Next Article in Journal
Functional Analysis of a Polluted River Microbiome Reveals a Metabolic Potential for Bioremediation
Next Article in Special Issue
Biofilm Eradication by Symmetrical Selenoesters for Food-Borne Pathogens
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation of Multispectral Imaging (MSI) for Microbiological Quality Assessment of Poultry Products
Previous Article in Special Issue
Quantitative and Compositional Study of Monospecies Biofilms of Spoilage Microorganisms in the Meat Industry and Their Interaction in the Development of Multispecies Biofilms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ascorbic Acid Changes Growth of Food-Borne Pathogens in the Early Stage of Biofilm Formation

1
Department of Microbiology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, 9 Maria Skłodowska-Curie Street, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Department of Food Hygiene and Consumer Health, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, 31 C.K. Norwida St., 50-375 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 7 March 2020 / Revised: 1 April 2020 / Accepted: 9 April 2020 / Published: 11 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacterial Biofilms and Its Eradication in Food Industry)

Abstract

:
Since bacterial biofilm may contribute to the secondary contamination of food during the manufacturing/processing stage there is a need for new methods allowing its effective eradication. Application of food additives such as vitamin C already used in food industry as antioxidant food industry antioxidants may be a promising solution. The aim of this research was evaluation of the impact of vitamin C (ascorbic acid), in a range of concentrations 2.50 µg mL−1–25.0 mg mL−1, on biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from food. The efficacy of ascorbic acid was assessed based on the reduction of optical density (λ = 595 nm). The greatest elimination of the biofilm was achieved at the concentration of vitamin C of 25.0 mg mL−1. The effect of the vitamin C on biofilm, however, was strain dependent. The concentration of 25.0 mg mL−1 reduced 93.4%, 74.9%, and 40.5% of E. coli, L. monocytogenes, and S. aureus number, respectively. For E. coli and S. aureus lower concentrations were ineffective. In turn, for L. monocytogenes the biofilm inhibition was observed even at the concentration of 0.25 mg mL−1. The addition of vitamin C may be helpful in the elimination of bacterial biofilms. Nonetheless, some concentrations can induce growth of the pathogens, posing risk for the consumers’ health.

1. Introduction

Foodborne diseases are a serious problem for public health. Their number has been increasing for many years. In the developed countries the proportion of infected people reaches up to 30% every year [1]. In 2010 foodborne diseases resulted in circa 420,000 deaths worldwide, with children under 5 years accounting for 40% of them [2]. According to the EFSA (European and Food Safety Agency) report, since over a decade, the most prevalent diseases in the European Union have been campylobacteriosis and salmonellosis [3]. In turn, listeriosis and Escherichia coli O157:H7 infections are mainly associated with the consumption of RTE (ready to eat) food [4].
Many foodborne pathogens, including E. coli, Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus are able to form a biofilm both on the food and food contact surfaces [5,6,7]. Such ability protects bacteria from adverse conditions and helps them to survive in the food production environment, thereby being a great challenge for the assurance of microbiological safety of fresh products. In the mature biofilm bacteria may tolerate up to 1000 times higher concentrations of antimicrobials than in the planktonic form [8]. The ability to form a biofilm is affected by many factors, including surface type (plastic, metal, etc.) and temperature of the environment. For the majority of pathogens, the temperature of the human body is optimal for the growth and biofilm formation. In the food industry, however, room temperature (25 °C) and lower are applied. L. monocytogenes is the bacterium well-known for its ability to adapt to wide range of temperatures [9,10] and form a biofilm even at temperatures as low as 0 °C [11]. The ability of S. aureus and E. coli to colonize the surfaces and form a biofilm at low temperatures on various surfaces also may contribute to bacterial survival in the food industry environment, increasing the risk of food cross-contamination [12]. Therefore, conventional methods of disinfection in food plants may be insufficient to eliminate pathogens [13,14]. Currently, the efficacy of natural compounds extracted from plants and bacteriocins against biofilms has been studied. These substances are regarded as safe and biodegradable and may penetrate the biofilm structure killing the bacteria [14]. The application of vitamin C is one of such alternatives. Vitamin C is cheap, easily accessible, and has been reported to have antimicrobial activity against S. aureus, Enterococcus faecalis [15], Mycobacterium tuberculosis [16], and Aspergillus spp. [17]. Additionally, vitamin C may augment the inhibiting action of antibiotics i.e., levofloxacin and azithromycin [17]. It is a food additive (E300), applied as an acidity regulator, antioxidant, food improver, and sequestrant in many types of food products e.g., milk, fresh produce, frozen food, pasta, meat, fish, flour, juice. Depending on the product its maximal concentration ranges from 50 to 500 mg/kg. The inhibiting action of ascorbic acid may be associated with its anti-quorum sensing activity as it competes with the autoinducer-2 (AI-2) [18]. It has been also suggested that vitamin C inhibits extracellular polymeric substances production, the major biofilm component, destabilizing the biofilm structure [19].
The new method of food preservation is active antimicrobial packaging. The idea is to use the antimicrobial material as packaging and/or coat the packaging material with antimicrobial agents, such as organic acids, bacteriocins, silver, enzymes, essential oils, and parabens. This solution may affect only the surface of the packaging and the product in contact with packaging or, if the antimicrobial agent is volatile or soluble, it can penetrate to liquid products, such as juices [20,21].
Vitamin C, as organic compound, could be possibly incorporated into packages made from edible films (e.g., polysaccharides, like chitosan or starch, but also proteins (collagen, gelatin)) or lipids (beeswax, paraffin, resins) or polyethylene, e.g., EVA (ethyl vinyl acetate) or LLDPE (linear low density polyethylene) [22].
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of vitamin C on L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, and E. coli strains in the early stage of biofilm formation. This is a pilot study for the assessment of vitamin C as a possible anti-biofilm agent to incorporate in active antimicrobial packaging materials.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains

The study was conducted on 18 L. monocytogenes strains isolated form frozen vegetables and salmon, 15 E. coli strains, and 13 S. aureus strains derived from cow milk. Strains were isolated through years 2013–2017. In addition, three reference strains were included: Listeria monocytogenes ATCC®19111™, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC®35556™, and Escherichia coli ATCC®25922™. All strains came from the collection of the Department of Microbiology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland. Strains were deposited in Brain Heart Infusion (BHI, Becton-Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) broth with 20% of glycerol (Avantor, Gliwice, Poland) at −70 °C.

2.2. Biofilm Formation

Before examination, strains were plated on Columbia Agar Base enriched with 5% sheep blood (CAB-SB, bioMérieux, Marcy-l’Étoile, France) using the striking method. Cultures were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Obtained single colonies were cultured on CAB-SB (and incubated for next 24 h at 37 °C. Then bacterial suspensions (0.5 McFarland scale) in BHI broth, corresponding to 7.80 × 107 (±1.66 × 107) CFU × cm−3 of L. monocytogenes, 5.20 × 108 (±2.86 × 107) CFU × cm−3 of E. coli, and 1.72 × 108 (±4.17 × 107) CFU × cm−3 of S. aureus, were prepared. Such suspensions were diluted 1:100 (v/v) in BHI broth and deposited in 96-well plates (Profilab, Warszawa, Poland) (200 µL). After 24 h of incubation in a humid chamber at 37 °C planktonic cells were removed and wells were washed four times with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS, BTL, Łódź, Poland). For L. monocytogenes after 24 h the wells were washed, and the medium was replaced with the fresh one for additional 24 h to prevent planktonic cells from multiplication and instead provide the conditions for the biofilm to establish. The negative control was sterile BHI broth. Reference strains were included and treated the same as other strains.

2.3. The Assessment of Ascorbic Acid Addition on Bacterial Biofilm Elimination

The ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MI, USA) at five concentrations, 2.50 µg mL−1, 25.0 µg mL−1, 0.25 mg mL−1, 2.50 mg mL−1, and 25.0 mg mL−1, was added to wells washed with PBS containing bacterial biofilm. After 24-h incubation at 37 °C wells were washed four times with PBS, refilled with PBS and sonicated (Ultrasonic DU-4 sonicator, Nickel-Electro, Oldmixon, Great Britain, 20 min). Finally, optical density (λ = 595 nm) was measured (Bio-Tek, Synergy HT, Winooski, VT, USA) [23]. For each strain the positive control was bacterial biofilms treated with sterile BHI (not exposed to vitamin C treatment). The reduction of optical density was calculated according to the formula:
Reduction (%) = [(OD K(+) − OD)/OD K(+)] × 100%
where:
  • OD K(+)—optical density of the positive control;
  • OD—optical density of the biofilm treated with vitamin C.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Each experiment was repeated three times. Statistical analysis was performed in Statistica 13 (TIBCO Software, Palo Alto, CA, USA). To test whether significant differences exist between different experimental groups one-way ANOVA with the Tukey post-hoc test and the sign test were used. A p value above 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Strains of each species were also divided into two groups: weak and strong biofilm producers based on cut-off point (ODc) and positive control (ODK(+)) comparison (Table 1).
ODc is defined as optical density cut-off value and calculated according to Equation (2):
ODc = x + (3 × SD)
where:
  • ODc—optical density cut-off value;
  • x—average optical density of negative control;
  • SD—standard deviation of optical density of negative control.
Groups of weak and strong biofilm producers were compared using one-way ANOVA with the Tukey post-hoc test. A p value above 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

From the tested concentrations of vitamin C, 25.0 mg mL−1 most efficiently inhibited bacterial growth in the biofilm. The average inhibited bacterial growth for E coli, L. monocytogenes, and S. aureus were 93.4%, 74.9%, and 40.5%, respectively. The sensitivity to vitamin C, however, was strain dependent. For E. coli, only the concentration of 25.0 mg mL−1 of vitamin C significantly reduced the optical density, whereas for L. monocytogenes the inhibition was observed at concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 25.0 mg mL−1. For S. aureus no concentration significantly reduced optical density, in fact, the concentration of 2.50 mg mL−1 significantly increased optical density (Figure 1). The concentration of 2.50 mg mL−1 increased optical density of 115.9%. ANOVA analysis and post-hoc Tukey test confirmed that for S. aureus there was a statistically significant difference between concentrations 25.0 and 2.50 mg mL−1. The comparison of weak and strong biofilm producers of S. aureus showed that there was no statistically significant difference between these groups, with the exception of the concentration of 2.50 mg mL−1.
For L. monocytogenes (Figure 2) statistically significant differences after vitamin C treatment compared to the positive control were noted for the concentrations of 25.0 mg mL−1, 2.50 mg mL−1, 0.25 mg mL−1, and 25.0 µg mL−1. Only for the concentration of 2.50 µg mL−1 no difference compared to the positive control was observed. There were no statistically significant differences between strong and weak biofilm producer groups.
For E. coli sign test (Figure 3) a statistically significant difference between the treated group and the positive control was only found for the concentration of 25.0 mg mL−1. This was confirmed by the one-way ANOVA analysis and the Tukey post-hoc test. No statistically significant differences between strong and weak biofilm former groups were found.

4. Discussion

Bacterial biofilms are a serious problem in the food industry. In such a structure, pathogenic bacteria may survive for a long time and contribute to the secondary contamination of food products, thereby posing a risk for the consumer. Therefore, it is of great importance to eliminate biofilms from the food production environment. One method is the application of safe and biodegradable food additives as antimicrobial agents in active antimicrobial packaging. Vitamin C is commonly applied in the food industry and has been shown to inhibit bacterial growth. Since this substance is easily accessible and cheap it may be an alternative method of pathogen elimination. To date, many studies have reported its antibacterial activity against S. aureus, E. faecalis Helicobacter pylori, L. monocytogenes, Campylobacter jejuni, M. tuberculosis, and Aspergillus spp. [15,16,17,24,25].
Several studies have also reported the inhibitive or stimulative impact of ascorbic acid on biofilm formation, established biofilm and colony spreading of S. aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacillus subtilis. [26,27,28]. However, still little is known about the effect of different concentrations of vitamin C on foodborne pathogens in the early stage of biofilm formation.
In the present study the role of ascorbic acid on biofilms of S. aureus, E. coli, and L. monocytogenes was evaluated. We found the best antimicrobial activity of vitamin C in the concentration of 25.0 mg mL−1. The sensitivity to vitamin C was species dependent. The greatest biofilm growth inhibition was noted for E. coli, whereas S. aureus was the least susceptible. For E. coli inhibition was observed only for the highest concentration applied (25.0 mg mL−1). Moreover, the concentration of 2.50 mg mL−1 stimulated the growth of S. aureus. On the other hand, in the case of L. monocytogenes the optical density reduction was achieved also at lower concentrations (2.50 and 0.25 mg mL−1). In this study no correlation between the strength of biofilm formation ability and the sensitivity to vitamin C treatment was observed. Tabak et al. [29] have also found that ascorbic acid in concentrations of 0.2% to 2.0% inhibited the growth of H. pylori in liquid medium. Isela et al. [15] have shown that MIC (Minimum Inhibitory Concentration) of vitamin C for S. aureus was 10 mg mL−1 and the concentration of 20 mg mL−1 reduced 90.0% of bacteria [15]. In turn, Mirani et al. [26] have observed that ascorbic acid inhibited EPS production and staphylococcal biofilm formation but the survived bacteria tolerated its toxic concentration. Helgadóttir et al. [30] have noticed the reduction of 89.9% of S. epidermidis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa bacteria number on catheters after vitamin C treatment. Similar results against mature biofilms of uropathogenic bacteria (E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Proteus spp., and Pseudomonas spp.) have been reported by El-Gebaly et al. [31]. On the contrary, other studies [30,32,33,34] have found that ascorbic acid did not inhibit the growth of E. coli and P. aeruginosa but made them more resistant to antimicrobials and physical disinfection.
In the present study biofilm formation was examined at 37 °C, as it is the optimal temperature for the vast majority of human pathogens. However, for the idea of vitamin C application as an anti-biofilm agent in the food industry lower temperatures may play also important role. Air temperature has an impact on cell surface properties, movement ability, and virulence factors expression [35]. For example, L. monocytogenes can grow and form a biofilm at wide range of temperatures, even as low as 4 °C [36]. Synthesis of the cilia, an element crucial in biofilm formation by L. monocytogenes, is temperature-dependent (20–25 °C) [37]. About 20% of L. monocytogenes clinical isolates has the ability to form cilia at 37 °C [38]. Piercey et al. [39] have shown that L. monocytogenes isolates formed biofilm more effectively at a temperature of 30 °C than at 37 °C. The main tendency, however, is the weakening of biofilm production with a temperature decrease [39,40]. The ability of S. aureus to adhere to and to form a biofilm on surfaces such as polystyrene, polypropylene, and stainless steel is well-known [41,42,43]. Silva Meira et al. [43] documented that the temperature of incubation (7 and 28 °C) has no significant effect on biofilm formation by S. aureus on stainless steel and polypropylene. Pagedor et al. [42] have shown a higher number of S. aureus biofilm cells at 25 °C compared to 37 °C on stainless steel. Di Ciccio et al. [41] have found that only one of 67 S. aureus strains isolated from food was able to form a biofilm on polystyrene and stainless steel at 12 °C. Temperature is also a cue for the gene expression regulation in E. coli. White-Ziegler et al. [44] have shown the increased expression of the cilia genes in E. coli and concluded that low temperature is a significant environmental cue used to enhance the expression of a few biofilm genes in E. coli.
The presented study is a pilot investigation aiming to assess the effect of vitamin C on bacteria at the first stage of biofilm formation. Nonetheless, further research is needed to evaluate the influence of lower temperatures, used in the food industry, as well as the stage of biofilm formation on the antibacterial efficacy of ascorbic acid.
Based on the current research and previous studies it can be assumed that the application of vitamin C in the food industry can be an alternative method of the inhibition of bacterial growth and biofilm eradication. Its mechanism of action includes not only anti-quorum sensing activity [18] and inhibition of extracellular polymeric substances production [19], but also its ability to lower the pH in the environment, providing unsuitable conditions for bacteria to survive.
Vitamin C is more often used in active packages as an antioxidant agent [45,46]. Lee J-S. et al. [46] have demonstrated higher oxygen scavenging properties of activated carbon-ascorbic acid active packaging than standard iron powder. In addition, they have shown that ascorbic acid active packaging significantly inhibited growth of aerobic bacteria, yeasts, and molds on meatloaves during 4 days of incubation at 4 °C [46].
Nevertheless, vitamin C efficacy is species dependent and is strongly correlated with the used concentration. A dose too low may exert a reverse effect and stimulate the bacterial growth. In turn, a dose too high may impact the organoleptic properties of food and consumer health. According to the Regulation (EC) No 13333/2008 of the European Parliament [47] the maximal dose of vitamin C in the food ranges from 50 to 500 mg/kg, depending on the product type. Stepien et al. [48] have suggested that extremely high intake of this vitamin may lead to kidney stones and acute kidney failure. Nonetheless, Curhan et al. [49] have not shown the relations between high daily intake of vitamin C and kidney stones. The others have stated that side effects are rare and occur at doses over 4 g per day [50].

5. Conclusions

Currently, researchers have been looking for antibiofilm agents that are based on natural compounds and are easily biodegradable. Vitamin C, commonly used as a food additive, seems to be a good alternative. We showed that ascorbic acid, in the appropriate concentration, reduces bacterial growth in the biofilm of S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli. However, further studies are needed to establish a dose that will be effective for the most prevalent foodborne pathogens, safe for consumers, and will not influence food quality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.P.; methodology, A.B., J.P., N.W.; validation, A.B., J.P., N.W. formal analysis, J.P.; investigation, A.B., J.P., N.W.; resources, E.G.-K.; data curation, J.P.; writing—original draft preparation, N.W., E.W.-Z., writing—review and editing, E.G.-K.; visualization, J.P.; supervision, E.G.-K.; project administration; funding acquisition, E.G.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was financially supported by the Nicolaus Copernicus University with funds from the maintenance of the research potential of the Department of Microbiology DS-UPB no. WF 536.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO Fact Sheet N_237, Food Safety and Foodborne Illness. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety (accessed on 25 February 2020).
  2. Havelaar, A.H.; Kirk, M.D.; Torgerson, P.R.; Gibb, H.J.; Hald, T.; Lake, R.J.; Praet, N.; Bellinger, D.C.; de Silva, N.R.; Gargouri, N.; et al. World Health Organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 2010, 12, e1001923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. The European Union One Health 2018 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Ölmez, H.; Temur, S.D. Effects of different sanitizing treatments on biofilms and attachment of Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes on green leaf lettuce. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 964–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Annous, B.A.; Solomon, E.B.; Cooke, P.H.; Burke, A. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. on cantaloupe melons. J. Food Saf. 2005, 25, 276–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lapidot, A.; Romling, U.; Yaron, S. Biofilm formation and the survival of Salmonella typhimurium on parsley. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 109, 229–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Stepanovic, S.; Cirkovic, I.; Ranin, L.; Svabic-Vlahovic, M. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surfaces. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 38, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mohamed, J.A.; Huang, D.B. Biofilm formation by enterococci. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 1581–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tienungoon, S.; Ratkowsky, D.A.; McMeekin, T.A.; Ross, T. Growth Limits of Listeria monocytogenes as a Function of Temperature, pH, NaCl, and Lactic Acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4979–4987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wałecka-Zacharska, E.; Gmyrek, R.; Skowron, K.; Kosek-Paszkowska, K.; Bania, J. Duration of Heat Stress Effect on Invasiveness of L. monocytogenes Strains. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 1457480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Santos, T.; Viala, D.; Chambon, C.; Esbelin, J.; Hébraud, M. Listeria monocytogenes Biofilm Adaptation to Different Temperatures Seen Through Shotgun Proteomics. Front. Nutr. 2019, 6, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Galié, S.; García-Gutiérrez, C.; Miguélez, E.M.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Biofilms in the Food Industry: Health Aspects and Control Methods. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Habimana, O.; Heir, E.; Langsrud, S.; Asli, A.W.; Møretrø, T. Enhanced surface colonization by Escherichia coli O157:H7 in biofilms formed by an Acinetobacter calcoaceticus isolate from meat-processing environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 6, 4557–4559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bridier, A.; Sanchez-Vizuete, P.; Guilbaud, M.; Piard, J.-C.; Naïtali, M.; Briandet, R. Biofilm-associated persistence of food-borne pathogens. Food Microbiol. 2015, 45, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Isela, S.; Sergio, N.; Jose, M.; Rene, H.; Claudio, C. Ascorbic acid on oral microbial growth and biofilm formation. Pharma Innov. 2013, 2, 104–109. [Google Scholar]
  16. Vilchèze, C.; Hartman, T.; Weinrick, B.; Jacobs, W.R., Jr. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is extraordinarily sensitive to killing by a vitamin C-induced Fenton reaction. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Verghese, R.J.; Mathew, S.K.; David, A. Antimicrobial activity of vitamin C demonstrated on uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. J. Curr. Res. Sci. Med. 2017, 3, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Novak, J.S.; Fratamico, P.M. Evaluation of ascorbic acid as a quorum sensing analogue to control growth, sporulation, and enterotoxin production in Clostridium perfringens. J. Food Sci. 2004, 69, FMS72–FMS78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pandit, S.; Mokkapati, V.R.S.S.; Helgadóttir, S.H.; Westerlund, F.; Mijakovic, I. Combination of cold atmospheric plasma and vitamin C effectively disrupts bacterial biofilms. Clin. Microbiol. 2017, 6, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Han, J.H. Edible Films and Coatings: A Review. In Innovations in Food Packaging, 2nd ed.; Han, J., Ed.; Pepsico Inc.: Plano, TX, USA, 2014; pp. 213–255. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mlalila, N.; Hilonga, A.; Swai, H.; Devlieghere, F.; Ragaert, P. Antimicrobial packaging based on starch, poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) and poly(lactic-co-glycolide) materials and application challenges. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 74, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yam, K.L.; Lee, D.S. Emerging food packaging technologies: An overview. In Emerging Food Packaging Technologies: Principles and Practice, 1st ed.; Yam, K.L., Lee, D.S., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2012; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  23. Meyers, A.; Furtmann, C.; Jose, J. Direct optical density determination of bacterial cultures in microplates for high-throughput screening applications. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2018, 118, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, H.M.; Wakisaka, N.; Maeda, O.; Yamamoto, T. Vitamin C inhibits the growth of a bacterial risk factor for gastric carcinoma: Helicobacter Pylori. Cancer 1997, 80, 1897–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Valero, A.; Carrasco, E.; Pѐrez-Rodriguez, F.; Garcìa-Gimeno, R.M.; Zurera, G. Growth/no growth model of Listeria monocytogenes as a function of temperature, pH, citric acid and ascorbic acid. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 224, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mirani, Z.A.; Khan, M.N.; Siddiqui, A.; Khan, F.; Aziz, M.; Naz, S.; Ahmed, A.; Khan, S.I. Ascorbic acid augments colony spreading by reducing biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2018, 21, 175–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Diaz De Rienzo, M.A.; Stevenson, P.S.; Marchant, R.; Banat, I.M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm disruption using microbial surfactants. JAM 2016, 120, 868–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Pandit, S.; Ravikumar, V.; Abdel-Haleem, A.M.; Derouiche, A.; Mokkapati, V.R.S.S.; Sihlbom, C.; Mineta, K.; Gojobori, T.; Gao, X.; Westerlund, F.; et al. Low concentrations of vitamin C reduce the synthesis of extracellular polymers and destabilize bacterial biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Tabak, M.; Armon, R.; Rosenblat, G.; Stermer, E.; Neeman, I. Diverse effect of ascorbic acid and palmitoyl ascorbate on Helicobacter pylori survival and growth. Fed. Eur. Microbiol. Soc. Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 224, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Helgadóttir, S.; Pandit, S.; Mokkapati, V.R.; Westerlund, F.; Apell, P.; Mijakovic, I. Vitamin C pretreatment enhances the antibacterial effect of cold atmospheric plasma. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. El-Gebaly, E.; Essam, T.; Hashem, S.; El-Baky, R.A. Effect of levofloxacin and vitamin C on bacterial adherence and preformed biofilm on urethral catheter surfaces. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2012, 4, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Abu-Ghazaleh, B.M. Effects of ascorbic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, NaCl, potassium sorbate and Thymus vulgaris extract on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 7, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kallio, J.; Jaakkola, M.; Maki, M.; Kilpelainen, P.; Virtanen, V. Vitamin C inhibits Staphylococcus aureus growth and enhances the inhibitory effect of quercetin on growth of Escherichia coli in vitro. Planta Med. 2012, 78, 1824–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Khameneh, B.; Fazly Bazzaz, B.S.; Amani, A.; Rostami, J.; Vahdati-Mashhadian, N. Combination of anti-tuberculosis drugs with vitamin C or NAC against different Staphylococcus aureus and Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Microb. Pathog. 2016, 93, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. McGann, P.; Ivanek, R.; Wiedmann, M.; Boor, K.J. Temperature-dependent expression of Listeria monocytogenes internalin and internalin-like genes suggests functional diversity of these proteins among the listeriae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 2806–2814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Mauder, M.; Williams, T.; Fritsch, F.; Kuhn, M.; Beier, D. Response regulator DegU of Listeria monocytogenes controls temperature-responsive flagellar gene expression in its unphosphorylated state. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 13, 4777–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Peel, M.; Donachie, W.; Shaw, A. Temperature-dependent expression of flagella of Listeria manocytogenes studied by electron microscopy, SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1988, 134, 2171–2178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Way, S.S.; Thompson, L.J.; Lopes, J.E.; Hajjar, A.M.; Kollmann, T.R.; Freitag, N.E.; Wilson, C.B. Characterization of flagellin expression and its role in Listeria monocytogenes infection and immunity. Cell. Microbiol. 2004, 6, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Piercey, M.J.; Hingston, P.A.; Truelstrup Hansen, L. Genes involved in Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation at a simulated food processing plant temperature of 15 °C. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2016, 223, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kadam, S.R.; den Besten, H.M.; van der Veen, S.; Zwietering, M.H.; Moezelaar, R.; Abee, T. Diversity assessment of Listeria monocytogenes biofilm formation: Impact of growth condition, serotype and strain origin. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2013, 165, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Di Ciccio, P.; Vergara, A.; Festino, A.R.; Paludi, D.; Zanardi, E.; Ghidini, S.; Ianieri, A. Biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus on food contact surfaces: Relationship with temperature and cell surface hydrophobicity. Food Control 2015, 50, 930–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pagedar, A.; Singh, J.; Batish, V.K. Surface hydrophobicity, nutritional contents affect Staphylococcus aureus biofilms and temperature influences its survival in preformed biofilms. J. Basic Microb. 2010, 50, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Silva-Meira, Q.G.; Medeiros-Barbosa, I.; Athayde, A.J.A.A.; Siqueira-Júnior, J.P.; Souza, E.L. Influence of temperature and surface kind on biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus from food-contact surfaces and sensitivity to sanitizers. Food Control 2012, 25, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. White-Ziegler, C.A.; Um, S.; Pérez, N.M.; Berns, A.L.; Malhowski, A.J.; Young, S. Low temperature (23 °C) increases expression of biofilm-, cold-shock- and RpoS-dependent genes in Escherichia coli K-12. Microbiology 2008, 154, 148–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Kowalczyk, D.; Kazimierczak, W.; Zięba, E.; Mężyńska, M.; Basiura-Cembala, M.; Lisiecki, S.; Karaś, M.; Baraniak, B. Ascorbic acid- and sodium ascorbate-loaded oxidized potato starch films: Comparative evaluation of physicochemical and antioxidant properties. Carbohyd. Polym. 2018, 181, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Lee, J.-S.; Chang, Y.; Lee, E.-S.; Song, H.-G.; Chang, P.-S.; Han, J. Ascorbic Acid-Based Oxygen Scavenger in Active Food Packaging System for Raw Meatloaf. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 682–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on Food Additives (Text with EEA Relevance). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ (accessed on 24 February 2020).
  48. Stepien, K.; Prinsloo, P.; Hitch, T.; McCulloch, T.; Sims, R. Acute renal failure, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, and secondary oxalosis in a young female patient. Int. J. Nephrol. 2011, 679160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Curhan, G.C.; Willett, W.C.; Rimm, E.B.; Stampfer, M.J. A prospective study of the intake of vitamins C and B6, and the risk of kidney stones in men. J. Urol. 1996, 155, 1847–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meyers, D.G.; Maloley, P.A.; Weeks, D. Safety of antioxidant vitamins. Arch. Intern. Med. 1996, 156, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Reduction of optical density (%) after ascorbic acid treatment on Staphylococcus aureus (n = 14) strains. Amongst all strains, n = 5 were defined as weak biofilm producers and n = 9 as strong biofilm producers. Letters a, b mark statistically significant differences between different concentrations (all strains included). Letters x, y mark statistically significant differences between groups of strong and weak biofilm producers (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant difference between certain ascorbic acid concentration and positive control (marked with horizontal line, value “0” on y axis).
Figure 1. Reduction of optical density (%) after ascorbic acid treatment on Staphylococcus aureus (n = 14) strains. Amongst all strains, n = 5 were defined as weak biofilm producers and n = 9 as strong biofilm producers. Letters a, b mark statistically significant differences between different concentrations (all strains included). Letters x, y mark statistically significant differences between groups of strong and weak biofilm producers (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant difference between certain ascorbic acid concentration and positive control (marked with horizontal line, value “0” on y axis).
Microorganisms 08 00553 g001
Figure 2. Reduction of optical density (%) after ascorbic acid treatment on Listeria monocytogenes (n = 19) strains. Amongst all strains n = 10 were defined as weak biofilm producers and n = 9 as strong biofilm producers. Letters a, b, c, d mark statistically significant differences between different concentrations (all strains included). Letters x, y, z mark statistically significant differences between groups of strong and weak biofilm producers (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant difference between certain ascorbic acid concentration and positive control (marked with horizontal line, value “0” on y axis).
Figure 2. Reduction of optical density (%) after ascorbic acid treatment on Listeria monocytogenes (n = 19) strains. Amongst all strains n = 10 were defined as weak biofilm producers and n = 9 as strong biofilm producers. Letters a, b, c, d mark statistically significant differences between different concentrations (all strains included). Letters x, y, z mark statistically significant differences between groups of strong and weak biofilm producers (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant difference between certain ascorbic acid concentration and positive control (marked with horizontal line, value “0” on y axis).
Microorganisms 08 00553 g002
Figure 3. Reduction of optical density (%) after ascorbic acid treatment on Escherichia coli (n = 16) strains. Amongst all strains n = 9 were defined as weak biofilm producers and n = 7 as strong biofilm producers. Letters a, b mark statistically significant differences between different concentrations (all strains included). Letters x, y mark statistically significant differences between groups of strong and weak biofilm producers (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant difference between certain ascorbic acid concentration and positive control (marked with horizontal line, value “0” on y axis).
Figure 3. Reduction of optical density (%) after ascorbic acid treatment on Escherichia coli (n = 16) strains. Amongst all strains n = 9 were defined as weak biofilm producers and n = 7 as strong biofilm producers. Letters a, b mark statistically significant differences between different concentrations (all strains included). Letters x, y mark statistically significant differences between groups of strong and weak biofilm producers (p < 0.05). * Statistically significant difference between certain ascorbic acid concentration and positive control (marked with horizontal line, value “0” on y axis).
Microorganisms 08 00553 g003
Table 1. Cut-off point for differentiation of weak and strong biofilm producers.
Table 1. Cut-off point for differentiation of weak and strong biofilm producers.
OD K(+)/ODcBiofilm Production
≤3Weak
>3Strong

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Przekwas, J.; Wiktorczyk, N.; Budzyńska, A.; Wałecka-Zacharska, E.; Gospodarek-Komkowska, E. Ascorbic Acid Changes Growth of Food-Borne Pathogens in the Early Stage of Biofilm Formation. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 553. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8040553

AMA Style

Przekwas J, Wiktorczyk N, Budzyńska A, Wałecka-Zacharska E, Gospodarek-Komkowska E. Ascorbic Acid Changes Growth of Food-Borne Pathogens in the Early Stage of Biofilm Formation. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(4):553. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8040553

Chicago/Turabian Style

Przekwas, Jana, Natalia Wiktorczyk, Anna Budzyńska, Ewa Wałecka-Zacharska, and Eugenia Gospodarek-Komkowska. 2020. "Ascorbic Acid Changes Growth of Food-Borne Pathogens in the Early Stage of Biofilm Formation" Microorganisms 8, no. 4: 553. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms8040553

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop