Next Article in Journal
Flavan-3-ols and Proanthocyanidins in Japanese, Bohemian and Giant Knotweed
Previous Article in Journal
Non-Cannabinoid Metabolites of Cannabis sativa L. with Therapeutic Potential
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/plants10020401
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea from Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in China

by
Li Wang
,
Hui Hou
,
Zengqiang Zhou
,
Hongtao Tu
* and
Hongbo Yuan
*
Zhengzhou Fruit Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450009, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(2), 401; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10020401
Submission received: 20 January 2021 / Revised: 1 February 2021 / Accepted: 8 February 2021 / Published: 20 February 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Kiwifruit is very popular among consumers due to its high nutritional value. The increasing expansion in kiwifruit cultivation has led to the spread of rot diseases. To identify the pathogens causing kiwifruit ripe rots in China, 24 isolates were isolated from the diseased fruit and wart in trees. Botryosphaeria dothidea was recognized as the pathogen causing kiwifruit ripe rot and wart in the tree through internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing, pathogenicity testing, morphological and microscopic characteristics. The rapid and accurate detection of this pathogen will lead to better disease monitoring and control efforts. A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method was then developed to rapidly and specifically identify B. dothidea. These results offer value to further research into kiwifruit ripe rot, such as disease prediction, pathogen rapid detection, and effective disease control.

1. Introduction

Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) is a deciduous tree belonging to the Actinidiaceae family. Kiwifruit has been popular due to its balanced nutritional minerals, dietary fibers, high vitamin C contents, and health-promoting metabolites [1]. At present, it is widely planted in China, New Zealand, Italy, Iran, and so on [2,3].
The climate, environment, and mode of production changes have led to the spread of various diseases including rots, which can accelerate the softening rate, shorten the storage period and seriously affect the quality and taste of kiwifruit [4]. So far, several fungi including Alternaria, Colletotrichum, Botryosphearia, Cylindrocarpon, Phomopsis, Phoma, Diaporthe, Botrytis, and Penicillium have been reported in association with kiwifruit rot [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Botryosphaeria dothidea, frequently isolated from rotted fruit, is one of the major causing agents of post-harvest rot of kiwifruit, an important disease of A. deliciosa [2]. B. dothidea is a fungal pathogen capable of infecting a wide range of woody plant species, and causes different disease phenotypes including fruit rot, dieback, stem canker, and tree death [12]. Clear external symptoms of ripe rot were sometimes absent from the surface of the fruit, but a portion of the fruit surface becomes collapsed. If the collapsed portion of the fruit is peeled off, the sunken area shows the appearance of water-soaked flesh tissue. The milky-colored spot, which is present in the flesh, develops concentrically as the fruit ripens [13]. However, it is difficult to distinguish it from the other rot kiwifruit based on symptoms.
Thus, accurate and rapid approaches for the detection of B. dothidea are essential to rapidly and effectively control the spread of rot diseases and to guide appropriate fungicide selection. Traditional pathogen identification approaches are based upon morphological properties such as pathogen size, shape, color, conidial texture, colony morphology, and cell wall thickness [14,15]. The identification of pathogens based upon these phenotypic traits, however, can often be inaccurate. For example, B. dothidea exhibits phenotypic traits that are similar to those of related Botryosphaeriaceae species [12]. Besides, such phenotypic characterization is a labor-intensive process that necessitates isolating and preparing pure cultures from individual fungal isolates [16].
Many researchers have developed DNA-based approaches for the detection and identification of pathogens on a molecular basis. Among them, PCR-based assays are the most commonly used approaches [16]. These strategies generally take advantage of species-specific differences in pathogen ribosomal DNA (rDNA) internal transcribed spacer (ITS), tubulin, and elongation factor-1a sequences to design primers capable of identifying specific pathogens of interest [12,17]. PCR-based assays have previously been leveraged to detect Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with a range of different hosts [18]. While these approaches are simpler and less time-intensive than traditional approaches, they are expensive, and require complicated instrumentations such that they are difficult to be utilized in the field.
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) is a novel DNA amplification strategy that proceeds at a constant temperature and is highly accurate and specific while allowing for naked eye visualization and analysis of the LAMP reaction products eye via incorporation of metal-ion-based indicators or DNA-intercalating dyes [19,20]. LAMP does not require a thermal cycler, electrophoresis, or gel imaging system, thus, is promising and is used widely for detecting a range of pathogens at field levels [21,22]. LAMP assay has been used to detect the B. dothidea causing Chinese hickory canker and apple ring rot [23,24], but only detected the pathogen in trunk. Whether a similar approach can be used to diagnose kiwifruit ripe rot caused by B. dothidea, however, remains to be determined.
The aim of the study was to identify and detect of B. dothidea causing ripe rots of kiwifruit in China. As such, the first objective of this study was to identify the pathogen causing kiwifruit ripe rots in China via a combined analysis of microscopic, morphological, and molecular characteristics, and pathogenicity testing. The second objective was to develop a LAMP-based approach to specifically detect B. dothidea isolate. Together, the results of this study offer value to further research into kiwifruit ripe rot, such as disease prediction, pathogen rapid detection, and effective disease control.

2. Results

2.1. Isolate Characterization

Naturally diseased fruits were healthy in appearance, with soft tissues and slightly sunken infected sites (Figure 1A). Infected branches or trunks of trees had warts (Figure 1B). Isolates (24) were isolated from all the samples, 12 isolates (include Bd431) come from the diseased fruit, while 12 isolates (include Bd432) come from the wart. On potato dextrose agar (PDA), initially greenish-brown to gray colonies were formed by all isolates, which were then turned into dark gray after the incubation of five days (Figure 2A). After nine days, the isolates started to produce pycnidia (Figure 2B). Conidia were hyaline, unicellular, and fusoid, the size of the conidia of isolates producing abundant spores was (21.2–27.5) × (5.2–7.1) µm (Figure 2C). Based on morphological characters, the fungus matched the holotype strains CBS 115476 of B. dothidea (Moug. ex Fr.) Cesati and De Notaris [15].

2.2. Molecular Identification

The use of ITS1/ITS4 primers caused the amplification of the expected bands in Bd431 and Bd432 isolates, which was in accordance with the classification of the morphological features employed in this research. For BD431 isolate, the region sequence of ITS rDNA revealed 100% homology to B. dothidea isolate (AF027747) (Figure 3), and the sequence was deposited in Genbank with accession number MW547773. The β-tubulin gene and the EF1α gene were successfully amplified for the isolate, the β-tubulin sequence analysis of the isolate revealed 100% homology to B. dothidea isolate (KY393166), and the EF1α gene also has 100% homology to B. dothidea isolate (GU294736). Moreover, the BD432 isolate has the same result. The results of ITS and β-tubulin and EF1α identification were found to be identical with analysis of microscopic and morphological characteristics.

2.3. Pathogenicity Testing

In pathogenicity assays, disease symptoms appeared as soft lesions with slightly sunken infected sites (Figure 4). On the other hand, all the non-inoculated control fruits remained undecayed.

2.4. Reisolation and Identification of Infected Fungi

From the lesion margins, the decayed tissue samples were shifted to PDA plates, reisolated the fungus, and identified as the inoculated strain by analyzing the microscopic, morphological, and molecular characteristics.

2.5. LAMP Primers Selection

To design the specific primers for the detection of B. dothidea species, ITS sequences of B. dothidea and several other fungi were used for alignment analysis. Based on the diversity of the ITS regions, we designed a set of four primers for LAMP assays to amplify the specific ITS fragment of B. dothidea. Through a series of adjustments and optimization of reaction conditions, a successful LAMP assay for the detection of B. dothidea was developed in this study. As shown in Figure 5A, only the reactions containing DNA from B. dothidea isolates displayed positive reactions as indicated by a visible fluorescent yellow-green color, whereas the samples containing DNA from other fungi isolates were negative reactions with orange color, and a ladder-like electrophoresis pattern (Figure 5B).

2.6. Assessment of LAMP Assay Sensitivity

The sensitivity of this LAMP assay was determined by using DNA serial 10-fold dilutions of DNA from a B. dothidea isolate (Bd-432) and was subjected to serial 10-fold dilution (10 ng to 10−6 ng). This assay has the potential to detect as low as 10−5 ng of DNA, with clear color changes and DNA ladder products consistent with a positive reaction (Figure 6), demonstrating high sensitivity of the assay for the detection of B. dothidea isolates.

2.7. LAMP-Mediated Detection of B. dothidea in Fruit Samples

To assess the ability of LAMP assay for the detection of B. dothidea isolates in diseased apple tissues, samples were collected from healthy kiwifruit and kiwifruit infected with B. dothidea isolates. Samples from kiwifruit infected with B. dothidea isolates yielded positive LAMP reactions (Figure 7). Moreover, we isolated the diseased kiwifruit fruits from the field for the LAMP assay. Based on the morphology and biological characters, the isolates were identified as B. dothidea. These findings confirmed that our LAMP assay could be successfully used to rapidly and accurately diagnose kiwifruit rot caused by B. dothidea strain isolates.

3. Discussion

Previous studies revealed that various pathogens are not only able to cause the infection but also responsible for the severe deterioration of trees and harvested fruit quality during the cold- or post-storage ripening [25]. B. dothidea caused ripe rot affects harvested fruits during post-storage ripening. While during cold storage, Botrytis cinerea based Botrytis storage rot affects harvested fruits [26]. Sclerotinia rot, caused by Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, mainly affects immature fruits on the trees [27,28]. In this paper, the symptom of infected rot fruit on the trees conformed to “ripe rots”; the observed symptoms were similar as reported previously from Iran, China, Korea, and New Zealand [1,8,9,12]. Although there were many reports about fruit ripe rot caused by B. dothidea, few reports exist about stem symptoms. In this study, fruit showing rot symptoms and warts on the stem were collected from kiwifruit orchards. The results of the study suggested that B. dothidea was the pathogen that causes the kiwifruit ripe rots and stems warts in China. No other pathogens were isolated in this research, probably because the sample size is not enough.
Approaches to treating and controlling this disease remain limited, and a novel approach to effectively and reliably detecting B. dothidea must be developed. A range of molecular techniques has been designed in recent years to detect plant pathogens including bacteria, viruses, oomycetes, and fungi [29,30,31,32,33]. Several strategies including PCR-based approach, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and high-resolution melting have been used to detect isolates. While these approaches are simpler and less time-intensive than traditional approaches, they are expensive and require complicated instrumentations such that they are difficult to be utilized in the field.
LAMP assays represent a novel, efficient, specific, sensitive, and low-cost DNA amplification approach that is highly amenable to application in the field as it does not require expensive equipment [19]. Such LAMP assays have previously been employed successfully to detect Chinese hickory canker and apple ring rot caused by B. dothidea [23,24]. In this study, we designed a LAMP assay that was able to detect B. dothidea. Our results confirm the value of our newly developed LAMP assay as a highly sensitive method of detecting B. dothidea isolates with a DNA detection limit of 10–5 ng. This LAMP sensitivity threshold is consistent with reported thresholds in other pathogen detection analyses [17,34]. Notably, our LAMP assay was 100-fold more sensitive than a previously reported quantitative LAMP (q-LAMP) assay designed to detect Chinese hickory canker caused by B. dothidea [23]. This LAMP assay can also be employed to identify B. dothidea within samples of diseased fruit, thus, offering clear value as a test that can be conducted in the field for B. dothidea detection. This approach, thereby, allows for the dynamic monitoring of B. dothidea spread, enabling farmers to select appropriate fungicides to optimally protect their crops.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Isolates Used and Morphological Observation

Twelve kiwifruit fruits showing rot symptoms and twelve warts on branches (important cultivars: A. chinensis var. chinensis “Jinyan”) were collected from orchards of a main kiwifruit-producing area, Xixia County (111°01′ E 33°05′ N), in 2019, which is a temperate continental monsoon climate; the climate is mild, the sunshine is sufficient in the southwest of Henan Province in China. The pathogens were isolated by the tissue isolation method. They were disinfected with 0.5% NaClO for 1 min and washed twice with sterile distilled water. Small pieces from the edges of diseased tissue were placed on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (200 g potato extracts L-1, 2% glucose, and 2% agar) medium. After culturing for five days at 25 °C, a mycelial plug was collected from the growing edge of each colony and transferred to a new PDA plate followed by incubation at 25 °C for seven days. Emerging colonies were transferred several times by the hyphal tipmethod until and pure cultures were obtained [35].
After five days, the morphological features of the culture of each isolate were studied on PDA at 25 °C. Malt extract agar (MEA, 2%) was used to culture the isolates by applying 12 h of an intermittent cycle of near black UV light (2U, Cnlight, Nanjing, China) to induce sporulation [36].

4.2. DNA Extraction, Sequencing, and Analysis

Isolates of Bd431 and Bd432 were grown on PDA for five days and mycelium was used to extract the genomic DNA by following the CTAB method described by Möller et al. [37]. DNA concentration of each sample was quantified by using a NanDrop UV spectrophotometer (NanoVue Plus, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, New York, NY, USA). Phylogenetic analyses of ITS, translation elongation factor 1-α, and beta-tubulin were used to identify B. dothidea [38], so the three genes were used in our study. Primers ITS1 and ITS4 were used to amplify the ITS region of DNA [39], while amplification of partial β-tubulin gene was accomplished by the primers Bt2a and Bt2b [40], and for the partial elongation factor 1α gene with the primers EF1-728F and EF1-986R [41].
The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed in an iCycler Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) in a final volume of 25 μL containing 12.5 μL of 2 × PCR mix (Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), 1.5 μL of each primer (10 μM), 1 μL of DNA (10 ng), and 8.5 μL of double-distilled H2O. The PCR conditions include the 3 min duration for the initial denaturation at 94 °C; followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 °C, and 90 s at 72 °C; and a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The resulting PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel in 1 × Tris-borate-EDTA buffer and sequenced by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Amplified sequence was compared with the other sequences found in the National Center for Biotechnological Information (NCBI) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 20 February 2021) using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) [42].

4.3. Pathogenicity Testing

The selected isolates were screened for their pathogenicity on kiwifruits according to their morphological and molecular data. The pathogenicity of the two isolates was assessed by growing these isolates on kiwifruit fruits under laboratory conditions. Briefly, ‘Jintao’ kiwifruits were rinsed and disinfected for 5 min via treatment with 1% NaOCl, after which they were washed two times using sterile dH2O and dried in a transfer hood. From each isolate, mycelial plugs with a diameter of 5 mm were obtained from the edges of five-day-old colonies and added to the surface of each kiwifruit, with control apples instead being inoculated using fungi-free PDA. Three replicates per treatment condition were prepared on three different apples. Following inoculation, fruits were transferred to a sterilized plastic box and were incubated at 25 °C. This analysis was repeated two times.

4.4. Reisolation and Identification of Infected Fungi

To complete Koch’s postulates, fungi were isolated from diseased parts of inoculated fruit [43]. Surface disinfection of lesion edges was performed in 0.5% NaOCl for 60 s followed by three times washing with sterile-distilled water and then kept on PDA in dishes for seven days at 25 °C. Identification of fungi was based on conidial morphology and the sequence of the rDNA ITS region as described previously.

4.5. LAMP Primers Design for the Detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea

The obtained ITS sequence was compared with that another four different fungal isolates including Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Valsa mali, Alternaria alternate, and Marssonina coronaria by multiple sequence alignment using MUSCLE. The design of LAMP primers was prepared according to the sequence variability among the four fungal species. Primer Explorer V4 software was used to design the LAMP primers. We designed four primers (F3: CCGCCAGAGGACCATCAA; B3: CCTTCGGAATACCAAAGGGC; FIP: CCAGAACCAAGAGATCCGTTGTTCTCCAGTCAGTAAACGATGCA; BIP: GATGAAGAACGCAGCGAAATGCCAATGTGCGTTCAAAGATTCGA) as a set of LAMP primers were used to detect the B. dothidea. To assess the LAMP primer’s specificity, we also used other samples of fungal species including Botrytis cinerea, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Valsa mali, Alternaria alternata, and Marssonina coronaria. B. cinerea was collected from kiwifruit, while other isolates were collected from apples from different orchards in China. All isolates were isolated and identified as described previously. All isolates were cultured on PDA plates at 25 °C for five days, followed by the collection of mycelial samples for genomic DNA extraction, as described previously.
Initial LAMP reaction conditions were selected and modified based on a prior study [44]. Initially, LAMP reactions were carried out in a 25-μL volume, which contained 4 U of a large fragment of Bst DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs), 2.5 μL of 10 × ThermoPol Buffer (New England Biolabs), 4 mM MgSO4 (New England Biolabs), 1 mM dNTP, 1.4 μM each FIP and BIP, 0.2 mM each F3 and B3, 0.8 M betaine, and 1 μL target DNA, with ddH2O being added to a final volume of 25 μL. As a control, ddH2O was instead used. Reaction mixtures were then incubated for 60 min at 60 °C, after which they were heated for 10 min to 80 °C to terminate the reaction via enzymatic inactivation. Next, we added 1 μL of SYBR Green I (1000×) per reaction tube. Positive reactions yielded a fluorescent yellow-green color that was readily detectable to the naked eye, while negative reactions remained brown. The resulting products were analyzed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis, and experiments were repeated two times.

4.6. Assessment of LAMP Assay Sensitivity

The LAMP sensitivity was evaluated by performing serial 10-fold dilutions of template DNA from a B. dothidea isolate (Bd-432), with ddH2O serving as a negative control. Optimal LAMP reaction parameters, as detailed above, were then used to conduct LAMP detection. The analysis was repeated twice.

4.7. LAMP-Mediated Detection of B. dothidea in Fruit Samples

Infected kiwifruit from the pathogenicity determination experiments and different kiwifruit orchards were collected for the test. A piece of tissue was taken from infected kiwifruit and was surface-sterilized with 75% alcohol for DNA extraction. Total genomic gDNA was extracted using a Fast DNA isolation kit (TransGen) based on the provided directions. Then the DNA was used for LAMP assays as above. This experiment was repeated two times.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our results provide clear evidence that B. dothidea is the pathogen causing kiwifruit ripe rots and stem warts in China. The developed LAMP method represents a rapid, efficient, and effective means of reliably identifying the isolates.

Author Contributions

H.Y. and H.T. designed experiments; L.W. carried out experiments; H.H., and Z.Z. gave instructions in language grammar; L.W. analyzed experimental results and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Special Engineering Science and Technology Innovation, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (grantnumber: CAAS-ASTIP-2020-ZFRI); Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (No. ZGS202006 and No. 1610192020105).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

In this section, you can acknowledge any support given which is not covered by the author contribution or funding sections. This may include administrative and technical support, or donations in kind (e.g., materials used for experiments).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, H.W. Huang History of 100 Years of Domestication and Improvement of Kiwifruit and Gene Discovery from Genetic Introgressed Populations in the Wild. Chin. Bull. Bot. 2009, 44, 127–142. [Google Scholar]
  2. Eisa, N.; Mansoureh, M.; Samira, P.A.; Farid, B. Characterization of Botryosphaeria dothidea as new pathogen of kiwifruit in Iran. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2019, 59, 134–137. [Google Scholar]
  3. Shihang, S.; Fang, J.; Lin, M.; Qi, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, R.; Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Muhammad, A. Freezing Tolerance and Expression of β-amylase Gene in Two Actinidia arguta Cultivars with Seasonal Changes. Plants 2020, 9, 515. [Google Scholar]
  4. Manning, M.; Burdon, J.; Silva, N.D.; Meier, X.; Pidakala, P.; Punter, M.; Billing, D. Maturity and postharvest temperature management affect rot expression in ‘Hort16A’ kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2016, 113, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hawthorne, B.T.; Reid, M.S. Possibility for fungicidal control of kiwifruit fungal storage rots. N. Z. J. Exp. Agric. 1982, 10, 333–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Opgenorth, D.C. Storage rot of California-grown kiwifruit. Plant Dis. 1983, 67, 382–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Willetts, H.J.; Wong, J.A.L.; Kirst, G.D. The biology of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Sclerotinia trifoliorum and Sclerotinia minor with emphasis on specific nomenclature. Bot. Rev. 1980, 46, 101–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Manning, M.A.; Meier, X.; Olsen, T.L.; Johnston, P.R. Fungi associated with fruit rots of Actinidia chinensis ‘Hort16A’ in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2003, 31, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Koh, Y.J.; Hur, J.S.; Jung, J.S. Postharvest fruit rot of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) in Korea. N. Z. J. Crop Hortic. Sci. 2005, 33, 303–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luongo, L.; Santori, A.; Riccioni, L.; Belisario, A. Phomopsis sp. associated with post-harvest fruit rot of kiwifruit in Italy. J. Plant Pathol. 2011, 93, 205–209. [Google Scholar]
  11. Erper, I.; Turkkan, M.; Ozcan, M.; Luongo, L.; Belisario, A. Characterization of Diaporthe hongkongensis species causing stem-end rot on kiwifruit in Turkey. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 99, 3. [Google Scholar]
  12. Marsberg, A.; Kemler, M.; Jami, F.; Nagel, J.H.; Postma-Smidt, A.; Naidoo, S.; Wingfield, M.J.; Crous, P.W.; Spatafora, J.W.; Hesse, C.N. Botryosphaeria dothidea: A latent pathogen of global importance to woody plant health. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2017, 18, 477–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, L.; Pan, H.; Chen, M.; Zhang, S.; Zhong, C. Isolation and identification of pathogenic fungi causing postharvest fruit rot of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in China. J. Phytopathol. 2017, 165, 782–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Phillips, A.; Alves, A.; Abdollahzadeh, J.; Slippers, B.; Wingfield, M.J.; Groenewald, J.; Crous, P.W. The Botryosphaeriaceae: Genera and species known from culture. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 76, 51–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Slippers, B.; Crous, P.W.; Denman, S.; Coutinho, T.A.; Wingfield, B.D.; Wingfield, M.J. Combined multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several species previously identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea. Mycologia. 2004, 96, 83–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Aslam, S.; Tahir, A.; Aslam, M.F.; Alam, M.W.; Shedayi, A.A.; Sadia, S. Recent advances in molecular techniques for the identification of phytopathogenic fungia mini review. J. Plant Interact. 2017, 12, 493–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Yang, X.; Hameed, U.; Zhang, A.F.; Zang, H.Y.; Gu, C.Y.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.L. Development of a nested-PCR assay for the rapid detection of Pilidiella granati in pomegranate fruit. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Xu, C.; Zhang, H.; Chi, F.; Ji, Z.; Dong, Q.; Cao, K.; Zhou, Z. Species-specific PCR-based assays for identification and detection of Botryosphaeriaceae species causing stem blight on blueberry in China. J. Integr. Agric. 2016, 15, 573–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Notomi, T.; Okayama, H.; Masubuchi, H.; Yonekawa, T.; Watanabe, K.; Amino, N.; Hase, T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, e63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Goto, M.; Honda, E.; Ogura, A.; Nomoto, A.; Hanaki, K.I. Colorimetric detection of loop-mediated isothermal amplification reaction by using hydroxy naphthol blue. Biotechniques 2009, 46, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moradi, A.; Nasiri, J.; Abdollahi, H.; Almasi, M. Development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for detection of Erwinia amylovora based on chromosomal DNA. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2012, 133, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Niessen, L.; Vogel, R.F. Detection of Fusarium graminearum DNA using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 140, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, Q.; Zhang, C.Q. q-LAMP assays for the detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea causing Chinese hickory canker in trunk, water, and air samples. Plant Dis. 2019, 103, 3142–3149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Shaoli, W.; Henghua, Q.; Yingzi, W.; Peisong, W.; Binghui, L.; Guanhua, W. Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for rapid detection of apple ring rot pathogen Botryosphaeria dothidea. Chin. J. Plant Prot. 2020, 47, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gyoung, H.K.; Young, J.K. Diagnosis and Integrated Management of Major Fungal Fruit Rots on Kiwifruit in Korea. Res. Plant Dis. 2018, 24, 113–122. [Google Scholar]
  26. Michailides, T.J.; Elmer, P.A.G. Botrytis gray mold of kiwi-fruit caused by Botrytis cinerea in the United States and New Zealand. Plant Dis. 2000, 84, 208–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pennycook, S.R. Sclerotinia rot of kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis). Orchardist N. Z. 1982, 55, 407–408. [Google Scholar]
  28. Pennycook, S.R. Fungal fruit rots of Actinidia deliciosa (kiwifruit). N. Z. J. Exp. Agric. 1985, 13, 289–299. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, G.; Huang, G.; Zhu, L.; Lv, D.; Cao, B.; Liao, F.; Luo, J. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) detection of Phytophthora hibernalis, P. syringae and P. cambivora. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 101, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pan, W.; Shen, H.; Zhao, M. Development and application of the novel visual loop-mediated isothermal amplification of Omp25 sequence for rapid detection of Brucella sp. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2011, 10, 2120–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Przewodowska, A.; Zacharzewska, B.; Chołuj, J.; Treder, K. A one-step, real-time reverse transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification assay to detect potato virus Y. Am. J. Potato Res. 2015, 92, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Sun, J.; Najafzadeh, M.; Vicente, V.; Xi, L.; De, H.G. Rapid detection of pathogenic fungi using loop-mediated isothermal amplification, exemplified by fonsecaea agents of chromoblastomycosis. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2010, 80, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, S.; Ye, W.; Tian, Q.; Dong, S.; Zheng, X. Rapid detection of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides using a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay. Australas. Plant Pathol. 2017, 46, 493–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fan, F.; Yin, W.; Li, G.; Lin, Y.; Luo, C. Development of a LAMP method for detecting SDHI fungicide resistance in Botrytis cinerea. Plant Dis. 2018, 102, 1612–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mathur, K.; Thakur, R.P.; Rao, V.P. Comparison of single-spore and hyphal-tip isolates of Colletotrichum graminicola for morphological and pathogenic diversity. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 2000, 30, 359–365. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tang, W.; Ding, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, Y.; Guo, L. Phylogenetic and pathogenic analyses show that the causal agent of apple ring rot in China is Botryosphaeria dothidea. Plant Dis. 2012, 96, 486–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Möller, E.; Bahnweg, G.; Sandermann, H.; Geiger, H. A simple and efficient protocol for isolation of high molecular weight DNA from filamentous fungi, fruit bodies, and infected plant tissues. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 6115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Daniel, P.L.; Francesca, P.H.; Gubler, W.D.; Florent, P.T. Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with dieback and canker disease of bay laurel in northern California with the description of Dothiorella californica sp. nov. Fungal Biol. 2017, 121, 347–360. [Google Scholar]
  39. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing offungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications; Academic Press, Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  40. An, J.; Guo, L.; Zhu, X.; Song, Y. Susceptibility of Botryosphaeria dothidea to tebuconazole and thiophanate-methyl. Chin. Plant Pro. 2016, 42, 187–191. [Google Scholar]
  41. Carbone, I.; Kohn, L.M. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous Ascomycetes. Mycologia 1999, 91, 553–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Altschul, S.F.; Madden, T.L.; Schaffer, A.A.; Zhang, J.H.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, W.; Lipman, D.J. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 3389–3402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Ross, L.N.; Woodward, J.F. Koch’s postulates: An interventionist perspective. Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 2016, 59, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Duan, Y.; Yang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Pan, X.; Wu, J.; Cai, Y.; Li, T.; Zhao, D.; Wang, J.; Zhou, M. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the rapid detection of the F200Y mutant genotype of carbendazim-resistant isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis. 2016, 100, 976–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Plants 10 00401 g001 550
Figure 1. Symptoms of kiwifruit soft rot. (A) External slightly sunken symptom (arrow) on kiwi fruit. (B) Wart (arrow) on kiwi stem.
Figure 1. Symptoms of kiwifruit soft rot. (A) External slightly sunken symptom (arrow) on kiwi fruit. (B) Wart (arrow) on kiwi stem.
Plants 10 00401 g001
Plants 10 00401 g002 550
Figure 2. Morphologic characteristics of Botryosphaeria dothidea. Bd 431 comes from the diseased fruit (left), Bd432 comes from the wart (right). (A) The B. dothidea phenotype following a 5-day culture period on potato dextrose agar (PDA). (B) Pycnidia formation of B. dothidea on PDA. (C) Conidial morphology of B. dothidea.
Figure 2. Morphologic characteristics of Botryosphaeria dothidea. Bd 431 comes from the diseased fruit (left), Bd432 comes from the wart (right). (A) The B. dothidea phenotype following a 5-day culture period on potato dextrose agar (PDA). (B) Pycnidia formation of B. dothidea on PDA. (C) Conidial morphology of B. dothidea.
Plants 10 00401 g002
Plants 10 00401 g003 550
Figure 3. Dendrogram constructed by the neighbor-joining method showing the phylogenetic relationship (100%) between the isolate of Botryosphaeria dothidea (BD431) and B. dothidea isolate (AF027747) based on the We have checked (ITS) sequences.
Figure 3. Dendrogram constructed by the neighbor-joining method showing the phylogenetic relationship (100%) between the isolate of Botryosphaeria dothidea (BD431) and B. dothidea isolate (AF027747) based on the We have checked (ITS) sequences.
Plants 10 00401 g003
Plants 10 00401 g004 550
Figure 4. Symptoms of kiwifruit inoculated by Botryosphaeria dothidea. (A) No external symptom (arrow) of kiwifruit artificial infection with fungi-free PDA. (B) External slightly sunken symptom (arrow) of kiwifruit artificial infection with B. dothidea (Bd 431 comes from the diseased fruit). (C) External slightly sunken symptom (arrow) of kiwifruit artificial infection with B. dothidea (Bd432 comes from the wart).
Figure 4. Symptoms of kiwifruit inoculated by Botryosphaeria dothidea. (A) No external symptom (arrow) of kiwifruit artificial infection with fungi-free PDA. (B) External slightly sunken symptom (arrow) of kiwifruit artificial infection with B. dothidea (Bd 431 comes from the diseased fruit). (C) External slightly sunken symptom (arrow) of kiwifruit artificial infection with B. dothidea (Bd432 comes from the wart).
Plants 10 00401 g004
Plants 10 00401 g005 550
Figure 5. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay on detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea. 1000 × SYBR Green I color change-based LAMP product detection (A). Agarose gel electrophoresis-based LAMP product detection (B). M: DNA marker 2 k, 1: Botryosphaeria dothidea isolate from kiwifruit fruit, 2: Botryosphaeria dothidea isolate from kiwifruit stem, 3: Botrytis cinerea, 4: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, 5: Valsa mali, 6: Alternaria alternate, 7: Marssonina coronaria, 8: water.
Figure 5. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay on detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea. 1000 × SYBR Green I color change-based LAMP product detection (A). Agarose gel electrophoresis-based LAMP product detection (B). M: DNA marker 2 k, 1: Botryosphaeria dothidea isolate from kiwifruit fruit, 2: Botryosphaeria dothidea isolate from kiwifruit stem, 3: Botrytis cinerea, 4: Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, 5: Valsa mali, 6: Alternaria alternate, 7: Marssonina coronaria, 8: water.
Plants 10 00401 g005
Plants 10 00401 g006a 550Plants 10 00401 g006b 550
Figure 6. Assessment of LAMP assay sensitivity for the detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea. 1000 × SYBR Green I color change-based LAMP product detection (A). Agarose gel electrophoresis-based LAMP product detection (B). DNA isolated from Botryosphaeria dothidea isolate was subjected to serial 10-fold dilution (10 ng–10−6 ng) and served as a template in LAMP assays. M: DNA marker 2 k, 1–7: 10 ng, 10−1 ng, 10−2 ng, 10−3 ng, 10−4 ng, 10−5 ng, 10−6 ng, 8: water.
Figure 6. Assessment of LAMP assay sensitivity for the detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea. 1000 × SYBR Green I color change-based LAMP product detection (A). Agarose gel electrophoresis-based LAMP product detection (B). DNA isolated from Botryosphaeria dothidea isolate was subjected to serial 10-fold dilution (10 ng–10−6 ng) and served as a template in LAMP assays. M: DNA marker 2 k, 1–7: 10 ng, 10−1 ng, 10−2 ng, 10−3 ng, 10−4 ng, 10−5 ng, 10−6 ng, 8: water.
Plants 10 00401 g006aPlants 10 00401 g006b
Plants 10 00401 g007 550
Figure 7. Detection of the Botryosphaeria dothidea in tissue samples from diseased kiwi fruits via LAMP assay. 1000 × SYBR Green I color change-based LAMP product detection (A). Agarose gel electrophoresis-based LAMP product detection (B). M: DNA marker 2 k, 1: DNA from Botryosphaeria dothidea isolate mycelium, 2: DNA from diseased kiwi fruit infected with Botryosphaeria dothidea from the pathogenicity determination experiment, 3,4: DNA from diseased kiwi fruit infected with Botryosphaeria dothidea from field, 5: DNA from healthy kiwifruit fruit, 6: water.
Figure 7. Detection of the Botryosphaeria dothidea in tissue samples from diseased kiwi fruits via LAMP assay. 1000 × SYBR Green I color change-based LAMP product detection (A). Agarose gel electrophoresis-based LAMP product detection (B). M: DNA marker 2 k, 1: DNA from Botryosphaeria dothidea isolate mycelium, 2: DNA from diseased kiwi fruit infected with Botryosphaeria dothidea from the pathogenicity determination experiment, 3,4: DNA from diseased kiwi fruit infected with Botryosphaeria dothidea from field, 5: DNA from healthy kiwifruit fruit, 6: water.
Plants 10 00401 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, L.; Hou, H.; Zhou, Z.; Tu, H.; Yuan, H. Identification and Detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea from Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in China. Plants 2021, 10, 401. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10020401

AMA Style

Wang L, Hou H, Zhou Z, Tu H, Yuan H. Identification and Detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea from Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in China. Plants. 2021; 10(2):401. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10020401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Li, Hui Hou, Zengqiang Zhou, Hongtao Tu, and Hongbo Yuan. 2021. "Identification and Detection of Botryosphaeria dothidea from Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis) in China" Plants 10, no. 2: 401. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10020401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop