Next Article in Journal
Discovering Penicillium polonicum with High-Lytic Capacity on Helianthus tuberosus Tubers: Oil-Based Preservation for Mold Management
Next Article in Special Issue
Trichoderma-Induced Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Solanum Species: A Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Are Methanol-Derived Foliar Methyl Acetate Emissions a Tracer of Acetate-Mediated Drought Survival in Plants?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Lacto-Fermented Agricultural By-Products as a Natural Disinfectant against Post-Harvest Diseases of Mango (Mangifera indica L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Involvement of Selected Phenotypes of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 in Olive Root Colonization and Biological Control of Verticillium dahliae

by
Nuria Montes-Osuna
1,
Carmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás
1,
Antonio Valverde-Corredor
1,
Roeland L. Berendsen
2,
Pilar Prieto
3 and
Jesús Mercado-Blanco
1,*
1
Departamento de Protección de Cultivos, Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n, Campus “Alameda del Obispo”, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
2
Plant–Microbe Interactions, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands
3
Departamento de Mejora Genética Vegetal, Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible, Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Avenida Menéndez Pidal s/n, Campus “Alameda del Obispo”, 14004 Córdoba, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 1 February 2021 / Revised: 16 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 23 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biological Control of Plant Diseases)

Abstract

:
Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 is an indigenous inhabitant of the olive (Olea europaea L.) rhizosphere/root endosphere and an effective biocontrol agent against Verticillium wilt of olive (VWO), caused by the soil-borne fungus Verticillium dahliae. This study aimed to evaluate the potential involvement of selected phenotypes of strain PICF7 in root colonization ability and VWO biocontrol. Therefore, a random transposon-insertion mutant bank of P. simiae PICF7 was screened for the loss of phenotypes likely involved in rhizosphere/soil persistence (copper resistance), root colonization (biofilm formation) and plant growth promotion (phytase activity). Transposon insertions in genes putatively coding for the transcriptional regulator CusR or the chemotaxis protein CheV were found to affect copper resistance, whereas an insertion in fleQ gene putatively encoding a flagellar regulatory protein hampered the ability to form a biofilm. However, these mutants displayed the same antagonistic effect against V. dahliae as the parental strain. Remarkably, two mutants impaired in biofilm formation were never found inside olive roots, whereas their ability to colonize the root exterior and to control VWO remained unaffected. Endophytic colonization of olive roots was unaltered in mutants impaired in copper resistance and phytase production. Results demonstrated that the phenotypes studied were irrelevant for VWO biocontrol.

1. Introduction

Olive (Olea europaea L. subsp europaea var. europaea) is an important crop widely distributed across the Mediterranean Basin, the region where 98% of the world’s olive cultivating acreage is concentrated [1]. Moreover, this crop and its associated agri-food industry constitute one of the main economic drivers for the agricultural sector in many countries of this geographical area. Verticillium wilt of olive (VWO) caused by the soil-borne fungus Verticillium dahliae Kleb. is considered one of the most serious biotic constraints affecting this woody crop, a devastating disease which is extremely difficult to control (reviewed by [2]). The persistence of dormant structures (microsclerotia) of the pathogen in soils, its broad host range, its survival inside xylem vessels during its parasitic phase, the high genetic and pathogenic diversity within V. dahliae populations and disease-aggravating agronomical practices are some of the factors explaining the difficulties in managing the disease. In this context, an efficient control of VWO can only be achieved under an integrated disease management strategy that combines physical, chemical, biological and agronomical approaches to be implemented both as preventive (pre-planting) and palliative (post-planting) measures [2,3]. Within this strategy, the use of beneficial microorganisms (i.e., biocontrol approaches) represents an interesting, sustainable and environmentally friendly option to be used in combination with other disease control tools.
Different microorganisms have been identified as effective biocontrol agents (BCA) against V. dahliae ([2,4,5] and references therein). Thus, just to name the most recent examples, several Pseudomonas spp. and Bacillales spp. members [6,7], non-pathogenic Fusarium strains [8], entomopathogenic fungi such as Metarhizium brunneum and Beauveria bassiana [9] or arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [10] have been shown to reduce both the severity of VWO in susceptible olive cultivars and the inoculum density of V. dahliae in the soil. Interestingly, several studies have evidenced the importance of the olive-associated microbiota as a reservoir of potential BCAs against VWO [6,7,11,12]. Moreover, a higher abundance of beneficial microbial genera was recently found in the root endosphere community of the resistant cultivar Frantoio, compared to that found in the susceptible cultivar Picual. This also suggests that VWO tolerance can be explained, at least to some extent, by the ability of tolerant cultivars to preferentially recruit beneficial microorganisms and the way constituents of the root endophytic community interact among them [13].
Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 (formerly P. fluorescens PICF7) [14,15], a natural inhabitant of the olive rhizosphere also able to endophytically colonize the root tissues [16], is perhaps the best characterized BCA against VWO [17,18,19]. However, the underlying mechanisms explaining its endophytic behavior and biocontrol effectiveness remain to be fully understood. For instance, while P. simiae PICF7 has been demonstrated to induce systemic resistance against Botrytis cinerea in the model plant A. thaliana [20], effective control of the olive phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi (Psv) was not observed when PICF7 and the pathogen were inoculated at different sites (i.e., PICF7 in the roots and Psv in the stem) [21]. Moreover, although P. simiae PICF7 is able to trigger defensive responses in both roots [22] and aerial tissues [17], effective control requires the presence of both the BCA and the pathogen on the same side of an olive split-root study system [18]. Overall, these results suggest that biocontrol performance of PICF7 must rely on a combination of mechanisms like competition for colonization sites, antibiosis and the triggering of local (i.e., in roots) host defense responses.
Efforts to identify PICF7 traits involved not only in VWO biocontrol but also in olive root colonization, including endophytism, were further pursued by Maldonado-González and co-workers [19]. A P. simiae PICF7 random transposon-insertion mutant bank was generated and massive screening of transposants was conducted to evaluate whether mutants altered in swimming motility and siderophore (pyoverdine) production had lost biocontrol effectiveness and endophytic colonization ability. Results indicated that these two PICF7 phenotypes were required neither for VWO biocontrol activity nor for the ability to colonize the olive root interior [19]. In order to investigate additional traits potentially involved in root (endophytic) colonization and biocontrol performance of strain PICF7, we focused our attention on selected phenotypes traditionally associated with (i) rhizosphere/soil persistence (i.e., copper resistance), root colonization (i.e., biofilm formation) and plant growth promotion (i.e., phytase activity).
Copper, an essential metal for most organisms, is required in trace amounts as a component of proteins and for cellular processes. However, excessive concentrations of this element can be lethal [23,24]. This makes copper an extremely effective antimicrobial agent, which explains its traditional and extensive use in agriculture. Particularly, most of the fungicides/bactericides used to control some olive diseases are based on copper [25]. Nevertheless, some soil inhabitants have developed/acquired resistance mechanisms towards a range of heavy metals found in soils, including copper, to maintain their fitness and survival capabilities [26]. Beneficial microorganisms able to tolerate significant concentrations of copper could therefore pose advantages from the perspective of controlling olive diseases, including VWO. In silico analysis of the P. simiae PICF7 genome previously revealed the presence of at least 11 genes related with copper resistance [14]. Up to date, however, no information is available on the actual tolerance of strain PICF7 to copper. Moreover, whether copper tolerance may confer any advantage with regard to root colonization and VWO biocontrol abilities of PICF7 is unknown.
Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 has been earlier demonstrated to promote the growth and enhance the yield of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) plants [27]. Several traits traditionally associated with plant growth promotion have been demonstrated in strain PICF7 (e.g., siderophore production, phytase and phosphatase activities, etc.) [6]. It is plausible to think that a correct nutritional status of the plant may help to better deal with different biotic stresses. Thus, a BCA capable to promote the plant growth by direct mechanisms may also help the host to reach an optimal fitness status, thereby contributing to confront the negative effects caused by the presence of a pathogen in a more efficient way [28]. Phosphorus (P) is an important macronutrient essential for plant growth and development. In soils, 20–80% of phosphate is present in organic forms but the ability of plants to mobilize P from these chemical species is very limited [29]. Some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are able to convert insoluble phosphates into soluble forms available to plants by the production of phytases [30]. Phytases (phosphatases catalyzing the hydrolysis of phytic acid) release a plant-usable form of P from soils with high content of organic P, a mechanism proposed to promote plant growth [31]. Phytase activity has been reported for PICF7 [6]. Furthermore, in silico analysis of the PICF7 genome has revealed the presence of a gene putatively coding for a 3-phytase [14]. However, no information is available on the possible link between this phenotype and root colonization ability and biocontrol performance of this BCA.
The capability of soil-borne rhizobacteria to exert their beneficial effects on plants firstly depend on their aptitude for colonizing (and persisting on/in) the rhizosphere, the root surface and/or the root interior [28]. Different mechanisms (i.e., production of mucilage, chemotaxis driven by root exudates, bacterial flagella, motility, quorum sensing responses, release of specific biomolecules, cell surface proteins, and site-specific recombinases among others), that can be used either alone or in combination, may be deployed by any given bacterial BCA to ensure successful colonization of the target niche [32,33,34]. Among these mechanisms, several studies have demonstrated the role that biofilm production plays in rhizosphere/root colonization processes [35]. Indeed, in roots colonized by beneficial rhizobacteria, biofilms provide a more protected niche. In addition, they are crucial for living on the roots as well as in the distribution of bacterial cells in this organ [36,37]. Production of bacterial biofilms is a complex process influenced by many genes and factors (e.g., [38,39,40,41]). Biofilms undoubtedly provide advantages to the bacterium able to generate them [42]. So far, nothing is known about the ability of strain PICF7 to produce biofilm. The identification of PICF7 genes involved in this trait, as well as their potential relationships with olive root colonization and biocontrol performance, can thus be useful in explaining the beneficial effects of this endophytic rhizobacteria.
Therefore, and taking into account the previous background, the main objectives of this study were: (i) to identify genes involved in three phenotypes traditionally associated with rhizosphere/soil persistence (copper tolerance), plant growth promotion (phytase activity) and root colonization ability (biofilm formation); and (ii) to determine whether mutants defective in these selected phenotypes could be compromised in the ability of strain PICF7 to effectively colonize olive roots, including the interior of this organ, and to control VWO. Additionally, using full-genome comparison, we aimed to confirm PICF7 as belonging to the P. simiae species.

2. Results

2.1. Comparative Genomics Supports the Taxonomic Assignment of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7

A previous multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA) using concatenated partial sequences of six housekeeping genes showed that strain PICF7 clustered with Pseudomonas simiae WCS417 [6]. In order to confirm the taxonomy of PICF7, its full genome was compared with the genomes of P. simiae WCS417 [43] and the reference strain Pseudomonas simiae CCUG 50988T [44] (Figure 1). Alignment using the MAUVE tool showed that P. simiae CCUG 50988T, P. simiae WCS417 and P. fluorescens PICF7 are nearly identical except for some small genomic islands that are unique for each of the strains. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) algorithm using BLAST (ANIb) analysis showed that PICF7 shared 99.38% average nucleotide identity with P. simiae CCUG 50988T and 99.35% with P. simiae WCS417 (http://jspecies.ribohost.com/jspeciesws/#genomesdb-detail;id=23494 (accessed on 17 January 2020)). The same colors shown in Figure 1 correspond to similar genomic regions present in the three strains. White gaps indicate genomic regions not shared among the analyzed strains. The small genomic region marked in a green color is present in the genomes of P. simiae WCS417 and in the P. simiae type strain but is missing in PICF7. Thus, results showed a high identity level among the three genomes, confirming strain PICF7 as P. simiae.

2.2. Screening of a PICF7 Mutant Bank to Identify Altered Target Phenotypes

More than 5.500 Tn5-TcR (Tetracycline-resistance) insertion mutants (transposants) of a pre-existing random transposon insertion mutant bank [19] were checked for phenotypes altered either in (i) growth on media supplemented with copper, or (ii) biofilm formation, or (iii) phytase activity. The screening of P. simiae PICF7 TcR-resistant individual colonies allowed us to generate an initial collection of 63 mutants affected in one of the phenotypes mentioned above.
Concerning the identification of mutants defective in copper tolerance, toxicity tests (see de Material and Methods section) using four different media supplemented with CuSO4·5H2O determined that the tolerance threshold of P. simiae PICF7 to copper depended on the medium used. Luria Bertani (LB), Nutrient Agar (NA), Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) and Standard Succinate Medium (SSM) were used. Regarding NA medium, PICF7 was able to grow up to a copper concentration of 2 mM. However, the tolerance threshold was lower in PDA (0.5 mM) and SSM (0.08 mM) media. Eventually, LB agar and a concentration of 4.5 mM CuSO4·5H2O were the culturing conditions chosen to identify PICF7 mutants defective in copper tolerance. Thirty-six TcR transposants presenting alterations either in growth or colony morphology were identified. Only two of them were not able to grow at all (mutants Cop1 and Cop33; Figure 2A). Another three showed an altered colony color, and the rest displayed differences in colony size/morphology compared to the wild-type strain, although all of them were able to grow at the conditions tested. Mutants of the two latter groups were not further investigated in this study.
Regarding to the search for transposants showing a phenotype altered in biofilm formation, and after conducting the screening strategy designed to identify them (see the Materials and Methods section), only five mutants could be identified. Loss in the ability to form a biofilm in liquid medium of the two mutants finally selected (Bfm8 and Bfm9) is shown in Figure 2B. It is worth mentioning that the ability of wild-type PICF7 to produce a biofilm was considerably lower than that of the reference strain (Pseudomonas putida KT2440) used to assess this phenotype, at least under our experimental conditions.
With regard to the identification of Tn5-TcR insertion mutants impaired in phytase activity, a total of 22 mutants that showed no halo formation or reduced haloes around the colonies in Phytase Specific Medium (PSM) were detected. Only two transposants (mutants Phy17 and Phy18; Figure 2C) unable to form haloes, indicating total loss of phytase activity, were eventually selected for further experiments.
Finally, BOX-PCR fingerprinting revealed no modification of the banding pattern in any of the selected P. simiae PICF7 mutants, compared to that of the wild-type (data not shown). This result confirmed that all mutants were PICF7 derivatives (i.e., discarding accidental contamination with other bacteria during processing), and that no major alterations were introduced in their genomes upon insertion of the transposon.

2.3. Identification of the Disrupted Gene in the Genomes of Selected Mutants of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7

Identification of the disrupted genes as a consequence of the Tn5-TcR insertion was attempted for 26 out of the 63 preselected mutants. Eventually, only six of them, two per phenotype here under study (i.e., Cop1, Cop33, Bfm8, Bfm9, Phy17 and Phy18, Figure 2) were selected for subsequent olive root colonization and VWO biocontrol assays (see below). This final selection was based on the following criteria: (i) unambiguous and full altered phenotype, (ii) neither alteration in colony morphology nor in growth rates in different culturing media, and (iii) the unequivocal identification of the transposon insertion site. While this was possible for mutants Cop1, Cop33, Bfm8 and Bfm9, the insertion site of mutants impaired in phytase activity (i.e., Phy17 and Phy18) could not be unambiguously identified after repeated attempts. Indeed, multiple, faint and overlapping PCR products (>8) were always obtained for these mutants, even though PCR conditions were modified for several parameters. Finally, selected mutants were checked for the absence of other altered phenotypes for which they were selected.
Results showed that mutant Cop1 carried the Tn5-TcR insertion in a cheV gene homologue, which codes for a chemotaxis protein, while in mutant Cop33 the insertion was located within the cusR gene, potentially coding for a transcriptional regulatory protein that is part of the two-component regulatory system CusS/CusR involved in response to copper and silver (Table 1 and Figure 3). The transposon insertion of mutant Bfm8 was localized in a fleQ gene homologue, coding for a flagellar regulatory protein, while in mutant Bfm9 the transposon hit a gene potentially coding for an unidentified 648 aa-long membrane protein (Table 1 and Figure 3). Interestingly, the N-terminal domain of this protein contains putative Flp pilus-assembly TadE/G-like (positions 11–57) and Tad-like Flp pilus-assembly (positions 55–156) motifs.

2.4. Only PICF7 Mutants Impaired in Biofilm Formation Are Unable to Internally Colonize Olive Roots

Olive roots inoculated with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-labeled derivatives of P. simiae PICF7 and of the selected mutants were sampled on a time-course basis (during 20 days after bacterial inoculation; DAI) for confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) analysis. Results showed that P. simiae PICF7, as well as all analyzed mutants, were able to extensively colonize the olive root surface. At 3 DAI, however, only bacterial cells of mutants altered in copper tolerance (Cop1 and Cop33) and phytase activity (Phy17 and Phy18) were visualized within root hair cells (Figure 4), a characteristic colonization behavior of the wild-type strain PICF7 [45].
Longitudinal sections of roots also showed fluorescent bacterial cells colonizing the interior of different root tissues like the intercellular spaces of the root cortex and the vascular system, as well as within epidermal cells (Figure 5A–E). The same colonization pattern was consistently observed for wild-type PICF7 and mutants defective in copper tolerance (Cop1 and Cop33) and phytase activity (Phy17 and Ph18) in a fair number of samples (at least 6 plants were examined for these treatments to obtain conclusive evidence of colonization). Mutants impaired in biofilm formation (Bfm8 and Bfm9), however, were only found on the root surface (Figure 5G,H). Indeed, after two independent experiments no evidence of root endophytic colonization by these mutants could be found in any of the plants examined (12). Thus, according to the results obtained, mutants Bfm8 and Bfm9 have lost the ability to internally colonize the olive root tissues, at least under the experimental conditions used.

2.5. PICF7 Mutants Defective in Phytase Activity Show a Significant Reduction of In Vitro Antagonism against Verticillium dahliae

Results from in vitro antagonism assays showed that phytase-deficient mutants Phy17 and Phy18 were not able to inhibit the growth of the defoliating (D) pathotype isolate V. dahliae V937I on PDA medium. In experiment I, no inhibition of V. dahliae by these mutants was observed (Table 2). In experiment II, only very slight inhibition of the pathogen’s growth (0.51% by Phy17 and 1.03% by Phy18) was scored compared with the wild-type PICF7 (control) in PDA medium (Table 2). In contrast, no significant differences were found between the antagonist behavior of these mutants and that of PICF7 when NA plates were used (Table 2 and Figure 6), indicating the influence exerted by the culturing media (and therefore nutrients availability) over the results scored for this type of experiment.
Regarding biofilm-impaired mutants (Bfm8 and Bfm9), results showed a significantly (p < 0.05) higher V. dahliae growth inhibition exerted by mutants Bfm8 (Experiment I, both culturing media) and Bfm9 (Experiment II, only in PDA) compared to inhibition percentages scored for the wild-strain PICF7. However, results scored for these mutants varied between experiments. Finally, mutants unable to grow in culturing media amended with copper, Cop1 and Cop33, did not show significant differences in their ability to inhibit V. dahliae growth compared to the wild-type strain (Table 2). It is worth mentioning that V. dahliae displayed altered mycelium growth on NA plates when Cop mutants were present. This phenomenon was not observed for the other interactions here examined (Figure 6).

2.6. PICF7 Mutants Are Not Affected in Biological Control Ability against Verticillium Wilt of Olive

Two independent experiments were carried out to test the biocontrol ability of the six selected P. simiae PICF7 mutants. Results showed that mutants Bfm8 and Bfm9 (impaired in biofilm formation), Cop1 and Cop33 (copper sensitive) and Phy17 and Phy18 (lacking phytase activity) displayed similar biocontrol effectiveness against VWO compared to the wild-type strain. Non-inoculated plants (control treatment) and plants inoculated only with the bacterial strains showed normal growth in both bioassays. The first VWO symptoms appeared three weeks after pathogen inoculation in the disease control treatment. Plants initially showed chlorosis and inward rolling of leaves in some cases. Approximately one-month after V. dahliae inoculation, the first events of green leaf fall were observed, a symptom that progressed over time until complete defoliation and death of some plants. In fact, mortality reached 25% in Experiment I and 41.67% in Experiment II (Table 3).
In Experiment I, PICF7-bacterized plants displayed significant (p < 0.05) reduction of the final mean severity symptoms (FS) and the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) disease parameters in comparison to non-bacterized (control) plants (Table 3). Besides, a decrease in disease intensity index (DII), disease incidence (DI) and mortality (M) values were also observed (Table 3). Plants inoculated with selected mutants showed a similar behavior to that observed in plants inoculated with the wild-type PICF7 (Table 3). No dead plants were observed for Bfm8, Bfm9, Phy17 and Cop33 treatments.
A more severe VWO epidemic was scored in Experiment II (Table 3), as clearly reflected by M, DII and FS parameters. While in this experiment P. simiae PICF7 did not display significant biocontrol activity against VWO, all disease parameters were lower than those scored for the control treatment. Interestingly, however, all mutants here examined were able to effectively control the disease as evidenced by a significant (p < 0.05) reduction of the AUDPC compared to non-bacterized plants. FS and DII parameters were also reduced in all mutant treatments (Table 3). Despite mutants Phy17 and Phy18 were altered in their capacities to antagonize V. dahliae (Table 2; Figure 4), biocontrol ability was not compromised. In addition, Phy mutants showed the lowest values for FS, FDII and AUDPC (Table 3) parameters in experiment II. Altogether, results from both experiments evidenced that the three phenotypes here under evaluation are not determinants of VWO biocontrol by P. simiae PICF7.

3. Discussion

The success of BCA relies on different modes of action. Competition for nutrients and space, niche colonization ability, induction of local and/or systemic host defense responses, and antibiosis are some of them, which can work individually or in combination [5,28,46]. Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 (formerly P. fluorescens PICF7) [14,15] is effective in controlling Verticillium wilt under different experimental conditions, and not only in olive [15,17,19] but also in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana [20]. Yet, the underlying mechanisms involved in VWO control are insufficiently understood. Moreover, they could be diverse and operate differentially in time and space [17,18,19].
Earlier, by the MLSA of concatenated partial sequences of housekeeping genes, we found that strain PICF7 clustered with the model BCA P. simiae WCS417 [6]. This latter strain was taxonomically reclassified (originally P. fluorescens) by Berendsen and co-workers [43]. Recently, Pieterse and co-workers [47] suggested that other strains formerly classified as P. fluorescens, such as PICF7, may actually be part of the simiae group based on genome sequence identities. This has been confirmed by the full-genome comparison analysis performed in this work. Indeed, results showed that strain PICF7 showed more than 99.3% ANIb with both P. simiae CCUG 50988T and P. simiae WCS417. Actually the three strains are nearly isogenic but for some genomic islands, probably as the result of horizontal gene transfer, found to be unique for each studied strain.
A previous study evaluated whether siderophore (pyoverdine) production and swimming motility were involved in the effectiveness of PICF7 to control VWO. By mutant analysis both phenotypes were discarded as needed for such a benefit since defective mutants were able to control the disease to the same extent as the wild-type strain [19]. In order to further understand the molecular bases conferring P. simiae PICF7 the ability to control VWO, as well as to colonize olive roots, additional phenotypes have been evaluated in this work by using the same mutant analysis approach.
A limiting factor of plant growth is the usually low P availability in soils. To alleviate this limitation, huge amounts of chemical fertilizers are used every year. Some microorganisms have developed the ability to solubilize mineral phosphates fixed in the soil [48]. Thus, through mechanisms such as the activity of phosphatases and phytases, which release P from organic phosphates, or the exudation of organic acids to solubilize inorganic phosphate, P is made available to plants [49]. Microorganisms with the ability to mobilize phosphate are of great interest for crop improvement, soil management and agro-biotechnological applications. Interestingly, and related to our aims, many of them also have the capacity to suppress diverse phytopathogens [6,50,51,52]. Earlier, in silico analysis of the PICF7 genome allowed the identification of a putative 3-phytase-coding gene [14]. Moreover, phytase activity has been confirmed for wild-type PICF7 ([6]; this study). Only two fully phytase-defective PICF7 mutants, Phy17 and Phy18, were found after the screening of more than 5500 Tn5-TcR transposants. Unfortunately, the transposon insertion site could not be unequivocally determined in any of them, although insertions seemed to be localized at different positions in the PICF7 genome according to the distinctive PCR profiles obtained for each mutant (data not shown). Whether a truly functional phytase-3 gene is present in PICF7, or whether alternatively other genes are involved in phytase activity, could not thus be unveiled. A site-directed mutagenesis strategy will be needed to achieve this goal. However, phytase activity was fully abolished in the two selected mutants, allowing the assessment of this phenotype as for its involvement in root colonization and VWO biocontrol. Both mutants lost their ability to inhibit the growth of V. dahliae (a representative of the D pathotype), although results varied depending on the culturing medium used. Such medium-dependent differences have been previously observed when characterizing a collection of olive-root-associated rhizobacteria [6,7,53]. While competition for nutrients and/or in vitro antibiosis towards V. dahliae seemed to be affected in these mutants, results from biocontrol experiments clearly showed that Phy17 and Phy18 controlled VWO to the same extent that the wild-type strain did. In addition, both phytase-defective mutants were able to colonize the interior of olive roots. Thus, results allowed discarding this phenotype as relevant for endophytic lifestyle and for biocontrol of V. dahliae by PICF7.
Successful biocontrol of soilborne fungal diseases must be preceded by efficient and persistent colonization of the niche (e.g., rhizosphere, rhizoplane, root interior, etc.) where BCA exert their beneficial effects [34,54]. The ability to form biofilms on plant roots has been reported as an important trait linked to the colonization ability of many biocontrol rhizobacteria. For example, the effectiveness to suppress Phytophthora capsici in pepper plants by Pseudomonas corrugata CCR04 and CCR80 is linked to good colonization of the host plant that is facilitated by the ability of both strains to form biofilms [55]. Similarly, the mutant 1srfAB, affected in biofilm formation, had a reduced colonization ability of melon roots and was impaired in biocontrol efficacy against bacterial fruit blotch compared with the wild-type B. subtilis 9407 [56]. Finally, Bacillus subtilis mutants enhanced in biofilm formation improved their biocontrol efficacy against Ralstonia wilt on tomato plants compared to biofilm-defective mutants [54]. Nevertheless, these authors also suggested that biofilm formation alone could not be enough to explain biocontrol activity. This was based on the observation that some wild-type strains of Bacillus producing a robust biofilm showed poor biocontrol performance. These results highlight the difficulties in establishing a clear relationship between the biofilm production process and effective biocontrol.
While the link between biofilm formation, root colonization ability and biocontrol performance has been demonstrated in different studies [42,55,57], our results indicate that this relationship cannot be established to explain VWO control by PICF7, particularly as for endophytic colonization is concerned. Indeed, although the two mutants impaired in biofilm formation (Bfm8 and Bfm9) displayed the same olive root surface colonization behavior than that of PICF7, they had lost their ability to colonize the root interior. However, both mutants displayed the same in vitro antagonist capacity against V. dahliae and biocontrol performance against VWO as that observed for the wild-type strain. Strain PICF7 was earlier demonstrated to control Verticillium wilt in A. thaliana even though no evidence of endophytism was found in the model plant [20]. Thus, results here obtained point to the fact that inner colonization of olive roots by PICF7 cells is not needed for the effective biocontrol of V. dahliae. Therefore, most of the biocontrol activity appears to rely on PICF7 activity on the olive root surface (e.g., attachment to pathogen hyphae [58], antibiosis, triggering of host local defense responses [22]), although competition for nutrients and space cannot be excluded either. In summary, biofilm formation by PICF7 is not needed for biocontrol activity but is important for colonization of the root interior.
Production of bacterial biofilms is a highly complex process in which many genes, as well as environmental factors, are involved. In silico analysis of the PICF7 genome revealed the presence of different gene clusters presumably involved in biofilm formation such as pelABCDEFG, pslADEFGHJKL and pgaABD [14]. The implication of pel, psl and pga genes in biofilm-forming bacteria has been described elsewhere [59,60,61,62]. However, mutants Bfm8 and Bfm9 here reported were disrupted in genes other than the previous ones, unveiling that additional loci in the PICF7 genome are relevant for biofilm formation. Thus, mutant Bfm8 harbored the Tn5-TcR insertion in a fleQ gene homologue, coding for a flagellar regulatory protein. This protein has been identified as a master regulator of flagella and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 and Pseudomonas putida KT2440 [63]. Mutations affecting fleQ produced non-motile, non-flagellated cells in the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 [64] and in the rhizobacterium P. putida KT2442 [65]. Disruption of fleQ seriously compromised biofilm formation in the latter strain as well as in P. putida KT2440 [66]. Finally, the transcriptional regulator FleQ has been described for its role in the modulation of lapA and bcs genes expression, involved in the production of biofilm matrix components in this latter strain [66]. The Tn5-TcR insertion in mutant Bfm9 was localized in a gene potentially encoding an unidentified membrane protein. One of the first stages in biofilm formation is mediated by the formation of an active attachment of bacterial apexes (fimbriae, flagella or pili) to the host surface. Interestingly, the membrane protein whose coding gene was disrupted in mutant Bfm9 contains putative Flp pilus-assembly TadE/G-like and Tad-like Flp pilus-assembly motifs (SSDB Motif Search Result: pff:PFLUOLIPICF705200 (kegg.jp)). Tad (tight adhesion) genes have been described for their role in biofilm formation. In addition, they have been shown to play an important role in colonization and pathogenicity in some bacterial species (i.e., Aggregatibacter (“Actinobacillus”) actinomycetemcomitans, Pseudomonas aeruginosa) [67,68]. Recently, Blanco-Romero and co-workers [69] have extensively studied the phylogenetic distribution of Flp/Tad pili. They reported that the required machinery for their biosynthesis is often found in plant-associated beneficial bacteria, with a likely involvement in rhizosphere colonization processes. Moreover, the Flp gene and the tad locus are linked, the latter encoding a macromolecular machine needed for the assemblage of type Ivb Flp subfamily adhesive pili [70]. Type IV pili have been described by their implication in biofilm formation [71,72]. Finally, it is worth mentioning that CLSM imagery has proven that PICF7 is able to form biofilms on/in roots of olive ([45,58]; this study) and cereal species [27]. However, biofilms were usually observed at localized spots. It might well be that PICF7 does not have a high capacity to produce biofilm compared to other robust biofilm producers such as P. putida KT2440 (Figure 2).
Different genes related to copper resistance, including copper tolerance two-component regulatory system cusSR (5) and copper resistance protein-encoding genes copBCD and copDC, were earlier identified in silico in the P. simiae PICF7 genome [14]. In our study, a gene potentially coding for a chemotaxis protein (CheV) has also been identified to be involved in copper tolerance, as revealed by the phenotype altered in mutant Cop1. Chemotaxis enables, for instance, bacteria to move towards nutrient sources (positive chemotaxis) or away from toxins (negative chemotaxis) [73]. In this way, chemotaxis is closely related to numerous biological processes that imply the movement of bacterial cells such as biofilm, cell aggregation or plant colonization ([74] and references therein). The actual link between CheV and copper tolerance by PICF7 needs further analysis beyond the aims of this study. Regarding Cop33, the transposon insertion was localized in a CusR gene that encodes a copper-responsive two-component system (TCS). Bacterial TCS allow perceiving, responding and adapting to environmental stimuli. It has been reported that the Cus system is involved in the homeostasis of copper, which is activated in the presence of submillimolar concentrations of this metal [75]. In Escherichia coli, the sensor kinase CusS forms a TCS with the response regulator CusR. This TCS has been demonstrated to be required for copper and silver resistance in this bacterium [76]. Furthermore, the CusR/CusS system is essential for the regulation of the cusCFBA operon, responsible for exporting both metals outside the cells [76,77].
Copper appears as one of the most common contaminants in soils [78]. In agriculture, most of the antifungal chemicals traditionally used against many phytopathogens are based on copper. Contamination and exposure to high doses of heavy metals is therefore a serious problem affecting agricultural fields [79]. The combination of BCA able to tolerate copper with reduced amounts of copper-based biocides may lessen the inputs of the latter to the environment, resulting in an interesting and more sustainable practice to control phytopathogens. Among Pseudomonas spp., including both beneficial and phytopathogenic, copper tolerance level may be highly variable [26,80]. In our study, P. simiae PICF7 was found to tolerate copper concentrations up to 4.5 mM of CuSO4·5H2O in LB, in agreement with values described elsewhere for a copper-resistant Pseudomonas extremaustralis [81]. Similarly, the PGPR Pseudomonas psychrotolerans CS51 also tolerates concentrations of 1mM of copper. Interestingly, cucumber plants pre-inoculated with strain CS51 showed an enhanced tolerance to copper compared with non-bacterized plants [82]. This offers interesting perspectives in the use of beneficial metal-tolerant rhizobacteria to enhance plant tolerance to heavy metals, coupled with additional plant growth-promoting traits present in these microorganisms [83].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Culturing Media and Conditions, Microorganisms and Plasmid

Bacterial strains, mutant derivatives, the fungal pathogen and the plasmid used in this study, including main characteristics and sources/references, are listed in Table 4.
Starting cultures of Bacillus sp. PIC28 [7], Pseudomonas indica PIC128, P. putida KT2440, and the wild-type P. simiae PICF7 were grown overnight in LB medium (5 g yeast extract, 10 g triptone and 5 g NaCl in 1000 mL of distilled water) at 28 °C. GFP-labelled derivatives of the wild-type P. simiae PICF7 (P. simiae PICF7 (pLRM1)) and of the six selected mutants (Cop1 (pLRM1), Cop33 (pLRM1), Bfm8 (pLRM1), Bfm9 (pLRM1), Phy17 (pLRM1) and Phy18 (pLRM1)) (Table 4), were used in order to evaluate olive root colonization ability by confocal CLSM. In this case, bacteria were grown at 28 °C in LB amended with gentamicin (Gm) and/or tetracycline (Tc) at a concentration of 50 mg/L or 20 mg/L, respectively. Escherichia coli DH5α harboring plasmid pLRM1 [85] (Table 1) was grown on LB amended with Gm (50 mg/L) at 37 °C.
Bacterial inocula were always adjusted at 1·108 cfu/mL by spectrophotometer measurement (A600 nm) and by building up standard curves. Besides, for root colonization assessment, in vitro antagonism assays and greenhouse biocontrol experiments, the actual number of viable cells of each working inoculum was checked by plating serial dilutions on LB agar plates (PICF7 wild-type colonies), LB agar plates plus Tc (PICF7 Tn5-TcR mutant derivatives), LB agar plates supplemented with Gm (PICF7 GFP-labeled derivative) or LB agar plates supplemented with Tc and Gm (GFP-labeled PICF7 mutant derivatives) (Table 4).
The fungal pathogen V. dahliae V937I was grown on PDA (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) plates at 25 °C in the dark. Subsequently, the required inoculum was prepared as indicated in the appropriate sections below. All microorganisms are deposited in the culture collection of the Laboratory of Plant-Microorganism Interactions, Crop Protection Department, Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (IAS, Córdoba, Spain).

4.2. Comparative Analysis of Pseudomonas simiae Genomes

Strains PICF7 and WCS417 were previously reported as phylogenetically related by comparing concatenated partial sequences of six housekeeping genes [6]. In order to confirm whether strain PICF7 (formerly classified as P. fluorescens) belonged to the P. simiae species, full genome comparisons were performed with progressive MAUVE [87]. Thus, the genomes of two representatives P. simiae strains, namely CCUG 50988T type strain [44] and P. simiae WCS417 [43], were selected and compared with the genome of strain PICF7 [14]. Prior to alignment, contigs of P. simiae WCS417 and P. simiae CCUG50988T genomes were reordered with PICF7 strain as the reference genome using the designated MAUVE tool.

4.3. Screening of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 Mutants

A pre-existing random transposon (Tn5-TcR) insertion mutant bank of P. simiae PICF7 [19] was used in this study. Altered phenotypes in copper resistance (potentially involved in soil/rhizosphere persistence), biofilm formation (putatively related to colonization ability) and phytase activity (potentially linked to plant growth promotion) were ad hoc evaluated. The screening of more than 5.500 TcR colonies allowed the identification of different mutants (transposants) for each of the phenotypes under evaluation. Additionally, selected mutants were further tested to confirm that they were affected neither in growth nor in any of the other phenotype under study.

4.3.1. Identification and Selection of Mutants Impaired in Copper Tolerance

Overnight cultures (28 °C, 175 rpm) of P. simiae PICF7 TcR transposants grown in 96-well microplates containing liquid LB were spotted using sterile toothpicks on LB square plates (12 × 12 cm) amended with CuSO4·5H2O 4.5 mM (see below), along with the parental strain PICF7 that was used as a control. Previously, a toxicity test was conducted to determine the tolerance threshold of wild-type PICF7 to CuSO5H2O. A stock solution (0.5 M) was prepared by dissolving CuSO4·5H2O in distilled water. This stock was then sterilized by filtration using a 0.2-µm pore size nylon membrane. One fresh individual colony of P. simiae PICF7 grown on LB agar was resuspended in 10 mM MgSO4·7H2O. Subsequently, bacterial cells (100 µL) were plated on LB, NA (Oxoid), PDA and SSM (per liter: 6 g K2HPO4, 3 g KH2PO4, 1 g (NH4)2SO4, 0.2 g MgSO4·7H2O, 4 g succinic acid, 15 g agar; pH 7) containing CuSO4·5H2O at increasing concentrations, ranging from 0.08 to 20 mM. Plates were then incubated at 28 °C and bacterial growth was checked for at least 4 days. This assay was performed twice with three replicates (plates) per culturing media and CuSO5H2O concentration. Eventually, LB medium amended with CuSO5H2O 4.5 mM was used for mutant selection.

4.3.2. Identification and Selection of Mutants Impaired in Biofilm Formation

In order to test the capacity of biofilm formation, PICF7 transposants were grown in LB liquid medium (28 °C, 175 rpm) in 96-well microplates for a first bulk screening. Biofilm production was analyzed following the indications, slightly modified, by Huertas-Rosales and co-workers [88]. After 8 h of incubation, bacterial cultures were removed and non-adhered cells were washed away by rinsing the wells with distilled water. Biofilm was stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 20 min. After that, the dye was removed and distilled water was added into each well after 5 min. Then, wells were rinsed twice with distilled water and dried at room temperature. After this initial massive screening, selected mutants unable to form a biofilm were tested individually in borosilicate glass tubes at least three times with three technical replicates. For this, each mutant was grown overnight in liquid LB medium (28 °C, 175 rpm). Subsequently, aliquots were transferred to new borosilicate glass tubes and cell suspensions were adjusted to 0.05 (A600 nm). Tubes were then incubated at 28 °C, 40 rpm. After 8 h, bacterial cultures were removed and the staining protocol described above was applied. Pseudomonas putida KT2440 [84], kindly provided by Dr. María José Soto Misffut (Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC) and P. simiae PICF7 wild-type strain, were used as positive controls, while strain P. indica PIC128 from Laboratory of Plant-Microorganism Interactions (IAS-CSIC) was used as a negative control in all assays (Table 1).

4.3.3. Identification and Selection of Mutants Defective in Phytase Activity

Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 transposants (>5.500) were grown overnight in LB liquid medium amended with Tc in 96-well microplates at 28 °C, 175 rpm. Subsequently, each culture was spotted individually using sterile toothpicks on square plates (12 × 12 cm) containing a modified PSM [89] (per liter: 10 g glucose, 2 g CaCl2, 5 g NH4NO3, 0.5 g KCl, 0.5 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.01 g FeSO47H2O, 0.01 g MnSO4·7H2O, 4 g Na Phytate, 15 g agar; pH 7). Wild-type PICF7 colonies were used as a positive control since phytase activity was previously confirmed for our model strain. The ability to hydrolyze sodium phytate (positive result) is visualized by the production of clear halo around the bacterial colony. Bacillus sp. PIC28 was used as a negative control. Mutants defective in phytase activity identified in this first bulk screening were individually re-checked later on by placing a 10 μL-droplet of a bacterial culture grown overnight on the center of a plate (9 cm of diameter) with PSM medium amended with Tc. Plates were incubated at 28 °C and checked during at least 3 days for the presence of a clear halo. This experiment was performed twice with three technical replicates.

4.4. Identification of Transposon Insertion Sites in Selected PICF7 Mutants

Total DNA from 63 preselected mutants showing alteration in one of the three phenotypes here under study was extracted and purified using the JetFlex Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Corporate Headquarters Genomed Gmbh, Löhne, Germany). After that, and in order to discard potential contamination, BOX-PCR fingerprinting was conducted to verify the presence of the same amplification pattern in mutants that were obtained for the wild-type strain. Amplifications were carried out using the BOX A1R (5′-CTACGGCAAGGCGACGCTGACG-3′) primer [90,91]. PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 6 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min; annealing at either 53 °C for 1 min; extension at 65 °C for 8 min; and a final extension at 65 °C for 16 min. PCR products were analyzed in 1.5% agarose gels stained with RedSafe and visualized with a VersaDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA). Two clones of each selected transposant were tested and cryopreserved in 30% glycerol at −80 °C.
The identification of the disrupted gene due to Tn5 insertion was performed on a selection of mutants showing neat alteration of the target phenotype. Thus, 26 out of the 63 preselected mutants were eventually analyzed by a combination of arbitrary and nested-PCR strategy previously described by Maldonado-González and co-workers [19]. When needed, PCR parameters were empirically adjusted to obtain neat, single PCR products. Amplification products were electrophoresed in 0.8% agarose gels and visualized under UV light. The observed amplicons were extracted from gels and purified using Megaquick-spin Total Fragment DNA purification Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Sangdaewon-Dong, South Korea). The region adjacent to the insertion site of Tn5 for each mutant was sequenced (Sistemas Genómicos S.L., Valencia, Spain) using primer Tn5Int. DNA sequences were then compared against the complete PICF7 genome sequence (GenBank, INSDC CP005975) and nucleotide databases using BLASTn and BLASTx algorithms in the NCBI website (https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/ (accessed on June 2020)).

4.5. Evaluation of the Olive Root Colonization Ability by Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 Mutants

In order to assess whether selected PICF7 derivative mutants (Table 4) displayed the same root colonization pattern as that of the wild-type strain, fluorescently labelled derivatives were constructed as previously described by Maldonado-González and co-workers [19]. The selected Tn5-TcR mutants were transformed with plasmid pLRM1 (GmR, GFP) (Table 4) [85]. For this, electrocompetent cells of each mutant were prepared based on protocol described by Miller and Nickoloff, 1995 [92], keeping Tc selective pressure in the cultures. The “Plasmid Extraction Mini” kit (Favorgen Biotech Co., Ping Tung, Taiwan) was used to purify plasmid pLRM1 from Escherichia coli DH5α. Ice-thawed aliquots (40 µL) of electrocompetent cells previously prepared was mixed with 2 µL of purified plasmid DNA in prechilled 1.5 mL microfuge tubes. Plasmid pLRM1 DNA was electroporated into electrocompetent cells of each selected mutant as described by Prieto and Mercado-Blanco [16]. Then, cell suspensions were plated onto LB plates amended with Tc and Gm and incubated at 28 °C. Three individual TcR/GmR colonies of each mutant were randomly chosen. The presence of plasmid pLMR1 in the selected transformants was checked by plasmid purification and restriction analysis with SacI, XbaI and BamHI (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Additionally, bacterial fluorescence was confirmed by visualizing bacterial cells under a Nikon Eclipse 80i epifluorescence microscope (Nikon Instruments Europe BV, Amstelveen, The Netherlands). Selected transformants were cryopreserved in 30% glycerol at −80 °C.
The root colonization ability of GFP-labeled derivatives of the selected mutants was then evaluated. A fluorescently labelled derivative of strain PICF7 harboring the plasmid pLRM1 [19,85] (Table 4) was used as control. Selected PICF7 mutants were grown at 28 °C and 180 rpm in LB liquid medium supplemented with Gm and Tc. Bacterial cells of GFP-labeled mutants and PICF7 wild-type strains were centrifuged at room temperature (11,000 g, 1 min) and the spent medium was discarded. The cell pellets were resuspended in 10 mM MgSO4·7H2O and bacterial concentration in the suspension was determined by measuring absorbance at 600 nm using standard curves for each mutant. Prior to the inoculation of olive plants, the fluorescence of bacterial cells was confirmed by a Nikon Eclipse 80i epifluorescence microscope.
A total of 48 olive plants (3-month-old, cv. Picual) purchased at a commercial nursery located in Córdoba province (Southern Spain) were used in this experiment. The bioassay consisted of 8 treatments (6 plants per treatment) corresponding to each of the 6 mutants finally characterized and selected (Table 1), P. simiae PICF7 wild-type (positive control) and a manipulation control (non-inoculated plants). Olive plants were carefully uprooted from the original substrate and roots were gently washed under tap water. The entire root systems were then inoculated by dipping them into a 300 mL of a bacterial suspension (1·108 cfu/mL in 10 mM MgSO4·7H2O) of each strain for 30 min. Roots of the non-inoculated plant treatment were just immersed in 300 mL of 10 mM MgSO4·7H2O. After that, plants were transferred into 9 × 9 × 10 cm polypropylene pots containing the same potting substrate used in the nursery. Finally, each plant was watered with 45 mL of the same inoculum immediately after planting. Plants were then maintained in a growth chamber at controlled conditions (23 ± 1 °C, 60–90% relative humidity). In order to reduce the stress of the plants after manipulation, inoculation and transplanting processes, the photoperiod was gradually increased over 5 days until it reached 14 h daylight.
Roots inoculated with GFP-labeled mutants and wild-type strain were examined at 3, 4, 5, 10, 17 and 20 DAI. Soil particles adhered to the root system were removed by shaking the roots. After that, root segments (1–4 cm long) representative of the entire root system of each sample were collected. Roots were washed with distilled water and visualized under Axioskop 2MOTmicroscope (Carl Zeiss Inc, Jena GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) set with a krypton and an argon laser, controlled by a Carl Zeiss Laser Scanning System LSM5 PASCAL software (Carl Zeiss Inc). The software Zeiss LSM Image Browser version 4.0 (Carl Zeiss Inc) was used for imaging and post-processing of the confocal stacks and maximum projections.
In order to better understand localization of GFP-labeled bacterial cells, longitudinal sections of root segments (about 30 micrometers thick) were obtained using a Vibratome Series 1000plus (TAAB Laboratories Equipment, Aldermarston, UK) and analyzed similarly. A fair number of root samples were examined until we obtained clear evidence of both external and internal root colonization. In the case of mutants Bfm8 and Bfm9 the experiment was performed twice in order to confirm results obtained in a first bioassay.

4.6. In Vitro Antagonism Assays

Antagonism of P. simiae PICF7 mutants against the olive D isolate V. dahliae V937I (Table 4) was evaluated using dual-culture in vitro assays in PDA and NA media. Isolate V937I was grown during seven days on PDA plates at 25 °C. Spore suspension was prepared from seven-day-old culture by adding 5 mL of sterile distilled water to a petri dish and scraping off the cultures with a Digralsky spreader. The inoculum concentration was adjusted to 1·106 conidia/mL with a Neubauer hemocytometer. V. dahliae V937I conidia (10-µL) were placed in the center of the plates. Cultures of P. simiae PICF7 and their mutants were prepared and adjusted as mentioned above (see Section 4.1). Subsequently, each plate was inoculated with four equidistant drops (10 µL per drop) of a bacterial suspension placed at 2.5 cm from the center of the plate. Plates containing only an individual drop of conidia suspension were used as control reference of V. dahliae growth in the absence of bacteria. The growth of the fungal colonies was measured after 10 days of incubation at 25 °C in the dark. The inhibition of the pathogen growth (relative inhibition index, PI) was expressed as a percentage according to the equation:
PI   =   ( R c R a R c )   ×   100
where Rc is the average radius of the V. dahliae colony in the absence of antagonist bacterium (cm) and Ra is the average radius of the V. dahliae colony in the presence of antagonistic bacterium (cm) [6].
This experiment was conducted twice with three biological replicates per each interaction and used medium. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for PI scores was carried out and mean values were compared using Tukey HSD Test at p = 0.05 via Statistix 10 program (NH Analytical Software, Roseville, MN, USA).

4.7. Biocontrol Effectiveness of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 Mutants against Verticillium Wilt of Olive

Two independent experiments were carried out in order to assess the biocontrol performance of the six selected PICF7 mutants (Table 4) against the D pathotype of V. dahliae under non-gnotobiotic conditions. Non-inoculated (control), V. dahliae-inoculated (disease control), PICF7 wild-type/V. dahliae-inoculated and PICF7 mutants/V. dahliae-inoculated plants were the 9 different treatments (12 plants per treatment) included in the bioassays. Nursery-produced olive plants cv. Picual (5-month old) qualified as very susceptible to the D pathotype [93] were used. Before starting the bioassays, plants were acclimated in a greenhouse under natural lighting and a temperature range of 21–26 °C for one month. One day before the inoculation with bacteria, olive plants were carefully uprooted and transplanted into polypropylene pots (11 × 11 × 12 cm, one plant per pot) containing the same potting substrate used in the nursery.
Inocula of P. simiae PICF7 wild-type and selected mutants were grown in LB agar plates at 28 °C for 48 h (Tc selective pressure was kept for the mutants). Bacterial cells were scraped from the medium with 5 mL of 10 mM MgSO47H2O. Plants were inoculated by drenching with 150 mL per pot of each bacterial cell suspension (1 × 108 cfu/mL), prepared as described by Gómez-Lama Cabanás and coworkers [6], or 10 mM MgSO4.7H2O for the disease control and control treatments (see above). One week after bacterial inoculation, plants were challenged with the pathogen following the method earlier described [6]. Non-inoculated (control) plants were watered with just 150 mL of water. Plants were randomly distributed in three blocks (each containing 4 plants per treatment).
Disease symptoms (defoliation, chlorosis and wilting) were assessed twice a week during 100 days after pathogen inoculation. To evaluate the disease progress, a scale from 0 to 4 was used according to the percentage of affected leaves and twigs (0, healthy plant; 1, 1–33%; 2, 34–66%; 3, 67–100%; and 4, dead plant). The estimated AUDPC [94] was calculated based on data collected over time. Parameters such as DI, M, FS and DII were also calculated for each treatment. Final DI and M were established as the percentage of affected or dead plants, respectively, at the end of each independent bioassay. DII was calculated as:
DII   =   Σ S i   ×   N i 4   ×   N t
where Si is the severity of symptoms, Ni is the number of plants with Si symptoms severity, and Nt is the total number of plants. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for AUDPC and FS parameters was performed using the Statistix 10 software (Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL, USA). Significant differences among means were compared using the Fisher’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test (p < 0.05).

5. Conclusions

Genes of P. simiae PICF7 involved in copper tolerance (i.e., putatively coding for the transcriptional regulator CusR and the chemotaxis protein CheV) and biofilm production (i.e., encoding a membrane protein and a flagellar regulatory protein (fleQ)) have been identified. Mutant analysis has demonstrated that these phenotypes, as well as phytase activity, are not involved in the effective control of VWO exerted by this rhizobacteria. Nevertheless, the colonization pattern of biofilm-defective mutants was altered compared to that of the wild-type strain. Indeed, inner colonization of olive roots was never observed for these mutants, indicating that biofilm formation is needed to fully develop an endophytic lifestyle. While P. simiae PICF7 offers interesting agro-biotechnological perspectives as for its copper-tolerance, biocontrol effectiveness and endophytic lifestyle, among other beneficial traits, further research will be necessary to elucidate the actual mechanisms explaining control of VWO by this BCA.

Author Contributions

J.M.-B. conceived the study. N.M.-O. and J.M.-B. designed the experiments. N.M.-O. performed all experiments. C.G.-L.C. and A.V.-C. contributed in the execution of all experiments. R.L.B. performed the genome comparison analyses. P.P. conducted CLSM studies. N.M.-O., C.G.-L.C. and J.M.-B. wrote the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad/Agencia Estatal de Investigación, grant number AGL2016-75729-C2-1-R, and Junta de Andalucía (Consejería de Economía, Innovación y Ciencia), grant number P12-AGR-0667, both co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).

Data Availability Statement

All data required to reproduce the results presented in this study can be found in the article.

Acknowledgments

We thank to María José Soto Misffut (Estación Experimental del Zaidín, CSIC) for her support and advice to perform the biofilm production assays, and for the gift of strain Pseudomonas putida KT2440 used in these experiments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Olive Council. Available online: www.internationaloliveoil.org/ (accessed on 17 February 2020).
  2. Montes-Osuna, N.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Verticillium Wilt of Olive and its Control: What Did We Learn during the Last Decade? Plants 2020, 9, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. López-Escudero, F.J.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Verticillium wilt of olive: A case study to implement an integrated strategy to control a soil-borne pathogen. Plant Soil 2011, 344, 1–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Bizos, G.; Papatheodorou, E.M.; Chatzistathis, T.; Ntalli, N.; Aschonitis, V.G.; Monokrousos, N. The Role of Microbial Inoculants on Plant Protection, Growth Stimulation, and Crop Productivity of the Olive Tree (Olea europea L.). Plants 2020, 9, 743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Deketelaere, S.; Tyvaert, L.; França, S.D.C.; Höfte, M. Desirable Traits of a Good Biocontrol Agent against Verticillium Wilt. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Legarda, G.; Ruano-Rosa, D.; Pizarro-Tobías, P.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Niqui, J.L.; Triviño, J.C.; Roca, A.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Indigenous Pseudomonas spp. Strains from the Olive (Olea europaea L.) Rhizosphere as Effective Biocontrol Agents against Verticillium dahliae: From the Host Roots to the Bacterial Genomes. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Ruano-Rosa, D.; Legarda, G.; Pizarro-Tobías, P.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Triviño, J.C.; Roca, A.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Bacillales Members from the Olive Rhizosphere Are Effective Biological Control Agents against the Defoliating Pathotype of Verticillium dahliae. Agriculture 2018, 8, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mulero-Aparicio, A.; Agustí-Brisach, C.; Varo, Á.; López-Escudero, F.J.; Trapero, A. A non-pathogenic strain of Fusarium oxysporum as a potential biocontrol agent against Verticillium wilt of olive. Biol. Control. 2019, 139, 104045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lozano-Tovar, M.; Garrido-Jurado, I.; Quesada-Moraga, E.; Raya-Ortega, M.; Trapero-Casas, A. Metarhizium brunneum and Beauveria bassiana release secondary metabolites with antagonistic activity against Verticillium dahliae and Phytophthora megasperma olive pathogens. Crop. Prot. 2017, 100, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boutaj, H.; Chakhchar, A.; Meddich, A.; Wahbi, S.; El Alaoui-Talibi, Z.; Douira, A.; Filali-Maltouf, A.; El Modafar, C. Bioprotection of olive tree from Verticillium wilt by autochthonous endomycorrhizal fungi. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2020, 127, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aranda, S.; Montes-Borrego, M.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.M.; Landa, B.B. Microbial communities associated with the root system of wild olives (Olea europaea L. subsp. europaea var. sylvestris) are good reservoirs of bacteria with antagonistic potential against Verticillium dahliae. Plant Soil 2011, 343, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Emueller, H.; Eberg, C.; Landa, B.B.; Eauerbach, A.; Emoissl-Eichinger, C.; Eberg, G. Plant genotype-specific archaeal and bacterial endophytes but similar Bacillus antagonists colonize Mediterranean olive trees. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Fernández-González, A.J.; Cardoni, M.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Villadas, P.J.; Fernández-López, M.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Linking belowground microbial network changes to different tolerance level towards Verticillium wilt of olive. Microbiome 2020, 8, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Martínez-García, P.M.; Ruano-Rosa, D.; Schilirò, E.; Prieto, P.; Ramos, C.; Rodríguez-Palenzuela, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas fluorescens strain PICF7, an indigenous root endophyte from olive (Olea europaea L.) and effective biocontrol agent against Verticillium dahliae. Stand. Genom. Sci. 2015, 10, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Mercado-Blanco, J.; Rodrı́guez-Jurado, D.; Hervás, A.B.; Jiménez-Dı́az, R.M. Suppression of Verticillium wilt in olive planting stocks by root-associated fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. Biol. Control. 2004, 30, 474–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Endophytic colonization of olive roots by the biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 64, 297–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Schilirò, E.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Mercado-Blanco, J. The biocontrol endophytic bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 induces systemic defense responses in aerial tissues upon colonization of olive roots. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Sesmero, R.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; López-Escudero, F.J.; Mercado-Blanco, J. A split-root system to assess biocontrol effectiveness and defense-related genetic responses in above-ground tissues during the tripartite interaction Verticillium dahliae-olive-Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 in roots. Plant Soil 2017, 417, 433–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Maldonado-González, M.M.; Schilirò, E.; Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Endophytic colonization and biocontrol performance of Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 in olive (Olea europaea L.) are determined neither by pyoverdine production nor swimming motility. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 17, 3139–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Maldonado-González, M.M.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Arabidopsis thaliana as a tool to identify traits involved in Verticillium dahliae biocontrol by the olive root endophyte Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maldonado-González, M.M.; Prieto, P.; Ramos, C.; Mercado-Blanco, J. From the root to the stem: Interaction between the biocontrol root endophyte Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7 and the pathogen Pseudomonas savastanoi NCPPB 3335 in olive knots. Microb. Biotechnol. 2013, 6, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Schilirò, E.; Ferrara, M.; Nigro, F.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Genetic Responses Induced in Olive Roots upon Colonization by the Biocontrol Endophytic Bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e48646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Outten, F.W.; Huffman, D.L.; Hale, J.A.; O’Halloran, T.V. The Independent cue and cusSystems Confer Copper Tolerance during Aerobic and Anaerobic Growth in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 30670–30677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Rensing, C.; Franke, S. Copper Homeostasis in Escherichia coli and Other Enterobacteriaceae. EcoSal Plus 2007, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Castro, D.; Torres, M.; Sampedro, I.; Martínez-Checa, F.; Torres, B.; Béjar, V. Biological Control of Verticillium Wilt on Olive Trees by the Salt-Tolerant Strain Bacillus velezensis XT1. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chong, T.M.; Yin, W.-F.; Chen, J.-W.; Mondy, S.; Grandclément, C.; Faure, D.; Dessaux, Y.; Chan, K.-G. Comprehensive genomic and phenotypic metal resistance profile of Pseudomonas putida strain S13.1.2 isolated from a vineyard soil. AMB Express 2016, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Mercado-Blanco, J.; Alós, E.; Rey, M.D.; Prieto, P. Pseudomonas fluorescensPICF7 displays an endophytic lifestyle in cultivated cereals and enhances yield in barley. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Mercado-Blanco, J. What determines successful colonization and expression of biocontrol traits at the belowground level? In How Research can Stimulate the Development of Commercial Biological Control against Plant Diseases; De Cal, A., Melgarejo, P., Magan, N., Eds.; Progress in Biological Control; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 31–46. ISBN 978-3-030-53238-3. [Google Scholar]
  29. Singh, P.; Kumar, V.; Agrawal, S. Evaluation of Phytase Producing Bacteria for Their Plant Growth Promoting Activities. Int. J. Microbiol. 2014, 2014, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Li, L.; Chen, R.; Zuo, Z.; Lv, Z.; Yang, Z.; Mao, W.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, J.; Song, Z. Evaluation and improvement of phosphate solubilization by an isolated bacterium Pantoea agglomerans ZB. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Alori, E.T.; Glick, B.R.; Babalola, O.O. Microbial Phosphorus Solubilization and Its Potential for Use in Sustainable Agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Compant, S.; Clément, C.; Sessitsch, A. Plant growth-promoting bacteria in the rhizo- and endosphere of plants: Their role, colonization, mechanisms involved and prospects for utilization. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42, 669–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Hartmann, A.; Schikora, A. Quorum Sensing of Bacteria and Trans-Kingdom Interactions of N-Acyl Homoserine Lactones with Eukaryotes. J. Chem. Ecol. 2012, 38, 704–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Mercado-Blanco, J.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. Interactions between plants and beneficial Pseudomonas spp.: Exploiting bacterial traits for crop protection. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2007, 92, 367–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Sun, X.; Liu, Y.; Yan, W.; Xun, W.; Shen, Q.; Zhang, R. Bacillus velezensis Wall Teichoic Acids Are Required for Biofilm Formation and Root Colonization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 85, 02116–02118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Pandin, C.; Le Coq, D.; Canette, A.; Aymerich, S.; Briandet, R. Should the biofilm mode of life be taken into consideration for microbial biocontrol agents? Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 10, 719–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Tovi, N.; Frenk, S.; Hadar, Y.; Minz, D. Host Specificity and Spatial Distribution Preference of Three Pseudomonas Isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Calderón, C.E.; Tienda, S.; Heredia-Ponce, Z.; Arrebola, E.; Cárcamo-Oyarce, G.; Eberl, L.; Cazorla, F.M. The Compound 2-Hexyl, 5-Propyl Resorcinol Has a Key Role in Biofilm Formation by the Biocontrol Rhizobacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1606. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Colvin, K.M.; Alnabelseya, N.; Baker, P.; Whitney, J.C.; Howell, P.L.; Parsek, M.R. PelA Deacetylase Activity Is Required for Pel Polysaccharide Synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 2013, 195, 2329–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Pham, T.H.; Webb, J.S.; Rehm, B.H.A. The role of polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in rhamnolipid and alginate production as well as stress tolerance and biofilm formation. Microbiology 2004, 150, 3405–3413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wang, Y.; Wilks, J.C.; Danhorn, T.; Ramos, I.; Croal, L.; Newman, D.K. Phenazine-1-Carboxylic Acid Promotes Bacterial Biofilm Development via Ferrous Iron Acquisition. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3606–3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Velmourougane, K.; Prasanna, R.; Saxena, A.K. Agriculturally important microbial biofilms: Present status and future prospects. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 548–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Berendsen, R.L.; Van Verk, M.C.; Stringlis, I.A.; Zamioudis, C.; Tommassen, J.; Pieterse, C.M.J.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. Unearthing the genomes of plant-beneficial Pseudomonas model strains WCS358, WCS374 and WCS417. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Vela, A.I.; Gutiérrez, M.C.; Falsen, E.; Rollán, E.; Simarro, I.; García, P.; Domínguez, L.; Ventosa, A.; Fernández-Garayzábal, J.F. Pseudomonas simiae sp. nov., isolated from clinical specimens from monkeys (Callithrix geoffroyi). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 2671–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Prieto, P.; Schilirò, E.; Maldonado-González, M.M.; Valderrama, R.; Barroso-Albarracín, J.B.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Root Hairs Play a Key Role in the Endophytic Colonization of Olive Roots by Pseudomonas spp. with Biocontrol Activity. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 62, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Eljounaidi, K.; Lee, S.K.; Bae, H. Bacterial endophytes as potential biocontrol agents of vascular wilt diseases—Review and future prospects. Biol. Control. 2016, 103, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pieterse, C.M.J.; Berendsen, R.L.; De Jonge, R.; Stringlis, I.A.; Van Dijken, A.J.H.; Van Pelt, J.A.; Van Wees, S.C.M.; Yu, K.; Zamioudis, C.; Bakker, P.A.H.M. Pseudomonas simiae WCS417: Star track of a model beneficial rhizobacterium. Plant Soil 2020, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khoshru, B.; Mitra, D.; Khoshmanzar, E.; Myo, E.M.; Uniyal, N.; Mahakur, B.; Das Mohapatra, P.K.; Panneerselvam, P.; Boutaj, H.; Alizadeh, M.; et al. Current scenario and future prospects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: An economic valuable resource for the agriculture revival under stressful conditions. J. Plant Nutr. 2020, 43, 3062–3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shulse, C.N.; Chovatia, M.; Agosto, C.; Wang, G.; Hamilton, M.; Deutsch, S.; Yoshikuni, Y.; Blow, M.J. Engineered Root Bacteria Release Plant-Available Phosphate from Phytate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01210-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Hanif, M.K.; Hameed, S.; Imran, A.; Naqqash, T.; Shahid, M.; Van Elsas, J.D. Isolation and characterization of a β-propeller gene containing phosphobacterium Bacillus subtilis strain KPS-11 for growth promotion of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Illakkiam, D.; Shankar, M.; Ponraj, P.; Rajendhran, J.; Gunasekaran, P. Genome Sequencing of a Mung Bean Plant Growth Promoting Strain of P. aeruginosa with Biocontrol Ability. Int. J. Genom. 2014, 2014, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Jog, R.; Pandya, M.; Nareshkumar, G.; Rajkumar, S. Mechanism of phosphate solubilization and antifungal activity of Streptomyces spp. isolated from wheat roots and rhizosphere and their application in improving plant growth. Microbiology 2014, 160, 778–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Trivedi, P.; Pandey, A.; Palni, L.M.S. In vitro evaluation of antagonistic properties of Pseudomonas corrugata. Microbiol. Res. 2008, 163, 329–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Chen, Y.; Yan, F.; Chai, Y.; Liu, H.; Kolter, R.; Losick, R.; Guo, J.-H. Biocontrol of tomato wilt disease by Bacillus subtilis isolates from natural environments depends on conserved genes mediating biofilm formation. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 848–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Sang, M.K.; Kim, K.D. Biocontrol activity and root colonization by Pseudomonas corrugata strains CCR04 and CCR80 against Phytophthora blight of pepper. BioControl 2014, 59, 437–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fan, H.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Duan, Y.; Wang, Q. Biocontrol of Bacterial Fruit Blotch by Bacillus subtilis 9407 via Surfactin-Mediated Antibacterial Activity and Colonization. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Triveni, S.; Prasanna, R.; Kumar, A.; Bidyarani, N.; Singh, R.; Saxena, A.K. Evaluating the promise of Trichoderma and Anabaena based biofilms as multifunctional agents in Macrophomina phaseolina- infected cotton crop. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2015, 25, 656–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Prieto, P.; Navarro-Raya, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Amyotte, S.G.; Dobinson, K.F.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Colonization process of olive tissues by Verticillium dahliae and its in planta interaction with the biocontrol root endophyte Pseudomonas fluorescens PICF7. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 499–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Colvin, K.M.; Irie, Y.; Tart, C.S.; Urbano, R.; Whitney, J.C.; Ryder, C.; Howell, P.L.; Wozniak, D.J.; Parsek, M.R. The Pel and Psl polysaccharides provide Pseudomonas aeruginosa structural redundancy within the biofilm matrix. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 1913–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Nielsen, L.; Li, X.; Halverson, L.J. Cell-cell and cell-surface interactions mediated by cellulose and a novel exopolysaccharide contribute to Pseudomonas putida biofilm formation and fitness under water-limiting conditions. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 13, 1342–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Porbaran, M.; Habibipour, R. Relationship between Biofilm Regulating Operons and Various Β-Lactamase Enzymes: Analysis of the Clinical Features of Infections caused by Non-Fermentative Gram-Negative Bacilli (Nfgnb) from Iran. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2020, 14, 1723–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rybtke, M.; Berthelsen, J.; Yang, L.; Høiby, N.; Givskov, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. The LapG protein plays a role in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation by controlling the presence of the CdrA adhesin on the cell surface. Microbiology 2015, 4, 917–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Blanco-Romero, E.; Redondo-Nieto, M.; Martínez-Granero, F.; Garrido-Sanz, D.; Ramos-González, M.I.; Martín, M.; Rivilla, R. Genome-wide analysis of the FleQ direct regulon in Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 and Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Nogales, J.; Vargas, P.; Farias, G.A.; Olmedilla, A.; Sanjuán, J.; Gallegos, M.-T. FleQ Coordinates Flagellum-Dependent and -Independent Motilities in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 7533–7545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Jiménez-Fernández, A.; López-Sánchez, A.; Jiménez-Díaz, L.; Navarrete, B.; Calero, P.; Platero, A.I.; Govantes, F. Complex Interplay between FleQ, Cyclic Diguanylate and Multiple σ Factors Coordinately Regulates Flagellar Motility and Biofilm Development in Pseudomonas putida. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xiao, Y.; Nie, H.; Liu, H.; Luo, X.; Chen, W.; Huang, Q. C-di-GMP regulates the expression of lapA and bcs operons via FleQ in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2016, 8, 659–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Tomich, M.; Planet, P.J.; Figurski, D.H. The tad locus: Postcards from the widespread colonization island. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 5, 363–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Eangelov, A.; Ebergen, P.; Enadler, F.; Ehornburg, P.; Elichev, A.; Ãœbelacker, M.; Epachl, F.; Ekuster, B.; Eliebl, W. Novel Flp pilus biogenesis-dependent natural transformation. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Blanco-Romero, E.; Garrido-Sanz, D.; Rivilla, R.; Redondo-Nieto, M.; Martín, M. In Silico Characterization and Phylogenetic Distribution of Extracellular Matrix Components in the Model Rhizobacteria Pseudomonas fluorescens F113 and Other Pseudomonads. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Bernard, C.S.; Bordi, C.; Termine, E.; Filloux, A.; De Bentzmann, S. Organization and PprB-Dependent Control of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa tad Locus, Involved in Flp Pilus Biology. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 1961–1973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Burrows, L.L. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Twitching Motility: Type IV Pili in Action. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 66, 493–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Schilling, J.; Wagner, K.; Seekircher, S.; Greune, L.; Humberg, V.; Schmidt, M.A.; Heusipp, G. Transcriptional Activation of the tad Type IVb Pilus Operon by PypB in Yersinia enterocolitica. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 3809–3821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Walukiewicz, H.E.; Tohidifar, P.; Ordal, G.W.; Rao, C.V. Interactions among the three adaptation systems of Bacillus subtilis chemotaxis as revealed by an in vitro receptor-kinase assay. Mol. Microbiol. 2014, 93, 1104–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Huang, Z.; Pan, X.; Xu, N.; Guo, M. Bacterial chemotaxis coupling protein: Structure, function and diversity. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 219, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Yamamoto, K.; Ishihama, A. Transcriptional response of Escherichia coli to external copper. Mol. Microbiol. 2005, 56, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Gudipaty, S.A.; Larsen, A.S.; Rensing, C.; McEvoy, M.M. Regulation of Cu(I)/Ag(I) efflux genes in Escherichia coli by the sensor kinase CusS. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 330, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Xiao, M.; Zhu, X.; Fan, F.; Xu, H.; Tang, J.; Qin, Y.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, X. Osmotolerance in Escherichia coli Is Improved by Activation of Copper Efflux Genes or Supplementation with Sulfur-Containing Amino Acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83, e03050-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Nunes, I.; Jacquiod, S.; Brejnrod, A.; Holm, P.E.; Johansen, A.; Brandt, K.K.; Priemé, A.; Sørensen, S.J. Coping with copper: Legacy effect of copper on potential activity of soil bacteria following a century of exposure. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Jain, D.; Kour, R.; Bhojiya, A.A.; Meena, R.H.; Singh, A.; Mohanty, S.R.; Rajpurohit, D.; Ameta, K.D. Zinc tolerant plant growth promoting bacteria alleviates phytotoxic effects of zinc on maize through zinc immobilization. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Nakajima, M.; Goto, M.; Hibi, T. Similarity between Copper Resistance Genes from Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae and P. syringae pv. tomato. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 2002, 68, 68–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Colonnella, M.A.; Lizarraga, L.; Rossi, L.; Peña, R.D.; Egoburo, D.; López, N.I.; Iustman, L.J.R. Effect of copper on diesel degradation in Pseudomonas extremaustralis. Extremophiles 2019, 23, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Kang, S.-M.; Asaf, S.; Khan, A.L.; Lubna; Khan, A.; Mun, B.-G.; Khan, M.A.; Gul, H.; Lee, I.-J. Complete Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas psychrotolerans CS51, a Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium, Under Heavy Metal Stress Conditions. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Kang, S.-M.; Shahzad, R.; Bilal, S.; Khan, A.L.; You, Y.-H.; Lee, W.-H.; Ryu, H.-L.; Lee, K.-E.; Lee, I.-J. Metabolism-mediated induction of zinc tolerance in Brassica rapa by Burkholderia cepacia CS2-1. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 955–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Bagdasarian, M.; Lurz, R.; Ruckert, B.; Franklin, F.; E Frey, J.; Timmis, K.N. Specific-purpose plasmid cloning vectors II. Broad host range, high copy number, RSF 1010-derived vectors, and a host-vector system for gene cloning in Pseudomonas. Gene 1981, 16, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rodríguez-Moreno, L.; Jiménez, A.J.; Ramos, C. Endopathogenic lifestyle of Pseudomonas savastanoi pv. savastanoi in olive knots. Microb. Biotechnol. 2009, 2, 476–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Collado-Romero, M.; Mercado-Blanco, J.; Olivares-García, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Jiménez-Díaz, R.M. Molecular Variability Within and Among Verticillium dahliae Vegetative Compatibility Groups Determined by Fluorescent Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism and Polymerase Chain Reaction Markers. Phytopathology 2006, 96, 485–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Darling, A.E.; Mau, B.; Perna, N.T. progressiveMauve: Multiple Genome Alignment with Gene Gain, Loss and Rearrangement. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Huertas-Rosales, Ó.; Ramos-González, M.I.; Espinosa-Urgel, M. Self-Regulation and Interplay of Rsm Family Proteins Modulate the Lifestyle of Pseudomonas putida. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 5673–5686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Hosseinkhani, B.; Emtiazi, G.; Nahvi, I. Analysis of phytase producing bacteria (Pseudomonas sp.) from poultry faeces and optimization of this enzyme production. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Rademaker, J.L.W.; de Bruijn, F.J. Characterization and classification of microbes by rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting and computer assisted pattern analysis. In DNA Markers: Protocols, Applications and Overviews; Caetano-Anollés, G., Gresshoff, P.M., Eds.; J. Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1997; Volume 10, pp. 151–171. [Google Scholar]
  91. Versalovic, J.; Schneider, M.; Bruijn, F.J.D.; Lupski, J.R. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. Methods Mol. Biol. 1994, 5, 25–40. [Google Scholar]
  92. Miller, E.M.; Nickoloff, J.A. Escherichia coli Electrotransformation. In Electroporation Protocols for Microorganisms; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2003; Volume 47, pp. 105–114. [Google Scholar]
  93. Leyva-Pérez, M.d.l.O.; Jiménez-Ruiz, J.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Barroso, J.B.; Luque, F.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Tolerance of olive (Olea europaea) cv Frantoio to Verticillium dahliae relies on both basal and pathogen-induced differential transcriptomic responses. New Phytol. 2017, 217, 671–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Campbell, C.L.; Madden, L.V. Introduction to Plant Disease Epidemiology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Similarity plot of type strain Pseudomonas simiae CCUG 50988T, Pseudomonas simiae WCS417 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 constructed by using progressive Mauve (see main text, Section 2.1, for color codes).
Figure 1. Similarity plot of type strain Pseudomonas simiae CCUG 50988T, Pseudomonas simiae WCS417 and Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 constructed by using progressive Mauve (see main text, Section 2.1, for color codes).
Plants 10 00412 g001
Figure 2. Phenotypes altered in selected Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 mutants. (A) Cop1 and Cop33 mutants are unable to grow on LB agar plates supplemented with 4.5 mM CuSO4·5H2O (image taken 3 days after bacterial inoculation. (B) Mutants Bfm8 and Bfm9 are defective in producing biofilm. Upper image shows borosilicate tubes containing the bacterial cultures in LB medium. Lower image shows the result obtained after performing the staining procedure with crystal violet and the inner surface-adhered bacteria. (C) Mutants Phy17 and Phy18 are impaired in phytase activity when assayed in Phytase Specific Medium (PSM) (picture taken 3 days after bacterial inoculation). See the Materials and Methods section for full experimental details. PICF7, P. simiae PICF7; KT2440, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. These strains were used as positive controls. PIC128, Pseudomonas indica PIC128 was used as a negative control.
Figure 2. Phenotypes altered in selected Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 mutants. (A) Cop1 and Cop33 mutants are unable to grow on LB agar plates supplemented with 4.5 mM CuSO4·5H2O (image taken 3 days after bacterial inoculation. (B) Mutants Bfm8 and Bfm9 are defective in producing biofilm. Upper image shows borosilicate tubes containing the bacterial cultures in LB medium. Lower image shows the result obtained after performing the staining procedure with crystal violet and the inner surface-adhered bacteria. (C) Mutants Phy17 and Phy18 are impaired in phytase activity when assayed in Phytase Specific Medium (PSM) (picture taken 3 days after bacterial inoculation). See the Materials and Methods section for full experimental details. PICF7, P. simiae PICF7; KT2440, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. These strains were used as positive controls. PIC128, Pseudomonas indica PIC128 was used as a negative control.
Plants 10 00412 g002
Figure 3. Schemes representing the Tn5-TcR insertion sites (within genes shown in yellow color) in the genome of the Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 selected mutants. (A), Mutant Cop1; (B), Mutant Cop33; (C), Mutant Bfm8; (D), Mutant Bfm9. The approximate transposon insertion sites are shown as inverted blue triangles.
Figure 3. Schemes representing the Tn5-TcR insertion sites (within genes shown in yellow color) in the genome of the Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 selected mutants. (A), Mutant Cop1; (B), Mutant Cop33; (C), Mutant Bfm8; (D), Mutant Bfm9. The approximate transposon insertion sites are shown as inverted blue triangles.
Plants 10 00412 g003
Figure 4. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of root hairs from olive (cv. Picual) internally colonized by GFP-labeled PICF7 mutants. Images are representative of colonization events photographed from 5 to 10 days after root bacterization. Scale bar represents 50 μm in panels (A,B), and 20 μm in panels (C,D). rh, root hair.
Figure 4. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of root hairs from olive (cv. Picual) internally colonized by GFP-labeled PICF7 mutants. Images are representative of colonization events photographed from 5 to 10 days after root bacterization. Scale bar represents 50 μm in panels (A,B), and 20 μm in panels (C,D). rh, root hair.
Plants 10 00412 g004
Figure 5. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of olive (cultivar Picual) roots colonized by GFP-labeled Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 and its selected Tn5-TcR insertion mutants. Images show inner colonization events of different root tissues by wild-type PICF7 (panel (A)), and mutants Cop1 (B), Cop33 (C), Phy17 (D) and Phy18 (E). Additionally, colonization of olive root surface by wild-type PICF7 (panel (F)) and biofilm mutants Bfm8 (G) and Bfm9 (H) are also shown. Images are representative of the colonization events observed and were taken from 4 to 17 days after root bacterization with fluorescently labelled derivatives. Scale bar represents 50 μm in all panels, except in ((C), 100 μm) and ((F), 20 μm). White arrows point to spots or microcolonies of the inoculated bacteria. co, cortical cells; vt, vascular tissue. In panels (B,E), the red channel was added to increase plant tissue contrast and improve visualization.
Figure 5. Confocal laser scanning microscopy images of olive (cultivar Picual) roots colonized by GFP-labeled Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 and its selected Tn5-TcR insertion mutants. Images show inner colonization events of different root tissues by wild-type PICF7 (panel (A)), and mutants Cop1 (B), Cop33 (C), Phy17 (D) and Phy18 (E). Additionally, colonization of olive root surface by wild-type PICF7 (panel (F)) and biofilm mutants Bfm8 (G) and Bfm9 (H) are also shown. Images are representative of the colonization events observed and were taken from 4 to 17 days after root bacterization with fluorescently labelled derivatives. Scale bar represents 50 μm in all panels, except in ((C), 100 μm) and ((F), 20 μm). White arrows point to spots or microcolonies of the inoculated bacteria. co, cortical cells; vt, vascular tissue. In panels (B,E), the red channel was added to increase plant tissue contrast and improve visualization.
Plants 10 00412 g005
Figure 6. In vitro antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 and its mutants against Verticillium dahliae V937I. Pictures were taken 10 days after incubation at 25 °C. V937I, Verticillium dahliae V937I; PICF7, Pseudomonas simiae PICF7; PDA, Potato Dextrose Agar; and NA, Nutrient Agar. Images are representative plates used in two independent experiments (see Table 2).
Figure 6. In vitro antagonistic activity of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 and its mutants against Verticillium dahliae V937I. Pictures were taken 10 days after incubation at 25 °C. V937I, Verticillium dahliae V937I; PICF7, Pseudomonas simiae PICF7; PDA, Potato Dextrose Agar; and NA, Nutrient Agar. Images are representative plates used in two independent experiments (see Table 2).
Plants 10 00412 g006
Table 1. Disrupted genes identified in the selected Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 mutants.
Table 1. Disrupted genes identified in the selected Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 mutants.
Mutant NameLength of the DNA Sequence AnalyzedPhenotypeAccession NumberClosest StrainQuery Cover (%)E-ValueIdentity (%)Definition (GenBank)Definition (GenName)
Cop1294Modified copper toleranceWP_069672392.1Pseudomonas simiae WCS417611 × 10−31100chemotaxis protein CheVcheV
Cop33549WP_176332083.1Pseudomonas simiae WCS417418 × 10−44100Heavy metal response regulator transcription factorcusR
Bfm8468Impaired in biofilm formationPHX42735.1Pseudomonas simiae PCL17511007 × 10−108100ATPase AAAfleQ
Bfm9212WP_045791339.1Pseudomonas simiae PCL1751994 × 10−21100membrane protein- 1
Identification of the disrupted genes by Tn5-TcR transposon insertion was carried out using a combination of arbitrary and nested-PCR strategy, followed by sequence comparison using the BLASTn and BLASTx algorithms available at the NCBI website. 1 No definition provided.
Table 2. Percentage of growth inhibition exerted over Verticillium dahliae V937I (defoliating pathotype) by wild-type PICF7 and mutants.
Table 2. Percentage of growth inhibition exerted over Verticillium dahliae V937I (defoliating pathotype) by wild-type PICF7 and mutants.
Experiment I Experiment II
Media Media
StrainPDANAStrainPDANA
PICF741.4921.70PICF747.6921.90
Cop147.6827.63Cop142.3826.97
Cop3341.7226.97Cop3342.3823.68
Bfm864.36 *29.72 *Bfm846.1521.90
Bfm937.7720.75Bfm954.36 *25.24
Phy17ni25.47Phy170.51 *30.48
Phy18ni21.23Phy181.03 *18.10
Asterisks mean significant difference compared to the wild-type strain (p ≤ 0.05) according to Tukey HSD Test. At least three biological replicates for each dual confrontation and culturing medium were performed. PICF7, Pseudomonas simiae PICF7; PDA, Potato Dextrose Agar; NA, Nutrient Agar; ni, no inhibition observed.
Table 3. Assessment of biocontrol activity of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 and selected mutants against Verticillium dahliae V937I (defoliating pathotype).
Table 3. Assessment of biocontrol activity of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 and selected mutants against Verticillium dahliae V937I (defoliating pathotype).
Experiment IExperiment II
Disease ParametersDisease Parameters
TreatmentsFSFinal DI (%)Final DIIM (%)AUDPCFSFinal DI (%)Final DIIM (%)AUDPC
V. dahliae2.13a91.670.532588.11a2.79a91.670.7041.67101.64a
V. dahliae/PICF71.17b750.2916.6731.43b2.04ab66.670.5133.3383.75ab
V. dahliae/Bfm80.63b91.670.15019.71b1.58bc66.670.4016.6759.00bc
V. dahliae/Bfm91.00b750.25029.24b1.50bc500.3833.3356.10bc
V. dahliae/Phy170.81b83.330.2019.02b0.96c500.248.3338.19c
V. dahliae/Phy180.85b750.218.3324.35b1.04c33.330.2616.6730.06c
V. dahliae/Cop11.27b83.330.318.3340.09b1.56bc66.670.392549.58bc
V. dahliae/Cop330.92b91.670.22031.51b1.31bc66.670.3316.6743.44bc
FS, mean (n = 12) of disease severity symptoms (from 0 to 4) scored at the end of the experiments. Final DI, final disease incidence (%). Final DII, final disease intensity index (ranging 0–1) calculated with data on incidence and severity of symptoms. M, dead plants at the end of the experiments (%). AUDPC, area under the disease progress curve. Data are the average of three randomly distributed blocks each with four pots (plants) per treatment. In each column, values followed by different letters are significantly different according to Fisher’s protected LSD test (p < 0.05). All disease parameters were calculated at the end of the experiments (100 days).
Table 4. Bacterial strains, fungal pathogen and plasmid used in this study.
Table 4. Bacterial strains, fungal pathogen and plasmid used in this study.
Microorganisms and PlasmidCharacteristicsReference/Source
Bacterial Strains and Mutants
Escherichia coli DH5αrecA1 endA1 Φ80d lacZ dam-15Clontech
Bacillus sp. PIC28PGPR, negative control used in phytase activity assays[7]
Pseudomonas indica PIC128PGPR, negative control used in biofilm formation assays, isolated from the rhizosphere of a nursery-produced olive plantLab. Plant-Microorganism Interactions/This study
Pseudomonas putida KT2440PGPR, positive control used in biofilm formation assays[84]
Pseudomonas simiae PICF7Wild-type PGPR[14]
Cop1PICF7 Tn5-TcR mutant (cheV::Tn5-TcR) affected in copper resistanceThis work
Cop33PICF7 Tn5-TcR mutant (CusR::Tn5-TcR) affected in copper resistanceThis work
Bfm8PICF7 Tn5-TcR mutant (fleQ::Tn5-TcR) impaired in biofilm formationThis work
Bfm9PICF7 Tn5-TcR mutant impaired in biofilm formationThis work
Phy17PICF7 Tn5-TcR mutant deficient in phytase activityThis work
Phy18PICF7 Tn5-TcR mutant deficient in phytase activityThis work
P. simiae PICF7 (pLRM1)PICF7 (GmR) GFP-labeled mutant derivative[19]
Cop1 (pLRM1)Cop1 (TcR and GmR) GFP-labeled mutant derivativeThis work
Cop33 (pLRM1)Cop33 (TcR and GmR) GFP-labeled mutant derivativeThis work
Bfm8 (pLRM1)Bfm8 (TcR and GmR) GFP-labeled mutant derivativeThis work
Bfm9 (pLRM1)Bfm9 (TcR and GmR) GFP-labeled mutant derivativeThis work
Phy17 (pLRM1)Phy17 (TcR and GmR) GFP-labeled mutant derivativeThis work
Phy18 (pLRM1)Phy18 (TcR and GmR) GFP-labeled mutant derivativeThis work
Plasmid
pLRM1pBBR1-MCS5 carrying a fusion of the PA1/04/03 promoter to the gfpmut3* gene, GmR[85]
Fungal pathogen
Verticillium dahliae V937IRepresentative of the defoliating pathotype, originating from a diseased olive tree[86]
Tc, tetracycline; Gm, gentamicin; GFP, Green Fluorescence Protein, PGPR, Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Montes-Osuna, N.; Gómez-Lama Cabanás, C.; Valverde-Corredor, A.; Berendsen, R.L.; Prieto, P.; Mercado-Blanco, J. Assessing the Involvement of Selected Phenotypes of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 in Olive Root Colonization and Biological Control of Verticillium dahliae. Plants 2021, 10, 412. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10020412

AMA Style

Montes-Osuna N, Gómez-Lama Cabanás C, Valverde-Corredor A, Berendsen RL, Prieto P, Mercado-Blanco J. Assessing the Involvement of Selected Phenotypes of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 in Olive Root Colonization and Biological Control of Verticillium dahliae. Plants. 2021; 10(2):412. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10020412

Chicago/Turabian Style

Montes-Osuna, Nuria, Carmen Gómez-Lama Cabanás, Antonio Valverde-Corredor, Roeland L. Berendsen, Pilar Prieto, and Jesús Mercado-Blanco. 2021. "Assessing the Involvement of Selected Phenotypes of Pseudomonas simiae PICF7 in Olive Root Colonization and Biological Control of Verticillium dahliae" Plants 10, no. 2: 412. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10020412

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop