Next Article in Journal
Certain Subclasses of Bi-Starlike Function of Complex Order Defined by Erdély–Kober-Type Integral Operator
Next Article in Special Issue
New Inequalities and Generalizations for Symmetric Means Induced by Majorization Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Projective Integration for Hyperbolic Shallow Water Moment Equations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bounds for the Neuman–Sándor Mean in Terms of the Arithmetic and Contra-Harmonic Means

1
Department of Basic Courses, Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou 450064, China
2
School of Mathematics and Informatics, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454010, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 April 2022 / Revised: 13 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2022 / Published: 19 May 2022

Abstract

:
In this paper, the authors provide several sharp upper and lower bounds for the Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of the arithmetic and contra-harmonic means, and present some new sharp inequalities involving hyperbolic sine function and hyperbolic cosine function.

1. Introduction

In the literature, the quantities
A ( s , t ) = s + t 2 , G ( s , t ) = s t , H ( s , t ) = 2 s t s + t , C ¯ ( s , t ) = 2 ( s 2 + s t + t 2 ) 3 ( s + t ) , C ( s , t ) = s 2 + t 2 s + t , S ( s , t ) = s 2 + t 2 2 , M p ( s , t ) = { s p + t p 2 1 / p , p 0 ; s t , p = 0
are called in [1,2,3], for example, the arithmetic mean, geometric mean, harmonic mean, centroidal mean, contra-harmonic mean, root-square mean, and the power mean of order p of two positive numbers s and t, respectively.
For s , t > 0 with s t , the first Seiffert means P ( s , t ) , the second Seiffert means T ( s , t ) , and Neuman–Sándor mean M ( s , t ) are, respectively, defined [4,5,6] by
P ( s , t ) = s t 4 arctan s t π , T ( s , t ) = s t 2 arctan s t s + t , M ( s , t ) = s t 2 arsinh s t s + t ,
where arsinh v = ln v + v 2 + 1 is the inverse hyperbolic sine function.
The first Seiffert mean P ( s , t ) can be rewritten [6] (Equation (2.4]) as
P ( s , t ) = s t 2 arcsin s t s + t .
A chain of inequalities
G ( s , t ) < L 1 ( s , t ) < P ( s , t ) < A ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < T ( s , t ) < Q ( s , t )
were given in [6], where
L p ( s , t ) = { t p + 1 s p + 1 ( p + 1 ) ( t s ) 1 / p , p 1 , 0 ; 1 e t t s s 1 / ( t s ) , p = 0 ; t s ln t ln s , p = 1
is the p-th generalized logarithmic mean of s and t with s t .
In [6,7], three double inequalities
A ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < T ( s , t ) , P ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < T 2 ( s , t ) ,
and
A ( s , t ) T ( s , t ) < M 2 ( s , t ) < A 2 ( s , t ) + T 2 ( s , t ) 2
were established for s , t > 0 with s t .
For 0 < s , t < 1 2 with s t , the inequalities
G ( s , t ) G ( 1 s , 1 t ) < L 1 ( s , t ) L 1 ( 1 s , 1 t ) < P ( s , t ) P ( 1 s , 1 t ) < A ( s , t ) A ( 1 s , 1 t ) < M ( s , t ) M ( 1 s , 1 t ) < T ( s , t ) T ( 1 s , 1 t )
of Ky Fan type were presented in [6] (Proposition 2.2).
In [8], Li and their two coauthors showed that the double inequality
L p 0 ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < L 2 ( s , t )
holds for all s , t > 0 with s t and for p 0 = 1.843 , where p 0 is the unique solution of the equation ( p + 1 ) 1 / p = 2 ln 1 + 2 .
In [9], Neuman proved that the double inequalities
α Q ( s , t ) + ( 1 α ) A ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < β Q ( s , t ) + ( 1 β ) A ( s , t )
and
λ C ( s , t ) + ( 1 λ ) A ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < μ C ( s , t ) + ( 1 μ ) A ( s , t )
hold for all s , t > 0 with s t if and only if
α 1 ln 1 + 2 2 1 ln 1 + 2 = 0.3249 , β 1 3
and
λ 1 ln 1 + 2 ln 1 + 2 = 0.1345 , μ 1 6 .
In [10], (Theorems 1.1 to 1.3), it was found that the double inequalities
α 1 H ( s , t ) + ( 1 α 1 ) Q ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < β 1 H ( s , t ) + ( 1 β 1 ) Q ( s , t ) ,
α 2 G ( s , t ) + ( 1 α 2 ) Q ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < β 2 G ( s , t ) + ( 1 β 2 ) Q ( s , t ) ,
and
α 3 H ( s , t ) + ( 1 α 3 ) C ( s , t ) < M ( s , t ) < β 3 H ( s , t ) + ( 1 β 3 ) C ( s , t )
hold for all s , t > 0 with s t if and only if
α 1 2 9 = 0.2222 , β 1 1 1 2 ln 1 + 2 = 0.1977 , α 2 1 3 = 0.3333 , β 2 1 1 2 ln 1 + 2 = 0.1977 ,
and
α 3 1 1 2 ln 1 + 2 = 0.4327 , β 3 5 12 = 0.4166
In 2017, Chen and their two coauthors [11] established bounds for Neuman–Sándor mean M ( s , t ) in terms of the convex combination of the logarithmic mean and the second Seiffert mean T ( s , t ) . In 2022, Wang and Yin [12] obtained bounds for the reciprocals of the Neuman–Sándor mean M ( s , t ) .
In [13], it was showed that the double inequality
α A ( s , t ) + 1 α C ¯ ( s , t ) < 1 T D ( s , t ) < β A ( s , t ) + 1 β C ¯ ( s , t )
holds for all s , t > 0 with s t if and only if α π 3 and β 1 4 , where T D ( s , t ) is the Toader mean introduced in [14] by
T D ( s , t ) = 2 π 0 π / 2 s 2 cos 2 ϕ + t 2 sin 2 ϕ d ϕ .
In this paper, motivated by the double inequality (1), we will aim to find out the largest values α 1 , α 2 , and α 3 and the smallest values β 1 , β 2 , and β 3 such that the double inequalities
α 1 C ( s , t ) + 1 α 1 A ( s , t ) < 1 M ( s , t ) < β 1 C ( s , t ) + 1 β 1 A ( s , t ) ,
α 2 C 2 ( s , t ) + 1 α 2 A 2 ( s , t ) < 1 M 2 ( s , t ) < β 2 C 2 ( s , t ) + 1 β 2 A 2 ( s , t ) ,
and
α 3 C 2 ( s , t ) + ( 1 α 3 ) A 2 ( s , t ) < M 2 ( s , t ) < β 3 C 2 ( s , t ) + ( 1 β 3 ) A 2 ( s , t )
hold for all positive real numbers s and t with s t .

2. Lemmas

To attain our main purposes, we need the following lemmas.
Lemma 1 
([15] (Theorem 1.25)). For < s < t < , let f , g : [ s , t ] R be continuous on [ s , t ] , differentiable on ( s , t ) , and g ( v ) 0 on ( s , t ) . If f ( v ) g ( v ) is (strictly) increasing (or (strictly) decreasing, respectively) on ( s , t ) , so are the functions
f ( v ) f ( s ) g ( v ) g ( s ) and f ( v ) f ( t ) g ( v ) g ( t ) .
Lemma 2 
([16] (Lemma 1.1)). Suppose that the power series f ( v ) = = 0 u v and g ( v ) = = 0 w v have the convergent radius r > 0 and w > 0 for all N = { 0 , 1 , 2 , } . Let h ( v ) = f ( v ) g ( v ) . Then the following statements are true.
(1)
If the sequence { u w } = 0 is (strictly) increasing (or decreasing, respectively), then h ( v ) is also (strictly) increasing (or decreasing, respectively) on ( 0 , r ) .
(2)
If the sequence { u w } = 0 is (strictly) increasing (or decreasing resepctively) for 0 < 0 and (strictly) decreasing (or increasing resepctively) for > 0 , then there exists x 0 ( 0 , r ) such that h ( v ) is (strictly) increasing (decreasing) on ( 0 , x 0 ) and (strictly) decreasing (or increasing resepctively) on ( x 0 , r ) .
Lemma 3. 
Let
h 1 ( v ) = 2 v sinh v + cosh v 1 3 sinh 2 v .
Then h 1 ( v ) is strictly decreasing on ( 0 , ) with lim v 0 + h 1 ( v ) = 5 6 and lim v h 1 ( v ) = 0 .
Proof. 
Let
f 1 ( v ) = 2 v sinh v + cosh v 1 and f 2 ( v ) = 3 sinh 2 v = 3 2 [ cosh ( 2 v ) 1 ] .
Using the power series
sinh v = = 0 v 2 + 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! and cosh v = = 0 v 2 ( 2 ) ! ,
we can express the functions f 1 ( v ) and f 2 ( v ) as
f 1 ( v ) = = 0 2 ( 2 + 2 ) ! + ( 2 + 1 ) ! ( 2 + 1 ) ! ( 2 + 2 ) ! v 2 + 2 and f 2 ( v ) = 3 2 = 0 2 2 + 2 v 2 + 2 ( 2 + 2 ) ! .
Hence, we have
h 1 ( v ) = = 0 u v 2 + 2 = 0 w v 2 + 2 ,
where u = 2 ( 2 + 2 ) ! + ( 2 + 1 ) ! ( 2 + 1 ) ! ( 2 + 2 ) ! and w = 3 × 2 2 + 1 ( 2 + 2 ) ! .
Let c = u w . Then
c = 2 ( 2 + 2 ) ! + ( 2 + 1 ) ! 3 ( 2 + 1 ) ! 2 2 + 1 and c + 1 c = 4 ( 3 + 4 ) ( 2 + 2 ) ! + 3 ( 2 + 3 ) ! 3 ( 2 + 3 ) ! 2 2 + 3 < 0 .
As a result, by Lemma 2, it follows that the function h 1 ( v ) is strictly decreasing on ( 0 , ) . From (6), it is easy to see that lim v 0 + h 1 ( v ) = u 0 w 0 = 5 6 .
Using the L’Hospital rule leads to lim v h 1 ( v ) = 0 immediately. The proof of Lemma 3 is complete.  □
Lemma 4. 
Let
h 2 ( v ) = sinh 2 v v 2 cosh 4 v cosh 2 v + 1 sinh 4 v .
Then h 2 ( v ) is strictly increasing on v ( 0 , ) and has the limit lim v 0 + h 2 ( v ) = 1 6 and lim v h 2 ( v ) = 1 .
Proof. 
Let
f 3 ( v ) = sinh 2 v v 2 cosh 4 v and f 4 ( v ) = cosh 2 v + 1 sinh 4 v .
Since
f 3 ( v ) = 2 sinh v + 3 sinh 3 v v cosh v 2 v 2 sinh v cosh 3 v
and
f 4 ( v ) = 2 3 cosh 2 v + 1 sinh 3 v cosh v ,
we obtain
f 3 ( v ) f 4 ( v ) = sinh v + 3 sinh 3 v v cosh v 2 v 2 sinh v cosh 2 v 3 cosh 2 v + 1 sinh 3 v = cosh 2 v 3 cosh 2 v + 1 sinh v + 3 sinh 3 v v cosh v 2 v 2 sinh v sinh 3 v = 1 3 + 1 cosh 2 v 3 + sinh v v cosh v 2 v 2 sinh v sinh 3 v = 1 3 + 1 cosh 2 v [ 3 + g ( v ) ] ,
where
g ( v ) = sinh v v cosh v 2 v 2 sinh v sinh 3 v .
By using the identity that sinh ( 3 v ) = 3 sinh v + 4 sinh 3 v , we arrive at
g ( v ) = 4 sinh v v cosh v 2 v 2 sinh v sinh ( 3 v ) 3 sinh v 4 g 1 ( v ) g 2 ( v ) ,
where g 1 ( v ) = sinh v v cosh v 2 v 2 sinh v and g 2 ( v ) = sinh ( 3 v ) 3 sinh v .
Straightforward computation gives
g 1 ( v ) = 5 v sinh v + 2 v 2 cosh v , g 2 ( v ) = 3 [ cosh ( 3 v ) cosh v ] , g 1 ( v ) = 5 sinh v + 9 v cosh v + 2 v 2 sinh v , g 2 ( v ) = 3 [ 3 sinh ( 3 v ) sinh v ] ,
and
g 1 0 + = g 2 0 + = g 1 0 + = g 2 0 + = g 1 0 + = g 2 0 + = 0 .
Consequently, we obtain
g 1 ( v ) g 2 ( v ) = 5 sinh v + 9 v cosh v + 2 v 2 sinh v 3 [ 3 sinh ( 3 v ) sinh v ] 1 3 g 3 ( v ) g 4 ( v )
Using the power series of sinh v and cosh v , we deduce
g 3 ( v ) = 5 = 0 v 2 + 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! + 9 = 0 v 2 + 1 ( 2 ) ! + 2 = 0 v 2 + 3 ( 2 + 1 ) ! = 14 v + = 1 5 ( 2 + 1 ) ! + 9 ( 2 ) ! + 2 ( 2 1 ) ! v 2 + 1 = 14 v + = 1 ( 4 + 7 ) ( 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 1 ) ! ( 2 ) ! ( 2 + 1 ) ! v 2 + 1
and
g 4 ( v ) = 3 = 0 ( 3 v ) 2 + 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! = 0 v 2 + 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! = = 0 3 2 + 2 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! v 2 + 1 .
Therefore, we find
g 3 ( v ) g 4 ( v ) = = 0 u v 2 + 1 = 0 w v 2 + 1 ,
where
u = { 14 , = 0 ; ( 4 + 7 ) ( 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 1 ) ! ( 2 ) ! ( 2 + 1 ) ! , 1 and w = { 8 > 0 , = 0 ; 3 2 + 2 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! , 1 .
Let c = u w . Then
c = { 7 4 , = 0 ; ( 4 + 7 ) ( 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 1 ) ! 3 2 + 2 1 ( 2 ) ! , 1 .
When = 0 , we have c 1 c 0 = 51 40 < 0 . When 1 , it follows that
c + 1 c = ( 4 + 11 ) ( 2 + 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 3 ) ! 3 2 + 4 1 ( 2 + 2 ) ! ( 4 + 7 ) ( 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 1 ) ! 3 2 + 2 1 ( 2 ) ! = 1 3 2 + 2 1 3 2 + 4 1 ( 2 + 2 ) ! { [ ( 4 + 11 ) ( 2 + 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 3 ) ! ] 3 2 + 2 1 [ ( 4 + 7 ) ( 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 1 ) ! ] ( 2 + 2 ) 3 2 + 4 1 } = 1 3 2 + 2 1 3 2 + 4 1 ( 2 + 2 ) ! { [ ( 4 + 11 ) ( 2 + 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 3 ) ! ] 3 2 + 2 [ ( 4 + 7 ) ( 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 1 ) ! ] ( 2 + 2 ) 3 2 + 4 + ( 2 + 2 ) [ ( 4 + 7 ) ( 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 1 ) ! ] [ ( 4 + 11 ) ( 2 + 2 ) ! + 9 ( 2 + 3 ) ! ] } = 1 3 2 + 2 1 3 2 + 4 1 ( 2 + 2 ) ! { [ ( 8 + 13 ) ( 2 + 2 ) ! + 9 ( 16 + 15 ) ( 2 + 1 ) ! ] 3 2 + 2 + 9 ( 2 + 1 ) ! + 4 ( 2 + 2 ) ! } < 0 .
By Lemma 2, it follows that the function g 3 ( v ) g 4 ( v ) is strictly decreasing on ( 0 , ) , so the function g 1 ( v ) g 2 ( v ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , ) . Applying Lemma 1, it follows that the function g ( v ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , ) . By the L’Hospital rule, we have
lim v 0 + g ( v ) = 7 3 and lim v g ( v ) = 0 .
It is common knowledge that the function cosh v is strictly increasing on ( 0 , ) . Hence, the function 1 3 + 1 cosh 2 v is strictly increasing on ( 0 , ) . Therefore, the function h 2 ( v ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , ) with the limits
lim v 0 h 2 ( v ) = 1 6 and lim v h 2 ( v ) = 1 .
The proof of Lemma 3 is complete.  □
Lemma 5. 
Let
h 3 ( v ) = 2 v cosh 2 v sinh v .
Then h 3 ( v ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , ) and has the limit lim v 0 + h 3 ( v ) = 2 .
Proof. 
Let k 1 ( v ) = 2 v cosh 2 v = v cosh ( 2 v ) + v and k 2 ( v ) = sinh v . By Equation (5), we have
k 1 ( v ) = 2 v + = 1 2 2 ( 2 ) ! v 2 + 1 and k 2 ( v ) = = 0 v 2 + 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! .
Hence,
h 3 ( v ) = 2 v + = 1 u v 2 + 1 = 0 w v 2 + 1 ,
where
u = { 2 , = 0 ; 2 2 ( 2 ) ! , 1 and w = 1 2 + 1 ! .
Let c = u w . Then
c = { 2 , = 0 ; ( 2 + 1 ) ! 2 2 ( 2 ) ! , 1 and c + 1 c = { 10 , = 0 ; ( 3 + 5 ) ( 2 + 1 ) ! 2 2 + 1 ( 2 + 2 ) ! > 0 , 1 .
Thus, by Lemma 2, it follows that the function h 3 ( v ) is strictly increasing on ( 0 , ) . From (7), it is easy to see that lim v 0 + h 3 ( v ) = u 0 w 0 = 2 . The proof of Lemma 5 is complete.  □

3. Bounds for Neuman–Sándor Mean

Now we are in a position to state and prove our main results.
Theorem 1. 
For s , t > 0 with s t , the double inequality (2) holds if and only if
α 1 2 1 ln 1 + 2 = 0.237253 and β 1 1 6 .
Proof. 
Without loss of generality, we assume that s > t > 0 . Let q = s t s + t . Then q ( 0 , 1 ) and
1 M ( s , t ) 1 A ( s , t ) 1 C ( s , t ) 1 A ( s , t ) = arsinh q q 1 1 1 + q 2 1 .
Let q = sinh ϕ . Then ϕ 0 , ln 1 + 2 and
1 M ( s , t ) 1 A ( s , t ) 1 C ( s , t ) 1 A ( s , t ) = ϕ sinh ϕ 1 1 cosh 2 ϕ 1 = ( sinh ϕ ϕ ) cosh 2 ϕ sinh 3 ϕ F ( ϕ ) = k 1 ( ϕ ) k 2 ( ϕ ) .
Let
k 1 ( ϕ ) = ( sinh ϕ ϕ ) cosh 2 ϕ and k 2 ( ϕ ) = sinh 3 ϕ .
Then elaborated computations lead to k 1 0 + = k 2 0 + = 0 and
k 1 ( ϕ ) k 2 ( ϕ ) = 2 ( sinh ϕ ϕ ) sinh ϕ + ( cosh ϕ 1 ) cosh ϕ 3 sinh 2 ϕ = 1 2 ϕ sinh ϕ + cosh ϕ 1 3 sinh 2 ϕ .
Combining this with Lemmas 1 and 3 reveals that the function F ( ϕ ) is strictly increasing on 0 , ln 1 + 2 . Moreover, it is easy to compute the limits
lim ϕ 0 + F ( ϕ ) = 1 6 and lim ϕ ln ( 1 + 2 ) F ( ϕ ) = 2 2 ln 1 + 2 .
The proof of Theorem 1 is thus complete.  □
Corollary 1. 
For all ϕ 0 , ln 1 + 2 , the double inequality
1 β 1 1 1 cosh 2 ϕ < ϕ sinh ϕ < 1 α 1 1 1 cosh 2 ϕ
holds if and only if
α 1 1 6 and β 1 2 1 ln 1 + 2 = 0.237253 .
Theorem 2. 
For s , t > 0 with s t , the double inequality (3) holds if and only if
α 2 4 3 [ 1 ln 2 1 + 2 ] = 0.297574 and β 2 1 6 .
Proof. 
Without loss of generality, we assume that s > t > 0 . Let q = s t s + t . Then q ( 0 , 1 ) and
1 M 2 ( s , t ) 1 A 2 ( s , t ) 1 C 2 ( s , t ) 1 A 2 ( s , t ) = arsinh 2 q q 2 1 1 ( 1 + q 2 ) 2 1 .
Let q = sinh ϕ . Then ϕ 0 , ln 1 + 2 and
1 M 2 ( s , t ) 1 A 2 ( s , t ) 1 C 2 ( s , t ) 1 A 2 ( s , t ) = ϕ 2 sinh 2 ϕ 1 1 cosh 4 ϕ 1 = ( sinh 2 ϕ ϕ 2 ) cosh 4 ϕ ( cosh 2 ϕ + 1 ) sinh 4 ϕ H ( ϕ ) .
By Lemma 4, it is easy to show that H ( ϕ ) is strictly increasing on 0 , ln 1 + 2 . Moreover, the limits
lim ϕ 0 + H ( ϕ ) = 1 6 and lim ϕ ln ( 1 + 2 ) H ( ϕ ) = 4 3 1 ln 2 1 + 2
can be computed readily. The double inequality (3) is thus proved.  □
Corollary 2. 
For all ϕ 0 , ln 1 + 2 , the double inequality
1 β 2 1 1 cosh 4 ϕ < ϕ sinh ϕ 2 < 1 α 2 1 1 cosh 4 ϕ
holds if and only if
α 2 1 6 and β 2 4 3 1 ln 2 1 + 2 = 0.297574 .
Theorem 3. 
For s , t > 0 with s t , the double inequality (4) holds if and only if
α 3 1 ln 2 1 + 2 3 ln 2 1 + 2 = 0.095767 and β 3 1 6 .
Proof. 
Without loss of generality, we assume that s > t > 0 . Let q = s t s + t . Then q ( 0 , 1 ) and
M 2 ( s , t ) A 2 ( s , t ) C 2 ( s , t ) A 2 ( s , t ) = q 2 arsinh 2 q 1 ( 1 + q 2 ) 2 1 .
Let q = sinh ϕ . Then ϕ 0 , ln 1 + 2 and
M 2 ( s , t ) A 2 ( s , t ) C 2 ( s , t ) A 2 ( s , t ) = sinh 2 ϕ ϕ 2 1 cosh 4 ϕ 1 G ( ϕ ) = k 1 ( ϕ ) k 2 ( ϕ ) ,
where
k 1 ( ϕ ) = sinh 2 ϕ ϕ 2 1 and k 2 ( ϕ ) = cosh 4 ϕ 1 .
Then k 1 0 + = k 2 0 + = 0 and
k 1 ( ϕ ) k 2 ( ϕ ) = ϕ cosh ϕ sinh ϕ 2 ϕ 3 cosh 3 ϕ .
Denote
k 3 ( ϕ ) = ϕ cosh ϕ sinh ϕ and k 4 ( ϕ ) = 2 ϕ 3 cosh 3 ϕ ,
it is easy to obtain k 3 0 + = k 4 0 + = 0 and
k 4 ( ϕ ) k 3 ( ϕ ) = 6 ϕ cosh 2 ϕ sinh ϕ + 6 ϕ 2 cosh 2 ϕ .
Since the function v 2 cosh 2 v is strictly increasing on ( 0 , ) , by Lemma 5, we see that the ratio in (10) is strictly increasing and k 3 ( ϕ ) k 4 ( ϕ ) is strictly decreasing on 0 , ln 1 + 2 . Consequently, from Lemma 1, it follows that G ( ϕ ) is strictly decreasing on 0 , ln 1 + 2 .
The limits
lim ϕ 0 + G ( ϕ ) = 1 6 and lim ϕ ln ( 1 + 2 ) G ( ϕ ) = 1 ln 2 1 + 2 3 ln 2 1 + 2
can be computed easily. The proof of Theorem 3 is thus complete.  □
Corollary 3. 
For all ϕ 0 , ln 1 + 2 , the double inequality
1 + α 3 cosh 4 ϕ 1 < sinh ϕ ϕ 2 < 1 + β 3 cosh 4 ϕ 1
holds if and only if
α 3 1 ln 2 1 + 2 3 ln 2 1 + 2 = 0.095767 and β 3 1 6 .

4. A Double Inequality

From Lemma 5, we can deduce
sinh v v < cosh 2 v and sinh v v > tanh 2 x v 2
for v ( 0 , ) . The inequality
sinh v v 3 > cosh v
for v ( 0 , ) can be found and has been applied in [17] (p. 65), [18] (p. 300), [19] (pp. 279, 3.6.9), and [20] (p. 260). In [21], (Lemma 3), Zhu recovered the fact stated in [19] (pp. 279, 3.6.9) that the exponent 3 in the inequality (13) is the least possible, that is, the inequality
sinh v v p > cosh v
for x > 0 holds if and only if p 3 .
Inspired by (12) and (14), we find out the following double inequality.
Theorem 4. 
The inequality
cosh α v < sinh v v < cosh β v
for v 0 holds if and only if α 1 3 and β 1 .
Proof. 
Let
h ( v ) = ln sinh v ln v ln cosh v f 1 ( v ) f 2 ( v ) .
Direct calculation yields
f 1 ( v ) f 2 ( v ) = v cosh 2 v sinh v cosh v v sinh 2 v = v cosh ( 2 v ) + v sinh ( 2 v ) v cosh ( 2 v ) v f 3 ( v ) f 4 ( v ) .
Using the power series of sinh v and cosh v , we obtain
f 3 ( v ) = v + v = 0 ( 2 v ) 2 ( 2 ) ! = 0 ( 2 v ) 2 + 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! = = 1 2 2 ( 2 ) ! 2 2 + 1 ( 2 + 1 ) ! v 2 + 1 = = 0 ( 2 + 1 ) 2 2 + 2 ( 2 + 3 ) ! v 2 + 3 = 0 u v 2 + 3
and
f 4 ( v ) = v = 0 ( 2 v ) 2 ( 2 ) ! v = = 1 2 2 ( 2 ) ! v 2 + 1 = = 0 2 2 + 2 ( 2 + 2 ) ! v 2 + 3 = 0 w v 2 + 3 ,
where
u = ( 2 + 1 ) 2 2 + 2 ( 2 + 3 ) ! and w = 2 2 + 2 ( 2 + 2 ) ! .
When setting c = u w , we obtain
c = 2 + 1 2 + 3 = 1 2 2 + 3
is increasing on N . Therefore, by Lemma 2, the ratio f 3 ( v ) f 4 ( v ) is increasing on ( 0 , ) . Using Lemma 1, we obtain that
h ( v ) = f 1 ( v ) f 2 ( v ) = f 1 ( v ) f 1 0 + f 2 ( v ) f 2 0 +
is increasing on ( 0 , ) .
Moreover, the limits lim v 0 + h 1 = 1 3 and lim v h 1 = 1 are obvious. The proof of Lemma 4 is thus complete.  □

5. A Remark

For v , r R , we have
sinh v v r = 1 + m = 1 k = 1 2 m ( r ) k k ! j = 1 k ( 1 ) j k j T ( 2 m + j , j ) 2 m + j j ( 2 v ) 2 m ( 2 m ) ! ,
where the rising factorial ( r ) k is defined by
( r ) k = = 0 k 1 ( r + ) = r ( r + 1 ) ( r + k 1 ) , k 1 1 , k = 0
and T ( 2 m + j , j ) is called central factorial numbers of the second kind and can be computed by
T ( n , ) = 1 ! j = 0 ( 1 ) j j 2 j n .
for n 0 .
The series expansion (16) was recently derived in [22] (Corollary 4.1).
Can one find bounds of the function sinh v v r for v , r R \ { 0 } ?

6. Conclusions

In this paper, we found out the largest values α 1 , α 2 , α 3 and the smallest values β 1 , β 2 , β 3 such that the double inequalities (2), (3), and (4) hold for all positive real number s , t > 0 with s t . Moreover, we presented some new sharp inequalities (8), (9), (11), and (15) involving the hyperbolic sine function sinh ϕ and the hyperbolic cosine function cosh ϕ .

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, W.-H.L., P.M. and B.-N.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank anonymous referees for their careful corrections to and valuable comments on the original version of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, W.-D.; Qi, F. Sharp bounds for Neuman–Sándor’s mean in terms of the root-mean-square. Period. Math. Hung. 2014, 69, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Jiang, W.-D.; Qi, F. Sharp bounds in terms of the power of the contra-harmonic mean for Neuman–Sándor mean. Cogent Math. 2015, 2, 995951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Qi, F.; Li, W.-H. A unified proof of inequalities and some new inequalities involving Neuman–Sándor mean. Miskolc Math. Notes 2014, 15, 665–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Seiffert, H.-J. Problem 887. Nieuw Arch. Wiskd. 1993, 11, 176. [Google Scholar]
  5. Seiffert, H.-J. Aufgabe β 16. Wurzel 1995, 29, 221–222. [Google Scholar]
  6. Neuman, E.; Sándor, J. On the Schwab–Borchardt mean. Math. Pannon. 2003, 14, 253–266. [Google Scholar]
  7. Neuman, E.; Sándor, J. On the Schwab–Borchardt mean II. Math. Pannon. 2006, 17, 49–59. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, Y.-M.; Long, B.-Y.; Chu, Y.-M. Sharp bounds for the Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of generalized logarithmic mean. J. Math. Inequal. 2012, 6, 567–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Neuman, E. A note on a certain bivariate mean. J. Math. Inequal. 2012, 6, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhao, T.-H.; Chu, Y.-M.; Liu, B.-Y. Optimal bounds for Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of the convex combinations of harmonic, geometric, quadratic, and contraharmonic means. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, 2012, 302635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, J.-J.; Lei, J.-J.; Long, B.-Y. Optimal bounds for Neuman–Sándor mean in terms of the convex combination of the logarithmic and the second Seiffert means. J. Inequal. Appl. 2017, 2017, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Wang, X.-L.; Yin, L. Sharp bounds for the reciprocals of the Neuman–Sándor mean. J. Interdiscip. Math. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hua, Y.; Qi, F. The best bounds for Toader mean in terms of the centroidal and arithmetic means. Filomat 2014, 28, 775–59780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Toader, G. Some mean values related to the arithmetic-geometric mean. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 1998, 218, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Anderson, G.D.; Vamanamurthy, M.K.; Vuorinen, M. Conformal Invariants, Inequalities, and Quasiconformal Maps; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  16. Simić, S.; Vuorinen, M. Landen inequalities for zero-balanced hypergeometric functions. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, 2012, 932061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, B.-N.; Qi, F. The function (bx-ax)/x: Logarithmic convexity and applications to extended mean values. Filomat 2011, 25, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kuang, J.C. Applied Inequalities, 3rd ed.; Shangdong Science and Technology Press: Jinan, China, 2004; pp. 300–301. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mitrinović, D.S. Analytic Inequalities; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1970. [Google Scholar]
  20. Qi, F. On bounds for norms of sine and cosine along a circle on the complex plane. Kragujevac J. Math. 2024, 48, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, L. On Wilker-type inequalities. Math. Inequal. Appl. 2007, 10, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Qi, F.; Taylor, P. Several series expansions for real powers and several formulas for partial Bell polynomials of sinc and sinhc functions in terms of central factorial and Stirling numbers of second kind. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2204.05612v4. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, W.-H.; Miao, P.; Guo, B.-N. Bounds for the Neuman–Sándor Mean in Terms of the Arithmetic and Contra-Harmonic Means. Axioms 2022, 11, 236. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/axioms11050236

AMA Style

Li W-H, Miao P, Guo B-N. Bounds for the Neuman–Sándor Mean in Terms of the Arithmetic and Contra-Harmonic Means. Axioms. 2022; 11(5):236. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/axioms11050236

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Wen-Hui, Peng Miao, and Bai-Ni Guo. 2022. "Bounds for the Neuman–Sándor Mean in Terms of the Arithmetic and Contra-Harmonic Means" Axioms 11, no. 5: 236. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/axioms11050236

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop