Next Article in Journal
Clinical Pharmacology of Antibody-Drug Conjugates
Next Article in Special Issue
Deciphering the Contribution of BP230 Autoantibodies in Bullous Pemphigoid
Previous Article in Journal
Recombinant Antibody Production Using a Dual-Promoter Single Plasmid System
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibodies
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/antib10020019
antibodies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Acquired Autoimmune Blistering Diseases in Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa: Implications for the Future of Gene Therapy

by
Payal M. Patel
1,2,
Virginia A. Jones
1,
Christy T. Behnam
1,
Giovanni Di Zenzo
3 and
Kyle T. Amber
2,4,*
1
Department of Dermatology, University of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
2
Rush University Medical Center, Division of Dermatology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
3
Laboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology, IDI-IRCCS, 00167 Rome, Italy
4
Rush University Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibodies 2021, 10(2), 19; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antib10020019
Submission received: 8 April 2021 / Revised: 24 April 2021 / Accepted: 10 May 2021 / Published: 17 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Use of Therapeutic Antibodies and Identification of Novel Autoantibodies in Dermatologic Disease)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gene therapy serves as a promising therapy in the pipeline for treatment of epidermolysis bullosa (EB). However, with great promise, the risk of autoimmunity must be considered. While EB is a group of inherited blistering disorders caused by mutations in various skin proteins, autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD) have a similar clinical phenotype and are caused by autoantibodies targeting skin antigens. Often, AIBD and EB have the same protein targeted through antibody or mutation, respectively. Moreover, EB patients are also reported to carry anti-skin antibodies of questionable pathogenicity. It has been speculated that activation of autoimmunity is both a consequence and cause of further skin deterioration in EB due to a state of chronic inflammation. Herein, we review the factors that facilitate the initiation of autoimmune and inflammatory responses to help understand the pathogenesis and therapeutic implications of the overlap between EB and AIBD. These may also help explain whether corrections of highly immunogenic portions of protein through gene therapy confers a greater risk towards developing AIBD.

1. Introduction

Autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD) are rare diseases with significant morbidity and mortality [1,2]. AIBD are caused by autoantibodies targeting various skin antigens. In contrast, epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of inherited blistering disorders caused by mutations in various skin proteins [3]. AIBD and EB often have the same protein targeted through antibody or mutation, respectively (Table 1).
EB encompasses a group of inherited skin fragility diseases marked by blisters which may erode and lead to ulcers in the skin and mucous membranes [4]. Recently, EB has been grouped into four expansive categories based on the location of tissue separation within the basement membrane zone (BMZ) [4]. These categories include the simplex forms (EBS), the junctional forms (JEB), the dystrophic forms (DEB), and the newest subtype, known as the Kindler syndrome [4]. In this review, we will focus on the JEB and DEB forms which involve tissue separation, namely within the lamina lucida, within and below the lamina densa confined to the upper papillary dermis, respectively [4].
While EB and AIBD are distinct entities, there are reports of spontaneous development of AIBD in patients with pre-existing EB. Likewise, several groups have noted the prevalence of anti-skin antibodies in EB patients. Although the pathogenicity of these antibodies remains elusive, some speculate that chronic inflammation in EB combined with antigen unmasking can lead to a break in immune tolerance, resulting in development of AIBD.
Gene therapy serves as a promising therapy in the pipeline for treatment of EB. Through various vectors, different technologies lead to correction or expression of functional portions of collagen [3,5]. However, with great promise, the risk of autoimmunity must be considered. For example, corrections of highly immunogenic portions of protein may confer a greater risk towards developing AIBD. For illustration, Figure 1 details the location of mutations in collagen VII and collagen XVII with respect to the immunogenic epitopes in AIBD. As such, we reviewed the literature concerning the development of AIBD and anti-skin in EB patients.

2. Presence of Anti-Skin Antibodies in EB

Although EB is an inherited disorder caused by genetic defects, autoantibodies to skin antigens have been demonstrated in the sera of patients with EB [14,15,16,17]. Overall, patients with EB have significantly higher antibody titers against components of molecules responsible for cell adhesion, such as desmoglein 1, desmoglein 3, collagen XVII, BP230, and collagen VII compared to controls (Table 2) [7]. Similarly, 40.6–90.6% of patients with EB have significant antibody titers against collagen type III, IV, and V, as well as laminin [14]. Different subtypes of EB have varying prevalence of these circulating autoantibodies [14,15,16]. For instance, patients with the generalized forms of EB had significantly higher antibody titers (2–5-fold) against desmoglein 1, desmoglein 3, collagen XVII, BP230, and collagen VII compared to patients with other EB forms [15,16]. This difference in antibodies concentrations was accentuated when the sera of patients with recessive DEB (the most severe EB subtype clinically) was compared to that of patients with EBS, as recessive DEB patients had 7–11-fold higher antibody titers against collagen XVII, BP230, and collagen VII [15]. Furthermore, a direct correlation was found between disease severity (Birmingham EB Severity scores) and the concentrations of the antibody titers against collagen XVII, BP230, and collagen VII [15,16].
The implications of elevation in serum concentrations of autoantibodies in EB are not yet known, but autoantibodies against collagen VII have been shown to induce blistering in humans and experimental models [18]. IgG4 dominated the autoimmune response in patients with collagen-VII-specific antibodies [19]. High levels of IgG4 autoantibodies and other circulating anti-collagen VII autoantibodies have been detected in a majority of recessive DEB patients, independent of the COL7A1 mutation type or quantitative collagen VII levels [16,20,21]. In epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), autoantibody-induced tissue damage against collagen VII contributes to blistering [22]. Complement activation through both the classical and alternative pathways have been implicated in disease pathogenesis but the alternative pathway appears to be predominant [23,24]. Autoreactive IgG and immune complex-FcγR binding initiate an inflammatory complement cascade resulting in extravasation of neutrophils, release of proteolytic enzymes, and reactive oxygen species [25]. Moreover, T cells may perpetuate tissue damage in EBA through association with immune complexes and neutrophils [26].
Anti-collagen XVII antibodies trigger subepidermal blistering in this bullous pemphigoid (BP) model via complement activation and non-complement patterns [27,28]. The IgG4 subtype was found to induce inflammation by activating leukocytes in a non-complement fixing pattern or by binding collagen XVII in a Fc-independent manner causing dermo–epidermal junction (DEJ) separation in BP [29]. Elevated anti-collagen XVII autoantibodies are even linked to more active and severe disease, as well as poorer prognosis [30,31,32]. However, negative direct and indirect immunofluorescence test results in most cases suggest that circulating autoantibodies are not pathogenic [33].
Moreover, immune-mediated complications and disease pathology have been described in EB patients, including celiac disease, amyloidosis, post-infectious glomerulonephritis, and IgA nephropathy [34,35,36,37]. Among cutaneous disease, a few reported cases of autoantibodies causing concurrent AIBD in patients with inherited EB include: EBA in a patient with dominant DEB [20], EBA in a patient with recessive DEB [38], and BP in a patient with JEB [39] (Table 3). In each of these cases, the acquired AIBD was resistant to common therapy, patients had minimal clinical improvement, and one patient with dominant DEB even died from severe hypoalbuminemia and anemia [20]. The authors speculate that genetic modifiers or environmental factors may help explain why some patients with positive serology exhibit clinical disease while others do not. Although not fully understood, the authors propose that chronic blistering and inflammation due to altered protein synthesis and structure in EB [16,38] contribute to the immunologic recognition of “self.” Alternatively, it is plausible that activation of autoimmunity is both a consequence and cause of further skin deterioration in EB due to a state of chronic inflammation. Herein, we review the factors that facilitate the initiation of autoimmune and inflammatory responses to help understand the pathogenesis and therapeutic implications of the overlap between EB and AIBD.

3. Altered ECM Properties

In DEB, dysfunctional collagen VII induces inflammation even with minor injury or trauma [40]. This structural compromise coupled with increased tumor growth factor-β (TGFβ) and its downstream effects on fibroblast differentiation promote the biosynthesis and remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) [40]. Primary fibroblasts found in DEB skin demonstrate a pro-fibrotic profile, along with increased levels of context-dependent fibroblast activator, WNT-5A [41], thrombospondin-1 [42], collagen V, collagen XII, and integrin α3β1. Additionally, loss of collagen VII decreases the levels of basement membrane-associated proteins and increases proteins linked to the dermal matrix, TGF-β, and metalloproteases [43,44]. Altogether, the chronicity of damage and increased dermal stiffness promote inflammation and scarring within the DEB dermis [45,46].
The mutant protein inherited in EB may be sensitive to such inflammation and protease cleavage, possibly resulting in the generation of neo-epitopes [47]. An immunocompromised district is a vulnerable area of skin resulting from an inherited or acquired process that causes dysregulation of the local inflammatory response [48]. It is likely that repeat mechanical injury in EB compromises the DEJ, thus increasing antigen presentation and subsequent epitope spreading, resulting in the activation of autoimmunity in EB [49]. Likewise, epithelial barrier disruption through triggering factors, such as surgical trauma, ultraviolet radiation, infections, and necrosis have been associated with development of AIBD [50,51,52,53,54].
Flightless I (Flii), an actin remodeling protein and nuclear receptor co-activator has been implicated in cell adhesion and intracellular signaling [55,56]. Disruptions in levels of Flii affect wound healing through effects on TGFβ signaling and ECM reorganization [56]. As such, levels of Flii are increased in blistered skin of EB patients, and Flii over-expression in experimental EBA decreased expression of proteins that make up cell–cell tight junctions [57]. The interaction of Flii with tight junctions may impair formation of tight junction protein complexes and function of the epidermal barrier [57]. Moreover, topical application of Flii-neutralizing antibodies improved healing in experimental EBA [56]. Additionally, increased levels of Flii have been shown to result in increased pro-inflammatory cytokine production in a T helper (Th)2 cells pattern in atopic dermatitis, and poor mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis [58,59]. Thus, altered levels of Flii in EB and EBA may contribute to the delayed healing and skin fragility [57].

4. Eosinophilia and Elevated IgE

Conventionally, EB is considered a paucicellular blistering disorder but individual reports of an inflammatory infiltrate in EB patients can be found [60]. The most commonly encountered infiltrate is eosinophilic, but leukocytes, lymphocytes, and neutrophils have all been documented in various types of EB [61,62,63,64,65,66,67]. Notably, three patients with JEB and extensive eosinophilic infiltration were reported with a common mutation in exon 5 of COL17A1 [64]. Eosinophilia and eosinophilic infiltration are prototypic features of BP [50,51] where eosinophils play a crucial role in disease pathogenesis [68]. Therefore, the authors speculate if an autoantibody against truncated COL17A1 evoked an immune reaction involving eosinophils or whether a common immunologic mechanism exists between BP and JEB [64].
Eosinophils are deemed vital to anti-collagen XVII IgE-mediated and FcεRI-dependent DEJ separation in BP [69,70]. IgE are important in presenting allergens to Th2, which produce IL-4 and IL-5 [71]. IL-5 also plays an important role in activating eosinophils that promote BP pathogenesis [72]. Degranulation of eosinophils releases several toxic proteins, including eosinophil cationic protein, which can induce keratinocyte production of IL-5, generating a positive feedback loop which may perpetuate BP [73]. Furthermore, eosinophils also act as a mediator of pruritus by exerting influence on peripheral nerves and the autonomic nervous system, as well as through local production of IL-31 [68,74,75]. Therefore, it is plausible that in EB cases where eosinophilic infiltration is accompanied by elevations in IgE or Th2 cytokines, the disease course may worsen likened to that of BP.
Moreover, another case of a DEB patient with features of both eosinophilia and elevated IgE has also been observed [61]. Elevations in IgE are seen in BP and correlated to disease severity and pathogenesis [69,70]. A humanized mouse model expressing a truncated form of collagen XVII, through dysfunctional NC16a, resulted in spontaneous BP-like inflammation characterized by severe itch and a defective skin barrier, along with hyper IgE and immune cell infiltration [76]. However, IgE or components of adaptive immunity were not linked to cause severe itch in these mice. Similar to BP, elevated levels of anti-collagen VII IgE autoantibodies were found in the sera of EBA patients and correlated to the inflammatory phenotype [77]. IgE specific to collagen XVII and BP230 were associated with inflammatory cells (eosinophils and mast cells) [78], suggesting that the anti-collagen VII IgE are of pathogenic relevance, and thus may exacerbate EB severity.

5. Pro-Inflammatory Microenvironment Due to Cytokine Dysregulation

High levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6 [79,80], interferon-γ (IFN-γ), IL-1β, IL-2, and tumor necrosis factor- β (TNF-β) are present in patients with inherited EB, with the greatest increase in patients with recessive DEB [15,17]. Elevations in the circulating levels of IL-6 were also related to the severity of the disease and with anti-skin antibody levels [17]. IL-6 is known to promote the production of acute-phase proteins and Th17 proliferation, previously found to induce a shift from innate to acquired immunity [81,82]. Moreover, elevation in IL-6 levels was also found in the sera and blister fluid in EBA and BP cases [83]. The role of IL-6 in BP pathogenesis can be attributed to its pro-inflammatory drive and indirect activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), shown to weaken hemidesmosomes in BP [84]. Similarly, MMP-9 and IL-8 are not only upregulated in circulation, but also in the blister fluid of EBS, JEB, and DEB patients [85,86]. Both MMP-9 and IL-8 have been reported in other AIBD, such as BP and pemphigus vulgaris but their pathologic significance in EB and overlapping AIBD needs elucidation [68,87,88].
Pro-inflammatory chemokines, such as chemokine C-X-C motif ligand 12 (CXCL12) and high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) [89,90] are increased in EB patients [91], sometimes in correlation with the affected body surface area [91]. CXCL12 and HMGB1 are both involved in the stress-induced recruitment of stem cells to damaged tissue and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) migration into wound cells, suggesting that together they promote wound healing in EB [92,93,94,95]. Serum levels of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21 (CCL21) are lower in EB patients but tissue samples show increased CCL21 expression [91]. Since CCL21 has been shown to influence MSC migration into the skin, the gradient between serum and tissue levels of CCL21 could promote MSC migration into tissues [96].
In a humanized mouse model expressing truncated collagen XVII, increased production of IL-1β was found to trigger keratinocytes to produce thymic stromal lymphopoietin, held responsible for initiating inflammation or itch, a common symptom in both BP and JEB [76]. Likewise, IFN-γ, another important pro-inflammatory marker, is expressed in high quantity in both BP blister fluid and EBS [97,98,99]. IFN-γ-mediated release of cytokines propagates a cell-mediated immune response that contributes to the autoantibody-induced blister formation in BP, along with IL-1β [98]. In addition, IFN-γ was also shown to positively correlate with anti-skin antibodies in EB, suggesting a common link between cytokine milieu and disease pathogenesis in EB and AIBD [100].
In contrast to IFN-γ, a negative correlation was found between IL-5 and autoantibodies to collagen VII and BP230 [17]. IL-5, along other cytokines, also plays an important role in eosinophil activation, survival, chemotaxis, and degranulation [68,101,102]. Moreover, IL-5 activated eosinophils induce subepidermal blistering at the DEJ in BP [72], further supporting the finding that IL-5 elevation is correlated to severity of BP [103]. Perhaps, local IL-5 levels combined with antigen unmasking drive autoimmunity to EBA and BP. Alternatively, IL-5 is previously shown to promote induction of CD4+CD25+ T-regulatory cells that are involved in the suppression of autoimmunity [104].

6. Dysregulated Inflammatory Response and Blister Formation

When subjected to trauma, keratinocytes display increased sensitivity to autoantibodies [105]. Collagen XVII is a known inhibitor of keratinocyte migration, while its shed ectodomain leads to stabilization and cell immobilization [67]. In nonlethal JEB, the absence of collagen XVII or dysfunctional interaction between laminin-332 and collagen XVII is speculated to promote keratinocyte migration [67,106,107]. Thus, the weakened attachment of keratinocytes to the basement membrane, increased keratinocyte sensitivity to circulating autoantibodies, and subsequent expression of eosinophil chemotactic factors enhance deposition of antibodies and facilitate blister formation [108].
However, blister formation has a much more complex etiology where the interplay between cytokines, chemokines, and MMP is important. In patients with JEB, anti-collagen XVII autoantibodies trigger the release of inflammatory cytokines that may exacerbate DEJ separation [109]. In vitro, when JEB-derived (collagen-XVII-deficient) epidermal keratinocytes are exposed to inflammatory stimuli (ultraviolet B radiation, lipopolysaccharide, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, and tumor necrosis factor), an abnormally high IL-8 response is seen [109]. As a chemotactic agent, IL-8 contributes to neutrophil recruitment [110]. In turn, re-induction of collagen XVII expression normalizes this response (against lipopolysaccharide and ultraviolet B radiation), suggesting that it may serve as a pathway for inflammation and subsequent lesion formation in the skin of collagen-XVII-deficient EB patients [109]. Although not fully elucidated, antibody-mediated disruption of interactions between collagen XVII and other components of the BM may result in a pro-inflammatory response.
In the complement-independent pathway, the binding of autoantibody to collagen XVII and the subsequent internalization of these immune complexes causes a depletion of collagen XVII from cell surface [111]. This results in the formation of collagen XVII-deficient hemidesmosomes that weaken the adhesion in a patient’s skin [111]. Thus, BP-IgG may induce or exacerbate skin fragility by itself [28].

7. Bacterial Infections

An additional hypothesis for autoimmunity is related to molecular mimicry, where exposure to a foreign pathogen with a similar sequence to self-antigens incites autoimmunity through the activation of T and B cells [112]. Typically, EB patients are prone to bacterial colonization and wound infections [113,114]. Alteration of microbial diversity may be one of the inciting factors for the activation of autoimmunity in EB patients [15]. Repeat bacterial infections in the presence of chronic skin fragility and mechanical insults in DEB patients, promote a cycle of inflammation that results in an altered ECM architecture, dermal stiffening, and development of a mutagenic environment [15,115,116,117]. Therefore, molecular mimicry is likely to occur in EB.
Dysfunctional collagen VII affects the ability of lymphoid conduits to successfully sequester cochlin within secondary lymphoid organs, resulting in a loss of the innate immune response to bacterial challenges [116]. This offers strong evidence that the increased susceptibility to bacteria in recessive DEB and the aforementioned cytokine imbalance induce a chronic inflammatory response that could activate autoimmunity and/or worsen basal EB lesions. Further strengthening the importance of alteration of microbial diversity in BP is a study that reports clinical improvement of BP with antibiotics [118].
Taken together, these studies establish that autoimmunity and inflammatory responses are frequently activated in EB, potentially setting the stage for the formation of other autoimmune diseases.

8. Implications of Autoantibodies in Gene Therapy

Recent advancements in the understanding of EB pathogenesis have allowed researchers to identify novel treatment options, including gene therapy. Initial success in gene therapy was uncovered for JEB patients with a LAMB3 mutation, who received genetically engineered epidermal sheet grafts overexpressing an ex vivo, retroviral full-length LAMB3 transgenic product [119,120]. LAMB3 expression was maintained within the holoclonal epidermal stem cells and laminin 332 was found in the DEJ until 21 months [120]. However, gene therapy-mediated expression of a functional protein runs the risk of inducing autoimmunity. Fortunately, these study patients did not generate an immune reaction to the antigenic laminin β3 chain [121], likely because the selected patients had missense mutations involving a single amino acid or small deletions [119,120]. On the other hand, JEB patients with null mutations and fatal disease would be expected to develop immunoreactivity, and laminin-332 expression in skin via gene therapy would not correct severe upper respiratory, kidney, or internal disease [3]. Notably, autoantibodies against laminin β3 are also uncommon in patients with laminin-332 pemphigoid, occurring in less than 30% of patients [122]. However, autoantibodies against laminin α3 are present in close to 90%. This suggests that LAMB3 may be a less immunogenic target, thus contributing to the success of LAMB3 correction.
Gene therapy in recessive DEB patients is even more challenging due to the large size of COL7A1 and the increased immunogenicity of NC1 [123]. Epidermal sheet grafting maintained collagen VII expression in the primary collagen-VII-deficient recessive DEB keratinocytes of immunodeficient mice [124]. However, in order to avoid the risk of autoimmunity, human trials excluded patients without positive expression to the NC1 domain of collagen VII, the most antigenic portion of this protein [6]. While NC1 is a highly targeted epitope in EBA, only approximately 30% of patient cell cultures fail to express NC1 [125]. Another important criterion was selection of patients with severe generalized recessive DEB showing the absence of expression of full-length collagen VII (near the NC2 domain) [126]. All patients tolerated grafting with collagen-VII-engineered autologous epidermal sheets without adverse events and skin biopsy demonstrated linear collagen VII expression [126,127]. Clinical improvement in wound healing was more profound in grafted sites and patient-reported pain, itch, and wound durability [126]. Only one patient in this study developed autoantibodies (specific to NC2 domain of collagen VII), but pre-therapy serum Western blot analysis showed low levels of transient collagen VII antibodies despite an initial negative screening with indirect immunofluorescence [126]. It is likely that immunoreactivity pre-existed in this patient, and gene therapy exacerbated the immune response. Screening data revealed that this patient expressed a collagen VII molecule containing NC1 domain but not NC2, suggesting that this patient’s reaction was possibly an allo-reaction to the therapeutic gene product [126]. Thus, this patient did not experience increased blistering outside of the treated areas. Although low quantities of collagen VII antibodies in recessive DEB patients are considered nonpathogenic, as in this patient’s case [127,128,129], caution is advised when these patients are treated with gene therapy.
Nonsense mutations, prevalent in 30% of recessive DEB patients, result in a premature termination codon that generates a truncated collagen VII product. In a recent trial of these recessive DEB patients treated with intravenous gentamicin, a premature termination codon readthrough was induced which created a new type VII collagen and anchoring fibrils that persisted for 3 months. Preliminary results demonstrate that none of the patients developed autoantibodies to collagen VII despite aminoglycoside-induced production of new collagen VII [130].

9. Conclusions

Although novel treatments appear to be a safe and effective option for select patients, preventing immunoreactivity remains a challenge. The principal goal of gene therapy is to repair or replenish functional protein; however, avoiding highly immunogenic areas of epitope binding is helpful. Future improvements in gene therapy, such as in vivo approaches and refined repair of highly immunogenic areas (NC1 in collagen VII) may help prevent autoimmunity and result in successful gene therapy. Monitoring patients for autoantibody production and regular direct immunofluorescence screening in patients with EB subtypes who present with worsening of skin fragility may be warranted. Such cases may reveal additional examples of EB and AIBD overlap, providing a better understanding of these autoimmune and autoinflammatory responses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.T.A.; Methodology, K.T.A.; Formal Analysis, P.M.P., V.A.J. and C.T.B.; Investigation, P.M.P., V.A.J., C.T.B. and K.T.A.; Data Curation, P.M.P., V.A.J., C.T.B. and K.T.A.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, P.M.P., V.A.J., C.T.B. and K.T.A.; Writing—Review & Editing, P.M.P., V.A.J., C.T.B., K.T.A. and G.D.Z.; Figures, P.M.P., V.A.J. and K.T.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated during this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patel, P.M.; Jones, V.A.; Murray, T.N.; Amber, K.T. A Review Comparing International Guidelines for the Management of Bullous Pemphigoid, Pemphigoid Gestationis, Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid, and Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2020, 21, 557–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jones, V.A.; Patel, P.M.; Amber, K.T. Eosinophils in Bullous Pemphigoid. Panminerva Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Marinkovich, M.P.; Tang, J.Y. Gene Therapy for Epidermolysis Bullosa. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1221–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Has, C.; Nyström, A.; Saeidian, A.H.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Uitto, J. Epidermolysis bullosa: Molecular pathology of connective tissue components in the cutaneous basement membrane zone. Matrix Biol. 2018, 71, 313–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Mayr, E.; Koller, U.; Bauer, J.W. Gene Therapy for the COL7A1 Gene. In Gene Therapy; Molina, F.M., Ed.; IntechOpen: Rijeka, Croatia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lapiere, J.C.; Woodley, D.T.; Parente, M.G.; Iwasaki, T.; Wynn, K.C.; Christiano, A.M.; Uitto, J. Epitope mapping of type VII collagen. Identification of discrete peptide sequences recognized by sera from patients with acquired epidermolysis bullosa. J. Clin. Investig. 1993, 92, 1831–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Dang, N.; Murrell, D.F. Mutation analysis and characterization of COL7A1 mutations in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Exp. Dermatol. 2008, 17, 553–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tanaka, T.; Furukawa, F.; Imamura, S. Epitope mapping for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita autoantibody by molecularly cloned cDNA for type VII collagen. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1994, 102, 706–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dresow, S.K.; Sitaru, C.; Recke, A.; Oostingh, G.J.; Zillikens, D.; Gibbs, B.F. IgE autoantibodies against the intracellular domain of BP180. Br. J. Dermatol. 2009, 160, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Di Zenzo, G.; Grosso, F.; Terracina, M.; Mariotti, F.; De Pità, O.; Owaribe, K.; Mastrogiacomo, A.; Sera, F.; Borradori, L.; Zambruno, G. Characterization of the anti-BP180 autoantibody reactivity profile and epitope mapping in bullous pemphigoid patients. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2004, 122, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Bauer, J.W.; Lanschuetzer, C. Type XVII collagen gene mutations in junctional epidermolysis bullosa and prospects for gene therapy. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2003, 28, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Condrat, I.; He, Y.; Cosgarea, R.; Has, C. Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa: Allelic Heterogeneity and Mutation Stratification for Precision Medicine. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Pasmooij, A.M.G.; Pas, H.H.; Jansen, G.H.L.; Lemmink, H.H.; Jonkman, M.F. Localized and generalized forms of blistering in junctional epidermolysis bullosa due to COL17A1 mutations in the Netherlands. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 156, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gay, S.; Fine, J.D.; Storer, J.S. Autoantibodies to extracellular collagen matrix components in epidermolysis bullosa and other bullous diseases. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1988, 280, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Esposito, S.; Guez, S.; Orenti, A.; Tadini, G.; Scuvera, G.; Corti, L.; Scala, A.; Biganzoli, E.; Berti, E.; Principi, N. Autoimmunity and Cytokine Imbalance in Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Tampoia, M.; Bonamonte, D.; Filoni, A.; Garofalo, L.; Morgese, M.G.; Brunetti, L.; Di Giorgio, C.; Annicchiarico, G. Prevalence of specific anti-skin autoantibodies in a cohort of patients with inherited epidermolysis bullosa. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2013, 8, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Annicchiarico, G.; Morgese, M.G.; Esposito, S.; Lopalco, G.; Lattarulo, M.; Tampoia, M.; Bonamonte, D.; Brunetti, L.; Vitale, A.; Lapadula, G.; et al. Proinflammatory Cytokines and Antiskin Autoantibodies in Patients With Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa. Medicine 2015, 94, e1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kasperkiewicz, M.; Hirose, M.; Recke, A.; Schmidt, E.; Zillikens, D.; Ludwig, R.J. Clearance rates of circulating and tissue-bound autoantibodies to type VII collagen in experimental epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Br. J. Dermatol. 2010, 162, 1064–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Licarete, E.; Ganz, S.; Recknagel, M.J.; Di Zenzo, G.; Hashimoto, T.; Hertl, M.; Zambruno, G.; Hundorfean, G.; Mudter, J.; Neurath, M.F.; et al. Prevalence of collagen VII-specific autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. BMC Immunol. 2012, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Hayashi, R.; Natsuga, K.; Watanabe, M.; Iwata, H.; Shinkuma, S.; Ito, A.; Masui, Y.; Ito, M.; Shimomura, Y. Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita Develops in Dominant Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2016, 136, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gammon, W.R.; Briggaman, R.A.; Woodley, D.T.; Heald, P.W.; Wheeler, E.C., Jr. Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita—a pemphigoid-like disease. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1984, 11, 820–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stevens, N.E.; Cowin, A.J.; Kopecki, Z. Skin Barrier and Autoimmunity-Mechanisms and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Autoimmune Blistering Diseases of the Skin. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mihai, S.; Hirose, M.; Wang, Y.; Thurman, J.M.; Holers, V.M.; Morgan, B.P.; Kohl, J.; Zillikens, D.; Ludwig, R.J.; Nimmerjahn, F. Specific Inhibition of Complement Activation Significantly Ameliorates Autoimmune Blistering Disease in Mice. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mihai, S.; Chiriac, M.T.; Takahashi, K.; Thurman, J.M.; Holers, V.M.; Zillikens, D.; Botto, M.; Sitaru, C. The alternative pathway of complement activation is critical for blister induction in experimental epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 6514–6521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sitaru, C.; Kromminga, A.; Hashimoto, T.; Brocker, E.B.; Zillikens, D. Autoantibodies to type VII collagen mediate Fcgamma-dependent neutrophil activation and induce dermal-epidermal separation in cryosections of human skin. Am. J. Pathol. 2002, 161, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bieber, K.; Witte, M.; Sun, S.; Hundt, J.E.; Kalies, K.; Drager, S.; Kasprick, A.; Twelkmeyer, T.; Manz, R.A.; Konig, P.; et al. T cells mediate autoantibody-induced cutaneous inflammation and blistering in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Liu, Z.; Giudice, G.J.; Swartz, S.J.; Fairley, J.A.; Till, G.O.; Troy, J.L.; Diaz, L.A. The role of complement in experimental bullous pemphigoid. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 95, 1539–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Iwata, H.; Ujiie, H. Complement-independent blistering mechanisms in bullous pemphigoid. Exp. Dermatol. 2017, 26, 1235–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Mihai, S.; Chiriac, M.T.; Herrero-González, J.E.; Goodall, M.; Jefferis, R.; Savage, C.O.S.; Zillikens, D.; Sitaru, C. IgG4 autoantibodies induce dermal-epidermal separation. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2007, 11, 1117–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Xia, Y. BP180 Is Critical in the Autoimmunity of Bullous Pemphigoid. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, Y.-D.; Wang, Y.-H.; Ye, Y.-C.; Zhao, W.-L.; Li, L. Prognostic factors for mortality in patients with bullous pemphigoid: A meta-analysis. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2017, 309, 335–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. van Beek, N.; Lüttmann, N.; Huebner, F.; Recke, A.; Karl, I.; Schulze, F.S.; Zillikens, D.; Schmidt, E. Correlation of Serum Levels of IgE Autoantibodies Against BP180 With Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Activity. JAMA Dermatol. 2017, 153, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wieland, C.N.; Comfere, N.I.; Gibson, L.E.; Weaver, A.L.; Krause, P.K.; Murray, J.A. Anti-bullous pemphigoid 180 and 230 antibodies in a sample of unaffected subjects. Arch Dermatol. 2010, 146, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Málaga, S.; Toral, J.F.; Santos, F.; Riesgo, I.; Crespo, M. Renal amyloidosis complicating a recessive epidermolysis bullosa in childhood. Helv. Paediatr. Acta 1983, 38, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Mann, J.F.; Zeier, M.; Zilow, E.; Schärer, K.; Anton-Lamprecht, I.; Waldherr, R.; Andrassy, K.; Ritz, E. The spectrum of renal involvement in epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica hereditaria: Report of two cases. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1988, 11, 437–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, C.C.; Isomoto, H.; Hayashi, T. Gastrointestinal amyloidosis secondary to inherited skin disorder. Gastroenterology 2012, 142, e9–e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Annicchiarico, G.; Morgese, M.G.; Brunetti, L.; Tampoia, M.; Garofalo, L.; Aceto, G.; Fiore, T.; Mauro, S.; Minelli, M. Improvement of renal function in epidermolysis bullosa patients after gluten free diet: Two cases. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 16, 138–141. [Google Scholar]
  38. Guerra, L.; Condorelli, A.G.; Fortugno, P.; Calabresi, V.; Pedicelli, C.; Di Zenzo, G.; Castiglia, D. Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB) Acquisita in an Adult Patient with Previously Unrecognized Mild Dystrophic EB and Biallelic COL7A1 Mutations. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2018, 98, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Fania, L.; Provini, A.; Salemme, A.; Sinagra, J.L.; Guerra, L.; Mazzanti, C.; Didona, B.; Castiglia, D.; Di Zenzo, G. Development of bullous pemphigoid in junctional epidermolysis bullosa. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020, 34, e146–e148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mittapalli, V.R.; Madl, J.; Löffek, S.; Kiritsi, D.; Kern, J.S.; Römer, W.; Nyström, A.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L. Injury-Driven Stiffening of the Dermis Expedites Skin Carcinoma Progression. Cancer Res. 2016, 76, 940–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kumawat, K.; Gosens, R. WNT-5A: Signaling and functions in health and disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2016, 73, 567–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Atanasova, V.S.; Russell, R.J.; Webster, T.G.; Cao, Q.; Agarwal, P.; Lim, Y.Z.; Krishnan, S.; Fuentes, I.; Guttmann-Gruber, C.; McGrath, J.A.; et al. Thrombospondin-1 Is a Major Activator of TGF-β Signaling in Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Fibroblasts. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2019, 139, 1497–1505.e1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Küttner, V.; Mack, C.; Rigbolt, K.T.G.; Kern, J.S.; Schilling, O.; Busch, H.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Dengjel, J. Global remodelling of cellular microenvironment due to loss of collagen VII. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2013, 9, 657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Küttner, V.; Mack, C.; Gretzmeier, C.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Dengjel, J. Loss of collagen VII is associated with reduced transglutaminase 2 abundance and activity. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 2381–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Li, C.X.; Talele, N.P.; Boo, S.; Koehler, A.; Knee-Walden, E.; Balestrini, J.L.; Speight, P.; Kapus, A.; Hinz, B. MicroRNA-21 preserves the fibrotic mechanical memory of mesenchymal stem cells. Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 379–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Nyström, A.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L. Injury- and inflammation-driven skin fibrosis: The paradigm of epidermolysis bullosa. Matrix Biol. 2018, 68, 547–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Windler, C.; Hermsdorf, U.; Brinckmann, J.; Seeger, K. A type VII collagen subdomain mutant is thermolabile and shows enhanced proteolytic degradability—Implications for the pathogenesis of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa? Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2017, 1863, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ruocco, V.; Ruocco, E.; Piccolo, V.; Brunetti, G.; Guerrera, L.P.; Wolf, R. The immunocompromised district in dermatology: A unifying pathogenic view of the regional immune dysregulation. Clin. Dermatol. 2014, 32, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rotunda, A.M.; Bhupathy, A.R.; Dye, R.; Soriano, T.T. Pemphigus foliaceus masquerading as postoperative wound infection: Report of a case and review of the Koebner and related phenomenon following surgical procedures. Dermatol. Surg. 2005, 31, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sen, B.B.; Ekiz, Ö.; Rifaioglu, E.N.; Sen, T.; Atik, E.; Dogramaci, A.Ç. Localized bullous pemphigoid occurring on surgical scars. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2013, 79, 554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sanchez-Palacios, C.; Chan, L.S. Development of pemphigus herpetiformis in a patient with psoriasis receiving UV-light treatment. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2004, 31, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Baroero, L.; Coppo, P.; Bertolino, L.; Maccario, S.; Savino, F. Three case reports of post immunization and post viral Bullous Pemphigoid: Looking for the right trigger. BMC Pediatr. 2017, 17, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Sachet, M.; Liang, Y.Y.; Oehler, R. The immune response to secondary necrotic cells. Apoptosis 2017, 22, 1189–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Moro, F.; Fania, L.; Sinagra, J.L.M.; Salemme, A.; Zenzo, G.D. Bullous Pemphigoid: Trigger and Predisposing Factors. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kopecki, Z.; Cowin, A.J. Flightless I: An actin-remodelling protein and an important negative regulator of wound repair. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2008, 40, 1415–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kopecki, Z.; Ruzehaji, N.; Turner, C.; Iwata, H.; Ludwig, R.J.; Zillikens, D.; Murrell, D.F.; Cowin, A.J. Topically applied flightless I neutralizing antibodies improve healing of blistered skin in a murine model of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2013, 133, 1008–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kopecki, Z.; Yang, G.N.; Arkell, R.M.; Jackson, J.E.; Melville, E.; Iwata, H.; Ludwig, R.J.; Zillikens, D.; Murrell, D.F.; Cowin, A.J. Flightless I over-expression impairs skin barrier development, function and recovery following skin blistering. J. Pathol. 2014, 232, 541–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kopecki, Z.; Yang, G.; Treloar, S.; Mashtoub, S.; Howarth, G.S.; Cummins, A.G.; Cowin, A.J. Flightless I exacerbation of inflammatory responses contributes to increased colonic damage in a mouse model of dextran sulphate sodium-induced ulcerative colitis. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 12792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Kopecki, Z.; Stevens, N.E.; Chong, H.T.; Yang, G.N.; Cowin, A.J. Flightless I Alters the Inflammatory Response and Autoantibody Profile in an OVA-Induced Atopic Dermatitis Skin-Like Disease. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Saraiya, A.; Yang, C.S.; Kim, J.; Bercovitch, L.; Robinson-Bostom, L.; Telang, G. Dermal eosinophilic infiltrate in junctional epidermolysis bullosa. J. Cutan. Pathol. 2015, 42, 559–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Grunwald, M.H.; Amichai, B.; Avinoach, I.; Kedar, T.; Bergman, R. Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa associated with eosinophilic infiltrate and elevated serum IgE. Pediatr. Dermatol. 1999, 16, 16–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Roth, R.R.; Smith, K.J.; James, W.D. Eosinophilic infiltrates in epidermolysis bullosa. Arch. Dermatol. 1990, 126, 1191–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Anton-Lamprecht, I.; Schnyder, U.W. Epidermolysis bullosa herpetiformis Dowling-Meara. Report of a case and pathomorphogenesis. Dermatologica 1982, 164, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nomura, M.; Hamasaki, Y.-I.; Katayama, I.; Abe, K.; Niikawa, N.; Yoshiura, K.-I. Eosinophil infiltration in three patients with generalized atrophic benign epidermolysis bullosa from a Japanese family: Molecular genetic and immunohistochemical studies. J. Hum. Genet. 2005, 50, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Drury, R.E.; Prieto, A., Jr. Epidermolysis bullosa dystrophica. report of two cases within a family group. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1964, 18, 544–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vivehanantha, S.; Carr, R.A.; McGrath, J.A.; Taibjee, S.M.; Madhogaria, S.; Ilchyshyn, A. Epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa: A case with prominent histopathologic inflammation. JAMA Dermatol. 2013, 149, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Tasanen, K.; Tunggal, L.; Chometon, G.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Aumailley, M. Keratinocytes from patients lacking collagen XVII display a migratory phenotype. Am. J. Pathol. 2004, 164, 2027–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Amber, K.T.; Valdebran, M.; Kridin, K.; Grando, S.A. The Role of Eosinophils in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Developing Model of Eosinophil Pathogenicity in Mucocutaneous Disease. Front. Med. 2018, 5, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lin, L.; Hwang, B.-J.; Culton, D.A.; Li, N.; Burette, S.; Koller, B.H.; Messingham, K.A.; Fairley, J.A.; Lee, J.J.; Hall, R.P.; et al. Eosinophils Mediate Tissue Injury in the Autoimmune Skin Disease Bullous Pemphigoid. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2018, 138, 1032–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Kasahara-Imamura, M.; Hosokawa, H.; Maekawa, N.; Horio, T. Activation of Fc epsilon RI-positive eosinophils in bullous pemphigoid. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2001, 7, 249–253. [Google Scholar]
  71. Romagnani, S. Immunologic influences on allergy and the TH1/TH2 balance. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2004, 113, 395–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. de Graauw, E.; Sitaru, C.; Horn, M.; Borradori, L.; Yousefi, S.; Simon, H.U.; Simon, D. Evidence for a role of eosinophils in blister formation in bullous pemphigoid. Allergy 2017, 72, 1105–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Amber, K.T.; Chernyavsky, A.; Agnoletti, A.F.; Cozzani, E.; Grando, S.A. Mechanisms of pathogenic effects of eosinophil cationic protein and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin on human keratinocytes. Exp. Dermatol. 2018, 27, 1322–1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hashimoto, T.; Kursewicz, C.D.; Fayne, R.A.; Nanda, S.; Shah, S.M.; Nattkemper, L.; Yokozeki, H.; Yosipovitch, G. Pathophysiologic mechanisms of itch in bullous pemphigoid. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 2020, 83, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gibbs, B.F.; Patsinakidis, N.; Raap, U. Role of the Pruritic Cytokine IL-31 in Autoimmune Skin Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, Y.; Hwang, B.-J.; Liu, Z.; Li, N.; Lough, K.; Williams, S.E.; Chen, J.; Burette, S.W.; Diaz, L.A.; Su, M.A.; et al. BP180 dysfunction triggers spontaneous skin inflammation in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6434–6439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Koga, H.; Teye, K.; Yamashita, K.; Ishii, N.; Tsuruta, D.; Nakama, T. Detection of anti-type VII collagen IgE antibodies in epidermolysis bullosa acquisita. Br. J. Dermatol. 2019, 180, 1107–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Freire, P.C.; Muñoz, C.H.; Stingl, G. IgE autoreactivity in bullous pemphigoid: Eosinophils and mast cells as major targets of pathogenic immune reactants. Br. J. Dermatol. 2017, 177, 1644–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Kawakami, Y.; Oyama, N.; Ohtsuka, M.; Nakamura, K.; Kaneko, F. Increased serum levels of interleukin-6, immunoglobulin and acute phase protein in patients with the severe clinical form of inherited epidermolysis bullosa. J. Dermatol. 2005, 32, 503–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Odorisio, T.; Di Salvio, M.; Orecchia, A.; Di Zenzo, G.; Piccinni, E.; Cianfarani, F.; Travaglione, A.; Uva, P.; Bellei, B.; Conti, A.; et al. Monozygotic twins discordant for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa phenotype highlight the role of TGF-β signalling in modifying disease severity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2014, 23, 3907–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Komiyama, Y.; Nakae, S.; Matsuki, T.; Nambu, A.; Ishigame, H.; Kakuta, S.; Sudo, K.; Iwakura, Y. IL-17 plays an important role in the development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Immunol. 2006, 177, 566–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Ishigame, H.; Kakuta, S.; Nagai, T.; Kadoki, M.; Nambu, A.; Komiyama, Y.; Fujikado, N.; Tanahashi, Y.; Akitsu, A.; Kotaki, H.; et al. Differential roles of interleukin-17A and -17F in host defense against mucoepithelial bacterial infection and allergic responses. Immunity 2009, 30, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Samavedam, U.K.S.R.L.; Kalies, K.; Scheller, J.; Sadeghi, H.; Gupta, Y.; Jonkman, M.F.; Schmidt, E.; Westermann, J.; Zillikens, D.; Rose-John, S.; et al. Recombinant IL-6 treatment protects mice from organ specific autoimmune disease by IL-6 classical signalling-dependent IL-1ra induction. J. Autoimmun. 2013, 40, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kothari, P.; Pestana, R.; Mesraoua, R.; Elchaki, R.; Khan, K.M.F.; Dannenberg, A.J.; Falcone, D.J. IL-6-mediated induction of matrix metalloproteinase-9 is modulated by JAK-dependent IL-10 expression in macrophages. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Lettner, T.; Lang, R.; Bauer, J.W.; Wally, V. Increased levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and interleukin-8 in blister fluids of dystrophic and junctional epidermolysis bullosa patients. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2015, 29, 396–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lettner, T.; Lang, R.; Klausegger, A.; Hainzl, S.; Bauer, J.W.; Wally, V. MMP-9 and CXCL8/IL-8 are potential therapeutic targets in epidermolysis bullosa simplex. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e70123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Chakrabarti, S.; Patel, K.D. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 release from IL-8-stimulated human neutrophils. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2005, 78, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Cirillo, N.; Lanza, M.; Rossiello, L.; Gombos, F.; Lanza, A. Defining the involvement of proteinases in pemphigus vulgaris: Evidence of matrix metalloproteinase-9 overexpression in experimental models of disease. J. Cell Physiol. 2007, 212, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Petrof, G.; Abdul-Wahab, A.; Proudfoot, L.; Pramanik, R.; Mellerio, J.E.; McGrath, J.A. Serum levels of high mobility group box 1 correlate with disease severity in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Exp. Dermatol. 2013, 22, 433–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Tamai, K.; Yamazaki, T.; Chino, T.; Ishii, M.; Otsuru, S.; Kikuchi, Y.; Iinuma, S.; Saga, K.; Nimura, K.; Shimbo, T.; et al. PDGFRalpha-positive cells in bone marrow are mobilized by high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) to regenerate injured epithelia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 6609–6614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Ujiie, I.; Fujita, Y.; Nakayama, C.; Matsumura, W.; Suzuki, S.; Shinkuma, S.; Nomura, T.; Abe, R.; Shimizu, H. Altered balance of epidermis-related chemokines in epidermolysis bullosa. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2017, 86, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Burman, A.; Haworth, O.; Hardie, D.L.; Amft, E.N.; Siewert, C.; Jackson, D.G.; Salmon, M.; Buckley, C.D. A chemokine-dependent stromal induction mechanism for aberrant lymphocyte accumulation and compromised lymphatic return in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Immunol. 2005, 174, 1693–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Morales, J.; Homey, B.; Vicari, A.P.; Hudak, S.; Oldham, E.; Hedrick, J.; Orozco, R.; Copeland, N.G.; Jenkins, N.A.; McEvoy, L.M.; et al. CTACK, a skin-associated chemokine that preferentially attracts skin-homing memory T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 14470–14475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Jaerve, A.; Schira, J.; Müller, H.W. Concise review: The potential of stromal cell-derived factor 1 and its receptors to promote stem cell functions in spinal cord repair. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2012, 1, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Straino, S.; Di Carlo, A.; Mangoni, A.; De Mori, R.; Guerra, L.; Maurelli, R.; Panacchia, L.; Di Giacomo, F.; Palumbo, R.; Di Campli, C.; et al. High-mobility group box 1 protein in human and murine skin: Involvement in wound healing. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 1545–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Weber, M.; Hauschild, R.; Schwarz, J.; Moussion, C.; de Vries, I.; Legler, D.F.; Luther, S.A.; Bollenbach, T.; Sixt, M. Interstitial dendritic cell guidance by haptotactic chemokine gradients. Science 2013, 339, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Giomi, B.; Caproni, M.; Calzolari, A.; Bianchi, B.; Fabbri, P. Th1, Th2 and Th3 cytokines in the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2002, 30, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Takiguchi, Y.; Itoh, N.; Suzuki, M.; Kaneko, F.; Minagawa, T. The role of gamma-interferon in blister formation of bullous pemphigoid. Nihon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi Jpn. J. Dermatol. 1991, 101, 121–127. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kowalski, E.H.; Kneibner, D.; Kridin, K.; Amber, K.T. Serum and blister fluid levels of cytokines and chemokines in pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid. Autoimmun. Rev. 2019, 18, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Esposito, S.; Guez, S.; Manzoni, F.; Bosco, A.; Rigante, D. Epidermolysis bullosa and the partnership with autoimmunity: What should we assimilate? Immunol. Res. 2015, 61, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Yamaguchi, Y.; Suda, T.; Suda, J.; Eguchi, M.; Miura, Y.; Harada, N.; Tominaga, A.; Takatsu, K. Purified interleukin 5 supports the terminal differentiation and proliferation of murine eosinophilic precursors. J. Exp. Med. 1988, 167, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Lopez, A.F.; Sanderson, C.J.; Gamble, J.R.; Campbell, H.D.; Young, I.G.; Vadas, M.A. Recombinant human interleukin 5 is a selective activator of human eosinophil function. J. Exp. Med. 1988, 167, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. D’Auria, L.; Pietravalle, M.; Mastroianni, A.; Ferraro, C.; Mussi, A.; Bonifati, C.; Giacalone, B.; Ameglio, F. IL-5 levels in the serum and blister fluid of patients with bullous pemphigoid: Correlations with eosinophil cationic protein, RANTES, IgE and disease severity. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 1998, 290, 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Tran, G.T.; Hodgkinson, S.J.; Carter, N.M.; Verma, N.D.; Plain, K.M.; Boyd, R.; Robinson, C.M.; Nomura, M.; Killingsworth, M.; Hall, B.M. IL-5 promotes induction of antigen-specific CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells that suppress autoimmunity. Blood 2012, 119, 4441–4450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Balighi, K.; Daneshpazhooh, M.; Azizpour, A.; Lajevardi, V.; Mohammadi, F.; Chams-Davatchi, C. Koebner phenomenon in pemphigus vulgaris patients. JAAD Case Rep. 2016, 2, 419–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Jonkman, M.F.; de Jong, M.C.; Heeres, K.; Pas, H.H.; van der Meer, J.B.; Owaribe, K.; de Velasco, A.M.M.; Niessen, C.M.; Sonnenberg, A. 180-kD bullous pemphigoid antigen (BP180) is deficient in generalized atrophic benign epidermolysis bullosa. J. Clin. Investig. 1995, 95, 1345–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. McGrath, J.A.; Gatalica, B.; Christiano, A.M.; Li, K.; Owaribe, K.; McMillan, J.R.; Eady, R.A.; Uitto, J. Mutations in the 180-kD bullous pemphigoid antigen (BPAG2), a hemidesmosomal transmembrane collagen (COL17A1), in generalized atrophic benign epidermolysis bullosa. Nat. Genet. 1995, 11, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jones, V.A.; Patel, P.M.; Gibson, F.T.; Cordova, A.; Amber, K.T. The Role of Collagen XVII in Cancer: Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Beyond. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Van den Bergh, F.; Eliason, S.L.; Burmeister, B.T.; Giudice, G.J. Collagen XVII (BP180) modulates keratinocyte expression of the proinflammatory chemokine, IL-8. Exp. Dermatol. 2012, 21, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Liu, Z.; Giudice, G.J.; Zhou, X.; Swartz, S.J.; Troy, J.L.; Fairley, J.A.; Till, G.O.; Diaz, L.A. A major role for neutrophils in experimental bullous pemphigoid. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 100, 1256–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Iwata, H.; Kamaguchi, M.; Ujiie, H.; Nishimura, M.; Izumi, K.; Natsuga, K.; Shinkuma, S.; Nishie, W.; Shimizu, H. Macropinocytosis of type XVII collagen induced by bullous pemphigoid IgG is regulated via protein kinase C. Lab. Investig. 2016, 96, 1301–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cusick, M.F.; Libbey, J.E.; Fujinami, R.S. Molecular mimicry as a mechanism of autoimmune disease. Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol. 2012, 42, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Levin, L.E.; Shayegan, L.H.; Lucky, A.W.; Hook, K.P.; Bruckner, A.L.; Feinstein, J.A.; Whittier, S.; Lauren, C.T.; Pope, E.; Lara-Corrales, I.; et al. Characterization of wound microbes in epidermolysis bullosa: Results from the epidermolysis bullosa clinical characterization and outcomes database. Pediatr. Dermatol. 2020, 38, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. van der Kooi-Pol, M.M.; Veenstra-Kyuchukova, Y.K.; Duipmans, J.C.; Pluister, G.N.; Schouls, L.M.; de Neeling, A.J.; Grundmann, H.; Jonkman, M.F.; van Dijl, J.M. High genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus strains colonizing patients with epidermolysis bullosa. Exp. Dermatol. 2012, 21, 463–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Föll, M.C.; Fahrner, M.; Gretzmeier, C.; Thoma, K.; Biniossek, M.L.; Kiritsi, D.; Meiss, F.; Schilling, O.; Nyström, A.; Kern, J.S. Identification of tissue damage, extracellular matrix remodeling and bacterial challenge as common mechanisms associated with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Matrix Biol. 2018, 66, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Nyström, A.; Bornert, O.; Kühl, T.; Gretzmeier, C.; Thriene, K.; Dengjel, J.; Pfister-Wartha, A.; Kiritsi, D.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L. Impaired lymphoid extracellular matrix impedes antibacterial immunity in epidermolysis bullosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E705–E714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  117. Nyström, A.; Thriene, K.; Mittapalli, V.; Kern, J.S.; Kiritsi, D.; Dengjel, J.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L. Losartan ameliorates dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and uncovers new disease mechanisms. EMBO Mol. Med. 2015, 7, 1211–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Chalmers, J.R.; Wojnarowska, F.; Kirtschig, G.; Nunn, A.J.; Bratton, D.J.; Mason, J.; Foster, K.A.; Whitham, D.; Williams, H.C.; on behalf of the BLISTER study group. A randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and effectiveness of doxycycline (200 mg daily) with oral prednisolone (0.5 mg kg−1 daily) for initial treatment of bullous pemphigoid: A protocol for the Bullous Pemphigoid Steroids and Tetracyclines (BLISTER) Trial. Br. J. Dermatol. 2015, 173, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Bauer, J.W.; Koller, J.; Murauer, E.M.; De Rosa, L.; Enzo, E.; Carulli, S.; Bondanza, S.; Recchia, A.; Muss, W.; Diem, A.; et al. Closure of a Large Chronic Wound through Transplantation of Gene-Corrected Epidermal Stem Cells. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 778–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Hirsch, T.; Rothoeft, T.; Teig, N.; Bauer, J.W.; Pellegrini, G.; De Rosa, L.; Scaglione, D.; Reichelt, J.; Klausegger, A.; Kneisz, D.; et al. Regeneration of the entire human epidermis using transgenic stem cells. Nature 2017, 551, 327–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Domloge-Hultsch, N.; Gammon, W.R.; Briggaman, R.A.; Gil, S.G.; Carter, W.G.; Yancey, K.B. Epiligrin, the major human keratinocyte integrin ligand, is a target in both an acquired autoimmune and an inherited subepidermal blistering skin disease. J. Clin. Investig. 1992, 90, 1628–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Amber, K.T.; Bloom, R.; Hertl, M. A systematic review with pooled analysis of clinical presentation and immunodiagnostic testing in mucous membrane pemphigoid: Association of anti-laminin-332 IgG with oropharyngeal involvement and the usefulness of ELISA. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2016, 30, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Christiano, A.M.; Greenspan, D.S.; Lee, S.; Uitto, J. Cloning of human type VII collagen. Complete primary sequence of the alpha 1(VII) chain and identification of intragenic polymorphisms. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 20256–20262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Siprashvili, Z.; Nguyen, N.T.; Bezchinsky, M.Y.; Marinkovich, M.P.; Lane, A.T.; Khavari, P.A. Long-term type VII collagen restoration to human epidermolysis bullosa skin tissue. Hum. Gene Ther. 2010, 21, 1299–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Conget, P.; Rodriguez, F.; Kramer, S.; Allers, C.; Simon, V.; Palisson, F.; Gonzalez, S.; Yubero, M.J. Replenishment of type VII collagen and re-epithelialization of chronically ulcerated skin after intradermal administration of allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells in two patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Cytotherapy 2010, 12, 429–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Siprashvili, Z.; Nguyen, N.T.; Gorell, E.S.; Loutit, K.; Khuu, P.; Furukawa, L.K.; Lorenz, H.P.; Leung, T.H.; Keene, D.R.; Rieger, K.E.; et al. Safety and Wound Outcomes Following Genetically Corrected Autologous Epidermal Grafts in Patients With Recessive Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa. JAMA 2016, 316, 1808–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Eichstadt, S.; Barriga, M.; Ponakala, A.; Teng, C.; Nguyen, N.T.; Siprashvili, Z.; Nazaroff, J.; Gorell, E.S.; Chiou, A.S.; Taylor, L.; et al. Phase 1/2a clinical trial of gene-corrected autologous cell therapy for recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. JCI Insight 2019, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Pendaries, V.; Gasc, G.; Titeux, M.; Leroux, C.; Vitezica, Z.G.; Mejía, J.E.; Décha, A.; Loiseau, P.; Bodemer, C.; Prost-Squarcioni, C.; et al. Immune reactivity to type VII collagen: Implications for gene therapy of recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. Gene Ther. 2010, 17, 930–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Woodley, D.T.; Cogan, J.; Wang, X.; Hou, Y.; Haghighian, C.; Kudo, G.; Keene, D.R.; Chen, M. De novo anti-type VII collagen antibodies in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 1138–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Woodley, D.T.; Cogan, J.; Hou, Y.; Lyu, C.; Marinkovich, M.P.; Keene, D.; Chen, M. Gentamicin induces functional type VII collagen in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2017, 127, 3028–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Antibodies 10 00019 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Collagen mutation profile and immunogenic domains of epitope reactivity. This schematic representation of collagen VII consists of noncollagenous-1 (NC1, shown as a blue elliptical bar), triple-helix collagenous (shown as a blue rectangular bar), and noncollagenous-2 domains (NC2, shown as a blue oval bar). A crucial region within NC1 is the fibronectin-III-like domains 1–9 (shown as blue vertical bars). The asterisks indicate the approximate location of the mutations alongside intervals of 100 amino acids within the collagen VII polypeptide chain. The size of the asterisk corresponds to the number of mutations detected within the specified interval. The second half of this image depicts the combined results of studies measuring the reactivity of sera from patients with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita to epitopes alongside collagen VII. The intensity of the color relates to the percent reactivity identified within the individual domains. The areas of highest immunogenicity in a majority of patients include fibronectin-III-like domains 4–6 of collagen VII (approximately AA 500–800), and various regions within the NC1 and collagenous domains. As such, gene therapy must target the greatest number of mutations, while avoiding highly immunogenic areas of epitope binding [6,7,8]. (B) In this schematic representation of collagen XVII, the extracellular domain consists of stretches of noncollagenous domains and a series of 15 collagenous domains (shown as blue vertical bars). Also represented are the intracellular (shown as a blue elliptical bar) and transmembrane domains (shown as a black curved bar). The asterisks indicate the approximate location of the mutations alongside intervals of 50 amino acids within the collagen XVII polypeptide chain. The size of the asterisk corresponds to the number of mutations detected within the specified interval. The second half of this image depicts the combined results of studies measuring the reactivity of sera from patients with bullous pemphigoid to epitopes alongside collagen XVII. The intensity of the color relates to the percent reactivity identified within the individual domains. The NC16a region of collagen XVII (AA 490–566) was identified as having the highest immunogenicity in the majority of patients but reactivity to various subdomains within the intracellular region must be considered. As such, gene therapy must target the greatest number of mutations, while avoiding highly immunogenic areas of epitope binding [9,10,11,12,13].
Figure 1. (A) Collagen mutation profile and immunogenic domains of epitope reactivity. This schematic representation of collagen VII consists of noncollagenous-1 (NC1, shown as a blue elliptical bar), triple-helix collagenous (shown as a blue rectangular bar), and noncollagenous-2 domains (NC2, shown as a blue oval bar). A crucial region within NC1 is the fibronectin-III-like domains 1–9 (shown as blue vertical bars). The asterisks indicate the approximate location of the mutations alongside intervals of 100 amino acids within the collagen VII polypeptide chain. The size of the asterisk corresponds to the number of mutations detected within the specified interval. The second half of this image depicts the combined results of studies measuring the reactivity of sera from patients with epidermolysis bullosa acquisita to epitopes alongside collagen VII. The intensity of the color relates to the percent reactivity identified within the individual domains. The areas of highest immunogenicity in a majority of patients include fibronectin-III-like domains 4–6 of collagen VII (approximately AA 500–800), and various regions within the NC1 and collagenous domains. As such, gene therapy must target the greatest number of mutations, while avoiding highly immunogenic areas of epitope binding [6,7,8]. (B) In this schematic representation of collagen XVII, the extracellular domain consists of stretches of noncollagenous domains and a series of 15 collagenous domains (shown as blue vertical bars). Also represented are the intracellular (shown as a blue elliptical bar) and transmembrane domains (shown as a black curved bar). The asterisks indicate the approximate location of the mutations alongside intervals of 50 amino acids within the collagen XVII polypeptide chain. The size of the asterisk corresponds to the number of mutations detected within the specified interval. The second half of this image depicts the combined results of studies measuring the reactivity of sera from patients with bullous pemphigoid to epitopes alongside collagen XVII. The intensity of the color relates to the percent reactivity identified within the individual domains. The NC16a region of collagen XVII (AA 490–566) was identified as having the highest immunogenicity in the majority of patients but reactivity to various subdomains within the intracellular region must be considered. As such, gene therapy must target the greatest number of mutations, while avoiding highly immunogenic areas of epitope binding [9,10,11,12,13].
Antibodies 10 00019 g001
Table
Table 1. Select autoantigens shared between pemphigoid diseases and epidermolysis bullosa.
Table 1. Select autoantigens shared between pemphigoid diseases and epidermolysis bullosa.
AntigenEB SubtypeAIBD Subtype
BP230 (dystonin)EBSBullous pemphigoid
Collagen XVII (BP180)JEBBullous pemphigoid, Pemphigoid gestationis
Laminin 332JEBMucous membrane pemphigoid
α6β4 integrinJEBMucous membrane pemphigoid
Collagen VIIDEBEpidermolysis bullosa acquisita
AIBD = autoimmune blistering disease; EBS = epidermolysis bullosa simplex; JEB = junctional epidermolysis bullosa; and DEB = dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.
Table
Table 2. Presence of autoantibodies in patients with EB.
Table 2. Presence of autoantibodies in patients with EB.
EB SubtypenAutoantigen
Collagen FN LAM Dsg1 Dsg3 Collagen XVII/ BP180 BP230
I II III IV V VI VII
[14]EBA20.0%0.0%100.0%0.0%100.0%0.0% 0.0%50.0%
EBS200.0%0.0%85.0%60.0%85.0%0.0%0.0%40.0%
JEB40.0%0.0%100.0%50.0%100.0%25.0%0.0%0.0%
DEB60.0%16.7%83.3%33.3%100.0%16.7%16.7%66.7%
Total320.0%3.1%87.5%50.0%90.6%6.3%3.1%40.6%
[15]RDEB19 4.96 U/mL 5.62 U/mL6.14 U/mL14.2 U/mL12.7 U/mL
Other EB231.08 U/mL2.67 U/mL2.8 U/mL5.7 U/mL3.7 U/mL
Healthy Controls380.26 U/mL2.12 U/mL1.58 U/mL1.82 U/mL1.68 U/mL
[16]RDEB1788% combined percentage of 88%
EBS1010%combined percentage of 50%
Summary of studies assessing the seropositive (%) or quantity (U/mL) of autoantibodies against skin antigens. Abbreviations: Dsg 1 = desmoglein 1; Dsg 3 = desmoglein 3; EBA = epidermolysis bullosa acquisita; EBS = epidermolysis bullosa simplex; FN = fibronectin; JEB = junctional epidermolysis bullosa; and LAM = laminin; RDEB = recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.
Table
Table 3. Reported cases of confirmed cases of AIBD arising in patients with EB.
Table 3. Reported cases of confirmed cases of AIBD arising in patients with EB.
YearAuthorEB TypeAIBD TypeWorkup
2016HayashiDDEBEBADIF:
Linear deposits of IgG and C3 at the DEJ
IIF:
Linear deposition of IgG at the dermal side of the DEJ
Immunoblot analysis:
Reactive to collagen type VII and its NC1 domain. Non-reactive to laminin 322
Mutations:
c.7868G > A in the COL7A1 gene
2018GuerraRDEBEBADIF:
Linear deposition of IgG with a u-serrated pattern along the cutaneous BMZ
IIF:
IgG binding to the dermal side of the salt-split skin
ELISA:
Positive for anti-collagen type VII, anti-BP180, and anti-BP230
Immunoblot Analysis:
Reactive to laminin 332
Mutations:
c.410G > A and c.3674C > T in the COL7A1 gene
2019FaniaJEBBPDIF:
Linear IgG and C3 deposits in an n-serrated pattern at the DEJ
IIF:
Epidermal staining of the salt-split skin
ELISA:
Positive for anti-BP180. Negative for anti-BP230
Immunoblot analysis:
Reactive to BP180 and its LAD-1 domain. Not reactive to laminin 332
Mutations:
c.1132 + 5G > A in the LAMB3 gene
AIBD = autoimmune blistering disease; DDEB = dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa; RDEB = recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa; JEB = junctional epidermolysis bullosa; EBA = epidermolysis bullosa acquisita; BP = bullous pemphigoid; DIF = direct immunofluorescence; IIF = indirect immunofluorescence; DEJ = dermal epidermal junction; BMZ = basement membrane zone; and EB = epidermolysis bullosa.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patel, P.M.; Jones, V.A.; Behnam, C.T.; Di Zenzo, G.; Amber, K.T. A Review of Acquired Autoimmune Blistering Diseases in Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa: Implications for the Future of Gene Therapy. Antibodies 2021, 10, 19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antib10020019

AMA Style

Patel PM, Jones VA, Behnam CT, Di Zenzo G, Amber KT. A Review of Acquired Autoimmune Blistering Diseases in Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa: Implications for the Future of Gene Therapy. Antibodies. 2021; 10(2):19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antib10020019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patel, Payal M., Virginia A. Jones, Christy T. Behnam, Giovanni Di Zenzo, and Kyle T. Amber. 2021. "A Review of Acquired Autoimmune Blistering Diseases in Inherited Epidermolysis Bullosa: Implications for the Future of Gene Therapy" Antibodies 10, no. 2: 19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antib10020019

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop