Next Article in Journal
Unraveling the Roles of Regulatory Genes during Domestication of Cultivated Camellia: Evidence and Insights from Comparative and Evolutionary Genomics
Next Article in Special Issue
Sequence Composition and Evolution of Mammalian B Chromosomes
Previous Article in Journal
De Novo Assembly of Two Swedish Genomes Reveals Missing Segments from the Human GRCh38 Reference and Improves Variant Calling of Population-Scale Sequencing Data
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Behavior of the Maize B Chromosome and Centromere
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/genes9100487
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

B Chromosomes in Populations of Mammals Revisited

by
Mladen Vujošević
*,
Marija Rajičić
and
Jelena Blagojević
Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Department of Genetic Research, University of Belgrade, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, Belgrade 11060, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(10), 487; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes9100487
Submission received: 29 August 2018 / Revised: 1 October 2018 / Accepted: 3 October 2018 / Published: 9 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evolution, Composition and Regulation of Supernumerary B Chromosomes)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The study of B chromosomes (Bs) started more than a century ago, while their presence in mammals dates since 1965. As the past two decades have seen huge progress in application of molecular techniques, we decided to throw a glance on new data on Bs in mammals and to review them. We listed 85 mammals with Bs that make 1.94% of karyotypically studied species. Contrary to general view, a typical B chromosome in mammals appears both as sub- or metacentric that is the same size as small chromosomes of standard complement. Both karyotypically stable and unstable species possess Bs. The presence of Bs in certain species influences the cell division, the degree of recombination, the development, a number of quantitative characteristics, the host-parasite interactions and their behaviour. There is at least some data on molecular structure of Bs recorded in nearly a quarter of species. Nevertheless, a more detailed molecular composition of Bs presently known for six mammalian species, confirms the presence of protein coding genes, and the transcriptional activity for some of them. Therefore, the idea that Bs are inert is outdated, but the role of Bs is yet to be determined. The maintenance of Bs is obviously not the same for all species, so the current models must be adapted while bearing in mind that Bs are not inactive as it was once thought.

1. Introduction

The presence of supernumerary or B chromosomes (Bs) is the oldest known chromosome polymorphism [1], and yet, after more than a century of research, the biological importance of Bs is still to be better determined. The knowledge about Bs in mammals is more recent and dates since 1965 when they were found in the greater glider, Petauroides (Schoinobates) volans by Hayman and Martin [2] and in the red fox, Vulpes vulpes by Moore and Elder [3].
A complex collection of diverse chromosomes, such as Bs, is difficult to describe. Yet, Bs are defined as dispensable supernumerary chromosomes which do not recombine with members of the basic A chromosome set (As), and do not follow the rules of Mendelian segregation law [4]. This definition assembles a pool of various chromosomes that do not share a complete set of features but only the mentioned dispensability, which alludes that a regular growth and development take place with or without Bs. A typical B chromosome is seen as a supernumerary, heterochromatic chromosome, smaller and morphologically different from chromosomes of the standard set, that does not evoke visible phenotypic effects. Nevertheless, the Bs that do not fit either partly or entirely into this picture are far from being atypical. In reality, when it comes to Bs, being out of the ordinary is considered to be a rule.
The earlier Beukeboom’s estimate that 15% of all species carry Bs seems to be too high. The more accurate calculation stating that only 3% of karyologically studied extant species, across the majority of taxonomic groups carry Bs, was given by D’Ambrosio et al. [5]. Although it was thought that species with Bs in mammals are many times less frequent than in plants, it seems that this is not well grounded. According to the data that Jones [6] summarized, there are 1252 plant species with Bs that make about 2.4% of karyotypically studied plant species [7]. In the first review of Bs in mammals Volobujev [8] listed 14 species, but the next year he expanded list to 25 species [9]. Vujošević [10] increased the list to 34 species, and in 2004 we recorded fifty-five species carrying Bs [11]. There are nearly 70 species with Bs that were mentioned by Trifonov et al. [12], but the very list of species was not presented. As it can be seen in Table 1, the number of mammalian species carrying Bs has increased to 85. At the same time, the list of documented mammalian species has also increased from 4629 [13] to 6399 extant ones [14]. It appears that ~1.9% of 4380 karyotypically studied mammalian species (according to chromosome number database [15]) are featured by presence of Bs. We gave all species proper names according to the list of Burgin et al. [14], but even in such a detailed list, some species remain questionable. Besides adding new species to the list, we also removed some due to either being listed multiple times under different names, or incorrectly mentioned as species with Bs, such as the pocket gopher, Thomomys umbrinus [16].
Despite the vast body of knowledge on Bs within mammalian species, the question of what factors determine the distribution of Bs across different species is yet to be answered. Why are Bs present in some species and not in others? Is there some innate property of the genome, or karyotype, which determines whether a species is likely to carry Bs or not? As passed two decades witnessed huge progress in application of molecular techniques, we decided to re-examine the data on Bs in mammals, and to suggest the future directions of the research.

2. Morphological Characteristics and Size of B Chromosomes

B chromosomes were sorted in three categories [8,10,11] based on their size in relation to chromosomes from the standard set (Table 1). The most frequent Bs are of the same size (II) as the chromosomes from A set (52 species, 65.0%), so they cannot be recognized using standard cytogenetic techniques. In this category, the size of Bs often corresponds to the size of the smallest chromosome in the genome. Furthermore, about less than half (39 species, 48.8%) of species have Bs that are smaller than the smallest chromosomes of the standard set. They belong to category I. Ungulates and bats have only Bs from this category (Table 1). There are two primate species that possess micro Bs, but there is still a debate if human small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) could be considered as B chromosomes [17].
The rarest (3.5%) of the species are the ones with Bs either larger or the same size as the largest chromosomes from the standard complement (III): Uromys caudimaculatus [18], Holochilus brasiliensis [19] and Apodemus peninsulae [20]. Additionally, the presence of different types of Bs in the same genome contributes to a large variability of Bs. Eleven species from Table 1 show variation in size and morphology of Bs, so there are different types that are recognised. This variation is well studied in A. peninsulae where five classes with different morphological types of Bs are present.
Among Bs from type II, metacentrics and submetacentrics are more present (62.7%) than acrocentrics. Hewitt [21] noted that large Bs tend to be mitotically stabile while the small ones have an opposite tendency. It means that the intraindividual variability rises with the decrease in size of Bs (see more details in Section 3).

3. Frequency of B Chromosomes

A large variability of Bs in mammalian species is displayed on all levels: intra-individual, intra- and inter-populational. The most common for mammals is frequent appearance of intraindividual variability that can feature the same tissue or appear between different tissues. Mosaicism for the number of Bs was scored in Echymipera kalubu [22], Rattus rattus [103], V. vulpes [117], Myotis macrodactylus [28], A. peninsulae [118], Dicrostonix torquatus [119], Trinomys iheringi [113], Nictereutes procionides viverinus, Capreolus pygargus [44], Alouatta seniculus [32], Dasyprocta fuliginosa, Dasyprocta leporine, Dasyprocta prymnolopha [72], Apodemus flavicollis [11], Nictereutes procionides procyonides [120], Mazama nana [51], Mazama americana [51], Grammomys macmillani [78], Acomys ngurui, Tscherskia triton [121] and Mazama nemorivaga [52].
The mosaicism for the number of Bs is extensively studied in Korean field mouse, A. peninsulae, first noticed in early studies [122] and then confirmed in different areas of species’ wide distribution [123,124]. The frequency of mosaics extends from 0.05 in South Korea [125] to even 0.85 in populations from Primorskii region and Hokkaido [123]. Furthermore, it has been found that the variability of B chromosome numbers is higher in the group of mosaics [8,124,126].
The great variability produced by intraindividual mosaicism is also characteristic for genus Mazama. In this genus, Bs appear in five out of eight species [51]. For instance, in M. americana, Abril et al. [127] found Bs in all 18 studied animals with intraindividual variability from 0–6 Bs. The same occurrence happened in M. nana [51] and in M. nemorivaga [52] where all studied animals had 0–7 Bs. Besides Bs, genus Mazama is featured with other kinds of chromosome polymorphisms, involving autosomes and sex chromosomes. This is also the case with Acodon montensis [128]. On the other hand, genus Apodemus with one third of species with Bs is karyotypically very stable.
A presence of one B chromosome is the most common situation, but the number of Bs per animal can vary widely. The highest number of Bs, which counted 42, was found in D. torquatus [75]. Up to 30 Bs in a single animal have been detected in A. peninsulae [65], while there have been 17 Bs identified in Thamnomys gazellae (now Grammomys macmillani) [78]. The average maximal number of Bs per specimen found in 85 mammalian species is 4.88 (Table 1).
There are some species with Bs whose populations cover wide geographic areas. The yellow-necked field mouse, A. flavicollis, common in the Western Palearctic region, has showed Bs presence almost everywhere through its range with frequencies ranging from 0.07 to 0.94 [62,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138]. The frequency of animals with Bs in different geographic regions varies, but rules cannot be established easily. The variation in frequency of Bs that is generally present in A. flavicollis is also characteristic for small areas. For instance, we studied Bs presence in 40 populations from Serbia and the frequencies ranged from 0.11 to 0.67 [66,133,139,140,141,142]. Generally, the frequency of animals with Bs increases with altitude towards harsher climatological conditions [141,143]. However, this trend was not confirmed in the samples from Poland [138].
Shellhammer [144] suggested that the most reasonable explanation of great B frequency variation in southern marsh harvest mouse, Reithrodontomys megalotis, is a general increase in genetic variability towards the periphery of species distribution. The same was proposed for Bailey’s pocket mouse, Chaetodipus baileyi [70], while Boyeskorov et al. [145] found the highest B frequency in A. flavicollis (0.81) in a peripheral area of its distribution. A north-to-south increase in frequency of Bs was found in grassland Melomys, Melomys burtoni [85].
Besides being found in almost all studied populations, Bs in A. peninsulae are often present in all individuals. For instance, in the populations in East Asia, the frequency of animals with Bs vary from 0 to 1.0, while in the Siberian populations, from 0.99 to 1.0 [123,146]. So far, the only exceptions are Sakhalin Island and Stenina Island, where Bs repeatedly have not been found [146,147]. The distribution of Bs varies significantly between populations [62,148,149,150,151,152], however, these differences are still largely unexplained. The difference in the maximal number of Bs between regions is also evident varying from 30 in Siberia [65], to 6 in South Korea [123]. Roslik and Kartavtseva [124] established variability in modal number of Bs. Each population is characterized by a certain modal number of Bs. This number is also specific for regions. Roslik and Kartavtseva [153] documented the presence of clinal decreasing in frequency of rare B morphotypes from East to Northwest in the studied area.
Contrary to such high frequencies of Bs in A. peninsulae and A. flavicollis, Zima and Macholán [62] found that the frequency of animals with Bs in populations of long-tailed field mouse, A. sylvaticus, is very low (2.4%). Such sporadic occurrence of Bs is characteristic for another species from the same genus, the striped field mouse, Apodemus agrarius [59]. While A. peninsulae and A. flavicollis are typical forest-dwelling species, A. sylvaticus is limited to the edges of forests and A. agrarius is a typical field mouse.

4. Structure and Composition of B Chromosomes

The newly discovered facts about Bs are mostly concerning their structure. Bs were for a long time seen as chromosomes without genes or, at least without active ones, due to a prevailing absence of their visible phenotypic effects. Although the counterevidence was repeatedly suggested, they were generally ignored until recently when technological advances [154] in genome analysis and sequencing armed investigators with a variety of new technical approaches to shake this dogmatic view. Molecular studies represent Bs as assemblage of various repeated sequences originating from one or more A chromosomes [155,156,157] or even from all [158]. Non-coding repetitive sequences or mobile elements present in both A and B chromosomes prevail but some of them are more frequent in Bs [159]. Some paralogs of genes located on A chromosomes could be found on Bs as intact or as degenerate sequences [154]. Unique sequences specific for Bs are rarely found [23,160,161]. Yet, thanks to the new technology, the list of genes identified on Bs is promisingly increasing.
The previous studies on mammalian Bs that were based mostly on differential staining revealed that 60% of them are C positive [11]. Those studies showed that when different types of Bs are present they could be C positive or C negative, such as in A. peninsulae and M. nana [51,162]. Furthermore, the analyses of molecular DNA composition of Bs in A. peninsulae [163] showed a presence of two specific forms of chromatin with presumed autonomous origin. Besides that, homology to the heterochromatic region of sex chromosomes and pericentromeric DNA of autosomes was established [163,164,165].
Molecular composition of Bs for 19 mammalian species is presented in Table 2. A presence of ribosomal genes (rDNA) was detected in 5 species by using silver staining and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Telomeric repeats are most frequently found on Bs (12 species), but centromeric were detected in only three cases. The presence of molecular markers specific for Bs was found in P. volans [23] and A. flavicollis [160].
The first autosomal gene found on Bs of mammals was proto-oncogene receptor tyrosine kinase (C-KIT). It was found in three unrelated species, the red fox, V. vulpes, the Chinese and Japanese raccoon dog, N. procyonoides [168,169] and M. gouazoubira [175] but not in A. flavicollis [179]. Another gene (Vrk1) was found in two Apodemus species. By using ISSR-PCR, Bugarski-Stanojević et al. [180] found a part of Vrk1 gene on Bs of A. flavicollis. The presence of this gene was confirmed upon isolation by microdissection [181] and additional 37 genes or parts of genes were found on Bs of this species. The Bs in A. flavicollis have similar structure as pericentromeric region of sex chromosomes [188]. Through comparison of gene groups in Bs of six mammalian species from different families, Makunin et al., [173] confirmed enrichment with genes related to cell-cycle, development and genes functioning in the neuron synapse. They pointed that the presence of genes on Bs involved in cell-cycle regulation and tissue differentiation could be important for the B chromosome formation.
There are also findings that propose the existence of regulatory interactions between coding sequences of A and B-chromosomes. Bugno-Poniewierska et al. [189], from studies of Bs in Chinese raccoon dogs and red fox determined that DNA methylation may maintain the transcriptional inactivation of DNA sequences situated on Bs. This could be the way to avoid some negative effects of Bs presence. Trifonov et al. [174] found, for the first time, the protein coding sequences on Bs of the Siberian roe deer, C. pygargus, which are not fully inactivated. Earlier, the gene expression in A. flavicollis showed elevated expression of three DNA fragments in the presence of Bs [178]. So, B chromosome could be seen as a repository of various information which could be used depending on the selection pressure that a B carrier faces.

5. Origin of Bs in Mammals

There are several hypotheses proposed to explain the route of B chromosomes appearance [174,185,190]. In general, the source of Bs are chromosomes of the standard set, both autosomes and sex chromosomes, yet their origin from interspecies hybrids has also been proven in certain cases [191,192], but not in mammals. Whatever the source of their origin is, all proto-Bs must instantaneously pass through inactivation to avoid synapsis with the source chromosome. At present, a series of molecular processes are known as good candidates to achieve this condition, for instance mechanisms of sex chromosomes inactivation and epigenetic mechanisms. Bs can follow the same process operating in meiotic sex chromosome inactivation (MSCI) during the meiotic prophase I. Vujošević and Blagojević [11] proposed that B chromosomes are absent in birds due to genome reduction. Moreover, it appears that the sex chromosome specific silencing is absent in birds, although not yet been completely elucidated [193,194]. The same situation is found in egg laying monotremes [195] that also lack Bs. What is frequently overlooked in attempts to explain the initial steps of Bs origin is the possibility of simultaneous origin of proto-Bs in a population [11] that is far more probable in mammals due to their social organisation and population dynamics. This could promote spread of proto-Bs in populations.
The origin of Bs in mammalian species was based rather on presumptions than on facts. The circumstantial evidence come and is expected from molecular studies of Bs DNA contant. Sex chromosomes are proposed as a source of Bs in E. kalubu [22], Dycrostonix groenlandicus [196] and Apodemus argenteus [60]. In A. peninsulae a homology of heterochromatic region of Bs, sex chromosomes and autosomes was established [163,164,165]. Upon generation of microdissected DNA probes followed by FISH on metaphase chromosomes, another study found that Bs in A. flavicollis originate from pericentromeric region of sex chromosomes [188]. While there are five different types of Bs [197] with different origin (including sex chromosomes) in A. peninsulae, it was shown that all Bs in A. flavicollis have the same DNA contant regardless of their number or geographical distance which indicates a common origin from sex chromosomes [188]. Furthermore, whenever two or more types of Bs are present in one species, it appears that they do not have the same origin. A multiple origin of Bs in A. peninsulae was suggested by Matsubara et al., [198] based on the presence of 18S/28S rRNA genes only on meta- or submetacentric Bs. Some recent findings offer evidences for single origin of Bs in this species also [181]. A different origin for two types of Bs was also found in the harvest mouse, R. megalotis, by Peppers et al. [187].
Based on comparative cytogenetic studies [67,199] it was suggested that Bs in Bandicota indica, R. rattus and Rattus fuscipes originated before the divergence of these species occurred. Different origin was assumed for Bs in two species of Carnivora, N. procyonides and V. vulpes [163,173] based on molecular data.
A two-step appearance of Bs was proposed for A. peninsulae [164]. The first step is the destabilization of pericentromeric regions, produced by the invasion of DNA sequences from euchromatic parts of A chromosomes, which leads to a formation of microchromosomes in high frequency, and thus make proto-Bs. The second step is the insertion and amplification of new DNA sequences. Similar steps were proposed by Rubtsov et al. [200] that assumed that the origin of Bs start with a loss of a greater part of q arm of an ancestor autosome followed by subsequent evolution of Bs that includes additional constitutional rearrangements. Makunin et al. [175], by using sequencing of isolated Bs of two mammalian species, showed that Bs originate as segmental duplications of specific genomic regions, and subsequently passes through pseudogenization and a repeat accumulation.
Presently, it seems that the new data describing the molecular composition of Bs incites more questions than suggests answers to the old ones.

6. Behaviour of B Chromosomes during Meiosis and their Transmission

The number of species whose meiotic behaviour of Bs was studied increased just slightely in last 15 years but there are new details for some already studied species. Currently, the meiotic behaviour is known for 25 species and univalent Bs are present in all of them. Besides univalents, bivalents appear in 13 species, and multivalents in 7, while assimetrical bivalents are present in 6 species. There are 5 species (A. peninsulae, D. groenlandicus, N. procyonides, C. baileyi and V. vulpes) where all four mentioned types of configurations are found.
When a different type of Bs is characteristic for the same species, their meiotic behaviour is often type dependent. So Hyata [64] found that both paring and non-paring among Bs occur in A. peninsulae. He showed that small macro- and microchromosomes in most cases do not follow Mendelian inheritance, yet other types of supernumeraries do follow it. Further meiotic studies in this species [197] showed that Bs are able to form axial elements and synaptonemal complexes in prophase of the first meiotic division. The same authors found that univalents of dot like Bs of different morphology are obviously not homologous, while metacentric Bs showed a partial homology. Univalent Bs are commonly associated with sex bivalent. Ishak et al. [201] noticed an absence of transcriptional activity in Bs of this species during pachytene. Karamysheva et al. [202], through the use of 2D analysis of pachytene in A. peninsulae, found three types of configurations: synapsed bivalents, univalents, and univalents that contain the foldback structure. During meiosis, Bs in A. flavicollis appear as univalents, bivalents or, depending on number, combinations of both, but never as a pair with the members of A set [130,203]. In the same species, Banaszek and Jadwiszczak [204] found that Bs behave in non-Mendelian fashion during meiosis I of males.
In N. squamipes analysis of the synaptonemal complex revealed auto-pairing of univalent Bs [184]. In the Northen collared lemming, D. groenlandicus, it was found that, besides univalents, bivalents and trivalents Bs can make synaptic associations with the Y chromosome [196]. Studies of synaptonemal complex in M. americana by Aquino el al. [46] revealed the presence of both univalents and bivalents. Univalents appear in two forms: as autopaird or just univalents.
When Bs appear as univalents in the silver fox, they show a folding-back behaviour that ends as intrachromosomal pairing [205], which indicates the presence of repeated DNA sequences. Sosnowski et al. [206] conducted experiments with spermatocytes of the red fox and the Chinese raccoon dog, and found that Bs that conjugate together form diverse structures, such as bivalents, trivalents, and tetravalents. Sosnowski et al. [206] also concluded that the increase in the number of Bs in spermatocytes of the Chinese raccoon dog corresponds with the lack of conjugation more frequent. Basheva et al. [43] studied A- and B-chromosome pairing and recombination in the silver fox using electron and immunofluorescent microscopy. They found the same distribution of the foci along B- and A-bivalents and proved, for the first time, that meiotic recombination occurs in mammalian B chromosomes
The accumulation of B chromosomes in mammals appears to be a rarer event than expected. One of the reasons for sure is the lack of studies. Furthermore, Bs in some cases could maintain themselves without the apparent drive. In males, the evidences for accumulation of Bs were found in C. baileyi [207], V. vulpes [208], A. peninsulae [162,197,209], and in the greater long tailed hamster, T. triton [121]. In the latter, Bs were found in males only and the increase in number of Bs in germline cells was observed.
In lemmings, univalent Bs were eliminated from the polar body and incorporated into secondary oocytes [210,211]. The evidence of accumulation of Bs has been obtained in females of R. rattus [212,213] and R. fuscipes [97] by means of controlled crosses. In the case of experimental crosses done by Stitou et al. [213] in R. rattus, males showed Mendelian transmission rates, while only a slight accumulation of Bs happened in females.
Palestis et al. [214], following the theory of centromeric drive, based on a different ability of the two meiotic poles for capturing centromeres [215], showed that Bs in mammals are more common in species with acrocentric chromosomes. Since then, the number of mammalian species with Bs increased, therefore this theory is not valid anymore. The number of species with Bs with predominantly acrocentric chromosomes in standard set is just slightly larger, so it seems that such explanation for origin of Bs is reasonable only in proven cases.
Karamysheva et al. [202] studied nuclear organization of Bs in A. peninsulae. They showed that additional volume of heterochromatic regions of chromosomes and extra centromeres modify 3D architecture of interphase nuclei. The location of Bs in meiosis appeared not to be random, and unpaired Bs had a tendency to form a common compartment with unpaired part of the sex bivalent, and thus avoided pachytene check point.

7. The Effects of B-Chromosomes

Apart from few exceptions, Bs do not cause visible phenotypic manifestations at individual level. This makes the search for observable effects in mammals rather difficult. But even such a small amount of data, together with new findings of genes on Bs, raises objections to the idea of Bs genetic inertness. It has been found that Bs presence influences cell division, degree of recombination, development, some quantitative characteristics, host-parasite interactions and behaviour.
A new and interesting data came from three-dimensional studies of Bs behaviour during division in both somatic and germ cells. Kociucka et al. [216] studied three-dimensional positioning of B chromosomes in fibroblast nuclei of the red fox and the Chinese raccoon dog, and found that small Bs of the red fox are dominantly positioned in the interior of the nucleus, while the medium-sized Bs of the Chinese raccoon dog are in the peripheral area of the nucleus as well as in intermediate and interior locations. The data was in agreement with the chromosome size dependent theory [216]. But in the nuclei of the Korean field mouse all Bs, irrespective of their size, were located on nuclear periphery in common compartments with C-positive regions of A chromosomes [202]. They suppose that, at least for the Bs of the Korean field mouse, the DNA content is more important parameter that determines where Bs will be located inside the nucleus.
As we pointed earlier, Basheva et al. [43] proved that in the silver fox recombination occurs between B chromosomes which increases variability in the specimens that carry them. In earlier studies, the presence of B chromosomes was associated with increased chiasma frequency in Bailey’s pocket mouse, C. baileyi [207] and R. fuscipes [199]. In both species this increase is not influenced by the number of Bs yet only by their presence.
Gileva [211] recorded a reduction of body and skull sizes in D. torquatus that carry numerous Bs, and proposed that this could be reflected as a negative selective value in extreme climate conditions. Positive correlations between number of Bs and body weight were established in males of two species: N. p. viverinus [217] and A. flavicollis [62,218]. Effects of Bs presence are extensively studied in A. flavicollis and, in general, it was found that they influence the development of some morphometric characters, mostly cranial ones [140]. One of the two regions of the mandible shows almost a triple increase in intensity of integration in B carriers [219]. Furthermore, the maintenance of Bs in the same species was studied by examining their effects on 3 components of cranial variability: canalization, developmental stability, and morphological integration. It was suggested that B carriers follow different developmental pathway for generating covariations of cranial traits [220]. This specific developmental pathway is more sensitive to modifications caused by natural selection, which could be beneficial to B carriers under variable environmental conditions. It was previously established that reaction of animals with Bs to environmental changes differ from those without them [221]. Nonmetric traits analyses show that the population density influences, at the same time, both the variation in the frequency of specimens with Bs and the developmental homeostasis.
Adnađević et al. [222], by analysing effect of recorded endoparasites and parasite life-cycle stages in A. flavicollis on expression levels of genes MHC II-DRB, IL-10 and Tgf-β, found that the presence of Bs is associated with lower expression level of Tgf-β gene. Although the influence of host genetic background on parasite infection has already been well established, this is the first study in mammals that correlates presence of Bs with immune response. Curiously enough, the presence of Bs in this species plays an important role in infrapopulations of their certain endoparasites by shifting sex balance to higher proportion of males [223].
Shellhammer [144] from studies on R. megalotis was the first to propose that Bs could have an effect on behaviour. The behaviour and the presence of Bs were connected in foxes through a series of experimental crosses [224,225,226]. It appeared that groups of foxes selected for specific behaviour differs significantly in frequency of mosaics for Bs.

8. Maintenance of B Chromosomes

The mostly discussed question about Bs during a century of research was the way they are maintained in populations through time. Two schools of thought grouped around two models giving opposite explanations of the way Bs are retained in natural populations. Both models assume that the frequency of specimens with Bs in population is at equilibrium but the explanations how this equilibrium is reached and kept are different. The model firstly named parasitic and then selfish [227] claims that Bs are maintained by balance of accumulation and elimination due to detrimental effects. Contrary to this, the heterotic model [228] suggests that, in the absence of mechanism of accumulation, a small number of Bs could offer an adaptive advantage to carriers, while a large number could be harmful. Currently, the parasitic model is predominant, mostly because the search for adaptive significance of Bs was mostly ineffective. Furthermore, the convergence of this paradigm partly comes from the popular theory of selfish or parasitic DNA, irresistible to some scientists. The number of cases with proved Bs accumulation, which is prerequisite for parasitic model, although larger than the number of cases without accumulation, is still very small in comparison with the known number of species with Bs. For instance, the accumulation of Bs was studied in about 70 plant species and among them 42 (60%) manifested accumulation mechanism [4] which makes only 3.4% of plant species with Bs. Furthermore, detailed studies are largely directed on commercially important species that possess Bs, like maize and rye, and pests such as grasshoppers, so the number of extensively studied species groups is rather small. In attempt to include species without mechanism of Bs accumulation into parasitic model, Camacho et al. [229] proposed that all Bs are initially parasitic, and later on, through arm race with A genome, may become neutral. From this stage they can disappear or become parasitic again. One of their arguments against heterotic Bs is that it is unexpected that Bs could be beneficial in the first step, so a drive is necessary to establish themselves in population. Yet, if Bs appear simultaneously in population, these arguments are not plausible. Therefore, when models are assessed it is not good to stay frozen within a particular paradigm.
Temporal analyses of B frequency and transmission in mammals are scarce. The frequency of animals with Bs was the same in two successive years in Rattus rattus diardi [100]. During 8 years of study, equilibrium frequencies of Bs in populations of A. flavicollis at one locality were maintained in spite of fluctuations in population density [11,230]. Zima and Macholan [62] and Wojcik et al. [138] also found the equilibrium during a three-year study in the same species. Contrary to stable frequency from year to year, seasonal changes in frequency of animals with Bs could escape from equilibrium in stress situations [231] or could keep it when there is no tough competition present [232]. Thus, though frequencies of Bs could significantly differ through a year, their values stay the same between years [230].
B chromosome frequencies in A. peninsulae show temporal variation. Comparison of Bs from the population from Altai Republic, trapped in the 1980 and 2002 showed that a mean number of Bs in this population increased almost threefold in the period of 22 years [200]. This increase was mainly due to the rise of numbers of small and large bi-armed Bs (by factors of 7.0 and 5.3, respectively) and a slight increase in the number of medium-sized biarmed B chromosomes (by a factor of 1.6). Nonetheless, Borisov et al. [233] found that the number of Bs and theirs morphotypes were stable over the period of 30 years in certain populations.
Direct or indirect evidences for B drive in mammals are provided for seven species only: C. baileyi [208], V. vulpes [209], R. rattus [212,213], D. torquatus [211], R. fuscipes [97], A. peninsulae [197], and T. triton [121]. In 3 of them, B drive is operating in females thus supporting the theory of centromeric drive [214]. Thomson [97] showed that the maintenance of Bs in R. fuscipes supports the parasitic model very well.
The maintenance of Bs in populations can be explained in terms of their contribution to overall genetic diversity of the species possessing them, and it might be arguable under the heterotic model [142]. The increased variability widens the probability that species will survive in changing environmental situations. In A. flavicollis, an increased frequency of animals with Bs is found in more extreme climatic conditions [141]. Frequency of B chromosomes and quality of habitat are negatively correlated indicating that B chromosomes in this species are mentioned due to the effects that they exert at the level of populations [143]. Possible adaptive effects of Bs were also postulated by Blagojević et al. [234] upon comparison of head morphology in three populations of this species that have Bs at different frequencies. Adnađević et al. [235], by using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers, made a comparison of populations of A. flavicollis settled in ecologically distinct habitats differing in frequency of Bs, and found that the greatest genetic diversity is in the population settled in optimal conditions for this species featured by the lowest frequency of animals with Bs. The majority of loci that are subject of directional selection, feature either population with lower or with a higher frequency of Bs. They suggested that the different frequency of B carriers in populations is related to adaptive differentiation to diverse habitats. Tokarskaia et al. [45] found that the presence of Bs is positively correlated with heterozygosity for random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) loci, in populations of the Siberian roe deer, C. pygargus, thus indicating influence of Bs on the genetic variation of the species. All these findings support the heterotic model of Bs maintenance.
Theoretically, inbreeding is harmful to parasitic Bs but beneficial to mutualistic ones. Social organization of rodent populations and some other mammalian groups supports inbreeding which opens new possibilities for the existence of beneficial Bs.
Extensive population studies of two species of the same genus Apodemus best illustrate that the present models do not exclude each other but rather call for further adjustments. If we try to fit the maintenance of Bs in A. peninsulae and A. flavicollis into the current models, A. peninsulae will follow the parasitic (or selfish) model, while Bs in A. flavicollis will better fit into heterotic model. But when we go into details, it seems that neither A. peninsulae nor A. flavicollis fit quite well into proposed models. A. peninsule do not have populations at equilibrium and tolerance for Bs is so great that it is not easy to say when Bs become detrimental. Furthermore, five different types of Bs present in this species, have different outcomes. Some types are inherited in almost a Mendelian fashion. On the other hand, Bs in A. flavicollis brings adaptive advantage in certain situations and in some environments. In other situations (and environments) they could be neutral or deleterious. Therefore, it could be hypothesized that the adaptive advantage of these Bs is not general, but it is dependent on events through which the individual or population is passing. The existing models need to be very much adjusted, but the adjustment must be based on detailed and intensive studies in natural populations.

9. Conclusions

After more than a century, it appears that B chromosomes research suffers from an unbalanced approach. That is also true for research of Bs in mammals. Population studies are a very difficult task and are still largely avoided. Even rarer attempts are made to resolve effects of Bs in different species that carry them. While molecular breaks into DNA composition of Bs are rapidly increasing, the number of species included in them is still scarce. Namely, a more detailed molecular composition is known for only six mammalian species. Although the confirmed presence of genes on Bs, in all cases, disproved the claims that Bs are inert, the gathered knowledge and data are not sufficient to explain the significance of Bs to their carriers. Are the paths of evolution of As and Bs opposite, or do the lanes of the same highway promise a greater success in adapting to environmental changes? This is yet to be resolved, but the answer seems to be inclining towards the latter statement.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V. and J.B.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.V. and J.B.; Writing—review and editing, M.V.; M.R. and J.B.; visualization, M.V.; M.R. and J.B.; supervision, M.V. and J.B.; project administration, M.V.; funding acquisition, M.V.

Funding

This research was funded by Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia (http://www.mpn.gov.rs/nauka), grant number 173003.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Editors and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive comments that greatly contributed to improving the final version of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Wilson, E.B. Studies on chromosomes. V. The chromosomes of Metapodius. A contribution to the hypothesis of the genetic continuity of chromosomes. J. Exp. Zool. 1906, 6, 147–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hayman, D.L.; Martin, P.G. Supernumerary chromosomes in the marsupial Schoinobates volans (Ker). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1965, 18, 1081–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moore, J.W.; Elder, R.L. Chromosome of the fox. J. Hered. 1965, 56, 142–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jones, R.N. B chromosomes in plants. New Phytol. 1995, 131, 411–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. D’Ambrosio, U.; Alonso-Lifante, M.P.; Barros, K.; Kovařík, A.; Mas de Xaxars, G.; Garcia, S. B-chrom: A database on B-chromosomes of plants, animals and fungi. New Phytol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jones, N. New species with B chromosomes discovered since 1980. Nucleus 2017, 60, 263–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rice, A.; Glick, L.; Abadi, S.; Einhorn, M.; Kopelman, N.M.; Salman-Minkov, A.; Mayzel, J.; Chay, O.; Mayrose, I. The chromosome counts database (CCDB)—A community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytol. 2015, 206, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Volobujev, V.T. The B-chromosome system of mammals. Genetica 1980, 52/53, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Volobujev, V.T. The B-chromosome system of the mammals. Caryologia 1981, 34, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vujošević, M. B-chromosomes in mammals. Genetika 1993, 25, 247–258. [Google Scholar]
  11. Vujošević, M.; Blagojević, J. B chromosomes in populations of mammals. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2004, 106, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Trifonov, V.A.; Dementyeva, P.V.; Beklemisheva, V.R.; Yudkin, D.V.; Vorobieva, N.V.; Graphodatsky, A.S. Supernumerary chromosomes, segmental duplications, and evolution. Russ. J. Genet. 2010, 46, 1094–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wilson, D.E.; Reeder, D.M. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, 2nd ed.; Smithsonian Institutions: Washington, DC, USA; London, UK, 1993; pp. 1–12. ISBN 1-56098-217-9. [Google Scholar]
  14. Burgin, C.J.; Colella, J.P.; Kahn, P.L.; Upham, N.S. How many species of mammals are there? J. Mammal. 2018, 99, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Diploid Numbers of Mammalia. Available online: http://www.bionet.nsc.ru/labs/chromosomes/mammalia.htm (accessed on 25 July 2018).
  16. Patton, J.L.; Sherwood, S.W. Genome evolution in pocket gophers (Genus Thomomys) I. Heterochromatin variation and speciation potential. Chromosoma 1982, 85, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liehr, T.; Mrasek, K.; Kosyakova, N.; Ogilvie, C.M.; Vermeesch, J.; Trifonov, V.; Rubtsov, N. Small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMC) in humans; are there B chromosomes hidden among them. Mol. Cytogenet. 2008, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Baverstock, P.R.; Wats, C.H.S.; Hogarth, J.T. Heterochromatin variation in Australian rodent Uromys caudimaculatus. Chromosoma 1976, 59, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nachman, M.W. Geographic patterns of chromosomal variation in South American marsh rats, Holochilus brasiliensis and H. vulpinus. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1992, 61, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kartavtseva, I.V.; Pavlenko, M.V. Chromosome Variation in the Striped Field Mouse Apodemus agrarius (Rodentia, Muridae). Rus. J. Genet. C/C Genet. 2000, 36, 162–174. [Google Scholar]
  21. Hewitt, G.M. Orthoptera. In Animal cytogenetics. 3. Insecta 1 Orthoptera; John, B., Ed.; Gebr. Borntrager: Berlin, Germany, 1979; pp. 1–170. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hayman, D.L.; Martin, P.G.; Waller, P.F. Parallel mosaicism of supernumerary chromosomes and sex chromosomes in Echymipera kalabu (Marsupialia). Chromosoma 1969, 27, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. McQuade, L.R.; Hill, R.J.; Francis, D. B-chromosome systems in the greater glider, Petauroides volans (Marsupialia: Pseudocheiridae). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 1994, 66, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Atanassov, I.N.; Chassovnikarov, T.G. Karyotype characteristics of Crocidura leucodon Herman, 1780 and Crocidura suaveolens Pallas, 1811 (Mammalia: Insectivora: Soricidae) in Bulgaria. Acta Zool. Bulg. 2008, 2, 71–78. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ruedi, M.; Maddalena, T.; Yong, H.; Vogel, P. The Crocidura fuliginosa species complex (Mammalia: Insectivora) in peninsular Malaysia: Biological, karyological and genetical evidence. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 1990, 18, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Meylan, A.; Hausser, J. Position citotaxonomique de quelques museragines du genere Crocidura au Tessisn (Mammalia: Insectivora). Origine du dessin dentarie “Apodemus” (Rodentia, Mammalia). CR Acad. Sci. Paris 1974, 264, 711. [Google Scholar]
  27. Motokawa, M.; Wu, Y.; Harada, M. Karyotypes of six Soricomorph species from Emei Shan, Sichuan Province, China. Zool. Sci. 2009, 26, 791–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Obara, Y.; Tomyiasu, T.; Saitoh, K. Chromosome studies in the Japanese vespertilionid bats. I. Karyotypic variation in Myotis macrodactylus Temmink. Jpn. J. Genet. 1976, 51, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Volleth, M. Comparative analysis of the banded karyotypes of the European Nyctalus species (Vespertilionidae, Chiroptera). In Prague Studies in Mammology; Horáček, I., Vohralík, V., Eds.; Charles University Press: Prag, Czech Republic, 1992; pp. 221–226. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bhatnagar, V.S.; Srivastava, M.D.L. Somatic chromosomes of four common bats of Allahabad. Cytologia 1974, 39, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yunis, E.J.; De Caballero, O.M.T.; Ramirez, C.; Ramirez, Z.E. Chromosomal variations in the Primate Alouatta seniculus seniculus. Folia Primatol. 1976, 25, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vassart, M.; Guedant, A.; Vie, J.C.; Keravec, J.; Seguela, A.; Volobouev, V.T. Chromosomes of Alouatta seniculus (Platyrrhini, Primates) from French Guiana 331–334. J. Hered. 1996, 87, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Oliveira, E.H.C.; De Lima, M.M.C.; Sbaloqueuro, I.J.; Dasvila, A.F. Analysis of polimorphic NORs in Alouatta species (Primates, Atelidae). Caryologia 1999, 52, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Walzer, S.M.D.; Breau, G.; Gerald, P.S. A chromosome survey of 2400 normal new born. J. Pediatr. 1969, 74, 438–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Huang, B.; Crolla, J.A.; Christian, S.L.; Wolf-Ledbetter, M.E.; Macha, M.E.; Papenhausen, P.N.; Ledbetter, D.H. Refined molecular characterization of the breakpoints in small inv dup(15) chromosomes. Hum. Genet. 1997, 99, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hsu, T.C.; Benirschke, K. An Atlas of Mammalian Chromosomes 4; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1970; p. 178. [Google Scholar]
  37. Pieńkowska-Schelling, A.; Schelling, C.; Zawada, M.; Yang, F.; Bugno, M.; Ferguson-Smith, M. Cytogenetic studies and karyotype nomenclature of three wild canid species: Maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus), bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis) and fennec fox (Fennecus zerda). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2008, 121, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Makinen, A.; Fredga, K. Banding analyses of the somatic chromosomes of raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonides, from Finland. In Proceedings of the 4th Colloquium on the Cytogenetics of Domestic Animals, Uppsala, Sweden, 10–13 June 1980; pp. 420–430. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ward, O.G. Chromosomes studies in Japanese raccoon dogs: X chromosomes, supernumeraries, and heteromorphism. MCN 1984, 25, 34. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mäkinen, A.; Lohi, O.; Juvonen, M. Supernumerary chromosome in the chromosomally polymorphic blue fox, Alopex lagopus. Hereditas 1981, 94, 277–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bhatnagar, V.S. Microchromosomes in the somatic cells of Vulpes bengalensis Shaw. Chromosom. Inf. Serv. 1973, 15, 32. [Google Scholar]
  42. Chiarelli, A.B. The chromosomes of the Canidae. In Wild Canids Their Systematic Behaviour Ecology and Evolution; Fox, M.W., Ed.; Van Nonstrand Reinhold: New York, NY, USA, 1975; pp. 40–53. [Google Scholar]
  43. Basheva, E.A.; Torgasheva, A.A.; Sakaeva, G.R.; Bidau, C.; Borodin, P.M. A- and B-chromosome pairing and recombination in male meiosis of the silver fox (Vulpes vulpes L., 1758, Carnivora, Canidae). Chromosom. Res. 2010, 18, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Neitzel, H. Chromosome evolution of Cervidae: Karyotypic and molecular aspects. In Cytogenetics; Obe, G.B.A., Ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1987; pp. 90–112. [Google Scholar]
  45. Tokarskaia, O.N.; Efremova, D.A.; Kan, N.G.; Danilkin, A.A.; Sempere, A.; Petrosian, V.G.; Semenova, S.K.; Ryskov, A.P. Variability of multilocus DNA markers in populations of the Siberian (Capreolus pygargus Pall.) and European (C. capreolus L.) roe deer. Genetika 2000, 36, 1520–1530. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Aquino, C.I.; Abril, V.V.; Duarte, J.M.B. Meiotic pairing of B chromosomes, multiple sexual system, and Robertsonian fusion in the red brocket deer Mazama americana (Mammalia, Cervidae). Genet. Mol. Res. 2013, 12, 3566–3574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Duarte, J.M.B.; Jorge, W. Chromosomal polymorphism in several populations of deer (Genus Mazama) from Brazil. Arch. Zootec. 1996, 45, 281–287. [Google Scholar]
  48. Duarte, J.M.B.; Jorge, W. Morphologic and cytogenetic description of the small red brocket (Mazama bororo Duarte, 1996) in Brazil. Mammalia 2003, 67, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Valeri, M.P.; Tomazella, I.M.; Duarte, J.M.B. Intrapopulation Chromosomal Polymorphism in Mazama gouazoubira (Cetartiodactyla; Cervidae): The Emergence of a New Species? Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Rossi, R.V.; Bodmer, R.; Duarte, J.M.B.; Trovati, R.G. Amazonian brown brocket deer Mazama nemorivaga (Cuvier 1817). In Neotropical Cervidology: Biology and Medicine of Latin American Deer; Duarte, J.M.B., Gonzalez, S., Eds.; Funep: Jaboticabal, Brazil; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2010; pp. 202–210. ISBN 978-85-7805-046-7. [Google Scholar]
  51. Abril, V.V.; Duarte, J.M.B. Chromosome polymorphism in the Brazilian dwarf brocket deer, Mazama nana (Mammalia, Cervidae). Genet. Mol. Biol. 2008, 31, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fiorillo, B.F.; Sarria-Perea, J.A.; Abril, V.V.; Duarte, J.M.B. Cytogenetic description of the Amazonian brown brocket Mazama nemorivaga (Artiodactyla, Cervidae). Comp. Cytogenet. 2013, 7, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sokolov, V.E.; Prikhodko, I.V. Taxonomy of the musk deer moschus-moschiferus (Artiodactyla, Mammalia). Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Ser. Biol. 1998, 1, 37–46. [Google Scholar]
  54. Castiglia, R.; Makundi, R.; Corti, M. The origin of an unusual sex chromosome constitution in Acomys sp. (Rodentia, Muridae) from Tanzania. Genetica 2007, 131, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Castiglia, R.; Annesi, F. Cytotaxonomic considerations on the sex chromosome variation observed within Acomys ngurui Verheyen et al. 2011 (Rodentia Muridae). Zootaxa 2012, 3493, 35–38. [Google Scholar]
  56. Lobato, L.; Cantos, G.; Araujo, B.; Bianchi, N.O.; Merani, S. Cytogenetics of the South American akodont rodents (Cricetidae) X. Akodon mollis: A species with XY females and B chromosomes. Genetica 1982, 57, 199–205. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y.; Assis, M.F.L.; Kasahara, S. Variability of the nucleolus organizer regions and the presence of the rDNA genes in the supernumerary chromosome of Akodon aff. arviculoides (Cricetidae, Rodentia). Caryologia 1992, 45, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hass, I.; Soares, A.; Balieiro, P.; Miranda, M.L.P.; Alegri, C.K.; Dornelles, S.S.; Marques, D.; Sbalqueiro, I.J. Akodon montensis karyotype variability, in a sample of São Francisco do Sul—SC, arising 0–3 supernumerary chromosomes. In Proceedings of the 60° Congresso Brasileiro de Genética, Guarujá, Brazil, 26–29 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kartavtseva, I.V. Description of B-chromosomes in karyotype of field mouse Apodemus agrarius. Tsitol. Genet. 1994, 28, 96–97. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Obara, Y.; Sasaki, S. Fluorescent approaches on the origin of B chromosomes of Apodemus argenteus hokkaidi. Chrom. Sci. 1997, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  61. Soldatović, B.; Savić, I.; Seth, P.; Reichstein, H.; Tolksdorf, M. Comparative karyological study of the genus Apodemus. Acta Vet. 1975, 25, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  62. Zima, J.; Macholán, M. B chromosomes in the wood mice (genus Apodemus). Acta Theriol. 1995, 40 (Suppl. 3), 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Belcheva, R.G.; Topashka-Ancheva, M.N.; Atanassov, N. Karyological studies of five species of mammals from Bulgarian fauna. Comptes Rendus l’Académie Bulg. des Sci. 1988, 42, 125–128. [Google Scholar]
  64. Hayata, J. Chromosomal polymorphism caused by supernumerary chromosomes in field mouse, Apodemus giliacus. Chromosoma 1973, 42, 403–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Borisov, Y.M.; Afanasev, A.G.; Lebedev, T.T.; Bochkarev, M.N. Multiplicity of B microchromosomes in a Siberian population of mice Apodemus peninsulae (2n = 48 + 4–30 B chromosomes). Russ. J. Genet. 2010, 46, 705–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vujošević, M.; Živković, S. Numerical chromosome polymorphism in Apodemus flavicollis and A. sylvaticus (Mammalia: Rodentia) caused by supernumerary chromosomes. Acta Vet. 1987, 37, 81–92. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gadi, I.K.; Sharma, T.; Raman, R. Supernumerary chromosomes in Bandicota indica nemorivaga and a female individual with XX/X0 mosaicism. Genetica 1982, 58, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Badenhorst, D.; Herbreteau, V.; Chaval, Y.; Pagès, M.; Robinson, T.J.; Rerkamnuaychoke, W.; Morand, S.; Hugot, J.P.; Dobigny, G. New karyotypic data for Asian rodents (Rodentia, Muridae) with the first report of B-chromosomes in the genus Mus. J. Zool. 2009, 279, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ventura, K.; Sato-Kuwabara, Y.; Fagundes, V.; Geise, L.; Leite, Y.L.R.; Costa, L.P.; Silva, M.J.J.; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y.; Rodrigues, M.T. Phylogeographic structure and karyotypic diversity of the Brazilian shrew mouse (Blarinomys breviceps, Sigmodontinae) in the Atlantic forest. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2012, 138, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Patton, J.L. A complex system of chromosomal variation in the pocket mouse, Perognathus baileyi Merriam. Chromosoma 1972, 36, 241–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Volobouev, V.T.; Sicard, B.; Aniskin, V.M.; Gautun, J.C.; Granjon, L. Robertsonian polymorphism, B chromosomes variation and sex chromosomes heteromorphism in the african water rat Dasymys (Rodentia, Muridae). Chromosome Res. 2000, 8, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Ramos, R.S.L.; Vale, W.G.; Assis, F.L. Karyotypic analysis in species of the genus Dasyprocta (Rodentia: Dasyproctidae) found in Brazilian Amazon. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2003, 75, 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Van Wynsberghe, N.R.; Engstrom, M.D. Chromosomal variation in collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx) from the western Hudson Bay region. Musk-Ox 1992, 39, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  74. Gileva, E.A. B-chromosomes, unusual inheritance of sex chromosomes and sex ratio in the varying lemming, Dicrostonyx torquatus Pall. (1779). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1973, 213, 952–955. [Google Scholar]
  75. Chernyavsky, F.B.; Kozlovsky, A.I. Species status and history of the Arctic lemming (Dicrostonyx, Rodentia) of Wrangel Island. Zoo. Zhurnal 1980, 59, 266–273. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  76. Rao, K.S.; Aswathanrayana, N.V.; Prakash, K.S. Supernumerary (B) chromosomes in Indian bush rat Golunda ellioti (Gray). MCN 1979, 20, 79. [Google Scholar]
  77. Roche, J.; Capanna, E.; Civitelli, M.; Ceraso, A. caryotypes des rongeurs de Somalie. Monit. Zool. Ital. Suppl. 1984, 19, 259–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Civitelli, M.V.; Consentino, P.; Capanna, E. Inter- and intra-individual chromosome variability in Thamnomys (Grammomys) gazellae (Rodentia, Muridae) B-chromosomes and structural heteromorphisms. Genetica 1989, 79, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Freitas, T.R.O.; Mattevi, M.S.; Oliveira, L.F.B.; Souza, M.J.; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y.; Salzano, F.M. Chromosome relationship in three representatives of the genus Holochilus (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from Brazil. Genetica 1983, 61, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Vidal, O.R.; Riva, R.; Baro, N. Los cromosomas. del genero Holochilus. 1. Polimorfismo en H. chacarius Thomas (1906). Phys. (B. Aires) Ser. C 1976, 35, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  81. Sangines, N.; Aguilera, M. Chromosome polymorphism in Holochilus venezuelae (Rodentia: Cricetidae): C- and G-bands. Genome 1991, 34, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Baverstock, P.R.; Wats, C.H.S.; Hogarth, J.T. Chromosome evolution in Australian Rodents. I. The Pseudomyinae, the Hydrmyinae and the Uromys/Melomys group. Chromosoma 1977, 61, 95–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Denys, C.; Lalis, A.; Aniskin, V.; Kourouma, F.; Soropogui, B.; Sylla, O.; Doré, A.; Koulemou, K.; Beavogui, Z.B.; Sylla, M.; et al. New data on the taxonomy and distribution of Rodentia (Mammalia) from the western and coastal regions of Guinea West Africa. Ital. J. Zool. 2009, 76, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Denys, C.; Lalis, A.; Lecompte, É.; Cornette, R.; Moulin, S.; Makundi, R.H.; Machang’u, R.S.; Volobouev, V.; Aniskine, V.M. A faunal survey in Kingu Pira (south Tanzania), with new karyotypes of several small mammals and the description of a new Murid species (Mammalia, Rodentia). Zoosystema 2011, 33, 5–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Baverstock, P.R.; Watts, C.H.S.; Adams, M.; Gelder, M. Chromosomal and electrophorectic studies of Australian Melomys (Rodentia:Muridae). Aust. J. Zool. 1980, 28, 553–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Kovalskaja, Y.M. B-chromosomes and XO-males in narrow-skulled vole, Microtus/Stenocranius/gregalis from North Mongolia. In Proceedings of the 7th All-Union Conference, Nalchik, Sverdlovsk, Russia; 1988; Volume 1, pp. 73–74. [Google Scholar]
  87. Judd, S.R.; Cross, S.P. Chromosomal variation in Microtus longicaudus (Merriam). Murrelet 1980, 61, 2–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Gropp, A.; Marshall, J.; Markvong, A. Hriomosomal findings in the spiny mice of Thailand (genus Mus) and occurrence of a complex intraspecific variation in M. shortridgei. Z. Saugetierkd. 1973, 38, 159–168. [Google Scholar]
  89. Ivanitskaya, E.; Sözen, M.; Rashkovetsky, L.; Matur, F.; Nevo, E. Discrimination of 2n = 60 Spalax leucodon cytotypes (Spalacidae, Rodentia) in Turkey by means of classical and molecular cytogenetic techniques. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2008, 122, 139–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Maia, V.; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y.; Freitas, T.R.O.; Kasahara, S.; Sune-Mattevi, M.; Oliviera, L.F. Supernumerary chromosomes, Robertsonian rearrangement and variability of the sex chromosomes in scaly-footed water rat Nectomys squamipes (Cricetidae, Rodentia). Genetica 1984, 63, 121–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y.; do Prado, C.R.; Mello, D.A. Supernumerary chromosomes in Holochilus brasiliensis and comparative cytogenetic analysis with Nectomys squamipes (Cricetidae, Rodentia). Rev. Bras. Genet. 1987, X, 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  92. Andrades-Miranda, J.; Oliveira, L.F.B.; Zanchin, N.I.T.; Mattevi, M.S. Chromosomal description of the rodent genera Oecomys and Nectomys from Brazil. Acta Theriol. 2001, 46, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Myers, P.; Carleton, M.D. The species Oryzomys (Oligoryzomys) in Paraguay and the identity of Azara’s “Rat sixime ou Rat Tarse Noir”. Publ. Mus. Univ. Mich. 1981, 161, 1–141. [Google Scholar]
  94. Sbalqueiro, I.J.; Mattevi, M.S.; Oliveira, L.F.B.; Solano, M.J.V. B chromosome system in populations of Oryzomys flavescens (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil. Acta Theriol. (Warsz) 1991, 36, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Contrafatto, G.; Meester, J.; Bronner, G.; Taylor, P.J.; Willan, K. Genetic variation in the african rodent sub-family Otomyinae (Muridae). iv: Chromosome G-banding analysis of Otomys irroratus and O. angoniensis. Isr. J. Zool. 1992, 38, 277–291. [Google Scholar]
  96. Barros, R.M.S. Variabilidade Cromossômica em Proechimys e Oryzomys (Rodentia) do Amazonas; Universidade de São Paulo: São Paulo, Brazil, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  97. Thomson, R.L. B chromosomes in Rattus fuscipes II. The transmission of B chromosomes to offspring and population studies: Support for the “parasitic” model. Heredity 1984, 52, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Yosida, T.H. Studies on the karyotype differentiation of the Norway rat. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 1986, 62, 65–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wahrman, J.; Gourevitz, P. The chromosome biology of the 2n = 38 black rat, Rattus rattus. In Chromosomes Today 4; Wahrman, J., Lewis, K.R., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1973; pp. 433–434. [Google Scholar]
  100. Yong, H.S.; Dhaliwal, S.S. Supernumerary (B-) chromosomes in the Malayan house rat, Rattus rattus diardii (Rodentia, Muridae). Chromosoma 1972, 36, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Ladron de Guevara, R.G.; de la Guardia, R.D. Frequency of chromosome polymorphism for pericentric inversions and B-chromosomes in Spanish populations of Rattus rattus frugivorus. Genetica 1981, 57, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yosida, T.H. Population survey of B-chromosomes in black rat. Ann. Rep. Nat. Inst. Genet. 1976, 26, 33. [Google Scholar]
  103. Gropp, A.; Marshall, J.; Flatz, G.; Olbrich, M.; Manyanondha, K.; Santadust, A. Chromosomenpolymorphismus durch uberzahuge Autosomen Beobachtungen an der hausratte (R. rattus). Z. Saugetierkd. 1970, 35, 363–371. [Google Scholar]
  104. Baverstock, R.P.; Watts, S.C.H.; Hogarth, T.J.; Robinson, C.A.; Robinson, J.F. Chromosome evolution in Australian rodents. II. The Rattus group. Chromosoma 1977, 61, 227–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Blanks, G.A.; Shellhammer, H.S. Chromosome polymorphism in California populations of harvest mice. J. Mammal. 1968, 49, 726–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Robbins, L.W. Sex chromosome polymorphisms in Reithrodontomys montanus (Rodentia: Cricetidae). Southwest. Nat. 1981, 26, 201–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zimmerman, E.G. Karyology, systematics and chromosomal evolution in the rodent genus Sigmodon. Michigan State Univ. Publ. Mus. Biol. Ser. 1970, 4, 385–394. [Google Scholar]
  108. Silva, M.J.J.; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y. B chromosomes in Brazilian rodents. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2004, 106, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Suárez-Villota, E.; Di-Nizo, C.; Neves, C.; de Jesus Silva, M.J. First cytogenetic information for Drymoreomys albimaculatus (Rodentia, Cricetidae), a recently described genus from Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Zookeys 2013, 303, 65–76. [Google Scholar]
  110. Gordon, D.H. Discovery of another species of tree rat. Transvaal Museum Bull. 1987, 22, 30–32. [Google Scholar]
  111. Gordon, D.H.; Rautenbach, I.L. Species complexes in medically important rodents: Chromosome studies of Aethomys, Tatera and Saccostomus (Rodentia: Muridae, Cricetidae). S. Afr. J. Sci. 1980, 76, 559–561. [Google Scholar]
  112. Hafner, J.C.; Hafner, D.J.; Patton, J.L.; Smith, M.E. Contact zones and the genetics of differentiation in the pocket gopher Thomomys bottae (Rodentia: Geomyidae). Syst. Zool. 1983, 32, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y.; DeSouza, M.J.; Kasahara, S.; L’Abbate, M.; Chu, H.T. Supernumerary system in Proechimys iheringi iheringi (Rodentia, Echimydae), from the state of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Caryologia 1985, 38, 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Fagundes, V.; Camacho, J.P.M.; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y. Are the dot-like chromosomes in Trinomys iheringi (Rodentia, Echimyidae) B chromosomes? Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2004, 106, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Baverstock, P.R.; Gelder, M.; Jahnke, A. Cytogenetic studies of the Australian rodent Uromys caudimaculatus, a species showing extensive heterochromatin variation. Chromosoma 1982, 84, 517–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Mammal Diversity Database. Available online: www.mammaldiversity.org (accessed on 10 July 2018).
  117. Belayev, D.K.; Volobouev, V.T.; Radjabli, S.I.; Trut, L.N. Polymorphism and mosaicism for additional chromosomes in silver foxes. Genetika 1974, X, 58–67. [Google Scholar]
  118. Bekasova, T.S.; Vorontsov, N.N.; Korobitsyina, K.V.; Korablev, V.P. B-chromosomes and comparative karyology of the mice of the genus Apodemus. Genetica 1980, 52/53, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gileva, E. Chromosomal diversity and the aberrant genetic system of sex determination in the artic lemming, Dicrostonyx torquatus Pallas, 1779. Genetica 1980, 52/53, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Szczerbal, I.; Kaczmarek, M.; Switonski, M. Compound mosaicism, caused by B chromosome variability, in the Chinese raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides procyonoides). Folia Biol. 2005, 53, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Borisov, Y.M. The Polymorphism and distribution of B chromosomes in germline and somatic cells of Tscherskia triton de Winton (Rodentia, Cricetinae). Russ. J. Genet. 2012, 48, 538–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Radzhabli, S.I.; Borisov, Y.M. B-chromosomes system variants among continental forms of Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae). Dokl. Akad Nauk SSSR 1979, 248, 979–981. [Google Scholar]
  123. Kartavtseva, I.V.; Roslik, G.V. A complex B chromosome system in the Korean Field mouse Apodemus peninsulae, Cytogenet. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2004, 106, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Roslik, G.V.; Kartavtseva, I.V. Polymorphism and mosaicism of B chromosome number in Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia) in the Russian Far East. Cell Tissue Biol. 2010, 4, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Koh, H. Systematic studies of Korean Rodents: II. A chromosome analysis in Korean field mice, Apodemus peninsulae peninsulae Thomas (Muridae, Rodentia), from Mungyong, with the comparison of morphometric characters of these Korean Field Mice to sympatric striped. Korean J. Syst. Zool. 1986, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  126. Volobujev, V.T.; Timina, N.Z. Unusally high number of B-chromosomes and mosaicism by them in Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae). Tsitologia 1980, 14, 43–45. [Google Scholar]
  127. Abril, V.V.; Carnelossi, E.A.G.; González, S.; Duarte, J.M.B. Elucidating the evolution of the red brocket deer Mazama americana Complex (Artiodactyla; Cervidae). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2010, 128, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Malleret, M.; Labaroni, C.; García, G.V.; Ferro, J.; Marti, D.A.; Lanzone, C. Chromosomal variation in Argentine populations of Akodon montensis Thomas, 1913 (Rodentia, Cricetidae, Sigmodontinae). Comp. Cytogenet. 2016, 10, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  129. Kral, B.; Herzig-Straschil, B.; Štreba, O. Karyotypes of certain small mammals from Austria. Folia Zool. 1979, 28, 5–11. [Google Scholar]
  130. Rovatsos, M.T.; Mitsainas, G.P.; Tryfonopoulos, G.A.; Stamatopoulos, C.; Giagia-Athanasopoulou, E.B. A chromosomal study on Greek populations of the genus Apodemus (Rodentia, Murinae) reveals new data on B chromosome distribution. Acta Theriol. (Warsz) 2008, 53, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Sablina, O.V.; Radzabli, S.I.; Golenisev, F.N. B-chromosomes in the karyotype of A. flavicollis from Leningrad district. Zool. J. 1985, LXIV, 1901–1903. [Google Scholar]
  132. Giagia, E.; Soldatović, B.; Savić, I.; Zimonjić, D. Karyotype study of the genus Apodemus (Kaup 1829) populations from the Balkan peninsula. Acta Vet. 1985, 35, 289–298. [Google Scholar]
  133. Vujošević, M.; Blagojević, J.; Radosavljević, J.; Bejaković, D. B chromosome polymorphism in populations of Apodemus flavicollis in Yugoslavia. Genetica 1991, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Nadjafova, R.S.; Bulatova, N.S.; Chasovnikarova, Z.; Gerassimov, S. Karyological differences between two Apodemus species in Bulgaria. Z. Saugetierkd. 1993, 38, 232–239. [Google Scholar]
  135. Wolf, U.; Voiculescu, I.; Zenzes, M.T.; Vogel, W.; Engel, W. Chromosome polymorphism in Apodemus flavicollis, possibly due to creation of a new centromere. In Modern Aspects of Cytogenetics: Constitutive Heterochromatin in Man; Pfeiffer, A., Ed.; Schattauer F. K.: Stuttgart, Germany; New York, NY, USA, 1972; pp. 163–168. [Google Scholar]
  136. Ramalhinho, M.G.; Libois, R. First report on the presence in France of a B-chromosome polymorphism in Apodemus flavicollis. Mammalia 2002, 66, 300–303. [Google Scholar]
  137. Castiglia, R. Cytogenetic analysis of Apodemus flavicollis in Italy: First report of B chromosomes and X chromosome heteromorphism. Mammalia 2003, 67, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Wójcik, J.M.; Wójcik, A.M.; Macholán, M.; Piálek, J.; Zima, J. The mammalian model for population studies of B chromosomes: The wood mouse (Apodemus). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2004, 106, 264–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Vujošević, M.; Blagojević, J. New localities with B chromosomes in Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Mammalia). Arch. Biol. Sci. 1994, 46, 15. [Google Scholar]
  140. Blagojević, J.; Vujošević, M. Do B chromosomes affect morphometric characters in yellow-necked mice Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Mammalia)? Acta Theriol. (Warsz) 2000, 45, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Vujošević, M.; Blagojević, J. Does environment affect polymorphism of B chromosomes in the yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis? Z. Saugetierkd. 2000, 65, 313–317. [Google Scholar]
  142. Vujošević, M.; Blagojević, J.; Jojić-Šipetić, V.; Bugarski-Stanojević, V.; Adnađević, T.; Stamenković, G. Distribution of B chromosomes in age categories of the yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis (Mammalia, Rodentia). Arch. Biol. Sci. 2009, 61, 653–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Vujošević, M.; Jojić, V.; Bugarski-Stanojević, V.; Blagojević, J. Habitat quality and B chromosomes in the yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis. Ital. J. Zool. 2007, 74, 313–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Shellhammer, H.S. Supernumerary chromosomes of the harvest mouse, Reithrodontomys megalotis. Chromosoma 1969, 27, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Boyeskorov, G.; Zagorodnyuk, I.; Belyanin, A.N.; Lyapunova, E.A. B-chromosomes in Apodemus flavicollis from eastern Europe. Pol. Ecol. Stud. 1994, 20, 523–526. [Google Scholar]
  146. Kartavtseva, I.V.; Roslik, G.V.; Pavlenko, M.V.; Amachaeva, E.Y.; Sawaguchi, S.; Obara, Y. The B-chromosome system of the Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae in the Russian Far East. Chromosom. Sci. 2000, 4, 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  147. Ostromyshenskii, D.I.; Kuznetsova, I.S.; Podgornaya, O.I.; Kartavtseva, I.V. Appearance of B chromosomes like structures in Apodemus peninsulae primary cell culture. Res. J. Zool. 2018, 1, 1. [Google Scholar]
  148. Volobuev, V.T. Karyological analysis of three Siberian populations of Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae). Dokl. AN SSSR 1979, 248, 1452–1454. [Google Scholar]
  149. Borisov, Y.M. Variation of the cytogenetic structure of the population of Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae) in western Sayan Mountains. Genetika 1990, 26, 1484–1491. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  150. Borisov, Y.M. Cytogenetic differentiation of the population of Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae) in eastern Siberia. Genetika 1990, 26, 1828–1839. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  151. Borisov, Y.M. Cytogenetic Structure of the Population of Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae) on the bank of lake Teletskoe (Altai). Genetika 1990, 26, 1212–1220. [Google Scholar]
  152. Borisov, Y.M.; Malygin, M.V. Cline variability of B-chromosome system in Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae) from the Buryatia and Mongolia. Citologija 1991, 33, 106–111. [Google Scholar]
  153. Roslik, G.V.; Kartavtseva, I.V. Geographic differentiation of B chromosomes in Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia) from the east Asia. In Proceedings of the International Symposium: Modern Achievements in Population, Evolutionary, and Ecological Genetics, Vladivostok, Russia, 3–9 September 2017. [Google Scholar]
  154. Ruban, A.; Schmutzer, T.; Scholz, U.; Houben, A. How next-generation sequencing has aided our understanding of the sequence composition and origin of B chromosomes. Genes 2017, 8, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Page, B.T.; Wanous, M.K.; Birchler, J.; Ames, A. Characterization of a maize chromosome 4 centromeric sequence: Evidence for an evolutionary relationship with the B chromosome centromere. Genetics 2001, 159, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  156. Cheng, Y.-M.; Lin, B.-Y. Cloning and characterization of maize B chromosome sequences derived from microdissection. Genetics 2003, 164, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  157. Bugrov, A.G.; Karamysheva, T.V.; Perepelov, E.A.; Elisaphenko, E.A.; Rubtsov, D.N.; Warchałowska-Śliwa, E.; Tatsuta, H.; Rubtsov, N.B. DNA content of the B chromosomes in grasshopper Podisma kanoi Storozh. (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Chromosom. Res. 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Valente, G.T.; Nakajima, R.T.; Fantinatti, B.E.A.; Marques, D.F.; Almeida, R.O.; Simões, R.P.; Martins, C. B chromosomes: From cytogenetics to systems biology. Chromosoma 2017, 126, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Lamb, J.C.; Meyer, J.M.; Corcoran, B.; Kato, A.; Han, F.; Birchler, J.A. Distinct chromosomal distributions of highly repetitive sequences in maize. Chromosom. Res. 2007, 15, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Tanić, N.; Dedovic, N.; Vujošević, M.; Dimitrijević, B. DNA profiling of B chromosomes from the yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Mammalia). Genome Res. 2000, 10, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  161. Schmid, M.; Ziegler, C.G.; Steinlein, C.; Nanda, I.; Schartl, M. Cytogenetics of the bleak (Alburnus alburnus), with special emphasis on the B chromosomes. Chromosom. Res. 2006, 14, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Wang, J.; Zhao, X.; Qi, H.; Koh, H.S.; Zhang, L.; Guan, Z.; Wang, C. Karyotypes and B chromosomes of Apodemus peninsulae (Rodenita, Mammalia). Acta Theriol. Sin. 2000, 20, 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  163. Trifonov, V.A.; Perelman, P.L.; Kawada, S.I.; Iwasa, M.A.; Oda, S.I.; Graphodatsky, A.S. Complex structure of B-chromosomes in two mammalian species: Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia) and Nyctereutes procyonoides (Carnivora). Chromosom. Res. 2002, 10, 109–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Karamysheva, T.V.; Andreenkova, O.V.; Bochkarev, M.N.; Borisov, Y.M.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Borodin, P.M.; Rubtsov, N.B. B chromosomes of Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Murinae) analysed by microdissection and FISH. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2002, 96, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Rubtsov, N.B.; Karamysheva, T.V.; Andreenkova, O.V.; Bochkaerev, M.N.; Kartavtseva, I.V.; Roslik, G.V.; Borissov, Y.M. Comparative analysis of micro and macro B chromosomes in the Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Murinae) performed by chromosome microdissection and FISH. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2004, 106, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Wurster-Hill, D.H.; Ward, O.G.; Davis, B.H.; Park, J.P.; Moyzis, R.K.; Meyne, J. Fragile sites, telomeric DNA sequences, B chromosomes, and DNA content in raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonoides, with comparative notes on foxes, coyote, wolf, and raccoon. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 1988, 49, 278–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Szczerbal, I.; Switonski, M. B chromosomes of the Chinese raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides procyonoides Gray) contain inactive NOR-like sequences. Caryologia 2003, 56, 213–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Graphodatsky, A.S.; Kukekova, A.V.; Yudkin, D.V.; Trifonov, V.A.; Vorobieva, N.V.; Beklemisheva, V.R.; Perelman, P.L.; Graphodatskaya, D.A.; Trut, L.N.; Yang, F.; et al. The proto-oncogene C-KIT maps to canid B-chromosomes. Chromosom. Res. 2005, 13, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  169. Yudkin, D.V.; Trifonov, V.A.; Kukekova, A.V.; Vorobieva, N.V.; Rubtsova, N.V.; Yang, F.; Acland, G.M.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; Graphodatsky, A.S. Mapping of KIT adjacent sequences on canid autosomes and B chromosomes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2007, 116, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Wnuk, M.; Oklejewicz, B.; Lewinska, A.; Zabek, T.; Bartosz, G.; Slota, E.; Bugno-Poniewierska, M. PRINS detection of 18S rDNA in pig, red fox and Chinese raccoon dog, and centromere DNA in horse. Hereditas 2010, 147, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Becker, S.E.D.; Thomas, R.; Trifonov, V.A.; Wayne, R.K.; Graphodatsky, A.S.; Breen, M. Anchoring the dog to its relatives reveals new evolutionary breakpoints across 11 species of the Canidae and provides new clues for the role of B chromosomes. Chromosom. Res. 2011, 19, 685–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Li, Y.M.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, W.J.; Yan, S.Q.; Sun, J.H. Identification of polymorphisms and transcriptional activity of the proto-oncogene KIT located on both autosomal and B chromosomes of the Chinese raccoon dog. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Makunin, A.; Romanenko, S.; Beklemisheva, V.; Perelman, P.; Druzhkova, A.; Petrova, K.; Prokopov, D.; Chernyaeva, E.; Johnson, J.; Kukekova, A.; et al. Sequencing of supernumerary chromosomes of red fox and raccoon dog confirms a non-random gene acquisition by B chromosomes. Genes 2018, 9, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Trifonov, V.A.; Dementyeva, P.V.; Larkin, D.M.; O’Brien, P.C.; Perelman, P.L.; Yang, F.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; Graphodatsky, A.S. Transcription of a protein-coding gene on B chromosomes of the Siberian roe deer (Capreolus pygargus). BMC Biol. 2013, 11, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Makunin, A.I.; Kichigin, I.G.; Larkin, D.M.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A.; Yang, F.; Proskuryakova, A.A.; Vorobieva, N.V.; Chernyaeva, E.N.; O’Brien, S.J.; et al. Contrasting origin of B chromosomes in two cervids (Siberian roe deer and grey brocket deer) unravelled by chromosome-specific DNA sequencing. BMC Genom. 2016, 17, 618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Soares, A.A.; Castro, J.P.; Balieiro, P.; Dornelles, S.; Degrandi, T.M.; Sbalqueiro, I.J.; Ferreira Artoni, R.; Hass, I. B Chromosome diversity and repetitive sequence distribution in an isolated population of Akodon montensis (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2018, 154, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Boyeskorov, G.G.; Kartavseva, I.V.; Belyanin, A.N.; Liapunova, E.A. Nucleolus organizer regions and B-chromosomes of wood mice (Mammalia, Rodentia, Apodemus). Russ. J. Genet. 1995, 31, 156–163. [Google Scholar]
  178. Tanić, N.; Vujošević, M.; Dedović-Tanić, N.; Dimitrijević, B. Differential gene expression in yellow-necked mice Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Mammalia) with and without B. chromosomes. Chromosoma 2005, 113, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Rajičić, M.; Adnađević, T.; Stamenković, G.; Blagojević, J.; Vujošević, M. Screening of B chromosomes for presence of two genes in yellow-necked mice, Apodemus flavicollis (Mammalia, Rodentia). Genetika 2015, 47, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Bugarski-Stanojević, V.; Stamenković, G.; Blagojević, J.; Liehr, T.; Kosyakova, N.; Rajičić, M.; Vujošević, M. Exploring supernumeraries—A new marker for screening of B-chromosomes presence in the yellow necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Makunin, A.I.; Rajičić, M.; Karamysheva, T.V.; Romanenko, S.A.; Druzhkova, A.; Blagojević, J.; Vujošević, M.; Rubtsov, N.B.; Graphodatsky, A.S.; Trifonov, V.A. Low-pass single-chromosome sequencing of human small supernumerary marker chromosomes (sSMCs) and Apodemus B chromosomes. Chromosoma 2018, 127, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Matsubara, K.; Yamada, K.; Umemoto, S.; Tsuchiya, K.; Ikeda, N.; Nishida, C.; Chijiwa, T.; Moriwaki, K.; Matsuda, Y. Molecular cloning and characterization of the repetitive DNA sequences that comprise the constitutive heterochromatin of the A and B chromosomes of the Korean field mouse (Apodemus peninsulae, Muridae, Rodentia). Chromosom. Res. 2008, 16, 1013–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Ventura, K.; O’Brien, P.C.M.; do Nascimento Moreira, C.; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y.; Ferguson-Smith, M.A. On the Origin and evolution of the extant system of B chromosomes in Oryzomyini Radiation (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. De Jesus Silva, M.J.; Yonenaga-Yassuda, Y. Heterogeneity and meiotic behaviour of B and sex chromosomes, banding patterns and localization of (TTAGGG)n sequences by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the neotropical water rat Nectomys (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Chromosome Res. 1998, 6, 455–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Stitou, S.; Díaz de La Guardia, R.; Jiménez, R.; Burgos, M. Inactive ribosomal cistrons are spread throughout the B chromosomes of Rattus rattus (Rodentia, Muridae). Implications for their origin and evolution. Chromosome Res. 2000, 8, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Cavagna, P.; Stone, G.; Stanyon, R. Black rat (Rattus rattus) genomic variability characterized by chromosome painting. Mamm. Genome 2002, 13, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Peppers, J.A.; Wiggins, L.E.; Baker, R.J. Nature of B chromosomes in the harvest mouse Reithrodontomys megalotis by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Chromosome Res. 1997, 5, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Rajičić, M.; Romanenko, S.A.; Karamysheva, T.V.; Blagojević, J.; Adnađević, T.; Budinski, I.; Bogdanov, A.S.; Trifonov, V.A.; Rubtsov, N.B.; Vujošević, M. The origin of B chromosomes in yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollis)—Break rules but keep playing the game. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0172704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Bugno-Poniewierska, M.; Solek, P.; Wronski, M.; Potocki, L.; Jezewska-Witkowska, G.; Wnuk, M. Genome organization and DNA methylation patterns of B chromosomes in the red fox and Chinese raccoon dogs. Hereditas 2014, 151, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  190. Jones, R.N.; Houben, A. B chromosomes in plants: Escapees from the A chromosome genome? Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 417–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Sapre, A.B.; Deshpande, D.S. Origin of B chromosomes in Coix L. through spontaneous interspecific hybridization. J. Hered. 1987, 78, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. McAllister, B.F. Isolation and characterization of a retroelement from B chromosome (PSR) in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Insect Mol. Biol. 1995, 4, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Guioli, S.; Lovell-Badge, R.; Turner, J.M.A. Error-Prone ZW Pairing and no evidence for meiotic sex chromosomeinactivation in the chicken germ line. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Gu, L.; Walters, J.R. Evolution of sex shromosome dosage compensation in animals: A beautiful theory, undermined by facts and bedeviled by details. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 2461–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Daish, T.J.; Casey, A.E.; Grutzner, F. Lack of sex chromosome specific meiotic silencing in platypus reveals origin of MSCI in therian mammals. BMC Biol. 2015, 13, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Berend, S.A.; Hale, D.W.; Engstrom, M.D.; Greenbaum, I.F. Cytogenetics of collared lemmings (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus). II. Meiotic behavior of B chromosomes suggests a Y-chromosome origin of supernumerary chromosomes. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2001, 95, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Kolomeits, O.L.; Borbiev, T.E.; Safronova, L.D.; Borisov, Y.M. Synaptonemal analysis of B-chromosome behaviour in meiotic prophase I in the East-Asiatic mouse Apodemus peninsulae (Muridae, Rodentia). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1988, 48, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Matsubara, K.; Nishida-Umehara, C.; Tsuchiya, K.; Nukaya, D.; Matsuda, Y. Karyotypic evolution of Apodemus (Muridae, Rodentia) inferred from comparative FISH analyses. Chromosom. Res. 2004, 12, 383–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Thomson, R.L.; Westerman, M.; Murray, N.D. B chromosomes in Rattus fuscipes I. Mitotic and meiotic chromosomes and the effects of B on chiasma frequency. Heredity (Edinb) 1984, 52, 355–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Rubtsov, N.B.; Borisov, Y.M.; Karamysheva, T.V.; Bochkarev, M.N. The mechanisms of formation and evolution of B chromosomes in Korean field mice Apodemus peninsulae (Mammalia, Rodentia). Russ. J. Genet. 2009, 45, 389–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Ishak, B.; Maetz, J.L.; Rumpler, Y. Absence of transcriptional activity in the B-chromosomes of Apodemus flavicollis during pachytene. Chromosoma 1991, 100, 278–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Karamysheva, T.V.; Torgasheva, A.A.; Yefremov, Y.R.; Bogomolov, A.G.; Liehr, T.; Borodin, P.M.; Rubtsov, N.B. Spatial organization of fibroblast and spermatocyte nuclei with different B-chromosome content in Korean field mouse, Apodemus peninsulae (Rodentia, Muridae). Genome 2017, 60, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Vujošević, M.; Radosavljević, J.; Živković, S. Meiotic behavior of B chromosomes in yellow necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis. Arch. Biol. Sci. 1989, 41, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  204. Banaszek, A.; Jadwiszczak, K.A. B-chromosomes behaviour during meiosis of yellow-necked mouse, Apodemus flavicollis. Folia Zool. 2006, 55, 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  205. Świtoński, M.; Gustavsson, I.; Höjer, K.; Plöen, L. Synaptonemal complex analysis of the B-chromosomes in spermatocytes of the silver fox (Vulpes fulvus Desm.). Cytogenet. Genome Res. 1987, 45, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Sosnowski, J.; Łukasiewicz, A.; Migalska, L.; Wojnowska, M.; Polański, Z. Different levels of a lack of X-Y chromosome pairing in pachytene spermatocytes of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and Chinese raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides procyonoides). Ann. Anim. Sci. 2011, 11, 71–81. [Google Scholar]
  207. Patton, J.L. B-chromosome system in the pocket mouse, Perognathus baileyi: Meiosis and C-band studies. Chromosoma 1977, 60, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Radjabli, S.I.; Isaenko, A.A.; Volobuev, V.T. Investigation of the nature and role of additional chromosomes in silver fox. Genetika 1978, XIV, 438–443. [Google Scholar]
  209. Borisov, Y.M. Increase in the number of the B-chromosomes and variants of their system in mouse Apodemus peninsulae in Mountain Altai population over 26 years. Genetika 2008, 44, 1227–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Gileva, E.A.; Chebotar, N.A. Fertile X0 males and females in the varying lemming, Dicrostonyx torquatus Pall. (1779). Heredity (Edinb) 1979, 42, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Gileva, E. The B chromosome system in the varying lemming Dicrostonyx torquatus Pall., 1779 from natural and laboratory populations. Russ. J. Genet. 2004, 40, 1399–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Yosida, T.H. Some genetic analysis of supernumerary chromosomes in the black rat in laboratory matings. Proc. Jpn. Acad. 1978, 50, 440–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Stitou, S.; Zurita, F.; Díaz de la Guardia, R.; Jiménez, R.; Burgos, M. Transmission analysis of B chromosomes in Rattus rattus from Northern Africa. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2004, 106, 344–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Palestis, B.G.; Burt, A.; Jones, R.N.; Trivers, R. B chromosomes are more frequent in mammals with acrocentric karyotypes: Support for the theory of centromeric drive. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2004, 271, S22–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F.; Sapienza, C. Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals. Genetics 2001, 159, 1179–1189. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  216. Kociucka, B.; Sosnowski, J.; Kubiak, A.; Nowak, A.; Pawlak, P.; Szczerbal, I. Three-dimensional positioning of B chromosomes in fibroblast nuclei of the red fox and the Chinese raccoon dog. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 2013, 139, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Wurster-Hill, D.H.; Ward, O.G.; Kada, B.H.; Whittmore, S. Banded chromosome studies and B chromosomes in wild-caught raccoon dogs, Nyctereutes procyonides viverinus. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 1986, 42, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Zima, J.; Piálek, J.; Macholán, M. Possible heterotic effects of B chromosomes on body mass in a population of Apodemus flavicollis. Can. J. Zool. 2003, 81, 1312–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Jojić, V.; Blagojević, J.; Ivanović, A.; Bugarski-Stanojević, V.; Vujošević, M. Morphological integration of the mandible in yellow-necked field mice: The effects of B chromosomes. J. Mammal. 2007, 88, 689–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Jojić, V.; Blagojević, J.; Vujošević, M. B chromosomes and cranial variability in yellow-necked field mice (Apodemus flavicollis). J. Mammal. 2011, 92, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Blagojević, J.; Vujošević, M. B chromosomes and developmental homeostasis in the yellow-necked mouse, Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Mammalia): Effects on nonmetric traits. Heredity (Edinb) 2004, 93, 249–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Adnađević, T.; Jovanović, V.M.; Blagojević, J.; Budinski, I.; Čabrilo, B.; Bjelić-Čabrilo, O.; Vujošević, M. Possible influence of B chromosomes on genes included in immune response and parasite burden in Apodemus flavicollis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Jovanović, V.M.; Čabrilo, B.; Budinski, I.; Bjelić-Čabrilo, O.; Adnađević, T.; Blagojević, J.; Vujošević, M. Host B chromosomes as potential sex ratio distorters of intestinal nematode infrapopulations in the yellow-necked mouse (Apodemus flavicollis). J. Helminthol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Belayev, D.K.; Volobouev, V.T.; Radjabli, S.I.; Trut, L.N. Investigation of the nature and role of additional chromosomes in silver fox II. Additional chromosomes and breeding of animals for behaviour. Genetika 1974, X, 83–91. [Google Scholar]
  225. Volobuev, V.T.; Radjabli, S.I. Investigation of the nature and the role of additional chromosomes in silver fox. I. Comparative analysis of additional chromosomes in different tissues and types of preparations and at different seasons. Genetika 1974, X, 77–82. [Google Scholar]
  226. Volobujev, V.T.; Radzabli, S.I.; Belajeva, E.S. Investigation of the nature and the role of additional chromosomes in silver foxes. III. Replication pattern in additional chromosomes. Genetika 1976, XII, 30–34. [Google Scholar]
  227. Östergren, G. Parasitic nature of extra fragment chromosomes. Bot. Not. 1945, 2, 157–163. [Google Scholar]
  228. White, M.J.D. Animal Cytology and Evolution, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1973; ISBN 0-521-07071-6. [Google Scholar]
  229. Camacho, J.P.M.; Shaw, M.W.; López–León, M.D.; Pardo, M.C.; Cabrero, J. Population dynamics of a selfish B chromosome neutralized by the standard genome in the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans. Am. Nat. 1997, 149, 1030–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  230. Vujošević, M. B-chromosome polymorphism in Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Mammalia) during five years. Caryologia 1992, 45, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Blagojević, J.; Vujošević, M. The role of B chromosomes in the population dynamics of yellow-necked wood mice Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia, Mammalia). Genome 1995, 38, 472–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Vujošević, M.; Blagojević, J. Seasonal changes of B-chromosome frequencies within the population of Apodemus flavicollis (Rodentia) on Cer mountain in Yugoslavia. Acta Theriol. (Warsz) 1995, 40, 131–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Borisov, Y.M.; Sheftel, B.I.; Safronova, L.D.; Aleksandrov, D.Y. Stability of the Population Variants of the B-Chromosome System in the East-Asian Mouse Apodemus peninsulae from the Baikal Region and Northern Mongolia. Russ. J. Genet. 2012, 48, 1020–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Blagojević, J.; Stamenković, G.; Jojić Šipetić, V.; Bugarski-Stanojević, V.; Adnađević, T.; Vujošević, M. B chromosomes in populations of yellow-necked mice—Stowaways or contributing genetic elements? Ital. J. Zool. 2009, 76, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Adnađević, T.; Bugarski-Stanojević, V.; Blagojević, J.; Stamenković, G.; Vujošević, M. Genetic differentiation in populations of the yellow-necked mouse, Apodemus flavicollis, harbouring B chromosomes in different frequencies. Popul. Ecol. 2012, 54, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. List of species with B chromosomes.
Table 1. List of species with B chromosomes.
ORDER
Species		Common Name (◊)2nNFaX/YNo. BsBs MorphologyReferences
Size *Cent. Position †
PERAMELEMORPHIA
Echymipera kalubuCommon Echymipera13–14
XX/X0		26M/A1–5IM[22]
DIPROTODONTIA
Petauroides (Schoinobates) volansGreater glider2238M/A1–8Imi[2,23]
INSECTIVORA
Crocidura leucodonBicolored shrew2852SM/SM, A1IIA[24]
Crocidura malayanaMalayan shrew3862SM/M1–2IIM[25]
Crocidura suaveolensLesser shrew4046M/A1II [26]
Sorex bedfordiaeLesser stripe-backed shrew2444A/A1–2IIM[27]
CHIROPTERA
Myotis macrodactylusBig-footed Myotis4456M/A1Imi[28]
Nyctalus leisleriLesser Noctule4454М/А1–3Imi[29]
Pipistrellus tenuis (mimus)Least Pipistrelle3850М/А2–4Imi[30]
PRIMATES
Alouatta seniculus
A.seniculus macconelli		Red howler monkey46
47–49		64M/A1–3
1–3		I
A[31,32]
[33]
Homo sapiensHuman4678SM/A2Imi[34,35]
CARNIVORA
Atelocynus microtisShort-eared dog7472SM/SM2Imi[36]
Chrysocyon brachyurusManed wolf7672SM/SM1IIA[37]
Nyctereutes p. procyonoidesRaccoon dog5462M/M1–4IIA, SM[38]
Nyctereutes p. viverinus 3862M/M1–5IIA[39]
Vulpes (Alopex) lagopusArctic fox5092M/A1IIM[40]
Vulpes bengalensisBengal fox6068M/A Imi[41]
Vulpes pallidaPale fox [42]
Vulpes vulpes (fulvus)Red fox3464M/A1–10IA, M[3,43]
ARTIODACTYLA
Capreolus pygargusSiberian roe deer7072SM/A1–14Imi[44,45]
Mazama americanaRed brocket42–5342–52SM/A2–5Imi, A[44,46]
Mazama bororoSmall red brocket3446M4–6Imi, A[47,48]
Mazama gouazoubiraGray brocket69–70
70		68–69
68		M, A/A, mi
A/M		1–2
1–3		I
I		mi, A[47,49,50]
Mazama nanaBrazilian dwarf brocket3654M/mi1–6Imi, A[47,51]
Mazama nemorivagaAmazonian brown brocket67–6969–72SM/A,M2–7Imi[52]
Moschus moschiferus (sibiricus)Siberian musk deer5856A/A1–2--[53]
RODENTIA
Acomys ngurui 59–6168M/A,SM1IISM[54,55]
Acomys spinosissimusSpiny mouse59–61 A/SM1IIA[54]
Akodon mollisSoft grass mouse2242M/A1IIM[56]
Akodon montensis (arviculoides)Montane Akodont2442A/A1–3IISM[57,58]
Apodemus agrariusStriped field mouse4854А/А1I, IImi, A[59]
Apodemus argenteusSmall Japanese field mouse4648A/A1I, IImi, SM[60]
Apodemus flavicollisYellow-necked field mouse4846А/А1–9IIA[61,62]
Apodemus mystacinusEastern broad-toothed field mouse4850A/A2--[63]
Apodemus peninsulae (giliacus)Korean field mouse4846A/A1–30I, II, IIImi, A, SM, M[64,65]
Apodemus sylvaticusLong-tailed field mouse4846A/A1–3IIA[66]
Bandicota indicaGreater bandicoot rat44/45 XX/XO84SM/A1–3IISM[67]
Bandicota savileiSavile’s bandicoot rat4358SM1ISM[68]
Berylmys berdmoreiBerdmore’s Berylmys4062A1IIM[68]
Blarinomys brevicepsBrazilian shrew mouse29–5050A2IIM[69]
Chaetodipus (Perognathus) baileyiBailey’s pocket mouse4664M/M1–10IIM[70]
Dasymys rufulusWest African shaggy rat36, 38 39, 4042–50A,SM, M/A, SM, M1–3IIM[71]
Dasyprocta fuliginosaBlack Agouti64118M/SM1IISM[72]
Dasyprocta leporinaRed-rumped Agouti64118M/M1IM[72]
Dasyprocta prymnolopha
(nigriclunis)		Black-rumped Agouti64118M/SM1IIM[72]
Dasyprocta sp.-64118M/SM1IIM[72]
Dicrostonyx groenlandicus (kilangmiutak)Northern collared lemming48 M/SM1–3I, IIA, M[73]
47–5048A, M/A,SM1–8IIM[74]
Dicrostonyx torquatusPalearctic collared lemming4456A, SM/A1–42IISM, M[74,75]
Golunda elliotiIndian bush rat5454SM/A1–4IIA[76]
Grammomys (Thamnomys) dolichurusWoodland thicket rat5468SM/A4-7IIA, M[77]
Grammomys macmillani (Thamnomys gazellae)Macmillan’s thicket rat5470SM/A2–17Imi[78]
Holochilus brasiliensisWeb-footed marsh rat4858A/A1–2II, IIISM, M[79]
Holochilus chacariusChaco marsh rat48–5656–60 1–2II [80]
Holochilus venezuelae-4456A/A1IIM[81]
Holochilus vulpinus-3658A/A1–3IIA[19]
Mastacomys fuscusBroad-toothed rat4856SM/SM1IIA[82]
Mastomys erythroleucusGuinea multimammate mouse3854SM/SM2IIA[83]
Mastomys natalensisNatal multimammate mouse3254M/A1IISM[84]
Melomys burtoniGrassland Melomys4850A/A1–8I, IImi, A, SM, M[85]
Melomys capensisCape York Melomys4850A/A3–6- [85]
Melomys cervinipesFawn-footed Melomys4850A/A4–13I, IISM, A[82]
Microtus gregalisNarrow-headed vole3650M/A1–4IIA[86]
Microtus longicaudusSan bernardino long-tailed vole5684M/A1–14IM[87]
Mus cookiiRyley’s spiny mouse4038A/A1I, IIA, M[68]
Mus shortridgeiShortridge’s mouse4646A/A1–3I, IIA, M[88]
Nannospalax (Spalax) leucodonLesser blind mole rat6074SM/M1–3Imi, A[89]
Nectomys rattusCommon water rat5250A, SM/A, SM1–3IIA, SM, M[90]
Nectomys squamipesSouth American water rat5654A, SM/A, SM, M1–3IIA, SM[91]
Oecomys concolorNatterer’s Oecomys6062 1–2ISM[92]
Oligoryzomys (Oryzomys) fornesiFornes colilargo62–6664SM/SM1–2IA[93]
Oligoryzomys flavescensYellow pygmy rice rat6464SM/SM1–2Imi[94]
Otomys irroratusSouthern African vlei rat2844M/SM2–4IISM, M[95]
Proechimys sp. 26 1Imi[96]
Rattus fuscipesBush rat3858A/A1–3IIM[82,97]
Rattus norvegicusBrown rat4260A/A1IIA[98]
Rattus rattusHouse rat4260–64A/A1–3IIM[99]
Rattus r. diardii 42 1–4IIM[100]
Rattus r. frugivorus 38 1–3IIM[101]
Rattus r. kandianus 40 1IIM[102]
Rattus r. tahnezumi 42 1IIM[102]
Rattus r. thai 42 1-6 [103]
Rattus tunneyiPale field rat4260A/A1IIM[104]
Reithrodontomys megalotisSouthern marsh harvest mouse42 1–7Imi[105]
Reithrodontomys montanusPlains harvest mouse3672M/A, SM1ISM[106]
Sigmodon hispidusHispid cotton rat5250A/M3–4- [107]
Sooretamys angouya (Oryzomys angouya, O. buccinatus, O. ratticeps) 5860A/A2I, IImi, SM[108,109,110]
Thallomys nigricaudaBlack-tailed tree rat4860 - [111]
Thomomys bottaeAnimas mountains pocket gopher76130SM/mi6–12Imi[112]
Trinomys (Proechimys) iheringiIhering’s spiny rat60116SM/SM1–6Imi[113,114]
Tscherskia (Cricettilus) tritonGreater long-tailed hamster2830A/M1–2IIA[112,113]
Uromys caudimaculatusWhite-tailed giant rat4650A/A2–12II, IIIA, SM, M[18,115]
2n—diploid number, NFa—fundamental number of autosomes, X/Y—morphology of sex chromosomes; * Category: I—Bs smaller than chromosomes from A set, II—same as A, III—larger than A; † mi—micro Bs, M—metacentric, SM—submetacentric, A—acrocentric chromosomes; (◊) Mammal Diversity Database [116].
Table
Table 2. Current data on molecular composition of B chromosomes in mammalian species.
Table 2. Current data on molecular composition of B chromosomes in mammalian species.
SpeciesFound on B ChromosomeMethodReferences
Petauroides volanscentromeric regions,
B specific regions		FISH,
PCR		[23]
Nyctereutes procyonoides procyonoidesinterstitial telomeric sequencesFISH[166]
rDNA (NOR)FISH, silver staining[167]
C-KITFISH[168]
Kdr,
RPL23A pseudogene		FISH, PCR[169]
rDNAPRINS (primed in situ DNA synthesis)[170]
Lrig1FISH[171]
Ret
Lrig1
Ret		FISH
C-KIT (no transcriptional activitiy)PCR, RT-PCR[172]
100 sequences located on B, homologous to genes
involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, neuron sinapse, cell junction		sequencing of microdissected B[173]
Nyctereutes procyonoides viverrinusinterstitial telomeric sequencesFISH[166]
three types of B-specific heterochromatinFISH[173]
C-KITFISH[168,169,171]
Kdr
RPL23A pseudogene		FISH, PCR[169]
Vulpes vulpesC-KITFISH[168,171]
RPL23A pseudogenePCR[169]
Mdn1,
Ctndd2		FISH [171]
49 sequences located on B, homologous to genes associated with cell division machinery, cell cycle control functions, microtubule, centrosomes, cell differentiation, proliferationsequencing of microdissected B[173]
Capreolus pygargusTnni3k,
Fpgt,
Lrriq3		FISH,
flow-sorted DNA libraries derived from Bs		[174,175]

9 genes located on Bre-analyzed data from [175][173]
Mazama gouazoubira55 sequences located on B, homologous to genes
associated with functional clusters associated with ATP-binding/kinase, mitochondria, cell cycle, Zn-ion binding/Zn-finger, membrane, cell proliferation/ differentiation, positive regulation of protein kinase activity		sequencing of microdissected B[175]
107 sequences located on B homologous to genesre-analyzed data from [175][173]
Acomys sp.telomeric repeatFISH[54]
Akodon montensis (arviculoides)rDNA (NOR)silver staining[57,108]
telomeric repeat,
rDNA (NOR)		FISH,
silver staining		[176]
Apodemus flavicollisrDNA (NOR)silver staining[177]
B specific regionsAP-PCR
RT-PCR		[160]
[178]
rDNART-PCR[179]
Vrk1ISSR-PCR,
sequencing 		[180]
38 sequences located on B, homologous to genes associated with microtubule, cell cycle proteins, and less significant nucleotide-binding, membrane and metal binding proteins. Satellite repeats, MurSatRep1, ERVL (MaLR), ERVK LTRs and transposable elements.sequencing of microdissected B[181]
101 sequences located on B homologous to genesre-analyzed data from [181][173]
Apodemus peninsulaetelomeric repeat,
two types of B arm-specific repeats		FISH[164]
[163]
two types of B-specific chromatinFISH[181]
repetitive elementsFISH[182]
centromeric repeats, 32 sequences located on B homologous to genes
associated with cell division machinery, cell cycle control, nucleotide-binding, laminin and EGF-like domain-containing, cytoskeleton and ion-bindings proteins, LINE L1 elements, centromeric repeats, satelite repeats MurSatRep1, ERVK and ERVL (MaLR) LTRs.		sequencing of microdissected Bs[181]
152 sequencies located on Bs homologous to genesre-analyzed data from [181][173]
Blarinomys brevicepstelomeric repeats,
ITSs		FISH[69]
Holochilus brasilensisOSHR, telomeric repeatsFISH[183]
Nanospalax leucodontelomeric repeatFISH[89]
Nectomys sp.ITBsFISH[184]
Nectomys rattusOSHRFISH[183]
Nectomys squamipesOSHR, ITSFISH[183]
Rattus rattusrDNAFISH[185]
telomeric repeatFISH[186]
Reithrodontomys megalotistelomeric repeat,
LINE elements,
centromeric repeats		FISH[187]
Sooretamys angouyarDNA (NOR)silver staining[108]
Trinomys iheringitelomeric repeatsFISH[114]
FISH—fluorecent in situ hybridization; RT-PCR—real time-PCR; rDNA (NOR)—ribosomal DNA (nucleolus organizer region); AP-PCR—arbitrarily primed-PCR; ISSR-PCR—inter simple sequence repeat-PCR; EGF—epidermal growth factor; LINE—long interspersed nuclear element; ERVK—endogenous retrovirus-K; ERVL—endogenous retroviruses-related; LTRs—long terminal repeats; ITS—interstitial telomeric sequences; OSHR—Oryzomyini shared heterochromatin region; ITBs—interstitial telomeric bands.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vujošević, M.; Rajičić, M.; Blagojević, J. B Chromosomes in Populations of Mammals Revisited. Genes 2018, 9, 487. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes9100487

AMA Style

Vujošević M, Rajičić M, Blagojević J. B Chromosomes in Populations of Mammals Revisited. Genes. 2018; 9(10):487. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes9100487

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vujošević, Mladen, Marija Rajičić, and Jelena Blagojević. 2018. "B Chromosomes in Populations of Mammals Revisited" Genes 9, no. 10: 487. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes9100487

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop