Next Article in Journal
Three-Dimensional Inundation Mapping Using UAV Image Segmentation and Digital Surface Model
Next Article in Special Issue
The Cyberdivisions Produced by the Design of VGI under the Platform Economy: The Case of the Restaurant Sector in TripAdvisor
Previous Article in Journal
The Extended Concept of the Map in View of Modern Geoinformation Products
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Evaluation of Street Dynamic Vitality and Its Influential Factors Based on Multi-Source Big Data

1
School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710119, China
2
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Tourism Informatics, Xi’an 710119, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10(3), 143; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi10030143
Submission received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 23 February 2021 / Accepted: 1 March 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mapping, Modeling and Prediction with VGI)

Abstract

:
Urban vitality is an important indicator of urban development capacity. Streets’ metrics can depict intro-urban fabrics and physiognomy in detail, and thus street vitality affected by street metrics is a concrete manifestation of urban vitality. However, few studies have evaluated dynamic vitality or explored how it is influenced by land use. To bridge this gap, we fully evaluated street dynamic vitality and explored how to enhance the street dynamic vitality by changing the distribution and combination of land use. Specifically, we examined the street dynamic vitality and land use diversity in the main urban zone of Xining city in China using mobile communication and point of interest data, adopted optimized K-means clustering to identify street dynamic vitality types, evaluated the classification result based on vitality intensity and vitality stability, and explored the link between land use and dynamic vitality. Since vitality intensity limitations were found in describing street dynamic vitality, it was necessary to introduce vitality stability. We also found a positive correlation between the vitality intensity and land use density, there were outstanding traffic facilities in high-intensity vitality streets, and improving the abundance and uniformity of land use was beneficial to increase vitality stability. Overall, describing street vitality from a dynamic perspective can improve resource utilization efficiency and rationally plan layouts.

1. Introduction

The world has ushered in the “urban era” where the proportion of urban population rising sharply to now exceed that of the rural population [1]. Joseph E. Stiglitz, the Nobel Laureate in Economics, stated that: “The high-tech development in the United States and China’s urbanization will be two key factors affecting the process of human society development in the 21st century.” The scale of Chinese urbanization is large, and its impact is far-reaching. Guided by people-oriented and harmonious living concepts, Chinese urbanization has transformed from scale development to connotative growth [2]. Urban vitality plays an important role in meeting people’s demands for high-quality living, and promoting urbanization connotative development [3]. Jacobs first proposed “urban vitality” as the intensity of human activity in city space, which is characterized by people conducting abundant activities and the urban space providing a favorable environment for activities [4]. As the basic unit of public and living spaces [5], street metrics—including geometry, neighboring block connectivity, and vegetation—have proved effective in discriminating urban typologies in intro-urban structures and morphologies [6,7]. Hence, street characteristics are the microscopic embodiment of urban fabrics and physiognomy, and street vitality affected by street properties is a concrete manifestation of urban vitality. Meanwhile, street vitality is a manifestation of social vitality in urban vitality which is composed of economic vitality, social vitality, and cultural vitality [8]. According to the concept of urban vitality, street vitality is the concentration of people and activities in street space. However, in recent years, the functions of urban streets have changed. Specifically, the increase in trafficability, decrease in sociality, and imbalance in people flow have led to a weakening of people’s willingness to play activities. Therefore, the exploration of street vitality and its changes demands attention in the field of urban research.
Traditional quantitative studies generally obtain research data through questionnaires, field surveys, on-site interviews, and photography to evaluate vitality through comparisons, semantic analysis, and expert scoring [9,10,11]. However, traditional data are so static that quantitative studies cannot shed light on continuous spatio-temporal behavior. By measuring the average activity density and evaluating only vitality intensity, static vitality is affected by extreme values, which reduces the accuracy of vitality area recognition and confuses vitality areas with similar overall vitality but different patterns of change. Further, the static vitality overestimates or underestimates the vitality value in a certain period. This leads to incorrect urban planning decisions that result in redundancy and the insufficient allocation of public resources.
Volunteered geographic big data overcome the shortcomings of static vitality and show a strong potential for new exploration of a city by providing huge and successive spatio–temporal datasets [12]. Accordingly, the volunteered geographic datasets are increasingly applied to research on human movement patterns [13,14,15] and human–space interaction characteristics [16,17]. The new data environment has proven beneficial in characterizing urban or street vitality. For example, mobile phone data, characterized by wide spatial coverage, real-time data collection, and continuous user tracking, have become an ideal data source for studying urban vitality at the micro-level [18,19,20,21]. The number or density of specific facilities obtained by point of interest (POI) data is also used to quantify urban vitality [22]. Moreover, social network check-in data can display real-time urban vitality maps through kernel density analysis [23]. Benefiting from the low deviation of location-based service data, the real intensity of activities can be expressed to quantify the vitality [24]. Similarly, continuous and most recognizable Baidu heat maps can be applied to calculate the population [25]. Although most of the extant studies have adopted dynamic datasets, the vitality fell into static vitality due to the static measurement method of vitality and the inclination toward vitality spatial distribution and the factors of vitality spatial differentiation.
Based on the necessity of settling various defects in static vitality and the feasibility provided by the application of volunteered geographic big data, dynamic vitality came into being. Dynamic vitality helps explain the overall vitality intensity while recognizing the characteristics of vitality changes over time and thus provides the possibility to describe street vitality comprehensively. We believe that street vitality originates from continuous activities. Thus, we take a temporal series of activity density as a representation of street dynamic vitality and consider the street dynamic vitality as an ability to attract people and activities while maintaining the attraction at all times. Wu et al. [26] proposed the concept of “temporal vitality” by exploring the spatio–temporal distribution of vitality and influential factors based on social media check-in data in Shenzhen. By utilizing the temporal and spatial information contained in volunteered geographic big data, research on street vitality has started to focus on the temporal and spatial distribution of street vitality [27,28]. By contrast, few have evaluated temporal dynamic vitality through a comprehensive index system.
Within the literature, streets with a short length, high pedestrian density, high functional mixing, diverse building ages, and high connectivity represent vibrance [29], and street size, open spaces, building density, and compact structures affect street vitality [30]. The literature has comprehensively discussed multiple factors affecting street vitality, including the physical environment [31,32,33,34], employment rates [35], accessibility, and connectivity [36]. However, research on the impacts of specific land use indicators on dynamic vitality is limited.
More studies have examined urban vitality over street vitality, and although the spatial vitality methods are rather developed, the research on temporal vitality, its evaluation index, and the factors that impact its changing patterns is also rare. Thus, based on the connotation of dynamic vitality, we took streets as the research object, used subscribers’ spatio–temporal movement information—provided by mobile communication data—to quantify dynamic vitality, introduced the indicator “vitality stability” and evaluated street dynamic vitality together with “vitality intensity”. We also analyzed the internal mechanism that affects street dynamic vitality in detail from a land use perspective using POI data.
The purpose of this research is to deepen the understanding of street vitality by evaluating dynamic vitality and to address the shortcomings of previous studies focusing on static vitality. Further, examining street dynamic vitality is beneficial to grasp the characteristics of urban structure and physiognomy and provides scientific guidance for urban planning and layout design.

2. Study Area and Dataset

2.1. Study Area

Our study area was the main urban area of Xining city, Qinghai Province, China (Figure 1). Located on the eastern edge of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, Xining city is the only modernized central city in the region with a population of over one million [37]. As the capital, Xining city plays an important role in leading and promoting the economic development of Qinghai Province and the regional development of the Hehuang Basin [38]. The main urban area is in the Xining Basin in the upper reaches of the Huangshui River. This river runs through Xining city from west to east and its tributaries—the Beichuan River and Nanchuan River—run through the north and south of Xining city. The main urban area is 26 km long from north to south and 32 km wide from east to west. It includes Chengzhong, Chengbei, Chengdong, and Chengnan Districts and has a total area of 346 km2. At the end of 2017, the population of the main urban area was 1.3084 million, and 0.071% of the land area held 21% of the population of Qinghai Province.

2.2. Dataset

We used the four datasets below to measure street dynamic vitality and the land use indices:
  • The road network data. We obtained Xining city’s road network data from the Open Street Map (OSM) website in 2018. The OSM data on major Chinese cities have a short renewal cycle and relatively high quality. Previous studies have used these data to measure the built environment [22] and represent urban forms and functions [39]. As there were too many details in the original road network data, we screened out the main roads from the messy road network (see Figure 2a) and took a buffer zone of 55 m on the both sides of the center as the street range [33].
  • The mobile communication dataset. We obtained 258,814,289 communication records covering 24 hours a day from 566,163 mobile phone users in the main urban area. These were anonymized and were collected by one mobile phone operator in Xining city from 1 August 2018 to 6 August 2018. We only exploited the number of subscribers and did not include sensitive information. We extracted 4527 base stations in the area and illustrated their distribution in Figure 2b. The data contained when and where the users’ mobile communication behavior occurred. We used the location of the base stations to approximately represent users’ locations and to study street dynamic vitality.
  • The urban spatial data. The Baidu Map [40] provides accurate and comprehensive urban spatial data for urban planning research [31], and we used the data to extract building names, spatial coordinates, floor space, height, basic outlines, and other information (see Figure 2c).
  • The POI dataset. Since they are characterized by easy access, flexibility, and fine statistical granularity, the POI data reflect mixed land use and land development intensity better than traditional land use data. In recent years, POI data have mainly been used to measure the built environment [41]. We obtained POI data for cities in 2018 based on the AutoNavi Open Platform [42], the largest map navigation service provider in China, and selected 52,267 POIs at the street level (see Figure 2d). We grouped the POI data into 12 categories based on the POI category comparison table that was officially released on the AutoNavi Open Platform as well as urban land classification and construction land planning standards (GB50137-2011) [43]. The specific integration method was centered on the primary classification of the POI category comparison table, and the categories that were not included in the tertiary classification of the GB50137-2011 were merged with the corresponding categories. Table A1 in Appendix A shows the classification result of POIs in the main urban area.

3. Methodology

3.1. Street Dynamic Vitality

We used the population density at each time period to represent street dynamic vitality. The urban spatial data reflected the three-dimensional space where vitality occurred, the Thiessen polygon approximately represented the service range of the base stations, and the mobile phone communication data at different time periods quantified street dynamic vitality.
The built environment affects the subjective feelings and activities of crowds [24]. The three-dimensional space enclosed by a road intersection is a complete space through which the elements within the built environment affect people’s feelings and the integrity of their activities. Therefore, using the processed road network data, we considered the space enclosed by two road intersections as a street (streets with a length less than 200 m were not divided by intersections). Finally, we obtained 652 streets in the main urban area of Xining city.
The time units of the mobile communication data were accurate to the second, and the spatial sampling accuracy of the mobile communication was about 160 m in our study. Table 1 presents the information of the acquired mobile communication data.
Data pre-processing involved deleting data with missing timestamps, removing personal trajectory information outside the scope of this research area, and eliminating the ping-pong phenomenon in neighboring base stations. It also included dividing the data into 12 periods at two-hour intervals and counting the population served by the base station by these 12 groups.
We allocated the population on the street equally following the spatial area in the Thiessen polygon [44]. As shown in Formula (1), the spatial area refers to the sum of the block area and building area, excluding the ground floor of the building. The population in the smallest unit of the street is determined by the ratio of the spatial area of the unit to the total spatial area of the Thiessen polygon, and formula (2) is proposed. (The smallest unit of the street is the smallest irregular spatial unit formed by the intersection of the street and Thiessen polygon). Hence, street vitality can be expressed as population density per spatial area, so the vitality value at each time period is shown in Formula (3).
S k = S d + S j f 1 ,
X i = Q × S i k / S b k ,
Formula (1) calculates the spatial area ( S k is the dependent variable), where S d represents the block area, S j is the building area, and f is the number of building floors. Formula (2) measures the smallest unit’s allocated population ( X i where Q is the number of users served by the base station connected to the smallest unit, S i k is smallest unit’s total spatial area, and S b k is the Thiessen polygon’s spatial area corresponding to the smallest unit.
V = X / S ,
Formula (3) measures the value of the street’s vitality (V), where X represents the number of subscribers on the street and S reflects the street’s total spatial area.

3.2. K-means Clustering

Regular spatio–temporal patterns of crowd activity determine the continuity and dynamics of street vitality [26]. We focused on the changing patterns of street vitality and used the K-means clustering method to cluster streets with similar patterns of vitality. We used a distance-based non-hierarchical clustering algorithm that took the error function as a reference and divided the data into K sets, where distance measured the similarity of the time series datasets. The closer the distance between two objects, the greater is the similarity [45].
First, we selected K objects as the clustering center. Second, we calculated the distance of other sample objects from the K clustering center, and then divided the objects into the nearest clustering center to form K clusters. Third, we recalculated the mass center of each cluster. Lastly, we repeated steps two and three until the mass position center no longer changed or until we reached the set number of iterations. Formula (4) calculates the distance between two objects:
D i s t X , Y = j = 1 n X j Y j 2 ,
where X and Y represent the objects, and j represents the dimension of the calculated object.
To optimize this method, the data need to be pre-processed with Z-score stand-ardization to improve the clustering accuracy and the convergence speed of the min-imum error function. The elbow rule determined the value of “K”, and the inflection point position was the optimal classification number “K”. To ensure the stability of the final results and the maximum difference between the cluster classes, we used the maximum distance method to select the initial clusters.

3.3. Index System

  • Street Dynamic Vitality Evaluation Index
Formula (5) shows an effective index to measure overall vitality intensity [27]; however, it cannot describe fluctuation characteristics of vitality. We therefore defined vitality stability as the ability of activities to maintain stability over time, and its quantitative method is shown in Formula (6). We adopted vitality intensity and vitality stability to construct an index system for comprehensively evaluating street dynamic vitality.
I T S = i = 1 n V i n
S T B = I T S i = 1 n V i I T S 2 / n 1 1 2 ,
where V i is the vitality value in each time period calculated using the same calculation as V in Formula (3), and n is the number of periods.
  • Land Use Index
The diversity of street functions plays an important role in ensuring street vitality [4] (p. 150), and the diversity of land use determines the diversity of street functions to some extent. The term “diversity” was originally used to describe species diversity in ecology and was later used to describe land use diversity [46]. We employed a series of indicators that measured species diversity to construct a land use diversity evaluation index that includes density, richness, the Simpson index [47], and the main land use types. Density reflects the intensity of land development, where size depends on the number of POIs (Formula (7)); richness directly represents the number of land use types (Formula (8)); the Simpson index as a reference of uniformity for land use distribution (Formula (9)) [41]. And we define the main land use types as those with high proportions and important functions, and the selection method is shown in Formula (10).
D e n = N / S ,
R i c = m 1 / ln N ,
S i m = 1 i = 1 m P i 2 ,
M a i n = t y p e a b s s u m _ t o p i P 1 , P 2 , , P i , , P n α ,
where N represents the number of POIs, S is a street’s spatial area, m represents the total number of land use types, Pi is the proportion of each land use type, the s u m _ t o p i ( ) function calculates the cumulative percentage, α is the cumulative percentage threshold, the a b s ( ) function selects the value that meets the requirements, and the t y p e ( ) function identifies the object corresponding to the value.

3.4. Methodology Framework

The activities change dynamically over time and occur in three-dimensional space. We chose the spatio–temporal dataset of the human movement provided by the mobile communication data and the floor information obtained by urban spatial data to measure street dynamic vitality. Then, we adopted the optimized K-means to classify the street vitality types according to the similarity of their dynamic vitality and evaluated the classification results by the dynamic vitality evaluation system formed by the vitality intensity and vitality stability. Finally, using POI data, we constructed a land use index system constituted by the density, richness, and Simpson index of land use, as well as the main land use types in preparation for discussing the impact of land use on street dynamic vitality types (Figure 3).

4. Results

4.1. Characteristics of Street Temporal and Spatial Vitality

Figure 4 shows that the variation in street vitality is in line with the rhythm of human daily lives. The vitality value decreases significantly during sleep times, and rises sharply during the morning rush hour. It peaks around noon and dip in the afternoon. When the evening rush hours or having entertainment at night, the vitality value rises and approaches the peak. Around 24:00, people stop outdoor activities, and street vitality decreases. Spatially, there are different distribution characteristics of the streets with high-value vitality in four districts of the main urban area. The high-value vitality streets are mainly concentrated in the shopping malls and commercial pedestrian areas in the Chengxi District, Beichuan River in the Chengbei District, parks and squares, shopping malls and Nanchuan River in the Chengzhong District, and shopping malls and schools in the Chengdong District. Therefore, a good consumption environment is conducive to the formation of street vitality in the main urban area.
Figure 5 indicates that from 0:00 to 6:00, the street vitality value in the city center is generally lower on weekdays than that on weekends. Except for the streets near the industrial parks in the Chengbei District and Chengdong District, the street vitality values in the peripheral area of the main urban area are almost the same as those on weekends. From 6:00 to 8:00, owing to the morning rush hour, the street vitality on weekdays is generally higher than that on weekends. During working hours, there are two-thirds of the streets with higher vitality on weekdays than on weekends, half of which with much higher vitality on weekdays than on weekends. After 18:00, the street vitality values on weekends generally exceed those on weekdays, which points to the fact that the street vitality at night mainly comes from the activities on weekends.

4.2. Street Vitality Types

For the street vitality types, classified by K-means clustering, we used the elbow rule to determine the optimal number of street types. Figure 6 indicates that the street vitality types on weekdays and weekends are divided into four categories.
As seen in Table 2 where the evaluation index was calculated by Formulas (5) and (6), we define the street vitality types whose vitality intensity is higher than the average value of vitality intensity as high-intensity, and those below the average value as low-intensity. In the same vein, the classification of high-stability and low-stability depends on the average value of vitality stability. Following the above division rule, these categories were high-stability and high-intensity vitality streets (HSHI), high-stability and low-intensity vitality streets (HSLI), low-stability and high-intensity vitality streets (LSHI), and low-stability and low-intensity vitality streets (LSLI). The vitality stability of streets with similar vitality intensity was quite different. On weekdays, streets with stable vitality changes account for 79.8% of high-intensity vitality streets, while 20.2% of street vitality changes drastically. Further, 35.6% of low-intensity vitality streets’ vitality changes slightly, and the remaining streets’ vitality changes drastically. During weekends, streets with similar vitality intensity also show significant differences in stability. Thus, it is necessary to combine vitality intensity and stability to describe street dynamic vitality.

4.3. Temporal and Spatial Characteristics of Street Vitality Types

As shown in Figure 7, the streets with high-intensity vitality occupy the prosperous areas in the city center, the vitality intensity decreases from the city center to the periphery, and the high and low vitality stability distribution are nested. HSHI and LSHI are distributed around the city center, where activity is dense at all times, and the HSHI is dominant. LSLI is widely distributed in the fringe area, and HSLI is concentrated around the Huangshui and Nanchuan Rivers.
Figure 8 indicates that most street vitality types do not change from weekdays to weekends. Of the 30 streets with varying vitality types, including from HSLI to LSLI, they are mainly distributed in residential areas, where people’s activities are irregular on weekends. The vitality stability of streets from LSLI to HSLI and LSHI to HSHI are improved, and these appear near the prosperous traffic arteries. For the streets from HSLI to HSHI and HSHI to HSLI, the vitality intensity changes significantly. Among these, there are prominent ornamental and entertainment facilities, and because of the significantly lower number of visitors on weekends, the vitality intensity of many schools and hospitals reduces during these time.
Figure 9 shows that LSHI’s peak first appears around 12:00, that the second peak emerges later on weekends than on weekdays. The daytime and night-time vitality values of LSHI streets are higher than those of the other types; yet, the vitality fluctuation is large and stability is poor over a day. The vitality intensity of HSHI is slightly lower than that of LSHI; its vitality peak is not evident and the temporal distribution of the crowd is relatively even. HSLI and LSLI show lower vitality values, as they are far less likely to attract crowds than the first two types of streets, especially LSLI’s extremely poor vitality status (its highest vitality intensity value is less than 50 people per hectare). Figure 10 compares the evaluation indicators of street vitality types on weekdays and weekends. From weekdays to weekends, the vitality intensity changes less perceptively, but the vitality stability changes significantly. Moreover, the stability of street vitality types is higher on weekends than on weekdays, which indirectly reflects that vitality performance is more reasonable on weekends than on weekdays, which effectively reduces street pressure.

4.4. Influential Factors of Street Vitality Types

We used the POI indicators to analyze the influencing factors of land use on street dynamic vitality. Table 3 shows the results of Xining City’s land use indicators introduced in Section 3.3. As five streets had missing POI data, we calculated the average values of their vitality type indicator. Figure 11 shows the land use composition of the street vitality types in Xining city’s main urban area.
Table 3 shows the land use indicators of different vitality types of streets in the main urban area of Xining city. The density calculated by the number of POIs reflects the intensity of land development, the richness measures the diversity of street function, and the Simpson index describes the uniformity of the street function distribution. The main land use types are the key to attracting vitality and dominate the street functions. Combining Table 2 and Table 3, we can see that POI density is positively correlated with the vitality intensity of the street vitality types: the POI density of the high-vitality streets is higher than that of the low-vitality streets. In short, the intensity of land development positively affects street vitality intensity. Vitality stability is positively correlated with POI richness and the Simpson index. The richness and Simpson index of the high-stability streets are higher than those of the low-stability streets. Thus, the richer and more uniform the land use, the more it can meet the activity needs of different groups of people at different times, and the higher is the sustainability of street vitality.
Given that the last eight or nine land use types of each street vitality type account for less than 30% of the cumulative total (see Figure 11), we considered the land use types with a cumulative percentage of 70% as the main land use type. The results show that shopping, life, and catering services are fundamental land use, and the traffic services of the high-vitality streets are prominent. In addition to basic services, low-vitality streets comprise a larger proportion of residential areas. In addition to the main land use types, the proportions of other land use types on HSHI are relatively similar. HSHI creates vitality through the main land use types and stabilizes it through the uniform and coordinated effect of the other land use types.

5. Discussion

Most studies have recognized street vitality from a static perspective, defining it as the ability to support various activities, and use the accumulated or average street activities to measure vitality [48,49]. However, in this study, we defined street vitality as the ability to attract and maintain activities at all times. Thus, we focused on the temporal dynamics of street vitality and scientifically evaluated street dynamic vitality from a full perspective. Theoretically, we think that the street dynamic vitality is an ability to attract people and activities while maintaining the attraction at all times, which enriches the previous definition of street vitality and promotes the transformation of street vitality research from static vitality to dynamic vitality. Methodically, we put forward an evaluation index “vitality stability”, and the experimental results verified the necessity and scientific rigor of this indicator. The vitality intensity and vitality stability helped us to fully evaluate the street dynamic vitality. Practically, our results reflect the relationship between street dynamic vitality types and land use, which can offer significant guidance for improving street vitality intensity and stability. We suggest three effective measures to improve street vitality intensity: (1) enhance the intensity of land development and increase the utilization rate of land resources, (2) provide a good consumption environment by building large shopping malls and commercial pedestrian areas as vitality attraction poles, and (3) perfect transportation networks (long-term goal), increase the number of bus routes, and focus on planning and building parking lots (short-term goal), creating convenient travel traffic conditions. To ensure street vitality stability, it is necessary to increase land use types and distribute land use types evenly, which would meet the needs of different activities at different times and enrich shopping, dining, transportation, leisure, and entertainment functions on residential streets, thus creating regional vitality micro-circulation, and minimize the separation of working places and residences to strengthen the stability of street vitality during weekdays.
Despite the many strengths of this study, there are some limitations that future research could address. First, we distributed the population according to the proportion of the spatial area, which resulted in a gap between the estimated and actual number of people. Given the impacts of building properties on population distribution, future research could consider the building properties within the Thiessen polygon to assign weights and more accurately simulate the population at the street level. Second, because human activities show obvious volatility and periodicity [50], the mobile communication dataset which covered four weekdays and two weekends was adequate to reflect activity patterns of an activity cycle, and the result was consistent with the urban spatial structure of the main urban area of Xining, so it was representative to study street vitality. Future works could consider quantifying street dynamic vitality comprehensively by adaptively weighting mobile communication datasets and social media check-in data. Thirdly, we discussed the impact of traffic services on street dynamic vitality, but ignored the particularity of pedestrian streets with high-intensity vitality but fewer traffic POIs. Differentiating street types may help us to unearth the causes of their dynamic vitality of different street types. Finally, although many factors affect street dynamic vitality, our research only focused on the impact of land use on the street dynamic vitality, but other built environmental factors, such as the number of intersections, road network density, distance to traffic facilities, slow traffic environment, and other traffic data, affect the street vitality by affecting traffic accessibility [51,52]. Follow-up research could thus use the traffic accessibility and characteristics of the street fabrics and physiognomy provided by aerial images or light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data to discuss the driving forces behind street dynamic vitality in depth.

6. Conclusions

By collecting mobile communication data, we quantified street dynamic vitality in Xining city’s main urban area, used vitality intensity and stability to evaluate street dynamic vitality, and explored its driving factors from a land use perspective.
The results fund that the temporal characteristics of street vitality were consistent with human activities: in the main urban area of Xining city, the daytime street vitality was higher than that of the night-time, the daytime street vitality was lower on weekends than on weekdays, and night-time street vitality was higher on weekends. The spatial distribution of street vitality followed the attenuation principle and was centered on large shopping malls. In Xining city, the high vitality streets were mainly concentrated around the shopping malls, commercial pedestrian areas, schools, and rivers. The vitality intensity and stability were important indicators of dynamic vitality; the introduction of vitality stability indicators effectively distinguished streets with similar overall vitality values but different change patterns. We found that the vitality of most streets in the main urban area of Xining city was characterized by low intensity and low stability, and that vitality intensity on weekdays and weekends was similar; however, street vitality stability increased significantly on weekends. While previous studies have shown that the spatial concentration and orderliness of land use have a significant impact on vitality [53], we found that land use concentration was positively related to street vitality intensity, and its richness and uniformity were positively related to street vitality stability. Superior shopping, life, catering, and transportation services appeared on these high-intensity vitality streets, which confirm the previous findings that convenient traffic conditions are an important driving force for vitality [11]. The streets with low vitality stability and low vitality intensity in the main urban area of Xining city are widely distributed, and it is necessary to improve the street vitality intensity and stability. In addition to the existing large shopping malls, large shopping malls should be built on the fringe of the main urban area, such as in the university town in Chengbei District. As Xining city is a mountainous city, there are limited land resources, and it is difficult to increase the density of its road network. Therefore, the city must make full use of land resources, enrich the types of industries, distribute urban function points more evenly, and improve traffic services by adding more bus routes and parking lots.

Author Contributions

Xin Guo and Hongfei Chen conceived and designed the presented idea; Xin Guo implemented the experiments, analyzed the results, and wrote the manuscript; Hongfei Chen and Xiping Yang collected the research data, reviewed the manuscript, and provided comments. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was jointly funded by MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities Social Sciences (No. 16YJCZH005), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. GK201803052), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41801373), and Open Research Fund Program of LIESMARS (Grant No. 20S03).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to restrictions of privacy and morality.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the reviewers for their works.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. POI data classification.
Table A1. POI data classification.
Integration CategorySpecific TypeCounts
Catering service
(CS)
Catering services8988
Shopping service
(SR)
Shopping services/Cars or motorcycle sales/Access facilities/Place name and address information15,031
Life service
(LS)
Life services/Cars or motorcycle services or repairs/Public facilities/Access facilities/Indoor facilities/Place name and address information9406
Traffic service
(TS)
Transportation facility services/Access facilities/Place name and address information3007
Corporate business
(CB)
Access facilities/Place name and address information3171
Government body
(GB)
Government agencies/Social organizations/Access facilities/Place name and address information1371
Education and culture
(EC)
Education and culture services/Access facilities/Place name and address information1347
Accommodation service
(AS)
Accommodation services/Access facilities2219
Residential area
(RA)
Business residence/Access facilities3878
Health care
(HC)
Health care services/Access facilities1903
Leisure and entertainment
(LE)
Sports and leisure services/Famous tourist sites/Access facilities/Place name and address information837
Financial service
(FS)
Financial insurance services/Access facilities1109

References

  1. Malakoff, D. Use our infographics to explore the rise of the urban planet. Science 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fang, C.L. Basic rules and key paths for high-quality development of the new urbanization in China. Geogr. Res. 2019, 38, 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  3. Lu, S.; Huang, Y.; Shi, C.; Yang, X. Exploring the associations between urban form and neighborhood vibrancy: A case study of Chengdu, China. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Jacobs, J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities, 50th Anniversary Ed; Penguin Random House: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2011; pp. 29, 150. [Google Scholar]
  5. Du, H.; Liu, S.; Han, Y. Designing user-oriented street: A case study of Dongcheng Shibo commercial area in Dong-guan. Urban Transp. China 2017, 15, 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  6. Hermosilla, T.; Palomar-Vázquez, J. Using street based metrics to characterize urban typologies. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2014, 44, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Guyot, M.; Araldi, A.; Fusco, G.; Thomas, I. The urban form of Brussels from the street perspective: The role of vegetation in the definition of the urban fabric. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2021, 205, 103947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tao, Z.; Ma, S. Research on the vitality of urban streets. Archit. J. 2009, 56, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ewing, R.; Cervero, R. Travel and the built environment. JAPA 2010, 76, 265–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jalaladdini, S.; Oktay, D. Urban public spaces and vitality: A socio-spatial analysis in the streets of Cypriot towns. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 35, 664–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gou, A.; Wang, J. Research on street space vitality evaluation based on SD method. Planners 2011, 27, 102–106. [Google Scholar]
  12. Torrens, P.M. Slipstreaming human geosimulation in virtual geographic environments. Ann. GIS 2015, 21, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, Y.; Kang, C.; Wang, F. Towards big data-driven human mobility patterns and models. Geomat. Inf. Sci. Wuhan Univ. 2014, 39, 660–666. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wu, X. Exploring Shanghai Residents Trip Characteristics Using Multi-Source Public Transportation Big Data. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China, 24 March 2018. [Google Scholar]
  15. Khazaei, E.; Alimohammadi, A. Context-aware group-oriented location recommendation in location-based social networks. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2019, 8, 406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tu, W.; Zhu, T.; Xia, J.; Zhou, Y.; Lai, Y.; Jiang, J.; Li, Q. Portraying the spatial dynamics of urban vibrancy using multisource urban big data. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2020, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yuan, X.; Crooks, A.; Andreas, Z. A thematic similarity network approach for analysis of places using volunteered geographic information. Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Candia, J.; González, M.C.; Wang, P.; Schoenharl, T.; Madey, G.; Barabási, A.L. Uncovering individual and collective human dynamics from mobile phone records. J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 2008, 41, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Liu, L.; Biderman, A.; Ratti, C. Urban Mobility Landscape: Real Time Monitoring of Urban Mobility Patterns. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Hong Kong, China, 16–18 June 2009; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, X.; Fang, Z.; Yin, L.; Lin, J.; Lu, S.; Zhao, Z. Revealing the relationship of human convergence–divergence dynamics and land use: A case study on Shenzhen City, China. Cities 2019, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shi, L.; Chi, G.; Liu, X.; Liu, Y. Human mobility patterns in different communities: A mobile phone data-based social network approach. Ann. GIS 2015, 21, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ye, Y.; Li, D.; Liu, X. How block density and typology affect urban vitality: An exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China. Urban Geogr. 2017, 39, 631–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, Q.; Wang, M.; Li, Q. Urban hotspot and commercial area exploration with check-in data. Acta Geod. Cartogr Sin. 2014, 43, 314–321. [Google Scholar]
  24. Niu, X.; Wu, W.; Li, M. Influence of built environment on street vitality and its spatio-temporal characteristics based on LBS positioning data. Urban Plan. Int. 2019, 34, 32–41. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang, C.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, H. The analysis and influence mechanism research of urban vigorous space based on multiple big data: A case study on the partial area of central Hangzhou. Archit. Cult. 2017, 9, 183–187. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wu, C.; Ye, X.; Ren, F.; Du, Q. Check-in behaviour and spatio-temporal vibrancy: An exploratory analysis in Shenzhen, China. Cities 2018, 77, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huang, S.; Wang, C. Street urbanism: Quantitative evaluation on Wuhan street vibrancy and its impact factors. Shanghai Urban Plan. Rev. 2020, 24, 105–113. [Google Scholar]
  28. Min, Z.; Ding, F. Analysis of temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of street vitality based on Baidu thermal diagram: The case of the historical Nanchang city, Jiangxi Province. Urban Dev. Stud. 2020, 27, 31–36. [Google Scholar]
  29. Montgomery, J. Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. J. Urban Des. 1998, 3, 93–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Delafons, J. The New Urbanism: Toward an architecture of community. Cities 1994, 11, 342–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Winters, M.; Brauer, M.; Setton, E.M.; Teschke, K. Built environment influences on healthy transportation choices: Bicycling versus driving. J. Urban Health 2010, 87, 969–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Xia, C.; Yeh, G.O.; Zhang, A. Analyzing spatial relationships between urban land use intensity and urban vitality at street block level: A case study of five Chinese megacities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2020, 193, 103669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Long, Y.; Zhou, Y. Quantitative evaluation on street vibrancy and its impact factors: A case study of Chengdu. New Archit. 2016, 34, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ming, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J. Vitality assessment of mountainous cities based on multi-source data: A case of Chongqing Municipality, China. Resour. Sci. 2020, 42, 710–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Harvey, L. Defining and measuring employability. Qual. High. Educ. 2001, 7, 97–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Braun, L.M.; Malizia, E. Downtown vibrancy influences public health and safety outcomes in urban counties. J. Transp. Health 2015, 2, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Xining Municipal People’s Government. Xining City Overall Plan (2010–2020); Xining Municipal People’s Government: Xining City, China, 2012.
  38. Zhuomacuo, F.Q. The study on water resources exploitation and regional of Hehuang areas in Qinghai. J. Arid Land Resour. Environ. 2007, 21, 95–99. [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, X.; Long, Y. Automated identification and characterization of parcels with OpenStreetMap and points of interest. Environ. Plan. B Urban Anal. City Sci. 2016, 43, 341–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Baidu Map Open Platform. Available online: http://lbsyun.baidu.com/ (accessed on 17 October 2018).
  41. Yue, Y.; Zhuang, Y.; Yeh, A.G.O.; Xie, J.Y.; Ma, C.L.; Li, Q.Q. Measurements of POI-based mixed use and their relationships with neighbourhood vibrancy. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2017, 31, 658–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. AutoNavi Open Platform. Available online: https://lbs.amap.com/ (accessed on 29 August 2018).
  43. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China (MOHURD). The Urban Land Classification and Construction Land Planning Standards (GB50137-2011); MOHURD: Beijing, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  44. Fang, Y. The Measurement and Influence Mechanism of City Street Vitality Using Multi-Source Big Data—Taking Nanjing as an Example. Master’s Thesis, Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 29 May 2018. [Google Scholar]
  45. Su, Y. Dynamic Soft Sensor Development Based on Gaussian Mixture Regression. Master’s Thesis, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China, 1 April 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Qiu, Y.; Yang, L.; Di, C.; Yu, L. Landscape effect analysis of land consolidation using GIS. Geogr. Res. 2007, 26, 258–264. [Google Scholar]
  47. Chen, Y.; Liu, L.; Guan, X.; Liu, B. Impact of transgenic herbicide-resistant soybean on the diversity of arthropods and weeds in soybean fields. Acta Entomol. Sin. 2020, 63, 1366–1376. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hao, X.; Long, Y. Street vibrancy of Beijing: Measurement, impact factors, and design implication. Shanghai Urban Plan. Rev. 2016, 20, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu, X.; Xu, X.; Guan, P.; Ren, Y.; Wang, W.; Xu, N. The cause and evolution of urban street vitality under the time dimension: Nine cases of streets in Nanjing City, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhou, T.; Han, Y.; Yan, X.; Yang, Z.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, B. Statistical Mechanics on Temporal and Spatial Activities of Human. J. Univ. Electron. Sci. Technol. China 2013, 42, 481–540. [Google Scholar]
  51. Azmi, D.I.; Karim, H.A. Implications of walkability towards promoting sustainable urban neighborhood. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 50, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chhetri, P.; Stimson, R.J.; Western, J. Modeling the factors of neighborhood attractiveness reflected in residential location decision choices. Stud. Reg. Sci. 2006, 36, 393–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Liu, S.; Zhang, L.; Long, Y. Urban vitality area identification and pattern analysis from the perspective of time and space fusion. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Study area location.
Figure 1. Study area location.
Ijgi 10 00143 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the elements from the four data sources. (a) Main roads; (b) Base station; (c) Buildings; (d) points of interest (POIs).
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of the elements from the four data sources. (a) Main roads; (b) Base station; (c) Buildings; (d) points of interest (POIs).
Ijgi 10 00143 g002
Figure 3. The methodology framework.
Figure 3. The methodology framework.
Ijgi 10 00143 g003
Figure 4. Spatio–temporal vitality of streets.
Figure 4. Spatio–temporal vitality of streets.
Ijgi 10 00143 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of street vitality values on weekdays and weekends.
Figure 5. Comparison of street vitality values on weekdays and weekends.
Ijgi 10 00143 g005
Figure 6. Best “K” value by the elbow rule. (a) Ideal “K” value on weekdays; (b) Ideal “K” value on weekends.
Figure 6. Best “K” value by the elbow rule. (a) Ideal “K” value on weekdays; (b) Ideal “K” value on weekends.
Ijgi 10 00143 g006
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of street vitality types. (a) Weekdays; (b) Weekends. “LSLI” represents streets with low-stability and low-intensity vitality; “LSHI” is an abbreviation for streets with low-stability and high-intensity vitality; “HSLI” describes the streets with high-stability and low-intensity vitality, and “HSHI” symbolizes the streets with high-stability and high-intensity vitality.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of street vitality types. (a) Weekdays; (b) Weekends. “LSLI” represents streets with low-stability and low-intensity vitality; “LSHI” is an abbreviation for streets with low-stability and high-intensity vitality; “HSLI” describes the streets with high-stability and low-intensity vitality, and “HSHI” symbolizes the streets with high-stability and high-intensity vitality.
Ijgi 10 00143 g007
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of changes in street vitality types from weekdays to weekends.
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of changes in street vitality types from weekdays to weekends.
Ijgi 10 00143 g008
Figure 9. Temporal characteristics of street vitality types. (a) Weekdays; (b) Weekends.
Figure 9. Temporal characteristics of street vitality types. (a) Weekdays; (b) Weekends.
Ijgi 10 00143 g009aIjgi 10 00143 g009b
Figure 10. Comparison of the dynamic evaluation index of street vitality types on weekdays and weekends. (a) Vitality intensity; (b) Vitality stability.
Figure 10. Comparison of the dynamic evaluation index of street vitality types on weekdays and weekends. (a) Vitality intensity; (b) Vitality stability.
Ijgi 10 00143 g010
Figure 11. Land use composition of street vitality types. (a) Weekdays; (b) Weekends.
Figure 11. Land use composition of street vitality types. (a) Weekdays; (b) Weekends.
Ijgi 10 00143 g011aIjgi 10 00143 g011b
Table 1. Mobile communication data for Xining City.
Table 1. Mobile communication data for Xining City.
FieldsDescriptions
IDThe unique and encrypted identification numbers of mobile phone subscribers
Start TimeThe time stamp when mobile communication occurred, accurate to the second
End Time
LongitudeThe base station’s location, where the subscribers were when the mobile communication occurred
Latitude
Table 2. Classification and evaluation of street vitality types.
Table 2. Classification and evaluation of street vitality types.
Street Vitality TypesNumber of StreetsEvaluation Index
ITS
(Vitality Intensity)
STB
(Vitality Stability)
WeekdaysHSHI6762.65362.2109
HSLI20229.04452.1290
LSLI3667.96971.9410
LSHI17132.47351.9489
WeekendsHSHI6763.00592.2836
HSLI18929.29962.2090
LSLI3828.27652.0092
LSHI14132.31982.0547
Table 3. Land use characteristics of street types.
Table 3. Land use characteristics of street types.
Land Use Index
CategoryCountDensityRichnessSimpsonMain Type
WeekdaysHSHI71495.77972.04700.7813SR, LS, CS, TS
HSLI25,0325.75891.88950.7566SR, LS, CS, RA
LSHI13928.66111.84960.7025SR, LS, CS
LSLI18,6943.09131.55280.6342SR, LS, CS, RA
WeekendsHSHI71885.89561.98980.7640SR, LS, CS, TS
HSLI23,5655.83881.91480.7602SR, LS, CS, RA
LSHI12409.10981.89220.7317SR, LS, CS
LSLI20,2743.15131.56270.6393SR, LS, CS, RA
Note: Shopping service (SR); Life service (LS); Catering service (CS); Residential area (RA); Traffic service (TS).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, X.; Chen, H.; Yang, X. An Evaluation of Street Dynamic Vitality and Its Influential Factors Based on Multi-Source Big Data. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 143. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi10030143

AMA Style

Guo X, Chen H, Yang X. An Evaluation of Street Dynamic Vitality and Its Influential Factors Based on Multi-Source Big Data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2021; 10(3):143. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi10030143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Xin, Hongfei Chen, and Xiping Yang. 2021. "An Evaluation of Street Dynamic Vitality and Its Influential Factors Based on Multi-Source Big Data" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 10, no. 3: 143. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi10030143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop