Next Article in Journal
Structural and Functional Comparison of Salmonella Flagellar Filaments Composed of FljB and FliC
Next Article in Special Issue
Lactoferrin’s Anti-Cancer Properties: Safety, Selectivity, and Wide Range of Action
Previous Article in Journal
Interaction between Sex and LDLR rs688 Polymorphism on Hyperlipidemia among Taiwan Biobank Adult Participants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Suppression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Progression through FOXM1 and EMT Inhibition via Hydroxygenkwanin-Induced miR-320a Expression
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells and Inhibits NF-κB Signaling

by Xing Zhen 1,†, Hack Sun Choi 2,†, Ji-Hyang Kim 1, Su-Lim Kim 1, Ren Liu 1, Bong-Sik Yun 3 and Dong-Sun Lee 1,2,4,5,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 8 January 2020 / Revised: 31 January 2020 / Accepted: 3 February 2020 / Published: 5 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomolecules and Cancer Prevention)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The data presented by Zhen et al. show that machilin D is a tumorsuppressive substance. By using MDA-MB-231 cells, the authors demonstrate that machilin D acts on cell growth, migration and on the cancer stem cell population. Mechanistically, machilin D suppresses NFkappaB activity and inhibits the production of IL-6 and IL-8. These data are convincing. However, the authors claim that the suppression of the NFkappaB activity is the reason for the loss of IL-6 and IL-8 synthesis, but don’t show this for their experimental system. This needs to be demonstrated, also because they state in the title “..NFkappaB-mediated reduction in interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 secretion”. Another weakness of their manuscript is that they used only one breast cancer cell line for their study. The MDA-MB-231 cell line is a frequently used cell line and certainly represents the triple-negative subtype, but it also belongs to a rare subgroup of the TNBCs. Hence, the author should at least show for 1 or 2 additional TNBC lines that machilin D suppresses cell growth and inhibits stem cell activity.

 

Further comments are given below

 

lanes 147/148: Why do the author claim that the viability test they are using determines proliferation at 10% FBS. The colorimetric assay measures viable cells, hence it measures growth, not proliferation. Please change accordingly, also in the figures.

 

Fig. 7: The specificity of the antibodies detecting the stem cell markers Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog should be shown by RNA interference or antibody-blocking peptides. How was the relative protein levels measured? How many Western blots were run for these measurements?

 

MDA-MB-231 cells use interleukin-6 to keep the activity of STAT3 high. Do the authors see reduced P-STAT3 levels in response to machilin D?

Author Response

I will submit reviewer 1 comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript entitled "Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells through NF-κB-mediated Reductions in Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 8 Secretion" by Xing Zhen, Hack Sun Choi, Ji-Hyang Kim, Su-Lim Kim, Ren Liu, Bong-Sik Yun, and Dong‐Sun Lee describes the effect of S. chinensis-derived machilin D on breast cancer stem cells. This study indicates machilin D as a possible therapeutic agent.

Major comments:

The title suggests the direct link between NF-κB and IL-6 and IL-8 inhibition by machilin D. Secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 may not be only NF-κB-dependent. Lines 69-70 indicate inhibition of BCSC via IL-6 and IL-8 regulation. These statements should be presented as assumptions. I would suggest changing the title (and for the title of chapter 3.6, lines 350-351, etc.) to avoid the phrase "NF-κB-mediated" throughout the manuscript. Figure 6 description: what are the control conditions for the experiments?

Minor comments:

Line 45: oestrogen ---> estrogen

Chapter 2.13: Please provide antibody manufacturer

Chapter 2.14: Please provide protein extraction method.

Line 304: NF-kB and p65 ---> NF-κB p65

Line 407: localization of the NF-κB protein --> localization of NF-κB p65

Overall, the manuscript needs certain modifications before it can be published.

 

 

Author Response

I will submit reviewer 2 comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Though the authors responded to my comment that the colorimetric method they used measured growth not proliferation by saying:

"We had a mistake and changed material methods and Figure 3 legend".

it still reads "proliferation", not "growth" in the figure, figure legend and the text. Please do the changes. Thanks.

Otherwise, the authors responded satisfactorily to the issues raised.

Author Response

Review 1 comments

Though the authors responded to my comment that the colorimetric method they used measured growth not proliferation by saying:

"We had a mistake and changed material methods and Figure 3 legend".

it still reads "proliferation", not "growth" in the figure, figure legend and the text. Please do the changes. Thanks.

Otherwise, the authors responded satisfactorily to the issues raised.

→The reviewer’s point was well taken.

We changed proliferation in the figure, figure legend and the text into growth.

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript entitled "Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells through NF-κB-mediated Reductions in Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 8 Secretion" by Xing Zhen, Hack Sun Choi, Ji-Hyang Kim, Su-Lim Kim, Ren Liu, Bong-Sik Yun, and Dong‐Sun Lee describes the effect of S. chinensis-derived machilin D on breast cancer stem cells. This study indicates machilin D as a possible therapeutic agent.

Minor comments:

The current title: "Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells through Reductions in Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 8 Secretion" should be modified. Although the original title: Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells through NF-κB-mediated Reductions in Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 8 Secretion" has been changed, it still needs modification to avoid the conclusions that machilin D acts through IL-6 and IL-8. I suggest changing the title to: "Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells and inhibits NF-κB signaling". Line 308: NF-kB ---> NF-κB Line 316: please rewrite the sentence (wrong tenses?) Line 323: analyses ---> analyse Line 354: showed ---> suggested?

Overall, the manuscript needs few modifications before it can be published.

Author Response

Review 2.

The manuscript entitled "Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells through NF-κB-mediated Reductions in Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 8 Secretion" by Xing Zhen, Hack Sun Choi, Ji-Hyang Kim, Su-Lim Kim, Ren Liu, Bong-Sik Yun, and Dong‐Sun Lee describes the effect of S. chinensis-derived machilin D on breast cancer stem cells. This study indicates machilin D as a possible therapeutic agent.

 

Minor comments:

The current title: "Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells through Reductions in Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 8 Secretion" should be modified. Although the original title: Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells through NF-κB-mediated Reductions in Interleukin 6 and Interleukin 8 Secretion" has been changed, it still needs modification to avoid the conclusions that machilin D acts through IL-6 and IL-8.

I suggest changing the title to: "Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells and inhibits NF-κB signaling".

→The reviewer’s point was well taken.

We changed the title to: "Machilin D, a Lignin Derived from Saururus chinensis, Suppresses Breast Cancer Stem Cells and Inhibits NF-κB Signaling".

 

Line 308: NF-kB ---> NF-κB

→ we changed “NF-kB” into “NF-κB”.

 

Line 316: please rewrite the sentence (wrong tenses?)

→ We added new sentences at Line 316 as followed,

To determine the cellular mechanism of machilin D, we have analyzed the localization of NF-κB p65 and secretion of IL-6 and IL-8 of the mammospheres treated with machilin D

 

Line 323: analyses ---> analyse

→ We changed “analyses” into “analyse”.

.

Line 354: showed ---> suggested?

→We changed “showed” into “suggested”.

 

Overall, the manuscript needs few modifications before it can be published.

→The reviewer’s point was well taken. We changed the manuscript.

 

Back to TopTop