Next Article in Journal
Invasive Candida Infections in Neonates after Major Surgery: Current Evidence and New Directions
Next Article in Special Issue
Establishment of Babesia bovis In Vitro Culture Using Medium Free of Animal Products
Previous Article in Journal
Staphylococcus aureus in Intensive Pig Production in South Africa: Antibiotic Resistance, Virulence Determinants, and Clonality
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Infection of Calves with Transfected Attenuated Babesia bovis Expressing the Rhipicephalus microplus Bm86 Antigen and eGFP Marker: Preliminary Studies towards a Dual Anti-Tick/Babesia Vaccine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A Comparative Genomic Study of Attenuated and Virulent Strains of Babesia bigemina

1
CENID-Salud Animal e Inocuidad, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Jiutepec, Morelos 62550, Mexico
2
Centro de Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, AP565-A Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 January 2021 / Revised: 23 February 2021 / Accepted: 6 March 2021 / Published: 8 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bovine Babesiosis)

Abstract

:
Cattle babesiosis is a socio-economically important tick-borne disease caused by Apicomplexa protozoa of the genus Babesia that are obligate intraerythrocytic parasites. The pathogenicity of Babesia parasites for cattle is determined by the interaction with the host immune system and the presence of the parasite’s virulence genes. A Babesia bigemina strain that has been maintained under a microaerophilic stationary phase in in vitro culture conditions for several years in the laboratory lost virulence for the bovine host and the capacity for being transmitted by the tick vector. In this study, we compared the virulome of the in vitro culture attenuated Babesia bigemina strain (S) and the virulent tick transmitted parental Mexican B. bigemina strain (M). Preliminary results obtained by using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) showed that out of 27 virulence genes described and analyzed in the B. bigemina virulent tick transmitted strain, only five were fully identified in the attenuated laboratory strain. In all cases, the identity and coverture of the identified genes of the wildtype strain were higher than those of the laboratory strain. This finding is putatively associated with the continuous partial loss of virulence genes in the laboratory strain after several passages of the parasite population under optimal in vitro growth conditions. The loss of virulence factors might be reflected in the absence of symptoms of the disease in cattle inoculated with the attenuated strain despite the presence of infection in the bovine host cells.

1. Introduction

Bovine babesiosis is caused by Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina in Mexico. The disease is distributed in tropical areas and is considered to be one of the most important diseases transmitted by Rhipicephalus microplus and R. annulatus ticks [1]. The presentation of bovine babesiosis caused by B. bigemina is 12–16 days after the ticks feed on the bovine, coinciding with the presence of the intraerythrocytic parasite in the peripheral blood. The temperature rises parallel to the increase in parasitemia to 41–42 °C in two or three days. The infected animals are lethargic, anorexic and have shaggy fur. Hemoglobinemia and hemoglobinuria occur followed by pale mucous membranes along with other signs that may include constipation, dehydration, muscle tremors, weakness, prostration and, if inadequate treatment is instituted, death [2].
B. bigemina is an obligate intraerythrocytic Apicomplexan parasite; it belongs to the Protista kingdom, Protozoan sub-kingdom, Apicomplexa phylum, Sporozoasida class, Piroplasmia sub-class, Eucocciiorida order, Piroplasmorina sub-order and Babesiidae family [3]. Parasites have the characteristics of a normal eukaryotic cell with an endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi apparatus, nucleus, microtubules and organelles specific to the Apicomplexa phylum [4]. Babesia is a protozoan with alternating (sexual-asexual) reproduction that is characterized by the presence of an apical complex, although incomplete, without a cone but with rhoptries, a polar ring and with sub-pellicular microtubules, micronemes and dense granules known in Babesia as spherical bodies. Its shape can be round, piriform or amoeboid [1]. Regarding their biology, they are obligate heteroxenous parasites developing in the invertebrate host (definitive host where the sexual phases of the cycle take place) gametogony and sporogony and in the vertebrate (intermediate) host, binary asexual divisions develop giving rise to merozoites. Various studies have been generated on the bovine host, the agent and their relationships trying to recognize its biological characteristics as well as its distribution to establish programs for the prevention and/or control of the disease. These activities have required the replication of the biological cycle using the parasite-host-vector complex and after multiple tests the artificial growth of this type of parasite has been achieved under in vitro conditions [5,6]. Various methods have been reported to decrease the virulence of pathogenic species in cattle such as rapid passages by parenteral inoculation in splenectomized calves [7], slow passages by parenteral inoculation in intact calves [8], the use of radiation on infected blood [9] and the in vitro culture methodology for the Babesia species that affect cattle [5,6,10,11]. The attenuation of intracellular pathogens by in vitro culture is a well known phenomenon and pathogens of viral, rickettsial and protozoal origin (i.e., B. bovis and B. divergens) have become avirulent or less pathogenic by prolonged growth in cell culture [12,13,14,15]. Work from our research group has shown that a strain of B. bigemina maintained by continuous passages in in vitro culture has behaved as an attenuated population as it did not significantly affect the hematological values in inoculated animals [16,17]. The attenuated strain of B. bigemina has induced protection from a heterologous challenge with infected blood or infected ticks under controlled and field conditions [16,17,18]. Animals vaccinated with attenuated strains of Babesia bovis have been reported to remain as healthy carriers, leading to the emergence of clinical cases due to the reversion to virulence of the strains when they are passed through intact animals or when transmitted by ticks [19]. Vaccine strains have been developed to confer adequate protection without being transmitted by ticks, a trait considered ecologically desirable because it prevents the appearance of clinical cases due to the transmission of the vaccine strain by ticks [20]. This ability has been demonstrated after one passage in susceptible cattle [16,19,20,21]. Furthermore, this type of live attenuated vaccine has the great advantage conferred by its in vitro production: a low risk of contamination with other infectious agents [22,23,24], a highly parasitized suspension of red blood cells and the possibility of relatively large scale vaccine production [25]. Importantly, it was shown that the attenuated Babesia bigemina S strain was not transmitted by ticks after several passages in susceptible cattle [26]. The absence of a reversion to virulence of the attenuated B. bigemina S strain was demonstrated after three successive passages in susceptible cattle and it was confirmed that the parasites maintained in the in vitro culture lost the ability to multiply in the vector tick during a second pass by sub-inoculation in susceptible cattle [26]. This was evidenced by the absence of kinetes in the hemolymph of ticks fed in cattle with patent parasitemia. Furthermore, it has been shown that even when subjected to three successive passages in highly susceptible cattle, the parasite population maintains its biological characteristic of reduced virulence manifested by the clinical values determined in the sub-inoculated cattle, which did not show relevant changes. As a sexual phase of Babesia is required for the infection of the epithelial cells of the midgut of the vector tick [27] and consequently the trans-ovarian transmission [28,29], the parasite population of the Mexican attenuated strain is apparently unable to reproduce sexually in R. microplus infested cattle to induce the formation of infective forms for the tick vector. On the other hand, it was not known until now what the components of the parasite responsible for the induction of hemolysis and other pathophysiological effects were in infected cattle.
It is evident that additional studies and research are required using a new generation of sequencing methodologies to identify the possible mechanisms involved in the determination of virulence for the development of the parasite within the erythrocyte infected (and thus cause disease in an inoculated bovine) as well as for the development of subsequent stages of Babesia necessary for the infection of the midgut of R. microplus (sexual forms) that allow the parasite to acquire again the infective capacity toward the tick vector and, consequently, be trans-ovarially transmitted. Only by using innovative methods of massive sequencing and analysis of the genome and transcriptome shall it be possible to test the hypothesis that a few genetic changes (chromosomal rearrangements, deletions or insertions in genes) occurred in the genome of the attenuated strain that is the subject of study and maintained in an in vitro culture, which are reflected in an attenuated phenotype lacking the ability to be transmitted by the tick vector R. microplus. In this study we performed a bioinformatic analysis of possible plasticity on the genome of B. bigemina by sequencing the genome of a virulent strain and an attenuated strain (derived from the virulent isolate but maintained in continuous in vitro cultivation in Mexico). The list of genes associated with the virulence of B. bigemina is called the virulome of B. bigemina.

2. Results and Discussion

The genome sequencing and assembly analysis elucidated that the attenuated Babesia bigemina laboratory strain contained a 9,180,241 pb and a wildtype 11,852,459 pb, which represented a 22.545% difference (Table 1). Interestingly, the guanine-cytosine (GC) content was slightly higher in the laboratory strain of B. bigemina (52.3%) versus the wildtype (50.74%).
Although nucleotide variations in the sequencing effort were important, the synteny was maintained as can be observed in the comparative dot plot in Figure 1.

Genomic Gene Virulence Differences between Babesia bigemina Strains

The virulence gene sequences were obtained from a Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) search and the differences between the strains were remarkable; while the wildtype strain presented 27 genes with a coverture average of 98.06%, the attenuated laboratory strain only presented five of those genes with 81.2% of coverture (Table 2). The most common type of genes identified in both strains were putative partial genes; 18 for the virulent wildtype and three for the attenuated strain. The only identified hypothetical gene belonged to the wildtype strain with the shortest sequence observed and zero mismatches (107 bp; Table 2). The largest gene (6117 bp) present in the virulent strain had the highest number of mismatches (216 bp; Table 2). Attempts were made to predict whether those genes would translate into proteins. For the predictions of the eukaryote genes, we usually utilize the Augustus online program, which predicts in the six open reading frames the possible forms of proteins. Unfortunately for us, the genome assembly performed with the sequence reads still contained too many contigs, which made an adequate bioinformatic analysis not possible. This was solved by performing high-throughput genome sequencing on a PacBio Single Molecule Real Time (SMRT) sequencing platform to close gaps or extend contig ends in the Illumina assembly [30].
In addition, considering that the phenotype differences among the culture attenuated and the wildtype strain included a lack of transmission of the cultured strain by ticks, a comparative analysis of gene encoding for proteins involved in the sexual stage development, kinete-specific or other genes required for tick transmission was performed. Several genes that are involved in the parasite development in the tick vector are well described in the literature such as the hap2 and CCp gene family (Table 3) [31,32,33,34,35]. It was found that these genes were well conserved in both genomes analyzed with a slightly higher sequence identity in the attenuated strain. Interestingly, CCp2 and BBBOND genes were identified in two different contigs and apparently a few nucleotides were missing (406 bp and 61 bp, respectively). The CCp1 gene described in B. bovis [33] was apparently missing in both the virulent and the attenuated strain genomes (Table 3). Regarding the developmental genes described in Table 3 that seemed to have a similar homology no matter whether they belonged to the avirulent isolate or the virulent one, previous studies have shown that the CCp gene family members of Babesia parasites are differentially expressed throughout the life cycle and data presented in those studies demonstrated that the Babesia CCcp genes are predominantly expressed during parasite replication in the tick vector [32,33,34,35]. Whether this is the case for the CCp genes identified in this comparative genomic study needs further investigation and we are currently preparing the appropriate in vivo and in vitro experiments to test that by RT-PCR.
The genome sequencing effort was performed with two replicates for each parasite strain. The genome assembly was achieved with two sets of reads for each strain and these data are presented in Table 1. The BLAST analysis searching for the genes of interest was performed with both contigs of the assembly obtained with the reads from the two technical replicates for both Babesia strains and separately with contigs from the reads of the two technical replicates of each Babesia strain. Despite having shorter contigs in the individual technical replicates, the results of the analysis obtained were essentially the same as those presented in Table 2 and Table 3 when the replicates were submitted to BLAST analysis.
Genetic changes have been identified in the genome of other Apicomplexa agents cultured in vitro [36,37]. In addition, the comparative analysis of the genome of the Mexican virulent strain with the genome of the Australian virulent strain called Bond [38] allowed the mapping of virulent gene sequences against a reference genome (Australian B. bigemina genome) as performed with BLAST. This approach allowed a first analysis of the genome composition of each strain and identified possible changes (deletions or insertions) or chromosomal rearrangements that occurred in the genomes of the virulent and attenuated B. bigemina strains. For a pathogen with a relatively small genome such as that representing Babesia, which for the case of the Bond strain is estimated to have 4457 genes, the completion of the genome sequences will provide the complete genetic repertoire of antigens and virulence factors from which new candidates as targets for treatment or immune prophylaxis can be identified. It has been estimated that more candidates can be identified (between 10 and 100 times more) using genomics-based approaches than those identified through conventional methods in the same period. Research studies implemented on the development of genomic-based vaccines have substantively increased our understanding of the physiology, epidemiology, pathogenicity and protein function of pathogenic organisms [39,40,41]. Traditionally, sequencing projects have focused on the genome study of pathogenic and virulent organisms. A comparison of genomes of pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains allows the identification of targets for the development of vaccines and therapeutic drugs based on proteins that are specifically involved in pathogenesis and virulence. Comparative genomics allows the identification of unique genes from certain pathogenic strains that may be absent in apathogenic strains. This comparative filter significantly decreases the multitude of potential targets to be sifted [38].
Recent advances in the development of in depth sequencing technologies open new possibilities for a variety of applications in research at the transcriptional level of an organism. The information provided by genome-level transcription studies is important for understanding the biology of an organism in the context of a system and particularly when the interface with the entire genome sequence is performed, enabling the analysis of gene transcription in relation to the organization of the genome [41].
Gene loss in other eukaryotic parasites of several animals that appear to have adapted to live in blood spaces and even an obligate intracellular lifestyle by modifying the morphology and content of their cells has also been observed [42,43]. Gene loss or reductive evolution is so extensive that it has been suggested to be the dominant mode of biological evolution in complex organisms [44].
In this study we present an evolutionary reduction due to the apparent loss of genes for the first time reported in B. bigemina observed in a strain that has been maintained for several years under laboratory conditions, which has lost more than 80% of the analyzed virulence genes compared with the wildtype strain. Alternatively, whether these changes were due merely to the selection of a parasite sub-population that previously existed in the original strain that underwent culturing needs to be experimentally tested. Undoubtedly, this also has to be corroborated by transcriptional analysis in future research studies. It will be interesting to analyze the repertoire of differentially expressed genes in the attenuated B. bigemina strain and transcriptome studies are on course to determine if the differential gene expression is maintained [45] or if it varies with respect to the wildtype strain.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Parasites

The attenuated strain of B. bigemina is a population of parasites originally derived from a virulent isolate from Mexico collected from a clinical case of babesiosis. The strain was adapted to an in vitro culture using a microaerophilic stationary system [6]. Once established in in vitro cultivation it was continuously cultivated for almost five consecutive years in the laboratory with passes every 72 or 96 hrs (at least 500 sub-cultures in cultivation). Thereafter, the in vitro culture of the B. bigemina was carried out discontinuously and with an indefinite number of passes in cultivation; it was grown for short periods of time (one or two months), just until enough material was obtained for experiments that were conducted during the development of the attenuated live vaccine (periods 1991–1998 and 2001–2006) and immediately frozen down in liquid nitrogen until other experiments were conducted in the period 2011–2017 in which it was cultivated for the latest experiments (tick transmissibility) and immunogenicity validation [17,18,23,24,26] until now when sequencing was carried out. More importantly to note is that the attenuated biological material has not been passed through a bovine host since its original isolation unlike the virulent isolate (from which the attenuate strain was selected) and that is replicated in animals whenever required. Morphologically, the attenuated strain has not changed; it keeps infecting erythrocytes both in vivo and in vitro but it does not cause disease when inoculated in cattle and has been maintained by alternating continuous cultivation and cryopreservation since then [17,18,23,24,26]. The virulent strain, originally isolated from a field clinical case, has been maintained through tick passages in susceptible animals and cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen [6,17,26].

3.2. Genomic DNA Extraction

Bovine erythrocytes infected with the different populations of B. bigemina were used to carry out the extraction of genomic DNA by conventional methods [46]. Between 20 and 30 µg of genomic DNA was used to prepare the two clonal libraries required for each strain.

3.3. Genome Sequencing of B. bigemina, Attenuated and Virulent Strains

Whole genome sequencing was performed at the next-generation sequencing Illumina Mi-Seq (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) core facility of the National Autonomous University of Mexico located at the Biotechnology Institute in Cuernavaca, Morelos. The sequence readings obtained with the Illumina system were assembled de novo using the SPAdes program (version 3.1.1) (Algorithmic Biology Laboratory, Saint Petersburg Academic University, St. Petersburg, Russia) [47]. The contigs generated were ordered with the MUmmer tool [48]. The sequencing effort obtained 264× and 89× of coverage (attenuated and virulent strains, respectively) to obtain the genome sequences. The list of selected genes was based initially by considering previous articles on classical immunology and transcriptomic studies where it was mentioned that those were genes attributed to virulence or potential virulence factors [32,49]. The mapping of virulent gene sequences against a reference genome (Australian B. bigemina genome) was performed with BLAST [50]. This allowed a first analysis of the genome composition for each strain and identified possible changes (deletions or insertions) or chromosomal rearrangements that occurred in the genomes of the virulent and attenuated B. bigemina strains.

3.4. Data Accession

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited in GenBank under the accession Genome number JAFBJA000000000, BioSample accession SAMN17098652, BioProject ID PRJNA685856 for the attenuated strain and Genome submission SUB8750815, BioSample accession SAMN17098654, BioProject ID PRJNA685857 for the virulent strain.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.V.F. and J.A.Á.; methodology, J.J.L., G.M., C.R., J.A.Á., J.V.F.; software, B.S.-R. and L.L.; validation, B.S.-R., L.L. and J.V.F.; formal analysis, B.S.-R. and L.L.; investigation, B.S.-R., L.L. and J.V.F.; resources, J.J.L., G.M., C.R. and J.A.Á.; data curation, B.S.-R. and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, J.V.F. and B.S.-R.; writing—review and editing, B.S.-R. and J.V.F.; visualization, B.S.-R. and L.L.; supervision, J.V.F.; project administration, G.M. and J.V.F.; funding acquisition, J.V.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Project No. CB2018 A1-S-43508; and INIFAP, Project No. 1672534936.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the exclusive use of parasite DNA that was extracted from cryopreserved vials.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Technical support was provided by Unidad Universitaria de Secuenciación Masiva y Bioinformática, IBT, UNAM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bock, R.E.; Jackson, L.; de Vos, A.J.; Jorgensen, W. Babesiosis of cattle. Parasitology 2004, 129, 247–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Dalgliesh, R.J.; Stewart, N.P. The use of tick transmission by Boophilus microplus to isolate pure strains of Babesia bovis, Babesia bigemina and Anaplasma marginale from cattle with mixed infections. Vet. Parasitol. 1983, 13, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Levine, N.D.; Corliss, J.O.; Cox, F.E.G.; Deroux, G.; Grano, J.; Honigberg, B.M.; Leedale, G.F.; Loeblich, A.R.; Lom, J.; Lynn, D.H.; et al. A newly revised classification of the protozoa. J. Protozool. 1980, 27, 37–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Morrissette, N.S.; Sibley, L.D. Cytoskeleton of apicomplexan parasites. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 21–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Levy, M.G.; Ristic, M. Babesia bovis: Continuous cultivation in a microaerophilous stationary phase culture. Science 1980, 207, 1218–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Vega, C.A.; Buening, G.M.; Green, T.J.; Carson, C.A. In vitro cultivation of Babesia bigemina. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1985, 46, 416–420. [Google Scholar]
  7. Callow, L.L.; Mellors, L.T.; McGregor, W. Reduction in virulence of Babesia bovis due to rapid passage in splenectomized cattle. Int. J. Parasitol. 1979, 9, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Callow, L.L.; Dalgliesh, R.J. The development of effective, safe vaccination against babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Australia. In Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases: Proceedings of the Symposium Held at the 56th Annual Conference of the Australian Veterinary Association, Townsville, 1979; Johnston, L.A.Y., Cooper, M.G., Eds.; Australian Veterinary Association: Sydney, Australia; pp. 19804–19808.
  9. Bishop, J.P.; Adams, L.G. Babesia bigemina: Immune response of cattle inoculated with irradiated parasites. Exp. Parasitol. 1974, 35, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Figueroa-Millan, J.V.; Canto-Alarcon, A.G.; Juarez-Flores, J.; Ruiz-Lopez, F. Babesia bovis: Establecimiento y condiciones optimas de multiplicacion. Tec. Pecu. Mex. 1984, 46, 46–52. Available online: https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/3299/2719 (accessed on 16 June 2020).
  11. Fish, L.; Leibovich, B.; Krigel, Y.; McElwain, T.; Shkap, V. Vaccination of cattle against B. bovis infection with live attenuated parasites and non-viable immunogens. Vaccine 2008, 265, G29–G33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yunker, C.E.; Kuttler, K.L.; Johnson, L.W. Attenuation of Babesia bovis by in vitro cultivation. Vet. Parasitol. 1987, 24, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuttler, K.L.; Zaugg, J.L.; Yunker, C.E. The pathogenicity and immunologic relationship of a virulent and a tissue-culture-adapted Babesia bovis. Vet. Parasitol. 1988, 27, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Winger, C.M.; Canning, E.U.; Culverhouse, J.D. A strain of Babesia divergens, attenuated after long term culture. Res. Vet. Sci. 1989, 46, 110–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Schuster, F.L. Cultivation of Babesia and Babesia-like blood parasites: Agents of an emerging zoonotic disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2002, 15, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hernandez-Ortiz, R.; Alvarez-Martinez, J.A.; Buening, G.M.; Canto-Alarcon, G.; Monroy-Garcia, M.; Ramos-Aragon, J.A.; Vega y Murguia, C.A. Diferencias en la virulencia y en la induccion de proteccion de aislamientos de Babesia bigemina derivados de cultivo in vitro. Tec. Pecu. Mex. 1990, 28, 51–61. Available online: https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/3554/2974 (accessed on 17 June 2020).
  17. Figueroa, J.V.; Canto, G.J.; Alvarez, J.A.; Rocio, L.G.; Ramos, J.A.; Vega, C.A. Capacidad protectora en bovinos de una cepa de Babesia bigemina derivada del cultivo in vitro. Tec. Pecu. Mex. 1998, 36, 95–107. Available online: https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/638/636 (accessed on 16 June 2020).
  18. Alvarez, J.A.; Ramos, J.A.; Rojas, E.E.; Mosqueda, J.J.; Vega, C.A.; Olvera, A.; Figueroa, J.V.; Canto, G.J. Field challenge of cattle vaccinated with a combined Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina frozen immunogen. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2004, 1026, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Timms, P.; Stewart, N.P.; de Vos, A.J. Study of virulence and vector transmission of Babesia bovis by use of cloned parasite lines. Infect. Immun. 1990, 58, 2171–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Mangold, A.J.; Aguirre, D.H.; Cafrune, M.M.; de Echaide, S.T.; Guglielmone, A.A. Evaluation of the infectivity of a vaccinal and a pathogenic Babesia bovis strain from Argentina to Boophilus microplus. Vet. Parasitol. 1993, 51, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. O’Sullivan, P.J.; Callow, L.L. Loss of infectivity of a vaccine strain of Babesia argentina for Boophilus microplus. Aust. Vet. J. 1966, 42, 252–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pipano, E. Live vaccines against hemoparasitic diseases in livestock. Vet. Parasitol. 1995, 57, 213–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rojas-Martinez, C.; Rodriguez-Vivas, R.I.; Figueroa-Millan, J.V.; Acosta-Viana, K.Y.; Gutierrez-Ruiz, E.J.; Bautista-Garfias, C.R.; Lira-Amaya, J.J.; Polanco-Martinez, D.J.; Alvarez-Martinez, J.A. Babesia bigemina: Advances in continuous in vitro culture using serum free medium, supplemented with insulin, transferrin, selenite and putrescine. Parasitol. Intl. 2018, 67, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rojas-Martinez, C.; Rodriguez-Vivas, R.I.; Figueroa-Millan, J.V.; Bautista-Garfias, C.R.; Castaneda-Arriola, R.O.; Lira-Amaya, J.J.; Vargas-Uriostegui, P.; Ojeda-Carrasco, J.J.; Alvarez-Martinez, J.A. Bovine babesiosis: Cattle protected in the field with a frozen vaccine containing Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina cultured in vitro with a serum-free medium. Parasitol. Intl. 2018, 67, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Timms, P.; Stewart, N.P. Growth of Babesia bovis parasites in stationery and suspension cultures and their use in experimental vaccination of cattle. Res. Vet. Sci. 1989, 47, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rojas-Ramírez, E.E.; Mosqueda-Gualito, J.J.; Alvarez Martínez, J.A.; Hernandez-Ortiz, R.; Ramos-Aragon, J.A.; Rojas-Martinez, C.; Canto-Alarcon, G.J.; Vega y Murguia, C.A.; Figueroa-Millan, J.V. Transmissibility of Babesia bigemina and Babesia bovis attenuated strains by Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Pecu. 2011, 2, 267–281. Available online: https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/1437/1432 (accessed on 18 June 2020).
  27. Mackenstedt, U.; Gauer, M.; Fuchs, P.; Zapf, F.; Schein, E.; Mehlhorn, H. DNA measurements reveal differences in the life cycles of Babesia bigemina and B. canis, two typical members of the genus Babesia. Parasitol. Res. 1995, 81, 595–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Smith, R.D. Ciclo biologico de Babesia en la garrapata. Cienc. Vet. 1978, 2, 234–264. Available online: http://fmvz.unam.mx/fmvz/cienciavet/revistas/CVvol2/CVv2c9.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2020).
  29. Stewart, N.P. Differences in the life cycles between a vaccine strain and an unmodified strain of Babesia bovis (Babes, 1889) in the tick Boophilus microplus (Canestrini). J. Protozool. 1978, 25, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. English, A.C.; Richards, S.; Han, Y.; Wang, M.; Vee, V.; Qu, J.; Qin, X.; Muzny, D.M.; Reid, J.G.; Worley, K.C.; et al. Mind the gap: Upgrading genomes with Pacific Biosciences RS long-read sequencing technology. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Camacho-Nuez, M.; Hernández-Silva, D.J.; Castañeda-Ortiz, E.J.; Paredes-Martínez, M.E.; Rocha-Martínez, M.K.; Alvarez-Sánchez, M.E.; Mercado-Curiel, R.F.; Aguilar-Tipacamu, G.; Mosqueda, J. Hap2, a novel gene in Babesia bigemina is expressed in tick stages, and specific antibodies block zygote formation. Parasites Vectors 2017, 10, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bastos, R.G.; Suarez, C.E.; Laughery, J.M.; Johnson, W.C.; Ueti, M.W.; Knowles, D.P. Differential expression of three members of the multidomain adhesion CCp family in Babesia bigemina, Babesia bovis and Theileria equi. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Alzan, H.F.; Lau, A.O.T.; Knowles, D.P.; Herndon, D.R.; Ueti, M.W.; Scoles, G.A.; Kappmeyer, L.S.; Suarez, C.E. Expression of 6-Cys gene superfamily defines Babesia bovis sexual stage development within Rhipicephalus microplus. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bohaliga, G.A.R.; Johnson, W.C.; Taus, N.S.; Hussein, H.E.; Bastos, R.G.; Suarez, C.E.; Scoles, G.A.; Ueti, M.W. Identification of proteins expressed by Babesia bigemina kinetes. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bohaliga, G.A.R.; Johnson, W.C.; Taus, N.S.; Hussein, H.E.; Bastos, R.G.; Suarez, C.E.; O’Connor, R.; Ueti, M.W. Identification of a putative methyltransferase gene of Babesia bigemina as a novel molecular biomarker uniquely expressed in parasite tick stages. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Frontali, C. Genome plasticity in Plasmodium. Genetica 1994, 94, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. LeRoux, M.; Lakshmanan, V.; Daily, J.P. Plasmodium falciparum biology: Analysis of in vitro versus in vivo growth conditions. Trends Parasitol. 2009, 25, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jackson, A.P.; Otto, T.D.; Darby, A.; Ramaprasad, A.; Xia, D.; Echaide, I.E.; Farber, M.; Gahlot, S.; Gamble, J.; Gupta, D.; et al. The evolutionary dynamics of variant antigen genes in Babesia reveal a history of genomic innovation underlying host–parasite interaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42, 7113–7131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Brayton, K.A.; Lau, A.O.T.; Herndon, D.R.; Hannick, L.; Kappmeyer, L.S.; Berens, S.J.; Bidwell, S.L.; Brown, W.C.; Crabtree, J.; Fadrosh, D.; et al. Genome sequence of Babesia bovis and comparative analysis of apicomplexan hemoprotozoa. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3, e148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gardner, M.J.; Bishop, R.; Shah, T.; de Villiers, E.P.; Carlton, J.M.; Hall, N.; Ren, Q.; Paulsen, I.T.; Pain, A.; Berriman, M.; et al. Genome sequence of Theileria parva, a bovine pathogen that transforms lymphocytes. Science 2005, 309, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Bishop, R.P.; Odongo, D.O.; Mann, D.J.; Pearson, T.W.; Sugimoto, C.; Haines, L.R.; Glass, E.; Jensen, C.; Seitzer, U.; Ahmed, J.S.; et al. Genome Mapping and Genomics in Animal-Associated Microbes; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 2009; pp. 191–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Corradi, N. Microsporidia: Eukaryotic intracellular parasites shaped by gene loss and horizontal gene transfers. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 69, 167–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kelly, S.; Ivens, A.; Mott, G.A.; O’Neill, E.; Emms, D.; Macleod, O.; Voorheis, P.; Tyler, K.; Clark, M.; Matthews, J.; et al. An alternative strategy for Trypanosome survival in the mammalian bloodstream revealed through genome and transcriptome analysis of the ubiquitous bovine parasite Trypanosoma (Megatrypanum) theileri. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 2093–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Wolf, Y.I.; Koonin, E.V. Genome reduction as the dominant mode of evolution. BioEssays 2013, 35, 829–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Pedroni, M.J.; Sondgeroth, K.S.; Gallego-Lopez, G.M.; Echaide, I.; Lau, A.O. Comparative transcriptome analysis of geographically distinct virulent and attenuated Babesia bovis strains reveals similar gene expression changes through attenuation. BMC Genom. 2013, 14, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Strauss, W.M. Preparation of genomic DNA from mammalian tissue. In Current Protocols in Mol Biol; Ausubel, F.M., Ed.; Jhon Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, UK, 2001; Volume 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Kurtz, S.; Phillippy, A.; Delcher, A.L.; Smoot, M.; Shumway, M.; Antonescu, C.; Salzberg, S.L. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 2004, 5, R12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Eichenberger, R.M.; Ramakrishnan, C.; Russo, G.; Deplazes, P.; Hehl, A.B. Genome-wide analysis of gene expression and protein secretion of Babesia canis during virulent infection identifies potential pathogenicity factors. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dot plot of the genomic synteny comparison between B. bigemina wildtype versus laboratory strains. The circles in red represent the genes that keep the wildtype (5’–3’) orientation and the blue ones the genes that are in a position opposite to the wild strain.
Figure 1. Dot plot of the genomic synteny comparison between B. bigemina wildtype versus laboratory strains. The circles in red represent the genes that keep the wildtype (5’–3’) orientation and the blue ones the genes that are in a position opposite to the wild strain.
Pathogens 10 00318 g001
Table 1. Sequencing effort of the Babesia bigemina strains analyzed in this work.
Table 1. Sequencing effort of the Babesia bigemina strains analyzed in this work.
Sequencing Data *\ StrainB. bigemina AttenuatedB. bigemina Virulent
# Contigs39141537
Total length9,180,24111,852,459
GC (%)52.350.74
Coverage (X)26489
N50459941,154
N7516827155
L5046385
L751318230
# N’s per 100 kbp0.030.01
GenBank accession no.JAFBJA000000000PRJNA685857
* Statistics are based on contigs of size > = 500 bp. # = Number of contigs. GC = Guanine-Cytosine content. #N’s = Number of unasigned Nucleotides.
Table 2. Virulence genes of B. bigemina wildtype and laboratory strains.
Table 2. Virulence genes of B. bigemina wildtype and laboratory strains.
NameGeneAccession no.Contig_number% Identity *Alignment LengthMismatchesQuery StartQuery EndE-value
Virulent Strain
Calcium-dependent protein kinase 4 PP **XM_012911530.1contig0016999.08151814115180
Calmodulin-domain protein kinase 2 PPXM_012910710.1contig0013498.75232229123220
cAMP-dependent protein kinase PPXM_012914446.1contig0002698.88106812110680
Casein kinase I PPXM_012913338.1contig0017498.62101714110170
cGMP dependent protein kinase cGMP XM_012914849.1contig0005699.21164413116440
Cyclin 4 PPXM_012914402.1contig0001898.62506763811430
Diphosphate kinase family, putative PPXM_012913759.1contig0001299.34302213021 × 10−166
dnaJ C terminal region domain dnaJXM_012910446.1contig0022098.74119415111940
Glycerol kinase PPXM_012914443.1contig0002698.992963103013254 × 10−160
Glycogen synthase kinase-3 alpha PPXM_012910925.1contig0007698.8626431744374 × 10−141
Hypothetical gene HG ***XM_012911455.1contig006741001070131614222 × 10−54
Merozoite surface glycoprotein gp45AF298630.1contig0009892.312862191912042 × 10−106
Mitogen-activated protein kinase PPXM_012912499.1contig0001398.23180332118030
Phosphatidylinositol 3-and 4-kinase PPXM_012912148.1contig0015697.66341780134170
Phosphatidylinositol 4 kinase PPXM_012911128.1contig0005997.19341796134170
Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase PPXM_012914497.1contig0006399.1334385511880
Phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase PPXM_012910512.1contig0013896.476117216161170
Probable fructokinase PPXM_012910446.1contig0022098.74119415111940
Protein kinase domain kinDXM_012914171.1contig0000698.32208235120820
Putative rhoptry protein rap-1cNC_027216.1contig0016796.66152951115290
RAP-1 related antigen rraNC_027216.1contig0000397.46106227110620
Related serine/threonine protein kinase MAPKKXM_012911485.1contig0002895.77443253812810
Ser/Thr protein kinase PPXM_012910695.1contig0006496.967232234010620
Serine/threonine kinase PPXM_012914264.1contig0017198.78189323118930
Serine/threonine kinase 1 PPXM_012914521.1contig0004198.239601719600
Transcription factor TFIIB TFIIBXM_012912762.1contig0001698.16157529115750
Transcription initiation factor TFIIB PPXM_012910684.1contig0006498.679751319750
Attenuated Strain
cGMP dependent protein kinase cGMP XM_012914849.1contig0003284.5511017179519041 × 10−15
Calcium-dependent protein kinase 4 PPXM_012911530.1contig0006678.684691003207886 × 10−32
Phosphatidylinositol 4 kinase PPXM_012911128.1contig0000980.5242683296833932 × 10−46
Serine/threonine kinase PPXM_012914264.1contig0003583.5416427111112744 × 10−24
Transcription factor TFIIB TFIIBXM_012912762.1contig0002378.73569121376052 × 10−41
* Percent identity compared with the reference genome (Australian B. bigemina BOND genome). ** PP, putative partial. *** HG, hypothetical gene.
Table 3. Development genes of B. bigemina wildtype and laboratory strains.
Table 3. Development genes of B. bigemina wildtype and laboratory strains.
NameGeneAccession No.Contig_number% Identity *Alignment LengthMismatchesQuery StartQuery EndE-value
Virulent Strainhap2 NC_027218.1:c1816274-1813816NODE_36_length_66145_cov_3.06401996.928247461124590
BbiKSPNC_027217.1:1488918-1490756NODE_115_length_32231_cov_1.73694097.879183939118390
CCp1XM_001611715.1 **Not Found
CCp2NC_027217.1:905825-910977NODE_16_length_99920_cov_2.45071197.8465153105151530
CCp3NC_027218.1:c3038315-3033906NODE_11_length_111305_cov_2.39329797.937441091144100
BBBOND_0204030NC_027217.1:c927096-926018NODE_16_length_99920_cov_2.45071196.762108133110790
Attenuated Strainhap2 NC_027218.1:c1816274-1813816NODE_28_length_21819_cov_0.31671996.888247462124590
BbiKSPNC_027217.1:1488918-1490756NODE_840_length_2631_cov_0.24687597.662183943118390
CCp1XM_001611715.1 **Not Found
CCp2NC_027217.1:905825-910977NODE_145_length_10242_cov_0.31481798.031289551128950
NC_027217.1:905825-910977NODE_328_length_6126_cov_0.30619397.841185340330151530
CCp3NC_027218.1:c3038315-3033906NODE_133_length_10700_cov_0.28535198.05441086144100
BBBOND_0204030NC_027217.1:c927096-926018NODE_281_length_6848_cov_0.24597996.448993018970
NC_027217.1:c927096-926018NODE_1850_length_1188_cov_0.25335799.18122195810793 × 10−57
* Percent identity compared with the reference B. bigemina genes. ** Sequence from Babesia bovis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sachman-Ruiz, B.; Lozano, L.; Lira, J.J.; Martínez, G.; Rojas, C.; Álvarez, J.A.; Figueroa, J.V. A Comparative Genomic Study of Attenuated and Virulent Strains of Babesia bigemina. Pathogens 2021, 10, 318. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens10030318

AMA Style

Sachman-Ruiz B, Lozano L, Lira JJ, Martínez G, Rojas C, Álvarez JA, Figueroa JV. A Comparative Genomic Study of Attenuated and Virulent Strains of Babesia bigemina. Pathogens. 2021; 10(3):318. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens10030318

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sachman-Ruiz, Bernardo, Luis Lozano, José J. Lira, Grecia Martínez, Carmen Rojas, J. Antonio Álvarez, and Julio V. Figueroa. 2021. "A Comparative Genomic Study of Attenuated and Virulent Strains of Babesia bigemina" Pathogens 10, no. 3: 318. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens10030318

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop