Next Article in Journal
A Review of Quality Measures for Assessing the Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Hospitals
Previous Article in Journal
Going beyond the Control of Quorum-Sensing to Combat Biofilm Infections
Previous Article in Special Issue
Co-Selection of Resistance to Antibiotics, Biocides and Heavy Metals, and Its Relevance to Foodborne Pathogens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 5
Issue 1
10.3390/antibiotics5010004
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microarray Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence of Escherichia coli Isolates from Portuguese Poultry

by
Nuno Mendonça
1,2,†,
Rui Figueiredo
1,2,3,†,
Catarina Mendes
1,
Roderick M. Card
3,†,
Muna F. Anjum
3,† and
Gabriela Jorge Da Silva
1,2,*,†
1
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Coimbra, Health Sciences Campus, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-458 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Centre for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal
3
Department of Bacteriology, Animal and Plant Health Agency, Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, KT15 3NB Surrey, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antibiotics 2016, 5(1), 4; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics5010004
Submission received: 8 June 2015 / Revised: 15 December 2015 / Accepted: 5 January 2016 / Published: 13 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Use of Antibiotics in Food-Producing Animals)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The presence of antimicrobial resistance and virulence factors of 174 Escherichia coli strains isolated from healthy Portuguese Gallus gallus was evaluated. Resistance profiles were determined against 33 antimicrobials by microbroth dilution. Resistance was prevalent for tetracycline (70%) and ampicillin (63%). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype was observed in 18% of the isolates. Multidrug resistance was found in 56% of isolates. A subset of 74 isolates were screened by DNA microarrays for the carriage of 88 antibiotic resistance genes and 62 virulence genes. Overall, 37 different resistance genes were detected. The most common were tet(A) (72%), blaTEM (68%), and sul1 (47%), while 21% isolates harbored an ESBL gene (blaCTX-M group 1, group 2, or group 9). Of these, 96% carried the increased serum survival (iss) virulence gene, while 89% presented the enterobactin siderophore receptor protein (iroN), 70% the temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin (tsh), and 68% the long polar fimbriae (lpfA) virulence genes associated with extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli. In conclusion, prevalence of antibiotic resistant E. coli from the microbiota of Portuguese chickens was high, including to extended spectrum cephalosporins. The majority of isolates seems to have the potential to trigger extraintestinal human infection due to the presence of some virulence genes. However, the absence of genes specific for enteropathogenic E. coli reduces the risk for human intestinal infection.

1. Introduction

The use of antibiotics as growth promoters in animal production has led to the development of major reservoirs of antibiotic resistance genes among bacterial strains that could enter the food-chain, leading to an increased risk for human health. In 2006, the European Union limited these types of drugs to prophylactic and therapeutic use [1].
According to the Eurostat, the overall production of poultry meat for human consumption in Europe in 2012 passed 11,000 tons, among which Gallus gallus represents the major section. However, a recent report revealed alarming rates of antibiotic resistance among Escherichia coli isolated from all types of fowl production (intensive, extensive, layers, and breeding) [2]. Across Europe, E. coli resistance to ampicillin reached 44.1%, 40.5% to ciprofloxacin, 50.8% to sulfonamides, and 45.2% to tetracyclines [2], largely associated with several foodborne outbreaks across Europe [3].
According to the report of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), under the EARS-Net surveillance program, among human clinical E. coli, 57.4% of the strains were resistant to aminopenicillins, while 22.3% were resistant to fluoroquinolones [4]. Although these resistance rates are mainly associated with the consumption of antibiotics within the clinical environment, acquisition of resistance can be potentiated by dissemination of mobile genetic elements, like plasmids from bacteria present in the food chain [5]. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that, at least for some avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC) strains, the virulence genotyping was similar to human uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), suggesting a food-borne link between APEC and UPEC [6,7].
To our knowledge, no data have been reported from Portugal regarding the resistance and virulence of E. coli collected from poultry. Therefore, in this study we have examined the burden of antibiotic resistance and virulence factors harbored by E. coli isolates recovered from healthy Portuguese chickens. Isolates (n = 174) were examined for susceptibility to 33 antimicrobials of therapeutic relevance in humans and poultry infections. Subsequently, a subset of isolates (n = 74) demonstrating resistance to at least one antibiotic was screened for the presence of 88 antimicrobial resistance genes and 62 virulence genes by using a DNA microarray.

2. Results

The susceptibilities of the 174 isolates were tested by Microscan, and 150 (86%) had resistance to at least one antibiotic in the panel and 24 (14%) were susceptible to all antibiotics tested. The number of isolates resistant to each antibiotic tested is presented in Table 1, and the most frequent resistances were to tetracycline (n = 121, 70%), ampicillin (n = 109, 63%), mezlocillin (n = 102, 59%), moxifloxacine (n = 98, 56%), and piperacillin (n = 97, 56%).
A lower frequency of resistance was detected against other antibiotics used in human therapeutics, such as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (33%), gentamycin (17%), and amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid (17%). Resistance to cefotaxime was present among 21% of strains and associated with the production of ESBL. All isolates were susceptible to meropenem, ertapenem, imipenem, amikacin, and tigecycline. Multidrug resistance, defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes [8], was detected in 56% of strains. No isolate was extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant according to the criteria of Magiorakos et al. [8].
Table
Table 1. Summary of antibiotic resistances detected in E. coli strains isolated from Gallus gallus from different types of production.
Table 1. Summary of antibiotic resistances detected in E. coli strains isolated from Gallus gallus from different types of production.
AntibioticType of Poultry ProductionTotal (n = 174)
Intensive Meat Production Farms (n = 121)Extensive Meat Production Farms (n = 11)Intensive Layers Farms (n = 17)Intensive Breeding Farms (n = 25)
Tetracycline90 (74%)8 (73%)10 (59%)13 (52%)121 (70%)
Ampicillin80 (66%)7 (64%)7 (41%)15 (60%)109 (63%)
Mezlocillin77 (64%)6 (55%)7 (41%)12 (48%)102 (59%)
Piperacillin73 (60%)5 (45%)7 (41%)12 (48%)97 (56%)
Moxifloxacin73 (60%)6 (55%)9 (53%)10 (40%)98 (56%)
Ciprofloxacin65 (54%)5 (45%)8 (47%)8 (32%)86 (49%)
Norfloxacin66 (55%)5 (45%)6 (35%)8 (32%)85 (49%)
Cefazolin43 (36%)5 (45%)1 (6%)9 (36%)58 (33%)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole46 (38%)5 (45%)1 (6%)5 (20%)57 (33%)
Cefpodoxime42 (35%)5 (45%)0 (0%)8 (32%)55 (32%)
Ampicillin plus sulbactam34 (28%)4 (36%)2 (12%)4 (16%)44 (25%)
Levofloxacin37 (31%)3 (27%)1 (6%)2 (8%)43 (25%)
Cefotaxime26 (21%)3 (27%)1 (6%)7 (28%)37 (21%)
Cefuroxime23 (19%)2 (18%)1 (6%)5 (20%)31 (18%)
Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid22 (18%)3 (27%)0 (0%)4 (16%)29 (17%)
Gentamicin20 (17%)0 (0%)3 (18%)6 (24%)29 (17%)
Aztreonam19 (16%)1 (9%)0 (0%)6 (24%)26 (15%)
Cefoxitin19 (16%)2 (18%)0 (0%)3 (12%)24 (14%)
Chloramphenicol13 (11%)2 (18%)2 (12%)4 (16%)21 (12%)
Ceftazidime12 (10%)0 (0%)0 (0%)7 (28%)19 (11%)
Tobramycin14 (12%)0 (0%)1 (6%)3 (12%)18 (10%)
Cefepime9 (7%)2 (18%)0 (0%)2 (8%)13 (7%)
Colistin7 (6%)0 (0%)0 (0%)5 (20%)12 (7%)
Nitrofurantoin6 (5%)0 (0%)1 (6%)0 (0%)7 (4%)
Piperacillin plus tazobactam1 (1%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
Fosfomycin1 (1%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)1 (1%)
Ertapenem0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Imipenem0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Meropenem0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Amikacin0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Tigecycline0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
From the total E. coli collection, a subset of 74 isolates presenting resistance to at least one antibiotic was selected for microarray analysis. Selected isolates were distributed over the study time and according to the proportions of the different production types. A total of 37 different resistance genes were detected in these isolates by microarray and each isolate harboured between two to fifteen genes. The most commonly detected genes were tet(A), blaTEM, and sul1 (Figure 1; Table S1). In fact, 74% and 24% of the strains analyzed by microarray, with phenotypic resistance to tetracycline, presented positive signal for the tet(A) and tet(B) gene, respectively. Ten isolates were positive for a blaCTX-M group 1, one for a blaCTX-M group 2, and four for blaCTX-M group 9 genes. The integrase genes intI1 (43 isolates) and intI2 (two isolates) were also detected, which are associated with class 1 and 2 integrons, respectively.
Virulence genes were detected by microarray in 73/74 isolates (Figure 1; Table S1). Many isolates harbored multiple virulence genes: nine isolates had from nine to eleven genes, 46 possessed six to eight genes, and 19 had five or less genes. The most commonly-detected virulence genes included: iss, involved in the increased serum survival (96% of isolates); iroN, encoding a siderophore receptor (89% of isolates); the bacteriocin gene mchF (72% of isolates); the temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin gene tsh (70% of isolates); the fimbriae encoding gene lpfA (68% of isolates); and the polypeptide toxin gene cofA (46% of isolates). The gene gad, encoding glutamate decarboxylase, is a housekeeping gene used as a control.
Overall, 50% of the multidrug resistance strains, for which the genotype was evaluated by microarray, presented between five to eight virulence factors and three to six antibiotic resistance encoding genes. Figure 1 also reveals that several sets of genes are observed frequently, e.g., 26% of strains presented blaTEM, aadA1, sul1, tet(A), and intI1 and 8% presented blaTEM, aac6Ib catA1, sul1, tet(B), and intI1, all from intensive production.
Antibiotics 05 00004 g001 1024
Figure 1. Virulence and resistance determinants detected by microarray for 74 E. coli isolates. The order of strains represents their relatedness according to the UPGMA dendrogram type performed in BioNumerics 5.1. The hybridization result of a distinct isolate is shown by row. A white box indicates the absence and a black box indicates the presence of the target gene.
Figure 1. Virulence and resistance determinants detected by microarray for 74 E. coli isolates. The order of strains represents their relatedness according to the UPGMA dendrogram type performed in BioNumerics 5.1. The hybridization result of a distinct isolate is shown by row. A white box indicates the absence and a black box indicates the presence of the target gene.
Antibiotics 05 00004 g001

3. Discussion

To our knowledge, in Portugal there is a lack of reports on antibiotic resistance among E. coli from healthy poultry and their carriage of virulence determinants. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the concomitant presence of antimicrobial resistance genes and some virulence factors among E. coli strains isolated from Gallus gallus from Portuguese farms. We detected higher resistance frequencies to several antibiotics from different classes when compared to other European countries. Resistance to ampicillin (63% vs. 44%), cefotaxime (21% vs. 6%), gentamicin (17% vs. 4%), and tetracycline (70% vs. 37%) were higher than the average resistance among the ten members states that reported to EFSA. However, these Portuguese isolates presented a similar resistance profile to that described in Spain [2]. The resistance level against nitrofurantoin was 4%, which is higher than that detected in human clinical samples in France (1.8%), USA, and Canada (1.1%) [9]. More than half of the isolates showed multidrug resistance (56%), with 8% showing co-resistance to ciprofloxacin and cefotaxime. This co-resistance decreases therapeutic options as both antibiotics are representative of major classes used in treatment of E. coli infections. Again, this value was higher than those reported in most European countries, with the exception of Spain where 20.8% of isolates showed this co-resistance [2]. The prevalence of resistance to aminopenicillins, third-generations cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones was higher in these poultry isolates than in Portuguese human clinical E. coli strains [4]. No carbapenem resistance phenotype was detected in these poultry isolates. Antimicrobial resistant food-borne E. coli can colonize the human gut and constitute a reservoir for subsequent infection [6]. In fact, diverse studies have associated resistant E. coli collected from retail meat, especially poultry, to extraintestinal human disease. Many of these zoonotic isolates belonged to B2 and D phylogenetic groups, the most commonly found in human urinary tract infections. Thus, it was suggested that poultry could be considered one of the reservoirs of antimicrobial resistant E. coli causing human UTIs [7]. Although B2 and D phylogroups are considered the most virulent groups, we cannot discard the association of other phylogenetic groups, such as A and B1, with UTIs [10]. In this study, the virulence microarray allowed the rapid detection and designation of pathotypes, therefore screening for specific or novel virulence combinations and the classification in phylogroups of this bacterial population was not performed.
Prevalent antimicrobial resistance genes included tet(A), blaTEM, and sul1 genes, which are common in clinical and non-clinical isolates [11,12,13]. Many of the resistance genes represented on the microarray can be harboured on mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids and integrons. Thus, there is the potential for these resistance genes to be transferred to other bacteria in the microbiota of poultry or human hosts, further contributing to the dissemination of resistance. The detection of type 1 and 2 integrase genes in some isolates shows a potential for gene acquisition and transfer.
The use of antibiotics in poultry production, either prophylactically or for treatment, has been considered as a major contributor to the increased resistance frequencies detected among bacteria isolated from this type of samples. Among Portuguese poultry farms, fluoroquinolones have been detected at higher levels than the maximum residue level allowed [14], which could account for the resistance to ciprofloxacin detected in this study (49%).
Antimicrobial resistance determinants detection by microarray supported the high resistance observed to beta-lactams and tetracyclines. Similar frequencies were observed in another study on poultry in China [13], while among human UTIs the frequency of genes differs between community and clinical samples [5].
ESBLs production was detected in 21% of samples. In 2012, ECDC reported that the frequency of ESBL among clinical E. coli in Portugal was 13% [4], which has been attributed mainly to the dissemination of resistance mechanisms or bacterial clones. In fact, already in 2007, Mendonça et al. described a high incidence of blaCTX-M from group 1 among human UTI isolates [12]. Thus, the higher prevalence of ESBLs among Gallus gallus strains is worrisome. Resistance to fosfomycin (in one isolate) associated with beta-lactam resistance mechanism blaCTX-M group 2, and aminoglycoside resistance mechanism aadB, could potentiate co-resistance in case of co-selection [15]. Despite the ban of antibiotics in animal feed in European Union countries, our results showed that more strict policies of both prophylactic and therapeutic administration of antibiotics should be considered in Portugal.
The virulence traits detected in this study revealed an almost total presence of the increased serum survival (iss), a distinguishing trait of avian extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) [16]. Other important virulence traits, prevalent in these isolates were the enterobactin siderophore receptor protein (iroN), the temperature-sensitive hemagglutinin (tsh), and the long polar fimbriae (lpfA) normally associated with ExPECs, including uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) [17,18]. iroN has been directly associated with human UTI, by allowing bacterial growth even under iron-limiting conditions which are found during the infection process [19], while tsh has been more frequently detected among E. coli from UTI than commensal E. coli [20]. Finally, lpfA has been described as an adherence determinant among E. coli O157:H7 [21].
None of the genes characteristic of human intestinal pathogenic E. coli (STEC, ETEC, EPEC, etc.) strains were found, such as eae (intimin gene), stx1 and stx2 (shiga toxins), or sta1 and sta2 (heat-stable enterotoxins ST-Ia and ST-Ib, respectively). The gene astA coding for the heat-stable enterotoxin 1 was found in 13 isolates, but was the only gene of the enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) pathogroup. These findings reduce the public health concern on acquisition intestinal pathogenic E. coli strains. For extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), iroN was common but most isolates had no other gene from this pathogroup. Only one strain showed three of the five ExPEC genes represented in the array (ireA, iroN, prfB/papB) [17].
Colibacillosis is a disease in poultry caused by avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC). It has been difficult to identify genes that define APEC strains. They cause different types of systemic extraintestinal infections probably derived from the combinations of virulence genes acquired by the causative bacterial pathogen, and host characteristics such as age and immune status. Johnson et al. tried to define a set of five genes to characterize highly pathogenic APEC [16]. Nevertheless, not all of these genes are part of the microarray used [16]. More recently, some data seem to indicate that APEC are not a homogeneous group and diverse combination of genes may contribute to different clinical presentations of the infection [22]. In the virulence microarray used in this study, only four genes typically associated with APECs were screened. The lpfA and tsh genes were very common but only one isolate had the hlyE gene and seven the iha. Three isolates carried three of the four APEC genes represented in the array. So, considering the current limitations of this microarray in representation of APEC genes, and the complexity in defining clearly which virulence genes characterize APECs as a pathogroup we have limited ability to predict the health risk for the chickens in this study; although this could be resolved by expanding the microarray in the future.
Nevertheless, a strong statistical relationship was detected for the iron-regulated gene homologue adhesin (iha) and bacteriocins (mchB and mchC) (r = 1.000), present in 9% of strains. In these strains, the presence of genes encoding resistance to at least two antibiotics combined with an adherence factor [23,24], and bacteriocins, suggests an increased capacity of this E. coli for colonization and establishment of its niche in the urinary tract [18].

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Bacterial Isolation and Phenotypic Resistance Typing

Healthy chickens (Gallus gallus) (n = 174) originating from intensive meat production farms (121, 70%), intensive layers farms (25, 14%), intensive breeding farms (17, 10%), and extensive meat production farms (11, 6%) were collected in central Portugal between November 2010 and November 2012. E. coli isolates were recovered from the carcasses (58%) or internal organs (42%) of the birds at the ControlVet laboratory using standard protocols, as defined in ISO 7251:2005 [25] and identified with the API 20E System (BioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France). One isolate per bird was selected for further analysis.
Isolates were tested for their susceptibility to a panel of 33 antimicrobials and combinations thereof using the microdilution broth method (Microscan Panel, Siemens, West Sacramento, CA, USA) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI) [26]. The antimicrobial panel comprised: ampicillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin, ampicillin plus sulbactam, amoxicillin plus clavulanate, piperacillin plus tazobactam, cephazolin, ceftazidime, ceftazidime plus clavulanate, cefotaxime, cefotaxime plus clavulanate, aztreonam, cefpodoxime, cefepime, cefuroxime, cefoxitin, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim plus sulfamethoxazole, colistin, nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, and tigecyclin. All susceptibility breakpoints were interpreted according to CLSI, except moxifloxacin, colistin and tigecycline for which the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint was used [27].

4.2. Microarray Analyses and Data Analysis

The E. coli isolates were cultured overnight on Luria Bertani agar plates at 37 °C and DNA extracted by lysis as described previously [10,28]. A microarray was then used to screen each DNA sample for the presence of 88 genes encoding resistance determinants [10] and 60 genes encoding virulence factors [29]. Represented on the microarray were genes encoding resistance to beta-lactams, aminoglycosides, quinolones, phenicols, tetracycline, sulfonamides, trimethoprim, macrolide, streptogramins, and ansamycins. Among the virulence array there were genes encoding to several factors, like increased serum survival, siderophere receptors, bacteriocins, toxins, fimbria and other adhesins, among others. The DNA was labeled as described previously [10,28,29], and hybridized to the microarray using the HybPlus Kit (Alere Technologies, Jena, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Microarray analysis was performed according Figueiredo et al. [28]. The phylogenetic relationship between bacterial strains according to the presence or absence of resistance and virulence factors genes was evaluated using the Bionumerics software 5.1 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). An unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram was calculated by simple matching of binary coefficients on the basis of the resistance and/or virulence gene set represented on the microarray (Table S1).

4.3. Statistical Analysis

Pearson’s correlation was used to analyze the possible relationships among or between antimicrobial resistance phenotype, genotype, and virulence factors encoding genes. Statistical analysis was performed by the use of the statistical software SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY, USA).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, E. coli from the microbiota of healthy Portuguese chickens might have the potential to trigger human extraintestinal infection, although the risk of acquisition of specific enteropathogenic E. coli strains from poultry appears to be low. The high level of resistance to some antibiotics, including extended spectrum cephalosporins, and the frequency of multidrug resistance found compared to data from other European countries is worrisome and a more effective control on the prophylactic and therapeutic use of antibiotics in avian production is recommended.

Supplementary Files

Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

Our thanks are due to Ana Henriques and Rui Sereno from ControlVet, Tondela, Portugal for isolation and identification of E. coli isolates. N. Mendonça by the grant from SFRH/BPD/45815/2008 and SFRH/BGCT/113701/2015 and R. Figueiredo was supported by the grant SFRH/BD/78833/2011 Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Lisboa, Portugal. This work was supported financially by the PTDC/AGR-ALI/113953/2009 project from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia and by the PEst-OE/SAU/UI0177/2014 from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia attributed to the Center for Pharmaceutical Studies, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Medicines Agency (EMEA). Public Statement on the Use of (Fluoro) Quinolones in Food-Producing Animals in the EUROPEAN Union: Development of Resistance and Impact on the Human and Animal Health; EMEA/CVMP/SAGAM/184651/2005; EMEA: London, UK, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union Summary Report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2011. EFSA J. 2013, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). The European Union Summary Report on Trends and Sources of Zoonoses, Zoonotic Agents and Food-borne Outbreaks in 2012. EFSA J. 2014, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance in Europe 2012. Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net); ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2013; p. 218. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hölzel, C.S.; Harms, K.S.; Bauer, J.; Bauer-Unkauf, I.; Hörmansdorfer, S.; Kämpf, P.; Mölle, G.; Oehme, C.; Preikschat, P.; Schwaiger, K. Diversity of antimicrobial resistance genes and class-1-integrons in phylogenetically related porcine and human Escherichia coli. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 160, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Johnson, T.J.; Kariyawasam, S.; Wannemuehler, Y.; Mangiamele, P.; Johnson, S.J.; Doetkott, C.; Skyberg, J.A.; Lynne, A.M.; Johnson, J.R.; Nolan, L.K. The genome sequence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain O1:K1:H7 shares strong similarities with human extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli genomes. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 3228–3236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nordstrom, L.; Liu, C.M.; Price, L.B. Foodborne urinary tract infections: A new paradigm for antimicrobial-resistant foodborne illness. Front. Microbiol. 2013, 4, e29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Magiorakos, A.P.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; Paterson, D.L.; et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Garau, J. Other antimicrobials of interest in the era of extended-spectrum β-lactamases: Fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and tigecycline. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2008, 14, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Calhau, V.; Domingues, S.; Ribeiro, G.; Mendonça, N.; da Silva, G.J. Interplay between pathogenicity island carriage, resistance profile and plasmid acquisition in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. J. Med. Microbiol. 2015, 64, 828–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Card, R.; Zhang, J.; Das, P.; Cook, C.; Woodford, N.; Anjum, M.F. Evaluation of an expanded microarray for detecting antibiotic resistance genes in a broad range of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mendonça, N.; Leitão, J.; Manageiro, V.; Ferreira, E.; ARSIP; Caniça, M. Spread of clinical extended-spectrum ß-lactamase CTX-M-producing Escherichia coli isolates in community and nosocomial environments in Portugal. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 1946–1955. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, T.; Wang, C.G.; Lv, J.C.; Wang, R.S.; Zhong, X.H. Survey on tetracycline resistance and antibiotic-resistant genotype of avian Escherichia coli in North China. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2774–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Pereira, A.; Gomes, A.; Lino, C.M.; Pena, A. Does the use of fluoroquinolones in poultry production reach your plate? Portuguese nationwide surveillance. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Sustainable Development of Energy Water and Environment Systems (ISSN 1847-7178), Dubrovnik, Hrvatska, 22–27 September 2013; Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture: Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wellington, E.M.; Boxall, A.B.; Cross, P.; Feil, E.J.; Gaze, W.H.; Hawkey, P.M.; Johnson-Rollings, A.S.; Jones, D.L.; Lee, N.M.; Otten, W.; et al. The role of the natural environment in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Johnson, T.J.; Wannemuehler, Y.M.; Nolan, L.K. Evolution of the iss gene in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 2360–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Anjum, M.F.; Mafura, M.; Slickers, P.; Ballmer, K.; Kuhnert, P.; Woodward, M.J.; Ehricht, R. Pathotyping Escherichia coli by using miniaturized DNA microarrays. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 5692–5697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Welch, R.A.; Burland, V.; Plunkett III, G.; Redford, P.; Roesch, P.; Rasko, D.; Buckles, E.L.; Liou, S.-R.; Boutin, A.; Hackett, J.; et al. Extensive mosaic structure revealed by the complete genome sequence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 17020–17024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Johnson, J.R. Virulence factors in Escherichia coli urinary tract infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1991, 4, 80–128. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Heimer, S.R.; Rasko, D.A.; Lockatell, C.V.; Johnson, D.E.; Mobley, H.L. Autotransporter genes pic and tsh are associated with Escherichia coli strains that cause acute pyelonephritis and are expressed during urinary tract infection. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Torres, A.G.; Milflores-Flores, L.; Garcia-Gallegos, J.G.; Patel, S.D.; Best, A.; la Ragione, R.M.; Martinez-Laguna, Y.; Woodward, M.J. Environmental regulation and colonization attributes of the long polar fimbriae (LPF) of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 297, 177–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Maturana, V.G.; de Pace, F.; Carlos, C.; Mistretta Pires, M.; Amabile-de-Campos, T.; Nakazato, G.; Guedes-Stheling, E.; Logue, C.M.; Nolan, L.K.; Dias-da-Silveira, W. Subpathotypes of Avian Pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) Exist as Defined by their Syndromes and Virulence Traits. Open Microbiol. J. 2011, 5, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Johnson, J.R.; Jelacic, S.; Schoening, L.M.; Clabots, C.; Shaikh, N.; Mobley, H.L.; Tarr, P.I. The IrgA homologue adhesin Iha is an Escherichia coli virulence factor in murine urinary tract infection. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 965–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rodríguez, E.; Gaggero, C.; Laviña, M. The structural gene for Microcin H47 encodes a peptide precursor with antibiotic activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 2176–2182. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. International Organization for Standardization. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs. Horizontal Method for the Detection and Enumeration of Presumptive Escherichia coli. Most Probable Number Technique; ISO 7251:2005; International Organization for Standardization IOS: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; p. 13. [Google Scholar]
  26. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: Twentieth Informational Supplement M100-S20; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2010; p. 188. [Google Scholar]
  27. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters, Version 4.0. 2014. Available online: http://www.eucast.org (accessed on 7 January 2016).
  28. Figueiredo, R.; Card, R.; Nunes, C.; AbuOun, M.; Bagnall, M.C.; Nunez, J.; Anjum, M.F.; da Silva, G.J. Virulence Characterization of Salmonella enterica by a New Microarray: Detection and Evaluation of the Cytolethal Distending Toxin Gene Activity in the Unusual Host S. Typhimurium. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Szmolka, A.; Anjum, M.F.; la Ragione, R.M.; Kaszanyitzky, E.J.; Nagy, B. Microarray based comparative genotyping of gentamicin resistant Escherichia coli strains from food animals and humans. Vet. Microbiol. 2012, 156, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mendonça, N.; Figueiredo, R.; Mendes, C.; Card, R.M.; Anjum, M.F.; Da Silva, G.J. Microarray Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence of Escherichia coli Isolates from Portuguese Poultry. Antibiotics 2016, 5, 4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics5010004

AMA Style

Mendonça N, Figueiredo R, Mendes C, Card RM, Anjum MF, Da Silva GJ. Microarray Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence of Escherichia coli Isolates from Portuguese Poultry. Antibiotics. 2016; 5(1):4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics5010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mendonça, Nuno, Rui Figueiredo, Catarina Mendes, Roderick M. Card, Muna F. Anjum, and Gabriela Jorge Da Silva. 2016. "Microarray Evaluation of Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence of Escherichia coli Isolates from Portuguese Poultry" Antibiotics 5, no. 1: 4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics5010004

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop