Next Article in Journal
A Review on Historical Tsunamis in the Canary Islands: Implications for Tsunami Risk Reduction
Previous Article in Journal
Benthic Foraminiferal Response to Sedimentary Processes in a Prodeltaic Environment: The Gulf of Patti Case Study (Southeastern Tyrrhenian Sea)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Erratum

Erratum: Merisalu et al. A Framework for Risk-Based Cost–Benefit Analysis for Decision Support on Hydrogeological Risks in Underground Construction. Geosciences 2021, 11, 82

by
Geosciences Editorial Office
MDPI AG, St. Alban-Anlage 66, 4052 Basel, Switzerland
Submission received: 9 April 2021 / Accepted: 18 May 2021 / Published: 20 May 2021
The Geosciences Editorial Office would like to make the following change to this paper [1].
  • In page 5: A “)” must be added after “(Figure 4”, and should have read: “(Figure 4)”.
  • In page 7: The sentences “Schematic description of staircase and continuous risk functions indicated by red circles and black solid line together with an interval for uncertainty indicated by dashed lines. “P” and “C” indicate probability and consequence, respectively. (a) The risk curve; (b) the risk curve after retrieval of more information resulting in less uncertainty; and (c) “the risk curve after implementation of risk-reducing measures resulting in reduced total risk.” in the main text should be deleted. The paragraph should have read: “As illustrated by Figure 6a, the risk function includes both high-probability ...”.
  • In Page 16: “Data Availability Statement: None of these three parts are relevant for this study.” should be changed to “Data Availability Statement: Not relevant for this study.”
We apologize for any inconvenience caused to the readers by this change. The change does not affect the scientific results.

Reference

  1. Merisalu, J.; Sundell, J.; Rosén, L. A Framework for Risk-Based Cost–Benefit Analysis for Decision Support on Hydrogeological Risks in Underground Construction. Geosciences 2021, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Geosciences Editorial Office. Erratum: Merisalu et al. A Framework for Risk-Based Cost–Benefit Analysis for Decision Support on Hydrogeological Risks in Underground Construction. Geosciences 2021, 11, 82. Geosciences 2021, 11, 221. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/geosciences11050221

AMA Style

Geosciences Editorial Office. Erratum: Merisalu et al. A Framework for Risk-Based Cost–Benefit Analysis for Decision Support on Hydrogeological Risks in Underground Construction. Geosciences 2021, 11, 82. Geosciences. 2021; 11(5):221. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/geosciences11050221

Chicago/Turabian Style

Geosciences Editorial Office. 2021. "Erratum: Merisalu et al. A Framework for Risk-Based Cost–Benefit Analysis for Decision Support on Hydrogeological Risks in Underground Construction. Geosciences 2021, 11, 82" Geosciences 11, no. 5: 221. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/geosciences11050221

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop