Next Article in Journal
Microstructures and Photodegradation Performance toward Methylene Orange of Sputtering-Assisted Decoration of ZnFe2O4 Crystallites onto TiO2 Nanorods
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Impact of Cu-In-Ga-S Nanoparticles Compactness on Holes Transfer of Perovskite Solar Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Improvement in Light Output of Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Diodes with Patterned Double-Layer ITO by Laser Direct Writing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Perovskite Downconverters for Efficient, Excellent Color-Rendering, and Circadian Solid-State Lighting
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Improved Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells by the Interfacial Modification of the Active Layer

1
College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, ShanXi DaTong University, Datong 037009, China
2
Beijing Key Laboratory of Energy Conversion and Storage Materials, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 26 December 2018 / Revised: 15 January 2019 / Accepted: 1 February 2019 / Published: 5 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Perovskite Materials and Devices–– Progress and Challenges)

Abstract

:
As the most promising material for thin-film solar cells nowadays, perovskite shine for its unique optical and electronic properties. Perovskite-based solar cells have already been demonstrated with high efficiencies. However, it is still very challenging to optimize the morphology of perovskite film. In this paper we proposed a smooth and continuous perovskite active layer by treating the poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly (styrenesulphonate) (PEDOT:PSS) with pre-perovskite deposition and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) rinse. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and atomic force microscope (AFM) images confirmed a perovskite active layer consisting of large crystal grains with less grain boundary area and enhanced crystallinity. The perovskite devices fabricated by this method feature a high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 11.36% and a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 21.9 mA·cm−2.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Since 2012, methylammonium lead halide (MAPbX3, where MA is methylammonium CH3NH3 and X is a halogen) perovskite-based photovoltaic devices have been studied intensively [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. On one hand, these organic-inorganic hybrid compounds act as light absorbers because their small band gap and high extinction coefficients endow the solar cells strong light absorption in a broad region from visible to the near-infrared; on the other hand, the compounds perform as carrier transporters because their excellent crystallinity and long electron-hole diffusion length [12,13,14,15]. Such distinguished advantages have brought up the value of power conversion efficiency (PCE) of planar structure solar cells as high as 22.7% combined with the precise interface engineering and more importantly, optimizing the morphology of perovskite film [16]. As the active layer to absorb photons and generate charge carries, the quality of CH3NH3PbI3 film is crucial for the photovoltaic performance [5,17,18,19,20]. Tremendously experimental and theoretical efforts have been made to develop effective methods for high quality perovskite film. Among them, spin-coating is mostly used in solution-processed perovskite solar cells (PSCs) due to its simplicity and flexibility [21,22]. It normally performs with one-step or two-step successive deposition of the inorganic and organic precursor [23,24]. The quality of fabricated perovskite films depends on the experimental conditions in a large extent. Various strategies including temperature annealing [19,25,26], solvent annealing [27] and the addition of various additives have been reported to optimize the morphology [20,28,29,30]. Moreover, interface engineering has also been shown as an effective method in morphology manipulation [31,32]. It is achieved by either filling the voids on the surfaces of perovskite film or growing large crystalline grains on hole/electron transport layers (HTLs/HELs). For example, Huang et al. realized that the perovskite grains with different aspect ratio deposited on a wide range of non-wetting HTLs and then attained reduced grain boundary area and charge recombination [33]. Consequently, the morphology of the perovskite layer is highly sensitive to the property of adjacent interface as exemplified by poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly (styrenesulphonate) (PEDOT: PSS), which is extensive applied as a buffer layer in planar perovskite solar cells. Although depositing polar solvent like dimethylformamide (DMF), DMSO and/or perovskite materials on PEDOT:PSS has been elucidated in the previous studies [34], the improvement of perovskite morphology was inconspicuous and they mainly induced enhancement in conductivity of PEDOT:PSS. It is still a pivotal challenge to form continuous, uniform perovskite film.
Therefore, in this work we demonstrate a strategy for optimizing the morphology of perovskite films via combined effect of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and pre-casted perovskite solution. A smooth and continuous perovskite layer was formed upon PEDOT:PSS layer that pre-treated by perovskite solution deposition and subsequent DMSO rinse. This film consists of large crystal grains with less boundary area and enhanced crystallinity which is preferred to reduce the charge recombination. The impressive increase of short-circuit current (Jsc) from 11.2 to 21.9 mA·cm−2 greatly promotes the final PCE to be 11.36%.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Instruments

PbCl2 (99.999%), CH3NH3I and NH4Cl were gained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). PEDOT:PSS (Clevios P VP AI 4083) was purchased from H.C. Starck GmbH (Munich, Germany) and used only after filtered with a 0.45 µm PVDF film. N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF, 99.8%), chlorobenzene (CB, 99.8%) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, 99.8%) were obtained from Acros (Innochem co. LTD, Beijing, China).
UV absorption spectra were determined by a PerkinElmer UV-vis spectrometer model Lambda 750 (Beijing, China). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was obtained on a Kratos AXIS UTRADLD XPS system (Manchester, UK) with a monochromatic Al Kα (1,486.6 eV). The SEM images were acquired with a JEOL 7000F field emission SEM system (Tescan China, Shanghai, China). AFM measurements were acquired with a Digital Instrument Multimode Nanoscope IIIA (Plainview, TX, USA) operating in the tapping mode. The thickness of the PEDOT:PSS film and perovskite layer were collected by a Dektak surface profilometer (Beijing, China). The average contact angles were obtained from three different positions of the same sample by using an OCA20 instrument (Data Physics, Filderstadt, Germany).

2.2. Solar cell Fabrication and Characterization

First, the indium-tin-oxide (ITO) substrates was ultrasonicated with detergents, deionized water, acetone, isopropyl alcohol, deionized water for 25 minutes step by step. The conductivity of ITO was 20 Ω/□. The ITO substrates were treated with ammonium water, H2O2 and deionized water (1:1:5 by volume) at 160 °C for 30 minutes and followed by deionized water washing. A 38 nm thick PEDOT:PSS layer was deposited on the cleaned ITO glass by spin-coated method at 3500 rpm for 30 s and then dried at 150 °C for 15 min in air. Perovskite precursor was prepared by CH3NH3I and PbI2 (1:1 molar ratio) in DMF (400 mg/mL) at 60 °C for 6 h using NH4Cl (31.6 mg/mL) as the additive. The perovskite precursor solution was pin-coated on the ITO/PEDOT:PSS glass at the speed of 3000 rpm for 60 s in a N2-glove box and then the perovskite film was rinsed with DMSO. Afterwards, the perovskite layer was deposited onto the treated PEDOT:PSS film with a speed of 3000 rpm for 180 s and heated at 50 °C for 5 min. Phenyl-C71-butyric acid methyl ester (PC71BM, 20 mg/mL in chlorobenzene) was spin-coated on top of the perovskite layer and the top Ag electrode was deposited with 100 nm under 10−4 Pa. The device was measured with an effective area 0.04 cm2 in nitrogen condition. J-V characteristics were obtained with an Agilent B2902A Source Meter (model XES-301S, SAN-EI) by simulating AM 1.5 G illumination at 100 mW/cm and calibrating the intensity with a standard single-crystal Si photovoltaic cell.

2.3. Fabrication and Characterization of SCLC

The space charge limited current (SCLC) devices were prepared with a structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PVSK/PC71BM/Au. A thin PEDOT:PSS film was deposited on the substrate of cleaned ITO by spin-coated method at 3500 rpm/s for 30 s and annealed on a hotplate at 150 °C for 15 min. The PEDOT:PSS layer thickness determined by Dektak surface profilometer is about 38 nm. The perovskite layer was deposited onto the treated PEDOT:PSS film at 3000 rpm/s for 180 s and heated at 50 °C for 5 min. A thin layer of PC71BM (20 mg/mL in chlorobenzene, 60–70 nm) was then spin deposited on top of the perovskite layer at 3000 rpm for 60 s inside a N2-glovebox. The top Au electrode was obtained by evaporating 100 nm of gold through a shadow mask under high vacuum (10−4 Pa). The J-V characteristics of the device were equipped with an Agilent B2902A Source Meter with the darkness of 0 V to 1.0 V.

3. Results and Discussion

The planar heterojunction perovskite device is fabricated by a typically inverted configuration of ITO/PEDOT:PSS (38 nm)/perovskite layer (~230 nm)/PC71BM/Ag (100 nm). Specifically, the CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite films were formed by spin coating method which put a perovskite precursor solution on the top of ITO substrates coated by PEDOT:PSS and dry at 100 °C for 3 min. Based on this procedure, more devices were fabricated as well that composed of treated PEDOT:PSS film which refer to that the PEDOT:PSS layer was subjected to pre-perovskite deposition and subsequently rinsed with DMSO (fully treated) or only DMSO rinsed before the fabrication of perovskite layer. All the devices were fabricated under the optimized condition and their photovoltaic properties were investigated. Figure 1a shows the typical current-voltage (J-V) curves of devices prepared with the untreated and treated PEDOT:PSS films. And the photovoltaic performances of the devices including the open-circuit voltage (Voc), Jsc, fill factor (FF) and the final PCE values are listed in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, for the pristine devices which just could obtain a relatively low PCE value of 6.51 %. But a slightly increased PCE is observed for the devices with the PEDOT:PSS layer treated with drops of pure DMSO, which can be mainly attributed to the improvement of Jsc from 11.2 to 13.92 mA cm−2. For the fully treated devices, the PCE is greatly promoted to be 11.36 % with a Jsc of 21.9 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.960 V and a FF of 0.539. It is noticeable that the almost fold increase (74.5% enhancement) of overall PCE is mainly assigned to the almost over-doubled Jsc, although slightly higher Voc and declined FF are obtained. According to the previous studies [35], Voc is highly related with the annealing temperature that is 100, 80 and 50 °C, respectively, corresponding to gradually increased Voc for pristine (0.840 V), DMSO-treated (0.890 V) and fully treated (0.960 V) devices built in the optimal conditions. Therefore, it is reasonable to understand the higher Voc presented finally. For FF decreased from 0.70 to 0.539, it is undesirable but indeed observed which will be tentatively explained below.
As the most effective photovoltaic parameter that influences PCE characteristics of perovskite devices, Jsc is mainly determined by absorption characteristics, exciton dissociation, charge carrier transport/collection efficiency and so forth. Most of these physical processes are closely depending on the quality of active layer, including the morphology and surface coverage. In our case, the dramatically improved Jsc from 11.2 to 21.9 mA cm−2 was achieved for the fully treated devices. To verify these Jsc values, external quantum efficiencies (EQEs) measurement were carried out. As seen from Figure 1b, both pristine and fully treated devices exhibit a broad spectrum response from 350 nm to 800 nm and the EQE response is much higher after the treatment of pre-perovskite deposition and DMSO rinse. In addition, Jsc values calculated from integrated EQE curves fit well with that obtained from the J-V measurement. As current hysteresis may drastically affect the conclusions regarding the PCE [36,37], we have measured the J-V curves of PSCs with DMSO-treated PEDOT:PSS layer (PVSK/DMSO/PVSK) under different scan directions, with a delay time of 20 ms and a voltage step of 0.02 V s−1. Very close PCE values of 10.33% in the forward and 9.70% in the reverse scanning direction are presented as telling from Figure S1, suggesting that the PSCs with DMSO-treated PEDOT:PSS layer showed small hysteresis.
Considering that Jsc is closely correlated to the quality of active layer, the SEM and AFM were carried out to investigate the morphology of perovskite films. It can be told from the SEM images (Figure 2a–d) that both the perovskite films exhibit unique crystalline features and completely “cover” the bottom PEDOT:PSS underlayer. In general, a great deal of domains with length scales in the order of several hundred nanometres consist of these films, meanwhile typical cracks among these crystalline domains are present as well. However, the difference of the CH3NH3PbI3 films deposited on pristine PEDOT:PSS and treated PEDOT:PSS underlayer is extremely evident. In the pristine film (Figure 2a,b), both the crystals with small and large grain size are distributed randomly and large boundaries area is created. Such broad size distribution leads to the coarse surface formation as reflected by the AFM images in Supporting Information (Figure S2). It exhibits a root-mean-square (RMS) roughness of 5.41 nm that is in sharp contrast with RMS of 2.64 nm for the film grown on treated PEDOT:PSS underlayer.
Clearly, CH3NH3PbI3 film grown on the treated PEDOT:PSS underlayer demonstrated improved crystalline properties with large grain size and good uniformity, resulting in reduced grain boundary area. Large grain size with less grain boundaries are always pursued because it has a critical influence on photovoltaic parameters of FF and Jsc. The main positive effects can lie in the dramatically reduced charge recombination according to the previous reports [25,33]. Hence, a continuous and smooth CH3NH3PbI3 film was formed with the PEDOT:PSS layer treated via pre-perovskite deposition and DMSO rinse. The effect of these treatment and mechanism behind can be described in terms of the removal of PSSH chains and the conformational change of the PEDOT chains as reported previously [34]. Indeed, it was proven in our work again and the decreased amount of PSS was detected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) as demonstrated in Figure S3. Since PSS (or PSSH) is hydrophilic, its removal reasonably led to an increased contact angle from 12.1o to 45.5o for the fully treated PEDOT:PSS layer (see Figure 3). The contact angle represented the wetting capability of PEDOT:PSS layer to water or N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) due to its similar dissolubility in these two solvents. The decreased wetting capability is beneficial to the perovskite film growth with large crystalline grain and less boundaries as revealed in the previous studies [33]. This agrees well with our results derived from SEM and X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns in Figure 4a. The higher intensity of diffraction peaks illustrates enhanced perovskite crystallinity.
To better understand and evaluate the enhanced Jsc, we also performed UV-vis absorption measurements. In Figure 4b, an increased optical absorbance for active perovskite layer deposited on treated PEDDOT:PSS underlayer are observed across the entire absorption region. This is mainly due to the improved crystal growth upon PEDDOT:PSS layer with the treatment of pre-perovskite deposition and DMSO rinse. Moreover, the effect of these treatments can be elucidated from the charge transport point of view. Hence, we measured the hole mobility of perovskite devices by space charge limited current (SCLC) method and the hole-only device was constructed with a structure of ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PVSK/PCBM/Au. The transfer curves are depicted in Figure S4 and hole mobilities are calculated based on the literature dates [38,39]. The hole mobility of fully treated devices reached 2.32 × 10−2 cm2 V−1s-1 (as shown in Table 2), showing two orders of magnitude higher than that of plain devices, which implied that the charge transport benefited from the modified of the morphology, namely, the formation of much more uniform and smoother film. This boosted hole mobility also coincided well with declined series resistances (Rs, from 6.80 to 4.84 Ω cm−2 as shown in Table 2) of perovskite devices with fully treatment that rationalizes the saliently increased Jsc. However, we have to say that meanwhile shunt resistances (Rsh) got decreased unfortunately as shown in Table 2 that brought up the depressed FF as mentioned above [40]. Based on the analysis of contact angle, these can be attributed to the weakened interfacial contact between perovskite active layer and PEDOT:PSS layer since the pre-perovskite deposition on PEDOT:PSS layer and subsequent rinse with DMSO induced a significant decrease of hydrophilicity as we discussed in the context.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a smooth and continuous perovskite film has been fabricated by pre-perovskite deposition on PEDOT:PSS layer and subsequent DMSO rinse. This film consists of large crystal grains with less grain boundary area and enhanced crystallinity, which can reduce the charge recombination. It was demonstrated that the performance of perovskite devices based on this layer was significantly enhanced and the improved morphology of perovskite film mainly promoted an impressive increasing of Jsc from 11.2 to 21.9 mA cm−2. On one hand, the increased optical absorbance for active perovskite layer deposited on treated PEDDOT:PSS underlayer is responsible for the improved Jsc; On the other hand, the highly increased hole mobility of active perovskite layer grown upon treated PEDDOT:PSS layer indicates that the improved charge transport properties made major contribution to the enhancement of Jsc and resulted in a final PCE of 11.36%. In general, it is a simple and flexible method to achieve uniform perovskite film with the treatment of pre-perovskite deposition and subsequent DMSO rinse.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2079-4991/9/2/204/s1, Figure S1: J-V curves of PSCs with DMSO-treated PEDOT:PSS layer (PVSK/DMSO/PVSK), Figure S2: AFM image of (a) perovskite film processed on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film; ( b) perovskite film processed on PEDOT:PSS film coated with the perovskite layer washing away by DMSO, Figure S3: 2p XPS spectra of a pristine PEDOT:PSS film and PEDOT:PSS films treated with perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO, Figure S4: SCLC curves of devices on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (PVSK) and PEDOT:PSS films treated with perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO (PVSK/DMSO/PVSK), Table S1: Performance data of PSCs on a perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO(PVSK/DMSO/PVSK) at the optimal conditions (annealing temperature: 50 °C, time: 5 min).

Author Contributions

Data curation, Z.L., S.W. and H.L.; Investigation, S.W.; Project administration, F.F.; Writing-original draft, Z.L.; Writing-review & editing, W.L.

Funding

This research was funded by Da Tong Key Research Project of Science and Technology Planning Industry (2017013), PhD Research Startup Foundation of Shanxi Datong University (2013-B-01), the NSF of China (51403021), the NSF of China (21375083) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (2152017).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, H.S.; Lee, C.R.; Im, J.H.; Lee, K.B.; Moehl, T.; Marchioro, A.; Moon, S.J.; Humphry Baker, R.; Yum, J.H.; Moser, J.E.; et al. Lead Iodide Perovskite Sensitized All-Solid-State Submicron Thin Film Mesoscopic Solar Cell with Efficiency Exceeding 9%. Sci. Rep. 2012, 2, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lee, M.M.; Teuscher, J.; Miyasaka, T.; Murakami, T.N.; Snaith, H.J. Efficient Hybrid Solar Cells Based on Meso-Superstructured Organometal Halide Perovskites. Science 2012, 338, 643–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Burschka, J.; Pellet, N.; Moon, S.-J.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Graetzel, M. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 2013, 499, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Wu, Y.; Islam, A.; Yang, X.; Qin, C.; Liu, J.; Zhang, K.; Peng, W.; Han, L. Retarding the crystallization of PbI2 for highly reproducible planar-structured perovskite solar cells via sequential deposition. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2934–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, D.; Kelly, T.L. Perovskite solar cells with a planar heterojunction structure prepared using room-temperature solution processing techniques. Nat. Photonics 2014, 8, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, K.; Liu, C.; Du, P.; Chen, L.; Zhu, J.; Karim, A.; Gong, X. Efficiencies of perovskite hybrid solar cells influenced by film thickness and morphology of CH3NH3PbI3-xClx layer. Org. Electron. 2015, 21, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elumalai, N.K.; Uddin, A. Hysteresis in organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 157, 476–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bryant, D.; Greenwood, P.; Troughton, J.; Wijdekop, M.; Carnie, M.; Davies, M.; Wojciechowski, K.; Snaith, H.J.; Watson, T.; Worsley, D. A Transparent Conductive Adhesive Laminate Electrode for High-Efficiency Organic-Inorganic Lead Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 7499–7504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Manser, J.S.; Saidaminov, M.I.; Christians, J.A.; Bakr, O.M.; Kamat, P.V. Making and Breaking of Lead Halide Perovskites. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, L.C.; Tseng, Z.L.; Huang, J.K. A Study of Inverted-Type Perovskite Solar Cells with Various Composition Ratios of (FAPbI(3))(1-x)(MAPbBr(3))(x). Nanomaterials 2016, 6, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Yang, W.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Ryu, S.; Seo, J.; Seok, S.I. Compositional engineering of perovskite materials for high-performance solar cells. Nature 2015, 517, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Dong, Q.; Fang, Y.; Shao, Y.; Mulligan, P.; Qiu, J.; Cao, L.; Huang, J. Electron-hole diffusion lengths > 175 mu m in solution-grown CH3NH3PbI3 single crystals. Science 2015, 347, 967–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xing, G.; Mathews, N.; Sun, S.; Lim, S.S.; Lam, Y.M.; Graetzel, M.; Mhaisalkar, S.; Sum, T.C. Long-Range Balanced Electron- and Hole-Transport Lengths in Organic-Inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science 2013, 342, 344–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Loeper, P.; Stuckelberger, M.; Niesen, B.; Werner, J.; Filipic, M.; Moon, S.-J.; Yum, J.-H.; Topic, M.; De Wolf, S.; Ballif, C. Complex Refractive Index Spectra of CH3NH3PbI3 Perovskite Thin Films Determined by Spectroscopic Ellipsometry and Spectrophotometry. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wehrenfennig, C.; Eperon, G.E.; Johnston, M.B.; Snaith, H.J.; Herz, L.M. High Charge Carrier Mobilities and Lifetimes in Organolead Trihalide Perovskites. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 1584–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. NREL chart. Available online: http://www.nrel.gov/ncpv/images/efficiency_chart.jpg (accessed on 10 December 2017).
  17. Eperon, G.E.; Burlakov, V.M.; Docampo, P.; Goriely, A.; Snaith, H.J. Morphological Control for High Performance, Solution-Processed Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, Q.; Zhou, H.; Hong, Z.; Luo, S.; Duan, H.S.; Wang, H.H.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.; Yang, Y. Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cells via Vapor-Assisted Solution Process. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 622–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dualeh, A.; Tetreault, N.; Moehl, T.; Gao, P.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Graetzel, M. Effect of Annealing Temperature on Film Morphology of Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Pervoskite Solid-State Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2014, 24, 3250–3258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Y.; Song, N.; Feng, L.; Deng, X. Effects of Organic Cation Additives on the Fast Growth of Perovskite Thin Films for Efficient Planar Heterojunction Solar Cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 24703–24711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Noh, J.H.; Im, S.H.; Heo, J.H.; Mandal, T.N.; Seok, S.I. Chemical Management for Colorful, Efficient, and Stable Inorganic-Organic Hybrid Nanostructured Solar Cells. Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1764–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Seo, J.; Park, S.; Kim, Y.C.; Jeon, N.J.; Noh, J.H.; Yoon, S.C.; Seok, S.I. Benefits of very thin PCBM and LiF layers for solution-processed p-i-n perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 2642–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, W.S.; Park, B.W.; Jung, E.H.; Jeon, N.J.; Kim, Y.C.; Lee, D.U.; Shin, S.S.; Seo, J.; Kim, E.K.; Noh, J.H.; et al. Iodide management in formamidinium-lead-halide–based perovskite layers for efficient solar cells. Science 2017, 356, 1376–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dong, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, X.; Xu, Q.; Liu, Q.; Li, C.; Bo, Z. Highly Efficient Planar Perovskite Solar Cells Via Interfacial Modification with Fullerene Derivatives. Small 2016, 12, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bi, C.; Shao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Wang, C.; Gao, Y.; Huang, J. Understanding the formation and evolution of interdiffusion grown organolead halide perovskite thin films by thermal annealing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 18508–18514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, L.; Hu, Z.; Xu, J.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, Y. Multi-step slow annealing perovskite films for high performance planar perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 141, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, Z.; Dong, Q.; Bi, C.; Shao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Huang, J. Solvent Annealing of Perovskite-Induced Crystal Growth for Photovoltaic-Device Efficiency Enhancement. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 6503–6509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, F.; Yuan, J.; Ling, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Cheung, S.H.; Ho, C.H.Y.; Gao, X.; Ma, W. A Universal Strategy to Utilize Polymeric Semiconductors for Perovskite Solar Cells with Enhanced Efficiency and Longevity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, Y.; Tu, L.; Li, H.; Li, S.; Yang, S.-E.; Chen, Y. A Feasible and Effective Post-Treatment Method for High-Quality CH3NH3PbI3 Films and High-Efficiency Perovskite Solar Cells. Crystals 2018, 8, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ahn, N.; Son, D.Y.; Jang, I.H.; Kang, S.M.; Choi, M.; Park, N.G. Highly Reproducible Perovskite Solar Cells with Average Efficiency of 18.3% and Best Efficiency of 19.7% Fabricated via Lewis Base Adduct of Lead(II) Iodide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8696–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, T.; Oez, S.; Sasinska, A.; Frohnhoven, R.; Mathur, S.; Miyasaka, T. Sulfate-Assisted Interfacial Engineering for High Yield and Efficiency of Triple Cation Perovskite Solar Cells with Alkali-Doped TiO2 Electron-Transporting Layers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706287–1706296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zheng, D.; Zhao, L.; Fan, P.; Ji, R.; Yu, J. Highly Efficient and Stable Organic Solar Cells via Interface Engineering with a Nanostructured ITR-GO/PFN Bilayer Cathode Interlayer. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bi, C.; Wang, Q.; Shao, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Xiao, Z.; Huang, J. Non-wetting surface-driven high-aspect-ratio crystalline grain growth for efficient hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xia, Y.; Sun, K.; Chang, J.; Ouyang, J. Effects of organic inorganic hybrid perovskite materials on the electronic properties and morphology of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrenesulfonate) and the photovoltaic performance of planar perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 15897–15904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Leong, W.L.; Ooi, Z.E.; Sabba, D.; Yi, C.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Graetzel, M.; Gordon, J.M.; Katz, E.A.; Mathews, N. Identifying Fundamental Limitations in Halide Perovskite Solar Cells. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2439–2445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tress, W.; Marinova, N.; Moehl, T.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Nazeeruddin, M.K.; Grätzel, M. Understanding the rate-dependent J–V hysteresis, slow time component, and aging in CH3 NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells: The role of a compensated electric field. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nemnes, G.A.; Besleaga, C.; Tomulescu, A.G.; Palici, A.; Pintilie, L.; Manolescu, A.; Pintilie, I. How measurement protocols influence the dynamic JV characteristics of perovskite solar cells: Theory and experiment. Sol. Energy 2018, 173, 976–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Albrecht, S.; Janietz, S.; Schindler, W.; Frisch, J.; Kurpiers, J.; Kniepert, J.; Inal, S.; Pingel, P.; Fostiropoulos, K.; Koch, N.; et al. Fluorinated Copolymer PCPDTBT with Enhanced Open-Circuit Voltage and Reduced Recombination for Highly Efficient Polymer Solar Cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14932–14944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Goh, C.; Kline, R.J.; McGehee, M.D.; Kadnikova, E.N.; Frechet, J.M.J. Molecular-weight-dependent mobilities in regioregular poly(3-hexyl-thiophene) diodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 122110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gupta, D.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Narayan, K.S. Fill factor in organic solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2010, 94, 1309–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) J-V characteristics and (b) EQE spectra of the PSCs on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (PVSK) (dark) and PEDOT:PSS films treated with perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO (PVSK/DMSO/PVSK) (red) and photocurrent density (blue) calculated by integrating the EQE with the AM 1.5G solar spectrum.
Figure 1. (a) J-V characteristics and (b) EQE spectra of the PSCs on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (PVSK) (dark) and PEDOT:PSS films treated with perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO (PVSK/DMSO/PVSK) (red) and photocurrent density (blue) calculated by integrating the EQE with the AM 1.5G solar spectrum.
Nanomaterials 09 00204 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of perovskite film deposited on (a,b) perovskite film processed on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film; (c,d) perovskite film processed on PEDOT:PSS film with the perovskite layer rinsed away by DMSO with high magnification, respectively.
Figure 2. SEM images of perovskite film deposited on (a,b) perovskite film processed on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film; (c,d) perovskite film processed on PEDOT:PSS film with the perovskite layer rinsed away by DMSO with high magnification, respectively.
Nanomaterials 09 00204 g002
Figure 3. Contact angles with deionized (DI) water drops on the different substrate a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (12.1o) and PEDOT:PSS films treated with perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO (45.5o) (PVSK/DMSO).
Figure 3. Contact angles with deionized (DI) water drops on the different substrate a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (12.1o) and PEDOT:PSS films treated with perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO (45.5o) (PVSK/DMSO).
Nanomaterials 09 00204 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns (a) and UV absorption spectra (b) of perovskite film on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film and PEDOT:PSS films rinsed with DMSO and the pre-deposited perovskite layer rinsed with DMSO.
Figure 4. XRD patterns (a) and UV absorption spectra (b) of perovskite film on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film and PEDOT:PSS films rinsed with DMSO and the pre-deposited perovskite layer rinsed with DMSO.
Nanomaterials 09 00204 g004
Table 1. Performance data of PSCs on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (PVSK) and PEDOT:PSS films treated with DMSO (DMSO/PVSK) and perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO(PVSK/DMSO/PVSK).
Table 1. Performance data of PSCs on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (PVSK) and PEDOT:PSS films treated with DMSO (DMSO/PVSK) and perovskite layer rinsed away with DMSO(PVSK/DMSO/PVSK).
ConditionsAnnealing temperature (°C)Time (min)Voc (V)Jsc (mA·cm−2)FFPCE (%)
PVSK10030.8411.20.6926.51a (6.37b)
PVSK8030.8811.20.6206.29a (6.08b)
PVSK5050.979.700.6506.14a (5.70b)
DMSO/PVSK8030.8913.90.7008.28a (7.84b)
PVSK/DMSO/PVSK5030.95220.70.52010.25a (10.04b)
PVSK/DMSO/PVSK5050.96021.90.53911.36a (10.95b)
PVSK/DMSO/PVSK50100.95021.60.51910.68a (10.40b)
a The highest PCE among 20 devices; b Average PCE of 20 devices (Table S1)
Table 2. SCLC data, Rs and RSh of perovskite device on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (PVSK) and PEDOT:PSS films on PEDOT:PSS film with the perovskite layer washed away by DMSO (PVSK/DMSO/PVSK).
Table 2. SCLC data, Rs and RSh of perovskite device on a pristine PEDOT:PSS film (PVSK) and PEDOT:PSS films on PEDOT:PSS film with the perovskite layer washed away by DMSO (PVSK/DMSO/PVSK).
DeviceRs (Ω·cm−2)Rsh (Ω·cm−2)SCLC (cm2·V−1·s−1)
PVSK6.80679.31.66×10−4
PVSK/DMSO/PVSK4.32100.32.32×10−2

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lu, Z.; Wang, S.; Liu, H.; Feng, F.; Li, W. Improved Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells by the Interfacial Modification of the Active Layer. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 204. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano9020204

AMA Style

Lu Z, Wang S, Liu H, Feng F, Li W. Improved Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells by the Interfacial Modification of the Active Layer. Nanomaterials. 2019; 9(2):204. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano9020204

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lu, Zhen, Shangzhi Wang, Huijun Liu, Feng Feng, and Wenhua Li. 2019. "Improved Efficiency of Perovskite Solar Cells by the Interfacial Modification of the Active Layer" Nanomaterials 9, no. 2: 204. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano9020204

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop