Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Activity of Chemically and Biologically Treated Chitosan Prepared from Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Pupal Shell Waste
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Ionizing Radiation and Long-Term Storage on Hydrated vs. Dried Cell Samples of Extremophilic Microorganisms
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Bifidobacteria on Infant Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Abundance and Taxonomic Diversity of Filterable Forms of Bacteria during Succession in the Soils of Antarctica (Bunger Hills)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to Grow on and Bioleach Metals from Mars and Lunar Regolith Simulants under Simulated Microgravity Conditions

1
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Land and Water, Floreat 6014, Australia
2
School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley 6009, Australia
3
International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan
4
BioServe Space Technologies, Smead Aerospace Engineering Sciences Department, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
5
Centre for Microbiome Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, Translational Research Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Woolloongabba 4102, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 25 October 2021 / Revised: 15 November 2021 / Accepted: 15 November 2021 / Published: 23 November 2021

Abstract

:
The biomining microbes which extract metals from ores that have been applied in mining processes worldwide hold potential for harnessing space resources. Their cell growth and ability to extract metals from extraterrestrial minerals under microgravity environments, however, remains largely unknown. The present study used the model biomining bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to extract metals from lunar and Martian regolith simulants cultivated in a rotating clinostat with matched controls grown under the influence of terrestrial gravity. Analyses included assessments of final cell count, size, morphology, and soluble metal concentrations. Under Earth gravity, with the addition of Fe3+ and H2/CO2, A. ferrooxidans grew in the presence of regolith simulants to a final cell density comparable to controls without regoliths. The simulated microgravity appeared to enable cells to grow to a higher cell density in the presence of lunar regolith simulants. Clinostat cultures of A. ferrooxidans solubilised higher amounts of Si, Mn and Mg from lunar and Martian regolith simulants than abiotic controls. Electron microscopy observations revealed that microgravity stimulated the biosynthesis of intracellular nanoparticles (most likely magnetite) in anaerobically grown A. ferrooxidans cells. These results suggested that A. ferrooxidans has the potential for metal bioleaching and the production of useful nanoparticles in space.

1. Introduction

In situ resource utilization (ISRU), defined as the use of local resources to produce space consumables, is increasingly gaining importance with long-duration missions such as those to Mars, as the resupply from Earth is cost-limiting. The recent launch of NASA’s Moon to Mars program, aiming to lay the foundation for a sustained long-term human presence on the lunar surface will also require ISRU technologies that enable the production of commodities using natural resources from the Moon or other celestial bodies. Robust microorganisms can be used and potentially engineered using synthetic biology approaches as micro-factories for transforming in situ destination planet resources into useful products. It is known that microbes interact with minerals in the rocks or soils on Earth, contributing to the geochemical cycling of elements. Several chemolithoautotrophic microorganisms can dissolve valuable metals from minerals and wastes in the process called biomining [1,2]. Biomining has been successfully employed on Earth to extract copper, nickel, cobalt, zinc and uranium [3]. The use of microbes to extract resources from regoliths to establish space infrastructure can help tackle some economic and logistic challenges as they can be transported in small quantities and allowed to reproduce inside an extraterrestrial bioreactor. Biomining microbes could additionally be used as a microbial chassis to produce feedstocks for manufacturing processes from space junk, nutrients for astronauts, and on-demand space medicine, hence assisting in addressing the grand challenges in space synthetic biology [4].
The idea of using microorganisms to extract resources from regoliths have been explored as early as 2007 with NASA’s workshop on lunar regolith biomining. It was suggested that microbes might be able to extract metals and other resources from lunar materials, given suitable growth conditions [5]. The discovery of sulfate minerals in the Meridiani Planum on Mars [6,7] that indicates past aqueous acidic conditions led to a hypothesis for the role of chemolithoautotrophic microorganisms in the formation of these deposits. Several studies examining the ability of biomining microbes to grow on the minerals contained in space regoliths or assessing their survival capability when exposed to simulated space conditions have subsequently been reported [8,9,10]. For instance, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans was able to grow on the minerals contained in synthetic Mars regolith aerobically, using O2 as an electron acceptor for iron oxidation, or anaerobically, using H2 as an electron donor for iron reduction [8]. A. ferrooxidans could also oxidize iron from meteorites (Casas Grandes and Cape York) without the addition of extra nutrients [9]. Under the protection of a thin layer of ferric oxides and hydroxides, A. ferrooxidans could survive after being exposed for 10 h to simulated Mars environmental conditions [10]. Although microbes were able to survive in simulated space conditions, the poly-extreme nature of space will necessitate the use of containment when using terrestrial microbes in space. Recently, a prototype extraterrestrial biomining reactor was developed, and an International Space Station experiment, Biorock, was carried out with this prototype for studying microbe mineral interactions in space [11]. In addition to chemolithoautotrophs, dissimilatory metal-reducing bacteria such as Shewanella oneidensis that can respire anaerobically using solid metal oxides as a terminal electron acceptor and convert the oxides to more soluble forms have also been investigated. The theoretical feasibility (process yield and kinetics) of using A. ferrooxidans and S. oneidensis to extract iron from lunar and Martian regolith were simulated [12]. The estimated payback time of the infrastructure installation for the bioleaching process using S. oneidensis on Mars in this study was 3.3 years, with 44.7 g/L of iron being produced from 300 g/L Martian regolith [12].
Terrestrial microbes grown inside a space bioreactor will be exposed to different gravity conditions (e.g., lunar/Martian gravity, microgravity or weightlessness) depending on the location of the reactor. In addition to the reduction of the physical force of gravity, the microbes will encounter changes in the fluid dynamics or shear forces that occur during the microgravity of spaceflight and during the ground-based microgravity analogue. Several studies reported increased pathogenicity, enhanced biofilm formation or improved tolerance to antibiotics and other extreme conditions (e.g., osmolarity, pH, temperature) as microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments [13,14]. Assessing the leaching performance of biomining microbes in ground-based microgravity-simulating devices could be important for developing biomining technology for space applications. A. ferrooxidans and Metallosphaera sedula were able to release free soluble metals into the medium when they were grown in regolith simulants [15,16]. No study has previously measured the effect of microgravity on the metal solubilization of lunar and Martian regolith simulants using chemolithoautotrophs. So far, only the heterotroph S. oneidensis MR-1 has been studied for its ability to reduce iron under space flight conditions [17]. Here, the same space flight hardware: the fluid processing apparatus (FPA) and group activation pack (GAP), used in the space flight experiment with S. oneidensis, was used to explore the growth potential and metal extraction capability of the biomining microbe A. ferrooxidans under a simulated microgravity environment. The A. ferrooxidans was cultivated in the presence of lunar and Martian regolith simulants under anaerobic conditions using H2 as the electron donor. The microbial formation of magnetosomes under simulated microgravity was also evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain, Media and Growth Conditions

A. ferrooxidans DSM 14882T inoculum (10%) was grown in 125 mL serum flasks under anaerobic conditions for 7 days in 50 mL of modified 9K medium, which contained (g L−1): 0.4 (NH4)2SO4, 0.4 MgSO4·7H2O, 0.4 KH2PO4 and 1 mL of trace element solution. The trace element solution contained (mg L−1): 62 MnCl2·2H2O, 68 ZnSO4·7H2O, 64 CoCl2·6H2O, 30 H3BO3, 10 Na2MoO4, 66 CuCl2·2H2O and 30 NaVO3. The pH was adjusted to 1.8 with concentrated H2SO4. The medium was made anoxic by purging with N2 gas for 30 min. The medium was supplemented with 2.5 g L−1 Fe2(SO4)3 as the electron acceptor, while 2.50 mmol H2 was supplied as the electron donor by filling the 75 mL headspace with an H2:CO2 (80:20, v/v) gas mix using 0.8 bar overpressure.

2.2. Composition of Lunar and Martian Regolith Simulants

In this study, two regolith simulants, LMS-1 (lunar mare simulant) and MGS-1 (Mars global simulant) were used to examine whether these mineral mixtures could provide nutrients or energy necessary for lithoautotrophic growth of A. ferrooxidans. The regolith simulants were purchased from Exolith Lab (https://sciences.ucf.edu/class/exolithlab/, accessed on 12 March 2019), and their chemical and mineral compositions were as listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.

2.3. Microgravity Simulation Experiment

A BioServe Space Technologies GAP clinostat and FPA space flight hardware (previously operated in space over 5000 times) were used to grow A. ferrooxidans under a simulated microgravity (10−6× g) environment via clinorotation at 8 rpm [18,19]. LMS−1 and MGS-1 regolith simulants were sterilized by tyndallization at 100 °C for one hour over three successive days. After adding 13.5 mL of anoxic modified 9K medium into the fluid processing apparatus (FPA; BioServe, Boulder, CO, USA), 1% w/v of sterilized regolith and a 10% v/v 7-day inoculum of A. ferrooxidans culture were introduced into the FPA inside an anaerobic bag (Aldrich® AtmosBag, Merck, NJ, USA) filled with an H2:CO2 (80:20, v/v) gas mix. The initial cell number in each FPA was approximately 107 cells/mL. Some FPAs were supplemented with 2.5 g L−1 Fe2(SO4)3 (i.e., 12.5 mM Fe3+) as the electron acceptor (Table 3). Six FPAs were assembled into a group activation pack (GAP; BioServe, Boulder, CO, USA) (Figure 1A) and tightly sealed inside the anaerobic bag. The 18.2 mmoL of H2 in the 547 mL headspace of the GAP can diffuse into FPAs via gas-exchange (GE) membranes in each end and served as the electron donors for the cells. The cultures were incubated for 20 days at 30 °C under microgravity or Earth gravity conditions, which were maintained by rotating the GAP on a clinostat or letting it stand vertically, respectively (Figure 1B). Uninoculated FPAs in a GAP on Earth gravity conditions were used as abiotic controls (Table 3).

2.4. Physicochemical Analysis

After the 20-day incubation, samples (1 mL) were filtered through a 0.2 µm syringe filter (Terumo, Philippines) and collected in 1.5 mL tubes. The filtered samples were then tested for physicochemical parameters such as pH, redox potential and metal concentrations, as follows. Ferric iron concentrations were measured using modifications to the method previously described [20]. In brief, ferric iron standards (0–500 mg L−1) were prepared from a standard solution (1000 mg L−1 Fe(NO3)3 in 7 M HNO3; Merck). The indicator solution comprised 2 M HCl made using ultrapure water from Elga Purelab Flex water purifier. Sample and HCl solutions were combined in a volumetric ratio of 1:1 and mixed thoroughly. Modified 9K medium was used for blanks. Absorbance was measured at 340 nm in the Varioskan Lux plate reader (Thermo Scientific, Parkville, Australia) after loading samples into 96-well plates (Sarstedt, Mawson Lakes, Australia) in triplicate. Solution pH and redox were measured using the S2 Seven2Go™ meter and InLab® pH and redox microelectrodes, respectively. Redox potentials were reported against an Ag/AgCl reference. Samples for inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) were prepared by adding 1 mL of filtered sample to 0.1 mL 7M HNO3 and 8.9 mL ultrapure water. Where necessary, the samples were further diluted with Hamilton autodiluter and analyzed using a Varian 730-ES ICP-OES.

2.5. Cell Counting

Cell counting was carried out for each inoculated FPA. FPA was mixed well by shaking before sampling, and 100 µL aliquots were transferred to a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube. The tubes were sonicated three times for 30 s with a 30 s rest period between each sonication to detach and separate the bacteria from minerals. The regolith simulant in the tubes was left to settle for 30 min before taking the supernatant for measurement. Total cell count was performed in duplicate using a Helber Bacterial Counting Chamber SV400.

2.6. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

After incubating the cells under simulated microgravity and Earth gravity conditions for 20 days, 2 mL aliquots of cultures were immediately fixed with 2 mL of 5% glutaraldehyde prepared in phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7) for approximately 16 h and pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min. The fixed pellets were resuspended in 50 µL phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7) and transferred to the surface of glass plates precoated with 0.01% (w/v) poly-l-lysine and incubated for 30 min to allow cell attachment. The glass plates with attached cells were washed three times with phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7) and dehydrated in gradients of 25, 50, 75, 90, and 100% ethanol. The 100% ethanol was exchanged twice before the samples were freeze-dried in a Polaron KE3000 critical point drier (Quorum, Lewes, UK). The samples were then sputter-coated with Pt and viewed using a secondary electron imaging mode with a Verios XHR SEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

2.7. Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM)

After the incubation experiments, the cells were fixed and dehydrated as described above for SEM. The dehydrated cells in 100% ethanol were pelleted by centrifuging at 10,000× g for 10 min and were then infiltrated with 1 mL of 50% LR-white resin in 100% ethanol for 30 min at room temperature, and with 1 mL of 100% LR-white resin for 1 h at room temperature. After infiltration, cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 10 min, and 0.5 mL fresh 100% LR-white resin was added to the pellet and resuspended gently without forming air bubbles. The resin was polymerized at 60 °C for 2 days and cut into 80 nm-thick sections by a diamond knife (DiATOME, Hatfield, PA, USA). The sections were attached onto carbon-coated copper microgrids and viewed using a STEM mode with a Verios XHR SEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The statistical significances of the differences in results obtained for cultures incubated under various conditions were determined via unpaired two-sided t-tests, using R.

3. Results

The ability of A. ferrooxidans to extract metals from lunar and Martian regolith simulants was evaluated under simulated microgravity and Earth gravity conditions. A. ferrooxidans cultures were grown anaerobically using H2 as an electron donor inside FPAs with four substrate alternatives and two gravitational conditions (Figure 2).

3.1. Cell Growth

A. ferrooxidans appeared not to be able to grow solely in the presence of mars regolith simulants (MR), without the addition of Fe2(SO4)3 (Figure 3). The cell density in MR cultures remained similar to initial cultivation. The absence of observable growth in MR cultures was likely because the carbon source (CO2) provided in the gas mixture or the electron donor (Fe3+) gained from the regolith simulants was not sufficient to support growth, possibly leading the cells to starvation [21]. Under Earth gravity, the growth of A. ferrooxidans in MRS cultures was enhanced when cultivated with the Mars regolith simulant plus Fe2(SO4)3 (MRS vs. S in Figure 3, p-value = 0.0007). This was likely because MRS contains a high amount of iron (in ferrous and ferric forms) (Table 1).
Simulated microgravity affected the growth of A. ferrooxidans differently depending on which regolith simulants were added into the cultures. The cell density of the S and LRS cultures grown in clinostat appeared to be slightly higher than in Earth gravity. However, the difference between them was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.0795 and 0.2765 for S and LRS cultures, respectively). The number of cells in the MRS clinostat cultures were significantly lower (p-value = 0.0028) than in control cultures. The extra energy input presented in MRS may not be sufficient to encounter the stress caused by the regolith simulant and simulated microgravity conditions. The low cell counts in clinostat MRS cultures did not reflect the high ferric consumption rate presented in Table 4. Except for MR that did not get supplementation of Fe2(SO4)3, all cultures showed a higher ferric consumption rate when cultivated under simulated microgravity than in Earth gravity.

3.2. Changes in Ferric and Total Soluble Iron Concentration, Redox Potential and pH

The soluble ferric and total iron concentrations, redox potential and solution pH in the FPAs at the start and after 20 days of incubation are shown in Figure 4. The ferric iron concentration results for the substrate only (S), as well as both Mars and lunar regolith simulant cultures supplemented with Fe2(SO4)3 (MRS and LRS) showed a decrease after 20 days of incubation (Figure 4A). Together with the relatively minor decrease in total soluble iron concentrations (Figure 4B), this suggested ferric iron reduction and, hence, microbial activity. In cultures incubated under both simulated microgravity and Earth gravity conditions, there appeared to be lower ferric consumption with Fe3+ only (S) cultures as compared to the regolith cultures amended with Fe3+ (LRS and MRS) (Figure 4A and Table 4). This indicated that the regolith simulant did not have an inhibiting effect on anaerobic ferric iron reduction. No iron reduction was detected in the cultures with regolith simulant (MR-IE and MR-IM) only or in the abiotic tubes with substrate only (S-AE) or with regolith simulant only (MR-AE) (Figure 4A). However, some ferric iron reduction was detected in the abiotic tubes amended with both regoliths and substrate (MRS and LRS), although to a lesser extent than in the inoculated tubes, indicating possible ferric precipitation. Interestingly, simulated microgravity appeared to enhance the ferric reduction in all cultures amended with Fe3+ (S, MRS and LRS). The increase in ferric consumption was significantly higher in the S and MRS cultures grown under simulated microgravity than under Earth gravity (p-value = 0.0031 and 0.0003, respectively, Table 4).
In the presence of Mars regolith (MR), the total soluble iron concentration in inoculated FPAs increased under microgravity conditions as compared to time 0 and incubation under Earth gravity conditions (Figure 4B). This was consistent with the lower redox potential in the MR culture incubated under microgravity conditions as compared to under Earth gravity conditions. However, abiotic FPAs with the Mars regolith simulant (MR) showed a higher increase in soluble Fe than inoculated FPAs (p-value = 0.0002). In the Mars and lunar regolith simulant cultures supplemented with Fe3+ (i.e., MRS and LRS cultures, respectively) and incubated under Earth gravity or simulated microgravity conditions, soluble Fe concentrations were lower after 20 days of incubation as compared to the start of the experiment. A similar decrease in soluble Fe was detected in abiotic FPAs over time, suggesting iron precipitation.
All cultures, including MR, had lower redox potential after 20 days of incubation than at the start of the experiment, suggesting that reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ occurred (Figure 4C), which was consistent with the Fe3+ and total dissolved Fe results (Figure 4A,B). Redox potential also decreased somewhat in the abiotic FPAs that contained regolith simulants, while in the abiotic Fe3+ only FPA, no notable decrease in redox potential was detected. The solution pH increased slightly over time in all regolith simulant-containing FPAs, including in the abiotic controls. In inoculated FPAs, the pH increase was, however, more notable (Figure 4D). The pH increase in the abiotic FPAs (from pH 2 to ~2.5–3) was likely caused by acid consuming minerals in the regolith simulants. In regolith simulant-containing cultures, the pH increase was higher under simulated microgravity conditions than under Earth gravity.

3.3. Solubilisation Elements under Earth Gravity and Simulated Microgravity Conditions

The effect of simulated microgravity on the solubilization of elements from lunar and Mars regolith simulants was evaluated by analyzing the soluble concentrations of the selected elements after the 20-day incubation under Earth gravity (control) and simulated microgravity conditions. The regolith elements that were considered valuable for mining and were analyzed in this study were iron, aluminum (for space construction materials) and silicon (for solar cells). Other elements analyzed were manganese, sulfur and titanium. Solubilization of essential cations for life such as sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium were also investigated. Simulated microgravity had different impacts on the leaching of various elements, as shown in Figure 4B, Figure 5 and Figure 6.
The leaching of aluminum from Martian and lunar regolith simulants was higher in abiotic FPAs than in inoculated FPAs (p-value < 0.0001) (Figure 5A). In inoculated FPAs, Al leaching was somewhat higher under Earth gravity conditions than under simulated microgravity. Silicon leached readily from both Mars and lunar regolith simulants in both inoculated and abiotic FPAs (Figure 5B). In FPAs with Mars regolith simulant only (MR), abiotic FPAs showed higher leaching than inoculated FPAs (p-value < 0.0001). On the other hand, inoculated FPAs containing Mars or lunar regolith simulants and Fe3+ (MRS and LRS) showed higher leaching when incubated under simulated microgravity conditions than the inoculated FPAs under Earth gravity or the abiotic FPAs (p-value < 0.0001 for MRS and p-value = 0.0003 for LRS). The leaching of Si from the Mars and lunar regolith simulant in the presence of Fe3+ was similar in the inoculated and abiotic FPAs under Earth gravity conditions. No titanium leaching was detected under any conditions, as the soluble titanium concentrations were lower after 20 days than on day 0 for all regolith simulant-containing FPAs (Figure 5C).
The amount of manganese leached from Mars regolith simulants without substrate amendment (MR) in inoculated FPAs was slightly higher than that detected in abiotic FPAs (Figure 5E). On the other hand, for FPAs amended with Fe3+ (MRS and LRS), the inoculated FPAs incubated under both Earth gravity and simulated microgravity showed notably higher Mn leaching than the abiotic FPAs (p-value = 0.0008 for MRS and p-value = 0.0007 for LRS). Moreover, the simulated microgravity seemed to increase Mn leaching from MRS in inoculated FPAs supplemented with Fe3+. Soluble sulfur concentration increased over time in all FPAs (Figure 5F). In inoculated FPAs with Mars regolith simulant and Fe3+ (MRS), the increase in soluble sulfur concentration was similar to that detected in abiotic FPAs. On the other hand, FPAs with Mars regolith simulant only (MR) or lunar regolith simulant and Fe3+ (LRS), the increase in soluble sulfur concentration was higher in inoculated FPAs than in abiotic FPAs (p-value = 0.0003 for MR and p-value < 0.0001 for LRS). The concentrations were similar for inoculated FPAs incubated under both Earth gravity and simulated microgravity conditions.
When comparing to day 0, the leaching of Na from Mars regolith simulant without Fe3+ (MR) in inoculated FPAs was somewhat lower than in abiotic FPAs, but the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 6A, p-value = 0.1073). For FPAs containing Mars regolith simulant and Fe3+ (MRS), the increase in soluble Na concentration was higher in the inoculated FPAs under microgravity and abiotic FPAs than in the inoculated FPAs under Earth gravity conditions (p-value = 0.007). For FPAs with lunar regolith simulant and Fe3+ (LRS), cultures incubated under microgravity showed more Na leaching than abiotic FPAs. However, the inoculated FPAs under Earth gravity had lower Na leaching than abiotic FPAs. Soluble potassium concentration decreased over time in all inoculated FPAs under both Earth gravity and simulated microgravity conditions, whereas abiotic FPAs with regolith simulants (MR, MRS and LRS) showed a slight increase in K concentrations over time (Figure 6B).
Magnesium leached in all FPAs (Figure 6C). For FPAs with Mars regolith simulant (MR), Mg leaching was lower in inoculated FPAs than in abiotic FPAs (p-value < 0.0001), whereas for FPAs with Mars regolith simulant and Fe3+(MRS), inoculated FPAs showed higher leaching than abiotic ones. Moreover, for the inoculated MRS FPAs, the Mg leaching was higher under simulated microgravity than under Earth gravity conditions (p-value < 0.0001). For FPAs with lunar regolith simulant and Fe3+, the inoculated cultures incubated under microgravity showed also higher leaching than those under Earth gravity or abiotic FPAs (p-value = 0.0026). Calcium leached more from Mars regolith simulant than from lunar regolith simulant (Figure 6D). For Mars regolith simulant without Fe3+ (MR), the leaching was similar in the inoculated and abiotic FPAs. For FPAs with Mars regolith simulant and Fe3+ (MRS), the abiotic FPAs showed higher Ca leaching than the inoculated FPAs (p-value = 0.0181). The leaching of Ca in inoculated FPAs with lunar regolith simulant and substrate (LRS) under Earth gravity conditions was lower than that under simulated microgravity conditions and in abiotic FPAs (p-value < 0.0001).

3.4. SEM and STEM Observation of Cell Morphology

SEM analyses were conducted for A. ferrooxidans after 20-day cultivation under Earth gravity and simulated microgravity conditions to examine possible changes in cell morphology (Figure 7). No significant difference in the cell size was observed between the two conditions (Figure S1). The lack of changes in the thickness and structure of the cell envelope was further confirmed by STEM observation of 80-nm thick cell sections (Figure 8). This may be because motile A. ferrooxidans potentially disrupted the quiescent extracellular environment by active cell movement. However, STEM revealed that under simulated microgravity conditions, A. ferrooxidans cells produced spherical mineral nanoparticles in the cytoplasm. Similar spherical nanoparticles could not be observed in the cytoplasm of the cells cultured under Earth gravity.

4. Discussion

In the next decade, space exploration will likely move beyond low Earth orbit into deeper space. A long journey through the solar system would require novel means for providing supplies that rely on in situ destination resources. Robust organisms could be engineered to produce on-demand space consumables using synthetic biology approaches. Chemolithoautotrophs such as A. ferrooxidans are emerging space synthetic biology hosts, given their ability to grow on minerals contained in the regolith [8,9]. Albeit less explored, A. ferrooxidans can also synthesize intracellular magnetite magnetosomes [22], which have recently drawn increasing interest as nanoscale drug carriers [23]. Hence, acidophiles such as A. ferrooxidans can be viewed as micro-factories capable of providing supplies for long-term missions such as construction metals (e.g., leaching of minerals contained in regolith) and iron oxide nanoparticles (e.g., magnetosome). To be used as synthetic biology host organisms, the growth, survival and adaptability of A. ferrooxidans in harsh space environments needs to be evaluated. While using a purposely-designed biomining reactor has addressed the issue of growing terrestrial microorganisms in a harsh space environment [11], the microbes still experience microgravity throughout the journey. Here, we evaluated the ability of A. ferrooxidans to grow, leach metals and form magnetosomes under simulated microgravity conditions.
A. ferrooxidans was previously shown able to grow solely on the minerals contained in Mars regolith simulants with no added nutrients [8]. However, we observed no growth in A. ferrooxidans cultures when grown without additional Fe3+. This is likely due to the amount of electron donor present in MRS-1 regolith simulant being significantly lower (about 10-20 times lower) than in the synthetic regolith used in [8]. Spaceflight and ground-based experiments suggested that microbes showed diverse effects when exposed to (simulated) microgravity [24], which might influence their viability and survival. Microbial growth responses to microgravity and its analogs were mainly dependent on two aspects, the motility of the strains used in the experiments and experimental conditions (e.g., suspension or agar cultures, high or low nutrient concentrations, oxygen availability of the liquid media [24]. Motile cells in liquid cultures can actively agitate the quiescent fluid environment under microgravity, hence reducing the fluid environment differences between microgravity and Earth gravity (control) cultures [25]. The growth of mostly non-motile cells in suspension cultures was shown to exhibit an increased final cell density under microgravity [25,26]. A. ferrooxidans has a twitching motility which occurs through type IV pili production [27]. The growth of A. ferrooxidans cultures was, however, increased when they are grown in clinostat, indicating that other fluid dynamics parameters (e.g., the absence of sedimentation, convection or hydrostatic pressure under microgravity) might influence the extracellular transport, and hence the cellular growth [24]. For instance, under simulated microgravity, the regolith simulants will be in a free-fall state as the microbes are not settling down at the bottom of the FPAs as they would in terrestrial gravity, potentially providing better access to the cells.
Less cell growth was observed when A. ferrooxidans cultures were grown with Mars regolith simulants plus Fe3+ in clinostat than in Earth gravity. The cells, however, were metabolically active, as demonstrated by a higher decrease in redox potential (or higher ferric reduction). This could be the adaptation strategy used by the cells in response to the simulated microgravity environment, such as rerouting the energy resources allocated for biomass formation into the expression of stress-related proteins (e.g., DNA repair mechanism). Proteins and genes of numerous stress responses showed altered abundance and expression after exposure to outer space (real) and simulated environments (reviewed in detail in [28]). The regolith simulants additionally exposed the cells to sub-optimal pH, likely due to the presence of acid-consuming minerals in the regolith. The highest pH exposure was experienced by cultures grown in clinostat and without the addition of Fe3+. These results suggested that the design of a space biomining bioreactor needs to consider continuous alkaline addition to reduce the abiotic stress encountered by cells and hence increase the leaching performance.
Studies have shown that lunar and Martian regoliths comprise a high amount of silica (SiO2) and alumina (Al2O3) and a moderate amount of calcium oxide (CaO), which could be used for the production of cementitious-based construction materials [29]. Regolith also contains bioessential cations such as Na+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, which could provide resources to sustain the growth of organisms of a higher taxon. Under terrestrial gravity, A. ferrooxidans mobilized higher concentrations of Mg and Mn from Martian and lunar regolith simulants than abiotic ones when cultivated with the addition of Fe3+. Higher soluble S was measured in the growth medium of A. ferrooxidans cultured in the presence of the lunar regolith simulant plus ferric, and Mars regolith. More metals (Na, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, S and Si) were leached when extreme thermoacidophile Metallosphaera sedula cultures were grown with Martian regolith simulants [16]. The drop in K concentrations was detected in leachate solutions of all biotic cultures, indicated its consumption by microbes in order to maintain the growing population. The decrease of total iron in the biotic cultures suggested the formation of insoluble iron oxyhydroxides and hence they were not included in the leachate solution used for ICP-OES analysis. Iron precipitation was also detected in abiotic FPAs over time. It should, however, be noted that these abiotic cultures were grown under Earth gravity conditions, and not under simulated microgravity.
Under simulated microgravity, A. ferrooxidans leached a higher amount of Si, Mn and Mg when cultivated in the presence of Mars and lunar regolith simulants plus Fe3+ than abiotic controls. A recent International Space Station (ISS) biomining experiment demonstrated that the efficacy of the bioleaching process in the space environment depends on the microbes used, the metals leached and the gravity the applied [30,31]. Bioleaching of rare earth elements (REEs) from basaltic rock using three microorganisms showed that increased leached concentrations of REEs were obtained with Sphingomonas (S.) desiccabilis, but not with Bacillus subtilis or Cupriavidus metallidurans. The statistical difference between the biological and abiotic leaching processes of REEs was only observed in simulated Mars and Earth gravities, but not in microgravity [30]. S. desiccabilis and B. subtilis enhanced the leaching of vanadium under all gravities (microgravity, simulated Mars and Earth gravity) compared to sterile controls [31].
In addition to solubilizing metals, A. ferrooxidans is capable of synthesizing magnetic nanoparticles, known as magnetosomes. Magnetosomes, membrane-enclosed intracellular crystals of a magnetic iron mineral [32], provides a means for magnetotactic bacteria to navigate in response to Earth’s magnetic field. The synthesis of magnetosomes is favored under low redox potential and under oxygen-limited conditions [33]. The optimum conditions for magnetosome formation in A. ferrooxidans were reported for aerobic growth, 160 mM FeSO4, 2.4 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 20 °C, pH 1.75 and 50% loadings of medium (which correlated with oxygen concentration) [34]. We demonstrated here that A. ferrooxidans was also able to form magnetosomes when grown under anoxic conditions. Furthermore, magnetosome biosynthesis was enhanced when the microbes were grown under simulated microgravity. On the contrary, magnetotactic bacteria Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum lost their magnetosome and hence failed to exhibit magnetotaxis when grown aboard the space shuttle and the space station MIR [35]. The chain of magnetite was not formed or not preserved in the microgravity environment, likely correlated with the loss of cellular integrity in M. magnetotacticum. Electron micrographs of the ultrathin section of A. ferrooxidans BY-3 showed that only 1-3 magnetosomes per cell was found inside the cells, and no chain of magnetosomes was observed [22].
There has been increasing interest in the use of magnetosomes for drug delivery due to their intrinsic properties (e.g., magnetotaxis, low toxicity, biocompatibility, uniform shape and size, good dispersibility under physiological conditions, high surface to volume ratio, easy to modify, etc.) [36]. The abundance of primary amino groups in the surface of magnetosomes can be functionalized with diverse bioactive molecules (e.g., ligands) to potentially target the affected area and hence reduce the adverse side effects. Bacterial magnetosomes, synthesized by magnetotactic bacteria or by A. ferrooxidans, could potentially be used for similar applications, considering there is no immediate access to medical support in space. While the biosynthesis of magnetite nanoparticles is well known for cells aerobically cultivated with Fe2+/O2 [34], it has not been studied for anaerobically cultivated cells. The finding that microgravity stimulated the nanoparticle synthesis in anaerobically grown A. ferrooxidans suggests the potential of using A. ferrooxidans cells to produce useful nanoparticle materials in space.

5. Conclusions

We have demonstrated here that the biomining model organism A. ferrooxidans could potentially be used for space applications. A. ferrooxidans was able to grow anaerobically and solubilize metals from lunar and Martian regolith simulants, which mainly consist of oxides, under simulated microgravity conditions. Depending on the metals, a different performance of leaching was observed in comparison to the abiotic (acid) leaching. The biosynthesis of intracellular magnetite was additionally increased under simulated microgravity, thus opening the possibility of using A. ferrooxidans to produce nanoparticles in space. Furthermore, as deep space missions will go beyond low Earth orbit, the long-term exposures of astronauts to microgravity will require novel means of drug delivery (e.g., using nanoparticles).

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/microorganisms9122416/s1, Figure S1: Cell size of A. ferrooxidans cultures grown under Earth gravity (control) and in simulated microgravity conditions (clinostat). Sample size (nanaerobic control = 9 cells, nanaerobic clinostat = 6 cells).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.G.; methodology, Y.G., X.D., C.M., H.N.K., L.Z. and A.H.K.; formal analysis, Y.G., X.D., C.M., H.N.K. and A.H.K.; investigation, Y.G., X.D., C.M. and H.N.K.; resources, C.M., Y.G., L.Z. and A.H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.G., X.D., C.M., H.N.K., L.Z. and A.H.K.; writing—review and editing, Y.G., X.D., L.Z. and A.H.K.; visualization, Y.G., X.D. and A.H.K.; project administration, Y.G.; funding acquisition, Y.G., L.Z. and A.H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by CSIRO Space Future Science Platform (FSP), CSIRO Synthetic Biology FSP and CSIRO Land and Water. Luis Zea was supported by Colorado University, Boulder’s Research Innovation Office.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the facilities and the scientific and technical assistance of Microscopy Australia at the Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation & Analysis, The University of Western Australia, a facility funded by the University, State and Commonwealth Governments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Das, T.; Ayyappan, S.; Chaudhury, G.R. Factors affecting bioleaching kinetics of sulfide ores using acidophilic microorganisms. Biometals 1999, 12, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hong, Y.; Valix, M. Bioleaching of electronic waste using acidophilic sulfur oxidising bacteria. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 465–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kaksonen, A.H.; Boxall, N.J.; Usher, K.M.; Ucar, D.; Sahinkaya, E. Biosolubilisation of metals and metalloids. In Sustainable Heavy Metal Remediation; Volume 1: Principles and Processes; Rene, E.R., Sahinkaya, E., Lewis, A., Lens, P.N.L., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 233–283. [Google Scholar]
  4. Menezes, A.A.; Montague, M.G.; Cumbers, J.; Hogan, J.A.; Arkin, A.P. Grand challenges in space synthetic biology. J. R. Soc. Interface 2015, 12, 20150803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dalton, B.; Roberto, F. Lunar Regolith Biomining: Workshop Report; NASA: Moffet Field, CA, USA, 2008.
  6. Klingelhöfer, G.; Morris, R.V.; Bernhardt, B.; Schröder, C.; Rodionov, D.S.; De Souza, P.A.; Yen, A.; Gellert, R.; Evlanov, E.N.; Zubkov, B.; et al. Jarosite and hematite at Meridiani Planum from opportunity’s Mössbauer spectrometer. Science 2004, 306, 1740–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Squyres, S.W.; Grotzinger, J.P.; Arvidson, R.E.; Bell, J.F.; Calvin, W.; Christensen, P.R.; Clark, B.C.; Crisp, J.A.; Farrand, W.H.; Herkenhoff, K.E.; et al. In situ evidence for an ancient aqueous environment at Meridiani Planum, Mars. Science 2004, 306, 1709–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Bauermeister, A.; Rettberg, P.; Flemming, H.C. Growth of the acidophilic iron-sulfur bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans under Mars-like geochemical conditions. Planet. Space Sci. 2014, 98, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gronstal, A.; Pearson, V.; Kappler, A.; Dooris, C.; Anand, M.; Poitrasson, F.; Kee, T.P.; Cockell, C.S. Laboratory experiments on the weathering of iron meteorites and carbonaceous chondrites by iron-oxidizing bacteria. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 2009, 44, 233–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gómez Felipe, F.; Mateo-Martí, E.; Prieto-Ballesteros, O.; Martín-Gago, J.; Amils, R. Protection of chemolithoautotrophic bacteria exposed to simulated Mars environmental conditions. Icarus 2010, 209, 482–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Loudon, C.M.; Nicholson, N.; Finster, K.; Leys, N.; Byloos, B.; Van Houdt, R.; Rettberg, P.; Moeller, R.; Fuchs, F.M.; Demets, R.; et al. BioRock: New experiments and hardware to investigate microbe-mineral interactions in space. Int. J. Astrobiol. 2018, 17, 303–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Volger, R.; Pettersson, G.M.; Brouns, S.J.J.; Rothschild, L.J.; Cowley, A.; Lehner, B.A.E. Mining moon & mars with microbes: Biological approaches to extract iron from Lunar and Martian regolith. Planet. Space Sci. 2020, 184, 104850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Nickerson, C.A.; Ott, C.M.; Wilson, J.W.; Ramamurthy, R.; Pierson, D.L. Microbial responses to microgravity and other low-shear environments. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2004, 68, 345–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rosenzweig, J.A.; Abogunde, O.; Thomas, K.; Lawal, A.; Nguyen, Y.U.; Sodipe, A.; Jejelowo, O. Spaceflight and modeled microgravity effects on microbial growth and virulence. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 885–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Navarrete, J.U.; Cappelle, I.J.; Schnittker, K.; Borrok, D.M. Bioleaching of ilmenite and basalt in the presence of iron-oxidizing and iron-scavenging bacteria. Int. J. Astrobiol. 2013, 12, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kölbl, D.; Pignitter, M.; Somoza, V.; Schimak, M.P.; Strbak, O.; Blazevic, A.; Milojevic, T. Exploring fingerprints of the extreme thermoacidophile Metallosphaera sedula grown on synthetic martian regolith materials as the sole energy sources. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Dougherty, M. Results of the Micro-12 Flight Experiment: Effects of Microgravity on Shewanella Oneidensis MR-1; NASA: Moffet Field, CA, USA, 2019.
  18. Klaus, D.M. Clinostat and bioreactors. Gravit. Space Res. 2007, 14, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zea, L.; Estante, F.; Rosengren, A.; Stodieck, L.; Klaus, L. Determining the appropriate clinostat rotational speed. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Gravitational and Space Research (ASGSR), Washington, DC, USA, 31 October–3 November 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Govender, E.; Harrison, S.T.L.; Bryan, C.G. Modification of the ferric chloride assay for the spectrophotometric determination of ferric and total iron in acidic solutions containing high concentrations of copper. Miner. Eng. 2012, 35, 46–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Eckert, E.; Schaechterl, M. Bacterial growth under conditions of limited nutrition. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1962, 102, 549–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, L.; Zhang, S.; Chen, P.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y.; Li, H. Magnetic properties of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2013, 33, 4026–4031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, J.; Li, Y.; Liang, X.J.; Wang, P.C. Bacterial Magnetosome: A novel biogenetic magnetic targeted drug carrier with potential multifunction. J. Nanomater. 2011, 2011, 469031–469043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, B.; Li, D.G.; Huang, Y.; Liu, C.T. Effects of spaceflight and simulated microgravity on microbial growth and secondary metabolism. Mil. Med. Res. 2018, 5, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Benoit, M.; Klaus, D.M. Microgravity, bacteria, and the influence of motility. Adv. Space Res. 2007, 39, 1225–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Baker, P.; Leff, L.G. The effect of simulated microgravity on bacteria from the Mir space station. Microgravity Sci. Technol. 2004, 15, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, Y.Q.; Wan, D.S.; Huang, S.S.; Leng, F.F.; Yan, L.; Ni, Y.Q.; Li, H.Y. Type IV pili of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans are necessary for sliding, twitching motility and adherence. Curr. Microbiol. 2010, 60, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Milojevic, T.; Weckwerth, W. Molecular mechanisms of microbial survivability in outer space: A systems biology approach. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Naser, M.Z. Extraterrestrial construction materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 105, 100577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cockell, C.S.; Santomartino, R.; Finster, K.; Waajen, A.C.; Eades, L.J.; Moeller, R.; Rettberg, P.; Fuchs, F.M.; Van Houdt, R.; Leys, N.; et al. Space station biomining experiment demonstrates rare earth element extraction in microgravity and Mars gravity. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 5523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cockell, C.S.; Santomartino, R.; Finster, K.; Waajen, A.C.; Nicholson, N.; Loudon, C.M.; Eades, L.J.; Moeller, R.; Rettberg, P.; Fuchs, F.M.; et al. ’ Everroad, R.C.; Demets, R. Microbially enhanced vanadium mining and bioremediation under micro and mars gravity on the International Space Station. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 641387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shively, J.M.; Cannon, G.C.; Heinhorst, S.; Fuerst, J.A.; Bryant, D.A.; Gantt, E.; Maupin-Furlow, J.A.; Schüler, D.; Pfeifer, F.; Docampo, R.; et al. Intracellular structures of prokaryotes: Inclusions, compartments and assemblages. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Schaechter, M., Ed.; Elsevier Inc.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 404–424. [Google Scholar]
  33. Olszweska-Widdrat, A.; Schiro, G.; Reichel, W.E.; Faivre, D. Reducing conditions favor magnetosome production in Magnetospirillum magneticum AMB-1. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, S.; Yan, L.; Li, H.; Liu, H. Optimal conditions for growth and magnetosome formation of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2012, 6, 6142–6151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Urban, J.E. Adverse effects of microgravity on the magnetotactic bacterium Magnetospirillum magnetotacticum. Acta Astronaut. 2000, 47, 775–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kuzajewska, D.; Wszolek, A.; Zwierello, W.; Kirczuk, L.; Maruszweska, A. Magnetotactic bacteria and magnetosomes as smart drug delivery systems: A new weapon on the battlefield with cancer? Biology 2020, 9, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Experimental set-up for incubation of A. ferrooxidans under simulated microgravity and Earth gravity conditions. (A) Schematic image and a photo of BioServe’s fluid processing apparatus (FPA) and group activation pack (GAP) used for cultivation. (B) A photo showing GAPs kept rotating on a clinostat to simulate a microgravity condition and standing vertically to represent the Earth gravity condition.
Figure 1. Experimental set-up for incubation of A. ferrooxidans under simulated microgravity and Earth gravity conditions. (A) Schematic image and a photo of BioServe’s fluid processing apparatus (FPA) and group activation pack (GAP) used for cultivation. (B) A photo showing GAPs kept rotating on a clinostat to simulate a microgravity condition and standing vertically to represent the Earth gravity condition.
Microorganisms 09 02416 g001
Figure 2. A. ferrooxidans cultured in BioServe’s fluid processing apparatus (FPA) with four substrate alternatives (1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS); 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S); 1% lunar regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+(LRS); 1% Mars regolith simulant (MR) and two gravitational conditions (control and clinostat) at 30 °C for 20 days. H2/CO2 gas mixture was added to all cultures as electron donor and carbon sources, respectively.
Figure 2. A. ferrooxidans cultured in BioServe’s fluid processing apparatus (FPA) with four substrate alternatives (1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS); 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S); 1% lunar regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+(LRS); 1% Mars regolith simulant (MR) and two gravitational conditions (control and clinostat) at 30 °C for 20 days. H2/CO2 gas mixture was added to all cultures as electron donor and carbon sources, respectively.
Microorganisms 09 02416 g002
Figure 3. Cell counts of A. ferrooxidans-ionoculated (I) cultures after incubation for 20 days under Earth gravity (E) and simulated microgravity (M) conditions in the presence of 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S); 1% Mars regolith simulants (MR), 1% Mars regolith simulants plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS) and 1% lunar regolith simulants plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (LRS). H2/CO2 gas mixture was added to all cultures as electron donor and carbon sources, respectively. The initial cell density was 1 × 107 cells mL−1. Error bars show standard deviations.
Figure 3. Cell counts of A. ferrooxidans-ionoculated (I) cultures after incubation for 20 days under Earth gravity (E) and simulated microgravity (M) conditions in the presence of 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S); 1% Mars regolith simulants (MR), 1% Mars regolith simulants plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS) and 1% lunar regolith simulants plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (LRS). H2/CO2 gas mixture was added to all cultures as electron donor and carbon sources, respectively. The initial cell density was 1 × 107 cells mL−1. Error bars show standard deviations.
Microorganisms 09 02416 g003
Figure 4. Initial (0 d) and final (20 d) (A) ferric iron concentration, (B) total iron concentration, (C) redox potential and (D) pH of A. ferrooxidans inoculated (I) cultures and abiotic controls (A) after incubation under Earth gravity (E) and simulated microgravity (M) conditions in the presence of 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S), 1% Mars regolith simulant (MR), 1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS) and 1% lunar regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3 (LRS). H2/CO2 gas mixture was added to all cultures as source of electron donor and carbon source, respectively. Error bars show standard deviations.
Figure 4. Initial (0 d) and final (20 d) (A) ferric iron concentration, (B) total iron concentration, (C) redox potential and (D) pH of A. ferrooxidans inoculated (I) cultures and abiotic controls (A) after incubation under Earth gravity (E) and simulated microgravity (M) conditions in the presence of 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S), 1% Mars regolith simulant (MR), 1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS) and 1% lunar regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3 (LRS). H2/CO2 gas mixture was added to all cultures as source of electron donor and carbon source, respectively. Error bars show standard deviations.
Microorganisms 09 02416 g004
Figure 5. Concentrations of soluble metal cations: (A) aluminium, (B) silicon, (C) titanium, (D) manganese and (E) sulfur in inoculated (I) and abiotic (A) FPAs after incubation for 0 and 20 days under Earth gravity (E) and simulated microgravity (M) conditions in the presence of 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S), 1% Mars regolith simulant (MR), 1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS) and 1% lunar regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ as substrates (LRS).
Figure 5. Concentrations of soluble metal cations: (A) aluminium, (B) silicon, (C) titanium, (D) manganese and (E) sulfur in inoculated (I) and abiotic (A) FPAs after incubation for 0 and 20 days under Earth gravity (E) and simulated microgravity (M) conditions in the presence of 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S), 1% Mars regolith simulant (MR), 1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS) and 1% lunar regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ as substrates (LRS).
Microorganisms 09 02416 g005
Figure 6. Concentrations of soluble elements: (A) sodium, (B) potassium, (C) magnesium and (D) calcium in inoculated (I) and abiotic (A) FPAs after incubation for 0 and 20 days under Earth gravity (E) and simulated microgravity (M) conditions in the presence of 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S), 1% Mars regolith simulant (MR), 1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS) and 1% lunar regolith simulant 12.5 mM Fe3+ (LRS). H2/CO2 gas mixture was added to all cultures as source of electron donor and carbon source, respectively.
Figure 6. Concentrations of soluble elements: (A) sodium, (B) potassium, (C) magnesium and (D) calcium in inoculated (I) and abiotic (A) FPAs after incubation for 0 and 20 days under Earth gravity (E) and simulated microgravity (M) conditions in the presence of 12.5 mM Fe3+ (S), 1% Mars regolith simulant (MR), 1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+ (MRS) and 1% lunar regolith simulant 12.5 mM Fe3+ (LRS). H2/CO2 gas mixture was added to all cultures as source of electron donor and carbon source, respectively.
Microorganisms 09 02416 g006
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of A. ferrooxidans cells incubated with H2/CO2 and Fe3+ as the electron donor, carbon source and electron acceptor in the absence of regolith simulant under Earth gravity (AC) and simulated microgravity (DF). White arrows indicate cells.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of A. ferrooxidans cells incubated with H2/CO2 and Fe3+ as the electron donor, carbon source and electron acceptor in the absence of regolith simulant under Earth gravity (AC) and simulated microgravity (DF). White arrows indicate cells.
Microorganisms 09 02416 g007
Figure 8. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of 80 nm-thick sections of A. ferrooxidans cells incubated with H2/CO2 and Fe3+ as the electron donor, carbon source and electron acceptor in the absence of regolith simulant under Earth gravity (AC) and simulated microgravity (DF).
Figure 8. Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of 80 nm-thick sections of A. ferrooxidans cells incubated with H2/CO2 and Fe3+ as the electron donor, carbon source and electron acceptor in the absence of regolith simulant under Earth gravity (AC) and simulated microgravity (DF).
Microorganisms 09 02416 g008
Table 1. Chemical composition of Martian and lunar regolith simulants used in this study (source: ExolithLab).
Table 1. Chemical composition of Martian and lunar regolith simulants used in this study (source: ExolithLab).
Major Chemical CompositionMars Global Simulant (MGS-1)(%-wt)Lunar Mare Simulant (LMS-1) (%-wt)
SiO245.5742.81
TiO20.304.62
Al2O39.4314.13
Cr2O30.120.21
FeO T16.857.87
MgO16.5018.89
MnO0.100.15
CaO4.035.94
Na2O3.664.92
K2O0.430.57
P2O50.37-
SO32.630.11
T = total iron oxide (FeO and Fe2O3).
Table 2. Mineral composition of Martian and lunar regolith simulants used in this study (source: ExolithLab).
Table 2. Mineral composition of Martian and lunar regolith simulants used in this study (source: ExolithLab).
Mineral ComponentMars Global Simulant (MGS-1)(%-wt)Lunar Mare Simulant (LMS-1) (%-wt)
Pyroxene20.332.8
Plagioclase27.119.8
Olivine13.711.1
Basalt-7.5
Basaltic glass22.9-
Ilmenite-4.3
Mg-sulfate4.0-
Ferrihydrite3.5-
Hydrated silica3.0-
Magnetite1.9-
Anhydrite1.7-
Fe-carbonate1.4-
Hematite0.5-
Table 3. Experimental conditions for testing metal solubilization from Martian (MR) and lunar regolith simulants (LR) in the presence and absence of substrates (Fe3+) (S) and A. ferrooxidans inoculum (I) vs. abiotic (A) control under simulated microgravity (M) and/or Earth gravity (E) conditions.
Table 3. Experimental conditions for testing metal solubilization from Martian (MR) and lunar regolith simulants (LR) in the presence and absence of substrates (Fe3+) (S) and A. ferrooxidans inoculum (I) vs. abiotic (A) control under simulated microgravity (M) and/or Earth gravity (E) conditions.
TreatmentRegolith Simulant
(1% w/v)
Electron Acceptor/Donor 1Culture (10% v/v)Gravity
S-IM-Fe3+ + H2/CO2A. ferrooxidansSimulated µg
MR-IMMartianH2/CO2A. ferrooxidansSimulated µg
MRS-IMMartianFe3+ + H2/CO2A. ferrooxidansSimulated µg
LRS-IMLunarFe3+ + H2/CO2A. ferrooxidansSimulated µg
S-IE-Fe3+ + H2/CO2A. ferrooxidansEarth Gravity
MR-IEMartianH2/CO2A. ferrooxidansEarth Gravity
MRS-IEMartianFe3+ + H2/CO2A. ferrooxidansEarth Gravity
LRS-IELunarFe3+ + H2/CO2A. ferrooxidansEarth Gravity
S-AE-Fe3+ + H2/CO2-Earth Gravity
MR-AEMartianH2/CO2-Earth Gravity
MRS-AEMartianFe3+ + H2/CO2-Earth Gravity
LRS-AELunarFe3+ + H2/CO2-Earth Gravity
1 Fe3+ = electron acceptor, H2 = electron donor, CO2 = carbon source.
Table 4. Average ferric consumption rates of A. ferrooxidans cultures incubated under Earth gravity and simulated microgravity conditions. S = 12.5 mM Fe3+ only, MR = 1% Mars regolith simulant, MRS = 1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+, LR = 1% lunar regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+.
Table 4. Average ferric consumption rates of A. ferrooxidans cultures incubated under Earth gravity and simulated microgravity conditions. S = 12.5 mM Fe3+ only, MR = 1% Mars regolith simulant, MRS = 1% Mars regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+, LR = 1% lunar regolith simulant plus 12.5 mM Fe3+.
Ferric Iron Consumption Rate (mg L−1 d−1)
CulturesEarth GravitySimulated Microgravity
S-I8.3 ± 2.215.6 ± 1.1
MR-INANA
MRS-I17.1 ± 1.122.2 ± 0.2
LRS-I20.0 ± 1.522.3 ± 0.3
S-A0ND
MR-ANAND
MRS-A11.3 ± 3.8ND
LRS-A9.9 ± 0.3ND
NA = not applicable as there was no Fe3+ addition to MR cultures. ND = not determined.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kaksonen, A.H.; Deng, X.; Morris, C.; Khaleque, H.N.; Zea, L.; Gumulya, Y. Potential of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to Grow on and Bioleach Metals from Mars and Lunar Regolith Simulants under Simulated Microgravity Conditions. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2416. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122416

AMA Style

Kaksonen AH, Deng X, Morris C, Khaleque HN, Zea L, Gumulya Y. Potential of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to Grow on and Bioleach Metals from Mars and Lunar Regolith Simulants under Simulated Microgravity Conditions. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(12):2416. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kaksonen, Anna H., Xiao Deng, Christina Morris, Himel Nahreen Khaleque, Luis Zea, and Yosephine Gumulya. 2021. "Potential of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to Grow on and Bioleach Metals from Mars and Lunar Regolith Simulants under Simulated Microgravity Conditions" Microorganisms 9, no. 12: 2416. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop