1. Introduction and Roadmap
2. Talent Development and Innovation
3. Cognitive Aptitudes and Giftedness: Definitions
4. High Developed Aptitudes Can Often Lead to Greater Innovation
5. Improving Gifted Talent Development has the Potential to Enhance a Wide Range of Innovations and Social Returns
6. Companies Seek Talented People, Who Can Come from Anywhere
7. Lack of Development of the Gifted, Particularly among the Disadvantaged
8. Development of the Gifted on Multiple Dimensions
9. Practical Implications
9.1. Identification of Gifted Students (and Really All Students) on a Developmental Continuum
9.2. The Imperative of Gifted Support
9.3. An Environment Supporting Significant Intellectual Accomplishment
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
- Anderson, Stuart. 2004. The multiplier effect. International Educator 13: 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Assouline, Susan G., Nicholas Colangelo, Joyce VanTassel-Baska, and Ann Lupkowski-Shoplik. 2015. A Nation Empowered: Evidence Trumps Excuses Holding Back America’s Brightest Students. Iowa City: Belin Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa. [Google Scholar]
- Azevedo, Joao P., Amer Hasan, Koen Geven, Diana Goldemberg, and Syedah A. Iqbal. 2020. Learning Losses Due to COVID-19 Could Add up to $10 Trillion. Brookings Institution. Available online: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/future-development/2020/07/30/learning-losses-due-to-covid-19-could-add-up-to-10-trillion/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Ballantyne, Nathan. 2019. Epistemic trespassing. Mind 128: 367–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baron, Jonathan. 2019. Actively open-minded thinking in politics. Cognition 188: 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benbow, Camilla P., and Julian C. Stanley. 1996. Inequity in equity: How “equity” can lead to inequity for high-potential students. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2: 249–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berner, Ashley R. 2017. Pluralism and American Public Education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar]
- Bernstein, Brian O., David Lubinski, and Camilla P. Benbow. 2020. Academic acceleration in gifted youth and fruitless concerns regarding psychological well-being: A 35-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanchard, Olivier, and Dani Rodrik, eds. 2021. Combating Inequality: Rethinking Government’s Role. Cambridge: The MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
- Braben, Donald W. 2020. Scientific Freedom: The Elixir of Civilization. San Francisco: Stripe Press. [Google Scholar]
- Braben, Donald W. 1994. To Be a Scientist: The Spirit of Adventure in Science and Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Bronstein, Michael V., Gordon Pennycook, Adam Bear, David G. Rand, and Tyrone D. Cannon. 2019. Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8: 108–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brown, Harrison, James Bonner, and John Weir. 1957. The Next Hundred Years. London: The Scientific Book Club. [Google Scholar]
- Brown, Matt I., Jonathan Wai, and Christopher F. Chabris. 2021. Can you ever be too smart for your own good? Comparing linear and nonlinear effects of cognitive ability on life outcomes. Perspectives on Psychological Science. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calarco, Jessica M. 2018. Negotiating Opportunities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Card, David, and Laura Giuliano. 2016. Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113: 13678–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carroll, John B. 1993. Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Ceci, Stephen J. 1991. How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology 27: 703–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceci, Stephen J., and Paul B. Papierno. 2005. The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: When the “have-nots” gain but the “haves” gain even more. American Psychologist 60: 149–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chabris, Christopher F., and Jonathan Wai. 2014. Hire like Google? For Most Companies, that’s a Bad Idea. Los Angeles Times. Available online: https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-chabris-google-intelligence-20140309-story.html (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Cole, Jonathan. 2016. Toward a More Perfect University. New York: Public Affairs. [Google Scholar]
- Coleman, William, and Edward E. Cureton. 1954. Intelligence and achievement: The “jangle fallacy” again. Educational and Psychological Measurement 14: 347–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Congressional Research Service. 2019. Foreign STEM Students in the United States. Available online: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11347#:~:text=This%20percentage%20is%20even%20higher,United%20States%20in%20SY2016%2D2017 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Dawson, Michelle, Isabelle Soulières, Morton A. Gernsbacher, and Laurent Mottron. 2007. The level and nature of autistic intelligence. Psychological Science 18: 657–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Detterman, Douglas K. 1993. Giftedness and intelligence: One and the same? Ciba Foundation Symposium 178: 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dynarski, Susan M. 2018. ACT/SAT for all: A Cheap, Effective Way to Narrow Income Gaps in College. Brookings Institution. Available online: https://www.brookings.edu/research/act-sat-for-all-a-cheap-effective-way-to-narrow-income-gaps-in-college/ (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Flexner, Abraham, and Robbert Dijkgraaf. 2017. The Usefulness of Useless Knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Freeland, Chrystia. 2012. Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else. New York: The Penguin Press. [Google Scholar]
- Gagné, Francoys. 2018. Academic talent development: Theory and best practices. In APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. Edited by Steven I. Pfeiffer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 163–83. [Google Scholar]
- Gardner, John W. 1961. Excellence. New York: Harper. [Google Scholar]
- Gelles, David. 2020. The Husband-and-Wife Team Behind the Leading Vaccine to Solve Covid-19. New York Times. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/business/biontech-covid-vaccine.html (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Goodhart, David. 2020. Head, Hand, Heart: Why Intelligence Is Over-Rewarded, Manual Workers Matter, and Caregivers Deserve More Respect. New York: Free Press. [Google Scholar]
- Grissom, Jason A., and Christopher Redding. 2016. Descretion and disproportionality: Explaining the underrepresentation of high-achieving students of color in gifted programs. AERA Open 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, Nicole L., Jamie L. Hanson, Barbara L. Wolfe, and Seth D. Pollak. 2015. Association of child poverty, brain development, and academic achievement. JAMA Pediatrics 169: 822–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanushek, Eric A., and Ludger Woessmann. 2020. The Economic Impacts of Learning Losses. OECD Working Paper. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/education/The-economic-impacts-of-coronavirus-covid-19-learning-losses.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Harris, Jeffrey E. 2021. The Repeated Setbacks of HIV Vaccine Development Laid the Groundwork for SARS-COV-2 vaccines. NBER Working Paper 28587. Available online: http://nber.org/papers/w28587 (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Heckman, James J. 2000. Policies to Foster Human Capital. Research in Economics 54: 3–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, Garett. 2016. Hive Mind: How Your Nation’s IQ Matters so Much More than Your Own. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Jones, Benjamin F., and Lawrence H. Summers. 2020. A Calculation of the Social Returns to Innovation. NBER Working Paper No. 27863. Cambridge: NBER. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaufman, Scott B. 2013. Ungifted: Intelligence Redefined. New York: Basic Books. [Google Scholar]
- Kelley, Truman L. 1927. Interpretation of Educational Measurements. Yonkers: World Book Company. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Mihyeon. 2016. A meta-analysis of the effects of enrichment programs on gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly 60: 102–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lakin, Joni M., and Jonathan Wai. 2020. Spatially gifted, academically inconvenienced: Spatially talented students experience less academic engagement and more behavioral issues than other talented students. British Journal of Educational Psychology 90: 1015–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leary, Mark R., Kate J. Diebels, Erin K. Davisson, Katrina P. Jongman-Sereno, Jennifer C. Isherwood, Kaitlin T. Raimi, Samantha A. Deffler, and Rick H. Hoyle. 2017. Cognitive and interpersonal features of intellectual humility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 43: 793–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, William M., and LaNeisha Waller. 2018. Identifying and educating underrepresented gifted students. In APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. Edited by Steven I. Pfeiffer. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 417–31. [Google Scholar]
- Lohman, David F. 1993. Teaching and testing to develop fluid abilities. Educational Researcher 22: 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lohman, David F. 2005. Identifying Academically Talented Minority Students. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED505376.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Lovett, Benjamin J. 2013. The science and politics of gifted students with learning disabilities: A social inequality perspective. Roeper Review 35: 136–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lubinski, David. 2004. Introduction to the special section on cognitive abilities: 100 years after Spearman’s 1904 “‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86: 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lubinski, David, and Camilla P. Benbow. 2006. Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science 1: 316–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lubinski, David, and Camilla P. Benbow. 2020. Intellectual precocity: What have learned since Terman? Gifted Child Quarterly 65: 3–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McBee, Matthew T., Scott J. Peters, and Erin M. Miller. 2016. The impact of the nomination stage on gifted program identification: A comprehensive psychometric analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly 60: 258–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, Stephanie. 2020. Eric and Wendy Schmidt Launch Global Talent Corps for Teenagers. Fast Company. Available online: https://www.fastcompany.com/90575018/eric-and-wendy-schmidt-launch-global-talent-corps-for-teenagers (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Murray, Charles. 2008. Real Education: Four Simple Truths for Bringing America’s Schools Back to Reality. New York: Crown Forum. [Google Scholar]
- National Foundation for American Policy. 2020. Immigrants and Nobel Prizes: 1901–2020. Available online: https://nfap.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Immigrants-and-Nobel-Prizes-1901-to-2020.NFAP-Policy-Brief.October-2020.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Park, Gregory, David Lubinski, and Camilla P. Benbow. 2007. Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science 18: 948–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Parks, Sandra. 2015. Teaching analytical and critical thinking skills in gifted education. In Methods and Materials for Teaching the Gifted. Edited by Frances A. Karnes and Suzanne M. Bean. Waco: Prufrock Press, pp. 307–44. [Google Scholar]
- Peters, Scott J. 2021. The challenges of achieving equity within public school gifted and talented programs. Gifted Child Quarterly. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, Scott J., Karen Rambo-Hernandez, Matthew C. Makel, Michael S. Matthews, and Jonathan A. Plucker. 2019. Effects of local norms on racial and ethnic representation in gifted education. AERA Open 5: 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinker, Steven A. 2018. Enlightenment Now. New York: Viking. [Google Scholar]
- Revelle, William, Joshua Wilt, and David M. Condon. 2011. Individual differences and differential psychology: A brief history and prospect. In The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Personality and Individual Differences. Edited by Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, Sophie von Stumm and Adrian Furnham. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 3–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rindermann, Heiner, and James Thompson. 2011. Cognitive capitalism: The effect of cognitive ability on wealth, as mediated through scientific achievement and economic freedom. Psychological Science 22: 754–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritchie, Stuart J., and Elliot M. Tucker-Drob. 2018. How much does education improve intelligence? A meta-analysis. Psychological Science 29: 1358–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, Robert C. 2015. Learning intellectual humility. In Intellectual Virtues and Education. Edited by Jason Baehr. England: Routledge, pp. 184–201. [Google Scholar]
- Rosling, Hans, Anna R. Ronnlund, and Ola Rosling. 2018. Factfulness: Ten Reasons We’re Wrong About the World—and Why Things are Better than you Think. New York: Flatiron books. [Google Scholar]
- Roose, Kevin. 2014. Marc Andreessen on Why Optimism is Always the Safest Bet. New York Magazine. Available online: https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2014/10/marc-andreessen-in-conversation.html (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Sandel, Michael J. 2020. The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good? New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Google Scholar]
- Schleicher, Andreas. 2020. The Impact of Covid-19 on Education: Insights from Education at a Glance 2020. OECD. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/education/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-insights-education-at-a-glance-2020.pdf (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Shapiro, Eliza. 2019. Only 7 Black Students Got into Stuyvesant, N. Y.’s Most Selective High School, out of 895 Spots. New York Times. Available online: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/18/nyregion/black-students-nyc-high-schools.html (accessed on 10 June 2021).
- Snow, Richard E. 1996. Aptitude development and education. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2: 536–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegle, Del. 2018. Understanding underachievement. In Handbook of Giftedness in Children. Edited by Steven I. Pfeiffer. New York: Springer, pp. 285–97. [Google Scholar]
- Sorby, Sheryl A., Norma Veurink, and Scott Streiner. 2018. Does spatial skills instruction improve STEM outcomes? The answer is ‘yes’. Journal of Learning and Individual Differences 67: 209–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stanovich, Keith E., and Richard F. West. 2008. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94: 672–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stanovich, Keith E., Richard F. West, and Maggie E. Toplak. 2013. Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22: 259–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steenbergen-Hu, Saiying, and Sidney M. Moon. 2011. The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly 55: 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sternberg, Robert J. 2020. Rethinking what we mean by intelligence. Phi Delta Kappan 102: 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevens, David. 2020. The academic support index: A tool for contextualizing student data. In The Cambridge Handbook of Applied School Psychology. Edited by Frank C. Worrell, Tammy L. Hughes and Dante D. Dixson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strenze, Tarmo. 2013. Allocation of talent in society and its effect on economic development. Intelligence 41: 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Rong. 2020. The three faces of interests: An integrative review of interest research in vocational, organizational, and educational psychology. Journal of Vocational Behavior 116: 103240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- . Subotnik, Rena F., Paula Olszewski-Kubilius, and Frank C. Worrell. 2011. Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 12: 3–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, Lee A., and Jeremy Oehlert. 2010. The etiology of giftedness. Learning and Individual Differences 20: 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toplak, Maggie E., Richard F. West, and Keith E. Stanovich. 2017. Real-world correlates of performance on heuristics and biases tasks in a community sample. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 30: 541–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uttal, David H., Nathaniel G. Meadow, Elizabeth Tipton, Linda L. Hand, Alison R. Alden, Christopher Warren, and Nora S. Newcombe. 2013. The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin 139: 352–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wadhwa, Vivek, AnnaLee Saxenian, Ben A. Rissing, and G. Gereffi. 2007. America’s new immigrant entreprenuers: Part I. Duke Science, Technology and Innovation Paper 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wai, Jonathan. 2013. Investigating America’s elite: Cognitive ability, education, and sex differences. Intelligence 41: 203–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wai, Jonathan. 2014. Experts are born, then made: Combining prospective and retrospective longitudinal data shows that cognitive ability matters. Intelligence 45: 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wai, Jonathan, and Joni M. Lakin. 2020. Finding the missing Einsteins: Expanding the breadth of cognitive and noncognitive measures used in academic services. Contemporary Educational Psychology 63: 101920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wai, Jonathan, David Lubinski, and Camilla P. Benbow. 2009. Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 101: 817–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wai, Jonathan, David Lubinski, Camilla P. Benbow, and James H. Steiger. 2010. Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 102: 860–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wai, Jonathan, and Frank C. Worrell. 2020. How talented low-income kids are left behind. Phi Delta Kappan 102: 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wai, Jonathan, and Frank C. Worrell. 2016. Helping disadvantaged and spatially talented students fulfill their potential: Related and neglected national resources. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3: 122–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Worrell, Frank C., and Dante D. Dixson. 2018. Recruiting and retaining underrepresented gifted students. In Handbook of Giftedness in Children, 2nd ed. Edited by Steven I. Pfeiffer. New York: Springer, pp. 209–26. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).