Next Article in Journal
Differentially Expressed tRNA-Derived Small RNAs Co-Sediment Primarily with Non-Polysomal Fractions in Drosophila
Next Article in Special Issue
Surveillance of Foodborne Pathogens: Towards Diagnostic Metagenomics of Fecal Samples
Previous Article in Journal
Evolutionarily Distant Streptophyta Respond Differently to Genotoxic Stress
Article

Gene-Based Pathogen Detection: Can We Use qPCR to Predict the Outcome of Diagnostic Metagenomics?

1
National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kemitorvet, Building 204, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
2
Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 September 2017 / Revised: 2 November 2017 / Accepted: 14 November 2017 / Published: 20 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetics and Genomics of Foodborne Pathogens)
In microbial food safety, molecular methods such as quantitative PCR (qPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) of bacterial isolates can potentially be replaced by diagnostic shotgun metagenomics. However, the methods for pre-analytical sample preparation are often optimized for qPCR, and do not necessarily perform equally well for qPCR and sequencing. The present study investigates, through screening of methods, whether qPCR can be used as an indicator for the optimization of sample preparation for NGS-based shotgun metagenomics with a diagnostic focus. This was used on human fecal samples spiked with 103 or 106 colony-forming units (CFU)/g Campylobacter jejuni, as well as porcine fecal samples spiked with 103 or 106 CFU/g Salmonella typhimurium. DNA was extracted from the samples using variations of two widely used kits. The following quality parameters were measured: DNA concentration, qPCR, DNA fragmentation during library preparation, amount of DNA available for sequencing, amount of sequencing data, distribution of data between samples in a batch, and data insert size; none showed any correlation with the target ratio of the spiking organism detected in sequencing data. Surprisingly, diagnostic metagenomics can have better detection sensitivity than qPCR for samples spiked with 103 CFU/g C. jejuni. The study also showed that qPCR and sequencing results may be different due to inhibition in one of the methods. In conclusion, qPCR cannot uncritically be used as an indicator for the optimization of sample preparation for diagnostic metagenomics. View Full-Text
Keywords: zoonoses; testing; feces; DNA sequencing; bioinformatics zoonoses; testing; feces; DNA sequencing; bioinformatics
MDPI and ACS Style

Andersen, S.C.; Fachmann, M.S.R.; Kiil, K.; Møller Nielsen, E.; Hoorfar, J. Gene-Based Pathogen Detection: Can We Use qPCR to Predict the Outcome of Diagnostic Metagenomics? Genes 2017, 8, 332. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes8110332

AMA Style

Andersen SC, Fachmann MSR, Kiil K, Møller Nielsen E, Hoorfar J. Gene-Based Pathogen Detection: Can We Use qPCR to Predict the Outcome of Diagnostic Metagenomics? Genes. 2017; 8(11):332. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes8110332

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andersen, Sandra C., Mette S.R. Fachmann, Kristoffer Kiil, Eva Møller Nielsen, and Jeffrey Hoorfar. 2017. "Gene-Based Pathogen Detection: Can We Use qPCR to Predict the Outcome of Diagnostic Metagenomics?" Genes 8, no. 11: 332. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes8110332

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop