Next Article in Journal
Influence of Alternative Lifestyles on Antibiotic Use during Pregnancy, Lactation and in Children
Previous Article in Journal
Co-Existence of Certain ESBLs, MBLs and Plasmid Mediated Quinolone Resistance Genes among MDR E. coli Isolated from Different Clinical Specimens in Egypt
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Conjugative Plasmids Disseminating CTX-M-15 among Human, Animals and the Environment in Mwanza Tanzania: A Need to Intensify One Health Approach

by
Caroline A. Minja
1,*,
Gabriel Shirima
1 and
Stephen E. Mshana
2
1
School of Life Sciences, Department of Global Health and Biomedical Sciences, Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, Arusha 23306, Tanzania
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, Mwanza 33109, Tanzania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 2 May 2021 / Revised: 30 June 2021 / Accepted: 30 June 2021 / Published: 9 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mobile Elements and Antibiotic Resistance)

Abstract

:
Background: Globally, blaCTX-M-15 beta-lactamases are the most popular extended spectrum beta-lactamase alleles that are widely distributed due its mobilisation by mobile genetic elements in several compartments. We aimed to determine the conjugation frequencies and replicon types associated with plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 gene from Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase producing isolates in order to understand the dissemination of resistance genes in different compartments. Material and methods: A total of 51 archived isolates carrying blaCTX-M-15 beta-lactamases were used as donors in this study. Antibiotic susceptibility tests were performed as previously described for both donors and transconjugants. Conjugation experiment was performed by a modified protocol of the plate mating experiment, and plasmid replicon types were screened among donor and transconjugant isolates by multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction in a set of three primer panels. Results: The conjugation efficiency of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 was 88.2% (45/51) with conjugation frequencies in the order of 10−1 to 10−9 and a 100% transfer efficiency observed among E. coli of animal origin. Majority of donors (n = 21) and transconjugants (n = 14) plasmids were typed as either Inc FIA or Inc FIB. Resistance to non-beta-lactam antibiotics was transferrable in 34/45 (75.6%) of events. Ciprofloxacin, tetracycline and sulphamethoxazole-trimethoprim resistance was co-transferred in 29/34 (85.3%) such events. Gentamicin resistance was transferred in 17/34 (50%) of events. Conclusions: Majority of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 were conjugatively transferred by IncF plasmids along with non-beta lactam resistance. There is a need for more research on plasmids to understand how plasmids especially multi replicon plasmids interact and the effect of such interaction on conjugation. One Health approach is to be intensified to address antimicrobial resistance which is a public health threat.

1. Introduction

The increasing trend of antimicrobial resistance is intensified by mobile genetic elements that harbour resistance genes [1]. The effect of these elements is extensively reported among bacteria of the Enterobacteriaceae family where multi drug resistance (MDR) is high. The CTX-M extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) are the most successful MDR determinants [2], with over 100 alleles in five distinct phylogenetic groups [3]. The ecological success of CTX-M-ESBL attributes to the enzymes’ spread both clonally and horizontally [3,4,5] in multiple hosts that include Acinetobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis.
In natural environments, ESBL enzymes are chromosomally mediated by the selection pressure induced by beta-lactamase-producing soil organisms [6,7] or the irrational use of third-generation cephalosporins [6,8], however as previously reviewed [9], plasmid-mediated ESBL resulted from transposon-mediated insertion of different blaCTX-M genes in bacteria chromosome. Specifically, the precursors of plasmid-mediated blaCTX-M-15 are environmental Kluyvera spp. whose chromosomal CTX-M clusters are incorporated into the chromosome of host bacteria by mobilising elements such as ISEcp1 or ISCR1. Moreover, the location of ISEcp1 upstream blaCTX-M genes together with multiple inverted repeats downstream the gene facilitates the expression and ongoing transposition of blaKLU genes that result to various CTX-M enzymes, including plasmid-mediated blaCTX-M-15 [9,10]. The mobilisation potential of ISEcp1 for chromosome-linked multi-resistant determinants in other members of enterobacteriaceae increases with the additional possession of ISCR1, another mobile genetic element (MGE) embedded in a Class 1 integron that mobilises unrelated CTX-M groups in similar or different species.
As vectors and carriers of AMR genes, plasmids are responsible for the intracellular accumulation and intercellular transfer of these genes by the process of conjugation [11]. In such cases, high conjugation rates ensure the stable long-term persistence of plasmids and associated AMR genes in minimal fitness costs even in the absence of selection pressure [12,13,14]. A multidrug resistance phenomenon is observed when these plasmids are associated with other MGE possessing different resistance determinants and code for adaptive traits such as virulence or metal resistance genes among host bacteria strains [15,16].
The globally disseminated O25: H4-ST131 E. coli clone producing CTX-M-15 is by conjugative IncF plasmids that are frequently recovered from hospital and community settings [17]. In Tanzania, the prevalence of bacteria producing ESBL ranges between 25 and 50 percent [18], with blaCTX-M-15 as the predominant allele in both community [19] and hospital settings [20]. The gene is also observed among companion and domestic animals and the environment combined with quinolone and aminoglycoside resistance genes [21,22]. Therefore, as demonstrated by its discovery in a novel Enterobacter spp. [23] and location in multiple plasmid types such as IncF, IncY and IncHI1, there is a possibility of an extensive variation in the epidemiology of blaCTX-M-15 carrying plasmids in Tanzania.
The presence of blaCTX-M-15 gene in multiple E.coli clones of human, animal and the environment of Tanzania [24], and limited information on the persistence of the gene’s alleles in any compartments can lead to the acquisition, transmission and evolution of new resistant strains even among non-conjugative bacteria. Since plasmids facilitate the spread of AMR genes in different compartments efforts to understand their spread and establishment in these settings is unquestionable. This study has improved our understanding of the importance of IncF plasmids in disseminating multidrug-resistant determinants among human, animal and environmental settings. It has further highlighted the importance of collaborative One Health based efforts that focus on animal and human health as critical when addressing the global threat.

2. Results

2.1. Isolates Characteristics

Escherichia coli was the only species isolated in both human and animals. The environment included isolates from soil and fresh water fish and comprised of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, C. braakii and E. cloacae species (Table 1).

2.2. Conjugation Efficiency of blaCTX-M-15 Gene among Isolates of Human, Animals and the Environment

Among 51 blaCTX-M-15 positive donor isolates, 45 (88.2%) transferred plasmids by conjugation with a transfer rate (transconjugants per donor cells) ranging from 4.8 × 10−1 to 1.5 × 10−9 as observed from a human and environment isolate, respectively (Table 2).

2.3. Transferrable Resistance of Non-Beta-Lactam Phenotype among Isolates of Human, Animal and the Environment

Table 3 and Figure 1 presents a summary of non-beta lactam resistant phenotypes transferred along the blaCTX-M-15 gene. A total of 45 plasmids successful transferred the gene to transconjugants. Non-beta-lactam resistance phenotypes were observed in 34/45(75.6%) transconjugants. Donor resistance to ciprofloxacin (CIP), tetracycline (TE) and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (SXT) was observed in 46/51 (90.2%), 47/51 (92.2%) and 48/51 (94.1%) of events, respectively, and was co-transferred in 29/34 (85.3%) of such events. Gentamicin was the least transferred with a frequency of 17/34 (50.0%).

2.4. Replicon Types of Plasmids Carrying blaCTX-M-15

Common replicon types were FIA (n = 11) and FIB (n = 27) that occurred as single transferrable replicons in 14 events. Inc A/C and Y replicons were minor, and each was typed once. Of all the 14 typed transconjugant plasmids, 7 replicons were observed in both donors and transconjugants, while 20/27 donor replicons were not observed in respective transconjugants (Table 4), (Figure 2).

2.5. Transfer Success of blaCTX-M-15 among Escherichia coli Isolates

Table 5 shows the percentage transfer of blaCTX-M-15 among E. coli donor isolates. Out of 42 E. coli donors, 37 (88.1%) successfully transferred the gene, accounting for an 82.1% of all transconjugants. All E. coli originating from animals transferred the gene successfully.

3. Discussion

In this study, we aimed to determine conjugation frequencies and type plasmids carrying the blaCTX-M-15 gene from human, animal and environment ESBL producing isolates. The study is epidemiologically important in understanding the pattern and possibly predict the flow of AMR from different sources. As presented in (Table 1), Escherichia coli was the dominant bacteria species from all sourced samples. The successful colonisation of E. coli in human and animal gastrointestinal tract (GIT) have been reported previously [25], the GIT can serve as exchange hotspots and reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance genes. Likewise, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are frequently isolated in infections associated with CTX-M-15 in hospitals [26] and the community, including households [27], aquatic environment [28] and the soil [29].
The transfer efficiency of blaCTX-M-15 among isolates in this study was higher (88%) [Table 2], than that reported by Zurfluh and colleagues [30], where a 38.3% efficiency was observed, however, despite the varying frequencies of transfer, the reported efficiency is slightly lower than that previously reported (100%) for randomly selected hospital originating isolates [20]. It is reported that high conjugation rates above thresholds compensate fitness costs and establish a long-term persistence of plasmids in multiple hosts [13,31,32] through maintaining successive generations of bacteria with adaptive traits. Therefore, the high transfer efficiency is a fitness advantage that improves the persistence and dissemination potential of blaCTX-M-15 ESBL in human, animal and the environment interface. Moreover, transfer failure for some isolates‒ CN4, CN7, CN42, CN46, CN50 and CN51, could possibly be due to the gene’s integration in the chromosome [33] or transposition events that prevent plasmid mobility.
As summarised in Table 3 and Figure 1, transferable multidrug resistance phenotypes were also observed. The conjugative spread of blaCTX-M-15 gene by IncF plasmids along with tetracycline, aminoglycoside and quinolones have been reported [34]. These plasmids harbor several combinations of resistance determinants and transfer them to human, animals and environment isolates through the ecological interaction of bacteria in these settings. Moreover, the genetic environment of blaCTX-M-15 is dominated by multiple antibiotic resistance genes such as aac (6′)-lb-cr, tet (A, B), qnrS, qnr and sul genes [35,36,37], whose phenotypic expression denotes the existing selection pressure for these antibiotics. Such selection can increase their transfer rate and possibly account for the high co-transfer of non-beta lactam antibiotics observed in this study.
We also observed single replicon IncF plasmids as common vectors of blaCTXM-15, (Table 4), (Figure 2). Replicon typing of plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes is important for detecting, tracing or monitoring the spread of antimicrobial resistance. These observations are in line with findings in the same setting [20] and elsewhere [30,38] where multireplicon FIA and FIB plasmids were reported to carry multiple resistance genes including blaCTX-M-15. As in previous studies, IncY plasmids and Inc A/C carrying blaCTX-M-15 in association with quinolone and aminoglycoside genes were also reported [22], [39,40]. Together these findings support the diverse nature of plasmids adapted to spread and maintain blaCTXM-15 gene.
The absence of donor replicons in respective transconjugants might have resulted from conjugation failure, multi-replicons (undetected by the method used) that destabilise and prevent the transfer of some resident replicons [41], and prior plasmid dependent mutations (which do not occur in transconjugants) that may have altered backbone genes of donor plasmids and obscure the detection of existing replicons [32,39,41]. In addition, and as a shortcoming, the PBRT technique used in detecting plasmid replicons can give false-negative results when replicon sequences go undetected by the primer sets used, target replicon sequences undergo mutation through transpositional alterations and the unknown existence of new replicons in such plasmid [42].
Lastly, we observed that all animal originating E. coli isolates transferred blaCTX-M-15 to respective transconjugants (Table 5), (Figure 3). These findings were also supported by a recent review [34], that human and animal originating E.coli are adapted to disseminate ESBL genes by IncF plasmids. The colonisation and infection of animals by E. coli maximises microbial interactions between non-pathogenic and pathogenic commensal E.coli in either companion or food-producing animals and facilitate the exchange of materials between them through conjugation. In addition, the increasing use of antibiotics in animals could select and transfer resistant pathogenic bacteria from animals to human and the environment with huge cost implications. Since AMR is a public health threat, the highest transfer rate observed in animal originating E. coli calls for integrated efforts to address AMR with experts from veterinary, human and ecological fields. It further implies that animals may serve as dual targets for studies focusing on the horizontal transfer and evolution of antimicrobial resistance.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Isolates

All isolates used as donors in this study were obtained from the Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences (CUHAS) in Mwanza Tanzania. A total of 51 blaCTX-M-15 positive isolates were purposively selected and activated overnight in Luria Bertani (LB) broth at 37 °C ready for use in conjugation and PBRT techniques.
Among the 51 isolates, twenty-two blaCTX-M-15 positive isolates were obtained from a study that reported the magnitude of fecal carriage and diversity of ESBL genotypes among human residing in rural communities of Mwanza Tanzania [19], 12 other blaCTX-M-15 positive isolates were from a study that reported the fecal carriage of ESBL among companion and domestic farm animals that included pigs, chicken, dogs and goats [21]. The remaining 17 environmental isolates were obtained from a study that investigated the presence of blaCTX-M-15 from muddy soils and gut contents of freshwater fish from Lake Victoria in Mwanza Tanzania [22].

4.2. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Susceptibility testing of all donor isolates and the resulting transconjugants was performed by the disk diffusion method on Mueller Hinton agar as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute [43]. Antibiotics tested were tetracycline (30 µg), gentamicin (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg) and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 μg) (Hi-media, India).

4.3. Conjugation Experiment

A total of 51 known blaCTX-M-15 positive isolates and Escherichia coli J53 ((F, met, pro, Azr)‒a mutant strain of E. coli [44] obtained from the Institute of Medical Microbiology, Giessen, Germany, were used as donors and recipient strain, respectively. As previously described [20], we performed conjugation experiments with some modifications. Shortly, the recipient strain was prepared by streaking Escherichia coli J53 in Luria Bertani (LB) plates supplemented with 100 µg/mL NaN3 (LB++), while donor strains were selected in LB plates supplemented with 2 µg/mL cefotaxime only (LB+). From these, fresh overnight donor and recipient strains were prepared by picking single colonies emulsified in 10 mL LB broth and incubated overnight at 37 °C in a 150 rpm shaking incubator. After exactly 12 h, equal volumes (500 µL) of donor and recipient strains were immediately mixed in 1.5 mL eppendorf tubes previously labeled transconjugant (Tc) while 1000 µL of donor strain were added in fresh tubes of similar volume‒to be separately selected on LB+ and LB++ plates as respective controls. All tubes were incubated at 37 °C for 15 min, vortexed briefly, centrifuged at 12,000 g for 2 min and the pellet re-suspended in fresh 1000 µL LB broth. Finally, 0.1 mL of 10−1 to 10−4 transconjugant cultures were double selected on LB plates supplemented with 100 µg/mL NaN3 and 2 µg/mL cefotaxime. Conjugation efficiency was reported as transconjugants per donor cells, with the denominator obtained from an initial volume of 100 µL.

4.4. Genomic Extraction of Donor and Transconjugants DNA

Donor and transconjugant genomic DNA was extracted using a previously described chelex protocol with slight modifications [45]. First, 5 µL of proteinase K (10 mg/mL) were added into tubes containing 100 µL fresh LB emulsified colonies. In the same tubes, 300 µL of chelex buffer (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was added consecutively. The mixture was incubated for 3 hr at 55 °C before adding 85 µL of 5 M NaCl and vortexed for 15 s to precipitate proteins. The supernatant was centrifuged at 13,000× g for 10 min followed by the addition of 300 µL of 100% cold ethanol and a 5 min centrifugation at 13,000× g that precipitated and pelleted the DNA. Lastly, the pellet was rinsed by pouring off the remaining fluid, adding 500 µL of 70% ethanol, centrifuging at 13,000× g for 5 min and leaving the pellet to air dry at 55 °C for 10 min. The DNA was then re-suspended in 50 µL nuclease-free water. Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE) was used to check the quantity of the DNA, while the quality was confirmed by electrophoresis in 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel using TAE buffer. The obtained DNA samples were used in typing plasmid replicons or stored at −20 °C.

4.5. PCR Based Replicon Typing

Targeted genes were amplified by a simplified version of the previously described PBRT technique [42]. Shortly, the eight Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) panels illustrated by Caratolli and colleagues [46], were reduced to three [42], (Table 6). PCR was performed using a readily reconstituted master mix according to manufacturer’s instructions (New England BioLabs, Inc. Beverly, MA) under the following conditions; 5 min at 94 °C; 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 60 °C and 90 s at 72 °C; then a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. Amplicons were visualised on 1.5% tris-acetate EDTA agarose gels alongside a 100 bp DNA ladder (New England BioLabs, Inc. Beverly, MA). The sample was considered positive for replicon gene (s) if an amplicon of the expected band size was observed.

5. Conclusions

Majority of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 were conjugatively transferred by IncF plasmids along with non-beta lactam resistance. The heterogeneous nature of these plasmids continuously maintains and reserves the blaCTX-M-15 gene in these settings. The 100% transfer efficiency among E. coli of animal origin is of concern since the networked interaction of animals with human and their environment continuously exchange and reserve resistance determinants in this interface. Therefore, there is a need for more research to understand the interaction and spread of mobile elements circulating in animals, One Health approach is to be intensified to further address AMR as a public health threat.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, C.A.M. and S.E.M.; Formal analysis, S.E.M.; Funding acquisition, C.A.M.; Investigation, C.A.M. and G.S.; Supervision, G.S. and S.E.M.; Writing–original draft, C.A.M.; Writing–review and editing, G.S. and S.E.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Centre for Research, Agricultural advancement, Teaching Excellence and Sustainability in Food and Nutritional Security (CREATES) of the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST). The APC was funded by Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences (CUHAS).

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting presented results is available in this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the technical support provided by the department of Molecular biology at Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology. Specifically, we thank Emmanuel and Beatus Lyimo for providing necessary technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to publish the results.

Abbreviations

AMRAntimicrobial resistance
CREATESCentre for Research, Agricultural advancement, Teaching Excellence and Sustainability in Food and Nutritional Security
CUHASCatholic University of Health and Allied Sciences
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
EDTAEthylene Diaminetetracetic acid
ESBLExtended spectrum beta-lactamase
GITGastrointestinal tract
LBLuria Bertani
MGEMobile genetic element
NaClSodium Chloride
NaN3Sodium azide
PCRPolymerase chain reaction
TAETris acetate EDTA

References

  1. Barlow, M. What antimicrobial resistance has taught us about horizontal gene transfer. Horiz. Gene Transf. 2009, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bonnet, R. Growing group of extended-spectrum β-lactamases: The CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Lahlaoui, H.; Khalifa, A.B.H.; Moussa, M.B. Epidemiology of Enterobacteriaceae producing CTX-M type extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL). Med. Et Mal. Infect. 2014, 44, 400–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hirai, I.; Fukui, N.; Taguchi, M.; Yamauchi, K.; Nakamura, T.; Okano, S.; Yamamoto, Y. Detection of chromosomal blaCTX-M-15 in Escherichia coli O25b-B2-ST131 isolates from the Kinki region of Japan. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2013, 42, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Coque, T.M.; Novais, Â.; Carattoli, A.; Poirel, L.; Peixe, L.; Baquero, F.; Cantón, R.; Nordmann, P. Dissemination of clonally related Escherichia coli strains expressing extended-spectrum β-lactamase CTX-M-15. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Martin, J.F.; Liras, P. Organization and expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of antibiotics and other secondary metabolites. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1989, 43, 173–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Allen, H.K.; Moe, L.A.; Rodbumrer, J.; Gaarder, A.; Handelsman, J. Functional metagenomics reveals diverse β-lactamases in a remote Alaskan soil. ISME J. 2009, 3, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Paterson, D.L.; Bonomo, R.A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamases: A clinical update. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 18, 657–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cantón, R.; González-Alba, J.M.; Galán, J.C. CTX-M enzymes: Origin and diffusion. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Naseer, U.; Sundsfjord, A. The CTX-M conundrum: Dissemination of plasmids and Escherichia coli clones. Microb. Drug Resist. 2011, 17, 83–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vrancianu, C.O.; Popa, L.I.; Bleotu, C.; Chifiriuc, M.C. Targeting plasmids to limit acquisition and transmission of antimicrobial resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lopatkin, A.J.; Meredith, H.R.; Srimani, J.K.; Pfeiffer, C.; Durrett, R.; You, L. Persistence and reversal of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Levin, B.R.; Rozen, D.E. Non-inherited antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Benz, F.; Huisman, J.S.; Bakkeren, E.; Herter, J.A.; Stadler, T.; Ackermann, M.; Diard, M.; Egli, A.; Hall, A.R.; Hardt, W.-D. Plasmid-and strain-specific factors drive variation in ESBL-plasmid spread in vitro and in vivo. ISME J. 2021, 15, 862–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, Q.E.; Agouri, S.R.; Tyrrell, J.M.; Walsh, T.R. Heavy metal resistance genes are associated with blaNDM-1-and blaCTX-M-15-carrying Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02642-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Hernández-Ramírez, K.C.; Reyes-Gallegos, R.I.; Chávez-Jacobo, V.M.; Díaz-Magaña, A.; Meza-Carmen, V.; Ramírez-Díaz, M. A plasmid-encoded mobile genetic element from Pseudomonas aeruginosa that confers heavy metal resistance and virulence. Plasmid 2018, 98, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Nicolas-Chanoine, M.-H.; Blanco, J.; Leflon-Guibout, V.; Demarty, R.; Alonso, M.P.; Caniça, M.M.; Park, Y.-J.; Lavigne, J.-P.; Pitout, J.; Johnson, J.R. Intercontinental emergence of Escherichia coli clone O25: H4-ST131 producing CTX-M-15. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2008, 61, 273–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mshana, S.E.; Hain, T.; Domann, E.; Lyamuya, E.F.; Chakraborty, T.; Imirzalioglu, C. Predominance of Klebsiella pneumoniae ST14 carrying CTX-M-15 causing neonatal sepsis in Tanzania. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Mshana, S.E.; Falgenhauer, L.; Mirambo, M.M.; Mushi, M.F.; Moremi, N.; Julius, R.; Seni, J.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Matee, M.; Chakraborty, T. Predictors of bl a CTX-M-15 in varieties of Escherichia coli genotypes from humans in community settings in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Mshana, S.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Hain, T.; Domann, E.; Lyamuya, E.F.; Chakraborty, T. Multiple ST clonal complexes, with a predominance of ST131, of Escherichia coli harbouring blaCTX-M-15 in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011, 17, 1279–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Seni, J.; Falgenhauer, L.; Simeo, N.; Mirambo, M.M.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Matee, M.; Rweyemamu, M.; Chakraborty, T.; Mshana, S.E. Multiple ESBL-producing Escherichia coli sequence types carrying quinolone and aminoglycoside resistance genes circulating in companion and domestic farm animals in Mwanza, Tanzania, harbor commonly occurring plasmids. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Moremi, N.; Manda, E.V.; Falgenhauer, L.; Ghosh, H.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Matee, M.; Chakraborty, T.; Mshana, S.E. Predominance of CTX-M-15 among ESBL producers from environment and fish gut from the shores of Lake Victoria in Mwanza, Tanzania. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Mshana, S.E.; Gerwing, L.; Minde, M.; Hain, T.; Domann, E.; Lyamuya, E.; Chakraborty, T.; Imirzalioglu, C. Outbreak of a novel Enterobacter sp. carrying blaCTX-M-15 in a neonatal unit of a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 38, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Seni, J.; Falgenhauer, L.; Simeo, N.; Mirambo, M.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Matee, M.; Rweyemamu, M.; Chakraborty, T.; Mshana, S.E. Preliminary insights into the occurrence of similar clones of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in humans, animals and the environment in Tanzania: A systematic review and meta-analysis between 2005 and 2016. Zoonoses Public Health 2018, 65, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hosuru Subramanya, S.; Bairy, I.; Nayak, N.; Amberpet, R.; Padukone, S.; Metok, Y.; Bhatta, D.R.; Sathian, B. Detection and characterization of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from the gut of healthy chickens, Gallus gallus domesticus in rural Nepal: Dominance of CTX-M-15-non-ST131 Escherichia coli clones. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mshana, S.E.; Kamugisha, E.; Mirambo, M.; Chakraborty, T.; Lyamuya, E. Prevalence of multiresistant gram-negative organisms in a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Res. Notes 2009, 2, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Obeng-Nkrumah, N.; Labi, A.-K.; Blankson, H.; Awuah-Mensah, G.; Oduro-Mensah, D.; Anum, J.; Teye, J.; Kwashie, S.D.; Bako, E.; Ayeh-Kumi, P.F. Household cockroaches carry CTX-M-15-, OXA-48-and NDM-1-producing enterobacteria, and share beta-lactam resistance determinants with humans. BMC Microbiol. 2019, 19, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lyimo, B.; Buza, J.; Subbiah, M.; Temba, S.; Kipasika, H.; Smith, W.; Call, D.R. IncF plasmids are commonly carried by antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolated from drinking water sources in northern Tanzania. Int. J. Microbiol. 2016, 2016, 3103672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Gekenidis, M.-T.; Rigotti, S.; Hummerjohann, J.; Walsh, F.; Drissner, D. Long-Term Persistence of blaCTX-M-15 in Soil and Lettuce after Introducing Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli via Manure or Water. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zurfluh, K.; Glier, M.; Hächler, H.; Stephan, R. Replicon typing of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 among Enterobacteriaceae isolated at the environment, livestock and human interface. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 521, 75–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. San Millan, A.; Peña-Miller, R.; Toll-Riera, M.; Halbert, Z.V.; McLean, A.R.; Cooper, B.S.; MacLean, R.C. Positive selection and compensatory adaptation interact to stabilize non-transmissible plasmids. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Dionisio, F.; Conceicao, I.C.; Marques, A.C.R.; Fernandes, L.; Gordo, I. The evolution of a conjugative plasmid and its ability to increase bacterial fitness. Biol. Lett. 2005, 1, 250–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ragupathi, N.K.D.; Sethuvel, D.P.M.; Gajendran, R.; Anandan, S.; Walia, K.; Veeraraghavan, B. Horizontal transfer of antimicrobial resistance determinants among enteric pathogens through bacterial conjugation. Curr. Microbiol. 2019, 76, 666–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Rozwandowicz, M.; Brouwer, M.S.M.; Fischer, J.; Wagenaar, J.A.; Gonzalez-Zorn, B.; Guerra, B.; Mevius, D.J.; Hordijk, J. Plasmids carrying antimicrobial resistance genes in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2018, 73, 1121–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Yousfi, M.; Mairi, A.; Touati, A.; Hassissene, L.; Brasme, L.; Guillard, T.; De, C.C. Extended spectrum β-lactamase and plasmid mediated quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli fecal isolates from healthy companion animals in Algeria. J. Infect. Chemother. 2016, 22, 431–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Rafaï, C.; Frank, T.; Manirakiza, A.; Gaudeuille, A.; Mbecko, J.-R.; Nghario, L.; Serdouma, E.; Tekpa, B.; Garin, B.; Breurec, S. Dissemination of IncF-type plasmids in multiresistant CTX-M-15-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates from surgical-site infections in Bangui, Central African Republic. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Kiiru, J.; Butaye, P.; Goddeeris, B.M.; Kariuki, S. Analysis for prevalence and physical linkages amongst integrons, ISE cp 1, IS CR 1, Tn 21 and Tn 7 encountered in Escherichia coli strains from hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients in Kenya during a 19-year period (1992–2011). BMC Microbiol. 2013, 13, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mshana, S.E.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Hossain, H.; Hain, T.; Domann, E. Chakraborty, T. Conjugative IncFI plasmids carrying CTX-M-15 among Escherichia coli ESBL producing isolates at a University hospital in Germany. BMC Infect. Dis. 2009, 9, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Maherault, A.-C.; Kemble, H.; Magnan, M.; Gachet, B.; Roche, D.; Le Nagard, H.; Tenaillon, O.; Denamur, E.; Branger, C.; Landraud, L. Advantage of the F2: A1: B-IncF pandemic plasmid over IncC plasmids in in vitro acquisition and evolution of blaCTX-M gene-bearing plasmids in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63, e01130-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Lee, M.Y.; Ko, K.S.; Kang, C.–I.; Chung, D.R.; Peck, K.R.; Song, J.-H. High prevalence of CTX-M-15-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Asian countries: Diverse clones and clonal dissemination. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2011, 38, 160–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dionisio, F.; Zilhão, R.; Gama, J.A. Interactions between plasmids and other mobile genetic elements affect their transmission and persistence. Plasmid 2019, 102, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Johnson, T.J.; Wannemuehler, Y.M.; Johnson, S.J.; Logue, C.M.; White, D.G.; Doetkott, C.; Nolan, L.K. Plasmid replicon typing of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 1976–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 28th ed.; CLSI Standard M100: Wayne, PA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jacoby, G.A.; Han, P. Detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996, 34, 908–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Casquet, J.; Thebaud, C.; Gillespie, R.G. Chelex without boiling, a rapid and easy technique to obtain stable amplifiable DNA from small amounts of ethanol-stored spiders. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2012, 12, 136–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Carattoli, A.; Bertini, A.; Villa, L.; Falbo, V.; Hopkins, K.; Threlfall, E. Identification of plasmids by PCR-based replicon typing. J. Microbiol. Methods 2005, 63, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Transfer success of blaCTX-M-15 among E. coli isolates of human, animals and the environment.
Figure 1. Transfer success of blaCTX-M-15 among E. coli isolates of human, animals and the environment.
Antibiotics 10 00836 g001
Figure 2. Replicon types of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 among donors and transconjugants.
Figure 2. Replicon types of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 among donors and transconjugants.
Antibiotics 10 00836 g002
Figure 3. Transfer success of blaCTX-M-15 among E. coli isolates of human, animals and the environment.
Figure 3. Transfer success of blaCTX-M-15 among E. coli isolates of human, animals and the environment.
Antibiotics 10 00836 g003
Table 1. Bacteria species distributed among donor isolates of human, animal and environment.
Table 1. Bacteria species distributed among donor isolates of human, animal and environment.
Sample OriginSample TypeFrequency
n%
SpeciesSpecies n (%)Total n (%)
HumanHuman22 (43.14)E. coli22 (43.1)22 (43.14)
Goat1 (1.96)E. coli1 (1.96)
AnimalPig3 (5.88)E. coli3 (5.88)
Dog6 (11.76)E. coli6 (11.76)12 (23.52)
Chicken2 (3.92)E. coli2 (3.92)
EnvironmentSoil6 (11.76)E. coli6 (11.76)
E. coli2 (3.92)
Fish11 (21.57)K. pneumoniae3 (5.88)17 (33.32)
C. braakii2 (3.92)
E. cloacae4 (7.84)
Total (n) 51 (100) 51 (100)
Table 2. Conjugation efficiency of human, animal and environment donor isolates.
Table 2. Conjugation efficiency of human, animal and environment donor isolates.
Sample IDSourceSpeciesConjugation Frequency
CN1FishE. cloacae8.2 × 10−5
CN2FishE. cloacae2.3 × 10−4
CN3FishE. cloacae5.2 × 10−5
CN4FishE. cloacaeNIL
CN5FishC. braakii7.5 × 10−6
CN6FishE. coli7.6 × 10−3
CN7FishE. coliNIL
CN8FishK. pneumoniae2.0 × 10−5
CN9FishK. pneumoniae4.2 × 10−4
CN10FishK. pneumoniae3.3 × 10−5
CN11FishC. braakii9.4 × 10−4
CN12PigE. coli4.7 × 10−5
CN13PigE. coli2.6 × 10−6
CN14PigE. coli9.8 × 10−5
CN15Local chickenE. coli4.7 × 10−5
CN16Local chickenE. coli8.4 × 10−7
CN17GoatE. coli4.1 × 10−6
CN18DogE. coli2.1 × 10−5
CN19DogE. coli1.2 × 10−7
CN20DogE. coli5.0 × 10−5
CN21DogE. coli1.1 × 10−6
CN22DogE. coli6.0 × 10−4
CN23DogE. coli9.6 × 10−6
CN24EnvironmentE. coli1.5 × 10−9
CN25EnvironmentE. coli2.6 × 10−7
CN26EnvironmentE. coli3.5 × 10−6
CN27EnvironmentE. coli2.9 × 10−7
CN28EnvironmentE. coli6.1 × 10−6
CN29EnvironmentE. coli7.2 × 10−3
CN30HumanE. coli1.0 × 10−3
CN31HumanE. coli4.7 × 10−4
CN32HumanE. coli2.1 × 10−4
CN33HumanE. coli4.0 × 10−5
CN34HumanE. coli5.4 × 10−5
CN35HumanE. coli4.8 × 10−1
CN36HumanE. coli1.7 × 10−4
CN37HumanE. coli3.5 × 10−7
CN38HumanE. coli8.1 × 10−5
CN39HumanE. coli1.2 × 10−5
CN40HumanE. coli2.7 × 10−5
CN41HumanE. coli2.4 × 10−7
CN42HumanE. coliNIL
CN43HumanE. coli5.5 × 10−6
CN44HumanE. coli4.4 × 10−6
CN45HumanE. coli2.9 × 10−6
CN46HumanE. coliNIL
CN47HumanE. coli2.1 × 10−5
CN48HumanE. coli1.2 × 10−4
CN49HumanE. coli1.1 × 10−7
CN50HumanE. coliNIL
CN51HumanE. coliNIL
NIL: no conjugation.
Table 3. Antibiotic resistance phenotypes of donors and transconjugants of human animals and the environment.
Table 3. Antibiotic resistance phenotypes of donors and transconjugants of human animals and the environment.
Sample No.SourceSpeciesDonor’s Non-B-lactam
Resistance Phenotype
CN1FishE. cloacaeSXT *, CIP *,CN *,TE *
CN2FishE. cloacaeCIP, SXT, CN, TE
CN3FishE. cloacaeCIP *, SXT *, TE *, CN*
CN4FishE. cloacaeCIP, CN, TE, SXT
CN5FishC. braakiiCIP *, SXT *, CN *, TE *
CN6FishE. coliCIP, SXT, CN, TE
CN7FishE. coliCIP, TE
CN8FishK. pneumoniaeCIP *, SXT *, CN *, TE *
CN9FishK. pneumoniaeCIP *, SXT *, CN *, TE *
CN10FishK. pneumoniaeCIP, SXT, CN, TE
CN11FishC. braakiiCIP, SXT, CN, TE *
CN12PigE. coliCIP *, SXT *, TE *
CN13PigE. coliTE, CIP, CN
CN14PigE. coliCIP *, SXT *, TE *, CN *
CN15Local chickenE. coliCIP, SXT, CN, TE
CN16Local chickenE. coliCIP, SXT, CN, TE
CN17GoatE. coliSXT, TE *, CN, CIP *
CN18DogE. coliSXT
CN19DogE. coliSXT *, CIP *, TE, CN
CN20DogE. coliCIP *, SXT *, TE *
CN21DogE. coliCIP *, SXT *, TE *, CN *
CN22DogE. coliCIP *, CN *, TE *, SXT *
CN23DogE. coliSXT, TE, CN, CIP
CN24EnvironmentE. coliSXT *, CIP *, TE *
CN25EnvironmentE. coliSXT, TE, CIP
CN26EnvironmentE. coliCIP *, SXT *, TE*
CN27EnvironmentE. coliCIP *
CN28EnvironmentE. coliCIP *, SXT *, CN *, TE *
CN29EnvironmentE. coliCN, CIP *, SXT *, TE *
CN30HumanE. coliTE *, CIP *, CN, SXT *
CN31HumanE. coliCIP *, SXT *
CN32HumanE. coliSXT *, CIP *
CN33HumanE. coliTE *, CN *, CIP *, SXT *
CN34HumanE. coliSXT *, TE *, CN *, CIP
CN35HumanE. coliCIP *, CN *, SXT *, TE *
CN36HumanE. coliCIP *, CN *, SXT *, TE *
CN37HumanE. coliCIP *, CN *, SXT *, TE *
CN38HumanE. coliSXT *, TE *, CIP*, CN *
CN39HumanE. coliSXT, TE, CIP *, CN *
CN40HumanE. coliSXT *, TE *
CN41HumanE. coliSXT, TE *, CIP *, CN
CN42HumanE. coliSXT, CIP, CN, TE
CN43HumanE. coliCN *, CIP *, SXT *, TE *
CN44HumanE. coliSXT, TE, CIP
CN45HumanE. coliSXT, TE, CIP, CN
CN46HumanE. coliTE, SXT
CN47HumanE. coliSXT *, TE *, CIP, CN
CN48HumanE. coliSXT *, TE *, CIP, CN
CN49HumanE. coliCIP *, CN *, SXT *, TE *
CN50HumanE. coliSXT, TE
CN51HumanE. coliCN, CIP, SXT, TE
* Transferable resistance; SXT: Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole, CIP: Ciprofloxacin, TE: tetracycline, CN: Gentamicin.
Table 4. Replicon types of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 among donors and transconjugants.
Table 4. Replicon types of plasmids carrying blaCTX-M-15 among donors and transconjugants.
Sample SourceConjugation EfficiencyConjugation RangeDonor’s Plasmid RepliconTransconjugant Replicon Type
Human1.2 × 10−4 FIBFIA
Human8.1 × 10−5 FIA, FIBFIB
Dog5.0 × 10−5 FIBFIB
Human5.4 × 10−510−6–10−3FIBFIB
Human2.1 × 10−4 FIBFIB
Environment7.2 × 10−3 FIBFIB
Dog1.1 × 10−6 FIBFIB
Human1.7 × 10−4 FIBFIB
Dog9.6 × 10−6 no repFIB
Dog2.1 × 10−5 no repFIB
Human1.2 × 10−510−7–10−4no repFIB
Human4.7 × 10−4 no repFIB
Environment2.9 × 10−7 no repFIB
Fish2.3 × 10−4 no repFIB
FishNIL FIA, YNA
HumanNIL no repNA
HumanNIL0no repNA
HumanNIL no repNA
HumanNIL no repNA
FishNIL no repNA
Fish4.2 × 10−4 A/C, FIAno rep
Pig2.6 × 10−6 FIAno rep
Human5.5 × 10−6 FIAno rep
Dog6.0 × 10−4 FIAno rep
Pig9.8 × 10−5 FIAno rep
Human2.9 × 10−6 FIAno rep
Human4.0 × 10−5 FIAno rep
Human4.8 × 10−110−9–10−1FIAno rep
Dog1.2 × 10−7 FIBno rep
Human3.5 × 10−7 FIBno rep
Environment1.5 × 10−9 FIBno rep
Environment2.6 × 10−7 FIBno rep
Human4.4 × 10−6 FIBno rep
Environment3.5 × 10−6 FIBno rep
Human2.1 × 10−5 FIBno rep
Fish7.5 × 10−6 no repno rep
Fish9.4 × 10−4 no repno rep
Human2.7 × 10−5 no repno rep
Local chicken4.7 × 10−5 no repno rep
Pig4.7 × 10−5 no repno rep
Human2.4 × 10−7 no repno rep
Fish3.3 × 10−5 no repno rep
Fish2.0 × 10−510−7–10−3no repno rep
Fish7.6 × 10−3 no repno rep
Human1.1 × 10−7 no repno rep
Fish5.2 × 10−5 no repno rep
Goat4.1 × 10−6 no repno rep
Environment6.1 × 10−6 no repno rep
Local chicken8.4 × 10−7 no repno rep
Human1.0 × 10−3 no repno rep
Fish8.2 × 10−5 no repno rep
NIL: no conjugation, NA: no transconjugants, no rep: no typable replicon.
Table 5. Transfer success of blaCTX-M-15 among E. coli isolates of human, animals and the environment.
Table 5. Transfer success of blaCTX-M-15 among E. coli isolates of human, animals and the environment.
SourceE. coli Donors
n
E. coli Transconjugants
n (%)
Human22 18 (81.8)
Animal12 12 (100.0)
Environment8 7 (87.5)
Total42 37(88.1)
Table 6. Primers used in PCR based replicon typing of donor and transconjugant plasmids.
Table 6. Primers used in PCR based replicon typing of donor and transconjugant plasmids.
Primer Panel/TargetDirectionPrimer SequenceAnnealing Temp (°C)Amplicon
Size (bp)
Panel 1
B/OF5′-gcggtccggaaagccagaaaac-3′60159
R5′-tctgcgttccgccaagttcga-3′
FICF5′-gtgaactggcagatgaggaagg-3′60262
R5′-ttctcctcgtcgccaaactagat-3′
A/CF5′-gagaaccaaagacaaagacctgga3′60465
R5′-acgacaaacctgaattgcctcctt-3′
PF5′ctatggccctgcaaacgcgccagaaa3′60534
R5′-tcacgcgccagggcgcagcc-3′
TF5′-ttggcctgtttgtgcctaaaccat-3′60750
R5′-cgttgattacacttagctttggac-3′
Panel 2
K/BF5′-gcggtccggaaagccagaaaac-3′60160
R5′-tctttcacgagcccgccaaa-3
WF5′-cctaagaacaacaaagcccccg-3′60242
R5′-ggtgcgcggcatagaaccgt-3′
FIISF5′-ctgtcgtaagctgatggc-3′60270
R5′-ctctgccacaaacttcagc-3′
FIAF5′-ccatgctggttctagagaaggtg-3′60462
R5′-gtatatccttactggcttccgcag-3′
FIBF5′-ggagttctgacacacgattttctg-3′60702
5′-ctcccgtcgcttcagggcatt-3′
YF5′-aattcaaacaacactgtgcagcctg-3′60765
R5′-gcgagaatggacgattacaaaacttt-3′
Panel 3
I1F5′-cgaaagccggacggcagaa-3′60139
R5′-tcgtcgttccgccaagttcgt-3′
FrepBF5′-tgatcgtttaaggaattttg-3′60270
R5′-gaagatcagtcacaccatcc-3′
XF5′-aaccttagaggctatttaagttgctgat-3′60376
R5′-tgagagtcaatttttatctcatgttttagc3′
HI1F5′-ggagcgatggattacttcagtac-3′60471
R5′-tgccgtttcacctcgtgagta-3′
NF5′-gtctaacgagcttaccgaag-3′60559
R5′-gtttcaactctgccaagttc-3′
HI2F5′-tttctcctgagtcacctgttaacac-3′60644
R5′-ggctcactaccgttgtcatcct-3′
L/MF5′-ggatgaaaactatcagcatctgaag-3′60785
R5′-ctgcaggggcgattctttagg-3′
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Minja, C.A.; Shirima, G.; Mshana, S.E. Conjugative Plasmids Disseminating CTX-M-15 among Human, Animals and the Environment in Mwanza Tanzania: A Need to Intensify One Health Approach. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 836. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10070836

AMA Style

Minja CA, Shirima G, Mshana SE. Conjugative Plasmids Disseminating CTX-M-15 among Human, Animals and the Environment in Mwanza Tanzania: A Need to Intensify One Health Approach. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(7):836. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10070836

Chicago/Turabian Style

Minja, Caroline A., Gabriel Shirima, and Stephen E. Mshana. 2021. "Conjugative Plasmids Disseminating CTX-M-15 among Human, Animals and the Environment in Mwanza Tanzania: A Need to Intensify One Health Approach" Antibiotics 10, no. 7: 836. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10070836

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop