Next Article in Journal
Adducted Thumb and Peripheral Polyneuropathy: Diagnostic Supports in Suspecting White–Sutton Syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature
Previous Article in Journal
QTL Analysis of Stem Elongation and Flowering Time in Lettuce Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Telomere Length and Pediatric Obesity: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Associations of MC4R, LEP, and LEPR Polymorphisms with Obesity-Related Parameters in Childhood and Adulthood

by
Asta Raskiliene
1,*,
Alina Smalinskiene
2,
Vilma Kriaucioniene
1,
Vaiva Lesauskaite
2 and
Janina Petkeviciene
1
1
Health Research Institute, Faculty of Public Health, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania
2
Laboratory of Molecular Cardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50103 Kaunas, Lithuania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 27 May 2021 / Revised: 17 June 2021 / Accepted: 17 June 2021 / Published: 21 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Research in Paediatric Subjects with Body Fat Excess)

Abstract

:
MC4R, LEP, and LEPR genes are involved in the hypothalamic leptin-melanocortin regulation pathway, which is important for energy homeostasis. Our study aimed to evaluate the associations between the MC4R rs17782313, LEP rs7799039, and LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms with obesity-related parameters in childhood and adulthood. The data were obtained from the Kaunas Cardiovascular Risk Cohort study, which started in 1977 with 1082 participants aged 12–13 years. In 2012–2014, the follow-up survey was carried out. Genotype analysis of all respondents (n = 509) aged 48–49 years was performed for the gene polymorphisms using Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Anthropometric measurements were performed in childhood and adulthood. In childhood, only skinfold thicknesses were associated with gene variants being the lowest in children with MC4R TT genotype and LEP AG genotype. In adulthood, odds of obesity and metabolic syndrome was higher in MC4R CT/CC genotype than TT genotype carriers (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.2–2.8 and OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1–2.4, respectively). In men, physical activity attenuated the effect of the MC4R rs17782313 on obesity. The LEP GG genotype was associated with higher BMI, waist circumference, and visceral fat level only in men. No associations of the LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms with anthropometric measurements and leptin level were found. In conclusion, the associations of the MC4R and LEP gene polymorphisms with obesity-related parameters strengthened with age.

1. Introduction

The high prevalence of overweight and obesity is one of the most serious public health problems of the 21st century. During the last decades, the body mass index (BMI) of children and adolescents increased globally [1]. The data of the international Health Behavior in School-Aged Children study, conducted since the 1990s, revealed the increasing prevalence of overweight, especially in boys aged 11, 13, and 15 years [2]. According to the data of another international study, WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI), during 10 years, a rising trend of overweight and obesity among 6–9-year-old children was observed in some participating countries, including Lithuania [3]. Evidence suggests that overweight children and adolescents are at high risk of becoming overweight adults [4]. Obesity in adulthood is associated with many comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes, and cancers [5,6].
Genetic, metabolic, behavioral, and environmental factors play a role in the development of obesity [7]. Changes in body weight are related to energy balance, which is maintained via a homeostatic system. The central melanocortin system is very important for the regulation of energy homeostasis and controlling body weight [8]. Leptin (LEP), leptin receptors (LEPR), and melanocortin receptors (MC4R) are involved in the hypothalamic leptin-melanocortin regulation pathway. LEP is a hormone secreted by adipocytes. It binds to leptin receptors (LEPR) expressed on neurons in the hypothalamus and stimulates post-translational cleavage of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) to α- and β-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, and further signaling through MC4R [8,9]. In healthy individuals, a high LEP level leads to increased MC4R activity, a feeling of satiety, and a decreased food intake [9]. Genetic studies demonstrated that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the MC4R, LEP, and LEPR genes could be linked with obesity [10,11,12].
The MC4R gene has been extensively studied, during the last decades [13]. The MC4R rs17782313 variant was associated with overeating behavior, increased total energy and fat intake and higher BMI in childhood and adulthood [14,15,16]. The associations between the polymorphisms in LEP and LEPR genes and human obesity are still controversial. The most widely studied is the LEP rs7799039 polymorphism. Some studies indicated that the G allele of the LEP rs7799039 was associated with higher anthropometric measurements and increased risk of obesity [17,18]. On the contrary, other studies found that the A allele was linked with higher anthropometric parameters [19,20]. The rs1137101 polymorphism of the LEPR gene is one of the most common polymorphisms and it is believed to be associated with increased body weight and a high leptin level due to damaged capacity of LEPR signaling. However, only some studies proofed the associations of LEPR SNPs with being overweight and leptin level [21,22].
Studies of the associations between gene polymorphisms and anthropometric measurements across the life course can help to understand the mechanisms of action of genetic variants and the etiology of obesity [14,23]. The cohort study provides an opportunity to observe the study population for many years and assess the time changes in the associations between gene polymorphisms and body weight and the effect of gene-environment interaction.
Our study aimed to evaluate the associations between the MC4R rs17782313, LEP rs7799039, and LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms with obesity-related parameters in childhood and adulthood.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Sample

The data were obtained from the Kaunas Cardiovascular Risk Cohort study, which started in 1977 [24]. Fifteen secondary schools of Kaunas city (Lithuania) were randomly selected to participate in the study. In each selected school, all sixth-grade schoolchildren born in 1964 were examined. The data of 1082 participants aged 12–13 years were collected during the first cross-sectional survey. In 2012–2014, the fourth follow-up survey of the cohort was carried out. Over 35 years, 8.4% of participants died, 9.5% of individuals emigrated from Lithuania, and the addresses of 8.3% of individuals were not available in the National Population Register. Thus, the eligible sample consisted of 794 subjects. In total, 509 out of 794 individuals aged 48–49 years (64.1% of the eligible sample) participated in the follow-up survey.
The study protocol was approved by the Kaunas Regional Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research (protocol number BE-2-30). Written informed consent on behalf of the children enrolled in the first survey was obtained from parents or guardians. Written informed consent for participation in the follow-up survey was obtained from all participants.

2.2. Measurements in Childhood

The height, weight, and thickness of subscapular and triceps skinfold were measured in childhood. The height of participants was measured to the nearest centimeter with a stadiometer. The participants wearing light indoor clothing were weighed with standard medical scales to the nearest 0.1 kg. BMI was calculated: BMI = weight(kg)/height2(m). Overweight and obesity were defined using age and sex specific cut-off points for BMI recommended by Cole el al. [25]. The triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses were measured two times to the nearest 1.0 mm with a Harpenden caliper, and the mean values were used in the analyses. The triceps skinfold was taken on the mid-line of the posterior surface of the arm (over the triceps muscle) at the level of the mid-point between the acromial and the radial. The subscapular skinfold was measured just below the angle of the scapula. The sum of the triceps and subscapular skinfold thicknesses was calculated and used in the analysis.

2.3. Measurements in Adulthood

In adulthood, height and weight were measured according to the same methodology as in childhood. BMI was assessed according to the WHO criteria: BMI of 25–29.9 kg/m2—overweight, BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2—obesity. Waist circumference was measured in the midline between the lower rib arch and the iliac crest using a flexible plastic measuring tape to the nearest 0.5 cm. Increased waist circumference was determined for men with waist circumference ≥ 94 cm and women ≥ 80 cm. The percentage of body fat and internal fat was assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis using body composition analyzer OMRON (BF511).
Blood samples for leptin, lipids (total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides), and glucose measurements were taken in the morning after fasting for at least 12 h. Measurements were performed in a certified laboratory with COBAS Integra 400 plus device.
Hyperglycemia were defined at plasma glucose level ≥ 5.6 mmol/L. Participants were classified as having type 2 diabetes mellitus if they had received a diagnosis from a physician and reported the use of glucose-lowering medication. Metabolic syndrome was determined according to criteria of the International Diabetes Federation: increased waist circumference (≥94 cm for men and ≥80 cm for women) plus any two of the following: increased level of triglycerides (≥1.7 mmol/L); reduced level of HDL- cholesterol (for men < 1.03 mmol/L and for women < 1.29 mmol/L); increased level of systolic blood pressure (≥130 mm Hg) and/or diastolic blood pressure (≥85 mm Hg), or treatment of previously reported hypertension); increased fasting plasma glucose concentration (≥5.6 mmol/L) or previously diagnosed type 2 diabetes [26].
For dietary assessment, 24 h dietary recall method was used. Total energy intake in megajoules (MJ) per day, the percentage of energy from protein, fat, total carbohydrate, and sugars were analyzed. Physical activity was assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) [27]. Metabolic equivalents of task (METs) were calculated. Physical activity of less than 10 MET-hours/week was considered as low, 10–25 MET-hours/week—moderate and >25 MET-hours/week—high.

2.4. Genomic DNA Extraction and Genotyping

For DNA extraction, the blood samples were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes. Genomic DNA from peripheral blood leucocytes was extracted using genomic DNA purification kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. SNPs in MC4R gene (rs17782313) was estimated by using a commercially available genotyping kits C__32667060_10, in LEP gene (rs7799039)—C___1328079_10 and in LEPR gene (rs1137101)—C___8722581_10 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The Applied Biosystems 7900HT Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for SNPs detection. The cycling program started with heating at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles (at 95 °C for 15 s and at 60 °C for 1 min). Finally, allelic discrimination was done by using SDS 2.3 software provided by Applied Biosystems.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The normality of the distribution of continuous variables was tested by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Means and standard deviations (SD) were presented for the normally distributed continuous variables, while the median and interquartile range was calculated for the distributions that did not meet the criteria of normality. Student t test and ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison test were used to compare the mean values of normally distributed variables. Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests with Bonferroni multiple comparison tests were applied for the comparison of non-normal distributions. The categorical variables were presented as proportions, and were compared using a χ2 test and Z-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Each polymorphism was tested to ensure the fitting with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Associations of gene polymorphisms with obesity, increased waist circumference, and metabolic syndrome were analyzed using multiple logistic regression analysis. The odds ratios (OR) were adjusted for sex, energy intake and physical activity level.
Statistical data analysis was performed using the statistical package IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp., released 2011).

3. Results

Characteristics of the study participants in childhood and adulthood are presented in Table 1. In the first survey, all analyzed anthropometric measurements of girls were higher than boys; however, the prevalence of overweight and obesity did not differ by gender. Over 35 years of follow-up, BMI gain was greater in men than women. Adult men had a higher mean value of BMI and waist circumference also more visceral fat than women; however, in women, a higher body fat percentage was found. The proportion of obese men and women did not differ significantly, while a higher prevalence of overweight was observed among men than women. Serum leptin and HDL-cholesterol levels were higher in women; on the other hand, men had higher serum triglycerides and glucose level. Moreover, hyperglycemia and metabolic syndrome were more prevalent in men than women. Mean daily energy and fat intake was higher in men, while the proportion of energy from carbohydrates and sugars was higher in women. Although men spend more MET-hours/week on physical activity than women, the difference was not statistically significant.
The distributions of all analyzed genotypes did not differ from those predicted by a Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium: p = 0.355 for MC4R rs17782313, p = 0.697 for LEP rs7799039, and p = 0.744 for LEPR rs1137101. No significant differences in the frequency of MC4R, LEP, and LEPR genotypes or alleles between men and women were found (Table 2). The prevalence of MC4R rs17782313 CC genotype was very low (0.4% in men and 2.5% in women), so the two genotypes (CC and CT) were analyzed together.
In childhood, BMI was not associated with MC4R rs17782313, LEP rs7799039, and LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms. MC4R rs17782313 C allele carriers had higher values of subscapular skinfold thickness than subjects with TT genotype, 8.5 (5.9) mm and 7.5 (3.4) mm, respectively. LEP rs7799039 AG genotype was associated with lower values of triceps skinfold thickness and the sum of both skinfolds’ thicknesses compared with GG genotype (Table 3).
During the follow-up period, greater BMI gain was observed in women with MC4R rs17782313 CT/CC genotype compared with TT genotype, 7.9 (5.3) kg/m2 and 6.2 (5.5) kg/m2, respectively (Table 4). The MC4R minor C allele was associated with higher mean values of BMI, waist circumference, and visceral fat level in men and women. Men with CT/CC genotype also had a higher body fat proportion than the TT genotype carriers. A higher prevalence of central obesity was found in men with CT/CC genotype compared with TT genotype, 68.4% and 51.6%, respectively. More women CT/CC genotype carriers were obese than TT genotype carriers, 29.2% and 17.4%, respectively. Leptin level did not differ by MC4R genotypes. The prevalence of hyperglycemia and diabetes was higher in women with CT/CC genotype compared with the TT genotype. No such association was found in men. Higher fat intake was reported by men with CT/CC genotype.
The data of multiple logistic regression analysis showed that odds of obesity, increased waist circumference, and metabolic syndrome adjusted for gender, energy intake and level of physical activity was by 1.8, 1.7, and 1.6 times higher in MC4R rs17782313 C allele carriers than in subjects with TT genotype (Table 5).
The analysis of the associations of MC4R rs17782313 genotypes with anthropometric parameters in subgroups stratified by the level of physical activity showed that in men having a low level of physical activity, BMI, waist circumference, body fat percentage, and visceral fat level were higher in C allele carriers than in subjects with TT genotype (Table 6). In men with moderate and high-level physical activity, only the distribution of waist circumference differed between TT and CT/CC genotypes. The data of multiple logistic regression analysis showed the higher odds of obesity and increased waist circumference in men with CT/CC genotypes and a low level of physical activity. No associations with MC4R gene polymorphisms and anthropometric measurements were found in men with a moderate or high level of physical activity. Physical activity did not have any effect on the association between MC4R genotypes and anthropometric parameters in women.
Men with LEP rs7799039 genotype GG had higher BMI, waist circumference and visceral fat level than A allele carriers (Table 7). Moreover, men with GG genotype had the highest prevalence of obesity: 37.3% compared to 16.8% in men with AG genotype. LEP rs7799039 polymorphisms were not associated with anthropometric measurements in women.
No associations of the LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms with anthropometric measurements and leptin level were found (Table 8). Dietary assessment showed that women with the GG genotype reported higher fat intake than with the AA genotype.
Lipids and glucose levels did not differ between individuals with MC4R, LEP, and LEPR genetic variants. Moreover, no association between genetic variants and energy intake was found.

4. Discussion

This longitudinal study provides data obtained in a cohort examined in childhood (12–13 years of age) and 35 years later in adulthood (47–48 years of age). The data showed that the associations of MC4R rs17782313 and LEP rs7799039 polymorphisms with anthropometric measurements varied with age. In childhood, genetic variants had no effect on BMI; however, MC4R rs17782313 and LEP rs7799039 variants were associated with subscapular or triceps skinfold thickness. Such a weak link between genetic variants and children weight status could be partially explained by the relatively low prevalence of overweight and obesity (less than 15%). The associations of both genes’ polymorphisms with obesity-related parameters strengthened in adulthood. MC4R rs17782313 variants were associated with BMI, waist circumference, and visceral fat level in men and women, while LEP rs7799039 variants were linked with anthropometric measurements only in men. LEPR rs1137101 polymorphism was not associated with obesity-related parameters in childhood and adulthood.
Studies that examined the associations between gene variants and anthropometric measurements over the life course are particularly limited [14,23,28]. A study carried out in the United Kingdom demonstrated strengthening the association of MC4R genetic variants with BMI and weight during childhood up to age 20 years and then weakening with increasing adult age [14]. The evidence from several U.S. cohorts suggested that the effect of polygenic scores on BMI increases significantly with teenagers’ transition into adulthood [23]. In another study, MC4R gene polymorphism was associated with BMI change from adolescent to young adult [28]. Our study revealed greater BMI gain from childhood to adulthood in women with MC4R rs17782313 C allele.
We found the strongest association of MC4R rs17782313 variants with anthropometric parameters in adulthood. Odds of obesity, increased waist circumference, and metabolic syndrome adjusted for energy intake and level of physical activity was higher in subjects with CT/CC genotype than TT genotype. Evidence suggests that this gene is involved in appetite regulation and energy expenditure [29]. The MC4R rs17782313 variant was associated with the obesity-related proteins ghrelin and visfatin in the Arabic population [30]. Previous studies showed strong associations of the MC4R rs17782313 variant with higher energy and fat intake and lower carbohydrate and protein intake [31,32]. The dietary assessment carried out in our study estimated that the proportion of energy from fat was higher in men with the CT/CC genotype than TT genotype.
Our findings are in line with the previous studies showing that physical activity can attenuate the effect of the MC4R rs17782313 on obesity [33,34,35]. Xi B et al. found significant associations between rs17782313 minor C allele and increased risk of obesity only in children with sedentary behavior [33]. The risk of obesity was higher among sedentary Spain adults with MC4R risky C allele [34]. The data of the HUNT study found that the genetic effect among physically inactive individuals was larger if compared to active ones [35].
In our study, the rs7799039 polymorphism in the LEP gene was associated with anthropometric parameters only in men. The highest values of BMI, waist circumference, and visceral fat level were observed in GG genotype carriers. Some other studies also found that G is a risk allele [17,18]. However, findings from several studies revealed that the A allele is associated with a higher risk of obesity [19,20,36]. Acute exercise decreased leptin levels in G allele carriers but increased in AA homozygotes [36]. Some authors did not report any association between LEP rs7799039 genetic variants and obesity-related variables [37].
The data on associations between LEPR rs1137101 polymorphism is also contradictory. We did not find any association between this polymorphism and body weight status. The same findings were provided by other researchers [12,38,39]. However, a significant association between LEPR rs1137101 minor allele and the greater weight growth was found in the Spanish children population [22]. The findings from the study carried out in Tunis also confirmed that the LEPR rs1137101 polymorphism influences plasma leptin levels and BMI in obese patients [21]. The LEPR rs1137101 G allele was associated with higher BMI and waist circumference in overweight and obese subjects in Sri Lanka [40]. The authors of the systematic review concluded that most studies were underpowered to detect small effect sizes of the polymorphism [41].
Our study did not show any association between analyzed gene polymorphism and leptin level or metabolic traits (lipids and glucose level), except higher prevalence of hyperglycemia and diabetes in women with CT/CC genotype. This association can be explained by higher obesity prevalence in this group.
The strength of the present study is the randomly selected cohort examined in childhood and after 35 years. All anthropometric measurements were taken using the same standardized methodology in both surveys. A further strength includes the adjustment for energy intake and physical activity level in logistic regression analysis for the associations of gene polymorphisms with obesity and metabolic syndrome. The study has several limitations. During the 35-year follow-up, the loss of participants was quite substantial. A high rate of emigration from Lithuania over the last decades was one of the causes for non-participation in the follow-up survey. However, our previous study did not identify the differences in baseline measurements between participants and non-participants [42]. Finally, we did not have data on lipid and glucose levels, or nutrition and physical activity habits in the baseline survey, and we could not analyze the associations between gene variants and those variables.

5. Conclusions

The identified associations of MC4R and LEP polymorphisms with obesity-related parameters should be considered as risk factors for age- and gender-related obesity development. The LEPR polymorphism was not associated with anthropometric measurements. Physical activity attenuates the effect of the MC4R polymorphism on obesity in men. Further lifestyle intervention studies are needed to assess the effect of physical activity on body weight in obese individuals with different genes polymorphisms.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.L. and J.P.; methodology, A.S. and V.K.; investigation, A.S., V.K. and A.R.; data curation, A.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R. and V.K.; writing—review and editing, A.S., J.P. and V.L.; supervision, J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a research grant from the Research Council of Lithuania for the National Research Programme ‘Chronic Noncommunicable Diseases’ (LIG-12019).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Kaunas Regional Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research (protocol number BE-2-30).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical issues.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Height and body-mass index trajectories of school-aged children and adolescents from 1985 to 2019 in 200 countries and territories: A pooled analysis of 2181 population-based studies with 65 million participants. Lancet 2020, 396, 1511–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Inchley, J.; Currie, D.; Budisavljevic, S.; Torsheim, T.; Jåstad, A.; Cosma, A.; Kelly, C.; Arnarsson, A.M.; Samdal, O. Spotlight on Adolescent Health and Well-Being. Findings from the 2017/2018 Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Survey in Europe and Canada. International Report. Volume 2. Key Data; WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  3. WHO European Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative (COSI): Report on the Fourth Round of Data Collection, 2015–2017; WHO Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2021; Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/341189/WHO-EURO-2021-2495-42251-58349-eng.pdf (accessed on 24 May 2021).
  4. Simmonds, M.; Llewellyn, A.; Owen, C.G.; Woolacott, N. Predicting adult obesity from childhood obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 2016, 17, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Umer, A.; Kelley, G.A.; Cottrell, L.E.; Giacobbi, P., Jr.; Innes, K.E.; Lilly, C.L. Childhood obesity and adult cardiovascular disease risk factors: A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Bjerregaard, L.G.; Adelborg, K.; Baker, J.L. Change in body mass index from childhood onwards and risk of adult cardiovascular disease. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 30, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Kumar, S.; Kelly, A.S. Review of Childhood Obesity: From Epidemiology, Etiology, and Comorbidities to Clinical Assessment and Treatment. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2017, 92, 251–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Yang, Y.; Xu, Y. The central melanocortin system and human obesity. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020, 12, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Shen, W.J.; Yao, T.; Kong, X.; Williams, K.W.; Liu, T. Melanocortin neurons: Multiple routes to regulation of metabolism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 2477–2485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Almeida, S.M.; Furtado, J.M.; Mascarenhas, P.; Ferraz, M.E.; Ferreira, J.C.; Monteiro, M.P.; Vilanova, M.; Ferraz, F.P. Association between LEPR, FTO, MC4R, and PPARG-2 polymorphisms with obesity traits and metabolic phenotypes in school-aged children. Endocrine 2018, 60, 466–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Nordang, G.B.N.; Busk, Ø.L.; Tveten, K.; Hanevik, H.I.; Fell, A.K.M.; Hjelmesæth, J.; Holla, Ø.L.; Hertel, J.K. Next-generation sequencing of the monogenic obesity genes LEP, LEPR, MC4R, PCSK1 and POMC in a Norwegian cohort of patients with morbid obesity and normal weight controls. Mol. Genet. Metab. 2017, 121, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paolini, B.; Maltese, P.E.; Del Ciondolo, I.; Tavian, D.; Missaglia, S.; Ciuoli, C.; Zuntini, M.; Cecchin, S.; Bertelli, M.; Pompucci, G. Prevalence of mutations in LEP, LEPR, and MC4R genes in individuals with severe obesity. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Loos, R.J. The genetic epidemiology of melanocortin 4 receptor variants. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 660, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hardy, R.; Wills, A.K.; Wong, A.; Elks, C.E.; Wareham, N.J.; Loos, R.J.; Kuh, D.; Ong, K.K. Life course variations in the associations between FTO and MC4R gene variants and body size. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2010, 19, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Yu, K.; Li, L.; Zhang, L.; Guo, L.; Wang, C. Association between MC4R rs17782313 genotype and obesity: A meta-analysis. Gene 2020, 733, 144372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Crovesy, L.; Rosado, E.L. Interaction between genes involved in energy intake regulation and diet in obesity. Nutrition 2019, 67–68, 110547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martins, M.C.; Trujillo, J.; Farias, D.R.; Kac, G. Polymorphisms in the leptin (rs7799039) gene are associated with an increased risk of excessive gestational weight gain but not with leptin concentration during pregnancy. Nutr. Res. 2017, 47, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hasnain, S. Leptin promoter variant G2548A is associated with serum leptin and HDL-C levels in a case control observational study in association with obesity in a Pakistani cohort. J. Biosci. 2016, 41, 251–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zayani, N.; Omezzine, A.; Boumaiza, I.; Achour, O.; Rebhi, L.; Rejeb, J.; Ben Rejeb, N.; Ben Abdelaziz, A.; Bouslama, A. Association of ADIPOQ, leptin, LEPR, and resistin polymorphisms with obesity parameters in Hammam Sousse Sahloul Heart Study. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2017, 31, e22148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Chavarria-Avila, E.; Vázquez-Del Mercado, M.; Gomez-Bañuelos, E.; Ruiz-Quezada, S.L.; Castro-Albarran, J.; Sánchez-López, L.; Martín-Marquez, B.T.; Navarro-Hernández, R.E. The Impact of LEP G-2548A and LEPR Gln223Arg Polymorphisms on Adiposity, Leptin, and Leptin-Receptor Serum Levels in a Mexican Mestizo Population. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 539408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ben Ali, S.; Kallel, A.; Sediri, Y.; Ftouhi, B.; Feki, M.; Slimene, H.; Jemaa, R.; Kaabachi, N. LEPR p.Q223R Polymorphism influences plasma leptin levels and body mass index in Tunisian obese patients. Arch. Med. Res. 2009, 40, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marcos-Pasero, H.; Aguilar-Aguilar, E.; Colmenarejo, G.; Ramírez de Molina, A.; Reglero, G.; Loria-Kohen, V. The Q223R Polymorphism of the Leptin Receptor Gene as a Predictor of Weight Gain in Childhood Obesity and the Identification of Possible Factors Involved. Genes 2020, 11, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sanz-de-Galdeano, A.; Terskaya, A.; Upegui, A. Association of a genetic risk score with BMI along the life-cycle: Evidence from several US cohorts. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0239067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Torok, E.; Caukas, M.; Gyarfas, I. International Collaborative Study on Juvenile Hypertension; Hungarian Institute of Cardiology: Budapest, Hungary, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cole, T.J.; Bellizzi, M.C.; Flegal, K.M.; Dietz, W.H. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: International survey. BMJ 2000, 320, 1240–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Alberti, K.G.; Zimmet, P.; Shaw, J. Metabolic syndrome—A new world-wide definition. A consensus statement from the international diabetes federation. Diabet. Med. 2006, 23, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Craig, C.L.; Marshall, A.L.; Sjöström, M.; Bauman, A.E.; Booth, M.L.; Ainsworth, B.E.; Pratt, M.; Ekelund, U.; Yngve, A.; Sallis, J.F.; et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2003, 35, 1381–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Graff, M.; North, K.E.; Richardson, A.S.; Young, K.L.; Mazul, A.L.; Highland, H.M.; Mohlke, K.L.; Lange, L.A.; Lange, E.M.; Mullan Harris, K.; et al. BMI loci and longitudinal BMI from adolescence to young adulthood in an ethnically diverse cohort. Int. J. Obes. (Lond.) 2017, 41, 759–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Garfield, A.S.; Li, C.; Madara, J.C.; Shah, B.P.; Webber, E.; Steger, J.S.; Campbell, J.N.; Gavrilova, O.; Lee, C.E.; Olson, D.P.; et al. A neural basis for melanocortin-4 receptor-regulated appetite. Nat. Neurosci. 2015, 18, 863–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hammad, M.M.; Abu-Farha, M.; Hebbar, P.; Cherian, P.; Al Khairi, I.; Melhem, M.; Alkayal, F.; Alsmadi, O.; Thanaraj, T.A.; Al-Mulla, F.; et al. MC4R variant rs17782313 associates with increased levels of DNAJC27, ghrelin, and visfatin and correlates with obesity and hypertension in a Kuwaiti cohort. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Drabsch, T.; Gatzemeier, J.; Pfadenhauer, L.; Hauner, H.; Holzapfel, C. Associations between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms and Total Energy, Carbohydrate, and Fat Intakes: A Systematic Review. Adv. Nutr. 2018, 9, 425–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Khalilitehrani, A.; Qorbani, M.; Hosseini, S.; Pishva, H. The association of MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism with dietary intake in Iranian adults. Gene 2015, 563, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Xi, B.; Wang, C.; Wu, L.; Zhang, M.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, X.; Mi, J. Influence of physical inactivity on associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms and genetic predisposition to childhood obesity. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 173, 1256–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Corella, D.; Ortega-Azorín, C.; Sorlí, J.V.; Covas, M.I.; Carrasco, P.; Salas-Salvadó, J.; Martínez-González, M.Á.; Arós, F.; Lapetra, J.; Serra-Majem, L.; et al. Statistical and biological gene-lifestyle interactions of MC4R and FTO with diet and physical activity on obesity: New effects on alcohol consumption. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e52344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bjørnland, T.; Langaas, M.; Grill, V.; Mostad, I.L. Assessing gene-environment interaction effects of FTO, MC4R and lifestyle factors on obesity using an extreme phenotype sampling design: Results from the HUNT study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0175071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huuskonen, A.; Lappalainen, J.; Tanskanen, M.; Oksala, N.; Kyröläinen, H.; Atalay, M. Genetic variations of leptin and leptin receptor are associated with body composition changes in response to physical training. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2010, 28, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Constantin, A.; Costache, G.; Sima, A.V.; Glavce, C.S.; Vladica, M.; Popov, D.L. Leptin G-2548A and leptin receptor Q223R gene polymorphisms are not associated with obesity in Romanian subjects. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 391, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Diéguez-Campa, C.E.; Angel-Chávez, L.I.; Reyes-Ruvalcaba, D.; Talavera-Zermeño, M.J.; Armendáriz-Cabral, D.A.; Torres-Muro, D.; Pérez-Neri, I. Leptin Levels and Q223R Leptin Receptor Gene Polymorphism in Obese Mexican Young Adults. EJIFCC 2020, 31, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Becer, E.; Mehmetçik, G.; Bareke, H.; Serakıncı, N. Association of leptin receptor gene Q223R polymorphism on lipid profiles in comparison study between obese and non-obese subjects. Gene 2013, 529, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Illangasekera, Y.A.; Kumarasiri, P.V.R.; Fernando, D.J.; Dalton, C.F. Association of the leptin receptor Q223R (rs1137101) polymorphism with obesity measures in Sri Lankans. BMC Res. Notes 2020, 13, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Bender, N.; Allemann, N.; Marek, D.; Vollenweider, P.; Waeber, G.; Mooser, V.; Egger, M.; Bochud, M. Association between variants of the leptin receptor gene (LEPR) and overweight: A systematic review and an analysis of the CoLaus study. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Petkeviciene, J.; Klumbiene, J.; Kriaucioniene, V.; Raskiliene, A.; Sakyte, E.; Ceponiene, I. Anthropometric measurements in childhood and prediction of cardiovascular risk factors in adulthood: Kaunas cardiovascular risk cohort study. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Characteristics of the study sample.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study sample.
CharacteristicsBoys/Men
n = 230
Girls/Women
n = 279
p-Value
Childhood (12–13 years); mean (SD) or median (IQR)
Age (years) *12.9 (0.4)12.9 (0.6)0.979
Weight (kg) **42.9 (13.1)47.1 (13.0)<0.001
BMI (kg/m2) **17.8 (3.4)18.6 (3.3)0.003
Skinfold thickness (mm):
subscapular **5.5 (2.4)7.3 (3.8)<0.001
Triceps ** 10.2 (5.1)13.7 (6.4)<0.001
sum of both **15.6 (7.0)21.2 (9.3)<0.001
Childhood (12–13 years); percentages
Overweight11.312.70.623
Obesity1.72.50.528
Adulthood (48–49 years); mean (SD) or median (IQR)
Age (years) *48.0 (0.2)48.1 (0.2)0.045
Increase in BMI (child–adult) (kg/m2) **8.8 (5.6)6.8 (5.7)<0.001
BMI (kg/m2) **26.9 (5.5)25.6 (6.3)0.009
Waist circumference (cm) **95.8 (16.3)82.0 (16.3)<0.001
Body fat percentage **25.0 (9.0)38.0 (10.0)<0.001
Visceral fat level **11.0 (7.0)7.0 (3.0)<0.001
Leptin (ng/mL) **4.3 (4.8)12.1 (12.1)<0.001
Cholesterol (mmol/L) *6.1 (1.1)6.2 (1.1)0.543
LDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) *3.9 (1.0)3.8 (1.1)0.105
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/L) *1.4 (0.5)1.8 (0.6)<0.001
Triglycerides (mmol/L) **1.3 (0.8)1.0 (0.5)<0.001
Glucose (mmol/L) **5.3 (0.8)5.0 (0.6)<0.001
Energy intake (MJ/d) **8.8 (4.3)6.3 (3.4)<0.001
Protein intake (E%) *14.1 (5.5)13.8 (6.0)0.931
Fat intake (E%) *40.7 (12.5)37.7 (13.3)0.009
Carbohydrate intake (E%) *43.0 (15.0)45.9 (15.4)<0.001
Sugar intake (E%) *13.8 (8.9)16.7 (10.7)<0.001
Physical activity * (MET-hours/week)50.1 (126.4)39.1 (105.7)0.411
Adulthood (48–49 years); percentages
Overweight43.934.10.043
Obesity25.221.10.275
Increased waist circumference57.057.30.453
Hyperglycemia29.613.3<0.001
Diabetes3.92.20.242
Metabolic syndrome33.618.3<0.001
Physical activity levels: 0.740
low25.226.2
moderate31.333.7
high43.540.1
* Mean and standard deviation; ** median and interquartile range; SD—standard deviation; IQR—interquartile range; BMI—body mass index; LDL—low-density lipoprotein; HDL—high-density lipoprotein; MJ/d—megajoules per day; E%—energy percentage; MET—metabolic equivalent of task.
Table 2. Distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies (%).
Table 2. Distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies (%).
GenotypeMenWomenp-Value
n = 230n = 279
MC4R rs17782313
TT66.868.1
CT32.829.40.141
CC0.42.5
T allele0.830.830.866
C allele0.170.17
LEP rs7799039
GG29.336.4
AG54.647.10.19
AA16.116.5
G allele0.570.60.334
A allele0.430.4
LEPR rs1137101
AA21.823.9
AG50.552.50.555
GG27.723.6
A allele0.470.50.34
G allele0.530.5
Table 3. Median (IQR) of anthropometric measurements by MC4R, LEP, and LEPR genotypes in childhood.
Table 3. Median (IQR) of anthropometric measurements by MC4R, LEP, and LEPR genotypes in childhood.
GenotypeBody Mass Index
(kg/m2)
Subscapular Skinfold Thickness (mm)Triceps Skinfold Thickness (mm)Sum of Skinfold Thicknesses (mm)
MC4R rs17782313
TT18.3 (3.3)7.5 (3.4)11.9 (6.1)18.5 (9.3)
CT/CC18.6 (3.6)8.5 (5.9)12.3 (7.8)18.8 (10.6)
p-Value (χ2 test)0.1230.0090.3990.309
LEP rs7799039
GG18.4 (3.8)8.3 (4.7)12.5 (7.5)19.2 (12.2)
AG18.2 (3.2)7.5 (4.4) *11.2 (6.8) *17.5 (9.5) *
AA18.4 (3.5)7.6 (3.0)12.2 (5.7)19.6 (9.4)
p-Value (χ2 test)0.2880.1920.042 *0.031 *
LEPR rs1137101
AA18.3 (3.4)8.1 (4.6)12.1 (7.9)19.1 (12.1)
AG18.3 (3.3)7.9 (4.7)11.9 (6.9)18.4 (10.2)
GG18.4 (3.3)7.6 (36)12.2 (6.7)18.5 (9.7)
p-Value (χ2 test)0.8420.7690.3860.595
* p < 0.05 compared LEP rs7799039 genotype AG with GG (Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons); SD—standard deviation; IQR—interquartile range.
Table 4. Association of the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism with anthropometric measurements and other factors in adulthood.
Table 4. Association of the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism with anthropometric measurements and other factors in adulthood.
CharacteristicsMenWomen
TTCT/CCp-ValueTTCT/CCp-Value
Mean (SD) or Median (IQR)Mean (SD) or Median (IQR)
Increase in BMI (child–adult) (kg/m2) **8.4 (5.7)9.2 (5.0)0.0856.2 (5.5)7.9 (5.3)0.01
BMI (kg/m2) **26.1 (5.9)28.2 (6.7)0.00625.4 (6.0)26.4 (9.0)0.025
Waist circumference (cm) **95.0 (17.2)99.0 (17.8)0.00381.1 (15.1)85.0 (17.3)0.033
Body fat percentage **25.0 (9.0)27.0 (10.0)0.03337.5 (11.0)38.0 (10.0)0.199
Visceral fat level **10.0 (6.0)13.0 (7.0)0.0077.0 (3.0)8.0 (3.0)0.037
Leptin (ng/mL) **4.2 (4.4)4.2 (4.8)0.10011.6 (10.9)12.9 (12.9)0.208
Fat intake (E%) *39.2 (12.0)42.7 (13.1)0.02537.5 (13.2)38.5 (13.9)0.754
Percentages Percentages
Obesity22.231.60.12517.429.20.024
Increased waist circumference51.668.40.01654.264.00.122
Hyperglycemia30.726.30.49010.519.10.049
Diabetes3.93.90.9920.55.60.006
Metabolic syndrome30.340.60.11315.823.90.106
* Mean and standard deviation; ** median and interquartile range.
Table 5. Odds ratios for obesity, waist circumference, and metabolic syndrome by MC4R rs17782313 genotypes in adulthood.
Table 5. Odds ratios for obesity, waist circumference, and metabolic syndrome by MC4R rs17782313 genotypes in adulthood.
VariableMC4R rs17782313 Genotype
TTCT/CC
Odds Ratio *95% Confidence Intervalsp-Value
Obesity11.81.2–2.80.006
Increased waist circumference11.71.2–2.60.005
Metabolic syndrome11.61.1–2.40.032
* Odds ratios adjusted for gender, energy intake, and level of physical activity.
Table 6. Association of the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism with anthropometric measurements by the level of physical activity in men.
Table 6. Association of the MC4R rs17782313 polymorphism with anthropometric measurements by the level of physical activity in men.
CharacteristicsLow Level of Physical ActivityModerate and High Level of Physical Activity
Median (IQR)Median (IQR))
TTCT/CCp-ValueTTCT/CCp-Value
BMI (kg/m2)25.8 (5.7)30.3 (5.4)0.00726.2 (6.0)27.6 (9.2)0.088
Waist circumference (cm)97.0 (14.7)103.0 (13.4)0.02393.2 (17.5)97.2 (16.3)0.030
Body fat percentage26.0 (9.0)28.5 (9.0)0.03524.0 (9.0)26.0 (10.0)0.197
Visceral fat level10.0 (7.0)15.0 (5.0)0.01011.0 (7.0)12.0 (6.0)0.062
Odds ratio * (95% CI)Odds ratio * (95% CI)
Obesity15.6 (1.6–19.8)0.00711.0 (0.5–2.2)0.850
Increased waist circumference14.2 (1.0–17.0)0.04811.7 (0.9–3.3)0.123
* Odds ratios adjusted for gender, energy intake and level of physical activity; IQR—interquartile range; CI—confidence interval.
Table 7. Association of the LEP rs7799039 polymorphism with anthropometric measurements and leptin level in adulthood.
Table 7. Association of the LEP rs7799039 polymorphism with anthropometric measurements and leptin level in adulthood.
CharacteristicsMenWomen
GGAGAAp-ValueGGAGAAp-Value
Median (IQR) Median (IQR)
Increase in BMI (child–adult) (kg/m2)10.2 (7.1)8.5 (5.0)9.0 (5.7)0.1146.7 (5.6)6.5 (5.0)8.1 (6.9)0.607
BMI (kg/m2)27.9 (8.8)26.7 (4.3) *26.0 (8.8) *0.04025.6 (6.1)25.3 (6.1)27.1 (7.7)0.354
Waist circumference (cm)100.4 (14.1)95.6 (11.0) *96.2 (13.6)0.03581.0 (15.9)82.0 (15.5)85.0 (17.5)0.768
Visceral fat level12.0 (8.0)11.0 (5.0 *)10.5 (9.0) *0.0377.0 (3.0)7.0 (3.0)8.0 (4.0)0.352
Leptin (ng/mL)5.1 (5.6)3.9 (3.9)3.8 (4.1)0.25111.2 (10.9)12.3 (13.4)13.0 (9.8)0.982
Percentages Percentages
Obesity37.316.8 **29.70.00616.220.328.90.211
Increased waist circumference65.752.056.80.19055.656.364.40.571
* p < 0.05 compared with LEP rs7799039 GG genotype (Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons); ** p < 0.05 compared with LEP rs7799039 GG genotype (Z-test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons); SD—standard deviation; IQR—interquartile range.
Table 8. Association of the LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms with anthropometric measurements and other factors in adulthood.
Table 8. Association of the LEPR rs1137101 polymorphisms with anthropometric measurements and other factors in adulthood.
CharacteristicsMenWomen
AAAGGGp-ValueAAAGGGp-Value
Mean (SD) or Median (IQR)Mean (SD) or Median (IQR)
Increase in BMI (child–adult) (kg/m2) ** 8.0 (5.3)9.8 (5.9)7.9 (5.4)0.2146.6 (6.0)6.6 (5.0)7.8 (6.6)0.655
BMI (kg/m2) **25.8 (5.9)27.7 (5.5)26.3 (6.4)0.20125.4 (8.0)25.4 (6.2)26.2 (6.9)0.422
Waist circumference (cm) **95.0 (16.3)98.2 (14.8)95.0 (16.3)0.16884.0 (20.5)81.2 (16.3)84.3 (15.3)0.283
Visceral fat level **10.0 (8.0)12.0 (6.0)11.0 (8.0)0.1767.0 (4.0)7.0 (3.0)8.0 (3.0)0.421
Leptin (ng/mL) **4.2 (4.0)4.9 (4.9)4.3 (3.5)0.66210.4 (11.8)11.0 (11.7)15.1 (13.5)0.348
Fat intake (E%) *42.1 (15.4)41.2 (11.6)39.5 (13.0)0.74934.8 (11.0)38.3 (13.5)41.5 (14.3) *0.015
Percentages Percentages
Obesity22.927.026.20.86127.317.923.10.286
Increased waist circumference52.164.052.50.21457.654.564.60.389
* p < 0.05 compared with LEPR rs1137101 AA genotype (Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons); SD—standard deviation; IQR—interquartile range; * mean and standard deviation; ** median and interquartile range.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Raskiliene, A.; Smalinskiene, A.; Kriaucioniene, V.; Lesauskaite, V.; Petkeviciene, J. Associations of MC4R, LEP, and LEPR Polymorphisms with Obesity-Related Parameters in Childhood and Adulthood. Genes 2021, 12, 949. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12060949

AMA Style

Raskiliene A, Smalinskiene A, Kriaucioniene V, Lesauskaite V, Petkeviciene J. Associations of MC4R, LEP, and LEPR Polymorphisms with Obesity-Related Parameters in Childhood and Adulthood. Genes. 2021; 12(6):949. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12060949

Chicago/Turabian Style

Raskiliene, Asta, Alina Smalinskiene, Vilma Kriaucioniene, Vaiva Lesauskaite, and Janina Petkeviciene. 2021. "Associations of MC4R, LEP, and LEPR Polymorphisms with Obesity-Related Parameters in Childhood and Adulthood" Genes 12, no. 6: 949. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12060949

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop