Next Article in Journal
Cartography of Free-Living Amoebae in Soil in Guadeloupe (French West Indies) Using DNA Metabarcoding
Next Article in Special Issue
The Global Prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Human T leukaemia Type 1 and COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Strongyloides stercoralis in Alcoholic Patients: Implications of Alcohol Intake in the Frequency of Infection and Parasite Load
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Autochthonous Human and Canine Strongyloides stercoralis Infection in Europe: Report of a Human Case in An Italian Teen and Systematic Review of the Literature

1
Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy
2
IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, 37024 Verona, Italy
3
Department of Emergency and Organs Transplantation, Veterinary Section, Campus of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy
4
Microbiology and Virology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
5
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
6
Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, Careggi University and Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
7
Referral Center for Tropical Diseases of Tuscany, Careggi University Hospital, 50134 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 14 April 2020 / Revised: 30 May 2020 / Accepted: 1 June 2020 / Published: 3 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prevalence of Strongyloidiasis and Schistosomiasis)

Abstract

:
Autochthonous human and canine strongyloidiasis is reported in Europe but is unclear whether the transmission of infection still occurs. We report a previously unpublished human case in an Italian teen and perform a systematic review of literature on autochthonous human and canine strongyloidiasis in Europe to investigate the current dynamic of transmission. Overall, 109 papers published after 1987 were included and one previously unpublished Italian case was added. Eighty case reports were retrieved and 42 of them (52.5%) had severe strongyloidiasis. Most cases were diagnosed in Spain, Italy and France. The median age was 58, the most represented age group was 61–70 years, 11 patients were under 30, and 7 of them were diagnosed after 2000. Epidemiological studies on human strongyloidiasis showed prevalence ranging from 0.56% to 28%. Overall, agriculture work, mine work and walking barefoot were the most commonly reported risk factors for infection. Canine strongyloidiasis was reported mainly in Italy (68 cases), but a few cases occurred also in Iceland, Finland, England, Germany, France, Switzerland, Russia, Slovakia, Romania and Greece. Autochthonous strongyloidiasis is still reported in Europe and sporadic transmission still occurs. Health care professionals should be aware of this issue to identify infected subjects and avoid adverse outcomes, especially in immunosuppressed patients. Further investigations are needed to clarify the zoonotic transmission of this nematode.

1. Introduction

Strongyloides stercoralis is a parasitic nematode able to infect humans, non-human primates, dogs and wild canids. Parasite transmission occurs through direct skin (or mucosae in the case of animals) contact with contaminated soil containing filariform larvae [1]. Transmission through organ transplantation has been also reported in humans and transmammary infection can occur in dogs [2]. The nematode has the unique characteristic of replicate and persists for decades in human or animal hosts because of the so-called autoinfection cycle [3]. In most cases the chronic infection is asymptomatic in both human and animal hosts [4]. Nonspecific gastrointestinal, respiratory or dermatological symptoms may be present, with eosinophilia being frequently detected in humans [1]. In immunocompromised humans, but also in dogs, complicated and potentially fatal clinical syndromes called hyperinfection and disseminated infection may develop [5]. Severe strongyloidiasis has been associated with steroid or other immunosuppressive therapy, solid organ and stem cells transplantation, onco-hematologic malignancy, Human T-cell Leukemia Virus 1 (HTLV-1) and possibly Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 (HIV-1) [6]. Direct examination of stool has a very low sensitivity for the diagnosis of uncomplicated strongyloidiasis, while in severe infections the larvae can be found almost in any organ or biological sample [7]. More advanced diagnostic methods, such as agar plate culture or polymerase-chain reaction, increase the sensitivity up to about 45 and 57% respectively [8]. Serology has the highest sensitivity (95%), although cross-reactions can cause false positive results in patients with other helminthic infections and false negative results can occur especially in immunosuppressed individuals [8].
Human strongyloidiasis is widespread in tropical and subtropical regions, where the prevalence is between 10% and 40%, rising to 60% in some low socioeconomic areas [6]. Human cases have been also reported in subjects living in temperate areas. Several studies demonstrate a seroprevalence of 0–3.8% in circumscribed areas of the United States [9] and autochthonous cases have been described in Europe, mainly in the northern mining regions and in the Mediterranean area, although is not clear whether transmission is still occurring [6] raising questions on the current maintenance and modality of the parasite lifecycle.
Furthermore, the Strongyloides genus includes several pathogens of veterinary importance affecting a wide range of animals worldwide, including companion animals and livestock. Among these, S. stercoralis infects both humans and dogs and therefore is potentially zoonotic [4].
S. stercoralis dog infection is reported in almost every continent and climatic area [10,11,12,13,14,15]. In the last decades, the zoonotic potential of S. stercoralis has become an issue of interest. Some authors have described the presence of S. stercoralis antibodies in both humans and dogs living in close contact [16,17], and recent phylogenetic studies [18,19,20] support the idea of a possible cross-transmission of S. stercoralis isolates found both in humans and dogs, although transmission between the two hosts was not confirmed [4]. By contrast, studies from Takano Y. et al. excluded a causal relationship between human and canine strongyloidiasis on a Japanese island, where the infection is still endemic [21].
The objective of this paper is to review cases, series and epidemiological studies regarding autochthonous strongyloidiasis in Europe and to report a previously unpublished case that occurred in Italy. The aims of the work are to investigate: i) the occurrence of autochthonous human and canine strongyloidiasis in Europe, ii) the risk factors for autochthonous human uncomplicated and complicated infection and iii) the occurrence of zoonotic transmission in Europe.

2. Materials and Methods

We reported a previously unpublished case of autochthonous S. stercoralis infection in an Italian teen and we performed a systematic review of literature on locally acquired human and canine strongyloidiasis in Europe. The systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [22]. The review protocol and PRISMA checklist are reported in the Supplementary Materials.

3. Case Report

An 18-year-old Italian girl, born in Tuscany, was referred to our Clinic for Tropical Diseases in 2017 because of a weak positive result of Trichinella spp. serology, performed with ELISA technique (NovaTec Immunodiagnostica GmbH, Dietzenbach, Germany), associated with hypereosinophilia lasting for three years. No symptoms were noticeable. The patient never travelled abroad but she used to bathe in Lake Bilancino (Florence province, Tuscany, Italy) and to walk barefoot on the lake shore. Since the age of 14 the complete blood count showed mild anaemia, without eosinophilia, which was treated with oral iron therapy. In 2014, at the age of 15, hypereosinophilia was detected for the first time, with an eosinophil count ranging between 1000 and 1600 cell/mm3 in the following years and with no other symptoms associated. In our clinic she underwent further investigations. The examinations showed a normal immunophenotype, negative autoimmunity tests, negative serology for Trichinella spp. with Western Blot technique (performed at the Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy). Serology for Echinococcus spp. (indirect haemoagglutination Cellognost Echinococcosis IHA, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany) and Schistosoma spp. (Schisto II Western Blot IgG, LD-BIO Diagnostics, Lyon France) were both negative. Surprisingly, a borderline result for Strongyloides IgG ELISA (Bordier Affinity Products SA, Crissier, Switzerland) was obtained (index 1, reference values ≤0.9 negative, 0.9–1.1 borderline, ≥1.1 positive) and the diagnosis of strongyloidiasis was confirmed through detection of the rhabdoid larvae with a prominent genital primordium and adult male in agar plate stool culture (Figure 1). Serology for S. stercoralis with SeroELISA Strongyloides IgG (IVD Research Carlsbad, Canada) was negative (index 0.41, reference value > 1 positive) as well as with the in house Indirect Immune Fluorescent Assay Test previously described by Boscolo et al. (title 0, reference value > 20) [23]. HIV 1–2 Ab/Ag and HTLV 1–2 Ab were negative. PCR for S. stercoralis on stool was performed in three different laboratories in Florence (amplification performed with RT-PCR homemade method), in Rome (PCR-based methods targeting the cox1 gene [24] and Negrar (qPCR performed as described previously by Verweij et al. [25]) and the results were negative. The girl was treated with ivermectin 200 mcg/Kg/day for two days plus another two days of therapy two weeks apart. Blood samples performed after one, six and 12 months showed normal eosinophil count and negative serology for S. stercoralis (with the Bordier kit) and agar plate stool culture.

4. Literature Review, Including the Previously Unpublished Case

According to the search strategy, 832 papers were identified, 733 articles were excluded, 10 articles were added from references and 109 paper were eventually included (Figure 2).
Out of the 109 papers included, 67 were single human strongyloidiasis case reports or case series reporting detailed data on each case, eight were papers reporting human aggregated data, 17 were human epidemiological studies, seven were canine case reports or case series and 11 were canine epidemiological studies. One paper was considered both among canine and human epidemiological studies [16].
Considering all the kinds of studies included (case reports and case series, paper reporting aggregated data, epidemiological studies), human strongyloidiasis was reported in 19 countries: Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, England, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Macedonia, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain and Turkey. The countries where at least 20 human cases were reported were: Spain (565 cases), Italy (264 cases), France (33 cases), Slovakia (25 cases) and Romania (23 cases). Among these countries, the most represented areas were the eastern coast of Spain, especially Valencia province, the north of Italy (Piedmont, Lombardy, Veneto and Friuli-Venezia-Giulia), and the south-west and the north-east of France. Canine strongyloidiasis cases were reported in 12 countries, most of them in Italy (68 cases) and fewer in Belgium, England, Finland, France, Iceland, Germany, Switzerland, Russia, Slovakia, Romania and Greece. The European distribution of human and canine cases, according to the information available from the papers, is illustrated in Figure 3.

4.1. Human Case Reports and Case Series

Sixty-seven papers reporting case reports and case series, plus the previously unpublished case reported above, were identified. Overall, 80 autochthonous human strongyloidiasis cases were retrieved in this category. Demographic and clinical details are showed in Table 1 and Table 2.
Thirty-four papers were published in the decade 2009–2018, 16 papers in the decade 1999–2008, and 17 papers between 1988 and 1998 (Figure 4).
The year of diagnosis was available in 44 cases: 12 cases were diagnosed in the decade 2009–2018, 13 cases were diagnosed in the decade 1999–2008, and 19 cases were diagnosed from 1971 to 1998 (Figure 5).
Male subjects were 60 (75%) and the median age was 58 years. The most represented age group was between 61 and 70 years (21 patients, 26.2%), 11 patients were under 30 (13.7%), and 7 of them were diagnosed after 2000. Most of the subjects were exposed to infection in Spain (21 cases), followed by Italy (18 cases), France (11 cases) and Turkey (8 cases). Out of the seven patients aged less than 30 years and diagnosed after 2000, two were exposed to infection in Spain, two in Turkey, and one each in France, Italy and Romania. The majority of subjects were symptomatic (72, 90%), as shown in Table 1. Hyperinfection syndrome was recognized in 42 patients (47%), eight of them had a disseminated strongyloidiasis, and 15 had a fatal outcome.
The most frequent risk factor for complicated strongyloidiasis was use of steroid therapy followed by chemotherapy, other immunosuppressive therapy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), oncohematological malignancy or solid tumor, solid organ transplant recipient and HIV infection. Concerning patients with HIV infection and severe strongyloidiasis, six had CD4+ lymphocytes < 60mm3 and one had 420 total lymphocytes. Possible factors linked to risk of exposure to strongyloidiasis were reported in 29 subjects: 15 patients were agriculture workers, four were miners, six subjects walked barefoot and two patients had mental disorder; no one was reported to be a dog owner. Interestingly, as it has recently been a matter of debate, two cases of strongyloidiasis in MSM were reported and one of them was supposed to be infected through homosexual intercourse.
The diagnosis of strongyloidiasis after solid organ transplantation (kidney, pancreas, heart and liver) was done in 12 subjects in Spain (seven cases), Norway (two cases), in Portugal (one case), in Turkey (one case) and in Netherland (one case). Seven transplant recipients most likely acquired the infection through the graft since their donors were originally born in endemic countries and retrospective testing of pre-donation donors serum resulted positive for S. stercoralis. In the remaining cases it was not possible to ascertain whether the infection was acquired before the transplant or through the graft.
The most frequently used diagnostic technique was fresh stool examination. Out of 62 patients (77.5%) tested with direct faecal smear examination and/or concentration methods, 47 (75.8%) had a positive result. Details on diagnostic test performed, when available, are listed in Table 2.

4.2. Human Aggregated Cases

Data on aggregated human strongyloidiasis cases were obtained from eight papers (Table 3), published between 1992 and 2018. Seven Spanish papers described 61 cases, most of which occurred in the Valencian area, where many of the male subjects had been agriculture workers. Rivasi F. reported 15 cases diagnosed with gastro-duodenal biopsy among a group of immunocompromised subjects living in the Po valley (northern Italy), a region considered endemic for strongyloidiasis. Other two Italian cases have been reported in Florence betwen 2012 and 2014 and the area of exposure was Tuscany and Umbria (central Italy), respectively.

4.3. Human Prevalence and Epidemiology Studies

Prevalence data were reported from epidemiological studies conducted at the hospital or community level (Table 4). The prevalence demonstrated a large variability, both within different countries and within different areas of the same country. The highest prevalence has been reported by an Italian paper where 37 out of 132 subjects over 60 (28%) living in the north of Italy (Lombardy and Veneto regions) with eosinophilia had also positive serology (IFAT technique). This was the pilot study of a more extended work by Buonfrate et al. which revealed a prevalence of 8% among subjects over 60 with eosinophilia (cases) and 1% among those without eosinophilia (controls) born in Lombardy, Veneto and Friuli-Venezia-Giulia regions. A prevalence of 7.78% is reported among 120 hospitalized children in Dabrowa Bialostocka District (Poland) with symptoms characteristic to parasite infections. Štrkolcová G. et al. described different prevalence among children and dogs living inside and outside a segregated settlement in the town of Medzev. No children tested positive to stool examination, while serologic test (ELISA technique) showed a prevalence of 33.3% (20/60) among children from settlement and 23.8% (5/21) among children from the rest of the population. Low prevalence is reported in Turkey, where Köksal and colleagues found two out of 27,664 subjects (0.17%) with positive stool samples. This large variability can be explained by both the different diagnostic techniques used, and the different risk factors of the subpopulation analysed in each study.

4.4. Canine Strongyloidiasis Case Reports, Aggregated Cases and Prevalence

Scarce literature is available for canine strongyloidiasis in Europe, although the number of reports has increased in the last ten years (Table 5 and Table 6). Most canine strongyloidiasis cases have been reported in southern Italy, in the Apulia region. Iatta et al. assessed the occurrence of S. stercoralis infection in dogs living in a kennel in Apulia: out of 100 dogs, 56 scored positive by different diagnostic techniques (serological, coprological and molecular methods). Sporadic infections have been reported in few other European countries. Interestingly a few cases have been described in northern Europe. A case series by Dillard KJ et al. described three infected dogs in a Finnish kennel. Eydal et al. described 20 cases diagnosed from 1989 to 2016 among imported dogs in quarantine (18 of them imported from European countries), and 11 infected household dogs diagnosed from 2012 to 2015 (two Icelandic bitches and nine imported dogs from other European countries). In a prevalence study by Štrkolcová G. et al., the rate of infection detected with the Koga Agar Plate method among dogs living in a Roma settlement in Slovakia was 13.3% (4/30) and 10% (2/20) among dogs living in a shelter. Seroprevalence (with ELISA) in this latter group was 55% (11/20). Low prevalence (between 0% and 3%) is reported in domestic and kennel dogs in England, Germany, Greece and northern Italy and in wild grey wolves in Slovakian natural Parks.

5. Discussion

The European countries where most of autochthonous strongyloidiasis cases have been reported are Spain, Italy and France. In Spain, as confirmed by a review by Barroso et al., most cases have been diagnosed in the Valencia region among elderly patients that worked as farmer or in other jobs typically done barefoot [127]. The review showed that the peak of diagnosis occurred from 2001 to 2010, but even if drastically reduced new diagnoses are still reported. In Italy most cases have been reported in the last 20 years, due to prevalence studies conducted among the elderly population living in agricultural areas in the north of the country, where the transmission was frequent in the past. Regarding France, data from a retrospective study by Magnaval et al. suggest that infestation still exists in the Midi-Pyrenees region (southwestern France) [93], while sporadic cases have been reported in almost all other regions from the north to the south. Interestingly, besides the Mediterranean area, a few cases have been described also in colder countries of Eastern Europe, such as Romania, Bulgaria and Poland. Norway is the country at the highest latitude where strongyloidiasis has been described, although the transmission of the infection seemed to be related to kidney transplantation from a donor that was born in an endemic area. The epidemiological findings vary widely among European countries, where the different climate areas and humidity degrees can be more or less favourable for larvae survival in the soil.
Most of cases were diagnosed with direct stool examination and about half of them were severe cases. Since direct stool examination has a low sensitivity and severe strongyloidiasis develops in a minority of patients, it is probable that there are fewer reported cases compared to the real number of infected people. On the other hand, high seroprevalence reported by some studies, such as the one carried out among Slovakian children with no positive direct stool examinations, should be interpreted with caution since serological false positive results cannot be ruled out [16]. Concerning the transmission of infection through transplantation, we found twelve cases of strongyloidiasis diagnosed after solid organ transplantation in subjects without history of travel outside Europe. All of them were diagnosed in the last decade. In seven cases, the infection was most likely transmitted through the graft since the donors were born in tropical or subtropical endemic countries and resulted positive to S. stercoralis serology. In the remaining five cases the infection could have been acquired by the recipient before transplantation or through the graft.
Canine strongyloidiasis is not frequently reported in Europe. Italy is the country that has recorded the highest number of cases. Epidemiological studies have been conducted in different regions among kennel, wild and domestic dogs, finding prevalence ranging within 3% and 0.2%, with a single study conducted in an Italian shelter reporting a prevalence of 56% [112]. The higher prevalence in the latter study could be due to the diagnostic test performed, since overall prevalence was detected with fecal examination and/or rt-PCR plus serology (ELISA and IFAT). Sporadic canine infections have been described in England, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia and Switzerland.
Concerning human strongyloidiasis case reports, the maximum peak of diagnosis occurred within 60 and 70 years of age from the 1980s to the present. Given the typical chronicity of the infestation, most of these elderly subjects may have been infected in the post-war period when the scarce hygienic conditions could have facilitated the transmission. Although the improvement of health and working conditions probably led to a reduction in transmission, a stronger clinician’s awareness of the disease can explain the stable trend of cases reported. Moreover, some sporadic infections among young patients have been reported, even in the last decade. Several hypotheses can explain these recent cases including soil transmitted cases sustained by persistent free-living cycle in the environment; canine or, less likely, human reservoir; or direct interhuman transmission (for example through sexual intercourse).
The role of strongyloidiasis as a zoonotic disease has been largely debated [128] under the historical evidence that S. stercoralis can adapt from human to dog hosts, suggesting that the reverse could also be possible [4,129]. Recent phylogenetic studies [18,19] indicated that S. stercoralis consists of two genetically distinct lineages, one isolated from both dogs and humans, the other found exclusively in dogs. Moreover, the study conducted by Jaleta et al. on humans and dogs living in the same household in rural Cambodia demonstrated that dogs carry two genetically different populations of S. stercoralis one of which is shared with humans [130]. Thus, this study is the first to provide convincing evidence of natural zoonotic transmission of S. stercoralis between dogs and humans. According to this evidence, some authors suggested concomitant treatment of dogs alongside mass drug administration programs to control strongyloidiasis in humans [19,131,132]; however, this approach could be more useful in highly endemic countries rather than in Europe.
Another issue of concern is direct interhuman transmission. Infestation with S. stercoralis through homosexual intercourse has been described since 1981 [133], and it has been recognized by the scientific community that sexual contact, especially oral–anal contact, can facilitate the transmission of intestinal parasites [134].
When the disease is not recognized, the characteristic mechanism of autoinfection can lead to chronic infestation persisting for decades, posing infected subjects to ongoing risk of severe manifestations in cases of immunosuppression. According to our findings, strongyloidiasis must be taken in account in elderly European subjects living in endemic areas, with or without clinical symptoms or eosinophilia and whether they are immunosuppressed or a candidate for immunosuppression [135]. The risk of development of a severe form of strongyloidiasis has been associated with many immunosuppressive conditions such as steroid therapy, other immunosuppressants, solid tumour or oncohematologic malignancy, transplantation, and chemotherapy [136]. The COHEMI guidelines by Requena-Méndez et al. provide indications for the screening and management of Strongyloides in subjects living in non-endemic countries. Concerning immunosuppressed patients, screening for strongyloidiasis or pre-emptive therapy where a strong clinical suspicious exists is strongly recommended in every subject at risk, including elderly European patients that have lived in endemic areas [137]. In 2013, the American Society of Transplantation provided guidelines recommending the evaluation for Strongyloides infection in transplant candidates and donors with epidemiologic risk factors or unexplained eosinophilia during pretransplant evaluation [138]. In our opinion, deeper efforts are needed to improve European screening programs among transplant centers, with a focus on donors’ origins and risk factors for infection. According to this review, cases might occur, although seldom, in young patients. Hence, strongyloidiasis cannot be excluded in young autochthonous patients especially in cases of unexplained eosinophilia or in cases with risk factors such as working as a farmer or miner, walking barefoot, having at risk sexual intercourse, or mental disorders.
A limitation of our review is the exclusion of grey literature and papers written in languages other than Italian, English, French, Spanish or German, probably underrepresenting the total number of papers. Another limitation is that several cases have probably been misdiagnosed and are not published in the literature. Moreover, a publication bias can be present, due to the higher interest of journals in publishing papers reporting cases of severe strongyloidiasis rather than an asymptomatic infection.

6. Conclusions

Traditionally, strongyloidiasis is considered a disease related to tropical and subtropical areas and is often underdiagnosed and underestimated. In Europe transmission of the disease still occurs in humans and dogs, although rarely. Clinicians need to be aware of the epidemiological features of autochthonous infection in order to promptly recognize it and avoid severe complications in immunosuppressed patients. Further studies must be performed to better understand the possible zoonotic transmission of this infection.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2076-0817/9/6/439/s1. Supplementary Material 1: Review Protocol, Table S1: PRISMA checklist.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.Z. and L.O.; methodology, L.Z.; formal analysis, L.O.; investigation, A.A., D.B., S.G.; data curation, L.O.; writing—original draft preparation, L.O.; writing—review and editing, A.A., D.B., S.G., P.P., L.Z.; supervision, A.B., G.M.R., Z.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nutman, T.B. Human infection with Strongyloides stercoralis and other related Strongyloides species. Parasitology 2017, 144, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Roxby, A.C.; Gottlieb, G.S.; Limaye, A.P. Strongyloidiasis in transplant patients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 1411–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Jourdan, P.M.; Lamberton, P.H.L.; Fenwick, A.; Addiss, D.G. Soil-transmitted helminth infections. Lancet Lond. Engl. 2018, 391, 252–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Thamsborg, S.M.; Ketzis, J.; Horii, Y.; Matthews, J.B. Strongyloides spp. infections of veterinary importance. Parasitology 2017, 144, 274–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Keiser, P.B.; Nutman, T.B. Strongyloides stercoralis in the Immunocompromised Population. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Schär, F.; Trostdorf, U.; Giardina, F.; Khieu, V.; Muth, S.; Marti, H.; Vounatsou, P.; Odermatt, P. Strongyloides stercoralis: Global Distribution and Risk Factors. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7, e2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Buonfrate, D.; Requena-Mendez, A.; Angheben, A.; Muñoz, J.; Gobbi, F.; Van Den Ende, J.; Bisoffi, Z. Severe strongyloidiasis: A systematic review of case reports. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Buonfrate, D.; Perandin, F.; Formenti, F.; Bisoffi, Z. A retrospective study comparing agar plate culture, indirect immunofluorescence and real-time PCR for the diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Parasitology 2017, 144, 812–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Starr, M.C.; Montgomery, S.P. Soil-transmitted Helminthiasis in the United States: A systematic review—1940–2010. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2011, 85, 680–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Júnior, A.F.; Gonçalves-Pires, M.R.F.; Silva, D.a.O.; Gonçalves, A.L.R.; Costa-Cruz, J.M. Parasitological and serological diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis in domesticated dogs from southeastern Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 136, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palmer, J.M.; Wong-Riley, M.; Sharkey, K.A. Functional alterations in jejunal myenteric neurons during inflammation in nematode-infected guinea pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 1998, 275, G922–G935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gates, M.C.; Nolan, T.J. Endoparasite prevalence and recurrence across different age groups of dogs and cats. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 166, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Paulos, D.; Addis, M.; Fromsa Merga, A.; Mekibib, B. Studies on the prevalence of gastrointestinal helminthes of dogs and owners awareness about zoonotic dog parasites in Hawassa Town, Ethiopia. J. Public Health Epidemiol. 2012, 4, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Riggio, F.; Mannella, R.; Ariti, G.; Perrucci, S. Intestinal and lung parasites in owned dogs and cats from central Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 193, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Asano, K.; Suzuki, K.; Matsumoto, T.; Sakai, T.; Asano, R. Prevalence of dogs with intestinal parasites in Tochigi, Japan in 1979, 1991 and 2002. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 120, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Štrkolcová, G.; Goldová, M.; Bocková, E.; Mojžišová, J. The roundworm Strongyloides stercoralis in children, dogs, and soil inside and outside a segregated settlement in Eastern Slovakia: Frequent but hardly detectable parasite. Parasitol. Res. 2017, 116, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Gonçalves, A.L.R.; Machado, G.A.; Gonçalves-Pires, M.R.F.; Ferreira-Júnior, A.; Silva, D.a.O.; Costa-Cruz, J.M. Evaluation of strongyloidiasis in kennel dogs and keepers by parasitological and serological assays. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 147, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nagayasu, E.; Aung, M.P.P.T.H.H.; Hortiwakul, T.; Hino, A.; Tanaka, T.; Higashiarakawa, M.; Olia, A.; Taniguchi, T.; Win, S.M.T.; Ohashi, I.; et al. A possible origin population of pathogenic intestinal nematodes, Strongyloides stercoralis, unveiled by molecular phylogeny. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 4844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Jaleta, T.G.; Lok, J.B. Advances in the Molecular and Cellular Biology of Strongyloides spp. Curr. Trop. Med. Rep. 2019, 6, 161–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Barratt, J.L.N.; Lane, M.; Talundzic, E.; Richins, T.; Robertson, G.; Formenti, F.; Pritt, B.; Verocai, G.; Nascimento de Souza, J.; Mato Soares, N.; et al. A global genotyping survey of Strongyloides stercoralis and Strongyloides fuelleborni using deep amplicon sequencing. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Takano, Y.; Minakami, K.; Kodama, S.; Matsuo, T.; Satozono, I. Cross Infection of Strongyloides between Humans and Dogs in the Amami Islands, Japan. Trop. Med. Health 2009, 37, 149–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Boscolo, M.; Gobbo, M.; Mantovani, W.; Degani, M.; Anselmi, M.; Monteiro, G.B.; Marocco, S.; Angheben, A.; Mistretta, M.; Santacatterina, M.; et al. Evaluation of an indirect immunofluorescence assay for strongyloidiasis as a tool for diagnosis and follow-up. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. CVI 2007, 14, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hasegawa, H.; Kalousova, B.; McLennan, M.R.; Modry, D.; Profousova-Psenkova, I.; Shutt-Phillips, K.A.; Todd, A.; Huffman, M.A.; Petrzelkova, K.J. Strongyloides infections of humans and great apes in Dzanga-Sangha Protected Areas, Central African Republic and in degraded forest fragments in Bulindi, Uganda. Parasitol. Int. 2016, 65, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Verweij, J.J.; Canales, M.; Polman, K.; Ziem, J.; Brienen, E.A.T.; Polderman, A.M.; van Lieshout, L. Molecular diagnosis of Strongyloides stercoralis in faecal samples using real-time PCR. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2009, 103, 342–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pypen, Y.; Oris, E.; Meeuwissen, J.; Vander Laenen, M.; Van Gompel, F.; Coppens, G. Late onset of Strongyloides stercoralis meningitis in a retired Belgian miner. Acta Clin. Belg. 2015, 70, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. de Goede, E.; Martens, M.; Van Rooy, S.; VanMoerkerke, I. A case of systemic strongyloidiasis in an ex-coal miner with idiopathic colitis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1995, 7, 807–809. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Arsić-Arsenijević, V.; Dzamić, A.; Dzamić, Z.; Milobratović, D.; Tomić, D. Fatal Strongyloides stercoralis infection in a young woman with lupus glomerulonephritis. J. Nephrol. 2005, 18, 787–790. [Google Scholar]
  29. Pichard, D.C.; Hensley, J.R.; Williams, E.; Apolo, A.B.; Klion, A.D.; DiGiovanna, J.J. Rapid development of migratory, linear, and serpiginous lesions in association with immunosuppression. J. Am. Acad. Derm. 2014, 70, 1130–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Topić, M.B.; Čuković-Čavka, S.; Brinar, M.; Kalauz, M.; Škrlec, I.; Majerović, M. Terminal ileum resection as a trigger for Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection and ensuing serial sepsis in a 37-year-old patient with complicated Crohn’s disease: A case report. Z. Gastroenterol. 2018, 56, 380–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Harcourt-Webster, J.N.; Scaravilli, F.; Darwish, A.H. Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection in an HIV positive patient. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991, 44, 346–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Osio, A.; Demongeot, C.; Battistella, M.; Lhuillier, E.; Zafrani, L.; Vignon-Pennamen, M.-D. Periumbilical purpura: Challenge and answer. Diagnosis: Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection. Am. J. Derm. 2014, 36, 899–900, 907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Glize, B.; Malvy, D. Autochthonous strongyloidiasis, Bordeaux area, South-Western France. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2014, 12, 106–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Collet, F.; Favory, R.; Augusto, D.; Moukassa, D.; Dutoit, E.; Mathieu, D. Massive haemoptysis associated with pulmonary Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfestation. Rev. Mal. Respir. 2005, 22, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Masseau, A.; Hervier, B.; Leclair, F.; Grossi, O.; Mosnier, J.-F.; Hamidou, M. Strongyloides stercoralis infection simulating polyarteritis nodosa. Rev. Med. Interne 2005, 26, 661–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Coton, T.; Chaudier, B.; Rey, P.; Molinier, S.; Wade, B.; Sang, V.; Lemaitre, X.; Gras, C. Indigenous strongyloidiasis: Apropos of a case. Med. Trop. Rev. Corps Sante Colon. 1999, 59, 100. [Google Scholar]
  37. Doury, P. Autochthonous anguilluliasis in France. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1990 1993, 86, 116. [Google Scholar]
  38. Poirriez, J.; Becquet, R.; Dutoit, E.; Crepin, M.; Cousin, J. Autochthonous strongyloidiasis in the north of France. Bull. Soc. Pathol. Exot. 1990 1992, 85, 292–295. [Google Scholar]
  39. Pinel, C.; Pelloux, H.; Bureau du Colombier, J.; Ambroise-Thomas, P. Endemic strongyloidiasis in the Grenoble region. Presse Medicale Paris Fr. 1983 1991, 20, 1899–1900. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ziegler, T.; Schau, A.; Winkler, C. Autochthonous strongyloidosis in an 81-year-old woman. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 2002, 114, 405–409. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kechagia, M.; Stamoulos, K.; Skarmoutsou, N.; Katsika, P.; Basoulis, D.; Martsoukou, M.; Pavlou, K.; Fakiri, E.M. Rare Case of Strongyloides stercoralis Hyperinfection in a Greek Patient with Chronic Eosinophilia. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2012, 3, 370–372. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Xouris, D.; Vafiadis-Zoumbulis, I.; Papaxoinis, K.; Bamias, G.; Karamanolis, G.; Vlachogiannakos, J.; Ladas, S.D. Possible Strongyloides stercoralis infection diagnosed by videocapsule endoscopy in an immunocompetent patient with devastating diarrhea. Ann. Gastroenterol. 2012, 25, 268–270. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Grapsa, D.; Petrakakou, E.; Botsoli-Stergiou, E.; Mikou, P.; Athanassiadou, P.; Karkampasi, A.; Ioakim-Liossi, A. Strongyloides stercoralis in a bronchial washing specimen processed as conventional and Thin-Prep smears: Report of a case and a review of the literature. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2009, 37, 903–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Almasidou, D.; Maniatis, M.; Vassiou, K.; Damani, E.; Vakalis, N.; Fesoulidis, I.; Gourgoulianis, K.I. Strongyloides hyperinfection in a patient with sarcoidosis. Respirology 2003, 8, 105–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bamias, G.; Toskas, A.; Psychogiou, M.; Delladetsima, I.; Siakavellas, S.I.; Dimarogona, K.; Daikos, G.L. Strongyloides hyperinfection syndrome presenting as enterococcal meningitis in a low-endemicity area. Virulence 2010, 1, 468–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Beltrame, A.; Bortesi, L.; Benini, M.; Bisoffi, Z. A case of chronic strongyloidiasis diagnosed by histopathological study. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 77, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Lo Gullo, A.; Aragona, C.O.; Ardesia, M.; Versace, A.G.; Cascio, A.; Saitta, A.; Mandraffino, G. A Strongyloides stercoralis infection presenting as arthritis of sternoclavicular joint. Mod. Rheumatol. 2016, 26, 981–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Marchesi, F.; Lepanto, D.; Annibali, O.; Cerchiara, E.; Tirindelli, M.C.; Bianchi, A.; Sedati, P.; Muda, A.O.; Avvisati, G. Sytemic strongyloidiasis and primary aspergillosis of digestive tract in a patient with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk. Res. 2011, 35, 978–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Caramaschi, P.; Marocco, S.; Gobbo, M.; La Verde, V.; Volpe, A.; Bambara, L.; Biasi, D. Systemic lupus erythematosus and strongyloidiasis: A multifaceted connection. Lupus 2010, 19, 872–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tassara, R.; Parodi, L.; Brignone, M.; Di Pede, E.; Scogna, M.; Minetti, F.; Bonanni, F. Eosinophilia and Strongyloides stercoralis infestation: Case report. Infez. Med. 1999, 7, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Corsetti, M.; Basilisco, G.; Pometta, R.; Allocca, M.; Conte, D. Mistaken diagnosis of eosinophilic colitis. Ital. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1999, 31, 607–609. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Gulletta, M.; Chatel, G.; Pavia, M.; Signorini, L.; Tebaldi, A.; Bombana, E.; Carosi, G. AIDS and strongyloidiasis. Int. J. STD AIDS 1998, 9, 427–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Casati, A.; Cornero, G.; Muttini, S.; Tresoldi, M.; Gallioli, G.; Torri, G. Hyperacute pneumonitis in a patient with overwhelming Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 1996, 13, 498–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mariotta, S.; Pallone, G.; Li Bianchi, E.; Gilardi, G.; Bisetti, A. Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection in a case of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Panminerva Med. 1996, 38, 45–47. [Google Scholar]
  55. Ronchetto, F.; Pistono, P.G.; Guasco, C. Strongyloides stercoralis in a region of northwestern Italy. An epidemiological note and presentation of a case of eosinophilic infiltration of the lung. Recenti Prog. Med. 1995, 86, 234–237. [Google Scholar]
  56. Hanck, C.; Holzer, R.B. Chronic abdominal pain and eosinophilia in a patient from Southern Italy. Schweiz. Rundsch. Med. Prax. 1993, 82, 186–188. [Google Scholar]
  57. Brügemann, J.; Kampinga, G.A.; Riezebos-Brilman, A.; Stek, C.J.; Edel, J.P.; van der Bij, W.; Sprenger, H.G.; Zijlstra, F. Two donor-related infections in a heart transplant recipient: One common, the other a tropical surprise. J. Heart Lung Transpl. 2010, 29, 1433–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nordheim, E.; Olafsson Storrø, M.; Natvik, A.K.; Birkeland Kro, G.; Midtvedt, K.; Varberg Reisaeter, A.; Hagness, M.; Fevang, B.; Pettersen, F.O. Donor-derived strongyloidiasis after organ transplantation in Norway. Transpl. Infect. Dis. 2019, 21, e13008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Rego Silva, J.; Macau, R.A.; Mateus, A.; Cruz, P.; Aleixo, M.J.; Brito, M.; Alcobia, A.; Oliveira, C.; Ramos, A. Successful Treatment of Strongyloides stercoralis Hyperinfection in a Kidney Transplant Recipient: Case Report. Transpl. Proc. 2018, 50, 861–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gluhovschi, G.; Gluhovschi, C.; Velciov, S.; Ratiu, I.; Bozdog, G.; Taban, S.; Petrica, L. “Surprise” in the evolution of chronic membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis associated with severe strongyloidiasis under corticotherapy: “hygienic paradox”? Ren. Fail. 2013, 35, 1017–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Drug, V.; Haliga, R.; Akbar, Q.; Mihai, C.; Cijevschi Prelipcean, C.; Stanciu, C. Ascites with Strongyloides stercoralis in a patient with acute alcoholic pancreatitis and liver cirrhosis. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. 2009, 18, 367–369. [Google Scholar]
  62. Galiano, A.; Trelis, M.; Moya-Herráiz, Á.; Sánchez-Plumed, J.; Merino, J.F. Donor-derived Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome after simultaneous kidney/pancreas transplantation. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 51, 19–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Pacheco-Tenza, M.I.; Ruiz-Maciá, J.A.; Navarro-Cots, M.; Gregori-Colomé, J.; Cepeda-Rodrigo, J.M.; Llenas-García, J. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in a Spanish regional hospital: Not just an imported disease. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2018, 36, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Contreras, S.N.; Barreiro Alonso, E.; Liguori Ljoka, M.E.; Díaz Trapiella, A. Strongyloidiasis native to Asturias. Semergen 2017, 43, e6–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Esteban Ronda, V.; Franco Serrano, J.; Briones Urtiaga, M.L. Pulmonary Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2016, 52, 442–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gómez-Junyent, J.; Paredes-Zapata, D.; de las Parras, E.R.; González-Costello, J.; Ruiz-Arranz, Á.; Cañizares, R.; Saugar, J.M.; Muñoz, J. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction in Stool Detects Transmission of Strongyloides stercoralis from an Infected Donor to Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2016, 94, 897–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Fernández Rodríguez, C.; Enríquez-Matas, A.; Sanchéz Millán, M.; Mielgo Ballesteros, R.; Jukic Beteta, K.; Valdez Tejeda, M.; Almonte Durán, P.; Levano Vasquez, J.; Sánchez González, M. Strongyloides stercoralis infection: A series of cases diagnosed in an allergy department in Spain. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2012, 22, 437–459. [Google Scholar]
  68. Villena-Ruiz, M.Á.; Arboleda-Sánchez, J.A.; Del Arco-Jiménez, A.; Fernandez-Sánchez, F. Severe pneumonia in a patient infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2012, 30, 209–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Rodriguez-Hernandez, M.J.; Ruiz-Perez-Pipaon, M.; Cañas, E.; Bernal, C.; Gavilan, F. Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection transmitted by liver allograft in a transplant recipient. Am. J. Transpl. 2009, 9, 2637–2640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Beltrán Catalán, S.; Crespo Albiach, J.F.; Morales García, A.I.; Gavela Martínez, E.; Górriz Teruel, J.L.; Pallardó Mateu, L.M. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in renal transplant recipients. Nefrol. Publ. Soc. Esp. Nefrol. 2009, 29, 482–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Mayayo, E.; Gomez-Aracil, V.; Azua-Blanco, J.; Azua-Romeo, J.; Capilla, J.; Mayayo, R. Strongyloides stercolaris infection mimicking a malignant tumour in a non-immunocompromised patient. Diagnosis by bronchoalveolar cytology. J. Clin. Pathol. 2005, 58, 420–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Olmos, M.; Gracia, S.; Villoria, F.; Salesa, R.; González-Macías, J. Disseminated strongyloidiasis in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2004, 15, 529–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Martínez-Vázquez, C.; González Mediero, G.; Núñez, M.; Pérez, S.; García-Fernaández, J.M.; Gimena, B. Strongyloides stercoralis in the south of Galicia. An. Med. Interna Madr. Spain 1984 2003, 20, 477–479. [Google Scholar]
  74. Cremades Romero, M.J.; Martínez García, M.A.; Menéndez Villanueva, R.; Cremades Romero, M.L.; Pemán García, J.P. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in a cortico-dependent patient with chronic airflow obstruction. Arch. Bronconeumol. 1996, 32, 430–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Batista, N.; Dávila, M.F.; Gijón, H.; Pérez, M.A. Strongyloidiasis in a patient with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 1992, 10, 431–432. [Google Scholar]
  76. del Mar Ortiz Romero, M.; León Martínez, M.D.; de Los Ángeles Muñoz Pérez, M.; Altuna Cuesta, A.; Cano Sánchez, A.; Hernández Martínez, J. Strongyloides stercoralys: Una peculiar forma de exacerbación en la EPOC. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2008, 44, 451–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Dogan, C.; Gayaf, M.; Ozsoz, A.; Sahin, B.; Aksel, N.; Karasu, I.; Aydogdu, Z.; Turgay, N. Pulmonary Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Respir. Med. Case Rep. 2014, 11, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Korkmaz, U.; Duman, A.E.; Gurkan, B.; Sirin, G.; Topcu, Y.; Dindar, G.; Gurbuz, Y.; Senturk, O. Nonresponsive celiac disease due to Strongyloides stercoralis infestation. Intern. Med. 2012, 51, 881–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Oztürk, G.; Aydınlı, B.; Celebi, F.; Gürsan, N. Gastric perforation caused by Strongyloides stercoralis: A case report. Ulus. Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2011, 17, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Altintop, L.; Cakar, B.; Hokelek, M.; Bektas, A.; Yildiz, L.; Karaoglanoglu, M. Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and bronchial asthma: A case report. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2010, 9, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Sav, T.; Yaman, O.; Gunal, A.I.; Oymak, O.; Utas, C. Peritonitis associated with Strongyloides stercoralis in a patient undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. NDT Plus 2009, 2, 390–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yaldiz, M.; Hakverdi, S.; Aslan, A.; Temiz, M.; Culha, G. Gastric infection by Strongyloides stercoralis: A case report. Turk. J. Gastroenterol. 2009, 20, 48–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Gulbas, Z.; Kebapci, M.; Pasaoglu, O.; Vardareli, E. Successful ivermectin treatment of hepatic strongyloidiasis presenting with severe eosinophilia. South. Med. J. 2004, 97, 907–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Dinleyici, E.C.; Dogan, N.; Ucar, B.; Ilhan, H. Strongyloidiasis associated with amebiasis and giardiaisis in an immunocompetent boy presented with acute abdomen. Korean J. Parasitol. 2003, 41, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Steiner, B.; Riebold, D.; Wolff, D.; Freund, M.; Reisinger, E.C. Strongyloides stercoralis eggs in a urethral smear after bone marrow transplantation. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2002, 34, 1280–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  86. Müller, A.; Fätkenheuer, G.; Salzberger, B.; Schrappe, M.; Diehl, V.; Franzen, C. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in a patient with AIDS and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 1946 1998, 123, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Juchems, M.S.; Niess, J.H.; Leder, G.; Barth, T.F.; Adler, G.; Brambs, H.-J.; Wagner, M. Strongyloides stercoralis: A rare cause of obstructive duodenal stenosis. Digestion 2008, 77, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Martinez-Perez, A.; Roure Díez, S.; Belhassen-Garcia, M.; Torrús-Tendero, D.; Perez-Arellano, J.L.; Cabezas, T.; Soler, C.; Díaz-Menéndez, M.; Navarro, M.; Treviño, B.; et al. Management of severe strongyloidiasis attended at reference centers in Spain. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Zammarchi, L.; Vellere, I.; Stella, L.; Bartalesi, F.; Strohmeyer, M.; Bartoloni, A. Spectrum and burden of neglected tropical diseases observed in an infectious and tropical diseases unit in Florence, Italy (2000–2015). Intern. Emerg. Med. 2017, 12, 467–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Geri, G.; Rabbat, A.; Mayaux, J.; Zafrani, L.; Chalumeau-Lemoine, L.; Guidet, B.; Azoulay, E.; Pène, F. Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection syndrome: A case series and a review of the literature. Infection 2015, 43, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rivasi, F.; Pampiglione, S.; Boldorini, R.; Cardinale, L. Histopathology of gastric and duodenal Strongyloides stercoralis locations in fifteen immunocompromised subjects. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2006, 130, 1792–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Rodríguez Calabuig, D.; Igual Adell, R.; Oltra Alcaraz, C.; Sánchez Sánchez, P.; Bustamante Balen, M.; Parra Godoy, F.; Nagore Enguidanos, E. Agricultural occupation and strongyloidiasis. A case-control study. Rev. Clin. Esp. 2001, 201, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Magnaval, J.F.; Mansuy, J.M.; Villeneuve, L.; Cassaing, S. A retrospective study of autochthonous strongyloïdiasis in Région Midi-Pyrénées (Southwestern France). Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 16, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Rodríguez Calabuig, D.; Oltra Alcaraz, C.; Igual Adell, R.; Parra Godoy, F.; Martínez Sánchez, J.; Ángel Rodenas, C.; Llario Sanjuán, M.; Sanjuán Bautista, M.T. Treinta casos de estrongiloidiasis en un centro de atención primaria: Características y posibles complicaciones. Aten. Primaria 1998, 21, 271–274. [Google Scholar]
  95. Germanaud, J.; Padonou, C.; Poisson, D. Systematic parasitic coprologic testing. Value in hospital kitchen staff. Presse Medicale Paris Fr. 1983 1992, 21, 1513–1515. [Google Scholar]
  96. Winnicki, W.; Eder, M.; Mazal, P.; Mayer, F.J.; Sengölge, G.; Wagner, L. Prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis infection and hyperinfection syndrome among renal allograft recipients in Central Europe. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 15406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Erdem Kivrak, E.; Atalay Şahar, E.; Can, H.; Döşkaya, M.; Yilmaz, M.; Pullukçu, H.; Caner, A.; Töz, H.; Gürüz, A.Y.; Işikgöz Taşbakan, M. Screening of immunocompromised patients at risk of strongyloidiasis in western Turkey using ELISA and real-time PCR. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2017, 47, 897–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Buonfrate, D.; Baldissera, M.; Abrescia, F.; Bassetti, M.; Caramaschi, G.; Giobbia, M.; Mascarello, M.; Rodari, P.; Scattolo, N.; Napoletano, G.; et al. Epidemiology of Strongyloides stercoralis in northern Italy: Results of a multicentre case-control study, February 2013 to July 2014. Euro Surveill. 2016, 21, 30310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Valerio, L.; Roure, S.; Fernández-Rivas, G.; Basile, L.; Martínez-Cuevas, O.; Ballesteros, Á.-L.; Ramos, X.; Sabrià, M. North Metropolitan Working Group on Imported Diseases. Strongyloides stercoralis, the hidden worm. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 70 cases diagnosed in the North Metropolitan Area of Barcelona, Spain, 2003–2012. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013, 107, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Zukiewicz, M.; Kaczmarski, M.; Topczewska, M.; Sidor, K.; Tomaszewska, B. Epidemiological and clinical picture of parasitic infections in the group of children and adolescents from north-east region of Poland. Wiad Parazytol. 2011, 57, 179–187. [Google Scholar]
  101. Grande, R.; Ranzi, M.L.; Restelli, A.; Maraschini, A.; Perego, L.; Torresani, E. Intestinal parasitosis prevalence in outpatients and inpatients of Cã Granda IRCCS Foundation—Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan: Data comparison between 1984–1985 and 2007–2009. Infez. Med. 2011, 19, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  102. Köksal, F.; Başlanti, I.; Samasti, M. A retrospective evaluation of the prevalence of intestinal parasites in Istanbul, Turkey. Turk. Parazitoloji Derg. 2010, 34, 166–171. [Google Scholar]
  103. Abrescia, F.F.; Falda, A.; Caramaschi, G.; Scalzini, A.; Gobbi, F.; Angheben, A.; Gobbo, M.; Schiavon, R.; Rovere, P.; Bisoffi, Z. Reemergence of strongyloidiasis, northern Italy. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 1531–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Pirisi, M.; Salvador, E.; Bisoffi, Z.; Gobbo, M.; Smirne, C.; Gigli, C.; Minisini, R.; Fortina, G.; Bellomo, G.; Bartoli, E. Unsuspected strongyloidiasis in hospitalised elderly patients with and without eosinophilia. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2006, 12, 787–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Alcaraz, C.O.; Adell, R.I.; Sánchez, P.S.; Blasco, M.J.V.; Sánchez, O.A.; Auñón, A.S.; Calabuig, D.R. Characteristics and geographical profile of strongyloidiasis in healthcare area 11 of the Valencian community (Spain). J. Infect. 2004, 49, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Román-Sánchez, P.; Pastor-Guzmán, A.; Moreno-Guillén, S.; Igual-Adell, R.; Suñer-Generoso, S.; Tornero-Estébanez, C. High prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis among farm workers on the Mediterranean coast of Spain: Analysis of the predictive factors of infection in developed countries. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2003, 69, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sánchez, P.R.; Guzman, A.P.; Guillen, S.M.; Adell, R.I.; Estruch, A.M.; Gonzalo, I.N.; Olmos, C.R. Endemic strongyloidiasis on the Spanish Mediterranean coast. QJM Mon. J. Assoc. Physicians 2001, 94, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Gatti, S.; Lopes, R.; Cevini, C.; Ijaoba, B.; Bruno, A.; Bernuzzi, A.M.; de Lio, P.; Monco, A.; Scaglia, M. Intestinal parasitic infections in an institution for the mentally retarded. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2000, 94, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cremades Romero, M.J.; Igual Adell, R.; Ricart Olmos, C.; Estellés Piera, F.; Pastor-Guzmán, A.; Menéndez Villanueva, R. Infection by Strongyloides stercoralis in the county of Safor, Spain. Med. Clin. (Barc.) 1997, 109, 212–215. [Google Scholar]
  110. Panaitescu, D.; Căpraru, T.; Bugarin, V. Study of the incidence of intestinal and systemic parasitoses in a group of children with handicaps. Roum. Arch. Microbiol. Immunol. 1995, 54, 65–74. [Google Scholar]
  111. Genta, R.M.; Gatti, S.; Linke, M.J.; Cevini, C.; Scaglia, M. Endemic strongyloidiasis in northern Italy: Clinical and immunological aspects. Q. J. Med. 1988, 68, 679–690. [Google Scholar]
  112. Iatta, R.; Buonfrate, D.; Paradies, P.; Cavalera, M.A.; Capogna, A.; Iarussi, F.; Šlapeta, J.; Giorli, G.; Trerotoli, P.; Bisoffi, Z.; et al. Occurrence, diagnosis and follow-up of canine strongyloidiosis in naturally infected shelter dogs. Parasitology 2019, 146, 246–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Čabanová, V.; Guimaraes, N.; Hurníková, Z.; Chovancová, G.; Urban, P.; Miterpáková, M. Endoparasites of the grey wolf (Canis lupus) in protected areas of Slovakia. Ann. Parasitol. 2017, 63, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Sauda, F.; Malandrucco, L.; Macrì, G.; Scarpulla, M.; De Liberato, C.; Terracciano, G.; Fichi, G.; Berrilli, F.; Perrucci, S. Leishmania infantum, Dirofilaria spp. and other endoparasite infections in kennel dogs in central Italy. Parasite Paris Fr. 2018, 25, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Kostopoulou, D.; Claerebout, E.; Arvanitis, D.; Ligda, P.; Voutzourakis, N.; Casaert, S.; Sotiraki, S. Abundance, zoonotic potential and risk factors of intestinal parasitism amongst dog and cat populations: The scenario of Crete, Greece. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Wright, I.; Stafford, K.; Coles, G. The prevalence of intestinal nematodes in cats and dogs from Lancashire, north-west England. J. Small Anim. Pr. 2016, 57, 393–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zanzani, S.A.; Di Cerbo, A.R.; Gazzonis, A.L.; Genchi, M.; Rinaldi, L.; Musella, V.; Cringoli, G.; Manfredi, M.T. Canine fecal contamination in a metropolitan area (Milan, north-western Italy): Prevalence of intestinal parasites and evaluation of health risks. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 132361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Mircean, V.; Györke, A.; Cozma, V. Prevalence and risk factors of Giardia duodenalis in dogs from Romania. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 184, 325–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Papazahariadou, M.; Founta, A.; Papadopoulos, E.; Chliounakis, S.; Antoniadou-Sotiriadou, K.; Theodorides, Y. Gastrointestinal parasites of shepherd and hunting dogs in the Serres Prefecture, Northern Greece. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 148, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Gothe, R.; Reichler, I. Spectrum of species and infection frequency of endoparasites in bitches and their puppies in south Germany. Tierarztl. Prax. 1990, 18, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  121. Cvetkovikj, A.; Rashikj, L.; Celeska, I.; Petrov, E.A.; Angjelovski, B.; Cvetkovikj, I.; Pavlova, M.J.; Stefanovska, J. First Case of Strongyloides stercoralis Infection in a Dog in the Republic of Macedonia. Maced. Vet. Rev. 2018, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Cervone, M.; Giannelli, A.; Otranto, D.; Perrucci, S. Strongyloides stercoralis hyperinfection in an immunosuppressed dog from France. Rev. Vét. Clin. 2016, 51, 55–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Paradies, P.; Iarussi, F.; Sasanelli, M.; Capogna, A.; Lia, R.P.; Zucca, D.; Greco, B.; Cantacessi, C.; Otranto, D. Occurrence of strongyloidiasis in privately owned and sheltered dogs: Clinical presentation and treatment outcome. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Eydal, M.; Skirnisson, K. Strongyloides stercoralis found in imported dogs, household dogs and kennel dogs in Iceland. Icel. Agric. Sci. 2016, 29, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Dillard, K.J.; Saari, S.A.; Anttila, M. Strongyloides stercoralis infection in a Finnish kennel. Acta Vet. Scand. 2007, 49, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Gibbons, L.M.; Jacobs, D.E.; Pilkington, J.G. Strongyloides in British greyhounds. Vet. Rec. 1988, 122, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Barroso, M.; Salvador, F.; Sánchez-Montalvá, A.; Bosch-Nicolau, P.; Molina, I. Strongyloides stercoralis infection: A systematic review of endemic cases in Spain. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2019, 13, e0007230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Viney, M.E. Strongyloides. Parasitology 2017, 144, 259–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Faust, E.C. Experimental Studies on Human and Primate Species of Strongyloides. II. The Development of Strongyloides in the Experimental Host. Am. J. Hyg. 1933, 18, 114–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Jaleta, T.G.; Zhou, S.; Bemm, F.M.; Schär, F.; Khieu, V.; Muth, S.; Odermatt, P.; Lok, J.B.; Streit, A. Different but overlapping populations of Strongyloides stercoralis in dogs and humans-Dogs as a possible source for zoonotic strongyloidiasis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Beknazarova, M.; Whiley, H.; Ross, K. Mass drug administration for the prevention human strongyloidiasis should consider concomitant treatment of dogs. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  132. Page, W.; Judd, J.A.; Bradbury, R.S. The Unique Life Cycle of Strongyloides stercoralis and Implications for Public Health Action. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2018, 3, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  133. Sorvillo, F.; Mori, K.; Sewake, W.; Fishman, L. Sexual transmission of Strongyloides stercoralis among homosexual men. Br. J. Vener. Dis. 1983, 59, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  134. Bourée, P.; Usubillaga, R.; Viard, J.-P.; Slama, L.; Salmon, D. L’anguillulose, une parasitose de transmission sexuelle? Presse Médicale 2019, 48, 322–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Tamarozzi, F.; Martello, E.; Giorli, G.; Fittipaldo, A.; Staffolani, S.; Montresor, A.; Bisoffi, Z.; Buonfrate, D. Morbidity Associated with Chronic Strongyloides stercoralis Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2019, 100, 1305–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Asdamongkol, N.; Pornsuriyasak, P.; Sungkanuparph, S. Risk factors for strongyloidiasis hyperinfection and clinical outcomes. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 2006, 37, 875–884. [Google Scholar]
  137. Requena-Méndez, A.; Buonfrate, D.; Gomez-Junyent, J.; Zammarchi, L.; Bisoffi, Z.; Muñoz, J. Evidence-Based Guidelines for Screening and Management of Strongyloidiasis in Non-Endemic Countries. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2017, 97, 645–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Schwartz, B.S.; Mawhorter, S.D. AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice Parasitic infections in solid organ transplantation. Am. J. Transpl. 2013, 13, 280–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Findings at the agar plate stool culture. (A) Strongyloides stercoralis rhabditoid larvae L1 (length 250 µm, magnification 40×), BC: buccal cavity, GP: germinal primordium; (B) migration paths of the larvae (black arrows) on an agar plate culture; (C) S. stercoralis adult male with spicule (white arrow); (D) germinal primordium.
Figure 1. Findings at the agar plate stool culture. (A) Strongyloides stercoralis rhabditoid larvae L1 (length 250 µm, magnification 40×), BC: buccal cavity, GP: germinal primordium; (B) migration paths of the larvae (black arrows) on an agar plate culture; (C) S. stercoralis adult male with spicule (white arrow); (D) germinal primordium.
Pathogens 09 00439 g001
Figure 2. Flow diagram of the selection process.
Figure 2. Flow diagram of the selection process.
Pathogens 09 00439 g002
Figure 3. Regional distribution of human (red) and canine (green) autochthonous strongyloidiasis cases in Europe reported in the literature from 1988 to 2018. If multiple countries of exposure were reported, the case was not inserted in the map. One canine case was reported from an unspecified area of Russia and it was arbitrarily highlighted the geographical corresponding to the Russia capital city Moscow [24]. Two countries (Belgium, 2 cases; and Bulgaria, 1 case) were fully coloured since the regions of exposure of respective cases were not specified.
Figure 3. Regional distribution of human (red) and canine (green) autochthonous strongyloidiasis cases in Europe reported in the literature from 1988 to 2018. If multiple countries of exposure were reported, the case was not inserted in the map. One canine case was reported from an unspecified area of Russia and it was arbitrarily highlighted the geographical corresponding to the Russia capital city Moscow [24]. Two countries (Belgium, 2 cases; and Bulgaria, 1 case) were fully coloured since the regions of exposure of respective cases were not specified.
Pathogens 09 00439 g003
Figure 4. Years of publication of case report/case series on human autochthonous strongyloidiasis in Europe.
Figure 4. Years of publication of case report/case series on human autochthonous strongyloidiasis in Europe.
Pathogens 09 00439 g004
Figure 5. Number and age of patients diagnosed with autochthonous strongyloidiasis in Europe in different periods. Data collected from case reports/case series where the year of diagnosis was available and from an unpublished case reported for the first time in this review.
Figure 5. Number and age of patients diagnosed with autochthonous strongyloidiasis in Europe in different periods. Data collected from case reports/case series where the year of diagnosis was available and from an unpublished case reported for the first time in this review.
Pathogens 09 00439 g005
Table 1. Demographic and clinical details of 80 patients with autochthonous human strongyloidiasis acquired in Europe described in case reports or case series.
Table 1. Demographic and clinical details of 80 patients with autochthonous human strongyloidiasis acquired in Europe described in case reports or case series.
Demographic Features
Median age (range in years)58 (5–86)
Male sex: n (%)60 (75%)
Country of Infection Exposure–[Reference]n (%)
Belgium [26,27]2 (2.5%)
Bosnia and Herzegovina [28]1 (1.2%)
Bulgaria [29]1 (1.2%)
Croatia [30]1 (1.2%)
England [31]1 (1.2%)
France [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]11 (13.7%)
Germany [40]1 (1.2%)
Greece [41,42,43,44,45]5 (6.2%)
Italy [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]18 (22.5%)
Macedonia [56]1 (1.2%)
Netherlands [57]1 (1.2%)
Norway [58]2 (2.5%)
Portugal [59]1 (1.2%)
Romania [60,61]2 (2.5%)
Spain [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76]21 (26.2%)
Turkey [77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84]8 (10%)
Multiple EU Countries [85,86,87]3 (3.7%)
Symptoms among Symptomatic Subjects (n: 72, 90%)n (%)
Nausea or vomiting26 (36.1%)
Diarrhea32 (44.4%)
Abdominal pain44 (61.1%)
Weight loss28 (38.9%)
Itching13 (18%)
Urticaria13 (18%)
Cough21 (29.2%)
Dyspnea13 (18%)
Angioedema4 (5.5%)
Fever29 (40.3%)
Asymptomatic subjects8 (10%)
Eosinophilia47 (58.7%)
Severe Strongyloidiasis42 (52.5%)
Hyperinfection Syndrome42 (52.5%)
Disseminated strongyloidiasis8 (10%)
Risk Factors among Patients with Severe Strongyloidiasisn (%)
Corticosteroid therapy20 (47.6%)
Chemotherapy6 (14.3%)
Other immunosuppressive therapy8 (19%)
COPD5 (12%)
Oncohematologic disease3 (7.1%)
Solid tumor3 (7.1%)
Solid organ transplant recipient7 (16.7%)
HIV infection7 (16.7%)
Reported Risk Factors for Exposure to Infectionn (%)
Agriculture worker15 (18.7%)
Miners4 (5%)
Walk barefoot6 (7.5%)
Mental disorders2 (2.5%)
Dog owner0 (0%)
MSM2 (2.5%)
None reported51 (63.7%)
Footnotes: EU: Europe, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, HIV: human immunodeficency virus, MSM: men who have sex with men.
Table 2. Diagnostic test performed in 80 patients with human autochthonous strongyloidiasis in Europe, described in case reports or case series.
Table 2. Diagnostic test performed in 80 patients with human autochthonous strongyloidiasis in Europe, described in case reports or case series.
Diagnostic Test Performedn/N (%)
Agar plate culture
Positive results
23/80 (28.7%)
9/23 (39.2%)
Parasitological test on stool
Positive results
62/80 (77.5%)
47/62 (75.8%)
Positive parasitological test on other specimens22/80 (27.5%)
Sputum7/22 (31.8%)
BAL/BA10/22 (45.4%)
Ascitic fluid/peritoneal dyalisate2/22 (9%)
Urine2/22 (9%)
Gastric/jejunal fluid2/22 (9%)
Bile1/22 (4.5%)
Urethral smear1/22 (4.5%)
Serology19/80 (23.7%)
Positive results13/19 (68.4%)
Histological examination (biopsy/autoptic finding)36/80 (45%)
Positive gastric/duodenal histologic findings20/36 (55.5%)
Positive colonic histologic findings5/36 (13.8%)
Positive liver histologic findings1/36 (2.7%)
Positive skin histologic findings2/36 (5.5%)
Positive lung/transbronchial histologic findings3/36 (8.3%)
PCR
Positive PCR on stool
Positive PCR on BAL
5/80 (6.2%)
3/5 (60%)
1/5 (20%)
Footnotes: BAL: bronchoalveolar lavage, BA: bronchial aspirate, PCR: polymerase chain reaction.
Table 3. Human strongyloidiasis aggregated data.
Table 3. Human strongyloidiasis aggregated data.
First Author and Year of PublicationType of StudyDiagnostic TestCountry of ExposureArea of ExposureN. of CasesYear of DiagnosesAge at DiagnosisEosinophiliaSymptomsHyperinfection Syndrome/ Disseminated StrongyloidiasisPotential Risk Factors for Infection ReportedRisk Factors for Hyperinfection or Disseminated Infection
Martinez-Perez A 2018 [88]Retrospective multicentric study on severe strongyloidiasis in SpainDetection of larvae in fresh stool samplesSpainCanary Island1200640YesDigestive, fever, General malaiseYesNoSteroids and other immunosuppresssive therapy for renal transplant
Zammarchi L 2017 [89]Retrospective case seriesPt 1: Serology (ELISA);
Pt 2: coprocolture
ItalyUmbria/
Tuscany
22012–2014Pt 1: 70,
Pt 2: 23
Pt 1: no,
Pt 2: NA
Pt 1: diarrhea,
Pt 2: NA
NoPt 1: no,
Pt 2: residency in a nursing institute
Dementia; congenial mental retardation
Geri G 2015 [90]Case series and review of literatureParasitological test on stools, respiratory samples, CSF, biopsiesFranceFrance41970–2013NANANAYesNACCS (n: 111, 83%), immunosuppressive therapy (n: 33. 24.8%), CHT (n: 24. 18.1%), autoimmune disease (n: 33, 24.8%), haematological malignancy, (n: 27, 20.3%), HIV (n: 13, 10.7%)
Rivasi F 2006 [91]Study on histopathologic alterations of the gastric and duodenal mucosa in StrogyloidiasisGastrointestinal biopsyItalyModena (8), Lodi (2), and Novara (5)152000–200589–58NANANANASolid tumors (n: 3), hematological malignancy (n: 6), gastric ulcer (n: 1), CCS therapy (n: 1)
Rodríguez Calabuig D 2001 [92]Case control study to investigate the relationship between occupational activities and strongyloidiasisDirect stool examinationSpainValencia province451997–1999Mean age 66NA23 cough, 22 pruritus, and 13 dyspepsia;1Agriculture workersCorticosteroids (n: 7)
Magnaval JF 2000 [93]Retrospective descriptive studyStool examination with Baermann’s method, serology (IFA)FranceToulouse171991–1997Mean age 53.9 years (range 25–89 years)12 patients eosinophil count ≥ 0.6·109cells/Lasymptomatic (n: 7), chronic weakness (n: 5), abdominal pain (n: 4), urticaria (n: 3), diarrhoea (n: 2), muscle pain (n: 2), pruritus (n: 2) flatulence (n: 1), angioedemas (n: 1)NoFarmers (n: 6), masons (n: 2), swimming pool builder (n: 1), gardener (n: 3)Alcohol abuse (n: 1)
Rodríguez Calabuig D 1998 [94]Case series and survey on workplace and domestic health conditionsFresh stool examination and/or stool cultureSpain/FranceOliva, Valencia province15 (Spain) + 11 (Spain/France)1994–1997Mean age 65NA40% respiratory, 26% digestive and 26% dermatologic symptomsNo66.6% had some risk factor as work barefoot, drink non-potable waterMultiple (COPD, lung cancer, pulmonary fibrosis, duodenal ulcers, diverticulitis, alcoholism, steroid therapy)
Germanaud J 1992 [95]Annual parasitological coprology survey among members of the hospital kitchen staffFresh stool examination, stool cultureFranceOrléans11985–1990NANANANANANA
N.: number, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, CSF: cerebrospinal fluid, NA: not available, CCS: corticosteroids, CHT: chemotherapy, IFA: immunofluorescence assay, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Table 4. Human strongyloidiasis epidemiological/prevalence study.
Table 4. Human strongyloidiasis epidemiological/prevalence study.
First Author and Year of PublicationType of StudyDiagnostic TestCountry of ExposureCity of Diagnosis or Where the Study Was ConductedLevel of Data CollectionN. of Cases/
Sample Size
PrevalenceStudy PeriodAge at DiagnosisEosinophilia in Positive CasesSymptoms/ Hyperinfection Syndrome/ Disseminated StrongyloidiasisPotential Risk Factors for Infection Reported in Positive CasesRisk Factors for Hyperinfection or Disseminated Infection in Positive Cases
Winnicki W 2018 [96]Prevalence study among renal transplant recipients in a division of nephrology and dialysisSerology (ELISA) (1 duodenal biopsy and direct smear of pleural effusion)AustriaWienHospital based6*/200
*(4 patients with possible exposure outside Europe)
3%NAMean age at transplantation 55.9 ± 12.3 yearsNo1 patient with hyperinfectionNATriple immunosuppressive therapy (tacrolimus, steroids and mycophenolate)
Erdem Kivrak E 2017 [97]Prevalence study among renal transplant recipients or patients receiving hemodialysisSerology (ELISA) +
RT-PCR (direct microscopy negative)
TurkeyIzmirHospital based1/1080.92%2013NANANoWalking barefootDiabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive therapy for renal transplant
Štrkolcová G 2017 [16]Prevalence study among Roma segregated settlement and children from general populationKoga agar plate culture, Baermann technique and serology (ELISA)SlovakiaMedzevCommunity basedFecal sample: 0/60 settlement,
0/21 outside settlement
Serology: 20/60 inside settlement,
5/21 outside settlement
Seroprevalence 33.3% children from settlement, 23.8% children from general population2013–20151–1739 children from segregated settlement and 4 children outside settlementNAChildren from the settlement: poor hygienic conditionsNA
Buonfrate D 2016 [98]Epidemiological multicenter case–control study among italian subjects > 60 years old with and without eosinophiliaSerology (ELISA + IFA)ItalyNegrar, San Bonifacio, Treviso, Brescia,
Mantova, Trieste, Udine
Outpatients blood sampling sectors of seven northern Italian hospital97/1137 among patients with eosinophilia; 13/1178 among patients without eosinophilia8% among patients with eosinophilia; 1% among
patients without eosinophilia
2013–2014NA97 patients with eosinophil count ≥500/µLPruritus (n: 23), skin rash (n: 13),
respiratory symptoms (n: 16), abdominal pain (n: 9), diarrhoea (n: 1)
Age > 60,
farm work (n: 32),
walking barefoot in earlier years (n: 37)
NA
Valerio L 2013 [99]Incidence study in north metropolitan area of BarcelonaAny positive test within direct fecal or sputum smear, serology (ELISA), stool cultureSpainBarcelonaSentinel clinicians based study70* newly diagnosed cases in a reference population of 406,000 over a 10-year period
*only 2 patients considered autochthonous
0.2 newly diagnosed cases per 10,000 inhabitants per year2003–2012NANANANANA
Zukiewicz M 2011 [100]Study on prevalence of different intestinal parasites in children (0–18) with symptoms of possible parasitosisMicroscopic stool testPolandDąbrowa BiałostockaHospital based7/1205.83%December 2008–May 20090–11NANANANA
Grande R 2011 [101]Study on prevalence of different intestinal parasites in patients with symptoms of possible parasitosisMicroscopic stool test, agar coproculture and/or serology (ELISA)ItalyMilanHospital based1/303 children;
4/189 adults
0.33% children; 2.11% adults2007–2009NANANANANA
Köksal F 2010 [102]Retrospective prevalence study of intestinal parasitesFaecal concentration techniqueTurkeyIstanbulHospital based2/ stool samples of patients with suspicious intestinal parasitic infections0.17%1999–2009NANANANANA
Abrescia FF 2009 [103]Preliminary Epidemiological multicenter case–control study among Italian subjects > 60 years old with and without eosinophiliaSerology (IFAT)ItalyMantova- LegnagoOutpatients blood sampling sectors of two northern Italian hospitals37/132 eligible patients28%2008Mean age 76,4 years, range 68–90 years100% (eosinophil count >500 cells/µL)NAElderly (born in 1940 or earlier), agricultural areaNA
Pirisi M 2006 [104]Seroprevalence study among elderly patients with and without eosinophiliaSerology (IFA and ELISA)ItalyNovaraHospital based19/100 patients with eosinophilia and 9/100 patients without eosinophilia19% patients with eosinophilia and 9% patients without eosinophilia2002–2003Mean age 74 years19 patients with eosinophil count ≥
0.5·109cells/L
NAElderly, agricultural areaNA
Oltra-Alcaraz 2004 [105]Retrospective, descriptive epidemiological studyFresh stool examination, Baermann test and fecal cultureSpainFrancesc de Borja Hospital, Area 11 of La Safor, Valencia provinceHospital based, inpatients and outpatients473/ (261 autochthonous)0.33%1995–199921–100 years oldNANAAgriculture activities (n: 124), irrigation ditches cleaners (n: 33), ditch baths (n: 6), construction activities (n: 18)NA
Román-Sánchez P 2003 [106]Prevalence study among farm workers and analysis of predictive factors of infectionAgar plate culture techniqueSpainGandìaCommunity based31/250 farm workers12.4%2003Mean age 68.6 yearsNANAFarm workers, (100%), history of working barefoot (97%)Alcohol (19.3%), Smoking (74.2%), Gastrectomy (3.2%), Debilitating illness (22.5%),
Corticoids (3.1%), Immunosuppressors (3.1%)
Román-Sánchez P 2001 [107]Epidemiological prospective studyDirect fecal examinationSpainGandìaHospital based152/patients admitted to the hospital0.9%1990–1997Mean age 67 years82% (n: 125) eosinophil count > 500 cells/mm3Asymptomatic 41.65% (n: 63), Severe infection 13% (n: 20)Agriculture workersCOPD (n: 44), heart disease (n: 38), solid neoplasia (n: 7), HIV infection (n: 1)
Gatti S 2000 [108]Prevalence study of parasitic infections in an institution for mentally retardedMicroscopic fecal examinationItalyMogliano VenetoHospital based1/550 patients0.8%NANANANAMental retardationNA
Cremades Romero MJ, Igual Adell R 1997 [109]Observational and descriptive prospective studyFresh stool examination and/or fecal culture, bronchoalveolar lavage and gastric biopsySpainValencia provinceHospital Comarcal Francesc de Borja de Gandìa, inpatients and outpatients37NA1994–1995Mean age 68 years (range 51–87 years)65% had respiratory, digestive and/or cutaneous symptomsAsymptomatic (n: 13), pruritus (n: 14), flatulence (n: 8), pyrosis (n: 6), epigastralgia (n: 5), nausea and vomit (n: 3), diarrhoea (n: 2), constipation (n: 2), gastrointestinal bleeding (n: 1), skin lesions (n: 2), respiratory symptoms (n: 4), meningitis (n: 1)Farmers (n: 33)Solid tumor (n: 2), gastrectomy (n: 1), diabetes (n: 3), alcoholic (n: 1), COPD (n: 9), asthma (n: 9)
Panaitescu D 1995 [110]Prevalence study of parasitosis in children with handicapsAgar plate cultureRomaniaBucharestHospital based21/2319.9%NA3–6 yearsNANAChildren with physical and psychic handicapsNA
Genta RM 1988 [111]Prevalence study among inpatients and outpatients of Infectious Disease Department in San Matteo HospitalFormol-ether stool concentration, coprocoltureItalyPaviaHospital based118/4203 (48 certainly autochthonous)3%1984–1986Mean age 61.4 years (range 38–80 years)43 patients (90%) with eosinophils >5%Gastrointestinal manifestation (n: 23; 47%), skin rash (n: 22; 46%)Living in endemic areaSteroid treatment (n: 1), previous gastric surgery (n: 7)
NA: not available, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, RT-PCR: reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, IFA: immunofluorescence assay, IFAT: immunofluorescence antibody test, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Table 5. Canine strongyloidiasis prevalence/epidemiological data.
Table 5. Canine strongyloidiasis prevalence/epidemiological data.
First Author and Year of PublicationType of StudyDiagnostic TestCountry of ExposureCity of DiagnosisSetting of Data CollectionN. of Cases/Sample SizePrevalenceStudy Period
Iatta R 2018 [112]Prevalence study and comparative study between different diagnostic testsCoprological methods, rt-PCR on stool, serology (ELISA/IFAT)ItalyBariShelter36/100 (coprocolture and/or rt-PCR); 56/100 (serology)36% (coprological test and/or rt-PCR on feces) and 56% (adding serology)2017
Čabanová V 2017 [113]Epidemiologic parasitological studyFresh stool examination (flotation method with zinc sulphate)SlovakiaKošiceTatra National Park, Muránska Planina National Park and Pol’ana Protected Landscape AreaNA (2 stool samples)NA (0.8% fecal samples)2015–2016
Sauda F 2017 [114]Prevalence study on Leishmania infantum, Dirofilaria spp. and other endoparasiteFresh stool examination, Baermann methodItalyNAKennels in Latium and TuscanyNot available0.2%2011–2014
Štrkolcová G 2017 [16]Prevalence studyMicroscopic stool sample (KAP culture, Baermann method) and serology (ELISA)SlovakiaMedzevSegregated settlement and shelterFecal sample: 4/30 dogs in settlement,
2/20 dogs in shelter outside settlement (KAP method);
0 (Baermann method)
Serology: Not performed in dogs inside settlement.
11/20 dogs in shelter outside settlement
Fecal sample: 13.3%
settlement,
10% shelter outside settlement (KAP method);
0% (Baermann method)
Serology: not performed in dogs inside settlement
55% in dogs in shelter outside settlement
2013–2015
Kostopoulou D [115] 2017Prevalence study of intestinal parasites in cats and dogs in CreteSedimentation, flotation, Telemann sedimentationGreeceCreteHousehold/
shelter/
shepherd dogs
1/8790.1%2011–2015
Wright I 2016 [116]Prevalence study of intestinal nematode in cats and dogsFLOTAC methodEnglandLancashireDomestic dogs3/1711.7%NA
Zanzani SA 2014 [117]Prevalence study of intestinal parasitesCoproscopyItalyMilanFecal samples collected in the metropolitan area of Milan4/463 fecal samples collected0.86%2010
Riggio F 2013 [14]Prevalence study of intestinal and lung parasites in cats and dogsCoproscopy/Baermann methodItalyPisaDomestic dogs2/2390.8%2008–2010
Mircean V 2012 [118]Prevalence study of G. intestinalis infectionFresh stool examinationRomaniaCluj-NapocaKennel/shelters/shepherd/household dogs from West, North-West, Center and North-East Romania2/614NA2008/2009
Papazahariadou M 2007 [119]Prevalence study of gastrointestinal parasites of shepherd and hunting dogsTelemann’s sedimentation methodGreeceThessalonikiOwned dogs1 shepherd and 4 hunting dogs/2811.8% (0.7% shepherds, 2.4% hunting dogs)2004–2005
Gothe R 1990 [120]Incidence study on endoparasites of bitches and their puppiesFecal flotationGermanySouthern GermanyBitches and their puppies in Southern GermanyNA3%NA
Rt-PCR: reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, IFAT: immunofluorescence antibody test, NA: not available, KAP: Koga agar plate.
Table 6. Canine strongyloidiasis case report/case series.
Table 6. Canine strongyloidiasis case report/case series.
First Author and Year of PublicationType of StudyN. of CasesDiagnostic TestCountry of ExposureCity of DiagnosisWild/Kennel /Domestic DogYear of DiagnosisAge of DogSymptomsSevere InfectionEosinophiliaFatal Outcome
Basso W 2018 [113]Case series3Sedimentation-flotation, Baermann method+/- SAFCBelgium/ France/SwitzerlandBernDomestic dog (n: 2), Kennel dog (n: 1)NA< 11 monthsGastro-intestinal signs (n: 3); itching, cough (n: 1)No (n: 3)NANo (n: 3)
Cvetkovikj A 2018 [121]Case report1Flotation, Baermann methodRussiaSkopjeDomestic dog20176 monthsDiarrhea, weight lossNoNoNo
Cervone M 2016 [122]Case report1Flotation, Baermann methodFranceParisDomestic dogNA10 monthsDiarrhea, weight loss, abdominal pain, vomiting, itching, coughYesNoNo
Paradies P 2017 [123]Case series6Coproscopy/Baermann methodItalyBariShelter dog (n: 5), domestic dog (n: 1)NAadultAcute (n: 1) or Chronic (n: 4) gastro-intestinal signs +/- depression (n: 2), abdominal mass (n: 1). No symptoms (n: 1)No (n: 6)No (n: 5), Mild (n: 1)No (n: 5); Yes (n: 1)
Eydal M 2016 [124]Screening study2 autochthonous household dogs + 27 imported dogs from EuropeFresh stool examination (formalin-ethyl acetate sedimentation technique or Baermann method)Iceland/
imported dogs
ReykjavíkKennel and domestic dogs1989–2016 Asymptomatic and symptomatic (soft stool, diarrhoea, blood in fecesNoNANo
Dillard KJ 2007 [125]Case series4Intestinal autoptic findings (n: 1); Baermann method (n: 3)FinlandHelsinkiKennel dogNA10 weeks (n: 1); NA (n: 3)Severe gastro-intestinal signs (n: 1), no symptoms (n: 3)Yes (n: 1), No (n: 3)NAYes (n: 1), No (n: 3)
Gibbons LM 1988 [126]Case series20autoptic findings on gastrointestinal mucosaEnglandNAKennel dogsNANANoNoNANA
NA: not available, SAFC: sodium acetate-acetic acid-formalin-concentration.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ottino, L.; Buonfrate, D.; Paradies, P.; Bisoffi, Z.; Antonelli, A.; Rossolini, G.M.; Gabrielli, S.; Bartoloni, A.; Zammarchi, L. Autochthonous Human and Canine Strongyloides stercoralis Infection in Europe: Report of a Human Case in An Italian Teen and Systematic Review of the Literature. Pathogens 2020, 9, 439. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens9060439

AMA Style

Ottino L, Buonfrate D, Paradies P, Bisoffi Z, Antonelli A, Rossolini GM, Gabrielli S, Bartoloni A, Zammarchi L. Autochthonous Human and Canine Strongyloides stercoralis Infection in Europe: Report of a Human Case in An Italian Teen and Systematic Review of the Literature. Pathogens. 2020; 9(6):439. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens9060439

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ottino, Letizia, Dora Buonfrate, Paola Paradies, Zeno Bisoffi, Alberto Antonelli, Gian Maria Rossolini, Simona Gabrielli, Alessandro Bartoloni, and Lorenzo Zammarchi. 2020. "Autochthonous Human and Canine Strongyloides stercoralis Infection in Europe: Report of a Human Case in An Italian Teen and Systematic Review of the Literature" Pathogens 9, no. 6: 439. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens9060439

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop