Next Article in Journal
Accurate Energy and Performance Prediction for Frequency-Scaled GPU Kernels
Previous Article in Journal
Optimal Design in Roller Pump System Applications for Linear Infusion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gas Transport in Mixed Matrix Membranes: Two Methods for Time Lag Determination
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Computational Approaches in Membrane Science and Engineering

Institute on Membrane Technology, CNR-ITM, Via P. Bucci 17/C, 87036 Rende (CS), Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 April 2020 / Accepted: 21 April 2020 / Published: 23 April 2020
Computational modelling and simulation form a consolidated branch in the multidisciplinary field of membrane science and technology [1,2,3,4], covering a wide range of disciplines from chemistry, physics and materials science, to chemical engineering and process technology. This Special Issue aims to cover all the aspects of computer-aided investigations: from molecular modelling to assess the properties of the materials at the atomic scale, to fluid dynamics to investigate the membrane module performances, to novel characterization and data elaboration methods.
In this issue, Petrosino et al. [5] used a double-scale computational approach, based on quantum and molecular mechanics, to focus on the noncovalent interactions involved in the adsorption of enzymes on polymeric membrane surfaces. They investigate the surface charges of the enzyme and membrane at the sub-nano- and nano-scale, while a larger molecular mechanics model is used to study the surface protein interactions, and hence the adsorption. The potential energy profile of the enzyme shows good agreement with the experimental data. Such knowledge of the potential energy landscape is important for subsequent simulations. One of their main findings is the enzyme’s orientation analysis as a function of its distance from the surface. This analysis is the first step to investigate the kinetics of immobilized enzymes. Finally, the quantities, computed without resorting to adjustable parameters, can be used as inputs in meso- or macroscale modeling.
Keshin and Altinkaya [6] review the atomic–molecular modelling used to predict several properties of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) based on metal organic frameworks (MOFs) as the filler. They discuss the models that allow the screening of MOF/polymer compatibility as well as their combination to increase their transport properties for gas separation applications. In particular, they pointed out that the used force fields should be validated for the in-silico synthesis of novel materials and their transport properties’ characterization.
Mazo et al. [7] use molecular dynamics to compare four glassy polymers, two with low permeability and high selectivity, the other two being highly permeable but with low selectivity. Their analysis of the relationship between molecular structures and their gas transport properties shows that the precise correlation between the latter depends on the free volume and free volume distribution. They also highlight the chemical nature of the groups forming the surface of free volume elements, identifying fluorine atoms as the dominant species.
Molecular dynamics simulations are also applied by Karataraki et al. [8] in their investigations on the interaction of water with conically shaped carbon nanoparticles. To increase the insight into the membrane-assisted separation processes in the liquid phase, their studies focus on the properties of the hydration shell of nanoparticles and on the behavior of water molecules in a nano-confined environment, a crucial aspect for the separation performances of membranes [9,10]. Thus, this work will help in the understanding of the extraordinary efficiency of biological porins [11,12].
Macroscopic computational approaches are used by Valdés et al. [13], who study fluid dynamics to investigate the behavior of supercritical CO2 in hollow fiber membrane modules used as contactors. The investigation of the 3D profiles describing the hydrodynamics of the supercritical fluid highlights the critical points in the process, providing useful information to anticipate potential technical issues, and helping with the future exploitation of this technology. Interestingly they show an inverse correlation between the number of fibers and the irregularity of the flow.
Also at the macroscopic scale, a combination of fluid dynamics and mechanical simulations is applied by Battaglia et al. [14] to investigate the effect of the transmembrane pressure in electro-membrane processes using round pillar type-profiled membranes. This study shows that the pressure that arises between the solutions flowing in alternate channels causes a slight deformation of the membrane, which may affect its mass transport properties. Thus, their computational work investigates these aspects for a better understanding of the membrane behaviour that normally remains hidden for the eye.
At a different level, computational tools are also used by Fuoco et al. [15] for a better comparison of the experimental data with theoretical transport models. For instance, they discuss two different methods for the analysis of the transient and pseudo-steady state gas transport in dense polymeric or mixed matrix membranes. They show some of the limits of the traditional time lag method in the description of complex systems such as mixed matrix membranes, and demonstrate how the fit of the entire permeation curve gives information on anomalies in the gas transport. In combination with a specially designed permeation instrument, this evaluation method provides even accurate mixed gas diffusion coefficients data, which are so far almost inaccessible.
In conclusion, the papers in this Special Issue illustrate how computational approaches, different in the “time–space scale”, can be used at several levels in the field of membrane science and engineering. It shows how a more extensive use of computer-aided approaches contributes not only to strengthening the fundamental research in this field, but it also helps a more successful exploitation of membrane technology in industrial applications.
Finally, we are really grateful to all the authors for their valuable contributions and to the reviewers for their critical remarks and suggestions, which boosted the quality of the herein published scientific works.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed in similar extent to the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Liu, L.; Du, J.; Zhu, X.; Ming Ng, K. Computer-Aided Polymer Design: Integrating Group Contribution and Molecular Dynamics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 15542–15552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kupgan, G.; Abbott, L.J.; Hart, K.E.; Colina, C.M. Modeling Amorphous Microporous Polymers for CO2 Capture and Separations. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 5488–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Venable, R.M.; Krämer, A.; Pastor, R.W. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Membrane Permeability. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 5954–5997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xu, Q.; Jiang, J. Molecular simulations of liquid separations in polymer membranes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2020, 28, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Petrosino, F.; Curcio, S.; Chakraborty, S.; De Luca, G. Enzyme Immobilization on Polymer Membranes: A Quantum and Molecular Mechanics Study. Computation 2019, 7, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Keskin, S.; Alsoy Altinkaya, S. A Review on Computational Modeling Tools for MOF-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes. Computation 2019, 7, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Mazo, M.; Balabaev, N.; Alentiev, A.; Strelnikov, I.; Yampolskii, Y. Structure and Properties of High and Low Free Volume Polymers Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulation. Computation 2019, 7, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Karataraki, G.; Sapalidis, A.; Tocci, E.; Gotzias, A. Molecular Dynamics of Water Embedded Carbon Nanocones: Surface Waves Observation. Computation 2019, 7, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Fuoco, A.; Galier, S.; Roux-de Balmann, H.; De Luca, G. Correlation between macroscopic sugar transfer and nanoscale interactions in cation exchange membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 493, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Fuoco, A.; Zwijnenberg, H.; Galier, S.; Balmann, H.R.; De Luca, G. Structural properties of cation exchange membranes: Characterization, electrolyte effect and solute transfer. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 520, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tunuguntla, R.H.; Henley, R.Y.; Yao, Y.-C.; Pham, T.A.; Wanunu, M.; Noy, A. Enhanced water permeability and tunable ion selectivity in subnanometer carbon nanotube porins. Science 2017, 357, 792–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Wagh, P.; Escobar, I.C. Biomimetic and bioinspired membranes for water purification: A critical review and future directions. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2019, 38, e13215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Valdés, H.; Unda, K.; Saavedra, A. Numerical Simulation on Supercritical CO2 Fluid Dynamics in a Hollow Fiber Membrane Contactor. Computation 2019, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Battaglia, G.; Gurreri, L.; Airò Farulla, G.; Cipollina, A.; Pirrotta, A.; Micale, G.; Ciofalo, M. Pressure-Induced Deformation of Pillar-Type Profiled Membranes and Its Effects on Flow and Mass Transfer. Computation 2019, 7, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Fuoco, A.; Monteleone, M.; Esposito, E.; Bruno, R.; Ferrando-Soria, J.; Pardo, E.; Armentano, D.; Jansen, C.J. Gas Transport in Mixed Matrix Membranes: Two Methods for Time Lag Determination. Computation 2020, 8, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fuoco, A.; De Luca, G.; Tocci, E.; Jansen, J.C. Computational Approaches in Membrane Science and Engineering. Computation 2020, 8, 36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/computation8020036

AMA Style

Fuoco A, De Luca G, Tocci E, Jansen JC. Computational Approaches in Membrane Science and Engineering. Computation. 2020; 8(2):36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/computation8020036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fuoco, Alessio, Giorgio De Luca, Elena Tocci, and Johannes Carolus Jansen. 2020. "Computational Approaches in Membrane Science and Engineering" Computation 8, no. 2: 36. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/computation8020036

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop