizoctonia solani Infection in Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)" Agronomy 11, no. 8: 1589. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agronomy11081589

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop