Next Article in Journal
Drosophila suzukii Susceptibility to the Oral Administration of Bacillus thuringiensis, Xenorhabdus nematophila and Its Secondary Metabolites
Next Article in Special Issue
Change in the Physiological and Biochemical Aspects of Tomato Caused by Infestation by Cryptic Species of Bemisia tabaci MED and MEAM1
Previous Article in Journal
RNAi by Soaking Aedes aegypti Pupae in dsRNA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endophytic Isaria javanica pf185 Persists after Spraying and Controls Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Colletotrichum acutatum (Glomerellales: Glomerellaceae) in Pepper
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 12
Issue 7
10.3390/insects12070633
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Encapsulation of Basil Essential Oil by Paste Method and Combined Application with Mechanical Trap for Oriental Fruit Fly Control

by
Tibet Tangpao
1,2,
Patcharin Krutmuang
3,4,
Wilawan Kumpoun
5,
Pensak Jantrawut
6,
Tonapha Pusadee
2,4,
Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon
3,4,
Sarana Rose Sommano
1,2,* and
Bajaree Chuttong
3,4,*
1
Plant Bioactive Compound Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
3
Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
4
Innovative Agriculture Research Center, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
5
Science and Technology Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
6
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2021, 12(7), 633; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12070633
Submission received: 21 June 2021 / Revised: 6 July 2021 / Accepted: 9 July 2021 / Published: 13 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Collection Integrated Pest Management Strategies for Horticultural Crops)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Essential oils of the Ocimum spp. comprised of the volatile phenylpropanoids known for the Oriental fruit fly attractant property. However, fully exposing the essential oils in the field limited their ability. Therefore, we proposed a cheap yet effective paste encapsulation technique combined with a plastic trap for controlling tropical fruit fly in tropical fruit orchard.

Abstract

In this work, the chemical compositions of basils oils, including those of lemon basil, white holy basil, Thai basil, tree basil and red holy basil, were analysed. Methyl eugenol was detected in all types of basils. The essential oils of red and white holy basils possessed a comparable ability (~25%) to attract male Oriental fruit fly to the synthesised fruit fly attractant in the laboratory experiment. To control the release of the active ingredients, the white holly basil oil (WBO) was encapsulated with maltodextrin (MD) and gum arabic (GA) by paste method. The essential oil is retained in the wall complex much longer with the addition of MD. The results also revealed that the combination of the MD:GA (25:75) had the highest loading efficiency of the oil (9.40%) as observed by the numerous porous structures by scanning electron microscopy. Fourier-transform infrared spectra of the encapsulated polymer confirmed traces of essential oil functional groups. The field test study advised that WBO-encapsulated products improved fruit fly attractive efficiency by maintaining the release rate of basil essential oil.

1. Introduction

Tropical fruit production along with postharvest handling chains, particularly those of soft skin types, such as avocado, mango and papaya, have been severely desecrating by the invasion of Oriental fruit fly (ORF; Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel). In Thailand, for instance, the estimated loss from this pest alone is roughly over 100-million US$ per year, and the most vulnerable crop being mango [1,2]. The infestation leads to a vast reduction of the consumption demand and has raised quarantine restrictions of the importing countries. Many strategies have been used to control the population of the ORF, for example, spraying with insecticide or protein bait, trapping with attractants, releasing of natural enemies, the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT), as well as the combined approach in the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) [2,3]. While the SIT-integrated management scheme appeared to be effective, the most popular methods are insecticide cover spray and bait spraying [4,5]. However, the remaining pesticide risks the health and welfare of both farmers and consumers and, more importantly, leaves severe damage to the environment [6,7]. The male-lure-based trapping system is among the interests for fruit fly bio-control approaches. Trends are moving toward incorporating the trap with natural plant products for more sustainable practices [8,9,10]. More importantly, a plant-based active ingredient is also economical, non-hazardous, environment-friendly, and simple technology. It is also insect-genera specific, which is effective as a bio-control agent [11,12].
Plant phenylpropanoids of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are derived from the shikimate secondary metabolite biosynthesis pathway between L-phenylalanine and L-tyrosine [13]. Interestingly, the volatiles of these types serve as natural attractants to numerous species of Dacine fruit flies (Tephritidae: Dacinae: Dacini) [14]. Among those, methyl eugenol is highly attractive to male ORFs [8,9,15]. It is also known as a precursor or booster of male ORF’s sex pheromone [16]. Methyl eugenol has been used in the IPM to control ORF population [17,18]. However, as many synthesised controlling substances are banned from organic fruit production, VOCs from natural sources have increasingly gained attention lately [8,9,10]. This compound is a widely distributed natural plant product and consisted of the essential oils from as many as 200 tropical plant species such as anise (Pimpinella anisum), nutmeg (Myristica fragrans), and the Ocimum spp. [7,19,20,21,22,23]. The genus Ocimum of the Lamiaceae is recognised globally as the wealthiest essential oil-bearing family comprising more than 150 species grown widely throughout the tropical and temperate regions [24]. They are collectively known as “basils” of landscape, culinary and medicinal importance [25]. In Asia and the Pacific regions, four basil varieties viz., holy basil (O. sanctum), lemon basil (O. citriodorum), sweet or Thai basil (O. basilicum), and tree basil (O. gratissimum) were commonly grown in large quantities for culinary purposes [26,27]. Plants of the Ocimum spp. have been cultivated for the essential oil extraction industry, especially the sweet basil (O. basilicum L.), in which the annual production was ca. 50 tonnes globally [28,29]. The essential oils are, indeed, of high demand as flavouring agents, cosmetic ingredients and medicines [30,31,32,33]. In 2018, Tangpao et al. [34] illustrated that estragole, eugenol, and methyl eugenol were among the significant VOCs found in the essential oils of some Thai Ocimum spp. plants. Thus, it has been used for the controlling of agricultural pests such as common fruit flies by attracting and killing ability [24,35,36,37]. Accordingly, it is interesting to apply the essential oil from basils as a natural lure for ORF.
There are, however, only limited studies on the use of basil essential oils as ORF biocontrol along with their chemotypes relations. However, the constraint is that essential oil generally decomposes fast when exposed to outdoor conditions [38]. Encapsulation can retain VOCs through physical or chemical interaction with matrix complexation, which improves stability and controls the release [39]. The most used and cheap technique is dispersing the essential oil onto the matrix of wall materials known as paste method complexation. With this technique, the complexation is created by kneading the essential oil with a saccharide paste containing 10–40% water, and no organic solvent is required [40]. To the best of our knowledge, there is no research conducting the efficacy of essential oils from locally available basil species to attract the ORF as well as the development of relating innovative products. The aims of this study are to determine the chemical compositions of basil essential oils from the commonly available Thai Ocimum spp. and to examine their efficiency as a lure for controlling the ORF. Lastly, we also propose an alternative product formulation with a simple encapsulating technique. This research is also one of the first studies to apprise paste encapsulation technology for crop protection and pest management.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Dichloromethane (RCI Labscan, Bangkok, Thailand), toluene (RCI Labscan, Bangkok, Thailand), acetone (RCI Labscan, Bangkok, Thailand), alkane standard solution C8-C20 (Fluka® Analytical, Munich, Germany), commercial fruit fly attractant (methyl eugenol) (S.S.U. Intertrade, Bangkok, Thailand), maltodextrin DE10 (Krungthepchemi, Bangkok, Thailand), and gum arabic (Krungthepchemi, Bangkok, Thailand).

2.2. Insects

ORF pupae were obtained from Plant Protection Research and Development, Department of Agriculture, Bangkok, Thailand. The adult ORFs were fed daily with an artificial diet (yeast extract and sugar with 1:3 ratio) and water (wet sponge). ORFs were between 15–30-day-old (days after emerging from pupae) upon the attractiveness laboratory testing.
  • Experiment 1: Volatile analysis of the essential oils and B. dorsalis attractiveness

2.3. Essential Oil Extraction

The cut stems of Ocimum spp. plants, including O. sanctum var. Rama (red holy basil; RB), O. sanctum var. Shyama (white holy basil; WB), O. citriodorum (lemon basil; LB), O. basilicum var. thyrsiflorum (Thai basil; TB), and O. gratissimum (tree basil; TrB), were collected fresh from the local contract farmer and brought to the laboratory immediately. The plant species and types were confirmed by their taxonomy [34]. The leaves were separated from the stems and shade-dried at room temperature (27–32 °C) until a constant weight was reached. Dried leaves (~300 g) were used for essential oil extraction in a 5 L Clevenger hydro-distillation apparatus containing 2.5 L of distilled water. The extraction was for 2 h at 120 °C. After cooling down at room temperature, the essential oil was removed and treated with anhydrous sodium sulphate to eliminate the remaining water [41].

2.4. Volatile Analyses

Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses were accomplished with a Bruker-scion 436 GC-MS equipped with 30 m × 0.25 mm, Rxi-5Sil MS column (Restek, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Essential oil (2 µL at a dilution of 1% (v/v) in dichloromethane with a presence of 0.015 mg/mL toluene as an internal standard) was injected in a split mode (1:20). The oven temperature was set at 60 °C for 3 min and increased by 3 °C/min until 240 °C, where it was held for 6 min. The carrier gas was helium with a flow rate of 1 mL /min [34]. The interface with MS was at 200 °C, and mass spectra were taken at 70 eV in electron impact ionisation mode, with a scanning speed of 0.5 scans/s from m/z 20–350 [42]. The identification of the volatile compositions was by comparison with mass spectra in NIST 05.L and NIST 98.L libraries. The amount in µg/mL of essential oil was calculated relative to the amount of the internal standard.

2.5. Attractiveness

Attractiveness was performed in a mesh cage (50 × 40 × 40 cm) in a controlled room (23–25 °C; RH 40–70%) as modified from Biasazin et al. [43]. Two bottle-trap was placed inside the cage. The air was pumped in and filtered through the activated charcoal and distilled water then essential oil vapour was released through the top of the cone on bottle traps (Scheme 1). The airflow was adjusted to 0.50 L/min constantly, and all pieces of the experimental apparatus were joined by Teflon tubing. The concentration of the test solutions was 1% (v/v) of essential oil in acetone and acetone as a control solution. The test solution 10 µL was applied to 2 cm2 of filter paper 5 min before testing. One hundred ORFs (50 males and 50 females) were released between two bottles (control and treatment). The number of ORFs trapped in the bottle was recorded (male and female) after ORFs were released for 1 h. The bottles containing the test material were replaced and cleaned every single test. Four replications were determined for each test solution.

2.6. Insect Olfactory-Chemosensory Responses

To investigate insect behaviour response to the essential oils, male and female flies were mounted alive with glue in the position that their frontal parts (heads, wings, and forelegs) could move freely. A 20 µL drop of the 1% essential oils or ethanol as the control was pipetted onto the filter paper located ~10 cm underneath the ORF approximately every 30–60 secs apart. The movement of the antennae and the forelegs were observed [44].
  • Experiment 2: Paste matrix complexation with basil essential oil encapsulation
The highly effective essential oil type was chosen to conduct this experiment.

2.7. Paste Matrix Complexation

Wall materials were made according to Shrestha, Ho, and Bhandari [40], Bhandari et al. [45], and Carneiro et al. [46]. In the preparation, the mixture of the wall material (Table 1) was mixed with distilled water (40 °C) and stirred until completely dissolved. After that, the essential oil was added to the mixture solution at a concentration of 20% to total solids (wall materials). Emulsions were formed using a homogeniser operating at 18,000 rpm for 5 min, and the emulsion characteristic was recorded.
Emulsion viscosity and stability were analysed according to Carneiro, Tonon, Grosso, and Hubinger [46]. Immediately after emulsion, the viscosity of the paste solution was measured by determining steady-shear flow curves using a Rheometer. Emulsion stability was analysed using 25 mL-aliquots of each sample transferred to graduated cylinders of 25 mL, sealed, stored at room temperature for one day, and the upper phase’s volume measured after 24 h. The stability was measured by the percentage of separation and expressed as:
Separation (%) = (H1/H0) × 100
where H0 represents the initial emulsion height, and H1 is the upper phase height.

2.8. Encapsulation Characteristics

The emulsion paste was dried using a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 4 h and then ground to a powder using a grinder. The encapsulation efficiency was quantitatively determined by a UV-visible spectrophotometer [47]. The capsule morphology was examined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The capsule powder was mounted on double-sided tape attached to the specimen stub and then subjected to metallisation (sputtering) with a thin layer of gold. The images were viewed at magnifications of ×2000 using SEM (JEOL JSM-5910, Japan Electron Optics Laboratory Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with an accelerating voltage of 5 kV.

2.9. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR)

FTIR analysis was conducted using a DairyGuardTM Milk Powder Analyser (PerkinElmer). Each sample was scanned by placing the sample on the ATR diamond crystal and applying the pressure tower. The spectrum was verified in the transparent mode from 450–4000 cm−1.

2.10. Controlled Release of the Capsules

One gram of each capsule was placed into the 3 mL vial without sealing. The vials were then left at 25–30 °C (capsules were strictly maintained in dry condition), and weight loss was monitored in an analytical balance as a function of time for 3 h. The percentage of release was calculated in relation to the initial mass of the products [48].
  • Experiment 3: Product efficacy in the field test study

2.11. The Experiment Site

The experiment was conducted in a multi-crop orchard (Dusanee orchard) located in Mae Taeng District, Chiang Mai, Thailand (19°5′51.08″, 98°53′55.54″) in which mango and santol were cultivated 3 × 3 m alternately to one another. The test experiment was conducted during the peak harvesting of mango var. nam dok mai. The maintenance of the orchard was in accordant with Good Agricultural Practice (GAP). The orchard was in a healthy condition comprising a compact load of mango trees (five-year-old, small–medium tree size of ~3 m tall).

2.12. Trap

The trap was made from a plastic coffee cup (250 mL) with a round lid. Six holes were drilled on the cup (3 × Ø 1 cm on the lid and 3 × Ø 0.3 cm on the cup) (Scheme 2a). The capsule (1 g) was placed inside the lid, capped with the cup, and immediately tided onto the mango tree by upside-down position. The traps were hung up-side-down where natural air was able to flow naturally through holes. The efficacy of the encapsulated products was compared by placing traps inside the canopy at the height of ca 1.5–2 m (Scheme 2b). Insects caught on or in the traps were generally counted between 2.30–5.00 pm for 30, 60, 90, and 120 min, and thereafter 24, 48, and 72 h. A completely randomised design (CRD) was used, with eight replicates (Scheme 2c) [49]. The controls were the essential oil (5 µL) on a cotton ball and trap without the product. The product efficiency test was compared with traps with 5 µL on a cotton ball of the commercial fruit fly attractant. They were placed two rows away from the experiment.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

The averages of all the experiments’ data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the significance level p = 0.05 using the IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 23. In addition, principal component analysis (PCA) to summarise graphical differences of volatile components of the essential oil was adopted using Minitab Statistical Software (Minitab®).

3. Results

  • Experiment 1: Volatile analysis of the essential oils and B. dorsalis attractiveness (in-vitro study)

3.1. Chemical Compositions

The VOCs and the relative amount of essential oil from five basils are illustrated in Table 2. Overall, a total of 65 volatile compounds was identified, by which estragole, eugenol, and methyl eugenol of the phenylpropanoids were dominant, followed by the sesquiterpenes (viz., trans-caryophyllene, trans-α-bergamotene, τ-cadinol, cis-α-bisabolene, β-elemene, and germacrene) and monoterpenes (viz., trans-ocimene, linalool, 1,8-cineole, and camphor). The primary constituents of LB essential oil were estragole (~316.87 µg/mL EO), trans-caryophyllene (~51.20 µg/mL EO), cis-α-bisabolene (~37.24 µg/mL EO), and linalool (~32.64 µg/mL EO). Red holy basil oil comprised of the mixture of 17 volatile compounds, of which it was dominated by methyl eugenol (~335.58 µg/mL EO) and trans-caryophyllene (~193.96 µg/mL EO), β-elemene (~119.06 µg/mL EO), and germacrene (~60.35 µg/mL EO). In the essential oil of TB, estragole was the highest (~609.47 µg/mL EO), followed by 1,8-cineole (~37.91 µg/mL EO), τ-cadinol (~14.08 µg/mL EO), and camphor (~13.57 µg/mL EO). As many as 35 volatile compositions were identified in the TrB oil, with eugenol (~224.24 µg/mL EO), trans-ocimene (~169.23 µg/mL EO), trans-α-bergamotene (~83.64 µg/mL EO), and linalool (~45.01 µg/mL EO) being the major components. White holy basil oil contained 23 compounds, including methyl eugenol (~372.57 µg/mL EO), trans-caryophyllene (~99.38 µg/mL EO), estragole (~84.17 µg/mLEO), and eugenol (~83.04 µg/mL EO). The difference in VOC profiles of each type of essential oil was displayed on the chromatograms, as illustrated in Figure 1a.
The relationship of the VOCs and types of basil essential oil were elucidated using principal component analysis in Figure 1c. The biplots analysis depicted a total of 78.93% across the PCA range, which accounted for 45.44% in PC1 and 33.49% in PC2. The volatile compositions of all essential oil were similar from the analysed diagram, but TrB and LB oils were separated from the others by the lower content of estragole. Methyl eugenol was dominant in essential oils of RB, WB and TrB, while contents of eugenol, trans-caryophyllene, β-elemene and germacrene were variable among these oils. The volatiles were also categorised according to their chemical structure types (Figure 1b). It was apparent that the majority of the VOCs was of phenylpropanoids, followed by the sesquiterpene hydrocarbon and oxygenated terpenes. The free volatiles of the monoterpene were detected only in TrB and TB oils.

3.2. Attractiveness

The basil essential oils were able to attract ORF differently, and the vast majority of responsive ORF was male, as shown in Table 3. Although the efficiency of the essential oil was less than commercial ME, the essential oils of the RB (~25 flies) and WB (~19 flies) were comparable to the ME (28 flies). However, the numbers of responses were low for LB, TB, and TrB oils.

3.3. Insect Olfactory Chemosensory Responses

Overall, the ORFs of both sexes responded to the volatile substances by giving more movement frequency of the antenna and forelegs than when treated with ethanol (Table 4). The highest response was with ME, following by the WB, TB, and RB, respectively, and the degree of response was stronger in male ORFs than from the female ORFs. By looking only at the male ORFs, the antennae movement was more frequent when applied with the essential oils than the ME, but a high frequency of foreleg movement was observed with the ME (Supplementary Materials Video S1). These, however, were less obvious in the female ORFs.
  • Experiment 2: Paste matrix complexation with basil essential oil encapsulation
From the first experiment, we found that the essential oils that were effective in attracting ORF were of the holy basils of red and white types, in which the finding was in correspondent with its high content of methyl eugenol. In addition, the percentage yield of these essential oil types was considerably higher (~1%) compared with other basil types. Considering the material availability and yield, we then selected white holy basil oil (WBO) for the substantial studies.

3.4. Emulsion Characteristic and Encapsulation Characteristics

The viscosity of different wall material pastes is illustrated in Table 5. The result showed that the paste solution of GA gave high viscosity of 2976 cP. However, when mixed with MD, the viscosities decreased to 1348.0, 631.0, and 422.0, with 75%, 50%, and 25% MD content, respectively.
After loading with WBO, the loading capacity and encapsulation efficiency were also shown in the same table. The GA complexation gave a higher loading capacity (~0.3 µL/0.2 g) than that of the absolute MD. In addition, the GA-consisting products also gave the high WBO encapsulation efficiency. The 25:75 ratio of MD:GA had the highest efficiency of containing WBO at ~9.4%.
The SEM images illustrate surface characteristics of each processed capsule (Table 6). The WBO loaded products exhibited tiny pore characteristics on the surface complexation.

3.5. FTIR

The FTIR patterns of the WBO-encapsulated products and wall material (MD25GA75) are illustrated in Figure 2. We were interested mainly in the FTIR characteristics of holy basil essential oil previously described by Sutaphanit and Chitprasert [50] and Agatonovic-Kustrin et al. [51]. The C–H bending peaks of the alkene/aromatic groups were detected in the FTIR spectra at ~550 and ~995 cm−1, and at ~1123 cm−1 represented C–O stretching vibrations. The spectrum at ~1369 and ~1451 cm−1 was assigned to the symmetric and asymmetric C–H bending vibrations in –CH3, respectively. The bands observed at ~1513, ~1608, and ~1638 cm−1 indicated the –C=C– stretching vibrations of alkene/aromatic, symmetric and asymmetric C–H stretching vibrations in –CH2– are present in the bands at ~2860 and ~2928 cm−1 and asymmetric C–H stretching vibration in =CH2 at the band of ~3079 cm−1. The FTIR spectrum peaks of WBO-encapsulated product showed evidence of the functional groups of those detected in WBO marked at ~995, ~1369, ~1451, ~1608, and ~2928 cm−1. This implied that WBO was successfully loaded and remained in the wall material. It is also worth highlighting that there is no significant chemical interaction between WBO and the wall material based on the detected spectra.

3.6. Controlled Release of the White Holy Basil-Encapsulate Product

The volatile release characteristic of encapsulated products was given as in Figure 3. The results were reported according to the percentage of weight loss after exposure in the ambient condition. The releasing of all capsules during the first 120 min was initially subtle. However, after 120 min, capsules containing high GA (GA100 and MD25GA75) gave a remarkable increase in the release. In contrast, high doses of MD-containing capsules remained relatively stable.
  • Experiment 3: WBO-encapsulated products efficacy in the field test study

3.7. Product Efficacy

The essential oil capsules portrayed different attraction capacities at different times (Table 7). At the initial 30 min, MD75GA25 attracted the most fruit flies among all other products and increased proportionately thereafter. The WBO encapsulated in the MD25GA75 formula was able to trap flies constantly (at about 0.25 files per trap) at intervals of 30–120 min and increased after 24 and 72 h exposure in the field. As for the GA100 product, the capacity was approximately 0.25 and 0.50 per trap at 24 and 72 h, respectively. Whereas WBO alone resulted in a rapid loss of the volatile active ingredients to the environment, thereby reducing the attractant ability.
The efficiency of the capsules combined with the fruit fly traps was by potting response curves of the efficacy data (Figure 4). The results showed that the encapsulation by paste method could progressively increase fruit fly attraction at later hours, especially in formulations with a mixture of GA and MD. Meanwhile, the product’s efficiency of the commercial ME trended to decrease over time.

4. Discussion

The volatile compositions from the essential oils of all basil types comprised the phenylpropanoid group, including methyl chavicol (estragole), eugenol and methyl eugenol. The others belong to the sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes. These compounds contribute to the unique sweet-anise aroma, which is the aroma characteristic of the essential oils from these species [28]. Moreover, the influence of gene expression for the biosynthesis of the phenylpropanoids is able to confer variation of the chemotypes within the same species. Thus, the altered levels between methyl chavicol (estragole) and linalool can be used to classified subspecies of the sweet basil [28,52,53,54]. Similarly, the constituents of the eugenol and methyl eugenol can be used to discriminate sub-varieties of the holy basil (O. sanctum) [30]. This is in agreement with our finding where the distinct levels of these phenylpropanoids were observed in both WB and RB. In addition, the content of methyl eugenol also depended upon the cultivation climate in which the intensity was with the Ocimum spp. grown in sub-tropical areas of North Africa, Eastern Europe, and parts of Asia [32,55]. Methyl eugenol is the primary volatile active ingredient in holy basils and is also known as a highly potent attractant for the ORF and other species in the Tephritidae family [56]. Male ORFs are attracted to this substance because it acts as a hormonal precursor and booster of male ORF’s sex pheromone [16,57]. Insect antennae is an essential organ in the olfactory system that escorts insect behavioural expression such as food hunting, mating, and finding appropriate sites for laying eggs [58]. First, the semiochemicals are detected by sensilla on the antennae, bound to its transmembrane odorant receptors (ORs) that generate the chemical signals transmitted into nerve impulses to the brain and control movement organs, such as forelegs [58,59]. In our study, insects responded to the VOCs with the increase in the movement frequency of the antennae and forelegs. The antennae’s higher frequency move was with the essential oils indicating the sensitivity of natural VOCs to its olfactory organs. Gomez-Diaz, Martin, Garcia-Fernandez, and Alcorta [58], Leal [60] described that the insect sensilla comprises pores in the cuticle that allow odorants to diffuse into the nerve system. The located ORs are also described as odour-specific, especially natural products such as essential oils [61,62]. In the ORF, in particular, its ORs are able to bind structurally with all portions of methyl eugenol molecule and respond to ortho-substituted benzenes with adjacent oxygen atoms or isoelectronic equivalents [63]. Our study conveyed that male B. dorsalis responded to various forms of VOCs in the essential oils. However, only methyl eugenol composition rendered the movement of the forelegs towards the odorant sources.
The WBO was encapsulated to improve the volatility of the active compounds. Maltodextrin and gum arabic are affordable polysaccharides that are often used in encapsulations [64,65]. Maltodextrin is a water-soluble substance of low viscosity, low sugar content and free from colour and smell [66]. Likewise, GA is an emulsifier and enveloping material [67]. The viscosity of the MD was less but increased thereafter mixing with the GA. The efficiency of WBO loading also increased from the higher GA ratio in wall material formulation. Akhavan Mahdavi et al. [68] suggested that the encapsulation properties of the compounds were improved when the encapsulation mixture was composed of more than one type of wall material. The spectrum patterns were able to characterise the functional groups of the substance by the absorption or transmission, and the appearance of the vibration peak indicated [51]. The FTIR and SEM results indicated that the encapsulation characteristics of the wall materials were structurally formed. This was, however, not a chemical bond encapsulation as the volatile organics were not soluble in the water-soluble wall materials. The finding was in line with Sutaphanit and Chitprasert [50], in which the holy basil oil was not fully dissolved in the gelatine wall.
Our field study was conducted during the sunlight to test the ability of the product as an attractant and the efficiency compared to the methyl eugenol. The temporal pattern of the mating behaviour of fruit flies: courtship episodes of the flies were usually between 0–9 h, and the striking peak of the activity was before noon [69,70]. The decision of female flies to mate with male fruit flies depends on long-range attraction signals, willingness to copulate, and male-male competition [71]. On the other hand, males decide to mate upon their libido and external stimuli, such as methyl eugenol [72]. Courtship usually takes place on fruits and fruit trees, and the estimated male success rate of mating is only around 0.6 per female per day [70]. Without mechanical traps, delivery of methyl eugenol fumigation enhances the mating success of B. carambolae and B. dorsalis males [73], which is not recommended for the non-sterile insect approach. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain the release of VOCs with semiochemical properties during the courtship episodes to be successful in the mechanical trap. Our finding demonstrated that paste encapsulation with MD combined with GA could maintain the release rate of the essential oil.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://zenodo.org/record/5094021#.YO0VZEwRVPZ, Video S1: the olfactory chemosensory responses of male Oriental fruit fly with a drop of the following VOCs; ethanol (at 0.30 min), methyl eugenol (at 1.39 min), ethanol (at 3.05 min), white holy basil oil (at 4.10 min), ethanol (at 5.20 min), methyl eugenol (at 6.30 min), ethanol (at 7.36 min), and white holy basil oil (at 8.36 min).

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, S.R.S.; methodology, T.T., P.K., W.K., and P.J.; formal analysis, T.T.; investigation, T.T. and S.R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, T.T.; writing—review and editing, T.P., R.C., B.C., and S.R.S.; supervision, W.K., P.K., P.J., and S.R.S.; project administration, T.P., R.C., and B.C.; funding acquisition, T.P., R.C., and B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research project was funded by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) and was partially supported by Chiang Mai University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Teaching Assistant and Research Assistant (TA/RA) scholarship from the Graduate School, Chiang Mai University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Canhanga, L.; De Meyer, M.; Cugala, D.; Massimiliano, V.; Maulid, M. Economic injury level of the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), on commercial mango farms in Manica Province, Mozambique. Afr. Entomol. 2020, 28, 278–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Orankanok, W.; Chinvinijkul, S.; Thanaphum, S.; Sitilob, P.; Enkerlin, W.R. Area-Wide Integrated Control of Oriental Fruit Fly Bactrocera Dorsalis and Guava Fruit Fly Bactrocera Correcta in Thailand; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 517–526. [Google Scholar]
  3. Fezza, T.J.; Shelly, T.E. Comparative dispersal and survival of male Oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) from wild and genetic sexing strains. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2020, 41, 751–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chinajariyawong, A.; Kritsaneepaiboon, S.; Drew, R. Efficacy of protein bait sprays in controlling fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting angled luffa and bitter gourd in Thailand. Raffles Bull. Zool. 2003, 51, 7–16. [Google Scholar]
  5. Verghese, A.; Sreedevi, K.; Nagaraju, D. Pre and Postharvest IPM for the Mango Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fruit Flies of Economic Importance: From Basic to Applied Knowledge, Salvador, Brazil, 10–15 September 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ji, Q.E.; Chen, J.H.; McInnis, D.O.; Guo, Q.L. The effect of methyl eugenol exposure on subsequent mating performance of sterile males of Bactrocera dorsalis. J. Appl. Entomol. 2013, 137, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, H.Y.; Chen, L.S.; Shen, Z.C.; Zhou, H.J.; Hao, L.; Xu, H.; Zhou, X.H. Synthesis of mesoporous silica post-loaded by methyl eugenol as an environment-friendly slow-release bio pesticide. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Vargas, R.I.; Leblanc, L.; Piñero, J.C.; Hoffman, K.M. Male Annihilation, Past, Present, and Future. In Trapping and the Detection, Control, and Regulation of Tephritid Fruit Flies; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 493–511. [Google Scholar]
  9. Manoukis, N.C.; Vargas, R.I.; Carvalho, L.; Fezza, T.; Wilson, S.; Collier, T.; Shelly, T.E. A field test on the effectiveness of male annihilation technique against Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) at varying application densities. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0213337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Tan, K.H.; Nishida, R.; Jang, E.B.; Shelly, T.E. Pheromones, Male Lures, and Trapping of Tephritid Fruit Flies. In Trapping and the Detection, Control, and Regulation of Tephritid Fruit Flies: Lures, Area-Wide Programs, and Trade Implications; Shelly, T., Epsky, N., Jang, E.B., Reyes-Flores, J., Vargas, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 15–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mirani, Z. Study of diffusion and adoption of sustainable agricultural practice (Male Annihilation Technique). Int. J. Educ. Dev. Using ICT 2007, 3, 89–99. [Google Scholar]
  12. Manrakhan, A.; Daneel, J.-H.; Beck, R.; Love, C.N.; Gilbert, M.J.; Virgilio, M.; De Meyer, M. Effects of male lure dispensers and trap types for monitoring of Ceratitis capitata and Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 2219–2230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Santos Sánchez, N.; Salas-Coronado, R.; Hernandez-Carlos, B.; Villanueva, C. Shikimic Acid Pathway in Biosynthesis of Phenolic Compounds. In Plant Physiological Aspects of Phenolic Compounds; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Christenson, L. The Male Annihilation Technique in the Control of Fruit Flies; ACS Publications: Washington, DC, USA, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ndlela, S.; Mohamed, S.; Ndegwa, P.; Ong’Amo, G.; Ekesi, S. Male annihilation technique using methyl eugenol for field suppression of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)(Diptera: Tephritidae) on mango in Kenya. Afr. Entomol. 2016, 24, 437–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tan, K.H.; Nishida, R. Methyl eugenol: Its occurrence, distribution, and role in nature, especially in relation to insect behavior and pollination. J. Insect Sci. 2012, 12, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Kah-Wei Hee, A.; Tan, K.-H. Transport of methyl eugenol-derived sex pheromonal components in the male fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2006, 143, 422–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Law, J.H.; Regnier, F.E. Pheromones. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1971, 40, 533–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Janssen, A.; Scheffer, J.; Ntezurubanza, L.; Svendsen, A.B. Antimicrobial activities of some Ocimum species grown in Rwanda. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1989, 26, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zoghbi, M.d.G.B.; Oliveira, J.; Andrade, E.H.A.; Trigo, J.R.; Fonseca, R.C.M.; Rocha, A.E.S. Variation in volatiles of Ocimum campechianum Mill. and Ocimum gratissimum L. cultivated in the North of Brazil. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2007, 10, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Awasthi, P.; Dixit, S. Chemical Compositions of Ocimum sanctum Shyama and Ocimum sanctum Rama Oils from the plains of Northern India. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2007, 10, 292–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muráriková, A.; Ťažký, A.; Neugebauerová, J.; Planková, A.; Jampílek, J.; Mučaji, P.; Mikuš, P.J.M. Characterization of essential oil composition in different basil species and pot cultures by a GC-MS method. Molecules 2017, 22, 1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hossain, M.S.; Sarkar, B.C.; Hossain, M.M.; Mian, M.Y.; Rajotte, E.G.; Muniappan, R.; O’Rourke, M.E. Comparison of biorational management approaches against mango fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel) in Bangladesh. Crop. Prot. 2020, 135, 104807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pandey, A.K.; Singh, P.; Tripathi, N.N. Chemistry and bioactivities of essential oils of some Ocimum species: An overview. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2014, 4, 682–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Patel, R.P.; Singh, R.; Rao, B.R.R.; Singh, R.R.; Srivastava, A.; Lal, R.K. Differential response of genotype × environment on phenology, essential oil yield and quality of natural aroma chemicals of five Ocimum species. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2016, 87, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Juntachote, T.; Berghofer, E.; Siebenhandl, S.; Bauer, F. The antioxidative properties of holy basil and galangal in cooked ground pork. Meat Sci. 2006, 72, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mahajan, N.; Rawal, S.; Verma, M.; Poddar, M.; Alok, S. A phytopharmacological overview on Ocimum species with special emphasis on Ocimum sanctum. Biomed. Prev. Nutr. 2013, 3, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Grayer, R.J.; Kite, G.C.; Goldstone, F.J.; Bryan, S.E.; Paton, A.; Putievsky, E. Infraspecific taxonomy and essential oil chemotypes in sweet basil, Ocimum basilicum. Phytochemistry 1996, 43, 1033–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Maskri, A.Y.; Hanif, M.A.; Al-Maskari, M.Y.; Abraham, A.S.; Al-sabahi, J.N.; Al-Mantheri, O. Essential Oil from Ocimum basilicum (Omani Basil): A Desert Crop. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2011, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Saran, P.L.; Tripathy, V.; Saha, A.; Kalariya, K.A.; Suthar, M.K.; Kumar, J. Selection of superior Ocimum sanctum L. accessions for industrial application. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2017, 108, 700–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zheljazkov, V.D.; Callahan, A.; Cantrell, C.L. Yield and oil composition of 38 basil (Ocimum basilicum L.) accessions grown in Mississippi. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2008, 56, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Avetisyan, A.; Markosian, A.; Petrosyan, M.; Sahakyan, N.; Babayan, A.; Aloyan, S.; Trchounian, A. Chemical composition and some biological activities of the essential oils from basil Ocimum different cultivars. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Jentzsch, P.V.; Ramos, L.A.; Ciobotă, V. Handheld Raman spectroscopy for the distinction of essential oils used in the cosmetics industry. Cosmetics 2015, 2, 162–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tangpao, T.; Chung, H.-H.; Sommano, S.R. Aromatic profiles of essential oils from five commonly used Thai basils. Foods 2018, 7, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Verghese, A.; Sreedevi, K.; Nagaraju, D.; Mala, B. A farmer-friendly trap for the management of the fruit fly Bactrocera spp. (Tephritidae: Diptera). Pest Manag. Hortic. Ecosyst. 2006, 12, 164–167. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chowdhary, K.; Kumar, A.; Sharma, S.; Pathak, R.; Jangir, M. Ocimum sp.: Source of biorational pesticides. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2018, 122, 686–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ling Chang, C.; Kyu Cho, I.; Li, Q.X. Insecticidal activity of basil oil, trans-anethole, estragole, and linalool to adult fruit flies of Ceratitis capitata, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Bactrocera cucurbitae. J. Econ. Entomol. 2009, 102, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Turek, C.; Stintzing, F.C. Stability of essential oils: A Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2013, 12, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Maes, C.; Bouquillon, S.; Fauconnier, M.-L. Encapsulation of essential oils for the development of biosourced pesticides with controlled release: A review. Molecules 2019, 24, 2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Shrestha, M.; Ho, T.M.; Bhandari, B.R. Encapsulation of tea tree oil by amorphous beta-cyclodextrin powder. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 1474–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sriwichai, T.; Junmahasathien, T.; Sookwong, P.; Potapohn, N.; Sommano, S. Evaluation of the optimum harvesting maturity of makhwaen fruit for the perfumery industry. Agriculture 2019, 9, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. De Lira, C.S.; Pontual, E.V.; de Albuquerque, L.P.; Paiva, L.M.; Paiva, P.M.G.; de Oliveira, J.V.; Napoleão, T.H.; Navarro, D.M.d.A.F. Evaluation of the toxicity of essential oil from Alpinia purpurata inflorescences to Sitophilus zeamais (maize weevil). Crop. Prot. 2015, 71, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Biasazin, T.D.; Chernet, H.T.; Herrera, S.L.; Bengtsson, M.; Karlsson, M.F.; Lemmen-Lechelt, J.K.; Dekker, T. Detection of volatile constituents from food lures by Tephritid fruit flies. Insects 2018, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. McKinney, R.M.; Vernier, C.; Ben-Shahar, Y. The neural basis for insect pheromonal communication. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2015, 12, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Bhandari, B.R.; D’Arc, B.R.; Padukka, I. Encapsulation of lemon oil by paste method using β-cyclodextrin:  Encapsulation efficiency and profile of oil volatiles. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 5194–5197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Carneiro, H.C.F.; Tonon, R.V.; Grosso, C.R.F.; Hubinger, M.D. Encapsulation efficiency and oxidative stability of flaxseed oil microencapsulated by spray drying using different combinations of wall materials. J. Food Eng. 2013, 115, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Zhang, T.; Luo, Y.; Wang, M.; Chen, F.; Liu, J.; Meng, K.; Zhao, H. Double-layered microcapsules significantly improve the long-term effectiveness of essential oil. Polymers 2020, 12, 1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lopez, M.D.; Maudhuit, A.; Pascual-Villalobos, M.J.; Poncelet, D. Development of formulations to improve the controlled-release of linalool to be applied as an insecticide. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 1187–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Broumas, T.; Haniotakis, G.E. Comparative field studies of various traps and attractants of the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1994, 73, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sutaphanit, P.; Chitprasert, P. Optimisation of microencapsulation of holy basil essential oil in gelatin by response surface methodology. Food Chem. 2014, 150, 313–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Agatonovic-Kustrin, S.; Ristivojevic, P.; Gegechkori, V.; Litvinova, T.M.; Morton, D.W. Essential oil quality and purity evaluation via ft-ir spectroscopy and pattern recognition techniques. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Khalid, K.A. Influence of water stress on growth, essential oil, and chemical composition of herbs (Ocimum sp.). Int. Agrophysics 2006, 20, 289–296. [Google Scholar]
  53. Abdollahi Mandoulakani, B.; Eyvazpour, E.; Ghadimzadeh, M. The effect of drought stress on the expression of key genes involved in the biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids and essential oil components in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). Phytochemistry 2017, 139, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rezaie, R.; Mandoulakani, B.A.; Fattahi, M. Cold stress changes antioxidant defense system, phenylpropanoid contents and expression of genes involved in their biosynthesis in Ocimum basilicum L. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Joshi, R.K. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Ocimum basilicum L. (sweet basil) from Western Ghats of North West Karnataka, India. Anc. Sci. Life 2014, 33, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kothari, S.K.; Bhattacharya, A.K.; Ramesh, S. Essential oil yield and quality of methyl eugenol rich Ocimum tenuiflorum L.f. (syn. O. sanctum L.) grown in south India as influenced by method of harvest. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1054, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nishida, R.; Tan, K.H.; Serit, M.; Lajis, N.H.; Sukari, A.M.; Takahashi, S.; Fukami, H. Accumulation of phenylpropanoids in the rectal glands of males of the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis. Experientia 1988, 44, 534–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Gomez-Diaz, C.; Martin, F.; Garcia-Fernandez, J.M.; Alcorta, E. The two main olfactory receptor families in Drosophila, ORs and IRs: A comparative approach. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liu, Z.; Smagghe, G.; Lei, Z.; Wang, J.-J. Identification of male- and female-specific olfaction genes in antennae of the Oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0147783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Leal, W.S. Odorant Reception in Insects: Roles of receptors, binding proteins, and degrading enzymes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58, 373–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Benton, R.; Sachse, S.; Michnick, S.W.; Vosshall, L.B. Atypical membrane topology and heteromeric function of drosophila odorant receptors in vivo. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, Q.; Xu, P.; Sanchez, S.; Duran, P.; Andreazza, F.; Isaacs, R.; Dong, K. Behavioral and physiological responses of Drosophila melanogaster and D. suzukii to volatiles from plant essential oils. Pest Manag. Sci 2021, 77, 3698–3705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Metcalf, R.L.; Metcalf, E.R.; Mitchell, W.C.; Lee, L.W. Evolution of olfactory receptor in Oriental fruit fly Dacus dorsalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1979, 76, 1561–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Akdeniz, B.; Sumnu, G.; Sahin, S. Microencapsulation of phenolic compounds extracted from onion (Allium cepa) skin. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2018, 42, e13648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ravichandran, K.; Palaniraj, R.; Saw, N.M.M.T.; Gabr, A.M.M.; Ahmed, A.R.; Knorr, D.; Smetanska, I. Effects of different encapsulation agents and drying process on stability of betalains extract. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 51, 2216–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Robert, P.; Gorena, T.; Romero, N.; Sepulveda, E.; Chavez, J.; Saenz, C. Encapsulation of polyphenols and anthocyanins from pomegranate (Punica granatum) by spray drying. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1386–1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hosseini, A.; Jafari, S.M.; Mirzaei, H.; Asghari, A.; Akhavan, S. Application of image processing to assess emulsion stability and emulsification properties of Arabic gum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 126, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Akhavan Mahdavi, S.; Jafari, S.M.; Assadpoor, E.; Dehnad, D. Microencapsulation optimization of natural anthocyanins with maltodextrin, gum Arabic and gelatin. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 85, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. De Almeida, L.M.; Araújo, A.; Mendes, N.H.D.; de Souza, J.M.G.A.; Menezes, A.A.L. The temporal pattern of mating behavior of the fruit fly, Anastrepha zenildae in the laboratory. J. Insect Sci. 2011, 11, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Dukas, R. Natural history of social and sexual behavior in fruit flies. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 21932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Poramarcom, R.; Boake, C.R.B. Behavioural influences on male mating success in the Oriental fruit fly, Dacus dorsalis Hendel. Anim. Behav. 1991, 42, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhang, S.X.; Miner, L.E.; Boutros, C.L.; Rogulja, D.; Crickmore, M.A. Motivation, perception, and chance converge to make a binary decision. Neuron 2018, 99, 376–388.e376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Haq, I.u.; Cáceres, C.; Meza, J.S.; Hendrichs, J.; Vreysen, M.J.B. Different methods of methyl eugenol application enhance the mating success of male Oriental fruit fly (Dipera: Tephritidae). Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 12 00633 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The attractiveness experiment using the two bottle-trap (two-choice olfactometer): (1) electric air pump, (2) activated charcoal flasks, (3) distilled water flasks, (4) experimental cage, (5) insects releasing point, and (5.1) and (5.2) bottle traps.
Scheme 1. The attractiveness experiment using the two bottle-trap (two-choice olfactometer): (1) electric air pump, (2) activated charcoal flasks, (3) distilled water flasks, (4) experimental cage, (5) insects releasing point, and (5.1) and (5.2) bottle traps.
Insects 12 00633 sch001
Insects 12 00633 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Field study of the Oriental fruit fly traps with encapsulated products during mango var. nam dok mai harvesting season. (a) Trap and (b) Trap hanging inside the canopy; TR1 = MD100, TR2 = GA100, TR3 = MD50GA50, TR4 = MD75GA25, TR5 = MD25GA75, CTR+ = white holy basil essential oil, and CTR- = no test solution (c) Experimental arrangement; R1–R8 as trap replications 1–8, and C1–C3 as traps with the commercial fruit fly attractant 1–3.
Scheme 2. Field study of the Oriental fruit fly traps with encapsulated products during mango var. nam dok mai harvesting season. (a) Trap and (b) Trap hanging inside the canopy; TR1 = MD100, TR2 = GA100, TR3 = MD50GA50, TR4 = MD75GA25, TR5 = MD25GA75, CTR+ = white holy basil essential oil, and CTR- = no test solution (c) Experimental arrangement; R1–R8 as trap replications 1–8, and C1–C3 as traps with the commercial fruit fly attractant 1–3.
Insects 12 00633 sch002
Insects 12 00633 g001 550
Figure 1. The chromatograms of the VOC profiles of different basils essential oils (LB; lemon basil (O. citriodorum), RB; red holy basil (O. sanctum var. Rama), TB; Thai basil (O. basilicum var. thyrsiflorum), TrB; tree basil (O. gratissimum), and WB; white holy basil (O. sanctum var. Shyama)) with the detailed analysis of the chemical compositions as illustrated in Table 2 (a), their relative percentage composition of volatile types (b), and a biplot diagram illustrating the relationships among the volatiles components with five basil types (c).
Figure 1. The chromatograms of the VOC profiles of different basils essential oils (LB; lemon basil (O. citriodorum), RB; red holy basil (O. sanctum var. Rama), TB; Thai basil (O. basilicum var. thyrsiflorum), TrB; tree basil (O. gratissimum), and WB; white holy basil (O. sanctum var. Shyama)) with the detailed analysis of the chemical compositions as illustrated in Table 2 (a), their relative percentage composition of volatile types (b), and a biplot diagram illustrating the relationships among the volatiles components with five basil types (c).
Insects 12 00633 g001
Insects 12 00633 g002 550
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of white holy basil oil (WBO), the wall material (MD25GA75), and white holy basil oil-loaded product (WBO-MD25GA75).
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of white holy basil oil (WBO), the wall material (MD25GA75), and white holy basil oil-loaded product (WBO-MD25GA75).
Insects 12 00633 g002
Insects 12 00633 g003 550
Figure 3. The percentage of volatile release as a function of time.
Figure 3. The percentage of volatile release as a function of time.
Insects 12 00633 g003
Insects 12 00633 g004 550
Figure 4. The trend of fruit flies caught by different lures at different times of field exposure.
Figure 4. The trend of fruit flies caught by different lures at different times of field exposure.
Insects 12 00633 g004
Table
Table 1. Wall material types and ratio.
Table 1. Wall material types and ratio.
TreatmentsRatioEmblem
Maltodextrin (MD)100MD100
Gum Arabic (GA)100GA100
MD–GA50–50MD50GA50
MD–GA75–25MD75GA25
MD–GA25–75MD25GA75
Table
Table 2. Chemical compositions of the essential oils from five Ocimum spp. plants.
Table 2. Chemical compositions of the essential oils from five Ocimum spp. plants.
No.RICompoundsVolatile TypesAmount of Chemical (µg/mL Essential Oils ± SE)
LBRBTBTrBWB
1785methyl 2-methylbutanoateothersndndnd2.56 ± 0.07nd
2818(E)-hex-2-enalothersndndnd1.04 ± 0.12nd
3974β-pinenemonoterpenendnd2.72 ± 0.06ndnd
49761-octen-3-olothers3.64 ± 0.12ndnd7.58 ± 0.27nd
59816-methyl-5-hepten-2-oneothers11.02 ± 0.41ndnd2.25 ± 0.08nd
6987myrcenemonoterpenendnd3.15 ± 0.117.89 ± 0.21nd
79916-methyl-5-Hepten-2-olothers1.25 ± 0.06ndndndnd
89963-octanolothersndndnd4.29 ± 0.14nd
91127l-limonenemonoterpenendnd2.23 ± 0.08ndnd
1011291,8-cineolemonoterpenoid2.41 ± 0.09nd37.91 ± 1.28ndnd
111136trans-ocimenemonoterpenendndnd169.23 ± 4.57nd
121144(E)-3,7-dimethylocta-1,3,6-trienemonoterpenendnd9.42 ± 0.34ndnd
131144ocimenemonoterpenendndnd7.98 ± 0.26nd
141185fenchonemonoterpenoid2.64 ± 0.09ndndndnd
151198linaloolmonoterpenoid32.64 ± 1.336.95 ± 0.211.77 ± 0.0745.01 ± 1.907.41 ± 0.41
1612016-methyl-hepta-3,5-dien-2-oneothersndndnd2.00 ± 0.12nd
171219(3E,5E)-2,6-dimethyl-1,3,5,7-octatetraenemonoterpenendndnd2.42 ± 0.06nd
1812262,6-dimethyl-2,4,6-octatrienemonoterpenendndnd20.29 ± 0.51nd
191237trans-epoxyocimenemonoterpenoidndndnd0.89 ± 0.05nd
201242camphormonoterpenoid5.48 ± 0.22nd13.57 ± 0.57nd3.25 ± 0.13
211249nerol oxidemonoterpenoid2.01 ± 0.11ndndndnd
221267l-borneolmonoterpenoidnd10.50 ± 0.32ndnd11.99 ±0.42
231268p-Mentha-1,5-dien-8-olmonoterpenoidndndnd2.13 ± 0.10nd
241292fencholmonoterpenoid13.05 ± 0.30nd1.48 ± 0.04nd3.65 ± 0.10
251294estragolephenylpropanoid316.87 ± 15.1214.98 ± 0.47609.47 ± 20.00nd84.17 ± 2.81
261299(E,E)-2,6-dimethyl-3,5,7-octatrien-2-olmonoterpenoidndndnd10.96 ±0.43nd
271323nerolmonoterpenoid15.35 ± 0.66ndndndnd
281335neralmonoterpenoid13.43 ± 0.55ndndndnd
291349geraniolmonoterpenoid9.67 ± 0.35ndndndnd
301365geranialmonoterpenoid18.74 ± 0.76ndndndnd
311380bornyl acetateothers2.48 ± 0.10ndndndnd
321447eugenolphenylpropanoid3.15 ± 0.1248.84 ± 1.28nd224.24 ± 9.9783.04 ± 2.79
331471α-copaenesesquiterpene3.57 ± 0.1824.67 ± 0.13nd25.06 ± 1.158.86 ± 0.31
341478β-elemenesesquiterpene9.38 ± 0.35119.06 ± 3.99nd2.97 ± 0.1968.52 ± 2.89
351479β-bourbonenesesquiterpenendndnd2.78 ±0.13nd
361497methyl eugenolphenylpropanoid28.12 ± 1.08335.58 ± 11.999.57 ± 1.301.11 ± 0.01372.57 ± 9.49
371509rotundenesesquiterpenend1.48 ± 0.02ndndnd
381515trans-caryophyllenesesquiterpene51.20 ± 2.17193.96 ± 6.54nd19.11 ± 0.9599.38 ± 3.20
391532trans-α-bergamotenesesquiterpene27.55 ± 1.18nd10.91 ± 0.6183.64 ± 3.5810.08 ±0.38
401553α-humulenesesquiterpene18.49 ± 0.7614.82 ± 0.41nd2.68 ± 0.309.95 ± 0.38
411581germacrenesesquiterpene13.31 ± 0.5460.35 ± 2.122.83 ± 0.1537.65 ± 1.7725.13 ± 0.87
421585trans-β-farnesenesesquiterpene2.71 ± 0.11ndnd7.40 ± 0.39nd
431589β-selinenesesquiterpene3.53 ± 0.137.18 ± 0.20ndnd6.21 ± 0.26
441596(Z,E)-α-farnesenesesquiterpenendndnd24.55 ±1.03nd
451596α-selinenesesquiterpene2.96 ± 0.1213.85 ± 0.33ndnd7.79 ± 0.39
461603α-bulnesenesesquiterpenendnd1.06 ± 0.01nd1.46 ± 0.06
471611trans-α-bisabolenesesquiterpene2.89 ± 0.12ndnd0.68 ± 0.03nd
481614β-copaenesesquiterpene5.66 ± 0.27nd4.97 ± 0.28nd4.28 ± 0.17
491619δ-cadinenesesquiterpene3.31 ± 0.139.37 ± 0.20nd7.21 ± 0.375.39 ± 0.25
501625β-sesquiphellandrenesesquiterpenendndnd5.49 ±0.30nd
511641cis-α-bisabolenesesquiterpene37.24 ± 1.47ndndnd2.06 ± 0.07
521647elemolsesquiterpenoidnd2.94 ± 0.02ndnd2.30 ± 0.19
531671spathulenolsesquiterpenoidndnd1.36 ±0.033.27 ±0.16nd
541676caryophyllene oxidesesquiterpenoid30.16 ± 1.0921.31 ± 0.44nd13.26 ± 0.6515.71 ± 0.61
551682lanceolsesquiterpenoidndndnd1.58 ± 0.02nd
561686salvial-4(14)-en-1-onesesquiterpenoidndndnd2.63 ± 0.27nd
571801humulene epoxide IIsesquiterpenoid7.94 ± 0.29nd2.11 ± 0.00ndnd
581808cubenolsesquiterpenoidndnd2.21 ± 0.14ndnd
591809ledene oxide-(II)sesquiterpenoidndndnd3.99 ± 0.04nd
601835τ-cadinolsesquiterpenoid3.28 ± 0.11nd14.08 ± 0.79nd3.45 ± 0.16
6118428-methylene-dispiro [2.1.2.4] undecaneothers1.78 ± 0.04ndndndnd
621847β-eudesmolsesquiterpenoid1.25 ± 0.03ndndndnd
631849α-cadinolsesquiterpenoidndndnd2.99 ± 0.05nd
641850juniper camphorsesquiterpenoidnd5.73 ± 1.50ndnd2.59 ± 0.12
651880α-bisabololsesquiterpenoid2.37 ± 0.07ndndndnd
Percent yield essential oils from dried plant materials0.86 ± 0.321.02 ± 0.211.13 ± 0.320.26 ± 0.021.04 ± 0.06
Compounds detected3617183523
Monoterpene hydrocarbons (%)0.00.02.427.40.0
Oxygenated monoterpene (%)16.22.07.57.83.1
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (%)25.649.92.728.929.7
Oxygenated sesquiterpenes (%)6.33.42.73.72.9
Others (%)51.844.884.732.364.3
LB; lemon basil (O. citriodorum), RB; red holy basil (O. sanctum var. Rama), TB; Thai basil (O. basilicum var. thyrsiflorum), TrB; tree basil (O. gratissimum), and WB; white holy basil (O. sanctum var. Shyama). Values are calculated as a reference to the internal standard toluene (0.015 mg/mL), 3 replications, SE = standard error, nd = not detected, RI = Retention Indices determined concerning a homologous series of n-alkanes on a Rxi-5Sil MS column.
Table
Table 3. The attractiveness of five essential oils and commercial fruit fly attractant to Oriental fruit flies.
Table 3. The attractiveness of five essential oils and commercial fruit fly attractant to Oriental fruit flies.
Volatile Organic CompoundsAverage of Number of Trapped Insects
Treatment (n ± SE/100)Control (n ± SE/100)
LB5.00 ± 1.68 a0
95.00%♂5.00%♀
RB25.00 ± 2.48 bc0.5 ± 0.25
90.00%♂10.00%♀
TB4.00 ± 1.47 a0.25 ± 0.22
93.75%♂6.25%♀
TrB2.00 ± 1.41 a0.25 ± 0.22
100.00%♂0.00%♀
WB18.75 ± 2.69 b0
94.66%♂5.44%♀
ME28.75 ± 2.87 c0.5 ± 0.25
89.56%♂10.44%♀
LB; lemon basil (O. citriodorum), RB; red holy basil (O. sanctum var. Rama), TB; Thai basil (O. basilicum var. thyrsiflorum), TrB; tree basil (O. gratissimum), WB; white holy basil (O. sanctum var. Shyama) and ME; commercial fruit fly attractant (methyl eugenol). The mean difference in the treatment column was analysed using one-way ANOVA, and the letters (a–c) indicated the significant difference at 95 confidence level. SE = standard error.
Table
Table 4. The olfactory chemosensory responses of Oriental fruit flies to volatile organic compounds and different basil essential oils.
Table 4. The olfactory chemosensory responses of Oriental fruit flies to volatile organic compounds and different basil essential oils.
Volatile Organic CompoundsFrequency of Movement
MaleFemale
AntennaeForelegsAntennaeForelegs
LB+++++++
RB++++++++++++
TB+++++++++++++
TrB++++++
WB+++++++++++++
ME+++++++++++
Ethanol+++++++
+ level of frequent movement, LB; lemon basil (O. citriodorum), RB; red holy basil (O. sanctum var. Rama), TB; Thai basil (O. basilicum var. thyrsiflorum), TrB; tree basil (O. gratissimum), WB; white holy basil (O. sanctum var. Shyama), and ME; commercial fruit fly attractant (methyl eugenol).
Table
Table 5. Characteristics of the wall materials.
Table 5. Characteristics of the wall materials.
Wall MaterialsEmulsionWBO-Encapsulated Products
Viscosity (cP)Stability (%Separation)Oil Loading (µL/0.2 g) *Encapsulation Efficiency (%)
MD100150.0>10.163 ± 0.0218 a4.27
GA1002976.0-0.303 ± 0.0362 ab7.92
MD50GA50631.0-0.313 ± 0.0728 ab8.18
MD25GA751348.0-0.360 ± 0.0678 b9.39
MD75GA25422.0>10.235 ± 0.0493 ab6.14
* The difference of mean ± SE (standard error) of three replications in the oil loading column was analysed using one-way ANOVA. The letters (a,b) indicated the significant difference at 95 confidence level.
Table
Table 6. The capsule structures.
Table 6. The capsule structures.
The Structure of Processed Maltodextrin and Gum Arabic
MD100GA100
Insects 12 00633 i001Insects 12 00633 i002
The Structure of White Holy Basil Essential Oil (WBO) Loaded Capsules
WBO-MD100WBO-GA100
Insects 12 00633 i003Insects 12 00633 i004
WBO-MD50GA50WBO-MD25GA75
Insects 12 00633 i005Insects 12 00633 i006
WBO-MD75GA25
Insects 12 00633 i007
Table
Table 7. Number of flies per trap with different lures at the period of 72 h.
Table 7. Number of flies per trap with different lures at the period of 72 h.
Product Formulas (Treatments)The Average Number of Oriental Fruit Fly (Fly/Trap)
Time of Exposure in the Field
Mins h
30601202472
MD1000.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a0.25 ± 0.46 a0.75 ± 0.89 b
GA1000.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a0.25 ± 0.46 a0.50 ± 0.92 ab
MD50GA500.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a0.00 ± 0.00 a0.31 ± 0.33 a0.31 ± 0.33 a
MD25GA750.25 ± 0.46 ab0.25 ± 0.46 a0.25 ± 0.46 a1.00 ± 0.75 bc1.00 ± 0.75 b
MD75GA250.75 ± 1.39 b1.00 ± 1.30 b1.25 ± 1.16 b1.50 ± 0.92 c2.00 ± 0.00 c
White holy basil essential oil0.00 ± 0.00 a0.25 ± 0.46 a0.25 ± 0.46 a0.50 ± 0.53 b0.50 ± 0.53 ab
Control (CTR)0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
The difference of mean ± SE (standard error) of eight replications in the same column was analysed by one-way ANOVA and the letters (a–c) are indicated the significantly different at 95 confidence level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tangpao, T.; Krutmuang, P.; Kumpoun, W.; Jantrawut, P.; Pusadee, T.; Cheewangkoon, R.; Sommano, S.R.; Chuttong, B. Encapsulation of Basil Essential Oil by Paste Method and Combined Application with Mechanical Trap for Oriental Fruit Fly Control. Insects 2021, 12, 633. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12070633

AMA Style

Tangpao T, Krutmuang P, Kumpoun W, Jantrawut P, Pusadee T, Cheewangkoon R, Sommano SR, Chuttong B. Encapsulation of Basil Essential Oil by Paste Method and Combined Application with Mechanical Trap for Oriental Fruit Fly Control. Insects. 2021; 12(7):633. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12070633

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tangpao, Tibet, Patcharin Krutmuang, Wilawan Kumpoun, Pensak Jantrawut, Tonapha Pusadee, Ratchadawan Cheewangkoon, Sarana Rose Sommano, and Bajaree Chuttong. 2021. "Encapsulation of Basil Essential Oil by Paste Method and Combined Application with Mechanical Trap for Oriental Fruit Fly Control" Insects 12, no. 7: 633. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12070633

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop