Next Article in Journal
Multi-Functional Electrospun Nanofibers from Polymer Blends for Scaffold Tissue Engineering
Next Article in Special Issue
An Aging Evaluation of the Bearing Performances of Glass Fiber Composite Laminate in Salt Spray Fog Environment
Previous Article in Journal
Probing of Nanoscale Friction and Mechanical Characteristics of Cotton Fiber’s Surface
Previous Article in Special Issue
In-Line Nanostructuring of Glass Fibres Using Different Carbon Allotropes for Structural Health Monitoring Application
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Nozzle Diameter on Basalt Continuous Fiber Properties

by
Sergey I. Gutnikov
* and
Bogdan I. Lazoryak
Chemical Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 8 June 2019 / Revised: 7 July 2019 / Accepted: 17 July 2019 / Published: 19 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Glass Fibers)

Abstract

:
The experimental data presented in this work show the effects of nozzle diameter, drawing speed, and formation temperature on the diameter and strength of basalt filaments and melt flow rate. Several series of basalt continuous fibers were obtained using a specially designed crucible of platinum–rhodium alloy with four nozzles of different diameters (1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 mm). The conditions of the process varied in formation temperature (from 1370 to 1450 °C) and winding speed (from 300 to 1200 m/min). Melt flow rate was almost independent of the winding speed, indicating laminar flow of the melt through the nozzles and the Newtonian nature of the liquid. The results show strict correlations between fiber diameter, nozzle diameter, and winding speed. The diameter of the fibers had a significant effect on their strength. The tensile strength of the obtained basalt fibers varied from 550 to 3320 MPa depending on the formation conditions. The results of this work could be useful not only for scientists, but also for technologists seeking the optimal conditions for technological processes.

1. Introduction

Fiber-reinforced polymer composites are widely used in different sectors of industry and technology. In recent years, significant growth has been observed in the manufacture of composite materials based on basalt continuous fibers (BCFs). They can successfully replace traditional construction materials, and can also be applied to conditions that exclude the use of metals [1]. Basalt fibers exhibit good adhesion to various polymeric binders: epoxy [2], polycarbonate [3], poly(butylene succinate) [4], etc. Therefore, the prospect of their use in fiber-reinforced polymer composites instead of E-glass fibers is very high. Basalt fibers show better alkali resistance than E-glass fibers. They are a promising reinforcing component for concrete reinforcement [5,6].
Basalt continuous fiber production technology consists of several stages: glass melting, melt homogenization, formation, sizing, and winding. Most works in this area are devoted to the study of the dependence of different physicochemical properties of basalt melts, glasses, and fibers on their chemical composition. Glasses based on basalts are multicomponent systems with the following composition, in mass. %: SiO2 43–58, Al2O3 11–20, CaO 7–13, FeO + Fe2O3 8–16, MgO 4–12, R2O ≤ 4. The effects of both glass-forming oxides [7,8] and modifier oxides have been studied [9]. Researchers have mostly paid attention to the effects of iron oxides [10,11].
Although the first continuous glass fibers based on rocks were obtained in the middle of the 20th century, the development of the BCF production technology is still hampered. The process of basalt continuous fiber production is quite complicated. It is influenced by various factors, such as melt viscosity, melt surface tension, and crystallization ability. In addition to that, external factors such as winding speed, flow rate, external cooling condition, and thermal uniformity play a role. The first group of parameters is primarily defined by the chemical composition of the raw materials. The second group can be conventionally attributed to the technological parameters [12]. The effect of technological parameters (winding speed, melt temperature, nozzle diameter, etc.) on the properties of basalt continuous fibers has been insufficiently studied.
The influence of the basalt and E-glass melt viscosity, cooling rate, structural heterogeneity, and technological defects on mechanical and thermal properties have been thoroughly studied by Yue et al. [13,14,15,16]. For E-glass fibers, the effects of parameters such as the length and diameter of the nozzle, winding speed, and temperature of the melt were studied [17,18]. In contrast to the composition of E-glass melt, basalt melts have a significantly higher ability to crystallize. As a result, basalt melt has a narrow production temperature range, which leads to a catastrophically large number of fiber breaks. This dramatically affects the capacity of the technological plants.
The bushing for basalt and glass fibers is made of a platinum–rhodium alloy, which makes studying the effects of shape and size of the nozzles on the filament formation process and the properties of continuous fibers very expensive. Due to low thermal conductivity and viscosity, the basalt melt flowing through the nozzle plate has a high temperature gradient [16,19]. Due to its high crystallization ability, this can have a significant effect on the stability of the fiber-forming process as well as the mechanical properties of the fibers [20]. The diameter of the nozzle can have a significant impact on this process.
A crucible of platinum–rhodium alloy with four nozzles of different diameters (1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 mm) was specially designed and made for the purpose of this work. During fiber formation, we varied both the preparation temperature (from 1370 to 1450 °C) and the winding speed (from 300 to 1200 m/min). The melt flow through the nozzles, diameter of fibers, and influence of technological parameters on the strength of continuous basalt fibers for all series of samples were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Glasses

Basalt rocks were grinded and heated in a platinum crucible in a high-temperature furnace at a rate of 250 °C/h up to 1000 °C and at 30 °C/h in the range of 1000–1600 °C. Then, they were homogenized at a temperature of 1600 °C for 9 h. The molten glasses were quenched in water from 1590 °C.

2.2. X-ray Fluorescence Analysis

X-ray fluorescence analysis of the specimens was performed on a PAN Analytical Axios Advanced spectrometer (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands). Characteristic X-rays were excited using a 4 kW Rh-anode X-ray tube. The excited radiation was recorded by a scanning channel with five exchangeable wave crystals and a detector. Measurements were made in transmission geometry in vacuum. Specimens were prepared in the form of pellets with a binder.

2.3. X-ray Diffraction

X-ray diffraction (XRD) was performed at room temperature on Thermo ARL X’TRA powder diffractometer (radiation, λ = 1.54060 Å; radiation, λ = 1.54443 A, Thermo Electron SA, Ecublens, Switzerland). XRD patterns were collected in an angular range 2θ = 10–60° at a scan step 2θ = 0.02° and a scan rate of 1°(2θ)/min.

2.4. Measuring of Diameters

Fiber diameters were determined using an OLYMPUS BX51TRF (OLYMPUS Co, Tokyo, Japan) module optical microscope equipped with an integrated OLYMPUS C-5060 photo camera with a magnification of 50–500.

2.5. Measuring of Mechanical Properties

The tensile strength of the fibers was determined with a Hounsfield H100K-S (Hounsfield Test Equipment Ltd., Redhill, UK) universal tensile testing machine. Specimens were mounted in paper support frames using epoxy. The gauge length was 10 mm, and the crosshead speed was 5 mm/min (ISO 5079).

3. Results

Basalt continuous fibers were produced using a laboratory-scale system [21]. BCFs were drawn from melts and wound onto a take-up reel. According to X-ray diffraction, all obtained samples were amorphous. The chemical composition was determined by X-ray fluorescence analysis and contained (in wt.%): 55.6% SiO2, 1.1% TiO2, 15.8% Al2O3, 10.5% Fe2O3, 3.7% MgO, 9.2% CaO, 2.2% Na2O, and 1.8% K2O. All the iron is reported as Fe2O3.
A special crucible was designed To investigate the effect of the nozzle diameter on the strength properties of the basalt continuous fibers and the basalt melt flow (Figure 1). The crucible was made of a platinum–rhodium alloy (90/10). The scheme and dimensions of the crucible are presented in Figure 1. At the bottom of the crucible there were four nozzles with inner diameters of 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 mm. The length of each nozzle was 2.8 mm.
In order to obtain the fiber, previously prepared basalt glass was added to the crucible. Then, the melt was heated to the formation temperature. Basalt continuous fibers were obtained at temperatures corresponding to the lower, middle, and upper limits of the formation temperature range (1370, 1410, and 1450 °C, respectively). During the experiments, the winding speed of the take-up reel was varied from 300 to 1200 m/min.
The experiment was carried out so that the level of the melt for each obtained sample differed by no more than 10%. The melt level was calculated based on the mass of the obtained sample and the geometric dimensions of the crucible.
In order to determine the possibility of using nozzles with the given diameters in industrial-scale plants, the number of filament breaks within 20 minutes of drawing was calculated. It was possible to achieve a stable process of fiber formation for the experiments with nozzles having diameters of 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 mm. For the 1.5-mm diameter nozzle, it was not possible to obtain fibers steadily.
The diameter and tensile strength were measured for all obtained fibers. The melt flow rate was determined by calculation based on the measured diameters and density. Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 present the obtained results.

4. Discussion

One of the key stages of the basalt continuous fiber production technology is fiber formation. Basalt melt flows through the nozzles that are placed on the bottom of the bushing. The bushing is usually made of platinum alloyed with rhodium (up to 10 mass. %). The fiberization process takes place within a definite temperature range (usually 70–100 °C for basalt systems). The drawing cone (or gob) is formed at the end of the nozzle that forms the fiber by winding on a rotating cylinder (winding machine). Although this technology has been known since the last century, there are not many papers devoted to the influence of the shape and dimensions of the nozzle on the melt flow and fiber properties.
Figure 2a shows the dependence of the melt flow rate on the winding speed. The melt flow rate was almost independent of the winding speed, which indicates a laminar flow of the melt through the nozzles and a Newtonian nature of the liquid. The dependence of the melt flow rate correlated well with the biquadratic nozzle diameter (Figure 2b). Pearson’s correlation coefficients for all cases were greater than 0.99. This confirms the possibility of applying the Hagen–Poiseuille equation to the basalt system. This result correlates with the data obtained previously for E-glass fibers [17,18].
Figure 3 shows the dependence of the diameter of the obtained basalt continuous fibers on the winding speed and formation temperature. With an increase in the nozzle diameter from 1.5 to 4.5 mm, the fiber diameter increased by 6.5–9 times (for the same conditions). An increase in winding speed led to a decrease in fiber diameter. For nozzles with a large diameter this dependence was more explicit. For example, with an increase of winding speed from 300 to 1200 m/min, fiber diameter increased from 7 to 12.8 μm (nozzle diameter 2.5 mm, formation temperature 1410 °C), and with an increase of winding speed from 300 to 1200 m/min, fiber diameter increased from 28.8 to 58.8 μm (nozzle diameter 4.5 mm, formation temperature 1410 °C)—these represent respective increases of 83% and 104%. In a rough approximation at a definite formation temperature, this dependence can be estimated by a linear approximation.
The formation temperature had a less-significant effect on fiber diameter under otherwise equal conditions. For example, with an increase of formation temperature from 1370 to 1450 °C the fiber diameter decreased from 10.3 to 6 μm (nozzle diameter 2.5 mm, winding speed 900 m/min) and with an increase from 1370 to 1450 °C the fiber diameter decreased from 39.7 to 23.8 μm (nozzle diameter 4.5 mm, winding speed 900 m/min)—decreases of 72% and 67%, respectively. This dependence can be well estimated by a linear approximation.
In order to explain the obtained results, the theory of basalt melt flow through a nozzle should be taken into account. In the 19th century, Poiseuille proposed the use of an empirical formula for calculating the flow rate of viscous liquids flowing through tubes with small diameter:
Q = KHd 4 ν L ,
where K is a constant (m/s2), H is the head pressure (melt level) in meters, L is the inner tube length (nozzle length) in meters, d is the inner tube diameter (nozzle diameter) in meters, and ν is the kinematic viscosity of the liquid in stokes.
Subsequently, this formula was clarified by Hagen, yielding the following form:
Q = π gHd 4 128 ν L .
Reynolds showed that this formula is valid not only for capillaries, but also for tubes with small diameter (Reynolds numbers of the order of 10−2).
For basalt continuous fiber production technology, the Reynolds numbers are rather small, on the order of approximately 6 × 10−6 [18]. Thus, many authors believe that the Hagen–Poiseuille equation may be applicable to the process of glass and basalt fiber formation [17,19,22]. Most researchers believe that basalt melt flow in the spinning zone usually follows a Newtonian behavior [18,23,24]. The influence of the basalt and E-glass melt viscosity, cooling rate, structural heterogeneity, and technological defects on mechanical and thermal properties were studied in detail by Yue et al. [13,14,15,16]. The authors suggest the existence of non-Newtonian extensional thinning flow in a fibrous stream [12]. This can indirectly confirm the fact that many experiments have shown that the melt flow rate through nozzles for E-glass exceeds the theoretical one by several times [17,25]. This is because the Hagen–Poiseuille equation ignores the nonisothermal nature of the melt in nozzles. This effect should be greatly enhanced for continuous basalt fibers, which have a high crystallization capacity [11,20].
The assumption that the length of the nozzles were not sufficient to establish laminar flow are not supported by calculations. The effect of winding tension on increasing melt flow rate has not been confirmed practically [17,18]. Many authors have shown [17,19,26] that the melt flow rate during a drip flow is significantly less than that during winding. This can be explained by the fact that the downward-directed forces arising from the gob formation (Fw) reduce the surface forces () directed upwards. In this case, the smaller the diameter of the nozzle, the higher the value of these forces (Figure 4). Due to the significant difference between the speed of the glass melt near the edge of the flow and in its center, the melt temperature at these points can differ significantly. This leads not only to different values of melt viscosity, but also to different contents of crystalline inclusions.
The melt viscosity of the basalt, hydrostatic pressure, diameter and length of the nozzle, and winding speed are the most important parameters determining the diameter of basalt fiber being drawn out. For a stable melt flow rate (i.e., a constant amount of molten basalt to draw the fibers flowing out of the nozzle per unit of time), the fiber diameter will be determined by winding speed. This fact stems from the conditions of the process of drawing the fiber (i.e., the continuous drawing of the molten basalt from the nozzle into a filament of a given diameter). Thus, a change in the nozzle diameter with a given stabilized winding speed will lead to a change in the diameter of the fiber. Changes in the basalt melt viscosity during the formation lead to high crystallization ability, which significantly affects the strength of the fiber.
The effect of the nozzle diameter and the conditions of obtaining fiber on its strength were studied in this work. Fiber strength is affected by a very large number of factors, including structure anisotropy [15], high crystallization ability [20], chemical composition fluctuations [21], ambient temperature and quenching speed [23], axial stress [14], etc. Thus, it is very difficult to isolate the influence of one factor in any study of this issue.
The obtained results are in good agreement with the literature data on the effect of the diameter of basalt and glass fibers on their strength [1,3]. Figure 5 shows this dependence for all obtained fibers.
This dependence is described in many papers devoted to glass fibers [27] and basalt fibers [14]. Many authors place importance on the fact that the strength of the fibers reaches an asymptote at a certain diameter, due to the influence of axial stress. Considering the dependence of the optical birefringence on axial stress, authors decided that the structural anisotropy induced by the axial stress plays an important role in determining the tensile strength of the continuous fibers. It was found that an increase of the axial stress resulted in a linear increase of the degree of structural anisotropy. Thus, it can be inferred that increases of structural anisotropy enhance the tensile strength of glass fibers. However, unlike the anisotropy, tensile strength reaches a plateau or maximum above a certain axial stress value.
Surface defects (crystals, cracks, immiscibility) appear due to the high crystallization ability of the melt and the tension arising in the basalt melt under the action of the winding forces. The degree of influence of these parameters depends on the cooling rate of the basalt melt in the forming zone. Increasing the cooling rate while reducing the nozzle diameter slows down the process of phase separation and crystal growth, thereby reducing the formation of defects on the surface of the fibers and increasing their strength (Figure 6). However, an increase in the cooling rate of the melt entails an increase in tensions in the basalt melt, which leads to an increase in the damageability of the fibers during formation and a decrease in strength. Thus, the dependence of the strength of the fibers on the conditions of their production has a more complex correlation. As one would expect, the diameter of the fibers has a significant effect on the strength thereof. That is due to the nature of the strength of glass basalt fibers. In fact, the strength of the fiber is determined by the probability of finding a defect of critical size in the fiber surface. On the other hand, as the formation temperature of the fiber increases, the probability of crystal formation decreases. Due to the difficulty of experimental determination of the upper limit of the crystallization temperature range, every 10 °C becomes critical. Thus, we can observe that the effect of formation temperature is particularly important for the case of basalt fibers. The drawing speed in this case probably affected the strength of the fibers indirectly according to their diameters. However, one should always consider that a high quenching rate also allows for a more homogeneous structure, which directly affects the strength.
The results of this work could be useful not only for scientists, but also for technologists that choose the optimal conditions for technological processes.

5. Conclusions

To perform the work, a special crucible with four nozzles of different diameter (1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 mm) was designed and produced. Basalt continuous fibers were obtained with varying formation conditions. The conditions of the process varied in formation temperature (from 1370 to 1450 °C) and winding speed (from 300 to 1200 m/min). It was found that the melt flow rate was almost independent of the winding speed, which indicated the laminar flow of the melt through the nozzles. The melt flow rate correlated linearly with the biquadratic nozzle diameter. The diameter of the fibers had a significant effect on the strength thereof. The change in the nozzle diameter with a given stabilized winding speed led to a change in the diameter of the fiber. Changes in the basalt melt viscosity during the formation led to high crystallization ability, which significantly affected the strength of the fiber. The tensile strength of the obtained basalt fibers varied depending on the production conditions, from 550 to 3320 MPa.

Author Contributions

S.I.G. prepared and tested the specimens, performed the experiment and supported to test the specimens, B.I.L. analyzed the graphics, reviewed and supervisor the paper.

Funding

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project № 18-29-17068

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Dhand, V.; Mittal, G.; Rhee, K.Y.; Park, S.-J.; Hui, D. A short review on basalt fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2015, 73, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kuzmin, K.L.; Timoshkin, I.A.; Gutnikov, S.I.; Zhukovskaya, E.S.; Lipatov, Y.V.; Lazoryak, B.I. Effect of silane/nano-silica on the mechanical properties of basalt fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Interfaces 2017, 24, 13–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jang, K.S. Mechanics and rheology of basalt fiber-reinforced polycarbonate composites. Polymer (Guildf) 2018, 147, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Yu, C.; Chu, P.K.; Lv, F.; Zhang, C.; Ji, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, H. Mechanical and thermal properties of basalt fiber reinforced poly(butylene succinate) composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 133, 845–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lipatov, Y.V.; Gutnikov, S.I.; Manylov, M.S.; Lazoryak, B.I. Effect of ZrO2 on the alkali resistance and mechanical properties of basalt fibers. Inorg. Mater. 2012, 48, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Elgabbas, F.; Vincent, P.; Ahmed, E.A.; Benmokrane, B. Experimental testing of basalt-fiber-reinforced polymer bars in concrete beams. Compos. Part B Eng. 2016, 91, 205–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gutnikov, S.I.; Malakho, A.P.; Lazoryak, B.I.; Loginov, V.S. Influence of alumina on the properties of continuous basalt fibers. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 54, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.; Yang, J.; Chen, M.; Lei, L.; Wu, Z. Effect of SiO2, Al2O3 on heat resistance of basalt fiber. Thermochim. Acta 2018, 660, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kuzmin, K.L.; Gutnikov, S.I.; Zhukovskaya, E.S.; Lazoryak, B.I. Basaltic glass fibers with advanced mechanical properties. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2017, 476, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Karamanov, A.; Pelino, M. Crystallization phenomena in iron-rich glasses. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2001, 281, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Moiseev, E.A.; Gutnikov, S.I.; Malakho, A.P.; Lazoryak, B.I. Effect of iron oxides on the fabrication and properties of continuous glass fibers. Inorg. Mater. 2008, 44, 1026–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yue, Y.; Zheng, Q. Fiber spinnability of glass melts. Int. J. Appl. Glas. Sci. 2017, 8, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hornbøll, L.; Yue, Y. Enthalpy relaxation in hyperquenched glasses of different fragility. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2008, 354, 1862–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lund, M.D.; Yue, Y. Impact of drawing stress on the tensile strength of oxide glass fibers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 3236–3243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ya, M.; Deubener, J.; Yue, Y. Enthalpy and Anisotropy Relaxation of Glass Fibers. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 91, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Vulfson, Y.; Zheng, Q.; Luo, J.; Kim, S.H.; Yue, Y. Impact of fiberizing method on physical properties of glass wool fibers. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2017, 476, 122–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Khodakovskii, M.D.; Kutukov, S.S. The flow of glass from dies of various length. Glas. Ceram. 1966, 23, 536–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shkol’nikov, Y.A. Calculating the technological parameters for the production of glass fiber. Glas. Ceram. 1964, 21, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ivanitskii, S.G.; Gorbachev, G.F. Continuous basalt fibers: Production aspects and simulation of forming processes. II. Optimizing the fiber production technology through simulation of heat-exchange processes in bushing nozzles. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 2011, 50, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Manylov, M.S.; Gutnikov, S.I.; Pokholok, K.V.; Lazoryak, B.I.; Lipatov, Y.V. Crystallization mechanism of basalt glass fibers in air. Mendeleev Commun. 2013, 23, 361–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gutnikov, S.I.; Manylov, M.S.; Lipatov, Y.V.; Lazoryak, B.I.; Pokholok, K.V. Effect of the reduction treatment on the basalt continuous fiber crystallization properties. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 2013, 368, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stockhorst, H.; Brückner, R. Structure sensitive measurements on e-glass fibers. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 1982, 49, 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, J.S.; Lim, J.H.; Huh, Y. Melt-spinning basalt fibers based on dielectric heating and steady-state process characteristics. Fibers Polym. 2013, 14, 1148–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Persikov, E.S.; Bukhtiyarov, P.G.; Sokol, A.G. Viscosity of hydrous kimberlite and basaltic melts at high pressures. Russ. Geol. Geophys. 2017, 58, 1093–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tobol’skii, G.F. Yield of silicate melt from the die of a glass furnace and its effect on the fiber breakage. Glas. Ceram. 1966, 23, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khazanov, V.E.; Kolesov, Y.I.; Trofimov, N.N. Glass fibres. In Fibre Science and Technology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1995; pp. 15–230. [Google Scholar]
  27. Aslanova, M.S. The effect of different factors on the mechanical properties of glass fibers. Glas. Ceram. 1960, 17, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 3D model and drawing of the crucible made of a platinum–rhodium alloy. The drawing shows the geometric dimensions of the crucible. At the bottom of the crucible there were four nozzles of different diameters (1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 mm).
Figure 1. 3D model and drawing of the crucible made of a platinum–rhodium alloy. The drawing shows the geometric dimensions of the crucible. At the bottom of the crucible there were four nozzles of different diameters (1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 mm).
Fibers 07 00065 g001
Figure 2. (a) The melt flow rate dependence on winding speed; (b) The melt flow rate dependence on biquadratic nozzle diameter.
Figure 2. (a) The melt flow rate dependence on winding speed; (b) The melt flow rate dependence on biquadratic nozzle diameter.
Fibers 07 00065 g002
Figure 3. The dependence of the diameter of the obtained basalt continuous fibers on the winding speed and the formation temperature.
Figure 3. The dependence of the diameter of the obtained basalt continuous fibers on the winding speed and the formation temperature.
Fibers 07 00065 g003
Figure 4. Scheme of the distribution of flow velocity in the basalt melt through the nozzle and in the drawing cone. (Fw: winding forces, : surface tension forces).
Figure 4. Scheme of the distribution of flow velocity in the basalt melt through the nozzle and in the drawing cone. (Fw: winding forces, : surface tension forces).
Fibers 07 00065 g004
Figure 5. The dependence of basalt fiber tensile strength on their diameter.
Figure 5. The dependence of basalt fiber tensile strength on their diameter.
Fibers 07 00065 g005
Figure 6. The dependence of tensile strength of the obtained basalt continuous fibers on winding speed and formation temperature.
Figure 6. The dependence of tensile strength of the obtained basalt continuous fibers on winding speed and formation temperature.
Fibers 07 00065 g006
Table 1. Tensile strength of the fibers obtained under different process parameters using nozzle 1 (diameter 4.5 mm).
Table 1. Tensile strength of the fibers obtained under different process parameters using nozzle 1 (diameter 4.5 mm).
Winding Speed, m/minFormation Temperature, °CFiber Diameter, μmMelt Flow Rate, g/hTensile Strength, MPa
(±10 m/min)(±5 °C)(±0.5 μm)(±5%)(±5%)
300145041.666.1797
600145030.872.4867
900145023.864.81078
1200145021.268.61398
300141055.8118.8638
600141041.6132.1801
900141035.6145.11034
1200141028.8126.61242
300137068.1176.9550
600137051.2200.1607
900137039.7180.4755
1200137034.5181.6812
Table 2. Tensile strength of the fibers obtained under different process parameters using nozzle 2 (diameter 3.5 mm).
Table 2. Tensile strength of the fibers obtained under different process parameters using nozzle 2 (diameter 3.5 mm).
Winding Speed, m/minFormation Temperature, °CFiber Diameter, μmMelt Flow Rate, g/hTensile Strength, MPa
(±10 m/min)(±5 °C)(±0.5 μm)(±5%)(±5%)
300145024.122.21159
600145017.422.91392
900145013.219.91673
1200145012.222.81871
300141028.130.2900
600141020.732.81040
900141017.133.51324
1200141015.134.81679
300137038.155.41012
600137028.561.81186
900137023.865.11331
1200137020.161.61579
Table 3. Tensile strength of the fibers obtained under different process parameters using nozzle 3 (diameter 2.5 mm).
Table 3. Tensile strength of the fibers obtained under different process parameters using nozzle 3 (diameter 2.5 mm).
Winding Speed, m/minFormation Temperature, °CFiber Diameter, μmMelt Flow Rate, g/hTensile Strength, MPa
(±10 m/min)(±5 °C)(±0.5 μm)(±5%)(±5%)
30014509.53.41901
60014506.93.62024
90014505.93.92288
120014505.44.42567
300141012.86.31572
60014109.67.11855
90014107.97.12232
120014107.17.72498
300137018.212.61381
600137012.912.71888
900137010.312.12224
120013709.112.62323
Table 4. Tensile strength of the fibers obtained under different process parameters using nozzle 4 (diameter 1.5 mm).
Table 4. Tensile strength of the fibers obtained under different process parameters using nozzle 4 (diameter 1.5 mm).
Winding Speed, m/minFormation Temperature, °CFiber Diameter, μmMelt Flow Rate, g/hTensile Strength, MPa
(±10 m/min)(±5 °C)(±0.5 μm)(±5%)(±5%)
30014504.60.83128
60014503.50.93178
90014502.80.93234
120014502.50.93279
30014106.91.82817
60014105.22.12914
90014104.21.93200
120014103.51.93305
300137010.13.92585
60013707.44.22682
90013706.14.33219
120013705.24.13320

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gutnikov, S.I.; Lazoryak, B.I. Effect of Nozzle Diameter on Basalt Continuous Fiber Properties. Fibers 2019, 7, 65. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/fib7070065

AMA Style

Gutnikov SI, Lazoryak BI. Effect of Nozzle Diameter on Basalt Continuous Fiber Properties. Fibers. 2019; 7(7):65. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/fib7070065

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gutnikov, Sergey I., and Bogdan I. Lazoryak. 2019. "Effect of Nozzle Diameter on Basalt Continuous Fiber Properties" Fibers 7, no. 7: 65. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/fib7070065

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop