Homologous Recombination as a Fundamental Genome Surveillance Mechanism during DNA Replication
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Homologous Recombination: An Overview
Critical Determinants and Mechanistic Basis of HR in a Nutshell
3. HR as an Intrinsic Safeguard of DNA Replication in Mammalian Somatic Cells
3.1. Low RS Coupled to Replication Fork Slowing: RAD51 and Beyond
3.2. Severe RS and Global Stalling of Replication Forks: HR-Mediated Fork Stabilization and Replication Restart
3.3. Moderate Replication Stress: HR-Mediated Genome Surveillance behind the Replication Fork
3.3.1. DSGs and Their Repair
3.3.2. Expansion of Unprotected DSGs as a Source for Genome Instability
3.3.3. Implications of DSG Repair for Genome Integrity Maintenance
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hochegger, H.; Takeda, S.; Hunt, T. Cyclin-dependent kinases and cell-cycle transitions: Does one fit all? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 910–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bell, S.P.; Dutta, A. DNA replication in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002, 71, 333–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Negrini, S.; Gorgoulis, V.G.; Halazonetis, T.D. Genomic instability—An evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Macheret, M.; Halazonetis, T.D. DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 2015, 10, 425–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Zeman, M.K.; Cimprich, K.A. Causes and consequences of replication stress. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 16, 2–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berti, M.; Cortez, D.; Lopes, M. The plasticity of DNA replication forks in response to clinically relevant genotoxic stress. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 21, 633–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bartek, J.; Mistrik, M.; Bartkova, J. Thresholds of replication stress signaling in cancer development and treatment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19, 5–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saldivar, J.C.; Cortez, D.; Cimprich, K.A. The essential kinase ATR: Ensuring faithful duplication of a challenging genome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2017, 18, 622–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Panagopoulos, A.; Altmeyer, M. The Hammer and the Dance of Cell Cycle Control. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2021, 46, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartek, J.; Lukas, C.; Lukas, J. Checking on DNA damage in S phase. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5, 792–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinet, A.; Tirman, S.; Cybulla, E.; Meroni, A.; Vindigni, A. To skip or not to skip: Choosing repriming to tolerate DNA damage. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jasin, M.; Rothstein, R. Repair of strand breaks by homologous recombination. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a012740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haber, J.E. DNA Repair: The Search for Homology. Bioessays 2018, 40, e1700229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scully, R.; Elango, R.; Panday, A.; Willis, N.A. Recombination and restart at blocked replication forks. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2021, 71, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Matos-Rodrigues, G.; Guirouilh-Barbat, J.; Martini, E.; Lopez, B.S. Homologous recombination, cancer and the ‘RAD51 paradox’. NAR Cancer 2021, 3, zcab016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Prakash, R.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, W.; Jasin, M. Homologous recombination and human health: The roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2015, 7, a016600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scully, R.; Livingston, D.M. In search of the tumour-suppressor functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Nature 2000, 408, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welcsh, P.L.; Owens, K.N.; King, M.C. Insights into the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Trends Genet. 2000, 16, 69–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scully, R.; Chen, J.; Ochs, R.L.; Keegan, K.; Hoekstra, M.; Feunteun, J.; Livingston, D.M. Dynamic changes of BRCA1 subnuclear location and phosphorylation state are initiated by DNA damage. Cell 1997, 90, 425–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Scully, R.; Chen, J.; Plug, A.; Xiao, Y.; Weaver, D.; Feunteun, J.; Ashley, T.; Livingston, D.M. Association of BRCA1 with Rad51 in mitotic and meiotic cells. Cell 1997, 88, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moynahan, M.E.; Chiu, J.W.; Koller, B.H.; Jasin, M. Brca1 controls homology-directed DNA repair. Mol. Cell 1999, 4, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moynahan, M.E.; Pierce, A.J.; Jasin, M. BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol. Cell 2001, 7, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, W.; Steinfeld, J.B.; Liang, F.; Chen, X.; Maranon, D.G.; Jian Ma, C.; Kwon, Y.; Rao, T.; Wang, W.; Sheng, C.; et al. BRCA1-BARD1 promotes RAD51-mediated homologous DNA pairing. Nature 2017, 550, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, R.B.; Carreira, A.; Kowalczykowski, S.C. Purified human BRCA2 stimulates RAD51-mediated recombination. Nature 2010, 467, 678–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Thorslund, T.; McIlwraith, M.J.; Compton, S.A.; Lekomtsev, S.; Petronczki, M.; Griffith, J.D.; West, S.C. The breast cancer tumor suppressor BRCA2 promotes the specific targeting of RAD51 to single-stranded DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 1263–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, L.H.; Schild, D. Recombinational DNA repair and human disease. Mutat. Res. 2002, 509, 49–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sung, P.; Klein, H. Mechanism of homologous recombination: Mediators and helicases take on regulatory functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rickman, K.; Smogorzewska, A. Advances in understanding DNA processing and protection at stalled replication forks. J. Cell Biol. 2019, 218, 1096–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yap, T.A.; Plummer, R.; Azad, N.S.; Helleday, T. The DNA Damaging Revolution: PARP Inhibitors and Beyond. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2019, 39, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scully, R.; Panday, A.; Elango, R.; Willis, N.A. DNA double-strand break repair-pathway choice in somatic mammalian cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019, 20, 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Symington, L.S.; Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2011, 45, 247–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ochs, F.; Somyajit, K.; Altmeyer, M.; Rask, M.B.; Lukas, J.; Lukas, C. 53BP1 fosters fidelity of homology-directed DNA repair. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 714–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zong, D.; Chaudhuri, A.R.; Nussenzweig, A. More end resection is not merrier. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016, 23, 699–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bonilla, B.; Hengel, S.R.; Grundy, M.K.; Bernstein, K.A. RAD51 Gene Family Structure and Function. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2020, 54, 25–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somyajit, K.; Subramanya, S.; Nagaraju, G. RAD51C: A novel cancer susceptibility gene is linked to Fanconi anemia and breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 2010, 31, 2031–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Masson, J.Y.; Tarsounas, M.C.; Stasiak, A.Z.; Stasiak, A.; Shah, R.; McIlwraith, M.J.; Benson, F.E.; West, S.C. Identification and purification of two distinct complexes containing the five RAD51 paralogs. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 3296–3307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Masson, J.Y.; Stasiak, A.Z.; Stasiak, A.; Benson, F.E.; West, S.C. Complex formation by the human RAD51C and XRCC3 recombination repair proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 8440–8446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cejka, P. Single-molecule studies illuminate the function of RAD51 paralogs. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 898–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwaki, N.; Klare, K.; Tarsounas, M. RAD51 paralogs: Roles in DNA damage signalling, recombinational repair and tumorigenesis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22, 898–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somyajit, K.; Subramanya, S.; Nagaraju, G. Distinct roles of FANCO/RAD51C protein in DNA damage signaling and repair: Implications for Fanconi anemia and breast cancer susceptibility. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287, 3366–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chun, J.; Buechelmaier, E.S.; Powell, S.N. Rad51 paralog complexes BCDX2 and CX3 act at different stages in the BRCA1-BRCA2-dependent homologous recombination pathway. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 33, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rein, H.L.; Bernstein, K.A.; Baldock, R.A. RAD51 paralog function in replicative DNA damage and tolerance. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2021, 71, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berti, M.; Teloni, F.; Mijic, S.; Ursich, S.; Fuchs, J.; Palumbieri, M.D.; Krietsch, J.; Schmid, J.A.; Garcin, E.B.; Gon, S.; et al. Sequential role of RAD51 paralog complexes in replication fork remodeling and restart. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Northall, S.J.; Ivancic-Bace, I.; Soultanas, P.; Bolt, E.L. Remodeling and Control of Homologous Recombination by DNA Helicases and Translocases that Target Recombinases and Synapsis. Genes 2016, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Elbakry, A.; Lobrich, M. Homologous Recombination Subpathways: A Tangle to Resolve. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 723847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puget, N.; Knowlton, M.; Scully, R. Molecular analysis of sister chromatid recombination in mammalian cells. DNA Repair 2005, 4, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nagaraju, G.; Odate, S.; Xie, A.; Scully, R. Differential regulation of short- and long-tract gene conversion between sister chromatids by Rad51C. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26, 8075–8086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Somyajit, K.; Gupta, R.; Sedlackova, H.; Neelsen, K.J.; Ochs, F.; Rask, M.B.; Choudhary, C.; Lukas, J. Redox-sensitive alteration of replisome architecture safeguards genome integrity. Science 2017, 358, 797–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Xu, X.; Yuan, Y.; Zhang, B.; Li, Z.; Xie, Y.; Yan, R.; Zheng, Z.; Ji, J.; et al. The intra-S phase checkpoint directly regulates replication elongation to preserve the integrity of stalled replisomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2019183118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Zhang, J.; Bellani, M.A.; Pokharel, D.; Gichimu, J.; James, R.C.; Gali, H.; Ling, C.; Yan, Z.; Xu, D.; et al. Remodeling of Interstrand Crosslink Proximal Replisomes Is Dependent on ATR, FANCM, and FANCD2. Cell Rep. 2019, 27, 1794–1808.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vujanovic, M.; Krietsch, J.; Raso, M.C.; Terraneo, N.; Zellweger, R.; Schmid, J.A.; Taglialatela, A.; Huang, J.W.; Holland, C.L.; Zwicky, K.; et al. Replication Fork Slowing and Reversal upon DNA Damage Require PCNA Polyubiquitination and ZRANB3 DNA Translocase Activity. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 882–890.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Neelsen, K.J.; Lopes, M. Replication fork reversal in eukaryotes: From dead end to dynamic response. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2015, 16, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhat, K.P.; Cortez, D. RPA and RAD51: Fork reversal, fork protection, and genome stability. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2018, 25, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bai, G.; Kermi, C.; Stoy, H.; Schiltz, C.J.; Bacal, J.; Zaino, A.M.; Hadden, M.K.; Eichman, B.F.; Lopes, M.; Cimprich, K.A. HLTF Promotes Fork Reversal, Limiting Replication Stress Resistance and Preventing Multiple Mechanisms of Unrestrained DNA Synthesis. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 1237–1251.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schalbetter, S.A.; Mansoubi, S.; Chambers, A.L.; Downs, J.A.; Baxter, J. Fork rotation and DNA precatenation are restricted during DNA replication to prevent chromosomal instability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, E4565–E4570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kolinjivadi, A.M.; Sannino, V.; De Antoni, A.; Zadorozhny, K.; Kilkenny, M.; Techer, H.; Baldi, G.; Shen, R.; Ciccia, A.; Pellegrini, L.; et al. Smarcal1-Mediated Fork Reversal Triggers Mre11-Dependent Degradation of Nascent DNA in the Absence of Brca2 and Stable Rad51 Nucleofilaments. Mol. Cell 2017, 67, 867–881.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Mutreja, K.; Krietsch, J.; Hess, J.; Ursich, S.; Berti, M.; Roessler, F.K.; Zellweger, R.; Patra, M.; Gasser, G.; Lopes, M. ATR-Mediated Global Fork Slowing and Reversal Assist Fork Traverse and Prevent Chromosomal Breakage at DNA Interstrand Cross-Links. Cell Rep. 2018, 24, 2629–2642.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Saxena, S.; Somyajit, K.; Nagaraju, G. XRCC2 Regulates Replication Fork Progression during dNTP Alterations. Cell Rep. 2018, 25, 3273–3282.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Somyajit, K.; Basavaraju, S.; Scully, R.; Nagaraju, G. ATM- and ATR-mediated phosphorylation of XRCC3 regulates DNA double-strand break-induced checkpoint activation and repair. Mol. Cell Biol. 2013, 33, 1830–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Saxena, S.; Dixit, S.; Somyajit, K.; Nagaraju, G. ATR Signaling Uncouples the Role of RAD51 Paralogs in Homologous Recombination and Replication Stress Response. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 551–559.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Couch, F.B.; Bansbach, C.E.; Driscoll, R.; Luzwick, J.W.; Glick, G.G.; Betous, R.; Carroll, C.M.; Jung, S.Y.; Qin, J.; Cimprich, K.A.; et al. ATR phosphorylates SMARCAL1 to prevent replication fork collapse. Genes Dev. 2013, 27, 1610–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sedlackova, H.; Rask, M.B.; Gupta, R.; Choudhary, C.; Somyajit, K.; Lukas, J. Equilibrium between nascent and parental MCM proteins protects replicating genomes. Nature 2020, 587, 297–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez-Acebes, S.; Mouron, S.; Mendez, J. Uncoupling fork speed and origin activity to identify the primary cause of replicative stress phenotypes. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 12855–12861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Maya-Mendoza, A.; Moudry, P.; Merchut-Maya, J.M.; Lee, M.; Strauss, R.; Bartek, J. High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability. Nature 2018, 559, 279–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lomonosov, M.; Anand, S.; Sangrithi, M.; Davies, R.; Venkitaraman, A.R. Stabilization of stalled DNA replication forks by the BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility protein. Genes Dev. 2003, 17, 3017–3022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schlacher, K.; Christ, N.; Siaud, N.; Egashira, A.; Wu, H.; Jasin, M. Double-strand break repair-independent role for BRCA2 in blocking stalled replication fork degradation by MRE11. Cell 2011, 145, 529–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Schlacher, K.; Wu, H.; Jasin, M. A distinct replication fork protection pathway connects Fanconi anemia tumor suppressors to RAD51-BRCA1/2. Cancer Cell 2012, 22, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Somyajit, K.; Saxena, S.; Babu, S.; Mishra, A.; Nagaraju, G. Mammalian RAD51 paralogs protect nascent DNA at stalled forks and mediate replication restart. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 9835–9855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somyajit, K.; Spies, J.; Coscia, F.; Kirik, U.; Rask, M.B.; Lee, J.H.; Neelsen, K.J.; Mund, A.; Jensen, L.J.; Paull, T.T.; et al. Homology-directed repair protects the replicating genome from metabolic assaults. Dev. Cell 2021, 56, 461–477.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liao, H.; Ji, F.; Helleday, T.; Ying, S. Mechanisms for stalled replication fork stabilization: New targets for synthetic lethality strategies in cancer treatments. EMBO Rep. 2018, 19, e46263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, M.E.; Facca, C.; Fatmi, Z.; Baille, D.; Benakli, S.; Vernis, L. DNA replication inhibitor hydroxyurea alters Fe-S centers by producing reactive oxygen species in vivo. Sci Rep. 2016, 6, 29361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dias, M.P.; Moser, S.C.; Ganesan, S.; Jonkers, J. Understanding and overcoming resistance to PARP inhibitors in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 18, 773–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ding, X.; Ray Chaudhuri, A.; Callen, E.; Pang, Y.; Biswas, K.; Klarmann, K.D.; Martin, B.K.; Burkett, S.; Cleveland, L.; Stauffer, S.; et al. Synthetic viability by BRCA2 and PARP1/ARTD1 deficiencies. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ray Chaudhuri, A.; Callen, E.; Ding, X.; Gogola, E.; Duarte, A.A.; Lee, J.E.; Wong, N.; Lafarga, V.; Calvo, J.A.; Panzarino, N.J.; et al. Replication fork stability confers chemoresistance in BRCA-deficient cells. Nature 2016, 535, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petermann, E.; Orta, M.L.; Issaeva, N.; Schultz, N.; Helleday, T. Hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks become progressively inactivated and require two different RAD51-mediated pathways for restart and repair. Mol. Cell 2010, 37, 492–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Xing, M.; Wang, X.; Palmai-Pallag, T.; Shen, H.; Helleday, T.; Hickson, I.D.; Ying, S. Acute MUS81 depletion leads to replication fork slowing and a constitutive DNA damage response. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 37638–37646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sotiriou, S.K.; Kamileri, I.; Lugli, N.; Evangelou, K.; Da-Re, C.; Huber, F.; Padayachy, L.; Tardy, S.; Nicati, N.L.; Barriot, S.; et al. Mammalian RAD52 Functions in Break-Induced Replication Repair of Collapsed DNA Replication Forks. Mol. Cell 2016, 64, 1127–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Bhowmick, R.; Minocherhomji, S.; Hickson, I.D. RAD52 Facilitates Mitotic DNA Synthesis Following Replication Stress. Mol. Cell 2016, 64, 1117–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Techer, H.; Koundrioukoff, S.; Nicolas, A.; Debatisse, M. The impact of replication stress on replication dynamics and DNA damage in vertebrate cells. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2017, 18, 535–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yasuhara, T.; Kato, R.; Hagiwara, Y.; Shiotani, B.; Yamauchi, M.; Nakada, S.; Shibata, A.; Miyagawa, K. Human Rad52 Promotes XPG-Mediated R-loop Processing to Initiate Transcription-Associated Homologous Recombination Repair. Cell 2018, 175, 558–570.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nagaraju, G.; Scully, R. Minding the gap: The underground functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair 2007, 6, 1018–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cantor, S.B. Revisiting the BRCA-pathway through the lens of replication gap suppression: “Gaps determine therapy response in BRCA mutant cancer”. DNA Repair 2021, 107, 103209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wong, R.P.; Petriukov, K.; Ulrich, H.D. Daughter-strand gaps in DNA replication—Substrates of lesion processing and initiators of distress signalling. DNA Repair 2021, 105, 103163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howard-Flanders, P.; Rupp, W.D.; Wilkins, B.M.; Cole, R.S. DNA replication and recombination after UV irradiation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 1968, 33, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rupp, W.D.; Howard-Flanders, P. Discontinuities in the DNA synthesized in an excision-defective strain of Escherichia coli following ultraviolet irradiation. J. Mol. Biol. 1968, 31, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prakash, L. Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1981, 184, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehmann, A.R. Post-replication repair of DNA in ultraviolet-irradiated mammalian cells. No gaps in DNA synthesized late after ultraviolet irradiation. Eur. J. Biochem. 1972, 31, 438–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hashimoto, Y.; Ray Chaudhuri, A.; Lopes, M.; Costanzo, V. Rad51 protects nascent DNA from Mre11-dependent degradation and promotes continuous DNA synthesis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2010, 17, 1305–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Quinet, A.; Tirman, S.; Jackson, J.; Svikovic, S.; Lemacon, D.; Carvajal-Maldonado, D.; Gonzalez-Acosta, D.; Vessoni, A.T.; Cybulla, E.; Wood, M.; et al. PRIMPOL-Mediated Adaptive Response Suppresses Replication Fork Reversal in BRCA-Deficient Cells. Mol. Cell 2020, 77, 461–474.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cong, K.; Peng, M.; Kousholt, A.N.; Lee, W.T.C.; Lee, S.; Nayak, S.; Krais, J.; VanderVere-Carozza, P.S.; Pawelczak, K.S.; Calvo, J.; et al. Replication gaps are a key determinant of PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality with BRCA deficiency. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 3128–3144.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nayak, S.; Calvo, J.A.; Cong, K.; Peng, M.; Berthiaume, E.; Jackson, J.; Zaino, A.M.; Vindigni, A.; Hadden, M.K.; Cantor, S.B. Inhibition of the translesion synthesis polymerase REV1 exploits replication gaps as a cancer vulnerability. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaaz7808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quinet, A.; Carvajal-Maldonado, D.; Lemacon, D.; Vindigni, A. DNA Fiber Analysis: Mind the Gap! Methods Enzym. 2017, 591, 55–82. [Google Scholar]
- Taglialatela, A.; Leuzzi, G.; Sannino, V.; Cuella-Martin, R.; Huang, J.W.; Wu-Baer, F.; Baer, R.; Costanzo, V.; Ciccia, A. REV1-Polzeta maintains the viability of homologous recombination-deficient cancer cells through mutagenic repair of PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 4008–4025.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ashour, M.E.; Mosammaparast, N. Mechanisms of damage tolerance and repair during DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 3033–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vrtis, K.B.; Dewar, J.M.; Chistol, G.; Wu, R.A.; Graham, T.G.W.; Walter, J.C. Single-strand DNA breaks cause replisome disassembly. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 1309–1318.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bindra, R.S.; Schaffer, P.J.; Meng, A.; Woo, J.; Maseide, K.; Roth, M.E.; Lizardi, P.; Hedley, D.W.; Bristow, R.G.; Glazer, P.M. Alterations in DNA repair gene expression under hypoxia: Elucidating the mechanisms of hypoxia-induced genetic instability. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2005, 1059, 184–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wong, R.P.; Garcia-Rodriguez, N.; Zilio, N.; Hanulova, M.; Ulrich, H.D. Processing of DNA Polymerase-Blocking Lesions during Genome Replication Is Spatially and Temporally Segregated from Replication Forks. Mol. Cell 2020, 77, 3–16.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Spies, J.; Waizenegger, A.; Barton, O.; Surder, M.; Wright, W.D.; Heyer, W.D.; Lobrich, M. Nek1 Regulates Rad54 to Orchestrate Homologous Recombination and Replication Fork Stability. Mol. Cell 2016, 62, 903–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Tirman, S.; Quinet, A.; Wood, M.; Meroni, A.; Cybulla, E.; Jackson, J.; Pegoraro, S.; Simoneau, A.; Zou, L.; Vindigni, A. Temporally distinct post-replicative repair mechanisms fill PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps in human cells. Mol. Cell 2021, 81, 4026–4040.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, W.; Jasin, M. BRCA2 suppresses replication stress-induced mitotic and G1 abnormalities through homologous recombination. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yong, C.; Stewart, G.D.; Frezza, C. Oncometabolites in renal cancer. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2020, 16, 156–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Halazonetis, T.D.; Gorgoulis, V.G.; Bartek, J. An oncogene-induced DNA damage model for cancer development. Science 2008, 319, 1352–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ceccaldi, R.; Sarangi, P.; D’Andrea, A.D. The Fanconi anaemia pathway: New players and new functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2016, 17, 337–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joenje, H.; Patel, K.J. The emerging genetic and molecular basis of Fanconi anaemia. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chabi, S.; Uzan, B.; Naguibneva, I.; Rucci, J.; Fahy, L.; Calvo, J.; Arcangeli, M.L.; Mazurier, F.; Pflumio, F.; Haddad, R. Hypoxia Regulates Lymphoid Development of Human Hematopoietic Progenitors. Cell Rep. 2019, 29, 2307–2320.e6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ceccaldi, R.; Parmar, K.; Mouly, E.; Delord, M.; Kim, J.M.; Regairaz, M.; Pla, M.; Vasquez, N.; Zhang, Q.S.; Pondarre, C.; et al. Bone marrow failure in Fanconi anemia is triggered by an exacerbated p53/p21 DNA damage response that impairs hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell 2012, 11, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ahuja, A.K.; Jodkowska, K.; Teloni, F.; Bizard, A.H.; Zellweger, R.; Herrador, R.; Ortega, S.; Hickson, I.D.; Altmeyer, M.; Mendez, J.; et al. A short G1 phase imposes constitutive replication stress and fork remodelling in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 10660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spies, J.; Lukas, C.; Somyajit, K.; Rask, M.B.; Lukas, J.; Neelsen, K.J. 53BP1 nuclear bodies enforce replication timing at under-replicated DNA to limit heritable DNA damage. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 21, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Simoneau, A.; Xiong, R.; Zou, L. The trans cell cycle effects of PARP inhibitors underlie their selectivity toward BRCA1/2-deficient cells. Genes Dev. 2021, 35, 1271–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Spies, J.; Polasek-Sedlackova, H.; Lukas, J.; Somyajit, K. Homologous Recombination as a Fundamental Genome Surveillance Mechanism during DNA Replication. Genes 2021, 12, 1960. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12121960
Spies J, Polasek-Sedlackova H, Lukas J, Somyajit K. Homologous Recombination as a Fundamental Genome Surveillance Mechanism during DNA Replication. Genes. 2021; 12(12):1960. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12121960
Chicago/Turabian StyleSpies, Julian, Hana Polasek-Sedlackova, Jiri Lukas, and Kumar Somyajit. 2021. "Homologous Recombination as a Fundamental Genome Surveillance Mechanism during DNA Replication" Genes 12, no. 12: 1960. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12121960