Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Cold Periods on the Biological Cycle of Marchalina hellenica
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Host Plants on Bacterial Community Structure in Larvae Midgut of Spodoptera frugiperda
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 4
10.3390/insects13040374
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of a Cordyceps fumosorosea Fungus Isolate and Its Pathogenicity against Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae)

by
Yaru Luo
,
Shujie Wu
,
Xinyu He
,
Desen Wang
,
Yurong He
* and
Xiaoge Nian
*
Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(4), 374; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects13040374
Submission received: 22 February 2022 / Revised: 6 April 2022 / Accepted: 7 April 2022 / Published: 11 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Insect Pest and Vector Management)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Some entomopathogenic fungi are highly pathogenic to Diaphorina citri, which is the mainly transmitting vector of CLas. In our study, we isolated an entomopathogenic fungus strain from an adult cadaver of D. citri. The isolate was identified as Cordyceps fumosorosea, based on morphology and ITS sequence analysis, and named C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01. We further evaluated its pathogenicity against D. citri nymphs and adults under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. The laboratory results showed that C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 was most pathogenic to young nymphs, followed by old nymphs and adults. Furthermore, the results on greenhouse experiments revealed that C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 not only had high pathogenicity against nymphs, but also had serious negative effects on adults from nymphs treated, including emergence rate of adults and female longevity. Our results showed C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 was highly pathogenic to D. citri, and these findings will facilitate mycoparasite development for biological control of D. citri.

Abstract

Diaphorina citri is the mainly transmitting vector of the citrus huanglongbing pathogen, which causes severe losses in in the citrus industry. In this study, we isolated a new entomopathogenic fungus, identified as member of Cordyceps fumosorosea based on morphology and ITS sequence analysis. We named C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 and evaluated its pathogenicity against D. citri nymphs and adults by immersion under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. Results showed that SCAU-CFDC01 was most pathogenic to young nymphs, followed by old nymphs and adults. The LC50 values of the fungus on nymphs and adults showed a declining trend over a 2–7-day period after inoculation. The LT50 (lethal time for a certain concentration to cause 50% mortality) values also presented a decreasing trend along with increasing conidia concentrations. For the results on greenhouse experiments, when 3rd and 5th instar nymphs were inoculated with 1 × 105 conidia mL−1, the survival rate of nymphs were lower, and the emergence rate of adults and female longevity was significantly reduced compared with the control. However, there were no significant effects on sex ratio of adults and male longevity. Our results showed SCAU-CFDC01 was highly pathogenic to D. citri, and may promote mycoparasite development for biological control of D. citri.

1. Introduction

Huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening disease, is a highly severe citrus disease [1,2,3]. After citrus is infected with HLB, the typical symptoms include yellow mottling on leaves and shoots, stunted growth, premature fruit drop, small and green fruit, and so on [1,4]. There are three species of Gram-negative, phloem-limited bacteria associated with HLB symptoms: Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), Candidatus L. africanus (CLaf), and Candidatus L. americanus (CLam). CLas and CLam are transmitted by Diaphorina citri, while CLaf is transmitted by Trioza erytreae [1]. In China, HLB is transmitted by D. citri in a propagative–circulative manner [5,6]. As a result, control of D. citri is the most effective measure to prevent HLB epidemics.
To date, chemical control is still the principal management strategy for D. citri. However, injudicious usage of chemical pesticides had led to a series of adverse environmental issues, such as pesticide resistance of insects, harm to beneficial insects, and insecticide residues [7,8]. In addition, insecticides are restricted for urban areas where D. citri may reproduce on ornamental (i.e., Murraya paniculata (L) Jacks plants) and backyard citrus plants. Moreover, D. citri has been reported to develop resistance to at least two pesticides (malathion and chlorpyrifos) [9]. Therefore, alternative management methods such as biological control have been gradually introduced. Entomopathogenic fungi, as an important agent of biological control, play a crucial role. Once touch with the insect epidermis, the fungus multiplies within the insect eventually killing the host, then emerges and sporulates on the cadaver. Finally, the fungus breaks through the epidermis and releases conidiophores to infect other insects [10,11,12].
Some entomopathogenic fungi are highly pathogenic to phloem-sucking pests such as aphids, thrips, and plant hoppers [13]. Many species, including Hirsutella citriformis, Metarhizium anisopliae, Cordyceps bassiana, Beauveria bassiana, Cordyceps javanica, C. fumosorosea (Isaria fumosorosea), and Clonostachys rosea, are reported to be highly pathogenic to D. citri [14,15,16,17,18,19]. For example, after application 4 times using 2 × 1013 conidia ha−1 of C. fumosorosea, B. bassiana, and M. anisopliae under field conditions, the mortality rates of D. citri were 40, 60, and 50% in nymphs, and 42, 50, and 50% in adults, respectively [15]. M. anisopliae and B. bassiana strains caused a more serious infection in the nymphs and adults of D. citri in comparison with C. fumosorosea isolates [20]. Nevertheless, few isolates targeting D. citri have been found in China. Ou et al. [17] reported that C. javanica GZQ-1 isolate was highly pathogenic to D. citri, and resulted in 91.7%, 88.3%, 73.3%, and 72.2% mortality rates of younger instar, median instar, older instar nymphs, and adults, respectively. Awan et al. [18] tested 12 fungal isolates and found that C. javanica FHY002-ACPHali was the most pathogenic to D. citri.
In the current study, a new isolate of C. fumosorosea was cultured from a cadaver of D. citri in the citrus-producing areas in Zhanjiang city, Guangdong Province, China. The aims of this study were the following: (ⅰ) to identify the isolate using molecular and morphological characteristics; (ⅱ) to investigate its pathogenicity to nymphs and adults of D. citri under laboratory conditions; (ⅲ) to evaluate the effects of the isolate on emergence rate, sex ratio, and longevity of adults from nymphs treated in the greenhouse. The overall objective was to determine whether the isolate could be used as a potential mycoparasite for the control of D. citri.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Fungus

Firstly, the entomopathogenic fungus was isolated from an adult cadaver of D. citri from the citrus-producing area in Zhanjiang City of Guangdong Province, China. The cadaver was surface-sterilized by immersion in 75% ethanol, and rinsed at least three times using sterile distilled water. After drying on filter paper, the cadaver was incubated on water medium in an incubator (4 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH (relative humidity) with 24 h total darkness). Once small mycelia from the cadaver were observed, the fresh fungal colony was picked and subcultured on SDAY medium a couple of times to obtain the fungal isolate. The fungal isolate was stored in the Key Laboratory of Bio-Pesticide Innovation and Application, South China Agricultural University (SCAU), China.

2.2. Morphological Characterization and Inoculation

The isolate was inoculated on SDAY medium and incubated at 26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH with a 14 light (L):10 dark (D) h photoperiod. After 12 days inoculation, the conidia were scraped off from the plates, suspended into 0.05% Tween-80 (v/v), quantified, and pictures were taken under a Nikon eclipse 80i phase contrast microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). In addition, after 5th instar nymphs of D. citri were inoculated with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1, the preliminary morphology was recorded on the 3rd, 5th, and 9th day, and identified using the taxonomy keys of Humber [21,22]. In addition, the mycelia from the cadaver were picked and subcultured on SDAY medium for completing the Koch postulates.

2.3. Indentification and Phylogenetic Tree of Fungal Isolate

For extraction of genomic DNA (gDNA), the isolate was grown on SDAY medium at 26 ± 1 °C for 7 days. The mycelia were harvested, and the gDNA was extracted using a fungal DNA kit following the manual (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). To amplify and sequence the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) of the isolate, the universal primers ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS5 (5′-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3′) were used. Total reaction volume of PCR amplification was 50 μL including 25 μL of PrimerSTAR®Max DNA Polymerase (Takara Biomedical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), 2 μL 10 mM ITS1, 2 μL 10 mM ITS5, 2 μL of total DNA template (76.9 ng/μL), and 19 μL of ddH2O. The thermal cycle conditions used in the PCR were: 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and 1 cycle of 72 °C for 5 min. PCR products were determined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and sent to the Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) for complete bidirectional sequencing with PCR primers. To determine the homogeneous counterparts, the DNA sequence of the isolate was submitted to the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) and aligned with other GenBank sequences (Table 1). For the phylogenetic analysis, the ITS sequences of the isolate and other related fungal species were selected by the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD). Subsequently, a phylogenetic tree was built based on the maximum likelihood method using MEGA7 software. The clade stability of supporting values of the branches was based on bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates.

2.4. Host Plants and Insect Colony

A total of 300 healthy M. paniculata plants were cultured in 40 cm-diameter plastic pots in the greenhouse in autumn of 2021. The D. citri colony was collected from the SCAU campus and reared on M. paniculata plants, which were individually covered with insect-rearing sleeves (50 × 45 cm). The plant colony was raised in an incubator (26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH with a 14 L:10 D h photoperiod).

2.5. Laboratory Bioassays

A total of 3 assays were conducted to evaluate the pathogenicity of the isolate to D. citri nymphs (3rd and 5th instar nymphs) and the newly emerged adults (1–2 days old) under laboratory conditions. To obtain different instar nymphs of insects, 9 M. paniculata plants with flushes were moved into 4 fine-mesh screen cages (60 × 60 × 60 cm). Approximate 2000 D. citri adults of mixed gender were introduced in each cage for oviposition for 24 h. After 24 h, the adults were removed, and the plants with eggs were maintained in a growth incubator (26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH with a 14 L: 10 D h photoperiod) for egg hatching and nymphs’ development. Conidia were suspended in 0.05% Tween-80 (v/v) and diluted with distilled water. Every assay consisted of 5 corresponding conidia concentrations (1 × 103, 1 × 104, 1 × 105, 1 × 106, 1 × 107 conidia mL−1 for 3rd or 5th instar nymphs; 1 × 106, 5 × 106, 1 × 107, 5 × 107, 1 × 108 conidia mL−1 for adults) plus a control check (CK) with 0.05% Tween-80. For inoculation, excised flushes with specific nymphs were dipped into above conidia concentrations and negative control for 30 s, and then air-dried at room temperature. After completion, each flush was individually put into 2.0 mL microcentrifuge tubes (Fisher Scientifific, Pittsburg, PA, USA) containing a 2% sucrose solution, and were placed into 50 mL microcentrifuge tubes sealed with gauze. Adults were fumigated with CO2, loaded on the gauze, immersed in above the concentrations for 30 s, and then transferred to flushes, which were put into clear plastic cups (30 × 15 cm) sealed with gauze. For all assays, there were 3 independent replicates (20–30 nymphs and adults per replicate) in each concentration treatment. The entire bioassay studies were repeated three times. All the devices and treated insects were maintained in the incubator (26 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 5% RH with a 14 L: 10 D h photoperiod). All treated nymphs and adults were checked daily for 7 days, and fresh untreated flushes were added as requirement. Dead insects from all treatments were transferred to moist filter paper for further fungal incubation.

2.6. Greenhouse Bioassays

Based on the above experiments, effects of the isolate against D. citri adults emerging from treated nymphs were investigated in the greenhouse. M. paniculata plants with about 10 fresh flushes were grown in 15 cm-diameter pots in the greenhouse. Approximately 300 D. citri adults of mixed gender were released per plant, and laid eggs for 12 h; they were then removed. Nine plants were introduced into one chamber (120 × 120 × 120 cm) with D. citri-proof meshes. When 3rd or 5th instar nymphs were observed, the number of nymphs per plant was counted (about 30–60 nymphs plant−1 observed). The 1 × 105 conidia mL−1 suspension was sprayed on both sides of M. paniculata plants, at 20 mL plant−1 using a manual sprayer (SW-168 model). A measure of 0.05% Tween-80 was included as blank control.
Nymphs per individual flush per plant were counted every day until emergence, and were grown from emergence under the stereomicroscope. Survival rate of nymphs, emergence rate, longevity, and sex ratio of adults from nymphs treated were recorded. Each treatment included three biological replicates, and the whole experiment was repeated three times on different days in autumn 2021.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

All the data were normalized prior to any data analysis. Corrected mortality was used based on Abbott’s formula [23]. For determining significant differences of insect mortality rate in the laboratory bioassay, split-plot ANOVA and Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) tests were carried out. The LT50, LC50, and their 95% confidence limits (CIs) were derived from probit analysis. Two-tailed paired Student’s t-test was used for analyzing the difference of development parameters (survival rate of nymphs, emergence rate, longevity, and sex ratio of adults from nymphs treated) between the control and fungal treatment in the greenhouse bioassays. SPSS 22.0 [24] and GraphPad Prism 9.0 software were used to perform all the statistical analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Identification and Characterization of the Isolate

The hyphae were white and velvet-like (Figure 1a). After 15 days of incubation, the surface of the culture medium was covered with mature smoke rose conidia (Figure 1b). The mature conidia were club-shaped (Figure 1c). After 5th instar nymphs of D. citri were infected with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1, the nymphs were observed to be less active, moving more slowly, and began to die 24 h after inocubation. A duration of 48 h after inoculation, white mycelia were found in the leg, mouthparts, and intersegmental regions of the nymphs. After 3 days of inoculation, the white mycelia were found, and the whole body was covered with white mycelia on the 5th day. Smoke rose conidia were produced on the 9th day (Figure 1d–f).
The result of the morphological identification demonstrated that this isolate is C. fumosorosea [21,22]. Genomic analysis further confirmed the isolate has 100% homology with other C. fumosorosea strains, such as C. fumosorosea FAFU-1 (GenBank accession number MG837716.1), C. fumosorosea ARSEF: 3302 (HM209050.1), C. fumosorosea CNRCB1(HM209049.1), C. fumosorosea SKCH-1 (HM209050.1), and C. fumosorosea ifTS02 (KX057373.1) (Figure 2). We named the C. fumosorosea isolate SCAU-CFDC01 with the GenBank accession number OL872288.1.

3.2. Pathogenicity of C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 against D. citri

The total mortality trends of D. citri nymphs and adults in response to various concentrations of C. fumosorosea conidia over time after inoculation are illustrated in Figure 3. The mortality rates of both nymphs and adults were significantly affected by the interaction of conidia concentration and days after inoculation (3rd instar nymphs, and 5th instar, p < 0.001; adults, p < 0.05), meaning that inoculum load effect was dependent on the exposure time.
The LC50 values for nymphs and adults treated with various conidia concentration are shown in Table 2. Based on LC50 values, 3rd instar nymphs were the most susceptible to SCAU-CFDC01, followed by 5th instar nymphs, and then adults.
The LT50 values estimated decreased with increasing fungal concentrations, and the LT50 differences among three assays tended to diminish with increasing fungal concentrations. The LT50 estimates for 3rd instar nymphs, 5th instar nymphs, and adults were 6.93–1.18 days, 7.60–1.51 days, and 9.71–1.20 days, respectively, in the range 1 × 103–1 × 108 conidia mL−1 (Table 3). These results demonstrated that our C. fumosorosea isolate was more pathogenic against nymphs of D. citri than adults. The bioassay results indicated that C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 isolate was highly pathogenic to D. citri.

3.3. Greenhouse Experiments

After treatment with 1 × 105 conida mL−1, the survival rates of adults from 3rd and 5th instar nymphs were only 9.20 ± 1.51% and 33.53 ± 3.19% and were significantly lower than the control (p < 0.001) (Figure 4a,b). Emergence rates of adults from 3rd and 5th nymphs treated were only 7.17 ± 1.21% and 26.32 ± 2.62%, respectively, which was significantly lower than the control groups (87.75 ± 2.29% and 91.24 ± 2.06%, respectively; p < 0.001) (Figure 4c,d). In addition, C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 significantly reduced female longevity, from 19.48 ± 0.92 days to 16.45 ± 0.84 days (p < 0.05), and from 20.61 ± 0.77 days to 16.47 ± 0.38 days (p < 0.001) for females from 3rd and 5th instar nymphs treated, respectively (Figure 4e,f). However, compared to the control, the isolate had no significant effects on male longevity and sex ratio of adults from 3rd/5th instar nymphs treated (p > 0.05) (Figure 4e–h).

4. Discussion

In this study, morpho-molecular characterization was performed to identify a new fungus isolate from D. citri. Firstly, the morphological proofs are consistent with the previously reported C. fumosorosea by Gallou et al. [25]. Next, BLAST analysis showed that it was 100% sequence homology with Cordyceps spp., and this result was further proved by phylogenetic analysis based on ITS1/ITS5 sequences (Figure 2).
To date, only a few entomopathogenic fungi have been shown to affect D. citri. Hoy et al. [26] isolated a new C. fumosorosea IfrAsCP and assessed its pathogenicity against D. citri with respective LT50 values of 4.63 and 4.27 days after the exposure to 1 × 107 and 1 × 108 conidia mL−1, respectively. Pinto et al. [27] reported that B. bassiana IBCB 66 was highly pathogenic to D. citri nymphs and the LC50 value on the 10th day after inoculation was 4.0 × 105 conidia mL−1. Ibarra-Cortes et al. [20] showed that both isolates of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae caused the greatest infection in adults and nymphs of D. citri. Ou et al. [17] investigated the virulence of C. javanica GZQ-1 fungus to D. citri, in which LC50 and LT50 values against lower instar, medium instar, older instar, and adults were 1.20 × 105, 1.10 × 106, 4.47 × 106, and 8.12 × 106 conidia mL−1 and 4.25, 4.51, 5.17, and 5.49 days, respectively. In our current study, after inoculation with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1, the mortality of younger and older instar nymphs achieved 100% mortality on the 3rd day, indicating that C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 isolate was better than other fungus described above terms of the pathogenicity to D. citri nymphs under controlled conditions.
In our study, 7 days after inoculation 1 × 107 conidia mL−1, the mortality rate of adults was 66%. However, Stauderman et al. [14] reported that the mortality rates of D. citri adults reached 100% between 106 and 107 conidia mL−1 of C. fumosorosea for 12 days. Compared with the dipping method we used, D. citri adults continually in contact with conidia-contaminated grapefruit leaves for 12 days in Stauderman et al. [14] showed higher mortality rates. Similar results were reported by Orduño-Cruz et al. [16] and Ibarra-Cotres et al. [20]. In addition to the applied method, leading to difference in fungal virulence, numerous studies have revealed the pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungi is also easily affect by various biotic and abiotic factors, such as host, light, humidity, temperature, and agricultural practices, etc., see [18,28,29,30,31]. Therefore, exploring the pathogenicity of potential fungi on different developmental stages and environmental conditions is important. Validation at field conditions is also fundamental.
Nymphs are more susceptible to fungal infection than adults of D. citri. Furthermore, nymphs are more like gregarious on young leaflets and move more slowly than adults, which means they are more fitting targets for biological control [32]. In addition, lethality requires an infection period; therefore, an infected adult may be able to transmit CLas before its eventual death. In the present study, along with the increasing in D. citri developmental stage, the corresponding LT50s and LC50s also increased when inoculated with the same conidia concentration, indicating that the C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 strain is more pathogenic to nymphs than adults, which is in accordance with previously published works [17,20]. However, we cannot ignore the adults, because they are more active in disseminating CLas. Bamisile et al. [33] assessed the pathogenicity of two fungal strains of B. bassiana and one strain of I. fumosorosea against adults of D. citri in a greenhouse setting, and found that there was a 50% reduction in the survival rate of D. citri adults within 5 days of exposure. Yang et al. [34] reported that the mortality rates of D. citri adults reached 46.7% mortality at 1 × 108 conidia mL−1 of Clonostachys rosea for 9 days in the laboratory conditions. In our study, we also assessed the pathogenicity of SCAU-CFDC01 to adults and found 88% mortality at 1 × 108 conidia mL−1 in the laboratory conditions. Furthermore, the results of greenhouse experiments showed that SCAU-CFDC01 not only had high virulence to nymphs, but also had serious negative effects on adults which emerged from treated nymphs. The survival rate of nymphs, emergence rate of adults and female longevity significantly decrease, which further revealed the potential good control effect of our fungus on D. citri population. In conclusion, our results and previously reported results findings [3,14,15,17,19,32,35] all showed that entomopathogenic fungi are excellent prospective options for the biological control of D. citri.

5. Conclusions

The discovery of entomopathogenic fungi will promote the development of biopesticides for the biological control of D. citri. In the current study, we identified a highly pathogenic isolate, C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01, based on morphology and molecular proofs, and estimated its effect on the mortality, survival, emergence rate, longevity, and sex ratio of D. citri. Our study not only enriches the available resource library of entomopathogenic fungi, but also provides an alternative option for D. citri control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.L. and X.N.; methodology, Y.L. and X.N.; software, Y.L. and D.W.; validation, Y.L., S.W. and X.H.; formal analysis, Y.L. and D.W.; investigation, Y.L., S.W. and X.H.; resources, Y.L., S.W. and X.H.; data curation, Y.L. and D.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.L., X.N. and Y.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.L. and X.N.; visualization, Y.L. and X.N.; supervision, Y.L., Y.H. and X.N.; project administration, Y.L., Y.H. and X.N.; funding acquisition, X.N. and Y.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Guangdong Provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams, grant number 2019KJ125 and National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32102193.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The ITS sequence of C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 used in this study can be accessed via accession number OL872288.1 in NCBI GenBank.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editor and reviewers for the modifications and suggestions of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bové, J.M. Huanglongbing: A destructive newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus. J. Plant Path. 2006, 88, 7–37. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassanezi, R.B.; Montesino, L.H.; Gasparoto, M.C.G.; Filho, A.B.; Amorim, L. Yield loss caused by huanglongbing in different sweet orange cultivars in so paulo, brazil. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 130, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Graa, J.V.D.; Douhan, G.W.; Halbert, S.E.; Keremane, M.L.; Lee, R.F.; Vidalakis, G.; Zhao, H. Huanglongbing: An overview of a complex pathosystem ravaging the world’s citrus. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2016, 58, 373–387. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang, N.; Pierson, E.A.; Setubal, J.C.; Xu, J.; Levy, J.G.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Li, J.Y.; Rangel, L.T.; Martins, J. The Candidatus Liberibacter-host interferface: Insights into pathogenesis mechanisms and disease control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2017, 55, 451–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hall, D.G.; Richardson, M.L.; Ammar, E.D.; Halbert, S.E. Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, vector of citrus huanglongbing disease. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2013, 146, 207–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yang, Y.P.; Huang, M.D.; Beattie, G.A.C.; Xia, Y.L.; Ouyang, G.C.; Xiong, J.J. Distribution, biology, ecology and control of the psyllid Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, a major pest of citrus: A status report for China. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2006, 552, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boina, D.R.; Onagbola, E.O.; Salyani, M.; Stelinski, L.L. Antifeedant and sublethal effects of imidacloprid on Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri. Pest Manag. Sci. 2009, 65, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, J.K.; Hu, R.F.; Pray, C.; Qiao, F.B.; Rozelle, S. Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: A case study of Bt cotton in China. Agric. Econ. 2015, 29, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pardo, S.; Martinez, A.M.; Figueroa, J.I.; Chavarrieta, J.M.; Vinuela, E.; Rebollar-Alviter, A.; Miranda, M.A.; Valle, J.; Pineda, S. Insecticide resistance of adults and nymphs of Asian citrus psyllid populations from Apatzingan Valley, Mexico. Pest Manag. Sci. 2018, 74, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiong, Q.; Xie, Y.P.; Zhu, Y.M.; Xue, J.L.; Li, J.; Fan, R.J. Morphological and ultrastructural characterization of Carposina sasakii larvae (Lepidoptera: Carposinidae) infected by Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales: Clavicipitaceae). Micron 2013, 44, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, C.S.; Wang, S.B. Insect pathogenic fungi: Genomics, molecular interactions, and genetic improvements. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2017, 62, 73–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wei, G.; Lai, Y.L.; Wang, G.D.; Chen, H.; Li, F.; Wang, S.B. Insect pathogenic fungus interacts with the gut microbiota to accelerate mosquito mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 5994–5999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Shipp, J.L.; Zhang, Y.; Hunt, D.W.A.; Ferguson, G. Influence of humidity and greenhouse microclimate on the efficacy of Beauveria bassiana (Balsamo) for control of greenhouse arthropod pests. Environ. Entomol. 2003, 32, 1154–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Stauderman, K.; Avery, P.; Aristizábal, L.; Arthurs, S. Evaluation of Isaria fumosorosea (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) for control of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2012, 22, 747–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lezama-Gutiérrez, R.; Molina-Ochoa, J.; Chávez-Flores, O.; Ángel-Sahagún, C.A.; Skoda, S.R.; Reyes-Martínez, G.; Barba-Reynoso, M.; Rebolledo-Domínguez, O.; Ruíz-Aguilar, G.M.L.; Foster, J.E. Use of the entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae, Cordyceps bassiana and Isaria fumosorosea to control Diaphorina citri (hemiptera: Psyllidae) in persian lime under field conditions. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2012, 32, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Orduño-Cruz, N.; Guzmán-Franco, A.W.; Rodríguez-Leyva, E.; Alatorre-Rosas, R.; González-Hernández, H.; Mora-Aguilera, G. In vivo selection of entomopathogenic fungal isolates for control of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Biol. Control. 2015, 90, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ou, D.; Zhang, L.H.; Guo, C.F.; Chen, X.S.; Ali, S.; Qiu, B.L. Identifification of a new Cordyceps javanica fungus isolate and its toxicity evaluation against Asian citrus psyllid. MicrobiologyOpen 2019, 8, e00760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Awan, U.A.; Meng, L.X.; Xia, S.; Raza, M.F.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Zhang, H.Y. Isolation, fermentation, and formulation of entomopathogenic fungi virulent against adults of Diaphorina citri. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 4040–4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gallou, A.; Serna-Domínguez, M.G.; Berlanga-Padilla, A.M.; Ayala-Zermeño, M.A.; Mellín-Rosas, M.A.; Montesinos-Matías, R.; Arredondo-Bernal, H.C. Species clarification of Isaria isolates used as biocontrol agents against Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) in Mexico. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 414–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ibarra-Cortes, K.H.; Guzman-Franco, A.W.; Gonzalez-Hernandez, H.; Ortega-Arenas, L.D.; Villanueva-jimenez, J.A.; Robles-bermudez, A. Susceptibility of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) and its parasitoid Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) to entomopathogenic fungi under laboratory conditions. Neotrop. Entomol. 2018, 47, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Humber, R.A. Fungi: Identification. In Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology; Lacey, L.A., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  22. Humber, R.A. Identification of entomopathogenic fungi. In Manual of Techniques in Invertebrate Pathology, 2nd ed.; Lacey, L.A., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Abbott, W.S. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol. 1925, 18, 265–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Finney, D.J. Probit Analysis: A Statistical Treatment of the Sigmoid Response Curve, 3rd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1972. [Google Scholar]
  25. Grafton-Cardwell, E.E.; Stelinski, L.L.; Stansly, P.A. Biology and management of Asian citrus psyllid, vector of the huanglongbing pathogens. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013, 58, 413–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hoy, M.A.; Singh, R.; Rogers, M.E. Evaluations of a novel isolate of Isaria fumosorosea for control of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Fla. Entomol. 2010, 93, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pinto, A.P.F.; Filho, A.B.; Almeida, J.E.M.D.; Wenzel, I.M. Beauveria bassiana pathogenicity to Diaphorina citri and compatibility of the fungus with phytosanitary products. Pesqui. Agropecuária Bras. 2012, 47, 1673–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Bugeme, D.M.; Maniania, N.K.; Knapp, M.; Boga, H.I. Effect of temperature on virulence of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae isolates to Tetranychus evansi. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2008, 46, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Erler, F.; Ates, A.O. Potential of two entomopathogenic fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae), as biological control agents against the June beetle. J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Fernández, M.; Miranda, I. Comportamiento de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Parte I: Características morfológicas, incidencia y enemigos naturales asociados. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2005, 2, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  31. Avery, P.B.; Wekesa, V.W.; Hunter, W.B.; Hall, D.G.; McKensie, C.L.; Osborne, L.S.; Powell, C.A.; Rogers, M.E. Effects of the fungus Isaria fumosorosea (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) on reduced feeding and mortality of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2011, 21, 1065–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cortez-Madrigal, H.J.; Sánchez-Saavedra, M.; Díaz-Godínez, G.; MoraAguilera, G. Enzymatic activity and pathogenicity of entomopathogenic fungi from central and southeastern Mexico to Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae). Southwest. Entomol. 2014, 39, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bamisile, B.S.; Dash, C.K.; Akutse, K.S.; Qasim, M.; Ramos Aguila, L.C.; Wang, F.; Keppanan, R.; Wang, L. Endophytic Beauveria bassiana in Foliar-treated citrus limon plants acting as a growth suppressor to three successive generations of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Insects 2019, 10, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yang, Z.; Wu, Q.; Fan, J.; Huang, J.; Wu, Z.; Lin, J.; Bin, S.; Shu, B. Effects of the entomopathogenic fungus Clonostachys rosea on mortality rates and gene expression profiles in Diaphorina citri adults. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 2021, 179, 107539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gandarilla-Pacheco, F.L.; Galán-Wong, L.J.; López-Arroyo, J.I.; Rodríguez-Guerra, R.; Quintero-Zapata, I. Optimization of pathogenicity tests for selection of native isolates of entomopathogenic fungi isolated from citrus-growing areas of México on adults of Diaphorina ciri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Fla. Entomol. 2013, 96, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Insects 13 00374 g001 550
Figure 1. Morphology characteristics of the isolate on SDAY medium and 5th instar nymph of D. citri. (a) The upper side of the colony on SDAY on 5th day at 25 °C; (b) the upper side of the mature colony on SDAY on the 15th day at 25 °C; (c) mature conidia; (d) 5th instar nymph of D. citri inoculated with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1 on 3rd day after inoculation; (e) 5th instar nymph of D. citri inoculated with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1 on 5th day after inoculation; (f) 5th instar nymph of D. citri inoculated with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1 on 9th day after inoculation.
Figure 1. Morphology characteristics of the isolate on SDAY medium and 5th instar nymph of D. citri. (a) The upper side of the colony on SDAY on 5th day at 25 °C; (b) the upper side of the mature colony on SDAY on the 15th day at 25 °C; (c) mature conidia; (d) 5th instar nymph of D. citri inoculated with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1 on 3rd day after inoculation; (e) 5th instar nymph of D. citri inoculated with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1 on 5th day after inoculation; (f) 5th instar nymph of D. citri inoculated with 1 × 107 conidia mL−1 on 9th day after inoculation.
Insects 13 00374 g001
Insects 13 00374 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular identification and phylogenetic analyses of the SCAU-IFDC01 fungus isolate from D. citri based on ITS1/ITS5 and maximum likelihood method.
Figure 2. Molecular identification and phylogenetic analyses of the SCAU-IFDC01 fungus isolate from D. citri based on ITS1/ITS5 and maximum likelihood method.
Insects 13 00374 g002
Insects 13 00374 g003 550
Figure 3. Pathogenicity of C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 against D. citri. (a–c) Trend over time in the percentage mortality of 3rd and 5th instar nymphs and adults of D. citri with days after inoculation with six concentrations of C. fumosorosea. CK (control check): distilled water.
Figure 3. Pathogenicity of C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 against D. citri. (a–c) Trend over time in the percentage mortality of 3rd and 5th instar nymphs and adults of D. citri with days after inoculation with six concentrations of C. fumosorosea. CK (control check): distilled water.
Insects 13 00374 g003
Insects 13 00374 g004 550
Figure 4. The effects of C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 on D. citri adults from nymphs treated. Adult survival rate (a), emergence rate (c), longevity (e), and sex ratio (g) based on a 3rd instar nymph cohort inoculated with the fungus. Adult survival rate (b), emergence rate (d), longevity (f), and sex ratio (h) based on a 5th instar nymph cohort inoculated with the fungus. All the results are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE). t-test statistically significant differences between treatment and CK were denoted by * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), and *** (p < 0.001). n.s.—not significant.
Figure 4. The effects of C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 on D. citri adults from nymphs treated. Adult survival rate (a), emergence rate (c), longevity (e), and sex ratio (g) based on a 3rd instar nymph cohort inoculated with the fungus. Adult survival rate (b), emergence rate (d), longevity (f), and sex ratio (h) based on a 5th instar nymph cohort inoculated with the fungus. All the results are presented as the mean ± standard error (SE). t-test statistically significant differences between treatment and CK were denoted by * (p < 0.05), ** (p < 0.01), and *** (p < 0.001). n.s.—not significant.
Insects 13 00374 g004
Table
Table 1. Fungal species, GenBank accession number, isolate number, location, number of nucleotides analyzed, and of entomopathogenic fungi.
Table 1. Fungal species, GenBank accession number, isolate number, location, number of nucleotides analyzed, and of entomopathogenic fungi.
SpeciesGenBank Accession NumberIsolate
Number		LocationNumber of Nucleotides Analyzed (bp)
C. fumosoroseaOL872288.1SCAU-CFDC01Guangzhou, China564
C. fumosoroseaMG837716FAFU-1Fuzhou, China603
C. fumosoroseaHM209050.1ARSEF:3302Mexico570
C. fumosoroseaHM209049.1CNRCB1Mexico572
C. fumosoroseaFJ765017.1SKCH-1Guangzhou, China635
C. fumosoroseaKX057373.1IfTS02Guangzhou, China564
M. anisopliaeKX380792.1YD2-1-8Nanchang, China559
M. anisopliaeJN377427.1zjWenchang, China685
B. brongniartiiJX110381.1SASR HHB32BSouth Africa595
B. brongniartiiJF947191.1ARSEF8153Canada593
B. bassianaMH854860.1CBS 119.26Indonesia637
B. bassianaKF772861.1YD-1Wuhan, Hubei491
B. bassianaAY531961.1813USA797
Beauveria pseudobassianaLT220765.1TM1527BPortugal958
I. amoeneroseaHM161732.1CBS729.73Thailand865
Table
Table 2. Pathogenicity regression equations for LC50 values of C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 against D. citri.
Table 2. Pathogenicity regression equations for LC50 values of C. fumosorosea SCAU-CFDC01 against D. citri.
Developmental StageDaysSlop ± SERegression Virulence ModelLC50 (Conidia mL−1) (95% CI)p *
3rd instar nymphs30.66 ± 0.09Y = 0.66X − 2.516.0 × 103 (2.37 × 103–1.25 × 104)0.65
40.72 ± 0.11Y = 0.72X − 2.493.00 × 103 (7.73–1.86 × 104)0.06
51.03 ± 0.16Y = 1.03X − 3.462.32 × 103 (1.10 × 103–4.08 × 103)0.72
61.16 ± 0.19Y = 1.16X − 3.771.82 × 103 (8.94 × 102–3.09 × 103)0.25
70.99 ± 0.18Y = 0.99X − 3.031.14 × 103 (1.61–4.63 × 103)0.11
5th instar nymphs30.56 ± 0.28Y = 0.56X − 2.841.14 × 105 (2.15 × 104–8.04 × 105)0.17
40.86 ± 0.26Y = 0.86X − 4.136.55 × 104 (1.97 × 103–2.15 × 105)0.17
51.63 ± 0.42Y = 1.63X − 7.282.86 × 104 (6.31 × 103–5.84 × 104)0.51
61.74 ± 0.53Y = 1.74X − 7.923.46 × 104 (4.76 × 103–7.23 × 104)0.54
71.57 ± 0.44Y = 1.57X − 6.982.88 × 104 (4.08 × 103–6.42 × 104)0.44
Adult30.32 ± 0.08Y = 0.32X − 2.362.68 × 107 (3.25 × 106–6.73 × 109)0.96
40.30 ± 0.08Y = 0.30X − 2.181.85 × 107 (2.26 × 106–5.01 × 109)0.98
50.27 ± 0.08Y = 0.27X − 1.845.43 × 106 (7.73 × 105–7.51 × 108)0.87
60.27 ± 0.08Y = 0.27X − 1.824.76 × 106 (6.89 × 105–6.02 × 108)0.94
70.26 ± 0.08Y = 0.26X − 1.704.69 × 106 (6.38 × 105–8.82 × 108)0.95
p * goodness of fit test. All p > 0.05 showed good regression fit to the probit model.
Table
Table 3. Pathogenicity regression equations for LT50 values of C. fumosorosea against D. citri.
Table 3. Pathogenicity regression equations for LT50 values of C. fumosorosea against D. citri.
Developmental StageConidia
Concentration		Slop ± SERegression ModelLT50 (days)
(95% CI)		p
3rd instar nymphs1 × 1075.71 ± 1.10Y = 5.71X − 0.361.18 (0.94–1.35)0.09
1 × 1064.55 ± 0.65Y = 4.55X − 0.851.53 (1.26–1.78)0.95
1 × 1054.20 ± 0.38Y = 4.23X − 1.111.75 (1.54–1.94)0.91
1 × 1042.01 ± 0.32Y = 2.06X − 1.063.28 (2.69–3.94)0.64
1 × 1031.58 ± 0.30Y = 1.58X − 1.336.93 (5.40–10.85)0.10
5th instar nymphs1 × 1076.35 ± 0.58Y = 6.35X − 1.141.51 (1.39–1.63)0.31
1 × 1064.78 ± 0.39Y = 4.78X − 1.582.14 (1.75–2.51)0.06
1 × 1053.32 ± 0.32Y = 3.32X − 1.422.67 (2.34–2.97)0.40
1 × 1042.10 ± 0.29Y = 2.10X − 1.485.09 (4.39–6.17)0.77
1 × 1031.75 ± 0.31Y = 1.75X − 1.547.60 (6.03–11.43)0.17
Adults1 × 1081.61 ± 0.58Y = 1.61X − 0.131.20 (0.00–3.67)0.74
5 × 1071.57 ± 0.64Y = 1.57X − 0.562.28 (0.00–5.89)0.97
1 × 1071.63 ± 0.62Y = 1.63X − 0.963.88 (0.14–6.99)0.88
5 × 1061.24 ± 0.54Y = 1.24X − 1.016.51 (0.04–13.78)0.83
1 × 1061.28 ± 0.83Y = 1.28X − 1.269.71 (0.21–15.78)0.98
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, Y.; Wu, S.; He, X.; Wang, D.; He, Y.; Nian, X. Identification of a Cordyceps fumosorosea Fungus Isolate and Its Pathogenicity against Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Insects 2022, 13, 374. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects13040374

AMA Style

Luo Y, Wu S, He X, Wang D, He Y, Nian X. Identification of a Cordyceps fumosorosea Fungus Isolate and Its Pathogenicity against Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). Insects. 2022; 13(4):374. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects13040374

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Yaru, Shujie Wu, Xinyu He, Desen Wang, Yurong He, and Xiaoge Nian. 2022. "Identification of a Cordyceps fumosorosea Fungus Isolate and Its Pathogenicity against Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae)" Insects 13, no. 4: 374. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects13040374

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop