Next Article in Journal
The Microbial Resource Research Infrastructure MIRRI: Strength through Coordination
Next Article in Special Issue
Metabolic Interactions in the Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT): Host, Commensal, Probiotics, and Bacteriophage Influences
Previous Article in Journal
Bioactivities of Ketones Terpenes: Antifungal Effect on F. verticillioides and Repellents to Control Insect Fungal Vector, S. zeamais
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gut Microbiota and Host Reaction in Liver Diseases
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 3
Issue 4
10.3390/microorganisms3040866
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Hydrogen Sulfide in Physiology and Diseases of the Digestive Tract

by
Sudha B. Singh
1,2 and
Henry C. Lin
1,*
1
Section of Gastroenterology, Medicine Service, New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA
2
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2015, 3(4), 866-889; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms3040866
Submission received: 1 September 2015 / Revised: 19 October 2015 / Accepted: 4 November 2015 / Published: 12 November 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host-Gut Microbiota Metabolic Interactions)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a Janus-faced molecule. On one hand, several toxic functions have been attributed to H2S and exposure to high levels of this gas is extremely hazardous to health. On the other hand, H2S delivery based clinical therapies are being developed to combat inflammation, visceral pain, oxidative stress related tissue injury, thrombosis and cancer. Since its discovery, H2S has been found to have pleiotropic effects on physiology and health. H2S is a gasotransmitter that exerts its effect on different systems, such as gastrointestinal, neuronal, cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, and hepatic systems. In the gastrointestinal tract, in addition to H2S production by mammalian cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS), cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE), H2S is also generated by the metabolic activity of resident gut microbes, mainly by colonic Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria (SRB) via a dissimilatory sulfate reduction (DSR) pathway. In the gut, H2S regulates functions such as inflammation, ischemia/ reperfusion injury and motility. H2S derived from gut microbes has been found to be associated with gastrointestinal disorders such as ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease and irritable bowel syndrome. This underscores the importance of gut microbes and their production of H2S on host physiology and pathophysiology.

1. Introduction

H2S is a notoriously toxic gas. Exposure to >700 ppm can cause sudden death. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) exposure limit is 20 parts per million (ppm). Accidents and deaths following exposure to high concentrations of H2S have been documented [1,2,3,4]. Numerous reports have identified respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic, neurological outcomes as a result of exposure to high levels of H2S. The most common sources of H2S include crude petroleum, hot springs, putrefying water and sewage plants. This gas is also produced by both vertebrates and invertebrates, in addition to prokaryotes and plants. Despite its lethal effects, H2S is a vital molecule for living organisms including humans. Abundant experimental evidences exist that indicate a role of H2S in physiology and pathophysiology. Many excellent reviews have discussed the biological roles of H2S with several focusing on its role in the gastrointestinal tract [5,6,7,8,9]. H2S is considered the third gasotransmitter, in addition to nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO), and is involved in inflammation, gut motility, oxidative stress, ulcer healing, vascular tone, neuromodulation, cryoprotection, memory formation, hormone secretion, apoptosis and many other vital biologic functions. Some of these processes are also targets for CO and NO although the mechanism of actions of these other gaseous signaling molecules may be different [10,11].
Based on its role in a wide range of organ systems, novel therapies are being attempted that aim at either suppressing H2S production or enhancing its availability [12]. H2S is found in many tissues, including the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, which is a major site of H2S production. H2S in the GI tract is produced not only by the enzymes CBS [13] and CSE [14] of the host but also by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) that are resident microbes using the fermentation by-product hydrogen as the substrate. Normally, the production of this toxic gas is primarily compartmentalized to the colon since the majority of the gut microbial community is compartmentalized to the distal end of the gastrointestinal tract [15]. Recent progress in the studies of physiological function of H2S in the gut, with a special emphasis on bacteria-derived H2S is discussed in this review.

2. Sources of H2S

2.1. Mammalian H2S

Endogenous H2S is found in various tissues such as central nervous system, liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, lungs and gastrointestinal tract. H2S is generated enzymatically through the reverse transsulfuration pathway by the activity of cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS), cystathionine-γ-lyase (CSE), and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3MST) [16,17,18] (Figure 1). Non-enzymatic pathways of H2S generation exist and reduce elemental sulfur to H2S [19]. However, these pathways only account for a small quantity of H2S produced in the mammalian tissues. CBS and CSE produce H2S using l-cysteine and homocysteine as substrates. 3-MST does so via the intermediate synthesis of 3-mercaptopyruvate, which is produced by cysteine aminotranferase (CAT) using cysteine as a substrate.
Microorganisms 03 00866 g001 1024
Figure 1. Biosynthesis of H2S by mammalian cells.
Figure 1. Biosynthesis of H2S by mammalian cells.
Microorganisms 03 00866 g001
A fourth pathway also exist that utilizes d-Cysteine as a substrate and involves enzymes d-amino oxidase and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase specifically in the cerebellum and kidney [20]. CBS and CSE are found in the cytosol while 3-MST is found in mitochondria as well as cytosol [21]. CBS, CSE and CAT use pyridoxal 5′-phosphate (PLP) as a cofactor, whereas 3-MST uses zinc as a cofactor. CBS and CSE are differentially expressed in various organs, such as the liver, kidney, brain, intestine, heart, lung [22,23,24], and in various cell types, such as interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), enteric neurons [25] and smooth muscle cells [26]. By and large, CBS is predominant in the nervous system and CSE in the cardiovascular system. MST has been detected in hippocampal pyramidal neurons [16] cardiomyocytes, glial cells, kidney cells, liver cells and vascular smooth muscle cells [21,27].

2.2. Intestinal H2S Production by Resident Microbes

H2S in the intestine is also produced by some members of the resident gut bacterial community. Analysis of fecal H2S revealed that 50% of fecal H2S is derived from bacteria as evident by the dependence of only 50% H2S synthesis on pyridoxal 5′-phosphate(P-5-P) and that in germ free mice, fecal H2S synthesis is only 50% of that in observed in colonized mice [28].
Microbial communities are an integral part of human gastrointestinal tract and carry out vital functions such as digestion, production of vitamins and other nutrients, resistance to colonization by invading pathogens and mucosal immunity [29,30]. Bacterial fermentation of complex carbohydrates in the colon releases large amounts of hydrogen, which is consumed by hydrogenotrophs that include methanogens, acetogens or sulfate-reducing bacteria, which produce methane, acetate, or H2S, respectively. Methanogens and SRB compete for H2 and, thus, usually one of these hydrogenotrophs predominates in the large intestine. When methanogenesis is the dominant pathway for handling fermentation derived H2, methane appears in the exhaled breath (methane excretor).
Among the most prominent producers of H2S are sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) [31,32]. On the basis of the prevalence of methane excretors, sulfate reduction is the dominant hydrogenotrophic pathway in ~60% of humans. Enumeration of SRB by culture dependent methods revealed a range of 103–1011 bacteria per gm of human feces [33]. SRB belong to the class δ-Proteobacteria and produce H2S using the enzyme complex dissimilatory sulfite reductases (DSR) (Figure 2). The most predominant genus in this category is Desulfovibrio, which utilize lactate and hydrogen as substrate. Other genera being Desulfobacter, Desulfomonas, Desulfobulbus, and Desulfotomaculum. The SRB use sulfate as a terminal electron acceptor for respiration, with the concomitant production of H2S [15]. Other bacterial species belonging to different genera, such as Streptococcus, Fusobacterium, Salmonella, Enterobacter, and Helicobacter also produce H2S from l-cysteine, by the activity of cysteine desulfhydrase [34,35,36,37,38]. An excellent review by Carbonero, et al. summarizes microbial pathways of sulfur metabolism in the colon [39].
Microorganisms 03 00866 g002 1024
Figure 2. Dissimilatory sulfate reduction by SRB. Sulfate is activated to adenosine-5-phosphosulfate (APS) by ATP sulfurylase (ATPS), also known as sulfate adenylyltransferase (Sat). The second enzyme, APS reductase (Apr), converts APS to sulfite, which is reduced to sulfide by dissimilatory sulfite reductase (Dsr).
Figure 2. Dissimilatory sulfate reduction by SRB. Sulfate is activated to adenosine-5-phosphosulfate (APS) by ATP sulfurylase (ATPS), also known as sulfate adenylyltransferase (Sat). The second enzyme, APS reductase (Apr), converts APS to sulfite, which is reduced to sulfide by dissimilatory sulfite reductase (Dsr).
Microorganisms 03 00866 g002
Colonic bacteria are responsible for generating vast quantities of H2S. Up to 1000 ppm of H2S has been detected in the rat cecum [40]. Analysis of flatus composition of human subjects revealed H2S concentration in the range of 0.2 to 30 ppm [41]. A high level of H2S induces DNA damage, inhibits cytochrome c oxidase, and inhibits butyrate oxidation. Weisiger et al. reported comparable thiol S-methyltransferase activity in colonic mucosa and liver [42] where methylation of H2S was the suggested mechanism for detoxification of H2S. The rate of methylation of H2S was found to be much lower (10−13 mol/min per milligram) and could not account for the rapid detoxification of H2S. Moreover, metabolism of H2S was found to be unresponsive to S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine, an inhibitor of S-methyltransferases [43]. Later, it was found that oxidation of H2S to thiosulfate was an efficient mechanism by which colonic mucosa dispose off this toxic gas [44]. It was observed that H2S was metabolized to thiosulfate by cecal and right colonic mucosa at a rate that was about twenty times greater than that of the gastric or small bowel mucosa and eight times greater than that of the liver [41]. H2S is also excreted out as flatus or in feces.

3. Impact of SRB, Bacterial Derived H2S and Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on Host

3.1. SRB and Inflammatory Diseases

Gut microbes control many aspects of human physiology and are key players in health and disease. An imbalance in the number or composition of gut microbes (dysbiosis), which can be triggered by disruptors such as antibiotics, stress, Western diet and infection, has been linked to a plethora of diseases such as obesity [45], Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [46], Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) [47,48], cardiovascular diseases [49], type 2 diabetes [50] and cancer [51]. Dysbiosis tips the delicate microbial balance and often accompanies intestinal inflammation. This altered environment may promote opportunistic growth of Gram-negative members of families Enterobacteriaceae and Desulfovibrionaceae. Moreover bacteria, such as SRB, are resistant to broad spectrum antibiotics [52] as bacterial H2S is a defense mechanism against antimicrobials [53]. This characteristic of SRB may favor a bloom of these bacteria in the setting of repeated antibiotic use.
A high number of SRB have been found in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) [54]. SRB was also observed in higher number in feces of IBD Crohn’s Disease (CD and UC) patients [55]. In addition, fecal H2S levels were reported to be greater in UC compared to controls [56,57]. Interestingly, consumption of meat and high sulfur or sulfate containing diet that could promote the production of H2S was associated with an increased likelihood of relapse for UC patients further suggesting a role of these microbes in the pathogenesis of UC [58]. 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), an anti-inflammatory medication commonly prescribed for UC, also inhibits SRB growth and production of H2S suggesting an additional explanation for its efficacy [59]. H2S inhibits oxidation of n-butyrate in colonic epithelial cells, thus compromising barrier function by inducing an energy deficit [60]. This may explain the increase in intestinal permeability in UC [61]. These studies also suggested that SRB growth may be favored under inflammatory conditions. However, other reports show that fecal H2S [62] and SRB [57] were not elevated in UC. Moreover, blocking bacterial H2S by bismuth did not show an improvement in the mouse model of dextran sulfate induced colitis [63]. However, this model of chemical colitis only partially reproduce the phenotype seen in ulcerative colitis in humans.
SRB were also found to be associated with other inflammatory conditions such periodontitis [64] and increased levels of H2S have also been detected in periodontal pockets [65]. SRB and H2S were also found to be much higher in Pouchitis [66]. SRB were found in greater number in constipation-predominant IBS patients compared to controls [67]. Desulfovibrionaceae were also found to be higher in number in animal models of metabolic syndrome [68]. Figure 3 summarizes the association of SRB with diseases. In addition, several case studies have reported D. desulfuricans bacteremia under different clinical conditions [69,70,71]. Some studies have highlighted the effects of probiotic and prebiotic treatments on SRB population in the gut. In one report, 4 weeks of oral consumption of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum P-8 Lp-8 treatment caused a significant reduction of Desulfovibrio genus in human volunteers [72]. In another study, mice fed with the prebiotic glycomacropeptide (GMP) showed a dramatic reduction in fecal load of Desulfovibrio and also reduced levels of proinflammatory cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-1β [73].
Microorganisms 03 00866 g003 1024
Figure 3. Association of SRB with human diseases. The evidence linking SRB with diseases is inconclusive.
Figure 3. Association of SRB with human diseases. The evidence linking SRB with diseases is inconclusive.
Microorganisms 03 00866 g003
In another diet-based analysis, when obese subjects were given diets to balance their gut microbes, weight loss was accompanied by a decrease in H2S-producing families Desulfovibrionaceae and Enterobacteriaceae (Escherichia, Shigella, Klebsiella, and Citrobacter), along with a decrease in proinflammatory Tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) and Interleukin (IL-6) cytokines [74]. There are conflicting reports including another study showing that Desulfovibrio levels were much lower in obese/overweight children compared to controls [75]. Thus, the role of SRB and SRB derived H2S in the pathogenesis of a disease condition, such as obesity, remain unclear. Even as mounting evidence suggests that SRB is associated with inflammatory conditions, it is not clear whether this is an epiphenomenon or SRB are the etiological agents of the disease.
In addition to SRB, other H2S-producing gut bacteria, such a Fusobacterium, have also been found to be associated with IBD [76]. Fusobacterium isolated from IBD patients induced inflammatory responses in colonic cell lines [77]. Genomic analysis of the colorectal carcinomas revealed the expansion of Fusobacterium on the mucosal surface of these cancers [78]. Since H2S is a known genotoxic agent [79], it is plausible that increased H2S production as a result of expansion of Fusobacterium may be the link between Fusobacterium and colorectal tumors. Moreover, E. coli, another H2S-producing enteric bacteria, has also been found to be associated with CD and colorectal cancer [80]. The connection between H2S-producing gut bacteria and inflammation was further supported by the finding that Bilophila wadsworthia, a sulfite-reducing bacteria that generates H2S similar to Desulfovibrio was higher in concentration in mice fed with high fat diet and this was associated with proinflammatory responses in genetically susceptible mice [81].
H2S production by these gut microbes can also lead to secondary effects including promoting the growth of pathogens. H2S in the gut is generally detoxified to thiosulfate by the colonic mucosa. Under the conditions of inflammation, reactive oxygen species (ROS), generated by the activity of neutrophils, oxidize thiosulfate to tetrathionate. Salmonella is capable of readily utilizing tetrathionate as electron acceptor and this confers growth advantage for this enteric pathogen [82] in overcoming colonization resistance. Moreover, Salmonella also produces H2S from thiosulfate [83,84]. Thus, H2S production by these bacteria may allow positive feedback favoring growth of pathogens such as Salmonella.

3.2. Effects of SRB Activity on Host

What is the effect of SRB and other H2S-producing gut microbes on host physiology and pathophysiology? Are SRB beneficial or harmful? Can this information be utilized to develop novel therapies to tackle inflammatory diseases based on targeting SRB?
Studies on effect of LPS derived from SRB provide further clues about potential impact of these bacteria on the host. LPS from D. desulfuricans causes secretion of proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 and neutrophils, basophils, and T-cell attracting chemokine IL-8 by human gingival fibroblast (HGF-1) cell line [85] and in human umbilical vein endothelial (HUVEC) cells [86] and IL-6 by Tamm–Horsfall protein 1 (THP1) cells [87], whereas it downregulated IL-8 secretion by Colonic adenocarcinoma (Caco-2 cells) [88]. This inconsistency in these results could be due to the fact that Caco-2 cells are derived from colon, which is a natural habitat for SRB and thus may respond differently to these bacteria or its products. It would be valuable to study if Desulfovibrio-derived LPS triggers the production of mammalian or bacterial H2S. Interestingly, E.coli LPS can cause increase in plasma H2S levels in mice along with inflammation and increased expression of CSE [89].
However, the direct impact of SRB on host physiology remains unknown. One possible way to study the unilateral effects of SRB on the host is by introducing exogenous SRB into the host. One such study was conducted by Rey et al., where gnotobiotic mice were colonized with gut bacterial species with or without Desulfovibrio piger and these mice were fed different diets [90]. High levels of cecal H2S were observed in mice colonized with D. piger compared to mice without D. piger. In addition, there was a decrease in the host consumption of amino acids in mice inoculated with D. piger. Mice colonized by D. piger had lower mRNA levels of several Ig subclasses such as IGHM and IGHA1 and claudin-4 (a tight junction protein) but high levels of matrix metalloproteinase-7; however, there was no significant effect on the gut barrier integrity. Another study highlighted the role of SRB in the biotransformation of environmental toxicants such as bacteria-driven thiolation of arsenic that enters the gut through food contaminated with this carcinogen. This activity correlates with the production of H2S by SRB [91].
Oral administration of bacteria into the host is a standard protocol to study the host microbe relationship and has been utilized to understand the effect of probiotics [92,93] and pathogens [94,95] in animal models. Thus, oral administration of SRB in rodents may be used as an important tool to understand the impact of SRB and its production of H2S on physiological functions of the host.

4. Effects of Host-Derived H2S on the Gastrointestinal System

Table 1 summarizes some of the commonly studied functions of H2S in gut physiology and the diseases it is associated with. Most of the physiologic studies on H2S have been carried out by either manipulating the endogenous mammalian source of H2S such as CBS and CSE by gain or loss of function or by addition of exogenous donors of H2S, such as sodium hydrosulfide (NaHS), and slow releasing donors, such as GYY4137. Some of these functions are discussed below.
Table
Table 1. H2S in gut physiology and diseases.
Table 1. H2S in gut physiology and diseases.
PhysiologyDisease
Protection against I/R InjuryInflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammation (Pro-/Anti-inflammatory)Colitis
Motility (Excitation/Inhibitory)Pouchitis
Nociception (Pro-/Anti-nociceptive)Periodontitis
Colonic SecretionHalitosis
Ulcer HealingSepsis
AntioxidantObesity
Apoptosis

4.1. H2S in Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

Ischemia followed by reperfusion (I/R) is a commonly occurring pathological condition that can lead to tissue and organ damage. Several clinical events are almost universally associated with some degree of I/R injury including bypass surgery, stroke, organ transplantation and myocardial infarction. Several studies have provided evidence for a protective role of H2S in I/R injury. In the heart, both in vivo and in vitro studies using endogenous and exogenous sources of H2S have highlighted the protective role of H2S on myocardial I/R. [96,97,98] that appears to involve autophagy [99,100]. Similarly, studies have shown that H2S protects against hepatic [101,102,103] renal [104,105,106] and brain I/R injury [107,108].
In the intestine, I/R injury can result in multiorgan failure and systemic inflammation and is associated with significant mortality and morbidity [109]. A handful of studies have confirmed the role of H2S in I/R injury. Liu et al. demonstrated that an H2S donor, NaHS protected rats from severe intestinal I/R injury by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase and peroxidase [110,111,112,113]. In another study, Pan et al. showed that NaHS protected rats from intestinal I/R injury in response to cardiac arrest followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Protective effects of NaHS may be mediated through reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inhibition of inflammation, apoptosis and HIF-1α activation. [114]. Furthermore, H2S protected enterocytes from hypoxia as evidenced by reduced apoptotic index [115]. H2S protected against injury 1 h and 2 h after ischemia and preserved the crypt villi height. H2S donor added 24 h prior to I/R reduced post ischemic intestinal mitochondria dysfunction and this was mediated by calcium-activated big potassium (BKCa) channels [116]. In addition, preconditioning of the small bowel with the exogenous H2S donor NaHS inhibited leukocyte rolling (LR) and adhesion (LA) induced by I/R through a p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism [117]. Thus, protective effects of H2S on I/R injury of different organs are mediated largely by its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic properties. A detailed review of role of H2S in I/R injury is discussed in an excellent review by Wu et al. [118].

4.2. H2S in Intestinal Inflammation

Reports of the role of H2S in inflammation are, at times, diametrical. H2S can have a pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory effects depending on what model system is used, the source of H2S (exogenous versus endogenous), the bioavailability of H2S (slow versus fast release H2S donors) and the route of administration. The effects of these factors are exemplified by reports in experimental models of sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP). Administration of NaHS (~5.6 mg/kg) subcutaneously improved survival in the experimental C57BL6/J mouse model of sepsis before and after the onset of CLP, decreased TNF-α and IL-10 cytokine production, decreased caspase-3 activation, increased bacterial clearance and decreased expression of CHOP [119]. In contrast, in a study by Zhang et al. in Swiss mice, CLP-induced systemic inflammation was associated with increased plasma levels of H2S and higher levels of CSE gene expression and treatment with NaHS (10mg/kg i.p.) further exacerbated the CLP-induced inflammation while administration of DL-propargylglycine (PAG; 50 mg/kg i.p.) an inhibitor of CSE, reversed these effects [120]. A follow-up study by Zhang et al. demonstrated that the pro-inflammatory effect of H2S donor NaHS (10mg/kg i.p.) on CLP associated sepsis depended on nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB) activation [121]. Treatment with PAG (50 mg/kg i.p.) decreased IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. When a higher dose of NaHS was used intraperitoneally rather than subcutaneously, a clear pro-inflammatory effect of H2S (NaHS; 14 μmol/kg i.p.) could be shown in a LPS-induced model of endotoxic shock in male Swiss mice where PAG (50 mg/kg i.p.) reduced this effect [89]. Thus, it appears that dosage and route of administration of NaHS may dictate whether the effects of NaHS will be pro- (high dose, i.p.) or anti-inflammatory (low dose, subcutaneous). The proinflammatory effect mediated by H2S may be dependent on the extracellular signal-related kinases (ERK) pathway [122]. Once again, in this study, NaHS was administered by i.p. ERK dependent pro-inflammatory effects of H2S were also observed in human monocytic cell line U937 [123].
Another factor that may influence the beneficial versus deleterious role of H2S in inflammation is the choice of H2S donor, which may determine bioavailability of H2S. While many reports tested the effect of the fast releasing H2S donor NaHS, some studies have tested the effect of H2S using a slow releasing donor GYY4137 (morpholin-4-ium-4-methoxyphenyl (morpholino) phosphinodithioate), which has been shown to exert an anti-inflammatory action in endotoxic shock model in rats [124]. GYY4137 (50 mg/kg, i.p.) administered to rats following LPS treatment decreased the rise in plasma proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and lung myeloperoxidase activity, increased plasma concentration of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, and decreased tissue damage [124]. Anti-inflammatory effects of GYY4137 are more consistently reported across different experiments [125,126,127]. GYY4137 treatment may be physiologically more relevant than using NaHS as this chemical may mimic slow and sustained release of endogenous H2S by cellular enzymes. In comparing the effects of fast releasing NaHS versus slow releasing GYY4137 on LPS treated cultured macrophages, it was found that while GYY4137 clearly and dose-dependently reduced LPS evoked expression of proinflammatory cytokines, the results with NaHS were biphasic [128]. At low concentrations, NaHS did not exhibit any effect on proinflammatory cytokines but at higher concentration, was pro-inflammatory by causing enhancement of LPS-induced expression of IL-1β and TNF-α. In addition, treatment of LPS-exposed RAW 264.7 cells with GYY4137 caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of the activation of NF-kB, whereas NaHS inhibited NF-kB at high concentrations while promoting NF-kB activation at lower concentrations. This study gives additional insight into the discrepancies observed among different H2S donors.
Several other pathways have been reported to explain the anti-inflammatory effects of H2S. H2S showed a protective effect against IFN-γ and TNF-α induced injury of epithelial barrier function in Caco2 cells by blocking NF-kB p65 activation [129]. H2S also prevented NF-kB activation, apoptosis and inflammation upon ischemia/reperfusion I/R injury of the gastric epithelial cells [130]. Another study reported that IL-10 may promote H2S synthesis in the colon which, in turn, exerts a protective effect. Specifically, IL-10 deficient mice fed a vitamin B-deficient diet had low levels of colonic H2S and an increased level of homocysteine in the serum and exhibited severe colonic inflammation [131]. Administration of IL-10 to the IL-10-deficient mice restored colonic H2S synthesis and significantly decreased serum homocysteine levels. H2S donors reduced colitis and H2S inhibitors exacerbated colitis [132,133]. 5-amino-2-hydroxy-benzoic acid 4-(5-thioxo-5H-[1,2]dithiol-3-yl)-phenyl ester hydrochloride ATB-429, a H2S releasing drug has been shown to reduce the severity of colitis [134]. Flannigan et al. reported that protective effects of H2S in experimental colitis are mediated via stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and that the loss of CSE-derived H2S production led to decreased HIF-1α stabilization and exacerbation of colitis [135].
In a recent study by Motta et al., H2S promoted resolution of colonic inflammation by facilitating microbial biofilm and mucus production. Therapeutic delivery of H2S into a hapten-induced colitis mouse model reduced inflammation, restored the microbial biofilm, and increased the production of mucus granules [136]. One mechanism by which H2S resolves inflammation is by reducing leukocyte migration to the site of injury [137] and by enhancing neutrophil apoptosis [138]. In addition, application of H2S to human or murine macrophages increased chemotaxsis of macrophages and the rate of phagocytosis of the bacterium Escherichia coli which resulted in a reduction of the accumulation of inflammatory cells [139]. In addition, H2S also promotes the activity of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 [140], an enzyme that plays crucial role in ulcer healing and resolution of inflammation [141]. Another mechanism by which H2S exerts its anti-inflammatory effect is by involving annexin-A1 pathway [142]. Following the onset of inflammation the l-cysteine/H2S pathway contributes to trigger AnxA1 mobilization, which in turn controls leukocyte trafficking. As discussed in an earlier section, H2S protects against I/R injury and ulcer healing via its anti-inflammatory properties. Thus, based on the existing evidence, it is tempting to assume that H2S is generally anti-inflammatory. However, more physiologically relevant studies are needed.

4.3. H2S in Ulcer Healing

Wallace and colleagues showed that gastric H2S synthesis was increased following induction of ulcer in rat stomach [143]. Administration of l-cysteine, a precursor for H2S synthesis, as well as exogenous H2S donors significantly enhanced gastric ulcer healing, whereas the administration of PAG, an inhibitor of endogenous H2S synthesis, impaired ulcer healing [143]. A recent study indicated that pretreatment with l-cysteine, vitamin B6 (a cofactor for the enzyme CBS) and NaHS protected the gastric mucosa against ethanol-induced gastric lesions [144]. This study corroborated previous findings by Medeiros et al. who demonstrated that administration of PAG reversed gastric protection induced by l-cysteine in an ethanol-induced gastric damage model [145]. However, Chávez et al., presented contradictory findings where PAG treatment conferred protection to the gastric mucosa in ethanol-induced gastric injury [146]. It is possible that the discrepancy in their results is due to the concentration (absolute versus 50% ethanol in the other two studies) and timing of ethanol introduction following PAG (3 h in Chávez et al. versus 30 min in Medeiros et al.) and NaHS administration (2 h versus 30 min). It is also possible that under these different settings, other H2S independent protective pathways may come into play, such as glutathione which is also modulated by l-cysteine and NaHS [145,147]. Nevertheless, Chávez et al. did show the protective effects of l-cysteine on gastric mucosa in their model of ethanol-induced gastric injury. The protective role of H2S on gastric ulcer may be facilitated by its anti-inflammatory effects since NaHS and l-cysteine treatment decreased gastric lesions along with a decrease in mRNA and plasma levels of IL-1β and TNF-α [148]. In another study, PAG increased gastric mucosal ulceration and the number of hemorrhage sites following gastric mucosal damage induced by I/R injury and this effect was attenuated by administration of l-cysteine via inhibition of free radical generation [149]. It was shown that H2S degradation was decreased at the site of ulceration and that local high concentration of H2S may be involved in the repair [150]. In a rat model of water immersion and restraint stress induced gastric ulcers, exposure to H2S reduced gastric ulcer index and also downregulated the expression of GRP78 and caspase 12, markers of endoplasmic reticulum stress [151,152]. Administration of ACS14, a H2S-releasing derivative of aspirin, caused attenuation of gastric damage induced by aspirin. ACS14 also attenuated Aspirin-suppressed superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD-1) expression and GSH activity [153]. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) decreased H2S formation, CSE expression and induced gastric injury, increase in myeloperoxidase (MPO) and TNF-α [154]. Treatment with NaHS significantly reduced these effects whereas treatment with PAG exacerbated gastric injury induced by NSAID. These effects of H2S against gastric injury were mediated through activation of KATP channels since glibenclamide, (KATP channel blocker) reversed effect of NaHS and pinacidil (a KATP opener) attenuated gastric mucosal injury. H2S regulates processes such as inflammation, apoptosis, nociception and I/R injury by activating KATP channels. While it is not clear how H2S activates KATP channels, it has been found that KATP channel is sulfhydrated by H2S [155] and that H2S activated cloned rvKir6.1/rvSUR1 channels by interacting with extracellular cysteine residues.

4.4. H2S in Intestinal Motility

Experimental evidence generally supports an inhibitory role of H2S on gastrointestinal motility [156,157,158,159,160,161]. The negative effect of H2S in some cases is mediated through KATP channels [159,162] but in others, blocking of KATP channels did not affect H2S-induced inhibition [158,163]. The relaxant effect of H2S on colonic motility has also been explained, in part, by its direct inhibition of l-type calcium channel. H2S inhibits both l-type calcium channels and BKCa channels in smooth muscle cells of rat colon [164]. In vascular smooth muscle cells, opening of KATP channels hyperpolarizes cell membrane and inactivates voltage-dependent l-type Ca2+ channels, leading to relaxation of smooth muscle cell and dilation of blood vessel. Recently, it was demonstrated that H2S exerted suppressive effects on colonic contractility by decreasing neurally mediated cholinergic and tachykinergic excitatory pathways [165]. It has been previously shown that H2S significantly reduced cholinergic mediated contractions [158,160]. In another study, NaHS inhibited the contractile activity of smooth muscle cells in rat stomach and jejunum [165]. l-cysteine, a precursor of H2S, inhibited the electrical stimulation (ES) induced contraction of mouse ileum. Contractions increased following the administration of aminooxyacetic acid, an inhibitor of CBS and CSE. The treatment with glibenclamide, a KATP channel blocker, reduced both the l-cysteine response and NaHS-induced inhibition of contractions [166]. The same group later identified that inhibition of electrical field stimulation-induced contractions in ileum by l-cysteine and d,l-homocysteine was decreased by the treatment with 2-aminobicyclo [2.2.1]heptane-2-carboxylate (BCH), an inhibitor of l type and B°+ transporter systems, thus highlighting the role of the amino acid transport system in l-cysteine regulation (via H2S) of motility [167].
A dual excitatory and inhibitory role of H2S was demonstrated in smooth muscle contractility, which was dependent on the dose of NaHS. Typically at lower concentrations, NaHS stimulated the contraction while at higher doses caused relaxation. NaHS also caused a biphasic effect, early transient excitation and late long-lasting inhibition on the motility of rat duodenum jejunum, ileum and colon [168]. The excitatory effects of NaHS were mediated by TRPV1 channels since capsazepine, a TRPV1 antagonist, inhibited this effect. TRPV1 channels are known to be activated by NaHS [169,170] Glibenclamide, on the other hand, did not affect NaHS induced excitatory effect but rather inhibited NaHS-induced long-lasting inhibition on the contraction of muscle strips, indicating the role of KATP channels.

5. Concluding Remarks

Over the last two decades or so, studies have uncovered many roles of H2S in physiology and disease. H2S has been found to have dichotomous effects (stimulatory and inhibitory) on several gastrointestinal processes such as inflammation, contractile responses, nociception, cancer and apoptosis. Thus the biological functions of H2S remain rather confusing and controversial. However, some effects of H2S appear to be unequivocal. H2S has been found to be protective in several animal models of I/R injury in the gastrointestinal tract, brain, lung, kidney and heart. Experimental evidences also point towards the overall protective effects of H2S in colitis via its anti-inflammatory properties. ATB-429, an H2S releasing derivative of mesalamine, seems promising in the treatment of colitis. H2S also protects against gastric injury induced by administration of NSAIDS. Similarly, several other H2S releasing compounds are effective in cancer [171] and arthritis models [172]. Thus, although excessive H2S may be a contributing factor in diseases, the overarching effect of H2S appears to be beneficial.
Owing to its role in several organs systems, tissues and cells, the biological significance of H2S has now been recognized and several H2S releasing compounds are being tested in clinical trials for the treatment of human disorders. However, our knowledge of this important gasotransmitter is far from complete. Interestingly, the multifaceted roles of H2S parallel those of other major gaseous signaling molecules NO and CO. All three regulatory gaseous molecules are synthesized from both the mammalian and microbial sources in the body. All three are hazardous at high concentrations but favorable at low concentrations. In fact, all three gases share many common chemical properties and exert similar biological effects albeit via different mechanisms. Moreover, H2S, CO and NO cross talk and stimulate or inhibit each other to regulate several physiological functions. Given several similarities between H2S, CO and NO in terms of their properties and physiological function, it may be helpful to exploit the lessons learnt from NO and CO to investigate the functions of H2S and to gain a better understanding of its role in health and disease and to develop H2S based therapies.
Lastly, it is important to emphasize the crucial role of gut microbes in host physiology. The impact of bacteria-derived H2S on host physiology and pathophysiology is largely unexplored but crucial area of research. Much work needs to be done to identify the role of bacteria derived H2S on host biological processes. Understanding how bacteria-derived H2S may impact host biology can help us gain a better understanding of underlying mechanism of diseases such as IBS, IBD, and obesity.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by VA Research, Department of Defense Congressional Directed Medical Research Program and the Winkler Bacterial Overgrowth Research Fund.

Author Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to all aspects of the manuscript including study concept and design; editing and reviewing of manuscript, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content.

Conflicts of Interest

Henry Lin has intellectual property rights in the area of gut microbiome.

References

  1. Kfir, H.; Rimbrot, S.; Markel, A. Toxic effects of hydrogen sulfide: Experience with three simultaneous patients. QJM 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chaturvedi, A.K.; Smith, D.R.; Canfield, D.V. A fatality caused by accidental production of hydrogen sulfide. Forensic. Sci. Int. 2001, 123, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Snyder, J.W.; Safir, E.F.; Summerville, G.P.; Middleberg, R.A. Occupational fatality and persistent neurological sequelae after mass exposure to hydrogen sulfide. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 1995, 13, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yalamanchili, C.; Smith, M.D. Acute hydrogen sulfide toxicity due to sewer gas exposure. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2008, 26, e5–e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wang, R. Physiological implications of hydrogen sulfide: A whiff exploration that blossomed. Physiol. Rev. 2012, 92, 791–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Linden, D.R. Hydrogen sulfide signaling in the gastrointestinal tract. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 818–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chan, M.V.; Wallace, J.L. Hydrogen sulfide-based therapeutics and gastrointestinal diseases: Translating physiology to treatments. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2013, 305, G467–G473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Medani, M.; Collins, D.; Docherty, N.G.; Baird, A.W.; O’Connell, P.R.; Winter, D.C. Emerging role of hydrogen sulfide in colonic physiology and pathophysiology. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 1620–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cipriani, S.; Mencarelli, A. Hydrogen sulfide in gastrointestinal and liver physiopathology. Inflamm. Allergy Drug Targets 2011, 10, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Magierowski, M.; Magierowska, K.; Kwiecien, S.; Brzozowski, T. Gaseous mediators nitric oxide and hydrogen sulfide in the mechanism of gastrointestinal integrity, protection and ulcer healing. Molecules 2015, 20, 9099–9123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Farrugia, G.; Szurszewski, J.H. Carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, and nitric oxide as signaling molecules in the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterology 2014, 147, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wallace, J.L.; Wang, R. Hydrogen sulfide-based therapeutics: Exploiting a unique but ubiquitous gasotransmitter. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Stepién, P.P.; Pieniazek, N.J. The use of the l-serine sulfhydrylase assay for the estimation of cystathionine beta-synthase. Anal. Biochem. 1973, 54, 294–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Radcliffe, B.C.; Egan, A.R. A survey of methionine adenosyltransferase and cystathionine gamma-lyase activities in ruminant tissues. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1974, 27, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Peck, H.D. Enzymatic basis for assimilatory and dissimilatory sulfate reduction. J. Bacteriol. 1961, 82, 933–939. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Shibuya, N.; Tanaka, M.; Yoshida, M.; Ogasawara, Y.; Togawa, T.; Ishii, K.; Kimura, H. 3-Mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase produces hydrogen sulfide and bound sulfane sulfur in the brain. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 703–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Stipanuk, M.H.; Beck, P.W. Characterization of the enzymic capacity for cysteine desulphhydration in liver and kidney of the rat. Biochem. J. 1982, 206, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Erickson, P.F.; Maxwell, I.H.; Su, L.J.; Baumann, M.; Glode, L.M. Sequence of cDNA for rat cystathionine gamma-lyase and comparison of deduced amino acid sequence with related Escherichia coli enzymes. Biochem. J. 1990, 269, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Searcy, D.G.; Lee, S.H. Sulfur reduction by human erythrocytes. J. Exp. Zool. 1998, 282, 310–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shibuya, N.; Koike, S.; Tanaka, M.; Ishigami-Yuasa, M.; Kimura, Y.; Ogasawara, Y.; Fukui, K.; Nagahara, N.; Kimura, H. A novel pathway for the production of hydrogen sulfide from d-cysteine in mammalian cells. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Nagahara, N.; Ito, T.; Kitamura, H.; Nishino, T. Tissue and subcellular distribution of mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase in the rat: confocal laser fluorescence and immunoelectron microscopic studies combined with biochemical analysis. Histochem. Cell Biol. 1998, 110, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Martin, G.R.; McKnight, G.W.; Dicay, M.S.; Coffin, C.S.; Ferraz, J.G.P.; Wallace, J.L. Hydrogen sulphide synthesis in the rat and mouse gastrointestinal tract. Dig. Liver Dis. 2010, 42, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Linden, D.R.; Sha, L.; Mazzone, A.; Stoltz, G.J.; Bernard, C.E.; Furne, J.K.; Levitt, M.D.; Farrugia, G.; Szurszewski, J.H. Production of the gaseous signal molecule hydrogen sulfide in mouse tissues. J. Neurochem. 2008, 106, 1577–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zhang, G.; Wang, P.; Yang, G.; Cao, Q.; Wang, R. The inhibitory role of hydrogen sulfide in airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 182, 1188–1195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Schicho, R.; Krueger, D.; Zeller, F.; von Weyhern, C.W.H.; Frieling, T.; Kimura, H.; Ishii, I.; de Giorgio, R.; Campi, B.; Schemann, M. Hydrogen sulfide is a novel prosecretory neuromodulator in the Guinea-pig and human colon. Gastroenterology 2006, 131, 1542–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hosoki, R.; Matsuki, N.; Kimura, H. The possible role of hydrogen sulfide as an endogenous smooth muscle relaxant in synergy with nitric oxide. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1997, 237, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Shibuya, N.; Mikami, Y.; Kimura, Y.; Nagahara, N.; Kimura, H. Vascular endothelium expresses 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase and produces hydrogen sulfide. J. Biochem. 2009, 146, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Flannigan, K.L.; McCoy, K.D.; Wallace, J.L. Eukaryotic and prokaryotic contributions to colonic hydrogen sulfide synthesis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011, 301, G188–G193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Stevens, C.E.; Hume, I.D. Contributions of microbes in vertebrate gastrointestinal tract to production and conservation of nutrients. Physiol Rev. 1998, 78, 393–427. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Littman, D.R.; Pamer, E.G. Role of the commensal microbiota in normal and pathogenic host immune responses. Cell Host Microbe 2011, 10, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Nava, G.M.; Carbonero, F.; Croix, J.A.; Greenberg, E.; Gaskins, H.R. Abundance and diversity of mucosa-associated hydrogenotrophic microbes in the healthy human colon. ISME J. 2012, 6, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Beerens, H.; Romond, C. Sulfate-reducing anaerobic bacteria in human feces. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1977, 30, 1770–1776. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  33. Gibson, G.R.; Macfarlane, G.T.; Cummings, J.H. Occurrence of sulphate-reducing bacteria in human faeces and the relationship of dissimilatory sulphate reduction to methanogenesis in the large gut. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1988, 65, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Claesson, R.; Edlund, M.B.; Persson, S.; Carlsson, J. Production of volatile sulfur compounds by various Fusobacterium species. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 1990, 5, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Takahashi, Y.; Yoshida, A.; Nagata, E.; Hoshino, T.; Oho, T.; Awano, S.; Takehara, T.; Ansai, T. Streptococcus anginosus l-cysteine desulfhydrase gene expression is associated with abscess formation in BALB/c mice. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2011, 26, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lee, H.; Kho, H.-S.; Chung, J.-W.; Chung, S.-C.; Kim, Y.-K. Volatile sulfur compounds produced by Helicobacter pylori. J. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2006, 40, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Metaxas, M.A.; Delwiche, E.A. The l-cysteine desulfhydrase of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1955, 70, 735–737. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  38. Kredich, N.M.; Keenan, B.S.; Foote, L.J. The purification and subunit structure of cysteine desulfhydrase from Salmonella typhimurium. J. Biol. Chem. 1972, 247, 7157–7162. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  39. Carbonero, F.; Benefiel, A.C.; Alizadeh-Ghamsari, A.H.; Gaskins, H.R. Microbial pathways in colonic sulfur metabolism and links with health and disease. Front. Physiol. 2012, 3, 448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Suarez, F.; Furne, J.; Springfield, J.; Levitt, M. Production and elimination of sulfur-containing gases in the rat colon. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 1998, 274, G727–G733. [Google Scholar]
  41. Furne, J.; Springfield, J.; Koenig, T.; DeMaster, E.; Levitt, M.D. Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide and methanethiol to thiosulfate by rat tissues: A specialized function of the colonic mucosa. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2001, 62, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Weisiger, R.A.; Pinkus, L.M.; Jakoby, W.B. Thiol S-methyltransferase: suggested role in detoxication of intestinal hydrogen sulfide. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1980, 29, 2885–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Borchardt, R.T.; Cheng, C.F. Purification and characterization of rat liver microsomal thiol methyltransferase. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1978, 522, 340–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Levitt, M.D.; Furne, J.; Springfield, J.; Suarez, F.; DeMaster, E. Detoxification of hydrogen sulfide and methanethiol in the cecal mucosa. J. Clin. Invest. 1999, 104, 1107–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ley, R.E.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Klein, S.; Gordon, J.I. Microbial ecology: Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 2006, 444, 1022–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Frank, D.N.; Amand, A.L.S.; Feldman, R.A.; Boedeker, E.C.; Harpaz, N.; Pace, N.R. Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 13780–13785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lin, H.C. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth: A framework for understanding irritable bowel syndrome. JAMA 2004, 292, 852–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. König, J.; Brummer, R.J. Alteration of the intestinal microbiota as a cause of and a potential therapeutic option in irritable bowel syndrome. Benef. Microbes 2014, 5, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lam, V.; Su, J.; Koprowski, S.; Hsu, A.; Tweddell, J.S.; Rafiee, P.; Gross, G.J.; Salzman, N.H.; Baker, J.E. Intestinal microbiota determine severity of myocardial infarction in rats. FASEB J. 2012, 26, 1727–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Qin, J.; Li, Y.; Cai, Z.; Li, S.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, F.; Liang, S.; Zhang, W.; Guan, Y.; Shen, D.; et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature 2012, 490, 55–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Borges Canha, M. Role of colonic microbiota in colorectal carcinogenesis: A systematic review. Rev. Esp. Enfermedades Dig. 2015, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ohge, H.; Furne, J.K.; Springfield, J.; Sueda, T.; Madoff, R.D.; Levitt, M.D. The effect of antibiotics and bismuth on fecal hydrogen sulfide and sulfate-reducing bacteria in the rat. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 228, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shatalin, K.; Shatalina, E.; Mironov, A.; Nudler, E. H2S: A universal defense against antibiotics in bacteria. Science 2011, 334, 986–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Gibson, G.R.; Cummings, J.H.; Macfarlane, G.T. Growth and activities of sulphate-reducing bacteria in gut contents of healthy subjects and patients with ulcerative colitis. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1991, 9, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Loubinoux, J.; Bronowicki, J.-P.; Pereira, I.A.C.; Mougenel, J.-L.; Faou, A.E. Sulfate-reducing bacteria in human feces and their association with inflammatory bowel diseases. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2002, 40, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Levine, J.; Ellis, C.J.; Furne, J.K.; Springfield, J.; Levitt, M.D. Fecal hydrogen sulfide production in ulcerative colitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1998, 93, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Pitcher, M.C. The contribution of sulphate reducing bacteria and 5-aminosalicylic acid to faecal sulphide in patients with ulcerative colitis. Gut 2000, 46, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Jowett, S.L.; Seal, C.J.; Pearce, M.S.; Phillips, E.; Gregory, W.; Barton, J.R.; Welfare, M.R. Influence of dietary factors on the clinical course of ulcerative colitis: A prospective cohort study. Gut 2004, 53, 1479–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Edmond, L.M.; Hopkins, M.J.; Magee, E.A.; Cummings, J.H. The effect of 5-aminosalicylic acid-containing drugs on sulfide production by sulfate-reducing and amino acid-fermenting bacteria. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2003, 9, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Roediger, W.E.; Duncan, A.; Kapaniris, O.; Millard, S. Reducing sulfur compounds of the colon impair colonocyte nutrition: implications for ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1993, 104, 802–809. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  61. Den Hond, E.; Hiele, M.; Evenepoel, P.; Peeters, M.; Ghoos, Y.; Rutgeerts, P. In vivo butyrate metabolism and colonic permeability in extensive ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1998, 115, 584–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moore, J.; Babidge, W.; Millard, S.; Roediger, W. Colonic luminal hydrogen sulfide is not elevated in ulcerative colitis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1998, 43, 162–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Furne, J.K.; Suarez, F.L.; Ewing, S.L.; Springfield, J.; Levitt, M.D. Binding of hydrogen sulfide by bismuth does not prevent dextran sulfate-induced colitis in rats. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2000, 45, 1439–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Langendijk, P.S.; Hanssen, J.T.; van der Hoeven, J.S. Sulfate-reducing bacteria in association with human periodontitis. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2000, 27, 943–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Persson, S. Hydrogen sulfide and methyl mercaptan in periodontal pockets. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 1992, 7, 378–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ohge, H.; Furne, J.K.; Springfield, J.; Rothenberger, D.A.; Madoff, R.D.; Levitt, M.D. Association between fecal hydrogen sulfide production and pouchitis. Dis. Colon Rectum 2005, 48, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chassard, C.; Dapoigny, M.; Scott, K.P.; Crouzet, L.; Del’homme, C.; Marquet, P.; Martin, J.C.; Pickering, G.; Ardid, D.; Eschalier, A.; et al. Functional dysbiosis within the gut microbiota of patients with constipated-irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012, 35, 828–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Zhang, C.; Zhang, M.; Wang, S.; Han, R.; Cao, Y.; Hua, W.; Mao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Pang, X.; Wei, C.; et al. Interactions between gut microbiota, host genetics and diet relevant to development of metabolic syndromes in mice. ISME J. 2010, 4, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Verstreken, I.; Laleman, W.; Wauters, G.; Verhaegen, J. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans bacteremia in an immunocompromised host with a liver graft and ulcerative colitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 199–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Goldstein, E.J.; Citron, D.M.; Peraino, V.A.; Cross, S.A. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans bacteremia and review of human Desulfovibrio infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2752–2754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Koyano, S.; Tatsuno, K.; Okazaki, M.; Ohkusu, K.; Sasaki, T.; Saito, R.; Okugawa, S.; Moriya, K. A Case of Liver Abscess with Desulfovibrio Desulfuricans Bacteremia. Case Rep. Infect. Dis. 2015, 2015, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Guo, Z.; Kwok, L.; Ma, C.; Zhang, W.; Lv, Q.; Huang, W.; Zhang, H. Effect of oral consumption of probiotic Lactobacillus planatarum P-8 on fecal microbiota, SIgA, SCFAs, and TBAs of adults of different ages. Nutrition 2014, 30, 776–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sawin, E.A.; de Wolfe, T.J.; Aktas, B.; Stroup, B.M.; Murali, S.G.; Steele, J.L.; Ney, D.M. Glycomacropeptide is a prebiotic that reduces Desulfovibrio bacteria, increases cecal short chain fatty acids and is anti-inflammatory in mice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2015, 309, G590–G601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Xiao, S.; Fei, N.; Pang, X.; Shen, J.; Wang, L.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; Li, M.; et al. A gut microbiota-targeted dietary intervention for amelioration of chronic inflammation underlying metabolic syndrome. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2014, 87, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Karlsson, C.L.; Onnerfält, J.; Xu, J.; Molin, G.; Ahrné, S.; Thorngren-Jerneck, K. The microbiota of the gut in preschool children with normal and excessive body weight. Obesity 2012, 20, 2257–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Strauss, J.; Kaplan, G.G.; Beck, P.L.; Rioux, K.; Panaccione, R.; Devinney, R.; Lynch, T.; Allen-Vercoe, E. Invasive potential of gut mucosa-derived Fusobacterium nucleatum positively correlates with IBD status of the host. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2011, 17, 1971–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Dharmani, P.; Strauss, J.; Ambrose, C.; Allen-Vercoe, E.; Chadee, K. Fusobacterium nucleatum infection of colonic cells stimulates MUC2 mucin and tumor necrosis factor alpha. Infect. Immun. 2011, 79, 2597–2607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Kostic, A.D.; Gevers, D.; Pedamallu, C.S.; Michaud, M.; Duke, F.; Earl, A.M.; Ojesina, A.I.; Jung, J.; Bass, A.J.; Tabernero, J.; et al. Genomic analysis identifies association of Fusobacterium with colorectal carcinoma. Genome Res. 2012, 22, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Attene-Ramos, M.S.; Wagner, E.D.; Plewa, M.J.; Gaskins, H.R. Evidence that hydrogen sulfide is a genotoxic agent. Mol. Cancer Res. 2006, 4, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Martin, H.M.; Campbell, B.J.; Hart, C.A.; Mpofu, C.; Nayar, M.; Singh, R.; Englyst, H.; Williams, H.F.; Rhodes, J.M. Enhanced Escherichia coli adherence and invasion in Crohn’s disease and colon cancer. Gastroenterology 2004, 127, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Devkota, S.; Wang, Y.; Musch, M.W.; Leone, V.; Fehlner-Peach, H.; Nadimpalli, A.; Antonopoulos, D.A.; Jabri, B.; Chang, E.B. Dietary-fat-induced taurocholic acid promotes pathobiont expansion and colitis in Il10-/- mice. Nature 2012, 487, 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Winter, S.E.; Thiennimitr, P.; Winter, M.G.; Butler, B.P.; Huseby, D.L.; Crawford, R.W.; Russell, J.M.; Bevins, C.L.; Adams, L.G.; Tsolis, R.M.; et al. Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella. Nature 2010, 467, 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Barrett, E.L.; Clark, M.A. Tetrathionate reduction and production of hydrogen sulfide from thiosulfate. Microbiol. Rev. 1987, 51, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Clark, M.A.; Barrett, E.L. The phs gene and hydrogen sulfide production by Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 1987, 169, 2391–2397. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  85. Dzierzewicz, Z.; Szczerba, J.; Lodowska, J.; Wolny, D.; Gruchlik, A.; Orchel, A.; Weglarz, L. The role of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans lipopolysaccharides in modulation of periodontal inflammation through stimulation of human gingival fibroblasts. Arch. Oral Biol. 2010, 55, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Weglarz, L.; Dzierzewicz, Z.; Skop, B.; Orchel, A.; Parfiniewicz, B.; Wiśniowska, B.; Swiatkowska, L.; Wilczok, T. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans lipopolysaccharides induce endothelial cell IL-6 and IL-8 secretion and E-selectin and VCAM-1 expression. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2003, 8, 991–1003. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  87. Zhang-Sun, W.; Augusto, L.A.; Zhao, L.; Caroff, M. Desulfovibrio desulfuricans isolates from the gut of a single individual: Structural and biological lipid a characterization. FEBS Lett. 2015, 589, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Weglarz, L.; Dzierzewicz, Z.; Orchel, A.; Szczerba, J.; Jaworska-Kik, M.; Wilczok, T. Biological activity of Desulfovibrio desulfuricans lipopolysaccharides evaluated via interleukin-8 secretion by Caco-2 cells. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2003, 38, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  89. Li, L.; Bhatia, M.; Zhu, Y.Z.; Zhu, Y.C.; Ramnath, R.D.; Wang, Z.J.; Anuar, F.B.M.; Whiteman, M.; Salto-Tellez, M.; Moore, P.K. Hydrogen sulfide is a novel mediator of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in the mouse. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 1196–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Rey, F.E.; Gonzalez, M.D.; Cheng, J.; Wu, M.; Ahern, P.P.; Gordon, J.I. Metabolic niche of a prominent sulfate-reducing human gut bacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 13582–13587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Rubin, S.C.; Alava, P.; Zekker, I.; Laing, G.D.; van de Wiele, T. Arsenic thiolation and the role of sulfate-reducing bacteria from the human intestinal tract. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 817–822. [Google Scholar]
  92. Wang, B.; Xu, H.; Wei, H.; Zeng, Z.; Xu, F. Oral administration of Bifidobacterim bifidum for modulating microflora, acid and bile resistance, and physiological indices in mice. Can. J. Microbiol. 2015, 61, 155–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Ma, Y.; Liu, J.; Hou, J.; Dong, Y.; Lu, Y.; Jin, L.; Cao, R.; Li, T.; Wu, J. Oral administration of recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing HSP65 and tandemly repeated P277 reduces the incidence of type I diabetes in non-obese diabetic mice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Nakajima, M.; Arimatsu, K.; Kato, T.; Matsuda, Y.; Minagawa, T.; Takahashi, N.; Ohno, H.; Yamazaki, K. Oral Administration of P. gingivalis induces dysbiosis of gut microbiota and impaired barrier function leading to dissemination of enterobacteria to the liver. PLoS ONE 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lyte, M.; Li, W.; Opitz, N.; Gaykema, R.P.; Goehler, L.E. Induction of anxiety-like behavior in mice during the initial stages of infection with the agent of murine colonic hyperplasia Citrobacter rodentium. Physiol. Behav. 2006, 89, 350–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Meng, G.; Wang, J.; Xiao, Y.; Bai, W.; Xie, L.; Shan, L.; Moore, P.K.; Ji, Y. GYY4137 protects against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury by attenuating oxidative stress and apoptosis in rats. J. Biomed. Res. 2015, 29, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  97. Sun, Y.-G.; Wang, X.-Y.; Chen, X.; Shen, C.-X.; Li, Y.-G. Hydrogen sulfide improves cardiomyocytes electrical remodeling post ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  98. Sun, W.-H.; Liu, F.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, Y.-C. Hydrogen sulfide decreases the levels of ROS by inhibiting mitochondrial complex IV and increasing SOD activities in cardiomyocytes under ischemia/reperfusion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 421, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Xie, H.; Xu, Q.; Jia, J.; Ao, G.; Sun, Y.; Hu, L.; Alkayed, N.J.; Wang, C.; Cheng, J. Hydrogen sulfide protects against myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury by activating AMP-activated protein kinase to restore autophagic flux. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 458, 632–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Jiang, H.; Xiao, J.; Kang, B.; Zhu, X.; Xin, N.; Wang, Z. PI3K/SGK1/GSK3β signaling pathway Is involved in inhibition of autophagy in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes exposed to hypoxia/reoxygenation by hydrogen sulfide. Exp. Cell Res. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Shimada, S.; Fukai, M.; Wakayama, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Kobayashi, N.; Kimura, T.; Yamashita, K.; Kamiyama, T.; Shimamura, T.; Taketomi, A.; et al. Hydrogen sulfide augments survival signals in warm ischemia and reperfusion of the mouse liver. Surg. Today 2015, 45, 892–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Cheng, P.; Wang, F.; Chen, K.; Shen, M.; Dai, W.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, C.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; et al. Hydrogen sulfide ameliorates ischemia/reperfusion-induced hepatitis by inhibiting apoptosis and autophagy pathways. Mediators Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 935251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Zhang, Q.; Fu, H.; Zhang, H.; Xu, F.; Zou, Z.; Liu, M.; Wang, Q.; Miao, M.; Shi, X. Hydrogen sulfide preconditioning protects rat liver against ischemia/reperfusion injury by activating Akt-GSK-3β signaling and inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Bos, E.M.; Wang, R.; Snijder, P.M.; Boersema, M.; Damman, J.; Fu, M.; Moser, J.; Hillebrands, J.-L.; Ploeg, R.J.; Yang, G.; et al. Cystathionine γ-lyase protects against renal ischemia/reperfusion by modulating oxidative stress. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 759–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Han, S.J.; Kim, J.I.; Park, J.-W.; Park, K.M. Hydrogen sulfide accelerates the recovery of kidney tubules after renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 2015, 30, 1497–1506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Azizi, F.; Seifi, B.; Kadkhodaee, M.; Ahghari, P. Administration of hydrogen sulfide protects ischemia reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury by reducing the oxidative stress. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Dai, H.-B.; Ji, X.; Zhu, S.-H.; Hu, Y.-M.; Zhang, L.-D.; Miao, X.-L.; Ma, R.-M.; Duan, M.-L.; Li, W.-Y. Hydrogen sulphide and mild hypothermia activate the CREB signaling pathway and prevent ischemia-reperfusion injury. BMC Anesthesiol. 2015, 15, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Yu, Q.; Lu, Z.; Tao, L.; Yang, L.; Guo, Y.; Yang, Y.; Sun, X.; Ding, Q. ROS-Dependent Neuroprotective Effects of NaHS in Ischemia Brain Injury Involves the PARP/AIF Pathway. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 36, 1539–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Pope, M.R.; Bukovnik, U.; Tomich, J.M.; Fleming, S.D. Small β2-glycoprotein I peptides protect from intestinal ischemia reperfusion injury. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 5047–5056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Liu, H.; Bai, X.-B.; Shi, S.; Cao, Y.-X. Hydrogen sulfide protects from intestinal ischaemia-reperfusion injury in rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2009, 61, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Parks, D.A.; Bulkley, G.B.; Granger, D.N.; Hamilton, S.R.; McCord, J.M. Ischemic injury in the cat small intestine: Role of superoxide radicals. Gastroenterology 1982, 82, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  112. Schoenberg, M.H.; Fredholm, B.B.; Haglund, U.; Jung, H.; Sellin, D.; Younes, M.; Schildberg, F.W. Studies on the oxygen radical mechanism involved in the small intestinal reperfusion damage. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1985, 124, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Younes, M.; Mohr, A.; Schoenberg, M.H.; Schildberg, F.W. Inhibition of lipid peroxidation by superoxide dismutase following regional intestinal ischemia and reperfusion. Res. Exp. Med. 1987, 187, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Pan, H.; Chen, D.; Liu, B.; Xie, X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, G. Effects of sodium hydrosulfide on intestinal mucosal injury in a rat model of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Life Sci. 2013, 93, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Henderson, P.W.; Weinstein, A.L.; Sung, J.; Singh, S.P.; Nagineni, V.; Spector, J.A. Hydrogen sulfide attenuates ischemia-reperfusion injury in in vitro and in vivo models of intestine free tissue transfer. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2010, 125, 1670–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Liu, Y.; Kalogeris, T.; Wang, M.; Zuidema, M.Y.; Wang, Q.; Dai, H.; Davis, M.J.; Hill, M.A.; Korthuis, R.J. Hydrogen sulfide preconditioning or neutrophil depletion attenuates ischemia-reperfusion-induced mitochondrial dysfunction in rat small intestine. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2012, 302, G44–G54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Yusof, M.; Kamada, K.; Kalogeris, T.; Gaskin, F.S.; Korthuis, R.J. Hydrogen sulfide triggers late-phase preconditioning in postischemic small intestine by an NO- and p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2009, 296, H868–H876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Wu, D.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Xue, M.; Ji, A.; Li, Y. Role of hydrogen sulfide in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Ferlito, M.; Wang, Q.; Fulton, W.B.; Colombani, P.M.; Marchionni, L.; Fox-Talbot, K.; Paolocci, N.; Steenbergen, C. Hydrogen sulfide [corrected] increases survival during sepsis: protective effect of CHOP inhibition. J. Immunol. 2014, 192, 1806–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Zhang, H.; Zhi, L.; Moore, P.K.; Bhatia, M. Role of hydrogen sulfide in cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis in the mouse. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2006, 290, L1193–L1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Zhang, H.; Zhi, L.; Moochhala, S.; Moore, P.K.; Bhatia, M. Hydrogen sulfide acts as an inflammatory mediator in cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis in mice by upregulating the production of cytokines and chemokines via NF-kB. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2007, 292, L960–L971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Zhang, H.; Moochhala, S.M.; Bhatia, M. Endogenous hydrogen sulfide regulates inflammatory response by activating the erk pathway in polymicrobial sepsis. J. Immunol. 2008, 181, 4320–4331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Zhi, L.; Ang, A.D.; Zhang, H.; Moore, P.K.; Bhatia, M. Hydrogen sulfide induces the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines in human monocyte cell line U937 via the ERK-NF-kappa B pathway. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2007, 81, 1322–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Li, L.; Salto-Tellez, M.; Tan, C.-H.; Whiteman, M.; Moore, P.K. GYY4137, a novel hydrogen sulfide-releasing molecule, protects against endotoxic shock in the rat. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2009, 47, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Wu, Z.; Peng, H.; Du, Q.; Lin, W.; Liu, Y. GYY4137, a hydrogen sulfide‑releasing molecule, inhibits the inflammatory response by suppressing the activation of nuclear factor‑kappa B and mitogen‑activated protein kinases in Coxsackie virus B3‑infected rat cardiomyocytes. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 11, 1837–1844. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Liu, Z.; Han, Y.; Li, L.; Lu, H.; Meng, G.; Li, X.; Shirhan, M.; Peh, M.T.; Xie, L.; Zhou, S.; et al. The hydrogen sulfide donor, GYY4137, exhibits anti-atherosclerotic activity in high fat fed apolipoprotein E(-/-) mice. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 169, 1795–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Li, L.; Fox, B.; Keeble, J.; Salto-Tellez, M.; Winyard, P.G.; Wood, M.E.; Moore, P.K.; Whiteman, M. The complex effects of the slow-releasing hydrogen sulfide donor GYY4137 in a model of acute joint inflammation and in human cartilage cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2013, 17, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Whiteman, M.; Li, L.; Rose, P.; Tan, C.-H.; Parkinson, D.B.; Moore, P.K. The Effect of Hydrogen Sulfide Donors on Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Formation of Inflammatory Mediators in Macrophages. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 1147–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Chen, S.-W.; Zhu, J.; Zuo, S.; Zhang, J.-L.; Chen, Z.-Y.; Chen, G.-W.; Wang, X.; Pan, Y.-S.; Liu, Y.-C.; Wang, P.-Y. Protective effect of hydrogen sulfide on TNF-α and IFN-γ-induced injury of intestinal epithelial barrier function in Caco-2 monolayers. Inflamm. Res. 2015, 64, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Guo, C.; Liang, F.; Masood, W.S.; Yan, X. Hydrogen sulfide protected gastric epithelial cell from ischemia/reperfusion injury by Keap1 S-sulfhydration, MAPK dependent anti-apoptosis and NF-κB dependent anti-inflammation pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 725, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Flannigan, K.L.; Agbor, T.A.; Blackler, R.W.; Kim, J.J.; Khan, W.I.; Verdu, E.F.; Ferraz, J.G.; Wallace, J.L. Impaired hydrogen sulfide synthesis and IL-10 signaling underlie hyperhomocysteinemia-associated exacerbation of colitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 13559–13564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Hirata, I.; Naito, Y.; Takagi, T.; Mizushima, K.; Suzuki, T.; Omatsu, T.; Handa, O.; Ichikawa, H.; Ueda, H.; Yoshikawa, T. Endogenous hydrogen sulfide is an anti-inflammatory molecule in dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011, 56, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Wallace, J.L.; Vong, L.; McKnight, W.; Dicay, M.; Martin, G.R. Endogenous and exogenous hydrogen sulfide promotes resolution of colitis in rats. Gastroenterology 2009, 137, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Fiorucci, S.; Orlandi, S.; Mencarelli, A.; Caliendo, G.; Santagada, V.; Distrutti, E.; Santucci, L.; Cirino, G.; Wallace, J.L. Enhanced activity of a hydrogen sulphide-releasing derivative of mesalamine (ATB-429) in a mouse model of colitis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2007, 150, 996–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Flannigan, K.L.; Agbor, T.A.; Motta, J.-P.; Ferraz, J.G.; Wang, R.; Buret, A.G.; Wallace, J.L. Proresolution effects of hydrogen sulfide during colitis are mediated through hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. FASEB J. 2015, 29, 1591–1602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Motta, J.-P.; Flannigan, K.L.; Agbor, T.A.; Beatty, J.K.; Blackler, R.W.; Workentine, M.L.; da Silva, G.J.; Wang, R.; Buret, A.G.; Wallace, J.L. Hydrogen sulfide protects from colitis and restores intestinal microbiota biofilm and mucus production. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2015, 21, 1006–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Zanardo, R.C.; Brancaleone, V.; Distrutti, E.; Fiorucci, S.; Cirino, G.; Wallace, J.L. Hydrogen sulfide is an endogenous modulator of leukocyte-mediated inflammation. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 2118–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Mariggiò, M.A.; Minunno, V.; Riccardi, S.; Santacroce, R.; de Rinaldis, P.; Fumarulo, R. Sulfide enhancement of PMN apoptosis. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 1998, 20, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Dufton, N.; Natividad, J.; Verdu, E.F.; Wallace, J.L. Hydrogen sulfide and resolution of acute inflammation: A comparative study utilizing a novel fluorescent probe. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Blackler, R.W.; Motta, J.-P.; Manko, A.; Workentine, M.; Bercik, P.; Surette, M.G.; Wallace, J.L. Hydrogen sulphide protects against NSAID-enteropathy through modulation of bile and the microbiota. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 172, 992–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Wallace, J.L.; Devchand, P.R. Emerging roles for cyclooxygenase-2 in gastrointestinal mucosal defense. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 145, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Brancaleone, V.; Mitidieri, E.; Flower, R.J.; Cirino, G.; Perretti, M. Annexin A1 mediates hydrogen sulfide properties in the control of inflammation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2014, 351, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Wallace, J.L.; Dicay, M.; McKnight, W.; Martin, G.R. Hydrogen sulfide enhances ulcer healing in rats. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 4070–4076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Mard, S.A.; Ashabi, A.; Badavi, M.; Dianat, M. Protective effects of vitamin B6 alone and in combination with l-cysteine and NaHS on ethanol and indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in mice. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2015, 18, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  145. Medeiros, J.V.; Bezerra, V.H.; Gomes, A.S.; Barbosa, A.L.; Lima-Júnior, R.C.; Soares, P.M.; Brito, G.A.; Ribeiro, R.A.; Cunha, F.Q.; Souza, M.H. Hydrogen sulfide prevents ethanol-induced gastric damage in mice: role of ATP-sensitive potassium channels and capsaicin-sensitive primary afferent neurons. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2009, 330, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Chávez-Piña, A.E.; Tapia-Alvarez, G.R.; Navarrete, A. Inhibition of endogenous hydrogen sulfide synthesis by PAG protects against ethanol-induced gastric damage in the rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 630, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Kimura, Y.; Kimura, H. Hydrogen sulfide protects neurons from oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1165–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Mard, S.A.; Neisi, N.; Solgi, G.; Hassanpour, M.; Darbor, M.; Maleki, M. Gastroprotective effect of NaHS against mucosal lesions induced by ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2012, 57, 1496–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Cui, J.; Liu, L.; Zou, J.; Qiao, W.; Liu, H.; Qi, Y.; Yan, C. Protective effect of endogenous hydrogen sulfide against oxidative stress in gastric ischemia-reperfusion injury. Exp. Ther. Med. 2013, 5, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  150. Flannigan, K.L.; Ferraz, J.G.; Wang, R.; Wallace, J.L. Enhanced synthesis and diminished degradation of hydrogen sulfide in experimental colitis: A site-specific, pro-resolution mechanism. PLoS ONE 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Lou, L.-X.; Geng, B.; Du, J.-B.; Tang, C.-S. Hydrogen sulphide-induced hypothermia attenuates stress-related ulceration in rats. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2008, 35, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Jiang, B.; Tang, G.; Cao, K.; Wu, L.; Wang, R. Molecular mechanism for H(2)S-induced activation of K(ATP) channels. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2010, 12, 1167–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Liu, L.; Cui, J.; Song, C.-J.; Bian, J.-S.; Sparatore, A.; Del Soldato, P.; Wang, X.-Y.; Yan, C.-D. H(2)S-releasing aspirin protects against aspirin-induced gastric injury via reducing oxidative stress. PLoS ONE 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Fiorucci, S.; Antonelli, E.; Distrutti, E.; Rizzo, G.; Mencarelli, A.; Orlandi, S.; Zanardo, R.; Renga, B.; Di Sante, M.; Morelli, A.; et al. Inhibition of hydrogen sulfide generation contributes to gastric injury caused by anti-inflammatory nonsteroidal drugs. Gastroenterology 2005, 129, 1210–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Mustafa, A.K.; Gadalla, M.M.; Sen, N.; Kim, S.; Mu, W.; Gazi, S.K.; Barrow, R.K.; Yang, G.; Wang, R.; Snyder, S.H. H2S signals through protein S-sulfhydration. Sci. Signal. 2009, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Gil, V.; Gallego, D.; Jiménez, M. Effects of inhibitors of hydrogen sulphide synthesis on rat colonic motility. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 164, 485–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Nagao, M.; Duenes, J.A.; Sarr, M.G. Role of hydrogen sulfide as a gasotransmitter in modulating contractile activity of circular muscle of rat jejunum. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2012, 16, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Kasparek, M.S.; Linden, D.R.; Farrugia, G.; Sarr, M.G. Hydrogen sulfide modulates contractile function in rat jejunum. J. Surg. Res. 2012, 175, 234–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Gallego, D.; Clavé, P.; Donovan, J.; Rahmati, R.; Grundy, D.; Jiménez, M.; Beyak, M.J. The gaseous mediator, hydrogen sulphide, inhibits in vitro motor patterns in the human, rat and mouse colon and jejunum. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 2008, 20, 1306–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  160. Gil, V.; Parsons, S.; Gallego, D.; Huizinga, J.; Jimenez, M. Effects of hydrogen sulphide on motility patterns in the rat colon. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2013, 169, 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Shafigullin, M.Y.; Zefirov, R.A.; Sabirullina, G.I.; Zefirov, A.L.; Sitdikova, G.F. Effects of a hydrogen sulfide donor on spontaneous contractile activity of rat stomach and jejunum. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med. 2014, 157, 302–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Tang, G.; Wu, L.; Wang, R. Interaction of hydrogen sulfide with ion channels. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2010, 37, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Teague, B.; Asiedu, S.; Moore, P.K. The smooth muscle relaxant effect of hydrogen sulphide in vitro: Evidence for a physiological role to control intestinal contractility. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 137, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Quan, X.; Luo, H.; Liu, Y.; Xia, H.; Chen, W.; Tang, Q. Hydrogen sulfide regulates the colonic motility by inhibiting both l-type calcium channels and BKCa channels in smooth muscle cells of rat colon. PLoS ONE 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Martinez-Cutillas, M.; Gil, V.; Mañé, N.; Clavé, P.; Gallego, D.; Martin, M.T.; Jimenez, M. Potential role of the gaseous mediator hydrogen sulphide (H2S) in inhibition of human colonic contractility. Pharmacol. Res. 2015, 93, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Yamane, S.; Kanno, T.; Nakamura, H.; Fujino, H.; Murayama, T. Hydrogen sulfide-mediated regulation of contractility in the mouse ileum with electrical stimulation: roles of l-cysteine, cystathionine β-synthase, and K+ channels. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 740, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Yamane, S.; Nomura, R.; Yanagihara, M.; Nakamura, H.; Fujino, H.; Matsumoto, K.; Horie, S.; Murayama, T. l-cysteine/d,l-homocysteine-regulated ileum motility via system L and B°,+ transporter: Modification by inhibitors of hydrogen sulfide synthesis and dietary treatments. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 764, 471–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Lu, W.; Li, J.; Gong, L.; Xu, X.; Han, T.; Ye, Y.; Che, T.; Luo, Y.; Li, J.; Zhan, R.; et al. H2 S modulates duodenal motility in male rats via activating TRPV1 and K(ATP) channels. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 1534–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Patacchini, R.; Santicioli, P.; Giuliani, S.; Maggi, C.A. Pharmacological investigation of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) contractile activity in rat detrusor muscle. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 509, 171–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Trevisani, M.; Patacchini, R.; Nicoletti, P.; Gatti, R.; Gazzieri, D.; Lissi, N.; Zagli, G.; Creminon, C.; Geppetti, P.; Harrison, S. Hydrogen sulfide causes vanilloid receptor 1-mediated neurogenic inflammation in the airways. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 145, 1123–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Chattopadhyay, M.; Kodela, R.; Nath, N.; Dastagirzada, Y.M.; Velázquez-Martínez, C.A.; Boring, D.; Kashfi, K. Hydrogen sulfide-releasing NSAIDs inhibit the growth of human cancer cells: A general property and evidence of a tissue type-independent effect. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2012, 83, 715–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Wallace, J.L.; Caliendo, G.; Santagada, V.; Cirino, G. Markedly reduced toxicity of a hydrogen sulphide-releasing derivative of naproxen (ATB-346). Br. J. Pharmacol. 2010, 159, 1236–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Singh, S.B.; Lin, H.C. Hydrogen Sulfide in Physiology and Diseases of the Digestive Tract. Microorganisms 2015, 3, 866-889. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms3040866

AMA Style

Singh SB, Lin HC. Hydrogen Sulfide in Physiology and Diseases of the Digestive Tract. Microorganisms. 2015; 3(4):866-889. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms3040866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Singh, Sudha B., and Henry C. Lin. 2015. "Hydrogen Sulfide in Physiology and Diseases of the Digestive Tract" Microorganisms 3, no. 4: 866-889. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms3040866

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop