Next Article in Journal
Understanding the Burial and Migration Characteristics of Deep Geothermal Water Using Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Inorganic Carbon Isotopes
Previous Article in Journal
Using Artificial Neural Networks to Solve the Problem Represented by BOD and DO Indicators
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing the Water-Resources Potential of Istanbul by Using a Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Hydrological Model
Editorial

A Guideline for Successful Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Soil and Water Assessment: A Review of Papers from the 2016 International SWAT Conference

1
Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, 8600 Duebendorf, Switzerland
2
Spatial Science Laboratory, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 26 November 2017 / Revised: 18 December 2017 / Accepted: 20 December 2017 / Published: 22 December 2017
Application of integrated hydrological models to manage a watershed’s water resources are increasingly finding their way into the decision-making processes. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is a multi-process model integrating hydrology, ecology, agriculture, and water quality. SWAT is a continuation of nearly 40 years of modeling efforts conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Research Service (ARS). A large number of SWAT-related papers have appeared in ISI journals, building a world-wide consensus around the model’s stability and usefulness. The current issue is a collection of the latest research using SWAT as the modeling tool. Most models must undergo calibration/validation and uncertainty analysis. Unfortunately, these sciences are not formal subjects of teaching in most universities and the students are often left to their own resources to calibrate their model. In this paper, we focus on calibration and uncertainty analysis highlighting some serious issues in the calibration of distributed models. A protocol for calibration is also highlighted to guide the users to obtain better modeling results. Finally, a summary of the papers published in this special issue is provided in the Appendix. View Full-Text
Keywords: calibration; validation; uncertainty analysis; sensitivity analysis; pre-calibration analysis; SWAT-CUP calibration; validation; uncertainty analysis; sensitivity analysis; pre-calibration analysis; SWAT-CUP
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbaspour, K.C.; Vaghefi, S.A.; Srinivasan, R. A Guideline for Successful Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Soil and Water Assessment: A Review of Papers from the 2016 International SWAT Conference. Water 2018, 10, 6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/w10010006

AMA Style

Abbaspour KC, Vaghefi SA, Srinivasan R. A Guideline for Successful Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Soil and Water Assessment: A Review of Papers from the 2016 International SWAT Conference. Water. 2018; 10(1):6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/w10010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbaspour, Karim C., Saeid A. Vaghefi, and Raghvan Srinivasan. 2018. "A Guideline for Successful Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Soil and Water Assessment: A Review of Papers from the 2016 International SWAT Conference" Water 10, no. 1: 6. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/w10010006

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop