Next Article in Journal
Heat-Killed Lactobacilli Preparations Promote Healing in the Experimental Cutaneous Wounds
Next Article in Special Issue
Vardenafil Activity in Lung Fibrosis and In Vitro Synergy with Nintedanib
Previous Article in Journal
The Interface between Cell Signaling Pathways and Pregnane X Receptor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deleterious Role of Th9 Cells in Pulmonary Fibrosis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Treatable Traits in Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Comprehensive Review

1
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore
2
Division of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore 119228, Singapore
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Co-first authors, these authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 10 October 2021 / Revised: 7 November 2021 / Accepted: 20 November 2021 / Published: 22 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Pulmonary Fibrosis and Cell Therapy)

Abstract

:
Chronic respiratory diseases are major contributors to the global burden of disease. While understanding of these diseases has improved, treatment guidelines have continued to rely on severity and exacerbation-based approaches. A new personalised approach, termed the “treatable traits” approach, has been suggested to address the limitations of the existing treatment strategies. We aim to systematically review the current evidence regarding treatable traits in chronic respiratory diseases and to identify gaps in the current literature. We searched the PubMed and Embase databases and included studies on treatable traits and chronic respiratory diseases. We then extracted information on prevalence, prognostic implications, treatment options and benefits from these studies. A total of 58 papers was included for review. The traits identified were grouped into five broad themes: physiological, biochemical, psychosocial, microbiological, and comorbidity traits. Studies have shown advantages of the treatable traits paradigm in the clinical setting. However, few randomised controlled trials have been conducted. Findings from our review suggest that multidisciplinary management with therapies targeted at treatable traits has the potential to be efficacious when added to the best practices currently implemented. This paradigm has the potential to improve the holistic care of chronic respiratory diseases.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Chronic respiratory diseases are pathologies of the airways and respiratory tract, for example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and bronchiectasis. While new developments in our understanding of these diseases have been documented widely in literature, general principles of treatment proposed by various guidelines have remained consistent over the years, relying on severity and exacerbation-based approaches. While these approaches are largely effective in chronic-disease control, it is recognised that patients with heterogenous diseases consisting of multiple phenotypes, like asthma, do not respond equally to the same type of treatment and have differing risks of exacerbation and prognosis [1]. Hence, a relatively recent treatment strategy proposed to tackle these limitations is a “treatable traits” approach.
The “treatable traits” approach involves treating specific traits possessed by patients, defined by specific trait markers, which are subsequently targeted by specific therapies. This differs from the current broad, stepwise treatment of the disease entity, such as the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines, which has been shown to be limited in its ability to predict exacerbations when used by itself [1]. Recent literature on asthma has shown that multidimensional assessment incorporating treatable traits has the potential to improve care and provide more individualised therapy, allowing management principles to be tailored to each patient’s characteristics or traits [2].
With an increasing number of studies on the treatable traits paradigm reporting its potential benefits, it is important to synthesise the results to help with its clinical applicability. Therefore, we aim to review current literature on the concept of treatable traits, delineate the information available on treatable traits and the prevalence of these traits among various subgroups, and identify treatment and prognostic implications of treating these traits. Through this review, we also sought to identify gaps in the current literature and to provide ideas for further research.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

This study has been registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021250992) and was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Two authors (Y.Q.L., A.S.) independently and systematically searched PubMed and Embase for all relevant articles published from inception to 24 October 2020 using the search term “treatable AND trait*”, with the data supplemented by reference-list checks. Studies regarding treatable traits in chronic respiratory diseases were shortlisted, and conference abstracts and review papers were included only if they contained new data not found elsewhere. Non-English papers, papers on acute respiratory diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome, and papers with irrelevant topics were excluded from this review. Disagreements between Y.Q.L. and A.S. were discussed with a third author (K.C.S.).

2.2. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Data on the following were extracted: author, publication date, study type, country, chronic respiratory disease studied, treatable traits, trait-identification marker, prevalence of trait, treatment description, treatment benefits and implications, and prognostic implications. The included studies were independently assessed by 2 authors (Y.Q.L., A.S.) for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS). Disagreements between Y.Q.L. and A.S. were discussed with a third author (K.C.S.). Qualitative synthesis of the studies was conducted.

3. Results

A total of 58 studies was included in this systematic review (flow diagram, Figure 1), and quality assessment was performed using the NOS (Table 1). Treatable traits findings from the included studies were grouped into five main themes: physiological traits, biochemical traits, psychosocial traits, microbiological traits, and comorbidity traits.

3.1. Physiological Traits

For physiological treatable traits (Table 2), these were studied mostly in the setting of asthma, COPD, and bronchiectasis. These studies described traits including airflow limitation, hypoxemia/hypercapnia, lung hyperinflation, and ciliary dysfunction.
The most prominent physiological trait is airflow limitation, being the most common trait in asthma and COPD. The average prevalence was 52.5% in asthma [5,18,49], with the prevalence varying from 45.5–54.5% between studies [5,18,49]. As defined by a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in the first second < 80% predicted, the prevalence in COPD was the highest, at 88.9% [18]. Airflow limitation has prognostic implications on asthma, leading to worsened severity of symptoms and increased exacerbations and healthcare utilisation [1]. Treatment of airflow limitation in asthma with long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) and bronchial thermoplasty have been shown to decrease exacerbations, improve lung function, and improve disease control [3,19,39], while short-acting anticholinergics and magnesium were found to decrease hospital admissions [1]. Similar treatments with LAMA, long-acting beta-agonists (LABA), inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), and pulmonary rehabilitation have been proposed to treat airflow limitation in COPD [18,42]. Airflow limitation was also described in bronchiectasis, with inhaled saline and airway clearance being the suggested treatment and with an ongoing trial on epithelial sodium channel inhibition [47].
Lung hyperinflation was also a trait targeted in the management of COPD patients, with endobronchial valves and bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation showing improved lung function and quality of life [56]. However, prevalence results of lung hyperinflation were not detailed in any of the studies.

3.2. Biochemical Traits

Type-2 inflammation is widely documented as a treatable trait in chronic airway diseases like asthma and COPD (Table 3), with a prevalence of 42.0% in asthma patients [49]. Type-2 inflammation is characterised by T2-high expression, such as IL-13 induced genes or high eosinophil count. Chung et al. [59] reported that asthma patients with type-2 inflammation were predisposed to corticosteroid insensitivity and may be dependent on oral corticosteroids in severe cases. Treatment options include bronchodilators containing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), which have been shown to be effective for asthma. ICS-LABA and ICS-LABA-LAMA combinations have similarly been effective for patients with COPD [42]. Anti-T2 biologics have also been shown to significantly reduce the risk of severe asthma exacerbation and improve lung function and quality of life of patients [59].
Specifically, eosinophilia is one of the most prominent biochemical traits studied, with its prevalence ranging from 51.4% to 56.4% in asthma and 22.2% to 60.1% in COPD [18,29,36]. Eosinophil levels can be measured using blood or sputum eosinophils, and high eosinophil levels are associated with increased risk of exacerbations in both asthma and COPD. In particular for asthma, Feng et al. [10] showed that patients with exacerbation-prone asthma had increased blood eosinophil and reduced lung function at baseline. Treatment for asthma and COPD patients with eosinophilia involves corticosteroid usage, which has been shown to be beneficial in acute exacerbations and to improve FEV1 of patients. Among patients with eosinophilia, monoclonal antibodies, such as anti-IL5, have also been reported to reduce exacerbations in COPD [29]. Specifically for asthma, omalizumab has been shown to significantly reduce both eosinophilia and exacerbations, with improved lung function and quality of life [45].
Neutrophil-related inflammation was also prominent in patients with asthma, bronchiectasis, and COPD, and it is identified by high sputum neutrophil counts [18]. It was associated with increased exacerbation risk for each of the above conditions [30], and high sputum neutrophil counts predicted more rapid decline in FEV1 in patients with bronchiectasis. Macrolides were shown to reduce exacerbations in asthma and COPD, while smoking cessation was additionally recommended for asthma patients. Neutrophil elastase inhibitors were also shown to improve lung function and quality of life for patients with bronchiectasis [4].
As for environmental exposure in united airway diseases identified by immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels and skin-prick tests, proposed treatment options included exposure avoidance, respiratory protection devices, and anti-IgE therapy [57]. However, data on the prevalence of these traits were lacking, and studies evaluating the clinical benefits of the proposed treatment strategies were not available either.

3.3. Psychosocial Traits

Two main psychosocial traits identified were treatment adherence/technique and smoking history (Table 4). These two treatable traits were identified across papers studying asthma, COPD, and chronic airway diseases in general. Suboptimal adherence to asthma treatment, as well as poor inhaler technique, was found to be present in 26.9–61.8% of patients [5,18], with a mean of 44.0%. McDonald et al. [30] also found that inhaler-device polypharmacy was more prevalent in severe asthma patients as compared to non-severe asthma patients, and polypharmacy was one of the best predictors of asthma exacerbation risk among 23 other traits. Education and medication reconciliation are the main treatment options, targeting inhaler technique, self-management action plans, and minimising the number of inhaler devices [18].
Smoking was prevalent among patients with chronic respiratory diseases, with a mean prevalence of 14.3% in asthma and 19.4% in COPD [18]. Smoking status was usually assessed through interview or the use of exhaled carbon monoxide and was shown to be a significant risk factor for exacerbation in chronic airway diseases [31]. Smoking cessation was shown to reduce lung-function decline and risk of recurrent exacerbations, highlighting the importance of opportunistic implementation of smoking cessation strategies during acute exacerbations [31]. Management options include counselling with pharmacologic adjuncts, such as nicotine replacement therapy, varenicline, and bupropion [18,31,42].
Low socioeconomic status and poor family support in chronic airway disease were also associated with increased symptomatic deterioration and exacerbations, with social support services proposed as a possible treatment option [31].

3.4. Microbiological Traits

Microbiological treatable traits were mostly found in asthma, bronchiectasis, COPD, and united (combined upper and lower) airway diseases (Table 5). The most prevalent trait was chronic respiratory infection in both asthma and COPD, with an average prevalence of 45.0% and a prevalence range of 34.8–47.3% among the studies on asthma [18,21,49]. Various treatment options, such as antibiotics, mucolytics, roflumilast, education, and inhaled interferon-β treatment, were suggested [1,5,18]. However, evidence was lacking regarding their efficacy. In patients with COPD, chronic respiratory infection was present in 55.6% of the patients [18], with prognostic implications on their quality of life and dyspnoea severity [28]. Macrolides have been shown to decrease hospital admissions resulting from exacerbations, but their usage must be balanced against the risk of colonisation with macrolide-resistant organisms [28].
Another prominent microbiological trait is microbial colonisation, present in an average of 18.9% of asthmatics, with a range varying from 12.7 to 55.6% [5,18]. Microbial colonisation was present in an average of 44.8% of COPD patients, with prevalence ranging from 38.9 to 45% [18,27]. This is a separate trait from infection, as colonisation refers to the presence of organisms, while infection refers to the presence of signs and symptoms due to these organisms. Microbial colonisation nonetheless had prognostic significance, demonstrated particularly in COPD patients, with implications on quality of life and increment in dyspnoea [27]. Treatment options for this trait in patients with asthma include education and antibiotic-based written action plans (e.g., using macrolides) [18,19]. However, information regarding treatment options for this trait was inadequate in COPD. Interestingly, patients with microbial colonisation had lower mortality for exacerbations associated with viral infections compared to bacterial infections, though the clinical significance of this is uncertain [27].

3.5. Comorbidity Traits

Impaired physical function is a comorbidity seen in almost all chronic respiratory conditions, with a prevalence of 36.1% in COPD and 10.9% in asthma [18]. Impaired physical function can present in different forms, such as low appendicular skeletal muscle mass, limitations in mobility, and low muscle strength and has been shown to be an independent predictor of hospital admission and mortality in COPD. Patients with lower 6 min walking distance were also reported to have higher readmission risk [31]. Various management measures targeted at physical function can be implemented. For instance, Hiles et al. [18] recommended a high-protein diet, strength training, and regular pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with low appendicular skeletal muscle mass.
Another prevalent comorbidity trait is the presence of psychiatric conditions, particularly depression and anxiety in asthma and COPD. Among asthma and COPD patients, anxiety was found in 40% and 27.8%, respectively, while depression was found in 30.9% and 27.8%, respectively [18]. These psychiatric conditions were identified through questionnaires, such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale [18,28]. A study by Matsunaga et al. [28] suggested that psychiatric comorbidities resulted in poorer quality of life, poorer adherence to treatment plans, increased exacerbations, increased hospitalisation, and increased healthcare cost. Treatments included counselling, cognitive behavioural therapy, and paroxetine [18,28].
Nutrition (underweight) is another common comorbidity, with a prevalence of 52.8% in COPD [18] and 38.1% in asthma, with a range of 35.1–58.2% [18]. These traits had similar prognostic implications, with decreased quality of life, increased severity of symptoms, and increased exacerbations [28,30,39,51]. Treatments to normalise body mass index, such as supplementation and weight loss, have also been shown to decrease asthma severity [39]. However, treatment benefits for COPD were not described in the literature.
Some of the other comorbidity traits with high prevalence include systemic inflammation, which was present in 56.4% of asthmatics and 63.9% of COPD patients, and sleep disorders, with a prevalence of 60.0% and 30.6% in patients with asthma and COPD, respectively [18]. For the mitigation of systemic inflammation, McDonald et al. showed that statin therapy improved C-reactive protein levels in COPD patients [2]. Separately, positive airway pressure has been shown to reduce overall mortality and exacerbation risk in COPD patients with sleep disorders, though its efficacy may be limited by patient adherence [28].

4. Discussion

In this review of 58 papers, our main findings include the identification of various treatable traits that can be broadly grouped into five themes: physiological, biochemical, psychosocial, microbiological, and comorbidity traits. Specific trait markers were identified for each trait, along with suggested treatment options, benefits and implications of these treatments, and the prognostic implications of the traits. The existence of multiple treatable traits in patients with chronic respiratory diseases suggests that adopting a holistic “treatable traits” approach would benefit clinical care and potentially improve outcomes.
Current literature on the treatable traits paradigm broadly categorises traits into three domains: pulmonary, extrapulmonary, and behavioural [60]. While this approach may be considered broader and more practical, the five-thematic-traits approach proposed in this paper provides a more structured and comprehensive categorisation of treatable traits. Traits of similar pathophysiology are grouped together, along with their therapeutic options, which can help organise treatment plans in the clinical setting for individualised care. The five-theme approach also helps to identify and classify traits that do not fit under the original three domains, allowing these traits to be addressed and considered as part of personalised medicine for patients.
Previous studies have been conducted for specific respiratory conditions, such as asthma and COPD, proving the effectiveness of the treatable-traits algorithm in each of the diseases. This review serves to provide a broad overview of literature regarding treatable traits across chronic respiratory conditions in order to highlight the role and potential of this paradigm on a broader scale. The review also aims to delineate the various gaps in the spectrum of conditions covered to facilitate future research.

4.1. Clinical Implications

Certain specific traits can be identified in patients with chronic respiratory diseases, and treating these traits provides benefits. The identification markers of these traits and their treatment were also generally uniform across different diseases, facilitating the formulation of standardised management plans. The treatable traits approach can be organised according to our five identified themes, which can be incorporated into future guidelines for various chronic respiratory diseases.

4.2. Clinical Evidence for the Treatable Traits Paradigm

A randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted by McDonald et al. [2], comparing management plans targeting pre-defined treatable traits against the current standard of care for severe asthma, where the intervention group reported improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and reduced exacerbations. Similar findings were found in a study on COPD, where the intervention group achieved significant quality-of-life improvement [61]. While there have been limited RCTs investigating the clinical utility of treatable traits, trials conducted have uniformly reported the benefits of treatable traits in the clinical setting.
As reported in the RCT on severe asthma, medication review led to improved lung function, and breath retraining improved respiratory symptoms [2]. The study also suggested that more emphasis should be placed beyond biomarkers; genetic, phenotypic, and psychosocial traits should also be looked into as part of a holistic management approach. In asthmatic patients, a multidimensional intervention has been shown to have a compounded effect on the HRQoL, demonstrating the potential benefits of a treatable-traits algorithm [2].
Another notable study by Hiles et al. [18] recognised the lack of feasibility in conducting RCTs. This study instead used a Bayesian model-averaging technique on data from two trials, identified traits that were prevalent and had the most significant impact on quality of life, and proposed treatment options to target these traits. Another study that used a similar Bayesian technique was by McDonald et al. [30], studying patients identified from an asthma registry for 24 months to draw comparisons between traits and exacerbation risks.

4.3. Gaps in the Current Literature

A treatable trait can be defined as a therapeutic target identified by phenotypes or endotypes through a validated biomarker [31]. However, in our data-collection process, it was noted that some studies used the term ‘treatable traits’ without indicating a clear trait-identification marker or specific therapeutics. Future studies on treatable traits should take into account the definition of treatable traits and include a specific set of trait markers, as well as specific therapeutic measures.
We also note that there was a lack of RCT evidence for treatable traits, and statistics regarding prevalence, treatment efficacy, and prognostic utility were also limited. Future studies, especially RCTs, will be useful to help evaluate the benefits and downsides of the treatable traits approach. Studies on prevalence and prognostic information of treatable traits will also be useful, as traits which are more prevalent or have greater impact on health can be prioritised, for which further studies can be done to explore and improve the management of these specific traits.
Despite its potential in delivering personalised care to patients, further studies have to be conducted to improve the clinical applicability and utility of the treatable-traits algorithm. Different traits with distinct trait-identification markers and therapeutic options can have overlapping pathways in their pathophysiology. Treating each trait with its individual therapeutic options may inadvertently lead to excessive treatments being implemented. One such instance is the relationship between neutrophilic inflammation and smoking, which are currently considered to be distinct traits in existing literature. However, smoking can also be a causative factor for neutrophilic inflammation. Current literature proposes macrolides as a targeted therapy for neutrophilic inflammation in asthma, in addition to smoking cessation. Given the overlap in pathophysiological pathways of the traits, smoking cessation in itself could possibly address both traits, hence avoiding unnecessary treatment [39]. In addition to the thematic approach, which facilitates the use of a common therapeutic agent to target multiple related traits, further research can be conducted to evaluate and integrate traits that can be targeted by common therapeutics.

4.4. Future Directions for Research

One future direction for research would be to conduct RCTs, given the lack of RCTs supporting a treatable traits approach. Studying the effectiveness of the treatable traits approach against the current stepwise approach would provide a more conclusive picture of whether there are any advantages conferred over the current approach. As an extension to efficacy trials, real-world effectiveness trials in both primary- and specialist-care settings can be conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness and feasibility of adopting a treatable traits approach. Given that prevalence data from the existing literature are limited, another possible area of research would be to conduct population-based surveys of treatable traits, as these can help direct efforts to tackle the more prevalent traits.

4.5. Strengths and Limitations

We have performed a systematic review addressing treatable traits across chronic respiratory diseases, providing a broad overview of current evidence. With inclusion criteria inclusive of all chronic respiratory conditions and a large number of papers reviewed, it provides comprehensive prevalence statistics across conditions and traits and brings new insights into the utility of treatable traits in the clinical setting. In particular, we found that even though a particular treatable trait (e.g., eosinophilia) can be found in different conditions, its treatment remains similar.
However, this review has certain limitations. Only English-language studies were included. Further work can be done in the future that assesses more databases on top of PubMed and Embase and included non-English papers in a review.
One trait not included in this paper that has proven clinical evidence in chronic respiratory diseases would be vaccination status, including pneumococcal, influenza, and COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccination status has been widely shown to improve the clinical status of COPD patients, and it could potentially be an important trait classified under microbiological traits [62]. However, further studies are probably unnecessary, given the great importance of vaccination in overall health, beyond respiratory health in individuals [63].

5. Conclusions

The treatable traits paradigm has been shown to be a promising model in our efforts to improve care in chronic airway diseases, which are often complex and heterogenous in nature. With therapy tailored to the presence of treatable traits in each patient, greater personalisation of healthcare may be possible. Current literature suggests that a multidisciplinary approach with targeted therapies has the potential to be efficacious compared to the best practices currently implemented. Further studies exploring this novel approach will help assess its effectiveness in the real world, with the potential to significantly improve management of chronic airway diseases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, Y.Q.L., A.S. and K.C.S.; methodology, Y.Q.L., A.S. and K.C.S.; validation, Y.Q.L., A.S. and K.C.S.; formal analysis, Y.Q.L., A.S. and K.C.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.Q.L., A.S. and K.C.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.Q.L., A.S. and K.C.S.; visualisation, Y.Q.L. and A.S.; supervision, K.C.S.; project administration, K.C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Martin, M.J.; Beasley, R.; Harrison, T.W. Towards a personalised treatment approach for asthma attacks. Thorax 2020, 75, 1119–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. McDonald, V.M.; Clark, V.L.; Cordova-Rivera, L.; Wark, P.A.B.; Baines, K.J.; Gibson, P.G. Targeting treatable traits in severe asthma: A randomised controlled trial. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 55, 1901509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cazzola, M.; Rogliani, P.; Matera, M.G. The latest on the role of LAMAs in asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 146, 1288–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chalmers, J.D.; Chotirmall, S.H. Bronchiectasis: New therapies and new perspectives. Lancet Respir. Med. 2018, 6, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Connolly, C.; Borg, C.; Gittins, A.; Shrimanker, R.; Hynes, G.; Hinks, T.; Pavord, I. P46 Treatable traits in a severe asthma cohort. Thorax 2018, 73, A123–A124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cottee, A.M.; Seccombe, L.M.; Thamrin, C.; King, G.G.; Peters, M.J.; Farah, C.S. Bronchodilator Response Assessed by the Forced Oscillation Technique Identifies Poor Asthma Control with Greater Sensitivity Than Spirometry. Chest 2020, 157, 1435–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Dean, K.; Niven, R. Asthma Phenotypes and Endotypes: Implications for Personalised Therapy. BioDrugs 2017, 31, 393–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Denton, E.; Bondarenko, J.; Tay, T.; Lee, J.; Radhakrishna, N.; Hore-Lacy, F.; Martin, C.; Hoy, R.; O’Hehir, R.; Dabscheck, E.; et al. Factors Associated with Dysfunctional Breathing in Patients with Difficult to Treat Asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2019, 7, 1471–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Descazeaux, M.; Brouquières, D.; Didier, A.; Lescouzères, M.; Napoléon, M.-F.; Escamilla, R.; Guilleminault, L. Obesity Predicts Treatment Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Chronic Cough. Lung 2020, 198, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Feng, M.; Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.P.; Wang, G. Clinical and inflammatory features of exacerbations-prone asthma in Chinese population: A cross-sectional study. Respirology 2019, 24, 273–274. [Google Scholar]
  11. Fingleton, J.; Williams, M.; Travers, J.; Weatherall, M.; Beasley, R. Prevalence of different treatable traits in symptomatic airways disease. Respirology 2018, 23, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Freitas, P.D.; Xavier, R.F.; McDonald, V.M.; Gibson, P.G.; Cordova-Rivera, L.; Furlanetto, K.C.; de Oliveira, J.M.; Carvalho-Pinto, R.M.; Cukier, A.; Stelmach, R.; et al. Identification of asthma phenotypes based on extrapulmonary treatable traits. Eur. Respir. J. 2021, 57, 2000240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Garudadri, S.; Woodruff, P.G. Targeting Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phenotypes, Endotypes, and Biomarkers. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2018, 15, S234–S238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gonçalves, I.; Guimarães, M.J.; van Zeller, M.; Menezes, F.; Moita, J.; Simão, P. Clinical and molecular markers in COPD. Pulmonology 2018, 24, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Heffler, E.; Malvezzi, L.; Pirola, F.; Zięba, N.; Paoletti, G.; Mercante, G.; Spriano, G.; Canonica, G.W. Treatable traits in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2019, 19, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Higham, A.; Dungwa, J.; Jackson, N.; Cunoosamy, D.; Singh, D. Characterisation of the bronchial epithelium in COPD frequent exacerbators. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, PA5226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hiles, S.; Gibson, P.; McDonald, V. Treatable traits predict health status and treatment response in airways disease. Respirology 2019, 24, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hiles, S.A.; Gibson, P.G.; Agusti, A.; McDonald, V.M. Treatable Traits That Predict Health Status and Treatment Response in Airway Disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2020, 9, 1255–1264.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hinks, T.S.; Levine, S.J.; Brusselle, G.G. Treatment options in type-2 low asthma. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 57, 2000528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Honkoop, P.; Boer, S.; Loijmans, R.; Snoeck-Stroband, J.; Assendelft, W.; Schermer, T.; Sont, J. Personalised FeNO-driven asthma management in Primary Care. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, OA5152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jabeen, M.; Street, T.; Foster, D.; Hood, D.; Sanderson, N.; Pavord, I.; Klenerman, P.; Hinks, T. Application of modern molecular microbiological techniques to identify treatable chronic bacterial airway infection in severe asthma. Thorax 2018, 73, A19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Koblizek, V.; Novotna, B.; Zatloukal, J.; Volakova, E.; Svoboda, M.; Popelkova, P.; Plutinsky, M.; Brat, K.; Musilova, P.; Lnenicka, J.; et al. United airway: Upper and lower respiratory symptoms of COPD patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, PA3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kolmert, J.; Gómez, C.; Lefaudeux, D.; De Meulder, B.; Pandis, I.; Djukanovic, R.; Sterk, P.; Adcook, I.; Dahlén, B.; Dahlén, S.E.; et al. Baseline and longitudinal urinary eicosanoid profiles for molecular sub-phenotyping in the U-BIOPRED study. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, OA3805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kuo, C.R.; Spears, M.; Haughney, J.; Smith, A.; Miller, J.; Bradshaw, T.; Murray, L.; Williamson, P.; Lipworth, B. Scottish consensus statement on the role of FeNO in adult asthma. Respir. Med. 2019, 155, 54–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Lee, J.-H.; An, J.; Won, H.-K.; Kang, Y.; Kwon, H.S.; Kim, T.B.; Cho, Y.S.; Moon, H.B.; Song, W.J.; Hull, J.H. Prevalence and impact of comorbid laryngeal dysfunction in asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2020, 145, 1165–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, L. Reduced bronchodilator reversibility correlates with severe asthma and more exacerbations: A prospective 12-month cohort study in a real-world setting. Respirology 2019, 24, 274–276. [Google Scholar]
  27. Mathioudakis, A.G.; Janssens, W.; Sivapalan, P.; Singanayagam, A.; Dransfield, M.T.; Jensen, J.S.; Vestbo, J. Acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: In search of diagnostic biomarkers and treatable traits. Thorax 2020, 75, 520–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Matsunaga, K.; Harada, M.; Suizu, J.; Oishi, K.; Asami-Noyama, M.; Hirano, T. Comorbid Conditions in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Potential Therapeutic Targets for Unmet Needs. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Matthes, S.; Stadler, J.; Barton, J.; Leuschner, G.; Munker, D.; Arnold, P.; Villena-Hermoza, H.; Frankenberger, M.; Probst, P.; Koch, A.; et al. Asthma features in severe COPD: Identifying treatable traits. Respir. Med. 2018, 145, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. McDonald, V.M.; Hiles, S.; Godbout, K.; Harvey, E.S.; Marks, G.B.; Hew, M.; Peters, M.; Bardin, P.G.; Reynolds, P.N.; Upham, J.; et al. Treatable traits can be identified in a severe asthma registry and predict future exacerbations. Respirology 2019, 24, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. McDonald, V.M.; Osadnik, C.R.; Gibson, P.G. Treatable traits in acute exacerbations of chronic airway diseases. Chronic Respir. Dis. 2019, 16, 1479973119867954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Milne, S.; Mannino, D.; Sin, D.D. Asthma-COPD Overlap and Chronic Airflow Obstruction: Definitions, Management, and Unanswered Questions. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pr. 2020, 8, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Milne, S.; Sin, D.D. Vitamin D Deficiency in COPD: Biomarker, Treatable Trait, or Just a Common Comorbidity? Chest 2020, 157, 755–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mohammed, S.; Steer, J.; Ellis, J.; Kellett, L.; Kurji-Smith, N.; Parker, S.M. Non-pharmacological cough suppression therapy for cough associated with underlying lung disease. Thorax 2018, 73, A98–A99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Müllerová, H.; Galkin, D.; Albers, F.C.; Landis, S.H.; Meeraus, W.H. Characteristics and outcomes of COPD patients with blood eosinophils ≥150 cells/μL who continue to exacerbate whilst treated with multiple inhaler triple therapy. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, A3137. [Google Scholar]
  36. Müllerová, H.; Simard, E.; Mu, G.; Hahn, B. Identifying populations with severe COPD and eosinophil counts ≥150 cells/μL. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2018, 197, A3140. [Google Scholar]
  37. Mummy, D.; Rankine, L.; Wang, Z.; Bier, E.; Rackley, C.; Morrison, L.D.; Mammarappallil, J.; Driehuys, B.; Tighe, R.M. Hyperpolarized 129xe magnetic resonance imaging is sensitive to therapy response in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, A7902. [Google Scholar]
  38. Osadnik, C.; Kavanagh, A.; Macdonald, M.; Tran, A.; Bardin, P.; Haines, T. Evaluation and impact of frailty in patients with acute exacerbations of COPD. Respirology 2019, 24, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Papaioannou, A.I.; Diamant, Z.; Bakakos, P.; Loukides, S. Towards precision medicine in severe asthma: Treatment algorithms based on treatable traits. Respir. Med. 2018, 142, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pavord, I.; Fowler, A.; Kerstjens, H.; Papi, A.; Hartley, B.; Goldfrad, C.; Barnes, N.; Oppenheimer, J.; Pizzichini, E.; Lee, L. Captain Study: Treatable Traits and the Outcome of Treatment with Inhaled Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI therapies in patients with uncontrolled asthma, a pre-specified subgroup analysis. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020, 201, A6247. [Google Scholar]
  41. Perez de Llano, L.; Martínez-Moragón, E.; Plaza Moral, V.; Trisan Alonso, A.; Sánchez, C.A.; Callejas, F.J.; Vera, E.; Soto Campos, J.G.; Martinez Rivera, C.; Alcazar Navarrete, B.; et al. Unmet therapeutic goals and potential treatable traits in a population of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma in Spain. ENEAS study. Respir. Med. 2019, 151, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Perez de Llano, L.; Miravitlles, M.; Golpe, R.; Alvarez-Gutiérrez, F.J.; Cisneros, C.; Almonacid, C.; Martinez-Moragon, E.; Gonzalez-Barcala, F.J.; Ramos-Barbón, D.; Plaza, V.; et al. A Proposed Approach to Chronic Airway Disease (CAD) Using Therapeutic Goals and Treatable Traits: A Look to the Future. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2020, 15, 2091–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ramsahai, J.M.; Simpson, J.; Wark, P. Eosinophilia as a treatable trait in three patients with asthma and COPD. Respirol. Case Rep. 2018, 6, e00295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Rosenkranz, S.; Howard, L.S.; Gomberg-Maitland, M.; Hoeper, M.M. Systemic Consequences of Pulmonary Hypertension and Right-Sided Heart Failure. Circulation 2020, 141, 678–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Santos, L.V.M.; Ramos, B.; Loureiro, C.C. Blood eosinophils fluctuation in asthmatics on Omalizumab-a mirror of disease outcomes improvement? Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 52, PA1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Shoemark, A.; Smith, A.; Giam, A.; Dicker, A.; Richardson, H.; Huang, J.T.J.; Keir, H.R.; Finch, S.; Aliberti, S.; Sibila, O.; et al. Inflammatory molecular endotypes in bronchiectasis. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 54, PA2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shteinberg, M.; Flume, P.A.; Chalmers, J.D. Is bronchiectasis really a disease? Eur. Respir. Rev. 2020, 29, 190051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Simpson, A.J.; Shaw, D.E.; Sousa, A.R.; Fleming, L.J.; Roberts, G.; Pandis, I.; Bansal, A.T.; Corfield, J.; Wagers, S.; Djukanovic, R.; et al. Treatable traits in the European U-BIOPRED adult severe asthma cohort. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2017, 7, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Simpson, J.; Shrimanker, R.; Thulborn, S.; Cane, J.; Russell, R.; Connolly, C.; Borg, C.; Pavord, I.; Bafadhel, M. Identification of pulmonary treatable traits in a real-life setting. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 52, PA3699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Soriano, J.B.; Pastor-Sanz, M.T.; García-Castillo, E.; Vázquez, E.; Gómez-Punter, R.M.; Alonso, T.; Ancochea, J. Late Breaking Abstract-Long-term variability of blood eosinophils in COPD patients by GOLD 2017 staging, and gender bias. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 52, PA4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tay, T.R.; Hew, M. Comorbid “treatable traits” in difficult asthma: Current evidence and clinical evaluation. Allergy 2018, 73, 1369–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tiew, P.Y.; Ko, F.W.S.; Pang, S.L.; Matta, S.A.; Sio, Y.Y.; Poh, M.E.; Lau, K.J.X.; Mac Aogáin, M.; Jaggi, T.K.; Ivan, F.X.; et al. Environmental fungal sensitisation associates with poorer clinical outcomes in COPD. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56, 2000418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tiotiu, A.; Plavec, D.; Novakova, S.; Mihaicuta, S.; Novakova, P.; Labor, M.; Bikov, A. Current opinions for the management of asthma associated with ear, nose and throat comorbidities. Eur. Respir. Rev. 2018, 27, 180056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Toledo-Pons, N.; Van Boven, J.F.M.; Román-Rodríguez, M.; Pérez, N.; Felices, J.L.; Soriano, J.B.; Cosío, B.G. ACO: Time to move from the description of different phenotypes to the treatable traits. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0210915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Van Der Meer, A.N.C.; De Jong, K.; Bel, E.H.; Brinke, A. Dynamic hyperinflation: A treatable trait in asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2019, 199, A6112. [Google Scholar]
  56. Van Dijk, M.; Gan, C.T.; Koster, T.D.; Wijkstra, P.J.; Slebos, D.-J.; Kerstjens, H.A.M.; van der Vaart, H.; Duiverman, M.L. Treatment of severe stable COPD: The multidimensional approach of treatable traits. ERJ Open Res. 2020, 6, 00322-2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Yii, A.C.A.; Tay, T.R.; Choo, X.N.; Koh, M.S.Y.; Tee, A.K.H.; Wang, D.Y. Precision medicine in united airways disease: A “treatable traits” approach. Allergy 2018, 73, 1964–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Yii, A.C.; Loh, C.; Tiew, P.Y.; Xu, H.; Taha, A.A.M.; Koh, J.; Tan, J.; Lapperre, T.S.; Anzueto, A.; Tee, A.K.H. A clinical prediction model for hospitalized COPD exacerbations based on “treatable traits”. Int. J. Chronic Obstr. Pulm. Dis. 2019, 14, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Chung, K.F.; Adcock, I.M. Precision medicine for the discovery of treatable mechanisms in severe asthma. Allergy 2019, 74, 1649–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. McDonald, V.M.; Fingleton, J.; Agusti, A.; Hiles, S.; Clark, V.L.; Holland, A.E.; Marks, G.; Bardin, P.P.; Beasley, R.; Pavord, I.D.; et al. Treatable traits: A new paradigm for 21st century management of chronic airway diseases: Treatable Traits Down Under International Workshop report. Eur. Respir. J. 2019, 53, 1802058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. McDonald, V.M.; Higgins, I.; Wood, L.; Gibson, P.G. Multidimensional assessment and tailored interventions for COPD: Respiratory utopia or common sense? Thorax 2013, 68, 691–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Ignatova, G.L.; Avdeev, S.N.; Antonov, V.N. Comparative effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination with PPV23 and PCV13 in COPD patients over a 5-year follow-up cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 15948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Greenwood, B. The contribution of vaccination to global health: Past, present and future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2014, 369, 20130433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.
Cells 10 03263 g001
Table 1. Quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS).
Table 1. Quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS).
Study SourcesRepresentativenessSelection of Non-Exposed CohortAscertainment of ExposureOutcome of Interest Not Present at Start of StudyComparability Assessment of OutcomeAdequacy of Follow-Up
Cazzola (2020) [3]
Chalmers (2018) [4] ★★
Connolly (2018) [5]
Cottee (2020) [6] ★★
Dean (2017) [7]
Denton (2019) [8] ★★
Descazeaux (2020) [9]
Feng (2019) [10]
Fingleton (2018) [11]
Freitas (2020) [12]
Garudadri (2018) [13]
Gonçalves (2018) [14]
Heffler (2019) [15]
Higham (2019) [16]
Hiles (2019) [17] ★★
Hiles (2020) [18]
Hinks (2020) [19]
Honkoop (2019) [20]
Jabeen (2018) [21]
Koblizek (2019) [22]
Kolmert (2019) [23]★★
Kuo (2019) [24]
Lee (2020) [25] ★★
Liu (2019) [26]
Martin (2020) [1]
Mathioudakis (2020) [27] ★★
Matsunaga (2020) [28] ★★
Matthes (2018) [29]
McDonald (2019) [30]★★
McDonald (2019) [31] ★★
Milne (2020) [32]
Milne (2020) [33]
Mohammed (2018) [34]
Müllerová (2018) [35]
Müllerová (2018) [36]
Mummy (2020) [37]
Osadnik (2019) [38]
Papaioannou (2018) [39]
Pavord (2020) [40]
Llano (2019) [41]
Llano (2020) [42]
Ramsahai (2018) [43]
Rosenkranz (2020) [44]
Santos (2018) [45]
Shoemark (2019) [46]
Shteinberg (2020) [47]
Simpson (2017) [48]
Simpson (2018) [49]
Soriano (2018) [50] ★★
Tay (2018) [51]
Tiew (2020) [52] ★★
Tiotiu (2018) [53]
Toledo-Pons (2019) [54]
Meer (2019) [55]
Dijk (2020) [56]
Yii (2018) [57]
Yii (2019) [58]
Chung (2019) [59]
A maximum of one star for each item within the Selection and Outcome categories. A maximum of two stars can be given for Comparability.
Table 2. Overview of physiological treatable traits.
Table 2. Overview of physiological treatable traits.
ConditionTreatable TraitTrait-Identification MarkerAverage PrevalenceTreatment Description and Benefits Prognostic ImplicationsAuthor (Year)
AsthmaAirway limitationPost-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7
FEV1 < 80% predicted
52.5% (45.5–54.5%)LAMA: ↑ Lung function, exacerbations
Bronchial Thermoplasty: ↑ control, ↑ QoL, ↓ exacerbations
SABA
Short-acting anticholinergics: ↓ risk of admission
Magnesium: ↓ odds of admission
Patients with poor PEFR response to salbutamol:
↑ airway obstruction, symptom duration and healthcare utilisation
↑ exacerbation risk
Hiles (2020) [18]
Cazzola (2020) [3]
Connolly (2018) [5]
Simpson (2018) [49]
Papaioannou (2018) [39]
Hinks (2020) [19]
Martin (2020) [1]
McDonald (2019) [30]
AsthmaHypoxemia/hypercapniaSpO2 < 90% at rest or during 6 min walk test10.9%Investigation and implementation of domiciliary oxygen therapy and nasal CPAP-Hiles (2020) [18]
AsthmaLung hyperinflation>10% reduction in in inspiratory capacity -Systemic Corticosteroids: ↓ of dynamic hyperinflationDynamic hyperinflation ↑ in placebo groupMeer (2019) [55]
BronchiectasisAirway limitationLow nasal NO, electron microscopic abnormalities, abnormal ciliary beating pattern-Inhaled saline, airway clearance, ongoing trial of ENaC inhibition-Shteinberg (2020) [47]
BronchiectasisCiliary dysfunctionElevated sweat chloride,
characteristic electrophysiological
abnormalities, CFTR mutations on
two alleles
-CFTR modulators-Shteinberg (2020) [47]
Chronic airway diseaseAirway limitationFEV1/FVC < 0.7 and
FEV1 < 80% predicted
-LAMA
LABA-ICS: Significant functional and symptomatic improvement,
Pulmonary rehabilitation
-Llano (2020) [42]
COPDAirway limitationPost-bronchodilator FER < 70% and FEV1 < 80% predicted88.9%LAMA, LABA-ICS, Pulmonary rehabilitation-Hiles (2020) [18]
Llano (2020) [42]
COPDHypoxemia/hypercapniaPO2/PCO238.9%Oxygen, NIVMarker of poor prognosisLlano (2020) [42]
Gonçalves (2018) [14]
Hiles (2020) [18]
COPDLung hyperinflationRV > 175% predicted or RV/TLC ≥ 0.58-Endobronchial valves, coils: ↑ in lung function, ↓ dyspnoea, ↑ QoL, ↑ exercise tolerance, ↓ residual volume
lung volume reduction surgery
Bronchoscopic thermal vapour ablation: ↑ lung function and QoL in upper lobe prominent emphysema
-Dijk (2020) [56]
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; EnaC, epithelial sodium channel; FER, forced expiratory ratio; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LABA, long-acting beta 2-agonists; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonists; NIV, non-invasive ventilation; NO, nitric oxide; PCO2, partial pressure of carbon dioxide; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; QoL, quality of life; PO2, partial pressure of oxygen; RV, residual volume; SABA, short-acting beta-agonists; SpO2, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation; TLC, total lung capacity; ↑, increased/improved; ↓, decreased/reduced.
Table 3. Overview of biochemical treatable traits.
Table 3. Overview of biochemical treatable traits.
ConditionTreatable TraitTrait-Identification MarkerPrevalence (Range)Treatment Description Prognostic ImplicationsAuthor (Year)
Asthma EosinophiliaBlood/Sputum Eosinophilia54.3% (51.4–56.4%)Corticosteroids: ↑ FEV1
Omalizumab: Significant ↓ in exacerbations and ↑ in CARAT and AQLQ. FEV1 ↑, RV ↓, mean BE ↓
Mepolizumab/Anti IL-5
Anti IL4/IL -13: High FeNO responds to anti-IL4/IL13 therapies
Associated with severe asthma, frequent exacerbations, ↓ lung function at baselineChung (2019) [59]
Connolly (2018) [5]
Dean (2017) [7]
Feng (2019) [10]
Santos (2018) [45]
Pavord (2020) [40]
Llano (2019) [41]
Papaioannou (2018) [39]
Hiles (2020) [18]
Hinks (2020) [19]
AsthmaFeNOFeNO levels-FeNO-guided ICS treatment: Improved symptoms, ↑ asthma control, ↓ exacerbations, ↑ QoL Dean (2017) [7]
Honkoop (2019) [20]
Kuo (2019) [24]
AsthmaNeutrophil elastase/inflammation; CXCR2R2Sputum neutrophilis ≥ 61%36.5% (27.3–40%)Macrolides: ↓ exacerbation. May result in antibiotic resistance
Smoking cessation: ↓ of neutrophilic inflammation, lung-function improvement in asthmatics
↑ exacerbation riskConnolly (2018) [5]
Dean (2017) [7]
Simpson (2018) [49]
Papaioannou (2018) [39]
Hiles (2020) [18]
Hinks (2020) [19]
McDonald (2019) [30]
AsthmaPaucigranulocytic phenotypeNeutrophil levels <61% and eosinophil levels <2%-Macrolides, bronchodilators, bronchial thermoplasty↑ risk of moderate-severe acute exacerbations, ↑ all-cause mortality. Higher airflow limitation and dyspnoea present in these patients.Papaioannou (2018) [39]
AsthmaProteins (periostin, galectin-3)Sputum galectin-3-Anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab)-Dean (2017) [7]
AsthmaType 2 inflammationT2-high expression42.0%Salbutamol: Improved bronchodilator response
Anti-T2 biologics: Major ↓ in severe exacerbations, small improvement in FEV1, improvement in asthma QoL scores
Corticosteroid insensitivity and oral corticosteroid dependence in severe patientsChung (2019) [59]
Simpson (2018) [49]
BronchiectasisEosinophiliaIL-5, IL-13 and Gro-α in sputum-ICS, Bronchodilators, macrolides: Treatment showed little difference in clinical parameters between groups-Shteinburg (2020) [47]
Shoemark (2019) [46]
Bronchiectasis Neutrophil elastase/inflammation; CXCR2R2Sputum neutrophils-Neutrophil elastase inhibitor: Significant ↑ in FEV1 and QoL.
CXCR2 antagonist: ↓ sputum neutrophils, no difference in exacerbations. Macrolides
Corticosteroids
↑ frequency of exacerbations and more rapid decline in FEV1 in some patients.
Disease severity worse with ↑ BSI score, sputum volume, and ↓ predicted FEV1%
Chalmers (2018) [4]
Shoemark (2019) [46]
Chronic airway diseaseFeNOExhaled CO-Primary prevention↑ acute exacerbations + major public health problem.McDonald (2019) [31]
Chronic airway diseaseT2-low inflammationEosinophil <100-Azithromycin, roflumilast, LABA-LAMA-Llano (2020) [42]
Chronic airway diseaseType 2 inflammationSputum/blood eosinophilia-ICS-LABA, ICS-LABA-LAMA, biologics-Llano (2020) [42]
McDonald (2019) [31]
COPDEosinophiliaSputum/blood eosinophilia60.1% (22.2–60.1%) Corticosteroids: Beneficial during exacerbations for patients with eosinophilia
Anti-IL5
↑ number of moderate exacerbations, risk of future exacerbations. Exacerbations characterised by enhanced airway eosinophilic inflammation; generally milder, with ↓ mortality and ↓ hospital stay.Garudadri (2018) [13]
Gonçalves (2018) [14]
Soriano (2018) [50]
Müllerová (2018) [36]
Müllerová (2018) [35]
Hiles (2020) [18]
Mathioudakis (2020) [27]
Matsunaga (2020) [28]
Matthes (2018) [29]
COPDNeutrophil elastase/inflammation; CXCR2R2Sputum neutrophils > 61%44.4%Macrolides-Hiles (2020) [18]
COPDProteins (periostin, galectin-3)Specific marker-Specific therapy-Llano (2020) [42]
COPDT2-low inflammationEosinophil < 100-Azithromycin, Roflumilast, LABA-LAMA-Llano (2020) [42]
COPDType 2 InflammationEosinophil > 300/>100 if on OCS-ICS-LABA, ICS-LABA-LAMA, Biologics-Llano (2020) [42]
COPDVitamin DSerum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol levels-Vitamin D supplementation: ↓ risk of respiratory tract infection.VDD was associated with ↓ FEV1 at baseline and faster decline in FEV1Llano (2020) [42]
Rhinitis/rhinosinusitisAirway/nasal inflammationNasal cytology; nasal polyps biopsy-Corticosteroids, biologicals-Heffler (2019) [15]
United Airways DzEosinophiliaBlood/sputum eosinophilia, blood periostin, high FeNO, absent specific IgE, non- reactive skin prick tests-Corticosteroids, anti-IL-5, IL-4, IL-13, anti-TSLP, CRTh2 antagonist-Yii (2018) [57]
United Airways DzEnvironmental exposureTotal IgE, skin prick tests Peak flow monitoring Specific bronchoprovocation challenge-Exposure avoidance, respiratory protection devices, anti-IgE-Yii (2018) [57]
United airways DzNeutrophil elastase/inflammation; CXCR2R2IL-8, sputum neutrophilia-Smoking cessation, macrolides-Yii (2018) [57]
Abbreviations: AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; BE, base excess; BSI, bronchiectasis severity index; CARAT, Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test; CO, carbon monoxide; CRTh2, prostaglandin D2 receptor 2; FeNO, fractional exhaled nitric oxide; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in the first second; FVC, forced vital capacity; ICS, inhaled corticosteroids; LABA, long-acting beta 2-agonists; LAMA, long-acting muscarinic antagonists; OCS, oral corticosteroids; QoL, quality of life; ↑, increase/improved; ↓, decreased/reduced.
Table 4. Overview of psychosocial treatable traits.
Table 4. Overview of psychosocial treatable traits.
ConditionTreatable TraitTrait-Identification MarkerPrevalence (Range)Treatment Description Prognostic ImplicationsAuthor (Year)
Asthma Adherence and techniqueAdherence check
Adherence rating scales
44.0% (26.9–61.8%)Self-management education and WAP
Treatment changed when possible to minimise devices
Inhaler technique skills
Self-management education with adherence-aiding strategies
Inhaler-device polypharmacy is one of the best predictors of exacerbation risk
↑ exacerbation risk
Connolly (2018) [5]
Simpson (2018) [49]
Hiles (2020) [18]
McDonald (2019) [30]
Asthma Smoking/ex-smokerMedical history of smoking or exhaled CO ≥ 10 ppm14.3% (13.9–14.5%)Counseling and NRT or varenicline, bupropion-Connolly (2018) [5]
Simpson (2018) [49]
Hiles (2020) [18]
Milne (2020) [32]
Chronic airway diseaseAdherence and techniqueAdherence check
Adherence rating scales
-Understanding reason
for non-adherence,
directing education
of adherence-aiding
strategies accordingly: Good adherence associated with ↓ severe exacerbations of asthma and COPD
Suboptimal inhaler technique and inhaler device polypharmacy associated with ↑ healthcare
utilisation
Llano (2020) [42]
McDonald (2019) [31]
Chronic airway diseaseSmoking/ex-smokerMedical history of smoking or exhaled CO ≥ 10 ppm-Counseling and NRT or varenicline, bupropion: Cessation ↓ lung function decline and future risk of exacerbationsSmoking is a risk factor for exacerbationLlano (2020) [42]
McDonald (2019) [31]
Chronic Airway DiseaseSocial issuesInterview- Activate support servicesPoor family and social support and deprived socioeconomic status associated with ↑ symptom deterioration and exacerbationMcDonald (2019) [31]
COPDAdherence and techniqueDoes not possess a WAP or does not use WAP during exacerbations
Test of adherence to inhalers
55.6%Self-management education and WAP
Treatment changed when possible to minimise devices
Inhaler technique skills
Self-management education with adherence-aiding strategies
-Hiles (2020) [18]
Llano (2020) [42]
COPDSmoking/ex-smokerMedical history of smoking or exhaled CO ≥ 10 ppm19.4%Counseling and NRT or varenicline, bupropion-Hiles (2020) [18]
Llano (2020) [42]
Abbreviations: CO, carbon monoxide; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NRT, nicotine replacement therapy; WAP, written action plan; ↑, increased/improved; ↓, decreased/reduced.
Table 5. Overview of microbiological treatable traits.
Table 5. Overview of microbiological treatable traits.
ConditionTreatable TraitTrait-Identification MarkerPrevalence (Range)Treatment DescriptionPrognostic ImplicationsAuthor (Year)
Asthma Chronic respiratory infectionHistory of chronic bronchitis, sputum analysis, culture/PCR45.0% (34.8–47.3%)Antibiotics: No treatment effect observed, asthma exacerbation
Mucolytics
Roflumilast
Education
Inhaled IFN-beta treatment: No effect on primary outcome, but morning PEFR increased in treatment group
H. influenzae is a clinically relevant pathogen in severe asthma that can be identified reliably using molecular microbiological methodsConnolly (2018) [5]
Simpson (2018) [49]
Hiles (2020) [18]
Jabeen (2018) [21]
Martin (2020) [1]
AsthmaFungal colonisationTotal serum IgE measurement, serum Aspergillus IgE, Aspergillus skin testing1.1%Corticosteroids, anti-fungals, omalizumab↑ exacerbation riskDean (2017) [7]
Llano (2019) [41]
McDonald (2019) [30]
AsthmaMicrobial colonisationSputum culture +/− CT to exclude bronchiectasis18.9% (12.7–55.6%)Education, antibiotics (e.g., azithromycin), antibiotic-based WAP-Connolly (2018) [5]
Hiles (2020) [18]
Hinks (2020) [19]
BronchiectasisChronic respiratory infectionGrowth of pathogens in respiratory secretions-Antimicrobials -Shteinberg (2020) [47]
COPDChronic respiratory infectionCulture/PCR55.6%Antibiotics (Macrolides): Azithromycin: ↑ incidence of colonisation with macrolide-resistant organisms, an excessive rate of hearing decrements, and the prolongation of the QTc interval.
↓ ED visits and hospitalisation due to COPD exacerbations
Education
Elevated SNOT-22 scores
Produce colored/purulent sputum, even in stable state, have more severe dyspnea and impaired quality of life
Llano (2020) [42]
Garudadri (2018) [13]
Hiles (2020) [18]
Koblizek (2019) [22]
Matsunaga (2020) [28]
COPDMicrobial colonisationSputum culture
Raised CRP
Raised procalcitonin
44.8% (38.9–45%)Antiviral vaccine and treatment (neuraminidase inhibitor)
Education and antibiotics-based written plans
Antibiotics: ↓ proportion of patients with exacerbations
↑ exacerbations, delayed recovery, and ↑ symptom burden
↓ mortality rate in exacerbations associated with respiratory viruses compared with those testing positive for bacteria either based on culture or PCR of sputum, endotracheal aspirates or BAL
Garudadri (2018) [13]
Hiles (2020) [18]
Mathioudakis (2020) [27]
United airways DzFungal colonisationAspergillus skin test positivity, Aspergillus specific IgE, IgE > 1000 IU/mL, Blood eosinophil > 500/lL, precipitating antibodies to Aspergillus-Steroids, antifungal, anti-IgE-Yii (2018) [57]
United airways DzStaphylococcus aureus enterotoxinStaph aureus enterotoxin IgE-Anti-IgE-Yii (2018) [57]
United airways DzURTIRespiratory cultures and nucleic acid tests-Antivirals, antibiotics, vaccinations-Yii (2018) [57]
Abbreviations: BAL, bronchoalveolar lavage; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; CRP, c-reactive protein; CT, computed tomography scan; ED, emergency department; IFN-beta, interferon-beta; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; SNOT-22, sinonasal outcome Test; WAP, written action plan; UnitedAirwayDz, united airway diseases; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection; ↑, increased/improved; ↓, decreased/reduced.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, Y.Q.; Selvakumar, A.; See, K.C. Treatable Traits in Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Cells 2021, 10, 3263. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells10113263

AMA Style

Lee YQ, Selvakumar A, See KC. Treatable Traits in Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Comprehensive Review. Cells. 2021; 10(11):3263. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells10113263

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Yong Qin, Asvin Selvakumar, and Kay Choong See. 2021. "Treatable Traits in Chronic Respiratory Disease: A Comprehensive Review" Cells 10, no. 11: 3263. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells10113263

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop