Next Article in Journal
A Convolutional Neural Network and Matrix Factorization-Based Travel Location Recommendation Method Using Community-Contributed Geotagged Photos
Next Article in Special Issue
Geospatial Open Data Usage and Metadata Quality
Previous Article in Journal
Change Detection in Multispectral Remote Sensing Images with Leader Intelligence PSO and NSCT Feature Fusion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploiting the Potential of VGI Metadata to Develop A Data-Driven Framework for Predicting User’s Proficiency in OpenStreetMap Context
Article

Spatial Metadata Usability Evaluation

1
Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
2
Indonesian Geospatial Agency, Jakarta 16911, Indonesia
3
Independent Researcher, Bogor 16115, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9(7), 463; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi9070463
Received: 10 June 2020 / Revised: 3 July 2020 / Accepted: 15 July 2020 / Published: 21 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geospatial Metadata)
Spatial metadata is a critical part of any spatial data infrastructure, which enables the organising, sharing, discovery and use of spatial data. This paper highlights a knowledge gap in the usability of the metadata systems for the end–users. It then addresses the gap by applying the User Centred Design approach to investigate the usability of metadata records. The research engages with end–users concerning efficiency and effectiveness of metadata systems, and end–users’ satisfaction and expectations. The results indicate significant gaps with the effectiveness and efficiency of metadata systems for spatial data discovery and selection. Inconsistency and irrelevant information in the metadata records were found in the title, keywords, abstracts, data quality and other elements of the metadata. Additionally, essential improvements were identified for user interfaces. Discouraging presentation of the metadata is a prominent problem found in the interface of the metadata systems. View Full-Text
Keywords: spatial data infrastructure; spatial metadata; geoportal; user centred design; usability; Australia spatial data infrastructure; spatial metadata; geoportal; user centred design; usability; Australia
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kalantari, M.; Syahrudin, S.; Rajabifard, A.; Subagyo, H.; Hubbard, H. Spatial Metadata Usability Evaluation. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 463. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi9070463

AMA Style

Kalantari M, Syahrudin S, Rajabifard A, Subagyo H, Hubbard H. Spatial Metadata Usability Evaluation. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2020; 9(7):463. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi9070463

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kalantari, Mohsen, Syahrudin Syahrudin, Abbas Rajabifard, Hardi Subagyo, and Hannah Hubbard. 2020. "Spatial Metadata Usability Evaluation" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9, no. 7: 463. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijgi9070463

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop