Next Article in Journal
Integrated Analysis of lncRNA and mRNA in Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue of Ningxiang Pig
Previous Article in Journal
Stochastic Simulations as a Tool for Assessing Signal Fidelity in Gene Expression in Synthetic Promoter Design
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 10
Issue 8
10.3390/biology10080725
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Quantitative Assessment of Choroidal Parameters in Patients with Various Types of Diabetic Macular Oedema: A Single-Centre Cross-Sectional Analysis

by
Diana Anna Dmuchowska
*,†,
Patryk Sidorczuk
*,†,
Barbara Pieklarz
,
Joanna Konopińska
,
Zofia Mariak
and
Iwona Obuchowska
Ophthalmology Department, Medical University of Bialystok, 24a M. Sklodowskiej-Curie, 15-276 Bialystok, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Diana Anna Dmuchowska and Patryk Sidorczuk contributed equally to this work.
Biology 2021, 10(8), 725; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biology10080725
Submission received: 8 July 2021 / Accepted: 26 July 2021 / Published: 29 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Human Anatomy and Pathophysiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Choroidopathy is one of the components in the pathogenesis of diabetic macular oedema (DME). This study investigated the optical coherence tomography-based choroidal parameters: thickness, volume, choroidal vascularity index (CVI), luminal area (LA), stromal area (SA), and total choroidal area (TCA) in relation to the presence and type of DME (cystoid, diffuse, and with subretinal fluid). Diabetic choroidopathy seems to play a role in the development of DME but is less likely involved in the pathogenesis of specific types thereof.

Abstract

Diabetic macular oedema (DME) is an outcome of multiple, complex and not fully understood mechanisms. The aim of this study was to define the role of choroidopathy in the pathogenesis of various DME types. The retrospective cross-sectional single-centre study included 140 eyes from 105 patients with DME and 76 eyes from 52 non-diabetic controls. The eyes were stratified according to the type of DME: cystoid, diffuse, and with subretinal fluid. Optical coherence tomography-based choroidal parameters: thickness, volume, choroidal vascularity index (CVI), luminal area (LA), stromal area (SA), and total choroidal area (TCA) were compared. Eyes with DME, regardless of the type thereof, had lower choroidal thickness, volume, and CVI values than the controls. Further, the eyes with some specific DME types differed significantly from the controls in terms of LA and SA. While the eyes with various DME types did not differ significantly in terms of their choroidal thickness, volume and CVI, some between-group differences were found in LA, SA and TCA. Diabetic choroidopathy seems to play a role in the development of DME but is less likely involved in the pathogenesis of specific types thereof.

1. Introduction

The retina is supplied with blood from two independent vascular beds. The inner retina is supplied by the central retinal artery. Choriocapillaris circulation provides the blood for the high-energy demanding outer retina, a region of utmost importance for visual acuity [1]. Diabetes mellitus affects negatively both vascular systems mentioned above [2,3]. Analogically to retinal abnormalities, diabetes may result in choroidal changes, such as microaneurysms, dilatation, and obstruction of the vessels, vascular remodelling with increased vascular tortuosity, vascular dropout, focal vascular non-perfusion, and choroidal vascularisation [4,5,6]. The histological findings are consistent with abnormalities observed on optical coherence tomography (OCT) [7,8]. Choroidopathy may trigger the development of retinopathy due to retinal tissue hypoxia and overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF); this contributes to further retinal damage and diabetic macular oedema (DME) [5]. However, the exact relationship between the choroidal abnormalities and the presence of DME, and especially the type thereof, remains unclear.
DME can occur at any stage of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Based on OCT findings, DME can be classified into three types: sponge-like retinal swelling, cystoid macular oedema, and serous retinal detachment [9]. Macular oedema is defined as an abnormal increase in the volume of intra- and extracellular fluid in the macula. It results from an imbalance between the fluid entry and exit, as well as from retinal hydraulic conductivity. Retinal homeostasis is necessary for tissue transparency and light transmission. DME is caused primarily by the breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier [10]. The inner blood–retinal barrier plays a pivotal role in the control of fluid entry into the retina. The barrier is formed by tight junctions between the endothelial cells of retinal vessels and regulated by a neuro-glio-vascular complex composed of pericytes, retinal glial Müller cells, astrocytes, and microglia [11,12]. The outer blood–retinal barrier is the intercellular junction complex of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) accompanied by the external limiting membrane (ELM) [13]. The breakdown of the inner and outer blood–retinal barrier may occur simultaneously, under the influence of various factors, receptors, and signalling pathways [10]. These molecular and cellular mechanisms affect not only the retinal and choroidal vessels and RPE but also neurons and glial cells [10]. Thus, DME may be triggered by three mechanisms: ischaemia, neurodegeneration, and oedema [14].
Available data on choroidal thickness in the course of diabetic retinopathy are contradictory, and further affected by the presence of DME [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Moreover, it should be remembered that choroidal thickness is a rough estimate rather than an accurate marker of choroidal status. Therefore, in this study, we not only determined the choroidal thickness and volume but also calculated the choroidal vascularity index (CVI). CVI is a novel OCT-based choroidal quantitative parameter providing more detailed information about the vascular constituent of the choroid across all its layers: choriocapillaris, Sattler’s layer, and Haller’s layer. CVI is defined as the ratio of the luminal area (LA) to the total choroidal area (TCA) [28,29]. It has been proposed as a marker for early diagnosis, progression monitoring, and stratification of patients with various retinal and choroidal diseases and systemic conditions, including those of vascular or inflammatory origin [28]. Choroidal thickness and consequently volume depend on various physiological and pathological factors, including age, ethnicity, sex, refraction, axial length, time of day, DME, DR severity, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), and systolic blood pressure [28,29,30,31,32]. On the contrary, CVI is modified only by subfoveal choroidal thickness and may depend on the patient’s age. Hence, CVI can be considered a relatively stable parameter to evaluate changes in the choroidal vasculature [33]. Unlike the relationship between choroidal thickness and DME, which has been the subject of many previous studies [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], only a few authors have analysed choroidal thickness depending on DME type [27,34,35] and even fewer have studied CVI in various DME types [34,35].
The aim of this study was to define the role of choroidopathy in the pathogenesis of various DME types. The OCT-based choroidal characteristics (choroidal thickness, choroidal volume, and other parameters) were analysed in relation to the presence of DME and type thereof. A better insight into the complex pathogenesis of DME may facilitate patient stratification in terms of the risk of occurrence, progression, or treatment response. Further, in the era of personalised medicine, each of the disease pathways should optimally be quantifiable to enable early and individualised treatment [36]. We believe that the results of this study might constitute a basis for novel treatment modalities.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

This retrospective single-centre cross-sectional study included 140 eyes from 105 patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent same-day fluorescein angiography and OCT at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Teaching Hospital of Bialystok (Poland) between 28 February 2017 and 20 February 2021. The patients’ eyes were stratified into three groups according to the DME type: (1) diffuse DME, (2) cystoid DME, and (3) DME with subretinal fluid [9]. The age-, sex- and spherical equivalent-matched control group comprised 76 eyes from 52 non-diabetic patients undergoing routine ophthalmological assessments.
The exclusion criteria included: tractional DME, a history of prior posterior segment surgery or intravitreal injections, macular laser photocoagulation, panretinal photocoagulation less than 3 months prior to the examination, ametropia ≥ 3.0 dioptres, other ocular diseases affecting macula, glaucoma, known ocular or systemic pathology potentially able to modulate choroidal vasculature, and insufficient quality of fluorescein angiograms or OCT images. The study protocol was previously described in detail by Sidorczuk et al. [37].
The protocol of the study was reviewed and approved by the Local Bioethics Committee at the Medical University of Bialystok (decision no. APK.002.216.2020) and conformed with the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki. On the day of the examination, written informed consent was provided by all patients involved in the study.

2.2. OCT Images Acquisition and Analysis

OCT images were taken in mydriasis between 8 a.m. and 11 a.m. to avoid diurnal variation in the choroidal thickness and volume. The images were independently assessed by two investigators (D.A.D. and P.S.) blinded to the clinical characteristics of examined eyes.
Spectral domain-OCT was carried out with a Spectralis HRA + OCT imaging device (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). As described in our previous publication [37], the protocol of OCT imaging comprised of 25 horizontal raster scans (20 × 20°) and a linear B-scan centred at the fovea, as shown in Figure 1.The values of choroidal parameters were obtained by subtracting retinal parameters from the sum of retinal and choroidal parameters. Averaged thickness and volume maps were created automatically according to the conventional Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (ETDRS) grid with nine subfields [38]. The fovea was checked and replotted manually whenever necessary.
Three types of DME were identified based on OCT findings (Figure 1), according to Otani et al. A sponge-like retinal swelling (diffuse oedema) was determined as the increased retinal thickness with reduced intraretinal reflectivity and expanded areas of lower reflectivity that were prominent in the outer retinal layers. Cystoid macular oedema was characterised by the presence of intraretinal cystoid spaces at the macular area that cause the fovea to protrude. Serous retinal detachment was seen as subretinal fluid accumulation with a distinct outer border of the detached retina [9]. Whenever an OCT image satisfied the criteria of both diffuse and cystoid oedema, the eye was classified according to the predominant type. Eyes with subretinal fluid were classified as such regardless of concomitant cystoid or diffuse macular oedema.
The major part of the choroid are vessels organised in three vascular layers. The choriocapillaris, a thin capillary network, is the innermost layer, the medium- and small-sized vessels form the intermediate Sattler’s layer, and the large vessels form the outermost Haller’s layer. The suprachoroid separates the latter layer from the sclera [10]. CVI reflects the vascularity of the choroid [28,39]. To calculate CVI, choroidal areas on OCT scans were binarised with a modified Niblack method, as described by Sonoda et al. [29,40]. Briefly, the entire horizontal scan (6 mm) across the fovea was assessed, with the BM as the upper margin and the choroidal-scleral junction as the lower margin. Binarisation and segmentation of the images were done with ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij (accessed on 6 April 2020), version 1.49). LA, stromal area (SA), and TCA were calculated, and the CVI was determined as the LA to TCA ratio.
The inter-grader reliability was measured by the absolute agreement model of the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). ICC value for choroidal thickness, volume, and CVI were greater than 0.8, which indicated good agreement. Since CVI is calculated from LA, SA, and TCA, ICC was not computed for the latter three parameters. With Bland–Altman plot analyses, the fixed and proportional biases were excluded.

2.3. Fluorescein Angiograms Acquisition and Analysis

Fluorescein angiography was performed with a Spectralis HRA + OCT imaging device (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany) according to the standard procedure. The images were used to assess the severity of DR according to the ETDRS criteria [38,41].

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with R software, version 3.5.1 (http://cran.r-project.org). Descriptive statistics included numbers (% of each group) for nominal variables and means ± standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables. The normality of the distribution was verified with the Shapiro–Wilk test, on the basis of skewness and kurtosis values, as well as based on visual inspection of histograms. Between-group comparisons were performed with the Fisher exact test for nominal variables and ANOVA for continuous variables. Univariate linear mixed-effects models were developed to compare the DME types (cystoid vs. diffuse vs. subretinal fluid vs. controls), with random effects for the correlation of two eyes from the same patient. A range of univariate models with choroidal parameters as independent variables and age, sex, PRP, and DR severity as covariates was created as well. All tests were two-tailed with α = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study patients are presented in Table 1. The study groups were age-, sex-, and spherical equivalent-matched and did not differ significantly in terms of DR severity or PRP distribution.

3.2. Choroidal Parameters in Eyes with Various Types of DME and Non-Diabetic Controls

Patients with DME differed significantly from controls in terms of choroidal thickness and volume and other choroidal parameters (Table 2 and Figure 2). Compared with controls, patients with DME, regardless of the type thereof, presented with thinner choroids and consequently lower choroidal volumes across all the ETDRS subfields. Moreover, the presence of DME was associated with lower CVI values, either due to a decrease in LA or due to an increase in SA.
Choroidal thickness and volume and other choroidal parameters, stratified according to the type of DME, are presented in Table S1. Univariate mixed-effect models without covariates comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME (cystoid/diffuse/subretinal fluid) with non-diabetic controls are shown in Table S2.

3.3. Choroidal Parameters According to the Type of DME

No significant differences in choroidal thickness, choroidal volume, or CVI were found when the results were stratified according to the DME type (Figure 2 and Tables S3–S5). However, the groups with various DME types differed (albeit not necessarily significantly) in terms of other choroidal parameters: LA, SA, and TCA (Table 3). The highest values of LA and TCA were found in the subretinal fluid group, followed by the diffuse and cystoid groups, respectively.

4. Discussion

The pathogenesis of DME is complex and multifactorial. In this study, we analysed one component of DME pathogenesis, namely the OCT-based choroidal characteristics, and their relationship with DME and its type.
Our present study confirmed that the type of DME does not correspond to DR severity. DME can develop at any stage of DR [10]. Some previous studies demonstrated that the presence of both DR and DME was associated with a decrease in choroidal thickness [16,17,20,21,22,23]. Our findings are consistent with these observations, as regardless of the DME type, the choroid across all ETDRS fields was thinner than in the controls. Consequently, DME was also associated with a decrease in choroidal volume. Gerendas et al. also found an evident association between DME and choroidal thinning. Similar to our present study, those researchers also observed choroidal thinning over the entire posterior pole [16]. However, some authors have reported an increase in choroidal thickness during DME [15,25,34,35,42], while others have found no significant association between the choroidal thickness and DME [18,24,26,43].
The discrepancies mentioned above might reflect a confounding effect of multiple systemic and ocular variables on choroidal thickness and volume; the list of such potential confounders includes anti-VEGF and steroid treatment and PRP, to mention but a few [5,28,31]. Importantly, our present study included solely the DME treatment-naïve patients, and the examined groups were age-, sex-, and spherical equivalent-matched. Furthermore, some potential confounding factors, namely age, sex, DR severity, and PRP, were considered covariates in the linear mixed-effects models.
Still, little is known about the association between choroidal parameters and the type of DME [27,34,35]. Our present study did not show significant differences in the choroidal thickness and volume in eyes with various DME types. However, choroid in the eyes with DME with subretinal fluid tended to be thicker than in those with cystoid and diffuse DME. In previous studies, DME with subretinal fluid was also shown to be associated with higher values of choroidal parameters [27,34,42]. However, the group of eyes with DME with subretinal fluid analysed in our present study was relatively small (13 eyes), and thus, the results should be interpreted with caution. Moreover, there are some ambiguities regarding the DME with subretinal fluid. According to Arf et al., serous macular detachment should be considered an accompanying morphological finding rather than a type of DME, as it was also found in the eyes with cystoid and diffuse DME [44]. In turn, Vujosevic et al. suggested that DME with and without subretinal fluid represent two distinct morphologic and functional entities [27]. Furthermore, there are some discrepancies regarding the association between subretinal fluid accumulation and DME duration and severity [27,44]. From the pathogenetic perspective, it is unclear in which proportion the accumulation of subretinal fluid results from its increased entry from the choroid and its insufficient removal by the RPE [45].
Choroidal thickness (and consequently volume) present wide inter-individual variability and are dependent on various confounding factors. In our study, patients with cystoid macular oedema and the controls were more numerous than diffuse and subretinal fluid groups, which could lead to greater variability.
CVI is defined as the ratio of LA to TCA, with the latter consisting of LA and SA. Our present study demonstrated alterations in the vascular and stromal component of the choroid in DME eyes. Our findings are consistent with the results of previous studies in which the CVI in diabetic eyes (even without DME) was lower than in the controls [34,46,47]. In our present study, the LA values in the cystoid DME group were lower than in the controls, whereas the eyes with diffuse DME and DME with subretinal fluid had higher SA values than the control eyes. The CVI values did not differ significantly according to the DME type, which is in line with the results reported by Gupta et al. [34] and Kase et al. [35]. While we found between-group differences in LA, SA, and TCA values for eyes with various DME types, none of them had a significant effect on CVI.
The choroidal volume showed a significant reduction in the majority of sectors of diabetic eyes in comparison to controls, whereas the TCA was not significantly different. We assume that this discrepancy might be due to the fact that TCA cannot be extrapolated on the whole ETDRS grid, as it is measured on a single scan passing through the fovea (in our study measured on a 6 mm scan). Choroid in healthy people has a bowl-shaped contour with a maximum thickness at the subfoveal level. S-shaped appearance, various contour alterations, or irregular contour have been reported in patients with DM (with DR/DME). The normally thickest subfoveal location is replaced extrafoveally in 80% of patients with DR, as reviewed in [32].
Decreased LA, similarly to decreased choroidal thickness and volume, can result from the obstruction of the choriocapillaris, vascular dropout, focal vascular non-perfusion, and reduction of the choroidal blood flow [4,5,6,7,8,48]. Doppler flowmetric studies demonstrated that the choroidal blood flow may decrease at the early stages of diabetic retinopathy and is further reduced in the presence of macular oedema [48]. According to Querques et al., the overall thinning of the choroid in diabetic eyes, with DME or without, may lead to tissue hypoxia. This may be reflected by an increase in VEGF synthesis and RPE dysfunction, with a resultant breakdown of the blood–retinal barrier and the development of DME [20,27]. According to Kase et al., a reason behind the SA increase may be the accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs). Finally, choroidal vascular permeability associated with hypoxia and VEGF overproduction may lead to protein leakage into the choroidal stroma [35].
In our present study, the eyes with DME differed significantly from non-diabetic controls in terms of choroidal parameters, but only slight differences in these parameters were found between the groups with various DME types. Thus, one may speculate that while choroidopathy and outer blood-retinal breakdown play a major role in DME development, these processes have little impact in the pathogenesis of specific types of DME Consequently, DME pathogenesis seems to be related to other mechanisms that may be more involved, such as the inner blood–retinal barrier breakdown, neurodegeneration, ischaemia, etc.
The eligibility criteria for this study constitute its strength. Among the analysed groups there was no difference in age, sex, or spherical equivalent. Only treatment-naïve patients were included. All measurements were taken at the same time of the day to avoid diurnal variations. Moreover, both the choroidal thickness and volume over a 6 mm diameter in the macula were evaluated to characterise the choroid. Singh et al. suggested that the choroidal volume assessment is advantageous due to the irregularities of the border between the choroidal and sclera [32]. To evaluate the choroid in more detail, we assessed its luminal and stromal components and calculated the CVI.
The study also has some potential limitations. Due to its retrospective design, the data on the type and duration of diabetes, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) levels were not available. However, as stated by Agrawal et al., CVI does not correlate with these parameters [28]. Choroidal thickness seems to decrease with the duration of DME [31] but might be independent of HbA1C levels [19]. Furthermore, we assessed a single foveal scan to determine CVI. This approach is consistent with findings that CVI is comparable across all the ETDRS subfields [32]. The CVI variation does not follow similar patterns as seen in choroidal thickness and volume in various locations [49]. However, it is unclear which choroidal layers were the source of changes in LA and SA. In future studies, improvements in CVI assessment and fully automated CVI algorithm integrated into the OCT device may facilitate standardisation of this informative parameter, as pointed out by Agrawal et al. [50]. Additionally, an automated and validated segmentation method dedicated to the segmentation of the choroidal layers would be a useful addition. Furthermore, the prospective longitudinal design of the study could facilitate a better understanding of the pathogenesis of DME.

5. Conclusions

Some choroidal parameters seem to be altered depending on the presence of DME and the type thereof. Choroidal thickness and volume and other choroidal parameters differed significantly between the eyes with DME and non-diabetic controls. However, the type of DME appeared to be less associated with the choroidal parameters, with some type-specific differences found solely for LA, SA, and TCA. Thus, while diabetic choroidopathy seems to play a role in the development of DME, it is less likely involved in the pathogenesis of specific types of DME. Other mechanisms may be more involved, such as the inner blood–retinal barrier breakdown, neurodegeneration, or ischemia.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/biology10080725/s1—Table S1: Choroidal parameters in study patients, stratified according to the type of DME, Table S2: Univariate mixed-effect models (without covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the presence of DME and type thereof (cystoid/diffuse/subretinal fluid vs. controls), Table S3: Univariate mixed-effect models (without covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME (cystoid vs. subretinal fluid, diffuse vs. subretinal fluid), Table S4: Univariate mixed-effect models (with covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME (cystoid vs. subretinal fluid, diffuse vs. subretinal fluid), Table S5. Univariate mixed-effect models (with covariates and without) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME (cystoid vs. diffuse).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A.D. and P.S.; methodology, D.A.D., P.S. and B.P.; software, P.S.; validation, B.P., J.K., I.O. and Z.M.; formal analysis, D.A.D. and P.S.; investigation, P.S. and D.A.D.; resources, Z.M.; data curation, P.S. and D.A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.D. and P.S.; writing—review and editing, B.P., J.K., I.O. and Z.M.; visualization, P.S.; supervision, D.A.D. and Z.M.; project administration, P.S. and D.A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. This study was performed as a part of the authors’ employment at the Medical University of Bialystok, Poland.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee at the Medical University of Bialystok (decision no. APK.002.216.2020 from 28 May 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. Names and exact data of the participants of the study may not be available because of the privacy policy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nickla, D.L.; Wallman, J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2010, 29, 144–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Krasnicki, P.; Dmuchowska, D.A.; Proniewska-Skretek, E.; Dobrzycki, S.; Mariak, Z. Ocular haemodynamics in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 98, 675–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dmuchowska, D.A.; Krasnicki, P.; Mariak, Z. Can optical coherence tomography replace fluorescein angiography in detection of ischemic diabetic maculopathy? Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2014, 252, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Lutty, G.A. Diabetic choroidopathy. Vis. Res. 2017, 139, 161–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Melancia, D.; Vicente, A.; Cunha, J.P.; Pinto, L.A.; Ferreira, J. Diabetic choroidopathy: A review of the current literature. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2016, 254, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sun, Z.; Yang, D.; Tang, Z.; Ng, D.S.; Cheung, C.Y. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: An updated review. Eye 2021, 35, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ferrara, D.; Waheed, N.K.; Duker, J.S. Investigating the choriocapillaris and choroidal vasculature with new optical coherence tomography technologies. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2016, 52, 130–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Murakami, T.; Uji, A.; Suzuma, K.; Dodo, Y.; Yoshitake, S.; Ghashut, R.; Yoza, R.; Fujimoto, M.; Yoshimura, N. In Vivo Choroidal Vascular Lesions in Diabetes on Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Otani, T.; Kishi, S.; Maruyama, Y. Patterns of diabetic macular edema with optical coherence tomography. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1999, 127, 688–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Daruich, A.; Matet, A.; Moulin, A.; Kowalczuk, L.; Nicolas, M.; Sellam, A.; Rothschild, P.-R.; Omri, S.; Gélizé, E.; Jonet, L.; et al. Mechanisms of macular edema: Beyond the surface. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2018, 63, 20–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sorrentino, F.S.; Allkabes, M.; Salsini, G.; Bonifazzi, C.; Perri, P. The importance of glial cells in the homeostasis of the retinal microenvironment and their pivotal role in the course of diabetic retinopathy. Life Sci. 2016, 162, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Klaassen, I.; Van Noorden, C.J.; Schlingemann, R.O. Molecular basis of the inner blood-retinal barrier and its breakdown in diabetic macular edema and other pathological conditions. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2013, 34, 19–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Omri, S.; Omri, B.; Savoldelli, M.; Jonet, L.; Thillaye-Goldenberg, B.; Thuret, G.; Gain, P.; Jeanny, J.C.; Crisanti, P.; Behar-Cohen, F.; et al. The outer limiting membrane (OLM) revisited: Clinical implications. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2010, 4, 183–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Marques, I.P.; Alves, D.; Santos, T.; Mendes, L.; Santos, A.R.; Lobo, C.; Durbin, M.; Cunha-Vaz, J. Multimodal Imaging of the Initial Stages of Diabetic Retinopathy: Different Disease Pathways in Different Patients. Diabetes 2019, 68, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Endo, H.; Kase, S.; Takahashi, M.; Yokoi, M.; Isozaki, C.; Katsuta, S.; Kase, M. Alteration of layer thickness in the choroid of diabetic patients. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2018, 46, 926–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gerendas, B.S.; Waldstein, S.M.; Simader, C.; Deak, G.; Hajnajeeb, B.; Zhang, L.; Bogunovic, H.; Abramoff, M.D.; Kundi, M.; Sonka, M.; et al. Three-dimensional automated choroidal volume assessment on standard spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and correlation with the level of diabetic macular edema. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 158, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Eliwa, T.F.; Hegazy, O.S.; Mahmoud, S.S.; Almaamon, T. Choroidal Thickness Change in Patients With Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2017, 48, 970–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Esmaeelpour, M.; Považay, B.; Hermann, B.; Hofer, B.; Kajic, V.; Hale, S.L.; North, R.V.; Drexler, W.; Sheen, N.J. Mapping choroidal and retinal thickness variation in type 2 diabetes using three-dimensional 1060-nm optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011, 52, 5311–5316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Esmaeelpour, M.; Považay, B.; Hermann, B.; Hofer, B.; Kajic, V.; Hale, S.L.; North, R.V.; Drexler, W.; Sheen, N.J. Choroidal thinning in diabetes type 1 detected by 3-dimensional 1060 nm optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 6803–6809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Querques, G.; Lattanzio, R.; Querques, L.; Del Turco, C.; Forte, R.; Pierro, L.; Souied, E.H.; Bandello, F. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography in type 2 diabetes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012, 53, 6017–6024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Regatieri, C.V.; Branchini, L.; Carmody, J.; Fujimoto, J.G.; Duker, J.S. Choroidal thickness in patients with diabetic retinopathy analyzed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 2012, 32, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Adhi, M.; Brewer, E.; Waheed, N.K.; Duker, J.S. Analysis of morphological features and vascular layers of choroid in diabetic retinopathy using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013, 131, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Unsal, E.; Eltutar, K.; Zirtiloğlu, S.; Dinçer, N.; Erkul, S.Ö.; Güngel, H. Choroidal thickness in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Clin. Ophthalmol. 2014, 8, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Rewbury, R.; Want, A.; Varughese, R.; Chong, V. Subfoveal choroidal thickness in patients with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Eye 2016, 30, 1568–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Okamoto, M.; Yamashita, M.; Ogata, N. Effects of intravitreal injection of ranibizumab on choroidal structure and blood flow in eyes with diabetic macular edema. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2018, 256, 885–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lee, D.H.; Kim, J.T.; Jung, D.W.; Joe, S.G.; Yoon, Y.H. The relationship between foveal ischemia and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography findings in ischemic diabetic macular edema. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 1080–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Vujosevic, S.; Torresin, T.; Berton, M.; Bini, S.; Convento, E.; Midena, E. Diabetic Macular Edema With and Without Subfoveal Neuroretinal Detachment: Two Different Morphologic and Functional Entities. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 181, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Agrawal, R.; Ding, J.; Sen, P.; Rousselot, A.; Chan, A.; Nivison-Smith, L.; Wei, X.; Mahajan, S.; Kim, R.; Mishra, C.; et al. Exploring choroidal angioarchitecture in health and disease using choroidal vascularity index. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2020, 77, 100829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sonoda, S.; Sakamoto, T.; Yamashita, T.; Uchino, E.; Kawano, H.; Yoshihara, N.; Terasaki, H.; Shirasawa, M.; Tomita, M.; Ishibashi, T. Luminal and stromal areas of choroid determined by binarization method of optical coherence tomographic images. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 159, 1123–1131.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Agrawal, R.; Salman, M.; Tan, K.A.; Karampelas, M.; Sim, D.A.; Keane, P.A.; Pavesio, C. Choroidal Vascularity Index (CVI)--A Novel Optical Coherence Tomography Parameter for Monitoring Patients with Panuveitis? PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Campos, A.; Campos, E.J.; Martins, J.; Ambrósio, A.F.; Silva, R. Viewing the choroid: Where we stand, challenges and contradictions in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular oedema. Acta. Ophthalmol. 2017, 95, 446–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Singh, S.R.; Vupparaboina, K.K.; Goud, A.; Dansingani, K.K.; Chhablani, J. Choroidal imaging biomarkers. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2019, 64, 312–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Iovino, C.; Pellegrini, M.; Bernabei, F.; Borrelli, E.; Sacconi, R.; Govetto, A.; Vagge, A.; Di Zazzo, A.; Forlini, M.; Finocchio, L.; et al. Choroidal Vascularity Index: An In-Depth Analysis of This Novel Optical Coherence Tomography Parameter. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Iovino, C.; Pellegrini, M.; Bernabei, F.; Borrelli, E.; Sacconi, R.; Govetto, A.; Vagge, A.; Di Zazzo, A.; Forlini, M.; Finocchio, L.; et al. Choroidal structural analysis in eyes with diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema-A novel OCT based imaging biomarker. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0207435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Kase, S.; Endo, H.; Takahashi, M.; Ito, Y.; Saito, M.; Yokoi, M.; Katsuta, S.; Sonoda, S.; Sakamoto, T.; Ishida, S.; et al. Alteration of choroidal vascular structure in diabetic macular edema. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 258, 971–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gardner, T.W.; Sundstrom, J.M. A proposal for early and personalized treatment of diabetic retinopathy based on clinical pathophysiology and molecular phenotyping. Vis. Res. 2017, 139, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sidorczuk, P.; Pieklarz, B.; Konopinska, J.; Saeed, E.; Mariak, Z.; Dmuchowska, D. Foveal avascular zone does not correspond to choroidal characteristics in patients with diabetic retinopathy: A single-center cross-sectional analysis. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. Targets Ther. 2021, 14, 2893–2903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs—An extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report number 10. Ophthalmology 1991, 98, 786–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agrawal, R.; Gupta, P.; Tan, K.A.; Cheung, C.M.; Wong, T.Y.; Cheng, C.Y. Choroidal vascularity index as a measure of vascular status of the choroid: Measurements in healthy eyes from a population-based study. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sonoda, S.; Sakamoto, T.; Yamashita, T.; Shirasawa, M.; Uchino, E.; Terasaki, H.; Tomita, M. Choroidal structure in normal eyes and after photodynamic therapy determined by binarization of optical coherence tomographic images. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014, 55, 3893–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy from Fluorescein Angiograms: ETDRS Report Number 11. Ophthalmology 1991, 98, 807–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kim, J.T.; Lee, D.H.; Joe, S.G.; Kim, J.G.; Yoon, Y.H. Changes in choroidal thickness in relation to the severity of retinopathy and macular edema in type 2 diabetic patients. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2013, 54, 3378–3384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Vujosevic, S.; Martini, F.; Cavarzeran, F.; Pilotto, E.; Midena, E. Macular and peripapillary choroidal thickness in diabetic patients. Retina 2012, 32, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Arf, S.; Muslubas, I.S.; Hocaoglu, M.; Ersoz, M.G.; Ozdemir, H.; Karacorlu, M. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography classification of diabetic macular edema: A new proposal to clinical practice. Graefe’s Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2020, 258, 1165–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Suciu, C.I.; Suciu, V.I.; Nicoara, S.D. Optical Coherence Tomography (Angiography) Biomarkers in the Assessment and Monitoring of Diabetic Macular Edema. J. Diabetes Res. 2020, 2020, 6655021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kase, S.; Endo, H.; Takahashi, M.; Saito, M.; Yokoi, M.; Ito, Y.; Katsuta, S.; Sonoda, S.; Sakamoto, T.; Ishida, S.; et al. Alteration of choroidal vascular structure in diabetic retinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020, 104, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kim, M.; Ha, M.J.; Choi, S.Y.; Park, Y.H. Choroidal vascularity index in type-2 diabetes analyzed by swept-source optical coherence tomography. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nagaoka, T.; Kitaya, N.; Sugawara, R.; Yokota, H.; Mori, F.; Hikichi, T.; Fujio, N.; Yoshida, A. Alteration of choroidal circulation in the foveal region in patients with type 2 diabetes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004, 88, 1060–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Goud, A.; Singh, S.R.; Sahoo, N.K.; Rasheed, M.A.; Vupparaboina, K.K.; Ankireddy, S.; Lupidi, M.; Chhablani, J. New Insights on Choroidal Vascularity: A Comprehensive Topographic Approach. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2019, 60, 3563–3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Agrawal, R.; Seen, S.; Vaishnavi, S.; Vupparaboina, K.K.; Goud, A.; Rasheed, M.A.; Chhablani, J. Choroidal Vascularity Index Using Swept-Source and Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography: A Comparative Study. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers Imaging Retin. 2019, 50, e26–e32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 10 00725 g001a 550Biology 10 00725 g001b 550
Figure 1. Representative OCT scans across the fovea representing measurements and types of diabetic macular oedema (DME): (a) control; (b) cystoid; (c) diffuse. DME with subretinal fluid was classified as such regardless of concomitant cystoid or diffuse oedema. In cases of mixed cystoid and diffuse oedema, the eye was classified according to the predominant type. As described previously [37], internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch’s membrane (BM) were detected automatically, while the choroidal-scleral junction (CSJ) was marked manually. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was defined as the distance between the BM and the CSJ at the fovea (green arrow). The SFCT was manually measured using the calliper tool and calculated as the difference between the foveal total thickness (FTRC, retinal + choroidal thickness, from the ILM to the CSJ; yellow arrow) and the central foveal thickness (CFT; red arrow). Analogically, the choroidal thickness outside the fovea (CT; green arrow) was calculated by subtracting the retinal thickness (RT; red arrow) from the total thickness (TRC, retinal + choroidal thickness, from the ILM to the CSJ, yellow arrow).
Figure 1. Representative OCT scans across the fovea representing measurements and types of diabetic macular oedema (DME): (a) control; (b) cystoid; (c) diffuse. DME with subretinal fluid was classified as such regardless of concomitant cystoid or diffuse oedema. In cases of mixed cystoid and diffuse oedema, the eye was classified according to the predominant type. As described previously [37], internal limiting membrane (ILM) and Bruch’s membrane (BM) were detected automatically, while the choroidal-scleral junction (CSJ) was marked manually. Subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) was defined as the distance between the BM and the CSJ at the fovea (green arrow). The SFCT was manually measured using the calliper tool and calculated as the difference between the foveal total thickness (FTRC, retinal + choroidal thickness, from the ILM to the CSJ; yellow arrow) and the central foveal thickness (CFT; red arrow). Analogically, the choroidal thickness outside the fovea (CT; green arrow) was calculated by subtracting the retinal thickness (RT; red arrow) from the total thickness (TRC, retinal + choroidal thickness, from the ILM to the CSJ, yellow arrow).
Biology 10 00725 g001aBiology 10 00725 g001b
Biology 10 00725 g002 550
Figure 2. Selected choroidal parameters in eyes with various types of DME and non-diabetic controls. Hollow dots indicate outlier observations (i.e., values exceeding 1.5 the interquartile range above the upper quartile and bellow the lower quartile); p-values from the univariate mixed-effect models (with covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME with non-diabetic controls; only p-values < 0.05 are marked; covariates included in each model: age in years, sex (male/female), DR (NPDR/PDR), PRP (no/yes). CVI = choroidal vascularity index.
Figure 2. Selected choroidal parameters in eyes with various types of DME and non-diabetic controls. Hollow dots indicate outlier observations (i.e., values exceeding 1.5 the interquartile range above the upper quartile and bellow the lower quartile); p-values from the univariate mixed-effect models (with covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME with non-diabetic controls; only p-values < 0.05 are marked; covariates included in each model: age in years, sex (male/female), DR (NPDR/PDR), PRP (no/yes). CVI = choroidal vascularity index.
Biology 10 00725 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study patients according to the type of DME.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study patients according to the type of DME.
OverallType of DMEControlsp
CystoidDiffuseSubretinal Fluid
Number of patients1576531952
Number of eyes21689381376
Age, years, mean ± SD58.98 ± 14.0161.17 ± 10.4160.28 ± 12.4452.60 ± 16.4655.73 ± 17.870.191
Sex, female, n (%)82 (52.2)32 (49.2)16 (51.6)6 (66.7)28 (53.8)0.790
Spherical equivalent, mean ± SD0.38 ± 1.160.24 ± 1.080.82 ± 1.05−0.06 ± 0.950.39 ± 1.280.198
DR severity, n (%)
NPDR87 (40.3)56 (62.9)21 (55.3)10 (76.9)-0.379
PDR53 (24.5)33 (37.1)17 (44.7)3 (23.1)-
PRP, n (%)
no167 (77.3)59 (66.3)22 (57.9)10 (76.9)-0.379
yes49 (22.7)30 (33.7)16 (42.1)3 (23.1)-
Between-group comparisons with Fisher exact test for nominal variables and ANOVA for continuous variables. DME = diabetic macular oedema; DR = diabetic retinopathy; NPDR = non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR = proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PRP = panretinal photocoagulation.
Table
Table 2. Univariate mixed-effect models (with covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME (cystoid/diffuse/subretinal fluid) with non-diabetic controls.
Table 2. Univariate mixed-effect models (with covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME (cystoid/diffuse/subretinal fluid) with non-diabetic controls.
CharacteristicCystoid vs. Controls (Baseline)Diffuse vs. Controls (Baseline)Subretinal Fluid vs. Controls (Baseline)
βSEpβSEpβSEp
Choroidal thickness (µm):
outerT−47.369.75<0.001−35.1511.400.002−31.4714.920.036
innerT−40.1010.77<0.001−32.9012.670.010−31.4716.650.060
central macular−35.7811.260.002−31.5213.130.017−33.8317.180.051
innerN−40.0712.160.001−38.4414.270.008−38.0318.640.043
outerN−39.0413.400.004−31.4815.390.042−20.4619.920.305
outerS−47.7410.86<0.001−38.0812.600.003−32.3216.410.051
innerS−42.8510.95<0.001−36.8912.770.004−26.3416.700.116
innerI−32.8611.380.004−21.8913.210.099−33.0717.230.056
outerI−30.0211.480.009−19.8113.280.138−14.7817.290.394
SFCT−33.1311.830.006−25.3114.000.072−28.0518.420.129
Choroidal volume (mm3):
outerT−0.250.05<0.001−0.190.060.002−0.170.080.038
innerT−0.070.02<0.001−0.050.020.011−0.050.030.059
central macular−0.030.010.002−0.030.010.015−0.030.010.054
innerN−0.050.020.009−0.0060.020.007−0.0050.030.074
outerN−0.220.070.002−0.170.080.033−0.100.100.329
outerS−0.260.06<0.001−0.210.060.001−0.180.080.039
innerS−0.070.02<0.001−0.060.020.001−0.040.030.136
innerI−0.050.020.004−0.030.020.105−0.050.030.056
outerI−0.170.060.007−0.110.070.105−0.100.090.247
total−1.160.30<0.001−0.890.340.008−0.760.430.079
Other choroidal parameters:
CVI−0.030.010.009−0.040.010.003−0.040.020.027
LA (mm2)−0.170.070.017−0.100.080.2270.040.110.703
SA (mm2)0.00010.040.9980.110.050.0340.170.070.011
TCA (mm2)−0.170.100.0990.0050.120.9650.210.160.176
β—coefficient from the regression model, SE—standard error, p < 0.05 highlighted with bold. n = 216 eyes (76 eyes in control group, 13 eyes with subretinal fluid, 89 eyes with cystoid macular oedema, and 38 eyes with diffuse macular oedema). Each row represents one model with a factorial response variable (diffuse, cystoid, subretinal fluid) with the control group as a baseline. Covariates included in each model: age in years, sex (male/female), DR (NPDR/PDR), PRP (no/yes). T = temporal; I = inferior; N = nasal; S = superior; SFCT = subfoveal choroidal thickness; CVI = choroidal vascularity index; LA = luminal area; SA = stromal area; TCA = total choroidal area; conventional ETDRS grid with nine subfields: central macular subfield (central field within a 500 µm radius), four inner subfields (within a 500–1500 µm radius), and four outer subfields (within a 1500–3000 µm radius) [38].
Table
Table 3. Univariate mixed-effect models (with covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME.
Table 3. Univariate mixed-effect models (with covariates) comparing the study groups identified based on the type of DME.
Choroidal ParametersCystoid vs. DiffuseCystoid vs. Subretinal FluidDiffuse vs. Subretinal Fluid
βSEpβSEpβSEp
CVI−0.0080.010.4560.010.020.5020.0020.020.920
LA (mm2)0.110.060.099−0.200.100.047−0.120.100.228
SA (mm2)0.120.040.008−0.170.070.011−0.070.070.352
TCA (mm2)0.210.090.021−0.400.150.011−0.200.150.192
β—coefficient from the regression model, SE—standard error, p < 0.05 highlighted with bold. n = 140 eyes (13 eyes with subretinal fluid, 89 eyes with cystoid macular oedema, and 38 eyes with diffuse macular oedema). Covariates included in each model: age in years, sex (male/female), DR (NPDR/PDR), PRP (no/yes). CVI = choroidal vascularity index; LA = luminal area; SA = stromal area; TCA = total choroidal area.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dmuchowska, D.A.; Sidorczuk, P.; Pieklarz, B.; Konopińska, J.; Mariak, Z.; Obuchowska, I. Quantitative Assessment of Choroidal Parameters in Patients with Various Types of Diabetic Macular Oedema: A Single-Centre Cross-Sectional Analysis. Biology 2021, 10, 725. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biology10080725

AMA Style

Dmuchowska DA, Sidorczuk P, Pieklarz B, Konopińska J, Mariak Z, Obuchowska I. Quantitative Assessment of Choroidal Parameters in Patients with Various Types of Diabetic Macular Oedema: A Single-Centre Cross-Sectional Analysis. Biology. 2021; 10(8):725. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biology10080725

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dmuchowska, Diana Anna, Patryk Sidorczuk, Barbara Pieklarz, Joanna Konopińska, Zofia Mariak, and Iwona Obuchowska. 2021. "Quantitative Assessment of Choroidal Parameters in Patients with Various Types of Diabetic Macular Oedema: A Single-Centre Cross-Sectional Analysis" Biology 10, no. 8: 725. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biology10080725

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop