Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Staphylococcus intermedius Group Isolates Associated with Animals from Antarctica and Emended Description of Staphylococcus delphini
Next Article in Special Issue
Safety Aspects of Genetically Modified Lactic Acid Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Microbiological Air Quality and Drug Resistance in Airborne Bacteria Isolated from a Waste Sorting Plant Located in Poland―A Case Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Warding Off Recurrent Yeast and Bacterial Vaginal Infections: Lactoferrin and Lactobacilli
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transmission of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in the Hospital Setting: Uncovering the Patient–Environment Interplay

1
Institute of Hygiene, University Hospital Münster, Robert-Koch-Straße 41, 48149 Münster, Germany
2
Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster, Domagkstraße 10, 48149 Münster, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 19 December 2019 / Revised: 27 January 2020 / Accepted: 30 January 2020 / Published: 31 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety Aspects of Lactic Acid Bacteria)

Abstract

:
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are relevant nosocomial pathogens with an increasing incidence in the last decades. Their transmission is optimal in the hospital setting, as it offers two potential, large reservoirs that are closely related: susceptible patients and their environment. Here we investigate the role of the hospital environment in the nosocomial transmission of VRE by establishing concrete links between contaminated surfaces and colonized/infected patients in outbreak and non-outbreak settings. Environmental and patient VRE isolates were collected between 2013 and 2019 and analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (WGS), subsequent multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and core genome (cg) MLST. Pairs of isolates differing in <3 alleles were rated as closely related, making a transmission likely. Fifty-three environmental VRE isolates were analyzed. MLST sequence types (ST) ST203 (50.0%), ST192 (21.3%), ST117 (17.3%), ST721 (8.8%), ST80 (2%), and ST1489 (0.7%) were detected, carrying the resistance determinants vanA (72.7%), vanB (24%), or both (3.3%). Of the 53 environmental isolates, 51 were found to form five clusters with genetically related patient isolates (n = 97 isolates). WGS confirms the role of the environment in the transmission dynamics of VRE in both the outbreak and non-outbreak settings, highlighting the importance of prevention and control of VRE spread.

1. Introduction

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are Gram-positive microorganisms that significantly contribute to the burden of healthcare-associated infections. First reported in Europe in the late 1980s [1,2], VRE are currently considered a public health problem, regarded as a high-level priority for the research and development of new therapeutic strategies by the World Health Organization [3]. The incidence of VRE infections has experienced a steady increase in different regions in the last decades [4], a trend also observed in Germany [5]. Considering the significantly higher mortality rate of VRE infections as compared to those caused by vancomycin-susceptible enterococci [6,7], and in view of the well-documented inter- and intra-species transmission of resistance genes [8,9], it has become necessary to adopt infection control strategies worldwide aimed at reducing the spread of VRE [10]. The clinical and epidemiological impact of VRE on the severity and burden of enterococcal disease [4,6,7], points out the relevance of identifying and understanding the conditions favoring the development and transmission of VRE in order to prevent their spread and ultimately reduce the incidence of infections. The healthcare setting represents the main scenario for the implementation of such strategies, given that it offers optimal conditions for the transmission and spread of multidrug-resistant microorganisms.
VRE are more frequently involved in nosocomial transmission events than other relevant resistant bacteria [11]. Hospitalized patients constitute an important element in the transmission dynamics of VRE, representing large reservoirs of susceptible individuals often displaying characteristics known to be associated with an increased risk of VRE colonization and infection, such as immunosuppression, multi-morbidity, and treatment with antimicrobial substances [12,13,14]. Furthermore, the colonization pressure exerted by VRE-positive patients on the susceptible population [15,16], as well as the close and constant interaction between staff members and patients, [17] facilitates transmission. A second key element in the nosocomial spread of VRE is the environment, comprising objects and surfaces that may act as potential reservoir [16,18]. VRE are known to attach to different materials and persist for up to several years on environmental surfaces [18]. Moreover, it has been observed that room contamination persists after the application of standard cleaning procedures following discharge of VRE-positive patients, leading to a significantly higher risk of VRE acquisition for new patients assigned to these rooms [16,19]. Elements of the environment have been identified as the source of outbreaks in the past [20]. However, demonstrating transmission chains by matching findings of environmental samplings to specific cases of colonization and/or infection is not always possible [21,22].
In the present study, we use whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based typing to analyze genetic relationships between VRE originating from patients and the hospital environment at a university hospital, in order to gain a deeper understanding of possible VRE transmission during outbreak and non-outbreak settings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Clinical Setting and Infection Control Measures

The University Hospital Münster (UHM) is a 1500-bed tertiary care center, admitting ca. 65,000 patients per year. Routinely, in accordance with the national German guideline published in 2018 [23], patients at high risk for developing VRE infections (e.g., hemato-oncological, orthopedic, and intensive-care unit patients), patients with a VRE history of colonization/infection, or patients with contact to a patient with confirmed VRE status are routinely screened for VRE. In case of VRE detection, affected patients are isolated in a separate room and contact precautions are established. Personnel staff and visitors are advised to wear gloves and gowns when entering the patient’s room. Surface disinfection using Incidin TM plus 0.5% (ECOLAB Healthcare, Monheim am Rhein, Germany) soaked wipes is performed at least once a day. Patient isolation can be discontinued if three negative anorectal swab samples are collected in at least a one-week interval without administering antibiotic therapy during this time.

2.2. Environmental Surveillance

At the UHM, environmental sampling is performed routinely during on-site infection control ward rounds (see also Supplementary Table S1), as well as in the case of increased incidence of multidrug-resistant bacteria or outbreaks, in which inanimate surfaces serve as possible sources of transmission. If multidrug-resistant bacteria (e.g., Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), VRE, or multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria) are detected, WGS-based typing methods are performed routinely to elucidate transmission chains at an early stage [24].
For the present study, all sequenced environmental isolates detected between January 2013 and August 2019 were retrospectively compared to all VRE strains isolated from patients admitted to the UHM during the same time period.

2.3. Sampling and Testing Methods

Screening and clinical samples were sent to the microbiological laboratory. Depending on the specimen the sample was streaked onto different agar media (e.g., Columbia sheep blood agar, Oxoid, Wesel, Germany and/or VRE selective agar, VRESelect, Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA) and incubated for 18 ± 2 h at 37 °C. Bacterial species of suspected colonies were identified by MALDI-TOF-MS (Bruker Corporation, Bremen, Germany) and antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using VITEK®2 system (BioMérieux, Nürtingen, Germany) in accordance with the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) standards for clinical breakpoints [25]. The GenoType Enterococcus system (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) was used to differentiate vancomycin resistance genes vanA and vanB. Subsequently, isolates were whole-genome sequenced.
Environmental sampling was performed by applying sterile packaged polywipes (MWE, Corsham, Wiltshire, UK) on hand contact surfaces, which were incubated in Tryptic Soy Broth + lecithin Tween (LT) (Merck Millipore, Eppelheim, Germany) for 24 h at 37 °C. Ten microliters of this broth was streaked onto blood agar and VRE selective agar and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Suspected colonies were subcultured on blood agar and species identification was performed with the help of MALDI-TOF-MS (Bruker Corporation). Susceptibility testing for vancomycin was performed using Etest® (Bestbion GmbH, Liofilchem, Italy) and evaluated in accordance with the EUCAST standards for clinical breakpoints [25]. Confirmed VRE were whole-genome sequenced.

2.4. Whole-Genome Sequencing

Confirmed VRE isolates were subjected to WGS using the Illumina MiSeq or HiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). After sequencing, quality trimming, and de novo assembly, coding regions were compared in a gene-by-gene approach, i.e., core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) using the SeqSphere+ software version 6.0.0 (Ridom GmbH, Muenster, Germany) as described previously. For cgMLST analysis, the public cgMLST scheme for Enterococcus faecium was applied [26]. In order to elucidate genetic relationships between isolates, a minimum spanning tree algorithm was applied using the same software. MLST sequence types were extracted in silico.

3. Results

3.1. Environmental and Patient VRE Isolates

From October 2013 to August 2019, in total, 53 environmental samples containing VRE were identified. During the retrospective investigation, 97 VRE patient isolates of patients admitted to the UHM during this time span could be detected as being genetically related to these environmental isolates. Further information regarding date of isolation and sampling point can be derived from Supplementary Table S1.

3.2. VRE Genotypes and Genetic Distribution of Strains

WGS resulted in four singletons (two patient and two environmental isolates) and eight clusters of genetically closely related strains (≤3 alleles differing between the genotypes) comprising 2–20 isolates. Of these, five clusters contained environmental and patient isolates (Figure 1). Except four environmental isolates, all other isolates gathered from the environment were closely related to patient isolates collected during routine screening and within outbreak settings. Additional information of exact sample sites can be gathered from Supplementary Table S1. Of all strains, 109 (72.7%) harbored vanA, 36 (24%) vanB, and 5 (3.3%) both vanA and vanB. Prevalent MLST sequence types (ST) were ST203 (50.0%), ST192 (21.3%), ST117 (17.3%), ST721 (8.8%), ST80 (2%), and ST1489 (0.7%). Additional information of distribution of van genes and MLST ST in patient and environmental isolates is displayed in Table 1.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the role of the contaminated hospital environment and its impact on VRE transmission, considering that these microorganisms are able to survive on inanimate surfaces for several years [18]. The analysis and comparison of VRE isolates obtained from environmental surfaces and patients revealed distinct genetic relationships between both groups of isolates, confirming that the environment acts as a suitable reservoir that can facilitate the spread of VRE and, thus, the subsequent occurrence of infections. The development of vancomycin-resistant bacterial populations in association with antibiotic treatment has been described in enterococci [27]. In addition, environmental contamination has been described to play a role in the nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant microorganisms [18,28]. Subsequently, resistant strains are transmitted via direct (person–person) or indirect (person–environment–person) contact [28]. Both events commonly occur in the healthcare setting, where VRE have shown to be more commonly transmitted than other relevant multidrug-resistant pathogens [11]. A limitation of our study is that we cannot conclude whether VRE was transmitted from surfaces to patients or vice versa. However, it seems most plausible that this microorganism transfer is a two-way process. The occurrence of the same genotype in patient and environmental isolates at least highlights two important aspects: 1) Person–environment transmission of VRE plays a role in everyday clinical practice and 2) aurface disinfection techniques during clinical routine have to be adequate to prevent person–environment transmissions.

5. Conclusions

Inanimate surfaces in the hospital environment are a relevant source of transmission of VRE during clinical routine. Improving surface disinfection procedures of possibly VRE-contaminated rooms is an important aspect in preventing VRE infections. Further prospective studies are needed to demonstrate direct links between contaminated surfaces and patients colonized or infected with VRE.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2076-2607/8/2/203/s1, Table S1: MLST sequence type (ST), collection date and localization of 150 chronologically listed VRE isolates derived from patients (P) and the hospital environment (E).

Author Contributions

C.L.C.-M.: Conception and design of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting article. H.T., N.J.F., and A.M.: Acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, revising article critically. S.K.: Conception and design of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, revising article critically. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ursula Keckevoet and Isabell Höfig for their excellent laboratory work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Leclercq, R.; Derlot, E.; Duval, J.; Courvalin, P. Plasmid-mediated resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin in Enterococcus faecium. N. Engl. J. Med. 1988, 319, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Uttley, A.H.; Collins, C.H.; Naidoo, J.; George, R.C. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Lancet 1988, 1, 57–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Pfaller, M.A.; Cormican, M.; Flamm, R.K.; Mendes, R.E.; Jones, R.N. Temporal and Geographic Variation in Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Resistance Patterns of Enterococci: Results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-2016. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2019, 6, S54–S62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Remschmidt, C.; Behnke, M.; Kola, A.; Pena Diaz, L.A.; Rohde, A.M.; Gastmeier, P.; Schwab, F. The effect of antibiotic use on prevalence of nosocomial vancomycin-resistant enterococci- an ecologic study. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2017, 6, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. DiazGranados, C.A.; Zimmer, S.M.; Klein, M.; Jernigan, J.A. Comparison of mortality associated with vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible enterococcal bloodstream infections: a meta-analysis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2005, 41, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Prematunge, C.; MacDougall, C.; Johnstone, J.; Adomako, K.; Lam, F.; Robertson, J.; Garber, G. VRE and VSE Bacteremia Outcomes in the Era of Effective VRE Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016, 37, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cafini, F.; Nguyen le, T.T.; Higashide, M.; Roman, F.; Prieto, J.; Morikawa, K. Horizontal gene transmission of the cfr gene to MRSA and Enterococcus: role of Staphylococcus epidermidis as a reservoir and alternative pathway for the spread of linezolid resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 587–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Juhas, M. Horizontal gene transfer in human pathogens. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 41, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Angelis, G.; Cataldo, M.A.; De Waure, C.; Venturiello, S.; La Torre, G.; Cauda, R.; Carmeli, Y.; Tacconelli, E. Infection control and prevention measures to reduce the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in hospitalized patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Erb, S.; Frei, R.; Dangel, M.; Widmer, A.F. Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Detected More Than 48 Hours After Hospital Admission Are Not Necessarily Hospital-Acquired. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2017, 38, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zacharioudakis, I.M.; Zervou, F.N.; Ziakas, P.D.; Rice, L.B.; Mylonakis, E. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization among dialysis patients: a meta-analysis of prevalence, risk factors, and significance. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2015, 65, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Papadimitriou-Olivgeris, M.; Drougka, E.; Fligou, F.; Kolonitsiou, F.; Liakopoulos, A.; Dodou, V.; Anastassiou, E.D.; Petinaki, E.; Marangos, M.; Filos, K.S.; et al. Risk factors for enterococcal infection and colonization by vancomycin-resistant enterococci in critically ill patients. Infection 2014, 42, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pan, S.C.; Wang, J.T.; Chen, Y.C.; Chang, Y.Y.; Chen, M.L.; Chang, S.C. Incidence of and risk factors for infection or colonization of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in patients in the intensive care unit. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e47297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Bonten, M.J.; Slaughter, S.; Ambergen, A.W.; Hayden, M.K.; van Voorhis, J.; Nathan, C.; Weinstein, R.A. The role of “colonization pressure” in the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: an important infection control variable. Arch. Intern. Med. 1998, 158, 1127–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ford, C.D.; Lopansri, B.K.; Gazdik, M.A.; Webb, B.; Snow, G.L.; Hoda, D.; Adams, B.; Petersen, F.B. Room contamination, patient colonization pressure, and the risk of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus colonization on a unit dedicated to the treatment of hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Am. J. Infect. Control 2016, 44, 1110–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jackson, S.S.; Harris, A.D.; Magder, L.S.; Stafford, K.A.; Johnson, J.K.; Miller, L.G.; Calfee, D.P.; Thom, K.A. Bacterial burden is associated with increased transmission to health care workers from patients colonized with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus. Am. J. Infect. Control 2019, 47, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Suleyman, G.; Alangaden, G.; Bardossy, A.C. The Role of Environmental Contamination in the Transmission of Nosocomial Pathogens and Healthcare-Associated Infections. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 2018, 20, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Drees, M.; Snydman, D.R.; Schmid, C.H.; Barefoot, L.; Hansjosten, K.; Vue, P.M.; Cronin, M.; Nasraway, S.A.; Golan, Y. Prior environmental contamination increases the risk of acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 46, 678–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kanamori, H.; Rutala, W.A.; Weber, D.J. The Role of Patient Care Items as a Fomite in Healthcare-Associated Outbreaks and Infection Prevention. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 65, 1412–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ulrich, N.; Vonberg, R.P.; Gastmeier, P. Outbreaks caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in hematology and oncology departments: A systematic review. Heliyon 2017, 3, e00473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Beggs, C.; Knibbs, L.D.; Johnson, G.R.; Morawska, L. Environmental contamination and hospital-acquired infection: factors that are easily overlooked. Indoor Air 2015, 25, 462–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. RKI Hygienemaßnahmen zur Prävention der Infektion durch Enterokokken mit speziellen Antibiotikaresistenzen. Empfehlung der Kommission für Krankenhaushygiene und Infektionsprävention (KRINKO) beim Robert-Koch-Institut. Bundesgesundheitsbla. 2018, 10, 1310. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mellmann, A.; Bletz, S.; Boking, T.; Kipp, F.; Becker, K.; Schultes, A.; Prior, K.; Harmsen, D. Real-Time Genome Sequencing of Resistant Bacteria Provides Precision Infection Control in an Institutional Setting. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 2874–2881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Version 9.0. Available online: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_9.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf (accessed on 15 December 2019).
  26. de Been, M.; Pinholt, M.; Top, J.; Bletz, S.; Mellmann, A.; van Schaik, W.; Brouwer, E.; Rogers, M.; Kraat, Y.; Bonten, M.; et al. Core Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing Scheme for High- Resolution Typing of Enterococcus faecium. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 3788–3797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tacconelli, E.; De Angelis, G.; Cataldo, M.A.; Mantengoli, E.; Spanu, T.; Pan, A.; Corti, G.; Radice, A.; Stolzuoli, L.; Antinori, S.; et al. Antibiotic usage and risk of colonization and infection with antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a hospital population-based study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4264–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Blanco, N.; O'Hara, L.M.; Harris, A.D. Transmission pathways of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital setting: a scoping review. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2019, 40, 447–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Minimum spanning tree of 150 VRE strains isolated from patients or environmental sampling points based on 1423 core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) target genes, pairwise ignore missing values. Every circle represents one genotype, the size of circles correlates with the number of identical genotypes. Different colors represent different MLST sequence types. Black bordered dots indicate environmental isolates. Grey coloring indicates close genetic relation (≤3 alleles differing between two genotypes).
Figure 1. Minimum spanning tree of 150 VRE strains isolated from patients or environmental sampling points based on 1423 core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) target genes, pairwise ignore missing values. Every circle represents one genotype, the size of circles correlates with the number of identical genotypes. Different colors represent different MLST sequence types. Black bordered dots indicate environmental isolates. Grey coloring indicates close genetic relation (≤3 alleles differing between two genotypes).
Microorganisms 08 00203 g001
Table 1. Distribution of van genes and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) sequence types (ST) in detected vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolates derived from patients (P) and the hospital environment (E).
Table 1. Distribution of van genes and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) sequence types (ST) in detected vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolates derived from patients (P) and the hospital environment (E).
MLST STvan genotype
ST80ST117ST192ST203ST721ST1489vanAvanBvanA+ vanB
P (n = 97)1 (1.0%)21 (21.6%)24 (24.7%)39 (40.2%)11 (11.3%)1 (1.0%)67 (69.1%)26 (26.8%)4 (4.1%)
E (n = 53)2 (3.8%)5 (9.4%)8 (15.1%)36 (67.9%)2 (3.8%)0 (0%)42 (79.2%)10 (18.9%)1 (1.9%)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Correa-Martinez, C.L.; Tönnies, H.; Froböse, N.J.; Mellmann, A.; Kampmeier, S. Transmission of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in the Hospital Setting: Uncovering the Patient–Environment Interplay. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 203. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8020203

AMA Style

Correa-Martinez CL, Tönnies H, Froböse NJ, Mellmann A, Kampmeier S. Transmission of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in the Hospital Setting: Uncovering the Patient–Environment Interplay. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(2):203. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8020203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Correa-Martinez, Carlos L., Hauke Tönnies, Neele J. Froböse, Alexander Mellmann, and Stefanie Kampmeier. 2020. "Transmission of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci in the Hospital Setting: Uncovering the Patient–Environment Interplay" Microorganisms 8, no. 2: 203. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8020203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop