Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Designing Feedback Systems: Examining a Feedback Approach to Facilitation in an Online Asynchronous Professional Development Course for High School Science Teachers
Previous Article in Journal
Hydrostructural Pedology, Culmination of the Systemic Approach of the Natural Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Expanding Opportunities for Systems Thinking, Conceptual Learning, and Participation through Embodied and Computational Modeling
Article

Building System Capacity with a Modeling-Based Inquiry Program for Elementary Students: A Case Study

1
Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19014, USA
2
Litzsinger Road Ecology Center, Missouri Botanical Gardens, Ladue, MO 63124, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 December 2020 / Revised: 18 January 2021 / Accepted: 21 January 2021 / Published: 26 January 2021
Science education in the United States should shift to incorporate innovative technologies and curricula that prepare students in the competencies needed for success in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) careers. Here we employ a qualitative case study analysis to investigate the system variables that supported or impeded one such reform effort aimed at improving elementary students’ science learning. We found that, while some program design features contributed to the success of the program (i.e., a strong multi-institutional partnership and a focus on teacher training and instructional supports), other features posed barriers to the long-term system-level change needed for reform (i.e., low levels of social capital activation, low prioritization of science learning, and frequent turnover of key personnel). In light of these findings, we discuss broader implications for building the capacity to overcome system barriers. In this way, an in-depth examination of the context-specific barriers to reform in this educational system can inform efforts for future reform and innovation design. View Full-Text
Keywords: data literacy; elementary education; agent-based simulations; StarLogo Nova; science curriculum; complex systems learning; usability cube; student engagement data literacy; elementary education; agent-based simulations; StarLogo Nova; science curriculum; complex systems learning; usability cube; student engagement
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Cottone, A.M.; Yoon, S.A.; Coulter, B.; Shim, J.; Carman, S. Building System Capacity with a Modeling-Based Inquiry Program for Elementary Students: A Case Study. Systems 2021, 9, 9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/systems9010009

AMA Style

Cottone AM, Yoon SA, Coulter B, Shim J, Carman S. Building System Capacity with a Modeling-Based Inquiry Program for Elementary Students: A Case Study. Systems. 2021; 9(1):9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/systems9010009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cottone, Amanda M., Susan A. Yoon, Bob Coulter, Jooeun Shim, and Stacey Carman. 2021. "Building System Capacity with a Modeling-Based Inquiry Program for Elementary Students: A Case Study" Systems 9, no. 1: 9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/systems9010009

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop