Next Article in Journal
Early Treatment with a Slow Maxillary Ni–Ti Leaf Springs Expander
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Modified Steel Slag Application in Catalytic Pyrolysis, Organic Degradation, Electrocatalysis, Photocatalysis, Transesterification and Carbon Capture and Storage
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Integrated Aerosol Sampling Techniques in Indoor, Confined and Outdoor Environments Characterized by Specific Emission Sources
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/app11104540
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Outdoor Air Quality of Environments Used for Exercise and Sports Practice: An Analysis of Scientific Production through Bibliometric Analysis

by
Alexandro Andrade
*,
Fábio Hech Dominski
and
Guilherme Torres Vilarino
Laboratory of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Center of Health and Sport Science, Santa Catarina State University, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina 88080-350, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2021, 11(10), 4540; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11104540
Submission received: 28 February 2020 / Revised: 19 March 2020 / Accepted: 27 March 2020 / Published: 17 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Air Pollution—Measurement Methods, Exposure, and Health Determinants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Outdoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice has been a concern for researchers for about 50 years, increasing from 2009 onward, mainly produced by researchers from institutions in the US and China, with focus on subjects related to human health.

Abstract

Thus, far, in the Environmental Science field, there appears to be only one previous bibliometric analysis of scientific production with regard to exercise and sports practice, performed in indoor environments. This study investigates and analyzes scientific production related to outdoor air quality of environments that are used for exercise and sports practice through a bibliometric analysis. Five databases were searched in March 2020. A bibliometric analysis was performed for authors, institutions and countries, in relation to publication year, language, citations, theme, and analysis of publication keywords. Of the 2401 screened studies, 106 satisfied the inclusion criteria. The first work was published in 1967. A high number of studies (85.8%) were published after 2008. The United States (US) accounted for most of the performed studies, followed by China. The author keywords associated with the words “pollutants”, “human health”, and “exercise/sports” were the most commonly used. A total of 59 journals had been published on this subject, and most of these were in the area of medicine. It was observed that most of this scientific production was developed by researchers from institutions in the US and China. The publications focused on pollutants and subjects related to human health and sports.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Air pollution represents a serious risk to human health, and the effects of exposure to pollution have been investigated in a variety of circumstances [1,2,3], mainly with regard to cardiovascular and respiratory health [4,5]. Along with pollution, physical inactivity is one of the major risk factors for population morbidity and mortality [6], and it is the fourth risk factor for overall mortality [7]. It is estimated that 23% of the population (one in four adults) does not follow recommendations regarding weekly physical activity, thus being characterized as insufficiently active [7]. The practice of regular physical exercise has shown positive results for several aspects of human health [8,9,10]; the most common recommendation advises that individuals should accomplish 150 minutes of moderately intensive physical activity per week [11].
Researchers’ interest in the relationship between pollution and physical activity has increased due the contrast between the benefits promoted by exercise and the potential risks to human health that are associated with such practices in unhealthy environments [12,13]. Exercise causes physiological changes in the human body; these changes include increased ventilation and airflow velocity, inhalation of air through the mouth (and not through the nasal mechanisms), and changes in lung diffusion capacity [14]. These changes may facilitate the transport of greater amounts of pollutants into the deeper parts of the respiratory system, thus increasing the risks to health. Thus, the importance of studies on air pollution and its implications for exercise and sports—especially in outdoor environments, where the practitioner’s exposure to pollutants and the risks to health are greater [15]—is evident.
Air pollution can discourage people from engaging in exercise and outdoor sports because human exposure to pollution is related to increased blood pressure [15,16,17], decreased lung function, respiratory symptoms [18,19], and reduced ability to exercise and maintain optimum performance [20].
It is important to gain a comprehensive understanding of the scientific production of outdoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice; this could help researchers understand the evolutions, trends, and emerging themes in this research field. In this way, it could help researchers to point out knowledge gaps in the field. From a quantitative perspective, bibliometric analyses offer an overview of research areas [21], thus contributing to the development of future studies.
We are aware of only one previous bibliometric analysis of scientific production related to physical exercise and sports practice in the Environmental Science field; however, this analysis was related to exercise and sports practice performed in indoor environments [22]. Our hypothesis is that there would be more studies regarding the use of outdoor environments for such activities than indoor environments.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate and analyze scientific production related to outdoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice by using a bibliometric analysis. We performed an analysis of relevant publications, authors, and journals.

2. Materials and Methods

This bibliometric analysis was based on the work of Andrade et al. [22] and Coimbra et al. [23].

2.1. Search Strategy

The search for studies was performed using the following electronic databases: SCOPUS, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), SPORTDiscus, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via PubMed, and Science Direct. We searched these databases using a sample period beginning with their inception and ending in March 17, 2020. The search terms used in the databases were {“air pollution” OR “air pollutants” OR “air quality”} AND {“physical exercise” OR “physical activity” OR “sport”}. The integrated search was conducted in the field of title, abstract, and subject of each database.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

We included (i) original articles; (ii) articles investigating outdoor air quality in environments used for exercise and sports practice; and (iii) full texts published in English. There were no restrictions on the date of publication. We excluded (i) review articles; (ii) articles investigating indoor air quality; and (iii) published papers with only English abstracts that lacked full texts in English.

2.3. Data Extraction

The authors independently extracted data from all included studies. We created categories for the bibliometric analysis and discussion. Analyses were carried out using the publication information of the articles, including the year and language of the publication, number of citations in the Web of Science (WoS, Web of Science Group, Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA) (total and average per year), number of citations in all the databases, and number of instances of use in WoS. The length of the study (number of pages), title length (number of words), and the numbers of tables, figures, keywords, and references were also analyzed as bibliometric data. In addition to these data, the study financing analysis was performed by identifying funding agencies and their countries, which were reported in the articles. To deepen the analysis of the main themes addressed in the studies, a survey of the keywords cited by the authors was carried out, and categories were created, which were further sub-categorized into clusters and used to describe the associations between words, with a view to identifying those that were more influential and important. We investigated the main pollutants and the exercise context according to the locations where the studies were carried out, such as sporting events, physical activity, sports in general, physical activity during transport, exercise, and others.
The relationships between the authors were also verified by analyzing the number of authors involved, the number of institutions, and the country. Based on these data, we identified the authors who had published the highest number of works on the topic, their respective collaboration networks, and the period of influence of publications. Data related to the journals’ impact factors, country, and area were also analyzed. The impact factor (in 2018) and the journal area were obtained through WoS and SCImago sites, respectively.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was conducted using “IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences” (SPSS) version 20.0. To compare studies published until 2008 and studies published after 2008, we performed independent t-tests and the Mann-Whitney U test in order to obtain the comparison of means regarding the impact factor, the number of citations in WoS, usage count, the number of authors, institutions and countries, length of study and title, and the numbers of tables, figures, keywords, and references. The significance level was defined as p < 0.05 for all the tests.

3. Results

Our search identified 2401 articles, of which the full texts for 170 were reviewed, and 106 met the inclusion criteria. A flowchart of the study selection process is reported in Figure 1.

3.1. Publications

The first publication about the topic occurred in 1967 (Figure 2). The study analysis showed that there was an increase in publications on this subject beginning in 2009; in the last decade, 83 studies were published, and these corresponded to 78.3% of publications. The year with the highest number of publications was 2013 (13 studies). All the studies included in the present study’s sample were published in the English language, except one published in Portuguese.
The quantitative analysis of the number of title words, keywords, tables, figures, pages, and references can also be carried out through bibliometric studies [24,25], though this depends on the potential of these results to allow analyses of the scope and depth.
The number of words in the title ranged from six (6) to 34 (median of 14). Relevant keywords started to appear in the studies only from 1994 onward, and in the last few years, the number of keywords was between four and eight. The number of pages ranged from four to 204 (median of 9).
The total number of citations to the published articles was 2,391, with an average of 22.55 (min.0; max.418) citations per document (Table 1). The usage count is a measure provided by WoS; it measures interest in a platform-specific item. This information reflects the number of times an article has met the user’s information needs, and it is updated daily.
Among the 106 publications, the most cited was the study by McConnell et al. published in 2002 in the Lancet and presenting 462 citations in the main collection of WoS; this publication also presented the highest average citations per year (24.3) in WoS [26]. This study aimed to evaluate the association between participating in sports teams and the subsequent development of asthma in children. In the study, concentrations of PM10, PM 2.5, O3, and NO2 were monitored. The ten selected studies with the highest amount of citations in WoS are presented in Table 2.
The studies used 411 keywords in total. Most of the studies cited five keywords (min.3; max.11). Figure 3 shows the keywords that were used in at least three studies. The larger size of the source indicates that more studies cited the specific keyword, and the smallest source indicates that the smallest number of studies cited the specific keyword. The most cited keywords were air pollution (20 studies), physical activity (15), and particulate matter (11).
The categorization of the keywords into clusters was performed in accordance with the work of Andrade et al. [22]. Most of the keywords were related to pollutants (85), human health (58), and exercise/sports (50). Figure 4 shows the keyword categories, number of related keywords, and examples of words.
Regarding the exercise context, most studies were performed during sporting events (39), mainly related to the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing, China. This was followed by physical activity (22), sports in general (22) such as football and cycling, physical activity during transport (10), exercise (11), physical education classes, and physical fitness tests.
The main pollutants investigated were particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10 (PM10) and PM2.5, with 43 and 45 studies, respectively. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was investigated in 34 studies, followed by ozone (O3) in 29 studies, CO (23), SO2 (19), black carbon (17), comfort parameters such as temperature (13) and humidity (8), NOx (5), benzene, PM1, PM not specified, and wind speed in 3 studies each. The benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) and air were analyzed in two studies. Air quality index was analyzed in three studies, and the number of measured parameters ranged from one to eight.
It was observed that 74 (69.8%) studies reported at least one funding agency, while 32 (30.2%) did not present any. Among the studies that presented financing information, 39 (36.7%) presented a financing agency, 15 (14.1%) presented two, ten (9.4%) had three agencies, and ten (9.4%) presented more than three agencies (Figure 5).
Among the 74 funded studies, 96 different funding agencies were reported. The National Natural Science Foundation of China was the agency that funded the largest number of studies, funding eleven studies in total (Table 3). The funding agencies had their headquarters in 17 countries. China and the United States (US) were the countries with the largest number of funding agencies, with 35 and 20 agencies, respectively.
Studies that were published before 2008 had a higher usage count in WoS (p < 0.01). More recently, the studies began to feature a greater number of authors, institutions (p < 0.01), and countries (p = 0.017), as well as longer study lengths in terms of pages (p < 0.01) and titles (p = 0.042) (Table 4).

3.2. The Authors

Out of the 559 different authors of the selected studies, the most published were Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen and Audrey de Nazelle; they had ten and nine studies, respectively. However, most of the researchers (489) had authored only one study. The number of publications per author ranged from 1 to 6, as shown in Figure 6.
The outdoor air quality of environments used for physical exercise and sports is a subject that has been investigated in several countries around the world. Most of the studies were carried out by researchers from institutions in the US (35), China (35), the United Kingdom (12), and Spain (12). The number of origin countries for the institutions per study ranged from one to five. Most of the studies (63/59.4%) were published by authors from institutions headquartered in only one country; however, some studies had authors with institutional affiliations in at least two countries (43/40.5%).
Researchers from institutions in 32 countries participated in publications on the subject. It was also observed that, in terms of global geographical distribution, publications on outdoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice were predominant in European countries (present in 56 studies). Figure 7 shows the worldwide geographical distribution of publications on the subject, considering country, continent, and the main institutions.

3.3. Journals

We observed 59 different scientific journals that published studies on the subject. The journal with the most publications was Atmospheric Environment (11). The impact factor of the journals ranged from 0.12 to 51.27, and only five journals did not present any impact factor (Table 5).

4. Discussion

We aimed to investigate and analyze the international scientific production related to the air quality in outdoor environments used for exercise and sports practice by using a bibliometric analysis. The bibliometric data analyzed were related to publications, authors, and journals.

4.1. Publications

Regarding publications, it was observed that growth in terms of number and frequency began from 2009 onward. More than 85% of the scientific production on the subject was published in recent years (2009–2020). The increased production of pollution-related knowledge is well reported in the literature [36]. Compared to the scientific production on indoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice [22], there were larger numbers of studies analyzing the outdoor environment, as presented in our results.
The first such published study investigated the effect of air oxidation on the athletic performance of 21 runners in Los Angeles in the US [35]. This study is among the ten most cited in WoS from among the selected studies (79 citations). The study with the highest number of citations was developed by McConnell et al. [26]; the authors investigated the effects of physical exercise in children with asthma who were exposed to ozone. This demonstrates the relevance and importance of the topic for researchers concerned with this subject area. However, the study by McConnell et al. obtained a small usage count in WoS [27]. Regarding this metric, a study that showed a high level of interest and met the information needs of the users was published by Wang et al. [27]; this study analyzed the reduction of air pollutant emission during the Beijing Olympics. The growing concern about the impact of pollution on the environment, which has even caused political tensions between several countries, shows that researchers from different areas are interested in this subject. This may have contributed to user interest in this paper. In addition, the Olympic Games were mega events with global relevance, and this explains the high level of interest shown by WoS users.
The keyword analysis used in the studies was mainly related to pollutants; this result is an outcome of the findings of the study developed by Andrade et al., which was carried out indoors [22]. Particulate material (PM10 and PM2.5), ozone, and black carbon were among the most cited pollutants. On the other hand, in contrast to the findings of the indoor environment studies, the present study showed that several keywords related to human health, such as blood pressure, lung function, and heart rate variability, were investigated in the selected studies. The relationship between air pollution and human health was also evidenced in the most cited publications, in which health risks, health benefits, asthma, and inflammatory biomarkers were investigated.
The size of the study, which was measured in pages, was higher in the most recent publications (2009–2020) compared to previous ones. There is a positive association between article length and citations, since this length may be related to greater scientific complexity and higher methodological quality. In addition, larger articles tended to contain more information, which, in turn, increased the possibility of some of the material being cited [37]. Our findings corroborate this information; the highest mean number of WoS citations per year in terms of studies published occurred in the last decade. The number of references cited was also higher in these studies, a fact that may be related to the greater amount of works available in the literature and the non-establishment of reference limits by the journals.

4.2. Authors, Institutions, and Countries

According to the study by Li et al., the US and China were the countries with the largest number of publications on air pollution [21]. This field of research is characterized by a high degree of international cooperation [21]; our results show that more than 40% of the studies were published by authors from institutions in at least two countries. Specifically, the US and China presented this characteristic in the vast majority of their publications. Here, we would like to highlight the study by Cole-Hunter et al., which attracted the participation of 10 authors from institutions in five countries (Spain, Canada, Switzerland, the US, and England) [38].
The number of authors and institutions per study was significantly higher in more recently publications (after 2008) compared to the previous period; this may have occurred due to the increase in collaborative research networks. The increase in the number of authors has also been reported in studies in other areas [39,40].
The institutions with the largest number of funded studies belonged to the State Council of China. Such institutions, such as the National Natural Science Foundation of China, seek to promote and fund basic and applied research in China. Studies have shown a difference in the impact (number of citations) of funded studies compared to those without funding [41,42]. However, the present study did not identify any such differences.
The main collaboration network was established by the researchers Audrey de Nazelle and Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen, who authored the largest number of publications in this analysis, representing a network involving more than 20 co-authors. The joint affiliation of these was the Center for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL) in Barcelona, Spain. Authors’ participation in research groups and international collaboration networks allows for increased productivity and improved research quality [43]. Above all, international collaboration for research on the issue of outdoor air pollution, which is a public health concern, is necessary [44]. Peking University was the institution with the largest number of publications on the subject; one of the oldest universities in China, it has a robust history of scientific research.
Europe proved to be a more productive continent in terms of rankings related to environmental concerns, as this is a noted domain for most European countries [45]. In addition, studies involving European institutions tended to have funding, and this promoted research.
While analyzing the scientific production relevant to this study’s selected subject, it was noted that researchers from China were highly productive, and they showed high interest in the subject due to the alarming levels of pollution observed at the venue of the Olympic Games in 2008. However, even four years after the 2016 Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro, there were only three publications on the air quality in that city. For example, the greatest attention was paid to water pollution in places where the sailing competitions had taken place [45]. Institutions in South America presented only ten publications, and nine of these were from Brazilian institutions.

4.3. Journals

In a bibliometric study of global pollution research between 2005 and 2014, Kolle and Thyavanahalli highlighted that some journals (e.g., Atmospheric Environment, Environmental Health Perspectives, and Science of the Total Environment) were the most active, presenting a large number of publications [46]. A similar result was observed in the study by Zell et al., which analyzed publications on air pollution between 1955 and 2006 [36]. Considering the published literature on outdoor pollution and respiratory health, Environmental Health Perspectives was the most active journal [44]. In contrast to these results, our results showed that these journals were among the five with the highest number of published articles on air quality in outdoor sports and exercise. These journals play an important role in disseminating scientific knowledge about air pollution.
Although a subject with a large number of publications (mainly in the Environmental Sciences area), air pollution has also been a relevant topic for medical journals, most of which are classified in the medical area according to the SCImago Journal & Country Rank.

4.4. Strengths and Limitations

Ours is the first study to assess research activity in the field of outdoor air pollution with special emphasis on environments used for exercise and sports practice; we performed 24 analyses with regard to several characteristics of the publications. The study results identified areas of research and exposed the concerns of scientists with regard to air pollution and environmental aspects; these are important factors that should be analyzed by managers and government officials. Such analyses will facilitate the creation of public policies for preserving the environment and reducing the population’s exposure to respiratory risks. Our study does not delve deeper into the analyses with respect to the methods and results, so new reviews with this objective are suggested.
Search strategies are another issue that should be taken into consideration. Our analysis used data from and about journals indexed in five major databases; however, studies published in non-indexed journals may have been excluded from the analysis. This is a limitation, especially with regard to journals published in countries such as China and India, which present a strong concern for public health due to air pollution [44].

5. Conclusions

Our results, based on more than 20 analyses related to the publications, journals, and authors, provide a quantitative perspective and overview of research about outdoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice.
The analysis of outdoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice has been a concern for researchers for about 50 years; however, interest in the subject increased from 2009 onward, and the greatest number of publications were produced in the last decade. It is observed that most of these publications were produced by researchers from institutions in the US and China, and these two countries had the largest number of funding agencies. The publications showed a focus on pollutants as well as subjects related to human health, besides physical exercise, physical activity, and sports.
The bibliometric approaches allowed us to recognize that the most productive researchers belong to European institutions and have demonstrated diverse institutional affiliations, which widens the network of collaboration and possibilities of research development.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A. and F.H.D.; methodology, F.H.D. and G.T.V.; investigation, F.H.D.; resources, F.H.D.; data curation, F.H.D.; writing—original draft preparation, F.H.D.; writing—review and editing, F.H.D and A.A.; visualization, G.T.V.; supervision, A.A.; project administration, A.A.; funding acquisition, A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the FAPESC (Research and Innovation Support Foundation of the State of Santa Catarina) for financial support through research (Project n. 2287/ PAP 04/2014). This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brazil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fuoco, F.C.; Stabile, L.; Buonanno, G.; Trassiera, C.V.; Massimo, A.; Russi, A.; Mazaheri, M.; Morawska, L.; Andrade, A. Indoor air quality in naturally ventilated Italian classrooms. Atmosphere 2015, 6, 1652–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Stabile, L.; Massimo, A.; Canale, L.; Russi, A.; Andrade, A.; Dell’Isola, M. The effect of ventilation strategies on indoor air quality and energy consumptions in classrooms. Buildings 2019, 9, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Andrade, A.; Dominski, F.H.; Pereira, M.L.; de Liz, C.M.; Buonanno, G. Fitness centers demonstrate CO2 concentration levels above recommended standards. Acta Sci. Health Sci. 2018, 40, e35768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Andrade, A.; Dominski, F.H.; Pereira, M.L.; de Liz, C.M.; Buonanno, G. Infection risk in gyms during physical exercise. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 19675–19686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Franchini, M.; Mannucci, P.M.; Harari, S.; Pontoni, F.; Croci, E. The health and economic burden of air pollution. Am. J. Med. 2015, 128, 931–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lee, I.M.; Shiroma, E.J.; Lobelo, F.; Puska, P.; Blair, S.N.; Katzmarzyk, P.T. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 2012, 380, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  8. Andrade, A.; Vilarino, G.T.; Bevilacqua, G.G. What is the effect of strength training on pain and sleep in patients with fibromyalgia? Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2017, 96, 889–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gebel, K.; Ding, D.; Chey, T.; Stamatakis, E.; Brown, W.J.; Bauman, A.E. Effect of moderate to vigorous physical activity on all-cause mortality in middle-aged and older Australians. JAMA Intern. Med. 2015, 175, 970–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Janssen, I.; LeBlanc, A.G. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Garber, C.E.; Blissmer, B.; Deschenes, M.R.; Franklin, B.A.; Lamonte, M.J.; Lee, I.M.; American College of Sports Medicine. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: Guidance for prescribing exercise. Med. Sci. Sports. Exerc. 2011, 43, 1334–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tainio, M.; de Nazelle, A.J.; Götschi, T.; Kahlmeier, S.; Rojas-Rueda, D.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J.; Thiago, H.S.; Paul, K.; James, W. Can air pollution negate the health benefits of cycling and walking? Prev. Med. 2016, 87, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Andrade, A.; Dominski, F.H. Indoor air quality of environments used for physical exercise and sports practice: Systematic review. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 15, 577–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Carlisle, A.; Sharp, N. Exercise and outdoor ambient air pollution. Br. J. Sports Med. 2001, 35, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Hajian, M.; Mohaghegh, S. Indoor Air Pollution in Exercise Centers. IJMTFM 2015, 5, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Brook, R.D.; Rajagopalan, S.; Pope, C.A., 3rd; Brook, J.R.; Bhatnagar, A.; Diez-Roux, A.V.; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010, 121, 2331–2378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Chan, S.H.; Van Hee, V.C.; Bergen, S.; Szpiro, A.A.; DeRoo, L.A.; London, S.J.; Sandler, D.P.; Julian, D.M.; Joel, D.K. Long-term air pollution exposure and blood pressure in the sister study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 951–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gauderman, W.J.; Urman, R.; Avol, E.; Berhane, K.; McConnell, R.; Rappaport, E.; Roger, C.; Fred, L. Association of improved air quality with lung development in children. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 905–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huang, S.K.; Zhang, Q.; Qiu, Z.; Chung, K.F. Mechanistic impact of outdoor air pollution on asthma and allergic diseases. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015, 7, 23–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Giles, L.V.; Koehle, M.S. The health effects of exercising in air pollution. Sports Med. 2014, 44, 223–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Rui, X.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, H.; Jian, Z.; Yindong, T. Sources of atmospheric pollution: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2017, 112, 1025–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Andrade, A.; Dominski, F.H.; Coimbra, D.R. Scientific production on indoor air quality of environments used for physical exercise and sports practice: Bibliometric analysis. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 196, 188–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Coimbra, D.R.; Dominski, F.H.; Correia, C.K.; Andrade, A. Scientific production in Sports Science Journals: Bibliometric analysis. Rev. Bras. Med. Esport. 2019, 25, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Brimblecombe, P.; Grossi, C.M. The bibliometrics of atmospheric environment. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Habibzadeh, F.; Yadollahie, M. Are shorter article titles more attractive for citations? Crosssectional study of 22 scientific journals. Croat. Med. J. 2010, 51, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. McConnell, R.; Berhane, K.; Gilliland, F.; London, S.J.; Islam, T.; Gauderman, W.J.; Edward, A.; Helene, G.M.; John, M.P. Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: A cohort study. Lancet 2002, 359, 386–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, S.; Zhao, M.; Xing, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Lei, Y.; Kebin, H.; Lixin, F.; Jiming, H. Quantifying the air pollutants emission reduction during the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 2490–2496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rojas-Rueda, D.; de Nazelle, A.; Tainio, M.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: Health impact assessment study. BMJ 2011, 343, 4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Rich, D.Q.; Kipen, H.M.; Huang, W.; Wang, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, P.; Ohman-Strickland, P.; Hu, M.; Philipp, C.; Diehl, S.R.; et al. Association between changes in air pollution levels during the Beijing Olympics and biomarkers of inflammation and thrombosis in healthy young adults. JAMA 2012, 307, 2068–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Panis, L.I.; De Geus, B.; Vandenbulcke, G.; Willems, H.; Degraeuwe, B.; Bleux, N.; Vinit, M.; Isabelle, T.; Romain, M. Exposure to particulate matter in traffic: A comparison of cyclists and car passengers. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 2263–2270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, W.; Primbs, T.; Tao, S.; Simonich, S.L.M. Atmospheric particulate matter pollution during the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 5314–5320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Wang, T.; Xie, S. Assessment of traffic-related air pollution in the urban streets before and during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games traffic control period. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43, 5682–5690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Marshall, J.D.; Brauer, M.; Frank, L.D. Healthy neighborhoods: Walkability and air pollution. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 1752–1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Jacobs, L.; Nawrot, T.S.; De Geus, B.; Meeusen, R.; Degraeuwe, B.; Bernard, A.; Sughis, M.; Nemery, B.; Panis, L.I. Subclinical responses in healthy cyclists briefly exposed to traffic-related air pollution: An intervention study. Environ. Health 2010, 9, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wayne, W.S.; Wehrle, P.F.; Carroll, R.E. Oxidant air pollution and athletic performance. JAMA 1967, 199, 901–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zell, H.; Quarcoo, D.; Scutaru, C.; Vitzthum, K.; Uibel, S.; Schöffel, N.; Mache, S.; Groneberg, D.A.; Spallek, M.F. Air pollution research: Visualization of research activity using density-equalizing mapping and scientometric benchmarking procedures. J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 2010, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Falagas, M.E.; Zarkali, A.; Karageorgopoulos, D.E.; Bardakas, V.; Mavros, M.N. The impact of article length on the number of future citations: A bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e49476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cole-Hunter, T.; Weichenthal, S.; Kubesch, N.; Foraster, M.; Carrasco-Turigas, G.; Bouso, L.; Martínez, D.; Westerdahl, D.; de Nazalle, A.; Nieuwenhijsen, M. Impact of traffic-related air pollution on acute changes in cardiac autonomic modulation during rest and physical activity: A cross-over study. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2016, 26, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Sheridan, G.; Wisken, E.; Hing, C.; Smith, T. A bibliometric analysis assessing temporal changes in publication and authorship characteristics in The Knee from 1996 to 2016. Knee 2018, 25, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Geminiani, A.; Ercoli, C.; Feng, C.; Caton, J.G. Bibliometrics study on authorship trends in periodontal literature from 1995 to 2010. J. Periodontol. 2014, 85, 136–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shen, C.C.; Hu, Y.H.; Lin, W.C.; Tsai, C.F.; Ke, S.W. Research impact of general and funded papers: A citation analysis of two ACM international conference proceeding series. Online Information Rev. 2016, 40, 472–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, J.; Shapira, P. Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. PLoS ONE. 2015, 10, e0117727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kyvik, S.; Reymert, I. Research collaboration in groups and networks: Differences across academic fields. Scientometrics 2017, 113, 951–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sweileh, W.M.; Al-Jabi, S.W.; Sa’ed, H.Z.; Sawalha, A.F. Outdoor air pollution and respiratory health: A bibliometric analysis of publications in peer-reviewed journals (1900–2017). Multidiscip. Respir. Med. 2018, 13, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Dragos, C.M.; Dragos, S.L. Bibliometric approach of factors affecting scientific productivity in environmental sciences and ecology. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 449, 184–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kolle, S.R.; Thyavanahalli, S.H. Global research on air pollution between 2005 and 2014: A bibliometric study. Collect. Build. 2016, 35, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Applsci 11 04540 g001 550
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the literature research and selection process.
Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the literature research and selection process.
Applsci 11 04540 g001
Applsci 11 04540 g002 550
Figure 2. Distribution of the number of publications per decade.
Figure 2. Distribution of the number of publications per decade.
Applsci 11 04540 g002
* The linear adjustment of the number of publications is represented by the red line.
Applsci 11 04540 g003 550
Figure 3. Keywords used in published studies.
Figure 3. Keywords used in published studies.
Applsci 11 04540 g003
Applsci 11 04540 g004 550
Figure 4. Categories of Keywords.
Figure 4. Categories of Keywords.
Applsci 11 04540 g004
Applsci 11 04540 g005 550
Figure 5. Funding of publications.
Figure 5. Funding of publications.
Applsci 11 04540 g005
Applsci 11 04540 g006 550
Figure 6. Number of publications by authors who had published studies about the topic.
Figure 6. Number of publications by authors who had published studies about the topic.
Applsci 11 04540 g006
Applsci 11 04540 g007 550
Figure 7. Global geographical distribution of publications: number of publications by continent and country, and institutions with the highest number of publications.
Figure 7. Global geographical distribution of publications: number of publications by continent and country, and institutions with the highest number of publications.
Applsci 11 04540 g007
Table
Table 1. Length of title, keywords, and number of tables, figures, and pages of studies about outdoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice.
Table 1. Length of title, keywords, and number of tables, figures, and pages of studies about outdoor air quality of environments used for exercise and sports practice.
MeanMedianMinimumMaximum
Length of title15.1214634
Number of keywords5.135011
Number of tables3.07309
Number of figures3.773030
Number of References41.39395149
Length (pages)11.94294204
Number of citations WoS22.7070418
Number of citations WoS by year2.681.33024.59
Citations in all databases24.1770427
Usage Count28.57190243
Table
Table 2. Publications with the highest number of citations in WoS.
Table 2. Publications with the highest number of citations in WoS.
TitleJournalAuthor/Year of PublicationWos Citations/Average by YearPollutants InvestigatedExercise/Sport Context
Asthma in exercising children exposed to ozone: a cohort studyLancetMcConnell et al. (2002) [26]462 / 24.32PM10, PM2.5, O3, NO2Sports
Quantifying the air pollutants emission reduction during the 2008 Olympic Games in BeijingEnvironmental Science & TechnologyWang et al. (2010) [27]215 / 19.55SO2, NOx, PM10, NMVOCThe 2008 Olympic Games
The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment studyBritish Medical JournalRojas-Rueda et al. (2011) [28]203 / 20.30PM2.5Transport—cyclism
Association Between Changes in Air Pollution Levels During the Beijing Olympics and Biomarkers of Inflammation and Thrombosis in Healthy Young AdultsJournal of the American Medical AssociationRich et al. (2012) [29]195 / 21.67PM2.5, SO2, NO2, CO, O3The 2008 Olympic Games
Exposure to particulate matter in traffic: A comparison of cyclists and car passengersAtmospheric EnvironmentPanis et al. (2010) [30]185 / 16.82PNC, PM2.5 and PM10Transport—cyclism
Atmospheric Particulate MatterPollution during the 2008 Beijing OlympicsEnvironmental Science & TechnologyWang et al. (2009) [31]113/9.42PM10, PM 2.5, PM 2.5-10The 2008 Olympic Games
Assessment of traffic-related air pollution in the urban streets before and during the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games traffic control periodAtmospheric EnvironmentWang and Xie (2009) [32]97/8.08PM10, CO, NO2, O3The 2008 Olympic Games
Healthy neighborhoods: Walkability and air pollutionEnvironmental Health PerspectivesMarshall et al. (2009) [33]97 / 8.08NO, O3Physical activity
Subclinical responses in healthy cyclists briefly exposed to traffic-related air pollution: An intervention studyEnvironmental HealthJacobs et al. (2010) [34]87 / 7.91PM10, PM2.5, UFPTransport - cyclism
Oxidant Air Pollution and Athletic Performance Journal of the American Medical AssociationWayne et al. (1967) [35]79 / 1.46COSport - Running
Table
Table 3. The main funding agencies of studies.
Table 3. The main funding agencies of studies.
Funding AgencyCountriesNumber of Studies Funded
National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaChina11
Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological DevelopmentBrazil5
Beijing Council of Science and TechnologyChina3
Chinese Academy of SciencesChina3
German Research Foundation (DFG)Germany3
National Basic Research Program of ChinaChina3
São Paulo Research FoundationBrazil3
Belgian science policy under the Science for Sustainable Development programBelgium2
The National Institute of Environmental Health SciencesUnited States2
Health CanadaCanada2
Universidad de Los AndesColombia2
Table
Table 4. Comparison of the averages of the studies published until 2008 and studies published after 2008 (journal impact factor, number of citations in WoS and usage count, the numbers of authors, institutions, and countries, study length and title, and numbers of tables, figures, keywords, and references).
Table 4. Comparison of the averages of the studies published until 2008 and studies published after 2008 (journal impact factor, number of citations in WoS and usage count, the numbers of authors, institutions, and countries, study length and title, and numbers of tables, figures, keywords, and references).
Study CharacteristicsUntil 2008After 2008p
n = 15 (14.2%)n = 91 (85.8%)
Journal impact factor8.954.380.145
Citations in WoS42.8019.220.446
Citations in WoS/year2.312.710.149
Usage count WoS **7.8531.75<0.01
N. of Authors **3.936.86<0.01
N. of Institutions **1.873.68<0.01
N. of countries *1.131.760.017
Length of study (pages) **7.6712.65<0.01
Length of title *13.2615.430.042
N. of Tables2.803.110.284
N. of Figures2.933.910.231
N. of Keywords4.375.220.118
N. of References **22.6044.48<0.01
* Significant difference at p < 0.05. ** Significant difference at p < 0.01.
Table
Table 5. The number of publications, impact factor, and country and area of the journals.
Table 5. The number of publications, impact factor, and country and area of the journals.
Number of PublicationsJournalsFICountry of JournalsJournal Area
11Atmospheric Environment4.01NetherlandsEnvironmental Science, Earth and Planetary Sciences
8Science of the Total Environment5.58NetherlandsEnvironmental Science
5Environmental Science & Technology7.14EUAChemistry, Environmental Sciences and Medicine
4Environmental Health Perspectives7.73EUAEnvironmental Science, Medicine
4Environment International7.94United KingdomEnvironmental Science
4Environmental Research5.02EUABiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Environmental Science
3Aerosol and Air Quality Research2.73TaiwanEnvironmental Science
3Environmental Health 4.43-Environmental Science
3Archives of Environmental Health-EUAEnvironmental Science
3Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1.59EUAMedicine
3Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise4.47EUAHealth Professions, Medicine
3International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health2.46SwitzerlandEnvironmental Science
3PLoS ONE2.77EUAAgricultural and Biological Sciences
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Medicine
2Inhalation Toxicology1.73United KingdomEnvironmental Science
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
2International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity6.03United KingdomHealth Professions
Medicine
Nursing
2Journal of the American Medical Association51.27EUAMedicine
143 journals0.128 until 51.277 countries-
IF: Impact Factor (year 2018)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andrade, A.; Dominski, F.H.; Vilarino, G.T. Outdoor Air Quality of Environments Used for Exercise and Sports Practice: An Analysis of Scientific Production through Bibliometric Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4540. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11104540

AMA Style

Andrade A, Dominski FH, Vilarino GT. Outdoor Air Quality of Environments Used for Exercise and Sports Practice: An Analysis of Scientific Production through Bibliometric Analysis. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(10):4540. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11104540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andrade, Alexandro, Fábio Hech Dominski, and Guilherme Torres Vilarino. 2021. "Outdoor Air Quality of Environments Used for Exercise and Sports Practice: An Analysis of Scientific Production through Bibliometric Analysis" Applied Sciences 11, no. 10: 4540. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/app11104540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop