Next Article in Journal
The Autotrophic Core: An Ancient Network of 404 Reactions Converts H2, CO2, and NH3 into Amino Acids, Bases, and Cofactors
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Interactions at the Interface of Plant Root Hair Cells and Intracellular Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Assessment of Pb(II), Cd(II), and Al(III) Removal Capacity of Bacteria from Food and Gut Ecological Niches: Insights into Biodiversity to Limit Intestinal Biodisponibility of Toxic Metals
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Gnotobiotic Model to Examine Plant and Microbiome Contributions to Survival under Arsenic Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Native Vineyard Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts Used for Biological Control of Botrytis cinerea in Stored Table Grape

by
Antonio Domenico Marsico
1,
Matteo Velenosi
1,2,
Rocco Perniola
1,
Carlo Bergamini
1,
Scott Sinonin
3,
Vanessa David-Vaizant
3,
Flavia Angela Maria Maggiolini
2,
Alexandre Hervè
3,
Maria Francesca Cardone
1,* and
Mario Ventura
2,*
1
Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e L’Analisi dell’Economia Agraria-Centro di Ricerca Viticoltura ed Enologia (CREA-VE), Via Casamassima 148, 70010 Turi, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro”, Via Orabona 4, 70124 Bari, Italy
3
Equipe VAlMiS (Vin, Aliment, Microbiologie, Stress), UMR Procédés Alimentaires et Microbiologiques, AgroSupDijon—Université de Bourgogne/Franche-Comté, IUVV, Rue Claude Ladrey, BP 27877, 21000 Dijon, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 3 February 2021 / Revised: 15 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 22 February 2021

Abstract

:
Postharvest spoilage fungi, such as Botrytis cinerea, are considered the main cause of losses of fresh fruit quality and vegetables during storage, distribution, and consumption. The current control strategy is the use of SO2 generator pads whose application is now largely under observation. A high quantity of SO2 can be deleterious for fresh fruits and vegetables and it is not allowed in organic agriculture. For this reason, great attention has been recently focused on identifying Biological Control Agents (BCA) to implement biological approaches devoid of chemicals. In this direction, we carried out our study in isolating five different non-Saccharomyces yeast strains from local vineyards in the South of Italy as possible BCA. We performed both in vitro and in vivo assays in semi-commercial conditions on detached grape berries stored at 0 °C, simulating the temperature normally used during cold storage, and obtained relevant results. We isolated three M. pulcherrima strains and one L. thermotolerans strain able to largely antagonize the development of the B. cinerea, at both in vitro and in vivo conditions. In particular, we detected the ability of the three isolates of M. pulcherrima strains Ale4, N20/006, and Pr7 and the L. thermotolerans strain N10 to completely inhibit (100% in reduction) the mycelial growth of B. cinerea by producing fungistatic compounds. We found, using an extracellular lytic enzymes activity assay, that such activity could be related to lipid hydrolyzation, β-1,3-glucanase and pectinase activity, and pectinase and protease activity, depending on the yeasts used. Results from our in vitro assays allowed us to hypothesize for M. pulcherrima strains Ale4 and N20/006 a possible combination of both the production of soluble metabolites and volatile organic compounds to antagonize against B. cinerea growth. Moreover, in semi-commercial conditions, the M. pulcherrima strain N20/006 and L. thermotolerans strain N10 showed relevant antagonistic effect also at low concentrations (with a significantly reduction of ‘slip skin’ incidence of 86.4% and 72.7%, respectively), thus highlighting a peculiar property to use in commercial development for organic agriculture and the handling process.

1. Introduction

The Apulia region is the largest producer of table grape in Italy, accounting for 57% of the national production [1], and it is one of the top table grape-growing regions in the world.
Fresh table grape is a very delicate fruit, being subjected to deteriorations during postharvest handling and cold storage, which can result in stem browning, berry drop and microbial rots [2,3,4]. Fungal decay in postharvest is mainly due to the polyphagous and ubiquitous fungus Botrytis cinerea Pers.: Fr. (teleomorph: Botryotinia fuckeliana (de Bary) Whetzel) that is able to grow and spread even at low temperatures (< −0.5 °C) [5]. This fungus can develop under different conditions such as in the field, during storage, marketing, and even after customer purchase. In stored table grape, without appropriate conditions, symptoms of infections start with small necrosis on the skin, which enlarges in brown spots. In those areas, the fungus produces macerating enzymes below the skin, that separate the cuticle from the flesh (slip skin). Later, on those areas white fungal mycelium starts growing, which originates gray conidia. Wounds or openings in fruit surfaces serve as infection courts but B. cinerea can also directly penetrate healthy plant tissues, by secreting β-glucosidase, pectin methylesterase, polygalacturonases and aspartate proteinase which can degrade host cell walls [6]. Agronomic practices alone cannot prevent the disease in many grape-growing area, so chemical treatments should normally be applied [7]. During postharvest storage, many countries have banned treatments with synthetic fungicides that can have a dangerous impact on human health. As a consequence, the use of sulfur dioxide (SO2) generator pads is the most common commercial method to control the grey mold in stored table grapes. This strategy has been relatively successful worldwide because of its efficiency, ease of use, affordable cost, and low health risk when compared with fungicides [8]. The SO2 pads contain sodium meta-bilsulfite (Na2S2O5), which reacts with the moisture within the carton of grapes to release SO2, that is able to kill and eliminate any actively growing B. cinerea spores [9]. However, an excessive dose of SO2 can damage table grape, causing early browning of the rachis, berry cracking, fruit injury, and allergies in consumers [8]. Therefore, especially for export purposes, the EU countries proposed 10 ppm as the maximum level of SO2, in order to protect consumers and the environment. For these reasons, several alternative strategies have been proposed in the postharvest management of B. cinerea rots, including chemical [10], biological [11], and physical means [11,12]. In line with environmental-friendly approaches, ‘organic viticulture’ continues to increase globally. It is defined by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movement (IFOAM) as a holistic production management system which promotes and enhances agro-ecosystem health, including biodiversity, biological cycles, and soil biological activity. It emphasizes the use of management practices in preference to the use of off-farm inputs, considering that regional conditions require locally adapted systems [13].
Among different biological approaches, the use of the microbial antagonists like yeasts, fungi, and bacteria is quite promising and gaining popularity. In particular, the simple nutritional requirements, the ability to colonize dry surfaces for long periods of time and to grow rapidly on inexpensive substrates in bioreactors [14] and inability to produce allergenic spores or mycotoxins [15,16] are few of the features making yeasts as good Biological Control Agents (BCAs). As recently reviewed [17,18], non-Saccharomyces yeasts have been explored as biological control agents against different spoilage fungi, including B. cinerea. Different products based on yeasts reached advanced stages of development and commercialization such as AspireTM (based on Candida oleophila Kaisha & Iizuka), YieldplusTM (based on Cryptococcus albidus Skinner) and ShemerTM, (based on Metschnikowia pulcherrima Pitt & Mill). However, the widespread use of postharvest biocontrol products is still limited, due to their inconsistent performance under commercial conditions as well as the limited market and small size companies involved in their development and commercialization [19].
The first relevant step in developing BCAs is the isolation in their natural environments, in which they compete with plant pathogens [20,21]. For this reason, in this study, we aim to isolate different yeasts from table and wine cultivars healthy grapes in Southern Italy and evaluate their efficacy to control B. cinerea in both in vitro and in vivo conditions.
In detail, we isolate five yeast strains and characterize these at both a morphological and molecular level. We test their potential as BCA by in vitro assays, both at 4 °C and 25 °C, and test their potential as BCAs in semi-commercial use. Finally, we test their putative mechanism of action by investigating the ability to produce compounds with specific enzymatic activity against the pathogen. Overall, our data will facilitate future applications in organic agriculture, offering a wider repertoire of yeasts to be used as possible Biological Control Agents (BCAs).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Yeast and Pathogen Isolation and Culture Conditions

Yeasts used in this study were isolated from grape juice produced from berries belonging to the Apulian wine varieties “Negroamaro”, “Aleatico”, and “Primitivo” and to new genotypes of table grape, deriving from the breeding program in progress at CREA-Viticulture and Enology of Turi and currently identified with the codes ‘N20/006′and “N10. The main characteristics of the two genotypes are reported in Table S1 (Supplementary Materials). Of note, bunches were sampled at the beginning of October in the experimental vineyard at CREA-VE, (Turi (BA), Southern Italy) which was not subjected to specific treatment against grey mold. Selected bunches were sampled from plants that showed tolerance to grey mold and totally void of any sign of infection. The grapes were aseptically placed in a full-page microperforated-filter blender bag (filter porosity = 63 microns) (Bag Filter®—Interscience Bag System®, St Nom, France) and manually crushed to obtain 500 mL of grape juice ready for the isolation protocol. Appropriate dilutions of grape juice for each variety were performed before the plating step in YPDA-Cm (Yeast Extract Peptone Dextrose Agar; 1% yeast extract (Thermo Fisher, Kendel, Germany), 2% peptone (VWR Chemicals, Leuven, Belgium), 2% dextrose (VWR Chemicals, Leuven, Belgium), 2% Agar (VWR Chemicals, Leuven, Belgium), amended with 10 mgmL−1 of chloramphenicol (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Plates were incubated for 2–3 days at 25 °C. When colonies obtained from each variety resulted larger than 0.25 ± 0.05 mm [22], they were classified in different groups on the basis of their morphology and/or color. A representative colony from each group was selected and streaked on YPDA-Cm, grown for 48 h at 25 °C and then stored at −80 °C in liquid YPD with 30% (v/v) of glycerol added. The color and morphology of each isolate were further evaluated on Wallerstein Laboratory (WL) Nutrient Medium (VWR Chemicals, Leuven, Belgium), by using descriptors previously reported [23].
The B. cinerea isolate was recovered from diseased table grape berries (cultivar Red Globe) in Apulia (Italy). Firstly, we microscopically evaluated the presence of the typical conidiophore branches of B. cinerea, and subsequently we tested its virulence in wounded grape berries. In particular, using a sterile needle, we performed artificial wounds along with the equatorial area of 20 mature berries of the “Red Globe” cultivar, previously disinfected by dipping for 2 min in 2% (w/v) of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution, they were then rinsed with sterilized water and then air dried. The artificial wound was inoculated with 20 µL drop of 1 × 105 conidia mL−1 of B. cinerea. Berries were placed on a wet paper, which was inserted into boxes that were coated with a plastic film. After 5 days of incubation at 25 °C, we visually evaluated the ability of our B. cinerea isolate to develop the common symptoms of the disease. The isolate was stored at 25 °C on petri dishes containing Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) (VWR Chemicals, Leuven, Belgium).

2.2. Molecular Identifications

Yeast DNA was extracted through the Fast DNA® SPIN kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, LLC, Solon, OH, USA), following the manufacturer’s protocols. Briefly, liquid YPD, containing 48-h-old cells of each yeast strain, were added to a lysing matrix, treated with lysis buffer, and subjected to bead beating in the FastPrep® instrument. DNA was bound to a silica matrix, washed, and eluted in DNase-free water. DNA concentration and purity were assessed spectrophotometrically.
The identification and characterization of the isolates were then verified by the sequencing of 18S and 5.8SrDNA [24]. The NS1⁄ITS2 primer pair with the following sequences was used to amplify the ITS1 region of the 18S rDNA:NS1 5′-GTAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC-3′ and ITS2 5′-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3′ [24]. The ITS1/ITS4 primer pair with the following sequences was used to amplify the 5.8S: ITS1 5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′ and ITS4 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′ [25,26]. PCR was performed as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, repeated denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min (annealing temperature, 60 °C for 30 s), and elongation at 72 °C for 1 min for 30 cycles. The final elongation lasted for 5 min.
Amplified sequences, after an agarose (1%) gel electrophoretic run phase (orange G marker), were purified using QIA quick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or by gel band purification, following the manufacturer’s protocols, by GFX PCR DNA and gel band purification kit provided by GE Healthcare (www.gelifescieces.com/illustra, 22 February 2021). After purification, each sample was sequenced by using the Sanger sequencing method following the manufacturer’s protocol of Genome Lab Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing with the Quick start Kit (www.beckmancoulter.com, 22 February 2021). Subsequently, yeast isolates were identified and classified at the molecular level by using sequencing approaches. We sequenced the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region both of the 18S rDNA and the 5.8S-ITS region gene of rDNA [27] and BLAST searched against the RNA/ITS Database available at NCBI public repository in order to deeply identify genus and species of the isolates (Table S2 and supplementary sequencing data in Supplementary Materials).
A sequences BLAST was performed using the National Center for Bio-technology Information database, (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, 22 February 2021), by searching for significant alignments in the rDNA/ITS database.

2.3. In vitro Assay

The yeast strains were grown in flasks containing liquid YPD for 48 h at 25 °C and stored at 4 °C, ready for their use in in vitro assays. A cellophane agar layer technique (CALt) [28] was used in order to evaluate the ability of yeasts to reduce the in vitro mycelial growth of B. cinerea. Disc of 90 mm diameter were placed individually between two rectangular sheets of blotting paper, wrapped with aluminum foil, and autoclaved at 121 °C for 20′. A sterilized disc of cellophane was laid aseptically over the solidified YPDA medium in the culture plates. The plates were laid out overnight to allow the excess moisture to evaporate. A volume of 50 µL (at the concentrations of 1.5 x 107 CFUmL−1) of each yeast was uniformly distributed on the cellophane disc. A volume of 50 µL of sterilized water was used as the control on a different plate. For each yeast and control, five replicates were produced. After 2 days of incubation at 25 °C, the cellophane discs with and without yeast were removed from the plates. An agar block of 9 mm diameter, cut from the actively growing margins of B. cinerea, was placed at the center of all plates and incubated at 25 °C. The radial growth of the colony on 2nd, 4th, 6th, 8th, and 10th days of incubation was measured, and daily mycelial growth was calculated with the following formula.
i = 0 n ( y n + 1 y n ) N
where:
yn = the diameter of the mycelium of B. cinerea at the time n
yn+1 = the diameter of the mycelium of B. cinerea at the time n + 1
N = total number of days considered in the experiment
A modified dual culture method was used to specifically evaluate the efficacy of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from yeast against B. cinerea [29]. Aliquots of 20 μL of yeast suspensions (1.5 × 107 CFUmL−1) were seeded on plates containing YPD agar and incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. A mycelial disc (9 mm square plugs) of B. cinerea was placed on plates containing YPD agar. The plates with B. cinerea disc were individually covered face to face with dishes containing 48-h-old yeast isolates, in order to create a microenvironment suitable for the diffusion of volatile compounds eventually produced by tested yeast isolates. The control was prepared by using YPD agar plates without yeasts. The two plates were firmly wrapped together with Parafilm to prevent air leakage and incubated at 25 °C. Radial growth of B. cinerea was calculated as previously described. In both experiments for each yeast strain and control, five plates (replicates) were used and the average daily mycelial growth between replicates was calculated.

2.4. Extracellular Lytic Enzymes Activity

The ability of selected yeast to produce lytic enzymes (such as chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, pectinase, protease, and lipase) was assessed by growing selected isolates on specific growth media for 7 days at 25 °C and 30 days at 0 °C. In particular: (i) chitinase activity was evaluated on solid media containing colloidal chitin, prepared with the second method reported by Roberts and Selitrennikoff (1988) [30] and mineral salts reported by Souza et al., (2009) [31]. Extracellular chitinase activity was detected by the presence of a clear zone around the inoculum zone; (ii) β-1,3-glucanase activity was evaluated on solid medium (pH = 7), containing 5.0 g L−1 glucan (Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan), 6.7 g L−1 Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) (VWR Chemicals, Solon, OH, USA) and 15.0 g L−1 Agar. After the incubation period, the plates were stained with Congo Red (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (0.6 g L−1) and left at room temperature for 90 min. The stain not adsorbed was decanted and the hydrolysis of glucan was evaluated by the presence of a yellow-orange zone around the colonies [32]; (iii) pectinase activity was evaluated on solid medium (pH = 7) containing citrus pectin (Thermo Fisher, Kendel, Germany) 10 g L−1, YNB 6.7 g L−1 and Agar 15 g L−1. After incubation at 25 °C and 0 °C, plates were flooded with hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (Alfa Aesar GmbH & Co., Karlsruhe, Germany) (10 g L−1) and the presence of a clear zone around the colony indicated the degradation of pectines [33]; (iv) protease activity was evaluated on YPDA amended with casein (Merk KGaA, Dermstadt, Germany) 20 g L−1. The presence of a clear zone around the colony indicated the ability of isolates to degrade the casein [34]; (v) lipase activity was evaluated on tributyrin agar medium reported by Buzzini and Martini, (2002) [33]. After the incubation period, a clear zone around the colony was detected. For each yeast isolate, 10 μL of a culture suspension (107 CFU mL−1) were spotted on three plates of each growth media. For each yeast strain and growth media, the ability to hydrolyze the specific tested compound (presence of a clear or colored zone around the colony) was reported as a positive response (+).

2.5. Bioassays Antagonistic Activity

All yeast isolates used in the in vitro assays were evaluated for their ability to control Botrytis bunch rot, both in wounded berries and in semi-commercial experimental trials.
Mature berries from healthy bunches of the “Red Globe” cultivar were surface disinfected by dipping for 2 min in 2% (w/v) of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution, rinsed with sterilized water, and then air dried. Artificial wounds were performed using a sterile needle along with the berry equatorial areas. We evaluated the ability of yeast to control Botrytis bunch rot at two different concentrations 1.5 × 107 and 1.5 × 104 CFUmL−1. In both experiments, each wound was inoculated with a 20 µL drop of yeast suspensions, and 21 grape berries (three replicates each consisting of seven grape berries) for each yeast isolate were placed on plastic boxes. Twenty-one berries inoculated with 20 µL of sterilized water were used as the control. To create a humid environment, a wet paper was placed on the bottom of the boxes that was coated with a plastic film. The trays were incubated at 25 °C for 48 h. After this period, each wound was inoculated with a 20 µL drop of 1 × 105 conidiamL−1 of B. cinerea. A complete experimental design with three repetition for each treatment was performed. After 5 days of incubation at 25 °C, the disease severity (DS) was evaluated by using an empirical 0-to-4 rating scale (0 = no visible symptoms; 1 = sporulation covering 5–10% of the wound surface; 2 = sporulation covering 10–25% of the wound surface; 3 = sporulation covering 25–50% of the wound surface; 4 = sporulation covering more than 50% of the wound surface). The average of the disease severity was calculated for each plastic box by using the Townsend and Heuberger’s formula [35]. Furthermore, on the basis of the empirical scale, the disease incidence (calculated as the percentage ratio between the number of infected berries and the total number of berries evaluated) and the Mckinney’s Index [36] were calculated.
For the experimental trial in semi-commercial conditions, twenty bunches of the “Red Globe” cultivar were harvested in an experimental vineyard of CREA-VE, located in Rutigliano (BA), southern Italy. All the berries with pedicels were detached from these bunches and divided on the basis of their content in Total Solid Soluble by flotation in different salt solutions. A total of 420 berries were taken from the salt solution corresponding to a soluble solid content between 16% and 17%. The surface of berries was disinfected by dipping for 2 min in 2% (w/v) of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) solution, rinsed with sterilized water, and then air dried. Three hundred of them were divided into five groups (60 berries for each group), and each was individually inoculated with the five yeast strains by dipping the berries for 2 min in 5 L tanks containing a yeasts suspension at the concentration of 1.5 × 104 CFUmL−1. The remaining 120 berries were put for 2 min in sterile water and then divided into two groups used as the control: the first group was stored in three boxes with SO2 generator pads (positive control), while the second group was stored in three boxes without any further treatment (negative control). After air drying, berries were putted on 21 plastic boxes (three boxes for each treatment), covered with a plastic film, and then placed in a cold refrigerator at 0 °C for 48 h. After this period, berries from each treatment were artificially inoculated by dipping for 2 min in 5 L tanks containing a conidial suspension (1 × 105 conidiamL−1) of B. cinerea, replaced in their boxes, air dried, and then placed in cold storage for 30 days. At the end of the experiment, the following parameters in each treatment were evaluated: the percentage reduction in berry weight, the incidence of ‘slip skin’ (ISS), browning of pedicel severity (BPS), and sporulation in the pedicel severity (SPS). Reduction in berry weight was evaluated as the delta percentage between the berry weight at the beginning of the experiment and the berry weight at the end of the experiment. The ISS was evaluated as the ratio between the number of berries that showed ‘slip skin’ phenomena and the total number of berries. The BPS was evaluated by using an empirical 0-to-4 rating scale (0 = pedicel without visible browning, 1 = surface browned just visible to 25% of the pedicel surface, 2 = 26–50% of pedicel surface affected by browning, 3 = 51–75% of pedicel surface affected by browning, 4 = more than 75% of pedicel surface affected by browning). The SPS was evaluated by using an empirical 0-to-4 rating scale (0 = uninfected pedicel, 1 = surface mycelia just visible to 25% of the pedicel surface, 2 = 26–50% of the pedicel surface covered with mycelia, 3 = 51–75% of the pedicel surface covered with mycelia, 4 = more than 75% of the pedicel surface covered with mycelia). The average of both browning and sporulation severity was calculated for each plastic box by using the Towsend and Heunberger’s formula [35]. Furthermore, regarding the sporulation of the pathogen in the pedicel, their incidence (SPI) (calculated as the percentage ratio between the number of infected pedicels and the total number of pedicels evaluated) and the relative McKinney’s index [36] were also evaluated.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using the R package software (v. 3.4.1). The normality and homoscedasticity of variances were determined through the Shapiro-Wilk’s test and Levene’s test, respectively. When normal distribution and homoscedasticity of variances were verified, we performed the analysis of variance using the two-way ANOVA test followed by the post-hoc Tukey test (p < 0.05). Otherwise, if no normal distribution and heteroscedasticity variances were assessed, the analysis of variance was performed by using the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by a post-hoc Dunn’s test (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Yeast Isolates and Molecular Identification

A total of five isolates were collected from the experimental vineyard in the south of Italy: two isolates, coded N10 and N20/006 (Table S1), were isolated from new table grape crossbreeds (Turi, Bari, Italy), Ale4 and Ale5 were isolated from Aleatico grapes, and Pr7 was isolated from Primitivo variety. Of note, all the isolates belonged to grapes showing good levels of resilience against fungi effects.
The color and morphology of each isolate were analyzed on WL semisolid plates, by using the morphological traits proposed by Pallmann et al., 2001 [23] (Figure S1, Table S2). Overall data revealed that the five isolates belonged to three genera: Metschnikowia, Lachancea, and Hanseniaspora, and, by combining sequencing both of 18S and 5.8S rDNA, this allowed us to assign each isolate to a species: indeed, the three isolates Ale4, N20/007, and Pr7 matched with M. pulcherrima with a percentage of sequence identity >97%, we therefore also performed multi-alignment analysis among M. pulcherrima sequences and data showed few differences among these three isolates sequences (Supplementary Materials). These findings agree with previously reported data assessing the high diffusion of this yeast species in the Southern Italy area [37]. The other two isolates N10 and Ale5 respectively matched with L. thermotolerans and Hanseniaspora uvarum (Niehaus) Shehata, Mrak & Phaff, with almost 100% identities (Table S2).

3.2. Extracellular Lytic Enzymes Activity

To further characterize the five isolates and get clues on their putative mode of action, specific enzymatic activity was investigated. As reported in Table 1, the three M. pulcherrimma isolates (N20/006, Ale4 and Pr7) showed different extracellular enzyme activity, thus confirming that they are different strains. In particular, both at mesophilic (25 °C) and psychrophilic (0 °C) temperatures, although all the three isolates were able to hydrolyze tributyrin (lipase activity), M. pulcherrima N20/006 showed also pectinase and protease activity, while M. pulcherrima Ale4 showed β-1,3-glucanase and pectinase activity. The L. thermotolerans N10 was able to hydrolyze both pectines and tributyrin; finally, the H. uvarum Ale5 showed β-1,3-glucanase, protease, and lipase activity. None of the yeast isolates tested were able to hydrolyze the chitin.

3.3. In Vitro Assay

The antagonistic role of the five isolates were first evaluated “in vitro”. We tested the ability of yeast isolates to reduce the mycelial daily growth (mmday−1) of B. cinerea at five time points using two different approaches to investigate the mode of action of each isolate, CALt to investigate the ability to produce antagonistic compound diffusible into the media and VOCs to search for volatile compound with anti-botritic activity (Figure 1). The daily growth reduction was calculated as the percentage reduction of the daily mycelial growth of B. cinerea obtained in the presence of the antagonistic yeast isolate compared to the control. We calculated the mycelial daily growth on the basis of the average of the longitudinal and orthogonal diameters of B. cinerea colonies, measured every 48 h from the beginning of the experiments until the fungus in the control occupied all the space available in the plates. Data collected from both the in vitro assays were statistically confirmed. On the basis of the results of the Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests, we did not find a normal distribution (p < 0.0001, in both assays) and homoscedasity of variance (p = 0.051 and 0.22, respectively). Therefore, we performed the analysis of variance using the non-parametric Kuskal–Wallis test and we identified significant differences by the non-parametric Dunn’s test. Results showed that, by using CALt, all the yeast isolates, except for strain H. uvarum Ale5, completely inhibited the mycelial growth of B. cinerea (Figure 1a).
Similarly, the five yeast isolates showed a different ability to reduce the mycelial growth of B. cinerea by VOCs (Figure 1b). In detail, M. pulcherrima strains Ale4 and N20/006 significantly reduced the daily growth of the fungus by 60.4 and 61.2%, respectively, while L. thermotolerans strain N10 and M. pulcherrima strain Pr7, did not significantly reduce the daily growth of B. cinerea. The H. uvarum strain Ale5 did not show any effect on the mycelial growth of the fungus B. cinerea.

3.4. Efficacy of the Yeast Cells in Controlling Botrytis Bunch Rot in Wounded Berries

The obtained results revealed that four out of five isolated were good candidates for in vivo assay. Nevertheless, we decided to use all the isolates in the in vivo assays, since the effectiveness of in vitro and in vivo experiments can be largely different mostly related to different mechanisms and interactions between yeasts and B. cinerea [38,39]. For this reason, in vivo assays are complementary and essential to confirm the BCA effect. In the in vivo experiments we evaluated the ability of yeast isolates to reduce the disease severity (%), the disease incidence (%), and the McKinney’s Index (%) [36] in wounded berries, artificially inoculated with two different conidia suspensions (1.5 × 107 CFUmL−1 and 1.5 × 104 CFUmL−1) of B. cinerea (Figure 2 and Table S3). Based on the results of Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests, data collected did not show normal distribution (p < 0.001, in both experiments) and homoscedacity of variance (p = 0.47 and 0.17, respectively); therefore, we performed the analysis of variance by using the non-parametric Kuskal–Wallis test and we identified significant differences by using the non-parametric Dunn’s test. In detail, when the BCAs were applied at the concentration of 1.5 × 107 CFUmL−1, DS values of gray mold decay were significantly lower (χ2 = 13.21, df = 5, p = 0.022) in grape berries treated with the three isolates of M. pulcherrima and L. thermotolerans strain N10 with respect to the control, likewise to that observed on berries treated with H. uvarum strain Ale5. Notably, the L. thermotolerans strain N10 and the M. pulcherrima strain N20/006 confirmed their ability to significantly reduce (χ2 = 15.08, df = 5, p = 0.01) the DS of gray mold decay, also when applied at the concentration of 1.5 × 104 CFUmL−1. Similar results were obtained regarding the incidence of disease and the McKinney’s index. In detail, the control in both experiments showed the highest incidence of disease (100%) and the McKinney’s index (12.75% and 11.57%, respectively). All the yeast strains (except H. uvarum Ale5), when applied at the concentration of 1.5 × 107 CFUmL−1, significantly reduced the appearance of the pathogen (reductions of disease incidence between 90.5% and 95.2% and reduction of the McKinney index between 97.3% and 98.7%). The L. thermotolerans strain N10 and M. pulcherrima strain N20/006, applied at the concentration of 1.5 × 104 CFUmL−1, unlike the others, significantly reduced the appearance of the pathogen compared to the control (reduction of disease incidence between 95.3% and 100% and reduction of McKinney’s index between 98.5% and 100%) (Table S3).

3.5. Efficacy of the Yeast Cells in Controlling Botrytis Bunch Rot in Semi-Commercial Conditions

For the statistical analysis of data collected from the assay in semi-commercial conditions, we used a multivariate approach. Indeed, data showed normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, thus we performed the MANOVA test, to evaluate the overall variability in the dataset, followed by ANOVA, to evaluate variability in each individual dependent variable and by the Tuckey’s, to evaluate differences among yeasts in each dependent variable. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) showed statistically significant differences (p < 0.0001) between “treatments” (different yeasts strains and control). The subsequent deepening by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that these significant differences concern all the dependent variables considered in the study and in ISS (p = 0.0029), BPS (p < 0.0001), SPS (p < 0.0001), SPI (<0.0001) and McKenney’s index (p < 0.0001). We did not find significant differences between treatments regarding the percentage reduction in berry weight (p = 0.10029) (Table S4).
Red Globe berries without treatment showed the highest values both in ISS (36.67%), BPS (89.58%) and SPS (50.42%) (Figure 3). Furthermore, they also showed the highest values of both SPI (90.0%) and McKinney’s Index (2.52%), calculated on the basis of the arbitrary scale used to assess the severity of Botrytis sporulation on the pedicel (Table S5). The different tested treatments showed a different ability to reduce these parameters. In detail, L. thermotolerans strain N10 and M. pulcherrima strain Pr7 and N20/006 showed the highest ability to reduce the ISS compared to the control (72.7%, 81.8%, and 86.4%, respectively). Furthermore, Red Globe berries treated with these yeasts showed significantly lower values than control of both BPS (49.58%, 62.92% and 53.33% respectively) and SPS (21.25%, 25.83% and 30.83%, respectively). H. uvarum strain Ale5 and M. pulcherrima strain Ale4 showed significantly lower values than the control of both BPS (50.83% and 56.25%, respectively) and SPS (25.42% and 17.08%, respectively). However, these two yeast strains did not significantly reduce the ISS (18.33% and 11.67%, respectively) compared to the control. Treatment with SO2 generator pads completely inhibited the SPS, but it was unable to significantly reduce both the ISS (22.7%) and the BPS (2.8%), compared to the control. About the presence of the pathogen on pedicel, only the treatment with the SO2 generator pads was able to completely inhibit both the SPI and the McKenney’s Index (100% in reduction compared to the control) (Supplementary Table S5). Conversely, the tested yeasts isolates did not significantly reduce the SPI compared to the control, but in all cases, the McKinney’s Index was significantly lower than control. In detail, the three M. pulcherrima strains were able to reduce the McKinney’s index by 38.3, 48.8 and 95.6%, respectively; the H. uvarum strain Ale5 significantly reduced the McKinney’s index by 49.6% and the L. thermotolerans strain N10 significantly reduced the McKinney’s index by 57.9%, compared to the control (Table S5).

4. Discussion

Postharvest fungal pathogens, such as B. cinerea, are considered the main cause of losses of fresh fruit quality during storage, distribution, and consumption. Among the approaches suggested for managing postharvest decay, the use fungicidal treatments is considered unsustainable, because of the emergence of a fungicide-resistance strain of fungal pathogens [40,41,42,43,44] and the dangerous effects on human and environmental health. The use of SO2 is, instead, permitted as adjuvant, and it is effective in reducing postharvest fungal pathogens, such as B. cinerea. However, alternative more sustainable approaches to SO2 are required when considering the hazards for human health and the damages that excessive SO2 can cause in stored fresh fruits. In addition, SO2 is not allowed as a postharvest treatment for use in organic production [45]. Biological control with microbial antagonists has emerged as a promising alternative to reduce the use of chemical compounds [20,46]. In our study, we isolated five autochthonous yeasts sharing many features as BCAs [14,15,16] against B. cinerea and tested them on plate tests and on artificial wounds and semi commercial conditions. We recovered the five isolates from the fructoplane of berries that are representative of the environment that normally is occupied by the pathogen and where the yeasts are able to colonize and survive and compete against antagonists [47].
The recovered isolates, firstly selected on their morphology and/or color, were subsequently identified by sequencing [24]. The identified isolates belong to the non-Saccharomyces yeast species, which have been previously isolated from vineyards, spontaneous fermentations [37], and table grape berries [4] in the Apulia region. In particular, the species M. pulcherrima, A. pullulans, and H. uvarum are good candidates as BCAs.
The results of the antagonistic activity in vitro and in vivo assays demonstrated that all the yeast isolates, except for H. uvarum strain Ale5, were able to inhibit the mycelial growth of B. cinerea at different levels. We hypothesize that the high number of yeasts (4/5) showing BCA effect might be related to the selection bias, since we isolated our yeasts starting from bunches showing tolerance to B. cinerea directly on the field. These data is related to the mechanisms of co-evolution of microorganisms with the growing areas and their interaction with the genotype of the host plant, suggesting, in our opinion, that the possibility of selecting co-evolved microorganisms in the same habitats is useful to increase the probability of identifying effective BCAs. Of note, previous data by Qin [48] showed that a proper combination of some H. uvarum strains and chemical reagent can provide an effective strategy to reduce postharvest decay of grape berries. Moreover, more recently, H. uvarum, isolated from V. vinifera ssp. sylvestris, has been described as a useful biocontrol agent able to create a protective biofilm [46]. We hypothesize that these contrasting results might be due to the use of different isolated strains and their metabolic characteristics. Indeed, these findings confirmed that the yeast strains isolated have significant differences on the effectiveness against harmful fungi [46]. Moreover, it suggests the importance to further investigate the microbiome diversity to understand how microorganism evolution could influence the resilience of vines and how they adapt to environmental conditions.
The in vitro tests shed light on the different biocontrol mechanism of actions of the yeasts, such as: (i) production of antifungal compounds, (ii) production of VOCs, and (iii) production of cell wall-degrading enzymes. In particular, the ability of the three isolates of M. pulcherrima strains Ale4, N20/006, and Pr7 and the L. thermotolerans strain N10 to completely inhibited the mycelial growth of B. cinerea in the cellophane-agar assays, indicating that they are able to produce fungistatic compounds. These, passing through the pores of cellophane and spreading into the substrate, are able to arrest the growth of B. cinerea. This hypothesis is confirmed by the results of an in vitro extracellular lytic enzymes activity assay, in which all the three isolates of M. pulcherrima used in this work were able to hydrolyze lipids. Moreover, the M. pulcherrima strain Ale4 shown extracellular β-1,3-glucanase and pectinase activity, and the M. pulcherrima strain N20/006 showed extracellular pectinase and protease activity. Furthermore, L. thermotolerans strain N10 showed both extracellular pectinase and lipase activity. Carbohydrates (such as glucans), proteins, and lipids are the main compounds that constitute the extracellular matrix (ECM) produced by germlings of B. cinerea [49,50]. Several possible roles for the ECM produced by B. cinerea have been suggested. Among these, there are the involvement in tropism toward the infection site, the prevention of desiccation of conidia, and the provisions of a matrix in which fungal toxins or enzymes required for the infection process could be sequestered [51]. The ability of our isolates to hydrolyze the main compounds that constitute the ECM can explain their ability to control the growth of B. cinerea both in in vitro and in vivo assays. Of note, in our work, we revealed that three isolates of M. pulcherrima are able to hydrolyze different compounds, thus demonstrating that M. pulcherrima not only is one of the most abundant species in the South of Italy, but it is a high versatile species. Different results were found by Parafati et al. (2005) [29]; the authors tested seven isolates of M. pulcherrima for their extracellular enzyme activity, including glucanase, chitinase, pectinase, and protease. The seven isolates of M. pulcherrima tested by the authors did not shown any extracellular enzyme activity [29].
Our data showed also a significant inhibition effect on the mycelial growth of B. cinerea by two isolates of M. pulcherrima strain Ale4 and N20/006 through the production of VOCs. These strains were more effective than others belonging to the same species [29,52], while they were less effective than the specific strain of Starmerella bacillaris (Kroemer & Krumbholz) Duarte & Fonseca [53]. The effectiveness of our isolates to reduce the mycelial growth of B. cinerea by VOCs supports the previous evidence of combined mechanisms of these strains in controlling the growth of fungus [29,52]. However, as in our bioassay the yeast strains were put in direct contact with the pathogen, the main mechanism of action could be related to the release of antifungal compounds and, at a lesser extent, to VOCs. More specific experiments, like those conducted by Parafiti et al. 2015 [29] are necessary in order to confirm if the production of VOCs can represent a main mechanism of action for M. pulcherrima Ale4 and N20/006. Interestingly, in our in vivo experiments, we applied the yeast isolates 48 h before the artificial inoculation with B. cinerea consequently, it is possible that the competition for nutrients and space may be an additional mechanism of action of these yeasts [54,55,56].
The inhibitory effect of our isolates was further proven on wounded grape berries artificially inoculated with B. cinerea, in order to confirm the antagonistic ability evaluated in the in vitro experiments. Our in vivo assays showed that the M. pulcherrima strains Ale4 and Pr7 were able to control the grey mold of grape berries at the concentration of 1.5 × 107 CFU mL−1, while the effectiveness of M. pulcherrima strain N20/006 and L. thermotolerans strain N10 was independent on their concentration. Strains belonging to the species M. pulcherrima [29,57,58,59], as well as to other species, such as Starmerella bacillaris [53,60], have already been considered for their high efficacy as biocontrol agents against gray mold of different fruit. However, our isolates were able to control the gray mold at concentrations lower than that previously reported (108 CFU mL−1), thus showing a crucial feature for commercial development [61]. The development of a microorganisms for commercial use in biological control involves a series of steps and investments that very often discourage companies to invest in the development of this products. For these reasons, the potential antagonists besides being active against the specific targeted plant pathogen, they must be cost-effective. The ability to be effective also at a low concentration is a key factor to obtain a greater cost-effectiveness of the final product.
Relevant differences have been observed also by comparing the effects of our strains vs. SO2 generators pads in semi-commercial conditions on detached grape berries stored at 0 °C, simulating the temperature normally used during cold storage. In particular, all yeast isolates were able to significantly reduce both the incidence of ‘slip skin’ from 50.0% to 86.4% (significantly higher than those obtained by using the SO2 generators pads), and the sporulation of the pathogen on the pedicel, from 38.8% to 66.1%, compared to the control. The effectiveness of our yeast isolates could be attributed to the ability of maintaining a high level of viable cells on the fruit surface under storage conditions (low temperature), an important feature for the commercial potential of a postharvest agent. Notably, while other authors have already reported positive effects at cold storage conditions of some strains of M. pulcherrima [54,57,62], to our knowledge, this is the first hint regarding L. thermotolerans. Of note, L. thermotolerans has shown contradictory effect as BCA being inhibitor [63,64] or neutral for the mycelial growth of A. carbonarius and A. niger [65]. In this study, L. thermotolerans strain N10 was effective as BCA against B. cinerea both in in vitro and in vivo conditions.
Both M. pulcherrima and L. thermotolerans have been reported as fermentation partners of S. cerevisiae, with inhibiting properties against wine spoilage microorganisms through the production of pulcherrimic acid and killer toxins [66]. The isolation of BCAs could be of interest for their application during winemaking. In particular, several strains of M. pulcherrima have a glucosidase activity, a relevant feature able to improve the aromatic profile of the wines [67] and show a high proteolytic activity to serve as a source of nutrients for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meyen [68]. Likewise, selected strains of L. thermotolerans have been reported to protect fermenting musts from spoilage microorganisms being producer of lactic acid [68] and improve the release of aroma and color compound through the production of β-D-glucosidase and carbon-sulfur lyase [67] and polymeric pigments [69]. M. pulcherrima strains N20/006 and ALE4 and L. thermotolerans strain N10 used in this study shown pectinase extracellular activity, that in wine making can be used to obtain positive results in the clarification of white must, to improve the extraction of aroma compounds and to improve the extraction of color and stability of red wine [70]. Further studies in this direction are necessary to clarify the effect of these yeast strains on must fermentation and to determine the nature of the antifungal compounds produced by these yeasts.
In organic viticulture the control of B. cinerea infections are usually carried out through canopy management and applications of organic compounds, such as bentonite clays, copper-based formulations, compost teas, or plant extract [7]. These strategies may be variable in effectiveness or have undesirable consequences on the aromatic compounds of some varieties. The yeast we isolated can represent relevant candidates for the technological development of BCA-based agrochemicals that can be used in organic viticulture. Being effective against gray mold both at psychrotrophic and mesophilic temperatures, they could be used both in postharvest and in the vineyard.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, in this work we aimed to isolate yeasts directly from their natural environment (Southern Italy), to be used in stored table grape as BCA control for B. cinerea at feasible concentration for commercial use. We isolated different M. pulcherrima and one L. thermotolerans strains showing inhibitory effects on gray mold decay also at considerably lower concentrations. Future research would help in elucidating the mechanisms of action and in identifying more specific protocols for an ideal postharvest process considering factors such as (i) effectiveness against a wide range of pathogens on different commodities, (ii) adaptability to formulation with a long shelf-life, (iii) possible effect to human health, and (iv) compatibility with commercial processing procedures. Moreover, further studies will need to evaluate and clarify the possible effect of these strains on quality parameters of table grapes such as aroma profile, firmness, taste, total acidity, total antioxidant activity, and color.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2076-2607/9/2/457/s1, Figure S1: Yeast morphology. Figure S2: In vitro antagonistic tests. Table S1: Agronomic characteristics of the new table grape genotypes. Table S2: Yeast characterization. Table S3: Incidence and McKinney’s Index of grey mold in wounded berries artificial inoculated with two different concentration of yeasts. Table S4: Percentage of reduction in fresh weight of ‘Red globe’ berries treated with different yeast strains and SO2 generator pads and stored at 0 °C. Table S5: Incidence and McKinney’s Index of sporulation of B. cinerea on pedicel of ‘Red globe’ berries treated with different yeast strains and SO2 generator pads and stored at 0 °C.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, investigation; writing—Original Draft; formal analysis; writing—reviewing and editing A.D.M., investigation M.V. (Matteo Velenosi), R.P., C.B., S.S., V.D.-V., A.H., and F.A.M.M., conceptualization, molecular investigation writing—original draft; writing—reviewing and editing; project administration; supervision M.F.C.; conceptualization, writing—original draft; writing—reviewing and editing; project administration; supervision M.V. (Mario Ventura). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding from any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The experiments were funded by local funds from the Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria-Centro di ricerca Viticoltura ed Enologia (CREA-VE) and the University of Bari “Aldo Moro”. Matteo Velenosi performed the experiments in the UMR Procédés Alimentaires et Microbiologiques, Equipe VAlMiS (Vin, Aliment, Microbiologie, Stress), AgroSup Dijon—Université de Bourgogne thanks to GlobalDoc thesis grant.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the sequence data are available in the supplementary materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ISTAT. ISTAT 2019. 2019. ISBN 978-88-458-2003-8. Available online: https://www.istat.it/it/files//2019/12/Asi-2019.pdf (accessed on 22 February 2021).
  2. Lydakis, D.; Aked, J. Vapour heat treatment of Sultanina table grapes. II: Effects on postharvest quality. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2003, 27, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pinto, L.; Malfeito-Ferreira, M.; Quintieri, L.; Silva, A.; Baruzzi, F. Growth and metabolite production of a grape sour rot yeast-bacterium consortium on different carbon sources. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019, 296, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pinto, L.; Caputo, L.; Quintieri, L.; de Candia, S.; Baruzzi, F. Efficacy of gaseous ozone to counteract postharvest table grape sour rot. Food Microbiol. 2017, 66, 190–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Droby, S.; Lichter, A. Postharvest Botrytis infection: Etiology, development and management. In Botrytis: Biology, Pathology and Control; Elad, Y., Williamson, B., Tudzynski, P., Delen, N., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: London, UK, 2004; pp. 349–367. [Google Scholar]
  6. Staples, R.; Mayer, A. Putative virulence factors of Botrytis cinerea acting as a wound pathogen. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995, 134, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jacometti, M.A.; Wratten, S.D.; Walter, M. Review: Alternatives to synthetic fungicides for Botrytis cinerea management in vineyards. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16, 154–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ahmed, S.; Roberto, S.R.; Domingues, A.R.; Shahab, M.; Junior, O.J.C.; Sumida, C.H.; De Souza, R.T. Effects of Different Sulfur Dioxide Pads on Botrytis Mold in ‘Italia’ Table Grapes under Cold Storage. Horticulturae 2018, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mustonen, H. The efficacy of a range of sulfur dioxide generating pads against Botrytis cinerea infection and on out-turn quality of Calmeria table grapes. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 1992, 32, 389–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Romanazzi, G.; Feliziani, E.; Baños, S.B.; Sivakumar, D. Shelf life extension of fresh fruit and vegetables by chitosan treatment. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017, 57, 579–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Romanazzi, G.; Lichter, A.; Gabler, F.M.; Smilanick, J.L. Recent advances on the use of natural and safe alternatives to conventional methods to control postharvest gray mold of table grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 63, 141–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Candir, E.; Ozdemir, A.E.; Kamiloglu, O.; Soylu, E.M.; Dilbaz, R.; Ustun, D. Modified atmosphere packaging and ethanol vapor to control decay of ‘Red Globe’ table grapes during storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2012, 63, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Beardsley, P.M.; Hauser, K.F. Glial modulators as potential treatments of psychostimulant abuse. Adv. Pharmacol. 2014, 69, 1–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Chanchaichaovivat, A.; Ruenwongsa, P.; Panijpan, B. Screening and identification of yeast strains from fruits and vegeta-bles: Potential for biological control of postharvest chilli anthracnose (Colletotrichum capsici). Biol. Control 2007, 42, 326–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. El-Tarabily, K.A.; Sivasithamparam, K. Potential of yeasts as biocontrol agents of soil-borne fungal plant pathogens and as plant growth promoters. Mycoscience 2006, 47, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nunes, C.A. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruit. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 133, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. De Simone, N.; Pace, B.; Grieco, F.; Chimienti, M.; Tyibilika, V.; Santoro, V.; Capozzi, V.; Colelli, G.; Spano, G.; Russo, P. Botrytis cinerea and Table Grapes: A Review of the Main Physical, Chemical, and Bio-Based Control Treatments in Post-Harvest. Foods 2020, 9, 1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Leneveu-Jenvrin, C.; Charles, F.; Barba, F.J.; Remize, F. Role of biological control agents and physical treatments in main-taining the quality of fresh and minimally-processed fruit and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 2837–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Spadaro, D.; Droby, S. Development of biocontrol products for postharvest diseases of fruit: The importance of elucidating the mechanisms of action of yeast antagonists. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 47, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Droby, S.; Wisniewski, M.; Macarisin, D.; Wilson, C. Twenty years of postharvest biocontrol research: Is it time for a new paradigm? Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2009, 52, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Janisiewicz, W.J.; Korsten, L. Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2002, 40, 411–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Eder, M.L.R.; Reynoso, C.; Lauret, S.C.; Rosa, A.L. Isolation and Identification of the Indigenous Yeast Population during Spontaneous Fermentation of Isabella (Vitis labrusca L.) Grape Must. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Pallmann, C.L.; Brown, J.A.; Olineka, T.L.; Cocolin, L.; Mills, D.A.; Bisson, L.F. Use of WL medium t profile native flora fermetations. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2001, 52, 6. [Google Scholar]
  24. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Innis, M., Gelfand, D., Shinsky, J., White, T., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  25. Valente, P.; Gouveia, F.C.; de Lemos, G.A.; Pimentel, D.; van Elsas, J.D.; Mendonça-Hagler, L.C.; Hagler, A.N. PCR amplifi-cation of the rDNA internal transcribed spacer region for differentiation of Saccharomyces cultures. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1996, 137, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Valente, P.; Gouveia, F.C.; Lemos, G.A.; Pimentel, D.; Mendonca-Hagler, L.C.; Hagler, A.N. PCR-amplified ITS length varia-tion within the yeast genus Metschnikowia. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 1997, 43, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, L.; Li, M.; Zhan, Y.; Ban, X.; Zeng, T.; Zhu, Y.; Yun, J.; Guan, X.-Y.; Li, Y. Down-regulation of POTEG predicts poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Mol. Carcinog. 2018, 57, 886–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Gibbs, J.N. A Study of the Epiphytic Growth Habit of Fomes annosus. Ann. Bot. 1967, 31, 755–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Parafati, L.; Vitale, A.; Restuccia, C.; Cirvilleri, G. Biocontrol ability and action mechanism of food-isolated yeast strains against Botrytis cinerea causing post-harvest bunch rot of table grape. Food Microbiol. 2015, 47, 85–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roberts, W.K.; Selitrennikoff, C.P. Plant and Bacterial Chitinases Differ in Antifungal Activity. Microbiology 1988, 134, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Souza, C.P.; Burbano-Rosero, E.M.; Almeida, B.C.; Martins, G.G.; Albertini, L.S.; Rivera, I.N.G. Culture medium for isolating chitinolytic bacteria from seawater and plankton. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 25, 2079–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Renwick, A.; Campbell, R.; Coe, S. Assessment of in vivo screening systems for potential biocontrol agents of Gaeuman-nomyces graminis. Plant Pathol. 1991, 40, 524–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Buzzini, P.; Martini, A. Extracellular enzymatic activity profiles in yeast and yeast-like strains isolated from tropical envi-ronments. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2002, 93, 1020–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Strauss, M.L.; Jolly, N.P.; Lambrechts, M.G.; van Rensburg, P. Screening for the production of extracellular hydrolytic en-zymes by non-Saccharomyces wine yeasts. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2001, 91, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Townsend, G.R.; Heuberger, J.W. Methods for estimating losses caused by diseases in fungicidal experiments. Plant Dis. Report. 1943, 27, 4. [Google Scholar]
  36. Servili, A.; Feliziani, E.; Romanazzi, G. Exposure to volatiles of essential oils alone or under hypobaric treatment to control postharvest gray mold of table grapes. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2017, 133, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tristezza, M.; Vetrano, C.; Bleve, G.; Spano, G.; Capozzi, V.; Logrieco, A.; Mita, G.; Grieco, F. Biodiversity and safety aspects of yeast strains characterized from vineyards and spontaneous fermentations in the Apulia Region, Italy. Food Microbiol. 2013, 36, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Boland, G.J. Biological control of plant diseases with fungal antagonists: Challenges and opportunities. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 1990, 12, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, H.; Guo, J.; Luo, L.; Liu, P.; Wang, B.; Cheng, Y.; Deng, B.; Long, C. Improvement of Hanseniaspora uvarum biocontrol activity against gray mold by the addition of ammonium molybdate and the possible mechanisms involved. Crop. Prot. 2010, 29, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Usall, J.; Sanchis, V. Tolerance of Penicillium expansum to postharvest fungicide treatments in apple packingshouses in Lerida (Spain). Mycopathol. 1991, 113, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Holmes, G.J.; Eckert, J.W. Sensitivity of Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum to Postharvest Citrus Fungicides in California. Phytopathology 1999, 89, 716–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. A Bardas, G.; Veloukas, T.; Koutita, O.; Karaoglanidis, G.S. Multiple resistance of Botrytis cinerea from kiwifruit to SDHIs, QoIs and fungicides of other chemical groups. Pest Manag. Sci. 2010, 66, 967–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Angelini, R.M.D.M.; Rotolo, C.; Masiello, M.; Gerin, D.; Pollastro, S.; Faretra, F. Occurrence of fungicide resistance in populations of Botryotinia fuckeliana (Botrytis cinerea ) on table grape and strawberry in southern Italy. Pest Manag. Sci. 2014, 70, 1785–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Panebianco, A.; Castello, I.; Cirvilleri, G.; Perrone, G.; Epifani, F.; Ferrara, M.; Polizzi, G.; Walters, D.R.; Vitale, A. Detection of Botrytis cinerea field isolates with multiple fungicide resistance from table grape in Sicily. Crop. Prot. 2015, 77, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Gabler, F.M.; Smilanick, J.L. Postharvest control of table grape gray mold on detached berries with carbonate and bicar-bonate salts and disinfectants. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2001, 52, 9. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cordero-Bueso, G.; Mangieri, N.; Maghradze, D.; Foschino, R.; Valdetara, F.; Cantoral, J.M.; Vigentini, I. Wild Grape-Associated Yeasts as Promising Biocontrol Agents against. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Manso, T.; Nunes, C. Metschnikowia andauensis as a new biocontrol agent of fruit postharvest diseases. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2011, 61, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Qin, X.; Xiao, H.; Xue, C.; Yu, Z.; Yang, R.; Cai, Z.; Si, L. Biocontrol of gray mold in grapes with the yeast Hanseniapora uvarum alone and in combination with salicylic acid or sodium bicarbonate. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2015, 100, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Doss, R.P.; Potter, S.W.; Soeldner, A.H.; Christian, J.K.; E Fukunaga, L. Adhesion of germlings of Botrytis cinerea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Gil-ad, N.L.; Bar-Nun, N.; Mayer, A.M. The possible function of the glucan sheath of Botrytis cinerea: Effects on the distri-bution of enzyme activities. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 199, 109–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Doss, R.P. Composition and Enzymatic Activity of the Extracellular Matrix Secreted by Germlings of Botrytis cinerea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Oro, L.; Feliziani, E.; Ciani, M.; Romanazzi, G.; Comitini, F. Volatile organic compounds from Wickerhamomyces anomalus, Metschnikowia pulcherrima and Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibit growth of decay causing fungi and control postharvest diseases of strawberries. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 265, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Junior, W.J.L.; Binati, R.L.; Felis, G.E.; Slaghenaufi, D.; Ugliano, M.; Torriani, S. Volatile organic compounds from Starmerella bacillaris to control gray mold on apples and modulate cider aroma profile. Food Microbiol. 2020, 89, 103446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Janisiewicz, W.J.; Tworkoski, T.J.; Kurtzman, C.P. Biocontrol Potential of Metchnikowia pulcherrima Strains against Blue Mold of Apple. Phytopathology 2001, 91, 1098–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Zhang, D.; Spadaro, D.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Selection and evaluation of new antagonists for their efficacy against postharvest brown rot of peaches. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2010, 55, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, D.; Spadaro, D.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Potential biocontrol activity of a strain of Pichia guilliermondii against grey mold of apples and its possible modes of action. Biol. Control. 2011, 57, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Piano, S.; Neyrotti, V.; Migheli, Q.; Gullino, M.L. Biocontrol capability of Metschnikowia pulcherrima aganist Botrytis postharvest rot of apple. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1997, 11, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Spadaro, D.; Vola, R.; Piano, S.; Gullino, M.L. Mechanisms of action and efficacy of four isolates of the yeast Metschnikowia pulcherrima active against postharvest pathogens on apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002, 24, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saravanakumar, D.; Spadaro, D.; Garibaldi, A.; Gullino, M.L. Detection of enzymatic activity and partial sequence of a chi-tinase gene in Metschnikowia pulcherrima strain MACH1 used as postharvest biocontrol agent. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2009, 123, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lemos, W.J.; Bovo, B.; Nadai, C.; Crosato, G.; Carlot, M.; Favaron, F.; Giacomini, A.; Corich, V. Biocontrol Ability and Action Mechanism of Starmerella bacillaris (Synonym Candida zemplinina) Isolated from Wine Musts against Gray Mold Disease Agent Botrytis cinerea on Grape and Their Effects on Alcoholic Fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Janisiewicz, W. Biocontrol of postharvest diseases of temperate fruit. In Plant–Microbe Interactions and Biological Control; Boland, G.J., Kuykendall, L.D., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, NY, USA, 1997; pp. 171–198. [Google Scholar]
  62. Oro, L.; Feliziani, E.; Ciani, M.; Romanazzi, G.; Comitini, F. Biocontrol of postharvest brown rot of sweet cherries by Saccha-romyces cerevisiae Disva 599, Metschnikowia pulcherrima Disva 267 and Wickerhamomyces anomalus Disva 2 strains. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2014, 96, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ponsone, M.L.; Chiotta, M.L.; Combina, M.; Dalcero, A.; Chulze, S. Biocontrol as a strategy to reduce the impact of ochratoxin A and Aspergillus section Nigri in grapes. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 151, 70–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nally, M.C.; Ponsone, M.L.; Pesce, V.M.; Toro, M.E.; Vazquez, F.; Chulze, S. Evaluation of behaviour of Lachancea thermo-tolerans biocontrol agents on grape fermentations. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Bleve, G.; Grieco, F.; Cozzi, G.; Logrieco, A.; Visconti, A. Isolation of epiphytic yeasts with potential for biocontrol of Asper-gillus carbonarius and A. niger on grape. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2006, 108, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pinto, L.; Baruzzi, F.; Cocolin, L.; Malfeito-Ferreira, M. Emerging technologies to control Brettanomyces spp. in wine: Recent advances and future trends. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 99, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Zott, K.; Thibon, C.; Bely, M.; Lonvaud-Funel, A.; Dubourdieu, D.; Masneuf-Pomarede, I. The grape must non-Saccharomyces microbial community: Impact on volatile thiol release. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 151, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Morata, A.; Loira, I.; Escott, C.; del Fresno, J.M.l.; Bañuelos, M.A.; Suárez-Lepe, J.A. Applications of Metschnikowia pul-cherrima in Wine Biotechnology. Fermentation 2019, 5, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Escott, C.; del Fresno, J.M.; Loira, I.; Morata, A.; Tesfaye, W.; González, M.d.; Suarez-Lepe, J.A. Formation of polymeric pigments in red wines through sequential fermentationof flavanol-enriched musts with non-Saccharomyces yeasts. Food Chem. 2018, 239, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Alimardani-Theuil, P.; Gainvors-Claisse, A.; Duchiron, F. Yeasts: An attractive source of pectinases—From gene expression to potential applications: A review. Process. Biochem. 2011, 46, 1525–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. In vitro assays (a) cellophane agar layer technique (white bars) (CALt); (b) antagonistic activity of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (grey bars). In vitro antagonistic activity of yeast strains refer to mycelial daily growth of Botrytis cinerea. Data are presented as the mean of five replicates with standard deviation (vertical bars). * Columns labeled by different letters are significantly different according to the Dunn’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1. In vitro assays (a) cellophane agar layer technique (white bars) (CALt); (b) antagonistic activity of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (grey bars). In vitro antagonistic activity of yeast strains refer to mycelial daily growth of Botrytis cinerea. Data are presented as the mean of five replicates with standard deviation (vertical bars). * Columns labeled by different letters are significantly different according to the Dunn’s test (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 09 00457 g001
Figure 2. In vivo assay. In vivo antagonistic activity of yeast strains in inhibiting gray mold decay on wounded grape berries at two concentrations: (a) report effects of yeasts at 1.5 × 107 CFU mL−1 (white columns) and (b) report effects of yeasts at 1.5 × 104 CFU mL−1 (grey columns). Effects of yeasts refer to the disease severity caused by Botrytis cinerea 5 days after incubation at 25 °C. Data are presented as the mean of three replicates with standard deviation (vertical bars). * Columns within the same assay labeled by different letters are significantly different according to the Dunn’s test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2. In vivo assay. In vivo antagonistic activity of yeast strains in inhibiting gray mold decay on wounded grape berries at two concentrations: (a) report effects of yeasts at 1.5 × 107 CFU mL−1 (white columns) and (b) report effects of yeasts at 1.5 × 104 CFU mL−1 (grey columns). Effects of yeasts refer to the disease severity caused by Botrytis cinerea 5 days after incubation at 25 °C. Data are presented as the mean of three replicates with standard deviation (vertical bars). * Columns within the same assay labeled by different letters are significantly different according to the Dunn’s test (p < 0.05).
Microorganisms 09 00457 g002
Figure 3. Antagonistic activity of yeast strains in inhibiting gray mold decay on grape berries in semi-commercial conditions. Effects of yeasts refer to the incidence of ‘slip skin’ (ISS), browning of pedicel severity (BPS), and sporulation on pedicel severity (SPS), caused by Botrytis cinerea 30 days after incubation at 0 °C. Data are presented as the mean of three replicates with the standard deviation (vertical bars).
Figure 3. Antagonistic activity of yeast strains in inhibiting gray mold decay on grape berries in semi-commercial conditions. Effects of yeasts refer to the incidence of ‘slip skin’ (ISS), browning of pedicel severity (BPS), and sporulation on pedicel severity (SPS), caused by Botrytis cinerea 30 days after incubation at 0 °C. Data are presented as the mean of three replicates with the standard deviation (vertical bars).
Microorganisms 09 00457 g003
Table 1. Extracellular lytic enzymes activity of yeast strains. The symbol (+) indicates that the isolate was able to hydrolyze the compound; the symbol (–) indicates that the isolates were not able to hydrolyze the compound.
Table 1. Extracellular lytic enzymes activity of yeast strains. The symbol (+) indicates that the isolate was able to hydrolyze the compound; the symbol (–) indicates that the isolates were not able to hydrolyze the compound.
Yeast StrainExtracellular Lytic Enzymes Activity
Chitinaseβ-1,3-glucanasePectinaseProteaseLipase
25 °C0 °C25 °C0 °C25 °C0 °C25 °C0 °C25 °C0 °C
M. pulcherrima N20/066++++++
M. pulcherrima Ale4++++++
M. pulcherrima Pr7++
L. thermotolerans N10++++
H. uvarum Ale5++++++++
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marsico, A.D.; Velenosi, M.; Perniola, R.; Bergamini, C.; Sinonin, S.; David-Vaizant, V.; Maggiolini, F.A.M.; Hervè, A.; Cardone, M.F.; Ventura, M. Native Vineyard Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts Used for Biological Control of Botrytis cinerea in Stored Table Grape. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 457. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9020457

AMA Style

Marsico AD, Velenosi M, Perniola R, Bergamini C, Sinonin S, David-Vaizant V, Maggiolini FAM, Hervè A, Cardone MF, Ventura M. Native Vineyard Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts Used for Biological Control of Botrytis cinerea in Stored Table Grape. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(2):457. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9020457

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marsico, Antonio Domenico, Matteo Velenosi, Rocco Perniola, Carlo Bergamini, Scott Sinonin, Vanessa David-Vaizant, Flavia Angela Maria Maggiolini, Alexandre Hervè, Maria Francesca Cardone, and Mario Ventura. 2021. "Native Vineyard Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts Used for Biological Control of Botrytis cinerea in Stored Table Grape" Microorganisms 9, no. 2: 457. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9020457

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop