Next Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Analysis of the Amino Acid Auxin Permease (AAAP) Gene Family and Identification of an AAAP Gene Associated with the Growth and Reproduction of the Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stål)
Next Article in Special Issue
Identification of the Short Neuropeptide F and Short Neuropeptide F Receptor Genes and Their Roles of Food Intake in Dendroctonus armandi
Previous Article in Journal
Capsella bursa-pastoris Is a Key Overwintering Plant for Aphids in the Mediterranean Region
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expression Patterns of Three Important Hormone Genes and Respiratory Metabolism in Antheraea pernyi during Pupal Diapause under a Long Photoperiod
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/insects12080745
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of Neuropeptides and Their Receptors in an Aphid Endoparasitoid Wasp, Aphidius gifuensi

by
Xue Kong
1,†,
Zhen-Xiang Li
1,†,
Yu-Qing Gao
1,
Fang-Hua Liu
1,
Zhen-Zhen Chen
1,
Hong-Gang Tian
2,
Tong-Xian Liu
3,
Yong-Yu Xu
1,* and
Zhi-Wei Kang
1,2,*
1
College of Plant Protection, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for the Arid Areas, Key Laboratory of Northwest Loess Plateau Crop Pest Management of Ministry of Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
3
Key Laboratory of Integrated Crop Pest Management of Shandong Province, College of Plant Health and Medicine, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
The authors contributed equally to this work.
Insects 2021, 12(8), 745; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12080745
Submission received: 22 June 2021 / Revised: 12 August 2021 / Accepted: 16 August 2021 / Published: 18 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insect Neuropeptides and Their Receptors: Molecular and Physiological Advances)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Neuropeptides and their receptors play important roles in insect physiology and behavior. Due to their specificity and importance, they have been considered as the targets for new environmentally friendly insecticides. Hence, more information on genomics and transcriptomics of neuropeptide and their receptors in more insects, especially in beneficial insects, are needed to avoid the side effects of these environmentally friendly insecticides. Aphidius gifuensis is one of the most well-known aphid parasitoids and has been successfully used to control aphids such as Myzus persicae and Sitobion avenae. In this study, we systematically identified neuropeptides and their receptors from the genome and head transcriptome of A. gifuensis. Meanwhile, we also analyzed their expression patterns in response to imidacloprid exposure and in different tissues. Our results not only laid a preliminary foundation for functional studies on neuropeptide precursors and their receptors but also provided useful information for future pesticide development.

Abstract

In insects, neuropeptides and their receptors not only play a critical role in insect physiology and behavior but also are the potential targets for novel pesticide discoveries. Aphidius gifuensis is one of the most important and widespread aphid parasitoids, and has been successfully used to control aphid. In the present work, we systematically identified neuropeptides and their receptors from the genome and head transcriptome of A. gifuensis. A total of 35 neuropeptide precursors and 49 corresponding receptors were identified. The phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that 35 of these receptors belong to family-A, four belong to family-B, two belong to leucine-rich repeat-containing GPCRs, four belong to receptor guanylyl cyclases, and four belong to receptor tyrosine kinases. Oral ingestion of imidacloprid significantly up-regulated five neuropeptide precursors and four receptors whereas three neuropeptide precursors and eight receptors were significantly down-regulated, which indicated that these neuropeptides and their receptors are potential targets of some commercial insecticides. The RT-qPCR results showed that dopamine receptor 1, dopamine receptor 2, octopamine receptor, allatostatin-A receptor, neuropeptides capa receptor, SIFamide receptor, FMRFamide receptor, tyramine receptor and short neuropeptide F predominantly were expressed in the head whilst the expression of ion transport peptide showed widespread distribution in various tissues. The high expression levels of these genes suggest their important roles in the central nervous system. Taken together, our study provides fundamental information that may further our understanding of neuropeptidergic signaling systems in the regulation of the physiology and behavior of solitary wasps. Furthermore, this information could also aid in the design and discovery of specific and environment-friendly insecticides.

1. Introduction

Neuropeptides are 3 to 100 amino acid polypeptides and have been identified as involved in various physiological processes in insects, such as behavior regulation, reproduction, and circadian rhythm [1,2,3,4,5]. For example, in Drosophila melanogaster, neuropeptide F (NPF) regulates their feeding behaviors thereby influences their reproductive capacity [2]. In Schistocerca gregaria, NPF plays a critical role in reproduction and ecdysteroidogenesis [6]. Silencing insulin-like peptide 2 leads to smaller male mandible size in Gnatocerus cornutus [7]. A neuropeptide is encoded by a larger precursor gene (called pre-propeptide) that produces one or more mature peptides by a series of cleavages and modifications [1,8]. Mature peptides exert their biological functions by binding to their corresponding receptors in the extracellular environment [1,9].
Neuropeptide corresponding receptors belong to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), receptor guanylyl cyclases (RGCs), and receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) [9,10,11]. Neuropeptide corresponding GPCRs belong to the A-family (or rhodopsin-like), the B-family (or secretin-like), or leucine-rich repeat-containing GPCRs (LGRs) [11]. Insect family A GPCRs include opsins, biogenic amine receptors and neuropeptide and protein hormone receptors [12]. Generally, the B family GPCRs have a long N-terminal domain and contain four types of receptor: corticotrophin-releasing-factor-related diuretic hormone receptor, calcitonin-like diuretic hormone receptor, pigment-dispersing factor receptor and parathyroid hormone receptor-like [13]. According to the numbers of leucine-rich repeat motifs, receptors in LGRs have three types: type A, B and C [14]. Receptors of prothoracicotropic hormone (PTTH), insulin-like peptides and neuroparsin are not GPCRs, but belong to RTKs [15,16]. In Tribolium castaneum, knockdown of dopamine-2 receptor results in over 90% mortality during larval–pupal metamorphosis [17]. Interestingly, injected dopamine and its agonists in Locusta migratoria cause gregarious behavior in the migratory locust [18]. Injection of dsDop1 (dsRNA of dopamine-1 receptor) and Dop1 antagonist impair the olfactory preference of gregarious locusts to their odors [19]. Notably, the injection of Dop1 agonist in solitarious locusts initiates preference to gregarious odors [19]. In Helicoverpa armigera, dopamine receptor is also serviced as a membrane receptor for 20-hydroxyecdysone [20]. Knockdown of CCHamide2 receptors in A. pisum influenced its feeding behaviors and thus reproductions [21]. Silencing PTTH receptor torso in the prothoracic gland prolongs the third-instar larval stage of D. melanogaster [16]. Topical application of 1895 and CAPA-PVK analogue 2315 (ASG-[β3L]-VAFPRVamide) cause 72% mortality in Myzus persicae, while having no influence on beneficial insects including Bombus terrestris, Chrysoperla carnea, Nasonia vitripennis and Adalia bipunctata [22]. Due to the critical role of neuropeptides and their receptors in insect survival, they have been considered as attractive targets for developing new environmentally friendly pesticides to control the economically important pests [5,23,24,25]. Meanwhile, the conservation of these pesticides target genes between target pests and beneficial insects should also be considered to avoid adverse side effects on these beneficial insects [1,24]. Thus, genetic information about neuropeptides and their corresponding receptors in beneficial insects are needed [26,27,28].
Aphidius gifuensis has been selected as a potential biological agent of the green peach aphid Myzus persicae Sulzer, one of the main pests of various crops in China and Japan, and it has been successfully used to control M. persicae on tobacco in Yunnan and many other regions of China [29,30,31,32,33]. A. gifuensis is non-host feeding, and a female parasitizes about 60 aphids per day [34]. A. gifuensis female is able to discriminate the plant volatiles that released from healthy, mechanically damaged or aphid infested plant [35]. Furthermore, when provided with various aphid species, the A. gifuensis female can adjust its parasitic strategy by laying fewer eggs in maternal aphid species and more eggs in other aphid species [30,36]. Interestingly, both virgin and mated A. gifuensis females show high preference of aphid alarm pheromone, E-(β)-farnesene [37]. All of these results suggested that A. gifuensis has evolved a comprehensive chemosensory and nervous system to help it find a suitable host and conduct the right parasitic strategy. The identification and expression of chemosensory genes have been well documented at genomic and transcriptomic levels, whereas neuropeptides and their corresponding receptors were ignored [37,38,39]. In our recent study, we found that exposure of imidacloprid (IMD) significantly disrupted the olfactory and parasitism behavior by influencing the expression of related genes such as detoxification genes, chemosensory genes, and acetylcholine receptors [40]. As for neuropeptide and their receptors, we only analyzed the expression of DopR1, OAR, TAR and NFR [40]. In D. melanogaster, neonicotinoids disturbed learning memory, circadian behavior and sleep by preventing the accumulation of pigment dispersing factor neuropeptides [41]. Thus, a comprehensive analysis of the influence of IMD on the expression of neuropeptides and their receptors in A. gifuensis is needed. In this study, we predicted the neuropeptide precursors and their receptors using the publicly accessible genome data and our newly sequenced head transcriptome data [38]. Furthermore, we also analyzed the expression of these genes in different tissues and their responses after the exposure of IMD based on our previous study [40]. We thought that the identification and expression of neuropeptides and their receptors provides fundamental information that may further our understanding of neuropeptidergic signaling systems in the regulation of physiology and behavior of solitary wasps. Furthermore, this information could also aid in design and discovery of specific and environment friendly insecticides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect Rearing

A colony of A. gifuensis and its host pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum Harris kept at 21 ± 1 °C and 16 L: 8D photoperiod. A. pisum was reared on broad bean (Vicia faba L., var. ‘Jingxuancandou’, Jinnong, Taigu, Shanxi, China). After the emergence of adults, 10% of honey water was provided as supplementary nutrients.

2.2. RNA Sequencing and Gene Identification

The heads of A. gifuensis were cut from newly emerged adult male and female wasps (1–2 days old), and then frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA of the heads was extracted from 40 heads using RNAiso reagent (Takara Bio, Dalian, China) following manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA integrity and quality were verified by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and Nanodrop ND-2000 spectrophotometer. A high-quality RNA sample was sent to Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd. for cDNA and Illumina library generation. Transcriptome de novo assembly was carried out as our previously published paper [39,40].
The identification of neuropeptide precursors and their receptors in A. gifuensis were predicted by local BLAST searching in the genome and transcriptome of A. gifuensis with the amino acid sequences of neuropeptide precursors and their receptors from Pteromalus puparum, Habrobracon hebetor, D. melanogaster and Nasonia vitripennis [26,27,28,38,42].

2.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

Phylogenetic analyses of these candidate neuropeptide receptors were constructed by PhyML3.1 [43]. Firstly, MAFFT was used to align the amino acid sequences of these receptors. Then, these alignments were manually edited using Bioedit Sequence Alignment Editor 7.1.3.0 (Ibis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) [44]. Phylogenetic trees were subsequently constructed by PhyML3.1 using the Maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1000 bootstraps [43]. Further editions of these phylogenetic trees were conducted with the ITOL tool [45]. All amino acid sequences for these receptors used in this study are shown in Table S1. For phylogenetic tree of family-A neuropeptide GPCRs, sequences from A. gifuensis, H. hebetor, B. mori, D. melanogaster, P. puparum, N. vitripennis, Rhodnius prolixus, Triatoma dimidiate, Triatoma infestans, Triatoma pallidipennis, and T. castaneum were used (Table S1). For the phylogenetic tree of the family B neuropeptide GPCRs, sequences from A. gifuensis, H. hebetor, B. mori, D. melanogaster, P. puparum, N. vitripennis, Rhodnius prolixus, Nilaparvata lugens, and T. castaneum were used (Table S1). For the phylogenetic tree of the LGRs, sequences from A. gifuensis, H. hebetor, A. mellifera, A. pisum, B. mori, D. melanogaster, Lymnaea stagnalis, Pediculus humanus corporis, P. puparum, N. vitripennis, N. lugens, R. prolixus, Triatoma dimidiate, Tetranychus urticae, T. pallidipennis, and T. castaneum were used (Table S1). For the phylogenetic tree of the RGCs, sequences from A. gifuensis, H. hebetor, H. hebetor, Aedes aegypti, Anopheles gambiae, D. melanogaster, P. puparum, and N. vitripennis were used (Table S1). For the phylogenetic tree of the RTKs, sequences from A. gifuensis, H. hebetor, A. aegypti, A. gambiae, D. melanogaster, P. puparum, and N. vitripennis were used (Table S1).

2.4. Expression Analysis

Heat maps of neuropeptide precursors and their receptors were performed by pheatmap in R 4.0.4 (https://www.r-project.org/, accessed date (15 February 2021)). Tissue-specific expressions of several target genes were determined by RT-qPCR. Total RNA of heads and bodies (without heads) were extracted using RNAiso reagent (Takara Bio, Dalian) following manufacturer’s protocol. To remove the genomic DNA, the total RNA was treated by Dnase I (42 °C 2 min). These total RNAs were subsequently used to produce cDNA using PrimeScript™ RT reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time, Takara Bio, Tokyo, Japan). Specific primers were designed by Primer Premier 5 (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA), and are provided in Table S2. qPCR was performed in iQ5 (Bio-rad, Hercules, CA, USA) in 20 μL reactions. The qPCR reaction condition and normalization of these genes were conducted as in our previously published paper [39,46]. Relative expressions of these genes were normalized by 18S RNA, and the normalization of each gene was compared with the expression level in female heads. Each sample had three technical replicates and three biological replicates (50 heads or 20 bodies per replicate). Differences among these samples were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s test at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Transcriptome Sequencing, Assembly, and Annotation

We sequenced the head of A. gifuensis and obtained 48,430,060 clean reads (Table S1). GC content was 28.32% (Table S1). N50 of the head transcriptome was from 546 (transcripts) and 370 (unigenes) (Table S1). Mean length was from 351 (transcripts) and 293 (unigenes) (Table S1). Gene ontology (GO) analysis showed that genes involved in cellular process, metabolic process, single-organism process, binding and catalytic activity were predominantly expressed in head (Figure S1). Notably, signal transduction, translation and endocrine system were the major enrichment pathways (Figure S2).

3.2. Identification of Neuropeptide Precursors

Based on the A. gifuensis genome and transcriptome data, we predicted and annotated 35 neuropeptide precursors from A. gifuensis genome and 27 neuropeptide precursors from A. gifuensis transcriptome (Figure 1; Table 1 and Table S2). Adipokinetic hormone, allatostatin B, allatostatin C, RYamide, sulfakinin and tachykinin were missing in A. gifuensis (Table 1). Allatostatin A, ecdysis triggering hormone, insulin-like peptide (ILP), leucokinin, natalisin, proctolin, SIFamide and trissin were only observed in the genome of A. gifuensis, while they were not found in the head transcriptome (Figure 1a). For the allatostatin neuropeptide family, allatostatin CCC was most conserved whereas allatostatin A was the most variable of the three allatostatin neuropeptides (Figure 2).

3.3. Neuropeptide Receptors in A. gifuensis

Based on the genomics and transcriptomics analyses, we also predicted 49 neuropeptide receptor genes (Table S1), including 35 A-families GPCRs, four B-families GPCRs, two LGRs, four RGCs, and four RTKs. Receptors for PDF, sNPF, CAPA and CCAP were only found in the genome of A. gifuensis (Figure 1b).
In the present study, our 35 identified A-family GPCRs include opsins and biogenic amine receptors, and neuropeptide and protein hormone receptors (Figure 3). There are two CAPA splicing variant a (CAPA) receptors (KAF7988142.1 and KAF7988143.1), one crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) receptor (KAF7998540.1), and one AKH/corazonin-related peptide (ACP) receptor (KAF7998144.1; Figure 3). We also found one AKH receptor (KAF7998064.1) while AKH were not found in A. gifuensis (Table 1 and Figure 3). For biogenic amine receptors, we identified two dopamine like receptors (KAF7998503.1: DopR1 and KAF7997032.1: DopR2), one serotonin receptor (KAF7991191.1: THR), one octopamine-tyramine receptor (KAF7998304.1: TAR) and one octopamine receptor (KAF7995300.1: OAR; Figure 3).
A total of four Family B GPCRs were identified from the genome and transcriptome of A. gifuensis. Interestingly, these four receptors were divided into four different groups, respectively (Figure 4).
For LGRs, a type C1 leucine-rich repeat (KAF7989315.1: LGR1) and a type B LRR (KAF7997781.1: LGR2) were predicted (Figure 5), and the ligand of LGR1 and LGR2 were orphan and bursicon, respectively (Table 1). Furthermore, the most similar genes of these two A. gifuensis LGRs were both from ectoparasitoid H. hebetor.
In addition to RGCs, we found one receptor for the eclosion hormone (KAF7988832.1: EHR) and neuropeptide-like precursor (KAF7988833.1: NPLPR) resepectively, and two orphan receptor guanylyl cyclases (KAF7995591.1: OGC2 and KAF7996629.1: OGC4) in A. gifuensis (Figure 6).
As for RTKs, we found one PTTH receptor torso (KAF7993905.1), two insulin-like peptide (ILP) receptors (KAF7992320.1: InR1 and KAF7989857.1: InR2) and one neuropeptide (NP) receptor (KAF7994006.1), while no fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor was found in A. gifuensis (Figure 7).

3.4. Expression Profiles of Neuropeptides and Their Receptors

Based on previously published and our newly sequenced transcriptome data, we analyzed the expression profiles of neuropeptides and their receptors in response to IMD exposure (Figure 8). We found that allatostatin CC (KAF7990447.1; AstCC), diuretic hormone 44 (KAF7994603.1; DH44), elevenin (KAF7994890.1; Ele), ion transport peptide (KAF7996763.1; ITP), NVP-like putative neuropeptide (KAF7992678.1; NVP) and SIFamide (KAF7993381.1) were significantly higher in IMD-treated A. gifuensis, whereas the expressions of FMRFamide (KAF7993326.1), Natalisin (KAF7987703.1) and pigment dispersing factor (KAF7994542.1; PDF) were significantly lower in IMD-treated A. gifuensis (Figure 8a. As to neuropeptide receptors, IMD significantly induced the expressions of AKHR (KAF7998064.1), myosuppressin receptor (KAF7994648.1; MSR), OGC2 (KAF7995591.1) and torso (KAF7993905.1), while the expressions of ecdysis triggering hormone receptor (KAF7994769.1: ETHR), neuropeptide receptor A5 (KAF7990334.1: ATR), CCAPR (KAF7998540.1), KAF7998145.1, NPFR (KAF7993395.1), DopR1 (KAF7998503.1), adhesion G protein-coupled receptor A3 (KAF7997869.1: OrphanR), diuretic hormone 44 receptor (KAF7989120.1: DH44R) and diuretic hormone 31 receptor (KAF7990226.1: DH31R) were down-regulated by IMD treatment (Figure 8b,c).
Furthermore, we also analyzed their expressions in different tissues by RT-qPCR. We found that sNPF was highly expressed in the head, while the expression of sNPF in the female head was significantly higher than that in the male head (Figure 9). The expression trends of DopR1, DopR2, AstAR, FMRFR (FMRFamid receptor), TAR, CAPAR and OAR were similar with sNPF (Figure 9). SIFaR (SIFamide receptor) was predominantly expressed in the head, and there was no significant difference between female and male (Figure 9). There was no tissue-specific expression of ITP (ion transport peptide; Figure 9).

4. Discussion

In the present study, we systematically identified neuropeptide precursors and their receptors of A. gifuensis from the previously released genome and our sequenced head transcriptome databases. The numbers of our identified neuropeptide precursors and their receptors in A. gifuensis genome are similar to those found in other parasitic wasps such as P. puparum, H. hebetor and N. vitripennis [26,27,28]. However, the numbers are less than those in D. melanogaster, Bombyx mori, N. lugens, A. aegypti, L. migratoria, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus, Aphis mellifera and T. castaneum, which might be due to the parasitic life of parasitic wasps [8,42,47,48,49,50,51]. Notably, there were three very conservative neuropeptide precursors (adipokinetic hormone, RYamide and tachykinin) not found in the A. gifuensis genome and transcriptome. RYamide was firstly found in N. vitripennis with the C-terminal consensus sequence FFXGSRY-amide [28]. In D. melanogaster and B. mori, RYamide or its receptor was found to be expressed in the brain, terminal abdominal ganglion and gut (enteroendocrine cells: EEs) [52,53]. Injection of RYamide significantly depressed the proboscis extension reflex of Phormia regina to sucrose [54]. Tachykinin is a multifunctional neuropeptide with a characteristic conserved C-terminal sequence FXGXR-amide [55,56]. In Bactrocera dorsalis, tachykinin modulates the olfactory sensitivity to ethyl acetate (avoid aversive odor) [57]. Knockdown of tachykinin significantly decreased the electrophysiological responses to ethyl acetate and suppressed the avoid behavior for ethyl acetate [57]. Furthermore, tachykinin is one of the most abundant secreted peptides expressed in midgut EEs [55]. In D. melanogaster and Plutella xylostella, tachykinin has been found to play a critical role in lipid metabolism [55,58]. Therefore, we speculate that the absence of some neuropeptide precursors might be due to a method as some specific neuropeptide genes that might not be identified by homolog searching. In the future, peptidomics is an alternative method to be used for identifying the neuropeptide genes and their products. Furthermore, it also can be used for confirming the predicted neuropeptide genes from genome and transcriptome.
Generally, expressions of genes in different tissues reflect their functions. In this study, sNPF, DopR1, DopR2, AstAR, FMRFR, TAR, CAPAR and OAR predominately expressed the head, while ITP was widely expressed among these samples. Consistent with our results, three dopamine receptors in Chilo suppressalis were also found to be significantly highly expressed in the central nervous tissues [59]. In Agrotis ipsilon, brains and antennal lobes predominately expressed DopR1 that is involved in sex pheromone responsiveness [60]. Similarly, TAR1 is highly expressed in the antennae, and silencing TAR1 reduced the sensitivity of Halyomorpha halys to its alarm pheromone (E)-2-decenal [61]. In L. migratoria, dopamine and octopamine signaling mediated the olfactory behavior and ultimately influenced the phase change [18,43,62]. Silencing DopR1/2 and OARα1 disrupted the attractive and repulsive behavior of L. migratoria to their odors [18,19,62,63]. For FMRFR, RNAi silencing of FMRFR decreased the locomotor and flight activities in D. melanogaster [64,65]. In previous studies, A. gifuensis showed higher parasitoid preference and suitability on its maternal host aphids than other aphid species [30]. Natal rearing experience affects the host discrimination and oviposition decision of A. gifuensis [36]. Due to the importance of neuropeptides and their receptors in the modulation of insect behavior, all of these results indicated that neuropeptides and their receptors in A. gifuensis may play a critical role in the odor perception and successful parasitism.
Based on previously published work, we analyzed the expression of neuropeptide precursors and their receptors in response to IMD [40]. The expressions of AstCC, DH44, Ele, NVP and SIFamide were up-regulated by IMD whereas FMRFamide, Natalisin and PDF were down-regulated. In D. melanogaster, PDF mutants showed a decreased male sex pheromones and increased frequency of remating behaviors [66]. Exposure of IMD disrupted the learning, behavioral rhythmicity and sleep of D. melanogaster [41]. Further investigation revealed that IMD prevented the accumulation of PDF in the dorsal terminals of clock neurons [41]. SIFamides are highly conserved neuropeptide precursors and have been identified to be involved in the regulation of sexual behavior, feeding and sleep [1,67,68]. Knockdown SIFamide in Rhodnius prolixus caused smaller blood meal consumption, while the injection of Rhopr-SIFa resulted in a larger blood meal [67]. Surprisingly, mutations and silencing (RNAi) of SIFamide in D. melanogaster led to male-male courtship behavior whilst the activation of SIFamidergic neuron enhances appetitive behavior [68]. Our previous work reported that some of the IMD-exposed females A. gifuensis bent their abdomens forward as if they were mating or attacking aphids, while no male A. gifuensis and aphids were present [40]. All of these results indicated that this abnormal behavior might be caused by the impact of IMD on these neuropeptide precursors that eventually leads to nervous disorder.
In the pharmaceutical industry, GPCRs are one of the therapeutic targets for the development of new drugs [23,24]. About 40–50% of all medications exert their effects via this family of proteins such as losartan, olanzapine and cinacalcet [9,23]. Due to the important roles of GPCRs in modulating biology, physiology and behavior in insects, GPCRs are also considered as targets for next generation insecticides. In contrast to the pharmaceutical industry (knowledge-driven drug design), research on insect GPCRs especially for new pesticide discovery is lacking [18,24]. Amitraz is the only pesticide that targets the octopamine receptor and tyramine receptor [69,70]. Recently, a research group provided a novel approach “proof-of-concept” for insecticide discovery using genome sequence data for functional characterization and chemical molecules screening of GPCRs [71]. They successfully found two lethal molecules (amitriptyline: 93% mortality and doxepin: 72% mortality) for A. aegypti [71]. In this work, we found that exposure of IMD significantly influenced the expression of GPCRs in A. gifuensis including dopamine receptor and FMRFamide receptor, which means random ligand screening for novel insecticide discovery might impair beneficial insects including natural enemies of insect pests and pollinators. Thus, genetic information of these beneficial insects will contribute to our current and future efforts in rational insecticide discovery and design.
Taken together, in this study, we systematically identified the neuropeptide precursors and their receptors in A. gifuensis. Meanwhile, we also analyzed their expression patterns in response to IMD exposure and different tissues. Our results not only laid a preliminary foundation for the functional studies on neuropeptide precursors and their receptors but also provided useful information for future pesticide development.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/insects12080745/s1, Figure S1: Functional annotation of A. gifuensis transcripts based on gene ontology (GO) categorization, Figure S2: Top 20 enriched Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomics (KEGG) pathways of A. gifuensis, Table S1: The amino acid sequences of neuropeptide receptors, Table S2: Primers used in this study, Table S3: Summary of head transcriptome, Table S4: The amino acid sequences of neuropeptide precursors. Predicted signal peptides (highlighted in yellow), cleavage signals (red), putative bioactive mature peptides (light blue), amidation signals (pink), and cysteine residues (deep yellow) are indicated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.-Y.X. and Z.-W.K.; Funding acquisition, H.-G.T., T.-X.L. and Y.-Y.X.; Investigation, X.K., Z.-X.L. and Y.-Q.G.; Methodology, X.K. and Z.-X.L.; Project administration, T.-X.L. and Y.-Y.X.; Resources, Y.-Q.G.; Software, F.-H.L.; Supervision, Z.-W.K.; Validation, X.K., Z.-Z.C. and H.-G.T.; Visualization, Z.-X.L., F.-H.L. and Z.-W.K.; Writing-original draft, Z.-W.K.; Writing: review and editing, Z.-Z.C. and T.-X.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0201000), the Modern Tea Industry Technology System of Shandong Province (SDAIT-19-04) and China Agriculture Research System (CARS-25).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the individual data are gathered in the Supplemental material section. Transcriptome data is available in NCBI bioproject PRJNA733581.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank all staff and students in the Key Laboratory of Applied Entomology (Northwest A&F University, China) and the Laboratory of Insect Eco-Physiology (Shandong Agricultural University). We also appreciate the constructive comments from two anonymous reviewers which greatly improved the quality of our paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schoofs, L.; De Loof, A.; Van Hiel, M.B. Neuropeptides as regulators of behavior in insects. Annu. Rev. Ѐntomol. 2017, 62, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Van Wielendaele, P.; Wynant, N.; Dillen, S.; Zels, S.; Badisco, L.; Broeck, J.V. Neuropeptide F regulates male reproductive processes in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 43, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ragionieri, L.; Predel, R. The neuropeptidome of Carabus (Coleoptera, Adephaga: Carabidae). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2019, 118, 103309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hou, L.; Yang, P.; Jiang, F.; Liu, Q.; Wang, X.; Kang, L. The neuropeptide F/nitric oxide pathway is essential for shaping locomotor plasticity underlying locust phase transition. eLife 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Ons, S. Neuropeptides in the regulation of Rhodnius prolixus physiology. J. Insect Physiol. 2017, 97, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Van Wielendaele, P.; Dillen, S.; Zels, S.; Badisco, L.; Broeck, J.V. Regulation of feeding by Neuropeptide F in the desert locust, Schistocerca gregaria. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 43, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Okada, Y.; Katsuki, M.; Okamoto, N.; Fujioka, H.; Okada, K. A specific type of insulin-like peptide regulates the conditional growth of a beetle weapon. PLoS Biol. 2019, 17, e3000541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hou, L.; Jiang, F.; Yang, P.; Wang, X.; Kang, L. Molecular characterization and expression profiles of neuropeptide precursors in the migratory locust. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 63, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Audsley, N.; Down, R.E. G protein coupled receptors as targets for next generation pesticides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 67, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ons, S.; Lavore, A.; Sterkel, M.; Wulff, J.P.; Sierra, I.; Martínez-Barnetche, J.; Rodriguez, M.H.; Rivera-Pomar, R. Identification of G protein coupled receptors for opsines and neurohormones in Rhodnius prolixus. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 69, 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jaeger, W.C.; Armstrong, S.P.; Hill, S.J.; Pfleger, K.D.G. Biophysical detection of diversity and bias in GPCR function. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Li, C.; Song, X.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.; Sang, M.; Wu, W.; Yun, X.; Hu, X.; Li, B. Identification and comparative analysis of G protein-coupled receptors in Pediculus humanus humanus. Genomics 2014, 104, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Harmar, A.J. Family-B G-protein-coupled receptors. Genome Biol. 2001, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Van Hiel, B.; Vandersmissen, H.P.; Van Loy, T.; Broeck, J.V. An evolutionary comparison of leucine-rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptors reveals a novel LGR subtype. Peptides 2012, 34, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vogel, K.; Brown, M.R.; Strand, M.R. Ovary ecdysteroidogenic hormone requires a receptor tyrosine kinase to activate egg formation in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 5057–5062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Rewitz, K.F.; Yamanaka, N.; Gilbert, L.I.; O’Connor, M.B. The insect neuropeptide ptth activates receptor tyrosine kinase torso to initiate metamorphosis. Science 2009, 326, 1403–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Bai, H.; Zhu, F.; Shah, K.; Palli, S.R. Large-scale RNAi screen of G protein-coupled receptors involved in larval growth, molting and metamorphosis in the red flour beetle. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Guo, X.; Ma, Z.; Kang, L. Two dopamine receptors play different roles in phase change of the migratory locust. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Guo, X.; Ma, Z.; Du, B.; Li, T.; Li, W.; Xu, L.; He, J.; Kang, L. Dop1 enhances conspecific olfactory attraction by inhibiting miR-9a maturation in locusts. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kang, X.L.; Zhang, J.Y.; Wang, D.; Zhao, Y.M.; Han, X.L.; Wang, J.X.; Zhao, X.F. The steroid hormone 20-hydroxyecdysone binds to dopamine receptor to repress lepidopteran insect feeding and promote pupation. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Shahid, S.; Shi, Y.; Yang, C.; Li, J.J.; Ali, M.Y.; Smagghe, G.; Liu, T.X. CCHamide2-receptor regulates feeding behavior in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum. Peptide 2021, 143, 170596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shi, Y.; Nachman, R.J.; Gui, S.; Piot, N.; Kaczmarek, K.; Zabrocki, J.; Dow, J.A.T.; Davies, S.; Smagghe, G. Efficacy and biosafety assessment of neuropeptide CAPA analogues against the peach-potato aphid (Myzus persicae). Insect Sci. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Garland, S.L. Are GPCRs still a source of new targets? J. Biomol. Screen 2013, 18, 947–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Yang, D.; Zhou, Q.; Labroska, V.; Qin, S.; Darbalaei, S.; Wu, Y.; Yuliantie, E.; Xie, L.; Tao, H.; Cheng, J.; et al. G protein-coupled receptors: Structure- and function-based drug discovery. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, N.; Li, T.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S. G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in insects—A potential target for new insecticide development. Molecules 2021, 26, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Xu, G.; Teng, Z.W.; Gu, G.X.; Qi, Y.X.; Guo, L.; Xiao, S.; Wang, F.; Fang, Q.; Wang, F.; Song, Q.S.; et al. Genome-wide characterization and transcriptomic analyses of neuropeptides and their receptors in an endoparasitoid wasp, Pteromalus puparum. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2020, 103, e21625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Yu, K.; Xiong, S.; Xu, G.; Ye, X.; Yao, H.; Wang, F.; Fang, Q.; Song, Q.; Ye, G. Identification of Neuropeptides and Their Receptors in the Ectoparasitoid, Habrobracon hebetor. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 575655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Hauser, F.; Neupert, S.; Williamson, M.; Predel, R.; Tanaka, Y.; Grimmelikhuijzen, C.J. Genomics and peptidomics of neuropeptides and protein hormones present in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 5296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kang, Z.W.; Liu, F.H.; Liu, X.; Yu, W.B.; Tan, X.L.; Zhang, S.Z.; Tian, H.G.; Liu, T.X. The potential coordination of the heat-shock proteins and antioxidant enzyme genes of Aphidius gifuensis in response to thermal stress. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Pan, M.Z.; Liu, T.X. Suitability of three aphid species for Aphidius gifuensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Parasitoid performance varies with hosts of origin. Biol. Control 2014, 69, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yang, S.; Wei, J.N.; Yang, S.Y.; Kuang, R.P. Current status and future trends of augmentative release of Aphidius gifuensis for control of Myzus persicae in China’s Yunnan province. J. Entomol. Res. Soc. 2011, 13, 87–99. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kang, Z.W.; Liu, F.H.; Tan, X.L.; Zhang, Z.F.; Zhu, J.Y.; Tian, H.G.; Liu, T.X. Infection of powdery mildew reduces the fitness of grain aphids (Sitobion avenae) through restricted nutrition and induced defense response in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kang, Z.W.; Liu, F.H.; Zhang, Z.F.; Tian, H.G.; Liu, T.X. Volatile β-Ocimene can regulate developmental performance of peach aphid Myzus persicae through activation of defense responses in Chinese cabbage Brassica pekinensis. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pan, M.Z.; Wei, Y.Y.; Wang, F.R.; Liu, T.X. Influence of plant species on biological control effectiveness of Myzus persicae by Aphidius gifuensis. Crop. Prot. 2020, 135, 105223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pan, M.Z.; Cao, H.H.; Liu, T.X. Effects of winter wheat cultivars on the life history traits and olfactory response of Aphidius gifuensis. BioControl 2014, 59, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Pan, M.Z.; Liu, T.X.; Nansen, C. Avoidance of parasitized host by female wasps of Aphidius gifuensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): The role of natal rearing effects and host availability? Insect Sci. 2018, 25, 1035–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fan, J.; Zhang, Q.; Xu, Q.; Xue, W.; Han, Z.; Sun, J.; Chen, J. Differential expression analysis of olfactory genes based on a combination of sequencing platforms and behavioral investigations in Aphidius gifuensis. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Li, B.; Du, Z.; Tian, L.; Zhang, L.; Huang, Z.; Wei, S.; Song, F.; Cai, W.; Yu, Y.; Yang, H.; et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius gifuensis using Oxford Nanopore sequencing and Hi-C technology. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2020, 21, 941–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kang, Z.W.; Tian, H.G.; Liu, F.H.; Liu, X.; Jing, X.F.; Liu, T.X. Identification and expression analysis of chemosensory receptor genes in an aphid endoparasitoid Aphidius gifuensis. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kang, Z.W.; Liu, F.H.; Pang, R.P.; Tian, H.G.; Liu, T.X. Effect of sublethal doses of imidacloprid on the biological performance of aphid endoparasitoid Aphidius gifuensis (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae) and influence on its related gene expression. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tasman, K.; Hidalgo, S.; Zhu, B.; Rands, S.A.; Hodge, J.J.L. Neonicotinoids disrupt memory, circadian behaviour and sleep. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Broeck, J.V. Neuropeptides and their precursors in the fruitfly, Drosophila melanogaster. Peptides 2001, 22, 241–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Guindon, S.; Dufayard, J.-F.; Lefort, V.; Anisimova, M.; Hordijk, W.; Gascuel, O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 2010, 59, 307–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Rozewicki, J.; Li, S.; Amada, K.M.; Standley, D.M.; Katoh, K. MAFFT-DASH: Integrated protein sequence and structural alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W5–W10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kang, Z.W.; Liu, F.H.; Xu, Y.Y.; Cheng, J.H.; Lin, X.L.; Jing, X.F.; Tian, H.G.; Liu, T.X. Identification of candidate odorant-degrading enzyme genes in the antennal transcriptome of Aphidius gifuensis. Ѐntomol. Res. 2020, 51, 36–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hummon, A.B.; Richmond, T.A.; Verleyen, P.; Baggerman, G.; Huybrechts, J.; Ewing, M.A.; Vierstraete, E.; Rodriguez-Zas, S.L.; Schoofs, L.; Robinson, G.E.; et al. From the genome to the proteome: Uncovering peptides in the Apis Brain. Science 2006, 314, 647–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Roller, L.; Yamanaka, N.; Watanabe, K.; Daubnerová, I.; Žitňan, D.; Kataoka, H.; Tanaka, Y. The unique evolution of neuropeptide genes in the silkworm Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2008, 38, 1147–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, B.; Predel, R.; Neupert, S.; Hauser, F.; Tanaka, Y.; Cazzamali, G.; Williamson, M.; Arakane, Y.; Verleyen, P.; Schoofs, L.; et al. Genomics, transcriptomics, and peptidomics of neuropeptides and protein hormones in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Genome Res. 2007, 18, 113–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Tanaka, Y.; Suetsugu, Y.; Yamamoto, K.; Noda, H.; Shinoda, T. Transcriptome analysis of neuropeptides and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) for neuropeptides in the brown planthopper Nilaparvata lugens. Peptides 2014, 53, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhang, H.; Bai, J.; Huang, S.; Liu, H.; Lin, J.; Hou, Y. Neuropeptides and G-Protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in the red palm weevil Rhynchophorus ferrugineus Olivier (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae). Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Roller, L.; Čižmár, D.; Bednár, B.; Žitňan, D. Expression of RYamide in the nervous and endocrine system of Bombyx mori. Peptides 2016, 80, 72–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Collin, C.; Hauser, F.; Krogh-Meyer, P.; Hansen, K.K.; de Valdivia, E.G.; Williamson, M.; Grimmelikhuijzen, C.J. Identification of the Drosophila and Tribolium receptors for the recently discovered insect RYamide neuropeptides. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 412, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ida, T.; Takahashi, T.; Tominaga, H.; Sato, T.; Kume, K.; Ozaki, M.; Hiraguchi, T.; Maeda, T.; Shiotani, H.; Terajima, S.; et al. Identification of the novel bioactive peptides dRYamide-1 and dRYamide-2, ligands for a neuropeptide Y-like receptor in Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 410, 872–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Song, W.; Veenstra, J.A.; Perrimon, N. Control of lipid metabolism by tachykinin in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 2014, 9, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Van Loy, T.; Vandersmissen, H.P.; Poels, J.; Van Hiel, B.; Verlinden, H.; Broeck, J.V. Tachykinin-related peptides and their receptors in invertebrates: A current view. Peptides 2010, 31, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Gui, S.H.; Jiang, H.B.; Xu, L.; Pei, Y.X.; Liu, X.Q.; Smagghe, G.; Wang, J.J. Role of a tachykinin-related peptide and its receptor in modulating the olfactory sensitivity in the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel). Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2016, 80, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wang, Y.; Wu, X.; Wang, Z.; Chen, T.; Zhou, S.; Chen, J.; Pang, L.; Ye, X.; Shi, M.; Huang, J.; et al. Symbiotic bracovirus of a parasite manipulates host lipid metabolism via tachykinin signaling. PLos Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Qi, Y.X.; Jin, M.; Ni, X.Y.; Ye, G.Y.; Lee, Y.; Huang, J. Characterization of three serotonin receptors from the small white butterfly, Pieris rapae. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2017, 87, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gassias, E.; Durand, N.; Demondion, E.; Bourgeois, T.; Aguilar, P.; Bozzolan, F.; Debernard, S. A critical role for Dop1-mediated dopaminergic signaling in the plasticity of behavioral and neuronal responses to sex pheromone in a moth. J. Exp. Biol. 2019, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Finetti, L.; Pezzi, M.; Civolani, S.; Calò, G.; Scapoli, C.; Bernacchia, G. Characterization of Halyomorpha halys TAR1 reveals its involvement in (E)-2-decenal pheromone perception. J. Exp. Biol. 2021, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ma, Z.; Guo, X.; Lei, H.; Li, T.; Hao, S.; Kang, L. Octopamine and tyramine respectively regulate attractive and repulsive behavior in locust phase changes. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, srep08036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Xu, L.; Li, L.; Yang, P.; Ma, Z. Calmodulin as a downstream gene of octopamine-OAR α1 signalling mediates olfactory attraction in gregarious locusts. Insect Mol. Biol. 2016, 26, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ravi, P.; Trivedi, D.; Hasan, G. FMRFa receptor stimulated Ca2+ signals alter the activity of flight modulating central dopaminergic neurons in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 2018, 14, e1007459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Kiss, B.; Szlanka, T.; Zvara, A.; Zurovec, M.; Sery, M.; Kakaš, S.; Ramasz, B.; Hegedüs, Z.; Lukacsovich, T.; Puskás, L.; et al. Selective elimination/RNAi silencing of FMRF-related peptides and their receptors decreases the locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2013, 191, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Krupp, J.J.; Billeter, J.-C.; Wong, A.; Choi, H.C.; Nitabach, M.N.; Levine, J.D. Pigment-dispersing factor modulates pheromone production in clock cells that influence mating in Drosophila. Neuron 2013, 79, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Ayub, M.; Hermiz, M.; Lange, A.B.; Orchard, I. SIFamide influences feeding in the Chagas disease vector, Rhodnius prolixus. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sellami, A.; Veenstra, J.A. SIFamide acts on fruitless neurons to modulate sexual behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Peptides 2015, 74, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Corta, E.; Bakkali, A.; A Berrueta, L.; Gallo, B.; Vicente, F. Kinetics and mechanism of amitraz hydrolysis in aqueous media by HPLC and GC-MS. Talanta 1999, 48, 189–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Finetti, L.; Roeder, T.; Calò, G.; Bernacchia, G. The insect type 1 tyramine receptors: From structure to behavior. Insects 2021, 12, 315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Meyer, J.M.; Ejendal, K.F.K.; Avramova, L.V.; Garland-Kuntz, E.E.; Giraldo-Calderón, G.I.; Brust, T.F.; Watts, V.J.; Hill, C.A. A “genome-to-lead” approach for insecticide discovery: Pharmacological characterization and screening of Aedes aegypti D1-like dopamine receptors. PLos Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012, 6, e1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Insects 12 00745 g001 550
Figure 1. Overlap of neuropeptides (a) and their corresponding receptors (b) identification results between genomes and transcriptomes databases.
Figure 1. Overlap of neuropeptides (a) and their corresponding receptors (b) identification results between genomes and transcriptomes databases.
Insects 12 00745 g001
Insects 12 00745 g002 550
Figure 2. Multiple alignment of allatostatin neuropeptides of A. gifuensis. (a) allatostatin A; (b) allatostatin CC; (c) allatostatin CCC.
Figure 2. Multiple alignment of allatostatin neuropeptides of A. gifuensis. (a) allatostatin A; (b) allatostatin CC; (c) allatostatin CCC.
Insects 12 00745 g002
Insects 12 00745 g003 550
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree analysis of the family-A neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), B. mori (Bm), D. melanogaster (Dm), P. puparum (Pp), N. vitripennis (Nv), Rhodnius prolixus (RPR), Triatoma dimidiate (TDIM), Triatoma infestans (TINF), Triatoma pallidipennis (TPAL), and T. castaneum (Tc). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree analysis of the family-A neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), B. mori (Bm), D. melanogaster (Dm), P. puparum (Pp), N. vitripennis (Nv), Rhodnius prolixus (RPR), Triatoma dimidiate (TDIM), Triatoma infestans (TINF), Triatoma pallidipennis (TPAL), and T. castaneum (Tc). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Insects 12 00745 g003
Insects 12 00745 g004 550
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of the family B neuropeptide GPCRs. A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), B. mori (Bm), D. melanogaster (Dm), P. puparum (Pp), N. vitripennis (Nv), Rhodnius prolixus (RPR), Nilaparvata lugens (Nl), and T. castaneum (Tc). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Figure 4. Phylogenetic tree of the family B neuropeptide GPCRs. A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), B. mori (Bm), D. melanogaster (Dm), P. puparum (Pp), N. vitripennis (Nv), Rhodnius prolixus (RPR), Nilaparvata lugens (Nl), and T. castaneum (Tc). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Insects 12 00745 g004
Insects 12 00745 g005 550
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of the leucine-rich repeat-containing GPCRs (LGRs). A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), A. mellifera (Am), A. pisum (Ap), B. mori (Bm), D. melanogaster (Dm), Lymnaea stagnalis (Ls), Pediculus humanus corporis (Pc), P. puparum (Pp), N. vitripennis (Nv), Nilaparvata lugens (Nl), R. prolixus (RPR), T. dimidiate (TDIM), Tetranychus urticae (tetur), T. pallidipennis (TPAL), and T. castaneum (Tc). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Figure 5. Phylogenetic tree of the leucine-rich repeat-containing GPCRs (LGRs). A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), A. mellifera (Am), A. pisum (Ap), B. mori (Bm), D. melanogaster (Dm), Lymnaea stagnalis (Ls), Pediculus humanus corporis (Pc), P. puparum (Pp), N. vitripennis (Nv), Nilaparvata lugens (Nl), R. prolixus (RPR), T. dimidiate (TDIM), Tetranychus urticae (tetur), T. pallidipennis (TPAL), and T. castaneum (Tc). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Insects 12 00745 g005
Insects 12 00745 g006 550
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of the receptor guanylyl cyclases (RGCs). A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), H. hebetor (Hh), Aedes aegypti (AAEL), Anopheles gambiae (AGAP), D. melanogaster (Dm), P. puparum (Pp), and N. vitripennis (Nv). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of the receptor guanylyl cyclases (RGCs). A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), H. hebetor (Hh), Aedes aegypti (AAEL), Anopheles gambiae (AGAP), D. melanogaster (Dm), P. puparum (Pp), and N. vitripennis (Nv). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Insects 12 00745 g006
Insects 12 00745 g007 550
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), A. aegypti (AAEL), A. gambiae (AGAP), D. melanogaster (Dm), P. puparum (Pp), and N. vitripennis (Nv). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Figure 7. Phylogenetic tree of the receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). A. gifuensis (KAF), H. hebetor (Hh), A. aegypti (AAEL), A. gambiae (AGAP), D. melanogaster (Dm), P. puparum (Pp), and N. vitripennis (Nv). The GPCRs from A. gifuensis are highlighted in red.
Insects 12 00745 g007
Insects 12 00745 g008 550
Figure 8. Expression profiles of A. gifuensis neuropeptide precursors and their receptors in response to imidacloprid (IMD). (a) neuropeptide precursors; (b) the family-A neuropeptide GPCRs; (c) receptors of the family-B GPCRs, LGRs, RGCs and RTKs. Asterisk (*) indicated that an absolute value of log2Ratio ≥1/≤−1 and FDR < 0.05.
Figure 8. Expression profiles of A. gifuensis neuropeptide precursors and their receptors in response to imidacloprid (IMD). (a) neuropeptide precursors; (b) the family-A neuropeptide GPCRs; (c) receptors of the family-B GPCRs, LGRs, RGCs and RTKs. Asterisk (*) indicated that an absolute value of log2Ratio ≥1/≤−1 and FDR < 0.05.
Insects 12 00745 g008
Insects 12 00745 g009 550
Figure 9. The tissue-specific transcript abundances of A. gifuensis neuropeptide precursors and their receptors. FH: female head, MH: male head, FB: female body, MB: male body. AstAR: allatostatin-A receptor; CAPAR: neuropeptides capa receptor; SIFaR: SIFamide receptor; FMRFR: FMRFamide receptor; sNPF: short neuropeptide F; ITP: ion transport peptide. The normalization of each gene was compared with the expression level in female heads. The error bars represent standard errors and the letters above each bar indicate significant differences in transcript abundances (p < 0.05).
Figure 9. The tissue-specific transcript abundances of A. gifuensis neuropeptide precursors and their receptors. FH: female head, MH: male head, FB: female body, MB: male body. AstAR: allatostatin-A receptor; CAPAR: neuropeptides capa receptor; SIFaR: SIFamide receptor; FMRFR: FMRFamide receptor; sNPF: short neuropeptide F; ITP: ion transport peptide. The normalization of each gene was compared with the expression level in female heads. The error bars represent standard errors and the letters above each bar indicate significant differences in transcript abundances (p < 0.05).
Insects 12 00745 g009
Table
Table 1. Description of neuropeptide genes in the genome of A. gifuensis.
Table 1. Description of neuropeptide genes in the genome of A. gifuensis.
Peptide NameGene IDAcronymProtein (AA)Assigned Receptor ID
Allatostatin AKAF7998325.1AstA181KAF7996862.1
Allatostatin CCKAF7990447.1AstCC136nd 1
Allatostatin CCCKAF7990446.1AstCCC90nd
Bursicon alphaKAF7994885.1Burα147KAF7997781.1
Bursicon betaKAF7994885.1Burβ123KAF7997781.1
CAPA splicing variant aKAF7994999.1CAPA103KAF7988142.1
KAF7988143.1
Crustacean cardioactive peptideKAF7995080.1CCAP130KAF7998540.1
CNMamideKAF7990444.1CNMa152nd
CorazoninKAF7991797.1Crz122KAF7996284.1
Diuretic hormone 31KAF7996337.1DH31110KAF7990226.1
Diuretic hormone 44KAF7994603.1DH44198KAF7989120.1
Eclosion hormoneKAF7992721.1EH85KAF7988832.1
Ecdysis triggering hormoneKAF7993382.1ETH168KAF7994769.1
FMRFamideKAF7993326.1FMRF305nd
IDLSRF-like peptideKAF7991605.1IDLSRF201nd
Insulin-like peptide 1KAF7990199.1ILP1645KAF7992320.1
KAF7989857.1
EleveninKAF7994890.1Ele151nd
InotocinKAF7991194.1Inotocin143nd
ITG-like peptideKAF7998553.1ITG237nd
Ion transport peptideKAF7996763.1ITP225nd
LeucokininKAF7987704.1LK218KAF7997530.1
MyosupressinKAF7994099.1MS99KAF7989857.1
NatalisinKAF7987703.1NTL296KAF7995563.1
NeuroparsinKAF7991177.1NP130KAF7994006.1
Neuropeptide F 2KAF7997106.1NPF2123KAF7993395.1
NVP-like putative neuropeptideKAF7992678.1NVP735nd
Neuropeptide-like precursorKAF7992639.1NPLP526KAF7988833.1
Orcokinin-AKAF7990442.1OKA154nd
Pheromone biosynthesis activating Neuropeptide/hugin-pyrokininKAF7995290.1PBAN158KAF7987302.1
KAF7991207.1
Pigment dispersing factorKAF7994542.1PDF88KAF7993218.1
ProctolinKAF7992386.1Pro220nd
Prothoracicotropic hormoneKAF7990443.1PTTH113KAF7993905.1
Short neuropeptide FKAF7990818.1sNPF95KAF7992286.1
SIFamideKAF7993381.1SIFa123KAF7995013.1
TrissinKAF7988021.1Tris76nd
1 nd means not found.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kong, X.; Li, Z.-X.; Gao, Y.-Q.; Liu, F.-H.; Chen, Z.-Z.; Tian, H.-G.; Liu, T.-X.; Xu, Y.-Y.; Kang, Z.-W. Genome-Wide Identification of Neuropeptides and Their Receptors in an Aphid Endoparasitoid Wasp, Aphidius gifuensi. Insects 2021, 12, 745. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12080745

AMA Style

Kong X, Li Z-X, Gao Y-Q, Liu F-H, Chen Z-Z, Tian H-G, Liu T-X, Xu Y-Y, Kang Z-W. Genome-Wide Identification of Neuropeptides and Their Receptors in an Aphid Endoparasitoid Wasp, Aphidius gifuensi. Insects. 2021; 12(8):745. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12080745

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kong, Xue, Zhen-Xiang Li, Yu-Qing Gao, Fang-Hua Liu, Zhen-Zhen Chen, Hong-Gang Tian, Tong-Xian Liu, Yong-Yu Xu, and Zhi-Wei Kang. 2021. "Genome-Wide Identification of Neuropeptides and Their Receptors in an Aphid Endoparasitoid Wasp, Aphidius gifuensi" Insects 12, no. 8: 745. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects12080745

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop