Next Article in Journal
Expanding the Search for Sperm Transmission Elements in the Mitochondrial Genomes of Bivalve Mollusks
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Transcriptome Analysis in Monocyte-Derived Macrophages of Asymptomatic GBA Mutation Carriers and Patients with GBA-Associated Parkinson’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Forensic Value of DNA Evidence from Y Chromosomes and Mitogenomes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

C9orf72-G4C2 Intermediate Repeats and Parkinson’s Disease; A Data-Driven Hypothesis

1
The Genomic Research Laboratory for Neurodegeneration, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel
2
Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
3
Movement Disorders Unit, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel
4
Laboratory for Early Markers of Neurodegeneration, Neurological Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
The two authors contributed equally to the work.
Submission received: 6 July 2021 / Revised: 2 August 2021 / Accepted: 3 August 2021 / Published: 5 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Parkinson's Disease: Genetics and Pathogenesis)

Abstract

:
Pathogenic C9orf72-G4C2 repeat expansions are associated with ALS/FTD, but not with Parkinson’s disease (PD); yet the possible link between intermediate repeat lengths and PD remains inconclusive. We aim to study the potential involvement of these repeats in PD. The number of C9orf72-repeats were determined by flanking and repeat-primed PCR assays, and the risk-haplotype was determined by SNP-array. Their association with PD was assessed in a stratified manner: in PD-patients-carriers of mutations in LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1 genes (n = 388), and in PD-non-carriers (NC, n = 718). Allelic distribution was significantly different only in PD-NC compared to 600 controls when looking both at the allele with higher repeat’s size (p = 0.034) and at the combined number of repeats from both alleles (p = 0.023). Intermediate repeats (20–60 repeats) were associated with PD in PD-NC patients (p = 0.041; OR = 3.684 (CI 1.05–13.0)) but not in PD-carriers (p = 0.684). The C9orf72 risk-haplotype, determined in a subgroup of 588 PDs and 126 controls, was observed in higher frequency in PD-NC (dominant model, OR = 1.71, CI 1.04–2.81, p = 0.0356). All 19 alleles within the risk-haplotype were associated with higher C9orf72 RNA levels according to the GTEx database. Based on our data, we suggest a model in which intermediate repeats are a risk factor for PD in non-carriers, driven not only by the number of repeats but also by the variants’ genotypes within the risk-haplotype. Further studies are needed to elucidate this possible role of C9orf72 in PD pathogenesis.

1. Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder, affecting about 2% of the elderly population worldwide [1]. Its complex genetic background has been revealed in the past decades, implicating many genes associated with the disease. A wide variety of genetic changes and mechanisms are involved in PD, including rare and common variants, recessive, dominant, and oligogenic inheritance, and epigenetics [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. However, the full range of genetic changes in PD is still evolving.
G4C2 Hexanucleotide repeat expansions in C9orf72 are strongly associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) [9,10], mostly in European and North American populations [11,12]. Although 30 repeats and over are considered pathogenic for ALS and FTD, most patients that are C9orf72- associated-ALS or -FTD, carry an expanded allele with hundreds, or even thousands, of repeats [12,13,14]. Interestingly, parkinsonism was observed in more than 40% of FTD and FTD/ALS patients with pathogenic C9orf72 expansions [15]. This observation has led researchers to investigate the possible association of C9orf72 expansions with PD.
While rare cases of PD patients with 30 to 60 repeat expansions or more in C9orf72 were detected (<0.7%), there was no association with PD [16,17,18,19,20]. Few studies have suggested that intermediate-size repeat lengths in C9orf72 may be a risk factor for PD; however, these studies suggested different repeat lengths for this association: ≥7 repeats in Han Chinese [21], and ≥20 repeats in Caucasians [17]. In a multi-center meta-analysis of mostly Caucasian and Asian populations, the pathogenicity expansions threshold was determined as >60 repeats, and the intermediate repeat size was set as 17–60 repeats [22], suggesting an effect on PD-risk for the cutoff of 17 repeats, and even as little as 10 repeats as a stand-alone or as a cutoff. In a recent comprehensive review by Bourinaris and Houlden [23], C9orf72 intermediate repeat lengths were reported in several parkinsonism and movement disorders, including in Dopa-responsive PD, atypical parkinsonisms including PSP and MSA, essential-tremor plus parkinsonism, and spinocerebellar ataxia.
As previous studies have shown the pivotal role of genetically homogeneous populations, such as the Ashkenazi Jews (AJ), in understanding the genetic background of neurodegenerative diseases [24,25,26,27], we hereby determined C9orf72 repeats’ size in PD patients of Ashkenazi origin and examined their potential association with PD. We also studied the possible association of the shared risk-haplotype, which is observed in carriers of intermediate repeats, with PD-risk.

2. Methods

2.1. Population

This study included a cohort of consecutively recruited unrelated 1106 PD patients of full Ashkenazi Jewish origin (Table 1). Patients were recruited between the years 2005 and 2015. The diagnostic criteria, recruitment, and genotyping for LRRK2, GBA, and SMPD1 mutations have been previously described [24,25,28]. Carrier patients (PD-carriers) were defined with one or more of the following mutations in LRRK2 (p.G2019S), SMPD1 (p. L302P), or any of the 10 GBA mutations (c.84insG, IVS2 + 1G > A, p.V394L, p.N370S, p.L444P, p.R496H, p.E326K, p.T369M, p.R44C, and 370Rec). Patients who did not carry any of these mutations were determined as non-carriers (PD-NC). The cohort of 600 ethnically matched control individuals used in this study has been previously described [26].

2.2. Determining the G4C2 Hexanucleotide Repeat Length in the C9orf72 Gene

To determine the number of repeats in C9orf72, flanking and repeat-primed PCR assays were performed as previously described [9,10], with some modifications [26]. This method detects all repeats expansion but can determine the number of repeats up to 55 repeats. Therefore, in all individuals that carried an allele with 30 repeats or more, an additional method was used to determine accurately the repeat number up to 145 repeats (Asuragen assay kit AmplideX® PCR/CE C9orf72 Kit; Asuragen Genetics; Austin, TX, USA).

2.3. Assembly of the Risk-Haplotype within the C9orf72 Locus

To determine the presence of the risk-haplotype in C9orf72-locus, we used the genotype data (from Vacic et al. [29], Affymetrixs SNP6.0) of 127 AJ controls (all part of our cohort of 600 controls) and 597 AJ-PD patients (594 are part of our cohort of 1106 PD patients). When determination of the presence of the risk-haplotype was impossible due to missing genotypes, these individuals were excluded (Control = 1, PD = 5). One PD was excluded due to low genotype rate, one was not tested for repeat size, and two PDs who carried >145 repeats were also excluded. In total, 126 controls and 588 PD patients were analyzed.

2.4. Statistical Analyses of C9orf72 G4C2 Hexanucleotide Repeats

All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS statistics software v25 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA). Differences in continuous variables were tested using Mann–Whitney U test or t-test (2-tailed). To test the difference in C9orf72 repeat lengths between patients and controls, both alleles repeat sizes (per individual) were included.
Categorical variables were compared using 2-sided χ2-test, or Fisher’s exact test when numbers were less than 5. Odds ratio (OR), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was applied to assess the association of C9orf72 G4C2 repeat lengths with PD. This association was examined using the longest repeat size (per individual) as the independent variable. Association of the risk-haplotype with PD was examined using a dominant model. Logistic regression analysis was performed when using repeat units as a quantitative trait (the largest allele or the sum of both alleles).

3. Results

3.1. Allele Frequencies of C9orf72 G4C2 Hexanucleotide Repeats in Ashkenazi PD Patients

Allele frequencies of C9orf72 repeats were determined in our cohort of 1106 Ashkenazi PD patients (Table 1), that was divided into two groups based on their genotypic status, either carriers of PD-associated mutations (see Methods section), or non-carrier patients (PD-NC). We ran a stratified analysis based on the carrier status in LRRK2, GBA, and SMPD1, as a high percentage of our PD cohort carry risk alleles in these 3 genes (35.1%, 388/1106), and these carrier-patients may mask the effect of the hexanucleotide repeat length on PD-risk in non-carrier patients. The most frequent alleles found were 2, 8 and 5 repeat units (66.2%, 12.1%, 8.9% in carrier, and 63.1%, 12.7%, 9.7% in non-carrier patients; Figure 1 and Supplement Table S1). These alleles were also shown as the most common alleles in our previously published data of Ashkenazi controls (66.4%, 11.0%, and 10.2%) [26]. No significant difference in allele distribution was observed between patients with mutations (in LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1 genes) and controls (Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.756; 4.23 ± 6.13, N = 776 and 4.09 ± 5.36, N = 1200, respectively). However, a significant difference in allele distribution was detected in PD-NC (Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.034; 4.71 ± 8.40, N = 1436). This was also significant for the total number of repeats (combining the numbers of repeats from both alleles; excluding individuals with expanded alleles of >145 repeats) in PD-NC (Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.023; 8.63 ± 5.57, N = 714, and 7.94 ± 5.01, N = 599) and was not significant in PD-carriers (Mann–Whitney U test p = 0.565; 8.10 ± 4.90, N = 387).

3.2. The Association of C9orf72 G4C2 Hexanucleotide Intermediate Repeat Lengths with PD in Ashkenazi Patients

We examined the association of the longest repeat allele in each individual with PD (in PD-carriers and PD-NC). First, we examined whether large expansion lengths (>145 repeats) are present within our cohort of PD patients and controls. We found one PD-carrier patient (carrying the LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation, 1/388 = 0.3%), four PD-NC (4/718 = 0.6%), and one control (1/600 = 0.2%) that carried an expanded allele. No significant association was detected in any of the patients’ groups compared to controls (Fisher’s Exact Test p = 1.000 and p = 0.384, respectively). Of interest, one of these PD patients was later diagnosed with ALS, and two had dementia. For further analysis, we excluded these five carriers with C9orf72 G4C2 repeats expansion (all with > 145 repeats). None of our patients or controls carried alleles between 60 and 145 repeats.
Next, we examined if intermediate C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeats (20–60 repeats) were associated with PD in our cohort. Among the 1101 PD patients, 3 PD-carriers (0.8%, 3/387) and 13 PD-NC (1.8%, 13/714) carried an allele with intermediate repeat lengths, compared to 3 among the controls (0.5%, 3/599). An association with increased risk for PD was observed in PD-NC patients compared to controls (Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.041; OR = 3.684, CI = 1.045–12.990; Table 2, Figure 1), but no association was detected when comparing PD-carrier patients to controls (p = 0.684, Table 2).
Measuring the effect of the risk associated with an increasing number of repeats (β, regression analysis for each one repeat unit) shows a significant effect in PD-NC when looking either at the largest allele or at the sum of alleles (β = 0.032, p = 0.015, OR = 1.032, CI = 1.006–1.059; β = 0.025, p = 0.021, OR = 1.025, CI = 1.004–1.047; respectively). No effect was observed in PD-carriers (β = 0.009, p = 0.542, OR = 1.01, CI = 0.979–1.041; β = 0.007, p = 0.617, OR = 1.007, CI = 0.981–1.033; respectively). No effect on age of motor symptoms onset was observed in PD-NC (p value = 0.978).

3.3. The C9orf72 Risk-Haplotype Is Associated with Higher RNA Expression Levels and with PD

We have previously shown that the C9orf72 expansions in AJ shared a risk-haplotype that expands 107Kb (Goldstein et al. [26], hg19: chr9:27484575-27591569), encompasses the complete C9orf72 gene, and includes 44 informative single nucleotide variants (SNVs), with significant association with higher number of repeats (over 8 repeats). We further examined here the effects of these 44 SNVs (within the risk haplotype) on the RNA expression levels (eQTL) and splicing (sQTL) of their adjacent genes, as reported by the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project [30]. Of them, 11 SNVs had no QTLs, 4 had low effect size (absolute NES < 0.2), and one had no significant effect (m-value < 0.9). Nine other variants were also excluded due to high allele frequency in AJs (> 0.5 in gnomAD v3.1 database of non-neuro cases). The other 19 SNVs within this 107Kb risk-haplotype were all associated with higher C9orf72 RNA expression levels compared to the expression levels of the non-risk alleles (Table 3, Figure 2). Cerebellum and Nucleus-accumbens were the tissues with the highest normalized effect size (NES). Moreover, as GTEx evaluates the effect of each SNV on the neighboring genes within a 2 Mb interval (1 Mb upstream and 1 Mb downstream), it is important to note that all 19 SNVs affected exclusively C9orf72-RNA levels and not any other genes within that 2 Mb window. These SNVs also affected splice variants (sQTL) in an exclusive manner, only for C9orf72, mainly in cerebellum (Table 3).
We, therefore, tested if carrying the risk-haplotype is associated with PD. Genotyping data from 127 AJ controls and 597 AJ-PD patients were assembled (see Methods), and the presence of the 19-SNVs-risk-haplotype was determined. Overall enrichment of the risk-haplotype was observed in PDs compared to controls: 167 out of 588 PDs carried one or two copies of the risk-haplotype (28.4%) compared to 24 out of 126 controls (19.0%). When stratifying based on mutation carrier status (PD-carriers and PD-NC), a significant association was detected in PD-NC: 28.6% of them carried one or two copies of the risk-haplotype (OR = 1.71, CI = 1.04–2.81, p = 0.0356), and tendency was shown in PD-carriers (28.0%, OR = 1.65, CI = 0.97–2.82, p = 0.0656).
We also attempted to define the correlation between the existence of risk-haplotype and number of repeats, by looking at all alleles (n = 1428 alleles): 100% negative correlation existed between the risk-haplotype and the 2-repeats’ allele (with zero percent risk-haplotype), and 100% positive correlation was observed in carriers of 14–60 repeats (100% carried the risk-haplotype, Supplement Figure S1). Thus, we used 14 repeats as the best assessor for carrying the risk-haplotype and re-calculated the association of 14 repeats and higher with PD in our cohorts. Among all alleles in PD-NC, 2.3% had 14–60 repeats, compared to only 1.3% in controls, showing a trend toward significance (Figure 3a, OR = 1.75, CI = 0.96–3.19, p = 0.069, uncorrected), with no significance observed in PD-carriers (Figure 3b, OR = 1.46, CI = 0.72–2.97, p = 0.296). Further analysis showed a significant association in PD-NC when the cutoff of 13 repeats or 12 repeats was selected (OR = 1.70, CI = 1.07–2.72, p = 0.0257 and OR = 1.51, CI = 1.01–2.25, p = 0.044, respectively, Figure 3a, uncorrected), while there was no significant association in PD-carriers (OR = 1.46, CI = 0.72–2.97, p = 0.296; OR = 1.39, CI = 0.79–2.42, p = 0.249 and OR = 1.32, CI = 0.83–2.12, p = 0.245, respectively, Figure 3b). No significance was shown at 11 repeats cutoff, both in PD-NC and PD-carriers (Figure 3, OR = 1.22, CI = 0.89–1.69, p = 0.214 and OR = 1.20, CI = 0.82–1.74, p = 0.345, respectively).

4. Discussion

More than 40 diseases, most of which affect the nervous system, were identified with a genetic basis of expansions of simple short DNA sequence (reviewed by Reference [31]). Among these diseases are myotonic dystrophy, Huntington’s disease, spinocerebeller ataxia (SCA), spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA), and Fragile-X syndrome. A common finding in these disorders is the correlation of the number of repeats with clinical phenotypes and penetrance. Interestingly, emerging studies suggest that expanded repeats and intermediate repeats can cause or act as risk factors for different neurological diseases, depending on the number of repeats. This was suggested for the FMR1 gene, when over 200 CCG repeats cause mental retardation (Fragile-X syndrome), while the premutations of 45–200 repeats are a risk factor for Fragile-X- tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) in males and premature ovarian failure 1 (FXPOI) in females. Other examples are ATXN2, in which more than 34 repeats cause SCA2, while 29–33 are risk factor for ALS [32,33], and ATXN1, in which more than 38 repeat cause SCA1, while ≥33 are risk factor for ALS, mostly in C9orf72 expansion carriers [34]. The latter is an example of the complexity of these mechanisms, as some of these risk alleles are more significant in specific subgroups of patients. To see if a similar phenomenon exists also for C9orf72 intermediate repeats, we analyzed Parkinson’s disease patients of Ashkenazi origin, in a stratified manner, in carriers of mutations in LRRK2, GBA, and/or SMPD1 genes, and in patients that do not carry these mutations. We showed that the expanded alleles (>60 repeats) had no association with PD, as shown by other groups and in a meta-analysis [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]; however, intermediate-size repeats of 20–60 are significantly enriched in PD-NC, increasing the risk for PD, while, in PD-carriers, there was no effect. The high significant odds ratio of 3.68 in non-carriers may be due to the exclusion of those patients who carry known risk alleles in LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1, as we believe that in these patients the risk for PD is likely influenced by these mutations and not by the C9orf72 intron 1 hexanucleotide repeat numbers. Of note is that Xi et al. also reported that intermediate repeats of 20–29 were found only in PD-NC, and not in PD-patients that carry the LRRK2 p.G2019S mutation [19]. Based on these observations, we propose that C9orf72 G4C2 hexanucleotide repeats in intron 1 act as a risk factor for PD when number of repeats are intermediates. Although the exact definition of intermediate- and pathogenic-length size is still in debate, and may differ in different populations, we believe that the presence of alleles lower than the 60 repeats, in the intermediate range, should not be dismissed as a potential risk for PD.
How may intermediate numbers of repeats affect the risk to develop PD?
In ALS, although the role of C9orf72 expansions is not yet fully established, three main mechanisms are proposed to contribute to its pathogenicity: C9orf72 loss-of-function, generation of toxic RNA aggregates, and short peptide accumulation [12,14]. As G4C2 repeats in the C9orf72 gene are located within intron 1 and are near the promoter region, they may lead to changes in promoter regulation, depending on the number of repeats. Indeed, it was shown that ALS/FTD-expanded alleles are highly methylated and lead to lower levels of C9orf72 mRNA and protein [35,36,37].
Do these same mechanisms contribute to Parkinson’s disease risk? We demonstrated here that the risk-haplotype, which is shared by the intermediate C9orf72 G4C2 repeats, includes many SNVs that have the same effect of increasing RNA expression levels of C9orf72, as reported in GTEx. We, therefore, suggest that the mechanism involved in the effect of intermediate-size repeats on PD-increased-risk, could be the higher expression of C9orf72. This mechanism was recently suggested for a different neurodegenerative disease, Corticobasal Degeneration (CBD), a rare neurodegenerative disease that shares some similar clinical features with PD [38]. Researchers showed a significant enrichment of intermediate repeats in autopsy-proven CBD, as well as increased C9orf72-RNA expression levels in human brain tissues and in CRISPR/cas9 knock-in iPSC cells, but no association with pathologic RNA foci or dipeptides aggregates.
One important question is whether intermediate-repeats-sizes or the increase of C9orf72 expression, which is associated with the risk-haplotype, may drive the risk for PD. As these two mostly go together, this question should be answered in an experimental set-up that separates the two events. Cali et al. tried to answer this question by knocking-in 28 repeats into iPSCs that normally have either 2 or 6 repeats (suggestive of cells that do not carry the risk haplotype) and demonstrated that these knocked-in cells show higher expression of C9orf72 [38]. As GTEx data suggest higher expression of C9orf72 for all 19 variants within the risk-haplotype, it is tempting to suggest that PD-risk may be determined by the level of C9orf72 expression, mediated by both the risk-haplotype and the number of repeats, a hypothesis that needs further evaluation. This hypothesis raises other questions: does the overall level of C9orf72 expression depend on the effect of the total number of repeats in both alleles, and whether the genomic region of the C9orf72-risk-haplotype might expand to a larger interval than the minimal linkage disequilibrium of 107 Kb, as suggested by gnomAD database? In addition, the GTEx data show that the risk-haplotype effect on C9orf72 RNA expression levels is not uniform in all tissues. The effect size is large and significant mostly in brain tissues, as well as in the small intestine, but much smaller in whole blood and lymphocytes.
What could be the effect of intermediate-size repeats on cellular expression? Cali et al. performed a comparative genes expression analysis between cells with intermediate repeats and cells with low number of repeats [38], demonstrating upregulation of genes that are enriched for vesicle trafficking and protein degradation pathways, including golgi vesicle transport, response to ER-stress, and autophagy, pathways which are involved in PD.
In summary, our stratified analysis suggests that intermediate- size hexanucleotide repeats in C9orf72 are a risk factor for PD in individuals who do not carry common AJ founder mutations in LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1. These results should be interpreted with caution as no correction for multiple comparisons was performed, and similar analyses should be performed on a larger cohort of PD patients. However, we propose a model in which the risk for PD may be driven not only by the number of repeats, but also by the genotypes of SNVs within the risk-haplotype, affecting C9orf72 RNA expression levels. Further studies are needed to elucidate the possible role of C9orf72 in PD pathogenesis.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/genes12081210/s1, Table S1. Allele frequencies of G4C2 hexanucleotide repeat lengths in C9orf72 in Parkinson’s disease patients of Ashkenazi Jewish origin and controls. Figure S1. Number of alleles observed for each C9orf72-G4C2-repeat-size with risk or non-risk haplotypes in the Ashkenazi Jews (PDs and controls).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.K., O.G., A.O.-U.; methodology, H.K., O.G., A.O.-U.; validation, H.K., O.G.; formal analysis, H.K., O.G.; investigation, H.K., O.G.; resources, M.G.-W., A.B.-S., T.G., A.T., A.M., N.G.; data curation, H.K., O.G., A.O.-U.; writing—original draft preparation, H.K., O.G., A.O.-U.; writing—review and editing, O.G., M.G.-W., A.B.-S., T.G., A.T., A.M., N.G., A.O.-U.; visualization, H.K., O.G.; supervision, O.G., A.O.-U.; project administration, M.G.-W., A.O.-U.; funding acquisition, A.O.-U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Kahn Foundation and Michael J Fox Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (The Institutional Helsinki Committee of the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; protocol code 05-069, date of approval 8 September 2005), and by the Israeli National Supreme Helsinki Committee for Genetic Studies (protocol code 920050035, date of approval 8 September 2005).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Supplementary Materials Table S1.

Acknowledgments

This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree by Hila Kobo at the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. We thank Haike Reznik-Wolf for assistance with Asuragene genotyping.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors H.K., O.G., M.G.-W. and A.B.-S. declare no conflicts of interest. Author T.G. has served as an advisor for Cytora, Synnerva, Teva, Medison, and Allergan, received honoraria from AbbVie and Neuroderm, research support from Parkinson’s Foundation, University Tel-Aviv, Phonetica Ltd., and Israel innovation authority and travel support from AbbVie, Medison, Medtronic, and Allergan. Author AT has received honoraria from AbbVie Inc. and research grants from Michael J Fox Foundation. Author AM has received consulting fees from NeuroDerm and research grants from Michal J Fox Foundation, the Israeli Science Foundation and the US Department of Defense. Author NG serves as consultant to Intec Pharma, NeuroDerm, Denali, Abbvie, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Vibrant, BOL, LTI, Idorsia and Neuron23, Pharma2B, receives payment for lectures at Abbvie, Sanofi-Genzyme and Movement Disorder Society, received research support from the Michael J Fox Foundation, the National Parkinson Foundation, and the Israel Science Foundation, as well as from Teva NNE program, Biogen, The Aufzien Center, and the Sieratzki family Foundation at Tel-Aviv University, serves on the advisory board of LTI, NeuroDerm, Sionara, Sanofi-Genzyme, Biogen, Denali, Intec Pharma, Idorsia, and own stocks in Lysosomal Therapeutic Ltd., Vibrant, BOL, and serves as a member of the Editorial Board for the Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. Author AOU has received research support from Michael J Fox Foundation and Chaya Charitable Fund and has received honoraria from Sanofi Genzyme. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AAE: age at enrollment; AAO, age-at-onset, ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; C9orf72, chromosome 9 open reading frame 72; CI, confidence interval; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; GBA, glucosidase β acid; LRRK2, leucine-rich repeat kinase 2; SMPD1, sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 1; N, number of individuals; OR, odds ratio; PD, Parkinson’s disease; SD, standard deviation; y, years.

References

  1. De Lau, L.M.; Breteler, M.M. Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2006, 5, 525–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Blauwendraat, C.; Nalls, M.A.; Singleton, A.B. The genetic architecture of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2020, 19, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Corti, O.; Lesage, S.; Brice, A. What genetics tells us about the causes and mechanisms of Parkinson’s disease. Physiol. Rev. 2011, 91, 1161–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Farrer, M.J. Genetics of Parkinson disease: Paradigm shifts and future prospects. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2006, 7, 306–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gasser, T.; Hardy, J.; Mizuno, Y. Milestones in PD genetics. Mov. Disord. 2011, 26, 1042–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lesage, S.; Brice, A. Parkinson’s disease: From monogenic forms to genetic susceptibility factors. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, R48–R59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lubbe, S.J.; Escott-Price, V.; Gibbs, J.R.; Nalls, M.A.; Bras, J.; Price, T.R.; Nicolas, A.; Jansen, I.E.; Mok, K.Y.; Pittman, A.M.; et al. Additional rare variant analysis in Parkinson’s disease cases with and without known pathogenic mutations: Evidence for oligogenic inheritance. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 5483–5489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Van Heesbeen, H.J.; Smidt, M.P. Entanglement of Genetics and Epigenetics in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Mackenzie, I.R.; Boeve, B.F.; Boxer, A.L.; Baker, M.; Rutherford, N.J.; Nicholson, A.M.; Finch, N.A.; Flynn, H.; Adamson, J.; et al. Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS. Neuron 2011, 72, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Renton, A.E.; Majounie, E.; Waite, A.; Simon-Sanchez, J.; Rollinson, S.; Gibbs, J.R.; Schymick, J.C.; Laaksovirta, H.; van Swieten, J.C.; Myllykangas, L.; et al. A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD. Neuron 2011, 72, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, Y.; Yu, J.T.; Zong, Y.; Zhou, J.; Tan, L. C9ORF72 mutations in neurodegenerative diseases. Mol. Neurobiol. 2014, 49, 386–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shu, L.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, Q.; Guo, J.; Yan, X.; Tang, B. The Association between C9orf72 Repeats and Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Meta-Analysis. Parkinsons Dis. 2016, 2016, 5731734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Dols-Icardo, O.; Garcia-Redondo, A.; Rojas-Garcia, R.; Sanchez-Valle, R.; Noguera, A.; Gomez-Tortosa, E.; Pastor, P.; Hernandez, I.; Esteban-Perez, J.; Suarez-Calvet, M.; et al. Characterization of the repeat expansion size in C9orf72 in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 749–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Haeusler, A.R.; Donnelly, C.J.; Rothstein, J.D. The expanding biology of the C9orf72 nucleotide repeat expansion in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2016, 17, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Boeve, B.F.; Boylan, K.B.; Graff-Radford, N.R.; DeJesus-Hernandez, M.; Knopman, D.S.; Pedraza, O.; Vemuri, P.; Jones, D.; Lowe, V.; Murray, M.E.; et al. Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72. Brain J. Neurol. 2012, 135, 765–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cooper-Knock, J.; Frolov, A.; Highley, J.R.; Charlesworth, G.; Kirby, J.; Milano, A.; Hartley, J.; Ince, P.G.; McDermott, C.J.; Lashley, T.; et al. C9ORF72 expansions, parkinsonism, and Parkinson disease: A clinicopathologic study. Neurology 2013, 81, 808–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Nuytemans, K.; Bademci, G.; Kohli, M.M.; Beecham, G.W.; Wang, L.; Young, J.I.; Nahab, F.; Martin, E.R.; Gilbert, J.R.; Benatar, M.; et al. C9ORF72 intermediate repeat copies are a significant risk factor for Parkinson disease. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2013, 77, 351–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Majounie, E.; Abramzon, Y.; Renton, A.E.; Keller, M.F.; Traynor, B.J.; Singleton, A.B. Large C9orf72 repeat expansions are not a common cause of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 2527.e1–2527.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Xi, Z.; Zinman, L.; Grinberg, Y.; Moreno, D.; Sato, C.; Bilbao, J.M.; Ghani, M.; Hernandez, I.; Ruiz, A.; Boada, M.; et al. Investigation of c9orf72 in 4 neurodegenerative disorders. Arch. Neurol. 2012, 69, 1583–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Lesage, S.; Le Ber, I.; Condroyer, C.; Broussolle, E.; Gabelle, A.; Thobois, S.; Pasquier, F.; Mondon, K.; Dion, P.A.; Rochefort, D.; et al. C9orf72 repeat expansions are a rare genetic cause of parkinsonism. Brain J. Neurol. 2013, 136, 385–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiao, B.; Guo, J.F.; Wang, Y.Q.; Yan, X.X.; Zhou, L.; Liu, X.Y.; Zhang, F.F.; Zhou, Y.F.; Xia, K.; Tang, B.S.; et al. C9orf72 mutation is rare in Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and essential tremor in China. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Theuns, J.; Verstraeten, A.; Sleegers, K.; Wauters, E.; Gijselinck, I.; Smolders, S.; Crosiers, D.; Corsmit, E.; Elinck, E.; Sharma, M.; et al. Global investigation and meta-analysis of the C9orf72 (G4C2)n repeat in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2014, 83, 1906–1913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Bourinaris, T.; Houlden, H. C9orf72 and its Relevance in Parkinsonism and Movement Disorders: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. Mov. Disord. Clin. Pract. 2018, 5, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Orr-Urtreger, A.; Shifrin, C.; Rozovski, U.; Rosner, S.; Bercovich, D.; Gurevich, T.; Yagev-More, H.; Bar-Shira, A.; Giladi, N. The LRRK2 G2019S mutation in Ashkenazi Jews with Parkinson disease: Is there a gender effect? Neurology 2007, 69, 1595–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gan-Or, Z.; Giladi, N.; Rozovski, U.; Shifrin, C.; Rosner, S.; Gurevich, T.; Bar-Shira, A.; Orr-Urtreger, A. Genotype-phenotype correlations between GBA mutations and Parkinson disease risk and onset. Neurology 2008, 70, 2277–2283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Goldstein, O.; Gana-Weisz, M.; Nefussy, B.; Vainer, B.; Nayshool, O.; Bar-Shira, A.; Traynor, B.J.; Drory, V.E.; Orr-Urtreger, A. High frequency of C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients from two founder populations sharing the same risk haplotype. Neurobiol. Aging 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Goldstein, O.; Nayshool, O.; Nefussy, B.; Traynor, B.J.; Renton, A.E.; Gana-Weisz, M.; Drory, V.E.; Orr-Urtreger, A. OPTN 691_692insAG is a founder mutation causing recessive ALS and increased risk in heterozygotes. Neurology 2016, 86, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Goldstein, O.; Gana-Weisz, M.; Cohen-Avinoam, D.; Shiner, T.; Thaler, A.; Cedarbaum, J.M.; John, S.; Lalioti, M.; Gurevich, T.; Bar-Shira, A.; et al. Revisiting the non-Gaucher-GBA-E326K carrier state: Is it sufficient to increase Parkinson’s disease risk? Mol. Genet. Metab. 2019, 128, 470–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Vacic, V.; Ozelius, L.J.; Clark, L.N.; Bar-Shira, A.; Gana-Weisz, M.; Gurevich, T.; Gusev, A.; Kedmi, M.; Kenny, E.E.; Liu, X.; et al. Genome-wide mapping of IBD segments in an Ashkenazi PD cohort identifies associated haplotypes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 4693–4702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Consortium, G.T. The GTEx Consortium atlas of genetic regulatory effects across human tissues. Science 2020, 369, 1318–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Paulson, H. Repeat expansion diseases. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2018, 147, 105–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Elden, A.C.; Kim, H.J.; Hart, M.P.; Chen-Plotkin, A.S.; Johnson, B.S.; Fang, X.; Armakola, M.; Geser, F.; Greene, R.; Lu, M.M.; et al. Ataxin-2 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions are associated with increased risk for ALS. Nature 2010, 466, 1069–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, T.; Li, Y.R.; Ingre, C.; Weber, M.; Grehl, T.; Gredal, O.; de Carvalho, M.; Meyer, T.; Tysnes, O.B.; Auburger, G.; et al. Ataxin-2 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions in European ALS patients. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 1697–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Lattante, S.; Pomponi, M.G.; Conte, A.; Marangi, G.; Bisogni, G.; Patanella, A.K.; Meleo, E.; Lunetta, C.; Riva, N.; Mosca, L.; et al. ATXN1 intermediate-length polyglutamine expansions are associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurobiol. Aging 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Xi, Z.; Zhang, M.; Bruni, A.C.; Maletta, R.G.; Colao, R.; Fratta, P.; Polke, J.M.; Sweeney, M.G.; Mudanohwo, E.; Nacmias, B.; et al. The C9orf72 repeat expansion itself is methylated in ALS and FTLD patients. Acta Neuropathol. 2015, 129, 715–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Belzil, V.V.; Bauer, P.O.; Prudencio, M.; Gendron, T.F.; Stetler, C.T.; Yan, I.K.; Pregent, L.; Daughrity, L.; Baker, M.C.; Rademakers, R.; et al. Reduced C9orf72 gene expression in c9FTD/ALS is caused by histone trimethylation, an epigenetic event detectable in blood. Acta Neuropathol. 2013, 126, 895–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Waite, A.J.; Baumer, D.; East, S.; Neal, J.; Morris, H.R.; Ansorge, O.; Blake, D.J. Reduced C9orf72 protein levels in frontal cortex of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal degeneration brain with the C9ORF72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion. Neurobiol. Aging 2014, 35, 1779.e5–1779.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Cali, C.P.; Patino, M.; Tai, Y.K.; Ho, W.Y.; McLean, C.A.; Morris, C.M.; Seeley, W.W.; Miller, B.L.; Gaig, C.; Vonsattel, J.P.G.; et al. C9orf72 intermediate repeats are associated with corticobasal degeneration, increased C9orf72 expression and disruption of autophagy. Acta Neuropathol. 2019, 138, 795–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Graphic representation of C9orf72 G4C2 hexanucleotide repeat allele frequencies in Ashkenazi Parkinson’s disease patients and controls. The repeats’ allele frequencies for each group are presented: PD patients without LRRK2, GBA, and SMPD1 mutations (PD-non-carriers, black); PD patients carrying mutation in LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1 (PD-carriers, gray); and controls as previously published (Reference [26], white). Upper panel is a zoomed-in graph of 12 repeats and higher.
Figure 1. Graphic representation of C9orf72 G4C2 hexanucleotide repeat allele frequencies in Ashkenazi Parkinson’s disease patients and controls. The repeats’ allele frequencies for each group are presented: PD patients without LRRK2, GBA, and SMPD1 mutations (PD-non-carriers, black); PD patients carrying mutation in LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1 (PD-carriers, gray); and controls as previously published (Reference [26], white). Upper panel is a zoomed-in graph of 12 repeats and higher.
Genes 12 01210 g001
Figure 2. Higher levels of C9orf72 RNA expression for all 19 SNVs within the risk-haplotype: Normalized eQTL effect size in Nucleus accumbens (dimond), Cortex (square), and small intestine (triangle). Upper panel and upper-case letters are the alternate allele observed in the risk haplotype, associated with higher levels of C9orf72 expression; lower panel and lower-case letters are the reference allele observed in the risk haplotype, associated with higher levels of C9orf72 expression.
Figure 2. Higher levels of C9orf72 RNA expression for all 19 SNVs within the risk-haplotype: Normalized eQTL effect size in Nucleus accumbens (dimond), Cortex (square), and small intestine (triangle). Upper panel and upper-case letters are the alternate allele observed in the risk haplotype, associated with higher levels of C9orf72 expression; lower panel and lower-case letters are the reference allele observed in the risk haplotype, associated with higher levels of C9orf72 expression.
Genes 12 01210 g002
Figure 3. The effect of each cutoff of C9orf72-repeats-size on Parkinsons’ disease risk in non-carriers of mutations ((a), PD-NC) and in carriers of mutation ((b), PD-Carriers; see Methods). Grey lines (circles) depict the Odds ratio and black lines (squares) depict the p-value. Dashed grey lines represent Odd Ratio of 1.0, and dashed black lines represent p-value of 0.05.
Figure 3. The effect of each cutoff of C9orf72-repeats-size on Parkinsons’ disease risk in non-carriers of mutations ((a), PD-NC) and in carriers of mutation ((b), PD-Carriers; see Methods). Grey lines (circles) depict the Odds ratio and black lines (squares) depict the p-value. Dashed grey lines represent Odd Ratio of 1.0, and dashed black lines represent p-value of 0.05.
Genes 12 01210 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of the 1106 Parkinson’s disease patients of Ashkenazi Jewish origin.
Table 1. Characteristics of the 1106 Parkinson’s disease patients of Ashkenazi Jewish origin.
Non-Carrier PD Patients aPD Patients Carriers of LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1 Mutations
N718388 c
Women, N (%)266 (37.0)171 (44.1)
AAE, mean (SD), y68.5 (10.2) d65.4 (10.1)
AAO, mean (SD), y61.4 (11.5)58.4 (10.6)
Family history of PD b, N (%)144 (20)120 (30.9)
Abbreviations: PD, Parkinson disease; N, number of individuals; AAE, age at enrollment; SD, standard deviation; y, years; AAO, age at disease onset. a Patients without the LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1 mutations (specified in the Methods section). b Patients with 1st or 2nd degree family members with PD. c Carrier patients included: 133 individuals with LRRK2 mutation, 223 individuals with GBA mutations, 8 individuals with SMPD1 mutation, 23 individuals with mutations in both LRRK2 and GBA, and 1 patient with both GBA and SMPD1 mutations. d Data regarding AAE was not available for one individual.
Table 2. The association 2–60 C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeats with Parkinson’s disease.
Table 2. The association 2–60 C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeats with Parkinson’s disease.
CohortNon-Carrier PD Patients aPD Patients Carriers of LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1 MutationsControls b
2–19 repeats, N (%)701 (98.2)384 (99.2)596 (99.5)
20–60 repeats, N (%)13 (1.8)3 (0.8)3 (0.5)
Odds Ratio (95% CI)3.684 (1.045–12.990)1.552 (0.312–7.729)
p-value c0.0410.684
Abbreviations: PD, Parkinson’s disease; N, Number of individuals; CI, confidence interval. The longest allele in each individual was recorded. a Patients without the LRRK2, GBA, or SMPD1 mutations (specified in the Methods section). b The values in the control cohort were previously published [26]. c 2 × 2 Fisher’s exact test (2-sided).
Table 3. The effect of the 19 variations within the risk-haplotype on RNA expression levels and splice variants as reported by GTEx database.
Table 3. The effect of the 19 variations within the risk-haplotype on RNA expression levels and splice variants as reported by GTEx database.
Location, chr9 (hg38)rs IDGeneRisk AlleleRef > Alt aHighest eQTL for C9orf72, NES (Tissue)eQTL for C9orf72 in Cerebellum, NES Highest sQTL for C9orf72, NES (Tissue)GnomAD v3.1- AF for the Risk Allele (in Non-Neuro Cases)
AJEuropean (Non-Finnish) All Populations
27488094rs17779457MOB3BGT > G0.464 (N.A.)0.341−0.88 (Cer)0.20970.24280.2490
27496663rs10812604MOB3BTT > G−0.416 (N.A.)−0.3430.70 (Cer)0.22520.28610.3555
27497990rs10967965MOB3BTA > T0.505 (N.A.)0.360−0.96 (C.H.)0.17420.21850.1547
27499629rs2492812MOB3BAC > A0.454 (N.A.)0.334−0.88 (C.H.)0.20910.24190.2486
27508491rs1537712MOB3BTC > T0.454 (N.A.)0.332−0.75 (Cer)0.23230.27530.2915
27509213rs12554036MOB3BTG > T0.484 (N.A.)0.345−1.0 (C.H.)0.20540.23350.1796
27514964rs4609281MOB3BGG > T−0.432 (N.A.)−0.3640.71 (Cer)0.24170.28650.3509
27515969rs774354MOB3BGA > G0.466 (N.A.)0.345−0.80 (C.H.)0.23540.27540.2909
27516592rs774352MOB3BCT > C0.466 (N.A.)0.345−0.80 (C.H.)0.23540.27550.2910
27525753rs10967973IFNKAA > G−0.602 (Cer)−0.6020.66 (Cer)0.35700.46400.5599
27526049rs700782IFNKTC > T0.498 (N.A.)0.370−0.98 (C.H.)0.21090.24400.2461
27527514rs2453552MOB3BGT > G0.501 (N.A.)0.36−1.0 (C.H.)0.21100.24500.2650
27541043rs7469146C9orf72CC > T−0.542 (Cer)−0.5420.65 (Cer)0.37360.51190.5916
27543384rs3849943C9orf72CC > T−0.485 (N.A.)−0.3360.96 (Cer, C.H.)0.20050.23620.2178
27545962rs700791C9orf72AC > A0.521 (N.A.)0.388−1.1 (C.H.)0.19580.22930.1979
27579562rs1982915IntergenicGA > G0.407 (Cer)0.407−0.49 (Cer)0.42120.49820.4745
27580676rs12350076IntergenicCA > C0.408 (Cer)0.408−0.51 (Cer)0.42620.51040.4964
27581241rs2783010IntergenicCT > C0.418 (Cer)0.418−0.56 (Cer)0.42730.46450.4808
27582313rs10967993IntergenicCT > C0.424 (Cer)0.424−0.54 (F.C.)0.40250.50440.5032
a In bold is the allele that is associated with higher C9orf72 RNA expression levels, as reported by GTEx database. Ref = reference allele; Alt = Alternate allele; eQTL = expression quantitative trait loci; sQTL = spliced quantitative trait loci; NES = normalized effect size; AF = Allele frequency; AJ = Ashkenazi Jews; N.A. = Nucleus accumbens; Cer = Cerebellum; C.H. = Cerebellar hemisphere; F.C. = Frontal Cortex.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kobo, H.; Goldstein, O.; Gana-Weisz, M.; Bar-Shira, A.; Gurevich, T.; Thaler, A.; Mirelman, A.; Giladi, N.; Orr-Urtreger, A. C9orf72-G4C2 Intermediate Repeats and Parkinson’s Disease; A Data-Driven Hypothesis. Genes 2021, 12, 1210. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12081210

AMA Style

Kobo H, Goldstein O, Gana-Weisz M, Bar-Shira A, Gurevich T, Thaler A, Mirelman A, Giladi N, Orr-Urtreger A. C9orf72-G4C2 Intermediate Repeats and Parkinson’s Disease; A Data-Driven Hypothesis. Genes. 2021; 12(8):1210. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12081210

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kobo, Hila, Orly Goldstein, Mali Gana-Weisz, Anat Bar-Shira, Tanya Gurevich, Avner Thaler, Anat Mirelman, Nir Giladi, and Avi Orr-Urtreger. 2021. "C9orf72-G4C2 Intermediate Repeats and Parkinson’s Disease; A Data-Driven Hypothesis" Genes 12, no. 8: 1210. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes12081210

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop