1. Introduction: Digitalization of Research Workflows
2. RADAR—Scope, Collaborations, Goals and Architecture
- guidelines for researchers to introduce and facilitate research data management in general and to store and/or publish their research data;
- a secure data preservation service including adequate storage periods (5, 10 and 15 years as well as permanent storage) by the use of distributed data storage mechanisms;
- (optional) data publication with Digital Object Identifier (DOI)-assignment to secure traceability, access and citeability; and
- technical implementation support for research institutions (e.g., by open API, the possibility of front end branding as well as the option for data peer-review)
2.4. Metadata Schema
3. Two-Stage Service Model
3.1. Basic service: Data Preservation
3.2. Extended Service: Data Publication
3.3. Data Management within RADAR: Access and Usage
4. The Business Model: Cost and Pricing
5. Conclusions and Outlook
Conflicts of Interest
- Whyte, J.; Stasis, A.; Lindkvist, C. Managing change in the delivery of complex projects: Configuration management, asset information and “big data”. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2016, 34, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Science Editorial. Challenges and opportunities. Science 2011, 331, 692–693. [Google Scholar]
- Harris, S.J. Long-distance corporations, big sciences and the geography of knowledge. In The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader; Harding, S., Ed.; Duke University Press: Durham, UK, 2011; pp. 61–83. [Google Scholar]
- Thessen, A.E.; Patterson, D.J. Data issues in the life sciences. Zookeys 2011, 150, 15–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- National Science Foundation (NSF). Proposal Preparation Instructions. Available online: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpg_2.jsp#dmp (accessed on 23 November 2015).
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG. Safeguarding good scientific practice. In Recommendations of the Commission on Professional Self Regulation in Science; Wiley-VCH: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 74–76. [Google Scholar]
- Treloar, A.; Harboe-Ree, C. Data management and the curation continuum: How the Monash experience is informing repository relationships. In Proceedings of the 14th Victorian Association for Library Automation Conference and Exhibition, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 5–7 February 2008.
- Klump, J. Managing the Data Continuum. Available online: http://oa.helmholtz.de/fileadmin/user_upload/redakteur/Workshops/data_continuum_klump.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2015).
- Neuroth, H.; Strathmann, S.; Oßwald, A.; Scheffel, R.; Klump, J.; Ludwig, J. Langzeitarchivierung von Forschungsdaten—Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Available online: http://nestor.sub.uni-goettingen.de/bestandsaufnahme/nestor_lza_forschungsdaten_bestandsaufnahme.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2015).
- Razum, M. Repository Platforms. Available online: https://www.fiz-karlsruhe.de/en/leistungen/e-research/repository-platforms.html (accessed on 8 January 2016).
- Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. Reference model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Available online: public.ccsds.org/publications/archive/650x0m2.pdf (accessed on 8 January 2016).
- DataCite. DataCite Metadata Schema for the Publication and Citation of Research Data. Available online: http://schema.datacite.org/meta/kernel-3.1/doc/DataCite-MetadataKernel_v3.1.pdf (accessed on 23 November 2015).
- CreativeCommons.org. CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication. Available online: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en (accessed on 23 November 2015).
- RDA/WDS Interest Group Publishing Data Cost Recovery for Data Centres: Income Streams for Data Repositories. Available online: https://rd-alliance.org/groups/rdawds-publishing-data-cost-recovery-data-centres.html (accessed on 14 January 2016).
- Kaur, K.; Herterich, P.; Dallmeier-Tiessen, S.; Schmitt, K.; Schrimpf, S.; Tjalsma, H.; Lambert, S.; McMeekin, S. D32.1 Report on Cost Parameters for Digital Repositories. Available online: http://www.alliancepermanentaccess.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/downloads/2014/06/APARSEN-REP-D32_1-01-1_0_incURN.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2016).
- 4C Project Collaboration to Clarify the Costs of Curation: D4.5 from Costs to Business Models. Available online: http://4cproject.eu/d4-5-from-costs-to-business-models (accessed on 14 January 2016).
- Palaiologk, A.S.; Economides, A.A.; Tjalsma, H.D.; Sesink, L.B. An activity-based costing model for long-term preservation and dissemination of digital research data: the case of DANS. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 2012, 12, 195–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DP4lib Project. Kostenmodell für Einen LZA-Dienst. Available online: http://dp4lib.langzeitarchivierung.de/downloads/DP4lib-Kostenmodell_eines_LZA-Dienstes_v1.0.pdf (accessed on 14 January 2016).
|General Service Concepts in RADAR|
|(A) Contract||A customer (e.g., institution, publisher, research project) enters a contract and agrees to pay for services provided by RADAR|
|(B) Workspace||The workspace represents an organizational entity in RADAR where research data and metadata can be added, modified and structured|
|(C) Dataset||Represents a collection of digital data that—with regards to content—belong together and form a logical entity|
|Roles and responsibilities|
|(A) RADAR Administrator||Supervision of contracts and provision of admin-accounts for customers (internal)|
|(B) Workspace Administrator||Creation of Workspaces and assigning Curator(s)—e.g., an institution, facility or project being a customer of RADAR|
|(C) Curator||Management within associated workspace(s) and optional set-up of additional (sub-)curators, e.g., being a scientist, data manager or editor within an institution|
|Dataset status and two-stage service model|
|(1.) Pending||Initial mode of a dataset uploaded to RADAR; editing is possible (including modification, update, deletion)|
|(2.) Review||The dataset is “frozen” for the duration of the peer review process and receives a secure “review-URL”|
|(3.) Archived (= service: Data Preservation)||The dataset is archived and identified via Handle. As soon as this status is chosen by the curator, no further editing within a dataset is possible|
|(4.) Published (= service: Data Publication)||The dataset is published and identified via DOI. As soon as this status is chosen by the curator, no further editing within a dataset is possible. A landing page is created and the corresponding metadata can be found using discovery services|
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons by Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).