Next Article in Journal
De Novo Analysis Reveals Transcriptomic Responses in Eriobotrya japonica Fruits during Postharvest Cold Storage
Previous Article in Journal
A Systematic Study on DNA Barcoding of Medicinally Important Genus Epimedium L. (Berberidaceae)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Genes
Volume 9
Issue 12
10.3390/genes9120638
genes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The 5′-3′ Exoribonuclease XRN4 Regulates Auxin Response via the Degradation of Auxin Receptor Transcripts

by
David Windels
1,2,* and
Etienne Bucher
1,2
1
Botanical Institute, University of Basel, Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, Part of the Swiss Plant Science Web, Schönbeinstrasse 6, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
2
IRHS, Agrocampus-Ouest, INRA, Université d’Angers, SFR 4207 QuaSaV, 49071 Beaucouzé, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Genes 2018, 9(12), 638; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes9120638
Submission received: 26 November 2018 / Revised: 13 December 2018 / Accepted: 13 December 2018 / Published: 17 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics and Genomics)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Auxin is a major hormone which plays crucial roles in instructing virtually all developmental programs of plants. Its signaling depends primarily on its perception by four partially redundant receptors of the TIR1/AFB2 clade (TAARs), which subsequently mediate the specific degradation of AUX/IAA transcriptional repressors to modulate the expression of primary auxin-responsive genes. Auxin homeostasis depends on complex regulations at the level of synthesis, conjugation, and transport. However, the mechanisms and principles involved in the homeostasis of its signaling are just starting to emerge. We report that xrn4 mutants exhibit pleiotropic developmental defects and strong auxin hypersensitivity phenotypes. We provide compelling evidences that these phenotypes are directly caused by improper regulation of TAAR transcript degradation. We show that the cytoplasmic 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN4 is required for auxin response. Thus, our work identifies new targets of XRN4 and a new level of regulation for TAAR transcripts important for auxin response and for plant development.
Keywords:
XRN4; RNA Decay; Auxin

1. Introduction

Plant growth, organogenesis, and diverse responses to environmental changes are control by auxins plant hormones [1,2]. The perception of Auxin signaling depends on auxin receptors of the TAAR [TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1 (TIR1)/AUXIN SIGNALLING F-BOX PROTEIN 2 (AFB2)] family. There are four TAARs genes which have partially-redundant functions [3,4,5]. TAAR proteins belong to SKIP/CULLIN/F-BOX (SCF)-ubiquitin ligase complexes and in presence of auxins can form a complex with AUXIN/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID (AUX/IAA) transcriptional repressors [6,7,8]. These AUX/IAA proteins are ubiquitinated and degraded by the 26S proteasome [6]. The degradation of AUX/IAA induces the release of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) transcription factors. ARFs leads to the activation (5 ARFs) or to the repression (18 ARFs) of primary auxin-responsive genes [1,9,10].
Auxin signaling is an extremely robust system which invokes complex homeostatic regulations at the levels of synthesis, conjugation, and transport [2,11]. Moreover, recent works, including ours, have shown that it also involves complex regulation at the level of signaling [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Thus, auxin signaling homeostasis also appears to depend on the homeostasis of TAAR transcripts and to involve tight regulation orchestrated by the microRNA miR393 and by a complex network of secondary small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), the siTAARs [13,14,15,18]. Importantly, this regulation is highly significant for auxin signaling, since it appears necessary for the production of proper signaling outputs important for plant development [16].
RNA surveillance and RNA decay encompass a large array of ubiquitous regulatory mechanisms involved in controlling the integrity and turn-over of cellular RNAs [19,20]. These mechanisms depend on specific recognition factors and on the activity of endonucleases and of 5′-3′ and 3′-5′ exonucleases to degrade decapped, improperly terminated, improperly processed or improperly spliced RNA molecules [19,20]. In Arabidopsis, the family of 5′-3′ exonucleases comprises 3 proteins: XRN2 and XRN3, which are localized in the nucleus and are involved in processing of pre-rRNA and for surveillance of proper termination of transcription [21,22], and XRN4, which is localized in the cytoplasm and is implicated in the degradation of a subset of 3′ RNA fragments generated upon microRNA-guided cleavages [23,24,25,26]. Importantly, none of the XRN proteins of plants seem to have a general role in mRNA turn-over [23,24,26]. Indeed, although the steady-state level of many transcripts is increased in xrn4 mutants, none of these transcripts exhibit altered turn-over rate [27]. For example, although XRN4 is an important component of signaling by the plant hormone ethylene, its involvement in this signaling pathway, via regulation of EIN3 BINDING F-BOX1 and 2 (EBF1 and EBF2) messenger RNA (mRNA) levels, was shown to be indirect [28,29,30,31]. Still recently, Merret et al. found that many transcripts may be targeted by XRN4 under heat stress, and at least eight of those were directly degraded [32].
We report here that xrn4 mutant plants exhibit pleiotropic developmental defects and hypersensitive responses to auxin that are caused by their inability to generate accurate auxin response. We show that xrn4 mutants are unable to properly regulate the turn-over of TIR1/AFB2 auxin receptor (TAAR) transcripts and that chemical suppression of TAAR functions leads to suppression of certain developmental defects observed in xrn4 plants. Thus, our data provide evidences showing that XRN4 is a component and a direct regulator of the auxin signaling pathway. Our work identifies new direct XRN4 target RNAs and a new layer of regulation of TAAR transcripts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material, Growth Conditions, and Treatments

For the scoring of developmental phenotypes and assays of cotyledon epinasty, Arabidopsis thaliana plants were grown in soil under long day conditions (16 h 10,000 lux lights at 21 °C/8 h dark at 16 °C) in growth chambers at 65% relative humidity [15,16,33]. Assays for inhibition of root elongation were done as described in [4]. For scoring the incidence of leaf serration, seeds were germinated and grown for 28 days on MS medium supplemented with PEO-IAA (alpha-(phenylethyl-2-oxo)-IAA) in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or DMSO alone as a control in 5.5 cm high Petri dishes. For studies of IAA3pro:GUS, IAA12pro:GUS, and DR5pro:GUS expression, seven day old seedlings were incubated in MS medium containing 10 µM 2,4-D in ethanol or ethanol alone as a control for the time indicated before proceeding to staining. For studies of AXR3-NT:GUS fusion protein stability, seven day old seedlings were placed in water at 37 °C for 2 h to induce the expression of the HSpro:AXR3-NT:GUS gene and incubated for 30 min at room temperature before proceeding to GUS staining. For the treatments, either 10 µM 2,4-D were added to the solution 4 h before the heat shock.

2.2. Histochemical GUS Assays

Arabidopsis seedlings were incubated into a staining solution containing 1 mM X-Gluc in 100 mM Na3PO4 (pH 7.2), 0.1% Triton X-100, 5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, and 5 mM K4Fe(CN)6 for 24 h at 37 °C in the dark. Seedlings were then cleared in 70% ethanol for two days and mounted in 50% v/v glycerol before observations.

2.3. RNA Decay Assay

For determining the rate of RNA decay, seeds were grown in short day (SD) conditions for 14 days in liquid MS medium and treated with 0.6 mM cordycepin as described in [34]. Tissues were collected at the indicated intervals before RNA extraction. Half-life times of transcripts were estimated by calculation of signal decay rate per minute.

2.4. RNA Preparation and RNA Analysis

RNA extractions and Northern blot hybridizations were done as described in [15].

3. Results

3.1. XRN4 Defective Plants Exhibit Pleiotropic Developmental Defects

We observed that mutants impaired in the function of XRN4 exhibit developmental abnormalities which resulted in an increase of their global stature and altered the morphology of several of their organs, as for the T-DNA insertion allele xrn4-3 (Figure 1). As exemplified in Table 1, ein5-7 mutants, another allele of xrn4, develop longer leaves and generate significantly more of these leaves (Student t-test, p = 1.2 × 10−5) than the wild-type (wt) plants. Their rosettes are three times heavier than those of wt plants (p = 4.4 × 10−7), their stems have shorter internodes (p = 2.7 × 10−6), and they develop a greater number of flowers (p = 1.9 × 10−3). Their root system is also affected; primary roots are longer with less lateral roots (p > 1.6 × 10−5) than in wt plants. The morphology of their organs is also altered; the leaves develop significantly more serrations (p > 3 × 10−4) and the flowers are more often duplicated (p = 3.1 × 10−4) in xrn4 compared to wt plants. Thus, deficiency in XRN4 function leads to production of pleiotropic morphological defects. These observations suggested that XRN4 regulates the expression of genes involved in several important developmental programs.

3.2. Defects in XRN4 Result in Hypersensitive Physiological Responses to Auxin

The pleiotropic defects observed for xrn4 plants, especially their greater stature, their affected root architecture, and their serrated leaves suggested that these mutants are deficient in the regulation of auxin responses. This hypothesis was also supported by our observation that, in normal axenic growth conditions, ein5-7 and xrn4-3 mutants exhibit a significantly higher frequency of root enrolling (37.3% and 52.2%, respectively) (student t-test, p < 1.2 × 10−5, n = 66) than wild-type plants (11.9%) which was similar to that of the hypersensitive auxin mutants mir393b-1, and thus indicative of defects in auxin-dependent gravitropic responses (Figure S1).
To test whether auxin-dependent physiological and developmental responses are affected in xrn4 mutants, we compared the incidence of extreme cotyledon epinasty, typical for hypersensitive auxin response [15,16] in wt, in the two xrn4 alleles xrn4-3 and ein5-7, and in the ein3-1 mutant, which serves as a control to evaluate indirect effects of ethylene signaling deficiency (Figure 2). When grown on standard medium, a high and significantly greater fraction of xrn4-3 and ein5-7 mutants (>74%; Fischer exact test, p < 3.1 × 10−8) than wt (2%) or ein3-1 (19%) plants exhibited the extreme cotyledon epinasty phenotype typical for hypersensitive response to auxin (Figure 2). Similar to what we observed earlier for miR393-deficient mutants and the siTAARs deficient mutant dcl4-2 [15,16], this incidence was decreased by increasing the concentration of the auxin transport inhibitor NPA (1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid) in the medium. Thus, these observations showed that xrn4 mutants exhibit a hypersensitive response to auxin and that the cotyledon epinasty response to auxin depends on the regulation by XRN4, independently of the ethylene pathway.
As an additional test of hypersensitive auxin responses, we compared the inhibition of root elongation typical for response to the synthetic auxin 2,4-D in these organs [4]. Although the changes were subtler, the root elongation of both xrn4 mutant alleles was slightly more inhibited than that of wt plants at all 2,4-D concentrations tested (Figure S2). The 2,4-D concentration necessary to reach 50% inhibition (RI50) was 12% to 24% lower for xrn4 alleles than for wt. Thus, these observations showed that xrn4 mutants also exhibit an auxin hypersensitive response phenotype in roots. Together with the cotyledon epinasty phenotype, these experiments established that XRN4 is important for proper physiological and developmental auxin-mediated responses.

3.3. Chemical Inhibition of TAAR Function Suppresses Specific xrn4 Phenotypes

The xrn4 plants exhibit pleiotropic developmental defects, and at least some of these are hypersensitive auxin responses. To test whether some of the xrn4 phenotypes are directly caused by improper auxin signaling, we suppressed the activity of TAAR proteins with the auxin antagonist PEO-IAA, which blocks auxin signaling by occupying the auxin binding site of TAAR proteins [35]. Interestingly, a significantly greater fraction of xrn4-3 plants (76%; Fischer exact test, p < 1.8 × 10−11) relative to wt plants (12.5%) showed an extreme cotyledon epinasty phenotype which was gradually decreased by increasing the concentration of PEO-IAA in the medium (Figure 3A). Furthermore, 80 µM of PEO-IAA was necessary to observe no significative difference between the xrn4-3 and wt plants.
We also measured the effect of PEO-IAA on the incidence of leaf serrations (Figure 3B). While the number of serrations, which we measured on the third and fourth leaf, was significantly higher in xrn4 compared to wt plants grown on MS medium, this number was decreased to similar values when 80 µM PEO-IAA was applied.
Thus, these experiments demonstrated that the chemical suppression of TAAR activity leads to suppression of some of the developmental and physiological defects of xrn4 mutants.

3.4. XRN4 Regulates the Turn-Over of TAAR Transcripts

The molecular function of XRN4, the phenotype displayed by xrn4 plants that could be reverted by a TAAR inhibitor and their hypersensitive auxin responses which were reminiscent to what we previously recorded for mir393b-1 suggested a potential role for XRN4 in the regulation of TAAR transcripts. Thus, to determine whether these hypersensitive auxin responses was the result of improper regulation of TAAR gene expression, we analyzed their steady-state mRNA levels in xrn4 mutants by northern blot. Interestingly, we found that the levels of full-length TIR1, AFB2, and AFB3 mRNAs was higher in xrn4 mutants than in wt plants (Figure 4A). AFB1, as for it, could not be detected using this method. To know if the increase of TAAR transcripts in xrn4 plants can affect the production of siTAARs derived from AFB2 (AFB2 3′D2(+)) (Figure 4B), we analyzed the accumulation of AFB2 3′D2(+) in xrn4-3 and xrn4-3/rdr6-14. Whereas the level of mir393 still remained unchanged in xrn4-3 (Figure S3), we can observe an increase of AFB2 3′D2(+) in xrn4-3 but not in the double mutants xrn4/rdr6 as expected, because the production of AFB2 3′D2(+) is dependent of RDR6.
To understand why the increase of siTAARs did not result in a decrease of TAAR transcripts, we analyzed the accumulation of AFB2 and AFB2 3′D2(+) in the xrn4/rdr6 double mutants. In the xrn4/rdr6 double mutants the level of AFB2 is much higher than in the xrn4 mutants (Figure 4C), indicating that XRN4 is important for the control of TAAR transcript and siTAAR levels. The expression of auxin receptor genes of the TIR1/AFB2 clade is affected in xrn4 mutants. However, whether this effect is direct or indirect, and, whether it is responsible for the hypersensitive auxin responses of xrn4 plants remains to be addressed.
To address if the TIR/AFB2 transcripts are targeted directly or indirectly by XRN4, we treated the plants with the transcription inhibitor cordycepin [30] and we measured the kinetic of TAAR transcripts decay. The signals obtained by northern blot for TIR1 and AFB3 were too weak to provide informative conclusion, however, for AFB2, the signals for full-length mRNAs decreased faster in wt than in xrn4 plants. Indeed, the half-life of AFB2 transcripts was more than three times longer in xrn4 (340 min) than in wt plants (100 min) (Figure 4D). Moreover, we ruled out the possibility that this is due to an increased activity of the AFB2 promoter since the expression pattern of AFB2p:GUS was similar or lower, but not higher, in xrn4 compared to wt plants (Figure S4). Thus, together these observations demonstrated that the increased accumulation of AFB2 mRNAs in xrn4, and possibly that of other TAAR mRNAs, is directly due to improper decay of these mRNAs. Our experiments identified new targets of XRN4.

3.5. xrn4 Plants Exhibit Hypersensitive Auxin Signaling Responses

We previously showed that the auxin-hypersensitive mutants mir393a-1 and mir393b-1 exhibit a decreased basal level of DR5pro:GUS expression and a conversely increased basal level of IAA3pro:GUS, of IAA12pro:GUS, and of HS:AXR3-NT:GUS expression, which we could explain by an increased basal level of AUX/IAA proteins [16]. To determine whether the auxin-dependent hypersensitive phenotypes of xrn4 arise from similar hypersensitive auxin responses, we analyzed the expression of these reporter genes in xrn4. While the synthetic primary auxin-responsive gene DR5pro:GUS was expressed in the margins and in the hydathodes of leaves, and in the hypocotyls and in the root tips of wt plants, it was only weakly or not at all expressed in xrn4 mutants (Figure 5A), and even after 2,4-D treatment, the induction of DR5pro:GUS was still weaker in xrn4 mutant roots compare to the wt roots (Figure 5B). Thus, the hypersensitive auxin signaling responses recorded in xrn4 were even stronger (Figure 5A) than those observed in mir393a-1, mir393b-1, and even mir393ab double mutant plants [16]. Conversely, the IAA12pro:GUS, which are not detected in wt plants, had much higher basal expression levels in emerging leaves and in the meristematic region of xrn4 mutants (Figure 5D). In the case of IAA3pro:GUS, we did not observe a difference between xrn4 and wt plants. However, like in miR393-deficient mutants, the expression of IAA3pro:GUS and IAA12pro:GUS was more rapidly induced in xrn4 compared to wt plants by the synthetic auxin 2,4-D (Figure 5C,D). Thus, altogether, these results showed that, like miR393 mutants, xrn4 mutants exhibit strong hypersensitive responses to auxin.
To determine whether these hypersensitive auxin responses also rely on an increased basal level of AUX/IAA proteins, we analyzed the rate of AUX/IAA degradation by monitoring the accumulation of the AXR3-NT:GUS protein fusion (Figure 6) [16]. After induction of the HSpro:AXR3-NT:GUS gene for two hours at 37 °C (Figure 6), the AXR3-NT:GUS protein was stable in the roots of xrn4 and accumulated to a level similar to that observed in mir393b-1, while it could not be detected in wt plants (Figure 6) [16]. Moreover, the two mutants occasionally exhibited ectopic expression of AXR3-NT:GUS in cotyledons and leaves (Figure 6). These observations showed that xrn4-3 plants are also unable to properly degrade AUX/IAA proteins under normal growth conditions. To test whether these hypersensitive auxin responses were due to increased basal levels of AUX/IAA proteins as well, we treated the plants with 2,4-D for 4 h before inducing the HSpro:AXR3-NT:GUS gene. As we anticipated, chasing the high level of AUX/IAA proteins by inducing their degradation with high levels of auxin led to a restoration of the proper degradation of the AXR3-NT:GUS protein (Figure 6).
Thus, altogether, these experiments suggest that xrn4, like miR393-deficient plants, likely accumulate high basal levels of endogenous AUX/IAA proteins. More importantly, these experiments demonstrated that the hypersensitive auxin responses exhibited by xrn4 are comparable and stronger than that exhibited by miR393-deficient mutants and that XRN4 is required to ensure the timely degradation of AUX/IAA proteins and to generate reliable auxin signaling outputs.

4. Discussion

We have shown here that the 5′-3′ exoribonuclease XRN4 is a component of the auxin signaling pathway and that this function is achieved through a mechanism involving controlled degradation of TAAR transcripts. The Arabidopsis family of 5′-3′ exonuclease comprises 3 members, only one of which is localized in the cytoplasm and can potentially be involved in mature mRNA turn-over. XRN4 had been implicated in the degradation of 3′ RNA fragments generated upon microRNA-guided cleavages. Rymarquis and colleagues have shown that special features comprised within the 150 nucleotides downstream of the miRNA-binding site are necessary and sufficient for degradation of the 3′ cleavage fragments by XRN4 [25]. Their bioinformatic analyses also proposed that the basis for XRN4 selectivity might reside at least partially in the presence of hexameric nucleotide motifs. However, none of the xrn4-enriched transcripts used for the analysis have yet been shown to be directly degraded. It is therefore possible that these hexameric motifs rather represent sequences used by other proteins directly or indirectly regulated by XRN4. Similarly, the role of XRN4 in the ethylene signaling pathway occurs by indirectly controlling the mRNA level of EBF1 and EBF2. Because ethylene and auxin pathways are subjected to complex cross-talks at the level of their synthesis and likely at the level of their signaling, it is possible that the effects observed on EBFs are an indirect consequence of direct TAAR regulation. However, this hypothesis remains to be demonstrated.
We have shown that the mRNAs of AFB2, and presumably those of the other TAARs, are directly degraded by XRN4. However, the basis for this selectivity or the underlying mechanism remain to be determined. Although the mechanism involved is unknown, we believe that it is highly regulated and specific for selected full-length transcripts. Indeed, accumulation of TAAR transcripts in the xrn4 mutants leads to hypersensitive responses to auxin and developmental defects. Studies by Gregory and colleagues have used deep sequencing approaches to identify Arabidopsis transcripts which might be decapped and degraded by XRN4 [36]. The experimental validation of at least some of these hypothetical targets will help determining the molecular determinants important for selection by XRN4. Of course, we also expect that the TAAR transcripts are decapped before degradation. Martinez de Alba and colleagues have shown that XRN4 is co-localized with decapping proteins such as decapping (DCP) and varicose (VCS) in the P-bodies [37]. Like in animals, where XRN1 interacts with DCP1, selection of TAARs for degradation by XRN4 should depend on a specific interaction with a decapping protein [38]. Martinez de Alba and colleagues have also shown that decapping prevents RDR6-dependent production of small RNAs. RDR6 is localized in siRNA bodies, which are themselves closely linked with the P-bodies, indicating a strong interaction between RNA turnover and RNA silencing. Thus, we can speculate that XRN4 could modulate the quantity of the matrix available for the production and amplification of siTAARs necessary for the TAARs silencing, and so to ensure an appropriate auxin response.
We anticipate that siTAARs may also act as non-cells autonomously. Indeed, the pathway that we have identified might be responsible for the generation of certain auxin signaling maxima important for initiation of lateral organ formation [39,40]. Indeed, considering that XRN4 would not be expressed in a given cell or cell group, this would lead to the accumulation of high levels of TAAR transcripts in these cells and to the production of high levels of siTAARs. These would create auxin signaling maxima by subsequently moving and silencing TAAR transcripts in the surrounding cells. Importantly, some of the phenotypic defects observed in XRN4, like the perturbed phyllotaxis characterized by the stochastic production of flowers on the stems or the high degree of leaf serration, strongly support our model [41] (Figure 1).
Our work reveals that TAAR mRNA are targets of XRN4 and demonstrates that their regulation by XRN4 is necessary for the proper auxin response and plant development.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2073-4425/9/12/638/s1, Figure S1: miR393b-1 and xrn4 mutants exhibit root enrolling phenotype typical for auxin-dependent gravitropy defects, Figure S2: Both ein5-7 and xrn4-3 mutants exhibit hypersensitive auxin-induced root growth inhibition, Figure S3: Level of mir393 remains unchanged in xrn4-3, Figure S4: Expression of the AFB2 promoter in xrn4-3.

Author Contributions

D.W. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. D.W. designed the research. E.B. and D.W. wrote the paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione individual research grants PZ00P3_126329 and PZ00P3_142106 to Franck Vazquez) and by the EPICENTER ConnecTalent grant of the Pays de la Loire (E.B.).

Acknowledgments

We thank Franck Vazquez, who initiated this work, and for his constant support. The authors thank NASC for providing seeds of xrn4-3 mutants (N014209), Thomas Potuschak for seeds of ein5-7 mutants, Miltos Tsiantis for seeds of DR5pro:GUS line, Mark Estelle for seeds of AFB2pro:GUS line, and Ken-ichiro Hayashi for providing samples of PEO-IAA and auxinole. We thank the organizers and participants of the Auxin’2012 meeting in Hawai’i for informative talks and discussions. We thank Thomas Boller and Christian Körner for providing laboratory space and facilities at the Botanical Institute of the University of Basel.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Mockaitis, K.; Estelle, M. Auxin receptors and plant development: A new signaling paradigm. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 24, 55–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Vanneste, S.; Friml, J. Auxin: A trigger for change in plant development. Cell 2009, 136, 1005–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dharmasiri, N.; Dharmasiri, S.; Estelle, M. The F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 2005, 435, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dharmasiri, N.; Dharmasiri, S.; Weijers, D.; Lechner, E.; Yamada, M.; Hobbie, L.; Ehrismann, J.S.; Jürgens, G.; Estelle, M. Plant development is regulated by a family of auxin receptor F box proteins. Dev. Cell 2005, 9, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kepinski, S.; Leyser, O. The Arabidopsis F-box protein TIR1 is an auxin receptor. Nature 2005, 435, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Gray, W.M.; Kepinski, S.; Rouse, D.; Leyser, O.; Estelle, M. Auxin regulates SCF(TIR1)-dependent degradation of AUX/IAA proteins. Nature 2001, 414, 271–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lechner, E.; Achard, P.; Vansiri, A.; Potuschak, T.; Genschik, P. F-box proteins everywhere. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Calderón Villalobos, L.I.; Lee, S.; De Oliveira, C.; Ivetac, A.; Brandt, W.; Armitage, L.; Sheard, L.B.; Tan, X.; Parry, G.; Mao, H.; et al. A combinatorial TIR1/AFB-Aux/IAA co-receptor system for differential sensing of auxin. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012, 8, 477–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ulmasov, T.; Hagen Gand Guilfoyle, T.J. Activation and repression of transcription by auxin-response factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 5844–5849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Ljung, K. Auxin metabolism and homeostasis during plant development. Development 2013, 140, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Rosquete, M.R.; Barbez, E.; Kleine-Vehn, J. Cellular auxin homeostasis: Gatekeeping is housekeeping. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 772–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Navarro, L.; Dunoyer, P.; Jay, F.; Arnold, B.; Dharmasiri, N.; Estelle, M.; Voinnet, O.; Jones, J.D. A plant miRNA contributes to antibacterial resistance by repressing auxin signaling. Science 2006, 312, 436–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vidal, E.A.; Araus, V.; Lu, C.; Parry, G.; Green, P.J.; Coruzzi, G.M.; Gutiérrez, R.A. Nitrate-responsive miR393/AFB3 regulatory module controls root system architecture in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 4477–4482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, Z.H.; Bao, M.L.; Sun, Y.Z.; Yang, Y.J.; Xu, X.H.; Wang, J.H.; Han, N.; Bian, H.W.; Zhu, M.Y. Regulation of auxin response by miR393-targeted transport inhibitor response protein 1 is involved in normal development in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77, 619–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Si-Ammour, A.; Windels, D.; Arn-Bouldoires, E.; Kutter, C.; Ailhas, J.; Meins, F., Jr.; Vazquez, F. miR393 and secondary siRNAs regulate expression of the TIR1/AFB2 auxin receptor clade and auxin-related development of Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Windels, D.; Bielewicz, D.; Ebneter, M.; Jarmolowski, A.; Szweykowska-Kulinska, Z.; Vazquez, F. miR393 is required for production of proper auxin signalling output. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Iglesias, M.J.; Terrile, M.C.; Windels, D.; Lombardo, M.C.; Bartoli, C.G.; Vazquez, F.; Estelle, M.; Casalongué, C. miR393 regulation of auxin signaling and redox-related components during acclimation to salinity in Arabidopsis. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Windels, D.; Vazquez, F. miR393: Integrator of environmental cues in auxin signaling? Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 1672–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Belostotsky, D.A. State of decay: An update on plant mRNA turnover. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 326, 179–199. [Google Scholar]
  20. Houseley, J.; Tollervey, D. The many pathways of RNA degradation. Cell 2009, 136, 763–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zakrzewska-Placzek, M.; Souret, F.F.; Sobczyk, G.J.; Green, P.J.; Kufel, J. Arabidopsis thaliana XRN2 is required for primary cleavage in the pre-ribosomal RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38, 4487–4502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kurihara, Y.; Schmitz, R.J.; Nery, J.R.; Schultz, M.D.; Okubo-Kurihara, E.; Morosawa, T.; Tanaka, M.; Toyoda, T.; Seki, M.; Ecker, J.R. Surveillance of 3′ noncoding transcripts requires FIERY1 and XRN3 in Arabidopsis. G3 (Bethesda) 2012, 2, 487–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kastenmayer, J.P.; Green, P.J. Novel features of the XRN-family in Arabidopsis: Evidence that AtXRN4, one of several orthologs of nuclear Xrn2p/Rat1p, functions in the cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 13985–13990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kastenmayer, J.P.; Johnson, M.A.; Green, P.J. Analysis of XRN orthologs by complementation of yeast mutants and localization of XRN-GFP fusion proteins. Methods Enzymol. 2001, 342, 269–282. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Rymarquis, L.A.; Souret, F.F.; Green, P.J. Evidence that XRN4, an Arabidopsis homolog of exoribonuclease XRN1, preferentially impacts transcripts with certain sequences or in particular functional categories. RNA 2011, 17, 501–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nagarajan, V.K.; Jones, C.I.; Newbury, S.F.; Green, P.J. XRN 5′→3′ exoribonucleases: Structure, mechanisms and functions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1829, 590–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Souret, F.F.; Kastenmayer, J.P.; Green, P.J. AtXRN4 degrades mRNA in Arabidopsis and its substrates include selected miRNA targets. Mol Cell. 2004, 15, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, K.L.; Li, H.; Ecker, J.R. Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S131–S151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Olmedo, G.; Guo, H.; Gregory, B.D.; Nourizadeh, S.D.; Aguilar-Henonin, L.; Li, H.; An, F.; Guzman, P.; Ecker, J.R. ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE5 encodes a 5′→3′ exoribonuclease required for regulation of the EIN3-targeting F-box proteins EBF1/2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13286–13293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Potuschak, T.; Vansiri, A.; Binder, B.M.; Lechner, E.; Vierstra, R.D.; Genschik, P. The exoribonuclease XRN4 is a component of the ethylene response pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 3047–3057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vandenbussche, F.; Vaseva, I.; Vissenberg, K.; Van Der Straeten, D. Ethylene in vegetative development: A tale with a riddle. New Phytol. 2012, 194, 895–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Merret, R.; Descombin, J.; Juan, Y.T.; Favory, J.J.; Carpentier, M.C.; Chaparro, C.; Charng, Y.Y.; Deragon, J.M.; Bousquet-Antonelli, C. XRN4 and LARP1 are required for a heat-triggered mRNA decay pathway involved in plant acclimation and survival during thermal stress. Cell Rep. 2013, 5, 1279–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Vazquez, F.; Blevins, T.; Ailhas, J.; Boller, T.; Meins, F., Jr. Evolution of Arabidopsis MIR genes generates novel microRNA classes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 6429–6438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gutierrez, R.A.; Ewing, R.M.; Cherry, J.M.; Green, P.J. Identification of unstable transcripts in Arabidopsis by cDNA microarray analysis: Rapid decay is associated with a group of touch- and specific clock-controlled genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 11513–11518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hayashi, K.; Neve, J.; Hirose, M.; Kuboki, A.; Shimada, Y.; Kepinski, S.; Nozaki, H. Rational design of an auxin antagonist of the SCF(TIR1) auxin receptor complex. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gregory, B.D.; O’Malley, R.C.; Lister, R.; Urich, M.A.; Tonti-Filippini, J.; Chen, H.; Millar, A.H.; Ecker, J.R. A link between RNA metabolism and silencing affecting Arabidopsis development. Dev Cell 2008, 14, 854–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Martínez de Alba, A.E.; Moreno, A.B.; Gabriel, M.; Mallory, A.C.; Christ, A.; Bounon, R.; Balzergue, S.; Aubourg, S.; Gautheret, D.; Crespi, M.D.; et al. In plants, decapping prevents RDR6-dependent production of small interfering RNAs from endogenous mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 2902–2913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Braun, J.E.; Truffault, V.; Boland, A.; Huntzinger, E.; Chang, C.T.; Haas, G.; Weichenrieder, O.; Coles, M.; Izaurralde, E. A direct interaction between DCP1 and XRN1 couples mRNA decapping to 5′ exonucleolytic degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012, 19, 1324–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Benková, E.; Michniewicz, M.; Sauer, M.; Teichmann, T.; Seifertová, D.; Jürgens, G.; Friml, J. Local, efflux-dependent auxin gradients as a common module for plant organ formation. Cell 2003, 115, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bilsborough, G.D.; Runions, A.; Barkoulas, M.; Jenkins, H.W.; Hasson, A.; Galinha, C.; Laufs, P.; Hay, A.; Prusinkiewicz, P.; Tsiantis, M. Model for the regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf margin development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 3424–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hay, A.; Barkoulas, M.; Tsiantis, M. ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and auxin activities converge to repress BREVIPEDICELLUS expression and promote leaf development in Arabidopsis. Development 2006, 133, 3955–3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Genes 09 00638 g001 550
Figure 1. The xrn4 mutants exhibit pleiotropic development defects. For Col-0 and xrn4-3, the photographs show representative series of rosette leaves and cauline leaves (A,G) and magnified views of the 5th leaves (B,H), stems with siliques and flowers (C,I), terminal inflorescences (D,J), closed flower buds (E,K), and opened flowers (F,L). See Table 1 for quantifications.
Figure 1. The xrn4 mutants exhibit pleiotropic development defects. For Col-0 and xrn4-3, the photographs show representative series of rosette leaves and cauline leaves (A,G) and magnified views of the 5th leaves (B,H), stems with siliques and flowers (C,I), terminal inflorescences (D,J), closed flower buds (E,K), and opened flowers (F,L). See Table 1 for quantifications.
Genes 09 00638 g001
Genes 09 00638 g002 550
Figure 2. The xrn4 mutants exhibit extreme auxin-dependent epinasty of cotyledons. The incidence of the auxin-hypersensitive response in populations of Col-0 (open bars), ein3-1 (light grey bars), ein5-7 (dark-grey bars), and xrn4-3 mutants (dark bars). Seedlings (n > 17 for each condition and genotype) were grown on media containing the concentration of N-1-Naphthylphthalamic Acid (NPA) indicated and harvested four days after germination. The p values (two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) for significant differences towards each other are indicated.
Figure 2. The xrn4 mutants exhibit extreme auxin-dependent epinasty of cotyledons. The incidence of the auxin-hypersensitive response in populations of Col-0 (open bars), ein3-1 (light grey bars), ein5-7 (dark-grey bars), and xrn4-3 mutants (dark bars). Seedlings (n > 17 for each condition and genotype) were grown on media containing the concentration of N-1-Naphthylphthalamic Acid (NPA) indicated and harvested four days after germination. The p values (two-tailed Fisher’s exact test) for significant differences towards each other are indicated.
Genes 09 00638 g002
Genes 09 00638 g003a 550Genes 09 00638 g003b 550
Figure 3. Reversion of xrn4’s developmental phenotypes by chemical suppression of TAAR functions. (A) The incidence of the auxin-hypersensitive response in populations of Col-0 (open bars); xrn4-3 (solid bars) seedlings grown on media containing the concentration of the auxin antagonist PEO-IAA (alpha-(phenylethyl-2-oxo)-IAA) indicated. The p values (two-sided Fisher exact test) for significant differences between pairs is indicated; no significant (NS), p > 0.05. (B) The mean number of serrations per leaf in populations of Col-0 (open bars) and xrn4-3 (solid bars) plantlets grown on media supplemented (+) or (−) with 80 μM of the auxin antagonist PEO-IAA. The p-values (Student t-test) for significant differences are indicated; NS, p > 0.05.
Figure 3. Reversion of xrn4’s developmental phenotypes by chemical suppression of TAAR functions. (A) The incidence of the auxin-hypersensitive response in populations of Col-0 (open bars); xrn4-3 (solid bars) seedlings grown on media containing the concentration of the auxin antagonist PEO-IAA (alpha-(phenylethyl-2-oxo)-IAA) indicated. The p values (two-sided Fisher exact test) for significant differences between pairs is indicated; no significant (NS), p > 0.05. (B) The mean number of serrations per leaf in populations of Col-0 (open bars) and xrn4-3 (solid bars) plantlets grown on media supplemented (+) or (−) with 80 μM of the auxin antagonist PEO-IAA. The p-values (Student t-test) for significant differences are indicated; NS, p > 0.05.
Genes 09 00638 g003aGenes 09 00638 g003b
Genes 09 00638 g004 550
Figure 4. XRN4 is required for proper accumulation and turn-over of TAAR messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and siTAARs. (A) Comparison of TIR1, AFB2, and AFB3 mRNA accumulation in Col-0, xrn4-3, and mir393b-1 by Northern blot. Signals detected in tir1-10, afb2-3, and afb3-5 mutants serve as negative controls; (B,C) analysis of AFB 3′D2(+) and AFB2 mRNA accumulation, respectively, in mir393b-1, Col-0, rdr6-14, xrn4-1, and xrn4-3/rdr6-14 by RNA-blot hybridization and Northern blot. (D) Analysis of AFB2 mRNA decay by Northern blot in Col-0 and xrn4-3 mutants for the time indicated after treatment with the transcription inhibitor cordycepin. The half-life (t1/2) of the AFB2 transcript was determined by normalizing the AFB2 signals to the 25S rRNA signals. Arrows indicate the full-length mRNA and asterisks indicate non-specific signals. Midori Green® stained 25S rRNAs serve as a loading standard for northern blot and U6 for RNA-Blot hybridization.
Figure 4. XRN4 is required for proper accumulation and turn-over of TAAR messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and siTAARs. (A) Comparison of TIR1, AFB2, and AFB3 mRNA accumulation in Col-0, xrn4-3, and mir393b-1 by Northern blot. Signals detected in tir1-10, afb2-3, and afb3-5 mutants serve as negative controls; (B,C) analysis of AFB 3′D2(+) and AFB2 mRNA accumulation, respectively, in mir393b-1, Col-0, rdr6-14, xrn4-1, and xrn4-3/rdr6-14 by RNA-blot hybridization and Northern blot. (D) Analysis of AFB2 mRNA decay by Northern blot in Col-0 and xrn4-3 mutants for the time indicated after treatment with the transcription inhibitor cordycepin. The half-life (t1/2) of the AFB2 transcript was determined by normalizing the AFB2 signals to the 25S rRNA signals. Arrows indicate the full-length mRNA and asterisks indicate non-specific signals. Midori Green® stained 25S rRNAs serve as a loading standard for northern blot and U6 for RNA-Blot hybridization.
Genes 09 00638 g004
Genes 09 00638 g005 550
Figure 5. The xrn4 mutant exhibits hypersensitive molecular responses to auxin. (A) Typical decrease in the basal expression levels of DR5pro:GUS in leaves, hypocotyl, and roots tips of xrn4-3 compared to wt plants; (B) lant treatment with 2,4-D for 4 h induced the expression of DR5pro:GUS more rapidly in wt than in xrn4-3 mutants; (C,D) expression levels of IAA3pro:GUS and IAA12pro:GUS in leaves of ein5-7 compared to wt plants.
Figure 5. The xrn4 mutant exhibits hypersensitive molecular responses to auxin. (A) Typical decrease in the basal expression levels of DR5pro:GUS in leaves, hypocotyl, and roots tips of xrn4-3 compared to wt plants; (B) lant treatment with 2,4-D for 4 h induced the expression of DR5pro:GUS more rapidly in wt than in xrn4-3 mutants; (C,D) expression levels of IAA3pro:GUS and IAA12pro:GUS in leaves of ein5-7 compared to wt plants.
Genes 09 00638 g005
Genes 09 00638 g006 550
Figure 6. XRN4 is required for proper degradation of AXR3-NT:GUS proteins. Pictures of cotyledons and roots of wt, xrn4-3 and mir393b-1 mutant expressing the HSpro:AXR3-NT:GUS gene. Without treatments, the AXR3-NT:GUS fusion protein is more stable in xrn4-3 and mir393b-1 than in wild-type (wt) plants, and sometimes accumulates ectopically in cotyledons. Clearance of high levels of endogenous AUX/IAA proteins by treatment with 2,4-D for 4 h before heat shock (HS) allowed proper degradation of AXR3-NT:GUS.
Figure 6. XRN4 is required for proper degradation of AXR3-NT:GUS proteins. Pictures of cotyledons and roots of wt, xrn4-3 and mir393b-1 mutant expressing the HSpro:AXR3-NT:GUS gene. Without treatments, the AXR3-NT:GUS fusion protein is more stable in xrn4-3 and mir393b-1 than in wild-type (wt) plants, and sometimes accumulates ectopically in cotyledons. Clearance of high levels of endogenous AUX/IAA proteins by treatment with 2,4-D for 4 h before heat shock (HS) allowed proper degradation of AXR3-NT:GUS.
Genes 09 00638 g006
Table
Table 1. Comparison of wild type (wt) and xrn4 phenotypes at different stages of plant development.
Table 1. Comparison of wild type (wt) and xrn4 phenotypes at different stages of plant development.
Col-0xrn4p-Value
14 days-old
Primary Root Length (mm)51.3 ± 1.361.6 ± 1.44.0 × 10−6
N. Lateral Roots19.9 ± 1.212.8 ± 0.71.6 × 10−5
28 days-old
Fresh Weight (mg)105 ± 10325 ± 294.4 × 10−7
N. of Serrations on 5th Leaf0.8 ± 0.22.0 ± 0.23.1 × 10−4
N. of Serrations on 7th Leaf1.3 ± 0.33.5 ± 0.22.5 × 10−6
34 days-old
Number of Leaves11.9 ± 0.217.4 ± 1.01.2 × 10−5
45 days-old
N. of duplicated siliques0.0 ± 0.03.3 ± 0.63.1 × 10−4
N. of aborted siliques0.1 ± 0.10.7 ± 0.23.4 × 10−2
N. of Silique insertions25.0 ± 1.329.3 ± 0.72.9 × 10−3
Internode length (mm)7.9 ± 0.16.3 ± 0.22.7 × 10−6
The values are Mean ± SE (standard error) for N = 10 plants grown in standard long day (LD) conditions. Statistical t-test p-values relative to Col-0 are given. Root measurements were done on vertically grown plantlets. The number of leaves was determined at 34 days just before bolting of the plants. These data are for the ein5-7 mutant allele. Similar values were recorded for the ein5-1 allele.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Windels, D.; Bucher, E. The 5′-3′ Exoribonuclease XRN4 Regulates Auxin Response via the Degradation of Auxin Receptor Transcripts. Genes 2018, 9, 638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes9120638

AMA Style

Windels D, Bucher E. The 5′-3′ Exoribonuclease XRN4 Regulates Auxin Response via the Degradation of Auxin Receptor Transcripts. Genes. 2018; 9(12):638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes9120638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Windels, David, and Etienne Bucher. 2018. "The 5′-3′ Exoribonuclease XRN4 Regulates Auxin Response via the Degradation of Auxin Receptor Transcripts" Genes 9, no. 12: 638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/genes9120638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop