Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of Eleven Plant Species as Potential Banker Plants to Support Predatory Orius sauteri in Tea Plant Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
High Survivorship of First-Generation Monarch Butterfly Eggs to Third Instar Associated with a Diverse Arthropod Community
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Impact of Post-Emergence Weed Control in Honeybee Colonies Located in Different Agricultural Surroundings
Previous Article in Special Issue
Miocene Diversification and High-Altitude Adaptation of Parnassius Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Qinghai–Tibet Plateau Revealed by Large-Scale Transcriptomic Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Further Insights on the Migration Biology of Monarch Butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from the Pacific Northwest

Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Department of Entomology, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 30 December 2020 / Revised: 5 February 2021 / Accepted: 10 February 2021 / Published: 14 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Butterfly Diversity and Conservation)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus, are known the world over for their iconic long-distance migration from the eastern United States and Canada to Mexico for overwintering. In this study, we shed more light on the less well-known migration of monarchs in the Pacific Northwest of North America. Utilizing the efforts of citizen scientists who captive-reared monarchs and tagged them, we confirmed that the majority of monarchs in Washington and Oregon migrate hundreds of kilometers south during late July–October to overwinter at sites on the California coast. However, some eastern Washington and most Idaho monarchs tended to migrate towards the southeast and may have an alternative winter destination, possibly Mexico. Overwintering monarchs in coastal California remain at sites for 2–3 months and can live for up to ten months. A small number of fall migrants may eschew overwintering and join winter-breeding populations in inland central and southern California. Wildfire smoke and infection with a protozoan parasite does not appear to greatly interfere with the survival and migration success of migrating monarch. Our data improve our understanding of western monarch migration, serving as a basis for further studies and providing information for conservation planning.

Abstract

The fall migration of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.), in the Pacific Northwest was studied during 2017–2019 by tagging 14,040 captive-reared and 450 wild monarchs. One hundred and twenty-two captive-reared monarchs (0.87%) were recovered at distances averaging 899.9 ± 98.6 km for Washington-released and 630.5 ± 19.9 km for Oregon-released monarchs. The greatest straight-line release to recovery distance was 1392.1 km. A mean travel rate of 20.7 ± 2.2 km/day and maximum travel of 46.1 km/day were recorded. Recovery rates were greater for Oregon-released monarchs (0.92%) than Washington-released (0.34%) or Idaho-released monarchs (0.30%). Most monarchs (106/122) were recovered SSW-S-SSE in California, with 82 at 18 coastal overwintering sites. Two migrants from Oregon were recovered just weeks after release ovipositing in Santa Barbara and Palo Alto, CA. Two migrants released in central Washington recovered up to 360.0 km to the SE, and recoveries from Idaho releases to the S and SE suggests that some Pacific Northwest migrants fly to an alternative overwintering destination. Monarchs released in southern Oregon into smoky, poor quality air appeared to be as successful at reaching overwintering sites and apparently lived just as long as monarchs released into non-smoky, good quality air. Migration and lifespan for monarchs infected with the protozoan parasite, Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (McLaughlin and Myers), appeared to be similar to the migration and survival of uninfected monarchs, although data are limited. Our data improve our understanding of western monarch migration, serving as a basis for further studies and providing information for conservation planning.

1. Introduction

The monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (L.), is an iconic species in North America and throughout the world, capturing widespread societal interest from children to activists to politicians [1]. In recent times, it has become a flagship species for pollinator conservation in North America, with many groups suffering a substantial worldwide decline in abundance and diversity [2]. Since the mid-1990s, monarch populations in the eastern and western US have suffered declines of ~80–95% [3,4]. The population west of the Rockies is at least three orders of magnitude smaller than the eastern population, and the recent decline has resulted in the smallest populations ever recorded at overwintering sites in coastal California [5]. Until recently, unlike the eastern population, relatively little was known about many aspects of the biology and ecology of western monarchs [6]. However, research during the past five years has provided information on habitats, host plants, breeding [7,8,9,10], and migration [11,12,13,14]. Research has also helped document the continuing decline of western monarch populations [4,5,15].
Pyle [6] suggested that “our understanding of monarch migration in the western population was based more on assumptions, limited observations and intuition rather than on good scientific evidence.” However, recent tagging studies in the southwest [11,14] and Pacific Northwest (PNW) [12,13] have provided important data on the fall migration of monarchs west of the Rocky Mountains. James et al. [13] showed that most recovered monarchs, captive-reared and tagged in Washington and Oregon during late summer and fall 2012–2016, migrated SSE to SSW to coastal California to join overwintering colonies at sites from Bolinas in the north to Carpinteria in the south. In addition, some tagging evidence was also obtained for the S to SE movement of migrating monarchs from eastern Washington and Idaho, which corroborated Pyle’s observations of monarchs migrating to the S and SE in different parts of the PNW [6]. One monarch released in Walla Walla, Washington, was recovered 724 km to the SE in Utah. No Idaho-released monarchs were recovered in California, but two were found ~100 km south of release locations, suggesting they were not heading to California [13].
This study provides additional data on the destinations, rate of travel, survival and lifespan for migrating monarchs from the PNW emanating from citizen scientist captive-rearing and tagging of monarchs during 2017–2019. Captive-rearing of monarchs has received some criticism in recent years with suggestions that it may reduce migration success [16], although our earlier study [13] indicated captive-reared monarchs were successful in reaching overwintering sites and living long lives. In this study, we increase our database of captive-reared, tagged and recovered monarchs from 60 to 182 and asked whether the pattern of migration we saw in our earlier study [13] of predominant south-southwestward movement to California and limited south-eastward movement from Washington and Idaho, was maintained. We also wanted to confirm or refute the low recovery rates of monarchs tagged in Idaho. James [12] reported on a tagged migrant from Oregon found in Santa Barbara, CA ovipositing. In this study, we asked whether we could detect further instances of migrants from the PNW becoming reproductive in CA. We also obtained additional data on longevity, residency and inter-colony movement at coastal overwintering sites in California. Opportunities arose during the study that allowed us to collect limited data on the impacts of wildfire smoke and infection by a protozoan parasite on the success of migration and adult lifespan. The data here, together with earlier information [13], combine to create an improved database from which to base a better understanding of monarch migration from the Pacific Northwest.

2. Materials and Methods

Captive monarch rearing was conducted annually during 2017–2019 by WSU personnel and citizen scientists at multiple locations in Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and far northern California (Table 1). In all cases, a single monarch brood, usually from locally derived gravid females, was reared each year by collaborators during July–October.

2.1. Washington

Selected inmates at the Washington State Penitentiary (WSP), Walla Walla, reared and tagged monarchs each year. Eggs and first instar larvae produced by captive D. plexippus females obtained from breeding habitats in central Washington were provided by DGJ to WSP inmates in late August–early September, who then reared the larvae to adulthood indoors in large cages made from plastic and muslin on cut and/or potted showy milkweed (Asclepias speciosa Torr.) at temperatures of 20–30 °C under naturally declining daylengths (windows) [17]. Adults were tagged by inmates and released on the grounds of the Penitentiary or taken to nearby locations for release by Penitentiary staff. Monarch rearing was used by WSP as a program to enhance the mental health of inmates [17]. Captive-rearing and tagging were also conducted each year (August–September) by personnel and citizen scientists at Prosser (WSU staff), Yakima (Cowiche Canyon Conservancy docents and volunteers), and in Spokane and Seattle (members of the Washington Butterfly Association). All captive-reared monarchs were derived from eggs laid by wild females obtained from breeding habitats in central WA, supplied by DGJ. Participants in Yakima (n = 12–20), Spokane (n = 8) and Seattle (n = 3–12) were given tutorials in monarch health, rearing and tagging at the beginning of the project and maintained contact during rearing with WSU via customized monarch rearing Facebook pages. All monarchs reared in Washington were fed on potted or cut A. speciosa (Yakima/Spokane) or swamp milkweed (Asclepias incarnata L.) (Seattle), exposed to temperatures of 20–30 °C indoors and naturally declining daylengths via windows. Collapsible muslin cages (at least 30 × 30 × 30 cm3) were used for rearing. Thirty wild monarchs at a summer breeding site in central Washington were tagged during August–September 2017, but no wild monarchs were tagged in Washington during 2018–2019.

2.2. Idaho

Monarchs were captive-reared and tagged each year (20–30 °C), during August–September indoors on potted or cut A. speciosa in muslin cages under naturally declining daylengths (windows) in northern Idaho (Bayview, Potlatch) by Bill Harryman and/or Bill Ament (Idaho Dept Fish and Game) and in southern Idaho (Boise) by Dave Hopper (US Fish and Wildlife Service). Monarchs reared in northern Idaho originated from livestock obtained from a mid-California butterfly farm, but those in southern Idaho originated from locally obtained wild females. Nearly 300 wild monarchs were tagged during August–September in breeding areas in southern Idaho in 2017, but less than 30 were tagged during this time period in each of 2018 and 2019.

2.3. Oregon

A large number (21–39) of individual citizen scientists in Oregon participated in this program annually, each rearing a varying number (3–600) of monarch butterflies in protected home gardens (~10% of rearers) or indoors during August–October. All captive-reared monarchs were locally sourced from eggs or larvae found within Oregon, often in the back yard or property of the citizen, and were mostly reared in muslin cages on narrow-leaved milkweed (A. fascicularis Dcne.) and/or showy milkweed (A. speciosa) at 20–30 °C under naturally declining daylengths provided by windows. Those reared outdoors occasionally experienced temperatures >30 °C and <20 °C for short periods. In 2019, a year of very low natural abundance of monarchs in the PNW, 88.9% of monarchs reared and tagged in Oregon originated from eggs laid by a few wild females in Brookings, OR, and transferred to other locations. Limited numbers of wild monarchs (1–59/year) were also tagged in Oregon.

2.4. Far Northern California

Three citizen scientists in far northern California (located at Tulelake, Smith River, Montague) reared and tagged 8–103 monarchs indoors in muslin cages on A. speciosa or A. fascicularis during August–October each year at 20–30 °C under naturally declining daylengths (windows), sourced from local wild eggs and early instar larvae.

2.5. Tagging

All monarchs were tagged with a single tag placed on the discal (or “mitten-shaped”) cell on the ventral surface of a hindwing. Tags were obtained from MonarchWatch.org and customized with a serial number and a Washington State University email address ([email protected]) for contact. For all tagged monarchs, the date of tagging/release, name of tagger, tag number, location of release and the sex of the butterfly were recorded.

2.6. Tag Recoveries

Tagged monarchs were primarily recovered by citizens sighting or photographing butterflies. Most recoveries were made at overwintering sites on the California coast, but a number were made at locations en route to the overwintering sites and occasionally post-overwintering. In Santa Cruz, CA, home to a number of overwintering sites, John Dayton, a monarch biologist, visited three major sites (Natural Bridges State Beach, Lighthouse Field State Beach, Moran Lake Park) weekly during October–March searching for tagged monarchs in each year of the study. In addition, a weeklong visit to overwintering sites from Pismo Beach in the south to Bolinas in the north was made in late November 2017 (by both authors) and 2019 by the senior author to search for tagged monarchs. Virtually all recoveries of tagged monarchs were supported by photographic evidence. Recoveries of monarchs sighted within a few days, and 10 km of the release point were not considered evidence of migration and are not reported.

2.7. Impact of Wildfire Smoke and Air Quality on Tagged Monarch Recovery

The impact of wildfire smoke on monarch survival and migration in 2017 and 2018 was opportunistically assessed in selected releases of monarchs from southern Oregon. During August–October 2017, 307 tagged monarchs were released in Brookings, OR, and the air quality index (AQI) was recorded for each release date (https://www.airnow.gov/aqi/aqi-basics/, accessed on 13 February 2021). AQI levels of <100 indicate acceptable air quality, while levels of 100–200 indicate unhealthy air for most people. AQI levels >200 precipitate a health alert, and levels >300 indicate an emergency or hazardous health conditions (https://www.airnow.gov/aqi/aqi-basics/, accessed on 13 February 2021). Of the 307 Brookings-released monarchs, 231 were released into non-smoky “healthy air” (AQI <100) and 76 were released into smoky “unhealthy air” (AQI >100). During August–October 2018, 450 tagged monarchs were released in the Ashland/Medford area of southern OR with the AQI recorded for each release date (http://www.ashland.or.us/SectionIndex.asp?SectionID=534, accessed on 13 February 2021). Of these, 245 monarchs were released into non-smoky “healthy air”, and 205 were released into smoky “unhealthy air”. The incidence of tagged monarchs from these releases recovered in California, along with data on lifespan and distance traveled, was recorded. Where appropriate, a Student’s t-test was used to analyze these data.

2.8. Impact of a Protozoan Parasite on Tagged Monarch Recovery

Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE) is a protozoan parasite that naturally infects monarchs [18]. Heavy OE infections are considered detrimental to eastern US monarchs by reducing or impairing longevity, eclosion, mating success, fecundity and flight ability [19,20,21]. In 2017, monarchs in our WSU laboratory developed an increasing incidence of OE during rearing in August–September (this did not occur in other years). Tagged monarchs were assessed for OE prior to release using the tape count method in which sticky tape is placed against the abdomen and then placed on white paper for examination under a stereomicroscope [22]. Infected monarchs had individual loads of 100–1000 spores, but all were apparently fit with no wing deformation or other physical problems and were able to fly strongly when released. The recovery of OE and non-OE infected tagged monarchs in coastal California overwintering colonies was recorded, along with data on longevity and distance traveled.

3. Results

Fourteen thousand and forty monarchs were reared and tagged in the PNW during 2017–2019. In addition, 450 wild monarchs were tagged, giving a grand total of 14,490 monarchs tagged over three years (Table 1). One hundred and twenty-two tagged monarchs were recovered, representing 0.87% of the captive-reared butterflies tagged (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4, Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). No wild monarchs were recovered. Migration occurred in monarchs released on 30 July and 1 August, while the latest migratory flight occurred in a monarch released from Brookings, OR on October 14. The mean recovery rate over three years was 0.80% (range: 0.49–1.2%), with the greatest recovery rate in 2017 (1.2%). The mean annual recovery rate of Washington-released monarchs was 0.34% (range 0.18–0.57%), lower than for Oregon-released monarchs, 0.92% (range 0.71–1.24%). The mean recovery rate of Idaho-released monarchs was lowest at 0.30% (range 0.00–0.79%), and apart from one, all were found in Idaho. Most recovered monarchs (106/122, 86.9%) were found in California, SSW-S-SSE of release points, and most of these (82, 65.6%) were at coastal overwintering sites from Bolinas in the north to Carpinteria in the south (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4, Figure 1).
Two recoveries were made of tagged females that had migrated 877.0 and 537.5 km from Oregon and were seen ovipositing on tropical milkweed (Asclepias curassavica L.) in suburban backyards in Santa Barbara (# B6679, Table 2, [12]) and Palo Alto, CA (# G1120, Table 4, Figure 5). Two individuals released in Yakima, WA were recovered 173.8 and 360.0 km to the SE in Pendleton, OR and Glenns Ferry, ID, respectively (Figure 2). Four of the eight recoveries of monarchs released in Idaho were recovered at locations 16.1–96.6 km S-SE of release points (Figure 4). Only one individual (0.04%) released in Idaho (from 2458 tagged) was recovered in California (Santa Barbara, 1065.4 km SSW, Figure 1). Of the 122 recovered monarchs, 89 (73.0%) originated in Oregon (45.7% of PNW-tagged butterflies), 22 (18.0%) originated in Washington (35.8% of PNW-tagged butterflies), 8 (6.6%) originated in Idaho (17% of PNW-tagged butterflies) and 3 (2.4%) originated in far northern California (1.5% of PNW-tagged butterflies) (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4).

3.1. Recoveries of Tagged Monarchs at Overwintering Sites

Eighty-two Washington and Oregon-released monarchs were found at 18 coastal California overwintering sites during October–March (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). Fifty-three (64.6%) of these were found at the three major overwintering sites (Natural Bridges State Beach, Lighthouse Field State Beach, Moran Lake Park) in Santa Cruz. The second most popular location for recoveries was Bolinas (11 at two overwintering sites), and six were found at the Pismo State Beach overwintering site. Single individuals were found at twelve other overwintering sites.

3.2. Residency and Inter-Colony Movement of Tagged Monarchs at Overwintering Sites

Forty-seven tagged monarchs sighted at overwintering sites were re-sighted two to twelve times in the same colonies 6 to 139 days later (Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7). Fifteen tagged monarchs were seen in two different overwintering colonies, and two (B5593, B6578) were seen in three Santa Cruz overwintering colonies. Tagged monarchs resided (as judged by re-sightings) at overwintering sites for up to 139 days. However, mean residency in each year varied from one to two months (mean = 60.6 ± 6.0 days, n = 47) (Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7).

3.3. Rate of Travel of Tagged Monarchs

Thirty-one tagged monarchs were recovered during the fall migration either at locations en route or as early colonizers at overwintering sites. Mean travel rates ranged from 18.7 ± 3.8 km/day in 2017 to 23.3 ± 1.9 km/day in 2019 with an overall rate of 20.7 ± 2.2 km/day. Maximum travel rates of 41.4 and 46.1 km/day occurred in 2018 and 2017, respectively (Table 8).

3.4. Distance Traveled by Tagged Monarchs

The greatest straight-line release point to recovery point distance recorded was 1392.1 km from Redmond, WA to Avila Beach, CA (Table 2). The greatest distance traveled by an Oregon-released monarch was 1042.9 km from Talent to Huntington Beach, CA (Table 4). The greatest distance traveled by an Idaho-released monarch was 1065.4 km from Boise to Santa Barbara, CA (Table 2). The mean distance traveled by Washington-released monarchs was 899.9 ± 98.6 km, compared to 630.5 ± 19.9 km for Oregon-released monarchs and 160.2 ± 129.7 km for Idaho-released monarchs.

3.5. Length of Life of Tagged Monarchs

The lifespan of tagged monarchs recorded as the interval between tagging and final sighting ranged from 5–312 days (mean = 82.0 ± 5.2 days, n = 122). Removing migrants (i.e., monarchs only seen prior to arrival at overwintering sites) from this analysis increases the mean lifespan to 107.4 ± 4.9 days (n = 88) or almost 3.5 months (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). This analysis does not take account of post-overwintering survival. The maximum lifespan recorded in this study (312 days/44.6 weeks/10 months for tag # E5182 in 2018) may be the longest recorded for a western monarch. This individual (not seen at an overwintering site) was captive-reared and released into smoky conditions (see below) at Ashland, Oregon on 18 August 2018, and recovered at Cayucos, California, on 26 June 2019.

3.6. Impact of Wildfire Smoke and Air Quality on Tagged Monarch Recovery

Nine (2.9%) captive-reared tagged monarchs from the Brookings, Oregon cohort of 307 released into smoky or non-smoky atmospheric conditions during August–October 2017 were recovered in California (Table 9). Four out of 76 (5.3%) released into smoky (unhealthy-hazardous) air (AQI: 198–304) were recovered, with three alive at overwintering sites 31 to 164 days after release (mean 109 ± 32.5 days) after migrating 455.4 to 618 km (mean 566.4 ± 37.4 km). One individual was recovered after 31 days at Vacaville, CA (455.4 km from Brookings), possibly en route to an overwintering site. Five out of 231 (2.2%) released into non-smoky, healthy air (AQI: < 50) were alive at overwintering sites 48 to 104 days post-release (mean 83.8 ± 11.3 days) after traveling 487.6 to 638.9 km (mean 570.0 ± 28.2 km) (Table 9). Post-release lifespan (t = 0.805, 7 df, p = 0.447) and migration distance (t = −0.0790, 7 df, p = 0.939) were not significantly different between the smoky and non-smoky air release cohorts (Student’s t-test).
Nine (4.4%) of 205 captive-reared tagged monarchs from the Ashland-Medford cohort of 450 released into smoky, (unhealthy-hazardous) atmospheric conditions (AQI: 100–177) during August–September 2018 were recovered in California after migrating 188.3 to 772.5 km (mean 537.3 ± 60.1 km). Post-release lifespan ranged from 13 to 312 days (mean 88.6 ± 31.2 days) (Table 10). Three of the recoveries were made 13–16 days after release (presumably migrating), and one individual was recovered 312 days after release, presumably following overwintering (Table 10). The remainder were recovered at overwintering sites. No recoveries were made of 245 monarchs released into healthy air (AQI < 100) during the same period.

3.7. Impact of a Protozoan Parasite on Monarch Migration and Length of Life

Captive-reared tagged monarchs released from Yakima, WA in 2017, infected or uninfected with OE, were recovered in California at overwintering sites at an apparently similar rate (OE-infected: 6/1473 (0.41%), Non-infected: 2/450 (0.44%). OE-infected monarchs migrated 983.1 to 1084.7 km (mean: 1051.2 ± 20.7 km) with a lifespan of between 57 and 170 days (mean: 116.8 ± 16.2 days) when last seen. Non-infected monarchs migrated 1084.7 km and had lived from 61–169 days (mean: 115.0 ± 54.0 days) when last seen (Table 11).

4. Discussion

This study provides additional and supportive data for our earlier study on monarch migration from the PNW [13]. That study conducted during 2012–2016 provided a preliminary understanding of monarch migration in the PNW based on 60 recoveries of tagged monarchs. The current study, conducted during 2017–2019, extends that research, adding a further 122 recoveries of captive-reared tagged monarchs. Our new data broadly support the earlier findings that the majority of monarchs in Washington and Oregon migrate south in the fall (August–October) to overwinter at sites along the California coast. We also provide additional evidence for some south-to-south-easterly movement of tagged monarchs in eastern Washington and Idaho first suggested by Pyle [6] and documented in James et al. [13], suggesting the possibility of an alternative overwintering destination for some PNW populations. While the majority of migrants from the PNW persist as non-reproductive individuals in overwintering colonies, we document two instances of tagged female monarchs migrating to California from Oregon and becoming reproductive after a few weeks, a phenomenon initially noted by James [12]. The fall migration in the PNW begins in late July. The earliest confirmed fall migrant in this study was released on 30 July 2017 in Eugene, Oregon (# B5260). A captive-reared tagged monarch released in Spokane, WA on 20 July 2020 was also apparently migratory, flying 98.2 km SSE in 8 days (James, unpubl. obs.). This study also provides opportunistic but limited data on the lack of impact of wildfire smoke (producing unhealthy atmospheric conditions) on survival, migration success and lifespan of monarchs exposed to these conditions early in adult life. Limited data were also obtained on apparent migration success and lifespan of monarchs infected with the protozoan parasite, O. elektroscirrha (OE).
The western US monarch population has always been substantially smaller than that of the eastern US [23,24]. The sparsity of northwestern monarch populations means that it is not feasible to tag enough wild butterflies to provide robust recovery data needed for conclusions about migration. Consequently, this and our earlier study [13] depended on captive-rearing by citizen scientists to generate monarchs for tagging. During the course of this research (2012–2019), 27,820 monarchs were captive-reared and tagged, along with 1323 wild-caught monarchs that were also tagged. One hundred and eighty-two monarchs were recovered (0.62%), and all except one were captive-reared monarchs. The single tagged wild monarch was mistakenly assigned as reared in our earlier study (Tag # A3264, Table 5 in James et al. [13]). During the current study, 122 (0.84%) tagged monarchs (all captive-reared) were recovered from 14,490 released.
The viability of captive-reared monarchs as successful migrants in eastern North America has recently been questioned [25,26,27]. Two of these studies [25,27] depended on flight simulators to conclude that captive-reared monarchs did not show proper orientation southward. However, captive-reared monarchs released in the wild and tracked by radio-telemetry apparently do show correct orientation [28]. Davis et al. [26], working with eastern US butterflies, showed captive-reared monarchs underperformed in three of four physical traits considered important for migration when compared to wild monarchs. Earlier, Steffy [29] showed that captive-reared eastern US monarchs have lower tag recovery rates (0.06%) than their wild counterparts (0.50%). This study and James et al. [13] suggest that captive-reared western US monarchs have little difficulty migrating to overwintering sites and living extended lives (up to 10.5 months). Although our number of wild-tagged monarchs (1323) was substantially lower than captive-reared, tagged monarchs (27,820), our 0.62% recovery rate for captive-reared monarchs predicts that at least eight wild-tagged monarchs should be recovered. Instead, we had a single wild tag recovery (0.08%) in eight years. It is possible that western and eastern monarchs differ in their response to captive rearing. A recent study [30] showed that despite no genetic difference, eastern monarchs are capable of superior flight performance in the laboratory compared to western monarchs. It is also possible that the more modest migration of western compared to eastern monarchs may serve to mask any negative influences of captiverearing if they exist.
The discovery of two tagged female monarchs (# B6679, # G1120) that had migrated 537–877 km from Oregon to California and become reproductive indicates that not all migrants from the PNW contribute to the high profile non-reproductive coastal overwintering populations in California. Monarch # B6679 was found ovipositing in a Santa Barbara backyard, joining the year-round breeding population of monarchs present in parts of southern California [12,31]. Monarch # G1220 was found ovipositing on backyard milkweed in Palo Alto, about 45 km south of San Francisco, where breeding populations of monarchs are not usual during winter but have become more frequent in recent years (James, unpubl. data). The frequency of assimilation of PNW fall migrants into winter-breeding California populations of monarchs is unknown but could be significant and increasing, especially in years of above-average fall temperatures. If the number of migrants that become reproductive is significant, then this may be an additional factor contributing to the recently documented contemporary smaller and declining populations at overwintering sites [4]. However, some research has shown that non-reproductive status may not be a reliable indicator of migratory status [32]. Research is urgently needed on this possibility of migrants from the PNW forming winter breeding populations in the San Francisco area. Observations reported online on social media and natural history reporting sites during winter 2020/21 suggested a substantial increase in monarch winter breeding activity in the San Francisco area (James, unpubl. data).
Tag recovery rates were greatest for Oregon-released monarchs (0.92%) and lowest for Idaho-released monarchs (0.30%), with Washington-released monarchs intermediate (0.34%). These recovery rates are similar to those reported for 2012–2016 [13]. They are also within the range reported for Arizona [11] and eastern US monarchs [33]. However, it is likely that the recovery rate for eastern US monarchs is an underestimate because it only uses individuals found dead at the Mexico overwintering sites [33]. If live tagged butterflies were counted in Mexico, the recovery rate would likely be much higher. In years with weather-related mass mortality events in Mexico, tag recovery rates reach 3–4% [33]. If tag recovery rates of ~1% are a true reflection of migration success in western monarchs, this could mean that migration mortality is greater in the west than in the eastern US, despite the much shorter travel distances. Continued tagging of the PNW population is needed to strengthen the conclusions drawn from our data to ensure we are not overlooking other possible outcomes.
While the majority of recoveries occurred in California, usually at overwintering sites, two monarchs released at Yakima in eastern WA were found 173.8 and 360.0 km to the SE. These individuals appeared not to be heading towards the California coast, similar to one individual released from Walla Walla, WA in 2012 and found at Brigham City, UT, (724.0 km SE) [13]. Similarly, half of the recoveries of Idaho-released monarchs in the current study were found S-SE of release points. Two of three Idaho-released monarchs reported in James et al. [13] were found to the S and SE. More recently, a tagged monarch released in Spokane, WA, was found a few days later 97.5 km to the SSE in Moscow, Idaho (James, unpubl. data). Together, these data support the suggestions of Pyle [6] and James et al. [13] that some monarchs in eastern WA and ID orient S and SE during the fall migration. The overwintering destination of S and SE orienting monarchs is uncertain but may include Arizona and/or Mexico. The lower recovery rates of tagged monarchs released in ID and eastern WA may be a consequence of a longer and more hazardous migration over sparsely vegetated and populated regions of ID, UT and AZ. Although 3655 monarchs were tagged in ID during 2012–2019, yielding 11 recoveries (0.30%), it is clear that many more need to be tagged in this state to provide data on destinations.
The mean lifespan (from release to final sighting) of monarchs at overwintering sites in this study was comparable (107.4 days) to that reported in James et al. [13] (98.9 days). However, the longest lifespan for a tagged monarch in the current study (312 days or just over 10 months, # E5182) was nearly twice that recorded in James et al. [13] (164 days), and it appears to be the longest-lived monarch reported from the western US to date. Data on release–recovery intervals showed distances of up to 46.1 km a day can be traveled by migrants, with a mean of 20.7 km traveled per day. James et al. [13] obtained a higher daily travel mean rate of 35.1 km with a maximum of 62.6 km/day. Combining the data from the two studies (n = 44) provides a mean daily rate of 25.0 km/day, lower than the 45.0 km/day reported by Brower et al. [34] for migrating monarchs in the eastern US. Eastern US monarchs were shown to have superior flight performance than western monarchs [30], and most have a substantially longer distance (up to 4000 km) to travel to reach the overwintering area in Mexico. Monarchs in this study migrated from the PNW for distances of 465.1–1392.1 km to reach overwintering sites in California, similar to the shortest (486.0 km) and longest (1360.0 km) distances reported by James et al. [13]. Since the commencement of tagging in 2012, only one (0.03%) of 3655 monarchs tagged in Idaho was recovered in California. This is an extremely low recovery rate and further supports the hypothesis that a good proportion of Idaho monarchs migrate in a southerly and/or south-easterly direction, possibly heading for overwintering sites in Arizona or Mexico.
Sixty-seven percent of tag recoveries occurred at 18 overwintering sites in coastal California. If all data obtained since 2012 are considered, 72% of tag recoveries occurred at 24 overwintering sites. Given the discrete nature of most overwintering colonies that occupy a small area and the relatively low numbers, we believe that we detected most of the tagged monarchs present. This was particularly true for sites like the Santa Cruz sites that were visited weekly or fortnightly and for public sites with many human observers like Pismo beach. However, at sites with large populations that we only visited once or twice (e.g., Bolinas), we may not have sighted all of the tagged butterflies present. Similar to James et al. [13], a majority of recovered monarchs (64.6%) in this study were recorded at overwintering sites in Santa Cruz. While clearly a favored location with three major sites, the preponderance of recoveries in Santa Cruz was no doubt strongly influenced by the weekly inspection of overwintering colonies in this location during October–March. These weekly inspections also facilitated the collection of data on butterfly residency at overwintering sites in Santa Cruz by individual tagged monarchs. Residency at single or multiple overwintering sites of up to 131 or 139 days, respectively, was recorded, similar to the 123 days at single sites recorded by James et al. [13]. James et al. [13] reported two tagged monarchs were found at two different Santa Cruz overwintering sites at different times during the winter. In this study, fifteen monarchs were reported from two or three overwintering sites in Santa Cruz, suggesting that movement between nearby colonies can be common. The three major overwintering sites in Santa Cruz are separated by 2.85–7.47 km.
A potential hazard to migrating monarchs in the western US is the incidence of wildfires and associated profuse smoke and poor air quality that has increased since the turn of the century [35]. No information exists on the possible impact of wildfire smoke on monarch migration. Hegedus et al. [36] suggested that by interfering with sky polarization, forest fire smoke might be responsible for the reported disorientation of some migratory insects in forest fire season in British Columbia [37]. Wildfires also produce emissions of gases like CO2; that might affect the orientation, flight and survival of invertebrates. The limited data collected in this study for tagged monarchs released into smoky, poor air quality conditions, compared to individuals released into good air quality at the same location in the same migration season, suggests little impact on migration and survival. Monarchs released into smoky air were just as successful in reaching overwintering sites and had a similar survival rate as butterflies released into non-smoky air. When recoveries are examined as a percentage of individuals released into either smoky or non-smoky conditions, the recovery rate was higher in smoky (4.4–5.3%) than non-smoky conditions (0–2.2%). The tagged monarch (# E5182) reported in this study as the longest-lived monarch documented in the western US (>10 months) was released into dense wildfire smoke and unhealthy air. However, the data we collected were opportunistic, not part of a planned experiment and are therefore limited. Additional studies are needed before firm conclusions can be made about the impact of wildfire smoke on monarch migration and survival.
Monarchs are commonly infected by the naturally occurring protozoan parasite, O. elektroscirrha (OE), and many studies have shown that badly infected adults are smaller, have lower eclosion success, and have reduced longevity and flight performance [19,20]. Infected monarchs are also reported to have reduced fitness for flight and migration [22,38,39]. Although opportunistic and very limited, the data collected on migration success and survival of heavily OE-infected monarchs in this study suggests that OE has little impact on the viability of migrating western monarchs. Both infected and non-infected migrants were recovered in California at an apparently similar rate, migrated similar distances and had a similar lifespan at final sighting. Although our data are limited, they suggest that the shorter distances flown by migrants in the west mean that western monarchs may be less impacted by OE infection than their eastern counterparts. Altizer et al. [22] showed that approximately 30% of the western US monarch population was heavily infected with OE but that this did not affect overwintering mortality. More research on this important issue is needed.
Our data here support the concept previously espoused by James et al. [13] that most PNW monarchs, particularly those from Oregon, fly to central California coastal overwintering sites during the fall. However, it is also clear that some individuals from Washington and Idaho orient S-SE and may overwinter elsewhere, as suggested by Pyle [6] and James et al. [13]. Increased tagging efforts in eastern Washington and Idaho should ultimately reveal the destinations of S-SE orienting migrants from these areas. Some PNW migrants may not join overwintering populations and may instead join winter-breeding populations in California. Recent field observations and reports from California suggests that this phenomenon may be increasing in incidence and importance. The recent widespread availability and planting of the introduced ornamental milkweeds, A. currassavica L., Gomphocarous physocarpus E. May and Gomphocarpus fruticosus (L.) W.T. Aiton, in the San Francisco and Los Angeles urban areas may help divert migrating monarchs towards reproduction as suggested by Satterfield et al. [40]. However, in Australia, winter reproductive and non-reproductive monarchs can exist in the same habitat together, suggesting termination of reproductive dormancy and migration in fall monarchs is dependent on more than host availability [41]. More research is needed to determine the cues involved and the importance of fall migrants to California winter breeding populations in the overall population dynamics and ecology of monarchs in the western US.
The fall migration of monarchs from the PNW is a period of major vulnerability. Factors such as lack of nectar, wildfires, predation, vehicle traffic, pesticides and pollution, frequently occur at high or heightened levels during August–September. Mortality during fall migration is likely to be a significant factor in the population dynamics of monarchs in the western US and may have contributed to recent declines in the west and east [4,42,43,44]. Recent work showed a correlation between the greenness of Texas and migration success [33]. Our research indicates that the bulk of migrating monarchs from the PNW travel through inland areas of Washington, Oregon and northern California. The availability of nectar in this region during August–October is likely to be one of the most important factors affecting monarch migration. Much of the region monarchs fly through is arid, sparsely populated and lacking in late summer and fall nectar resources. However, there are some key arid region nectar sources for monarchs like rabbitbrush (Ericameria spp.) available during this period that are likely critical for monarch survival. The majority of tagged migrants observed during this study were seen nectaring on garden ornamentals in townships in arid landscapes, suggesting that country towns may provide “rest stops” for migrating monarchs. Stocking gardens in country towns with fall-flowering plants like asters and buddleja in eastern parts of WA, OR and northern CA should be beneficial for migrants. Although the flight behavior of migrating western monarchs has not been studied, it is likely that they fly at high altitudes during the day like eastern monarchs [45] descending late in the day to “green” areas where they can find trees for roosting. Thus, it is possible that they “choose” towns and river courses for nectaring and roosting because, in arid landscapes, this is where most of the trees are. Ensuring nectar is available at these locations during fall is a simple conservation strategy that has the potential to benefit western monarch populations. Refraining from using pesticides, particularly neonicotinoids [46], in the home garden and public spaces during the migration season will also benefit monarch survival.

Author Contributions

D.G.J. and L.K. conceived and designed the study. L.K. liaised with cooperators and ensured data were gathered correctly and submitted. D.G.J. analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the legion of citizen scientists in the PNW who reared and tagged monarch butterflies and made this research possible. Of particular mention are the select groups of men incarcerated at Washington State Penitentiary (WSP) in Walla Walla, WA, who reared and tagged thousands of butterflies for our program. We thank Cathy Bly of WSP for facilitating the involvement of inmates in this research. We also thank the Washington Butterfly Association and Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, who provided significant assistance in the conduct of this program. Without the reporting of tagged butterflies, we would not have data, and we sincerely thank all those who submitted details of location and date when tagged butterflies were found. We particularly thank John Dayton for reporting tags during his regular monitoring of overwintering colonies in Santa Cruz. Dennis Triglia of Brookings, OR and Steve Johnson of Ashland, OR, provided or helped locate data on air quality in southern Oregon. Permits for rearing monarchs in WA were obtained annually from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. No external funding was supplied for this study.

References

  1. Gustafsson, K.M.; Agrawal, A.A.; Lewenstein, B.V.; Wolf, S.A. The monarch butterfly through time and space: The social construction of an icon. Bioscience 2015, 65, 612–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Potts, S.G.; Biesmeijer, J.C.; Kremen, C.; Neumann, P.; Schweiger, O.; Kunin, W.E. Global pollinator declines: Trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2010, 25, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Semmens, B.X.; Semmens, D.J.; Thogmartin, W.E.; Wiederholt, R.; Lopez-Hoffman, L.; Diffendorfer, J.E. Quasi-extinction risk and population targets for the eastern migratory population of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schultz, C.B.; Brown, L.M.; Pelton, E.; Crone, E.E. Citizen science monitoring demonstrates dramatic declines of monarch butterflies in western North America. Biol. Conserv. 2017, 214, 343–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pelton, E.M.; Schultz, C.B.; Jepsen, S.J.; Hoffman Black, S.; Crone, E.E. Western monarch population plummets: Status, probable causes and recommended conservation actions. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Pyle, R.M. Monarchs in the mist. New perspectives on monarch distribution in the Pacific Northwest. In The Monarch Butterfly: Biology and Conservation; Oberhauser, K.S., Solensky, M.J., Eds.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 237–246. [Google Scholar]
  7. James, D.G. Population biology of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) at a milkweed-rich summer breeding site in central Washington. J. Lepid. Soc. 2016, 70, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dilts, T.E.; Steele, M.O.; Engler, J.D.; Pelton, E.M.; Jepsen, S.J.; McKnight, S.J.; Taylor, A.R.; Fallon, C.E.; Black, S.H.; Cruz, E.E.; et al. Host plants and climate structure associations of the western monarch butterfly. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Svancara, L.K.; Abatzoglou, J.T.; Waterbury, B. Modeling current and future potential distributions of milkweeds and the monarch butterfly in Idaho. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Waterbury, B.; Potter, A.; Svancara, L.K. Monarch butterfly distribution and breeding ecology in Idaho and Washington. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Morris, G.M.; Kline, C.; Morris, S.M. Status of Danaus plexippus populations in Arizona. J. Lepid. Soc. 2015, 69, 91–107. [Google Scholar]
  12. James, D.G. Do some fall migrants from the Pacific Northwest augment winter breeding populations of monarch butterflies in southern California? J. Lepid. Soc. 2018, 72, 244–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. James, D.G.; James, T.S.; Seymour, L.; Kappen, L.; Russell, T.; Harryman, B.; Bly, C. Citizen scientist tagging reveals destinations of migrating monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.) from the Pacific Northwest. J. Lepid. Soc. 2018, 72, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Billings, J. Opening a window on southwestern monarchs: Fall migrant monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.), tagged synchronously in southeastern Arizona migrate to overwintering regions in either southern California or central Mexico. J. Lepid. Soc. 2019, 73, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Crone, E.E.; Pelton, E.M.; Brown, L.M.; Thomas, C.M.; Schultz, C.B. Why are monarch butterflies declining in the west? Understanding the importance of multiple correlated drivers. Ecol. Appl. 2019, 29, e01975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pelton, E. Keep Monarchs Wild: Why Captive Rearing Isn’t the Way to Help Monarchs. Xerces Society for Invertebrate Conservation Blog. 2018. Available online: https://xerces.org/blog/keep-monarchs-wild#:~:text=In%20recent%20years%2C%20a%20second%20issue%20regarding%20rearing,raising%20them%20in%20captivity%2C%20and%20then%20releasing%20them (accessed on 13 February 2021).
  17. James, D.G. Murderers touched by the magic of monarchs. News Lepid. Soc. 2016, 58, 127–129. [Google Scholar]
  18. Leong, K.L.H.; Kaya, H.K.; Yoshimura, M.A.; Frey, D.F. The occurrence and effect of a protozoan parasite, Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (Neogregarinida: Ophryocystidae) on overwintering monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) from two California overwintering sites. Ecol. Entomol. 1992, 17, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Altizer, S.M.; Oberhauser, K.S. Effects of the protozoan parasite Ophrycystis elektroscirrha on the fitness of monarch butterflies. J. Invert. Pathol. 1999, 74, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Bradley, C.; Altizer, S.M. Parasites hinder monarch butterfly flight ability: Implications for disease spread in migratory hosts. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De Roode, J.; Chi, C.J.; Rarick, R.M.; Altizer, S. Strength in numbers; high parasite burdens increase transmission of a protozoan parasite of monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus. Oecologia 2009, 161, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Altizer, S.M.; Oberhauser, K.S.; Brower, L.P. Associations between host migration and the prevalence of a protozoan parasite in natural populations of adult monarch butterflies. Ecol. Entomol. 2000, 25, 125–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brower, L.P. Understanding and misunderstanding the migration of the monarch butterfly (Nymphalidae) in North America. J. Lepid. Soc. 1995, 49, 304–385. [Google Scholar]
  24. Brower, L.P.; Pyle, R.M. The interchange of migratory monarchs between Mexico and the western United States and the importance of floral corridors to the fall and spring migrations. In Conserving Migratory Pollinators and Nectar Corridors in Western North America; University of Arizona Press: Tucson, Arizona, 2004; pp. 144–166. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tenger-Trolander, A.; Wei, L.; Noyes, M.; Kronforst, M.R. Contemporary loss of migration in monarch butterflies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 14671–14677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Davis, A.K.; Smith, S.F.; Ballew, A.M. A poor substitute for the real thing: Captive-reared monarch butterflies are weaker, paler and have less elongated wings than wild migrants. Biol. Lett. 2020, 16, 20190922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Tenger-Trolander, A.; Kronforst, M.R. Migration behavior of commercial monarchs reared outdoors and wild-derived monarchs reared indoors. Proc. R. Soc. B 2020, 287, 20201326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wilcox, A.A.E.; Newman, A.E.M.; Raine, N.E.; Norris, D.R. Captive-reared migratory monarch butterflies show natural orientation when released in the wild. bioRxiv 2020. [CrossRef]
  29. Steffy, G. Trends observed in fall migrant monarch butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) east of the Appalachian mountains, at an inland stopover in southern Pennsylvania over an eighteen year period. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2015, 108, 718–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Talla, V.; Pierce, A.A.; Adams, K.L.; de Man, T.J.B.; Nallu, S.; Villablanca, F.X.; Kronforst, M.R.; de Roode, J.C. Genomic evidence for gene flow between monarchs with divergent migratory phenotypes and flight performances. Mol. Ecol. 2020, 29, 2567–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Urquhart, F.A.; Urquhart, N.R.; Munger, F. A study of a continuously breeding population of Danaus plexippus in southern California compared to a migratory population and its significance in the study of insect movement. J. Res. Lepid. 1970, 7, 169–181. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhu, H.; Gegear, R.J.; Casselman, A.; Kanginakudru, S.; Reppert, S.M. Defining molecular and behavioral differences between summer and migratory monarch butterflies. BMC Biol. 2009, 7, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Taylor, O.R.; Pleasants, J.M.; Grundel, R.; Pecoraro, S.D.; Lovett, J.P.; Ryan, A. Evaluating the migration mortality hypothesis using monarch tagging data. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 8, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Brower, L.P.; Fink, L.S.; Walford, P. Fueling the fall migration of the monarch butterfly. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2006, 46, 1123–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Keeley, J.E.; Syphard, A.D. Twenty-first century California, USA, wildfires: Fuel-dominated vs. wind-dominated fires. Fire Ecol. 2019, 15, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hegedus, R.; Akesson, S.; Horvath, G. Anomalous celestial polarization caused by forest fire smoke: Why do some insects become visually disoriented under smoky skies? Appl. Opt. 2007, 46, 2717–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Johnson, D.L.; Naylor, D.; Scudder, G. Red sky in day, bugs go astray. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Geographers, Lethbridge, AB, Canada, 27–31 May 2019; p. 45. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bartel, R.A.; Oberhauser, K.S.; de Roode, J.C.; Altizer, S.M. Monarch butterfly migration and parasite transmission in eastern North America. Ecology 2011, 92, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Altizer, S.M.; Hobson, K.A.; Davis, A.K.; de Roode, J.C.; Wassenaar, L.I. Do healthy monarchs migrate farther? Tracking natal origins of parasitized vs uninfected monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Satterfield, D.A.; Maerz, J.C.; Hunter, M.D.; Flockhart, T.; Hobson, K.; Norris, D.R.; Streit, H.; de Roode, J.C.; Altizer, S.M. Migratory monarchs that encounter resident monarchs show life history differences and higher rates of parasitic infection. Ecol. Lett. 2018, 21, 1670–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. James, D.G.; James, T.A. Migration and overwintering in Australian monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): A review with new observations and research needs. J. Lepid. Soc. 2019, 73, 177–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Agrawal, A.A.; Inamine, H. Mechanisms behind the monarch’s decline. Science 2018, 360, 1294–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Malcolm, S.B. Anthropogenic impacts on mortality and population viability of the monarch butterfly. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2018, 63, 277–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Kantola, T.; Tracy, J.L.; Baum, K.A.; Quinn, M.A.; Coulson, R.N. Spatial risk assessment of eastern monarch butterfly road mortality during autumn migration within the southern corridor. Biol. Conserv. 2019, 231, 150–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gibo, D.L. Flight Strategies of Migrating Monarch Butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) in Southern Ontario. In Insect Flight. Proceedings in Life Sciences; Danthanarayana, W., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. James, D.G. A neonicotinoid insecticide at a rate found in nectar reduces longevity but not oogenesis in monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Insects 2019, 10, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Release–recovery lines (from N to S) for captive-reared tagged monarchs released in the Pacific Northwest during 2017–2019.
Figure 1. Release–recovery lines (from N to S) for captive-reared tagged monarchs released in the Pacific Northwest during 2017–2019.
Insects 12 00161 g001
Figure 2. Release–recovery lines (N to S) for captive-reared tagged monarchs released in Washington during 2017–2019.
Figure 2. Release–recovery lines (N to S) for captive-reared tagged monarchs released in Washington during 2017–2019.
Insects 12 00161 g002
Figure 3. Release–recovery lines (N to S) for captive-reared tagged monarchs released in Oregon during 2017–2019.
Figure 3. Release–recovery lines (N to S) for captive-reared tagged monarchs released in Oregon during 2017–2019.
Insects 12 00161 g003
Figure 4. Release–recovery lines (N to S) for captive-reared tagged monarchs released in Idaho during 2017–2019.
Figure 4. Release–recovery lines (N to S) for captive-reared tagged monarchs released in Idaho during 2017–2019.
Insects 12 00161 g004
Figure 5. G1120, a female monarch reared and released in Talent, Oregon on 14 September 2019 by Belinda Vos and photographed 40 days later on 24 October 2019 ovipositing on backyard milkweed in Palo Alto, California, after migrating 537.5 km. Photo by Karen Krimmer Easton.
Figure 5. G1120, a female monarch reared and released in Talent, Oregon on 14 September 2019 by Belinda Vos and photographed 40 days later on 24 October 2019 ovipositing on backyard milkweed in Palo Alto, California, after migrating 537.5 km. Photo by Karen Krimmer Easton.
Insects 12 00161 g005
Table 1. Numbers of monarchs, captive-reared and tagged and wild-tagged by organizations and citizen scientists during 2017–2019 (WSP = Washington State Penitentiary, WSU = Washington State University, CCC = Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, WBA = Washington Butterfly Association, IDFG = Idaho Fish and Game, USFWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Italics separate wild-tagged from captive.
Table 1. Numbers of monarchs, captive-reared and tagged and wild-tagged by organizations and citizen scientists during 2017–2019 (WSP = Washington State Penitentiary, WSU = Washington State University, CCC = Cowiche Canyon Conservancy, WBA = Washington Butterfly Association, IDFG = Idaho Fish and Game, USFWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service. Italics separate wild-tagged from captive.
Location2017201820192017–2019
Washington
WSP (Walla Walla)4945801051179
WSU (Yakima)19724521212545
CCC (Yakima)192245160597
WBA (Redmond, Spokane)4423900832
Wild-tagged300030
Total (WA)313016673865183
Idaho
IDFG (Bayview)8638753112049
USFWS/IDFG (Boise)1905776
Wild-tagged2782827333
Total (ID)11609033952458
Oregon
Central and Northern17668116360
Southern1987104131576185
Wild-tagged5915175
Total (OR)2222112432746620
Far N California
Tulelake, Montague, Smith R.831165204
Wild-tagged120012
Total (CA)2031165216
Montana
Missoula001313
Total (MT)001313
Total (PNW): Wild3794328450
Total (PNW): Reared61533682420514,040
Total (PNW): All65323725423314,490
Table 2. Release, recovery, distance, direction and lifespan data for monarchs, captive-reared, tagged and released in the PNW during 2017. OS = overwintering site. Santa Cruz overwintering sites: LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, ML = Moran Lake.
Table 2. Release, recovery, distance, direction and lifespan data for monarchs, captive-reared, tagged and released in the PNW during 2017. OS = overwintering site. Santa Cruz overwintering sites: LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, ML = Moran Lake.
Tag #SexRelease LocationDate and
Tagger
Recovery Location & DateLength of Life (Days)Distance (km) and DirectionFinder
B5629FGold Hill, ORAug 18, Lee FinneyJacksonville, OR Aug 19120.9 SEAngela Street
B6917FRathdrum, IDAug 18, Bill AmentCoeur d’ Alene, ID Aug 21316.1 SEDebbie Rochon
C2564MRathdrum, IDAug 20, Bill AmentSpokane, WA Aug 24424.1 SWNicole Carson
B6839MRathdrum, IDAug 25, Bill HarrymanSpokane, WA Aug 28327.4 SWMichelle Fab
C4433FRathdrum, IDAug 28, Bill HarrymanSpokane, WA Aug 30225.7 SWSusan Stephens
B6865MRathdrum, IDAug 28, Bill HarrymanCoeur d’ Alene, ID Sep 2416.1 SSEPaul Klawitter
C3416MRedmond, WASep 2, Connie GranbergRedmond, WA Sep 5310.0 SEMike Hamilton
C3462FRedmond, WASep 3, Connie GranbergRedmond, WA Sep 5210.0 SEWanda Boot
C2878MPost Falls, IDAug 22, Bill AmentCoeur d’ Alene, ID Sep 51410.0 SECharlie Miller
C4772FRedmond, WASep 3, Connie GranbergMercer Island, WA Sep 10716.1 SECindy Lee
B5553FElkton, ORSep 6, B. Slott/K. HendricksGrants Pass, OR Sep 115138.4 SJanet Gogue
B5554FElkton, ORSep 6, B. Slott/K. HendricksBrookings, OR Sep 115191.5 SSWPaul La Barbera
B5518MElkton, ORSep 3, B. Slott/K. HendricksJenner, CA Sep 1714585.8 SNick Lasater
B6679FKlamath Falls, ORSep 3, Akimi KingSanta Barbara, CA Sep 2219877.1 SSECathy Fletcher
B3729MBrookings, ORAug 24, Dennis TrigliaVacaville, CA Sept 2431455.4 SSE“charmedlady”
C1143MYakima, WASep 8, David JamesToppenish, WA Sept 211324.1 SSEB. and D. Cunningham
C4378FTalent, ORSep 12, Belinda VosUkiah, CA Sep 2818346.0 SSWJ and S. Tendick
B5244MAshland, ORSep 11, Steve JohnsonNB CA (OS) Oct 382585.8 SJohn Dayton
B5893MAshland, ORSep 5, Lauren HisatomiNB CA (OS) Oct 979574.5 SJohn Dayton
B5593FElkton, ORSep 3, B. Slott/K. HendricksNB CA (OS) Oct 9139754.8 SSEJohn Dayton
B5307MBrookings, ORAug 31, Holly BeyerLF CA (OS) Oct 9161595.5 SSEJohn Dayton
B5260FEugene, ORJul 30, Jessica JankowskiLF CA (OS) Oct 965793.4 SJohn Dayton
B3720MMedford, ORAug 26, R and S CoffanLF CA (OS) Oct 955598.7 SJohn Dayton
C0745MYakima, WAAug 31, David JamesLF CA (OS) Oct 91691084.7 SJohn Dayton
C3550MRedmond, WASep 3, Connie GranbergAvila Beach, CA Oct 261361392.1 SLyle Rains
B2462MRedmond, WAAug 31, Connie GranbergKale/Elm, Bolinas, CA (OS) Oct 26861086.3 SPaul Cherubini
C4407MAshland, ORSep 8, Becky SpanglerML CA (OS) Oct 19173585.8 SJohn Dayton
B3859MBrookings, ORSep 6, Dennis TrigliaLF CA (OS) Oct 20164618.0 SSEJohn Dayton
C4780FRedmond, WASep 6, Connie GranbergLF CA (OS) Oct 201431192.5 SJohn Dayton
B5239MAshland, ORSep 4, Steve JohnsonNB CA (OS) Oct 21156585.8 SJohn Dayton
B6698MKlamath Falls, ORSep 22, A. King/A. SterchoNB CA (OS) Oct 2168579.4 SJohn Dayton
C5043MElkton, ORSep 16, B. Slott/K. HendricksNB CA (OS) Oct 2168754.8 SSEJohn Dayton
C4114FGold Hill, ORSep 16, Lee FinneyNB CA (OS) Oct 29139616.4 SJohn Dayton
C0190MYakima, WAAug 22, David JamesML CA (OS) Oct 291101083.1 SSWJohn Dayton
B6578MSalem, ORAug 18, S. HazenNB CA (OS) Oct 30209883.5 SJohn Dayton
C0677MYakima, WAAug 30, David JamesNB CA (OS) Oct 30611084.7 SSWJohn Dayton
C5023MElkton, ORSep 16, B. Slott/K. HendricksML CA (OS) Nov 1187751.6 SJohn Dayton
B6806FEagle Point, ORSep 26, Leigh LeamingML CA (OS) Nov 1117616.4 SJohn Dayton
C4041FTalent, ORAug 31, Belinda VosEllwood West, Goleta,
CA (OS) Nov 8
69904.5 SSEDan Meade
B5981MMedford, ORSep 20, R. and S. CoffanAtascadero Ck. Goleta,
CA (OS) Nov 15
56914.1 SSECharis van der Heide
C0694MYakima, WAAug 30, David JamesML CA (OS) Nov 101701083.1 SSWJohn Dayton
B3745MBrookings, ORAug 28, Dennis TrigliaNB CA (OS) Nov 1580597.1 SSEJohn Dayton
C3451MRedmond, WASep 3, Connie GranbergLF CA (OS) Nov 151831190.9 SJohn Dayton
C3502MRedmond, WASep 3, Connie GranbergPrefumo Ck., San Luis Obispo,
CA (OS) Nov 17
751380.8 SJessica Griffiths
C1475MYakima, WASep 15, David JamesLF CA (OS) Nov 17931084.7 SSWJohn Dayton
C1775MYakima, WASep 22, David JamesKale/Elm, Bolinas, CA (OS) Nov 1857983.3 SSWJ. Garcia/M. Monroe
C5024MElkton, ORSep 16, B. Slott/K. HendricksPismo Beach, CA (OS) Nov 19130978.5 SSEDavid James
C4109MGold Hill, ORSep 14, Lee FinneyML CA (OS) Nov 22118614.8 SSED. James/J. Dayton
B5565MElkton, ORSep 6 B. Slott/K. HendricksML CA (OS) Nov 2294753.2 SSED. James/J. Dayton
C4094MBrookings, OROct 6, Holly BeyerNB CA (OS) Nov 2348606.7 SSED. James/J. Dayton
C4399FTalent, ORSep 17, Belinda VosKale/Elm, Bolinas, CA (OS) Nov 2468482.8 SDavid James
B5443FElkton, ORAug 29, B. Slott/K. HendricksAlder Ck., Bolinas, OR (OS) Nov 2487640.5 SSEDavid James
B5072FBrookings, ORSep 19, Patsy HaggertyMuir Beach, CA, (OS) Nov 2466487.6 SSEMia Monroe
C5015FElkton, ORSep 16, B. Slott/K. HendricksEncinal Beach, Alameda,
CA Nov 29
74661.4 SSESusan Ramos
C3592 (wing)MRedmond, WASep 4, Connie GranbergRedwoods SP, Orick, CA Nov 1269714.5 SSWTyler Steeves
B5436MElkton, ORAug 27, B. Slott/K. HendricksML CA (OS) Nov 28200754.8 SJohn Dayton
C4199MTalent, ORSep 5, Belinda VosArdenwood Farm, Fremont,
CA (OS) Dec 7
93526.2 SDaniel La Flash
B5754MTalent, ORSep 11, Aleece TownsendML CA (OS) Nov 28121592.2 SJohn Dayton
C4214MTalent, ORSep 16, Belinda VosPismo Beach, CA (OS) Dec 14114814.3 SSEDarya Veach
B5479FElkton, ORSep 1, B. Slott/K. HendricksLF CA (OS) Dec 12102754.8 SSEJohn Dayton
B6751MKlamath Falls, ORSep 20, Akimi KingLF CA (OS) Dec 15155579.4 SJohn Dayton
C5078MElkton, ORSep 26, B. Slott/K. HendricksPismo Beach, CA (OS) Dec 30107978.5 SSEBetty Sleath/Jere Schafer
B5983MMedford, ORSep 22, R. and S. CoffanLF CA (OS) Jan 7110597.1 SSEJohn Dayton
C5068FElkton, ORSep 26, B. Slott/K. HendricksAlder Ck., Bolinas, CA (OS) Jan 12108642.1 SSEDavid James
B2363MKlamath Falls, ORSep 12, A. King/T. KeppleAlder Ck., Bolinas, CA (OS) Jan 12122482.8 SSWDavid James
C0065MYakima, WAAug 21, David JamesAlder Ck., Bolinas, CA (OS) Jan 12144988.1 SSWDavid James
C4195MTalent, ORSep 4, Belinda VosAlder Ck., Bolinas, CA (OS) Jan 12130482.8 SDavid James
B5317MGold Beach, OROct 6, Holly BeyerAlder Ck., Bolinas, CA (OS) Jan 1298521.4 SSEDavid James
B5466MElkton, ORSep 1, B. Slott/K. HendricksLos Osos, CA Jan 12133954.3 SSEJoe Billings
B6756FKlamath Falls, ORSep 25, Akimi KingPismo Beach, CA (OS) Jan 16113785.3 SSEPeggy Burhenn
C1396FYakima, WASep 13, David JamesLF CA (OS) Jan 181271084.7 SSWJohn Dayton
B5321MBrookings, OROct 7, Holly BeyerLF CA (OS) Jan 18103595.5 SSEJohn Dayton
C4091FGold Beach, OROct 6, Holly BeyerLF CA (OS) Jan 18104638.9 SSEJohn Dayton
B1861FBoise, IDSep 4, Melinda LoweGoleta, CA Mar 21791065.4 SSWJohn McBirney
MEAN
(±SE)
89.4 ± 6.7
(n = 74)
640.8 ± 41.5
(n = 74)
Table 3. Release, recovery, distance, direction and lifespan data for monarchs captive-reared, tagged and released in the PNW during 2018. OS = overwintering site. Santa Cruz overwintering sites: LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, ML = Moran Lake.
Table 3. Release, recovery, distance, direction and lifespan data for monarchs captive-reared, tagged and released in the PNW during 2018. OS = overwintering site. Santa Cruz overwintering sites: LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, ML = Moran Lake.
Tag #SexRelease LocationDate and TaggerRecovery Location & DateLength of Life (Days)Distance (km)
and Direction
Finder
E5194FAshland, ORAug 24, Steve JohnsonSanta Rosa, CA Sep 914416.8 SBrenda Tharp
C6629MPost Falls, IDSep 6, Bill AmentPalouse, WA Sep 161096.6 SJohn Bafenkamp
E5146FMedford, ORSep 5, Lynn KunstmanPetaluma, CA Sep 1813457.1 SGary Danskin
E0195MYakima, WASep 4, Kristin GumzGlenns Ferry, ID Sep 1814360 SESheila Kramer
E3031MRedmond, WASep 24, Catherine BurnsKennydale, WA Sep 29520.9 SSWJulie Brown
E5798MElkton, ORSep 19, B. Slott/K. HendricksNB CA (OS) Oct 1049754.8 SLee Jaffe
E5068MTalent, ORAug 1, Belinda VosHyampom Airport, CA Aug 1514188.3 SSWJoe Shatos
E5844MElkton, ORSep 27, B. Slott/K. HendricksLF CA (OS) Nov 7114754.8 SJohn Dayton
E5711MAshland, ORSep 14, Steve JohnsonStinson Beach, CA (OS) Oct 2339478 SJudy and Len Chapman
E5363MTalent, ORAug 17, Belinda VosML CA (OS) Nov 19108590.6 SJohn Dayton
E5192MAshland, ORAug 24, Steve JohnsonML CA (OS) Nov 26101584.2 SJohn Dayton
E5125FApplegate, ORSep 7, Linda KappenML CA (OS) Dec 3114597.1 SJohn Dayton
E1247MYakima, WASep 26, David JamesNB CA (OS) Nov 22901084.7 SSWJenna Harrison
E5524MKlamath Falls, ORSep 2, Akimi KingCarpinteria, CA (OS) Dec 24113891.6 SSEJoe Billings
E5195MAshland, ORAug 27, Steve JohnsonMorro Bay Main St, CA (OS) Dec 27122772.5 SSEJoe Billings
E5834FElkton, ORSep 22, B. Slott/K. HendricksMorro Bay Golf C., CA (OS) Dec 2998949.5 SSEJoe Billings
B6628FTulelake, CASep 29, La Del BonhamDavenport, CA Feb 12136553.6 SSWJoe Paquin
E5182MAshland, ORAug 18, Steve JohnsonCayucos, CA Jun 26312764.4 SSEJeffrey Germond
MEAN
(±SE)
81.3 ± 17.6
(n = 18)
573 ± 68.1
(n = 18)
Table 4. Release, recovery, distance, direction and lifespan data for Monarchs captive-reared, tagged and released in the PNW during 2019. OS = overwintering site. Santa Cruz overwintering sites: LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, ML = Moran Lake.
Table 4. Release, recovery, distance, direction and lifespan data for Monarchs captive-reared, tagged and released in the PNW during 2019. OS = overwintering site. Santa Cruz overwintering sites: LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, ML = Moran Lake.
Tag #SexRelease LocationDate and TaggerRecovery Location & DateLength of
Life (Days)
Distance (km)
and Direction
Finder
G1043MTalent, ORAug 30, Belinda VosArcata, CA Sep 1112186.7 SWMelissa Mendez
G6159FYakima, WASep 21, Tim FranksPendleton, OR Sep 298173.8 SERobin Buckle
G0533FBrookings, ORSep 7, Dennis TrigliaOakland, CA Sep 2518506.9 SSEMichelle Schubnel
G0531MBrookings, ORSep 7, Dennis TrigliaNB CA (OS) Oct 668598.7 SSEChung-Cheng Piao
G2506MEagle Point, ORSep 23, Heather MauckBoulder Ck., CA Oct 1320597.1 SSEAdrienne Gaughan
G2404FRedding, CAOct 13, Harvey/ReynoldsSan Rafael, CA Oct 229288.0 SSWKambia Moezzi
G1120FTalent, ORSep 14, Belinda VosPalo Alto, CA Oct 2440537.5 SSEKaren Krimmer
G2006M Elkton, ORSep 27, B. Slott/K. HendricksAlameda, CA Oct 2528663.0 SSEGary Keep
G0679MTalent, ORAug 29, Belinda VosWoodland, CA Sept 1517405.6 SSERose Cassidy
G1769MAshland, OROct 3, Paula CaplingerNB CA (OS) Oct 2730584.2 SSERobert Cala
G1370MCrescent City, CASep 9, Vicki MionFt. Mason, San Fran, CA Nov 355465.1 SSESandi Wong
G1946FBrookings, ORSep 21, Dennis TrigliaNB CA (OS) Nov 3110598.7 SSELinda Milom
G1615MBend, ORSep 14, Egertson/SteeleLF CA (OS) Oct 2961793.4 SJohn Dayton
G1762MAshland, OROct 3, Paula CaplingerLF CA (OS) Nov 26123584.2 SSEJohn Dayton
G0116FElkton, ORSep 19, B. Slott/K. HendricksNB CA (OS) Oct 2940754.8 SSEJohn Dayton
G0571MBrookings, ORSep 16, Dennis TrigliaNB CA (OS) Nov 237598.7 SSEJohn Dayton
G0785MBrookings, ORSep 13, Holly BeyerLF CA (OS) Nov 6151601.9 SSEJohn Dayton
G0752FBrookings, ORAug 22, Holly BeyerNB CA (OS) Nov 747598.7 SSEJohn Dayton
G1772MAshland, OROct 4, Paula CaplingerNB CA (OS) Nov 7126584.2 SSEJohn Dayton
G0164MBrookings, ORAug 11, Holly BeyerElm/Kale Bolinas, CA (OS) Nov 1899481.2 SSEPaul Cherubini
E1478FBrookings, OROct 14, Holly BeyerPismo SB, CA (OS) Nov 2037832.0 SSECraig Corwin
G0112MElkton, ORSep 19, B. Slott/K. HendricksPismo SB, CA (OS) Nov 2062980.1 SAmber Clark
G2498MEagle Point, ORSep 21, Heather MauckDeer Flat, Big Sur, CA Nov 949750.0 SDan Richards
G2739MBrookings, OROct 10, Teresa LawsonLF CA (OS) Nov 18111601.9 SSEJohn Dayton
G0556MBrookings, ORSep 13, Dennis TrigliaElm/Kale Bolinas, CA (OS) Nov 2270481.2 SSEJuan Garcia
G0645MTalent, ORAug 28, Belinda VosML CA (OS) Nov 2357592.2 SSEJohn Dayton
G1109FTalent, ORSep 14, Belinda VosLF CA (OS) Dec 10113592.2 SSEJohn Dayton
G0927MBrookings, ORSep 30, Holly BeyerPresidio, S. Fran. CA Dec 1677498.9 SSEJean Koch
G1039MTalent, ORAug 29, Belinda VosHuntington, Beach, CA Jan 71311042.9 SSEDan Leichuk
E1320MBrookings, OROct 7, Patsy HaggertySanta Cruz, CA Feb 3119608.3 SSEToni Corrigan
MEAN
(±SE)
64.2 ± 7.7
(n = 30)
586.1 ± 34.5
(n = 30)
Table 5. Re-sighting data for captive-reared tagged monarchs in California in 2017. All data from overwintering sites except for C4378 re-sighted during migration. Santa Cruz overwintering sites: NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, ML = Moran Lake. Residency = period spent at overwintering site (s).
Table 5. Re-sighting data for captive-reared tagged monarchs in California in 2017. All data from overwintering sites except for C4378 re-sighted during migration. Santa Cruz overwintering sites: NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, ML = Moran Lake. Residency = period spent at overwintering site (s).
Tag #SexOrigin & Date1st
Resight
2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9thResidency
(Days)
C4378FTalent, OR Sep 12Ukiah
Sep 28
Ukiah
Oct 1
B5244MAshland, OR Sep 11NB
Oct 3
NB
Oct 3
NB
Oct 6
NB
Oct 14
NB
Nov 2
29
B5893MAshland, OR Sep 5NB
Oct 9
LF
Nov 23
45
B5593FElkton, OR Sep 9NB
Oct 9
ML
Nov 28
LF
Jan 10
LF
Jan 24
LF
Jan 26
108
B5307MBrookings, OR Aug 31LF
Oct 9
LF
Jan 10
LF
Jan 26
LF
Feb 1
LF
Feb 8
122
B5260FEugene, OR Jul 30LF
Oct 9
LF
Oct 30
LF
Nov 2
23
B3720MMedford, OR Aug
26
LF
Oct 9
LF
Oct 20
11
C0745MYakima, WA Aug 31LF
Oct 9
LF
Nov 2
LF
Nov 7
LF
Dec 12
LF
Dec 15
LF
Dec 27
LF
Feb 16
130
B5239MAshland, OR Sep 4NB
Oct 21
LF
Jan 13
LF
Feb 1
LF Feb 8 110
C3550MRedmond, WA Sep 3Avila Beach Oct 26Morro Bay CG Jan 7
B2462MRedmond, WA Aug 31Elm/Kal
Bolinas Oct 26
Alder
Bolinas
Nov 25
30
C4407MAshland, OR Sep 8ML
Oct 19
ML
Nov 28
ML
Jan 6
ML
Jan 10
ML
Feb 28
131
B3859MBrookings, OR Sep 6LF
Oct 20
LH
Dec 12
LF
Feb 27
131
C4780FRedmond, WA Sep 6LF
Oct 20
ML
Nov 23
ML
Dec 16
ML
Jan 27
99
B6698MKlamath Falls, OR Sep 22NB
Oct 21
LF
Nov 23
LF
Nov 29
39
C4114FGold Hill, OR Sep 16ML
Oct 29
ML
Nov 15
ML
Dec 10
ML
Dec 28
ML
Jan 15
ML Feb 2 96
C0190MYakima, WA Aug 22 ML
Oct 29
ML
Nov 10
ML
Nov 15
ML
Nov 23
ML
Dec 10
42
B6578MSalem, OR Aug 18NB
Oct 30
LF
Nov 29
ML
Dec 17
ML
Jan 15
ML
Jan 21
ML
Jan 24
LF Mar
10
131
C5023MElkton, OR Sep 16ML
Nov 1
LF
Nov 23
LF
Dec 27
LF
Dec 30
LF
Jan 7
LF
Feb 1
LF
Feb 16
LF
Mar 19
139
B6806FEagle Point, OR Aug 26ML
Nov 1
ML
Nov 10
ML
Nov 22
ML
Dec 13
ML
Dec 21
51
C0694MYakima, WA Aug 30ML
Nov 10
ML
Nov 15
LF
Feb 5
LF
Feb 8
LF
Feb 16
98
C3451MRedmond, WA Sep 3LF
Nov 14
LF
Nov 23
LF
Nov 29
LF
Dec 15
LF
Dec 30
LF
Jan 10
LF
Jan 26
LF
Feb 8
LF
Feb 23
101
C1475MYakima, WA Sep 15LF
Nov 17
ML
Dec 17
30
C5024MElkton, OR Sep 16Pismo
Nov 19
Pismo
Dec 29
Pismo
Dec 31
Pismo
Jan 24
66
C4109MGold Hill, OR Sep 14ML
Nov 22
ML
Jan 10
49
B5565MElkton, OR Sep 6 ML
Nov 22
ML
Nov 28
ML
Dec 19
27
B5436MElkton, OR Aug 27ML
Nov 28
ML
Dec 21
ML
Dec 23
ML
Dec 28
LF
Jan 20
LF
Mar 15
107
B5754MTalent, OR Sep 11ML
Nov 28
ML
Dec 10
ML Dec 13ML
Jan 10
43
C4214MTalent, OR Sep 16Pismo Dec 14Pismo
Jan 8
25
B6751MKlamath Falls, OR Sep 20LF
Dec 15
LF
Dec 22
LF
Dec 27
LF
Jan 20
LF
Jan 26
LF
Feb 16
63
B5983MMedford, OR Sep 22LF
Jan 7
LF
Jan 10
3
B5078MElkton, OR Sep 26Pismo
Dec 30
Pismo
Jan 11
12
B5321MBrookings, OR Oct 7LF
Jan 18
LF
Feb 8
LF Feb
13
26
C5043M Elkton, OR Sep 16NB
Oct 21
NB
Nov 17
LF
Nov 23
33
MEAN
(±SE)
67.2 ± 7.7
(n = 32)
Table 6. Re-sighting data for tagged captive-reared monarchs in California in 2018. All data from overwintering sites in Santa Cruz: NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, ML = Moran Lake. Residency = period spent at overwintering site (s).
Table 6. Re-sighting data for tagged captive-reared monarchs in California in 2018. All data from overwintering sites in Santa Cruz: NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, ML = Moran Lake. Residency = period spent at overwintering site (s).
Tag #SexOrigin & Date1st
Resight
2nd3rd4th5thResidency
(Days)
E5798MElkton, OR Sep 19NB
Oct 10
NB
Nov 7
28
E5844MElkton, OR Sep 27LF
Nov 7
LF
Nov 19
LF
Nov 27
LF
Dec 16
ML
Jan 19
73
E5363MTalent, OR Aug 17ML
Nov 19
ML
Nov 26
ML
Dec 3
15
E5192MAshland, OR Aug 24 ML
Nov 26
ML
Nov 30
ML
Dec 3
7
E5125FApplegate, OR Sep 7ML
Dec 3
ML
Dec 27
24
E1247MYakima, WA Sep 28NB
Nov 22
NB
Dec 27
35
MEAN
(±SE)
30.3 ± 9.4
(n = 6)
Table 7. Re-sighting data for captive-reared tagged monarchs in California in 2019. All data from overwintering sites in Santa Cruz: NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, ML = Moran Lake. Residency = period spent at overwintering site (s).
Table 7. Re-sighting data for captive-reared tagged monarchs in California in 2019. All data from overwintering sites in Santa Cruz: NB = Natural Bridges State Beach, LF = Lighthouse Field State Beach, ML = Moran Lake. Residency = period spent at overwintering site (s).
Tag #SexOrigin
and Date
1st Resight2nd3rd4th5th6th7th8th9th10th11th12thResidency
(Days)
G0531MBrookings,
OR Sep 7
NB
Oct 6
NB
Oct 29
NB
Nov 14
39
G1769MAshland,
OR Oct 3
NB
Oct 27
NB
Nov 2
6
G1946FBrookings,
OR Sep 21
NB
Nov 3
LF
Dec 15
LF
Jan 9
67
G1615MBend,
OR Sep 14
LF
Oct 29
NB
Nov 14
16
G1762MAshland,
OR Oct 3
LF
Oct 29
LF
Nov 14
LF
Nov 26
LF
Nov 29
LF
Dec 5
LF
Dec 17
LF
Dec 23
LF
Jan 17
LF
Jan 24
LF
Jan 29
LF
Feb 4
98
G0785MBrookings,
OR Sep 13
LF
Nov 6
LF
Nov 18
LF
Nov 26
LF
Nov 28
LF
Nov 29
LF
Dec 17
LF
Jan 2
LF
Jan 6
LF
Jan 9
LF
Jan 17
LF
Jan 23
LF
Feb 11
97
G1772MAshland,
OR Oct 4
NB
Nov 7
LF
Nov 28
LF
Dec 10
LF
Dec 23
LF
Jan 1
LF
Jan 23
LF
Jan 25
LF
Feb 2
LF
Feb 7
92
G2739MBrookings,
OR Oct 10
LF
Nov 18
LF
Nov 21
LF
Nov 29
LF
Dec 23
LF
Dec 29
LF
Jan 2
LF
Jan 29
72
G1109FTalent,
OR Sep 14
LF
Dec 10
LF
Dec 17
LF
Jan 9
30
MEAN
(±SE)
57.4 ± 11.9
(n = 9)
Table 8. Distance and daily rate of travel of captive-reared-tagged fall-migrating monarchs during 2017–2019.
Table 8. Distance and daily rate of travel of captive-reared-tagged fall-migrating monarchs during 2017–2019.
Tag# (Year)Release–Recovery LocationsDistance Traveled (km)Release-Recovery (Days)Rate of Travel (km/Day)
B5629 (2017)Gold Hill, OR–Jacksonville, OR20.9120.9
B6917 (2017)Rathdrum, ID–Coeur d’Alene, ID16.135.4
C2564 (2017)Rathdrum, ID–Spokane, WA24.146.0
B6839 (2017)Rathdrum, ID–Spokane, WA27.439.1
C4433 (2017)Rathdrum, ID–Spokane, WA25.7212.8
B6865 (2017)Rathdrum, ID–Coeur d’ Alene, ID16.135.4
C4772 (2017)Redmond, WA–Mercer Island, WA16.172.3
B5553 (2017)Elkton, OR–Grants Pass, OR138.4527.7
B5554 (2017)Elkton, OR–Brookings, OR191538.3
B5518 (2017)Elkton, OR–Jenner, CA585.81441.8
B6679 (2017)Klamath Falls, OR–Santa Barbara, CA877.11946.1
B3729 (2017)Brookings, OR–Vacaville, CA455.43114.7
C1143 (2017)Yakima, WA–Toppenish, WA24.1131.8
C4378 (2017)Talent, OR–Ukiah, CA346.01621.6
C3550 (2017)Redmond, WA–Avila Beach, CA1392.15326.3
MEAN ± SE (2017) 277.1 ± 104.311.9 ± 3.618.7 ± 3.8
E5194 (2018)Ashland, OR–Santa Rosa, CA416.81626.0
C6629 (2018)Post Falls, ID–Palouse, WA96.6109.7
E5146 (2018)Medford, OR–Petaluma, CA457.01335.1
E0195 (2018)Yakima, WA–Glenns Ferry, ID579.41441.4
E3031 (2018)Redmond, WA–Kennydale, WA20.954.2
E5068 (2018)Talent, OR–Hyampom, CA188.31512.6
MEAN ± SE (2018) 293.2 ± 90.912.2 ± 1.721.5 ± 6.1
G1043 (2019)Talent, OR–Arcata, CA186.71215.6
G6159 (2019)Yakima, WA–Pendleton, OR173.8821.7
G0533 (2019)Brookings, OR–Oakland, CA506.91828.2
G0531 (2019)Brookings, OR–Santa Cruz, CA598.72920.6
G2506 (2019)Eagle Point, OR–Boulder Ck., CA597.12029.9
G2404 (2019)Redding, CA–San Rafael, CA288.0932.0
G1120 (2019)Talent, OR–Palo Alto, CA537.54013.0
G2006 (2019)Elkton, OR–Alameda, CA663.02824.0
G0679 (2019)Talent, OR–Woodland, CA405.61723.9
G1769 (2019)Ashland, OR–Santa Cruz, CA584.22424.0
MEAN ± SE (2019) 454.2 ± 56.920.5 ± 3.223.3 ± 1.9
MEAN ± SE (2017–2019) 337.3 ± 57.014.7 ± 2.120.7 ± 2.2
Table 9. Migration distances and lifespan of captive-reared tagged monarchs released into smoky or non-smoky air at Brookings, Oregon during August–October 2017. All recoveries made at overwintering sites except where noted.
Table 9. Migration distances and lifespan of captive-reared tagged monarchs released into smoky or non-smoky air at Brookings, Oregon during August–October 2017. All recoveries made at overwintering sites except where noted.
Tag #SexRelease
Date
AQI (Air
Quality Index)
Recovery Date/LocationPost-Release Length
of Life (Days)
Migration
Distance (km)
Smoky: unhealthy air (AQI > 100)
B3729MAug 24200 (estimate)Sep 24 Vacaville, CA (pre overwintering)31455.4
B3745MAug 28198Nov 15, Natural Bridges, Santa Cruz, CA80597.1
B5307MAug 31200 (estimate)Oct 9, Lighthouse Field, Santa Cruz, CA161595.5
B3859MSep 6304Oct 20, Lighthouse Field, Santa Cruz, CA164618.0
MEAN ± SE 225.5 ± 26.2 109 ± 32.5566.5 ± 37.4
Non-smoky: healthy air (AQI < 100)
B5072FSep 1930Nov 24, Muir Bch, CA66487.6
B5317MOct 6<50Jan 12, Bolinas, CA98521.4
C4091FOct 6<50Jan 18, Lighthouse Field, Santa Cruz, CA104638.9
C4094MOct 6<50Nov 24, Natural Bridges, Santa Cruz, CA48606.7
B5321MOct 7<50Jan 18, Lighthouse Field, Santa Cruz, CA103595.5
MEAN ± SE <46 ± 4.0 83.8 ± 11.3570.0 ± 28.2
Table 10. Length of life and migration distances of captive-reared tagged monarchs released into smoky air in the Medford-Ashland region of southern Oregon during August–September 2018. All recoveries made at overwintering sites except where noted.
Table 10. Length of life and migration distances of captive-reared tagged monarchs released into smoky air in the Medford-Ashland region of southern Oregon during August–September 2018. All recoveries made at overwintering sites except where noted.
Tag #SexRelease Date/LocationAQI (Air
Quality Index)
Recovery Date/LocationPost-Release
Longevity (Days)
Migration
Distance (km)
E5068MAug 1, Talent, OR100Aug 15 Hyampom, CA (pre-wintering)14188.3
E5363MAug 17, Talent, OR142Nov 19, Moran Lake, S. Cruz, CA93590.6
E5182MAug 18, Ashland, OR172Jun 26, Cayucos, CA (post-wintering)312764.4
E5194FAug 24, Ashland, OR165Sep 9, Santa Rosa, CA (pre-wintering)16416.8
E5192MAug 24, Ashland, OR165Nov 26, Moran Lake, S. Cruz, CA94584.2
E5195MAug 27, Ashland, OR50Dec 27, Morro Bay, CA122772.5
E5146FSep 5, Medford, OR177Sep 18, Petaluma, CA (pre-wintering)13457.1
E5125FSep 7, Applegate, OR125Dec 3, Moran Lake, S. Cruz, CA94584.2
E5711MSep 14, Ashland, OR143Oct 23, Stinson Beach, CA39478.0
Mean (±SE) 137.7 ± 13.7 88.6 ± 31.2537.3 ± 60.1
Table 11. Length of life and migration distances of captive-reared tagged Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE)-infected and uninfected monarchs released from Yakima, WA during August–September 2017. All recoveries made at overwintering sites in California.
Table 11. Length of life and migration distances of captive-reared tagged Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE)-infected and uninfected monarchs released from Yakima, WA during August–September 2017. All recoveries made at overwintering sites in California.
Tag #SexRelease DateRecovery Date/LocationPost-Release Length of Life (Days)Migration Distance (km)
OE-infected
C 0065MAug 21Jan 12, Bolinas CA144988.1
C0190MAug 22Oct 29, Moran Lake, S. Cruz, CA1101083.1
C0694MAug 30Nov 10, Moran Lake, S. Cruz, CA1701083.1
C1396FSep 13Jan 18, Lighthouse Field, S. Cruz, CA1271084.7
C1475MSep 15Nov 17 Lighthouse Field, S. Cruz, CA931084.7
C1775MSep 22Nov 18, Bolinas, CA57983.3
MEAN (±SE) 116.8 ± 16.21051.2 ± 20.7
Non-infected
C0677MAug 30Oct 30 N. Bridges, S. Cruz, CA611084.7
C0745MAug 31Oct 9, Lighthouse Field, S. Cruz, CA1691084.7
MEAN (±SE) 115.0 ± 54.01084.7 ± 0.0
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

James, D.G.; Kappen, L. Further Insights on the Migration Biology of Monarch Butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from the Pacific Northwest. Insects 2021, 12, 161. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12020161

AMA Style

James DG, Kappen L. Further Insights on the Migration Biology of Monarch Butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from the Pacific Northwest. Insects. 2021; 12(2):161. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12020161

Chicago/Turabian Style

James, David G., and Linda Kappen. 2021. "Further Insights on the Migration Biology of Monarch Butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from the Pacific Northwest" Insects 12, no. 2: 161. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12020161

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop